Community hub
0 subscribers8 pages, 0 posts
Recent from talks
All channels
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Welcome to the community hub built to collect knowledge and have discussions related to Modern Language Association.
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Modern Language Association
View on Wikipediafrom Wikipedia
The Modern Language Association of America, often referred to as the Modern Language Association (MLA), is widely considered the principal professional association in the United States for scholars of language and literature.[1] The MLA aims to "strengthen the study and teaching of language and literature".[2] The organization includes over 20,000 members in 100 countries, primarily academic scholars, professors, and graduate students who study or teach language and literature, including English, other modern languages, and comparative literature.[2][3] Although founded in the United States, with offices in New York City, the MLA's membership, concerns, reputation, and influence are international in scope.[2]
Key Information
History
[edit]
The MLA was founded in 1883, as a discussion and advocacy group for the study of literature and modern languages (that is, all but classical languages, such as ancient Latin and Greek).[2] According to its profile featured by the American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS), "The Modern Language Association is formed for educational, scientific, literary, and social objects and purposes, and more specifically for the promotion of the academic and scientific study of English, German, French, Spanish, Italian, and other so-called modern languages and literatures."[3]
Officers and governance
[edit]The officers of the MLA are elected by its members. The 2019–2020 president was Simon Gikandi, the first vice-president was Judith Butler and the second vice-president was Barbara Fuchs. The 2020–2021 president is Judith Butler.[4]
The MLA is governed by an Executive Council, elected periodically by its members, according to the MLA Constitution. The Executive Director is Paula Krebs.[5]
Activities
[edit]
The MLA publishes several academic journals, including Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, one of the most prestigious journals in literary studies, and Profession, which is now published online on MLA Commons and discusses professional issues faced by teachers of language and literature. The association also publishes the MLA Handbook, a guide that is geared toward high school and undergraduate students and has sold more than 6,500,000 copies. The MLA produces the online database, MLA International Bibliography, the standard bibliography in language and literature.[6]
Since 1884 the MLA has held a national, four-day convention. For many years it was held the last week in December. Beginning in 2011, the convention dates moved to the first Thursday following 2 January. Approximately eight to twelve thousand members attend, depending on the location, which alternates among major cities in various regions of the United States. The MLA Annual Convention is the largest and most important of the year for scholars of languages and literature. Language departments of many universities and colleges interview candidates for teaching positions at the convention, although hiring occurs all year long. The organization's Job Information List (JIL) is available online.[7][8][9][10][11]
In addition to its job-placement activities, the convention features about 800 sessions, including presentations of papers and panel discussions on diverse topics (special sessions, forums, poetry readings, film presentations, interdisciplinary studies involving art and music, governance meetings) and social events hosted by English and language departments and allied or affiliated organizations.[2] There are also extensive book exhibits in one of the main hotel or convention center exhibition areas.
In November 2016, the association launched Humanities Commons, an open-access, crossdisciplinary hub for anyone interested in humanities research and scholarship. Other not-for-profit organizations involved in this project include College Art Association; Association for Jewish Studies; and the Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies.
The MLA's Web site features the MLA Language Map, which presents overviews and detailed data from the United States 2000 Census about the locations and numbers of speakers of thirty languages and seven groups of less commonly spoken languages in the United States and Canada.
The association has highlighted issues such as race, gender and class in its professional deliberations.[12] In The New Criterion, a classicist and politically conservative[13][14] magazine, Roger Kimball and Hilton Kramer argued that this was part of a "rampant politicization of literary study that the MLA has aggressively supported" in American colleges and universities, including elevating popular culture to a position of parity with great works of literature as subjects for classroom study, and other "radical" postures.[15]
Proposed academic boycott of Israel
[edit]On January 7, 2017, the MLA rejected a proposed boycott of Israeli academic institutions in a 113–79 vote during its annual meeting in Philadelphia.[16] Activists within the association had since 2014 pushed for such a boycott because they believed Israel was guilty of human rights violations and should be subjected to a boycott similarly to how South Africa was boycotted by the Anti-Apartheid Movement. The inspiration for the boycott came from the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement which is a global movement that calls for comprehensive boycotts of Israel.[17]
The activists calling themselves MLA Members for Justice in Palestine presented a resolution in December 2016 calling for a boycott. The call to boycott received support from scholars such as Judith Butler and novelist Viet Thanh Nguyen, but also opposition from scholars such as Cary Nelson and historian Kenneth Waltzer as well as a group calling itself MLA Members for Scholars Rights.[18][19] A group of Israeli scholars sent videotaped messages stating Israeli universities are multicultural and calling the BDS campaign one of harassment and slander.[20] On the other side of the debate, another group of Israeli scholars came out in support of the boycott, arguing that "the Israel-led campaign against the boycott of Israeli academic institutions rallies around the claim that if adapted it will hurt progressive Israeli scholars. Campaigners use this tactic to divert attention from the plight of the entire Palestinian population living under Israel's elaborate system of colonial repression and injustice to a manufactured victimization of Israeli academics. This is a manipulative inversion of victimhood."[18]
In a strongly worded letter, the pro-Israeli Brandeis Center threatened to sue MLA if the resolution was adopted. In the letter addressed to the association's President Kwame Anthony Appiah and Executive Director Rosemary G. Feal, the center claimed that the resolution was ultra vires.[21][22] That is, that it would take the association in a direction that went beyond its original mission. Supporters of the boycott argued that it was not ultra vires because the Association had in the past been engaged in human rights issues.[23]
At the 2025 annual meeting in New Orleans, the MLA executive council blocked a member vote on a resolution endorsing BDS and acknowledging Palestinian genocide accusation and scholasticide, prompting protest and campaign for members to lapse membership in the organization. The executive council released a statement in advance stating that while they are "appalled by the continued attack on Gaza," a BDS resolution would present "legal and fiduciary" challenges.[24]
Regional associations
[edit]There are several regional associations that are independent of the primary MLA, and which host smaller conventions at other times of the year:
- Midwest Modern Language Association
- Northeast Modern Language Association
- Pacific Ancient and Modern Language Association
- Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association
- South Atlantic Modern Language Association
- South Central Modern Language Association
Affiliated and allied societies
[edit]
- Association of Departments of English
- Association of Departments of Foreign Languages
- Society for Medieval Feminist Scholarship
- The International Federation for Modern Languages and Literatures (FILLM)[25][26]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ "Working in academia means living in crisis — and experiencing the sublime". Washington Post. Retrieved 2022-09-08.
- ^ a b c d e About the MLA", mla.org, Modern Language Association, 9 July 2008, Web, 25 April 2009.
- ^ a b "Modern Language Association of America", in "ACLS Member Learned Societies" (Directory), American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS), 2011, Web, 31 January 2011.
- ^ "The One Hundred Thirty-One Presidents". Modern Language Association.
- ^ "Modern Language Association of America Names La Salle University Alumna Paula M. Krebs, Ph.D., Executive Director". La Salle News. 8 June 2017. La Salle University. lasalle.edu. Retrieved 17 September 2017.
- ^ "eReviews: MLA International Bibliography", Library Journal, September 1, 2012, archived from the original on May 25, 2017, retrieved July 14, 2014
- ^ Burton, Antoinette (2003). After the Imperial Turn: Thinking with and through the Nation. Duke UP. p. 90. ISBN 9780822384397.
- ^ Formo, Dawn M.; Reed, Cheryl (2012). Job Search in Academe: How to Get the Position You Deserve. Stylus. p. 4. ISBN 9781579225384.
- ^ Wood, Maren; Brock Read (16 September 2014). "Are More MLA Faculty Jobs on the Way?". Chronicle Vitae. Retrieved 22 February 2015.
- ^ Flaherty, Colleen (21 December 2012). "English Down, Languages Up: Report reveals divergent trends in modern language job market". Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved 22 February 2015.
- ^ Hume, Kathryn (2010). Surviving Your Academic Job Hunt: Advice for Humanities PhDs. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 21. ISBN 9781137068293.
- ^ Kushner, Eva (2003). "The Modern Language Association of America". Diogenes. 50 (2): 136–137. doi:10.1177/039219210305000217. S2CID 146988960.
- ^ Knight, Christopher (December 29, 1991). "Art : Commentary : The Little Journal That Can't : The New Criterion, now in its 10th year under Hilton Kramer, has looked to neoconservative doctrine as its muse". Los Angeles Times. ISSN 0458-3035. Archived from the original on Nov 15, 2016. Retrieved January 9, 2019.
- ^ Honan, William H. (September 15, 2001). "Think Tank; At 20, a Conservative Gadfly Can Still Bite". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 9, 2019.
- ^ Farewell to the MLA", Roger Kimball and Hilton Kramer, New Criterion, February 1995. Web.
- ^ Schuessler, Jennifer (7 January 2017). "Modern Language Association Moves to Reject Academic Boycott of Israel". New York Times. Retrieved 27 February 2017.
- ^ "Resolution". MLA Members for Justice in Palestine. 15 November 2015. Retrieved 27 February 2017.
- ^ a b "Why was BDS beaten at the MLA conference?". BDS Movement. January 16, 2017. Retrieved August 21, 2020.
- ^ Speyer, Lea. "Prominent Scholars Slam Modern Language Association for Entertaining 'Shameful' BDS Resolution, Politicizing Academia". Algemeiner. Retrieved 27 February 2017.
- ^ "Resolution". YouTube. 4 January 2017. Archived from the original on 2021-11-18.
- ^ "LDB to MLA: Drop Ultra Vires Boycott Resolution". Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law. 20 December 2016. Retrieved 27 December 2018.
- ^ Speyer, Lea (3 January 2017). "Prominent Scholars Slam Modern Language Association for Entertaining 'Shameful' BDS Resolution, Politicizing Academia". Algemeiner. Retrieved 27 February 2017.
- ^ Palumbo-Liu, David (27 December 2016). "Brandeis Center Threatens Lawsuit Against Academic Organization for Supporting Call for Palestinian Rights". Huffington Post. Retrieved 27 February 2017.
- ^ Wilkins, Brett; Rosane, Olivia (January 12, 2025). "MLA Members for Palestine Protest Denial of BDS Vote at National Assembly". Common Dreams. Retrieved 2025-01-13.
- ^ "News: The Modern Language Association Joins FILLM!". FILLM. fillm.org. 15 September 2015. Retrieved 2016-09-17.
- ^ "Organizational Memberships". Modern Language Association. Retrieved 2016-09-19.
Further reading
[edit]- Barber, Virginia. "The Women's Revolt in the MLA". Change Magazine April 1972. Rpt. in Women on Campus: The Unfinished Liberation. Ed. George W. Bonham. Introd. Elizabeth Janeway. Somerset, NJ: Transaction, 2006. pp. 85–94. ["The Modern Language Association is finally opening its doors to professional women and their demands for reform."]
- Howe, Florence, Frederick C. Crews, Louis Kampf, Noam Chomsky, Paul Lauter, and Richard Ohmann. "Reforming the MLA." Letter to the editor. New York Review of Books, 19 December 1968. Web. 4 February 2007.
- Kimball, Roger. Tenured Radicals: How Politics Has Corrupted Our Higher Education. New York: Harper & Row, 1990. Rev. ed. Chicago: Elephant Paperbacks (Ivan R. Dee), 1998. ISBN 1-56663-195-5. ISBN 978-1-56663-195-2. Print.
- Kushner, Eva. "The Modern Language Association of America". Diogenes 50.2 (2003): 135–138. Web. 1 July 2016.
External links
[edit]- Official website
- Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 1884–1922, full text online via HathiTrust
Modern Language Association
View on Grokipediafrom Grokipedia
History
Founding and Early Development (1883–1920)
The Modern Language Association of America was founded on December 27 and 28, 1883, at Columbia College (now Columbia University) in New York City by a small group of scholars dedicated to advancing the study of modern languages and literatures, in contrast to the prevailing emphasis on classical languages like Latin and Greek.[9][3] The inaugural meeting featured discussions on philological methods and pedagogy, reflecting the participants' aim to establish modern languages as rigorous academic disciplines. A. Marshall Elliott of Johns Hopkins University, a key organizer, was elected secretary, while Franklin Carter of Williams College served as the first president.[9][3] Early activities centered on annual winter conventions, where members presented research papers on topics such as comparative grammar, textual criticism, and language instruction. The proceedings of the founding meeting were compiled and published in 1884 as volume 1 of Transactions of the Modern Language Association of America, comprising scholarly essays that underscored the association's commitment to empirical linguistic analysis.[10][11] In 1886, this evolved into Transactions and Proceedings of the Modern Language Association of America following a merger with related scholarly outputs, solidifying the MLA's role in disseminating research.[9] By the early 1900s, the association had formalized its operations through incorporation under Maryland law in 1900, transitioning from an informal society to a structured entity with an executive committee.[12] Membership grew from dozens of university-based philologists in the 1880s to several hundred by 1920, increasingly including secondary educators while maintaining a focus on higher education standards and scientific approaches to language study.[3] These developments positioned the MLA as a foundational influence on American literary and linguistic scholarship, prioritizing evidence-based inquiry over traditional humanistic traditions.[13]Mid-20th Century Expansion
During the post-World War II era, the Modern Language Association experienced significant growth in membership, reflecting the broader expansion of higher education in the United States fueled by the GI Bill of 1944, which enabled millions of veterans to attend college, and the subsequent baby boom that increased undergraduate enrollments. By 1950, MLA membership stood at nearly 6,500, doubling to 11,600 by 1960 as universities hired more faculty in language and literature departments to meet rising demand.[14] This surge aligned with a national increase in college attendance, from about 1.5 million students in 1940 to over 3.6 million by 1960, creating demand for professional organizations like the MLA to support scholarly and teaching activities.[14] The association expanded its data-gathering efforts to address evolving educational needs, launching annual surveys of foreign language enrollments in U.S. institutions starting in 1958, with support from the United States Department of Education; these surveys tracked undergraduate and graduate trends in languages other than English, providing empirical insights into curriculum shifts amid Cold War priorities.[15] Concurrently, the MLA International Bibliography, initiated in the 1920s, grew in scope and coverage during the 1950s and 1960s, incorporating more international scholarship and serving as a key resource for researchers as publication volumes in modern languages proliferated.[16] Annual conventions also scaled up, accommodating larger delegations of scholars and teachers; by the late 1950s, sessions addressed post-Sputnik concerns over language proficiency, influencing federal initiatives like the National Defense Education Act of 1958, which funded language programs and indirectly bolstered MLA's role in professional standards.[17] Publications such as PMLA maintained quarterly issues with expanded content on textual scholarship and pedagogy, exemplified by 1950 volumes featuring reproductions of rare manuscripts to advance philological research.[10] This period marked the MLA's transition from a modest scholarly society to a central hub for the burgeoning academic field, though growth strained administrative resources and foreshadowed later debates over professionalization.[14]Late 20th and Early 21st Century Shifts
During the 1970s and 1980s, the Modern Language Association responded to a protracted crisis in the academic job market for humanities positions, characterized by a sharp decline in tenure-track openings following post-World War II expansion. The MLA's Job Information List, which began tracking advertisements in the early 1970s, documented a market collapse by mid-decade, with positions falling amid economic stagnation, demographic shifts reducing college-age populations, and institutional hiring freezes; by the late 1980s, annual listings hovered around 1,000-1,500 but often prioritized non-tenure-track roles, signaling a structural turn toward contingent labor.[18][19] This prompted the MLA to formalize annual reports on job trends starting in the 1980s, including breakdowns by subfield and tenure status, and to advocate for improved conditions through affiliated groups like the Association of Departments of English (ADE), founded in 1964 but intensified in focus during this era.[20] Intellectually, the late 20th century marked a profound reconfiguration of scholarly priorities within the MLA, as structuralist and post-structuralist theories—emphasizing deconstruction, discourse analysis, and power dynamics—gained prominence in PMLA publications and convention programs from the 1970s onward, gradually supplanting earlier emphases on philology and formalist criticism. By the 1980s and 1990s, this evolved into a surge of cultural studies, ethnic studies, and gender-focused inquiries, with MLA sessions increasingly addressing multiculturalism, canon reform, and identity-based critiques rather than textual explication; for instance, 1990s conventions featured debates over expanding the literary canon to include non-Western and marginalized voices, reflecting broader academic trends but drawing criticism for prioritizing ideological frameworks over empirical literary evidence.[8][21] Such shifts aligned with institutional biases in humanities departments, where empirical metrics of scholarly output increasingly favored interpretive theories amenable to politicized readings, though detractors contended this diluted causal analysis of texts in favor of unsubstantiated social advocacy.[21] Into the early 21st century, the MLA adapted to persistent enrollment declines—English bachelor's degrees dropped 25% from 2008 to 2018 amid competing STEM priorities—and a further erosion of full-time positions, with Job List data showing a 24% plunge in advertisements from 2007–08 to 2008–09, followed by intermittent recoveries but no return to 1960s peaks.[22][23] Organizational responses included enhanced advocacy for adjunct equity, diversity hiring guidelines issued in the 2000s to address underrepresented groups in language faculties, and integration of digital humanities into conventions by the 2010s, though these measures coincided with membership stagnation around 20,000-25,000 active scholars, underscoring the profession's contraction relative to mid-century highs.[24] Critics of these adaptations highlighted an overemphasis on identity-driven reforms, potentially exacerbating market irrelevance by alienating broader audiences in favor of niche, ideologically charged scholarship.[8]Governance and Leadership
Officers and Executive Council
The officers of the Modern Language Association include the president, first vice president, second vice president, and executive director, who together with the Executive Council hold fiduciary and administrative responsibility for the organization.[25] The president presides over meetings, represents the association publicly, and advances its mission through initiatives aligned with the annual theme. The first and second vice presidents assist in these duties and succeed to the presidency in sequence. As of January 2025, the president is Tina Lu, a professor of East Asian languages and literatures at Yale University, serving through January 2026; the first vice president is Herman Beavers; and the second vice president is Waïl S. Hassan.[25] [26]| Position | Current Officer | Term |
|---|---|---|
| President | Tina Lu | Jan. 2025–Jan. 2026 |
| First Vice President | Herman Beavers | Jan. 2024–Jan. 2025 |
| Second Vice President | Waïl S. Hassan | Jan. 2023–Jan. 2024 |
Decision-Making and Membership Governance
The Modern Language Association's governance structure centers on the Executive Council, which holds fiduciary and administrative authority as the organization's board of directors. Composed of eighteen members—including the president, first vice president, second vice president, executive director (ex officio), and thirteen additional members—the Council oversees operations, approves budgets, and implements policies.[27][25] Members of the Council, excluding officers who ascend through election as second vice president, are directly elected by the general membership via annual fall ballots conducted electronically.[29] Terms for elected Council members last four years, with elections staggered to ensure continuity.[30] Complementing the Council is the Delegate Assembly, a representative body of 298 delegates selected primarily through elections within the MLA's eighty-plus academic forums (divisions focused on specific languages, literatures, or periods), supplemented by representatives from regional associations and allied professional organizations.[31] Forum executive committees nominate and oversee delegate elections among forum members, typically held annually in the fall.[32] The Assembly convenes once yearly during the association's convention, where it receives reports from the Executive Council and staff, debates and votes on resolutions, sets membership dues, and recommends policy actions or amendments to the Council or constitution.[31] Per the MLA Constitution, the Assembly's resolutions generally serve as recommendations to the Council, which retains final implementation authority, though the Assembly holds direct power over dues adjustments.[33][34] Membership, totaling around 20,000 to 25,000 active dues-paying individuals as of recent reports, is categorized into regular (full-time faculty and professionals), student, life, and honorary/fellow classes, with regular and student members holding voting rights in association-wide elections for officers and Council seats.[35] These members also participate in forum activities, enabling indirect influence via delegate selection, though direct voting on operational decisions beyond elections is limited to the representative framework.[36] Committees—standing (e.g., for elections or finance), ad hoc (for specific tasks), and forum executive committees—further support governance by advising the Council or Assembly on specialized issues, with appointments or elections varying by type.[37] In practice, this structure emphasizes centralized Executive Council oversight to maintain administrative efficiency, but it has drawn scrutiny for constraining membership input. For instance, in November 2024, the Council declined to advance a resolution endorsing academic boycott measures to the Delegate Assembly, citing procedural grounds, despite signatures from over 1,000 members and calls from eight former presidents for a vote, highlighting tensions between representative deliberation and leadership discretion.[38][39] Such actions underscore the Council's role in filtering proposals, potentially prioritizing organizational stability over broader membership debate on divisive topics.[40]Core Publications and Standards
MLA Handbook and Citation Style
The MLA Handbook serves as the authoritative guide published by the Modern Language Association for formatting research papers and documenting sources in MLA style, primarily used in humanities disciplines such as literature, language, and cultural studies.[41] It provides standardized rules for in-text citations, works-cited lists, paper structure, and ethical research practices, emphasizing clarity in attributing ideas to avoid plagiarism.[42] First developed to address inconsistencies in scholarly writing, the handbook evolved from earlier MLA style sheets to meet the needs of student and professional writers amid expanding source types like digital media.[43] The handbook's origins trace to an MLA Style Sheet published in 1951, with the first edition of the full MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations appearing in 1977.[44] Subsequent editions refined guidelines: the title shortened to MLA Handbook by the fourth edition in 1995, and major revisions occurred in 2009 (seventh), 2016 (eighth), and 2021 (ninth).[41] The eighth edition, released in 2016, shifted from rigid format-specific rules to a flexible template of core elements—author, title of source, title of container, other contributors, version, number, publisher, publication date, and location—allowing adaptation to diverse media without predefined categories for books, articles, or websites.[45] This model prioritizes the substance of sources over their medium, reflecting changes in publishing like online accessibility.[45] The ninth edition, published April 2021, expands on this framework with clarified core-element applications, where labels like "publisher" adapt contextually (e.g., applying to websites or apps).[46] It introduces detailed in-text citation explanations, including for time-based media and indirect sources, alongside hundreds of sample works-cited entries organized by source type.[46] New chapters cover research paper formatting (e.g., margins, headings, abstracts), using notes for supplementary material, and recommendations for inclusive language in writing, such as avoiding outdated terms while maintaining precision.[46] Updated rules address spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and plagiarism prevention, with emphasis on verifying source credibility in an era of abundant digital content.[46] MLA citation style employs parenthetical in-text references (typically author-page, e.g., (Smith 45)) linked to an alphabetical Works Cited list, distinguishing it from footnote-heavy systems like Chicago by integrating brevity with humanities-focused narrative flow.[47] For works with multiple authors, the first is listed followed by "et al." for three or more; publishers' full names omit business descriptors (e.g., "Inc."); and digital sources include stable URLs or DOIs, with access dates optional unless content is ephemeral.[45] Journal citations specify volume and issue (e.g., vol. 64, no. 1), incorporating seasons if relevant, while omitting publication cities unless ambiguous.[45] These conventions, iteratively updated to accommodate evolving scholarship, underscore MLA's role in standardizing documentation amid format proliferation, though critics note occasional overemphasis on fluidity at the expense of uniformity in rapidly changing digital landscapes.[47]Scholarly Journals Including PMLA
The Publications of the Modern Language Association (PMLA) is the flagship peer-reviewed journal of the Modern Language Association, dedicated to advancing scholarship in modern languages, literatures, and related fields. Established in 1884 with the MLA's founding, it initially appeared as the Transactions and Proceedings of the Modern Language Association of America, encompassing meeting reports, member communications, and early scholarly papers; the title shifted to PMLA starting with volume 4 in 1889 to emphasize original research contributions.[48][10] PMLA publishes four issues annually, featuring essays, book reviews, and special forums selected through a rigorous blind peer-review process for their significance to a wide audience of scholars and teachers. Its editorial policy prioritizes works addressing theoretical, historical, or interpretive aspects of language and literature from the late medieval period onward, with an emphasis on innovative methodologies while maintaining accessibility beyond narrow specializations. Manuscripts are accepted from MLA members, with submissions evaluated by the editorial board and external referees.[49][50] In partnership with Cambridge University Press since 2021, PMLA reaches over 25,000 subscribers, including institutional libraries worldwide, underscoring its status as one of the discipline's premier venues for disseminating research. The journal has evolved to include thematic clusters and digital supplements, adapting to contemporary scholarly practices while upholding standards of evidentiary rigor and argumentative clarity.[51][49] Beyond PMLA, the MLA issues Profession, an annual publication compiling invited and solicited essays on professional matters such as pedagogy, academic labor, and institutional trends in language and literature studies. Though not a traditional research outlet, Profession incorporates scholarly analyses of disciplinary shifts, drawing on empirical data like enrollment surveys to inform practitioner discourse. Other MLA periodicals, including the ADE Bulletin and ADFL Bulletin, target department administrators with practical guidance rather than primary research, distinguishing PMLA as the association's core scholarly journal.[52][53]Programs and Activities
Annual Conventions and Professional Networking
The Modern Language Association's annual convention, first convened in 1883, functions as the premier professional assembly for scholars, teachers, and professionals in modern languages, literatures, and related fields, with attendance growing from 40 participants initially to thousands in later decades.[54] Held each January—such as the 2025 event in New Orleans from 9 to 12 January and the 2026 gathering in Toronto from 8 to 11 January—the convention rotates among major North American cities and emphasizes scholarly exchange through hundreds of sessions, including member-proposed panels, paper presentations, and specialized seminars on topics like language pedagogy, literary criticism, and cultural studies.[55][56] An exhibit hall operates during core days, showcasing books, journals, and resources from academic publishers, which supports direct engagement between attendees and the publishing sector.[57] Professional networking constitutes a core component, facilitated by the convention's scale and structure, where participants connect through informal receptions, allied society meetings, and dedicated events.[58] The Professional Development Hub, introduced in recent years, centralizes career-oriented sessions on topics such as resume building, publication strategies, and interdisciplinary collaboration, explicitly aimed at expanding professional networks and addressing job market challenges in academia. These opportunities extend beyond formal programming, as the convention's concentration of humanities specialists enables serendipitous interactions that often lead to collaborations, mentorships, and project developments.[59] A longstanding tradition involves preliminary interviews for academic job placements, typically conducted in hotel rooms or designated spaces, though the MLA has issued guidelines to ensure ethical practices amid criticisms of inefficiency and inequity, prompting a partial shift to virtual alternatives since the mid-2010s.[60][61] This job market function underscores the convention's role in professional mobility, particularly for graduate students and early-career scholars, despite declining humanities hiring trends that have reduced interview volumes in recent years.[62] Attendance demographics, drawn from attendee surveys, reflect a mix of graduate students (around 24%), faculty, and contingent academics, highlighting the event's utility for diverse career stages.[63] Overall, these elements position the convention as a vital nexus for sustaining disciplinary communities amid evolving academic landscapes.[54]Surveys, Reports, and Advocacy Efforts
The Modern Language Association conducts periodic surveys on enrollments in languages other than English at United States postsecondary institutions, with data collection dating back to 1958.[64] The most recent comprehensive report, covering fall 2021, documented a 16.6% decline in such enrollments compared to fall 2016, marking the steepest drop in the survey's history and reflecting broader trends in reduced humanities course-taking amid competing institutional priorities.[64] [65] These surveys provide granular data by language, institution type, and region, enabling analysis of shifts such as the rise in less-commonly taught languages like Arabic and Chinese despite overall contraction.[66] In parallel, the MLA has tracked PhD job placements in modern languages and literatures since 1977 through questionnaires sent to doctoral-granting programs, revealing persistent challenges in academic hiring.[67] Reports from these surveys, such as those analyzing outcomes for English and foreign language PhDs, highlight low tenure-track placement rates—often below 50% for recent cohorts—and increasing reliance on non-tenure-track positions or alt-ac careers.[68] A 2017 survey of 311 modern language PhD graduates further detailed career trajectories, showing varied satisfaction levels but underscoring the need for better preparation for diverse employment paths beyond academia.[69] The MLA also compiles data from the National Science Foundation's Survey of Earned Doctorates, reporting on trends like stagnant or declining completions in language fields alongside postgraduate plans.[70] Beyond surveys, the MLA issues targeted reports addressing structural issues in language education and professional training. The 2007 Ad Hoc Committee report on foreign languages proposed new departmental models to integrate language study with cultural analysis, responding to curricular fragmentation.[71] A 2014 task force report on doctoral study critiqued extended time-to-degree and recommended reforms like expanded career advising and reduced emphasis on monograph dissertations to align programs with realistic job prospects.[72] More recently, a 2023 committee report on academic freedom documented threats from legislative and institutional pressures, advocating protections for scholarly inquiry amid politicized campus climates.[73] The MLA's advocacy efforts focus on bolstering humanities funding, curriculum preservation, and professional equity, often through coalitions and public statements. It promotes investment in language programs via initiatives like the Strategic Partnership Network, which collaborates with committed institutions to develop resources amid enrollment declines.[74] The MLA Pathways program targets recruitment and retention of underrepresented students, including those of color and first-generation learners, through mentorship and pathway-building grants.[75] In 2022–23, advocacy included media outreach on enrollment data to counter narratives of humanities irrelevance and lobbying against budget cuts, as detailed in the organization's annual report.[76] These activities position the MLA as a proponent of sustained federal and state support for language and literature study, though outcomes remain constrained by broader economic and demographic pressures on higher education.[77]Job Market and Enrollment Data Initiatives
The Modern Language Association (MLA) maintains the MLA Job List, a centralized platform for advertising academic and related positions in language and literature fields, which serves as a primary tool for tracking the humanities job market.[78] Annual reports on the Job List analyze postings from the previous academic year, detailing trends such as total listings, tenure-track versus non-tenure-track positions, and subfield distributions; for instance, the 2023–24 report documented ongoing declines in overall postings, with a focus on shifts toward contingent roles.[20] These initiatives, originating from earlier Job Information List (JIL) analyses dating back decades, highlight persistent challenges like reduced tenure-track opportunities, as evidenced by six consecutive years of declining positions through 2017–18, a pattern continuing into recent cycles amid broader academic hiring contractions.[23] Complementing job market tracking, the MLA conducts periodic surveys on graduate placement outcomes, including data from member departments on hires and career trajectories for PhDs in modern languages and literatures.[79] Historical reports, such as those from the Committee on Professional Employment in the 1980s and 1990s, framed these trends as a "job crisis" linked to overproduction of doctorates relative to available positions, recommending adjustments in graduate program scale without compromising diversity.[80] More recent efforts integrate Job List data with external metrics, such as median earnings for English majors reaching $76,000 at career peak in 2018—comparable to the $78,000 all-college graduate average—while advocating for expanded career preparation beyond academia.[81] On enrollment, the MLA has compiled comprehensive censuses of course registrations in languages other than English (LOTE) since 1958, surveying U.S. higher education institutions every several years to capture undergraduate and graduate trends.[66] The fall 2021 report, the twenty-sixth in the series, recorded a 16.6% decline in total LOTE enrollments from prior peaks, with absolute numbers dropping to levels not seen since the early 2000s despite population growth, attributing part of the shift to reduced institutional offerings in less commonly taught languages.[64] [82] This data, accessible via an online database spanning 1958–2021, informs MLA advocacy for sustained funding and curricular innovation, though analyses note that humanities bachelor's degrees have stabilized federally rather than endlessly declined.[83] [19] These initiatives collectively support MLA's broader programs by providing empirical baselines for professional guidelines, such as recommendations on graduate admissions tied to job prospects, and fuel reports urging investment in language study amid documented enrollment contractions of 9.2% between 2013 and 2016 in earlier cycles.[79] While the data underscore structural pressures like fiscal constraints in higher education, MLA publications emphasize interpretive frames calling for policy responses to preserve field vitality.[84]Controversies and Criticisms
Academic Boycott Proposals Targeting Israel
In January 2014, the MLA Delegate Assembly approved Resolution 2014-1 by a vote of 60 to 53, condemning Israel's denial of entry to U.S. academics invited to the West Bank and Gaza and calling for investigations into such restrictions.[85][86] The resolution did not endorse an academic boycott of Israeli institutions but urged MLA members to "refrain from complicity in the occupation" and oppose collaborations perceived as supporting policies denying academic freedom in Palestinian territories.[87][88] Critics, including the Anti-Defamation League, argued the measure singled out Israel amid broader global academic access issues and risked politicizing the association's focus on literary scholarship.[89] The resolution advanced to a membership ratification vote in spring 2014, receiving 1,560 yes votes to 1,063 no, but failing to meet the required two-thirds threshold for approval due to low overall participation.[90] A separate 2014 proposal explicitly endorsing the academic boycott of Israeli universities, similar to that passed by the American Studies Association, was debated but not forwarded by the Executive Council, citing concerns over academic freedom and the MLA's non-political mandate.[91][92] In June 2017, MLA members ratified an anti-BDS resolution by a wide margin, affirming opposition to academic boycotts that target scholars based on nationality or institutional affiliation and emphasizing collaboration across borders as essential to humanities research.[93] This followed earlier Delegate Assembly discussions where pro-boycott motions, including one citing U.S. support for Israel's policies, were rejected in favor of upholding academic exchange.[94] Proposals resurfaced in late 2024 with Resolution 2025-1, submitted by members urging endorsement of the 2005 Palestinian BDS call, which seeks comprehensive boycotts of Israeli academic institutions until alleged occupation ends.[95][96] The Executive Council reviewed the measure twice that fall and declined to advance it for Delegate Assembly or membership vote, determining it violated bylaws against endorsing political boycotts that impair scholarly exchange.[38][7] Proponents, including groups like Jewish Voice for Peace, contended the decision suppressed debate on academic complicity in alleged human rights issues, while opponents highlighted BDS's aim to isolate Israeli scholars regardless of individual views, potentially conflicting with MLA principles of open inquiry.[28][97] These episodes reflect ongoing tensions within the MLA between advocacy for Palestinian academic access and commitments to universal academic freedom, with leadership consistently rejecting full BDS alignment amid broader academic debates where pro-boycott resolutions have succeeded in fewer than 10% of U.S. scholarly associations surveyed.[98]Broader Politicization and Ideological Biases
The Modern Language Association has drawn criticism for exhibiting a pronounced left-wing ideological bias, manifested in its programming, leadership priorities, and resistance to empirical realities confronting the humanities. Observers contend that since the 1960s, the organization has shifted from emphasizing literary scholarship toward activism centered on race, gender, class, and cultural radicalism, with figures like 1971 president Louis Kampf exemplifying a view of literature as mere diversion rather than a pursuit of truth or moral insight.[99] This orientation aligns with broader patterns in academia, where progressive ideologies dominate, often sidelining dissenting or traditionalist perspectives in favor of theoretical frameworks that prioritize identity politics over textual analysis.[100] Annual conventions exemplify this politicization, featuring panels laden with jargon-heavy topics disconnected from canonical works or public appeal, such as "Queer OS: Queerness as Operating System" and "The Libidinal Economy of Data" at the 2015 Chicago meeting, alongside longstanding forums like the Radical Caucus and "Politics and the Profession" subgroup.[100] Sessions on "Queer Space" and "Feminist Criticism" have proliferated, as seen in the 1994 San Diego convention with over 800 panels attended by 9,000 members, often integrating political debates into curricula at the expense of literary focus—exemplified by proposals like Gerald Graff's "Teaching the Political Conflicts."[99] Critics argue this reflects an aggressive infusion of leftist politics, including defenses of figures like Joseph Stalin in discussions and symbolic endorsements such as hammer-and-sickle pins, fostering an environment where ideological conformity trumps scholarly pluralism.[100] Such biases have contributed to the MLA's failure to address verifiable declines in the field, including a 60% drop in Yale English majors from 1991 to 2012 and broader humanities enrollment shortfalls, which the organization attributes to external factors rather than introspecting on its jargon-impenetrable output or politicized irrelevance to non-academic audiences.[100] While the MLA's 31,000 members include diverse voices, the dominance of progressive agendas—evident in repeated Delegate Assembly debates on geopolitical issues like BDS alignments from 2013 to 2015—has led to accusations of anti-democratic suppression of debate and a departure from the association's founding mission of advancing language and literature studies.[99][100] This pattern underscores systemic left-leaning tilts in humanities institutions, where empirical data on student disinterest is subordinated to ideological imperatives.Criticisms of Organizational Priorities and Style Standards
Critics contend that the Modern Language Association has increasingly prioritized ideological advocacy and identity-based initiatives over its foundational mission of advancing the study and teaching of languages and literatures. At annual conventions, panels dominated by topics in feminist theory, queer studies, race, and critiques of imperialism have drawn large audiences, often displacing discussions of canonical texts and traditional scholarship in favor of cultural and political analysis. Roger Kimball, in a 1995 assessment of the organization's trajectory, observed that literary works by authors like Joseph Conrad and Willa Cather were reduced to vehicles for pop anthropology, reflecting a broader "displacement of literature by Sixties-derived radical politics."[99] This shift, critics argue, stems from causal dynamics in humanities academia, where institutional incentives reward politicized methodologies, leading the MLA to allocate resources—such as convention programming and advocacy efforts—to social justice themes rather than empirical literary research or professional development in core disciplines. The MLA's emphasis on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies has also elicited rebuke for overshadowing merit-based scholarship. A 2019 MLA statement affirmed commitments to diverse membership and leadership processes, yet detractors, aware of pervasive left-leaning biases in academic institutions, view such priorities as reinforcing echo chambers that marginalize dissenting or traditionalist perspectives. For example, in 2024, Aaron Koller criticized the MLA for aligning with activist narratives on contentious geopolitical issues, actively suppressing debate by rejecting protections for opposing views at delegate assemblies, and urged the organization to refocus on neutral standards like style guidelines instead of ideological interventions.[101][102] These priorities, opponents claim, contribute to declining humanities enrollments and job markets by alienating potential scholars uninterested in mandatory politicization. Regarding style standards, revisions to the MLA Handbook have been faulted for compromising scholarly precision in pursuit of broader accessibility and cultural alignment. The eighth edition (2016) provoked backlash from essayist Joseph Epstein, who decried its reintroduction of mandatory abbreviations (e.g., "vol." and "pp."), omission of basic paper-formatting instructions like margins and fonts, and relaxation of citation details such as publisher cities—changes he characterized as a "disservice to students and a potential disaster for scholars," mirroring lax student habits rather than upholding rigorous conventions.[103] The ninth edition (2021) further incorporated a dedicated chapter on inclusive language principles, recommending avoidance of terms deemed biased by contemporary standards (e.g., promoting singular "they" and gender-neutral phrasing), which the MLA presents as enhancing equity in writing.[104] However, in an academic environment rife with progressive norms, such guidance has been critiqued as subtly enforcing ideological conformity under the guise of neutrality, potentially biasing citation practices toward favored social frameworks without empirical justification for their superiority in scholarly communication.Affiliated and Related Organizations
Regional Language Associations
The Modern Language Association affiliates with six independent regional associations dedicated to fostering scholarship, teaching, and professional development in modern languages and literatures within specific geographic areas of the United States. These organizations host annual conferences, sponsor sessions on regional academic interests, and provide platforms for faculty, graduate students, and independent scholars to present research, often complementing the national scope of the MLA by addressing local pedagogical and cultural contexts. Membership in these groups is typically open to MLA members and others in the field, with activities including paper presentations, workshops, and awards for outstanding scholarship.[105] The affiliates are:- Midwest Modern Language Association (MMLA), covering midwestern states such as Illinois, Indiana, and Michigan; founded in 1959, it emphasizes interdisciplinary approaches to literature and language studies through its annual convention.[106]
- Northeast Modern Language Association (NeMLA), serving the northeastern U.S. and Canada; established in 1967, it is the largest affiliate with over 2,000 members and focuses on comparative literature, cultural studies, and digital humanities via themed conventions.[107]
- Pacific Ancient and Modern Language Association (PAMLA), representing the Pacific Coast region; originating in 1899 as the Philological Association of the Pacific Coast, it promotes research in ancient and modern languages, literatures, and cultures.[108]
- Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association (RMMLA), encompassing Rocky Mountain and southwestern states; formed in 1947, it operates as one of six regional branches, organizing conferences on topics like rhetoric and ethnic literatures.[107]
- South Atlantic Modern Language Association (SAMLA), for the southeastern U.S.; dating to 1928, it facilitates sessions on southern literatures, linguistics, and pedagogy at its annual meetings.[109]
- South Central Modern Language Association (SCMLA), serving south-central states; established in 1948, it supports diverse scholarly presentations in English, foreign languages, and folklore.[109]