Bob
Have a question related to this hub?
Alice
Got something to say related to this hub?
Share it here.
In mathematics, a local field is a certain type of topological field: by definition, a local field is a locally compact Hausdorff non-discrete topological field.[1] Local fields find many applications in algebraic number theory, where they arise naturally as completions of global fields.[2] Further, tools like integration and Fourier analysis are available for functions defined on local fields.
Given a local field, an absolute value can be defined on it which gives rise to a complete metric that generates its topology. There are two basic types of local field: those called Archimedean local fields in which the absolute value is Archimedean, and those called non-Archimedean local fields in which it is not. The non-Archimedean local fields can also be defined as those fields which are complete with respect to a metric induced by a discrete valuation v whose residue field is finite.[3]
Every local field is isomorphic (as a topological field) to one of the following:[4]
Given a local field F, a "module function" on F can be defined as follows. First, consider the additive group of the field. As a locally compact topological group, it has a unique (up to positive scalar multiple) Haar measure μ. The module of an element a of F is defined so as to measure the change in size of a set after multiplying it by a. Specifically, define modK : F → R by[5]
for any measurable subset X of F (with 0 < μ(X) < ∞). This module does not depend on X nor on the choice of Haar measure μ (since the same scalar multiple ambiguity will occur in both the numerator and the denominator). The function modK is continuous and satisfies
for some constant A that only depends on F.
Using modK, one may then define an absolute value |.| on F that induces a metric on F (via the standard d(x,y) = |x-y|), such that F is complete with respect to this metric, and the metric induces the given topology on F.
For a non-Archimedean local field F (with absolute value denoted by |·|), the following objects are important:
Every non-zero element a of F can be written as a = ϖnu with u a unit in , and n a unique integer. The normalized valuation of F is the surjective function v : F → Z ∪ {∞} defined by sending a non-zero a to the unique integer n such that a = ϖnu with u a unit, and by sending 0 to ∞. If q is the cardinality of the residue field, the absolute value on F induced by its structure as a local field is given by:[6]
An equivalent and very important definition of a non-Archimedean local field is that it is a field that is complete with respect to a discrete valuation and whose residue field is finite.
The nth higher unit group of a non-Archimedean local field F is
for n ≥ 1. The group U(1) is called the group of principal units, and any element of it is called a principal unit. The full unit group is denoted U(0).
The higher unit groups form a decreasing filtration of the unit group
whose quotients are given by
for n ≥ 1.[7] (Here "" means a non-canonical isomorphism.)
The multiplicative group of non-zero elements of a non-Archimedean local field F is isomorphic to
where q is the order of the residue field, and μq−1 is the group of (q−1)st roots of unity (in F). Its structure as an abelian group depends on its characteristic:
This theory includes the study of types of local fields, extensions of local fields using Hensel's lemma, Galois extensions of local fields, ramification groups filtrations of Galois groups of local fields, the behavior of the norm map on local fields, the local reciprocity homomorphism and existence theorem in local class field theory, local Langlands correspondence, Hodge-Tate theory (also called p-adic Hodge theory), explicit formulas for the Hilbert symbol in local class field theory, see e.g.[9]
The definition for "local field" adopted in this article, as a locally compact Hausdorff non-discrete topological field, is common today. Some authors however reserve the term "local field" for what we have called "non-Archimedian local field".
Research papers in modern number theory often consider a more general notion of non-Archimedean local field, requiring only that they be complete with respect to a discrete valuation and that the residue field be perfect of positive characteristic, not necessarily finite.[10]
Serre in his 1962 book Local Fields defined "local fields" as fields that are complete with respect to a discrete valuation, without any restriction on the residue field, leading to a notion that is more general still.
A local field is sometimes called a one-dimensional local field.
A non-Archimedean local field can be viewed as the field of fractions of the completion of the local ring of a one-dimensional arithmetic scheme of rank 1 at its non-singular point.
For a non-negative integer n, an n-dimensional local field is a complete discrete valuation field whose residue field is an (n − 1)-dimensional local field.[10] Depending on the definition of local field, a zero-dimensional local field is then either a finite field (with the definition used in this article), or a perfect field of positive characteristic.
From the geometric point of view, n-dimensional local fields with last finite residue field are naturally associated to a complete flag of subschemes of an n-dimensional arithmetic scheme.