Hubbry Logo
Karnataka State Election CommissionKarnataka State Election CommissionMain
Open search
Karnataka State Election Commission
Community hub
Karnataka State Election Commission
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Karnataka State Election Commission
Karnataka State Election Commission
Karnataka State Election Commission
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Karnataka State Election Commission
ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಾಜ್ಯ ಚುನಾವಣಾ ಆಯೋಗ
Seal of Karnataka
State Election Commission Body overview
Formed26 May 1993 (32 years ago) (1993-05-26)[1]
Preceding State Election Commission Body
  • Mysuru State Election Commission
JurisdictionKarnataka
HeadquartersBengaluru
State Election Commission Body executive
  • G.S.Sangreshi,.[2], Chief Election Commissioner
Parent departmentElection Commission of India
Websitekarsec.gov.in

Karnataka State Election Commission is an State Constitutional body constituted in Indian state of Karnataka for ensuring that elections in are conducted in free, fair and unbiased way. Constitution of India with provisions as per Article 243K and 243 ZA and Article 324 ensures creation and safeguarding of the powers of State Election Commissions. Karnataka State Election Commission came into existence with the promulgation of 73rd and 74th amendment to the Constitution of India on 26 May 1993 with an objective of superintendence, direction and control of the preparation of electoral rolls and to conduct all elections to the Urban Local Bodies and Rural local bodies like Municipalities, Municipal Corporations, Panchayats and any other specified by Election Commission of India. Karnataka State Election Commissioner is appointed by Governor of Karnataka.[1]

History and administration

[edit]

Karnataka State Election Commission was formed in accordance with powers of Election Commission of India, which was constituted in year 1950[3] to supervise state level elections.[4] State election commissioner is appointed by Governor.[5][6] To ensure the autonomy of the position, the Karnataka state election commissioner cannot be removed from office except on the grounds and manner specified for judge of High Court.

Powers and responsibilities

[edit]

Karnataka States Election Commissioner is responsible for the following:[3][7]

  • Releasing election schedule.[8]
  • Issue notification containing guidelines for conducting elections for Municipal Corporations in State.
  • Conducting elections for Municipal Corporations in State.
  • Issue notification containing guidelines for conducting elections for conducting elections for Municipal panchayats in State.
  • Conducting elections for Municipal panchayats in State.[9][10]
  • Laying guidelines for persons eligible to contest in elections for Municipal Corporations in State.
  • Conducting elections for Municipal panchayats in State.[11]
  • Model code of conduct are following in elections for local bodies.
  • Updating Electoral rolls with new additions.
  • Updating Electoral rolls with removals, if any.
  • Declaration of results of elections held for Municipal Corporations in State.
  • Declaration of results of elections held for Municipal panchayats in State.
  • Ordering repoll if needed.
  • Making arrangements for Statewide polls.
  • Monitoring poll expenditure for Panchayat polls.
  • Laying guidelines for issue of opinion polls.
  • Decision on conducting elections.
  • Declaring results of local body polls.
  • Municipal and Panchayat constituencies delimitation exercise.[12][13]
  • Countermanding elections in case of mal practices.[14]

Composition

[edit]

Karnataka State Election Commission is headed by Chief Election Commissioner and as many members as specified in State Act. State Election Commissioners are independent persons not holding position or office in any Central or State Government organisations[15]

Sri Dr B.Basavaraju, I.A.S., Retd., is the Chief Election Commissioner of Karnataka State Election Commission.[2] His period of service will be 5 years or attaining an age of 65 years whichever is earlier.

Constitutional requirements

[edit]

Karnataka State Election Commission was formed after amendment of Constitution with 73rd and 74th declaration.[16] State Election Commissions were formed as per Article 243K of the Constitution, similar to setting up of Election commission of India as per Article 324.[4]

See also

[edit]

Election Commission of India.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Karnataka State Election Commission

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Karnataka State Election Commission (KSEC) is an autonomous constitutional body in the Indian state of , vested with the superintendence, direction, and control over the preparation of electoral rolls and the conduct of elections to rural local bodies—such as gram panchayats, taluk panchayats, and zilla panchayats—and urban local bodies, including municipal corporations, city municipal councils, town municipalities, and town panchayats. Constituted in 1993 following the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments of 1992, which introduced Institutions and urban local governance structures, the KSEC operates independently of the state government to ensure impartial electoral processes at the level, distinct from the of India's purview over parliamentary and assembly polls. Headed by a State Election Commissioner appointed by the for a fixed term, the Commission enforces electoral laws, demarcates constituencies, allocates symbols to candidates, and monitors adherence to the during polls, thereby facilitating decentralized democracy as mandated by Articles 243K and 243ZA of the . While it has overseen multiple cycles of local elections without systemic disruptions attributable to its processes, the KSEC's operations occur amid broader national debates on , though specific institutional controversies remain limited compared to higher-level bodies.

Constitutional Provisions

Article 243K of the , inserted by the Constitution (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992, vests the superintendence, direction, and control of the preparation of electoral rolls for, and the conduct of, all elections to Panchayats in a State Election Commissioner appointed by the of the state. This provision establishes the State Election Commission as an independent constitutional authority responsible for ensuring free and fair elections to rural local self-government institutions, including Gram Panchayats, Taluk Panchayats, and Zilla Panchayats in . The State Election Commissioner holds office under conditions determined by rules made by the , subject to state legislation, and cannot be removed except in the same manner and on the same grounds as a of a . Article 243ZA, introduced by the Constitution (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992, extends analogous authority to the same State Election Commission for the preparation of electoral rolls and conduct of elections to Municipalities, encompassing urban local bodies such as municipal corporations, city municipal councils, town municipal councils, and town panchayats. This article explicitly references the State Election Commission under Article 243K, ensuring unified oversight for both rural and urban local elections without interference from the state's executive or legislature in the core electoral processes. The Governor is required, upon request, to provide necessary staff to the Commission, who operate under its control and supervision. These provisions empower the to enact laws on matters incidental to local body elections, such as qualifications of voters, delimitation of constituencies, and reservation of seats, but the Commission's in directing elections remains constitutionally safeguarded to prevent partisan influence. In , the Commission derives its mandate directly from these articles, operationalized through state acts like the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993, and the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 (as amended), to administer elections independently of the , which handles parliamentary and assembly polls.

Historical Establishment

The Karnataka State Election Commission was constituted on 25 May 1993 as an autonomous constitutional body responsible for overseeing elections to rural and urban local self-government institutions in the state. This establishment followed the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992 (effective from 24 April 1993), which introduced Part IX and Article 243K to the , mandating a State Election Commission for panchayat elections, and the 74th Amendment Act, 1992 (effective from 1 June 1993), which added Part IXA and Article 243ZA for municipal elections. These provisions aimed to decentralize electoral authority, insulating local body polls from executive influence previously exercised under departments. Prior to 1993, elections to gram panchayats, taluk panchayats, zilla panchayats, and urban bodies like municipal corporations were conducted under fragmented state laws such as the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1959 (as amended), without a dedicated independent overseer, often leading to delays and allegations of administrative bias. The KSEC's formation aligned with the national push for empowered local governance under the amendments, enabling the commission to prepare electoral rolls, delimit constituencies, and enforce the model code of conduct specifically for over 30,000 local wards across Karnataka's 30 districts. The Governor of Karnataka appoints the State Election Commissioner, whose tenure and conditions mirror those of the Chief Election Commissioner at the national level, ensuring operational independence.

Organizational Framework

Composition and Leadership

The Karnataka State Election Commission consists of a single State Election Commissioner, as established under Article 243K of the , which vests the superintendence, direction, and control of local body elections in this body headed by the appointee. The Commissioner is appointed by the Governor of Karnataka, typically on the advice of the , with qualifications often favoring experienced judicial or administrative officials to ensure independence in electoral oversight. The State Election Commissioner holds office for a term of six years from the date of assuming charge or until attaining the age of 65 years, whichever occurs earlier, and is not eligible for reappointment to maintain autonomy from political influences. This structure parallels the national Election Commission but is tailored for state-level local governance elections, emphasizing impartiality through fixed tenure and removal only via impeachment-like processes akin to a High Court judge. As of June 2024, G.S. Sangreshi, a retired district judge, serves as the State Election Commissioner, appointed to address delays in conducting overdue zilla panchayat, taluk panchayat, and Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike elections. His judicial background underscores the preference for appointees with proven integrity in legal matters, though critics have occasionally questioned government influence in selections despite constitutional safeguards. The leadership operates with a small administrative secretariat, but the Commissioner's authority is centralized for decision-making on electoral processes.

Administrative Operations

The Karnataka State Election Commission (KSEC) maintains its headquarters at No. 8, Cunningham Road, Bengaluru, serving as the central hub for its administrative functions. Established on May 25, 1993, following the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments, the commission operates as an independent constitutional body with a lean administrative setup primarily comprising the State Election Commissioner and a secretariat staffed by deputed officers from departments, such as and municipal administration. Day-to-day administrative operations focus on electoral preparation and execution, including the maintenance of voter lists for rural and urban local bodies, issuance of election notifications under the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993, and Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964, and logistical coordination for polling infrastructure. The secretariat handles routine tasks such as delimitation of constituencies, scrutiny of nominations, and enforcement of the during election periods, often in collaboration with district-level authorities and bodies like the (BBMP). Operational efficiency relies on directives from the State Election Commissioner, who supervises training programs for polling personnel and monitors compliance through field inspections and reports from returning officers. Budgetary provisions for these activities are allocated through grants, enabling the deployment of machines and voter awareness campaigns tailored to local body polls. The commission's administrative autonomy is underscored by its separation from the Chief Electoral Officer of , which oversees parliamentary and assembly elections.

Core Functions and Electoral Oversight

Powers and Responsibilities

The Karnataka State Election Commission exercises superintendence, direction, and control over the preparation of electoral rolls and the conduct of elections to panchayats under Article 243K of the Constitution of India. This includes rural local bodies such as grama panchayats, taluk panchayats, and zilla panchayats, with elections governed by the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993, which mandates their conduct under the Commission's oversight. Similarly, for urban local bodies—including municipal corporations, city municipal councils, town municipal councils, and town panchayats—the Commission holds equivalent authority per Article 243ZA, ensuring uniform electoral processes across local governance institutions. Key responsibilities encompass the preparation and periodic revision of electoral rolls, distinct from parliamentary rolls managed by the , to reflect eligible voters for local elections; this involves verifying voter eligibility, addressing discrepancies, and integrating data from revenue and other state records. The Commission also handles delimitation of constituencies and reservation of seats for scheduled castes, scheduled tribes, and other categories as prescribed by state law, notifying changes ahead of polls to maintain representational equity. It issues election notifications, appoints returning officers, presiding officers, and observers, and supervises polling stations to prevent malpractices. In conducting elections, the Commission enforces adherence to the , monitors campaign activities, and can direct state authorities to provide logistical support such as and ; violations may lead to directives for remedial action or postponement of polls in affected areas. It possesses rule-making powers to prescribe procedures for nominations, scrutiny, withdrawals, polling, counting, and declaration of results, as derived from constitutional provisions and enabling state legislation like the Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Election) Rules, 1993. While election disputes are typically adjudicated by designated authorities or courts, the Commission can summarily address certain irregularities during the process, such as booth capturing or impersonation, by ordering re-polls. These functions underscore its role in upholding at the level, independent of executive interference, with the State Election Commissioner appointed by the and removable only through an address by the akin to a .

Managed Electoral Processes

The Karnataka State Election Commission (SEC) manages elections to rural Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) and urban local bodies (ULBs), as mandated under Article 243K of the Indian Constitution for PRIs and Article 243ZA for ULBs, adapted through state legislation such as the Panchayat Raj Act, 1993, and the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964. These encompass:
  • Rural bodies: Gram Panchayats (village councils), Taluk Panchayat Samitis (block-level councils), and Zilla Panchayats (district councils).
  • Urban bodies: Mahanagara Palikes (municipal corporations, e.g., ), Nagar Sabhas (city municipal councils), Pura Sabhas (town municipal councils), and Pattana Panchayats (town panchayats).
The SEC's processes include delimitation of wards and constituencies, preparation and revision of separate electoral rolls for local bodies (distinct from state assembly rolls), issuance of election notifications, scrutiny of nominations, symbol allotment, deployment of polling personnel and materials, oversight of polling stations, , and result declarations, all aimed at ensuring timely and impartial conduct. Voter turnout and follow protocols aligned with state rules, with the SEC empowered to issue guidelines on reservations for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes, and women, typically comprising 50% of seats. Historically, the SEC conducted ULB elections across 30 municipal corporations, councils, and town bodies in phases during 2020, amidst delays, using Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trails (VVPATs). For PRIs, elections were held in multiple phases from late 2020 into 2021, covering over 6,000 s with approximately 1.2 seats. In September 2025, the state cabinet directed a shift to paper ballots for upcoming local elections, scrapping EVMs to address public concerns over machine reliability, with the SEC confirming compliance and plans for independent roll revisions. Preparations for 2025 polls, involving roll revisions and pre-election activities, were initiated by October 2025 to meet term expiry deadlines.

Key Elections and Operational History

Major Local Body Elections Conducted

The Karnataka State Election Commission oversees elections for rural local bodies, including gram panchayats, taluk panchayats, and zilla panchayats, as well as urban local bodies such as municipal corporations, city municipal councils, town municipal councils, and town panchayats. These elections occur approximately every five years, with the commission responsible for delimitation, voter list preparation, polling logistics, and result declaration. Major cycles have involved millions of voters and thousands of seats, reflecting the scale of local governance in the state. A prominent example is the 2020 gram panchayat elections, conducted in two phases on December 22 and December 27 across 30 districts, covering 5,728 and 54,041 seats. Voter turnout exceeded 80% in many areas, with results declared on December 31 showing BJP-backed independents securing approximately 60% of the seats, followed by and JD(S) candidates. In 2016, the commission managed zilla and taluk panchayat elections in two phases on February 13 and February 20, involving nearly 17,000 candidates across all 30 zilla panchayats and associated taluk bodies. emerged victorious in 10 zilla panchayats, BJP in 7, with the remainder split among JD(S) and independents, amid a of about 74% in the first phase. Urban local body elections, including those for the (BBMP), were last conducted in 2015, with BBMP polls on August 22 for 198 wards under the commission's supervision. Subsequent cycles for other municipal corporations and councils have followed similar quinquennial patterns, though delays in some urban polls due to administrative hurdles have been noted. The commission has historically employed machines for these processes, though recent recommendations seek a return to ballot papers for transparency concerns.

Technological and Procedural Evolutions

The initially relied on traditional ballot paper systems for local body elections, which were prone to issues such as high rates of invalid votes and delays in counting. To address these, the SEC explored the adoption of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) in the late 2010s; in December 2018, it announced plans to replace ballots with EVMs for upcoming polls, aiming to enhance efficiency and reduce invalid votes observed in prior elections like the 2015 polls where invalid votes exceeded 5% in some areas. EVMs were subsequently introduced for certain local body elections, marking a technological shift toward electronic polling to streamline processes and minimize human error in vote recording. However, this evolution reversed in September 2025 when the state cabinet recommended reverting to ballot papers for all future local body elections, including panchayat and urban polls, citing eroded in EVMs amid allegations of vote manipulation during recent assembly elections. The SEC accepted the directive, confirming its application to polls like those in Bengaluru's civic bodies, with legal amendments required to enforce the change and potential delays in scheduling elections due to procedural adjustments. This reversion prioritizes verifiable paper trails over electronic systems, though critics argue it risks reintroducing booth-level irregularities historically associated with ballots. Procedurally, a key evolution involves voter list management; previously dependent on rolls from the Chief Electoral Officer for assembly constituencies, the SEC gained autonomy in September 2025 to independently prepare and revise electoral rolls for local bodies, reducing discrepancies between state and local voter databases. This includes initiating a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) from November 1, 2025—the first such comprehensive update in over two decades—allowing for deletions, additions, and corrections to ensure accuracy ahead of polls. Such changes aim to mitigate claims of inflated or fraudulent entries, though implementation challenges persist due to the scale of 's rural and urban electorates exceeding 50 million.

Controversies and Challenges

Allegations of Electoral Irregularities

In preparation for the 2022 Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) elections, the Karnataka State Election Commission registered a First Information Report (FIR) on November 17, 2022, amid allegations of voter data irregularities in Bengaluru. These claims centered on staff from the NGO Chilume Trust, which had received permission from BBMP to conduct a door-to-door survey, allegedly collecting sensitive voter information such as Aadhaar numbers and bank details by impersonating government officials, raising concerns over potential misuse for electoral manipulation. The Congress party, then in opposition, accused the BJP-led state government, including Chief Minister Basavaraj Bommai, a cabinet minister, and BBMP officials, of complicity in a "voter data theft" scheme intended to influence the polls, prompting complaints to the Election Commission of India for intervention. The BJP dismissed these as politically motivated, attributing the survey to legitimate civic data-gathering efforts. The ensuing probe, involving arrests of individuals linked to the data collection, contributed to further delays in the already postponed BBMP elections, which had been due since 2020. Broader distrust in electronic voting machines (EVMs), fueled by national-level fraud claims, indirectly affected perceptions of the State Election Commission's processes. In September 2025, the Congress-led government recommended reverting to papers for future local body elections to mitigate risks of manipulation, a move the commission's head indicated was feasible, citing the need to rebuild public confidence amid ongoing EVM-related controversies. No widespread of booth capturing or stuffing specific to State Election Commission-conducted polls emerged in verified reports from the 2021 elections, though localized complaints of voter list discrepancies and delimitation disputes were raised by candidates excluded from urban extensions.

Political Criticisms and Impartiality Debates

The Karnataka State Election Commission (KSEC) has faced accusations from opposition parties alleging by the ruling government in delaying local body elections, particularly for zilla and taluk panchayats, as of late 2024. These delays, attributed to unresolved delimitation and reservation disputes, have persisted beyond constitutional timelines under Article 243E of the Indian Constitution, which mandates elections every five years. Critics, including (BJP) leaders, contend that the state government's reluctance to provide necessary administrative support allows it to retain control through appointed administrators, thereby circumventing electoral accountability and potentially favoring incumbents amid sentiments. Such postponements risk forfeiting over ₹18,948 in central grants tied to elected bodies, exacerbating fiscal strains and raising questions about the KSEC's enforcement powers against executive foot-dragging. In September 2025, the Congress-led cabinet's recommendation to revert to ballot papers for upcoming local body polls, citing "eroded credibility" of machines (EVMs) following assembly disputes, sparked debates on the KSEC's in adopting directives. Former KSEC officials and election experts criticized the move as regressive, arguing it could inflate invalid votes—historically 2-5% higher with ballots than EVMs—and expose processes to booth capturing or tampering, without evidence of EVM flaws specific to local polls. The KSEC's readiness to implement this, including empowering itself for voter roll revisions independent of the , was viewed by skeptics as overly deferential to the executive, potentially prioritizing political narratives over technological reliability proven in prior local s. defended the shift by noting that courts have not banned ballots and over 120 countries still use them, but opponents highlighted the inconsistency, as the same had previously relied on EVMs. Broader impartiality concerns stem from the KSEC's structural vulnerabilities, including the state government's unilateral appointment of the State Election Commissioner under the Karnataka State Election Commission Act, 1997, without the tenure security afforded to the Chief Election Commissioner. Political analysts argue this fosters perceptions of bias, as seen in past cycles where ruling parties allegedly influenced delimitation exercises to consolidate vote banks in local bodies. In August 2025, the KSEC denied claims by leaders of forged voter lists in Bengaluru, demanding affidavits and underscoring its operational independence, yet such episodes fuel ongoing distrust among stakeholders who question whether the commission adequately counters executive overreach in voter verification processes. These debates highlight systemic tensions between the KSEC's mandate for fair local polls and the realities of state-level political dynamics, with calls for reforms like fixed tenures to bolster credibility.

Institutional Responses and Reforms

In response to allegations of electoral irregularities, including voter list manipulations and doubts regarding (EVM) reliability, the government directed the State Election Commission (SEC) to revert to paper ballots for upcoming local body elections. On September 4, 2025, State Election Commissioner G.S. Sangreshi confirmed the SEC's preparedness to conduct polls using ballot papers, emphasizing concurrent revisions to electoral rolls as mandated by the Representation of the People Act and state laws to ensure accuracy and inclusion. This shift, approved via cabinet ordinances amending acts such as the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, and Karnataka Gram and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993, aimed to enhance transparency and rebuild voter confidence amid nationwide scrutiny of EVMs, though it requires legislative ratification and has faced delays in implementation. Persistent delays in local body elections, often exceeding five years beyond term expirations—such as the 55-month postponement in Bengaluru's urban local bodies due to delimitation disputes—have prompted institutional pushback against political interference. The SEC, constrained by lacking statutory powers over ward delimitation and seat reservations, has relied on judicial directives for resolution, with courts intervening in at least six national cases including to enforce timely polls, as in State Election Commission v. Uma Mahadevan (2025). A 2025 Janaagraha report highlighted average 11-month lags in mayoral elections and council formations attributable to undefined timelines for post-nomination processes and withholding of reservation lists. Reform proposals include empowering the SEC with independent delimitation authority or integrating it into a dedicated commission, imposing 15-day statutory limits for convening inaugural council meetings after results, and prohibiting boundary alterations within six months of elections to curb manipulation. Legislative amendments, such as those under the Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill (approved August 2025), seek to streamline preparation for expanded municipal areas, addressing discrepancies in voter verification that have fueled impartiality debates. These measures, while advancing procedural robustness, have been critiqued by opposition parties like the BJP for potentially reintroducing risks of invalid votes and booth-level irregularities inherent in paper systems, contrasting the SEC's prior adoption of EVMs for efficiency since 2015.

Assessment of Performance and Impact

Achievements in Local Governance Elections

The Karnataka State Election Commission successfully conducted elections to 5,728 gram panchayats across the state in December 2020, involving over 54,000 seats and more than 1.4 eligible rural voters, marking one of the largest local body polls in the state's history. Despite the ongoing , the Commission managed the two-phase process with stringent health protocols, achieving an average of approximately 81 percent, reflecting effective logistical planning and voter mobilization efforts. In the first phase on December 22, 2020, covering 3,019 gram panchayats in 117 taluks, turnout exceeded 80 percent, while the second phase on December 27 saw 80.71 percent participation, demonstrating the Commission's capacity to sustain high engagement in rural areas under adverse conditions. Results for all 54,041 seats were declared efficiently on December 31, with diverse outcomes including close contests resolved by minimal margins, underscoring the robustness of the ballot paper system employed in most areas (except , where EVMs were piloted). The Commission's oversight extended to urban local body elections, such as those in 102 bodies in , where it facilitated polling for thousands of wards despite varying turnout levels, contributing to the periodic renewal of local governance structures as mandated by the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act and municipal laws. These efforts have supported 's leading position in panchayat devolution metrics, enabling empowered local institutions through regular, inclusive electoral processes.

Ongoing Issues and Future Directions

One persistent challenge for the Karnataka State Election Commission (KSEC) involves allegations of irregularities in maintenance, particularly mass deletions of voters that have undermined . In , a (SIT) probe into the Aland constituency revealed attempts to manipulate voter lists using a , with evidence extending to at least two other seats in , linked to deletions ahead of the 2023 assembly polls. Similarly, Karnataka Health Minister Dinesh Gundurao alleged over 10 lakh fake voters in Bengaluru wards, highlighting systemic vulnerabilities in voter verification processes. These issues, while under investigation, reflect broader concerns about handling integrity, as opposition leaders like have cited them as evidence of "vote theft" patterns. Delays in conducting local body elections constitute another ongoing issue, exacerbated by administrative hurdles such as ward delimitation, reservation disputes, and now procedural shifts. Local polls, originally due earlier, remain postponed as of October 2025, with the government's September 2025 recommendation to revert to paper ballots over Machines (EVMs) potentially requiring legal amendments and further stalling timelines. This move, justified by as a trust-building measure amid EVM , has drawn from the BJP as politically motivated, illustrating tensions over electoral technology's reliability. Looking ahead, KSEC's future directions emphasize enhanced verification and transparency reforms, influenced by national initiatives like the Election Commission of India's (ECI) Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls launched in October 2025, which aims to purify lists through door-to-door checks and digital tools. At the state level, implementing paper ballots could reduce perceived tampering risks but introduce logistical challenges like higher invalid votes, necessitating training and infrastructure upgrades. Broader reforms may include of roll management to minimize manual errors, though skepticism toward electronic systems persists, potentially driving hybrid approaches or pilots for auditability as explored in discussions. These steps, if executed, could bolster KSEC's operational efficacy, but success hinges on addressing political interferences and ensuring impartial enforcement.

References

  1. https://karsec.gov.in/
  2. https://www.justdial.com/Bangalore/Karnataka-Election-Commission-Head-Office-Near-Veeraseva-Maha-Sabha-Sadashivanagar/080P3051314_BZDET
  3. https://legalaffairs.gov.in/sites/default/files/chapter%25209%2520.pdf
  4. https://ceo.karnataka.gov.in/en
  5. https://www.mea.gov.in/Images/pdf1/Part9.pdf
  6. https://www.latestlaws.com/bare-acts/central-acts-rules/article-243k-constitution-of-india-elections-to-the-panchayats/
  7. https://www.constitutionofindia.net/articles/article-243za-elections-to-the-municipalities/
  8. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/19151/1/constitution_of_india.pdf
  9. https://www.elections.in/election-commission/karnataka.html
  10. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/gs-sangreshi-appointed-as-state-election-commissioner/articleshow/111371803.cms
  11. https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/karnataka/2024/Jun/29/sangreshi-is-new-karnataka-election-commissioner
  12. https://data.gov.in/files/ogdpv2cms/s3fs-public/data_controller/CDO_Nomination_State_Election_Commission_US.pdf
  13. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/bangalore/bbmp-officials-told-to-upload-draft-voters-list/article65791466.ece
  14. https://www.constitutionofindia.net/articles/article-243k-elections-to-the-panchayats/
  15. https://www.legitquest.com/act/karnataka-panchayat-raj-conduct-of-election-rules-1993/ED45
  16. https://kanoongpt.in/bare-acts/constitution-of-india/articles-part-ixa-article-243za-462565ed351cf52c
  17. https://zpdk.karnataka.gov.in/uploads/58151650438654.pdf
  18. https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5609443ee4b014971124a93a
  19. https://panchayat.gov.in/en/status-of-panchayat-elections-in-pris/
  20. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/election-commission-begins-preparations-for-statewide-gram-panchayat-polls/articleshow/124532679.cms
  21. https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/bangalore/switch-from-evm-to-ballot-paper-for-local-body-polls-karnataka-cabinet-to-state-election-commission-10230628/
  22. https://www.deccanherald.com/india/karnataka/bengaluru/evms-out-bengaluru-civic-polls-to-use-ballot-papers-says-state-election-commissioner-3714270
  23. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/karnataka-panchayat-polls-in-two-phases-on-december-22-27/article61723996.ece
  24. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/results-for-54041-gp-seats-declared-in-karnataka/article33457189.ece
  25. https://swarajyamag.com/insta/bjp-backed-candidates-won-60-per-cent-of-seats-in-karnataka-panchayat-polls-cm-b-s-yediyurappa
  26. https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/bangalore/karnataka-bengaluru-coronavirus-covid-19-lockdown-6-0-gram-panchayat-elections-results-yediyurappa-sidddaramaiah-police-bbmp-live-7125695/
  27. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/live-congress-wins-in-10-zilla-panchayats-bjp-bags-7/article14095810.ece
  28. https://zeenews.india.com/news/karnataka/karnataka-zilla-taluk-panchayat-poll-results-2016-live-counting-of-votes-underway_1858235.html
  29. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/karnataka-zilla-taluk-panchayat-polls-on-feb-13-20/articleshow/50630957.cms
  30. https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/karnataka/2025/Aug/04/bbmp-elections-likely-only-early-next-year
  31. https://www.deccanherald.com/india/karnataka/elections-for-5-city-corporations-to-be-held-this-year-state-election-commissioner-3460897
  32. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/sec-ready-to-revert-to-ballot-papers/article70013413.ece
  33. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/evms-could-replace-ballots-in-local-body-polls-in-karnataka/article25663313.ece
  34. https://www.coastaldigest.com/evms-be-introduced-gram-panchayat-polls-karnataka
  35. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/state-govt-recommends-to-sec-to-revert-to-use-of-ballot-papers-in-local-body-polls-in-future/article70012705.ece
  36. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/return-to-ballot-paper-requires-amendments-to-law-may-further-delay-local-body-elections/articleshow/123813870.cms
  37. https://thefederal.com/category/states/south/karnataka/karnataka-to-use-ballot-papers-for-local-body-polls-separate-voter-list-205305
  38. https://www.thehansindia.com/news/cities/bengaluru/karnataka-state-election-commission-to-conduct-special-voter-list-revision-from-november-1-1011680
  39. https://www.deccanherald.com/india/karnataka/karnataka-gears-up-for-first-voter-roll-revision-in-23-years-ec-to-launch-drive-by-sept-25-3733274
  40. https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/bangalore/bengaluru-voter-data-irregularities-state-election-commission-fir-8273783/
  41. https://www.thenewsminute.com/karnataka/bengaluru-voter-scam-congress-spokesperson-complains-to-rahul-over-ias-officers-promotion
  42. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/voter-data-theft-congress-moves-ec-seeks-action-against-basavaraj-bommai-minister-bbmp-chief-in-karnataka/articleshow/95632184.cms
  43. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/voter-data-fraud-case-could-delay-bruhat-bengaluru-mahanagara-palike-elections-again/articleshow/95817169.cms
  44. https://bangaloremirror.indiatimes.com/bangalore/cover-story/the-infra-gram/articleshow/80104219.cms
  45. https://www.business-standard.com/politics/karnataka-risks-rs-18-948-crore-grants-as-local-body-polls-face-delays-124112200704_1.html
  46. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/election-commission-mounts-pressure-on-govt-to-clear-decks-for-panchayat-polls/articleshow/123192976.cms
  47. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/questions-raised-over-logic-of-using-ballot-papers-for-local-body-elections/article70019296.ece
  48. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/siddaramaiah-defends-return-to-ballot-paper-for-local-body-polls/articleshow/123723812.cms
  49. https://www.theindiaforum.in/politics/addressing-election-delays-local-governments
  50. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/no-record-poll-body-denies-congress-leaders-claim-of-forged-voter-list-9011821
  51. https://www.janaagraha.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Delays-in-Urban-Local-Government-Elections-in-India-Analysis-and-Reform-Pathways.pdf
  52. https://www.deccanherald.com/india/karnataka/karnataka-to-scrap-evms-for-local-body-polls-govt-recommends-use-of-ballot-papers-3712207
  53. https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/bengaluru-news/karnataka-cabinet-approves-greater-bengaluru-governance-bill-set-to-facilitate-bengaluru-local-body-elections-report-101754638779744.html
  54. https://www.thenewsminute.com/karnataka/bjp-slams-karnataka-govts-decision-to-replace-evms-with-ballot-papers-for-local-body-polls
  55. https://www.deccanherald.com/india/karnataka/karnataka-gram-panchayat-polls-over-140-crore-rural-citizens-to-vote-sunday-931911.html
  56. https://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/karnataka-local-body-election-2020-voting-concludes-results-5728-gram-panchayats-december-30-bjp-jds-congress-all-you-need-to-know/2158812/
  57. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/live-updates-karnataka-gram-panchayat-elections-2020-phase-2/liveblog/79973062.cms
  58. https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/karnataka/2020/Dec/23/80-per-cent-average-voter-turnout-in-first-phase-of-grampanchayat-polls-in-karnataka-2239946.html
  59. https://www.livemint.com/politics/news/karnataka-gram-panchayat-election-results-2020-counting-of-votes-begins-trends-shortly-11609296136828.html
  60. https://www.ndtv.com/karnataka-news/karnataka-urban-local-body-election-result-2018-live-updates-congress-leads-1910324
  61. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/karnataka-tops-in-devolution-index-ranking-of-panchayat-raj-system/article69222864.ece
  62. https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/voter-list-fraud-sit-probe-finds-attempt-made-in-other-seats-besides-aland-in-karnataka-10328725/
  63. https://www.nationalheraldindia.com/politics/sit-probe-reveals-wider-voter-list-manipulation-in-karnatakas-kalaburagi-region
  64. https://www.ndtv.com/video/karnataka-news-karnataka-health-minister-alleges-massive-fake-voters-in-bengaluru-wards-1013634
  65. https://m.thewire.in/article/government/democracy-on-delete-mode-what-karnatakas-voter-scam-says-about-the-eci
  66. https://www.heraldgoa.in/goa/karnataka-vote-chori-row-data-team-may-have-played-role-in-deletions-sources-say/450356/
  67. https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/karnataka-cm-siddaramaiah-defends-use-of-paper-ballots-in-local-body-polls-bjp-calls-it-move-to-appease-high-command/articleshow/123717044.cms
  68. https://swarajyamag.com/news-brief/ec-to-launch-first-phase-of-pan-India-voter-roll-revision-covering-1015-states
  69. https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/technology/electoral-roll-revamp-the-case-for-digital-transformation/article70186326.ece
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.