Hubbry Logo
PneumoencephalographyPneumoencephalographyMain
Open search
Pneumoencephalography
Community hub
Pneumoencephalography
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Pneumoencephalography
Pneumoencephalography
Pneumoencephalography
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Pneumoencephalography
Pneumoencephalography
ICD-9-CM87.01
MeSHD011011

Pneumoencephalography (sometimes abbreviated PEG; also referred to as an "air study") was a common medical procedure in which most of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was drained from around the brain by means of a lumbar puncture and replaced with air, oxygen, or helium to allow the structure of the brain to show up more clearly on an X-ray image. It was derived from ventriculography, an earlier and more primitive method in which the air is injected through holes drilled in the skull.

The procedure was introduced in 1919 by the American neurosurgeon Walter Dandy[1] and was performed extensively until the late 1970s, when it was replaced by more-sophisticated and less-invasive modern neuroimaging techniques.

Procedure

[edit]

Though pneumoencephalography was the single most important way of localizing brain lesions of its time, it was nevertheless overly painful and generally not well tolerated by conscious patients. Pneumoencephalography was associated with a wide range of side effects, including headaches and severe vomiting, often lasting well past the procedure.[2] During the study, the patient's entire body would be rotated into different positions in order to allow air to displace the CSF in different areas of the ventricular system and around the brain. The patient would be strapped into an open-backed chair, which allowed the spinal needle to be inserted, and they would need to be secured well, for they would be turned upside down at times during the procedure and then somersaulted into a face-down position in a specific order to follow the air to different areas in the ventricles. This further added to the patient's already heightened level of discomfort (if not anesthetized). A related procedure is pneumomyelography, in which gas is used similarly to investigate the spinal canal. [citation needed]

Limitations

[edit]

Pneumoencephalography makes use of plain X-ray images. These are very poor at resolving soft tissues, such as the brain. Moreover, all the structures captured in the image are superimposed on top of each other, which makes it difficult to pick out individual items of interest (unlike modern scanners, which are able to produce fine virtual slices of the body, including of soft tissues). Therefore, pneumoencephalography did not usually image abnormalities directly; rather, their secondary effects. The overall structure of the brain contains crevices and cavities that are filled by the CSF. Both the brain and the CSF produce similar signals on an X-ray image. However, draining the CSF allows for greater contrast between the brain matter and the (now drained) crevices in and around it, which then show up as dark shadows on the X-ray image. The aim of pneumoencephalography is to outline these shadow-forming air-filled structures so that their shape and anatomical location can be examined. Following the procedure, an experienced radiologist reviews the X-ray films to see if the shape or location of these structures have been distorted or shifted by the presence of certain kinds of lesions. This also means that in order to show up on the images, lesions have to either be located right on the edge of the structures or if located elsewhere in the brain, be large enough to push on surrounding healthy tissues to an extent necessary to cause a distortion in the shape of the more distant air-filled cavities (and hence more-distant tumors detected this way tended to be fairly large). [citation needed]

Despite its overall usefulness, there were major portions of the brain and other structures of the head that pneumoencephalography was unable to image. This was partially compensated by increased use of angiography as a complementary diagnostic tool, often in an attempt to infer the condition of non-neurovascular pathology from its secondary vascular characteristics. This additional testing was not without risk, though, particularly due to the rudimentary catheterization techniques and deleterious radiocontrast agents of the day. Another drawback of pneumoencephalography was that the risk and discomfort it carried meant that repeat studies were generally avoided, thus making it difficult to assess disease progression over time. [citation needed]

Current use

[edit]

Modern imaging techniques such as MRI and CT have rendered pneumoencephalography obsolete.[3] Widespread clinical use of diagnostic tools using these newer technologies began in the mid-to-late 1970s. These revolutionized the field of neuroimaging by not only being able to non-invasively examine all parts of the brain and its surrounding tissues, but also by doing so in much greater detail than previously available with plain X-rays, therefore making it possible to directly visualize and precisely localize soft-tissue abnormalities inside the skull. This led to significantly improved patient outcomes while reducing discomfort.[4] Today, pneumoencephalography is limited to the research field and is used under rare circumstances [citation needed].

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Pneumoencephalography

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Pneumoencephalography is an obsolete diagnostic imaging procedure in which air is introduced into the spaces surrounding the brain, either via or direct ventricular injection, to replace and provide contrast for visualizing ventricular and subarachnoid structures on plain radiographs. Developed by American neurosurgeon Walter E. Dandy in 1918 as ventriculography (direct ventricular air injection) and refined in 1919 as pneumoencephalography (via approach), the technique was inspired by observations of accidental and aimed to outline brain anatomy non-surgically. The procedure involved withdrawing through a needle insertion—typically at the spine or, in earlier methods, via a burr in the —and injecting an equivalent volume of air, with patients manipulated into various positions (such as tilting on a table or using specialized "somersaulting" chairs in later refinements) to distribute the air through the for optimal imaging. It was widely employed from the 1920s through the mid-20th century to diagnose conditions like brain tumors, , , and even neuropsychiatric disorders such as , where enlarged ventricles were observed in a significant proportion of cases (e.g., up to 68% in some studies). German physician Adolf Bingel is credited as a co-inventor for advancing the pneumoencephalography variant, and the method occasionally served therapeutic purposes, such as alleviating symptoms in or by reducing . Despite its diagnostic utility, which improved tumor detection rates by approximately 33% compared to plain skull X-rays, pneumoencephalography was notoriously invasive and distressing, frequently causing severe side effects including intense headaches (in up to 80% of cases), , , , , diaphoresis, and transient neurological deficits. More serious risks encompassed intracranial hypotension, herniation (particularly in patients with elevated ), hemorrhage, and reported mortality rates ranging from 0.25% to 3%, though some historical accounts indicated up to 30%, with higher complications in children and those with posterior fossa lesions. By the 1950s, began supplanting it for vascular assessments, but pneumoencephalography's definitive obsolescence occurred in the mid-1970s following the introduction of computed tomography (CT) in 1971, which offered non-invasive, higher-resolution brain imaging without the associated morbidity. (MRI) in the 1980s further rendered such air-contrast methods unnecessary, marking the end of an era in that bridged and early diagnostic imaging.

History

Invention and Early Development

Pneumoencephalography was developed independently in 1919 by American neurosurgeon Walter E. Dandy at in , , and German physician Adolf Bingel. This technique built directly on Dandy's earlier development of ventriculography in 1918, which involved direct injection of air into the cerebral ventricles through surgical burr holes to enhance visualization of these structures. The primary purpose of pneumoencephalography was to provide a non-surgical method for visualizing the cerebral ventricles and subarachnoid spaces by replacing (CSF) with air, which served as a radiopaque under imaging. Unlike ventriculography, which required invasive needling directly into the ventricles and was limited to outlining ventricular contours, pneumoencephalography achieved broader coverage of intracranial spaces through indirect injection of air into the via , allowing air to rise and fill the basal cisterns, ventricles, and convexity subarachnoid areas. Dandy's and Bingel's early experiments culminated in the first successful human applications of pneumoencephalography in 1919, where the technique demonstrated air effectively outlining both normal structures and abnormalities, such as those associated with tumors and , thereby aiding preoperative localization. These initial cases, detailed in Dandy's seminal publication, marked a significant advancement in noninvasive diagnostics at the time, though the method remained confined to experimental use until broader clinical adoption in the 1920s.

Adoption and Widespread Use

Following its independent development by Walter Dandy and Adolf Bingel in 1919, pneumoencephalography saw rapid adoption across and the during the 1920s, becoming a standard diagnostic tool for visualizing the and subarachnoid spaces via air injection through . In the , the technique was quickly integrated into neurosurgical practices at leading institutions, while in , Austrian neurologist Arthur Schüller played a key role in its dissemination through influential publications that demonstrated its utility in identifying space-occupying lesions. By the mid-1920s, refinements emerged to enhance safety and efficacy, including the substitution of air with oxygen or to minimize patient discomfort and improve radiographic contrast, as these gases were absorbed more readily by the body. The procedure reached its peak clinical application from to the , during which it was routinely employed worldwide for diagnosing a range of neurological disorders, particularly in neurosurgical settings where it facilitated preoperative planning. In , early adoption occurred in 1924 at the Vittorio Emanuele III Institute in , with Mario Bertolotti advancing techniques through detailed radiographic studies published in the , followed by further refinements in by Arturo Besta and colleagues who advocated minimal gas volumes for safer injections. By the , pneumoencephalography was often combined with —introduced by Egas Moniz in 1927—to provide complementary visualization of vascular structures alongside ventricular outlines, enhancing diagnostic accuracy for complex intracranial pathologies. At major centers like the , where was formalized in 1928, pneumoencephalography became a routine procedure integral to evaluating conditions such as brain and , contributing to foundational insights into ventricular dilation and tissue displacement patterns. Studies from this era at such institutions highlighted how the technique revealed enlarged ventricles in cases and widened subarachnoid spaces indicative of , aiding in the differentiation of obstructive from non-obstructive processes. This widespread integration underscored pneumoencephalography's role as a cornerstone of mid-20th-century until more advanced imaging modalities emerged.

Indications and Diagnostic Value

Targeted Conditions

Pneumoencephalography was primarily indicated for the diagnosis of , where it revealed ventricular enlargement through the displacement and distension of air-filled spaces visible on imaging. This technique allowed clinicians to identify abnormal accumulation of fluid within the by contrasting air against brain tissue, providing critical evidence for surgical interventions like shunting. Similarly, it targeted brain tumors by demonstrating mass effects, such as the compression or shifting of ventricles and sulci due to tumor growth, which aided in preoperative localization and planning. The procedure was also employed to detect cerebral atrophy in conditions like dementia and chronic alcoholism, manifesting as widened sulci and increased subarachnoid spaces filled with air. In dementia, such as , pneumoencephalography highlighted cortical thinning and ventricular dilation, offering an early in vivo method to assess neurodegenerative changes. For chronic alcoholism, studies of patients with prolonged heavy intake showed consistent increases in cerebrospinal fluid spaces across cases, attributing atrophy to toxic effects of alcohol. In epilepsy, it facilitated localization of structural anomalies, such as or focal lesions, by revealing asymmetries in ventricular contours that correlated with epileptogenic zones. During the 1940s and 1950s, pneumoencephalography found significant application in , particularly for and depression, where enlarged ventricles and cortical were assessed to inform treatment decisions, including prefrontal . In , air-contrast imaging demonstrated and sulcal widening, suggesting underlying brain volume loss that influenced surgical candidacy. The diagnostic mechanism relied on indirect signs of —such as , compression, or dilation of air-distended spaces—to infer mass effects or degenerative processes without direct visualization of lesions.

Advantages Over Contemporary Methods

Pneumoencephalography represented a significant advancement over plain X-rays, which were limited to visualizing bony structures, calcifications, and only advanced intracranial lesions, often failing to detect early or subtle abnormalities within the . By introducing air as a into the spaces via , the technique provided clear delineation of ventricular contours and subarachnoid spaces, enabling the identification of mass effects, , or displacements that were invisible on non-contrast radiographs. This improvement significantly enhanced the detection rate of intracranial tumors, increasing it by approximately 33% over plain X-rays and allowing visualization of nearly all tumors compared to about one-third with clinical examination and plain X-rays, fundamentally enhancing the precision of neurological assessments in the pre-computed era. In contrast to the era's reliance on exploratory craniotomy for lesion confirmation, pneumoencephalography offered a relatively non-invasive diagnostic pathway, obviating the need for immediate surgical intervention solely to localize pathology and thereby mitigating perioperative risks such as infection, hemorrhage, and anesthesia complications. Prior to its introduction, surgical exploration carried high mortality rates, particularly for conditions like hydrocephalus where blockages could only be inferred clinically; pneumoencephalography permitted precise identification of obstructive sites, transforming surgical planning and reducing overall operative hazards. This shift was pivotal in the 1920s, as it empowered neurosurgeons to select patients more accurately and intervene with greater confidence, ultimately lowering mortality from procedures that previously exceeded 50% in certain pathologies. Compared to its predecessor, ventriculography—developed by Walter Dandy in 1918—which required direct ventricular puncture through burr holes and was confined to imaging the , pneumoencephalography extended visualization to extra-ventricular regions including the basal cisterns and cortical sulci. Performed through lumbar injection, it minimized cranial trauma and associated risks like , while distributing air more broadly to outline the brain's silhouette against surrounding structures. This broader anatomical coverage proved invaluable for detecting lesions in non-ventricular locations, such as supratentorial tumors or atrophic changes, which ventriculography could overlook. The clinical impact of these advantages was profound, facilitating earlier detection of subtle abnormalities like ventricular enlargement in or tumor-induced shifts, which improved neurosurgical outcomes from the 1920s onward by enabling timely interventions and reducing diagnostic uncertainty. Widely adopted in neurosurgical centers, the procedure not only refined localization accuracy but also supported conservative management in non-surgical cases, marking a cornerstone in the evolution of diagnostic despite its inherent procedural discomforts.

Procedure

Preparation and Patient Management

Pneumoencephalography was primarily indicated for adults and older children with suspected intracranial pathologies, including tumors (such as sellar or suprasellar lesions), , cerebral atrophy, arteriovenous malformations, post-traumatic scars, and other neurological diseases that required visualization of ventricular and subarachnoid spaces. Patient selection emphasized those with clinical signs of space-occupying lesions or circulation obstruction, aiming to confirm diagnostic suspicions like tumor presence through air-contrast outlining of brain structures. Contraindications encompassed increased (due to herniation risk), active skin or soft tissue infections at the site, and bleeding disorders or coagulopathies that heightened hemorrhage potential during needle insertion. Pre-procedure preparation involved for at least 12 hours to reduce aspiration risks, particularly under or . with barbiturates, such as 0.10 g of administered one hour prior, was standard for procedures under to alleviate anxiety and discomfort. For nervous, semi-conscious, or pediatric patients, general was employed, often with like atropine and ; in cases of significant intracranial (e.g., exceeding 2 diopters), preliminary decompression via bilateral occipital burr holes was performed a few hours beforehand. A thorough baseline was conducted to evaluate mental status, reflexes, and signs of elevated pressure, while was obtained, underscoring the procedure's intense discomfort, including anticipated headaches and . Equipment setup required a sterile field for , utilizing specialized needles like the Stentrom model with a double stopcock for controlled withdrawal and air introduction, alongside an ordinary 10 cc serving as the air source (typically room air or oxygen from a ). The apparatus, including capabilities, was arranged in a darkened room to optimize image capture during positioning maneuvers, with additional tools such as a spinal fluid manometer for pressure monitoring. Initial positioning for lumbar access was typically sitting, with the patient seated upright and the head resting on a padded support like a pillow atop a table, slightly flexed forward, and the orbito-meatal line tilted 10°–20° to the horizontal for optimal spinal alignment. Alternatively, the lateral decubitus position was used if sitting was not tolerated, ensuring spinal flexion to widen intervertebral spaces; for posterior fossa evaluation, the head was gently extended backward while seated to facilitate air entry into basal cisterns.

Execution and Imaging Process

The execution of pneumoencephalography commenced with a , typically performed at the L3-L4 interspace using a 20- to 22-gauge needle inserted into the subarachnoid space while the patient was positioned sitting or lying on their side. Approximately 5-10 ml of (CSF) was first withdrawn to reduce , followed by the slow injection of an equivalent volume of room air to replace the drained CSF. This exchange was repeated incrementally, with 5-10 ml of air introduced per step, totaling 30-50 ml of air to achieve adequate filling of the and subarachnoid spaces without excessive pressure buildup. To distribute the air into targeted regions such as the , , basal cisterns, and convexity sulci, the patient was secured to a tilting fluoroscopic table or rotating chair and maneuvered through a series of positions. Initial filling often occurred in the upright or semi-upright position to allow air to rise into the ventricles; subsequent rotations included brow-down (for basal cisterns), lateral decubitus (to fill temporal horns), , and full 360-degree somersaults to facilitate air migration across the . These manipulations were performed gradually over the course of the procedure to minimize patient discomfort and ensure optimal air distribution. Radiographic imaging was conducted concurrently with the positional changes using conventional equipment under fluoroscopic guidance. Multiple views were captured, including anteroposterior (AP), lateral, and oblique projections, typically totaling 6-12 exposures to outline the ventricular contours and subarachnoid spaces comprehensively. The entire process, including injections, rotations, and imaging, generally lasted 30-60 minutes, with continuous monitoring of (such as and ) and neurological status to detect signs of distress like or .

Risks and Limitations

Physiological Complications

Pneumoencephalography commonly induced severe headaches due to meningeal irritation caused by the introduction of air into the subarachnoid space, affecting approximately 78-80% of patients and often persisting for 24-72 hours. Nausea and vomiting, resulting from transient changes in during air injection and withdrawal, occurred in about 34% of cases and typically peaked within 4-6 hours post-procedure before subsiding. Additional frequent symptoms included in 34% and in 74% of patients, reflecting the procedure's irritative effects on the . More serious physiological risks involved seizures, triggered by air emboli or direct cortical irritation from the air-CSF interface, with increased frequency observed in epileptic patients undergoing the procedure. Brainstem herniation is a rare but potentially fatal complication arising from acute intracranial pressure elevations. More broadly, post-procedure altered consciousness occurred in up to 18% of cases and abnormal neurological signs in 30%. Pneumocephalus, the accumulation of air within the cranial cavity, further heightened the risk of herniation and contributed to overall morbidity. Mortality rates in later series ranged from 0.15% to 1%, particularly in children as evidenced by a 0.15% rate in a series of 1334 pediatric cases, primarily attributed to these pressure-related events, though earlier reports documented rates as high as 3% in diagnostic contexts. Post-procedure management focused on supportive care to mitigate symptoms, including strict in a semi-upright position to facilitate air resorption, adequate hydration, and administration of analgesics such as opioids or for relief. Patients required close neurological monitoring for at least 7 days, with symptoms generally resolving within several days as the air was absorbed. Exacerbating factors included the injection of larger air volumes or rapid , which intensified spikes and heightened the likelihood of herniation or seizures.

Technical and Practical Constraints

Pneumoencephalography relied on plain radiographs to visualize air introduced into the spaces, which provided only basic silhouette contrasts of the and subarachnoid spaces, limiting its utility for detecting fine details or small lesions. This imaging approach was inherently constrained by the low resolution of early technology, which could not delineate subtle parenchymal abnormalities or small tumors beyond gross mass effects on ventricular contours. A key technical drawback was the incomplete filling of cerebral spaces with air, as the gas often failed to adequately distribute into peripheral structures such as the temporal horns of the , leading to obscured or partial visualizations. Achieving sufficient air distribution required precise patient positioning and multiple injections, but even then, consistent opacification of all ventricular components was challenging due to anatomical variations and gas , often necessitating repeated attempts that were impractical. Practically, the procedure was time-intensive, compounded by the need for specialized equipment like tilting tables or chairs to facilitate gas movement. Operator skill was critical for reproducible results, as variations in technique—such as the rate of withdrawal and replacement—directly influenced image quality and air dispersion, making the method dependent on experienced neuroradiologists. The cumulative patient discomfort from air injection and positional maneuvers created a significant barrier to , rendering serial pneumoencephalography studies rare despite potential clinical needs for follow-up assessments.

Decline and Legacy

Replacement by Modern Techniques

The introduction of computed tomography (CT) in 1971 by Godfrey Hounsfield marked a pivotal shift in , providing direct cross-sectional imaging of soft tissues without the need for invasive air contrast or patient discomfort associated with pneumoencephalography. This non-invasive technique utilized X-rays and computer reconstruction to generate detailed images of structures, rapidly reducing reliance on pneumoencephalography by offering safer visualization of ventricles and pathologies. The first commercial CT scanner, the Mark I, installed in 1973, accelerated this transition, with institutions like the reporting a sharp decline in pneumoencephalography procedures, dropping to near zero by late 1975. The advent of (MRI) in the early 1980s further solidified the obsolescence of pneumoencephalography, providing superior multiplanar views of brain anatomy with excellent soft-tissue contrast and no exposure. Clinical MRI systems became available around 1983, enabling repeatable studies without the physiological risks or technical limitations of earlier methods like pneumoencephalography's poor soft-tissue differentiation. By 1980, pneumoencephalography had been largely abandoned in routine practice, as CT and emerging MRI offered higher resolution and eliminated the need for patient rotation, spinal taps, and air . These modern techniques transformed diagnostic workflows in , prioritizing and efficiency while delivering unprecedented anatomical detail for conditions previously assessed via pneumoencephalography. The combined impact of CT and MRI not only rendered pneumoencephalography obsolete but also expanded the scope of non-invasive brain imaging, establishing standards for contemporary practice.

Historical and Ethical Significance

Pneumoencephalography, introduced by American neurosurgeon Walter Dandy in 1919, pioneered indirect by allowing visualization of ventricles and subarachnoid spaces through air injection replacing , thereby advancing early 20th-century understanding of anatomy beyond plain radiographs. This technique facilitated precise localization of lesions such as tumors and , enhancing preoperative planning in and increasing diagnostic accuracy by approximately 33% in relevant cases. Its refinements, including positional imaging and reduced air volumes by pioneers like Erik Lysholm and Cornelius Dyke, contributed to seminal works like The Normal Encephalogram, which mapped normal structures and influenced neurosurgical practices until the advent of computed tomography in the 1970s. The procedure's ethical concerns arose prominently from its severe patient suffering, often described in historical accounts as intensely painful and akin to due to the excruciating headaches, , and meningeal irritation induced by air introduction into the spaces. Common side effects included headaches in 80% of cases, in 34%, and in 34%, with high rates of complications and a ranging from 0.25% to 3%, leading to its condemnation as poorly tolerated even in its era. In the and , pneumoencephalography was controversially employed in pre-lobotomy assessments for psychiatric conditions like , where it aimed to identify ventricular enlargement as evidence of organic brain pathology to justify psychosurgical interventions, exacerbating ethical dilemmas around and the exploitation of vulnerable patients in an era lacking modern safeguards. From a modern perspective, pneumoencephalography exemplifies a critical in , illustrating the tension between innovative diagnostic imperatives and the imperative to minimize harm, particularly in where it was used to pathologize conditions like autism and even based on flawed anatomical interpretations. Its legacy underscores the evolution of (IRB) oversight, with any rare contemporary research revivals—such as historical imaging analyses—confined to strict ethical protocols prohibiting direct patient exposure. Culturally, the procedure has been immortalized in neurology's historical narratives and popular media, including its harrowing depiction in the 1973 film as a diagnostic tool for possession-like symptoms, highlighting the pre-digital era's reliance on invasive methods and serving as a in neuroethical discourse.

References

  1. https://radiopaedia.org/articles/pneumoencephalography?lang=us
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7966158/
  3. https://thejns.org/focus/view/journals/neurosurg-focus/43/3/article-pE10.xml
  4. https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/141/3/927/4840595
  5. https://thejns.org/view/journals/j-neurosurg/131/4/article-p1046.xml
  6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7610248/
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1410386/
  8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8185586/
  9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/pneumoencephalography
  10. https://www.ajnr.org/content/ajnr/17/4/721.full.pdf
  11. https://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196%2811%2963453-8/abstract
  12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780443028182500116
  13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123851574008630
  14. https://www.arquivosdeneuropsiquiatria.org/article/brain-atrophies-in-chronic-alcoholism-pneumoencephalographic-study/
  15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4158257/
  16. https://www.americanscientist.org/article/the-early-years-of-brain-imaging
  17. https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiographics.5.4.553
  18. https://ia801506.us.archive.org/7/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.114817/2015.114817.Neurosurgical-Techniques_text.pdf
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5454085/
  20. https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/81.3.495
  21. https://thejns.org/view/journals/j-neurosurg/36/1/article-p50.xml
  22. https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11969.x
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC494289/
  24. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/985029/
  25. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/archneurpsyc/articlepdf/651150/archneurpsyc_65_4_004.pdf
  26. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430925/
  27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1064968917300685
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10644676/
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8555965/
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9199974/
  31. https://www.siemens-healthineers.com/perspectives/history-of-mri
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.