Hubbry Logo
Pre-orderPre-orderMain
Open search
Pre-order
Community hub
Pre-order
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Pre-order
Pre-order
Pre-order
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A pre-order is an order placed for an item that has not yet been released. The idea for pre-orders came because people found it hard to get popular items in stores because of their popularity. Companies then had the idea to allow customers to reserve their personal copy before its release, which has been a huge success.

Pre-orders allow consumers to guarantee immediate shipment on release, manufacturers can gauge how much demand there will be and thus the size of initial production runs, and sellers can be assured of minimum sales. Additionally, high pre-order rates can be used to increase sales further.

Pre-order incentive

[edit]

Pre-order incentive, also known as pre-order bonus, is a marketing tactic in which a retailer or manufacturer/publisher of a product (usually a book[1] or video game) encourages buyers to reserve a copy of the product at the store prior to its release.

Reasons vary, but typically, publishers wish to ensure strong initial sales for a product, and the offered incentive is used to induce shoppers who might otherwise wait for positive reviews or a specific shopping period, like the holiday season, to commit to a purchase. Having paid for part or all of the purchase when placing the order, the consumers will usually complete the transaction shortly after the product's release, often on its first day in stores. Individual stores or retail chains may also offer bonuses for a popularly anticipated product to ensure that the customer chooses to buy at that location, rather than from a competitor.

The pre-order bonus may be as simple as a discount on the item's purchase price or other related merchandise, another marketing strategy, or it may be an actual item or set of items. The items may be related merchandise or exclusive items available only through the pre-order program.[2]

In video games

[edit]

Until around 2000, the primary distribution method for video games were through physical media such as CD-ROMs, DVDs, or game cartridges, including packaging and instruction manuals. Preparing enough copies for vendors to purchase and sell to consumers on the release day required a significant amount of market forecasting. Episodes in the industry's past, such as the 1983 video game crash, had made publishers wary of producing in great excess to avoid the situation that led to the Atari video game burial. On the other hand, having too few copies available at the game's launch can lead to consumer dissatisfaction.

Retailers like GameStop and Amazon.com discovered in the early 2000s that the pre-ordering mechanism helped with forecasts, as they could order a reasonable number of copies of new games based on pre-order interest, which, in turn, helped publishers to determine how many physical units to create. Then, pre-orders were usually placed by providing the vendor with a small percentage of the game's cost to hold their reservation (such as $5 or $10 on a $50 game), with assurances they would receive their copy on release day after paying the remaining balance. [citation needed] Retailers would be able to use pre-order money towards other investments, effectively accruing some interest on the pre-order fee.[3]

As the video game market grew with some widely popular series like Call of Duty and Grand Theft Auto, publishers would prepare by printing large runs of the games and having them ready to ship to retailers so that even consumers who failed to pre-order would likely be able to get a copy within a day or two of release, negating the primary drivers to pre-order. Furthermore, digital distribution eliminated the need for retail versions started to take off, as there is effectively no fixed volume of digital copies.[4]

Then, publishers and retailers started to turn to other methods to encourage pre-orders. Publishers created limited edition packages that would include additional physical items with the game, such as art books, soundtrack CDs, or figurines of the game's characters. Such editions would be published only in limited numbers encouraging consumers to pre-order early to reserve one. Retailers made deals with publishers to allow for unique content for the game that could be obtained only by pre-orders through that vendor.[4]

Pre-ordering is a part of most major releases but is now a significant point of contention. Some consumers believe pre-ordering to be a waste and do not believe that any kind of incentive is truly worth a marked up price of sometimes over twice the original price for certain digital in-game pre-order bonuses, which may be released as free downloadable content sometime later after the game's original release.[2][4] Others have pointed out that with the pre-ordering process, publishers can effectively assure a sale of the game to those consumers and so can release the game in an unfinished state or missing certain features to that captive audience, but without pre-orders, critical reviews of a game released in such a state would have harmed their sales.[3] That itself then leads to issues of promotion and marketing of how to sell a game as to gain pre-orders, which can lead to some potentially deceptive practices.[5] In some cases, a game can be significantly delayed or even canceled, making the pre-ordering process useless.[6]

In most cases, a pre-order can be refunded to the purchaser prior to release. However, Nintendo has a policy for digital pre-orders that does not allow such refunds. Consumer authorities in Germany and Norway took Nintendo to court in 2019, arguing this practice violated the Consumer Rights Directive 2011 for the European Union. The court ruled in January 2020 that Nintendo's practice does not violate the directive, though the German consumer authority does plan to appeal the ruling.[7][needs update]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Pre-order

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
In , a (or quasiorder) is a on a set that is reflexive—every element is related to itself—and transitive—if one element relates to a second and the second to a third, then the first relates to the third—but lacks the antisymmetry required of partial orders, allowing distinct elements to relate mutually without equality. generalize partial orders by permitting such equivalences, which induce a natural where elements are identified if mutually comparable, yielding a structure that is a (poset). This framework underpins key results in , such as the extension of preorders to linear orders via or choice principles, and finds applications in (as preordered sets model approach relations), (where preorders enrich categories without strict identities), and (modeling preferences without indifference resolution). Unlike stricter orders, preorders accommodate "thick" relations tolerant of approximations or tolerances, as seen in resource theories or finite approximations.

Definition and Fundamentals

Core Concept

A pre-order constitutes a commercial transaction wherein a buyer commits to acquiring a product, typically via partial or full upfront , prior to the item's manufacture, release, or general availability. This mechanism enables sellers to secure customer interest for forthcoming goods, often specifying estimated delivery timelines to manage expectations. Unlike reservations, which generally involve no financial commitment and serve merely to hold a spot without , pre-orders bind the buyer through monetary deposit or charge authorization, thereby creating enforceable demand signals. In contrast, backorders pertain to delays for products already released but temporarily out of stock, without the anticipatory production alignment characteristic of pre-orders. Central to pre-orders are elements such as advance collection, which secures product allocation amid potential , and the provision of delivery estimates to mitigate fulfillment uncertainties. This differs fundamentally from conventional retail paradigms, where production precedes stocking and sales occur from existing , exposing producers to overproduction risks absent confirmed . By requiring commitment before availability, pre-orders facilitate precise demand gauging, allowing manufacturers to calibrate output and minimize excess , while streamlining supply chains through buyer-funded production scaling. Such dynamics reduce financial exposure for sellers, as upfront funds offset costs and validate market viability prior to full-scale commitment. Prevalence of pre-orders has surged in , particularly since the early , driven by platform integrations that embed these tools into digital storefronts. For instance, Shopify's pre-order functionalities have gained traction among merchants, coinciding with the platform's exceeding $292 billion in 2024, reflecting broader adoption amid 's post-pandemic expansion to 18% of total retail by 2020. This growth underscores pre-orders' utility in validating demand and enhancing efficiency, as evidenced by their role in forecasting and optimization across online sales channels.

Historical Origins

The practice of pre-ordering emerged from 19th-century mail-order catalog systems, which allowed consumers to place advance orders for goods that would be manufactured or sourced post-purchase, thereby reducing producers' inventory risks and capitalizing on anticipated demand. , Roebuck and , founded in 1893 as a mail-order operation initially focused on watches and jewelry, expanded its annual catalogs to encompass thousands of items including , tools, and even prefabricated homes, enabling rural and urban customers alike to commit to purchases before items were stocked locally. This model addressed scarcity in remote areas and production uncertainties by aligning supply with verified orders, a causal mechanism that minimized while ensuring availability for popular goods. Following , mail-order systems proliferated amid economic expansion and rising consumer disposable income, extending beyond rural markets to urban households and diversifying into a broader array of consumer goods such as appliances and electronics. However, frequent delays in fulfillment—often due to bottlenecks or underestimated demand—prompted regulatory intervention; in 1975, the U.S. promulgated the Mail Order Merchandise Rule, mandating that sellers ship orders within 30 days or obtain buyer consent for delays, with options for refunds or cancellations to protect consumers from indefinite waits. This addressed causal frictions in scaling production to match advance commitments, formalizing accountability in an era when mail-order sales surged but reliability lagged. The 1990s digital revolution accelerated pre-ordering through online platforms, which streamlined order processing and amplified scarcity-driven hype for forthcoming releases by leveraging accessibility. Amazon.com, launching in as an online bookstore, facilitated pre-publication orders for titles with set release dates, allowing publishers to gauge demand upfront and mitigate printing risks while enabling global s to secure copies amid anticipated shortages. Into the , this evolved with broader adoption, where digital interfaces reduced transaction friction and integrated pre-orders into cycles for diverse products, driven by the causal interplay of production lead times and consumer FOMO in an increasingly connected marketplace.

Economic and Business Mechanics

Producer Incentives and Benefits

Pre-orders enable producers to secure upfront payments from consumers prior to or full production, thereby generating immediate streams that can directly fund operational costs without incurring or expenses associated with loans. This mechanism is particularly advantageous for operations, where collected funds cover raw materials, labor, and assembly, as evidenced by strategies employed on platforms like that prioritize pre-order fulfillment to sustain during scaling phases. In terms of inventory management, pre-orders facilitate precise signaling, allowing producers to scale production volumes based on verified orders rather than speculative forecasts, which empirically curtails and associated holding costs. This data-driven approach minimizes waste in capital-intensive sectors, such as those involving custom or high-variability goods, by shifting from push-based to pull-based systems responsive to actual market commitments. Pre-order initiatives also amplify efficacy by fostering and exclusivity perceptions, which drive heightened and contribute to elevated launch velocities. Industry analyses report that pre-orders can account for 20-30% of initial sales in competitive markets, thereby compounding post-launch momentum through validated hype and reduced entry barriers to production scaling.

Consumer Motivations and Incentives

Consumers pre-order products primarily to secure guaranteed availability, especially for high-demand items prone to shortages, such as limited-edition or video games during launch periods. This motivation stems from rational concerns over , where pre-ordering ensures access without competing for post-launch stock, as evidenced in markets with uncertain supply like perishable or trendy goods. Additional attractions include exclusive bonuses, such as , special editions, or , which enhance perceived value; for instance, in gaming, a 2023 YouGov survey identified to franchises as a leading driver among pre-orderers, often tied to these perks. Psychological factors like (FOMO) amplify these incentives, but empirical evidence links pre-ordering more directly to heuristics, where limited availability increases product attractiveness and prompts commitment before release. In launches, consumers rationally prioritize securing stock over waiting, as shortages can delay gratification by weeks or months; this behavior is particularly pronounced for innovative products where hype builds anticipation. Loyalty programs further reinforce participation by offering tiered rewards, though these are secondary to core availability guarantees. While pre-orders involve trade-offs like potential delays, consumers often accept them for the net value of incentives, with studies showing positive anticipatory —enjoyment from waiting—boosts evaluations and willingness to . Repeat pre-orderers, shaped by prior successes, tend to weigh perks higher than risks, demonstrating lower susceptibility to delays when experienced with the . This voluntary overcommitment reflects a calculated for exclusivity over immediate possession in sectors like gaming and tech.

Broader Market Dynamics

Pre-orders function as a that lowers financial for producers by securing upfront revenue commitments from consumers, akin to reward-based but integrated into commercial sales channels. This approach enables startups and smaller firms to fund production without relying heavily on or loans, thereby promoting and a broader diversity of product offerings in competitive markets. Empirical indicates that pre-order strategies yield superior outcomes compared to traditional campaigns, as consumers exhibit toward uncertain ventures, preferring tangible commitments to forthcoming products. By aligning production volumes with verifiable demand signals, pre-orders mitigate risks and excess inventory costs, contributing to efficiency amid market volatility. This demand-matching reduces the economic waste associated with speculative , allowing firms to scale output precisely and stabilize pressures that arise from mismatched supply and fluctuating interest. In sectors prone to rapid shifts, such as , these commitments provide causal foresight into viable quantities, countering narratives of producer exploitation by demonstrating optimization grounded in voluntary participation. Data from metrics between 2022 and 2025 reveal pre-orders' role in accelerating market responsiveness, with conversion rates of 10-20% for pre-order campaigns significantly outpacing standard averages of 2-4%, facilitating quicker capital turnover and product refinement cycles. Global retail sales, bolstered by such pre-commitment models, reached an estimated $6.42 trillion in 2025, reflecting a 6.86% year-over-year increase that correlates with enhanced iteration speeds as firms leverage early for iterative improvements. This dynamic underscores pre-orders' contribution to macroeconomic efficiency, where reduced entry costs and validation foster sustained without distorting free-market incentives.

Applications Across Industries

Video Games

Pre-orders in the originated as a mechanism to secure physical copies amid and retail allocation limits, particularly for high-demand titles in the when was absent. Retailers allocated stock based on pre-order commitments, reducing the risk of shortages on launch day for consumers and publishers alike. Contemporary digital pre-orders, facilitated by platforms such as and the , have largely supplanted physical reservations, enabling instant access upon release alongside platform-specific perks like beta testing phases. Publishers frequently bundle incentives such as exclusive digital , weapon skins, or (DLC) to drive commitments, with digital formats allowing low-cost distribution of these bonuses. Deluxe and collector's editions amplify pre-order appeal by incorporating tiered pricing for enhanced value, often including periods, expanded season passes, or physical memorabilia like art books, which cater to dedicated fans seeking comprehensive ownership. These editions contribute to pre-launch revenue streams, with industry data indicating that 20-30% of a game's first-year typically stem from pre-orders, providing upfront capital to offset development costs exceeding hundreds of millions for AAA titles. The transition to always-online and digital-first models post-2010 facilitated broader in pre-order campaigns, as publishers could gauge without risks and iterate on based on reservation metrics. This evolution supports sustained funding for ongoing post-launch updates but exposes projects to scrutiny if milestones slip, as pre-order funds are committed prior to full . Despite persistent online criticism regarding unfulfilled promises in some cases, pre-orders empirically bolster financial viability, with 15-28% of pre-launch sales occurring on the initial availability day, affirming their efficacy in for studios.

Consumer Electronics

Pre-orders in consumer electronics, particularly for smartphones and hardware gadgets, enable manufacturers to anticipate demand surges driven by marketing hype and product reveals, allowing for precise production scaling to avoid shortages or excess inventory. Companies like Apple leverage pre-order data to ramp up assembly lines with suppliers such as Foxconn, where initial commitments signal volumes needed for global distribution. This approach has been integral since the iPhone's debut, with pre-order windows typically opening shortly after announcement events to capture early adopter enthusiasm. A prominent example is Apple's annual iPhone launches, where pre-orders frequently exhaust allocated stock within hours or days, directly informing manufacturing adjustments. For the iPhone 16 series announced in September 2024, pre-orders reached an estimated 37 million units over the first weekend, a figure used to guide component procurement and final assembly rates despite a year-over-year decline from the iPhone 15. Similar patterns occurred with the iPhone 17 series in 2025, where initial pre-order demand exceeded prior models in key markets like China, breaking local sales records and prompting accelerated production to meet release-day fulfillment. These volumes help mitigate stockouts, as evidenced by reduced instances of launch-day shortages compared to eras without robust pre-order systems, where forecasting relied more on surveys and historical sales. To incentivize pre-orders amid competitive launches, carriers bundle devices with service plans and offer trade-in credits, effectively subsidizing costs for consumers switching providers or upgrading. In the U.S., providers such as , , and Verizon commonly extend up to $1,100 in bill credits for trading in eligible smartphones like recent or models, applied over 24-36 months and tied to new line activations. These mechanics not only boost pre-order conversions but also secure long-term subscriber lock-in, with empirical carrier reports indicating higher retention rates from bundled pre-order promotions. Such incentives have proven effective in high-hype scenarios, where consumers prioritize securing devices over waiting for in-store availability. A growing trend involves hybrid models blending traditional pre-orders with , particularly for innovative like wearables and smart home devices, where platforms validate prototypes through upfront pledges. has facilitated billions in hardware funding since 2011, with many campaigns functioning as de facto pre-order stores that gauge viability before —raising $4.35 billion across hardware by 2015 alone and continuing to support ventures. This fusion reduces manufacturer risk by funding development while providing consumers commitments, though it introduces delivery uncertainties absent in established brand pre-orders like those from Apple or .

Publishing and Books

In the publishing industry, pre-orders serve as a critical mechanism for demand and optimizing print runs, allowing publishers to align production with anticipated sales and minimize overstock risks. Since the late , platforms like Amazon have provided real-time pre-order data that directly influences these decisions, with strong pre-order performance signaling publishers to increase initial print quantities for titles expected to perform well upon release. Publishers and authors leverage various incentives to drive pre-orders, particularly in competitive launches where early commitments boost visibility. Common offerings include signed copies or bookplates, bundled merchandise such as stickers or art prints, and exclusive digital bonuses like deleted scenes or author notes, which are especially prevalent in independent author strategies during the 2020s to build momentum without relying on traditional budgets. For instance, indie campaigns often promise limited-edition swag or discounts verified post-purchase, encouraging fans to order early from retailers like Amazon or independent bookstores. Pre-orders significantly impact bestseller positioning by concentrating sales velocity in the first week of release, as they count toward aggregated totals used by lists such as or Amazon's charts. This front-loading effect creates algorithmic advantages on platforms, where high initial rankings increase organic discoverability and can propel a title higher on charts, with reports indicating that targeted pre-order campaigns correlate with up to 3.2 times greater sales momentum in the launch period compared to non-pre-order reliant strategies. Such dynamics also inform author advances in subsequent contracts, as demonstrated pre-order success evidences market viability, prompting publishers to offer higher guarantees for proven performers.

Other Sectors

Pre-orders in the sector often manifest through limited-edition apparel drops, as exemplified by Supreme's strategy of releasing scarce items weekly, which generates immediate demand and minimizes risks by producing only to confirmed levels, with select collaborations extending into pre-order phases for custom runs. Similarly, brands leverage pre-orders for new collections to validate designs before full-scale , reducing deadstock accumulation that plagued the industry with an estimated $70 billion to $140 billion in unsold inventory value in 2023. In the toys industry, pre-orders facilitate production alignment for seasonal exclusives, such as LEGO's Holiday Express Train set or Pop! holiday figures, which are available for advance purchase to gauge demand during peak periods like , thereby curtailing excess stock and enabling just-in-time fulfillment. This approach empirically lowers unsold by tying output to pre-committed , avoiding the common in mass-produced toys. Crowdfunding platforms like extend pre-order mechanics beyond traditional retail via post-campaign "InDemand" phases, where backers continue pledging for products, effectively validating custom manufacturing volumes and bridging to commercial production without upfront inventory risks. Variations in models include subscription-based pre-orders for ongoing apparel or accessory lines, forecasting sustained supply needs and further optimizing inventory turnover.

Risks, Criticisms, and Regulatory Oversight

Inherent Risks and Consumer Drawbacks

Pre-orders expose consumers to production delays stemming from disruptions or manufacturing overruns, though overall fulfillment rates remain high, with successful brands achieving perfect order rates of 95% or above. Such delays, while frustrating, function as market signals prompting producers to refine and practices, rather than indicating widespread unreliability. Non-fulfillment remains rare in established channels, as pre-order commitments align producer incentives with delivery to preserve revenue streams and reputation. Quality shortfalls represent another inherent risk, particularly in complex products like video games, where pre-order funding accelerates development timelines but may result in launches featuring unresolved or optimization issues due to incomplete pre-release testing. Developers often prioritize core functionality over exhaustive polishing under time pressures, leading to post-launch patches that address glitches, though initial experiences can fall short of expectations. on bug incidence rates is limited, but high-profile instances amplify perceptions of beyond their frequency, as the majority of titles receive iterative fixes that restore playability. Consumers face pitfalls from sunk costs incurred by upfront payments, which identifies as a fallacy prompting continued tolerance of subpar products to justify the investment, even when turns negative. This can exacerbate when the delivered item mismatches hyped previews, a discrepancy fueled by emphasis on anticipated features over verified . Without immediate recourse baked into the model, such mismatches heighten dissatisfaction, particularly for novelty-driven purchases where expectations outpace reality. These drawbacks are mitigated through consumer agency in selecting producers with verifiable track records, as historical delivery reliability strongly predicts future fulfillment and quality outcomes. Informed evaluation of past projects reduces exposure to hype-driven errors, enabling higher alignment between pre-order commitments and actual value, thereby channeling market feedback to penalize inconsistent actors while rewarding competence. The Federal Trade Commission's Mail, Internet, or Telephone Order Merchandise Rule, originally promulgated in 1975 and amended in 2014 to explicitly cover online transactions, mandates that sellers ship merchandise within the time promised or, absent a specific promise, within 30 days of receiving a properly completed order. If shipment will be delayed beyond these periods, sellers must notify consumers of the revised shipping date and either obtain express consent to the delay or offer an opportunity to cancel for a full refund. This rule applies to pre-orders by treating promised delivery estimates as binding shipment timelines, requiring sellers to disclose reasonable expected shipping dates upfront to enable informed consumer decisions. Refunds under the rule must be issued promptly upon cancellation requests or unshipped , using a method at least as fast and reliable as first-class mail, such as electronic transfer for modern orders, and include any overpayment differences if partial shipment occurs. Non-compliance can result in civil penalties enforced by the FTC, with documented cases involving fines for failure to provide timely refunds or notifications, underscoring accountability for verifiable delivery promises over indefinite holds on consumer funds. State laws supplement federal requirements with variations on cancellation rights, often mandating clear disclosure of refund policies and allowing rescission for undisclosed material delays, though no uniform national standard exists beyond FTC baselines. In law, pre-order agreements remain binding if terms are explicit, but buyers may revoke for substantial breaches like unnotified delays exceeding promised windows, particularly where time is deemed "of the essence" or under provisions permitting termination for non-conforming performance that impairs value. prioritizes documented promises in purchase confirmations, enabling s to demand refunds or without reliance on seller discretion.

Notable Controversies and Case Studies

One prominent case in the involved , developed by and released on August 9, 2016, following extensive pre-order marketing that promised expansive and multiplayer features not fully realized at launch. The game's failure to meet advertised scope led to widespread consumer backlash, with review scores plummeting and sales impacted despite initial pre-order success exceeding 1 million units. Platforms responded by extending refund policies; granted refunds beyond its standard two-hour playtime limit for dissatisfied buyers, processing thousands of requests in the weeks post-launch. Over subsequent years, revenue from pre-orders and sales enabled to release multiple free updates, gradually fulfilling promised elements like base-building and multiplayer, demonstrating how upfront funding facilitated iterative improvements without regulatory intervention. Similarly, BioWare's , launched February 22, 2019, after heavy pre-order promotion emphasizing shared-world shooter mechanics, suffered from technical instability, including server crashes and progression bugs that rendered gameplay frustrating for many. On , glitches reportedly caused system instability, prompting to issue full refunds to affected digital purchasers starting March 4, 2019, even after the standard return window. , the publisher, acknowledged shortcomings and released patches, but ongoing issues contributed to the game's service shutdown on January 12, 2026, with no further refunds offered for legacy purchases. This case highlighted platform-enforced remedies, as 's voluntary refunds mitigated consumer losses, underscoring market-driven accountability over calls for broader oversight. The December 10, 2020, release of by CD Projekt Red exemplified console-specific pre-order pitfalls, where versions for last-generation hardware like exhibited severe performance issues, including crashes and visual glitches, despite pre-release assurances. delisted the game from the on December 17, 2020, and provided full refunds to all digital buyers requesting them, affecting an estimated tens of thousands of transactions. CD Projekt Red facilitated refunds through other channels and committed to patches funded by launch revenue, which by 2023 had stabilized the title sufficiently for re-listing and expansions. This self-correcting response—driven by reputational pressure and platform actions—illustrated how pre-order capital supported post-launch remediation, countering narratives of inherent exploitation by evidencing developer incentives to recover trust. Beyond gaming, crowdfunding platforms mimicking pre-order models have seen outliers like the campaign on , which raised $13.3 million in pledges for a multifunctional cooler but delivered incomplete or defective units to backers years later, resulting in lawsuits and FTC scrutiny by 2016. Such defaults, while generating headlines, remain statistically rare; analyses of data identify fraudulent reward-based campaigns as comprising less than 1% of projects, with most failures attributable to overambitious scoping rather than outright scams. These incidents prompted platform policy refinements, such as enhanced verification, enabling consumer recovery through chargebacks and legal avenues without necessitating systemic regulatory expansion, as empirical fraud incidence in analogs hovers around 2-3% globally. Critics of pre-orders often decry "pay-to-hype" dynamics, arguing they incentivize , yet evidence from cases like reveals upfront revenue enabling sustained patching—Hello Games invested years in updates post-backlash, transforming viability. Similarly, 's patch trajectory relied on initial sales to finance fixes exceeding $100 million in development costs. This causal link debunks overregulation advocacy by showing voluntary market mechanisms—refunds, delistings, and iterative development—predominantly resolve disputes, with low fraud persistence indicating self-regulation efficacy over imposed controls.

References

  1. https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/act_course/lecture_3.html
  2. https://www.seas.upenn.edu/~cis5000/cis500-f16/sf/Rel.html
  3. https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/preorder
  4. http://math.uchicago.edu/~may/REU2023/REUPapers/Liu%2CJohnston.pdf
  5. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Preorder.html
  6. http://www.columbia.edu/~md3405/Behave_Col_UM_3_15.pdf
  7. https://math.berkeley.edu/~ogus/Math_250A/Notes/sets.pdf
  8. https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/18-s097-applied-category-theory-january-iap-2019/774c718ff02c6f49e1862440571ea78d_18-s097iap19ch2.pdf
  9. https://www.shopify.com/blog/shopify-pre-orders
  10. https://www.shipbob.com/blog/pre-orders-for-ecommerce-stores/
  11. https://www.sana-commerce.com/blog/preorder-backorder/
  12. https://www.shipstation.com/blog/backorder-meaning/
  13. https://www.bepragma.ai/blogs/what-is-pre-order
  14. https://pimberly.com/blog/why-pre-orders-make-sense-for-your-business/
  15. https://www.hotwax.co/blog/4-key-benefits-of-pre-orders-for-retailers
  16. https://www.getonecart.com/the-ultimate-guide-to-pre-orders-how-they-work-benefits-and-best-practices/
  17. https://www.demandsage.com/shopify-statistics/
  18. https://redstagfulfillment.com/2010s-ecommerce-growth-decade/
  19. https://recollections.biz/blog/the-early-history-of-mail-order-catalogs/
  20. https://www.colortechinc.com/insights/a-brief-history-of-mail-order-catalogs/
  21. https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/mail-internet-or-telephone-order-merchandise-rule
  22. https://www.nytimes.com/1975/10/18/archives/mail-order-rules-are-set-by-ftc-refund-must-be-offered-on-overdue.html
  23. https://paleofuture.com/blog/2019/7/3/heres-what-people-thought-of-amazon-when-it-first-launched-in-the-mid-1990s
  24. https://www.ecommerceeducation.org/blog/a-brief-history-of-ecommerce-past-present-and-future
  25. https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisoncoleman/2022/07/01/how-to-run-a-successful-pre-order-sales-strategy/
  26. https://ecomposer.io/blogs/shopify-knowledge/setup-preorder
  27. https://www.easyreplenish.com/blog/pre-order-inventory-planning
  28. https://www.daguerlogistics.com/blog/pre-orders-for-e-commerce-how-to-boost-sales-forecast-demand-and-streamline-fulfillment
  29. https://www.reverselogix.com/industry-updates/how-preorders-work-in-ecommerce/
  30. https://mailchimp.com/resources/preorders/
  31. https://xsolla.com/blog/why-its-critical-to-increase-pre-order-sales
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9664194/
  33. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/msom.1120.0398
  34. https://yougov.com/articles/45760-why-do-gamers-preorder-video-games
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435922000434
  36. https://www.appikon.com/blog/marketing-psychology-hacks-to-use-to-get-more-pre-orders
  37. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/busadmin_fac/239/
  38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0148296319301158
  39. https://walton.uark.edu/insights/posts/to-wait-or-not-to-wait-how-customers-decide-to-preorder.php
  40. https://www.fastercapital.com/content/Pre-order--Pre-Order-Success-Stories--How-Entrepreneurs-Built-Thriving-Businesses.html
  41. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.984775/full
  42. https://www.amraandelma.com/pre-order-conversion-statistics/
  43. https://backlinko.com/ecommerce-stats
  44. https://www.quora.com/When-and-why-did-pre-ordering-games-first-become-an-option
  45. https://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/sezzr3/when_did_the_preorder_trend_start_and_what_do/
  46. https://store.playstation.com/en-us/category/3bf499d7-7acf-4931-97dd-2667494ee2c9/1
  47. https://xsolla.com/blog/breaking-into-the-new-market-pre-orders
  48. https://www.ign.com/wikis/silent-hill-f/Editions_and_Pre-Order_Bonuses
  49. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbAHJ9Q90as
  50. https://appleinsider.com/articles/25/09/13/apple-breaks-records-in-china-with-high-iphone-17-preorders
  51. https://www.apple.com/shop/buy-iphone/carrier-offers
  52. https://www.t-mobile.com/offers/apple-iphone-deals
  53. https://about.att.com/story/2025/iphone-17-lineup.html
  54. https://www.fictiv.com/articles/financing-hardware-products-kickstarter-vs-indiegogo-vs-pre-orders
  55. https://carolnewmancronin.com/why-book-pre-orders-matter/
  56. https://booksforward.com/how-do-pre-orders-affect-release-day-sales/
  57. https://beautifulbooks.info/book-preorder-swag-current/
  58. https://amarketingexpert.com/2023/10/17/sell-more-books-pre-order-strategies/
  59. https://www.brianmcclellan.com/blog/the-importance-of-pre-orders
  60. https://smartbuy.alibaba.com/bestselling/how-to-become-a-best-selling-author
  61. https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/authors/pw-select/article/68748-how-indie-authors-can-use-preorders-to-crack-the-bestseller-lists.html
  62. https://www.glossy.co/fashion/pre-order-is-catching-on-as-a-solution-to-fashions-overproduction-problem/
  63. https://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/retail/the-state-of-fashion-2025-report-inventory-excess-stock-supply-chain/
  64. https://www.lego.com/en-us/categories/exclusives
  65. https://clarktoys.com/brands/funko/funko-holiday/
  66. https://www.vogue.com/article/fashion-designers-pre-order-model-coronavirus-response
  67. https://entrepreneur.indiegogo.com/how-it-works/indemand/
  68. https://www.convertcart.com/blog/ecommerce-pre-order
  69. https://www.opensend.com/post/perfect-order-rate-statistics-ecommerce
  70. https://pinglestudio.com/blog/game-testing/pre-release-bug-fixing-in-game-development-expectation-vs-reality
  71. https://www.quora.com/Why-do-game-companies-launch-games-that-are-so-buggy-and-crashy-Why-cant-they-launch-stable-program-without-bugs-and-crashes
  72. https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/the-sunk-cost-fallacy
  73. https://lifessence.quora.com/How-important-is-the-developer-s-track-record-delivery-history-and-reputation-in-your-decision-making
  74. https://www.apartments.com.au/expert-insights/buying/how-to-evaluate-a-developers-reputation-and-track-record-before-making-an-off-the-plan-property-purchase
  75. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/11/3/127
  76. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2014/09/17/2014-22092/mail-or-telephone-order-merchandise-rule
  77. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-16/chapter-I/subchapter-D/part-435
  78. https://www.getpurpledot.com/insights/building-customer-trust-around-pre-orders-understanding-the-ftcs-pre-order-regulations
  79. https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/business-guide-ftcs-mail-internet-or-telephone-order-merchandise-rule
  80. https://ftcdefenselawyer.com/how-comply-ftc-mail-internet-telephone-order-merchandise-rule/
  81. https://www.findlaw.com/consumer/consumer-transactions/customer-returns-and-refund-laws-by-state.html
  82. https://www.termsfeed.com/blog/return-refund-laws-usa/
  83. https://www.clarionsolicitors.com/articles/contract-delay-or-disruption-what-can-you-do
  84. https://code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/council/code/sections/28:2-608
  85. https://www.justanswer.com/consumer-protection-law/88y4a-ftc-laws-regarding-refunding-pre-purchases.html
  86. https://www.gamespot.com/articles/no-mans-sky-refund-claims-prompt-a-new-notice-on-i/1100-6443120/
  87. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-47454530
  88. https://www.ign.com/articles/sony-removing-cyberpunk-2077-from-ps-store-will-offer-refunds-to-playstation-players-who-already-bought-it
  89. https://www.forbes.com/sites/siladityaray/2020/12/18/cyberpunk-2077s-disastrous-launch-gets-worse-as-sony-removes-game-from-playstation-store-promises-refunds/
  90. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/16-biggest-crowdfunding-scams-failures-103657040.html
  91. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9573152/
  92. https://www.demandsage.com/ecommerce-fraud-statistics/
  93. https://www.pcmag.com/opinions/stop-giving-your-money-to-game-publishers-that-sell-now-patch-later
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.