Hubbry Logo
International Typographical UnionInternational Typographical UnionMain
Open search
International Typographical Union
Community hub
International Typographical Union
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
International Typographical Union
International Typographical Union
International Typographical Union
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The International Typographical Union (ITU) was a North American trade union for the printing trade of newspapers and other media. It was founded on May 3, 1852, in the United States as the National Typographical Union. It changed its name to the International Typographical Union at its Albany, New York, convention in 1869 after it began organizing members in Canada. The ITU was one of the first unions to admit female members, admitting women members such as Augusta Lewis, Mary Moore and Eva Howard in 1869.

Key Information

Typographers were educated, economically mobile, and in every major urban center with newspapers, and they had the unique possibility to influence publicity in favour of their cause. This led the union to the forefront of improving working conditions. ITU President W. B. Prescott led the ITU in 1897 to win a 48-hour work week and a standard wage scale for all printers. During the Great Depression, the ITU introduced the 40-hour work week across the industry at no cost to employers as a way to share the fewer jobs available. That ITU initiative spread to other unions and has since been codified across the labor sector by federal legislation in the US establishing the 40-hour work week.

The ITU had a unique system of factional opposition in its democratic elections, documented by Seymour Martin Lipset in his co-authored book Union Democracy: The Internal Politics of the International Typographical Union (1957).[1] The local scale committees worked for a decent wage while the executive council sent ITU representatives to assist local unions in contract negotiations. All contracts had to be approved and ratified by both the Executive Council and the newspaper publisher. For most of its history, the ITU benefited from friendly and strong competition between Independents and Progressives for control of the union.

As the work of typographers declined with automation, computers and mechanization of the print media, the ITU was disbanded. In 1986, a majority of ITU mailers voted to merge with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and the remaining typographers joined the Communications Workers of America. Before its dissolution, the ITU was the oldest union in the United States.

History

[edit]

Formation

[edit]

The concept for a typographical union was formed at a New York City meeting of 18 representatives from typographers' associations in New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland and Kentucky in December 1850. A committee led by John Keyser of Philadelphia was formed to investigate issues and propose a plan of action.

The representatives met again in Baltimore in September 1851. While they resolved to form a national union, no other actions were taken.

Finally, delegates from typographers' unions in 14 cities met in Cincinnati in May 1852 and organized the National Typographical Union. A random drawing enabled the Indianapolis local to become Local Union #1 and the new headquarters. In 1869, a new Constitution was adopted, accepting the affiliation of Canadian printing trade unions and changing the name to the International Typographical Union. In 1873, in Montreal, Canada, the first ITU convention outside the United States was held. The ITU Book of Laws would be amended many times, yet it was as members called it "ITU Law." Each union shop was a "Chapel" and the shop steward was the "Chapel Chairman". All apprentices and journeymen had to have working cards showing paid union dues. ITU Law dictated that dues, which were proportionate to the amount of work done in the chapel, had to be paid by the first Tuesday after the last Saturday of the month. If the Union dues were not paid, the member was not allowed to work until their payment.

Fragmentation

[edit]
The International Brotherhood of Bookbinders in Salt Lake City, Utah, in 1908

Technological developments in the late 19th century such as the development of lithography and photography led to diversification and specialization among printers. Further fragmentation in the printing labor movement led to the establishment of the International Printing Pressmen's Union of North America (IPPU), in 1889. In 1892, the ITU authorized membership for mailers and for newspaper writers. Pressure mounted for a separate pressman's union, and in 1892 the International Brotherhood of Bookbinders (IBB) was formed. Many pressmen left the ITU for the Bookbinders. At the same time as mailers joined, two thousand pressmen members seceded to form the International Printing Pressmen Union Assistants, (IPPUA) in 1897 and the International Stereotypers' and Electrotypers' Union, (IS&EU) in 1902. At the start of the 20th century, ITU membership was primarily compositors and mailers.

In 1894, the Louisville convention sought to have president W. B. Prescott examine ways to have newer technology under the ITU. Then, the ITU chartered a photoengravers' union in New York City. Over the next few years, the ITU organized photoengravers in several other cities as well. However, many photoengravers felt that the leaders of the ITU were indifferent to their needs.

In 1899, photoengravers in New York City went on strike to demand a 48-hour work week. ITU President S. B. Donnelly refused to support the local, fearing employers might retaliate. The New York City photoengravers won their strike, but the lack of ITU support led most of the union's photoengraver locals to seek disaffiliation. A national convention in Philadelphia in November 1900 saw the photoengravers leaving the ITU and establishing the International Photo-Engravers Union of North America. ITU President James M. Lynch pressured the AFL into refusing to recognize the photoengravers' union until May 1904.

In 1893, the ITU struck Harrison Gray Otis's Los Angeles Times. In 1896, the union began a boycott that ran until 1908. In 1903, ITU President James M. Lynch, persuaded William Randolph Hearst to start a rival paper, the Los Angeles Examiner.

On October 1, 1910, James B. Mc Namara, an ITU member and his brother. Joseph J. Mc Namara, secretary-treasurer of the International Union of Bridge and Structural Iron Workers placed a bomb in the L.A. Times building, killing 21 people. Famed attorney Clarence Darrow defended the brothers. They were convicted of the bombing and murder. Despite various job actions that lasted into the 1920s, the L.A. Times remained a non-union shop. This was a major defeat for both the ITU and other trade unions; Los Angeles and Southern California would be lost to trade unions except in the case of the entertainment industry.

AFL

[edit]

As early as 1879, the International Typographical Union was at the forefront of organized labor. The ITU was instrumental in the formation of the Federation of Organized Trades and Labor Unions in 1882. In the same time frame, the ITU rejected the Knights of Labor. In the American Federation of Labor (AFL) presidential election of 1881, William H. Foster of the ITU defeated Samuel Gompers. In 1886, the Cigar Makers' Union leader, Samuel Gompers, was elected AFL president. The ITU was the largest and strongest union in the AFL. By the end of the 19th century, ITU President S. B. Donnelly called the ITU the "strongest and most stable printing union in the United States". In 1924, William Green succeeded Gompers as AFL president. The seeds of discord between the AFL and ITU were sown.

Fight for better working conditions

[edit]
International Typographical Union exhibit at the Alaska–Yukon–Pacific Exposition, Seattle, 1909

From October 1891, the ITU Mortuary Benefits were the most respected in trade unionism.

In 1906, ITU President James M. Lynch decided to use strong tactics and initiated strikes in most major cities, attempting to secure an eight-hour work day. The union had lost a fight for a nine-hour day a few years earlier; however, this time, the union spent over US$4 million supporting its striking locals. Not only did the ITU win an eight-hour work day, but the ITU strike paved the way for similar gains by the five other printing unions.

The ITU was a democratic labor union. Members served a five-year apprenticeship and were tested to become journeymen. The Progressives and Independents gave the union a two-party organization. The Progressive party gave most of the leaders to the ITU.

In 1907, ITU President James M. Lynch appointed a special committee, "to formulate some system for the technical trade education of our members and apprentices." The committee selected, and President Lynch accepted, the ITU Course of Instruction: thirty-six "Lessons in Printing". Courses were first offered to members of Chicago Typographical #16 by The Inland Printer Technical School of Chicago. Alumni would include future ITU presidents, Woodruff Randolph and John J. Pilch.

In 1914, ITU President James M. Lynch resigned, appointed by Governor Martin H. Glynn as New York State Commissioner of Labor. Many printers in the New York "Big 6" Local, saw the political appointment, a way to remove Lynch from dealing with newspaper publishers. James M. Lynch would serve as ITU president 1925–1926. Employers sought concessions after World War I as part of their 'open shop' movement. A key goal was to lengthen the work day to 10 to 12 hours. The wartime ITU president Marsden G. Scott fought back with massive strikes all over the country. In one period (May to December 1921), new ITU president John McParland could say the defense fund was secure as the union collected over $6 million in strike donations and spent $5.5 million in strike benefits.

By June 1924, employers had had enough. The three-year running battle with the union had cost owners dearly and the union preserved its gains. However, the win was one that had cost the health of ITU president, John McParland, who served from 1921–1923. Charles P. Howard served out the rest of 1923 as ITU president; being elected in 1924 and serving until 1938.

ITU role in forming the CIO

[edit]

The ITU had been active in organizing new workers for almost 80 years. As the Great Depression created a crisis for American workers, the ITU joined with other unions in the AFL to agitate for more organizing.

In 1935, Charles P. Howard, president of the ITU, joined with John L. Lewis of the United Mine Workers; David Dubinsky of the International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union; Sidney Hillman of the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America; Thomas McMahon of the United Textile Workers; John Sheridan of the International Union of Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers; Harvey Fremming of the Oil Workers Union and Max Zaritsky of the Hatters, Cap and Millinery Workers to form the Committee for Industrial Organization within the AFL.

In 1937, ITU Secretary Randolph was livid at AFL President William Green. The AFL executive council levied an assessment to fight industrial organization upon allied unions. The ITU refused to pay; Randolph's reason was "not to pay any assessment levied by any means other than a referendum vote of ITU printers and mailers."

The craft unions within the AFL demanded that the committee stop organizing members on an industrial basis. Lewis and the other members of the CIO persisted.

In 1938, the AFL ejected the eight member unions of the CIO, including the ITU. At the 1938, ITU convention at Birmingham, Alabama, President Claude M. Baker disclosed to the delegates the decision of the AFL. Three unions returned to the AFL. On May 21, 1941, the ITU turned down reaffiliation with the AFL by referendum vote of the ITU members. During its time in the CIO, the union experienced a brief growth in members, topping out at 84,200 in 1939. The increase was notable, but moderate as production swung towards heavy industry during World War II.[2] In 1944, the ITU reaffiliated with the American Federation of Labor. The AFL promised the ITU full autonomy. ITU President Woodruff Randolph and AFL President William Green re-established and re-affirmed the ITU–AFL relationship, as if no breach had taken place. The five remaining unions subsequently formed the Congress of Industrial Organizations. The CIO rejoined the AFL in 1955, forming the new entity known as the AFL–CIO. AFL–CIO President George Meany and his successors would have a cool relationship with all ITU presidents from Randolph to Bingle. ITU President Joe Bingle asked AFL–CIO President Lane Kirkland to speak at the 1983 San Francisco ITU Convention; Kirkland declined.

Woodruff Randolph

[edit]
Main article: Woodruff Randolph

Woodruff Randolph (1892–1966), a printer from Chicago #16 and attorney-at-law, served as ITU Secretary-Treasurer (1929–1944) and ITU President (1944–1957). Randolph was very powerful and often usurped the position of ITU president Claude M. Baker. The ITU presidential election of 1944 between Baker and Randolph was one of the most vicious in union history. He loathed the National Labor Relations Board. During World War II, Randolph dealt with the National War Labor Board. He led the Progressive party of the ITU. At the 1949 Oakland ITU convention, he spoke in harsh terms against the Taft–Hartley Act, the act in favor of the open shop. Chicago #16, Randolph's home local, was the first local hit by Taft-Hartley. On November 24, 1947 the Chicago papers went on a strike that lasted 22 months. Newspaper publishers called for aid from the authors of the law, US Senator Robert A. Taft (R.-Ohio) and Congressman Fred A. Hartley, Jr. (R.-New Jersey) The ITU and Woodruff Randolph won in Chicago. He fought publishers and won in the early 1950s. In 1951, Randolph created Unitypo, the union-supported newspaper in struck cities. Unitypo met with mixed results from the public at large. In the mid-1950s, Randolph embodied the ITU; his power was felt in every ITU shop and feared in every newspaper's board room. The printers were shocked during the 1957 ITU convention in New York to find that Randolph would not seek reelection.

Woodruff Randolph hand-picked the Progressives to run for executive council in 1958, which would control the ITU for nearly twenty years. At the same time United States Senator John McClellan (D.-AR) was investigating organized crime in labor unions. When Dave Beck, president of the Teamsters, resigned in 1957—near the time of Randolph's statement of retirement—many ITU members wondered about their long-time leader. The new ITU President Elmer Brown meekly appeared before the US Senate Select Committee on Improper Activities in Labor and Management. Brown had been ITU second Vice-President (1944–1949) and had served in various offices in his home local, New York Typographical #6 (1945–1957). Brown claimed that during the 1957 ITU convention, Randolph requested Brown run for president of the ITU. Brown told the committee that he had not been aware of events in Indianapolis since he left the Executive Council. Randolph retired to his homes in Indiana and Florida, October 1, 1966, he died in the Union Printers Home.

Printing decline

[edit]

Woodruff Randolph's hand-picked Progressive Executive Council held the longest tenure as a unit in ITU history: from 1958–1978, its membership was Elmer Brown, president; John J. Pilch, first vice-president; Alexander Sandy Bevis, second vice-president (Canadian); Joseph P. Bailey, third vice-president (Mailer). Secretary-treasurer Don Hurd died in 1959, succeeded by William R. Cloud. After Elmer Brown's 1968 death, the ITU presidents were Pilch (1968–1973) and Bevis (1974–1978).

The Mergenthaler linotype machine was used by newspaper printers from the 1880s to the 1970s. Technological progress again confronted the ITU in the post-war period. A number of new advances—including offset lithography, flexography, relief print, screen printing, rotogravure, and digital printing—greatly reduced the number of workers needed in the modern printshop and newspaper composing room.

In 1964, the ITU counted 121,858 members. But by 1980, the union had shed nearly a quarter of its membership due to technological advances. Toward the end of the ITU, the mailers outnumbered the printers. With the disappearance of linotype machines and the advent of paste makeup and computerized composition methods, the work in the composing rooms dropped. The mail rooms needed people to work on the inserting machines.

Merger

[edit]

Concerned that the union did not have the economic strength to win good wages and benefits for its members and worried that further membership declines might threaten the viability of the union, the ITU leadership sought a merger with another printing union.

The ITU sought to merge with the Newspaper Guild but terminated negotiations in 1981 after nearly four years of talks. The ITU discussed merging with the Graphic Communications International Union, but the talks did not proceed very far. Later, the GCIU merged into the IBT.

Problems plagued the term of ITU President Joe Bingel (1978–1983). In a contested special election between Bingel and Robert McMichen, McMichen, the anti-Teamster candidate, won the election. However, the ITU was dying.

The ITU executive council subsequently required president Robert McMichen to enter into merger talks with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. IBT President Jackie Presser spoke of merger with the ITU; at the 1983 San Francisco ITU convention. ITU President Joe Bingle risked his leadership post on the ITU–IBT merger and lost. However, the ITU's 74,000 members turned down the merger two-to-one in a vote taken in 1985, fearing that the Teamsters could not be trusted to respect the terms of the merger agreement—which included the hallmark of the ITU: autonomy. The Mailers would later join the Teamsters; the Printers would not. The last ITU convention was held in 1984 in Hershey, Pennsylvania. By 1986, the ITU had only 44,000 active members.

On December 31, 1986, the Associated Press printed the following with a dateline of Colorado Springs, Colorado:

The International Typographical Union has ceased to exist, and most of its staff was laid off at national headquarters here. Most of the 60 workers are continuing on a temporary basis with the Communication Workers of America, with which the ITU merged, said ITU spokesman Bill Frazee. The ITU ended operations on December 31, 1986. On January 1, 1987, the union joined the CWA as its Printing, Publishing and Media Workers Sector. CWA has its headquarters in Washington, D.C., and employees working for the sector will transfer there in two to four months, Frazee said. The International Typographical Union was the nation's oldest union, charted nationally in 1852. Its membership peaked in the 1960s at 100,000 printers. But since computerization of the business, membership has dropped to 40,000 working printers and 35,000 retirees.

Finally, in 1987, the printers of the ITU merged with the Communications Workers of America (CWA). It is now the Printing, Publishing, and Media Workers Sector of the CWA. Daniel F. Wasser is currently president [3] of the sector.

The Mailers were split between the CWA and IBT. In May 1986, many Mailer locals joined "The Mailers' Conference of the CWA". When the ITU ended, some of the Mailer locals merged into the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT). It is now the Newspaper, Magazine and Electronic Media Workers Division. Joe Molinero is the division director.

The ITU Fraternal Pension Fund was from 1908 to 1966. Elmer Brown created the Negotiated Pension Plan (NPP). Today, the pension for all ITU members before 1986 and CWA members since 1987 is the CWA/ITU Negotiated Pension Plan. This pension plan is located in Colorado Springs, Colorado. The Teamsters have the IBT Pension for members after 1987.

Administration

[edit]

Original chartered locals

[edit]

On May 5, 1852:

  • Indianapolis, #1
  • Philadelphia, #2
  • Cincinnati, #3
  • Albany, #4
  • Columbus, #5
  • New York, #6
  • Pittsburgh, #7
  • St. Louis, #8
  • Buffalo, #9
  • Louisville, #10
  • Memphis, #11
  • Baltimore, #12
  • Boston, #13
  • Harrisburg, #14

Chartered later in 1852:

  • Rochester, #15
  • Chicago, #16
  • New Orleans, #17
  • Detroit, #18
  • Elmira, #19
  • Nashville, #20
  • San Francisco, #21

A group of thirty men met to organize the Columbia Typographical Society in Washington, DC in December 1814. In 1867 they joined the newly-formed National Typographical Union (later, the International Typographical Union) as Columbia Typographical Union No. 101, representing workers at The Washington Post and Times-Herald, and Evening Star. Columbia Typographical Union/CWA No. 101 is now the oldest continuously existing labor union local in the United States.[4]

The Typographical Journal records that in May 1892 there were 300 locals.[citation needed]

Office headquarters

[edit]

At the Kansas City ITU convention of 1888, Indianapolis was selected as the official headquarters for the International Typographical Union. ITU President Edward T. Plank, declared, "In 1888 [...] all official (ITU) business, together with books, accounts and records shall be kept [...] at the City of Indianapolis, County of Marion, State of Indiana." During the 1927 ITU convention, at Indianapolis, ITU President Charles P. Howard showed delegates the Van Camp Mansion at Meridian and Twenty-Eighth Streets, which was to serve as the ITU headquarters.

The 1959 ITU convention at Philadelphia passed an action to move the ITU headquarters, after 73 years in Indianapolis, it was decided that the headquarters would be moved to Colorado Springs, Colorado. The building began in 1961, the new ITU Headquarters (225 S. Union Blvd.) and ITU Training Center (301 S. Union Blvd.) being located on the grounds of the Union Printers Home (101 S. Union Blvd.). The final move to Colorado Springs of President Elmer Brown and the Executive Council was completed in February 1963. The ITU Training Center, which opened on May 5, 1962, would publish The Typographical Journal, The ITU Bulletin, and The ITU Review. The former two were the oldest trade union organs founded in 1889.

Union Printers Home

[edit]

In 1889, Colorado Springs, Colorado was chosen as the site of Union Printers Home. George W. Childs, publisher of the Philadelphia Public Ledger and his philanthropist friend Anthony J. Drexel gave a gift of $10,000 in 1886 to start work toward the Home, thus starting a fund which grew. The 1890 ITU convention in Atlanta approved of the Home.

On May 12, 1892, the Childs–Drexel Home for Union Printers opened on 29 acres (120,000 m2) located on the corner of Pikes Peak Ave. and S. Union Blvd. "A Home for the Aged and Sanatorium for Tuberculars. Maintained by the International Typographical Union for Its Distressed Members." 19th Century printers suffered from tuberculosis, and the clean air of the Rocky Mountains, Pikes Peak area in Colorado was seen as a location to clean the diseased lungs. The home was open only to members of the ITU; members' wives or widows were not admitted. John D. Vaughn served as first Superintendent of the Home while its first member was W. B. Eckert, a retired member and former officer of the Philadelphia #2 local. The 1899 ITU convention at Detroit approved the name Union Printers Home. The home, a hospital and sanatorium, was staffed by its own doctors, nurses and other medical technicians. The lands of the home grew to 260 acres (1.1 km2) to accommodate a dairy, farms, gardens, power plant, and workshops to help make the UPH self-sufficient. In 1944, Dowell Patterson (1899–1968), superintendent of the home, saw that the most modern of medical equipment was furnished to the UPH. In later years, the tubercular sanitoriums were razed. Today the home serves the people of Colorado Springs and El Paso County as a health care facility with assisted living and nursing care. The main building is a State of Colorado historical site. In February 2020, the local press and media reported the State of Colorado had shut down the facility, citing numerous violations.[5] In July 2021, a small group of investors are planning to refurbish the UPH over the next five years and turn it into a public space.[6]

Women's International Auxiliary

[edit]

The Women's International Auxiliary was formed at the 1902 Cincinnati ITU Convention. The WIA slogan was Spend Union Earned Money for Union Label Products and Union Services and its quarterly publication was Label Facts. The WIA contributed to the Union Printers Home Fund with various fund raising events. At each ITU convention the WIA would award prizes for the, Union Label Poster contest. Only printer wives were eligible to be elected to the WIA local and international offices. After 1948, mailers' wives were only eligible to serve the local and international WIA auxiliary as third vice president.

The Women's International Auxiliary of the International Typographical Union ceased to exist after 1990, which was after the dissolution of the parent union.

Allied Printing Trades Association

[edit]

In March 1911, five international unions created the Allied Printing Trades Association:

  • International Typographical Union
  • International Printing Pressmen Union of North America
  • Bookbinders
  • Photo Engravers
  • Stereotypers and Electrotypers Unions

In 1955, there was a new agreement, and the following unions were included in the association:

The Mailer unions chartered by the ITU were eligible for membership in Allied Printing Trades Councils. The International Mailers Union was refused membership.

Mailers

[edit]

Nearly 100 Mailer Locals would be chartered under the ITU. To mark the difference between the Printers and Mailers Unions, the ITU used the M before the local number. In New York City, Typographical #6 and Mailers, M-6. The position of the mailers was that of second-class citizens in the ITU, with no voice on the executive council. Mailers Cary Weaver and Munro Roberts felt the needs of mailers fell on deaf printer ears on the ITU executive council.

The Mailers Trade District Union (MTDU) was an internal part of the ITU. Lawsuits from 1926–1944 were fought for mailer rights. The MTDU was eventually abolished by court injunction and referendum vote. In 1929, ITU president Charles P. Howard selected third vice-president C. N. Smith (a printer) to represent the MTDU. The mailers were allowed to vote in 1930 for their MTDU representative; John Mc Ardle and Harold Mitchell served in 1934. Munro Roberts was elected as MTDU member of the executive council, (1935–1937) but he had no voice or vote. After many heated arguments with ITU President Howard and Secretary Randolph, Roberts became committed to a separate mailer union. Moreover, the International Mailers' Union (IMU), was created and many shops would have two boards, ITU and IMU. With the departure of Roberts, Thomas J. Martin represented the MTDU (1938–1944). The MTDU continued by court order; however, the mailers were again without an observer to the executive council. The 1947 Cleveland convention paved the way for the demise of the MTDU and the election of a mailer to the executive council. Joe Bailey (San Francisco–Oakland Mailers #M-18), was elected third vice-president before the 1948 Milwaukee convention. ITU President Woodruff Randolph saw a way to appease mailers returning after service in World War II. The agreement made between ITU President Randolph and Joe Bailey: only a Printer would ever be president, first and second Vice-President or Secretary-Treasurer of the ITU. The position of third Vice-President would be held only by a Mailer. The IMU lost much power to draw new membership. The IMU finally was finally fully merged into the ITU only in 1982, only five years before the union's demise. Joe Bailey served on the ITU executive council until 1973. A mailer would remain ITU third vice-president: Robert F. Ameln, (1974–1975) and the Canadian mailer, Allen J. Heritage, (1976–1986).

Leadership

[edit]

Presidents

[edit]
1852: John S. Nafew[7]
1853: Gerard Stith[7]
1854: Lewis Graham[7]
1855: Charles F. Town[7]
1856: M. C. Brown[7]
1857: William Cuddy[7]
1858: Robert C. Smith[7]
1860: John McCreath Farquhar[7]
1863: Eugene Vallette[7]
1864: A. M. Carver[7]
1865: Robert E. Craig[7]
1866: John H. Oberly[7]
1868: Robert McKechnie[7]
1869: Isaac D. George[7]
1870: William J. Hammond[7]
1873: W. R. McLean[7]
1874: William H. Bodwell[7]
1875: Walter W. Bell[7]
1876: John McVicar[7]
1877: Darwin R. Streeter[7]
1878: John Armstrong[7]
1879: Samuel Haldeman[7]
1880: William P. Atkinson[7]
1881: George Clark[7]
1883: Mark L. Crawford[7]
1884: M. R. H. Witter[7]
1886: William Aimison[7]
1888: Edward T. Plank[7]
1891: William B. Prescott[7]
1898: Samuel B. Donnelly[7]
1900: James M. Lynch[7]
1914: James M. Duncan[7]
1915: M. G. Scott[7]
1921: John McParland[7]
1923: Charles P. Howard[7]
1924: James M. Lynch[7]
1926: Charles P. Howard[7]
1938: Claude M. Baker[7]
1944: Woodruff Randolph[7]
1957: Elmer Brown[7]
1968: John J. Pilch[7]
1974: Sandy Bevis
1978: Joe Bingel
1984: Robert McMichen

Secretary-Treasurers

[edit]
1854: H. H. Whitcomb
1857: Lewis Graham
1858: George W. Smith
1859: Thomas J. Walsh
1864: William F. Moore
1866: Alexander Troup
1868: John Collins
1874: W. A. Hutchinson
1877: John H. O'Donnell
1878: William White
1880: William H. Trayes
1882: Mark L. Crawford
1883: William Briggs
1885: E. S. McIntosh
1886: D. M. Pascoe
1887: William S. McClevey
1893: A. G. Wines
1896: John W. Bramwood
1909: John W. Hays
1929: Woodruff Randolph
1944: Jack Gill
1947: Don Hurd
1959: William R. Cloud
1974/5: Thomas Kopeck

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

International Typographical Union

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The International Typographical Union (ITU) was a craft labor union representing typesetters, printers, and related workers in the industry across the and , established on May 5, 1852, in , , as the oldest continuously operating in the country. Initially formed by consolidating local printers' societies to standardize wages and working conditions amid rapid industrialization of newspapers and publishing, the ITU grew to influence labor practices in the trade through , apprenticeship programs, and militant strike actions that often disrupted major publications. It pioneered inclusive policies by admitting women members as early as 1869 and advocated for within its ranks, positioning itself as one of the more progressive unions in the , which it helped found in 1886. The union's defining achievements included adapting to technological shifts like the in the late , which expanded the industry and bolstered membership to over by the mid-20th century, enabling the establishment of benefits such as the Union Printers Home for retired members. However, controversies arose from its aggressive tactics, including prolonged strikes—such as the 1962–1963 newspaper strike that idled the industry for 114 days—and resistance to , which employers argued stifled and contributed to the union's eventual decline as photocomposition and digital typesetting obsoleted traditional skills. Internally democratic with institutionalized opposition parties, the ITU maintained a reputation for fairness but faced legal challenges over jurisdictional disputes and practices. By the , membership had plummeted due to industry consolidation and technology; in 1986, a majority voted to merge with the , effectively dissolving the ITU as an independent entity by 1987, though some divisions affiliated with the Teamsters. This merger reflected the causal reality of unions' vulnerability to exogenous technological disruption, underscoring how craft-specific organizations struggled against broader economic transformations without diversification.

History

Formation and Early Development

The groundwork for a national printers' union was laid during a meeting in New York City in early December 1850, where representatives from typographical societies in several states discussed coordinating efforts to address declining wages and inconsistent working conditions in the printing trade. This initiative culminated in the formal establishment of the National Typographical Union (NTU) on May 5, 1852, in , , by delegates from fourteen local printers' associations, marking it as the oldest in the United States with continuous existence. The NTU aimed to standardize wages, regulate apprenticeships, and promote mutual support among printers amid rapid industry expansion driven by steam-powered presses and . In its initial years, the NTU held annual conventions to adopt constitutions and resolve disputes, focusing on enforcing uniform price lists for piecework and limiting non-union , though it faced challenges from employer resistance and internal debates over striking versus . By the eve of the Civil War, membership had grown to encompass dozens of local unions across the , reflecting the trade's centrality to and production. The union maintained a non-partisan stance politically but advocated for shorter workdays and better training, establishing itself as a model for without relying on government intervention. The NTU's scope expanded internationally in the late 1860s when Canadian typographical societies sought affiliation, prompting a in that enabled their integration and renamed the the International Typographical Union (ITU). This period also saw the ITU become one of the first major unions to admit women printers as full members starting in , acknowledging their growing presence in the workforce despite prevailing male dominance. Early growth was tempered by economic fluctuations, but the ITU's emphasis on democratic local autonomy and trade education laid foundations for sustained influence in the sector through the 1870s.

Expansion and AFL Affiliation

Following its reorganization as the International Typographical Union in , which incorporated Canadian locals and expanded its jurisdictional scope beyond the , the ITU experienced steady growth through the chartering of additional subordinate unions in emerging printing centers across . By the late , the union had established formalized systems for mobility, including trade cards that facilitated work-seeking among members, with usage rising from 22.5% of membership in 1880 to 66% by 1889, reflecting increased internal cohesion and geographic spread. This period also saw the ITU advocate for uniform price lists and standards, which helped consolidate and attract skilled compositors amid rising and production demands post-Civil War. The union's expansion was bolstered by campaigns for reduced working hours, notably the push for an eight-hour day, which gained traction in major cities like New York and during the 1870s and 1880s, drawing in new members disillusioned with exploitative shop conditions. Membership figures, though variably reported, indicated a craft-focused base that grew to support over 100 active locals by the mid-1880s, emphasizing in over mass recruitment. Women were admitted as early as 1869, with figures like Augusta Lewis serving in leadership roles, further diversifying and stabilizing the workforce amid gender-specific labor shifts in . In pursuit of broader labor coordination, the ITU played a pivotal role in establishing the Federation of Organized Trades and Labor Unions in 1881, serving as an early proponent of national trade union federation to counter fragmented local efforts and employer resistance. This culminated in the ITU's participation as a charter member in the formation of the American Federation of Labor (AFL) on December 8, 1886, in Columbus, Ohio, where it dispatched delegates including J.R. Winders and others to the founding convention. Affiliation with the AFL provided the ITU access to centralized lobbying for legislative protections, such as anti-conspiracy laws shielding union activities, while aligning its craft-oriented model with Gompers-era voluntarism that prioritized economic action over political radicalism. As one of the AFL's strongest affiliates, the ITU influenced early federation policies on strikes and arbitration, though it maintained autonomy in jurisdictional disputes.

Internal Fragmentation and CIO Involvement

In the mid-1930s, the International Typographical Union (ITU) experienced significant internal tensions over the broader schism, driven by debates between and the industrial organizing approach advocated by the newly formed Committee for Industrial Organization (CIO). ITU President Charles P. Howard, who had led the union since 1924, served as the CIO's first secretary and championed its strategy as essential for organizing mass-production industries, including aspects of printing affected by technological shifts. This alignment positioned the ITU as one of the CIO's eight founding affiliates in November 1935, alongside unions like the United Mine Workers. By , following the AFL's expulsion of CIO-aligned groups and imposition of per-capita tax penalties, the ITU formally affiliated with the CIO, leveraging its network of across 658 cities to support organizing drives that secured gains such as the 40-hour workweek in trades. However, this move exacerbated factionalism within the ITU, as conservative elements prioritized craft jurisdiction and viewed CIO tactics as diluting skilled workers' bargaining power, while progressive factions saw as vital against employer resistance. Howard's CIO involvement drew AFL criticism, including calls to bar the ITU from AFL bodies, intensifying delegate divisions at union conventions. The fragmentation peaked at the ITU's 1938 convention, where was defeated for re-election amid backlash against his CIO leadership, signaling a shift toward reaffirmation of AFL ties. Under new President Woodruff Randolph, internal debates persisted over CIO policies, including concerns about jurisdictional overlaps and emerging communist influence in CIO ranks, which alienated craft-oriented members. In , the ITU disaffiliated from the CIO and reaffiliated with the AFL, negotiating expanded over trades in exchange, thereby resolving the split but highlighting the union's pragmatic navigation of labor politics. This episode underscored the ITU's relative autonomy and democratic processes, with locals retaining influence despite international-level shifts. By 1949, the ITU reported 836 locals in 712 cities, maintaining defiance of the Taft-Hartley Act's anti-communist provisions while anchored in the AFL.

Post-World War II Growth and Challenges

Following the conclusion of , the International Typographical Union experienced membership growth amid the U.S. economic expansion and rising demand for printed media, including , magazines, and commercial . This period saw the union's influence expand within the printing trades, with membership building toward a peak exceeding 100,000 by the 1960s, primarily from employment. The union initially rejected proposals for an early merger between the AFL and CIO in 1946, reflecting concerns over ideological differences and organizational autonomy, but participated in the successful 1955 AFL-CIO merger, which consolidated labor resources and bargaining power. This affiliation aided coordination on industry-wide issues, though it did not prevent ongoing jurisdictional rivalries with other printing crafts like pressmen. Key challenges emerged from postwar anti-union legislation, particularly the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947, which prohibited secondary boycotts, mandated 60-day cooling-off periods before strikes, and required union officers to affirm non-communist status, thereby weakening organized labor's leverage in negotiations. Employers exploited these restrictions to demand concessions, including on work rules, while the ITU relied on strikes and slowdowns to defend traditional jurisdiction over amid nascent shifts toward and early . These tensions foreshadowed deeper disruptions from photocomposition technologies in the ensuing decade, as publishers sought to reduce reliance on skilled compositors.

Technological Disruptions and Industry Decline

The postwar era introduced offset lithography and photocomposition technologies, which eroded the ITU's control over traditional hot-metal typesetting processes reliant on skilled compositors. , adapted from wartime developments, enabled faster reproduction without metal plates, while photocomposition systems from companies like Fairchild in the late 1950s used perforated tape to automate type setting, slashing production times from hours to seconds per line. Phototypesetting, proliferating in the 1960s, further de-skilled the craft by projecting type photographically onto film rather than casting lead, reducing the need for ITU-trained journeymen and allowing non-union operations to enter the market. This shift contributed to job displacement, as composing room employment at major outlets like fell from 1,200 in 1960 to 300 by the late . Employers, facing high union wages, accelerated adoption to lower costs, prompting ITU resistance through contract clauses limiting , though these often preserved jobs only for incumbents via attrition. The 1962–1963 New York City newspaper strike, initiated by ITU Local 6 under Bertram Powers, exemplified tensions over computerized and tape-fed systems, halting seven dailies for 114 days and securing wage gains but accelerating four papers' closures and publishers' pivot to technology. By the , computerized cold-type systems and early word processing compounded losses, decentralizing work from union shops to offices. ITU membership peaked at approximately 103,000 in 1960 but plummeted below 50,000 by the mid-1980s amid desktop publishing's rise, which integrated into personal computers and eliminated specialized roles. Facing eroded and industry contraction, the ITU merged into the in 1986, forming a printing sector to bolster organizing against ongoing mechanization.

Organizational Structure

Local Charters and Administration

The International Typographical Union (ITU) established its organizational reach through subordinate local unions, chartered sequentially upon application from groups of journeymen printers in a given locality. Charters were granted by the ITU's executive committee or at conventions, requiring petitioners to demonstrate a viable membership base and adherence to union rituals and laws; for instance, the Richmond Typographical Union Local 90 received its ITU charter in 1872 following an initial grant from the predecessor National Typographical Union in 1866. By 1873, the ITU had issued charters to 105 locals, encompassing over 10,000 members across . This expansion continued, with locals operating in 658 cities by 1937, enabling localized enforcement of trade standards while contributing per capita dues to the international body. Local administration emphasized democratic within ITU oversight, with each mandating election of core officers including a president to preside over meetings, a recording secretary for minutes and correspondence, a financial secretary-treasurer for dues and accounts, and additional roles like or trustees for specific duties. Regular assemblies, typically weekly, handled admissions via examination and ritual, grievance processing, and ratification of local scale agreements negotiated directly with employers. Standing committees—such as those for scales, appeals, and discipline—managed operational details, while locals maintained autonomy in routine affairs but remitted portions of dues to fund ITU activities. The ITU constitution vested the international executive with supervisory powers over , including the right to amend charters, impose trusteeships, reorganize, or dissolve non-compliant unions to ensure uniformity in practices like strike protocols and membership standards. This centralized authority, detailed in the ITU's bylaws and general , allowed intervention in cases of internal discord or failure to uphold international directives, as evidenced in legal disputes over local in the mid-20th century. Such mechanisms balanced local initiative with federation-wide cohesion, though they occasionally sparked tensions between rank-and-file members and ITU leadership.

Headquarters and Support Institutions

The International Typographical Union established its national headquarters in Indianapolis, Indiana, in 1888 after relocating from New York City to achieve a more central geographic position for coordinating activities across North America. In 1925, the offices shifted to the renovated former Van Camp mansion at 2820 North Meridian Street, which served as the administrative base during a period of union expansion and hosted the 72nd national convention from August 8 to 13, 1927. The headquarters remained in Indianapolis until 1961–1962, when it moved to Colorado Springs, Colorado, to a new building integrated with the Union Printers Home grounds, reflecting the union's emphasis on member welfare facilities amid declining urban printing centers. The Union Printers Home in Colorado Springs functioned as the ITU's principal support institution, established on 80 acres acquired in 1889 specifically for the rest, recovery, and long-term care of aged, infirm, or ill members, including those afflicted with tuberculosis or "printer's lung" from occupational dust exposure. Officially dedicated on May 12, 1892, and initially funded by philanthropists George W. Childs and Anthony J. Drexel, the facility evolved from a convalescent sanitarium into a comprehensive retirement and medical complex with hospital services, dormitories, and self-sustaining agricultural operations such as dairy farms and poultry to support resident needs. Over its operational history, it provided housing and treatment to approximately 40,000 ITU members, underscoring the union's commitment to mutual aid benefits funded through member contributions and embodying early organized labor's model of institutional self-reliance.

Auxiliary Groups and Specialized Divisions

The Women's International Auxiliary to the International Typographical Union was established in during the ITU's convention to foster fraternal ties between printers' families and the union, promote union-labeled products, and support initiatives like the Printers' . Local chapters, such as the Women's Auxiliary of ITU Local 48 in founded on November 2, 1899, organized social events, fundraisers, and advocacy for union causes, including awareness campaigns for the union label and assistance to striking members' families. Similarly, the Women's Auxiliary to ITU Local 2 in handled charitable work and community outreach aligned with union objectives. These auxiliaries participated in ITU conventions and events, as evidenced by their presence at the 1912 annual meeting where they convened alongside delegates. Their efforts extended to broader labor solidarity, such as promoting union products and aiding in membership drives, though they remained non-voting support organizations without direct bargaining authority. The national Women's International Auxiliary persisted until 1990, after the ITU's merger into the , by which time its role had diminished amid industry changes. Specialized divisions within the ITU were limited, as the union primarily focused on compositors and related typesetting crafts, with auxiliary trades like pressmen and mailers often handled through affiliated or separate locals rather than formal internal divisions. Efforts to organize broader printing sectors, including auxiliary unions for non-composing roles, were proposed in joint AFL-CIO initiatives during the 1940s but did not result in enduring specialized structures under the ITU. This craft-specific orientation reflected the ITU's emphasis on skilled typographical work, distinguishing it from more industrialized unions.

Leadership and Governance

Presidents and Terms

The International Typographical Union elected its president annually at conventions, with terms typically beginning after the and serving until the next successful or succession due to or . Leadership often focused on wage scales, work hours, and jurisdictional issues amid industry changes.
PresidentTermNotes
W. B. Prescottc. 1893–1900Led efforts on mechanical typesetting and apprenticeships; active in 1893 Chicago convention and 1896–1898 negotiations.
James M. Lynch1901–c. 1914Elected president in 1901 after serving as vice president from 1899; championed the 48-hour week and addressed conventions through 1912.
John McParland1921–1923Elected in 1921; re-elected in 1922 with majority over challengers; term ended upon death in 1923.
Charles P. Howard1923–1944Succeeded McParland upon death; led during CIO formation in 1935 and 1930s labor disputes; served until 1944.
Claude Baker1944–1948Elected in 1944; addressed wartime labor board disputes and 1939 AFL matters; died 1951 after term.
Elmer Brown1958–1968Elected in 1958 as first new president in 14 years; re-elected for fifth term in 1964; died in office after 10 years.
Subsequent presidents included John J. Pilch from 1968 onward, amid ongoing challenges like and mergers. The union's leadership evolved with declining membership, culminating in its 1987 merger into the .

Secretary-Treasurers and Key Officials

The secretary-treasurer of the International Typographical Union served as the chief administrative and financial officer, overseeing membership records, dues collection, correspondence with locals, and budget management, with election occurring at biennial conventions alongside the president and vice presidents. This role ensured operational continuity amid the union's craft-focused structure, which emphasized decentralized local autonomy while centralizing fiscal accountability at headquarters in . Early secretary-treasurers included J. W. Bramwood of , holding office as of June 1906 during the union's expansion phase. John W. Hays of succeeded in this role by at least November 1924, managing finances during a period of post-World War I labor militancy and jurisdictional growth. Woodruff Randolph, a printer and lawyer, was elected secretary-treasurer in 1928, serving through 1944; in this capacity, he handled administrative responses to technological shifts like linotype adoption and coordinated with the executive committee on strike funds, before ascending to the amid wartime printing demands. Don Hurd acted as secretary-treasurer by 1948, during a time of legal challenges over union security clauses and post-war contract negotiations, as documented in federal labor directories and proceedings involving ITU leadership. Key officials beyond the secretary-treasurer included regionally elected s—typically eight to ten, representing districts from major printing centers—who advised on policy and mediated disputes, such as first R. L. Taylor and second K. C. Brown in the late 1940s, who participated in executive decisions on resistance and AFL alignments. The structure prioritized experienced journeymen, with terms limited to maintain internal checks, though longevity in office often reflected delegate support at conventions.

Internal Democracy and Political Dynamics

The International Typographical Union (ITU) maintained a robust system of internal democracy, distinguished by competitive elections, institutionalized factions, and high member participation, which contrasted with the oligarchic tendencies observed in many other labor organizations. This structure enabled regular leadership turnover and prevented the consolidation of unchecked power by incumbents, as analyzed in Seymour Martin Lipset, Martin A. Trow, and James S. Coleman's 1956 study, which identified the ITU as a rare exception to Robert Michels' "iron law of oligarchy." Key enablers included the union's constitutional provisions for referendums on major decisions, biennial conventions where delegates from autonomous locals elected officers, and equitable access to campaign resources among members, fostering broad engagement in governance. Factional competition formed the core of ITU's political dynamics, with organized parties such as the Progressives and Independents challenging the administration slate in convention elections, often resulting in narrow victories and policy shifts. For instance, in 1923, the Progressive faction contested the seating of officers, highlighting disputes over union priorities, though administration forces prevailed. Similarly, by 1948, Independent party units across 23 states mobilized to endorse platforms opposing incumbent leadership, underscoring the legitimacy of opposition within the union's framework. These factions, sustained by ideological differences on issues like wage-setting mechanisms and technological adaptation, ensured that no single group dominated indefinitely, with two primary parties and numerous subgroups active throughout the mid-20th century. Structural factors unique to the printing trade reinforced this democratic resilience, including the skilled, homogeneous membership of journeymen printers who valued from local governance, and the industry's competitive market pressures that incentivized responsive leadership. Lipset et al. emphasized that the ITU's early formation in as a federation of locals, combined with cultural norms of participation inherited from craft traditions, promoted ongoing debate and , though they noted oligarchic risks persisted without vigilant factionalism. Over time, these dynamics contributed to adaptive policies, such as the union's pioneering use of the "" for local wage referendums, but also exposed tensions when external economic shifts eroded member incentives for involvement.

Achievements and Contributions

Gains in Wages and Working Conditions

The International Typographical Union (ITU) secured reductions in working hours through sustained campaigns and strikes, prioritizing the eight-hour day as a core demand. From 1865 onward, the ITU lobbied employers and allied with broader labor efforts for shorter hours to mitigate fatigue and improve productivity in the skilled trade. A pivotal advance occurred in 1905-1906, when the ITU endorsed a nationwide push at its convention and initiated strikes, including in New York where Local 6 mobilized over 3,000 members, resulting in agreements for the eight-hour day and closed shops in affected offices. These actions established the eight-hour standard in union operations across multiple cities, influencing subsequent gains by other trades. Wage improvements followed from standardized scales and , with data documenting steady rises in printing trades under ITU jurisdiction. By 1908, the wage index for hand compositors stood at 33.3 (1929=100), climbing to 110.1 by amid negotiations that tied pay to skill levels and output. Average hourly rates for ITU-covered machine operators reached $1.307 for day work and $1.406 for night work in , reflecting adjustments for cost-of-living pressures and rules. Annual earnings for members tripled from 1933 to 1953, driven by post-Depression contracts that included premiums at rates. Further enhancements in conditions included the 40-hour workweek adopted during the to distribute scarce jobs without employer expense, formalized in 1937 across 658 locals. The ITU also instituted pension benefits via a fund financed by a 2% earnings assessment, yielding average monthly payments of $6.22 per member by the mid-20th century, alongside pushes for paid vacations—rising to coverage for about 5% of workers by 1939—and security provisions. These gains stemmed from the union's scale system, which allocated earnings based on verifiable piecework and minimum guarantees, fostering stability in an industry prone to fluctuations.

Role in Broader Labor Standards

The International Typographical Union (ITU) advanced broader labor standards through persistent campaigns for reduced work hours, beginning with agitation for an eight-hour workday in the mid-19th century. Printers affiliated with the ITU were among the earliest trade unionists to demand legislative and contractual limits on daily labor, viewing excessive hours as a causal driver of exploitation and inefficiency in skilled crafts. By the , ITU conventions debated eight-hour laws, reflecting a strategic emphasis on balancing with worker and time, though initial efforts yielded uneven results across locals. This push intensified in the early , with ITU Local 6 in launching a major strike in 1905 to enforce an eight-hour day during negotiations, highlighting the union's willingness to deploy economic leverage against employers resistant to change. The campaign succeeded nationally by , securing the eight-hour standard for many ITU members and establishing a precedent that influenced subsequent demands in and adjacent industries, as shorter shifts demonstrably mitigated fatigue-related errors in precision work like . During the , the ITU adapted its standards strategy by negotiating a 40-hour workweek across its 658 by , not as a concession but as a mechanism to distribute scarce jobs equitably among members without layoffs, thereby preserving skills and union amid technological and economic pressures. This set aspirational benchmarks for work-sharing and hour reductions in other craft unions, while the ITU simultaneously advocated for complementary social legislation on unemployment insurance and safety protocols tailored to hazardous printing environments involving chemicals and machinery. ITU standards extended to apprenticeship regulations, mandating structured training periods and skill certifications from the onward to prevent undercutting by unskilled labor, which indirectly elevated baseline competencies and wages in the broader trades. These measures, enforced through union bylaws and scales, fostered a model of merit-based progression that countered arbitrary employer hiring, influencing federation-wide discussions on vocational standards within the .

Adaptations to Early Technological Changes

The introduction of mechanized machines, particularly Ottmar Mergenthaler's Linotype in , posed a significant challenge to traditional hand composition methods that had defined the craft since the union's founding. The Linotype, which cast entire lines of type (slugs) from molten metal via a keyboard-operated , dramatically increased productivity, enabling newspapers like the to produce pages far faster than manual labor allowed. Rather than outright resistance, the International Typographical Union (ITU) pursued by asserting jurisdictional control over machine operation, recognizing that expanded the overall volume of printing work despite reducing the need for hand compositors. ITU policy encouraged members to acquire skills in operating composing , with conventions resolving that subordinate unions should workers wherever such was installed, thereby integrating machine tenders into the union's skilled workforce. This approach minimized displacement; fears that machines would eliminate jobs proved unfounded in the short term, as cheaper production spurred demand for printed materials, including newspapers and , leading to net job creation. By negotiating "machine scales"—specific wage rates for Linotype and similar devices like the Monotype (introduced in the )—the ITU secured higher compensation for operators, often 20-50% above hand rates, reflecting the machines' complexity and speed. For instance, early agreements stipulated priority for veteran hand compositors to transition to machine roles, preserving while adapting to the new . These adaptations facilitated the union's growth amid industrialization. ITU membership, which stood at around 5,000 in the mid-1880s, surged to over 30,000 by 1900, as democratized access to typesetting skills within the union and expanded opportunities in burgeoning print shops. The union also influenced machine design indirectly by insisting on operator-friendly features, such as ergonomic keyboards, through , which helped sustain craft standards. However, this era's successes relied on the ITU's ability to monopolize skilled machine operation, a control that later eroded with further .

Criticisms and Controversies

Resistance to Innovation and Automation

The International Typographical Union (ITU) initially embraced mechanical innovations like the in the late , which enhanced productivity by enabling hot-metal and allowed the union to secure higher wages and through control over skilled labor. However, by the mid-20th century, as , , and early computerization threatened to deskill composing room work and reduce demand for trained typographers, the ITU adopted restrictive policies to limit their adoption. These included contractual clauses requiring employer consultation and union approval for new equipment, as well as "priority systems" that prioritized for jobs, effectively slowing technological integration to preserve employment levels. A pivotal example of this resistance occurred during the 1962–1963 newspaper strike, initiated by ITU Local 6 under president Bertram Powers on December 8, 1962, involving approximately 17,000 workers across seven major dailies. The strike, lasting 114 days until April 1, 1963, centered on demands to restrict , including bans on "cold type" without adequate job protections and guarantees against job displacement. Publishers sought contractual freedom to implement efficiency-boosting technologies amid rising costs, but the ITU viewed such changes as existential threats to its craft-based membership, leading to shutdowns that halted production and caused significant financial losses estimated in tens of millions for the newspapers. The strike's resolution granted some union concessions, such as severance funds and retraining provisions, but failed to halt broader technological adoption, as non-union shops and suburban printing plants proliferated to bypass restrictions. ITU policies, including an "unalterable" stance against unauthorized use of composing machinery, extended to opposition against computerized and electronic pre-press systems in the and , contributing to membership decline from over 100,000 in the to under 20,000 by the . This rigidity contrasted with earlier adaptability, as from industry shifts showed that resisting cost-reducing innovations accelerated and closures, with New York City's daily newspapers dropping from seven to four viable outlets post-strike.

Militant Tactics and Economic Impacts

The International Typographical Union (ITU) frequently resorted to strikes and boycotts as core militant tactics to enforce wage standards, resist automation, and counter employer lockouts. These actions often involved "unfair lists," which publicized non-compliant firms and directed union members to withhold labor or services from them, effectively organizing secondary boycotts to pressure employers into compliance. Such tactics were rooted in the union's defense fund, which supported prolonged disputes; for instance, in 1891, the ITU disbursed over $17,000 in strike benefits amid multiple conflicts. In the , the ITU's militancy manifested in extended industry-wide strikes, including disputes with pressmen that endured up to four years, costing the union approximately $15.4 million in direct expenditures for benefits and relief. These actions secured temporary concessions on hours and pay but strained union finances, diverting resources from other initiatives. The 1962–1963 New York City newspaper strike exemplified the ITU's aggressive stance against technological displacement, with Local 6 initiating a walkout on December 8, 1962, over , joined by other crafts in halting seven major dailies for 114 days. The dispute affected 17,000 workers and triggered publisher lockouts, eliminating daily circulation of 5.7 million copies and Sunday editions of 7.2 million, while costing publishers an estimated $100 million in lost . Economically, the strike accelerated reader migration to television news, with many abandoning print habits permanently, and imposed post-settlement contracts that added millions in labor costs for publishers, heightening industry vulnerabilities to competition. Broader impacts included disrupted local commerce from reduced print advertising and elevated operational expenses, which publishers cited as factors in subsequent consolidations and non-union shifts. While yielding short-term gains in work preservation for members, these tactics contributed to escalating costs that eroded the competitive edge of unionized printing operations against and .

Jurisdictional Disputes and Failed Mergers

The International Typographical Union (ITU) frequently engaged in jurisdictional disputes with other craft unions over work assignments, particularly those emerging from technological advancements in printing processes. The introduction of linotype machines in the 1880s precipitated conflicts with the International Association of Machinists, as both organizations asserted claims to operating, maintaining, and repairing the equipment; these tensions arose because linotype operators, traditionally under ITU jurisdiction, overlapped with machinists' skills in mechanical upkeep. In one notable case, a linotype machinist secured $650 in damages against the ITU in 1900 after being compelled to leave employment in Buffalo, New York, due to union pressure enforcing exclusive jurisdiction. Disputes with pressmen's unions were recurrent, stemming from the 1889 secession of press assistants from the ITU to establish the International Printing Pressmen's Union, which fragmented authority over printing room tasks like feeding and operating presses. By 1946, the ITU proposed constitutional amendments to reclaim over pressmen and related roles, signaling ongoing efforts to consolidate control amid industry evolution. Local-level clashes persisted, such as the 1961–1962 conflict in , between ITU Local 95 and Printing Pressmen and Assistants' Union Local 9, involving contested work in operations. In 1965, the ITU contested with the over electrical maintenance on a new web offset press, highlighting frictions from integrating electrical systems into traditional domains. These disputes often escalated to National Labor Relations Board interventions or court rulings, diverting resources and undermining coordinated bargaining power in the printing sector. As membership eroded from automation and competition, the ITU pursued mergers with complementary unions to broaden its base, but several initiatives collapsed due to internal divisions and ratification failures. Negotiations with the Newspaper Guild, spanning nearly four years, ended in rejection by ITU delegates in the early 1980s, as members prioritized preserving craft autonomy over integrating with a broader newsroom-focused organization. A proposed merger with the Graphic Communications International Union (GCIU) advanced to a full agreement in January 1985, aiming to unite typographers with lithographers and bindery workers, but unraveled by March 1985 amid disputes over governance structures and per capita dues allocation. Similarly, a merger overture with the was overwhelmingly rejected by ITU members in August 1985 via , reflecting resistance to diluting the union's printing-specific identity within a larger transportation and warehouse-oriented entity. Such failures, driven by democratic referenda and concerns over loss of influence, exacerbated the ITU's isolation and accelerated its vulnerability to industry consolidation without collective scale.

Decline and Dissolution

Factors Accelerating Membership Loss

The advent of photocomposition and computer-based in the 1960s and 1970s fundamentally disrupted the demand for traditional typographical skills, as these technologies eliminated the need for hot-metal linotype machines and manual composition that had defined ITU work for decades. Membership, which peaked above 100,000 in the mid-1960s primarily among compositors, began a precipitous drop as publishers adopted offset lithography and automated systems to cut costs and speed production. By the early , had rendered many ITU-protected job classifications obsolete, with membership halving between 1984 and 1987 alone. ITU resistance to these innovations exacerbated the losses, as militant tactics including strikes and contract rejections delayed adaptation and prompted employers to circumvent union shops. In 1969, for instance, New York newspaper printers rejected an automation agreement that would have phased out substitute categories, leading to prolonged disputes and accelerated non-union hiring. Such rigidity preserved short-term job protections but alienated publishers, who invested in cold-type systems outside ITU jurisdiction, resulting in a two-thirds decline in active membership from the 1960s to 1986. Jurisdictional rules enforcing "union-only" composition further hindered flexibility, as emerging digital workflows integrated editing and typesetting, bypassing skilled compositors entirely. Economic consolidation in amplified these pressures, with fewer, larger firms prioritizing efficiency over craft traditions, while broader labor market shifts reduced entry-level apprenticeships. By 1986, these factors converged to dissolve the ITU on , as typographical trades vanished amid unchecked . The union's failure to retrain members for hybrid roles or negotiate technology-sharing pacts left it vulnerable to market-driven displacement, underscoring how institutional inertia accelerated structural job erosion in a capital-intensive industry.

Merger Negotiations and Outcomes

In the early 1980s, the International Typographical Union (ITU) initiated merger discussions with the Newspaper Guild after nearly four years of negotiations, but these talks collapsed in 1981 when delegates rejected the proposal. Subsequent substantive negotiations with the began in September 1983, yet ITU members voted against this merger in July 1984, opting instead to pursue affiliation with the Graphic Communications International Union (GCIU), which represented overlapping printing trades. A tentative merger agreement between the ITU and GCIU was announced on January 11, 1985, envisioning a combined entity headquartered in , but the GCIU's general board decisively rejected the deal in March 1985, marking the third failed ITU merger attempt in recent years. These repeated failures underscored the ITU's vulnerability amid sharp membership declines from , prompting a shift toward the (CWA), a larger union expanding into information and media sectors. Merger plans with the CWA were formalized in July 1986, with ITU delegates approving the terms that preserved key autonomy for printing workers within a new CWA sector. On November 26, 1986, ITU members ratified the merger by an 80% majority vote, ending the union's independent existence after 134 years and integrating its approximately 40,000 members into the CWA's Printing, Publishing and Media Workers Sector. This outcome provided the ITU with access to the CWA's broader resources for organizing and bargaining, though it effectively dissolved the historic craft union's distinct structure in response to industry contraction.

Integration into Successor Organizations

In December 1986, delegates from the International Typographical Union (ITU) approved a merger agreement with the (CWA), under which the ITU would be absorbed as a distinct sector focused on , publishing, and media workers. On November 26, 1986, ITU members voted by an 80% majority to ratify the merger, marking the culmination of negotiations after failed attempts with the , The Newspaper Guild, and the Graphic Communications International Union. The merger took effect in 1987, integrating approximately 50,000 ITU members—down from peaks exceeding 100,000 in prior decades—into the CWA, which represented over 600,000 workers in , , and related fields at the time. Within the CWA, former ITU members formed the Printing, Publishing and Media Workers Sector, preserving elements of ITU's , such as dedicated leadership and bargaining units for typographical crafts amid ongoing industry shifts to digital technologies. This integration allowed ITU's legacy structures, including local unions and benefit funds like the Union Printers Home, to continue under CWA oversight, though membership in printing sectors continued to erode due to and . The CWA's broader scope in information-age industries facilitated adaptation for some ITU holdovers, but jurisdictional overlaps with other printing unions led to further consolidations, such as the 1983 formation of the Graphic Communications International Union from separate mergers unrelated to the ITU's final path.

Legacy

Influence on Printing and Labor History

The International Typographical Union (ITU), established in 1852 as the National Typographical Union and renamed in 1869 upon incorporating Canadian locals, holds the distinction of being the first enduring national labor organization . It played a foundational role in the labor movement by contributing to the creation of the Federation of Organized Trades and Labor Unions in 1881, a direct precursor to the formed five years later. The ITU's early advocacy for reduced work hours, including persistent for an eight-hour workday and opposition to compulsory Sunday labor, advanced progressive standards that influenced subsequent union campaigns. Within the printing sector, the standardized practices for craftsmanship, apprenticeships, and internal union discipline, elevating professional norms across composing rooms, press operations, and related trades. A notable innovation was the introduction of the "union bug" emblem in , a small placed on printed products to verify union labor and signal quality to consumers, which became a hallmark of the industry's unionized output. By the late 1930s, with over 650 locals spanning North American cities, the union negotiated the 40-hour workweek alongside enhanced protections for wages, , and , establishing benchmarks emulated by other and craft unions. The ITU's organizational evolution further shaped labor structures, implementing centralized administration by 1884 and full-time paid officers by 1888, while retaining local autonomy for contract negotiations—a balance that informed federation models. It also pioneered social welfare by founding the Union Printers' Home in Colorado Springs in 1892, offering residential care for retired or destitute members and demonstrating unions' capacity for mutual aid. These efforts collectively professionalized the printing workforce and reinforced craft unionism's emphasis on skill preservation amid technological shifts, leaving a legacy of disciplined bargaining and standards enforcement in both printing history and the wider labor landscape.

Causal Lessons on Union Rigidity vs. Market Forces

The International Typographical Union's trajectory reveals how entrenched work rules, designed to safeguard member interests, clashed with market imperatives for productivity gains through technological substitution. By the 1950s, innovations like photocomposition and began supplanting labor-intensive hot-metal , enabling employers to reduce staffing needs by up to 50% in composition processes while maintaining or increasing output volumes. The ITU's rigid structures— including "bogus" compensation for machine setup time, mandatory multi-person crews per unit, and protracted seven-year apprenticeships—elevated labor costs, rendering unionized shops uncompetitive against emerging non-union operations that embraced these efficiencies. This institutional inflexibility, rather than the technologies themselves, accelerated job displacement, as employers prioritized capital investments yielding higher returns amid rising competition from automated facilities. Militant responses, such as the 1962–1963 newspaper strike led by ITU Local 6 president Bertram Powers, intensified this dynamic, with 114 days of work stoppage over demands to regulate computerized resulting in over $100 million in combined losses for publishers and union members. Post-strike, newspapers rapidly deployed , including cathode-ray tube compositors, bypassing union controls and eroding jurisdictional power; similar rejections of modernization pacts, as in 1969 when Local 6 voted down proposals to streamline substitute staffing for automated rooms, further alienated employers. These episodes demonstrate a causal pathway where union leverage, exercised through strikes and rule enforcement, prompted decisive shifts to capital over labor, shrinking the ITU's domain as printing firms outsourced or internalized tech-driven workflows. Ultimately, the ITU's failure to renegotiate productivity shares—as successfully done during the Linotype era, when cheaper methods spurred demand and membership growth—left it vulnerable to secular declines in skilled trades. Membership peaked in the before contracting sharply amid these shifts, culminating in the union's 1986 merger into broader organizations amid insurmountable jurisdictional fragmentation. This outcome empirically validates that , channeled through competitive pressures for cost minimization, override protective institutions unless the latter evolve to capture gains from ; rigid preservation of status quo practices, while deferring short-term losses, invites long-term obsolescence as rivals exploit efficiency advantages.

Contemporary Reflections on Union Decline

The decline of the International Typographical Union (ITU) serves as a cautionary in , illustrating how institutional rigidity in the face of technological disruption can render once-dominant organizations obsolete. At its peak in the mid-20th century, the ITU represented over members controlling the skilled craft of hot-metal , which required extensive and union oversight, effectively bifurcating production costs between content creators and typesetters. However, the introduction of linotype machines in the late , followed by and digital pre-press technologies in the and , drastically reduced the demand for traditional typesetters, as these innovations automated composition and slashed labor requirements from thousands of manual operations to minimal intervention. The ITU's militant resistance—through strikes, jurisdictional claims, and contract clauses mandating inefficient practices—accelerated job losses, as publishers increasingly adopted non-union or outsourced alternatives to bypass union constraints. By the 1980s, membership had plummeted to approximately 30,000, prompting the ITU's merger into the (CWA) in , approved by 80% of members, effectively dissolving the independent entity after 137 years. This outcome underscores a core dynamic: unions that prioritize short-term job preservation over adaptation to productivity-enhancing technologies invite their marginalization, as market forces favor efficient competitors unencumbered by legacy work rules. Analyses of the ITU's trajectory highlight that such resistance not only failed to halt but exacerbated economic pressures on employers, leading to industry consolidation and of operations. In contemporary labor discourse, the ITU's experience informs reflections on broader union challenges amid and . Modern sectors like and media face analogous shifts—e.g., electric vehicles displacing assembly-line skills or AI automating content workflows—where unions risk similar erosion if they entrench outdated protections rather than retraining workforces for emergent roles. Empirical trends in U.S. union density, declining from 20.1% of workers in 1983 to 10.1% in , reflect this pattern, with craft-specific unions faring worst against technological displacement. Unlike the ITU era, today's fragmented labor landscape includes gig economies and , amplifying the costs of rigidity; successful adaptations, such as tech-sector organizing, emphasize flexibility over control, suggesting that unions must evolve causal models from adversarial to symbiotic to sustain . This perspective, drawn from historical case studies rather than ideological , posits that market-driven efficiencies ultimately prevail, compelling labor organizations to prioritize value creation over veto power.

References

  1. https://archiveswest.orbiscascade.org/ark:80444/xv80072
  2. https://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:%252F13030%252Fft7779p18z
  3. https://depts.washington.edu/moves/CIO_ITU_locals.shtml
  4. https://theconversation.com/what-todays-labor-leaders-can-learn-from-the-explosive-rise-and-quick-fall-of-the-typesetters-union-214519
  5. https://time.com/archive/6626141/labor-hard-times/
  6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/41110584_Democracy_in_Private_Government_A_Case_Study_of_the_International_Typographical_Union
  7. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1986/11/27/Historic-ITU-to-merge-with-expanding-CWA/6777533451600/
  8. https://findingaids.library.nyu.edu/tamwag/wag_276/
  9. https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/national-typographical-union
  10. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1821011.pdf
  11. https://deafprinters.com/exhibits/show/history/itu
  12. https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31007/1/MoodyThesisCorrectedMigration.pdf
  13. https://www.dol.gov/general/aboutdol/history/chapter3
  14. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1653&context=oa_dissertations
  15. https://www.dol.gov/general/aboutdol/history/chapter5
  16. https://www.nytimes.com/1936/09/15/archives/morrison-urges-printers-bar-cio-afl-secretary-appeals-to.html
  17. https://time.com/archive/6768630/national-affairs-printers-choice/
  18. https://insights.bu.edu/what-todays-labor-leaders-can-learn-from-the-explosive-rise-and-quick-fall-of-the-typesetters-union/
  19. https://www.nytimes.com/1946/08/22/archives/itu-rejects-plan-for-aflcio-unity-but-resolutions-group-head.html
  20. https://www.bolshevik.org/1917/no6/no06prin.html
  21. https://repository.uclawsf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1089&context=hastings_comm_ent_law_journal
  22. https://bolsheviktendency.org/2020/06/11/the-decline-of-the-printers-union/
  23. https://jacobin.com/2017/09/typesetting-union-technology-automation-printing
  24. https://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2012/11/1963-newspaper-strike-bertram-powers
  25. https://archivesspace.library.gsu.edu/repositories/2/resources/308
  26. https://archives.nypl.org/mss/2228
  27. https://archiveswest.orbiscascade.org/ark:/80444/xv98660
  28. https://archives.libraries.psu.edu/repositories/3/resources/1302
  29. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/files/docs/publications/bls/bls_1263_1959.pdf
  30. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/76/881/2304336/
  31. https://indyencyclopedia.org/international-typographical-union/
  32. https://indyencyclopedia.org/labor-unions-national-headquarters/
  33. https://unionprintershome.com/history/
  34. https://archivesspace.library.gsu.edu/repositories/2/resources/481
  35. https://sclfind.libs.uga.edu/sclfind/view?docId=ead/ms1028.xml%3Bquery=%3Bbrand=default
  36. https://hsp.org/sites/default/files/legacy_files/migrated/findingaid2076itup.pdf
  37. https://www.nytimes.com/1912/08/13/archives/printers-are-in-session-international-typographical-union-opens-its.html
  38. https://www.chroniclingillinois.org/collections/show/430
  39. https://archivesspace.library.gsu.edu/agents/corporate_entities/378
  40. https://www.nytimes.com/1940/02/25/archives/organizing-group-set-up-by-printers-afl-and-cio-units-form-joint.html
  41. https://www.nytimes.com/1922/05/30/archives/mcparland-heads-printers-reelected-president-of-international.html
  42. https://www.nytimes.com/1930/07/17/archives/james-m-lynch-labor-leader-dies-champion-of-8hour-day-for-printers.html
  43. https://convention2.allacademic.com/one/theasa/theasa23/online_program_direct_link/view_paper/2060789/
  44. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/453737
  45. https://ohiomemory.org/digital/collection/p16007coll56/id/83744/
  46. https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=OLSF19300726.2.31
  47. https://www.nytimes.com/1922/05/27/archives/typographical-union-vote-john-mcparland-of-new-york-leads-ww.html
  48. https://washingtondigitalnewspapers.org/?a=d&d=SUR19230616.1.7
  49. https://www.nytimes.com/1936/11/23/archives/printers-threaten-bolt-from-af-of-l-in-cio-quarrel-howard-in-tampa.html
  50. https://www.nytimes.com/1944/01/08/archives/newark-news-halts-publication-in-dispute-over-printers-wages-labor.html
  51. https://www.nytimes.com/1939/10/02/archives/afl-council-calls-role-of-mediator-best-we-can-offer-with-hope-for.html
  52. https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/60156570
  53. https://www.nytimes.com/1958/06/05/archives/brown-is-elected-president-of-itu-extennessean-leads-full.html
  54. https://www.nytimes.com/1968/02/28/archives/elmer-brown-of-the-i-t-u-dies-president-of-union-for-10-years.html
  55. https://www.nytimes.com/1964/05/27/archives/brown-wins-fifth-term-as-president-of-the-itu.html
  56. https://archivesspace.library.gsu.edu/repositories/2/resources/333/collection_organization
  57. https://findingaids.library.nyu.edu/tamwag/wag_173/
  58. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/files/docs/publications/bls/bls_0937_1948.pdf
  59. https://www.nytimes.com/1957/08/22/archives/randolph-of-itu-to-retire-in-1958-head-of-printers-union-for-13.html
  60. https://www.nytimes.com/1906/06/06/archives/typographical-union-officers.html
  61. https://www.nytimes.com/1924/11/02/archives/lynch-takes-office-installed-as-new-president-of-international.html
  62. https://acawiki.org/Union_democracy:_The_Internal_Politics_of_the_International_Typographical_Union
  63. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2773578
  64. https://www.nytimes.com/1923/08/15/archives/wins-itu-contest-ea-smith-of-binghamton-is-seated-as-convention.html
  65. https://www.nytimes.com/1948/01/24/archives/itu-independents-seek-union-rule-begin-campaign-to-overthrow.html
  66. https://www.nytimes.com/1905/08/18/archives/printers-may-strike-gompers-commends-eighthour-stand-which.html
  67. https://www.nytimes.com/1906/01/01/archives/1000-printers-to-strike-typographical-union-no-6-formally-opens.html
  68. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/files/docs/publications/bls/bls_0675_1940.pdf
  69. https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=EBLJ19530821-01.2.19
  70. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41832641
  71. https://archives.colorado.edu/repositories/2/resources/1176
  72. http://rmc.library.cornell.edu/EAD/htmldocs/KCL05345.html
  73. https://buttonmuseum.org/buttons/international-typographical-union-8-hours
  74. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/250209
  75. https://gsipe-workshop.github.io/files/AMParker__Unions_and_the_Political_Economy_of_Automation_220829.pdf
  76. https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/fcpd-8f84
  77. https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=5391
  78. https://www.nytimes.com/1965/08/21/archives/industry-growth-is-urged-by-itu-printers-deny-attrition-is-answer.html
  79. https://archive.org/stream/historyoftypogra00tracrich/historyoftypogra00tracrich_djvu.txt
  80. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/143656543.pdf
  81. https://www.nytimes.com/1924/08/12/archives/strikes-cost-union-15391342.html
  82. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/labor-strikes-1920s
  83. https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/otm/segments/311624-great-newspaper-strike-1962-1963
  84. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2009/05/what-the-1962-63-new-york-newspaper-strike-teaches-us-about-our-post-newspaper-future.html
  85. https://www.wnyc.org/story/278844-people-without-papers/
  86. https://www.thecrimson.com/article/1963/1/23/the-newspaper-strike-pthe-international-typographical/
  87. https://cjc.utppublishing.com/doi/10.22230/cjc.2006v31n3a1834
  88. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1025576
  89. https://www.nytimes.com/1900/01/06/archives/typographical-union-loses-damages-of-650-awarded-a-machinist-forced.html
  90. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.7312/bake92420-007/pdf
  91. http://www.nytimes.com/1946/08/21/archives/itu-move-is-seen-to-broaden-rule-proposed-amendment-would-reclaim.html
  92. https://archiveswest.orbiscascade.org/ark:80444/xv03767
  93. https://www.nytimes.com/1965/08/17/archives/union-aide-warns-of-nlrb-power-authority-over-jurisdiction-is.html
  94. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/278/6/132301/
  95. https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1984/09/art4full.pdf
  96. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1985/01/11/The-International-Typographical-Union-said-Friday-a-merger-agreement/3737474267600/
  97. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1985-03-14-mn-26522-story.html
  98. https://www.chicagotribune.com/1985/08/29/printers-say-no-to-teamsters/
  99. https://www.nytimes.com/1969/12/22/archives/printers-turn-down-automation-pact.html
  100. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/national/1986/07/10/printers-union-plans-merger/bd5b2061-8dd0-40b3-9151-dd8e87fd0748/
  101. https://archives.lib.umn.edu/repositories/22/resources/9102
  102. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1983/09/28/ITU-Teamsters-in-merger-talks/9887433569600/
  103. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1984/07/28/itu-members-replace-chief-reject-teamsters/b5dafd4f-e358-464d-8971-0900faf53942/
  104. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1986/11/26/Members-of-the-134-year-old-International-Typographical-Union-voted-overwhelmingly/9757533365200/
  105. https://www.nytimes.com/1986/11/27/us/printers-to-join-with-communications-union.html
  106. https://cwa-union.org/about/cwa-history
  107. https://cwa-union.org/printing-publishing-and-media-workers
  108. https://archives.libraries.psu.edu/repositories/3/resources/2143
  109. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w7076/w7076.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.