Hubbry Logo
10BASE510BASE5Main
Open search
10BASE5
Community hub
10BASE5
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
10BASE5
10BASE5
10BASE5
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

10BASE5 vampire tap Medium Attachment Unit (transceiver)
10BASE5 transceivers, cables, and tapping tool

10BASE5 (also known as thick Ethernet or thicknet) was the first commercially available variant of Ethernet. The technology was standardized in 1982[1] as IEEE 802.3. 10BASE5 uses a thick and stiff coaxial cable[2] up to 500 meters (1,600 ft) in length. Up to 100 stations can be connected to the cable using vampire taps and share a single collision domain with 10 Mbit/s of bandwidth shared among them. The system is difficult to install and maintain.

10BASE5 was superseded by much cheaper and more convenient alternatives: first by 10BASE2 based on a thinner coaxial cable (1985), and then, once Ethernet over twisted pair was developed, by 10BASE-T (1990) and its successors 100BASE-TX and 1000BASE-T. In 2003, the IEEE 802.3 working group deprecated 10BASE5 for new installations.[3]

Name origination

[edit]

The name 10BASE5 is derived from several characteristics of the physical medium. The 10 refers to its transmission speed of 10 Mbit/s. The BASE is short for baseband signaling (as opposed to broadband[a]), and the 5 stands for the maximum segment length of 500 meters (1,600 ft).[4]

Network design and installation

[edit]

For its physical layer 10BASE5 uses cable similar to RG-8/U coaxial cable but with extra braided shielding. This is a stiff, 0.375-inch (9.5 mm) diameter cable with an impedance of 50 ohms, a solid center conductor, a foam insulating filler, a shielding braid, and an outer jacket. The outer jacket is often yellow-to-orange fluorinated ethylene propylene (for fire resistance) so it often is called "yellow cable", "orange hose", or sometimes humorously "frozen yellow garden hose".[5] 10BASE5 coaxial cables had a maximum length of 500 meters (1,600 ft). Up to 100 nodes could be connected to a 10BASE5 segment.[6]

Transceiver nodes can be connected to cable segments with N connectors, or via a vampire tap, which allows new nodes to be added while existing connections are live. A vampire tap clamps onto the cable, a hole is drilled through the outer shielding, and a spike is forced to pierce the outer three layers and contact the inner conductor while other spikes bite into the outer braided shield. Care is required to keep the outer shield from touching the spike; installation kits include a "coring tool" to drill through the outer layers and a "braid pick" to clear stray pieces of the outer shield.

Transceivers should be installed only at precise 2.5-meter intervals. This distance was chosen to not correspond to the signal's wavelength; this ensures that the reflections from multiple taps are not in phase.[7] These suitable points are marked on the cable with black bands. The cable is required to be one continuous run; T-connections are not allowed.

As is the case with most other high-speed buses, segments must be terminated at each end. For coaxial-cable-based Ethernet, each end of the cable has a 50 ohm resistor attached. Typically this resistor is built into a male N connector and attached to the cable's end just past the last device. With termination missing, or if there is a break in the cable, the signal on the bus will be reflected, rather than dissipated when it reaches the end. This reflected signal is indistinguishable from a collision and prevents communication.

Disadvantages

[edit]

Adding new stations to the network is complicated by the need to pierce the cable accurately. The cable is stiff and difficult to bend around corners. One improper connection can take down the whole network and finding the source of the trouble is difficult.[8]

See also

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to 10BASE5.

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

10BASE5

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
10BASE5, also known as Thick Ethernet or Thicknet, is the original physical layer specification for Ethernet local area networks, defined in the IEEE 802.3 standard as a 10 megabits per second (Mbps) baseband transmission system using a thick coaxial cable as the shared medium, with each network segment supporting up to 500 meters of cable length. It operates on a linear bus topology, where devices connect through an Attachment Unit Interface (AUI) to external transceivers that attach to the cable via vampire taps—specialized connectors that pierce the cable's outer shielding and insulation to contact the center conductor without cutting the line. The system employs Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection (CSMA/CD) for medium access control, enabling multiple stations to share the bus while detecting and resolving data collisions. Ethernet, the foundational technology behind 10BASE5, was invented in 1973 at Xerox's Palo Alto Research Center (PARC) by Robert Metcalfe and a team of engineers, including David Boggs, who sought to create a simple, high-speed method for computers to communicate and share peripherals like printers and storage devices within a local environment. Initially an experimental prototype using coaxial cable and operating at 2.94 Mbps, the design evolved through demonstrations and partnerships—such as with Intel and DEC in 1979—to reach 10 Mbps and gain commercial traction. The IEEE 802.3 committee formalized 10BASE5 as the first standard in June 1983, marking its adoption as a unified industry specification for local area networking and establishing Ethernet's core principles of packet-based, shared-medium communication. Despite its pioneering role, 10BASE5's installation challenges—requiring precise cable preparation, vampire tap drilling (with failures reportedly common), and N-type connectors for segment termination—limited its practicality for widespread deployment, prompting the development of thinner, more flexible alternatives like (thin coaxial) in 1985 and twisted-pair standards such as 10BASE-T in 1990. By the mid-1990s, these successors had largely replaced 10BASE5 in enterprise and office settings due to easier wiring and scalability, though the thick coaxial backbone remained in use for some backbone applications until the early 2000s. Today, 10BASE5 cables and related hardware exemplify the origins of Ethernet, which has evolved into gigabit and multi-gigabit standards supporting modern data centers and the ; they are now largely collector's items among retro computing enthusiasts, with their legacy embedded in the framework that continues to drive global networking innovations.

History and Development

Origins in Ethernet

The origins of 10BASE5 trace back to the pioneering work at Palo Alto Research Center (PARC) in the early 1970s, where researchers sought to create a (LAN) to interconnect personal computers like the . In May 1973, , then a researcher at PARC, authored an internal memo outlining the concept of "Ethernet," inspired by the packet radio network and the broader packet-switching ideas from the . This initiative, led by Metcalfe alongside David Boggs and others under the guidance of laboratory director Robert Taylor, aimed to enable resource sharing—such as laser printers and file servers—among Alto workstations in a shared-medium environment. The project received approval in June 1973, marking the start of hardware prototyping to connect these computers via a common communication channel. The initial prototype, operational by late 1973, utilized 75-ohm RG-11 foam to form a bus topology, achieving a data rate of 2.94 Mbps over distances up to 1 km. This setup connected a small number of computers, demonstrating reliable packet transmission in a multi-access environment without centralized control. By 1974, the system had evolved to a more stable 3 Mbps implementation using similar low-loss cabling, supporting up to 100 nodes by mid-1975 and proving viable for in-building and multi-building deployments at PARC. These experiments laid the groundwork for scaling to the 10 Mbps standard that would define 10BASE5, emphasizing simplicity in cabling and attachment to foster widespread adoption in office settings. A cornerstone innovation was the with (CSMA/CD) medium access protocol, which allowed multiple stations to share the coaxial bus efficiently while minimizing conflicts. In CSMA/CD, a station listens for an idle channel (carrier sense) before transmitting, detects collisions via signal interference during transmission, and aborts if one occurs. To resolve collisions, the protocol employed a binary exponential backoff mechanism: after a collision, stations wait a random multiple of a slot time (51.2 µs for the 10 Mbps version, derived from round-trip propagation delay) before retrying, with the wait interval doubling exponentially up to a maximum to prevent persistent jamming. This adaptive retry strategy ensured high throughput even under load, with simulations showing over 75% efficiency at peak. Pre-IEEE frame formats in these prototypes featured a simple structure to support distributed : an 8-bit destination address, an 8-bit source address, a variable-length field (up to about 1,000 bytes), and a 16-bit (CRC) for error detection, all preceded by a for . This design prioritized low overhead and compatibility with PARC's Pup internetworking protocol, enabling seamless exchange among Altos. The Ethernet experiments at PARC not only advanced LAN concepts by demonstrating scalable, cost-effective networking for personal computing but also influenced the evolution of wide-area networks like the through PARC's Pup protocol, which bridged local Ethernet segments to ARPANET hosts and informed internetworking designs. These foundations proved instrumental in shaping modern distributed systems, transitioning later to formal standards like IEEE 802.3.

Standardization Process

The standardization of 10BASE5 emerged from collaborative efforts to formalize Ethernet as an open industry standard. In September 1980, the (DEC), , and (DIX) consortium released version 1.0 of their Ethernet specification, known as the "Blue Book," which defined a 10 Mbps using CSMA/CD over thick and served as the primary basis for subsequent standards. In February 1980, the IEEE launched Project 802 to develop local and metropolitan area network standards, with the 802.3 working group focusing on CSMA/CD access methods; by late 1982, this effort merged with the specification, incorporating minor adjustments to align with broader IEEE requirements. The resulting standard was ratified on June 24, 1983, with 10BASE5 specified in Clause 8 as the medium attachment unit (MAU) for thick coaxial cabling supporting up to 500-meter segments. The standard was formally published in 1985 as IEEE Std 802.3-1985, officially designating Type 10BASE5 and enabling widespread commercial adoption. Key differences from the original version included modifications to frame encapsulation, where the 2-byte field was replaced by a length field, requiring the use of (LLC) for protocol identification, and the addition of management frames to support network monitoring and control.

Naming and Terminology

Etymology of 10BASE5

The nomenclature "10BASE5" follows the systematic established for specifications, where the components denote key performance and medium characteristics. The "10" indicates the nominal data signaling rate of 10 megabits per second (Mbps). "BASE" signifies baseband transmission, in which the entire bandwidth of the cable is used to transmit a single , as opposed to methods that divide the bandwidth into multiple channels. The "5" represents the maximum allowable length of a single , measured in hundreds of meters, thus equating to 500 meters for 10BASE5. This convention extends to other early Ethernet variants, providing a consistent framework for differentiation. For instance, employs the same 10 Mbps signaling but uses a thinner with a maximum segment length of 185 meters (approximately "2" hundred meters), earning it the informal designation of "thinnet." In contrast, 10BASE-T adapts the 10 Mbps approach to unshielded twisted-pair wiring, with a segment limit of 100 meters and a star topology, where "T" denotes the twisted-pair medium rather than a distance metric. The naming originated in the collaborative efforts of , , and (DIX), whose Ethernet Specification Version 2.0, released in November 1982, defined the foundational 10 Mbps carrier-sense multiple access with collision detection (CSMA/CD) protocol over without yet using the "10BASE5" term explicitly. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) adopted and formalized this in its 802.3 standard, with the first draft published in 1983 designating the coaxial implementation as "Type 10BASE5" to specify the physical medium type. By the full IEEE 802.3-1985 standard, this became the canonical name, integrating the DIX frame format while establishing the enduring nomenclature for Ethernet PHY variants.

Common Nicknames and Variants

10BASE5 is commonly known by several informal nicknames that highlight its physical characteristics and historical role in early networking. The most prevalent is "Thick Ethernet" or "Thicknet," referring to the robust, 0.4-inch diameter RG-8/U coaxial cable that distinguished it from later, slimmer variants. These terms emerged in the 1980s among engineers and technicians due to the cable's rigidity and thickness compared to subsequent technologies like 10BASE2. Another nickname, "Frozen Yellow Cable" or "Frozen Yellow Garden Hose," alludes to the cable's stiff, inflexible nature and its typical yellow-orange outer sheath, which made it resemble a rigid hose in lab and office environments. This moniker captured the challenges of handling the cable during installation, as its foam-insulated core and thick jacket resisted bending, often requiring specialized tools for deployment. While 10BASE5 itself had few direct variants, it was occasionally extended using the Fiber Optic Inter-Repeater Link (FOIRL) standard, defined in IEEE 802.3d-1987, to connect over fiber optic cables up to 1 km. This hybrid approach allowed 10BASE5 bus segments to span greater distances but remained distinct from pure 10BASE5 implementations, primarily serving as a repeater interconnection method rather than a core variant. Culturally, 10BASE5 evokes images of early computing labs and corporate setups, where its yellow cable snaked through rooms like a "," often captured in historical photographs of PARC prototypes and university networks. These visuals, showing vampire taps and AUI transceivers clamped along the rigid trunk, underscore its foundational yet cumbersome role in pioneering local area networking before twisted-pair alternatives supplanted it.

Technical Specifications

Physical Layer Characteristics

The 10BASE5 supports a data rate of 10 Mbps through Manchester-encoded signaling, where each bit is represented by a transition in the middle of the bit period, providing both and within the same signal. This encoding ensures reliable detection of bit boundaries and supports the transmission required for the shared medium environment. The interfaces with the medium attachment unit (MAU) to generate and interpret these signals, integrating seamlessly with the CSMA/CD protocol for medium access. The signaling employs an unbalanced coaxial transmission line characterized by a 50-ohm impedance, which matches the cable to prevent signal reflections and maintain integrity across segment. Operating as a system, the frequency spectrum spans from 0 to 10 MHz, encompassing the fundamental components of the Manchester-encoded ; this limited bandwidth allows for cost-effective components while accommodating the 10 Mbps . Rise and fall times are constrained to a maximum of 50 ns to control signal distortion and ensure compatibility with receiver circuitry. Voltage levels in the 10BASE5 physical layer are calibrated for robust operation on the coaxial medium, with a peak-to-peak signal amplitude of 25-35 V specifically for collision enforcement. This elevated amplitude during overlapping transmissions guarantees that collision signals propagate effectively to all attached stations, enabling prompt detection and resolution in accordance with the IEEE 802.3 requirements.

Cabling and Connector Standards

The cabling for 10BASE5 networks utilizes RG-8/U or equivalent 50-ohm , featuring a solid core conductor, foam insulation—typically gas-injected (HDPE)—and a braided metallic shield for protection. This construction ensures low and reliable over distances up to 500 meters, with the cable's rigid yellow PVC jacket providing durability in backbone installations. A minimum of 20 cm is required to prevent damage to the internal structure and maintain impedance integrity. Connectors for 10BASE5 adhere to Clause 7 specifications for the Media Attachment Unit (MAU), employing N-type connectors to interface s with the backbone; these threaded, weather-resistant plugs ensure secure, low-loss connections without the use of BNC connectors, which are reserved for thinner Ethernet variants. The Attachment Unit Interface (AUI), which links the network interface card to the transceiver, uses a 15-pin connector with pinouts resembling those of EIA for signal and ground lines, including transmit/receive data pairs, , and power. Compliance with standards mandates that 10BASE5 cables bear specific markings, such as "10BASE5" or "IEEE 802.3 10BASE5," printed along the jacket at regular intervals to certify adherence to electrical and mechanical requirements, facilitating verification during installation and maintenance. These markings, often accompanied by manufacturer details and compliance logos, ensure and safety in certified deployments.

Network Topology and Components

Bus Topology Design

The 10BASE5 network employs a linear bus topology, utilizing a single shared as the backbone to which all nodes connect, enabling every station to receive all transmitted signals on the medium. This shared architecture facilitates with (CSMA/CD), where nodes listen to the bus before transmitting and detect collisions if multiple signals overlap. Connections to the backbone are made using vampire taps, which pierce the outer shielding of the thick (RG-8/U type) to access the center conductor without severing it, allowing for a continuous linear structure; these taps are placed sequentially along the cable in a manner that maintains the bus integrity. A single 10BASE5 segment is limited to a maximum of 500 meters to ensure and minimize , supporting up to 100 nodes (medium attachment units or ) per segment. To prevent signal reflections and interference, a minimum spacing of 2.5 meters must be maintained between any two taps or on the segment. Both ends of the backbone require termination with 50-ohm resistors (tolerance ±1%, phase angle ≤5°, power rating ≥1 ) to match the cable's and absorb signals, thereby preventing destructive echoes that could degrade network performance. For extended networks, permits the use of to interconnect up to five segments, with a maximum of four in cascade between any two nodes, resulting in a total length of up to 2500 meters while adhering to the (five segments total, four repeaters, and only three segments populated with more than two nodes). This configuration ensures that the round-trip propagation delay remains within limits for effective across the . regenerate and amplify signals without altering the logical bus structure, maintaining the shared medium characteristic.

Transceivers and Attachment Units

The Medium Attachment Unit (MAU) serves as the external transceiver in 10BASE5 networks, interfacing the device's Network Interface Card (NIC) with the coaxial backbone cable through the Attachment Unit Interface (AUI). The MAU performs signal conversion between the balanced differential signals of the AUI and the unbalanced coaxial medium, enabling reliable data transmission and reception at 10 Mb/s. Typically housed in a separate box, the MAU connects to the NIC via a shielded AUI cable, which supports lengths up to 50 meters to allow flexible station placement relative to the bus. Transceivers in 10BASE5 systems are available in inline configurations using piercing taps, commonly known as vampire taps, which directly penetrate the outer jacket and shield of the thick coaxial cable without requiring cable cutting. These taps employ a needle-like contact to pierce the center conductor, secured by clamping mechanisms for a secure RF connection. Alternatively, external transceivers utilize non-piercing N-connectors attached to the cable via compatible taps, ensuring minimal signal disruption to the shared bus. Power for the MAU is supplied via the AUI cable's dedicated pins, delivering 12-15 V DC at up to 250 mA from the NIC or a separate source, with the voltage range typically specified as +10 to +16 V to accommodate variations. operates through a dedicated collision pair in the AUI, where the MAU signals collisions to the NIC using higher-voltage pulses (typically exceeding normal data levels) superimposed on the receive line, allowing the CSMA/CD protocol to function effectively. This mechanism includes Signal Quality Error (SQE) testing, where the MAU generates a 1 µs heartbeat pulse post-transmission to verify integrity. The electrical specifications for the AUI, including signal levels, timing, and shielding requirements, are defined in Clause 9, ensuring interoperability across 10 Mb/s Ethernet implementations. This clause outlines differential Manchester-encoded signaling for data and collision paths, with common-mode rejection to mitigate noise. modes, such as normal loopback during transmission and optional test loopbacks, are mandated for diagnostics, where received signals are looped back to the transmitter to confirm MAU functionality without external stimuli. These features support robust attachment in bus topologies while adhering to the half-duplex nature of 10BASE5.

Installation and Operation

Cable Laying Procedures

The installation of 10BASE5 , also known as Thicknet, demands precise routing to maintain over its maximum segment length of 500 meters. Horizontal runs are typically routed through plenum spaces, conduits, or cable trays, with the cable supported directly by the building structure to prevent sagging or stress, rather than relying on suspended ceilings or ductwork. Sharp bends must be avoided, adhering to a minimum of 254 mm (10 inches) to minimize mechanical damage and signal reflections that could degrade performance. Additionally, cable paths should be planned to avoid (EMI) sources, such as fluorescent lights (maintaining at least 30.5 cm separation) and transformers (at least 1.02 m separation), using tie wraps to secure the stiff cable and reduce movement-induced noise. Grounding is critical for 10BASE5 to ensure safety and prevent noise from ground loops or static buildup. The cable must maintain continuity across the segment via connectors, with grounding applied at a single point—typically at one terminator or an inline connector using a ground lug—to avoid multiple ground paths that could induce currents. Both ends of the segment require grounding provisions for static discharge, but the shield connection is restricted to one point per segment, complying with local electrical codes such as ANSI/TIA/EIA-607. This single-point approach, often with a minimum 1,500-ampacity ground, preserves the 50-ohm impedance while mitigating susceptibility. Testing procedures are essential post-installation to validate cable quality before connecting transceivers or termination hardware. Time-domain reflectometry (TDR) is used to measure (50 ohms ±2 ohms), detect faults like opens, shorts, or mismatches from improper bends, and ensure reflections are no more than 7% of the incident wave. Continuity tests confirm end-to-end integrity, while attenuation (maximum 8.5 dB at 10 MHz over 500 m) and velocity of propagation are verified to meet specifications. Environmental considerations guide 10BASE5 deployment to ensure reliable operation within specified limits. The cable is rated for temperatures from 0°C to 40°C and 10% to 90% non-condensing relative , with some configurations tolerating up to 95% . Plenum-rated variants (e.g., with Teflon insulation) are required for air-handling spaces per Article 800, but the cable is unsuitable for direct burial without protective conduits to shield against moisture and physical damage. Installations should avoid proximity to heat sources like hot-water pipes to prevent jacket degradation.

Tapping and Termination Methods

In 10BASE5 networks, stations are attached to the trunk cable using vampire taps, also known as piercing taps, which provide a non-intrusive connection method. These taps consist of clamps equipped with a that penetrates the cable's jacket, , and outer to make direct contact with the center conductor, while a separate captures the braided outer conductor without severing the cable. The design ensures low , limited to 4 pF total for the tap and associated circuitry, and contact resistance not exceeding 50 mΩ to maintain . Vampire taps connect to the medium attachment unit (MAU) via Type N connectors, adhering to 50 Ω impedance standards. To add or remove a vampire tap, the clamp is physically secured or released on the cable, a process that requires network downtime to minimize the risk of signal reflections or disruptions in the shared bus topology. Inline splices, when necessary for cable extension or repair, utilize Type N connectors to join segments without compromising impedance, avoiding the need for cutting or permanent alterations to the trunk. Taps must be positioned at least 2.5 meters apart along the cable, with markings on the cable itself indicating valid attachment points to ensure phase cancellation of any minor reflections. The maximum number of taps per 500-meter segment is 100, balancing connectivity with attenuation limits. Cable termination in 10BASE5 systems employs precision 50 Ω resistors, rated at a minimum of 1 W power dissipation and with impedance tolerance of ±1%, installed at both ends of each segment via integrated Type N male connectors. These terminators absorb transmitted signals to prevent standing waves and reflections that could degrade performance across the . No more than two terminations are permitted per segment, one at each extremity, to maintain the linear bus configuration. Grounding is required at exactly one termination point per segment to avoid ground loops, with the selected end depending on the installation environment. Maintenance of taps and terminations focuses on preserving electrical continuity and , as oxidation or loosening can introduce faults. Periodic inspection of contacts is essential, with relocation to fresh cable sections recommended if degradation is observed, though specific intervals are not standardized. The overall design prioritizes reliability, with engineered for a of 1 million hours under normal operating conditions.

Performance Characteristics

Signal Propagation and Attenuation

In 10BASE5 networks, signals propagate as Manchester-encoded pulses along the thick at a of at least 0.77 times the (approximately 231,000 km/s), determined by the cable's constant and structure. This propagation speed ensures that the round-trip delay across a maximum 500 m segment remains within the timing requirements for in the CSMA/CD protocol. The of 0.77c allows signals to traverse the full segment length in about 2.16 μs one-way, contributing to the overall slot time of 51.2 μs used for reliable network operation. Signal in 10BASE5 arises primarily from resistive losses in the conductors, absorption, and leakage through the cable shielding, with the standard limiting the total to no more than 8.5 dB at 10 MHz across a 500 m segment (equivalent to approximately 1.7 dB per 100 m). This budget includes the effects of up to four taps and terminations, ensuring the received signal remains sufficient for detection at transceivers. The is frequency-dependent, increasing roughly linearly with in the 5–10 MHz range relevant to Ethernet signaling; for instance, it is capped at 6.0 dB at 5 MHz. The cable loss can be modeled as α=k⋅L\alpha = k \cdot L, where α\alpha is in dB, k≈0.017k \approx 0.017 dB/m at 10 MHz, and LL is length in meters, derived from the specified per-segment limits. Reflections in 10BASE5 systems result from impedance discontinuities, such as those introduced by vampire taps or improper terminations, where the nominal 50 Ω of the may vary by ±2 Ω. The standard mandates that the magnitude of the reflection from any MAU or cable section does not exceed that produced by a 4 pF in the worst case, measured with a 25 ns step, to prevent waveform distortion and . These mismatches are minimized through precise tap design and 50 Ω terminations at both ends of the segment, with cumulative effects from multiple taps limited to maintain overall signal fidelity. Rise time degradation accumulates from the dispersive effects of the cable length and the capacitive loading of attached taps and transceivers (MAUs), degrading the edge sharpness of the 10 Mbps signal. The standard specifies a maximum 10%–90% rise/fall time of 50 ns for the cable alone, with the total system rise time controlled to 25 ± 5 ns at the transceiver output to preserve Manchester encoding integrity and support collision detection timing. This limit ensures that signal transitions remain sharp enough across the segment without excessive jitter (≤ 6 ns edge jitter allowed), preventing bit errors in the shared bus environment.

Collision Detection and CSMA/CD

The with (CSMA/CD) protocol governs medium access in 10BASE5 networks, enabling multiple stations to share the bus while minimizing data collisions. Before transmitting, a station performs carrier sense by monitoring the medium for activity; if idle, it begins transmission, but if busy, it defers until the medium is free for at least the interframe gap duration. Multiple stations may attempt transmission simultaneously, leading to collisions that are detected by the (MAU) monitoring the DC voltage level on the , which rises due to overlapping bias currents from the transmitting MAUs. Upon detection, the MAU asserts the Collision Detect signals on the AUI to the DTE, and the transmitting station immediately ceases data transmission and instead broadcasts a 32-bit jam signal, usually a pattern of alternating 1s and 0s or all 1s, to ensure all stations on the segment recognize the collision and cease their attempts. The slot time, defined as 512 bit times or 51.2 μs at 10 Mb/s, represents the maximum round-trip delay across the network's , ensuring that any collision occurring at the farthest point is detectable before the frame transmission completes. This parameter sets the minimum frame size and bounds the , with implementations allowing a small margin up to 575 bit times for practical variations. Following a collision, the employs truncated binary : for the nth collision, the station selects a random k from 0 to 2^{min(n,10)} - 1 and waits k slot times before retrying, capping the exponent at 10 to prevent indefinite retries while promoting fairness. After 16 attempts, the frame is discarded to avoid congestion. To allow transceiver recovery and signal settling between transmissions, a minimum interframe gap of 96 bit times, or 9.6 μs, must elapse before a station may transmit the next frame, even on a lightly loaded network. This gap enforces orderly access and prevents overlapping signals, with repeaters potentially shortening it slightly under load but never below the minimum. Overall, CSMA/CD ensures reliable operation on the shared 10BASE5 bus by balancing efficiency and collision resolution, though performance degrades with increasing station count due to higher collision probabilities.

Limitations and Legacy

Key Disadvantages

The installation of 10BASE5 networks presented significant challenges due to the use of rigid, thick , which was difficult to bend and route through building structures or around obstacles. Connecting devices required vampire taps that pierced the cable's outer conductor to access the inner core, necessitating specialized tools and precise placement to avoid damaging the cable or introducing signal reflections. This process often demanded professional expertise and could result in , as adding or removing nodes involved careful handling to maintain the bus integrity without disrupting ongoing operations. The cost of deploying 10BASE5 was notably high compared to subsequent Ethernet variants, driven by the expense of the thick coaxial cable and the separate transceivers required for each node. This economic barrier limited widespread adoption beyond large organizations with dedicated IT resources. Scalability was constrained by the shared bus architecture, which supported a maximum of 100 nodes per segment and created a single point of failure where any cable damage could partition the network. Under heavy load, the CSMA/CD protocol led to increased collision rates, reducing effective throughput as more nodes competed for the 10 Mbit/s bandwidth, with utilization dropping significantly beyond moderate traffic levels. Maintenance proved particularly arduous, lacking plug-and-play simplicity and requiring diagnostic tools to isolate faults along the linear bus, such as signal attenuation or improper terminations. Troubleshooting often involved physically inspecting the cable and taps, which was time-consuming and error-prone without modern segmentation options.

Evolution to Successor Standards

The transition from 10BASE5 began in the mid-1980s with the introduction of , standardized under IEEE 802.3a in 1985, which utilized thinner to reduce costs and simplify installation compared to the rigid thicknet of 10BASE5. This variant maintained the 10 Mbps speed and bus topology but allowed for easier BNC connectors and shorter segment lengths, making it more accessible for small networks and accelerating Ethernet's adoption in offices and labs. By the early 1990s, the shift accelerated toward twisted-pair cabling with 10BASE-T, defined in IEEE 802.3i in 1990, which replaced the coaxial bus with a star topology using unshielded twisted pair (UTP) wiring, enabling hub-based connections up to 100 meters per segment. This change addressed 10BASE5's installation challenges, leveraging existing telephone wiring infrastructure and supporting easier scalability, which propelled Ethernet into widespread commercial use. Subsequent IEEE 802.3 amendments drove further evolution, with IEEE 802.3u in 1995 introducing 100BASE-TX for 100 Mbps speeds over Category 5 UTP, and later standards like IEEE 802.3ab in 1999 adding 1000BASE-T , all while retaining backward compatibility with earlier physical layers. A pivotal advancement came with IEEE 802.3x in 1997, which formalized full-duplex operation, eliminating the need for CSMA/CD by allowing simultaneous bidirectional transmission on separate pairs, thus boosting efficiency in switched networks. Despite these advancements, 10BASE5 lingered in legacy industrial control systems through the due to its robustness in harsh environments, though it was formally deprecated by the working group in 2003 for new installations, with clauses removed in later maintenance revisions. Today, echoes of 10BASE5's design persist in Wi-Fi's CSMA/CA mechanism under , adapted to avoid collisions in wireless shared media.

References

  1. https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.3/10422/
  2. https://information-technology.web.cern.ch/about/computer-centre/visits/visitpoint/display-objects/10base5-ethernet-cable-vampire-tap
  3. https://standards.ieee.org/beyond-standards/ethernet-50th-anniversary/
  4. https://www.pathsolutions.com/blog/42-dead-networking-technologies
  5. https://davidbombal.com/retro-10base5-thicknet-and-10base2-thinnet-network/
  6. https://www.mattmillman.com/projects/10base5/
  7. https://historyofcomputercommunications.info/section/8.7/Ethernet-and-Robert-Metcalfe-and-Xerox-PARC-1971-1975/
  8. https://ethw.org/Milestones:Ethernet_Local_Area_Network_%28LAN%29%2C_1973-1985
  9. https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/teaching/2425/CompNet/files/p395-metcalfe.pdf
  10. http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/xerox/parc/techReports/OPD-T8102_Evolution_of_the_Ethernet_Sep81.pdf
  11. https://connectorsupplier.com/ethernet-still-going-strong-at-50/
  12. https://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/object/nmah_687626
  13. https://ethw.org/Ethernet
  14. https://ewh.ieee.org/r6/oeb/comsoc/Past_Presentations/EthernetHistory_NetWorkshop_Mar04.pdf
  15. https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/ethernet-version-2-versus-ieee-8023-ethernet
  16. https://www.iol.unh.edu/sites/default/files/knowledgebase/ethernet/ethernet_evolution.pdf
  17. https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/glossary/10base5/
  18. https://kashaffer.infprojects.fhsu.edu/courses/datacom1/html/lesson_12.html
  19. https://www.smartechcables.com/blog/different-types-of-ethernet-cables/
  20. https://www.ieee802.org/misc-docs/GlobeCom2009/IEEE_802d3_Law.pdf
  21. https://computerhistory.org/blog/happy-40th-birthday-ethernet/
  22. https://www.flukenetworks.com/knowledge-base/applicationstandards-articles-copper/mhz-vs-mbits-and-encoding
  23. https://www.belden.com/products/cable/coax-triax-cable/50-ohm-coax-cable/9880
  24. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/routers/1600-series-routers/46791-ethaui.html
  25. https://www.my-wire.de/schnittstellenbeschreibung/ethernet.pdf
  26. https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.3/1085/
  27. https://literature.rockwellautomation.com/idc/groups/literature/documents/in/1785-in057_-en-p.pdf
  28. http://mck-electric.weebly.com/uploads/5/6/2/3/5623157/cabling_-_the_complete_guide_to_network_wiring_2nd_ed_malestrom.pdf
  29. https://theswissbay.ch/pdf/Books/Computer%20science/O%27Reilly/O%27Reilly_-_Ethernet_Definitive_Guide.pdf
  30. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/FIPS/fipspub107-Mar1985.pdf
  31. http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/datapro/communications_standards/2770_LAN_Standards.pdf
  32. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/879000
  33. https://kenhan.academic.csusb.edu/CSE3660/lec/CSE3660_Systems_Networking1-2.pdf
  34. http://wireless.ictp.it/school_2001/labo/cabling/THICK.HTM
  35. https://www.extremenetworks.com/resources/blogs/wired-for-success-how-did-ethernet-become-the-backbone-of-modern-connectivity
  36. https://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/park/cs422-link-2-06s.pdf
  37. https://www.neccosecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Ethernet_Basics.43170219.pdf
  38. https://www.industrialethernetu.com/courses/ie101.html
  39. https://www.ieee802.org/3/cr/public/1118/Lewis_3cr_02_1118.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.