Hubbry Logo
Kite balloonKite balloonMain
Open search
Kite balloon
Community hub
Kite balloon
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Kite balloon
Kite balloon
Kite balloon
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Drachen kite balloon, showing its characteristic shape

A kite balloon is a tethered balloon which is shaped to help make it stable in low and moderate winds and to increase its lift. It typically comprises a streamlined envelope with stabilising features and a harness or yoke connecting it to the main tether and a second harness connected to an observer's basket.

Kite balloons are able to fly in higher winds than ordinary round balloons which tended to bob and spin in windy conditions.[1] They were extensively used for military observation during World War I and similar designs were used for anti-aircraft barriers, as barrage balloons in both world wars.

Design and development

[edit]

Developed in Germany from 1893 by Parseval and Sigsfeld (de:Hans Bartsch von Sigsfeld), the main component of their kite balloon is its tubular-shaped envelope, similar to that of a non-rigid airship, giving it its British and French nicknames of "sausage".[1] This was inclined at a nose up angle to about 30–40° from the horizontal, which resulted in it producing some aerodynamic lift to augment the lift from the hydrogen used and which helped reduce the up and down pitching common with spherical balloons.[1]

As with a blimp, the envelope was also the main lifting gas bag. Later versions of the Drachen used wind pressure to inflate a stabilising ballonets or sock at the rear, which acted as a tail fin and kept it pointed into the wind.[1] A yoke or harness connected the balloon to the tether and was arranged to aid stability.[1][2] Early versions of the Parseval had fixed fins, which were later replaced with the sock mounted on the underside that was inflated by the wind.[1] The Parseval's perceived resemblance to an erect phallus led to the nickname in German service of Die Freude der Mädchen (Maiden's joy).[1] Sizes of early examples varied but two main sizes became common – 600 and 1,200 m (2,000 and 3,900 ft) and mass production was carried out at the August Riedinger Balloon Plant in Augsburg, Germany.[1] The observer was given a parachute, attached to the outside of the basket and while the winch was pulling the balloon down, he would jump.[1]

Parseval balloons most often operated at an altitudes between 1,000 and 2,000 m (3,300 and 6,600 ft), could handle winds of up to 65 km/h (40 mph) and were equipped with an engine-driven winch to lower them quickly in the event of an attack.[1] To further dissuade attacks, they were often ringed with anti-aircraft batteries, making attacks on them extremely hazardous.[1] Despite this, they were the target of frequent attacks.

Caquot kite balloon with basket near the ground

Initially the French and British used copies of the German Parseval Drachen balloons but the French captain Albert Caquot, for whom it was named, developed a much-improved design that replaced the tubular sausage shaped envelope with a more aerodynamic teardrop shape and replaced the sock with three fins, which were also held rigid by the wind blowing past it.[3] Six versions of the Caquot (L, M, M.2, P, P.2 and R) saw widespread use, in four main sizes, 750, 800, 930 and 1,000 m3 (26,000, 28,000, 33,000 and 35,000 cu ft). The 750 m3 (26,000 cu ft) type P could carry two observers to 500 m (1,600 ft), while the 1,000 m3 (35,000 cu ft) type R could carry 3 to 500 m (1,600 ft) or 2 to 1,000 m (3,300 ft).[3]

Like the Parseval, the Caquot could be hauled down in an emergency, at speeds up to 6 m/s (20 ft/s). Until 1916 a Saconney type winch was used, powered with a Delahaye motor of either 32 or 60 hp (24 or 45 kW) but from 1917, a winch of their own design was used, powered with a 70 hp (52 kW) de Dion-Bouton motor.[4]

The kite balloon had a parachute in a flat container attached to the observation basket. The observer wore a harness around his waist, attached by lines to the parachute. If the balloonist jumped, the parachute was pulled from the container.[5]

For shipboard use by the US Navy, the observer boarded the basket each morning just before daylight and would clip the boarding line to his parachute harness. They tried to make the hoist during a calm period, as the balloon could behave erratically in turbulence, so the observation basket might be dunked before the tether was extended enough to allow the kite balloon to go aloft. Wet or dry, the balloon observer spent the whole day aloft. Its appearance earned it the nickname rubber cow.[6]

The Italian military also developed a kite balloon, called the Avorio-Prassone, which was similar to the Caquot but more spherical, although it was still able to generate some aerodynamic lift and, like the Caquot, had three fins for stability.

Army use

[edit]

The Parseval was in widespread use from the end of the 1800s in large numbers by the German Army to direct gunfire from heavy artillery.[1]

The French continued to operate spherical balloons, until deciding to abandon them in 1912 when reconnaissance aeroplanes became a practical alternative. By 1914, they too realized, with the British, the usefulness of captive balloons, as unlike aircraft, they could remain on station for hours, when most aeroplanes had an endurance limited to about two hours.[3] The French Army at one point had 76 companies operating Caquot balloons.[3]

The first aircraft-on-aircraft rocket attack was made on 22 May 1916 when a group of eight French aces including Charles Nungesser made a dawn attack while flying Nieuport 16s armed with eight Le Prieur rockets each, that shot down six balloons.[7] This panicked the German high command into lowering all their balloons along the entire front and blinding their Army to a French counter-attack on Fort Douaumont.[7] Certain aces on both sides known for going after the kite balloons became known as "balloon busters".

[edit]

Although their primary use was by armies to spot the fall of artillery shells and observe enemy movements, the cruisers and battleships of several nations were also equipped to operate Parseval kite balloons to direct gunfire like their army counterparts.[1] Twenty four French Navy vessels were equipped to handle Caquot balloons, with large vessels using the type R to direct gunfire, while smaller escort vessels used the type P and type P.2 against submarines. Although only ten were in service in July 1917, by July 1918 over 200 were in service.[3]

During the Atlantic U-boat campaign of World War I, Caquot balloons were used by American destroyers escorting merchant ship convoys. A balloon observer could often see submerged submarines invisible to observers on the ship and could notify the ship of U-boats and their evasive maneuvers during a depth charge attack, by telephone.[6] The availability of an elevated visual observation platform significantly enhanced the ability of destroyers to find and attack U-boats prior to the invention of sonar.

A shortage of crews prevented more widespread use of kite balloons even after the United States Navy established a training program in October 1917, at Goodyear in Akron, Ohio.[6]

The only casualty from the use of a kite balloon by the United States occurred on 14 August 1918, during an unsuccessful attempt to lower a balloon onto the deck of a destroyer while escorting an eastbound convoy through the Irish Sea. During a stormy evening, the balloon alternately plunged port and starboard as the tether was shortened, dipping the basket into the water on each dive. The crewman in the basket was lost before the balloon could be fully lowered.[6]

The U.S. Navy commissioned the specialized kite balloon tender USS Wright (AZ-1) in December 1921 and operated it as such until July 1922, when the ship was converted to a seaplane tender with the hull symbol AV-1.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Kite balloon

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A kite balloon is an elongated, designed as a captive , featuring stabilizing lobes or tails to maintain orientation into the wind and deriving additional lift from the inclination of its longitudinal axis. These non-rigid gas bags, typically filled with , carried an observer in a suspended connected by a along the for real-time communication. The kite balloon originated in with the Parseval-Sigsfeld Drachenballon, developed around 1896 by August von Parseval and Hans Bartsch von Sigsfeld to address the instability of earlier spherical balloons in wind. Known as the "Drachen" or "sausage" for its cylindrical shape with a stabilizing tail fin and air sack, this design allowed reliable operation in winds up to 50 mph and was quickly adopted by other nations. During , kite balloons became essential for military , with the German model serving as the standard until French innovations like the Caquot type—featuring a divided for and air cells, plus rudders for enhanced control—emerged in 1916. In the war, Allied and alike deployed thousands of kite balloons along the Western Front and at for spotting, photographic surveys, and detection, enabling observers to scan up to 20 miles in clear conditions. The U.S. Army trained over 16,000 personnel at Fort , from , using captured Drachen and Caquot balloons for ascensions totaling 5,866 flights, while the integrated them into escorts starting in to extend patrol visibility and provide early warnings. Despite vulnerabilities to enemy fire—leading to 12 U.S. balloons lost and routine parachuting drills—these devices marked a pivotal advancement in aerial observation before airplanes dominated the role.

History

Invention and Early Development

The kite balloon was developed in in the late 1890s by Major August von Parseval and Captain Hans Bartsch von Sigsfeld as a more stable alternative to traditional spherical observation balloons, which were prone to instability and drifting in windy conditions. Their design drew on aerodynamic principles to create a tethered, non-rigid that could maintain position against wind forces, combining with kite-like stability. Early prototypes featured a tubular envelope shape, with initial testing commencing in 1893 to refine the structure for better wind resistance. These trials demonstrated the balloon's ability to remain oriented into the wind, achieving stability in moderate breezes through a rear air appendage that acted as a , preventing rotation and collapse. By 1898, after iterative experiments with various configurations, the Parseval-Sigsfeld Drachenballon reached its finalized form, marking a significant evolution from the unstable spherical balloons of the late to the kite-shaped designs that dominated aerial in the early 1900s. The kite balloon saw its first combat deployment during the of 1904–1905, where Russian forces employed several units acquired from for and spotting. Deployed from ships like the balloon carrier Rus and at key battles such as Port Arthur and Mukden, these early operations were limited to several balloons overall, hampered by the Russian military's relative inexperience with the technology, which restricted their effectiveness despite the design's inherent stability advantages.

Adoption in World War I

The Germans pioneered the widespread military adoption of kite balloons during , introducing the Parseval-Sigsfeld design on the Western Front for the first time on , 1915, to spot targets. Mass production commenced at the August Ridinger plant in , with over 80 units entering service by the end of 1915 and an additional buildup to 70 units deployed specifically for Western Front observation by mid-1916. These balloons provided critical aerial vantage points for directing long-range fire, marking a significant shift from earlier spherical balloons that were unstable in wind. The Allies rapidly countered this advantage, with the British producing copies of the German Drachen-type kite balloon in 1915 and reorganizing their units into dedicated balloon wings, each comprising 4-6 sections equipped with winches, transport vehicles, and gas tenders for frontline mobility. The French, meanwhile, developed the superior Caquot kite in 1916, which featured enhanced stabilizing tails for better wind resistance, and expanded to dozens of dedicated companies by 1918 to support extensive operations. By major offensives such as the in 1916, Allied forces deployed over 100 kite balloons to coordinate barrages and monitor enemy movements, underscoring their integration into tactics. Despite their tactical value, kite balloons proved highly vulnerable to anti-aircraft fire and enemy attacks, often igniting due to their filling and leading to over 200 observer casualties across all belligerents, though parachutes introduced from mitigated some risks. German balloons alone were targeted in "balloon busting" missions, with Allied pilots downing hundreds by war's end, while ground defenses including anti-aircraft guns and escort fighters offered limited protection. This high-risk role highlighted the balloons' double-edged impact on the battlefield, balancing gains against personnel losses.

Design and Operation

Aerodynamic Principles

Kite balloons maintain stability through aerodynamic features resembling those of traditional , such as trailing tails or stabilizing fins (often termed lobes), which produce drag to orient the balloon head-on into the prevailing and resist tumbling during gusts of up to approximately 80 km/h (50 mph). This passive stabilization mechanism ensures the balloon remains aligned without requiring active control systems, relying instead on the 's dynamic forces to restore equilibrium after disturbances. Lift in kite balloons arises primarily from generated by filling the with lighter-than-air gases, such as , with a of about 0.09 kg/m³, which provides the static upward force necessary for elevation. This buoyant lift is augmented by dynamic aerodynamic lift produced as flows over the inclined during forward motion, collectively enabling sustained altitudes typically around 1,000 meters (3,400 feet) under operational conditions. The core equation governing the drag force that contributes to this stability is the standard aerodynamic drag formula: D=12ρv2CdAD = \frac{1}{2} \rho v^2 C_d A where DD is the drag force, ρ\rho is the air , vv is the wind speed, CdC_d is the (approximately 0.2 to 0.5 for typical kite balloon shapes), and AA is the projected frontal area. This drag, acting rearward, balances the tension and wind , promoting inherent stability across varying wind profiles. In contrast to free balloons, which depend exclusively on for lift and can maneuver omnidirectionally without external constraints, kite balloons are secured by a that imparts precise altitude and positional control but mandates a consistent wind-facing orientation to achieve aerodynamic equilibrium. For instance, designs like the Parseval-Sigsfeld incorporate a stabilizing to enhance this wind alignment.

Construction and Materials

Kite balloons were constructed with a streamlined envelope designed to enhance stability and lift when tethered. The envelope typically consisted of lightweight fabrics such as cotton or silk treated with rubber doping to ensure gas retention and prevent porosity. Volumes varied by design but generally ranged from 600 to 1,200 cubic meters, filled with hydrogen gas for buoyancy, though the gas's flammability posed significant risks, including losses from diffusion and leaks that necessitated regular replenishment. An internal ballonet in the lower portion of the envelope was filled with air via wind scoops to maintain shape and pressure, separating it from the hydrogen-filled upper section with a fabric diaphragm. Maintenance involved periodic re-doping of the fabric to address porosity and ensure hydrogen purity, typically requiring around 98% to minimize ignition hazards when mixed with air. Stabilizing elements included inflatable fabric tails or rigid fins at the rear, often 10 to 20 meters long, to keep the balloon oriented into the wind. These could feature up to six removable tail cups resembling small parachutes for added drag and stability, or air-filled fins and rudders inflated through scoops. The was a wire cable, usually 5 to 10 millimeters in diameter, connected to a system for controlled height adjustment up to several thousand feet. patches on the secured the lines, with crossover points distributing load to prevent twisting. The gondola was a lightweight wicker or bamboo basket accommodating two observers, suspended by adjustable ropes from the envelope. It included a telephone for communication with ground stations and emergency parachutes for the crew, though early designs sometimes lacked harnesses for secure attachment. Inflation and launch required a ground crew of around 48 personnel, with processes taking 15 to 25 minutes total, followed by ongoing checks for gas integrity and fabric condition.

Types of Kite Balloons

Parseval-Sigsfeld Design

The Parseval-Sigsfeld kite balloon originated from a collaborative effort in the early by Major August von Parseval and Hans Bartsch von Sigsfeld of the Prussian Balloon Corps, aimed at creating a more stable observation platform than traditional spherical balloons. Their design was formalized through German Patent DE 75731, filed in 1893 by balloon manufacturer August Riedinger in association with Parseval and Sigsfeld, which described a tubular envelope with an open-ended air intake to facilitate streamlined airflow and maintain shape under wind pressure. The core of the design featured a cylindrical, hydrogen-filled constructed from rubberized fabric, typically measuring approximately 27 meters in length and 7 meters in diameter for the standard model, providing a gas capacity of around 800 cubic meters. This tubular shape, with its open rear intake, allowed wind to enter and inflate an internal ballonet, ensuring the oriented itself into the wind like a for inherent stability without relying on complex . Testing of prototypes began in 1893, with the design refined and adopted by the German military by 1898 under the name "Drachenballon." A key innovation was the inflatable stabilizing sock, or steering bag, attached at the rear of the envelope; this air-filled appendage, equipped with a large intake opening and optional trailing cups for added drag, could be adjusted via valves to counterbalance the center of gravity and enhance in varying conditions. This feature enabled reliable flight in moderate winds, with the sock automatically inflating through or auxiliary means like a fan, marking a significant advance in captive technology for . Early descriptions from highlight its use of a strong fabric belt for suspension rather than a net, and its ease of packing for field deployment. Standard specifications for the 800 m³ variant included a standard operational altitude of about 500 meters in clear weather, though larger models reached up to 2,000 meters. By 1916, production had evolved into multiple variants with gas capacities ranging from 600 to 1,200 m³ to suit different tactical needs, such as extended or naval use, all retaining the core tubular and sock-stabilized configuration. Despite its advancements, the Parseval-Sigsfeld design had limitations, particularly its tendency to nose-dive in high winds or at elevated altitudes if ballasting was inadequate, as the rear sock could sometimes fail to fully counteract uneven lift distribution without manual adjustments. This vulnerability required careful operational handling, especially in gusty conditions exceeding 30-40 km/h, where improper weight distribution could lead to instability.

Caquot Design

The Caquot kite balloon was developed in 1915 by French engineer Lieutenant Albert Caquot as a non-rigid, tethered observation balloon for military use during World War I. Its streamlined teardrop-shaped envelope measured approximately 28 meters in length and 9.8 meters in maximum diameter, providing improved aerodynamics over earlier spherical or sausage-shaped designs. The envelope was constructed from hydrogen-filled, rubberized silk or high-grade cotton fabric, with a ballonet system inside to regulate pressure and maintain shape during altitude changes. For stabilization, it incorporated three fixed cotton fins positioned at the tail—typically arranged with two horizontal surfaces for pitch control and one vertical for yaw—enabling passive orientation into the wind without active controls. Ballast bags and the ballonet further allowed precise altitude adjustments, making it suitable for frontline observation roles. Key variants of the Caquot design included the Type R, with a hydrogen volume of about 910 cubic meters (32,200 cubic feet), and smaller models such as the Type P and P.2 at around 750 cubic meters, adapted for different platforms like larger ships and escorts respectively. These balloons were tethered via steel cables to ground winches or ship-mounted systems, enabling operations at altitudes ranging from 300 to 1,000 meters, with maximum capabilities up to 1,500 meters under favorable conditions. The , a wicker basket accommodating two observers, carried essential equipment including telephones for real-time coordination, , and maps. By 1918, production had exceeded 500 units for French and Allied forces, with approximately 1,000 more manufactured in the United States between 1918 and 1919 to support . Compared to the earlier German Parseval-Sigsfeld , the Caquot offered superior high-altitude stability in winds up to 50-60 knots, thanks to its fin configuration and streamlined form, which reduced vulnerability to gusts and improved observation range up to 40 miles behind enemy lines. This enhanced performance, combined with simpler construction using readily available materials like doped fabric, allowed for faster and deployment, making it a preferred choice for Allied balloon companies in and artillery spotting.

Military Applications

Land-Based Use

Kite balloons played a pivotal role in land-based military operations during , primarily serving as platforms for spotting and . Observers in the tethered baskets used field telephones to communicate directly with ground headquarters, directing fire and correcting barrages in real time. This allowed for effective coordination over distances of up to 20 miles (32 km) behind the front lines, enabling the identification of enemy troop movements, battery positions, and concealed targets that were invisible from ground level. German forces employed Parseval-Sigsfeld kite balloons extensively in forward positions along the Western Front, integrating them into layered observation systems that supplemented zeppelins for broader aerial surveillance. By the end of 1915, over 80 such balloons were in service with the German Army, with numbers expanding rapidly for major offensives; during the Battle of the Somme in 1916, they were critical for artillery observation and contact patrols, often positioned several miles behind the lines to monitor enemy concentrations near trenches. These balloons, typically ascending to 500 meters (or up to 2,000 meters in larger variants), provided vital intelligence that enhanced infantry coordination and gunnery accuracy, despite vulnerability to enemy aircraft attacks. Allied armies adapted similar tactics, with French Caquot-type balloons forming the backbone of observation efforts. Organized into sections under company commands, these balloons supported infantry advances by spotting enemy positions and adjusting fire, as seen in operations where visibility extended up to 11 miles with binoculars. British forces utilized kite balloons during the Third Battle of Ypres (Passchendaele) in 1917, where sections from wings like No. 2 Kite Balloon Wing conducted reconnaissance amid intense fighting; despite a high attrition rate from enemy anti-balloon fighters—with instances of multiple losses per engagement, including ground crew casualties—their contributions to artillery direction proved invaluable for maintaining pressure on German lines. To facilitate mobile warfare, innovations in kite balloon deployment included efforts to streamline inflation processes using on-site hydrogen compressors, allowing for quicker ascents in dynamic frontline conditions. These adaptations, combined with the balloons' inherent stability in winds up to 65 feet per second, enabled rapid repositioning during advances. Kite balloons were adapted for naval use primarily to extend the horizon for submarine detection and convoy protection during World War I, with the French Navy leading early deployments of the Caquot Type R variant on larger vessels. By 1918, approximately 25 French Navy ships were equipped with these balloons, enabling observers to spot potential threats up to about 20 miles (32 km) away during patrols, including in the Mediterranean Sea. The United States Navy adopted kite balloons for anti-submarine warfare, initially testing them on destroyers during convoy escorts in the Atlantic, though the dedicated tender USS Wright was not commissioned until 1921 for continued U-boat detection experiments. Smaller variants, such as the Type P.2, were deployed on destroyers like the USS Bell and USS Nevada to provide elevated observation platforms during escort duties, helping to guide depth charge attacks on spotted submarines. Operational challenges in naval applications arose from ship motion in rough seas, necessitating specialized like gyro-stabilized winches to maintain balloon stability and prevent entanglement. Success rates for sighting prior to attacks were limited due to factors such as weather and visibility constraints. A key contribution occurred during the 1917-1918 Atlantic convoys, where kite balloon-equipped escorts provided early warnings that helped enhance detection and response capabilities against U-boats.

Legacy

Post-World War I Developments

Following the in November 1918, Allied kite balloon operations were rapidly demobilized, with key stations in Europe such as NAS Brest, NAS Berehaven, and La Trinite-sur-Mer closing by February 1919. The retained a large surplus inventory of kite balloons from wartime production, which were repurposed for post-war experiments including gunfire spotting from ships like USS Nevada and USS Florida, as well as parachute testing at NAS Lakehurst. These assets supported limited training and utility roles into the early , with the last documented shipboard deployment occurring aboard USS Wright on July 16, 1922. Kite balloon designs significantly influenced the development of barrage balloons in the , transitioning from aerodynamic tethered observation platforms to simpler spherical barriers for air defense. British experiments in the at facilities like Cardington and Pulham tested high-altitude spherical types, building on kite balloon stability principles to create low-drag, wind-resistant systems such as early predecessors to the Mark IV, which reached altitudes up to 30,000 feet in 1925 trials despite challenges like gas surging. These interwar barrage trials emphasized mobile systems and vertical wire screens, evolving kite balloon bridling techniques for anti-aircraft protection in peacetime exercises. The decline of kite balloons stemmed primarily from the rapid advancement of powered aircraft, which offered cheaper, faster, and more versatile capabilities without the vulnerabilities of hydrogen-filled envelopes to and . Most militaries phased out operational kite balloon units by the mid-1920s, with shipboard use ending after failed trials on battleships due to . The U.S. Navy decommissioned its remaining kite balloon facilities by 1924, though testing continued sporadically at NAS Lakehurst until at least 1936. Interwar experiments focused on hybrids blending kite balloon with , such as the U.S. Navy's H-1 "animated kite balloon" delivered in May 1921, which aimed to provide powered but was destroyed shortly after in due to operational complexity. These efforts ultimately failed to compete with emerging non-rigid airships like the K-series, leading to a full shift away from kite designs by the early 1930s.

Modern Applications

In contemporary applications, kite balloons, often evolved into helium-filled kytoon hybrids that combine balloon lift with kite stability, serve primarily in scientific research for atmospheric monitoring. These systems enable the deployment of sensors at altitudes up to approximately 2 km via tethers, facilitating measurements of microphysics, , and conditions in challenging environments like polar regions. For instance, a tethered-balloon system was deployed in 2010 for mixed-phase studies, providing stable platforms for instruments that free-floating balloons could not achieve. Similarly, bespoke Helikite kytoons have been used since the for high-altitude sampling of composition, revealing previously unknown distributions through integrated payloads. The U.S. Geological Survey employs kite balloons for low-cost to generate digital elevation models, supporting geospatial research with helium-powered stability in variable winds. Recreational and commercial uses focus on small-scale kytoons with volumes of 50-100 m³ for and event applications, offering affordable alternatives to drones for stable, wind-resistant imaging. Manufacturers like Allsopp Helikites produce these since the early , equipping them with cameras for events, , and environmental surveys, where their hybrid design ensures persistent hover without propulsion. TCOM's tethered aerostats, akin to advanced kite balloons, support commercial surveillance with 360-degree coverage for monitoring, including photographic payloads, deployed globally since 2000 for persistent operations up to 30 days. These systems prioritize low operational costs and ease of deployment over high-altitude alternatives. Military applications of traditional kite balloons have largely faded by the 2020s, superseded by unmanned aerial vehicles, though remnants persist in training and niche roles. No active World War I-style units remain, but tethered systems—direct descendants of kite balloon designs—are used for and optical monitoring, as seen in U.S. Army programs testing high-altitude balloons for tracking and maritime since 2024. Rare demonstrations occur in some forces, such as environmental monitoring trials, but emphasis has shifted to integrated drone ecosystems. Recent innovations incorporate GPS-integrated tethers and solar-powered elements into kytoon variants for enhanced reliability in , enabling real-time tracking and persistent in operations. These systems support public safety monitoring, such as crowd gatherings or environmental hazards, with stable platforms for sensors amid wind and power constraints. For example, a 2022 kite balloon with GPS was developed for aerial in open areas at risk, providing for emergency coordination without relying on vulnerable ground infrastructure. Solar variants extend endurance for post-disaster assessments, tested in field scenarios for and monitoring.

References

  1. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19930091539/downloads/19930091539.pdf
  2. https://www.history.navy.mil/our-collections/art/exhibits/conflicts-and-operations/wwi/the-united-states-navy-in-world-war-i/shooting-down-a-kite-balloon.html
  3. https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/anecdotes-from-the-archive/the-serious-work-of-balloons-1916/
  4. https://history.nebraska.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/doc_publications_NH1988BalloonSchool.pdf
  5. https://plane-encyclopedia.com/ww1/caquot-type-m-kite-balloon/
  6. https://www.history.navy.mil/research/library/online-reading-room/title-list-alphabetically/k/kite-balloons-escorts.html
  7. https://plane-encyclopedia.com/ww1/parseval-sigsfeld-drachenballon/
  8. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/europe/uk-rnas-kite.htm
  9. http://www.avalanchepress.com/RusBalloons.php
  10. https://headfullofair.com/post/what-is-a-kite-balloon/
  11. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/media/photo/british-kite-balloon
  12. https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Visit/Museum-Exhibits/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/197400/caquot-type-r-observation-balloon/
  13. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0676037.pdf
  14. https://plane-encyclopedia.com/ww1/upson-balloon/
  15. http://www.bbrclub.org/The%20MK%20VII%20Series%20I%20Kite%20Balloon%20-%20Its%20construction%20and%20make%20up..htm
  16. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0685183.pdf
  17. https://suitcaseofmemoriessite.com/part-one-the-oliver-and-hawkes-families-of-kent-england/uncle-bernard/
  18. https://econterms.net/aero/August_Riedinger
  19. https://www.survivorlibrary.com/library/airships-the_use_of_balloons_in_connection_with_meteorology_1908.pdf
  20. https://ufdcimages.uflib.ufl.edu/UF/00/09/79/82/00001/americanairservi00franrich.pdf
  21. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/AUPress/Books/B_0066_FISCHER_MILITARY_NIGHT_AVIATION.pdf
  22. https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/reconnaissance-and-observation/
  23. https://www.allworldwars.com/The-German-Air-Force-In-The-Great-War-by-Neumann.html
  24. https://www.theworldwar.org/learn/about-wwi/balloons-and-dirigibles-wwi
  25. https://www.westernfrontassociation.com/world-war-i-articles/balloonatics-during-the-first-world-war-1914-1918/
  26. https://www.greatwarforum.org/topic/156411-parachutes-and-balloons/page/3/
  27. https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history-magazine/2022/february/flying-rubber-cows
  28. https://www.history.navy.mil/content/dam/nhhc/research/histories/naval-aviation/naval-aviation-in-world-war-i/pdfs/naval-aviation-in-wwi.pdf
  29. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/av-1.htm
  30. https://alcpress.org/military/lta/kite-balloons.html
  31. http://www.bbrclub.org/post_world_war_one_development_o.htm
  32. https://www.history.navy.mil/content/history/nhhc/research/histories/naval-aviation-history/navys-lighter-than-air-experience-monograph/new-airship-classes-in-the-post-wwi-period-the-demise-of-the-kite-baloon-and-the-switch-to-helium-pages-18-23.html
  33. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atot/28/5/2010jtecha1439_1.pdf
  34. https://www.meteorologicaltechnologyinternational.com/features/bespoke-kite-balloon-aerostat-uncovers-previously-unknown-data-regarding-cloud-composition.html
  35. https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/kite-balloon
  36. https://www.helikites.com/
  37. https://tcomlp.com/aerospace-platforms/tethered-aerostats/
  38. https://tcomlp.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/TCOM-ISR-Aerostats_Elevated-Awareness_V-11-2023.pdf
  39. https://interestingengineering.com/military/us-army-spy-balloons-to-hunt-jets
  40. https://www.flyajetfighter.com/us-army-tests-stratospheric-balloons-for-maritime-surveillance/
  41. https://www.memsait.it/volumi/Volume-93-n1-2022/2022MmSAI..1...98T.pdf
  42. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MmSAI..93a..98T/abstract
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.