Hubbry Logo
Impossible FoodsImpossible FoodsMain
Open search
Impossible Foods
Community hub
Impossible Foods
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Impossible Foods
Impossible Foods
Impossible Foods
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Impossible Foods Inc. is a company that develops plant-based substitutes for meat products. The company's signature product, the Impossible Burger, was launched in July 2016 as a vegan alternative to a beef hamburger.

Key Information

In partnership with Burger King, Impossible Whoppers were released across the United States by summer 2019. The company also makes plant-based chicken products and pork products.[3][4][5]

Company and product history

[edit]
An Impossible Burger given out during a promotional event at a food truck in San Francisco in November 2016

Impossible Foods was founded by Patrick O. Brown, a biochemistry professor at Stanford, in 2011.[6][7] Impossible Foods initially also worked on plant-based products that emulated chicken, pork, fish, and dairy,[8] but decided to concentrate first on creating a substitute for the ground beef in burger patties.[9]

In July 2016, the company launched its first meat analogue product, the Impossible Burger, which is made from material derived from plants.[10] The company says that making it uses 95% less land and 74% less water, and it emits about 87% less greenhouse gas than making a ground beef burger patty from cows.[11]

On January 7, 2019, Impossible Foods introduced the Impossible Burger 2.0.[12]

In May 2019, Little Caesars began serving Impossible Foods' first plant-based sausage on pizzas in Florida, New Mexico, and Washington state. Patrick Brown said the product had involved the development of 50 prototype sausage products before Little Caesars began offering it to the public.[13] In January 2020, Impossible Foods launched Impossible Sausage (also marketed as Impossible Pork) more widely.[14]

In late 2021, the company launched Impossible Chicken.[15]

Production and ingredients

[edit]

Unlike most plant-based products intended to emulate meat, the Impossible Burger contains heme. Heme is the molecule that gives blood its red color and helps carry oxygen in living organisms.[16] Heme is abundant in animal muscle tissue and is also found naturally in all living organisms.[17] Plants, particularly nitrogen-fixing plants and legumes, also contain heme.[18] The plant-based heme molecule is identical to the heme molecule found in meat.[19][20]

To produce heme protein from non-animal sources, Impossible Foods selected the leghemoglobin molecule found naturally in the roots of soy plants.[21] To make it in large quantities, the company's scientists genetically engineered a yeast and used a fermentation process very similar to the brewing process used to make some types of beer.[22]

The plant-based burger has more protein, less total fat, no cholesterol, and less food energy than a similar-sized hamburger patty made with beef.[23] It contains more sodium and more saturated fats than an unseasoned beef patty.[24]

Food safety approval

[edit]

United States

[edit]

In 2014, Impossible Foods declared leghemoglobin is generally recognized as safe after testing under oversight from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).[25] Impossible Foods filed updates with the FDA in 2017 and 2018.[26] In July 2018, the FDA issued a "no questions" letter, accepting the unanimous conclusion of a panel of food-safety experts that the heme protein is safe to eat.[27]

The FDA's acceptance in 2018 was limited to Impossible Burgers cooked in restaurants until soy leghemoglobin underwent safety review as a new food colorant for uncooked products.[28] In July 2019, the FDA accepted the colorant in uncooked products, allowing the sale of Impossible Burgers in grocery stores in September the same year.[29][30] In December 2019, the FDA affirmed this decision after considering an objection, finding that Impossible Foods had addressed the safety of soy leghemoglobin.[31]

In May 2021, a San Francisco federal appeals court upheld the FDA's decision. The court held that the FDA had “substantial evidence” to deem heme in Impossible Burgers safe to eat.[32]

Canada

[edit]

In January 2020, Health Canada approved the Impossible Burger patty for sale, notifying the company that it had 'no objection' to the level of soy leghemoglobin in the product.[33]

Product availability

[edit]
An Impossible Burger at Gott's Roadside in Napa in 2018
Impossible Whopper and packaging

In restaurants

[edit]

In 2016 and 2017, Impossible Foods produced Impossible Burgers in both Redwood City, California, and at Rutgers University in New Jersey.[34] Since the production was in relatively small quantities, the burgers were not available at retail locations.[35]

The restaurant Momofuku Nishi in New York, owned by David Chang, began serving the Impossible Burger in July 2016.[36] In October 2016, the Impossible Burger became a standing menu item in selected additional restaurants in California,[37] such as Jardinière and Cockscomb in San Francisco, and Crossroads Kitchen in Los Angeles.[38] The Michelin-starred restaurant Public, operated by Brad Farmerie, began serving the Impossible Burger in January 2017.[39]

In March 2017, Impossible Foods announced it would build its first large-scale plant in Oakland, California, to produce 1 million pounds of plant-based burger meat per month.[37] In the first half of 2017, the Impossible Burger debuted on the menu of multi-unit franchises, including Bareburger in New York City,[40] Umami Burger in California,[41] and Hopdoddy in Texas.[42] In April 2018, White Castle started serving Impossible Burgers. The partnership with White Castle eventually expanded to include all 377 of its locations.[43]

By July 2018, two years after its debut in New York, the Impossible Burger was available at about 3,000 locations in the United States and Hong Kong.[44] By the end of 2018, 5,000 restaurants across all 50 states included the burger on their menus.[45]

In April 2019, Burger King began test marketing an Impossible Whopper, using the patty at locations around St. Louis.[46] Later that month, the company announced plans to roll out Impossible Whoppers nationwide before the end of the year.[47] In August, it was officially made available nationwide.[48]

Retail

[edit]
Plant-based chicken nuggets made by Impossible Foods

The Impossible Burger became available in grocery stores for the first time in October 2019, at Gelson's stores, which are only in Southern California.[49]

As of May 2020, Impossible Burgers were also available at Fairway Market, Wegman's, Jewel-Osco, Vons, Pavilions, Albertsons in California and Nevada, Safeway in California and Nevada, and various chains owned by Kroger.[50] In April 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, the FDA started allowing restaurants to sell Impossible beef substitute to consumers, with an additional printed-out sheet satisfying label requirements.[51]

In July 2020, Impossible Burger patties became available at Trader Joe's and about 2,100 Walmart locations in the United States.[52]

Impossible sausage sandwiches are being sold at many restaurants, including Burger King and Starbucks.[53]

Financing

[edit]

Impossible Foods has raised rounds of $75 million and $108 million from investors, including Google Ventures, Khosla Ventures, Viking Global Investors, UBS,[54] Hong Kong billionaire Li Ka-shing's Horizons Ventures, and Bill Gates.[55] It was reported that Patrick Brown had turned down an offer of $300 million to buy out Impossible Foods in 2015.[9][56]

In August 2017, $75 million in additional financing was raised after reaching key objectives,[57] with Bill Gates investing additional money.[58] In April 2018, an additional $114 million was raised, led by Singapore’s Temasek Holdings and Hong Kong-based Sailing Capital, bringing the total to $372 million.[59] In May 2019, the company raised $300 million of investment.[60] The total valuation of the company raised to $2 billion.[61] On March 16, 2020, another $500 million was raised.[62]

In total, Impossible Foods has raised $1.3 billion over 12 rounds of funding.[63][64] In August 2020, the company raised another US$200 million in an internal round led by existing investor Coatue.[65]

Popularity and cultural impact

[edit]
An Impossible Burger showing its signature 'bleeding' juice

Business Insider has described the Impossible Burger as "a burger that satisfies even the most ardent meat-lovers",[66] whilst Vox has said that it "tastes pretty beefy" such that "many foodies now consider their products not only tolerable but trendy".[67]

The Impossible Burger received Kosher certification in May 2018[68] and Halal certification in December 2018.[69]

In 2019, TIME listed the Impossible Burger 2.0 as one of the 100 Best Inventions of 2019.[70] That same year, Engadget awarded the Impossible Burger the titles of 'Most Impactful Product' and 'Best of the Best' at CES 2019.[71] Further, at COP25, Impossible Foods received a UN Global Climate Action Award in the category of 'Planetary Health'.[72]

In 2020, TIME listed Impossible Pork as one of the 100 Best Inventions of 2020.[73]

LightLife, a brand of meat analogues, criticized its competitors Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods in an open letter published in The New York Times, asking that these companies reduce their use of "hyperprocessed" ingredients.[74] Impossible Foods responded by calling it a "disingenuous, desperate disinformation campaign".[75]

The Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF), a nonprofit advocacy group that has received funding from the meat industry, has targeted Impossible Foods and other meat analogue producers through advertising, including a commercial during Super Bowl LIV, criticizing meat analogues for using additives. Impossible Foods quickly answered with a parody commercial highlighting that fecal bacteria has been found in ground beef.[76][77]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Impossible Foods

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Impossible Foods, Inc. is an American biotechnology company founded in 2011 by Patrick O. Brown, a biochemist and professor emeritus of biochemistry at Stanford University, that engineers plant-based substitutes for animal-derived meat products using molecular analysis to replicate their sensory qualities. The company's core innovation involves soy leghemoglobin, a heme protein genetically engineered via yeast fermentation from soy genes, which imparts the bloody juiciness and umami flavor characteristic of cooked meat, enabling products like the Impossible Burger to closely mimic ground beef. Launched commercially in 2016, the Impossible Burger became the flagship product, expanding to retail and partnerships with major chains such as Burger King for the Impossible Whopper—though Restaurant Brands International's CEO indicated in 2023 that further plant-based expansion is not a current priority—driving widespread adoption in the plant-based meat category. Impossible Foods has since developed additional offerings including plant-based sausage, chicken nuggets, and pork substitutes, all formulated from ingredients like soy protein, coconut oil, and potato protein to achieve texture and nutrition profiles comparable to animal meats. The company has raised over $2 billion in funding from investors including Temasek and UBS, achieving a valuation estimated at $7 billion following its 2021 Series H funding round reflecting investor confidence in its potential to disrupt the $1.5 trillion global meat industry despite market challenges for plant-based alternatives, though secondary market share prices have since declined sharply, with employee shares down 89% since 2021. Brown established Impossible Foods to address the environmental footprint of livestock agriculture, which occupies nearly half of global habitable land and contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions, by creating affordable, nutritious alternatives that eliminate the need for animal farming without compromising consumer satisfaction. However, the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in heme production sparked regulatory scrutiny, including lawsuits from groups like the Center for Food Safety challenging the FDA's 2018 determination of soy leghemoglobin as generally recognized as safe (GRAS), though federal courts upheld the approval in 2021 citing substantial evidence of safety. Critics have also raised concerns over limited long-term health data and early animal testing for heme, though the company maintains rigorous safety protocols and transparency in its formulations.

Founding and Early Development

Establishment and Founding Principles

Patrick O. Brown, a biochemist and Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator at Stanford University, founded Impossible Foods in July 2011 after securing a $9 million Series A investment from Khosla Ventures. Brown's decision to establish the company followed a 2009 sabbatical during which he redirected his research from cancer biology toward sustainable food systems, motivated by livestock production's contributions to greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, and biodiversity loss. The core founding principle was to eliminate animal agriculture by developing plant-based products that replicate meat's essential characteristics—taste, texture, nutrition, and cooking behavior—using scientific reverse-engineering rather than mere imitation. Brown articulated the mission as transforming the global food system to end reliance on animals for protein, asserting that animal-derived meat would become obsolete within decades through superior plant-based alternatives that reduce environmental harm without compromising consumer satisfaction. This approach prioritized empirical analysis of meat's molecular components, such as heme proteins for flavor and juiciness, over ethical or health arguments alone, though Brown emphasized livestock's disproportionate resource intensity as a causal driver of planetary degradation. Maraxi, Inc., rebranded to Impossible Foods in 2013 with assistance from Lexicon Branding, was incorporated in 2011 with an emphasis on reverse-engineering ground beef, prioritizing molecules essential for meat's taste, texture, and cooking behavior over nutritional mimicry. The rebranding to "Impossible Foods" later prompted trademark disputes, including opposition from Impossible X LLC leading to a 2021 declaratory judgment lawsuit by Impossible Foods, which remains pending as of early 2026 with core issues unresolved despite partial summary judgment, prompted counterclaims from Impossible X LLC and its principal Joel Runyon, whom Impossible Foods sued personally via an amended complaint, and involved attempts to cancel several Impossible X trademarks directly at the USPTO (with TTAB proceedings stayed pending the lawsuit); additionally, a failed 2025 challenge against Impossible Bakers' EU trademark. Impossible Foods' establishment reflected Brown's first-principles reasoning that food preferences are learned and malleable, allowing innovation to disrupt entrenched demand for animal products if alternatives match or exceed them in appeal and affordability. The company assembled a team of scientists to focus on scalable, nutrient-dense formulations derived from plants like soy and potatoes, with initial efforts centered on the burger as a high-impact entry point due to its cultural significance and environmental footprint. This framework eschewed incremental vegan substitutes in favor of direct replacement, aiming for market dominance through technological superiority rather than niche appeal.

Initial Research and Product Milestones

Patrick O. Brown, a biochemist and professor at Stanford University, began initial research into plant-based meat alternatives in 2009 during a sabbatical, driven by concerns over the environmental footprint of livestock production, which accounts for approximately 15% of global greenhouse gas emissions. He shifted focus from public awareness campaigns to engineering consumer-acceptable products that replicate meat's sensory attributes without animals. Maraxi, Inc., later rebranded to Impossible Foods, was incorporated in 2011 with an emphasis on reverse-engineering ground beef, prioritizing molecules essential for meat's taste, texture, and cooking behavior over nutritional mimicry. A pivotal discovery involved heme, an iron-carrying molecule that enables the Maillard reaction for savory flavors, meaty aroma, and "bleeding" juiciness during cooking; the company sourced it from soy leghemoglobin, a protein naturally produced by soybean root nodules to bind oxygen for nitrogen fixation. To produce heme at scale, Impossible Foods genetically engineered the yeast Pichia pastoris to express soy leghemoglobin via fermentation, yielding a sustainable, plant-derived analog without animal-derived ingredients. Over five years of iterative development, the team refined formulations using proteins like soy protein concentrate, coconut oil for fat marbling, and binders for structure, testing prototypes for sensory equivalence to beef. The first commercial product, the Impossible Burger—a patty composed primarily of soy protein, potato protein, sunflower oil, and coconut oil infused with heme—debuted in July 2016 at Momofuku Nishi restaurant in New York City, marking the initial public milestone after limited chef tastings. To support expansion, Impossible Foods opened its first dedicated production facility in Oakland, California, in March 2017, capable of manufacturing one million pounds of product monthly and enabling broader restaurant distribution. This infrastructure addressed early supply constraints, facilitating growth from niche availability to partnerships with major chains.

Technology and Production

Core Innovations in Plant-Based Meat Simulation

Impossible Foods' primary innovation in simulating animal meat lies in the incorporation of heme, an iron-containing molecule derived from soy leghemoglobin, which replicates the sensory attributes of beef such as its reddish color, juicy "bleed," and savory flavor during cooking. Heme, naturally abundant in animal muscle cells via myoglobin, facilitates oxygen binding and, upon heating, undergoes reactions with amino acids and sugars to produce the Maillard browning compounds responsible for meat's characteristic aroma and taste; Impossible Foods identified this molecule through comparative chemical analysis of meat versus plant materials, determining it as essential for mimicking these properties without animal-derived components. To produce heme at scale, the company genetically engineers yeast (Pichia pastoris) by inserting the gene for soy leghemoglobin, a protein found in soybean root nodules that binds heme similarly to animal versions, enabling fermentation-based synthesis rather than extraction from plants, which would be inefficient for commercial volumes. This process yields a heme preparation added to plant-based patties at concentrations approximating those in ground beef, allowing uncooked products to exhibit a pink hue that browns and releases moisture mimicking blood juices when seared. United States Patent US9700067B2, granted in 2017, covers compositions using such heme-containing leghemoglobins combined with flavor precursors to enhance aroma profiles, underscoring the patented method's role in generating meat-like volatiles. Beyond heme, texture simulation relies on soy protein isolate and concentrate, processed through high-moisture extrusion to form aligned fibers that replicate the fibrous structure of muscle tissue, providing chewiness and structural integrity under cooking stress without crumbling. This extrusion technique, adapted from existing plant protein technologies, integrates with binders like methylcellulose to retain moisture and fats (from coconut and sunflower oils), ensuring the product sizzles and contracts similarly to beef by expanding steam pockets during heating. These elements collectively address meat's multimodal sensory experience—visual bleed from heme oxidation, tactile firmness from protein matrices, and olfactory cues from thermal reactions—differentiating Impossible's approach from earlier plant-based analogs lacking such biochemical fidelity.

Key Ingredients and Manufacturing Process

The primary ingredients in Impossible Foods' flagship product, Impossible Beef, include water, soy protein concentrate, coconut oil, sunflower oil, and soy leghemoglobin, with additional components such as potato protein, methylcellulose, yeast extract, cultured dextrose, food starch, soy protein isolate, malic acid, sunflower lecithin, mixed tocopherols, and various vitamins and minerals including niacin, pyridoxine hydrochloride, thiamine hydrochloride, riboflavin, and folic acid. Soy protein concentrate serves as the main structural protein to mimic meat texture, while coconut and sunflower oils provide fat content for cooking sizzle and juiciness. Potato protein and methylcellulose act as binders to maintain form during preparation. Soy leghemoglobin, a heme protein derived from genetically modified yeast, is the key ingredient enabling the product's meat-like flavor, aroma, and red color that "bleeds" when cooked, replicating animal blood's role in myoglobin. This heme is produced through precision fermentation: yeast (Komagataella phaffii, formerly Pichia pastoris) is engineered with a soy leghemoglobin gene, then cultured in fermenters with sugars and nutrients to biosynthesize the protein, which is purified and added at up to 0.8% in ground beef analogues. The FDA determined this soy leghemoglobin preparation as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) in 2018 based on Impossible Foods' submitted data, though it noted the determination relies on the notifier's evidence rather than an independent affirmation. Manufacturing begins with sourcing plant-based components, followed by separate production of heme via the fermentation process, which resembles beer brewing in scalability and efficiency but uses genetic engineering for targeted output. The ingredients are then blended, extruded or mixed to form a textured matrix simulating ground meat, and shaped into patties, grounds, or other forms without animal-derived elements. This plant-only composition avoids cholesterol and relies on added nutrients to approximate beef's profile, with the overall process designed for industrial-scale production to reduce resource intensity compared to livestock farming, per company assertions.

Product Line Development

Impossible Foods' product line originated with the Impossible Burger, a plant-based patty designed to replicate the sensory attributes of ground beef through the use of soy leghemoglobin-derived heme for the characteristic "bleeding" and umami flavor upon cooking. The product debuted on July 26, 2016, at Momofuku Nishi restaurant in New York City, following five years of research iterations focused on texture, taste, and nutritional profile using soy protein concentrate, coconut oil, and potato protein. Initial availability was limited to select high-end restaurants to build chef endorsements and consumer familiarity before broader foodservice rollout. Subsequent refinements to the flagship burger addressed early criticisms of mouthfeel and ingredient profile. In January 2019, Impossible Foods announced the Impossible Burger 2.0, incorporating formulation changes such as reduced sodium, removal of gluten-containing wheat, and adjusted coconut oil ratios to enhance sizzle, juiciness, and beef-like aroma during cooking; this version achieved 21 grams of protein per serving and became available to U.S. restaurants via distributors starting February 2020. A further iteration, Impossible Burger 3.0, eliminated gluten entirely, increased iron and protein content, and optimized fat distribution for improved caramelization, supporting retail expansion into grocery stores beginning September 2019 at chains like Gelson's Markets and scaling to Kroger's 1,700 locations by May 2020. These updates stemmed from consumer feedback and sensory testing, prioritizing scalability for mass production while maintaining the core heme technology. Product diversification beyond beef began in 2020, extending the proprietary heme system to simulate other animal proteins amid growing demand for alternatives in the plant-based category. At CES on January 7, 2020, the company unveiled Impossible Pork, a versatile ground pork mimic for applications like meatballs and breakfast patties, and Impossible Sausage, available in savory and hot Italian varieties; these marked the first new protein lines since the burger's debut, using similar plant-based binders and fats to achieve marbling and tenderness. Sausage expanded internationally to Asia in September 2020, while pork targeted foodservice initially before grocery availability in select markets by fall 2021. Further expansion into poultry occurred with Impossible Chicken, launched in U.S. restaurants on September 7, 2021, featuring shredded and nugget formats derived from soy protein and sunflower oil to emulate crispy texture and neutral flavor for diverse preparations. By late 2023, the lineup included seven core offerings—beef, sausage, chicken, pork, meatballs, hot dogs, and packaged meals—alongside specialized items like Impossible Beef Lite for reduced saturated fat. In October 2024, Impossible Foods introduced family-oriented retail products, including rebranded Chicken Nuggets themed with Disney's The Lion King, plant-based corn dogs, and meal maker kits with ground beef, emphasizing convenience and kid appeal amid competitive pressures in the category. This progression reflects iterative R&D investments, including a 2020 doubling of the science team to accelerate formulations across meat types, though nutritional variances persist compared to animal counterparts, such as higher sodium in some processed variants.

Regulatory Approvals and Safety

FDA GRAS Designation and Initial Clearances

In September 2014, Impossible Foods submitted an initial GRAS notice to the FDA asserting that soy leghemoglobin (SLH), a heme protein produced via genetically engineered Pichia pastoris yeast and used to impart meat-like flavor and appearance to plant-based products, was safe for its intended use in meat analogues. The company followed this with a formal GRAS notification (GRN 000737) on October 3, 2017, providing data from toxicology studies, including a 28-day oral toxicity study in rats at doses up to 10% of the diet, compositional analysis, and allergenicity assessments, concluding that the SLH preparation was GRAS through scientific procedures for use at up to 0.8% by weight in ground beef analogue products. On July 23, 2018, the FDA issued a "no questions" letter in response to GRN 000737, signifying that the agency had reviewed the submitted evidence and did not object to Impossible Foods' determination that SLH was generally recognized as safe for the specified use. The GRAS designation for SLH as an ingredient enabled broader incorporation into formulated foods, but separate regulatory clearance was required for its function as a color additive in uncooked plant-based meat products intended for retail sale, due to its role in producing a "bleeding" effect mimicking raw beef. Impossible Foods petitioned the FDA accordingly, and on July 30, 2019, the agency approved SLH as a color additive exempt from certification, permitting its safe use at concentrations not exceeding 0.8% (about 4.0 mg heme per 100 g) in ground beef analogue products, based on evaluation of manufacturing processes, dietary exposure estimates (averaging 25–83 mg/day for heme), and prior GRAS safety data. This approval, published in the Federal Register on August 1, 2019, with an effective date of December 17, 2019, cleared the path for Impossible Foods to launch uncooked Impossible Burgers in grocery stores starting in September 2019. Prior to these formal clearances, Impossible Foods had introduced the Impossible Burger in select restaurants in July 2016, where products were cooked on-site, obviating the need for pre-market color additive approval as the items were not sold raw to consumers; the company's self-affirmed GRAS status for SLH, supported by internal safety studies, sufficed for this limited distribution channel. These initial FDA designations marked key milestones, affirming SLH's safety profile amid scrutiny over its novel production method and potential for trace residuals from yeast fermentation, though critics like the Center for Food Safety questioned the adequacy of submitted toxicology data, alleging overlooked adverse effects in rodent studies. Subsequent judicial review in 2021 upheld the FDA's approvals against challenges. In December 2019, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a final rule approving soy leghemoglobin (SLH), the genetically engineered heme protein central to Impossible Foods' products, as a color additive exempt from certification, enabling its use in uncooked plant-based meats sold in grocery stores. This followed the company's initial GRAS notice for SLH in cooked applications, which the FDA accepted without questions in 2018. The approval prompted a legal challenge from the Center for Food Safety (CFS), an advocacy group critical of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), which filed a lawsuit in March 2020 asserting that the FDA applied an incorrect legal standard under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act by treating SLH as a color additive rather than requiring full food additive review with long-term animal toxicity studies. CFS argued that the agency's reliance on short-term data and the company's self-affirmed GRAS determination overlooked potential health risks, including allergenicity and metabolic effects from the novel protein produced via yeast fermentation. Impossible Foods countered that extensive safety testing, including 90-day rodent studies showing no adverse effects at high doses, supported the approval, and the product complied with all U.S. regulations. In May 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the FDA's decision, ruling that the agency had not acted arbitrarily and that CFS failed to demonstrate procedural flaws warranting vacatur, thereby upholding SLH's status for raw applications. No further successful U.S. regulatory reversals occurred, though the litigation highlighted ongoing scrutiny from GMO-skeptical groups over the adequacy of pre-market testing for bioengineered ingredients. In March 2022, Impossible Foods filed a lawsuit against Motif FoodWorks in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of patents covering the use of heme proteins in plant-based meat products. Motif responded by filing Inter Partes Review petitions with the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board challenging the validity of Impossible's patents. In June 2024, the PTAB invalidated claims in at least one Impossible Foods patent. The parties settled the dispute in September 2024, dismissing the claims. Internationally, Impossible Foods encountered delays in securing approvals for SLH due to stringent GMO and novel food regulations. In the European Union, the ingredient required authorization as a novel food under Regulation (EU) 2015/2283, with panels assessing safety data on composition, toxicology, and allergenicity. By June 2024, the European Food Safety Authority cleared initial safety hurdles, but final European Commission approval remained pending as of mid-2025, attributed to member state reviews and GMO labeling requirements that could impact market entry. Similar hurdles arose in the United Kingdom post-Brexit, where the Food Standards Agency process was described as protracted, delaying commercial launches despite parallel progress in other regions like Singapore. These regulatory timelines reflected broader challenges for GMO-derived food additives in jurisdictions prioritizing precautionary assessments over self-affirmed safety notices.

Business Operations and Expansion

Financing History and Valuation

Impossible Foods, founded in July 2011, has raised approximately $2.01 billion across more than a dozen funding rounds from over 50 investors, including venture firms like Khosla Ventures and institutional players such as Temasek Holdings, UBS, and Mirae Asset Global Investments. Early backers also encompassed high-profile individuals like Bill Gates through the Breakthrough Energy Ventures fund and Google Ventures. These investments supported research, scaling production, and market expansion amid rising demand for plant-based alternatives in the late 2010s. Initial funding began with a seed round on September 11, 2011, followed by a Series B round of $25 million on July 17, 2013, led by Khosla Ventures. Subsequent early-to-mid-stage rounds included a Series D of $108 million in September 2015 and a Series E of $300 million around 2017, which enabled product development and initial commercialization efforts. Later rounds reflected heightened investor interest in alternative proteins: a $500 million Series F in March 2020 led by Mirae Asset Global Investments, which valued the company at approximately $4 billion post-money; and a $500 million Series H in November 2021, again led by Mirae Asset, with reported post-money valuations ranging from $7 billion to $7.5 billion based on share pricing in the round. No primary funding rounds have been announced since 2021, coinciding with cooling enthusiasm for the plant-based meat sector amid slower consumer adoption and competitive pressures. As of October 2025, secondary market estimates place the company's valuation at approximately $481 million, reflecting private transaction data rather than a new primary round or public listing, which remains unconfirmed despite prior speculation.

Market Availability and Distribution Channels

Impossible Foods products are primarily distributed through retail grocery stores and foodservice channels in the United States, with availability in approximately 35,000 retail locations as of mid-2025. Key retail partners include Kroger, which began stocking Impossible products in May 2020 to provide customers access to plant-based options. Expansion into supermarkets and hypermarkets has been a dominant distribution channel, reflecting broader trends in the plant-based meat sector. In foodservice, Impossible Burgers gained prominence through partnerships with major restaurant chains, starting with Burger King's nationwide rollout of the Impossible Whopper in summer 2019. By 2023, however, Restaurant Brands International CEO Josh Kobza stated that plant-based options were “not a big part of the current focus.” Subsequent collaborations include Red Robin in March 2019, the largest chain partnership at the time, MrBeast Burger in November 2021, which offered Impossible Burgers comprising approximately 3% of sales per MrBeast, and IHOP in September 2023, introducing plant-based sausage patties and burgers across 1,700 U.S. locations. Production and distribution for these channels were scaled via a 2019 partnership with OSI Group, a global food supplier. Internationally, Impossible Foods entered markets including Canada, the United Arab Emirates, Australia, and New Zealand in 2021. The company launched in the United Kingdom with availability in chicken shops and other outlets, followed by plans to expand plant-based burgers into broader European retail and foodservice networks in 2025 after meeting with UK retailers. Distribution relies on similar retail and restaurant partnerships abroad, though scaled more gradually compared to the U.S.; for example, Hopdoddy Burger Bar discontinued the Impossible Burger in August 2021 by switching to Beyond Meat as its exclusive plant-based option and removed all plant-based meat analogs from its menu in September 2023, in April 2025 Habit Burger & Grill discontinued the Impossible Burger nationwide, and in November 2025 White Castle discontinued the Impossible Slider, selling through existing inventory without reordering.

Operational Challenges and Restructuring

In 2022 and 2023, Impossible Foods encountered significant operational pressures amid a broader slowdown in the plant-based meat sector, characterized by declining consumer demand and inventory overhang at retailers. The company responded with multiple rounds of workforce reductions to streamline operations and align resources with revised growth priorities. In October 2022, under new CEO Peter McGuinness, formerly president and COO of Chobani, Impossible Foods eliminated approximately 6% of its staff—fewer than 50 positions—as part of an organizational reorganization aimed at enhancing efficiency and focusing on core product expansion. McGuinness stated that upon his arrival, the company was losing $1.5 million per day. These efforts intensified in January 2023, when the company laid off 20% of its workforce, affecting around 140 employees, marking the second major cut within a year. Employees who remained saw the value of their shares tumble 89% later that year. Management attributed the reductions to the need to address financial challenges stemming from reduced sales volumes and to reposition the business for long-term viability in a competitive market where plant-based alternatives struggled to maintain early-pandemic momentum. U.S. plant-based meat sales fell 9% overall in 2024, with refrigerated categories like burgers dropping 22.8%, exacerbating pressures on producers like Impossible Foods. In 2024, amid these pressures, Impossible Foods launched a new brand identity to better attract meat eaters, featuring meatier packaging and messaging focused on craveability. To mitigate pricing as a barrier to adoption, Impossible Foods implemented aggressive cost reductions for distributors and retailers, including a 15% cut to foodservice prices in early 2021 and subsequent 20% retail price drops, seeking parity with conventional beef. Earlier supply constraints, such as 2019 production shortages driven by surging demand rather than ingredient sourcing, highlighted scaling vulnerabilities tied to specialized components like soy leghemoglobin. In April 2024, Impossible Foods launched Impossible Ranch, converting a 70-acre former cattle ranch in South Carolina to cultivate crops such as soybeans and sunflowers for its products, while providing a sanctuary for rescued cattle, as a model for sustainable ingredient production. In August 2024, Impossible Foods launched "Impossible Quality Meats," a brick-and-mortar concept inside the xMarket food hall in Chicago, which closed in November 2024 following the food hall's shutdown. By 2025, investor sentiment reflected persistent challenges, evidenced by secondary market valuations for Impossible Foods shares that had plummeted over 90% from prior peaks, despite projections of private revenue growth and underscoring doubts about sustained profitability. Leadership transitions began with CFO David Lee departing in January 2021, but accelerated after Peter McGuinness took the helm, followed in 2022 by Chief Experience Officer Steve Turner in May, President Dennis Woodside in September, and vice presidents Jim Laumann (global real estate and workplace), Neha Singhania (strategic partnerships), Uday Idnani (sales and operations planning), Jennifer Hall (talent acquisition), Nikki Mostafavi (finance), and Tyler Jameson (government relations). Founder Pat Brown moved from CEO to Chief Visionary Officer in March 2022, then to leading the research division Impossible Labs in September 2022, followed by a leave of absence in November 2022; by 2024, Brown had shifted focus to a carbon ranch rewilding project in Arkansas. Executive departures extended into 2024 and 2025, including CMO Leslie Sims in September 2024 and Chief of Staff Nate Gorence, who joined Bridger Photonics. In October 2025, Chief People Officer Emma Hutchens left, alongside Senior Vice President of Sales Alexis Regan (who joined Graza), CFO Elaine Paik, CSO Sunil Chandran, and Chief Demand Officer Sherene Jagla, each taking positions at other firms. Overall, the announced restructurings and layoffs emphasized cost discipline over expansion, while ongoing leadership transitions and executive departures highlighted persistent challenges, though the company's private status restricted public access to detailed financial metrics. In January 2026, CEO Peter McGuinness announced his departure from Impossible Foods, with no immediate replacement named; the executive leadership team will manage operations in the interim. He subsequently joined Bel Group, an international dairy company, as chief executive of Bel North America.

Environmental and Sustainability Assertions

Company's Claims on Resource Efficiency

Impossible Foods maintains that its plant-based products achieve significant resource efficiencies relative to animal-derived meats, primarily through reduced demands on land, water, and energy in production. The company states that substituting Impossible Beef for conventional beef results in approximately 96% less land usage, 92% less water consumption, and 91% fewer greenhouse gas emissions, based on a comparative lifecycle analysis (LCA) of industrial beef production. These assertions position the Impossible Burger as requiring 96% less land and 87% less water than a traditional beef patty, while emitting 89% fewer greenhouse gases, figures the company has publicized since its product launch in 2016 and reiterated in sustainability reports. The company's claims extend to other metrics, including 92% fewer aquatic pollutants from Impossible Burger production compared to beef, derived from the same LCA framework that accounts for inputs like soy cultivation, processing, and transportation against beef's feed, rearing, and slaughter stages. Impossible Foods further quantifies impacts via an online calculator tool, which estimates annual resource savings for consumers switching to its products, assuming one-to-one displacement of animal meat; for instance, it projects reductions in land and water footprints scaled to individual consumption patterns. For products like Impossible Sausage, the firm reports 24% lower greenhouse gases, 24% less land, and 55% reduced water footprint versus pork sausage, though these vary by specific formulation and supply chain assumptions. These efficiency claims underpin Impossible Foods' broader narrative of mitigating agricultural resource strain, with the company attributing gains to heme protein (leghemoglobin) enabling meat-like yields from plant sources without animal metabolic inefficiencies. However, the LCAs rely on modeled data and specific baselines for conventional meat, which the firm acknowledges may fluctuate with real-world farming practices.

Empirical Assessments of Environmental Impact

A 2019 cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) commissioned by Impossible Foods from the consultancy Quantis, using ISO 14044 standards and data from ecoinvent v3.3, quantified the production impacts of the Impossible Burger relative to a conventional U.S. ground beef burger. The analysis reported that one kilogram of Impossible Burger generates 3.5 kg CO₂-equivalent in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, compared to 30.6 kg for beef (89% reduction); requires 2.5 m²-years of land occupation versus 62 m²-years (96% less); and consumes 107 liters of water versus 850 liters (87% less). Aquatic eutrophication was also 92% lower at 1.28 g PO₄-equivalent versus 15.1 g.
Impact CategoryImpossible Burger (per kg)Beef Burger (per kg)Reduction
GHG Emissions (kg CO₂e)3.530.689%
Land Use (m²-year)2.56296%
Water Consumption (L)10785087%
Peer-reviewed LCAs of plant-based patties, while not always specifying the Impossible Burger, align with substantial but variable reductions against beef baselines. A 2024 UK case study published in Sustainability found a generic plant-based burger with 65% lower global warming potential, 82% reduced land use, and 45% less water consumption than beef. Similarly, a 2021 analysis in Sustainable Production and Consumption reported plant-based patties incurring 77% lower climate change burdens than beef patties from Brazil or Ireland, though with 8% higher primary energy demand; per nutritional density units, impacts were 81-87% lower for climate change. These studies emphasize cradle-to-gate scopes and U.S. or European production contexts, often assuming soy sourcing from established croplands without full indirect land-use change accounting. Critiques of these LCAs highlight limitations in assumptions and data granularity that may overstate benefits. Commissioned analyses like Quantis's rely on modeled U.S. beef averages excluding more efficient or regenerative systems, potentially inflating relative gains; independent verification of Impossible's supply chain, including soy from regions with historical deforestation risks, remains incomplete, complicating eutrophication and biodiversity metrics. A 2022 review noted that while plant-based alternatives average 50% lower overall footprints than animal proteins, processing-intensive formulations can elevate energy and acidification impacts beyond simple plant foods. Scope 3 emissions transparency gaps persist, as plant-based firms report limited indirect data compared to livestock sector disclosures. Empirical evidence thus supports net environmental advantages over conventional beef in core metrics, contingent on validated substitution effects and sourcing improvements.

Controversies and Scientific Debates

Genetic Engineering and GMO Criticisms

Impossible Foods employs genetic engineering to produce soy leghemoglobin (SLH), the key ingredient imparting a meat-like taste and appearance to products like the Impossible Burger, by inserting soybean genes into the yeast Pichia pastoris (now classified as Komagataella phaffii), resulting in a genetically modified organism that ferments the protein. The base ingredients, including soy protein concentrate, are also derived from genetically modified soybeans. Critics from anti-GMO advocacy organizations, such as the Center for Food Safety (CFS), argue that the company's self-affirmation of SLH as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) exploits a regulatory loophole under the U.S. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, bypassing rigorous pre-market FDA approval required for novel food additives. In June 2019, CFS highlighted that this pathway allowed Impossible Foods to introduce a substance never previously consumed by humans without comprehensive toxicology data, and the group initiated legal action challenging the GRAS process for such synthetic biology-derived ingredients. The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) has similarly critiqued the FDA's 2018 consultation on SLH as inadequate, asserting in September 2019 that the reviewed rat feeding studies omitted critical endpoints linked to cancer risk, such as inflammation and cell proliferation markers, potentially underestimating long-term toxicity from chronic exposure. CSPI emphasized that while short-term studies showed no acute effects, the absence of multi-generational or carcinogenicity testing leaves uncertainties about subtle genetic or metabolic disruptions from engineered proteins. Allergenicity concerns center on SLH's derivation from soy, a known top allergen, with initial FDA memos in 2015 flagging insufficient data on hypersensitivity risks before granting consultation clearance. Although a 2017 peer-reviewed evaluation using bioinformatics and in vitro digestion assays concluded low allergenicity potential due to no sequence homology with major allergens and rapid pepsin breakdown, critics like CFS maintain that real-world human trials are lacking, and the novel fermentation process could introduce trace yeast proteins or unintended modifications amplifying risks for soy-sensitive individuals. A 2020 study on a refined production strain reaffirmed digestibility but did not address population-level allergy prevalence. Broader objections invoke first-principles risks of genetic engineering, including off-target mutations or horizontal gene transfer from GMO yeast, though empirical evidence from regulatory dossiers shows no such occurrences in controlled production. Advocacy analyses, such as those from Testbiotech in May 2025, accuse bodies like the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) of withholding raw data on SLH trials, fueling skepticism about transparency in assessing environmental persistence or ecological impacts from scaled GMO yeast cultivation. These critiques often emanate from groups with histories of opposing biotechnology, contrasting with peer-reviewed consensus on GMO safety but underscoring debates over precautionary testing burdens.

Health and Toxicity Concerns

Critics have raised concerns over the safety of soy leghemoglobin (SLH), the genetically engineered heme protein central to Impossible Foods' products for mimicking meat's bloody juiciness, citing inadequate long-term toxicology data in the FDA's 2018 GRAS determination. The FDA concluded that SLH was safe based on a 28-day rat study showing no adverse effects at doses up to 9.4% of diet (equivalent to over 300 times human exposure levels), alongside bioinformatics analyses indicating low allergenicity risk due to no significant sequence homology with known allergens. However, advocacy groups like the Center for Food Safety, which opposes GMOs, argued that the self-affirmed GRAS process bypassed rigorous pre-market review and omitted multi-generational or chronic exposure studies recommended for high-concern novel proteins, potentially overlooking subtle toxicities like inflammation or hormonal effects from sustained heme intake. Subsequent regulatory assessments have largely affirmed safety. In 2019, the FDA approved SLH as a color additive after additional review, finding it safe at up to 0.8% in plant-based meats, with no evidence of genotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, or carcinogenicity in available data. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in June 2024 evaluated SLH from genetically modified yeast and concluded it poses no safety concerns as a food additive at proposed levels, based on compositional analysis, in vitro digestion studies, and absence of toxicological signals in rodent models. Health Canada issued no objection to its use in 2022, aligning with these findings. A 2023 study published in Food and Chemical Toxicology tested SLH preparations in rats at doses simulating human consumption and reported no histopathological changes, altered organ weights, or clinical toxicities, supporting short-term safety. Despite approvals, some independent analyses highlight potential risks from ultra-processed formulation. Impossible products contain soy protein isolate, which may include trace phytoestrogens like isoflavones, though levels (around 20-30 mg per serving) fall below thresholds linked to endocrine disruption in human epidemiology, and no causal harm has been demonstrated at dietary intakes. High saturated fat from coconut and sunflower oils contributes to nutritional profiles comparable to or exceeding beef burgers in calories and fats per serving (e.g., 250-370 kcal, 14-19g fat for a patty), raising concerns for cardiovascular health in frequent consumers, akin to other processed foods. Elevated sodium (370-500 mg per patty) exceeds many fresh meats, potentially exacerbating hypertension risks without offsetting benefits from lower cholesterol. No peer-reviewed human trials have assessed long-term outcomes like cancer or metabolic effects from regular Impossible Foods consumption, leaving gaps in causal evidence beyond regulatory animal data. Allergen risks persist for soy-sensitive individuals, as products contain undeclared traces despite labeling.

Sustainability and Comparative Efficacy Disputes

Critics have challenged Impossible Foods' sustainability assertions by highlighting comparisons to regenerative grazing practices, which they argue achieve net environmental benefits through soil carbon sequestration that plant-based alternatives may not match. In its 2019 Impact Report, Impossible Foods described regenerative grazing as the "clean coal of meat," contending that such methods are insufficiently scalable to meet global demand and fail to substantially mitigate livestock's resource demands, citing studies by Judith Capper and the World Resources Institute. However, proponents of regenerative agriculture, including rancher Will Harris of White Oak Pastures, rebutted this by referencing a Quantis lifecycle assessment (LCA) of their operations, which reported net carbon sequestration of -3.5 kg CO2 equivalent per kg of beef produced—contrasting sharply with the 33 kg CO2e emissions for conventional beef and implying lower overall impacts than implied by Impossible's dismissal. The Savory Institute similarly argued that properly managed livestock regenerates ecosystems, enhances biodiversity, and sequesters more carbon than plant monocultures reliant on inputs like those in Impossible's soy-based products. Further disputes center on the verifiability of Impossible Foods' commissioned LCAs, which claim the Impossible Burger reduces greenhouse gas emissions by 89%, land use by 96%, and water use by 87% compared to conventional U.S. beef burgers. Independent researchers have reported difficulties replicating these findings due to insufficient disclosure of underlying data and methodologies, undermining claims of comparative efficacy. Environmental analysts, such as those at Sustainalytics, have criticized Impossible Foods and similar companies for opacity in reporting total emissions, including supply chain and waste factors, leading to sustainability ratings equivalent to those of major meat producers like JBS—described as a "severe risk" by some investor firms. Some peer-reviewed comparisons acknowledge plant-based patties' advantages in categories like climate change (77% lower burden) but note drawbacks, such as 8% higher energy use from processing, which could erode net benefits if energy sources are fossil-fuel dependent. These critiques emphasize that efficacy disputes often hinge on baselines: Impossible's analyses typically benchmark against industrial beef, potentially overstating superiority against improving animal agriculture practices, while lacking robust accounting for upstream impacts like soy deforestation or fermentation processes for heme. Overall, while empirical data supports lower average impacts for plant-based meats versus conventional beef, ongoing debates underscore the need for standardized, transparent LCAs to resolve claims of unequivocal sustainability gains.

Reception and Broader Impact

Impossible Foods achieved significant revenue growth during the late 2010s and early 2020s, driven by expanded retail distribution and partnerships with major chains like Burger King. Estimated annual sales reached approximately $460 million in 2022, marking over 50% year-over-year growth from prior years, with retail category sales expanding more than 50%. Post-2022, the company's performance aligned with broader plant-based meat sector contraction, as U.S. retail dollar sales stalled in 2022 before declining 19% in 2023 amid waning post-pandemic demand and consumer preference for traditional meats. Plant-based meat sales fell further by 7% in 2024, with refrigerated products dropping 22.8%, while overall meat sales rose. Impossible Foods' leadership has cited sector-wide marketing errors, including an overreliance on ideological appeals that alienated mainstream consumers, as a key factor in the sales downturn. Despite these pressures, the company maintained relative resilience, posting growth in frozen meat substitute sales and becoming the fastest-growing brand in that U.S. subcategory in early 2025. As a privately held firm, detailed quarterly financials remain undisclosed, but Impossible Foods signaled ongoing strategic evaluation in 2024, with CEO Peter McGuinness hinting at the possibility of selling the entire company, including potential IPO or sale within three years to capitalize on recovering segments or address valuation challenges. Consumer interest metrics showed improvement, with the share of Americans considering Impossible purchases nearly doubling year-over-year as of mid-2025.

Cultural and Industry Influence

Impossible Foods has exerted significant influence on the food industry through strategic partnerships with major fast-food chains, beginning with the nationwide launch of the Impossible Whopper at Burger King in August 2019. This collaboration marked the first time a major U.S. fast-food chain offered a plant-based burger at scale, contributing to a reported nearly 30% increase in Burger King's earnings in the period following the introduction. The partnership expanded to other outlets including White Castle, which discontinued the Impossible Slider in October 2025, IHOP, and Starbucks by 2023, where Impossible Sausage patties were added to breakfast menus across approximately 1,700 locations. These alliances helped normalize plant-based alternatives in mainstream dining, prompting competitors like Beyond Meat to secure similar deals and accelerating the entry of imitation meats into quick-service restaurants. However, production constraints prevented a partnership with McDonald's in 2020, limiting broader penetration into the world's largest fast-food chain; Beyond Meat tested the McPlant burger with McDonald's starting in 2021 and expanded in 2022, but discontinued it in the U.S. by 2024 due to low demand. The company's approach targeted carnivorous consumers rather than exclusively vegans or vegetarians, positioning products like the heme-infused Impossible Burger as direct substitutes for beef to appeal to meat enthusiasts. This strategy influenced industry marketing by emphasizing sensory mimicry—such as juiciness and flavor—over ideological appeals, fostering a flexitarian trend where occasional plant-based choices supplemented traditional meat consumption. Initially, these efforts drove sector growth, but U.S. plant-based meat retail sales reached about $1.13 billion for the 52 weeks ending April 20, 2025, down 7.5% year-over-year in dollars, contrasting earlier optimistic projections. Yet, by 2024, sales declined 9% overall and 22.8% for refrigerated categories, reflecting waning consumer enthusiasm amid perceptions of high processing and unmet sustainability expectations. Culturally, Impossible Foods contributed to mainstreaming discussions on alternative proteins, engaging younger demographics like Gen Z through school cafeterias and education on animal agriculture's ecological footprint starting around 2021. The brand's rise to a $2 billion valuation in 2019 was buoyed by environmental consciousness among urban and progressive consumers, yet CEO Peter McGuinness later critiqued the plant-based sector's pivot toward partisan and "woke" messaging, which he argued alienated broader audiences and contributed to its current lack of vogue. By 2024, the company shifted focus from climate claims to product performance, acknowledging that overt sustainability narratives failed to sustain demand. This evolution underscores a cultural backlash against highly processed "fake meats," with industry analysts noting subdued growth projections of 1-2% for 2023 onward.

References

  1. https://impossiblefoods.com/company
  2. https://med.stanford.edu/profiles/patrick-brown
  3. https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/impossible-foods
  4. https://faq.impossiblefoods.com/hc/en-us/articles/360019100013-What-is-Impossible-Foods
  5. https://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Article/2018/07/24/FDA-has-no-further-questions-over-the-safety-of-Impossible-Foods-star-ingredient/
  6. https://research.contrary.com/company/impossible-foods
  7. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-11-03/burger-king-won-t-offer-more-us-plant-based-options-in-near-term
  8. https://tracxn.com/d/companies/impossible-foods/__BPXOmdjGDEI5Ot3ImXm-Gm9dTyu6Y48quOGr8ATLadA/funding-and-investors
  9. https://tsginvest.com/impossiblefoods/
  10. https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/IMPF.PVT/
  11. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-06-13/value-of-workers-shares-of-impossible-foods-down-89-since-2021
  12. https://www.primarymarkets.com/trading-company/impossible-foods/
  13. https://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/press-releases/6256/lawsuit-challenging-fda-approval-of-novel-genetically-engineered-color-additive-that-makes-impossible-burger-bleed-moves-forward
  14. https://impossiblefoods.com/blog/setting-the-record-straight-regarding-the-center-for-food-safety-impossible-foods-long-standing-track-record-of-safety-and-transparency
  15. https://www.theverge.com/2021/5/3/22418036/impossible-foods-legal-battle-key-ingredient-heme-fda
  16. https://organicconsumers.org/tell-the-fda-the-impossible-burgers-gmo-heme-should-be-safety-tested/
  17. https://www.climateandcapitalmedia.com/people-directory/patrick-brown/
  18. https://www.climateone.org/people/patrick-o-brown
  19. https://medium.com/impossible-foods/the-mission-that-motivates-us-d4d7de61665
  20. https://impossiblefoods.com/mission
  21. https://scet.berkeley.edu/founder-ceo-impossible-foods/
  22. https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/97319-89
  23. https://www.lexiconbranding.com/case-studies/startup-branding-rebrand-impossible-foods/
  24. https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/09/12/21-16977.pdf
  25. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59791788/impossible-foods-inc-v-impossible-x-llc/
  26. https://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?pno=91266170&pty=OPP
  27. https://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/article/impossible-appeal-general-court-finds-no-likelihood-of-confusion
  28. https://www.foodbusinessnews.net/articles/11646-an-inside-look-at-impossible-foods
  29. https://faq.impossiblefoods.com/hc/en-us/articles/360019100553-What-is-soy-leghemoglobin-or-heme
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5956568/
  31. https://impossiblefoods.com/media/news-releases/2017/03/oakland-production-plant
  32. https://www.wired.com/story/the-impossible-burger/
  33. https://asm.org/articles/2019/may/the-microbial-reasons-why-the-impossible-burger-ta
  34. https://sciencemeetsfood.org/plant-based-burgers/
  35. https://patentpc.com/blog/patents-that-secured-impossible-foods-plant-based-meat-technology
  36. https://patents.google.com/patent/US9700067B2/en
  37. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-021-00099-y
  38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356664184_The_Impossible_Burger
  39. https://faq.impossiblefoods.com/hc/en-us/articles/360018937494-What-are-the-ingredients-in-Impossible-Beef-Meat-From-Plants
  40. https://impossiblefoods.com/nutrition/plant-based-impossible-ingredients
  41. https://www.fda.gov/media/116243/download
  42. https://hfpappexternal.fda.gov/scripts/fdcc/index.cfm?set=GRASNotices&id=737
  43. https://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Article/2018/07/24/FDA-has-no-further-questions-over-the-safety-of-Impossible-Foods-star-ingredient
  44. https://www.hudsonalpha.org/the-genetics-of-the-impossible-burger/
  45. https://www.rutgers.edu/news/how-impossible-burger-got-its-remarkable-start-rutgers
  46. https://www.businessofbusiness.com/articles/impossible-foods-plant-based-burgers-milk-food-industry-trend-data/
  47. https://www.foodbusinessnews.net/articles/13132-introducing-the-impossible-burger-20
  48. https://vegnews.com/guides/impossible-foods-guide
  49. https://www.supermarketnews.com/organic-natural/impossible-burger-debuts-at-1-700-kroger-stores
  50. https://impossiblefoods.com/media/news-releases/2020/01/impossible-foods-showcases-new-products-ces-2020
  51. https://www.fooddive.com/news/impossible-foods-to-sell-pork-and-sausage-made-from-plants/569882/
  52. https://impossiblefoods.com/media/news-releases/2020/09/impossible-sausage-made-from-plants-makes-its-international-debut-in-asia
  53. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/07/impossible-foods-launches-chicken-substitute-in-us-restaurants.html
  54. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241008457031/en/Impossible-Foods-Launches-3-New-Family-Friendly-Retail-Products-Reimagines-Best-Selling1-Chicken-Nuggets-with-Impossible-Disney-The-Lion-King-Chicken-Nuggets
  55. https://impossiblefoods.com/media/news-releases/2020/10/impossible-foods-is-doubling-its-r-and-d-team-and-seeking-worlds-best-scientists-to-help-eliminate-animal-agriculture
  56. https://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/files/2019-10-21-fda-letter-re-impossible-foods_47809.pdf
  57. https://www.regulations.gov/document/FDA-2018-C-4464-0002
  58. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/fda-brief/fda-brief-fda-approves-soy-leghemoglobin-color-additive
  59. https://impossiblefoods.com/media/news-releases/2019/07/fda-color-additive-approval
  60. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/12/19/2019-27173/listing-of-color-additives-exempt-from-certification-soy-leghemoglobin
  61. https://www.fda.gov/food/hfp-constituent-updates/fda-announces-effective-date-final-rule-adding-soy-leghemoglobin-list-color-additives-exempt
  62. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/beyond-meat-competitor-impossible-foods-receives-fda-approval-for-bleeding-pla-idUSKCN1UQ24N/
  63. https://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/blog/5783/5-myths-impossible-burger-is-serving-up
  64. https://www.fooddive.com/news/impossible-foods-gmo-plant-based-heme-received-proper-approval-court-rule/599474/
  65. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/fda-brief/fda-brief-fda-approval-soy-leghemoglobin-color-additive-now-effective
  66. https://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/press-releases/5961/center-for-food-safety-filed-lawsuit-against-fda-challenging-decision-to-approve-genetically-engineered-soy-protein-found-in-the-impossible-burger
  67. https://agfundernews.com/lawsuit-challenges-us-regulatory-approval-of-impossible-foods-heme
  68. https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/welldone/2021/05/heme-burgers-and-hot-dogs-ninth-circuit-affirms-fdas-approval-of-plant-meat-color-additive
  69. https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/impossible-foods-sues-startup-motif-foodworks-over-meatless-burger-patent-2022-03-09/
  70. https://agfundernews.com/ptab-invalidates-impossible-foods-patent-following-challenge-by-motif-foodworks-but-denies-requests-to-review-6-others
  71. https://agfundernews.com/impossible-foods-and-motif-foodworks-bury-the-legal-hatchet-in-ip-dispute
  72. https://plantbasednews.org/news/economics/impossible-foods-closer-eu-approval/
  73. https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/eenews/2025/06/30/impossible-foods-wants-to-put-plant-based-burgers-on-european-menus-this-year-00429555
  74. https://www.thegrocer.co.uk/news/impossible-foods-ready-for-uk-push-as-soon-as-it-gets-fsa-approval/706355.article
  75. https://tracxn.com/d/companies/impossible-foods/__BPXOmdjGDEI5Ot3ImXm-Gm9dTyu6Y48quOGr8ATLadA
  76. https://impossiblefoods.com/media/news-releases/impossible-foods-closes-usd500m-in-new-funding-amid-record-growth
  77. https://www.crunchbase.com/funding_round/impossible-foods-series-b--14784063
  78. https://www.seedtable.com/startups/Impossible_Foods-33AM36
  79. https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/impossible-foods-raises-500-mln-latest-funding-2021-11-23/
  80. https://www.clay.com/dossier/impossible-foods-funding
  81. https://equitybee.com/companies/company?company=impossible%2520foods
  82. https://www.ebc.com/forex/is-the-impossible-foods-ipo-coming-in--key-updates
  83. https://www.proteinproductiontechnology.com/post/impossible-foods-eyes-growth-with-flexitarian-focus-and-flavor-first-strategy
  84. https://impossiblefoods.com/media/news-releases/2020/05/kroger-launch
  85. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250310479336/en/Plant-Based-Meat-Market-Focused-Insights-Report-2024-2025-2030-with-Beyond-Meat-Conagra-Hungry-Planet-Impossible-Foods-Kellanova-Maple-Leaf-Quorn-Next-Level-Tofurky-Tyson-Foods-Dominating---ResearchAndMarkets.com
  86. https://www.fooddive.com/news/impossible-burgers-are-coming-to-grocery-shelves-in-september/559952/
  87. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-11-03/burger-king-parent-sees-no-demand-for-new-plant-based-menu-items
  88. https://skift.com/2019/03/25/impossible-foods-lands-another-restaurant-chain-partner/
  89. https://www.tubefilter.com/2021/11/03/mrbeast-burger-adds-vegan-impossible-burgers/
  90. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/eL70Czqm0Wk
  91. https://vegconomist.com/gastronomy-food-service/food-service/impossible-foods-ihop-1700-us-locations/
  92. https://impossiblefoods.com/media/news-releases/impossible-foods-launches-in-the-united-kingdom
  93. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-06-26/impossible-foods-plans-to-sell-plant-based-burgers-in-europe-in-2025
  94. https://www.beyondmeat.com/en-CA/press/hopdoddy-burger-bar-goes-beyond-meat-with-new-partnership
  95. https://www.nrn.com/fast-casual/hopdoddy-burger-bar-adds-more-regenerative-meat-to-its-menu-as-it-removes-manufactured-plant-based-protein
  96. https://gvwire.com/2025/04/18/habit-burger-grill-discontinues-beloved-impossible-burger-option/
  97. https://x.com/WhiteCastle/status/1977765252822384844
  98. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/05/15/3082424/28124/en/North-America-Meat-Substitutes-Market-Report-2025-2033-Brands-like-Beyond-Meat-and-Impossible-Foods-have-Taken-Significant-Share-with-Expansion-into-Retail-and-Foodservice-Channels.html
  99. https://www.businessinsider.com/impossible-foods-lays-off-20-plant-based-meat-struggles-2023-1
  100. https://impossiblefoods.com/blog/welcoming-peter-mcguinness
  101. https://newsroom.haas.berkeley.edu/peter-mcguinness-impossible-foods-haas-deans-speaker-series/
  102. https://www.fooddive.com/news/impossible-foods-lays-off-cuts-employees/633575/
  103. https://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Article/2022/10/07/Plant-based-meat-Layoffs-at-Impossible-Foods-as-new-CEO-restructures-to-grow-and-evolve/
  104. https://www.sunsethq.com/layoff-tracker/impossible-foods-copy
  105. https://www.reddit.com/r/vegan/comments/1lp8114/impossible_burger_and_beyone_meat_sales_continue/
  106. https://impossiblefoods.com/media/news-releases/impossible-foods-launches-new-brand-identity-and-packaging
  107. https://www.supplychaindive.com/news/impossible-foods-slashes-prices--foodservice-distributors-15/592964/
  108. https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2021/2/2/22260454/impossible-foods-burger-plant-based-meat
  109. https://www.supplychaindive.com/news/impossible-burger-supply-shortage-demand-uptick/554157/
  110. https://drive.drii.org/2019/05/16/single-ingredient-supply-chain-struggles-for-impossible-burgers-and-balloons/
  111. https://impossiblefoods.com/media/news-releases/impossible-foods-unveils-impossible-ranch
  112. https://impossiblefoods.com/media/news-releases/impossible-foods-launches-impossible-quality-meats-at-xmarket
  113. https://blockclubchicago.org/2024/10/31/fulton-market-food-hall-xmarket-to-close-after-less-than-a-year/
  114. https://www.linkedin.com/videos/joelrunyon_the-impossible-foods-secondary-market-is-activity-7367358914964676608-uZz3
  115. https://www.fooddive.com/news/impossible-foods-cfo-leaves-to-become-president-of-appharvest/592985/
  116. https://www.businessinsider.com/impossible-foods-loses-chief-experience-officer-and-president-executive-exodus-2022-9
  117. https://www.fooddive.com/news/impossible-founder-steps-down-outgoing-chobani-president-to-be-ceo/620578/
  118. https://www.businessinsider.com/email-pat-brown-to-lead-impossible-labs-step-down-from-c-suite-role-2022-9
  119. https://www.nosh.com/news/2022/news-roundup-impossible-founder-pat-brown-takes-leave-boosh-raises-capital/
  120. https://www.wildhope.tv/article/pat-brown-creator-of-the-impossible-burger-has-big-plans-to-curb-the-biodiversity-crisis/
  121. https://www.linkedin.com/in/leslie-sims-b382753
  122. https://financialpost.com/pmn/business-wire-news-releases-pmn/methane-detection-leader-bridger-photonics-reinforces-blazing-growth-with-seasoned-executive-hires
  123. https://www.linkedin.com/in/emmachutchens
  124. https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexis-regan-63155245
  125. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/sol-de-janeiro-expands-executive-team-with-two-powerhouse-female-leaders-to-support-next-phase-of-global-growth-302438341.html
  126. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/dr-sunil-chandran-rejoins-amyris-as-chief-technology-officer-to-meet-growing-customer-demand-for-innovative-and-renewable-biological-chemistry-302542462.html
  127. https://www.linkedin.com/in/sherene-jagla-b4a9956
  128. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/joelrunyon_the-impossible-foods-secondary-market-is-activity-7367358914964676608-uZz3
  129. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260130173262/en/Impossible-Foods-Announces-Leadership-Transition-Peter-McGuinness-to-Depart-as-CEO-Executive-Leadership-Team-to-Run-Operations
  130. https://www.fooddive.com/news/bel-group-impossible-ceo-north-america-snack-babybel/811708/
  131. https://impossiblefoods.com/media/impossible-foods-launches-impact-calculator-on-earth-day
  132. http://www.designlife-cycle.com/impossible-burger
  133. https://impossiblefoods.com/impossible-impact-calculator
  134. https://impossiblefoods.com/gb-en/claims
  135. https://civileats.com/2019/06/19/impossible-foods-and-regenerative-grazers-face-off-in-a-carbon-farming-dust-up/
  136. https://assets.ctfassets.net/hhv516v5f7sj/4exF7Ex74UoYku640WSF3t/cc213b148ee80fa2d8062e430012ec56/Impossible_foods_comparative_LCA.pdf
  137. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4417
  138. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550921002165
  139. https://www.agriculturedive.com/news/beyond-meat-impossible-foods-plant-based-meat-sustainability-data/714119/
  140. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9936781/
  141. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/15/business/beyond-meat-impossible-emissions.html
  142. https://impossiblefoods.com/technology
  143. https://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/issues/976/ge-food-labeling/blog/5628/our-beef-with-the-gmo-impossible-burger
  144. https://www.cspi.org/news/barebones-fda-review-impossible-burger-soy-leghemoglobin-inadequate-20190903
  145. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5813221/
  146. https://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/issues/308/food-safety/blog/5783/5-myths-impossible-burger-is-serving-up
  147. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33171209/
  148. https://www.testbiotech.org/en/news/efsa-is-hiding-data-on-genetically-engineered-burgers/
  149. https://food.ec.europa.eu/document/download/d2f34894-49f0-4c05-aa20-4365f47bd135_en?filename=gmo_pub-cons_comments_2024-9060_en.pdf&prefLang=ro
  150. https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8822
  151. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/genetically-modified-foods-other-novel-foods/approved-products/soy-leghemoglobin-simulated-meat-products/document.html
  152. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10581837/
  153. https://sniglobal.org/isoflavone-fears-unfounded/
  154. https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/impossible-and-beyond-how-healthy-are-these-meatless-burgers-2019081517448
  155. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9861156/
  156. https://impossiblefoods.com/mission/2019impact/letterfromtheceo/
  157. https://blog.whiteoakpastures.com/hubfs/WOP-LCA-Quantis-2019.pdf
  158. https://savory.global/impossible-impact/
  159. https://www.cheddarflow.com/blog/analyzing-impossible-foods-stock-growth/
  160. https://www.fooddive.com/news/impossible-foods-ceo-importance-first-impressions/715398/
  161. https://www.forbes.com/sites/claraludmir/2025/03/20/what-beyond-meat-got-wrong-about-the-future-of-plant-based-eating/
  162. https://www.businessinsider.com/impossible-foods-sales-consumption-decline-woke-2025-10
  163. https://qz.com/fake-meat-plant-protein-industry-impossible-foods-beyond
  164. https://plantbasednews.org/news/alternative-protein/impossible-foods-plant-based-too-woke/
  165. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1022080/sales-growth-frozen-meat-substitute-brand/
  166. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/impossible-foods-ceos-message-to-bbqing-investors-we-could-end-up-selling-the-company-120816331.html
  167. https://www.just-food.com/news/plant-based-impossible-foods-considering-ipo-or-sale-in-next-three-years/
  168. https://morningconsult.com/form/impossible-foods-growth/
  169. https://www.livekindly.com/burger-kings-earnings-skyrocket-nearly-30-since-vegan-whopper-launch/
  170. https://www.greenqueen.com.hk/impossible-foods-plant-based-meat-foodservice-collaborations-ihop-partnership/
  171. https://veggl.com/all-9-fast-food-restaurants-that-have-impossible-burger/
  172. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/23/starbucks-partners-with-impossible-to-sell-plant-based-breakfast-sandwich.html
  173. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/07/impossible-foods-abandons-pursuit-of-mcdonalds-burger-deal.html
  174. https://corporate.mcdonalds.com/corpmcd/our-stories/article/mcplant-usrestaurant.html
  175. https://www.delish.com/food-news/a61453824/mcdonalds-mcplant-plant-based-burger-failure/
  176. https://resources.latana.com/post/impossible-foods-deep-dive/
  177. https://impossiblefoods.com/blog/2021-state-of-meat-in-foodservice-report-is-here
  178. https://agfundernews.com/plant-based-meat-by-numbers-grim-reading-for-the-us-retail-market-brighter-spots-in-foodservice-and-globally
  179. https://www.fooddive.com/news/impossible-foods-gen-z-cn-label-school-cafeteria/601011/
  180. https://www.forbes.com/sites/korihale/2019/05/23/cultural-tree-huggers-push-impossible-foods-to-2-billion-valuation/
  181. https://www.fastcompany.com/91171073/why-impossible-foods-isnt-focusing-on-the-climate-impact-of-its-plant-based-meat-alternatives
  182. https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2023/4/17/23682232/impossible-beyond-plant-based-meat-sales
  183. https://vegnews.com/impossible-beyond-fake-meat
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.