Hubbry Logo
JET ProgrammeJET ProgrammeMain
Open search
JET Programme
Community hub
JET Programme
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
JET Programme
JET Programme
JET Programme
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Japan Exchange and Teaching Programme (外国語青年招致事業, Gaikokugo Seinen Shōchi Jigyō), often shortened to the JET Programme (JETプログラム, Jetto Puroguramu), is a teaching program sponsored by the Japanese government that brings foreign university graduates to Japan as Assistant Language Teachers (ALTs), Sports Education Advisors (SEAs), or Coordinators for International Relations (CIRs) for local governments and boards of education.[1][2]

Key Information

JET is one of the world's largest international exchange programmes.[3][4] Since its beginning in 1987, over 77,000 people from 77 countries have participated.[5][6] Official statistics published in July 2025 showed that 5,933 participants from 54 countries were employed on the programme at that time.[7] Japanese citizens are only allowed to apply if they relinquish their Japanese citizenship first. The programme states that its goal is to "promote internationalization in Japan's local communities by improving foreign language education and fostering international exchange at the community level."

JET requires applicants to be fluent in English, possess citizenship of certain countries, and hold a bachelor's degree; the degree can be in any subject and does not have to be related to languages or teaching, as the programme's focus is less on teachers and more on cultural ambassadors who are able to assist Japanese teachers of English. Applicants do not have be familiar with the Japanese language, though resources are provided for those who wish to learn during their time in the country. The vast majority of participants are recent graduates, but there is no age limit. About 90% of participants are ALTs, with the rest divided between CIRs and SEAs. Participants can be employed on the programme for a maximum of five years.

History

[edit]
Crown Prince Naruhito speaking at the programme's 30th anniversary commemorative ceremony at the Keio Plaza Hotel in November 2016

In August 1987, the JET Programme was formed by a merger of the Monbusho English Fellows Program and the British English Teachers Scheme (formerly the English Teaching Recruitment Programme).[8] JET offers English speakers with bachelor's degrees full-time employment as either an Assistant Language Teacher (ALT) in elementary and secondary schools, a Sports Exchange Advisor (SEA) whose role is to assist with sports training and the planning of sports related projects, or a Coordinator for International Relations (CIR) in selected local government offices in Japan.

The programme later revised its aims to "increase mutual understanding between the people of Japan and the people of other nations, to promote internationalisation in Japan's local communities by helping to improve foreign language education, and to develop international exchange at the community level". The total number of JET participants steadily decreased from a high of 6,273 in 2002 to 4,330 in 2011, then began to increase and stabilize.[9]

Administrative details

[edit]

The programme is operated by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications; the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) in conjunction with local authorities. It is administered by the Council of Local Authorities for International Relations (CLAIR) and has an annual budget of over ¥45 billion (approximately $314 million).[10][11]

The Association of Japan Exchange and Teaching (AJET) provides support for programme participants,[12] and facilitates communication with the programme's sponsors.[13] AJET organises events and has a number of publications to assist with teaching in Japan, including Planet Eigo[14] and Foxy Phonics.[14] AJET is not an official JET organization and has no official ties with CLAIR.

Application process

[edit]

Applicants must hold a bachelor's degree in any subject, be a citizen of the country where the recruitment and selection procedures take place, not possess Japanese citizenship,[15] have excellent written and spoken skills in the designated language (English or, for non-English speaking countries, English or their principal language), have a keen interest in the country and culture of Japan, and not have lived in Japan for six or more years after the year 2000 nor be a former participant in JET after 2007.[16][17]

Prospective participants must submit a detailed application including a statement of purpose and self-reported medical form, usually in November or December of the year before their departure. Those who pass stage one of the process are invited to interviews which are conducted in major cities, usually in February. Although applications are accepted from people living in Japan, there are no interviews offered in the country and applicants must interview in their home country. Interviews are conducted in English or in the language of the applicant's country, and part of the interview will be conducted in Japanese if the applicant indicated Japanese ability on their application or if they are a CIR applicant. The interview is normally conducted by a panel of three people consisting of former JETs and members of Japanese government, embassy, and consulate organizations. The interviews are approximately 20 minutes long.[18] Interviewees are then offered a position, rejected, or designated as "alternates" (backup applicants who may participate if positions become available).

Once offered a position, applicants must formally submit their acceptance or rejection of the offer. In addition, they must provide the results of a recent physical examination that has been performed by a physician within the last three months. Finally, they must submit detailed contact information so that the programme can send them materials and information as the departure date draws nearer. Participants usually learn of their placement details during May and July, just before their departure date of either late July (Group A) or early August (Group B). Alternates may receive very short notice, sometimes only a few weeks, if a placement becomes available. A small group of alternates will usually arrive in late August (Group C) and other alternates will arrive alone at various times throughout the fall. Applicants who withdraw from the program after receiving placement notification are ineligible to reapply the following year. Applicants are required to depart in a group from the city in which they were interviewed, although rare exceptions are made. Departure usually takes place from the Japanese embassy or consulate that serves the applicant's home town, though it could theoretically be any site in the country the applicant named on their application. Air fares are arranged by the programme.[19]

Participants are required to attend pre-departure and post-arrival orientations, as well as annual mid-year conferences, and may attend a returnee conference during their tenure.[20] Participants are placed with a local authority in Japan (the contracting organization) which serves as their employer. There are 47 prefectural governments and 12 city governments in addition to numerous individual city, town, and village governments and some private schools designated as contracting organizations. While applicants can specify up to three preferred locations and can request urban, semi-rural, or rural placements, they may be placed anywhere in Japan and placements may not match their requests.[21][22]

Participants sign a one-year contract which can be renewed up to four times for a maximum of five years. Some contracting organizations offer the option of contracting for a total of five years, although some prohibit contracting beyond three years. Before 2006, participants could only contract for up to three years, with the exception of a few positions.[23] A small percentage of exceptional participants are elected to stay for the maximum number of consecutive appointments, a sum of four renewal cycles, for a total of five years. Participants who began their tenure on the programme during or before 2011 received an annual net salary of ¥3.6 million (approximately $25,142).[24] Since 2012, participants have been paid on a new annual salary scale: ¥3.36 million (approximately $23,466) for the first year, ¥3.6 million (approximately $25,142) for the second year, ¥3.9 million (approximately $27,237) for the third year, and ¥3.96 million (approximately $27,656) each for the fourth and fifth years; notably, this is the gross salary as opposed to the pre-2011 net salary, so participants who are liable for income or residential taxes in Japan must pay them.[24]

The Japanese government provides participants with airfare to and from Japan, and may receive other benefits such as housing subsidies. Participants are generally forbidden to take paid work outside of their programme duties.[25]

Assistant Language Teacher responsibilities

[edit]

The duties of ALTs include assisting with English classes taught by Japanese teachers in primary and elementary high schools, English language training activities at primary and elementary schools, the preparation of materials for English language teaching, the language training of Japanese teachers of English, organizing and preparing activities for extracurricular activities and clubs, providing information on language and other related subjects to teachers' consultants and Japanese teachers of English (such as word usage and pronunciations), and English language speech contests. ALTs must also engage in local international exchange activities.

Participation

[edit]

Due to the nature of JET, most of its participants come from primarily English-speaking countries. In 2014, which saw 4,476 JET participants, about half of them were from the United States (2,457), Canada (495), the United Kingdom (383), Australia (315), New Zealand (255), South Africa (93), and Ireland (86).[26]

Participants by country and year
Year United States United Kingdom Australia New Zealand Canada Ireland Others[b] Total Ref.
1987 592 150 83 23 0 0 0 848
[27]
1988 871 248 143 34 127 20 0 1,443
1989 1,090 370 146 43 290 36 12 1,987
1990 1,249 396 145 71 366 41 16 2,284
1991 1,545 488 142 130 488 45 36 2,874
1992 1,710 596 182 165 586 44 42 3,325
1993 1,898 686 219 198 656 59 69 3,785
1994 2,180 729 242 200 685 60 89 4,185
1995 2,411 819 274 201 723 69 132 4,629
1996 2,599 920 299 213 761 72 169 5,033
1997 2,583 1,033 338 225 854 88 226 5,347
1998 2,613 1,128 355 255 873 93 360 5,677
1999 2,560 1,183 407 306 900 95 374 5,825
2000 2,514 1,320 417 370 998 99 360 6,078
2001 2,477 1,405 417 371 1,057 95 368 6,190
2002 2,669 1,287 447 397 991 99 383 6,273
2003 2,729 1,215 438 375 981 109 379 6,226
2004 2,841 1,060 431 345 894 132 400 6,103
2005 2,873 916 420 320 778 121 425 5,853
2006 2,879 717 387 274 685 114 452 5,508
[28]
2007 2,808 577 316 242 618 95 483 5,119
[29]
2008 2,681 440 276 208 529 78 459 4,682
[30]
2009 2,537 390 272 194 481 96 466 4,436
[31]
2010 2,420 399 254 206 474 112 469 4,334
[32]
2011 2,332 440 265 226 487 103 487 4,330
[33]
2012 2,334 432 262 248 477 107 500 4,360
[34]
2013 2,359 388 300 255 484 99 487 4,372
[35]
2014 2,457 383 315 255 495 86 485 4,476
[26]
2015 2,695 410 346 241 499 92 503 4,786
[36]
2016 2,814 409 340 237 500 101 551 4,952
[37]
2017 2,924 423 351 235 494 98 638 5,163
[38]
2018 3,012 513 355 240 566 113 729 5,528
[39]
2019 3,105 560 343 251 557 114 831 5,761
[40]
2020–2021

Irregular arrivals due to border restrictions arising from the COVID-19 pandemic

2022 3,047 685 266 202 564 116 852 5,723
[41]
2023 3,042 762 268 187 573 112 887 5,831
[42]
2024 3,002 741 287 182 548 120 981 5,861
[43]
2025 3,032 777 255 171 521 119 1,058 5,933
[44]

Developments

[edit]

Some JET participants in recent years have been placed in elementary schools, reflecting MEXT's plan to raise the English ability of Japanese students. Some contracting organizations go further and have ALTs periodically work with kindergarten students, teaching basic English vocabulary through games and activities. This also brings them exposure to foreigners. Participants occasionally also teach in special education.

Several prefectures have opted out of JET in recent years, and some hire individuals directly through advertising or word of mouth, while others use an intermediary dispatch company—usually one of the big English schools such as Heart, Interac, or Altia.[45][46] Whilst directly hired employees may obtain working conditions similar to the JET Programme, those employed by dispatch companies often have very different working contracts that include unpaid holidays or pay-by-the-day contracts. Some dispatch methods used by certain boards of education have even been declared illegal by Japanese labor standards authorities.[citation needed]

Since 1998, the Hong Kong government has operated a similar program known as the Native English-speaking Teacher scheme, which employs about 800 teachers. The South Korean government has also implemented a similar program called EPIK (English Program in Korea).[47]

In 2007, the possible stay for some JET participants was extended from three years to five years, subject to certain stipulations. JET participants in their third year are able to re-contract two more times if their work performance, accomplishments, and abilities are deemed outstanding by their contracting organization.[48] However, as in most JET matters, the application process is decided upon by the individual contracting organization.

In 2009, it became possible to apply for an April start.[49] This option does not exclude the applicant from being considered from the traditional August start. Successful applicants starting in April are notified in early March, which includes details on their placement. The April start is in line with the start of the Japanese school year.

In May 2010, the JET programme came up for review by the Government Revitalization Unit, the jigyōshiwake budget review panel, due to the need to cut costs given the state of the economy of Japan.[50] However, the subsequent LDP administration of Shinzō Abe in fact announced its expansion and aimed to double its size within years.[51]

In February 2012, The Japan Times alleged that one contracting board of education had fraudulently deducted payments from JET participants and harassed whistleblowers of the practice.[52]

In January 2019, Medium posted a report on an incident that involved a board of education attempting to cover up an incident of sexual assault concerning two members of the JET Programme. This bought awareness of similar events over the years in the programme. Those involved claim that JET has vowed to increase their support for JETs in the future and to work closer with boards of education, but no official statement was made by JET.[53] In December 2020, it was reported in Japanese media that the plaintiff had begun seeking legal redress and damages from the Nagasaki Prefecture's local government.[54]

Notable alumni

[edit]

See also

[edit]


Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

JET Programme

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Japan Exchange and Teaching (JET) Programme is a government-sponsored exchange initiative administered collaboratively by Japan's Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, , Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and the Council of Local Authorities for , with the primary aim of promoting grassroots-level international exchange and enhancing by employing overseas graduates in roles such as assistant language teachers, sports exchange advisors, and coordinators for . Launched in 1987 amid efforts to address deficiencies in instruction and advance local , or kokusaika, the programme initially focused on English teaching but evolved to emphasize cultural promotion and mutual understanding between and participating nations. Participants, selected competitively from dozens of countries and typically contracted for one to five years, assist in classrooms across public schools, engage in community events, and contribute to international activities, with annual recruitment exceeding 2,000 individuals in recent cycles. While the programme has facilitated cultural immersion for hundreds of thousands of alumni—fostering long-term ties and projection through personal networks—its educational impact remains mixed, with studies highlighting persistent challenges in team-teaching dynamics, undefined assistant roles, and limited gains in students' conversational proficiency due to inconsistent implementation and reliance on native-speaker novelty over structured pedagogy.

Origins and History

Predecessor Programs

The Monbusho English Fellows Program, initiated by Japan's Ministry of Education in the late 1970s, primarily recruited native English speakers to assist with instruction at universities and higher education institutions. This effort aimed to enhance spoken English proficiency among Japanese students through direct interaction with fluent speakers, but it operated on a limited scale, placing only a small number of fellows annually. Concurrently, the British English Teachers Scheme, launched in 1978, focused on deploying recent British university graduates as assistant teachers in secondary schools to support conversational English classes. It emphasized grassroots cultural exchange and language practice in settings, yet remained restricted to British nationals and school-level placements, excluding broader or coordination with other nationalities. These programs suffered from fragmentation, including inconsistent funding, varying administrative oversight, and insufficient scale to meet Japan's growing demand for English education amid economic internationalization in the 1980s. Their isolated nature—separating university-focused fellows from school-based assistants and limiting participation to specific countries—highlighted the need for a unified framework to streamline recruitment, training, and deployment, prompting merger discussions among government agencies by the mid-1980s.

Establishment and Early Years

The Japan Exchange and Teaching (JET) Programme was formally established in 1987 by the , in cooperation with the governments of the , , , and , with the primary aim of promoting grassroots-level (kokusaika) and enhancing foreign language education in local communities. This initiative emerged during Japan's period of rapid economic expansion in the late 1980s, when the country sought to address perceived insularity by fostering direct intercultural exchanges at the municipal and school levels, rather than relying solely on top-down . The program initially focused on deploying Assistant Language Teachers (ALTs) to assist in English instruction and Coordinators for International Relations (CIRs) to support outreach, reflecting a deliberate emphasis on practical, community-based contributions to mutual understanding between Japan and participating nations. Administrative oversight was provided through the Council of Local Authorities for International Relations (CLAIR), established to coordinate with Japan's Ministry of Education, Ministry of Home Affairs, , and Ministry of International Trade and Industry, ensuring alignment with national goals for local-level international engagement. In its inaugural year, the program welcomed 848 participants—813 ALTs and 35 CIRs—from the four founding countries, marking a structured entry point for foreign educators and coordinators into Japan's public schools and municipalities. Early operations included mandatory post-arrival orientations and mid-year seminars to equip participants with cultural and professional guidance, underscoring the government's commitment to program efficacy from the outset. By the early , the JET Programme demonstrated rapid growth, expanding to 1,443 participants from six countries in 1988 (adding and ), 1,987 from eight countries in 1989 (incorporating and France), 2,284 in 1990, 2,874 in 1991, and 3,325 from nine countries in 1992 (including ). This expansion exceeded initial targets of around 2,000 participants and led to the formation of the JET Alumni Association (JETAA) in 1989 to maintain post-program networks, while the establishment of a Counselling System Committee in 1992 addressed emerging support needs for participants. These developments solidified JET's role as a key mechanism for Japan's efforts during its economic zenith, with participant numbers reflecting sustained governmental investment in human exchange as a tool for projection.

Expansion and Key Milestones

The JET Programme underwent substantial expansion following its early years, with participant numbers increasing from approximately 2,000 in the early to over 5,000 annually by the mid-2000s. This growth paralleled an rise in participating countries, reaching around 40 by 2006 and exceeding 50 by the early , driven by broader efforts and Japan's emphasis on international exchange. Peak annual participation surpassed 5,700 in 2019, just prior to disruptions from the . Key milestones included the formalization of non-teaching roles to diversify contributions, such as Coordinators for (CIR), who assist local governments with international affairs, and Sports Exchange Advisors (SEA), focused on athletic programs; these positions expanded the program's administrative and cultural scope beyond Assistant Language Teachers (ALT). A pivotal event was the program's response to the March 2011 Tohoku earthquake and , where active JET participants aided immediate recovery in affected regions, and the Japanese government launched initiatives to invite former participants to support long-term rebuilding efforts in stricken areas, fostering alumni involvement in disaster relief. As of 2025, the programme had cumulatively engaged over individuals from 82 countries, underscoring its scale as one of the world's largest government-sponsored exchange initiatives; have historically comprised the largest national group, with more than 39,000 participants.

Program Objectives and Administration

Stated Goals and Rationale

The Japan Exchange and Teaching (JET) Programme was established in 1987 with the primary objective of increasing mutual understanding between the people of and those of other nations through direct, grassroots-level interactions. This aim focuses on promoting internationalization (kokusaika) within local communities by placing foreign participants in public schools and municipal offices, where they facilitate cultural exchanges and expose Japanese residents to diverse perspectives. A key component involves enhancing education, particularly English, at the elementary and secondary levels via native-speaking Assistant Language Teachers who emphasize conversational skills over rote memorization. The rationale for the programme stemmed from Japan's late-1980s context of rapid , marked by substantial trade surpluses and international frictions, such as U.S.-Japan tensions over market access and currency valuation following the 1985 . Amid these pressures, Japanese policymakers recognized the limitations of the country's cultural insularity—despite its economic prowess—and prioritized empirical exposure to foreigners through sustained local engagements as a means to cultivate international awareness and projection, rather than relying solely on abstract academic instruction or elite diplomacy. This approach aligned with broader kokusaika efforts to integrate global norms into everyday Japanese life, addressing the gap between and domestic . In distinction from private eikaiwa (conversation) schools, which operate commercially and target fee-paying adult learners for short-term , JET constitutes a government-sponsored initiative embedded in public institutions to forge long-term bilateral ties via structured roles in and administration. By embedding participants in daily community settings, the programme underscores causal mechanisms of familiarity—such as repeated interpersonal contacts—over transactional or profit-oriented models, aiming to embed intercultural competence at the societal base.

Organizational Structure

The JET Programme is administered by the Council of Local Authorities for International Relations (CLAIR), which coordinates implementation in partnership with Japan's Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), (MOFA), and Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC). These entities oversee program operations, including participant recruitment, training, and placement, with CLAIR handling administrative support for contracting organizations such as local governments and educational boards. Funding derives primarily from Japanese taxpayers through local boards of education (BOEs) and municipal offices, which serve as the direct employers—or contracting organizations—for most participants, particularly Assistant Language Teachers (ALTs). This structure channels national-level policy into localized execution, where BOEs allocate budgets for salaries, housing subsidies, and operational costs based on regional fiscal capacities. Participant contracts are standardized at one year, commencing post-arrival orientation, with renewals possible up to a maximum of five years to encourage long-term contributions while limiting dependency. First-year ALT salaries begin at approximately ¥3.36 million annually, increasing incrementally with re-contracting (e.g., to ¥3.72 million by the fifth year), though minor prefectural variations may occur due to local adjustments. Benefits include employer-provided round-trip economy airfare to , enrollment in the system, and partial severance gratuity upon contract completion, all funded by the contracting organization. The program's decentralized placement system assigns participants to over 1,500 municipalities via local authorities, prioritizing rural and regional areas to address uneven efforts, which introduces variability in supervision quality, resource access, and workplace support compared to urban postings. This approach reflects causal dependencies on local BOE priorities, often resulting in isolated rural assignments with limited oversight versus more structured urban environments.

Participant Categories and Roles

The JET Programme appoints participants to three distinct positions: Assistant Language Teachers (ALTs), Coordinators for (CIRs), and Sports Exchange Advisors (SEAs). ALTs comprise over 90% of participants and assist in foreign language instruction, primarily English, at public elementary, junior high, or senior high schools, or local boards of education, through collaborative team-teaching with Japanese instructors. This role emphasizes providing exposure to native or near-native speakers to enhance students' communicative abilities, rather than independent classroom management. CIRs, accounting for approximately 8-9% of positions, support internationalization efforts within municipal or prefectural government offices, handling tasks such as and interpretation between Japanese and participants' native languages, drafting multilingual materials, and coordinating community exchange events. Applicants for CIR roles must demonstrate advanced Japanese proficiency, typically equivalent to JLPT N1 or N2 levels, to perform administrative and interpretive functions effectively. SEAs represent a minor category, under 1% of participants, and are assigned to local authorities to advance sports-related international exchanges, including advising on programs, athletes, and developing sports initiatives that foster understanding. These positions target individuals with professional backgrounds in specific sports, prioritizing expertise in and event planning over language teaching. None of the positions mandate formal teaching certifications or prior pedagogical training; selection focuses on linguistic and cultural contributions, with ALTs leveraging native-speaker status to model authentic use.

Application and Selection Process

Eligibility Requirements

Eligibility for the JET Programme is determined by country-specific application offices in coordination with the Council of Local Authorities for International Relations (CLAIR), requiring applicants to be nationals—rather than mere residents—of participating countries, which include over 70 nations with diplomatic ties to facilitating participant dispatch. Applicants must hold a or equivalent qualification, or for Assistant Language Teacher () positions, a three-year , obtained by the designated arrival date in late July or August of the program year. No prior experience is mandatory, though enthusiasm for education and international exchange is emphasized, with preferences given to those demonstrating interest in Japanese or studies without formal quotas beyond bilateral agreements. There is no upper age limit, though applicants are evaluated for maturity, adaptability to rural placements, and commitment to program duties, with the majority of participants being recent graduates typically in their early to mid-20s; older applicants meeting other criteria have been accepted, reflecting the program's evolution from earlier informal limits around 40. Health requirements stipulate that candidates be both mentally and physically able to perform duties, including potential driving in remote areas, with self-reported medical conditions reviewed during application. Criminal background checks are implicit through requirements to have no disqualifying records, such as drug offenses, DUIs, or suspended sentences, ensuring compliance with Japanese laws; probation or legal issues must be resolved prior to application. Language proficiency varies by position: ALTs, who assist in English or other classes, require native or near-native fluency in the target language, with clear pronunciation and skills essential for roles, but no Japanese proficiency is needed at entry. Coordinators for (CIRs), focused on administrative and translation tasks, demand functional Japanese command equivalent to JLPT or N2 levels to handle official communications and events. Sports Exchange Advisors (SEAs), a smaller category for , align more closely with ALT language needs but emphasize sports expertise. Disqualifications include prior JET participation exceeding five years total since 2023, residence in Japan for six or more consecutive years since 2016, or prior declined offers without justification, aimed at prioritizing fresh exchanges over extended stays.

Application Timeline and Procedures

The JET Programme recruits participants annually, with the application cycle aligned to departures typically occurring in late July or August of the following year. Applications open in late and close in mid-November, requiring submission through country-specific online portals managed by local contracting organizations under the Council of Local Authorities for International Relations (CLAIR). For the 2026 program year, the U.S. application opened on September 29, 2025, and closed on November 14, 2025, at 11:59 p.m. HST, with all required documents—including a statement of purpose, self-introduction video or , academic transcripts, two reference letters, and proof of conferral by the departure date—uploaded via the portal by the deadline. Post-submission, initial screening occurs in December, evaluating completeness and eligibility, followed by shortlist notifications in early to mid-January. Shortlisted applicants must then submit additional documents, such as a medical statement and proof of English proficiency if applicable, before attending panel interviews in January or February, usually at Japanese embassies, consulates, or designated venues. These interviews, conducted by panels including Japanese officials and former JET participants, prioritize assessments of cultural adaptability, enthusiasm for intercultural exchange, and like communication and flexibility over pedagogical expertise or language teaching credentials. Final results are notified in late March to early April, with primary selectees advancing to pre-departure orientation, processing, and contract finalization coordinated by CLAIR. Applicants not initially selected may be placed on an alternate list, with opportunities for upgrades occurring mid-year—such as in June—due to withdrawals or additional placements, though these are not guaranteed and vary by country based on local demand. Country-specific variations include adjusted deadlines and interview formats; for example, the intake began September 25, 2025, with a November 6 deadline, while processes in other nations like or follow similar but locally tailored schedules. The JET Programme has historically selected approximately 3,000 to 4,000 new participants annually prior to 2020, contributing to a total active participant count of around 5,000 to 6,000 individuals employed across at any given time. Acceptance rates for applicants have typically ranged from 20% to 30%, reflecting a competitive process where thousands of applications are reviewed each year, with roughly half advancing to interviews in major sending countries. Participant numbers experienced a decline during the due to travel restrictions and recruitment pauses, but rebounded post-2022, reaching 6,614 active participants from 54 countries as of July 1, 2025. Demographic trends show a persistent dominance by participants from English-speaking nations, particularly the , , , and , which together account for the majority of placements. In 2025, the supplied 3,032 participants (approximately 46% of the total), followed by the with 777 and with 521. Increasing diversity is evident in rising numbers from non-traditional sending countries, such as the (370 participants in 2025), reflecting broader recruitment efforts amid efforts to enhance cultural exchange variety. The program has expanded from just 4 countries in 1987 to 54 by 2025, indicating a trend toward greater international representation, though native English speakers remain predominant due to the emphasis on (ALT) roles.
Top Nationalities (2025)Number of Participants
3,032
777
521
370
By 2025, the cumulative number of JET alumni exceeded 80,000 individuals worldwide, underscoring the program's scale over nearly four decades. Most participants are early-career professionals, typically recent university graduates meeting the requirement, with the majority entering as first-year contract holders (1,501 out of 6,614 in 2025). Gender distribution has maintained approximate parity, hovering near 50/50 in recent cohorts, though precise breakdowns vary by nationality and role.

Participant Responsibilities and Experiences

Assistant Language Teacher Duties

Assistant Language Teachers (ALTs) in the JET Programme primarily support Japanese Teachers of English (JTEs) through team-teaching in public elementary, junior high, and sometimes senior high schools, focusing on providing native-speaker exposure to spoken English rather than independent instruction in grammar or other subjects. This role emphasizes collaborative lesson delivery, where ALTs assist in facilitating conversation-based activities, pronunciation practice, and interactive exercises aligned with Japan's approach adopted by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). Core duties include preparing teaching materials such as worksheets, flashcards, and visual aids in coordination with JTEs before lessons; during classes, ALTs model natural speech patterns, lead short speaking segments, and engage students in pair or group work while deferring and primary instruction to the JTE. ALTs do not typically conduct solo lessons, as the program structure mandates team-teaching to integrate foreign input with local pedagogical expertise, though they may supervise extracurricular events like English speech contests, clubs, or camps organized by contracting boards of education (BOEs). Work hours are standardized at approximately 35 per week, excluding lunch, often spanning 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., though actual teaching periods number 3-4 per day (45-50 minutes each), with remaining time allocated to material preparation, meetings, or BOE-assigned tasks varying by placement. Many ALTs begin mid-year as replacements for departing participants, requiring rapid adaptation to ongoing curricula without full orientation periods available to August starters.

Coordinator for International Relations Functions

Coordinators for (CIRs) in the JET Programme are assigned to support efforts in , distinct from classroom instruction roles. They are typically placed in international affairs sections of prefectural or municipal offices, including city halls and organizations focused on or exchange, where they facilitate inbound activities such as welcoming foreign visitors and promoting cross-cultural understanding. Unlike Assistant Language Teachers, CIR duties emphasize administrative liaison work, requiring participants to bridge communication gaps between Japanese officials and international counterparts. CIR positions constitute approximately 8.6% of JET participants, reflecting their specialized nature compared to the majority in teaching roles. Applicants must demonstrate advanced Japanese proficiency, equivalent to at least JLPT N2 level, to handle professional interactions effectively; this includes functional command for tasks like document and real-time interpretation. Core responsibilities include translating and interpreting for officials during meetings or events, foreign-language materials for local publications, and international festivals or exchange programs to foster community outreach. CIRs also advise private groups on international activities, receive overseas guests, and collaborate on cultural promotion initiatives, often involving coordination with tourism boards for visitor support. These duties prioritize practical at the level, such as organizing programs or multilingual signage projects. Initial contracts last one year, with renewals possible up to a total of five years based on mutual agreement and performance, allowing some CIRs to transition into more stable, career-oriented roles within contracting organizations. This renewal pathway supports sustained contributions to local , though extensions depend on the needs of the host or .

Placement Realities and Daily Challenges

Assistant Language Teachers (ALTs) in the JET Programme are frequently assigned to rural or semi-rural locations, often in towns with populations under 20,000, which can exacerbate feelings of isolation due to limited access to international communities and urban amenities. These placements, determined by contracting Boards of (BOEs), prioritize areas with fewer native English speakers, leading to logistical strains such as long commutes—sometimes requiring personal vehicles—to cover multiple elementary and junior high schools within a single day. Bureaucratic processes in BOEs, including rigid administrative approvals for even minor adjustments like lesson materials, further compound daily frustrations, as ALTs navigate hierarchies where decisions favor institutional norms over individual initiative. Cooperation with Japanese Teachers of English (JTEs) varies widely by school; while some partnerships foster effective team teaching, others result in ALTs being sidelined to repetitive roles like reading scripts, requiring constant to differing pedagogical styles and communication barriers. Daily routines typically span 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., but cultural expectations often extend into unpaid overtime, mirroring broader Japanese work norms where ALTs face implicit pressure to remain on-site for meetings or events despite stipulations limiting hours to 35 per week without compensation. Social obligations, such as mandatory enkai (after-work drinking parties), integrate ALTs into workplace camaraderie but can strain personal boundaries, particularly for those unaccustomed to alcohol-centric bonding or hierarchical deference. Empirical challenges include mid-term participant arrivals, often due to contract extensions or replacements, which disrupt continuity as students adjust to new accents and teaching approaches mid-year, potentially undermining rapport built over prior months. remains limited post-orientation, with initial trainings in focusing on cultural adaptation and basic skills, but ongoing support varying —rural ALTs report fewer workshops, hindering skill progression amid static roles that prioritize native-speaker presence over pedagogical growth. These realities underscore causal factors like decentralized contracting and resource constraints in understaffed rural BOEs, which prioritize filling positions over optimizing participant integration or workload equity.

Impact and Effectiveness

Educational Outcomes and English Proficiency Data

Despite the JET Programme's inception in 1987 as a key component of Japan's efforts to enhance English education, empirical metrics indicate limited impact on national proficiency levels. In the 2024 EF English Proficiency Index (EPI), Japan ranked 92nd out of 116 non-native English-speaking countries, achieving a score of 454 in the low proficiency band—its lowest-ever position, down five places from the prior year. This decline persists despite consistent EPI participation since 2011, with Japan's scores remaining below the global average and showing no substantial upward trajectory correlating to JET's expansion or longevity. Similarly, average Listening and Reading scores in have stagnated, hovering around 550-600 points for much of the program's duration without of systemic gains attributable to JET-assisted team-teaching. on team-taught classes, a core JET delivery model involving Assistant Teachers (ALTs) alongside Japanese Teachers of English (JTEs), highlights short-term boosts in student engagement and exposure to native but lacks causal linking it to sustained proficiency improvements. For instance, surveys and observations reveal that while ALTs enhance communicative activities and lesson variety, outcomes depend heavily on JTE preparation and rarely translate to measurable or retention over time, critiquing an over-reliance on native-speaker presence rather than -based . The program's scale amplifies these concerns: with approximately 5,000 annual participants, JET's direct costs—including salaries of around ¥4 million per first-year ALT—exceed ¥20 billion yearly, excluding administrative and local government expenditures, amid Japan's demographic decline reducing student numbers by over 10% since 2000. Cumulative investment since 1987 surpasses hundreds of billions of yen, yet proficiency metrics like EF EPI and TOEIC show no commensurate progress, raising questions about resource allocation efficacy when alternative, method-focused interventions could yield clearer causal benefits.

Cultural and Grassroots Exchange Effects

The JET Programme has cultivated enduring pro-Japan affinity among participants, with alumni frequently reporting deepened appreciation for Japanese culture and society post-participation. A study of program legacies notes that most participants develop strong attachments, including intercultural marriages and sustained personal ties to . This sentiment translates into professional orientations, as surveys of American alumni reveal many incorporating Japanese language skills and cultural knowledge into careers, such as diplomacy, , and . Over 79,000 alumni worldwide thus function as informal ambassadors, leveraging experiences to advocate for in their home countries. At the level, participants contribute to local cultural events and awareness initiatives, enhancing 's through direct . JET associations organize festivals, workshops, and social gatherings that promote Japanese traditions abroad, fostering bilateral understanding via people-to-people exchanges. In , participants' involvement in school visits and resident activities has elevated local exposure to international perspectives, with programs like the Furusato Vision Project encouraging returns to strengthen ties. These efforts align with the program's aim of grassroots internationalization, yielding measurable increases in cross-cultural events in host communities. Empirical evidence, however, highlights constraints on exchange depth, particularly in rural areas where social reticence and logistical isolation can confine interactions to superficial levels. Participant accounts indicate that while novelty generates initial interest, sustained mutual understanding often falters amid gaps and conservative local norms, yielding more one-directional Western exposure for hosts than reciprocal transformation. Host feedback data remains sparse, underscoring causal challenges in achieving profound bilateral impacts beyond surface-level goodwill in resistant locales.

Long-Term Participant and Host Benefits

Participants in the JET Programme frequently report enhanced proficiency as a long-term outcome, with surveys indicating that immersion experiences contribute to conversational and professional-level skills applicable in subsequent . Through affiliations with the Japan Exchange and Teaching Association (JETAA), former participants access global networks that facilitate job opportunities in Japan-related fields, including , , and ; JETAA chapters organize events, programs, and job listings tailored to expertise in . These networks and acquired , such as adaptability and intercultural competence gained during program tenure, bolster resumes for roles in multinational firms or positions focused on relations, though direct causation varies by individual initiative post-participation. For host institutions and Japan broadly, long-term benefits accrue primarily through -driven , where former JET participants advocate for Japanese culture, products, and policies in their home countries, fostering goodwill and indirect economic ties. Quantifiable impacts remain limited; estimates from alumni return visits suggest JET participants generate equivalent to 20-17% of their program through repeat and recommendations, but comprehensive longitudinal is scarce beyond these approximations. Local governments experience sustained community-level via collaborations, such as promotional events or facilitation, yet these effects are more optic and relational than measurably transformative for host economies. Alumni surveys, including a 2023-2024 CLAIR poll of approximately 3,500 respondents, underscore high overall satisfaction among participants, with many viewing the program as a pivotal mechanism despite inconsistent teaching efficacy; this reflects enduring personal growth and host perceptions of enhanced grassroots exchange, though benefits to hosts emphasize intangible over direct fiscal gains.

Criticisms and Controversies

Doubts on Teaching Efficacy and Resource Allocation

Despite operating for over 35 years since its inception in 1987, the JET Programme has coincided with persistently low and recently declining English proficiency levels in Japan, as measured by standardized indices. In the 2024 EF English Proficiency Index (EPI), Japan ranked 92nd out of 116 countries and regions, with a score of 454 indicating low proficiency, marking its worst-ever performance and a drop from 87th in 2023. This stagnation or regression persists despite substantial annual investments in native-speaker assistants, leading critics to question the program's causal contribution to language acquisition outcomes, as empirical data show no commensurate rise in national scores attributable to JET participation. A core critique centers on the limited pedagogical role of Assistant Language Teachers (ALTs), who frequently function as "human tape recorders" by merely modeling pronunciation or reading scripted dialogues under Japanese Teachers of English (JTEs), rather than delivering interactive or curriculum-integrated instruction. This dynamic stems from ALTs' typical lack of formal teaching qualifications—JET recruits primarily based on native fluency and university degrees—and inconsistent team-teaching preparation, which undermines deeper skill-building in areas like conversational fluency or in English. Studies of stakeholder perceptions highlight that while ALTs may enhance exposure to authentic accents, their episodic classroom presence and scripted utility yield marginal gains in student performance metrics, such as scores, compared to evidence-based methods emphasizing sustained, structured practice. Resource allocation draws further given the program's high fiscal footprint relative to demonstrable returns. First-year ALTs receive salaries averaging ¥3.36 million annually (approximately ¥280,000 monthly), with total expenditures per participant exceeding this due to , orientation, (up to ¥200,000), and subsidies (often ¥40,000–50,000 monthly), amid a participant pool of around 5,000–6,000 annually. Critics, including program and analysts, contend this diverts funds from scalable alternatives like certified domestic instructors or digital platforms (e.g., AI-driven apps with proven efficacy in and vocabulary retention), which could achieve similar or superior results at lower cost without relying on untrained expatriates. Empirical cross-national comparisons reinforce doubts: , ranking 50th in the 2024 EF EPI with moderate proficiency (score approximately 523), has advanced through rigorous, exam-oriented curricula and private hagwons emphasizing output skills, without a JET-scale dependency on foreign assistants; , at 91st (low proficiency but with faster urban gains), leverages massive state investments in online resources and teacher training to outpace Japan's trends in select metrics. Compounding inefficiency concerns is Japan's demographic reality of shrinking school enrollments, driven by birthrate declines, with elementary and junior high student numbers hitting a record low of approximately 10.5 million in 2023. In this context, sustaining thousands of ALTs across consolidating rural schools—where class sizes dwindle and facilities close—raises questions about opportunity costs, as funds could redirect toward consolidating expertise in fewer, specialized programs or bolstering JTE , aligning more directly with causal drivers of proficiency like consistent immersion and assessment-aligned rather than supplementary native exposure. Such reallocations might better address systemic barriers, including Japan's late introduction of compulsory English ( since 2020) and cultural emphases on rote translation over , without presupposing JET's irreplaceability.

Participant Welfare and Cultural Adjustment Issues

Participants in the JET Programme frequently report experiencing significant , characterized by disorientation from differences in daily life, social norms, and professional expectations in . This phenomenon, often manifesting as cumulative fatigue from subtle cultural mismatches rather than a single event, can lead to anxiety, depression, and helplessness, particularly in rural placements where isolation exacerbates feelings of alienation. Workplace dynamics contribute to adjustment challenges, with reports of —abuse of authority by superiors—and without clear boundaries, as Japanese educational environments emphasize long hours and indirect communication. A 2021 survey by the North American JET Association found that 47% of female Assistant Language Teachers (ALTs) experienced , , or , while broader ALT experiences indicate 39% facing and over 50% encountering or . Japanese teachers of English sometimes resist ALTs' emphasis on methods, viewing them as disruptive to established grammar-focused curricula, which results in ALTs feeling underutilized or sidelined in team teaching roles. Welfare support gaps have historically included variable quality, with participants noting substandard accommodations such as pest infestations or outdated facilities in some rural or school-provided options, despite general subsidies. Mental health resources were limited before the 2020s, relying primarily on peer-led AJET helplines for confidential support rather than comprehensive professional services, though recent initiatives like CLAIR's partial subsidies for counseling aim to address this. These issues correlate with early terminations, discouraged by program guidelines due to disruptions in scheduling, though anecdotal reports from participant forums suggest rates around 5-10% annually, often linked to unresolved adjustment stressors.

Broader Program Necessity and Reforms

Critics have questioned the JET Programme's ongoing necessity amid Japan's persistent low English proficiency levels, with average scores for Japanese test-takers remaining near the bottom in despite the program's operation since 1987. This stagnation raises doubts about the causal efficacy of deploying largely untrained Assistant Language (ALTs), as empirical data shows minimal aggregate gains in communicative skills attributable to native-speaker immersion in classrooms. In an era of advanced digital language tools and global connectivity, some argue that taxpayer funds—subsidized at up to ¥246 million per for ALT placements—yield compared to targeted investments in teacher training or online platforms. Proposals for overhaul emphasize reallocating resources toward Coordinators for (CIRs), who possess specialized skills in administration and cultural liaison, over the volume of entry-level ALTs, to better align with Japan's goals under fiscal constraints. A 2013 opinion piece highlighted the program's potential irrelevance, suggesting or contraction to prioritize measurable outcomes like verifiable proficiency metrics rather than symbolic exchanges. Political resistance to such shifts persists, with government budget panels critiquing the program's scale amid economic pressures, though entrenched local dependencies on ALT staffing have slowed implementation of efficiency-driven reforms. While JET maintains value in fostering through alumni networks and diplomatic goodwill, its viability hinges on adopting accountability measures, such as rigorous impact evaluations and performance-based funding, to justify continued public expenditure over alternative strategies. Without these, causal critiques posit that the program risks obsolescence, failing to adapt to Japan's demographic and technological realities while diverting resources from higher-priority domestic needs.

Recent Developments and Future Outlook

Post-Pandemic Adjustments (2020-2025)

The JET Programme faced significant disruptions from the , with arrivals in 2020 requiring mandatory quarantines and limited departures in due to Japan's closures and restrictions. Participants arriving during this period underwent extended isolation protocols upon entry, while recruitment processes adapted to reduced international mobility, leading to lower participant inflows compared to pre-pandemic levels. By 2022, the programme rebounded as eased entry requirements and vaccination efforts progressed, enabling a return to more standard departure schedules and hybrid orientation models that incorporated both in-person and remote elements. Official data indicate sustained participation, with over 5,900 JET participants from 54 countries employed as of July 2025, reflecting recovery in enrollment primarily from major sending countries like the (2,908 participants). For the 2025 application cycle, the programme emphasized protocols, requiring successful candidates to submit a Certificate of Health alongside checks prior to departure. Interviews shifted to virtual formats to mitigate travel risks and logistical challenges, a continuation of adaptations seen in prior cycles. The Council of Local Authorities for International Relations (CLAIR), which administers aspects of the programme, enhanced post-JET support through a global survey conducted from December 2023 to January 2024, garnering responses from approximately 3,500 former participants to inform guidance on career transitions and long-term engagement. Additional surveys in 2024-2025 focused on participants' learning needs, aiming to refine support resources without altering the programme's core placement and structure. These adjustments prioritized participant welfare through data-driven insights rather than structural overhauls, maintaining the emphasis on assignments with limited transparency on specific placement criteria.

Alumni Networks and Ongoing Support

The JET Programme Alumni Association (JETAA) operates through an international network of chapters that provide ongoing resources and community for over 70,000 former participants worldwide. JETAA International coordinates with approximately 50 regional chapters across , , , and other areas, facilitating programs, social events, and advocacy for the programme's continuation. These chapters offer professional networking, career workshops, and virtual pairings, such as the JETAADC's five-month program launched in 2025, which connects alumni for skill-building and transition support. Annual conferences, including , , and international gatherings in , further enable knowledge-sharing and alumni engagement. A 2023-2024 alumni survey conducted by the Council of Local Authorities for International Relations (CLAIR), involving about 3,500 respondents globally, highlighted career trajectories post-JET, with many alumni pursuing roles in education, international relations, and business, underscoring the networks' role in long-term professional continuity. JETAA chapters also advocate for programme funding and reforms through coordinated efforts with governments, as seen in U.S. alumni lobbying via USJETAA. Beyond career aid, JETAA sustains participant-host connections via targeted initiatives, including invitations for to visit disaster-affected regions like Fukushima for recovery observation and grassroots exchange, as implemented in post-2011 programmes to foster empathy and information dissemination. webinars and job boards, such as USJETAA's listings for Japan-related opportunities, provide practical tools for reintegration. These alumni structures empirically extend the JET Programme's legacy by cultivating informal diplomacy, with returnees forming a "Japan-aware" cadre that bolsters bilateral ties through personal advocacy and cultural ambassadorship, independent of formal state channels. This grassroots persistence has been credited with enhancing mutual understanding, as alumni leverage firsthand experiences to influence policy perceptions and public discourse in host countries.

Potential Reforms and Sustainability

Japan's ongoing rural depopulation and aging demographics pose significant sustainability challenges for the JET Programme, as declining student numbers in local schools threaten the viability of (ALT) placements in these areas. By 2024, rural regions like Nishi-Awa in exemplified risks of cultural erosion due to insufficient community sustainment, with JET participants contributing to local vitalization efforts amid broader population shrinkage. To counter these trends, the programme has expanded integration with initiatives such as the Local Vitalization Cooperators Programme, which by 2024 engaged 162 foreign nationals, including 18 JET , in rural promotion activities like development and to bolster . Starting in 2025, career transition support facilitates direct placements into these roles within their former regions, leveraging acquired and local knowledge to address demographic voids. Currency volatility, notably the yen's depreciation against major currencies like the US dollar, erodes the effective of JET's fixed-yen salaries for international participants, potentially hindering despite historical appeal. The 2026 guidelines respond with remuneration hikes—reaching ¥4,020,000 annually for first-year participants, up from prior levels—alongside a new arrival option for early assignments, indicating adaptive measures to maintain programme continuity and attractiveness. Reform proposals emphasize prioritizing applicants with prior teaching experience, viewed as a favorable attribute by selectors, to optimize ALT effectiveness in under-resourced rural contexts where novice participants may struggle with integration. Enhanced in-service training reforms could further align participant skills with evolving local needs, building on evaluations of programme implementation since 1987. Such evidence-based adjustments, tied to demonstrable impacts on goals, would strengthen justification for ongoing public funding amid fiscal pressures.

Notable Alumni and Legacy

Contributions in Diplomacy and Public Service

Anthony Bianchi, who participated in the JET Programme as an in from 1989 to 1991, naturalized as a Japanese citizen and was elected to the Inuyama City Council in 2003, becoming the first American-born person to hold public office in ; he secured the highest number of votes in that and served five terms thereafter. His immersion in rural Japanese communities via JET provided practical insights into local administration and intercultural dynamics, which he applied to policies promoting international exchange during his tenure. Several JET from the have advanced into the Foreign Service, where their firsthand experience navigating Japanese bureaucracy, education systems, and social norms informs U.S. diplomatic engagements on , , and matters. For example, former Assistant Language Teachers have transitioned to overseas postings with the Department of State, citing JET's role in developing and cultural fluency that enhance bilateral dialogues beyond formal embassy channels. This pathway underscores JET's indirect influence on policy, as apply localized knowledge to broader strategic contexts, such as U.S.- security cooperation. Empirical data from alumni surveys reveal a pattern of elevated involvement in diplomacy-related careers, with JET participants demonstrating higher rates of expertise in Japan-specific issues compared to non-participants; a 2011 survey of over 500 American highlighted their sustained advocacy for U.S.-Japan ties through professional roles in . Similarly, a global JET alumni survey conducted by CLAIR in 2023-2024, involving approximately 3,500 respondents, indicated disproportionate representation in fields interfacing with Japan's (MOFA), including advisory and envoy positions that leverage program-acquired insights for policy formulation. These outcomes stem causally from JET's structure, which embeds participants in prefectural and municipal operations, fostering the relational acumen required for effective in Japan-oriented .

Achievements in Other Sectors

JET Programme have pursued in , often capitalizing on their acquired language proficiency and cultural knowledge to facilitate Japan-related trade and operations. For instance, participants have transitioned into roles at major financial institutions such as , where they apply cross-cultural expertise in global transactions. Others have entered consulting, providing advisory services on market entry and for firms expanding into . has also emerged, with some establishing ventures focused on Japan-U.S. or Japan- exchanges, though such outcomes represent a minority amid broader diversification. In media and publishing, notable have leveraged their JET experiences to produce influential works on Japanese society and travel. Canadian author Will Ferguson, who participated in the programme in the early 1990s and resided in for five years, drew from his tenure to write acclaimed books including Hokkaido Highway Blues (1998) and the Giller Prize-winning novel 419 (2012), which explore themes of and cultural encounters. Similarly, American writer , a 1989-1990 JET participant in , authored Learning to Bow: Inside the Heart of Japan (1991), a firsthand account of rural life and education that informed his subsequent New York Times bestsellers like Walking the (2001) and media appearances as a commentator on international affairs. These contributions highlight how programme immersion can inspire narrative , though most do not achieve such public prominence. Beyond these areas, have contributed to higher education and nonprofit sectors by integrating expertise into curricula or organizational development. A 2012 analysis of U.S. JET indicated that approximately 25% utilized programme networks for professional opportunities, often in roles involving cultural promotion or international coordination, such as at organizations like for media localization. However, longitudinal data suggest that only a subset—estimated around 20-30% based on self-reports—maintain long-term -focused , with many reverting to domestic or unrelated fields upon return. This reflects the programme's role as a temporary catalyst rather than a guaranteed pivot to specialized sectors.

References

  1. https://jetprogramme.org/en/about-jet/
  2. https://www.jlgc.org/activities/jet/
  3. https://www.japan.go.jp/tomodachi/2017/summer2017/the_jet_programme.html
  4. https://mymasheduplife.com/2017/11/17/the-jet-program-as-educational-reform-in-japan/
  5. https://jetprogramusa.org/jet-program/
  6. https://www.chicago.us.emb-japan.go.jp/itpr_en/jet.html
  7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274808907_Importing_Diversity_Inside_Japan%27s_JET_Program
  8. https://jalt-publications.org/sites/default/files/pdf-article/jj-26.2-art6.pdf
  9. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10007313/7/Borg%2C%2520Paul_Redacted.pdf
  10. https://shigajets.weebly.com/ajet.html
  11. https://www.jetaainternational.org/history-of-jetaai
  12. https://jet-programme.com/the-jet-programme-background/
  13. https://mockford.wordpress.com/2024/07/08/before-jet-teaching-english-in-japan-before-the-japan-exchange-and-teaching-program-began-in-1987/
  14. https://jetprogramme.org/en/history/
  15. https://www.nippon.com/en/currents/d00264/
  16. https://www.clair.or.jp/e/docs/pamphlet.pdf
  17. https://www.mofa.go.jp/announce/announce/2011/7/0728_01.html
  18. https://www.tt.emb-japan.go.jp/itpr_en/jet_program.html
  19. https://jetprogramusa.org/
  20. https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/000200323.pdf
  21. https://mejiro.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/1067/files/KJ00008691461.pdf
  22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44127862
  23. http://gku-repository.gku.ac.jp/bitstream/11207/274/1/ronshu_52%25282%2529_089_borg.pdf
  24. https://jetprogramme.org/en/organisations/
  25. https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/culture/people/youth/jet/index.html
  26. https://jetprogramme.org/en/faq01/
  27. https://jetprogramusa.org/contract-information/
  28. https://teast.co/blog/jet-programme-salary
  29. https://www.tefl.org/teach-english-abroad/teach-english-in-japan/jet/
  30. https://jetprogramme.org/en/faq02/
  31. https://jet-programme.com/the-jet-programme-jet-faq/
  32. https://www.jet-uk.org/faq-10/content/47/what-are-my-chances-of-being-placed-in-a-large-city-like
  33. https://jetprogramme.org/en/positions/
  34. https://jetprogramusa.org/positions/
  35. https://jetprogramme.org/en/eligibility/
  36. https://jetprogramusa.org/eligibility-criteria/
  37. https://jetprogramusa.org/sea/
  38. https://www.za.emb-japan.go.jp/en/culture/programme_JET_faq.html
  39. https://jetprogramusa.org/faq/
  40. https://www.jet-uk.org/faq-10/content/29/what-level-of-japanese-do-i-need-to-be-a-cir-coordinator-for
  41. https://jetprogramusa.org/application-departure/
  42. https://jetprogramusa.org/how-to-apply/
  43. https://jetprogramme.org/en/howto/
  44. https://jetprogramusa.org/application-faq/
  45. https://www.reddit.com/r/JETProgramme/comments/1bvnz5w/process_and_timeline_of_shortlist_documents/
  46. https://www.jet-uk.org/application-and-departure-process-34
  47. https://bridge.edu/tefl/blog/jet-program/
  48. https://jetprogramme.org/en/countries/
  49. https://fukuokajet.com/work/team-teaching/
  50. https://www.jet-uk.org/frequently-asked-questions-faq-10/category/75/work
  51. https://jetprogramme.org/en/jetinternship_cpinfo3_hidden/
  52. https://www.jet-uk.org/coordinator-for-international-relations-cir-32
  53. https://www.ph.emb-japan.go.jp/itpr_en/00_000147_00001.html
  54. https://www.jet-uk.org/pay-and-conditions-5
  55. https://www.sf.us.emb-japan.go.jp/itpr_en/jet_questions.html
  56. https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/a22410ad-6347-4dfd-9887-4be657af9a47/content
  57. https://hiroshimajet.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/2017-2018-hiroshima-guidebook-final-6-0.pdf
  58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242265879_A_Critical_Analysis_of_the_Jet_Programme
  59. https://tokyojet.fandom.com/wiki/Schedule
  60. https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-problems-that-an-assistant-language-teacher-ALT-in-the-Japan-Exchange-and-Teaching-Programme-JET-may-encounter-teaching-in-Japan
  61. https://thousandleaveschiba.wordpress.com/working-in-chiba/leave/
  62. https://jalt-publications.org/sites/default/files/pdf-article/jalt2019-pcp-004.pdf
  63. https://japantoday.com/category/national/japan-reaches-its-lowest-ever-ranking-on-education-first%25E2%2580%2599s-2024-english-proficiency-index
  64. https://www.nippon.com/en/japan-data/h02199/
  65. https://www.ef.com/assetscdn/WIBIwq6RdJvcD9bc8RMd/cefcom-epi-site/fact-sheets/2024/ef-epi-fact-sheet-japan-english.pdf
  66. https://osakalanguagesolutions.com/the-paradox-of-english-education-in-japan-why-investment-isnt-leading-to-proficiency/
  67. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ776355.pdf
  68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283560886_Team_Teaching_Styles_Utilized_in_Japan_Do_They_Really_Work
  69. https://aogaku-daku.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Natsuki-Suzuki.pdf
  70. https://www.su.se/polopoly_fs/1.564710.1625476985%21/menu/standard/file/Smith%2520Elliot%2520Final%2520Version%2520For%2520Emma.pdf
  71. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376188242_Effectiveness_of_English_Teaching_with_JET_Programme_Assistant_Language_Teachers_and_Japanese_Teachers_of_English_Team_Teaching_Perceptions_through_Team_Interviews_Effectiveness_of_English_Teaching_wi
  72. https://mountainrunner.us/2011/02/japan_exchange_and_teaching_program/
  73. https://jetprogramme.org/en/former/
  74. https://www.usjetaa.org/news/alumni-publications-importing-diversity-inside-japans-jet-program
  75. https://jetprogramme.org/en/furusatovisionproject/
  76. https://www.sf.us.emb-japan.go.jp/itpr_en/JET.html
  77. https://www.nature.com/articles/palcomms201713
  78. https://www.jetaainternational.org/post-jet
  79. https://www.usjetaa.org/news/debunking-the-myths-jet-program-edition-part-1
  80. https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/sites/uscpublicdiplomacy.org/files/Metzgar%252C%2520Emily%2520-%2520Paper%25203%252C%25202012%2520-%2520Promoting%2520Japan%252C%2520One%2520JET%2520at%2520a%2520Time.pdf
  81. https://jetwit.com/wordpress/2010/12/08/project-how-much-tourism-revenue-has-jet-generated-for-japan/
  82. https://jetprogramme.org/en/jetstreams/spring2024/
  83. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/37577/1/Jaime%2520Morrish%2520EdD%2520Thesis%2520Uni%2520of%2520Sheffield.pdf
  84. https://japantoday.com/category/features/opinions/grounding-the-jets
  85. https://attractivejournal.com/index.php/anglophile/article/view/1191
  86. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1574558/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  87. https://www.internationalteflacademy.com/blog/what-is-the-japanese-exchange-and-teaching-program-jet
  88. https://japantoday.com/category/features/opinions/is-the-jet-program-really-necessary-for-japan
  89. https://jref.com/threads/japans-english-proficiency-declines-to-historic-low.730960/
  90. https://newsonjapan.com/article/138384.php
  91. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/may/11/japan-rural-schools-dwindling-students
  92. https://www.tofugu.com/japan/culture-shock-in-japan-on-the-jet-program/
  93. https://kumamotojets.weebly.com/mental-health.html
  94. https://pnwjetaa.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/JET-Training-Mental-Health-for-JETs-2017.pdf
  95. https://m.facebook.com/AJETJapan/photos/2021-najet-harassment-assault-and-discrimination-survey-report-alt-summaryread-t/10165978626205597/
  96. https://altto.net/harassment-in-japan-experienced-by-alts-by-farrah-hasnain/
  97. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1383&context=usf_EPAA
  98. https://www.reddit.com/r/JETProgramme/comments/14gevlm/declining_shs_teacher_housing/
  99. https://jetprogramme.org/en/clairnews/jul2025/
  100. https://tokyojet.fandom.com/wiki/Mental_Health
  101. https://www.lt.emb-japan.go.jp/files/100786660.pdf
  102. https://www.za.emb-japan.go.jp/en/culture/programme_JET_terms.html
  103. https://www.reddit.com/r/JETProgramme/comments/xlrvlc/about_ending_contract_early_in_april/
  104. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/community/2017/05/03/issues/japans-jet-programme-hits-30s-jurys-still/
  105. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijal.12464
  106. https://www.debito.org/?p=7344
  107. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2S9nfpOcVc
  108. https://www.reddit.com/r/JETProgramme/comments/moorfb/will_the_jet_programme_2021_be_cancelled_due_to/
  109. https://jetprogramme.org/en/clairnewssept2022/
  110. https://jetprogramusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/JET_2025-Application-Guidelines.pdf
  111. https://jetprogramme.org/en/clairnews/nov2024/
  112. https://www.jetaainternational.org/jetaa-chapters
  113. https://jetprogramme.org/en/jetaa/
  114. https://www.usjetaa.org/news/jetaadc-mentorship-program
  115. https://www.jetaainternational.org/conferences
  116. https://jetprogramusa.org/alumni-jets/jet-alumni-associations/
  117. https://www.ca.emb-japan.go.jp/2012_shared_images/JET_alumni_invitation_programme_report.pdf
  118. https://www.usjetaa.org/usjetaa-job-board
  119. https://thediplomat.com/2015/04/the-jet-program-and-the-us-japan-relationship/
  120. https://www2.gwu.edu/~sigur/assets/docs/Wain%2520article%2520-%25207.11.11.pdf
  121. https://jetprogramme.org/en/jetstreams/spring2025/
  122. https://rakuten.today/tech-innovation/solving-rural-japans-challenges.html
  123. https://www.reddit.com/r/JETProgramme/comments/14l7vur/the_yen_is_getting_even_weaker/
  124. https://beatricebaker.com/2024/05/10/how-to-fix-the-jet-programme/
  125. https://jetprogramusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2026-Application-Guidelines-JET-USA.pdf
  126. https://www.ph.emb-japan.go.jp/itpr_ja/11_000001_00565.html
  127. https://www.academia.edu/95387017/To_Reform_or_Not_to_Reform_In_service_Training_on_the_JET_Program
  128. https://jetprogramme.org/en/
  129. https://www.usjetaa.org/news/senpai-spotlight-anthony-bianchi
  130. http://jetwit.com/wordpress/2013/11/25/clair-magazine-jet-plaza-series-anthony-bianchi-aichi/
  131. https://bklyner.com/bensonhurst-man-is-first-elected-american-in-japanese-government-bensonhurst/
  132. http://jetwit.com/wordpress/2014/06/09/jq-magazine-from-jet-to-the-u-s-state-department-alumni-share-their-stories/
  133. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WzvE_Xc2oQ
  134. https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/sites/uscpublicdiplomacy.org/files/legacy/publications/perspectives/CPD_Perspectives_Paper_3_2012.pdf
  135. https://jetprogramusa.org/tag/alumni-profile/page/3/
  136. https://www.usjetaa.org/jet-owned-businesses
  137. https://www.facebook.com/JETAAInternational/posts/if-youre-interested-in-networking-or-hearing-about-how-jet-alumni-entrepreneurs-/3400080300013959/
  138. https://www.willferguson.ca/
  139. http://jetwit.com/wordpress/2010/07/11/best-of-jq-the-bruce-feiler-interview-may-june-2010/
  140. https://jetprogramusa.org/category/alumni-profile/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.