Hubbry Logo
Lemóniz Nuclear Power PlantLemóniz Nuclear Power PlantMain
Open search
Lemóniz Nuclear Power Plant
Community hub
Lemóniz Nuclear Power Plant
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Lemóniz Nuclear Power Plant
Lemóniz Nuclear Power Plant
Lemóniz Nuclear Power Plant
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Lemóniz Nuclear Power Plant is an unfinished nuclear power plant in Lemoiz, in the Basque province of Bizkaia, Spain. Its construction stopped in 1983 when the Spanish nuclear power expansion program was cancelled following a change of government. Its two PWRs, each of 900 MWe, were almost complete but were never operated.

Key Information

Conflict concerning the Lemóniz Nuclear Power Plant was one of the major anti-nuclear issues in the 1970s and 1980s in Spain.[1] It faced major opposition from the Basque anti-nuclear movement and the Basque armed separatist organization ETA.

ETA response

[edit]

The building of the power station was opposed by ETA, a Basque separatist organisation proscribed as a terrorist group by the Spanish government.[2][3] The first attack on the site took place on 18 December 1977, when an ETA commando unit attacked a Guardia Civil post guarding the station. One of the cell members, David Álvarez Peña, was wounded in the attack and died a month later. On 17 March 1978, ETA planted a bomb in the reactor of the station, causing the death of two workers (Andrés Guerra and Alberto Negro), and wounded another two. The explosion also caused substantial material damage to the facility, which set back construction.

Gladys del Estal, anti-nuclear activist killed during the construction of the station.
Logo created by the sculptor Chillida against the Lemóniz Nuclear Power Plant.

On 3 June 1979, the anti-nuclear activist Gladys del Estal from Donostia died after being hit by a bullet from the police force Guardia Civil during a demonstration in Tudela (Navarra) on the international day of action against nuclear power. Ten days later, on 13 June, ETA managed to get another bomb into the works on the facility, this time in the turbine area. The explosion caused the death of another worker, Ángel Baños. Meanwhile, numerous demonstrations, activities and festivals attended by thousands were being held across the southern Basque Country by ecologists and left leaning groups to demand the closure of the station.

The escalation of ETA's actions came to a head on 29 January 1981, when they kidnapped the chief engineer of the power station, José María Ryan, from Bilbao. Although a large demonstration was held in Bilbao for the release of the engineer, ETA killed Ryan after a week passed, causing an outcry and the first anti-ETA strike. However, by February 1982, a combination of factors brought construction to a halt. Stumbling blocks included popular doubts over the plant's safety and the interests behind it, ETA's violent action, and differing approaches of the Spanish and Basque autonomous government.[4]

In May 1982 ETA assassinated Ángel Pascual, who had taken over the responsibilities from Ryan as chief project engineer.[5] Following the Spanish general election of a PSOE government, in 1984 a moratorium on new nuclear power plants was put in place for the whole country, affecting Lemóniz as well, which at that point was virtually ready to run.[6] The moratorium put an official end to the project.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Lemóniz Nuclear Power Plant

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Lemóniz Nuclear Power Plant is an incomplete station situated in the coastal municipality of Lemoiz, Biscay province, in Spain's Basque Country, planned to feature two Westinghouse-designed pressurized water reactors each rated at around 930 megawatts electrical capacity. began following official approval in 1972 as part of Spain's drive to expand nuclear generation amid rising energy demands. The project advanced to the point where the first reactor's containment structure was substantially finished by 1982, yet it never received fuel loading or commenced operations due to relentless and violence. The plant's development was overshadowed by fierce local opposition, culminating in a campaign of orchestrated by , the Basque separatist group, which viewed the facility as emblematic of centralized Spanish control and environmental risk. conducted multiple bombings at the site, including a 1978 explosion that killed two construction workers, Alberto Negro Viguera and Andrés Guerra Pereda, and damaged infrastructure, followed by further attacks in 1979 that inflicted structural harm to the and halls. These assaults, combined with broader anti-nuclear and a 1984 national moratorium on nuclear projects imposed by the government, led to the definitive halt of construction in 1983 and formal cancellation thereafter, rendering Lemóniz a costly relic estimated to have consumed billions in investments without yielding power generation. The site's abandonment underscores the interplay of ideological militancy and policy decisions that derailed what could have been a significant contributor to Spain's supply, leaving behind a "ghost plant" amid ongoing debates over nuclear viability and regional autonomy.

Location and Planning

Site Selection and Initial Proposal

In the early 1970s, Spain's government under Francisco Franco pursued nuclear power development to address surging electricity demand amid rapid industrialization, particularly in regions with depleted hydroelectric capacity and limited domestic coal reserves. Iberduero, the leading utility in northern Spain, proposed the Lemóniz Nuclear Power Plant as part of the 1972 National Energy Plan, which authorized seven new reactors to expand total nuclear capacity to 15,000 MWe, including three in the Basque Country. The site at Cala de Basordas in the of Lemoiz, Bizkaia province, was selected primarily for its coastal position on the , providing abundant seawater for reactor cooling, while offering geological stability and proximity to major load centers—approximately 18 kilometers from Bilbao's hub. This location aligned with standard criteria for pressurized water reactors, facilitating efficient transmission to high-demand areas where alternative energy sources were insufficient. Provisional approval from the national government was granted in 1972, enabling Iberduero to initiate planning for two 930 MWe units using Westinghouse technology, with projected operations starting in 1976 and 1978. The proposal emphasized economic viability through large-scale generation to support Basque industrial growth, backed by U.S.- agreements from 1959 that promoted American designs. groundwork commenced in 1972, reflecting optimism in nuclear energy's role in 's energy independence strategy.

Regulatory Approvals and Economic Rationale

The Lemóniz Nuclear Power Plant project obtained provisional approval from the Spanish government in 1972, initiating central planning under the National Energy Plan that envisioned expanding nuclear capacity through up to seven additional reactors to address surging during 's industrialization phase. This approval encompassed site selection in the Basque of Bizkaia and preliminary environmental and technical assessments overseen by the Junta de Energía Nuclear (JEN), the precursor to the Nuclear Safety Council (CSN). permits followed, incorporating mandatory design reviews for the proposed two Westinghouse pressurized water reactors (PWRs), each rated at approximately 900-1000 MWe, in line with 's evolving nuclear regulatory framework established by the 1964 Nuclear Energy Law. The economic rationale for Lemóniz stemmed from Spain's imperative to secure reliable baseload generation amid rapid economic expansion, where electricity consumption had doubled in the and continued rising due to heavy industry in regions like the Basque Country. was prioritized as a diversified alternative to imported oil, particularly following the , to mitigate supply vulnerabilities and stabilize costs for long-term industrial competitiveness. Government projections positioned nuclear expansion, including Lemóniz, as essential for energy self-sufficiency, with expected operational savings from low fuel costs relative to fossil alternatives enabling sustained GDP growth and job creation in construction and operations. This aligned with broader policy goals of guaranteeing supply security while fostering technological advancement under state-led development.

Technical Specifications

Reactor Design and Capacity

The Lemóniz Nuclear Power Plant was planned with two pressurized water reactors (PWRs), a common design utilizing light water as both coolant and to generate for production. Each unit was engineered by , employing a standard two-loop configuration typical of second-generation PWRs developed in the , with dioxide fuel assemblies arranged in a 17x17 grid pattern within the reactor core. The net electrical generating capacity for each reactor was specified at 930 megawatts (MWe), yielding a combined output of approximately 1,860 MWe upon full operation, sufficient to supply power to a significant portion of the Basque region's electricity needs. Thermal power per unit was projected at around 2,700 megawatts thermal (MWth), achieving a thermal efficiency of roughly 34 percent, consistent with contemporary PWR parameters. Safety features incorporated into the design included a pressure vessel with integrated control rods, emergency core cooling systems, and a containment structure rated to withstand internal pressures exceeding 5 atmospheres, aligned with international standards for preventing radiological releases. Construction preparatory work for the vessels and primary circuits began in the mid-1970s, but no fuel loading or criticality testing occurred due to project suspension. The design drew from proven Westinghouse models operational elsewhere in Europe, emphasizing reliability through redundant systems for reactivity control and removal.

Planned Infrastructure and Safety Systems

The Lemóniz Nuclear Power Plant was designed to feature two (PWR) units supplied by , each with a planned net electrical generating capacity of 930 megawatts (MWe). These units were intended as second-generation PWRs, incorporating steam generators and pressurizers to maintain integrity under operational conditions. The overall infrastructure encompassed reactor containment structures, turbine halls, and auxiliary buildings for control, fuel storage, and radwaste management, with seawater intake systems planned for once-through cooling given the coastal location. Safety systems were aligned with contemporary Westinghouse PWR designs, emphasizing multiple fission product barriers: the fuel cladding, reactor coolant system boundary, and . The reactor protection system (RPS) was planned to monitor key parameters such as , coolant temperature, and , automatically initiating a reactor trip to avert fuel damage and potential release during design-basis events. Engineered safety features included redundant core cooling systems (ECCS) for post-trip core heat removal, spray systems to mitigate buildup, and isolation valves to seal the against leakage. These active systems relied on diesel generators for power backup, with oversight by Spain's Nuclear Safety Council (CSN) to ensure compliance with evolving regulatory standards prior to construction halt.

Construction History

Early Construction Phase (1970s)

The construction of the Lemóniz Nuclear Power Plant began in 1972, under the auspices of utility company Iberduero (predecessor to Iberdrola), as part of Spain's second-generation nuclear expansion program outlined in the 1972 National Energy Plan. This initiative aimed to add seven reactors to meet growing electricity demand and reduce oil import dependence following the 1973 energy crisis, with Lemóniz designated for two pressurized water reactor (PWR) units totaling approximately 1,800 MWe capacity. The site, situated in the coastal municipality of Lemoiz in Bizkaia province, Basque Country, was selected for its access to for cooling and proximity to industrial centers like , approximately 18 kilometers away. Initial works focused on site preparation, including land acquisition, clearing, and basic such as access roads and temporary facilities, proceeding under approvals amid Franco-era policies prioritizing and self-sufficiency. The reactors were to employ Westinghouse technology, standard for many contemporary European projects, with construction contracts emphasizing modular structures. By the mid-1970s, foundational excavation and early piling for the halls and basemats had advanced, supported by an initial estimated at tens of millions of dollars equivalent, though detailed progress reports from this era remain limited due to the project's eventual abandonment. Labor involvement grew to hundreds of workers, drawn from regional firms, as the site transitioned from planning to active building phases before the political intensified external pressures in the late decade.

Progress and Challenges (1980-1983)

Despite ongoing security threats, construction at the Lemóniz Nuclear Power Plant progressed significantly during the early , with Iberduero having invested approximately $2 billion by mid-1982 in the twin-unit project featuring Westinghouse-designed pressurized water each rated at around 930 MWe. Work on structural elements, including and halls, advanced to near-completion for the first unit, though delays from prior had already extended timelines beyond initial projections. In March 1982, an agreement transferred partial management oversight to the Basque regional authorities via the Basque Public Managing Society, signaling continued commitment from both central and regional governments to push forward amid economic pressures to meet Spain's energy demands. The period was marked by escalating violence from the Basque separatist group , which targeted the project to force its abandonment. On January 29, 1981, ETA kidnapped chief engineer José María Ryan, demanding the plant's demolition; after public protests failed to secure his release, they executed him a week later, leading to a suspension of critical work as personnel feared for their safety. This was followed by over 30 documented ETA attacks on the site and related infrastructure, including nearly 100 bombings against Iberduero facilities that caused $30 million in repairs and widespread power disruptions. The violence peaked on May 5, 1982, when ETA assassinated project director Ángel Pascual, Ryan's successor, prompting technicians to abandon the site en masse and Iberduero to cancel all contracts on May 13, effectively halting operations despite $400 million in annual losses. Compounding these terrorist actions were persistent rooted in environmental and health concerns, which amplified labor shortages and political pressure on Iberduero and authorities. The combined insecurity eroded workforce morale, with employees refusing to return under threats, while the project's vulnerability—located near densely populated —exacerbated regional tensions. By 1983, these factors culminated in the national government's decision to cancel further nuclear expansions, formally ending Lemóniz construction amid a shift in policy following the PSOE's electoral victory.

Opposition Movements

Local Anti-Nuclear Protests

Local opposition to the Lemóniz Nuclear Power Plant crystallized in the early 1970s, driven by residents' concerns over environmental hazards, seismic risks in the Basque region, and potential threats to coastal ecosystems. The Comisión de Defensa contra una Costa Vasca No Nuclear, established around 1972, coordinated early efforts including petitions and awareness campaigns against the project. This grassroots organization united fishermen, farmers, and local communities fearing contamination of and from radioactive releases. Mass demonstrations marked the escalation of protests from 1976 onward, with tactics encompassing marches, site occupations, and public rallies that drew tens of thousands. On June 14, 1977, approximately 150,000 to 200,000 marched in , demanding an immediate halt to and highlighting safety deficiencies in the plant's and . A similar event on March 12 drew about 100,000 participants protesting near against the facility's development. These actions disrupted work and amplified regional antinuclear sentiment, though they remained largely non-violent distinct from armed opposition. Further protests persisted into the late 1970s, including a April 27, 1979, rally in where over 60,000 endured rain and hail to call for project suspension, underscoring sustained local resolve despite official endorsements of the plant's economic benefits. On September 8, 1979, during an antinuclear demonstration in Tudela, Navarra—organized in solidarity with Basque efforts—activist Gladys del Estal was fatally shot by a Civil Guard officer, an incident that intensified public outrage and media coverage of the movement. Such events, while not directly at the Lemóniz site, reflected the broader local mobilization against nuclear expansion in northern . The protests contributed to construction delays by fostering worker hesitancy, legal challenges, and political pressure, though their causal impact must be weighed against concurrent economic and security disruptions; empirical records indicate no plant operation despite near-completion of reactors by 1983. Local antinuclear groups prioritized empirical critiques of risk assessments, often citing inadequate seismic reinforcements and evacuation feasibility in the densely populated coastal area, positions substantiated by later revelations of geological vulnerabilities.

Broader Political and Environmental Debates

The opposition to the Lemóniz Nuclear Power Plant extended beyond local protests into national political debates during Spain's transition to democracy from 1975 to 1982, where the project embodied the centralized energy policies of the Franco era clashing with emerging regional autonomy demands in the Basque Country. Initiated in 1972 under the dictatorship to achieve energy independence amid oil crises, the plant faced scrutiny as democratic institutions allowed public contestation, with Basque nationalists viewing it as an imposition by Madrid that undermined self-governance. The Basque Nationalist Party and leftist independence groups, including Popular Unity, advocated halting construction and holding referendums, framing the plant—owned by the Spanish utility Iberduero—as antithetical to Basque self-management. Slogans such as "Euskadi ala Lemoiz" in 1979 linked the nuclear threat to Basque identity, amplifying mobilization that included major demonstrations drawing 150,000 to 200,000 participants in 1977. Environmental concerns centered on the plant's location on the densely populated Basque coast, raising fears of , health risks from potential accidents, and ecological damage in a seismically near geological fault lines. The Three Mile Island incident intensified debates, with anti-nuclear groups highlighting vulnerabilities like structural damage from prior and the challenges of in a compact area. Opponents criticized the government's emphasis on to reduce oil dependence—aiming for 15% of Spain's from nuclear by 1987—while downplaying these risks and alternatives, leading to calls for parliamentary reviews and expert studies by socialists. Crowding near the site and broader antinuclear sentiments also invoked worries over resident displacement and long-term environmental legacy. These debates influenced Spain's 1978 National Energy Plan, which initially proposed extensive nuclear expansion but was scaled back due to public opposition, culminating in the PSOE government's moratorium after their electoral victory, effectively halting Lemóniz. Anti-nuclear committees promoted decentralized models aligned with political , contrasting industrial lobbies' defense of nuclear as essential for modernization against movements that gained traction by tying critiques to anti-establishment rhetoric.

ETA Terrorist Campaign

Attacks on Personnel and Infrastructure

On March 17, 1978, militants smuggled and detonated a inside the under-construction building at the Lemóniz site, killing two workers—Alberto Negro Viguera, aged 31 and an assembly manager, and Andrés Guerra Pereda—and injuring 14 others. The explosion inflicted structural damage to the reactor area, marking the first lethal assault in 's campaign against the project. In 1979, ETA placed a second bomb at the site, which exploded and caused damage to the turbine hall without fatalities, further disrupting construction efforts. On January 29, 1981, ETA members kidnapped José María Ryan Estrada, the plant's chief engineer, as he traveled to work; the group held him for a week, demanding the project's dismantlement, before executing him on February 6 following a purported "trial." ETA's assaults extended to broader of supporting , including multiple explosive attacks on facilities and assets belonging to Iberduero, the overseeing Lemóniz. On May 5, 1982, ETA assassinated Ángel Pascual Múgica, a 44-year-old project director for Lemóniz employed by Iberduero, shooting him in as he prepared to commute to the site; the killing occurred amid heightened security measures and contributed to the suspension of work.

Strategic Objectives and Impact on Project

ETA's strategic objectives in campaigning against the Lemóniz Nuclear Power Plant centered on disrupting Spanish economic and infrastructural dominance in the Basque region, viewing the project as a symbol of centralized state control that undermined Basque autonomy aspirations. By targeting a high-profile, state-backed initiative valued at approximately $1.5 billion, the group sought to coerce the Spanish government into abandoning the plant, thereby demonstrating ETA's capacity to dictate regional development and extracting concessions toward independence demands. This aligned with broader tactics of economic sabotage, as articulated in ETA communiqués warning of escalated violence unless construction ceased, positioning the attacks as leverage in the separatist struggle rather than mere anti-nuclear ideology—though the group had initially supported nuclear energy as a path to self-sufficiency before shifting to opposition in the 1970s. The campaign's tactics, including assassinations of engineering staff and sabotage, inflicted direct operational disruptions: bombings smuggled into the site in 1978 and 1979 damaged the reactor and turbine halls, while murders of key figures like project director Ángel Pascual on May 5, 1981, created leadership vacuums and widespread worker intimidation. Complementary attacks on Iberduero's grid—nearly 100 bombings—caused over $30 million in damages, recurrent blackouts, and interruptions, amplifying financial strain on the . These actions led to labor shortages as thousands of workers fled the site amid threats, ballooning security expenditures and halting progress on the nearly complete 900 MWe pressurized water reactors. The cumulative impact eroded the project's economic viability, intertwining with public protests to foster a climate of untenable ; construction effectively stalled by , with the unfinished facility abandoned amid ETA's demonstrated ability to impose indefinite delays through , marking one of the few tangible "victories" attributed to the group's militant strategy in thwarting Spanish developmental objectives. While political factors, including the PSOE electoral victory and its moratorium on nuclear expansion, formalized the halt, ETA's campaign independently escalated costs and safety hazards, splitting anti-nuclear coalitions by introducing lethal coercion and underscoring terrorism's role in derailing infrastructure.

Cancellation and Aftermath

Decision to Halt Construction

In March 1984, the Spanish government under Prime Minister enacted a nationwide nuclear moratorium that formally suspended construction of several unfinished reactors, including both units at Lemóniz. This policy shift followed the PSOE's electoral victory in October 1982, which brought a center-left administration less committed to aggressive nuclear expansion compared to its predecessors. The moratorium effectively halted work on Lemóniz I and II, where Unit 1 had reached near-completion by late 1983 but never received fuel loading authorization. The decision reflected a confluence of factors, including sustained local and regional opposition amplified by environmental groups and Basque nationalist sentiments, alongside heightened security risks from ETA's campaign of and assassinations targeting plant personnel and since the mid-1970s. Prior to the moratorium, the had intervened in the project's management in 1982 amid escalating and delays, assuming control from the Iberduero to mitigate operational disruptions. However, the 1984 decree prioritized economic reorientation and public safety concerns over completing the estimated €2 billion investment already sunk into the site, marking a pragmatic retreat from Franco-era nuclear ambitions. Official rationales emphasized adapting to evolving energy demands and reducing reliance on capital-intensive nuclear builds, though critics from industry and pro-nuclear advocates argued the halt squandered technical and exacerbated Spain's future energy vulnerabilities. The measure aligned with broader European trends post-Three Mile Island and Chernobyl precursors, but in Lemóniz's case, ETA's strategic pressure—evident in ultimatums demanding dismantlement—undeniably eroded political will to sustain the project amid Basque regional tensions. No revival efforts followed, consigning the partially built facility to indefinite standby. Following the imposition of 's nuclear moratorium on March 28, 1984, as part of the 1983-1992 National Energy Plan, construction at Lemóniz ceased definitively, prompting initial efforts to remove salvageable components from the unfinished facility. Internal equipment, including machinery and fittings installed during the build phase, was systematically dismantled in the years immediately after the halt. Usable items were sold to operational nuclear plants elsewhere in , while non-viable materials were scrapped, leaving primarily the containment structures and external infrastructure intact as skeletal ruins spanning approximately 55,000 square meters. No comprehensive decommissioning process akin to that for operational reactors was undertaken, as the plant never loaded fuel or achieved criticality, resulting in the site remaining in a state of partial abandonment without full radiological requirements. The legal framework for the project's termination was codified through subsequent legislation, including Law 40/1994, which declared the definitive paralysis of unfinished nuclear installations like Lemóniz, with amendments via Laws 54/1997 and 24/2013 reinforcing the moratorium's effects. , the successor to original developer Iberduero and owner at the time of cessation, received compensation totaling 2,273,256,163 euros from the Spanish government to offset investments and losses, with full payment completed by Resolution of December 21, 2015. This settlement addressed contractual obligations and sunk costs estimated in the billions from the 1970s construction phase, though it did not cover indirect damages from or protests. In October 2019, Order TEC/1028/2019 transferred ownership of the remaining lands, emplacements, and installations to the Basque Autonomous , which assumed ongoing responsibilities for site maintenance, security, and potential repurposing, effective upon formal acceptance on October 16, 2019. These measures shifted financial liabilities from the national level to regional authorities, with the exploring non-nuclear uses such as a facility, though implementation has been delayed by prior ownership disputes resolved around 2019. The absence of full dismantling has perpetuated security challenges, including unauthorized access attempts, underscoring the unresolved legacy of the project's cancellation amid heightened vulnerability to and residual public opposition.

Current Status

Site Condition and Security

The Lemóniz Nuclear Power Plant site, located in the municipality of Lemoiz in Bizkaia province, Basque Country, Spain, consists of unfinished reactor buildings and associated infrastructure halted in 1984 following project cancellation. The primary containment structures for the two planned pressurized water reactors stand as concrete shells, partially exposed and deteriorating due to weathering, with visible rebar and incomplete roofing in some areas. No nuclear fuel was ever loaded, obviating radiological decommissioning, but the site requires ongoing structural monitoring to mitigate risks from collapse or erosion, exacerbated by its coastal position near the Bay of Biscay. Security measures at the site emphasize perimeter control and access restriction, maintained by the amid historical vulnerabilities to . As of recent assessments, the enclosure features fencing and limited personnel, including two agents and a patrol dog, adjudicated through public contracts to private firms. Annual expenditures surpass 365,000 euros, covering surveillance to deter unauthorized entry by urban explorers, vandals, or potential ideological actors, given the site's past targeting by . These protocols align with Spanish industrial site standards but remain scaled to the non-operational status, without advanced nuclear-specific safeguards like those for active facilities. Maintenance efforts focus on basic preservation rather than full dismantling, with Spanish Ministry of Industry investments totaling around 418,000 euros in recent years for inspections and minor stabilizations, excluding security outlays. The site's condition reflects deferred decisions on repurposing, such as proposals, which have stalled, leaving the structures as an industrial relic prone to gradual degradation. No major incidents of breach or structural failure have been reported post-cancellation, attributable to consistent guarding despite minimal staffing.

Potential for Future Use or Revival

The unfinished at Lemóniz exhibits extensive degradation, rendering nuclear revival technically and economically unfeasible. A 2023 assessment by the technological center Azti-Tecnalia documented severe corrosion and in the buildings, hall, and auxiliary structures, which have stood exposed since construction halted in the early . of these elements alone is estimated to cost around €50 million, with annual expenditures continuing at €365,000, while full reconstruction for nuclear operations would demand billions in investment amid outdated designs originally planned for 930 MW pressurized reactors per unit. The site's official cancellation in 1979 by the Spanish government, following local opposition and threats, has precluded any subsequent nuclear permitting or feasibility studies. Spain's national energy framework further diminishes prospects for Lemóniz-specific revival, despite emerging pressures to extend operational plants. The 2019 mandates phasing out all nuclear by 2035, with decommissioning starting in 2027, though 2025 parliamentary resolutions and industry requests—prompted by blackouts and needs—urge lifespan extensions for existing facilities like Almaraz. These debates center on active reactors contributing 20% of , not derelict sites in politically sensitive Basque regions where anti-nuclear resistance remains entrenched, as evidenced by historical protests and ongoing municipal reluctance to issue related licenses. Local initiatives prioritize non-nuclear repurposing over energy production. Past proposals, such as a 2017 plan for an aquaculture-technological park yielding 11,000 tons of fish annually and up to 575 jobs with €40 million in yearly revenue, have not advanced due to funding and licensing hurdles. In June 2025, the Uribe Kosta mancomunidad—encompassing municipalities like Lemoiz and Sopela—launched a participatory process involving the and to redefine the site's role, focusing on sustainable transformation, public debate, and governance models without nuclear considerations; budgeting is slated for 2026. Alternative visions include converting ruins into public spaces with viewpoints and memorials, underscoring a shift toward ecological or commemorative utility rather than industrial revival.

Legacy and Broader Impact

Contributions to Spanish Energy Policy

The sustained terrorist campaign against the Lemóniz Nuclear Power Plant, which included the kidnapping and murder of its director Ángel Pascual on February 1, 1981, the killing of his successor fifteen months later, and the deaths of at least twelve construction workers from bombings between 1976 and 1983, exposed acute security vulnerabilities in Spain's nuclear infrastructure. These attacks delayed construction of the two planned 930 MWe pressurized water reactors, which were over 90% complete by the early 1980s, and amplified public and political opposition, contributing to the PSOE government's decision under Prime Minister to impose a nationwide nuclear moratorium in following their 1982 electoral victory. This moratorium halted not only Lemóniz but also four other reactors under —Vandellòs 2, Valdecaballeros 1 and 2, and possibly Trillo 2—abandoning Spain's ambitious third-generation nuclear expansion that had begun in the early with five units totaling around 5,000 MWe. The policy shift prioritized alternative energy sources amid concerns over , safety, and regional instability, particularly in the Basque Country, leading to compensation payments of approximately €5.7 billion to utilities like and between 1994 and 2015, funded through consumer surcharges on electricity bills until October 2015. In the broader context of Spanish energy policy, the Lemóniz failure underscored the causal link between and infrastructure viability, prompting a strategic retreat from nuclear dependency and fostering diversification toward hydroelectric, fossil fuels, and eventually renewables, while capping nuclear capacity at seven operational reactors that supplied up to 20% of by the . The events reinforced lessons in , highlighting how separatist insurgencies could derail national projects and influencing subsequent frameworks to integrate robust physical and political safeguards for , though Spain's ongoing nuclear phase-out plan—set to close all reactors by 2035—reflects enduring policy caution shaped by such precedents.

Lessons on Terrorism, Energy Security, and Nuclear Development

The attacks on Lemóniz by the Basque separatist group illustrated the acute vulnerability of projects to targeted , particularly through assassinations of key personnel and of infrastructure, which can paralyze operations despite advanced construction progress. On February 1, 1981, kidnapped the director, issuing demands to cancel the before murdering him; his replacement was killed in 1982 amid heightened measures, while bombings claimed additional worker lives, escalating costs and . These tactics exploited the 's and long timelines, demonstrating how small-scale, asymmetric violence against individuals can achieve strategic disruption far beyond the attackers' numbers, ultimately contributing to the 1984 cancellation when the facility was 90% complete. In terms of , the Lemóniz episode underscored the risks of undermining national self-sufficiency in baseload power generation, as the abandonment of two planned 900 MWe reactors forfeited approximately 2,000 MWe of capacity, compelling greater reliance on imported fossil fuels and exposing to supply volatility. This outcome aligned with a broader 1984 nuclear moratorium under the Socialist government, which halted five reactors under construction nationwide and limited to seven operational units producing about 22% of as of 2014, rather than expanding to meet growing demands. The events highlighted the causal link between inadequate counter-terrorism resilience at critical sites and diminished , as disruptions not only inflate immediate protection costs but also deter investment in high-capital infrastructure essential for reducing foreign energy dependence. For nuclear development, Lemóniz serves as a in how amplifies public opposition and political pressures, leading to reversals that prioritize short-term appeasement over long-term technological and economic benefits, with ETA's campaign radicalizing local anti-nuclear movements and influencing the government's indefinite halt on new builds. Despite technical feasibility and prior approvals under Franco's starting in , the eroded stakeholder confidence, illustrating the necessity for projects to be sited in politically stable regions and fortified with proactive and physical barriers to mitigate insider threats and external . Globally, it reinforces that nuclear advancement demands integrated frameworks from inception, as unchecked ethno-nationalist or ideological can override empirical advantages like low-carbon output, perpetuating over-reliance on less reliable alternatives.

References

  1. https://www.csn.es/documents/10182/914813/OFC-02.01%2BConvention%2Bon%2BNuclear%2BSafety%2B-%2BFirst%2BNational%2BReport%2B%2528English%2529
  2. https://www.dark-tourism.com/index.php/1074-lemoniz
  3. https://www.ans.org/news/article-1680/spain-the-story-of-the-worst-commercial-disaster-of-nuclear-power/
  4. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/security/security-of-nuclear-facilities-and-material
  5. https://mapadelterror.com/en/victims/alberto-negro-viguera/
  6. https://www.naiz.eus/eu/hemeroteca/gara/editions/gara_2014-08-31-07-00/hemeroteca_articles/las-ruinas-de-lemoiz-siguen-dando-guerra-30-anos-despues
  7. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/articles/c2072w9vvgwo
  8. https://nvdatabase.swarthmore.edu/content/basque-citizens-end-construction-lemoniz-nuclear-power-plant-1976-1978
  9. https://blog.colminasbi.org/noticias/historia-central-nuclear-lemoniz/
  10. https://www.csn.es/documents/10182/103567/Primer%2520informe%2520nacional%2520de%2520la%2520convenci%25C3%25B3n%2520sobre%2520seguridad%2520nuclear%2520-%2520Septiembre%2520de%25201998%2520-%2520Espa%25C3%25B1ol
  11. https://www-pub.iaea.org/mtcd/publications/pdf/cnpp2003/cnpp_webpage/PDF/2000/Reports/SPAIN.pdf
  12. https://www.sne.es/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Libro-Uranio.pdf
  13. https://www.gem.wiki/Lem%C3%B3niz_nuclear_power_plant
  14. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1122/ML11223A218.pdf
  15. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ml1122/ML11223A300.pdf
  16. https://www.xlsemanal.com/conocer/20151220/anos-centrales-nucleares-espana-9305.html
  17. https://www.foronuclear.org/en/nuclear-power/questions-and-answers/on-nuclear-power/second-stage-of-spanish-nuclear-power-plants/
  18. https://www.csmonitor.com/1982/0507/050747.html
  19. https://cadenaser.com/euskadi/2024/10/04/la-central-nuclear-de-lemoniz-mas-alla-del-terrorismo-radio-bilbao/
  20. https://es.greenpeace.org/es/en-profundidad/democracia-y-protesta-pacifica-1978-2018/cuatro-casos-de-activismo-ambiental/
  21. https://whitehorsepress.blog/2024/01/30/anticluear-mobilisation-in-the-basque-country-the-case-of-lemoiz/
  22. https://www.britishpathe.com/asset/236888/
  23. https://elpais.com/diario/1979/04/28/espana/294098427_850215.html
  24. https://www.elperiodicoextremadura.com/sociedad/2025/04/19/lemoniz-protesta-antinuclear-eta-116382097.html
  25. https://www.nytimes.com/1982/02/18/world/spain-gets-warning-on-basque-nuclear-plant.html
  26. https://www.nytimes.com/1979/04/19/archives/spains-big-nuclear-energy-program-runs-afoul-of-democratic-politics.html
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269038466_Nuclear_Energy_in_the_Public_Sphere_Anti-Nuclear_Movements_vs_Industrial_Lobbies_in_Spain_1962-1979
  28. https://www.elmundo.es/economia/2025/07/05/6867b424e4d4d8ef458b4584.html
  29. https://mapadelterror.com/en/victims/andres-guerra-pereda/
  30. https://www.lavanguardia.com/local/paisvasco/20180315/441518783767/eta-atentado-central-nuclear-lemoniz-1978.html
  31. https://mapadelterror.com/en/victims/jose-maria-ryan-estrada/
  32. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1981/02/07/Killing-of-engineer-sparks-uproar/8805350370000/
  33. https://mapadelterror.com/victims/angel-pascual-mugica/
  34. https://journals.openedition.org/diacronie/12309
  35. https://cadenaser.com/euskadi/2025/05/05/angel-pascual-el-asesinato-de-eta-que-paralizo-la-construccion-de-la-central-nuclear-de-lemoniz-ser-vitoria/
  36. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/36718314.pdf
  37. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PETI-CR-702917_EN.pdf
  38. https://www.elmundo.es/economia/2015/11/15/5644de4c22601d80208b4614.html
  39. https://www.energyencyclopedia.com/en/nuclear-energy/the-nuclear-reactors/the-future-of-fission-reactors
  40. https://www.baskultur.info/reisen/oekologie/1400-lemoiz
  41. https://www.eldiario.es/euskadi/central-lemoiz-proyecto-sociedad-eta_1_1464109.html
  42. https://www.eleconomista.es/energia/noticias/6042139/08/14/La-central-nuclear-de-Lemoniz-treinta-anos-en-ruina-frente-a-la-costa-vasca.html
  43. https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2019-14848
  44. https://elpais.com/espana/2025-05-10/el-futuro-de-la-vieja-central-nuclear-de-lemoiz-se-arruina.html
  45. https://www.elindependiente.com/espana/pais-vasco/2021/06/15/lemoniz-de-fortin-nuclear-a-piscifactoria-vigilada-por-dos-agentes-y-un-perro/
  46. https://www.foronuclear.org/en/updates/news/the-spanish-congress-urges-the-government-to-extend-the-operational-life-of-nuclear-power-plants/
  47. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/iberdrola-endesa-naturgy-agree-seek-extension-almaraz-nuclear-plant-sources-say-2025-10-21/
  48. https://www.naiz.eus/es/info/noticia/20250619/uribe-kosta-impulsara-un-proceso-participativo-sobre-el-futuro-de-la-central-nuclear-de-lemoiz
  49. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-o-s/spain
  50. https://english.elpais.com/spain/2025-09-06/spain-and-portugal-call-for-more-power-links-to-europe-after-massive-blackout.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.