Hubbry Logo
Institut national de la statistique et des études économiquesInstitut national de la statistique et des études économiquesMain
Open search
Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques
Community hub
Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques
Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques
Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies
Map

Headquarters in Montrouge, France
Agency overview
Formed27 April 1946; 79 years ago (1946-04-27)
Preceding agency
  • Service national des statistiques
TypeGovernment agency
JurisdictionFrance
Headquarters88 Avenue Verdier
Montrouge
France
48°48′59″N 02°18′26″E / 48.81639°N 2.30722°E / 48.81639; 2.30722
Minister responsible
Agency executive
Websiteinsee.fr

The National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies (French: Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques, pronounced [ɛ̃stity nɑsjɔnal də la statistik e dez‿etyd(z‿)ekɔnɔmik]), abbreviated INSEE or Insee[1] (/ɪnˈseɪ/ in-SAY, French: [inse]), is the national statistics bureau of France. It collects and publishes information about the French economy and people and carries out the periodic national census. Headquartered in Montrouge, a commune in the southern Parisian suburbs, it is the French branch of Eurostat. The INSEE was created in 1946 as a successor to the Vichy regime's National Statistics Service (SNS). It works in close cooperation with the Institut national d'études démographiques (INED).

Purpose

[edit]

The INSEE is responsible for the production and analysis of official statistics in France. Its best known responsibilities include:

  • Organising and publishing the national census.
  • Producing various indices – which are widely recognised as being of excellent quality – including an inflation index used for determining the rates of rents and the costs associated with construction.
  • Eurostat uses INSEE statistics in combination with those of other national statistical agencies to compile comparable statistics for the European Union as a whole. It is also widely recognized as representing France on international questions of statistics.

Organisation

[edit]

The INSEE is the responsibility of MINEFI, the French Ministry of Finance. The current director is Jean-Luc Tavernier. However, Eurostat considers INSEE as an independent body, although its independence is not written in the law.[2]

Teaching and research

[edit]

Research and teaching for the INSEE is undertaken by GENES or Group of the National Schools of the Economy and Statistics (French: Groupe des Écoles Nationales d'Économie et Statistique) which includes:

  • ENSAE (École nationale de la statistique et de l'administration économique), a grande école which trains INSEE administrators and engineers specialized in statistics, the economy, and finance.
  • ENSAI, (École nationale de la statistique et de l'analyse de l'information), an engineering school.

Codes and numbering system

[edit]
Main article: INSEE code


INSEE gives numerical indexing codes (French: les Codes INSEE) to various entities in France:

  • INSEE codes (known as COG) are given to various administrative units, notably the French communes (they do not coincide with postcodes). The 'complete' code has 8 digits and 3 spaces within, but there is a popular 'simplified' code with 5 digits and no space within:
  • INSEE numbers (13 digits + a two-digit key) are national identification numbers given to people. The format is as follows: syymmlllllooo kk, where
    • s is 1 for a male, 2 for a female for a permanent number; it is 7 for a male, 8 for a female for a temporary number,
    • yy are the last two digits of the year of birth,
    • mm is the month of birth or a number above 20 if the birthdate is unknown
    • lllll is the COG for the location of birth,
    • ooo is an order number to distinguish people being born at the same place in the same year and month.
    • 'kk' is the "control key", equal to 97-(the rest of the number modulo 97).
      There are exceptions for people in particular situations.[3]
  • SIREN codes are given to businesses and nonprofit associations, SIRET codes to their establishments and facilities.[4]

History

[edit]
Former INSEE headquarters in Malakoff, Hauts-de-Seine

Statistics in France before the INSEE

[edit]

The INSEE was preceded by several related statistical agencies in France. In 1833, the Statistics Bureau (French: Bureau de la statistique) was created by Adolphe Thiers. In 1840 it was renamed SGF or General Statistics of France.[5]

Under the direction of Lucien March, the SGF expanded its activities. It began an investigation of consumption habits in 1907, following with periodic investigations on retail prices in 1911.

In 1920 Alfred Sauvy introduced competitive entrance exams for SGF recruitment. However, it was René Carmille, a pioneer of the use of the calculators, who laid the foundations of the modern organization. In 1940, the Demographic Service (Service de la démographie) was created under the Ministry of Finance in order to replace the military recruitment office prohibited by the June 1940 Armistice with Nazi Germany. In order to better conceal its undertakings, the Demographic Service absorbed the SGF on 11 October 1941. The new organization was called the SNS or National Statistics Service.[6] As part of this reorganization, six new offices were created in the Northern (occupied) zone whose regional structure is maintained today in INSEE.

René Carmille created an Applied Sciences School (predecessor of the current ENSAE) to specially train members for the SNS.

Carmille worked for Vichy France but he was actually a double agent for the French underground. From his position in the SNS he sabotaged the Nazi census of France, which saved untold numbers of Jewish people from death camps. He also used his department to help mobilize French resistance in Algeria. He was caught by the Nazis and sent to Dachau where he died in 1945.[7]

Creation of the INSEE

[edit]

The SNS was finally transformed into the INSEE by the law of 27 April 1946, The National Institute of Statistics and Economic Surveys for the metropolis and overseas France (L'Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques pour la métropole et la France d'outre-mer).

IRIS

[edit]

IRIS is the name for France's unit of division of geographical regions for the purposes of taking a census. In order to prepare for the dissemination of the 1999 French population census, INSEE developed a system for dividing the country into units of equal size, known as IRIS2000, now known simply as 'IRIS'.[8] The acronym stands for 'Ilots Regroupés pour l'Information Statistique' ('aggregated units for statistical information')[9] and the 2000 in the name referred not only to the upcoming millennium year but to the target size of 2,000 residents per basic unit. Since 1999, IRIS has represented the fundamental unit for dissemination of infra-municipal data in France and its overseas departments and regions. Towns with more than 10,000 inhabitants, and a large proportion of towns with between 5,000 and 10,000 inhabitants, are divided into several IRIS units. France is composed of around 16,100 IRIS in total, of which 650 are in the overseas departments.[8] There are 3 types of IRIS unit in use; residential IRIS (pop. between 1,800 and 5,000), business IRIS (containing more than 1,000 employees) and miscellaneous IRIS (specific large zones which are sparsely inhabited and have large surface areas (leisure parks, ports, forests etc.).[8]

List of directors

[edit]

The following is a list of directors of the INSEE since it was founded:

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE), or National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies, is France's central public statistics agency tasked with collecting, producing, analyzing, and disseminating data on the economy and society across the national territory. Established by the Budget Law of 27 April 1946, INSEE succeeded earlier statistical efforts dating back to 1833 by merging the National Statistics Service—originally formed under the Vichy regime—with an economic studies service, thereby centralizing and modernizing official data production in the post-war era. Operating as a Directorate-General under the Ministries of Economy and Finance, it coordinates the methods, resources, and operations of the broader Statistical System of Public Administrations (SSP), ensuring unified nomenclatures and compliance with national and European statistical standards. INSEE's core responsibilities encompass producing key indicators such as gross domestic product, inflation rates, unemployment figures, and demographic statistics, including exhaustive population censuses conducted at irregular intervals since 1946. It manages administrative files, maintains standardized classifications, and supports policy-making through empirical data on topics ranging from labor markets and enterprises to urban planning and sustainable development. With offices distributed throughout France, INSEE employs specialized administrators for designing and coordinating the statistical system, emphasizing methodological rigor and territorial coverage. As the cornerstone of France's official statistics, INSEE contributes to transparency and evidence-based governance by providing accessible, high-quality datasets that inform economic forecasting, social research, and international comparisons, while adhering to legal frameworks like the Decree of 14 June 1946 for statistical coordination.

Core Objectives and Functions

The Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE) pursues the overarching objective of generating reliable, interpretable statistics accompanied by expert analysis to illuminate economic, social, and environmental dynamics in France, thereby informing public policy and debate. This mission aligns with its motto, "Measuring to understand," emphasizing empirical measurement as a foundation for causal insights into societal trends. As the central producer of official statistics, INSEE operates with professional independence, designing, collecting, processing, and disseminating data under rigorous methodological standards to ensure accuracy and impartiality. INSEE's functions encompass six principal areas: first, collecting and producing high-quality data through surveys, administrative records, and other sources; second, conducting in-depth analyses to identify underlying patterns and drivers; third, disseminating statistics and studies in accessible formats for diverse users, including policymakers, businesses, and the public. Fourth, coordinating France's official statistical system to maintain coherence and quality across contributing entities; fifth, advancing statistical research and training to build expertise; and sixth, contributing to European and international statistical frameworks, such as harmonizing methodologies under EU regulations. These activities support key outputs like national accounts, inflation metrics, employment indicators, and regional economic profiles, all grounded in verifiable data collection protocols. INSEE's independence in executing these functions is legally protected, allowing it to prioritize methodological integrity over external pressures, while operating as a directorate-general under the Ministries of Economy and Public Finances. This structure enables causal-realist assessments, such as linking demographic shifts to labor market outcomes, without undue influence from political cycles. Through these efforts, INSEE provides foundational empirical evidence for evidence-based decision-making, countering reliance on anecdotal or ideologically driven narratives.

Establishment and Governance

The Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE) was established by the French Budget Law of 27 April 1946 (articles 32 and 33), which centralized public statistics responsibilities amid post-World War II reconstruction efforts. This new entity merged the National Statistics Service—originally formed in 1941 under the Vichy regime—with the economic studies and documentation services of the Ministry of National Economy, aiming to unify fragmented statistical activities dating back to the 19th century. The founding reflected a need for coordinated data production to support economic planning and policy-making in a war-ravaged economy, with initial operations placed under the Ministry of National Economy's general directorate. Francis-Louis Closon served as the inaugural Director General from 1946 to 1961, overseeing the transition and early expansions, such as the assignment of electoral roll responsibilities via the Law of 28 August 1946. INSEE's governance is structured as a public administrative establishment within the French Official Statistical System (SSP), operating under the joint authority of the Ministries of Economy and Finance, with funding drawn from the central government budget and adherence to state accounting rules. The Director General, appointed by presidential decree on the proposal of the Prime Minister, holds executive responsibility for defining the annual statistical program, coordinating with 16 ministerial statistical offices, and ensuring compliance with quality standards, including those mandated by European Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 on statistical governance. Oversight is provided by independent bodies such as the National Council for Statistical Information (CNIS), which fosters producer-user collaboration, and the Official Statistical Authority (ASP), tasked with verifying adherence to the European Statistics Code of Practice, professional independence, and data objectivity. Key governance mechanisms include specialized committees: the Official Statistics Quality Label Committee for methodological validation, the Statistical Confidentiality Committee for data protection, and the Litigation Committee for resolving disputes over compulsory surveys, all established under the Decree of 14 June 1946 and subsequent laws like the Statistical Law of 7 June 1951, which formalized obligations for public statistical inquiries. The Director General chairs the Statistical Programme Committee to prioritize operations and maintains a Strategic Quality Committee—introduced in 2015—to monitor overall strategy and European statistical coordination. This framework emphasizes methodological rigor and legal mandates for access to administrative data, while subjecting INSEE to parliamentary scrutiny through finance laws that approve its budget and program.

Organizational Framework

Central Administration and Decentralization

The central administration of the Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE) is headquartered at the Direction générale in Montrouge, near Paris, which oversees national coordination, methodology development, and strategic operations. This structure includes key directorates such as the Inspection générale for internal audits, the Secrétariat général for administrative support, the Direction du système d'information for IT infrastructure, and the Direction de la méthodologie et de la qualité for statistical standards. Additional specialized units handle areas like statistical coordination, international relations, business statistics, national accounts, and social statistics, ensuring centralized production of core national datasets. INSEE's decentralization is implemented through a network of regional directorates (directions régionales) and local services, aligning with France's administrative regions to facilitate localized data collection and analysis. Each of the 13 metropolitan regions and overseas territories has a dedicated regional directorate that operates as a deconcentrated service, interacting primarily with regional state services and local authorities to produce territorial statistics and conduct surveys tailored to regional needs. These units manage on-site data gathering, such as censuses and economic inquiries, while maintaining methodological consistency with central guidelines, supported by a new statistical center in Metz for processing and a distribution of resources between central and peripheral entities. This functional decentralization within the broader Service statistique public (SSP) combines national oversight with regional autonomy, enabling efficient response to territorial variations in data requirements while preserving statistical independence and uniformity. Regional directorates emphasize partnerships with deconcentrated state services, like those for environment and housing, to integrate local administrative data into national frameworks. As of 2024, this structure supports approximately 5,000 personnel distributed across central and decentralized levels, optimizing coverage of France's diverse geographic and economic landscapes.

Research and Training Components

The research activities of the Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE) are primarily channeled through the Centre de Recherche en Économie et Statistique (CREST), a multidisciplinary joint research unit established as UMR 9194 under the supervision of INSEE, the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), École Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Administration Économique (ENSAE) Paris, and other academic partners. CREST conducts empirical and theoretical research in economics, statistics, finance, actuarial sciences, and sociology, with approximately 100 permanent researchers, 120 doctoral and postdoctoral researchers, and 10 postdoctoral fellows contributing to advancements in quantitative methods and data analysis. This structure enables INSEE to integrate cutting-edge statistical methodologies into its data production and economic forecasting, fostering collaborations with external researchers while maintaining operational independence in core statistical functions. INSEE maintains close institutional ties with CREST to support methodological innovation, such as improving survey designs and econometric models used in national accounts and labor market analyses. Research outputs from CREST inform INSEE's analytical publications and contribute to public policy evaluations, with a focus on causal inference and large-scale dataset exploitation, though the center operates semi-autonomously to align with academic standards rather than direct institutional mandates. Training components within INSEE emphasize the development of specialized statistical expertise for its civil servants and external professionals, supervised through the Groupement des Écoles Nationales d'Économie et Statistique (GENES), which encompasses ENSAE Paris and École Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse de l'Information (ENSAI) Rennes. ENSAE Paris delivers a two-year graduate program for INSEE administrators (category A civil servants), combining advanced coursework in applied mathematics, economics, and statistics with research-linked projects, preparing graduates for roles in data processing, economic modeling, and policy analysis. This curriculum, tailored to INSEE's operational needs, includes mandatory internships and emphasizes quantitative skills essential for handling confidential datasets and ensuring statistical rigor. ENSAI Rennes focuses on training mid-level statisticians, such as attachés statisticiens, through programs lasting 1 to 2 years, covering specialties in economics, management, and data sciences, with a curriculum that integrates practical fieldwork and software proficiency for survey implementation and quality assurance. INSEE agents across categories—from senior statisticians to field investigators—undergo initial and continuous professional development via dedicated training centers, including national plans for quality methodologies and digital tools, supported by partnerships with recognized academic institutions to uphold methodological standards. These efforts ensure a workforce capable of producing reliable, impartial data amid evolving technological demands, with over 5,000 agents trained annually in core competencies like sampling techniques and confidentiality protocols.

Data Production and Methodologies

Collection, Processing, and Dissemination

INSEE employs a structured statistical production process encompassing eight phases: specification of needs, design, building, collection, processing, analysis, dissemination, and evaluation. Data collection occurs through compulsory surveys, voluntary surveys, population censuses conducted via annual surveys, and administrative sources such as payroll declarations (DSN) and fiscal data. For household surveys, mixed-mode approaches integrate online questionnaires with interviewer-led methods, tested via focus groups and standard protocols to ensure consistency and adaptability. Specialized collections, such as consumer price indices, incorporate internet-based manual inputs, automated robots, and daily scanner data from retailers. This mandate derives from the 1951 statistical law (modified), enabling access to diverse sources while upholding confidentiality. Processing involves reconciling raw administrative data with statistical concepts—such as aligning tax households to standard households via tools like ÉSANE—and applying imputation, estimation, and quality controls. Techniques include balanced sampling to optimize representation and calibration methods for adjusting estimates against auxiliary information, detailed in methodological notes. Metadata are managed through the RMéS repository for transparency, with systematic verifications, anomaly resolutions, and revisions per a 2019 general policy that standardizes calendars and explanations. Questionnaires undergo pre-collection testing by the Quality Label Committee, ensuring procedural integrity across phases. Dissemination prioritizes equal access and independence, releasing anonymized data freely via the INSEE website, including micro-data files for public use and restricted access for researchers through platforms like Réseau Quetelet or CASD. Macroeconomic indicators follow pre-announced schedules with limited pre-release to select users, disclosed transparently, in compliance with IMF SDDS and European Statistics Code of Practice. Revisions enhance accuracy and are announced alongside releases or in advance, while errors trigger prompt corrections with user notifications; individual data identification is prohibited. Outputs include statistical indicators, publications, and databases, governed by rules ensuring relevance and non-discriminatory provision.

Classification Systems and Standards

INSEE develops and maintains a suite of statistical nomenclatures, or classification systems, essential for standardizing data across economic, social, and demographic domains in France. These systems ensure consistency in data collection, processing, and analysis, facilitating comparability with European Union (EU) and international benchmarks. As the national statistical authority, INSEE aligns its classifications with regulations such as the European Statistics Code of Practice, which mandates the consistent application of standard concepts, definitions, and classifications to uphold methodological soundness. The Nomenclature d'Activités Française (NAF), INSEE's primary classification for economic activities, categorizes productive operations into hierarchical levels, with the current NAF Révision 2 (2008) comprising 21 sections, 88 divisions, and finer subdivisions up to five-digit codes. Derived from the EU's NACE Rev. 2, it underpins the assignment of Activité Principale Exercée (APE) codes to enterprises via the SIRENE register, enabling aggregated economic statistics like national accounts and business demographics. INSEE is preparing NAF 2025, incorporating updates for emerging sectors such as digital services, with implementation slated for January 1, 2027, to reflect evolving economic structures while preserving backward compatibility. For social statistics, the Nomenclature des Professions et Catégories Socioprofessionnelles (PCS) classifies occupations and socio-professional groups, with PCS 2020 featuring four hierarchical levels to code professions in population censuses and household surveys. This update refines categories to capture shifts in labor markets, such as growth in non-manual roles, while maintaining continuity with prior versions like PCS 2003 for time-series analysis. A variant, PCS-ESE, supports employer declarations in administrative data for salary and employment inquiries. INSEE also oversees product and consumption classifications, including the Classification des Produits Française (CPF Rev. 2.1), a hierarchical system for goods and services based on economic functions, aligned with the EU's CPA for trade and production statistics. Additional standards cover household consumption functions and legal entity categories, ensuring interoperability across datasets. These nomenclatures are periodically revised through consultative processes involving stakeholders, with revisions documented for transparency and methodological rigor.

Quality Control and Independence Protocols

INSEE maintains professional independence in the conception, production, and dissemination of official statistics as mandated by Article 1 of Act No. 51-711 of 7 June 1951, which requires complete autonomy from political or external interference. This framework was reinforced by Act No. 2008-776 of 4 August 2008, establishing the Autorité de la statistique publique (ASP) as an independent body to oversee compliance, conduct annual reviews with INSEE's Director-General, and issue public reports to Parliament evaluating adherence to independence protocols. Under European Regulation (EC) No. 223/2009, as amended, INSEE's Director-General holds exclusive authority over methodological choices, content, and release timing, with dissemination protocols enforcing strict embargoes and prohibiting ministerial pre-approval or linkage to political announcements to prevent undue influence. The ASP, comprising a nine-member college appointed for non-renewable terms by diverse stakeholders including Parliament and the Conseil d'État, actively monitors for impartiality through tools like opinions on appointments (per Decree No. 2016-663 of 24 May 2016) and investigations into potential breaches, such as the eight embargo violations detected since 2009, six involving government entities. Despite INSEE's structural integration as a directorate under the Ministry of the Economy, these protocols—aligned with the European Statistics Code of Practice—ensure separation, with ASP intervening in controversies, including 2020 disputes over inflation and unemployment data where methodological critiques escalated to unfounded attacks on objectivity. Quality control protocols emphasize process integration and risk management, guided by INSEE's Quality Strategy 2022–2027, which prioritizes documented workflows, optimization for security and efficiency, and user-focused dissemination following the Generic Statistical Business Process Model (GSBPM). A dedicated Quality Unit, established in 2012, supports methodological standardization, trains staff via a network of correspondents, and conducts annual compliance reviews against the Code of Practice, supplemented by external peer reviews from Eurostat and the OECD. Systematic risk analyses and process mapping address continuity threats, while the ASP's labeling mechanism—granting quality certifications to 14 public and private data producers since 2010—enforces transparent controls and recommendations for enhancement, achieving a 90% punctuality rate in scheduled releases across ministerial offices. These protocols collectively uphold impartiality under Principle 6 of the Code of Practice, mandating objective production free from bias, though integration with administrative structures has prompted ASP scrutiny of potential subtle pressures, as evidenced in its handling of dissemination fairness and publication delays.

Historical Evolution

Pre-20th Century Statistical Practices in France

Early statistical efforts in France during the Ancien Régime were largely ad hoc and decentralized, focused on fiscal, military, and administrative needs rather than systematic data collection. Provincial intendants under Louis XIV gathered estimates of population, agriculture, and trade to inform tax assessments and resource allocation, with notable attempts including Sébastien Le Prestre de Vauban's 1680s surveys for military purposes and early 18th-century inquiries into vital events by parish priests. These practices lacked national coordination and relied on indirect methods like hearth counts or multiplier estimates from baptisms, yielding inconsistent figures such as Jean-Baptist Colbert's administration approximating 20-21 million inhabitants around 1700 based on fragmented provincial reports. The late 18th century saw growing intellectual interest in quantitative data amid Enlightenment influences, with physiocrats like François Quesnay advocating empirical assessments of wealth and population to guide policy, though implementation remained sporadic. The French Revolution intensified demands for reliable statistics to support reforms, leading to initial vital registration laws in 1792 requiring civil records of births, marriages, and deaths for egalitarian taxation and conscription. Under Napoleon, these efforts formalized with the creation of a statistical bureau at the Ministry of the Interior in 1800 and the first modern national census in 1801, which enumerated 27,349,000 inhabitants through house-to-house inquiries, emphasizing administrative utility over scientific rigor. Subsequent censuses in 1817 and 1821 built on this, incorporating occupational and housing data, but coverage was incomplete due to resistance in rural areas and methodological inconsistencies. The July Monarchy marked a shift toward institutionalized statistics with the establishment in 1833 of the Bureau de Statistique Générale under the Ministry of Commerce, renamed Statistique Générale de la France (SGF) in 1840, tasked with coordinating national data on population, industry, and agriculture. This body mandated decennial censuses starting in 1836 (held every five years until 1836, then adjusted to decennial by mid-century), employing standardized questionnaires to capture demographics, professions, and economic activity, with the 1851 census documenting 35.8 million residents and pioneering fertility metrics. By the late 19th century, SGF practices evolved to include specialized inquiries into labor, migration, and commerce, publishing annual reports like the Statistique Générale de la France from 1875 onward, though challenges persisted in undercounting women’s work and rural illiteracy affecting response accuracy. These developments reflected causal links between state centralization, industrialization, and the need for evidence-based governance, prioritizing utility over theoretical purity.

World War II and Immediate Postwar Creation

During World War II, France's statistical apparatus faced significant disruptions from the German invasion and the establishment of the Vichy regime in 1940. Pre-existing decentralized services, scattered across ministries, continued limited operations under occupation, focusing on demographic censuses and economic data amid resource shortages and censorship. In October 1941, the Vichy government created the Service national des statistiques (SNS) through a decree merging these fragmented entities into a centralized body, primarily to streamline data for administrative control, labor mobilization, and demographic tracking, including the development of punch-card systems and an early form of individual identification numbering under director René Carmille. Carmille, who expanded mechanized processing capabilities, secretly sabotaged efforts to fully identify Jewish populations for deportation, leading to his arrest by the Gestapo in 1944 and execution in January 1945. The SNS thus provided continuity in data production but operated under collaborationist constraints, supplying information that supported both Vichy policies and indirect occupation demands. Following France's liberation in August 1944, the provisional government under Charles de Gaulle prioritized economic reconstruction, recognizing the need for an independent, modernized statistical framework to inform planning, resource allocation, and national accounts amid hyperinflation and industrial devastation. Previous services, including the SNS, were retained for expertise but deemed insufficiently robust and tainted by wartime associations, prompting reforms to ensure autonomy from political interference. On April 27, 1946, the Budget Law (articles 32 and 33) formally established the Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE) as the successor to the SNS, centralizing public statistics for metropolitan France and overseas territories under the Ministry of Finance's oversight while granting operational independence. This creation, led by Resistance figure Francis-Louis Closon—a Companion of the Liberation appointed as INSEE's first director—marked a deliberate break from prewar fragmentation and wartime centralization, introducing standardized methodologies and the inaugural French national accounts in 1946 to underpin initiatives like Jean Monnet's modernization plan. INSEE's mandate emphasized empirical rigor, with early efforts focusing on postwar censuses and economic indicators to quantify damages estimated at over 20% of prewar GDP.

Post-1946 Developments and Reforms

Following its establishment in 1946, the Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE) expanded its mandate through legislative and organizational changes to support France's postwar economic reconstruction and planning. In 1951, the Law of 7 June provided a comprehensive legal framework for conducting public statistical surveys, enabling systematic data collection across economic and social domains. This reform addressed gaps in prewar practices by standardizing survey methodologies and ensuring broader coverage of national activities. By 1962, INSEE absorbed responsibilities for national accounts and economic forecasting previously handled by the Service d'études économiques et financières (SEEF), integrating these functions to produce coherent macroeconomic indicators aligned with emerging planning needs. This consolidation enhanced INSEE's role in policy formulation, as national accounts became central to tracking gross domestic product, balance of payments, and sectoral outputs during the Trente Glorieuses growth period. Under director Edmond Malinvaud from 1974, regional offices underwent modernization to improve decentralized data gathering, while the head office relocated to Porte de Vanves in 1975, facilitating better coordination amid rising computational demands. Structural reforms in the late 1980s and early 1990s, led by director Jean-Claude Milleron from 1988 to 1994, reorganized internal departments, including the creation of specialized units for enterprise statistics and demographic/social data, to adapt to evolving economic complexities such as globalization and service sector growth. In 2001, INSEE adopted the European Statistics Code of Practice, committing to principles of impartiality, quality, and confidentiality, while increasing reliance on administrative data sources to reduce respondent burden and enhance efficiency. The population census transitioned in 2004 from decennial exhaustive enumerations to an annual rolling operation, combining sample surveys with administrative registers for timelier demographic insights. A pivotal 2009 legislative amendment established the Autorité de la statistique publique, granting INSEE greater professional independence from political influence by formalizing consultation requirements for methodological changes and budget allocations, thereby strengthening data credibility in line with international standards. These reforms collectively transitioned INSEE from a postwar reconstruction tool to a robust, EU-integrated institution emphasizing methodological rigor and administrative data integration.

Key Leadership Figures

The Director-General of INSEE serves as the chief executive, overseeing statistical production, methodological standards, and coordination with government and international bodies, appointed by decree following ministerial proposal. This role has been pivotal in shaping INSEE's evolution from postwar reconstruction to modern data-driven policy support. Francis-Louis Closon, the inaugural Director-General from 1946 to 1961, established INSEE under the April 27, 1946, law, integrating fragmented statistical services and prioritizing demographic data for reconstruction and electoral administration. His tenure focused on centralizing pre-existing bureaus, such as those from the Statistique Générale de la France, to produce reliable postwar censuses and economic indicators. Claude Gruson (1961–1967) expanded INSEE's scope into national accounts and economic forecasting, fostering collaboration with the Commissariat au Plan for indicative planning under the Fifth Republic. Jean Ripert (1967–1974) enhanced data dissemination through publications like Économie et statistique (launched 1969) and created the Conseil national de l'information statistique (CNIS) in 1972 to incorporate user feedback, marking a shift toward greater transparency. Edmond Malinvaud (1974–1987), an eminent econometrician, reinforced INSEE's operational independence amid oil crises, implementing administrative tools like the Système unifié de statistiques d'entreprises (Suse) and Sirene for enterprise identification, while modernizing 22 regional directorates. Jean-Claude Milleron (1987–1992) restructured the organization between 1988 and 1994, establishing a dedicated business statistics department to streamline relations with enterprises and initiating archival reviews of Vichy-era statistical files. Paul Champsaur (1992–2003) aligned INSEE with European standards for data comparability, contributing to Eurostat harmonization and co-founding Afristat in 1993 for African statistical capacity-building; his 1998 report detailed INSEE's WWII-era operations. Jean-Michel Charpin (2003–2007) digitized access by mandating free online data release in 2003, accelerating public and research utilization. Jean-Philippe Cotis (2007–2012) advanced compliance with EU Regulation 223/2009 on statistical governance, emphasizing quality frameworks amid the financial crisis. Jean-Luc Tavernier (2012–2025) navigated the "data explosion" from digital sources, prioritizing energy transition metrics and INSEE's role in societal debates, including the 2021 75th-anniversary commemoration. Fabrice Lenglart, appointed June 4, 2025, as the current Director-General, brings expertise in methodology and international coordination, with prior roles in INSEE's inspection and Ensae training.
Director-GeneralTermKey Contribution
Francis-Louis Closon1946–1961Postwar centralization and census implementation
Claude Gruson1961–1967National accounts expansion
Jean Ripert1967–1974Dissemination reforms and CNIS creation
Edmond Malinvaud1974–1987Independence strengthening and IT systems
Jean-Claude Milleron1987–1992Organizational restructuring
Paul Champsaur1992–2003European harmonization and international cooperation
Jean-Michel Charpin2003–2007Free data access policy
Jean-Philippe Cotis2007–2012EU governance compliance
Jean-Luc Tavernier2012–2025Digital data integration
Fabrice Lenglart2025–presentMethodological oversight

Outputs and Analytical Contributions

Economic Indicators and Forecasts

INSEE compiles and disseminates a range of core economic indicators, including quarterly gross domestic product (GDP) growth, consumer price index (CPI) inflation, unemployment rates, manufacturing output, household consumption, and business climate indices. These metrics are derived from national accounts, business surveys, and administrative data sources, with quarterly GDP estimates breaking down annual figures using monthly and quarterly conjunctural indicators. INSEE publishes CPI data monthly, typically with a delay of one month or more, providing figures for past periods only; data for future months, such as January 2026, is not available as that period has not yet occurred. For instance, in the second quarter of 2025, INSEE reported GDP growth of +0.3%, CPI inflation of +1.2% for September 2025, and an unemployment rate of 7.5%. The institute's forecasting approach emphasizes short-term projections through conjunctural analysis, relying on tendency surveys, composite business climate indicators, and econometric models to anticipate economic trends. Business surveys, such as those for manufacturing, construction, and services, form the backbone of these forecasts, capturing qualitative assessments of order books, production expectations, and employment outlooks. INSEE integrates these with quantitative data for nowcasting and quarterly outlooks, as detailed in publications like the "Economic Outlook" series under Conjoncture en France. This method enables continuous monitoring and revisions, with forecasts updated tri-monthly to reflect evolving conditions like foreign trade dynamics or fiscal policy impacts. Key outputs include the monthly Economic Dashboard, which aggregates indicators like industrial production capacity utilization and retail trade volumes, and specialized surveys such as the consumer confidence index. For longer horizons, INSEE provides annual projections, forecasting 0.8% GDP growth for 2025 amid sector-specific rebounds in construction and services, tempered by political uncertainty and subdued external demand. These forecasts inform policy but are subject to revisions based on incoming data, with historical accuracy tied to the stability of survey responses over quantitative benchmarks.

Demographic and Social Statistics

The Demographic and Social Statistics Directorate (DSDS) of INSEE conceives, produces, and disseminates official statistics on France's population dynamics, household structures, and key social indicators, including family formations, educational attainment, health outcomes, and living conditions. This directorate integrates data from civil registries, censuses, and targeted surveys to track trends such as fertility rates, mortality patterns, and migration flows, providing foundational inputs for policy analysis on aging populations and social welfare systems. INSEE conducts the Population Census (Recensement de la Population, RP), an annual operation since 2004 that enumerates residents, housing units, and socioeconomic characteristics across metropolitan France and overseas departments, yielding official population figures for administrative divisions as of January 1 each year. For instance, the 2022 census data indicated a total population of 67,761,000 across 34,918 municipalities, highlighting slower growth due to declining natural increase amid sustained immigration. Complementary to the census, the Permanent Demographic Sample (Échantillon Démographique Permanent, EDP) maintains a longitudinal panel of approximately 1% of the French population to analyze long-term trends in fertility, mortality, family transitions, and geographic mobility through linked administrative records. Annual Demographic Balance Sheets compile vital statistics, estimating population stocks and flows: on January 1, 2024, France's population stood at 68.4 million (66.1 million in metropolitan France and 2.3 million overseas), up 0.3% from the prior year, driven by a positive migratory balance offsetting a natural deficit where 663,000 births occurred—a 2.2% decline from 2023 and 21.5% below the 2010 peak—against higher deaths. These reports also detail civil events like 188,000 marriages and PACS (civil solidarity pacts) in 2023, alongside metrics on life expectancy, which reached 79.9 years for men and 85.5 years for women in recent estimates. Social statistics extend to household composition and inequality measures, as featured in publications like France, Portrait Social, which in 2023 reported 68.0 million inhabitants with breakdowns by age, sex, and dependency ratios, underscoring challenges like an aging society where over 20% of the population exceeds 65 years. INSEE's datasets on education reveal, for example, rising tertiary completion rates to 47% among 25-34-year-olds by 2023, while health indicators track morbidity and access disparities, all derived from harmonized surveys ensuring comparability over time and with European standards. These outputs support empirical assessments of social cohesion, with raw data accessible via INSEE's open platforms for replication and scrutiny.

Specialized Surveys and Publications

INSEE conducts specialized surveys to gather targeted data on niche economic, social, and sectoral dynamics, complementing its core statistical operations. The Community Innovation Survey (CIS), conducted periodically in alignment with European mandates, quantifies innovation prevalence among French enterprises, measuring indicators such as R&D spending, innovation frequency, and associated turnover shares, with results enabling EU-wide comparisons; for instance, the 2020-2022 wave covered over 10,000 firms. The Household Budget Survey (HBS), updated every five years, compiles detailed household expenditure records—including non-monetary consumption—and income streams, sampling approximately 10,000 households to track consumption patterns and resource allocation. Additional surveys address enterprise formation and structure. The New Enterprises Information System (SINE) analyzes creator profiles, startup conditions, and early development trajectories, drawing from administrative records of newly registered firms to inform entrepreneurship policy. The Financial Links between Enterprises survey (LIFI), updated biennially, delineates corporate group affiliations and control structures among French-operating entities, serving as a foundational tool for consolidated economic reporting. Sector-specific efforts include monthly business tendency surveys in construction, polling firms on output expectations and order books, and annual sectoral surveys capturing events like mergers alongside principal activities. INSEE channels these survey outputs into structured publication series for dissemination. The Insee Première collection delivers succinct four-page briefs on emergent findings from recent inquiries, covering diverse themes with textual analysis, graphs, and provisional data. Complementing this, Insee Références provides comprehensive, periodic monographs on pivotal socioeconomic issues, integrating statistical with interpretive commentary derived from public datasets; examples include annual overviews of and labor market trends. Specialized analytical outlets encompass Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, which features peer-reviewed articles on econometric methods and applied economic , and Documents de Travail, preliminary technical papers testing innovative statistical approaches. These formats ensure accessibility while prioritizing empirical rigor in reporting survey-derived insights.

Controversies and Critiques

Questions of Political Neutrality and Influence

INSEE maintains professional independence in the production and dissemination of official statistics, as codified in French law through the 2008 modernization of the economy act and aligned with the European Statistics Code of Practice, which mandates insulation from political interference. This framework positions INSEE as a direction générale under the Ministry of Economy and Finance, yet with operational autonomy in methodological decisions and data release timing to prevent undue governmental sway. De facto independence has historically been upheld, with former directors emphasizing resistance to external pressures, though coordination with ministerial statistical offices raises questions about subtle alignment with policy priorities. Critics, including economists and opposition figures, have questioned INSEE's neutrality, particularly in economic indicators that could portray government performance favorably. In February 2020, INSEE faced accusations of lacking true independence, underestimating inflation through hedonic adjustments and basket weightings, and inadequately capturing labor market slack by relying on narrow ILO unemployment definitions that exclude discouraged workers and part-time underemployment. Such methodological choices, while defended as internationally standardized, have fueled claims of systemic optimism in metrics like GDP growth and purchasing power, potentially influenced by fiscal policy needs during administrations from Hollande to Macron. For instance, during the 2018-2019 Yellow Vests protests, INSEE data revised downward the economic cost estimated by the government, highlighting tensions but also INSEE's role in empirical correction rather than fabrication. Demographic statistics have similarly drawn scrutiny for potential political calibration. The shift to annual sampling-based population estimates since 2004, replacing full decennial censuses, prompted 2012 polemics from researchers alleging undercounting in urban areas and inflated precision claims (e.g., population known to 0.02% accuracy), which could mask migration or urban decay trends politically sensitive under immigration debates. More recently, the 2025 census inclusion of questions on parental birthplace—intended to proxy immigration origins without direct ethnic categorization, per France's republican aversion to such data—sparked controversy, with critics arguing it indirectly enables policy-targeted statistics while others decry evasion of explicit ethnic breakdowns amid rising nativist concerns. Trust in INSEE varies by political orientation, with surveys indicating lower confidence among right-leaning respondents on economic and migration data, potentially reflecting perceived alignment with center-left governance narratives. Despite these critiques, of overt political manipulation remains scarce, with INSEE's adherence to peer-reviewed methods and European oversight providing buffers against influence. Historical analyses, such as postwar tensions between INSEE and the Directorate over , ongoing institutional frictions rather than capitulation. Methodological debates often stem from inherent statistical trade-offs—e.g., sampling versus exhaustive accuracy—rather than proven , though systemic placement within executive structures invites causal realism about indirect pressures during electoral cycles or crises.

Methodological and Accuracy Challenges

The adoption of a continuous census methodology in 2004, replacing the previous exhaustive annual enumeration with annual surveys covering approximately 8% of communes on a rotating basis, has drawn methodological scrutiny from demographers and researchers. This approach aims to provide more frequent updates but relies heavily on sampling and imputation techniques, which can introduce estimation errors, particularly for subpopulations with high mobility or low response rates, such as young children aged 0-4 and young adults aged 20-29. Studies have documented undercounts in these groups, with discrepancies attributed to urban concentration, non-response biases, and challenges in adjusting for net migration; for instance, the 1999-2004 transition revealed an undercount of around 480,000 people in metropolitan France compared to prior estimates. INSEE incorporates post-enumeration surveys and demographic modeling to mitigate these, yet critics argue the lightweight validation processes undermine comparability with historical data and precision for small-area statistics. Inflation measurement via the consumer price index (IPC) faces accuracy challenges related to basket composition and weighting, where fixed categories may lag behind shifts in consumption patterns, such as the rise of online purchases or quality adjustments in goods. Public surveys indicate persistent divergence between official figures—averaging 1.5-2% annually in the 2000s—and consumer perceptions of higher price pressures, particularly for essentials like food and energy, prompting questions about whether hedonic adjustments or substitution biases systematically understate lived inflation. INSEE addresses this through periodic basket revisions (e.g., every five years) and scanner data integration since the 2010s, but residual discrepancies highlight limitations in capturing heterogeneous household experiences without real-time microdata. GDP estimation involves multi-stage revisions incorporating preliminary surveys, administrative data, and annual benchmarks, often resulting in adjustments of 0.2-0.5 percentage points for quarterly growth rates as late as two years post-publication. While these reflect improved data completeness, they expose initial estimates to volatility from incomplete coverage of sectors like services or intangibles, with critiques noting potential underestimation of growth in import price deflators or digital economy investments during periods of rapid technological change. INSEE's protocols emphasize transparency in revision policies, yet the iterative nature underscores inherent trade-offs between timeliness and precision in macroeconomic statistics.

Public Trust and Empirical Scrutiny

Public trust in INSEE's statistical outputs remains relatively high among direct users and informed audiences, with a 2024 survey of connected individuals revealing that 90% deem the institute useful and it inspires confidence for a majority. Trust levels correlate strongly with educational attainment, reaching 90% among those with postgraduate qualifications ("bac +5") but dropping to 70% for lower education groups, suggesting accessibility and comprehension barriers contribute to variance. Among INSEE's online portal users ("Inseenautes"), 34% expressed full confidence in its economic and social data publications as of October 2024. Comparative international benchmarks, such as the UK's Office for National Statistics reporting 84% user trust in early 2024, position INSEE favorably within European public statistics bodies. Broader societal trust in official French statistics exhibits tensions, with academic analyses identifying a "contraried relationship" characterized by public skepticism toward aggregate indicators despite reliance on granular data. A 2015 Cevipof barometer wave indicated generalized wariness, potentially rooted in perceptions of methodological opacity or policy alignment, though specific INSEE polling remains limited outside self-assessments. France's Autorité de la statistique publique (ASP), established to enforce independence under European codes, has addressed polemics—such as 2020 disputes over employment and inflation metrics—by affirming compliance with professional standards, yet public discourse often amplifies doubts from non-expert sources. Empirical scrutiny of INSEE's data underscores adherence to rigorous validation protocols, including regular assessments of source data, sampling errors, and output revisions per Principle 12 of the European Statistics Code of Practice, which mandates minimizing biases through probabilistic methods and error quantification. External evaluations, such as the IMF's 2003 Data Quality Assessment Program review, praised INSEE's decentralized yet coordinated framework for producing reliable macroeconomic series, though it noted challenges in integrating ministerial inputs. Critiques have focused on specific inaccuracies, including 2020 accusations of underestimating inflation and misrepresenting labor market slack, prompting INSEE rebuttals citing methodological transparency and alignment with Eurostat benchmarks. Earlier challenges, like 2012 debates over population estimates, were empirically defended through cross-verification with census and administrative records, affirming overall accuracy despite local variances. These episodes highlight that while INSEE's outputs withstand peer review, public trust erodes when perceived discrepancies align with ideological narratives, necessitating ongoing transparency to counter confirmation biases in interpretation.

Broader Impact and Role

Influence on French Policy and Economic Analysis

INSEE's statistical outputs, including GDP estimates, unemployment rates, and inflation metrics, form the empirical backbone for French government decision-making across fiscal, monetary, and social policies. Quarterly national accounts and business tendency surveys provide timely indicators that enable policymakers to assess economic cycles and adjust interventions, such as during the COVID-19 downturn when INSEE documented a 7.9% GDP contraction in 2020, informing targeted recovery measures like short-time work schemes and aid packages. The institute's data underpins annual budget preparations, with projections on growth and revenues directly influencing deficit targets and expenditure allocations, as seen in the use of INSEE's 1.1% full-year GDP growth confirmation for 2024 to calibrate 2025 fiscal strategies amid political uncertainties. The INES model, jointly developed by INSEE with entities like the Directorate for Research, Studies, Evaluation and Statistics (DREES), simulates the distributional effects of proposed tax and benefit reforms, allowing legislators to evaluate equity and efficiency prior to enactment. For instance, simulations have been applied to assess pension indexing against inflation and household purchasing power dynamics, guiding adjustments that boosted real incomes in 2024 through automatic mechanisms tied to INSEE's consumer price indices. INSEE's Director General routinely advises the Minister of Economy, Prime Minister, and President on interpretive analyses of these datasets, ensuring that policy responses—such as labor market reforms amid falling unemployment to 2.3 million in Q4 2024—align with observed causal trends rather than unsubstantiated projections. In economic analysis, INSEE's forward-looking outlooks, like the 0.8% growth forecast for 2025 driven by sectoral rebounds, shape investor confidence and regulatory frameworks, while methodological rigor in integrating administrative data enhances the reliability of impact assessments for public policies. This role extends to causal evaluations, where INSEE statistics facilitate econometric scrutiny of interventions, such as energy crisis mitigations that curbed inflation's household effects through data-verified government supports. Despite institutional safeguards for independence, the institute's proximity to executive branches underscores its pivotal, non-partisan provision of evidence-based inputs that constrain policy to empirical realities over ideological priors.

International Engagements and Standards Alignment

INSEE actively participates in the European Statistical System (ESS), providing national data to Eurostat for the compilation of harmonized statistics across EU member states, ensuring methodological consistency through adherence to EU regulations on statistical production and dissemination. As part of this engagement, INSEE updates its national activity classification, such as transitioning from NAF 2008 to NAF 2025, to align with the European NACE Rev. 2 framework, facilitating cross-border comparability in economic statistics. The institute contributes to global statistical frameworks by supplying data and expertise to international organizations including the United Nations, International Monetary Fund, and OECD, supporting the development of worldwide indicators on national accounts, trade, and economic performance. INSEE's methodologies conform to international standards, such as those outlined in the IMF's Dissemination Standards Bulletin Board, where French producer price indices are verified as fully compliant, emphasizing rigorous data quality and transparency. In technical cooperation, INSEE conducts assistance missions and organizes study visits to aid statistical capacity building in developing countries, with a focus on Sub-Saharan Africa as part of France's development policy, including efforts to align foreign trade statistics in partner nations like Morocco with global best practices. Its general revisions policy employs standardized procedures planned in line with these international benchmarks, prioritizing empirical accuracy over ad hoc adjustments.

References

  1. https://www.insee.fr/en/accueil
  2. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/2381918
  3. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/2386424
  4. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/4250022
  5. https://www.insee.fr/en/metadonnees/source/serie/s1321
  6. https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/organisation/insee-institut-national-de-la-statistique-et-des-etudes-economiques_en
  7. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/dnss/docViewer.aspx?docID=579
  8. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/2404684
  9. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/2381925
  10. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/fichier/4195175/INSEE-2025-en.pdf
  11. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/64157/14414849/Improvement%2Bactions%2BFRANCE.pdf/f121972c-9f6e-49d0-f083-1dfdb80fa4d8?t=1647011377187
  12. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/4249488
  13. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/1892073
  14. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/1892139
  15. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/2382019
  16. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/2381999
  17. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/2115235
  18. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/2014334
  19. https://crest.science/
  20. https://www.ensae.fr/en/research/center-research-economics-and-statistics-crest
  21. https://www.linkedin.com/company/crest-research-lab/
  22. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/4256431
  23. https://crest.science/about-2/
  24. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/2404502
  25. https://www.ensae.fr/en/education/civil-servant-training-administrateurs-insee
  26. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/8615308
  27. https://ensai.fr/2-cursus/cursus-data-scientist-public/
  28. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/4257929
  29. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/4776620
  30. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/4249500
  31. https://www.insee.fr/en/metadonnees/source/serie/s1321/processus-statistique
  32. https://dsbb.imf.org/Pages/SDDS/DQAFBase.aspx?ctycode=FRA&catcode=IND00
  33. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/4257931
  34. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/7722513?sommaire=7722566
  35. https://www.insee.fr/en/metadonnees/source/indicateur/p1653/processus-statistique
  36. https://dsbb.imf.org/pages/sdds/DQAFBase.aspx?ctycode=FRA&catcode=PPI00
  37. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/5398341
  38. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/2388844
  39. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/5016599
  40. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/4249492
  41. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/2406147
  42. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/2120875
  43. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/8181066
  44. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/6208292
  45. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/2406153
  46. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/8621654
  47. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000000888573/
  48. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000019283050
  49. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:02009R0223-20150608&from=EN
  50. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/LEGITEXT000020344133/2018-09-23/
  51. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/4031688/9332274/KS-02-18-142-FR-N.pdf
  52. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/fichier/6691500/Quality_Strategy_2022_2027.pdf
  53. https://statswiki.unece.org/display/GSBPM/GSBPM+v5.1
  54. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/5897304
  55. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/4256490
  56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2278636
  57. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/c63bce47-c81f-4cf4-9772-1f4dc975bec1/external_content.pdf
  58. https://www.ined.fr/fichier/s_rubrique/18825/publi_pdf2_pop.and.soc.english.409.en.pdf
  59. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1081602X03000812
  60. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00167374/document
  61. https://eudml.org/doc/243072
  62. https://journals.openedition.org/criminocorpus/3659
  63. https://archives.humatheque-condorcet.fr/archive/fonds/LIGEO-1567
  64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380431846_ECONOMIC_EXPERTISE_AT_WAR_A_BRIEF_HISTORY_OF_THE_INSTITUTIONALIZATION_OF_FRENCH_ECONOMIC_EXPERTISE_1936-_1946_Documents_de_travail_GREDEG_GREDEG_Working_Papers_Series
  65. https://eml.berkeley.edu/~webfac/eichengreen/e211_fa05/white.pdf
  66. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/1300622
  67. https://presse.economie.gouv.fr/?p=154302
  68. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/8603402
  69. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/2405582
  70. https://www.insee.fr/en/metadonnees/source/serie/s1185
  71. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/fichier/4269288/122019_dossier1E.pdf
  72. https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/ece/ces/ge.42/2015/Seminar/Session_I__INSEE__Issues_Specific_to_Economic_Indicators_in_France_Catherine_Renne.pdf
  73. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/8254620
  74. https://www.reuters.com/world/french-economy-grow-08-2025-key-sectors-rebound-insee-says-2025-09-11/
  75. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/2414704
  76. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/1892171
  77. https://www.insee.fr/en/metadonnees/source/serie/s1166
  78. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/8333211?sommaire=8333329
  79. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/8327319
  80. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/7658776?sommaire=7666953
  81. https://www.data.gouv.fr/datasets/population/
  82. https://www.insee.fr/en/metadonnees/source/serie/s1001
  83. https://www.insee.fr/en/metadonnees/source/serie/s1194
  84. https://www.insee.fr/en/metadonnees/source/serie/s1271
  85. https://www.insee.fr/en/metadonnees/source/serie/s1249
  86. https://www.insee.fr/en/metadonnees/source/operation/s2199/presentation
  87. https://www.insee.fr/en/metadonnees/source/operation/s2170/presentation
  88. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/2410133
  89. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/2893607
  90. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/2410168
  91. https://www.insee.fr/en/plan-du-site/collection/1
  92. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/4256427
  93. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/2107702
  94. https://www.autorite-statistique-publique.fr/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Frances-Official-Statistical-Authority-.pdf
  95. https://www.lesechos.fr/economie-france/conjoncture/sous-le-feu-des-critiques-linsee-se-defend-1173267
  96. https://www.marianne.net/economie/pib-inflation-pouvoir-d-achat-ces-statistiques-de-l-insee-qui-font-polemique
  97. https://www.marianne.net/economie/non-les-gilets-jaunes-n-ont-pas-ruine-la-france-et-c-est-l-insee-qui-le-dit
  98. https://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2012/07/31/polemique-sur-la-nouvelle-methode-de-recensement-de-l-insee_1740535_3224.html
  99. https://www.lesechos.fr/politique-societe/societe/recensement-la-collecte-de-statistiques-ethniques-fait-polemique-2142964
  100. https://blog.insee.fr/who-trusts-insees-data/
  101. https://books.openedition.org/igpde/13747?lang=en
  102. https://www.insee.fr/en/[information](/page/Information)/5895237?sommaire=5894773
  103. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3233/SJI-171054
  104. https://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2012/08/13/population-les-calculs-de-l-insee-sont-fiables_1745688_3232.html
  105. https://www.lefigaro.fr/conso/2007/08/27/05007-20070827ARTFIG90256-les_consommateurs_s_interrogent_sur_la_fiabilite_de_l_indice_de_l_insee.php
  106. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/fichier/4203540/509_Leclair-Leonard-Rateau-Sillard-Varlet-Vernedal-EN.pdf
  107. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/fichier/3614242/ECOFRA18b_D1_croissance_EN.pdf
  108. https://www.lesechos.fr/2000/11/la-nouvelle-economie-relance-le-debat-sur-la-fiabilite-des-outils-statistiques-de-linsee-757833
  109. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/fichier/2388844/Politique_generale_revisions_Insee_EN_2025.pdf
  110. https://blog.insee.fr/qui-a-confiance-dans-les-chiffres-de-l-insee/
  111. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/8270623
  112. https://statistique-et-societe.fr/index.php/stat_soc/article/view/579/551
  113. https://paperssondages16.sfds.asso.fr/submission_20.pdf
  114. https://www.autorite-statistique-publique.fr/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Independance_statistique_publique.pdf
  115. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/4180455
  116. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2003/339/article-A003-en.xml
  117. https://www.cgtinsee.org/statistique-publique/travaux-et-missions/article/faut-il-croire-les-chiffres-manuel-d-autodefense-statistique
  118. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/5395039
  119. https://english.news.cn/20250302/c8131a35a1724fd58a89a10decce9ffe/c.html
  120. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/6049866?sommaire=6049874
  121. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/8595716?sommaire=8595764
  122. https://santandertrade.com/en/portal/analyse-markets/france/economic-political-outline
  123. https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-06/ip234_en.pdf
  124. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Sprint/webinar-3.cshtml
  125. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/fichier/4195175/insee_activity_report_2022.pdf
  126. https://www.insee.fr/en/information/4301982
  127. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/fichier/2404021/international-technical-support02.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.