Hubbry Logo
Losing IsaiahLosing IsaiahMain
Open search
Losing Isaiah
Community hub
Losing Isaiah
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Losing Isaiah
Losing Isaiah
Losing Isaiah
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Losing Isaiah
Theatrical release poster
Directed byStephen Gyllenhaal
Screenplay byNaomi Foner Gyllenhaal
Based onLosing Isaiah
by Seth Margolis
Produced byNaomi Foner Gyllenhaal
Hawk Koch
Starring
CinematographyAndrzej Bartkowiak
Edited byHarvey Rosenstock
Music byMark Isham
Distributed byParamount Pictures
Release date
  • March 17, 1995 (1995-03-17) (United States)
Running time
111 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$16 million[1]
Box office$7.6 million[2]

Losing Isaiah is a 1995 American drama film starring Jessica Lange and Halle Berry, directed by Stephen Gyllenhaal. It is based on the novel of the same name by Seth Margolis. The screenplay is written by Naomi Foner Gyllenhaal. The original music score is composed by Mark Isham.

Plot

[edit]

Khaila Richards (Halle Berry) is an African-American woman struggling with an addiction to crack cocaine. Desperate for drugs, she places her infant son, Isaiah, in a box and leaves him in an alley behind a crack house. Khaila promises to come back for Isaiah but later passes out from a crack cocaine binge. The next day, Isaiah narrowly escapes death by a garbage truck and is rushed to the hospital, where doctors discover that he is also addicted to crack cocaine because of his mother using it while she was pregnant with him. Khaila later awakens and returns to the alley where she left Isaiah and is horrified to discover that he is gone.

While caring for Isaiah, Margaret Lewin, (Jessica Lange), a white social worker, grows increasingly fond of him. Eventually, she adopts Isaiah and brings him home to live with her family, which includes husband Charles (David Strathairn), and daughter Hannah. Meanwhile, Khaila is caught shoplifting and sent to rehab, unaware Isaiah is still alive.

Three years later, Khaila successfully completes her treatment and confesses to her case worker that she abandoned Isaiah. Without Khaila's knowledge, the case worker investigates further and discovers that Isaiah is alive and adopted by the Lewins. They hire a lawyer, Kadar Lewis (Samuel L. Jackson) to contest the adoption and help Khaila regain custody of Isaiah. A custody battle ensues with racial and social issues at the forefront. Kailah's lawyer argues that Isaiah belongs with his biological mother and that the Lewins lack the cultural awareness to raise an African-American son. The Lewins argue Kaihla is unfit due to her past drug addiction, abandoning Isaiah, and limited financial resources. In the end, the judge makes the difficult decision to overturn the adoption and return Isaiah to Khaila's custody, much to the Lewins' horror and sadness.

After weeks pass, Isaiah does not consider Khaila his mother and struggles to adapt to the home she has created for him. He becomes increasingly withdrawn and prone to violent public outbursts. Eventually, Khaila, desperate for Isaiah's happiness, asks Margaret to return to Isaiah's life on a temporary basis; however, she insists she will also continue to be involved for the foreseeable future. The two mothers embrace each other, both proclaiming their equally strong motherly love for Isaiah. The two mothers then begin together playing building blocks with their beloved boy in a classroom.

Cast

[edit]

Production note

[edit]

Susan Sarandon turned down the role of Margaret Lewin.[3]

Reception

[edit]

On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, 45% of 29 critics' reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5.1/10. The website's consensus reads: "Losing Isaiah makes an admirable attempt to tackle complex, worthwhile themes, but loses sight of effective storytelling during a descent into melodrama."

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Losing Isaiah

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
is a 1995 American drama film directed by and adapted from the 1993 novel of the same name by Seth Margolis. The story centers on Khaila Richards, a woman portrayed by who, while addicted to , abandons her infant son in an alley; the child, suffering from prenatal drug exposure, is rescued, rehabilitated, and adopted by Margaret Lewin, a white social worker played by . Years later, after achieving sobriety, Khaila seeks to regain custody, sparking a legal battle that highlights tensions between biological parental rights, adoptive family bonds, and the child's established attachments. Produced with a budget of approximately $17 million, the film underperformed at the box office, earning about $7.6 million domestically. It received mixed critical reception, with praise for the lead performances—particularly Berry's raw depiction of addiction and recovery—but criticism for melodramatic scripting and reliance on archetypes over nuanced character development. The narrative's exploration of transracial adoption and the prioritization of a child's psychological stability over biological ties provoked debate, with some viewing it as challenging prevailing emphases on reuniting children with recovering birth parents regardless of prior abandonment and fetal harm. Subsequent analyses have faulted the film for perpetuating a "white savior" dynamic and binary portrayals of motherhood, where the biological mother embodies peril and the white adoptive mother stability, reflecting broader cultural critiques often amplified in academic discourse. Despite these contentions, Losing Isaiah underscores empirical considerations in child welfare, such as the lasting impacts of early trauma and the primacy of secure attachments formed through consistent caregiving.

Synopsis

Plot Summary

Losing Isaiah follows Khaila Richards (), an African-American woman addicted to , who, in a drug-induced haze, abandons her newborn son in a in an outside a crack house. The , found by garbage collectors and rushed to an emergency room where he nearly dies from exposure and withdrawal, is nursed back to health by Margaret Lewin (), a white social worker specializing in child welfare cases. Margaret and her husband Charles (), along with their teenage daughter, adopt the boy, naming him , and raise him in a stable suburban environment over the ensuing years. After serving prison time for drug-related offenses, Khaila completes a rehabilitation program, achieves sobriety, secures employment as a housekeeper, and learns that her son survived and was adopted. Assisted by a social worker and attorney Kadar Lewis (), she files a custody suit to reclaim , now a of approximately three or four years old, igniting a protracted legal battle that pits biological parental rights against the bonds formed through nurture and . The courtroom proceedings highlight expert testimonies on child attachment, racial identity considerations in transracial , and parental fitness, culminating in a resolution that acknowledges mutual understanding among the parties but inflicts significant emotional pain without fully resolving underlying tensions.

Production

Development

The film Losing Isaiah originated from the novel of the same name by Seth Margolis, published on October 7, 1993, by Dutton. Paramount Pictures acquired the rights to adapt the novel into a feature film more than three years before the movie's theatrical release on March 17, 1995, with the purchase occurring around 1991 or early 1992 as reported by Margolis himself. The studio's early acquisition allowed time for script development amid the novel's exploration of child custody, addiction recovery, and transracial adoption, themes that Margolis drew from real-world legal and social debates but fictionalized without direct basis in specific cases. Naomi Foner, a screenwriter known for prior works like Running on Empty (1988), adapted Margolis's novel into the film's screenplay, emphasizing emotional and courtroom confrontations between biological and adoptive parenthood. Foner's script retained the novel's core narrative of a crack-addicted mother reclaiming her abandoned child from a white adoptive family, while streamlining subplots for cinematic pacing; she also served as a producer alongside Howard W. Koch Jr., whose father Howard W. Koch Sr. had a history of directing social-issue dramas. Additional producers included Hawk Koch and Sharon Owyang, with the project falling under Paramount's focus on mid-budget dramas addressing contemporary family law tensions during the early 1990s. Development proceeded with family ties influencing key roles: Foner collaborated closely with her husband, director , whose prior films like Waterland (1992) demonstrated his interest in psychological family dynamics, ensuring the prioritized character-driven realism over sensationalism. emphasized sensitivity to racial and portrayals, with input from consultants on child welfare systems to ground custody dispute scenes in verifiable legal standards, such as the "best interests of the child" doctrine prevalent in U.S. family courts at the time. The script's completion aligned with rising Hollywood interest in adoption narratives, spurred by 1990s policy shifts like the Multiethnic Placement Act of 1994, though the film predated its enactment and focused on pre-existing transracial adoption controversies.

Casting

Jessica Lange was cast as Margaret Lewin, the white social worker who adopts the abandoned infant Isaiah and becomes deeply attached to him. Halle Berry portrayed Khaila Richards, a Black crack cocaine addict and prostitute who leaves her baby in a trash bin while under the influence but later seeks recovery and custody. The role marked a shift for Berry, moving beyond her earlier typecasting as a beauty queen or model to depict a gritty, multifaceted character grappling with addiction and redemption. David Strathairn played Charles Lewin, Margaret's husband, providing a grounded counterpoint to the custody battle. Cuba Gooding Jr. was selected as Eddie Hughes, Khaila's recovering addict friend who supports her rehabilitation efforts. Samuel L. Jackson appeared as Kadim, a counselor aiding Khaila's recovery.
ActorRoleDescription
Margaret LewinAdoptive mother and social worker fighting to retain custody.
Khaila RichardsBiological mother recovering from crack addiction.
Charles LewinMargaret's husband, involved in the family dynamics.
Eddie HughesKhaila's supportive friend in recovery.
KadimRehabilitation counselor.
The casting director was Aleta Chappelle, who assembled a ensemble blending established performers with rising talents to underscore the film's interracial and socioeconomic tensions. was chosen to play the toddler , central to the custody dispute.

Filming

Principal photography for Losing Isaiah took place from March 28 to June 7, 1994, primarily in , , to authentically depict the film's urban environments and settings. The production utilized real locations in the city, including the project, which represented the challenging neighborhood where Khaila Richards () resides early in the story. Specific sites included the back entrance of the Centre at 3858 S. Cottage Grove Avenue, standing in for the Cook County Juvenile Court exterior, and Khaila's apartment complex in a South Side area. A pivotal scene involving the discovery of the abandoned infant was filmed at 103 E. 58th Street, capturing an alleyway moment central to the plot's inciting incident. Director emphasized on-location shooting to convey the gritty realism of drug addiction and child welfare issues, drawing from Chicago's diverse and community landscapes without relying heavily on constructed sets. Cinematographer employed processing to highlight the contrasting worlds of poverty and suburban stability, enhancing the visual narrative of racial and class divides. No major production delays or on-set incidents were reported, allowing the schedule to conclude within the planned timeframe under ' oversight.

Themes and Analysis

Drug Addiction and Parental Fitness

In Losing Isaiah, drug addiction is portrayed as a profound barrier to parental fitness, exemplified by Khaila Richards' dependence, which drives her to abandon her son, , in an trash heap during a desperate search for drugs. The newborn, suffering from neonatal abstinence syndrome due to prenatal exposure, highlights the direct physiological harm inflicted on children of addicted mothers, including tremors, , and long-term developmental risks. This depiction aligns with clinical observations of crack addiction's grip, impairing judgment and impulse control to the extent that basic caregiving becomes untenable, often resulting in neglect or endangerment. The film's narrative arc shifts to examine recovery and restored fitness when Khaila, after and rehabilitation, achieves and seeks to reclaim , now bonded with his adoptive family. This raises core questions of whether alone rehabilitates parental capacity, given addiction's tendency to erode trust and stability; the story illustrates persistent challenges, such as Khalil's emotional volatility and incomplete grasp of Isaiah's needs, underscoring that past unfitness—evidenced by abandonment and exposure—lingers as a causal factor in assessing future risk. Legal proceedings emphasize the "best interest of the child" doctrine, prioritizing empirical indicators like potential and attachment disruption over biological claims, reflecting real-world custody standards where recovered addicts must demonstrate sustained behavioral change beyond . Ultimately, the resolution grants Khaila primary custody but incorporates adoptive mother Margaret Lewin's involvement for support, portraying a pragmatic acknowledgment that addiction's scars demand ongoing safeguards rather than unqualified redemption. This outcome critiques overly optimistic views of recovery, implying that parental fitness requires not just personal reform but verifiable, child-centered evidence of reliability, as unchecked could perpetuate cycles of trauma. The film's restraint in glamorizing addiction's grip avoids moral equivocation, grounding its analysis in the causal reality that fundamentally severs the foundational duties of parenthood until rigorously proven otherwise.

Transracial Adoption and Racial Dynamics

In Losing Isaiah, transracial adoption is depicted through the white social worker Margaret Lewin and her husband adopting the abandoned African American infant , whom she discovers in a trash heap while under the influence of drugs by his biological mother, Khaila Richards. The narrative underscores racial dynamics by contrasting the stability of the Lewins' middle-class white household with Khaila's impoverished urban black community, raising questions about whether white parents can adequately prepare a black child for experiences of and formation. During the custody trial, Khaila's attorney argues that requires placement in a black family to foster a secure racial identity, reflecting concerns that transracial adoptions may lead to "racial neutering" or a lack of belonging to any racial group. An testifies that black children might fare better in temporary white than permanent transracial adoption, prioritizing eventual same-race placement to avoid identity confusion, though the film leaves resolution ambiguous as struggles with adjustment after initial return to Khaila, including behavioral issues like running away. The film's portrayal has been critiqued for perpetuating stereotypes of African American birth mothers as inherently unfit due to drug addiction, potentially reinforcing biases that delay adoptions of black children by emphasizing pathology over broader socioeconomic factors. However, it also conveys American ideological values through the adoptive parents, such as equality, hard work, mutual support, and responsibility, treating equivalently to any biological child and promoting the notion that identity emerges from family nurturing, education, and opportunity rather than strict racial congruence. These elements align with debates intensified by the Multiethnic Placement Act of 1994, which prohibited denying adoptions based on race to expedite placements for minority children in need. Empirical research referenced in contemporaneous discussions challenges blanket assertions of harm in transracial adoptions; a of 204 transracial families from 1972 onward found adoptees to be "happy and content adults" without significant racial confusion or anger, countering fears of psychological marginality. Despite this, the film highlights persistent racial hierarchies in adoption preferences, where African American children remain least desired by prospective parents compared to white or international adoptees, influenced by implicit biases rather than of poorer outcomes in stable transracial homes. Ultimately, Losing Isaiah probes causal factors in child welfare—prioritizing and environmental stability over racial matching—without endorsing one side, though its ambiguity mirrors unresolved tensions in public attitudes toward interracial family formation.

Child Welfare and Custody Disputes

The film Losing Isaiah centers on a protracted custody dispute between Khaila Richards, a recovering addict portrayed by , and Margaret Lewin, the white social worker who adopts the abandoned infant , played by . After Khaila, in a drug-fueled haze on an unspecified date in the early setting, leaves two-day-old in a trash heap during a rainstorm, he is discovered by passersby and enters the child welfare system. This incident triggers immediate foster placement, followed by medical treatment for exposure and prenatal drug effects, illustrating the rapid intervention protocols in urban for neglected infants. As Isaiah thrives under Margaret's care, the system proceeds to terminate Khaila's parental rights due to abandonment and , enabling a finalized transracial adoption after approximately two years. Khaila's subsequent incarceration for drug-related offenses and participation in a rehabilitation program—spanning over 18 months of by the time she learns of Isaiah's survival—prompt her to petition for custody, arguing biological entitlement and reformed fitness. The dispute escalates into confrontations, where expert witnesses debate Isaiah's attachment bonds: Margaret emphasizes the secure environment she has provided since infancy, including for developmental delays, while Khaila's advocate highlights her cultural ties and recovery milestones, such as employment and stable housing. The narrative critiques aspects of the child welfare process by depicting how termination of rights, often irreversible under statutes like Illinois' Adoption Act requiring clear and convincing evidence of unfitness, can be challenged post-adoption if parental rehabilitation occurs. Courts apply the "best interest of the child" standard, weighing factors such as emotional stability, continuity of care, and potential trauma from separation—here, Isaiah's demonstrated distress during visits underscores risks of disrupting established bonds. However, the film's resolution, where the judge initially favors Khaila based on biological presumption and her , has drawn for potentially prioritizing parental redemption over the child's attachments, mirroring real-world cases where reunification occurs despite adoptive investments. This portrayal highlights systemic tensions in foster-to-adopt transitions, where social workers like advocate for permanence amid high caseloads, but recovery narratives challenge finality. Ethical debates in the film question whether history permanently impairs fitness or if sustained —Khaila's two-year clean streak—restores rights, with outcomes hinging on judicial rather than uniform metrics. Critics note the story, drawn from actual custody battles, exposes how welfare policies may inadvertently incentivize early while allowing later reversals, potentially destabilizing children who form deep ties in foster homes.

Release and Performance

Theatrical Release and Box Office

Losing Isaiah was released theatrically on March 17, 1995, distributed by in a across multiple theaters. The film opened to $2,520,972 in its first weekend, accounting for 33.3% of its total domestic earnings. Despite featuring prominent actors like and , it failed to sustain momentum, with attendance declining sharply in subsequent weeks. Over its full theatrical run, Losing Isaiah grossed $7,603,766 domestically, with no significant international earnings reported separately, resulting in a worldwide total matching the U.S. figure. Produced on a reported budget of $17 million, the film underperformed financially, recouping less than half its costs at the and contributing to its status as a commercial disappointment for the studio.

Awards and Nominations

Losing Isaiah garnered limited recognition from awards bodies, with its sole major nomination awarded to lead actress for her portrayal of Khaila Richards.
AwardCategoryRecipientResultYear
Outstanding Actress in a Motion PictureNominated1996
The film was deemed eligible for consideration at the in 1996 but did not receive any nominations across categories such as or Best Picture. No additional honors from guilds, critics' circles, or other ceremonies, including Golden Globes or , were documented for the production or its cast.

Reception

Critical Reviews

Critical reception to Losing Isaiah was mixed, with reviewers frequently praising the performances of and while critiquing the film's script for and narrative fragmentation. The film holds a 46% approval rating on based on 28 reviews, with the consensus noting an admirable effort to address complex themes but a descent into ineffective storytelling. Roger Ebert awarded the film 2.5 out of 4 stars in his March 17, 1995, review, highlighting its strength in ambiguity regarding drug addiction, racial prejudice, and custody disputes, as it avoids simplistic resolutions. Ebert appreciated how the movie reflects real-world complexities, such as societal issues like and the challenges of , without preaching moral absolutes. Janet Maslin of The New York Times, in her March 17, 1995, review, described the drama as serious and affecting, crediting the magnetic presence of and Lange for elevating the material despite its Solomonic plot contrivances. Maslin noted that the film tackles hot-button social issues typically suited to television movies but earns its theatrical status through the stars' believable anguish, though it nearly falters under its structural problems. Other critics echoed concerns about the screenplay's weaknesses; a March 21, 1995, review faulted the fragmented narrative and shifting perspectives, which dilute focus after an initial emphasis on Berry's character. Retrospective analyses have similarly pointed to the plot's wishy-washy ending and underdeveloped as shortcomings, despite strong that drew widespread acclaim.

Public and Cultural Response

The release of Losing Isaiah in March 1995 elicited polarized public reactions, with audiences and commentators dividing over the film's portrayal of a custody battle between a recovering crack-addicted biological mother (played by ) and white adoptive parents. Berry herself anticipated backlash for embodying a of maternal , stating in a contemporary that she expected for the role despite its basis in real-world crises. Public discourse often framed the narrative as a on parental fitness versus racial matching, with some viewers siding with biological reclamation and others prioritizing the child's stable environment, mirroring real custody tugs-of-war reported in media at the time. Culturally, the film intensified debates on transracial adoption, highlighting tensions between child welfare imperatives and concerns over cultural identity loss for Black children raised by white families. A 1995 New York Times article responding to the film cited longitudinal research by sociologist Howard Altstein on 204 transracial adoptive families, which found no widespread racial confusion among adult adoptees and affirmed their overall happiness, countering arguments that white parents inherently fail to instill Black cultural competence. However, adoptee testimonies and emerging studies noted potential "racial neutering," where transracial children feel disconnected from any racial group, fueling opposition from groups advocating same-race placements to preserve heritage. The movie's marketing navigated this "minefield" by emphasizing emotional authenticity over racial polemics, yet it contributed to national conversations linking adoption policy to welfare reform, as seen in contemporaneous op-eds questioning race-based barriers to placement. Audience reception, as aggregated on platforms like , remained mixed, with praise for the performances' emotional depth overshadowed by critiques of the script's contrived racial dynamics and simplistic resolution of recovery versus adoptive stability. Over time, retrospective analyses have scrutinized the film for reinforcing a "white savior" trope, where the white adoptive mother's stability implicitly triumphs over the biological mother's racial authenticity, though such views often reflect later cultural shifts rather than contemporaneous data on outcomes. later expressed regret for participating, admitting in an that she sensed the project was flawed but proceeded due to career hiatus. Despite these divisions, Losing Isaiah endured as a point in , underscoring empirical realities of substance abuse's disproportionate impact on family disruption while challenging idealized notions of racial in child-rearing.

Controversies and Legacy

Debates on Portrayal and Bias

Critics have accused the film of perpetuating a white savior trope in its depiction of transracial adoption, portraying the white adoptive mother, Margaret Lewin (), as inherently superior in nurturing the black child Isaiah compared to the biological mother, Khaila Richards (), despite the latter's rehabilitation efforts. This binary framing, where black motherhood is associated with initial neglect due to addiction and white motherhood with stability, has been interpreted as reinforcing racial hierarchies rather than exploring nuanced challenges for transracial adoptees. The portrayal of Khaila as a crack-addicted who abandons her has drawn charges of relying on negative stereotypes, amplifying perceptions during the crack epidemic that linked African American women disproportionately to irresponsible breeding and . Such depictions, critics argue, overlook systemic factors like urban poverty and limited access to treatment while emphasizing personal moral failure, potentially biasing public views on family structures without empirical grounding in recovery success rates, which data from the era showed varied widely but often favored long-term stability over biological reclamation. Halle Berry anticipated backlash for embodying a role that could be seen as self-stereotyping, stating in a 1995 that she expected for portraying a flawed black mother, yet defended it as a realistic examination of addiction's consequences. later expressed reservations about the project, admitting in a 1990s reflection that she sensed the script's flaws but proceeded due to career hiatus, highlighting internal production doubts about its balanced handling of racial and custodial biases. Defenders of the film's portrayal contend it reflects real-world custody precedents prioritizing the child's established environment over biological ties post-abandonment, as evidenced by legal standards like the "best interest of the child" applied in similar 1990s cases, rather than injecting ideological bias against recovery. However, academic analyses note that media like Losing Isaiah contributed to skewed narratives in discourse, where transracial placements were debated amid data showing mixed outcomes on racial , with some studies indicating higher resilience in stable interracial homes but others highlighting cultural disconnection risks. These debates underscore tensions between individual agency in addiction recovery and institutionalized preferences for adoptive continuity, often critiqued for underrepresenting black community support systems.

Long-term Impact on Adoption Discourse

The film Losing Isaiah (1995) contributed to mid-1990s debates on by dramatizing conflicts between biological reclamation rights and adoptive stability, particularly in cases involving minority birth parents recovering from . Its portrayal of a birth mother's successful rehabilitation juxtaposed against a white adoptive family's nurturing environment highlighted ambiguities in determining the child's , influencing scholarly examinations of custody standards that prioritize empirical stability over racial or genetic ties. In the context of contemporaneous policy shifts, the film's narrative aligned with arguments against race-based delays in placements, as embodied in the Multiethnic Placement Act (MEPA) of 1994, which barred denial of adoptions or based solely on racial differences between child and prospective parents. Released amid discussions, including a 1995 U.S. House bill provision prohibiting such delays, Losing Isaiah amplified public scrutiny of racial matching preferences, which critics argued prolonged for over 100,000 minority children awaiting homes while same-race families were scarce. Longer-term, the film has been referenced in legal and cultural analyses as perpetuating stereotypes of African American birth families as inherently unstable—such as portraying crack addiction as a near-universal for infants—potentially bolstering support for color-blind policies by eroding confidence in domestic minority placements and indirectly favoring international adoptions. Scholarly works cite it to critique media's role in embedding biases that prioritize perceived "healthy" foreign children over U.S. minority ones, contributing to sustained discourse on how cultural representations affect adoptive and enforcement under MEPA's 1996 amendments. Despite these influences, empirical outcomes post-MEPA showed modest increases in transracial placements without of widespread psychological harm to children, though identity preservation concerns persist in ongoing debates.

References

  1. https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/seth-margolis/losing-isaiah/
  2. https://variety.com/1995/film/reviews/losing-isaiah-2-1200441037/
  3. https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/losing-isaiah-1995
  4. https://www.spiritualityandpractice.com/films/reviews/view/4964?id=4964
  5. https://www.netflix.com/title/60029939
  6. https://www.the-numbers.com/person/73460401-Ora-Jones
  7. https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/losing-Isaiah-1995
  8. https://consequence.net/2015/03/losing-isaiah-the-white-savior-trope-20-years-later/
  9. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/blackcamera.11.2.08
  10. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113691/
  11. https://www.nytimes.com/1995/04/02/arts/culture-view-novelists-sell-that-book-to-hollywood.html
  12. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1995-03-17-ca-43713-story.html
  13. https://search.library.ucla.edu/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9954245033606533&context=L&vid=01UCS_LAL:UCLA&lang=en
  14. https://watch.afi.com/movie/losing-isaiah
  15. https://www.nytimes.com/1995/03/23/garden/parent-child-beyond-losing-isaiah-truth-in-shades-of-gray.html
  16. https://www.bet.com/photo-gallery/bd44ux/the-cast-of-losing-isaiah-where-are-they-now/qiurno
  17. https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/VA-news/VA-Pilot/issues/1995/vp950319/03170068.htm
  18. https://www.bet.com/photo-gallery/bd44ux/the-cast-of-losing-isaiah-where-are-they-now/gmzefi
  19. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113691/fullcredits/
  20. https://www.bet.com/photo-gallery/bd44ux/the-cast-of-losing-isaiah-where-are-they-now/svenvj
  21. https://www.themoviedb.org/movie/28313-losing-isaiah/cast?language=en-US
  22. https://www.suzeebehindthescenes.com/2013/11/meet-actor-marc-john-jefferies-or-have.html
  23. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113691/locations/
  24. https://www.itsfilmedthere.com/2011/03/losing-isaiah.html
  25. https://cinematherapyreview.com/losing-isaiah/
  26. https://spryfilm.com/2023/10/09/blu-ray-review-losing-isaiah-1989/
  27. https://www.themorning.lk/articles/vPwJV1tYe1n2uAbjI1Kb
  28. https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/2724807
  29. https://alishasangle.com/2016/06/02/losing-isaiah-thoughts/
  30. https://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/sites/g/files/dgvnsk15026/files/media/documents/DavisVol39No4_MALDONADO.pdf
  31. http://www.adoptionlcsw.com/2016/04/losing-isaiah-adoption-movie-review.html
  32. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/rubikon/article/view/34242
  33. https://www.adoptionlcsw.com/2016/04/losing-isaiah-adoption-movie-review.html
  34. https://www.123helpme.com/essay/Analysis-of-Losing-Isaiah-82964
  35. https://www.cliffsnotes.com/cliffs-questions/3442873
  36. https://digitalcommons.montclair.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=polysci-law-facpubs
  37. https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Losing-Isaiah
  38. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113691/awards/
  39. https://www.filmaffinity.com/en/film550383.html
  40. https://www.atogt.com/askoscar/display-reminder-list-text.php?yr=68
  41. https://www.nytimes.com/1995/03/17/movies/film-review-a-little-boy-and-a-plot-worthy-of-solomon.html
  42. https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/losing_isaiah
  43. https://www.deseret.com/1995/3/21/20088067/film-review-losing-isaiah/
  44. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1995-03-17-ca-43795-story.html
  45. https://www.chicagotribune.com/1995/04/20/interracial-adoptions-make-loving-sense/
  46. https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/losing_isaiah/reviews?type=user
  47. https://www.facebook.com/happenedinthe90s/posts/jessica-lange-said-in-an-interview-i-let-myself-get-talked-into-losing-isaiah-be/804712175007738/
  48. https://www.womenandprison.org/motherhood/cracked_lenses_the_visual_exploitation_of_crack_mothers
  49. https://jarm.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/jarm/article/download/40368/36545/50307
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.