Hubbry Logo
ResourceResourceMain
Open search
Resource
Community hub
Resource
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Resource
Resource
Resource
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Many types of resources are transported with the international shipping system.

Resources are all the materials available in our environment which are technologically accessible, economically feasible and culturally sustainable and help to satisfy needs and wants. There are many types of resources, which can broadly be classified according various parameters, such as their availability as renewable or non-renewable resources or national and international resources. An item may become a resource with technology. The benefits of resource utilization may include increased wealth, proper functioning of a system, or enhanced well-being. From a human perspective, a regular resource is anything to satisfy human needs and wants.

The concept of resources has been developed across many established areas of work, in economics, biology and ecology, computer science, management, and human resources for example - linked to the concepts of competition, sustainability, conservation, and stewardship. In application within human society, commercial or non-commercial factors require resource allocation through resource management.

The concept of resources can also be tied to the direction of leadership over resources; this may include human resources issues, for which leaders are responsible, in managing, supporting, or directing those matters and the resulting necessary actions. For example, in the cases of professional groups, innovative leaders and technical experts in archiving expertise, academic management, association management, business management, healthcare management, military management, public administration, spiritual leadership and social networking administration.

Definition of size asymmetry

[edit]

Resource competition can vary from completely symmetric (all individuals receive the same amount of resources, irrespective of their size, known also as scramble competition) to perfectly size symmetric (all individuals exploit the same amount of resource per unit biomass) to absolutely size asymmetric (the largest individuals exploit all the available resource).

Economic versus biological

[edit]

There are three fundamental differences between economic versus ecological views: 1) the economic resource definition is human-centered (anthropocentric) and the biological or ecological resource definition is nature-centered (biocentric or ecocentric); 2) the economic view includes desire along with necessity, whereas the biological view is about basic biological needs; and 3) economic systems are based on markets of currency exchanged for goods and services, whereas biological systems are based on natural processes of growth, maintenance, and reproduction.[1]

Computer resources

[edit]
Main article: Resource (computer science)
Diagram of computer resources

A computer resource is any physical or virtual component of limited availability within a computer or information management system. Computer resources include means for input, processing, output, communication, and storage.[2]

Natural

[edit]
Main article: Natural resource
Underground water, a natural resource, seen here coming out of a pipe in Himachal Pradesh, India

Natural resources are derived from the environment. Many natural resources are essential for human survival, while others are used to satisfy human desire. Conservation is the management of natural resources with the goal of sustainability. Natural resources may be further classified in different ways.[1]

Resources can be categorized based on origin:

  • Abiotic resources comprise non-living things (e.g., land, water, air, and minerals such as gold, iron, copper, silver).
  • Biotic resources are obtained from the biosphere. Forests and their products, animals, birds and their products, fish and other marine organisms are important examples. Minerals such as coal and petroleum are sometimes included in this category because they were formed from fossilized organic matter, over long periods.

Natural resources are also categorized based on the stage of development:

  • Potential resources are known to exist and may be used in the future. For example, petroleum may exist in many parts of India and Kuwait that have sedimentary rocks, but until the time it is actually drilled out and put into use, it remains a potential resource.
  • Actual resources are those, that have been surveyed, their quantity and quality determined, and are being used in present times. For example, petroleum and natural gas are actively being obtained from the Mumbai High Fields. The development of an actual resource, such as wood processing depends on the technology available and the cost involved. That part of the actual resource that can be developed profitably with the available technology is known as a reserve resource, while that part that can not be developed profitably due to a lack of technology is known as a stock resource.
Various fossil fuels, a nonrenewable resource - oil, coal, and natural gas

Natural resources can be categorized based on renewability:

  • Non-renewable resources are formed over very long geological periods. Minerals and fossils are included in this category. Since their formation rate is extremely slow, they cannot be replenished, once they are depleted. Even though metals can be recycled and reused, whereas petroleum and gas cannot, they are still considered non-renewable resources.
  • Renewable resources, such as forests and fisheries, can be replenished or reproduced relatively quickly. The highest rate at which a resource can be used sustainably is the sustainable yield. Some resources, such as sunlight, air, and wind, are called perpetual resources because they are available continuously, though at a limited rate. Human consumption does not affect their quantity. Many renewable resources can be depleted by human use, but may also be replenished, thus maintaining a flow. Some of these, such as crops, take a short time for renewal; others, such as water, take a comparatively longer time, while others, such as forests, need even longer periods.

Depending upon the speed and quantity of consumption, overconsumption can lead to depletion or the total and everlasting destruction of a resource. Important examples are agricultural areas, fish and other animals, forests, healthy water and soil, cultivated and natural landscapes. Such conditionally renewable resources are sometimes classified as a third kind of resource or as a subtype of renewable resources. Conditionally renewable resources are presently subject to excess human consumption and the only sustainable long-term use of such resources is within the so-called zero ecological footprint, where humans use less than the Earth's ecological capacity to regenerate.

Natural resources are also categorized based on distribution:

  • Ubiquitous resources are found everywhere (for example, air, light, and water).
  • Localized resources are found only in certain parts of the world (for example metal ores and geothermal power).

Actual vs. potential natural resources are distinguished as follows:

  • Actual resources are those resources whose location and quantity are known and we have the technology to exploit and use them.
  • Potential resources are those of which we have insufficient knowledge or do not have the technology to exploit them at present.

Based on ownership, resources can be classified as individual, community, national, and international.

Labour or human resources

[edit]
The 2018 OCHCO Human Capital Conference

In economics, labor or human resources refers to the human work in the production of goods and rendering of services. Human resources can be defined in terms of skills, energy, talent, abilities, or knowledge.[3]

In a project management context, human resources are those employees responsible for undertaking the activities defined in the project plan.[4]

Capital or infrastructure

[edit]

In economics, capital goods or capital are "those durable produced goods that are in turn used as productive inputs for further production" of goods and services.[5] A typical example is the machinery used in a factory. At the macroeconomic level, "the nation's capital stock includes buildings, equipment, software, and inventories during a given year."[6] Capitals are the most important economic resource.

Tangible versus intangible

[edit]

Whereas, tangible resources such as equipment have an actual physical existence, intangible resources such as corporate images, brands and patents, and other intellectual properties exist in abstraction.[7]

Use and sustainable development

[edit]

Typically resources cannot be consumed in their original form, but rather through resource development they must be processed into more usable commodities and usable things. The demand for resources is increasing as economies develop. There are marked differences in resource distribution and associated economic inequality between regions or countries, with developed countries using more natural resources than developing countries. Sustainable development is a pattern of resource use, that aims to meet human needs while preserving the environment.[1] Sustainable development means that we should exploit our resources carefully to meet our present requirement without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. The practice of the three R's – reduce, reuse, and recycle must be followed to save and extend the availability of resources.

Various problems are related to the usage of resources:

Various benefits can result from the wise usage of resources:

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Resource

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A resource is any stock or supply of assets, materials, personnel, or capabilities that can be drawn upon to produce benefits, achieve objectives, or sustain operations, with derived from its potential to address needs or wants. In , resources—often termed —include (natural endowments such as minerals, , and ), labor ( effort and skills), capital (tools, machinery, and ), and (organizational and innovative capacities), all characterized by relative to unlimited desires, compelling efficient allocation to maximize output and welfare. This underpins economic reasoning, where trade-offs arise from competing uses, as empirical observations of resource constraints in production systems demonstrate inevitable opportunity costs in decision-making. Beyond , resources extend to organizational contexts, where they represent essential inputs like financial reserves, technological tools, or necessary for goal attainment, often managed through strategies emphasizing conservation and optimization to counter depletion risks observed in real-world systems such as extraction or workforce burnout. resources, in particular, highlight causal dependencies on geological and ecological processes, with empirical data showing finite stocks like underground aquifers or fossil combustibles subject to extraction limits and renewal rates that influence long-term availability. Controversies arise in resource valuation and , where institutional biases in academic and media assessments—such as underemphasizing market-driven efficiencies in favor of regulatory interventions—can skew policy recommendations away from evidence-based incentives for and substitution.

Conceptual Foundations

Definition and Etymology

A resource is a source of supply or support, particularly an available means—such as financial assets, materials, or capabilities—that can be drawn upon to meet needs or achieve objectives. This encompasses entities with utility that are accessible, though often constrained by , enabling their deployment for practical ends like production or sustenance. In economic usage, resources denote the scarce —typically land (natural endowments), labor (human effort), capital (manufactured aids), and (organizational )—employed to generate , with allocation determined by their limited availability relative to . These elements underpin value creation, as their finite nature necessitates trade-offs and efficient utilization, distinguishing resources from unlimited alternatives. The English term "resource" entered usage in the early , with the recording its first appearance in 1611 as "a means of supplying a deficiency or need; something that is a source of help, information, strength, etc." It derives from Middle French ressource (source, spring), borrowed from Old French ressourse (relief, ), stemming from the verb resourdre (to relieve, literally "to rise again"), which traces to Latin resurgere (to rise again, spring up anew). This etymological root evokes renewal, akin to a spring replenishing itself, reflecting an original of recovery or resurgence rather than mere static stock. Earlier senses, around 1596, included "restoration," aligning with biblical and metaphorical ideas of revival before evolving to denote practical assets by the .

Principles of Scarcity and Value

Scarcity constitutes the foundational constraint in resource utilization, wherein available means are insufficient to satisfy all human ends simultaneously. This principle posits that resources, whether natural, human, or capital-based, exist in finite quantities relative to potentially unlimited wants, necessitating choices among alternative uses. Lionel Robbins formalized this in his 1932 work An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, defining economics as "the science which studies human behaviour as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses." Empirical evidence underscores this: global freshwater resources, for instance, total approximately 2.5% of Earth's water, with only 0.3% readily accessible, compelling allocation decisions amid competing demands for agriculture, industry, and consumption. Without scarcity, resources would hold no economic significance, as abundance eliminates trade-offs. Value emerges from scarcity through subjective human valuation, where the worth of a resource derives not from intrinsic properties or production costs but from its capacity to fulfill individual preferences at the margin. The subjective theory of value, pioneered by Carl Menger in his 1871 Principles of Economics, asserts that value reflects the anticipated satisfaction of needs, varying by personal circumstances and diminishing with additional units (marginal utility). This resolves classical paradoxes, such as why diamonds command higher prices than water despite lesser labor input: water's abundance reduces its marginal utility in typical contexts, while diamonds' rarity enhances theirs for non-essential ends like adornment. In resource markets, this manifests causally—scarce oil reserves, comprising about 1.7 trillion barrels proven globally as of 2023, drive prices upward when extraction lags demand, signaling reallocations via higher costs. Austrian economists extend this by emphasizing that scarcity imposes opportunity costs, rendering value relational and discoverable only through individual actions in voluntary exchange. argued in (1949) that economic calculation hinges on prices formed under scarcity, enabling efficient resource deployment absent central planning distortions. For human resources, scarcity of skilled labor—evident in persistent shortages, such as the U.S. nursing deficit exceeding 200,000 positions in 2023—elevates wages as proxies for forgone alternatives, incentivizing specialization. This framework rejects labor theories of value, which overlook subjective rankings; empirical pricing data, from commodities to intellectual capital, consistently aligns with marginal scarcity rather than embedded effort, affirming causal primacy of individual appraisal over aggregate inputs.

Theoretical Perspectives

In , resources were conceptualized as the primary —land (encompassing resources), labor, and capital—whose combinations determine output and growth. emphasized division of labor and to overcome , while highlighted on land, leading to rent as a surplus arising from resource limitations. Value was largely tied to embodied labor or production costs, with viewed as a constraint driving economic organization and trade. This perspective assumed markets self-regulate through competition, but treated resource endowments as fixed, influencing theories of and population pressures as articulated by Thomas Malthus. Neoclassical economics refined these ideas by centering as the core problem of allocating limited resources among competing ends via marginal analysis. Building on classical factors, it introduced subjective and opportunity costs, positing that efficient resource use occurs at equilibrium where marginal benefit equals , often modeled through . Natural resources are treated analogously to labor and capital, with prices signaling and guiding substitution or conservation; for instance, higher extraction costs for depleting incentivize technological shifts. Critics note this framework assumes and rationality, potentially underestimating institutional barriers or externalities like , though empirical tests affirm its predictive power in resource pricing. The Austrian school diverges by stressing subjective value theory, where a resource's worth emerges from individual valuations and purposeful action rather than objective costs or aggregates. argued that value originates in consumer preferences, propagating backward through production to appraise intermediate resources like capital goods via their anticipated contributions to ends. manifests in time preferences and entrepreneurial discovery, with market processes—uncoordinated and knowledge-dispersed—dynamically allocating resources absent central planning. This view critiques neoclassical equilibrium models for ignoring real-world and calculational chaos under intervention, emphasizing how malinvestment from distorted signals (e.g., subsidies) misallocates scarce resources. Other perspectives, such as the hypothesis, challenge abundance assumptions by positing that resource windfalls can hinder growth through (appreciation crowding out other sectors), , and institutional decay, as evidenced in econometric studies of oil-dependent economies showing negative GDP correlations post-1970s booms. Empirical data from 1970–2000 indicates resource-rich developing nations grew 1–2% slower annually than peers, attributable to volatility and weak rather than inherent . These theories underscore causal mechanisms like volatility amplifying fiscal mismanagement, informing policy debates on diversification.

Classifications

Natural Resources

Natural resources are naturally occurring assets, such as raw materials and sources, that provide use benefits through extraction and utilization in economic production or consumption. These include substances like minerals, fossil fuels, , , forests, and atmospheric gases, which exist without intervention and form the foundational inputs for . Unlike or capital resources, natural resources derive value from their relative to demand and the physical limits of geological or biological replenishment rates. Natural resources are classified primarily by replenishment potential: renewable and nonrenewable. Renewable resources can replenish naturally over human timescales through ecological processes, provided extraction rates do not exceed regeneration; examples include , wind, flowing water, timber from sustainable forests, and under managed harvesting. Nonrenewable resources, conversely, form over geological epochs and deplete irreversibly upon extraction, encompassing fossil fuels (, natural gas) and minerals (, , rare earth elements). Some resources, like aquifers, exhibit hybrid traits, replenishing slowly but risking permanent depletion if overexploited. Fossil fuels exemplify nonrenewable resources central to global supply. As of , proven global reserves totaled approximately 1.7 barrels, sufficient at current production rates to last about 53 years, with holding the largest share exceeding 300 billion barrels followed by . reserves stood at 1,139 billion short tons recoverable under existing technologies, predominantly in countries like the , , and . resources, such as Russia's vast deposits of , , , and rare earths, underpin national estimated at $75 in total resource value. Economically, natural resources generate rents that fund public goods and infrastructure but can foster dependency, known as the "resource curse," where overreliance correlates with slower growth due to institutional distortions like corruption or Dutch disease effects suppressing non-resource sectors. In resource-rich nations, extraction contributes significantly to GDP; for instance, oil accounts for over 40% of Saudi Arabia's economy, while minerals drive Australia's exports. Empirical studies show that while endowments enable initial capital accumulation, sustainable growth requires diversification and strong governance to mitigate volatility from price fluctuations. Proven reserves often expand with technological advances in exploration and extraction, challenging static scarcity narratives.

Human Resources

Human resources, interchangeably termed in economic contexts, encompass the aggregate knowledge, skills, abilities, experience, and health of individuals that contribute to productive activities. Unlike resources, which are exogenous and finite, or capital resources, which are physical and depreciable, human resources are endogenous, renewable through , and capable of innovation and adaptation, thereby driving technological progress and efficiency gains. This distinction underscores their active role in transforming other inputs into outputs, as labor provides not only effort but also and . The concept gained formal theoretical grounding in Gary Becker's 1964 treatise Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, which modeled investments in education, training, and health as yielding returns akin to physical capital, with empirical evidence showing that an additional year of schooling correlates with 7-10% higher earnings. Becker's framework posits that human capital accumulation explains wage differentials and economic growth, challenging earlier views that dismissed such investments as consumption rather than production-enhancing. Subsequent extensions incorporated health and migration, affirming that healthier workers exhibit higher productivity, with studies estimating that disease burdens reduce output by up to 20% in low-income settings. Empirically, underpin national and income levels; the World Bank's (HCI), launched in 2018, quantifies expected relative to full potential, revealing that a one-standard-deviation increase in HCI scores associates with GDP roughly doubling over time. Cross-country analyses attribute approximately two-thirds of income gaps to variances, surpassing physical capital's share, as nations with superior and systems—such as those averaging 12+ years of schooling—sustain higher growth rates, often exceeding 2% annually beyond resource endowments alone. OECD data further links firm-level skill intensity to frontiers, where high-skilled workforces boost output by 10-15% through better task allocation and innovation. Enhancement of human resources occurs via deliberate policies targeting education, vocational training, and healthcare; for example, returns on secondary education investments average 15-25% in developing economies, per Becker-inspired growth models. However, mismatches—such as skill gaps in aging populations—can constrain growth, as evidenced by Europe's labor shortages projecting a 1-2% GDP drag by 2030 without migration or retraining. Measurement challenges persist, with composite indices like HCI integrating survival rates, schooling quality, and stunting metrics, yet underemphasizing soft skills or entrepreneurial traits that amplify resource utilization.

Capital Resources

Capital resources, also known as capital goods, consist of human-produced assets employed in the manufacture of other , distinguishing them from natural resources and labor. These include physical items such as machinery, tools, buildings, and equipment that facilitate production processes rather than being directly consumed by end-users. In economic , capital resources represent one of the primary , alongside , labor, and , enabling the transformation of raw inputs into finished products. Examples of capital resources encompass manufacturing equipment like assembly line robots, construction tools such as drills and cranes, commercial buildings including factories and warehouses, vehicles for transportation like delivery trucks, and technological assets such as computers and software systems integral to operations. These assets are durable and yield value over multiple production cycles, though they require ongoing maintenance to sustain utility. In production, capital resources enhance efficiency and output by amplifying labor productivity and substituting for less effective manual methods; for instance, a in allows cultivation of larger areas with fewer workers compared to hand tools. They contribute to through capital deepening, where increased capital per worker raises marginal , though may set in as capital intensifies without proportional technological advances. Capital accumulation occurs via net investment, where savings fund the acquisition of new assets exceeding —the gradual loss of value due to , , or usage, often estimated at rates like 5-10% annually for machinery. Positive accumulation requires to outpace depreciation, fostering long-term capacity expansion, while inadequate replacement leads to capital erosion and reduced productive potential. Empirical models, such as the Solow growth framework, quantify this dynamic, showing steady-state capital levels balancing , depreciation, and .

Intangible and Informational Resources

Intangible resources encompass non-physical assets that generate economic value through legal rights, competitive advantages, or organizational capabilities, including such as patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets, as well as goodwill, , and software. These differ from tangible resources by lacking physical substance yet deriving worth from , exclusivity, or in production processes. In economic , identifiable intangibles like patents can be separately recognized and amortized over their useful lives, typically 3 to 20 years depending on and asset type, while non-identifiable ones like goodwill arise from business combinations and reflect synergies not attributable to specific assets. Informational resources form a critical subset of intangibles, comprising structured data sets, algorithms, , and knowledge repositories that enable , , and . These include datasets used in models or customer , which provide competitive edges by reducing uncertainty and optimizing in information-intensive sectors. Unlike traditional intangibles, informational resources often exhibit network effects, where value increases with usage or scale, as seen in platforms leveraging user-generated for or . In the , intangible and informational resources dominate value creation, accounting for approximately 90% of the of companies as of 2020, up from 17% in 1975, driven by shifts toward innovation-driven industries like and pharmaceuticals. This trend accelerated post-COVID-19, with investments in intangibles such as , software, and growing three times faster than tangible investments globally from 2000 to 2015. For instance, s protect inventions like pharmaceutical formulations, enabling firms to recoup R&D costs—global filings reached 3.4 million in 2022, concentrated in fields like digital communication and . Similarly, informational resources like analytics have underpinned valuation surges; companies such as and Meta derive substantial from data-driven , with Meta reporting $114 billion in ad in 2022 tied to user insights. Challenges in managing these resources include valuation difficulties due to subjectivity and lack of standardized metrics, often relying on methods like relief-from-royalty or income approaches, which estimate hypothetical licensing fees or discounted cash flows attributable to the asset. Legal frameworks, such as the U.S. Patent Act or EU Database Directive, enforce exclusivity but face enforcement issues in digital realms, where copying costs approach zero, underscoring the causal link between strong rights and sustained in intangibles. Empirical studies indicate that firms with higher intangible intensity exhibit greater productivity growth, with data showing intangible correlating to 0.5-1% annual GDP boosts in advanced economies from 1995-2015.

Historical Development

Early Concepts

In ancient civilizations, resources were conceptualized primarily as natural endowments critical for survival and societal organization, with management focused on , control, and basic extraction. Between approximately 4000 and 3000 BCE, early societies in river valleys such as the , Tigris-Euphrates, and Indus harnessed fertile soils, predictable flooding, and accessible to generate agricultural surpluses, which underpinned the formation of cities, specialization of labor, and hierarchical structures. These resources—, , and rudimentary minerals—were not abstract but tangible necessities viewed through practical and often religious lenses, as divine provisions enabling human flourishing amid . Greek philosophers introduced analytical distinctions, emphasizing self-sufficiency and the limits of natural bounty. , writing in the BCE, differentiated "natural" wealth—derived from production using , labor, and tools—from "unnatural" chrematistics involving unlimited monetary accumulation through , which he critiqued for prioritizing gain over utility. In his view, genuine resources were finite goods essential for the () and (), with measured by their productive use rather than , reflecting a causal understanding that excess pursuit of artificial means disrupted social harmony. , contemporaneously, linked resource stewardship to , advocating regulated and conservation in works like Laws to prevent degradation, positing that sustainable exploitation aligned with cosmic order and prevented societal decay. These early ideas highlighted scarcity's role in constraining human activity, with evidence of overexploitation—such as in societies—demonstrating causal feedbacks where unchecked demands on timber, , and fisheries led to collapses, as reconstructed from archaeological . Roman thinkers like later echoed Greco-Roman traditions by cataloging natural resources as providential for human dominion, yet warned of depletion risks, though without modern scarcity metrics. Overall, pre-modern concepts prioritized embeddedness in natural cycles over expansive exploitation, informed by empirical observations of environmental limits rather than theoretical abstraction.

Industrial Revolution and Resource Expansion

The , originating in Britain during the mid-18th century and extending to approximately 1830, fundamentally expanded resource utilization by harnessing fossil fuels and enhancing extraction technologies, shifting economies from reliance on animal and water power to coal-driven engines. This period saw the substitution of coke for in iron , pioneered by Abraham Darby in 1709, which reduced costs and enabled large-scale iron production essential for machinery and . A pivotal innovation was Thomas Newcomen's 1712 atmospheric engine, the first practical steam-powered device used to pump water from mines, allowing access to deeper seams and increasing output. James Watt's refinements, including a separate condenser, boosted efficiency by up to 75%, powering textile mills, , and eventually railways, thereby amplifying the demand and supply of as a resource. British production escalated from 5.2 million tons annually in 1750 to 62.5 million tons by 1850, reflecting a twelvefold expansion that fueled industrial growth and urban migration. Preceding and concurrent with these developments, the from the early improved yields through four-field , acts, and , reducing the agricultural labor force from about 75% of the in 1700 to under 25% by 1850 and generating surpluses that supported rapid from 6.5 million in 1750 to 21 million in 1851. This liberation of supplied factories with workers, while profits from and early industry accumulated capital for reinvestment in machinery and . The revolution's resource expansion extended beyond domestic boundaries, as Britain's naval power and colonial trade accessed raw materials like cotton from India and the Americas, integrating global supply chains and substituting imported resources for local scarcities. By 1800, steam power's rapid adoption post-Watt had transformed resource constraints into engines of growth, laying the groundwork for sustained economic expansion driven by substitutable energy sources rather than fixed agrarian limits.

20th Century Crises and Responses

The 20th century featured acute resource crises driven by war, , economic collapse, and geopolitical tensions, prompting governments to implement , conservation measures, and institutional reforms. During (1914–1918), European powers faced severe shortages of food, coal, and metals due to s and disrupted supply chains; for instance, Britain's naval reduced German food imports by over 80%, contributing to civilian and the "" of 1916–1917. In the United States, wartime demands led to voluntary conservation campaigns, though full was avoided until . World War II (1939–1945) intensified global resource strains, with Axis and Allied powers reallocating human, material, and energy resources on an unprecedented scale. The U.S. rationed , tires, sugar, and meat starting in 1942, as automobile production halted for needs, and scrap drives collected over 1 million tons of metal by 1943 to support armament manufacturing. Germany's synthetic fuel program, reliant on , produced 6.5 million tons annually by 1944 but failed to offset oil deficits, exposing vulnerabilities in dependency. Postwar reconstruction strained capital and , with experiencing labor shortages amid 20 million displaced persons. The compounded crises through the (1929–1939) and the (1930s). Economic contraction reduced U.S. industrial output by 45% and unemployment reached 25% by 1933, idling human and capital resources while farm foreclosures affected one-third of farmers. Overlapping with drought in the , the eroded 100 million acres of topsoil due to overplowing and , displacing 400,000 people and slashing agricultural productivity. Responses included the U.S. New Deal's creation of the Soil Conservation Service in 1935, which promoted , terracing, and , restoring soil on millions of acres by 1940. Energy crises peaked in the 1970s, exemplified by the 1973–1974 embargo following the , which cut Arab oil exports to the U.S. and , quadrupling prices from $3 to $12 per barrel and triggering global recessions with 4–5% GDP drops in affected nations. The 1979 caused further shortages, pushing prices to $40 per barrel. U.S. responses featured the Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act of 1973 for and , alongside incentives for fuel-efficient vehicles ( standards rose from 13.5 mpg in 1974 to 27.5 mpg by 1985) and expansion, with 100 reactors operational by 1980. These measures, combined with domestic drilling incentives, reduced U.S. oil import dependence from 35% in 1977 to 20% by 1985, though they highlighted limits of central planning amid market distortions.

Domain-Specific Applications

Economic Contexts

In economics, resources are defined as the scarce inputs or —, labor, capital, and —employed to generate amid unlimited human wants. This framework underscores the core economic problem of , where finite resources necessitate choices, trade-offs, and efficient allocation to maximize output and welfare. Resource allocation occurs primarily through market mechanisms, where prices signal and direct resources toward their highest-valued uses, as theorized in . For instance, labor markets equilibrate wages based on , while capital markets facilitate in machinery and that augment . Natural resources, such as minerals and , generate economic rents captured by owners or governments, influencing extraction rates and trade balances; empirical studies show that high dependence on resource exports correlates with slower long-term growth in many cases, attributed to effects and institutional weaknesses rather than resource abundance itself. Human capital, encompassing skills, education, and health, functions as a dynamic resource amplifying labor productivity; investments here, such as increased schooling, have empirically driven growth differentials across nations, with studies estimating that quality improvements in contribute more to output than mere quantity expansions. Capital resources, including physical assets like factories and equipment, enter production functions as complements to labor, where apply unless offset by technological progress; the Solow growth model formalizes this, positing steady-state output per worker dependent on rates. Entrepreneurship coordinates these factors, bearing to innovate and reallocate resources amid , often yielding supernormal profits in competitive equilibria. Resource economics extends this to non-market considerations, analyzing externalities like depletion costs and optimal extraction paths under , which equates marginal net benefits over time for non-renewable assets. Overall, models emphasize substitutability among resources via , challenging fixed-proportions views and highlighting institutions' role in mitigating inefficiencies from .

Biological and Ecological Contexts

In biological contexts, resources encompass any substances, sources, or environmental conditions essential for organisms' , growth, , and maintenance, such as nutrients, , oxygen, and . These requirements drive evolutionary adaptations, where organisms compete for access, with scarcity imposing selective pressures that favor efficient utilization or behavioral strategies to secure them. Biotic resources derive from living interactions, including , mates, and symbiotic partners, while abiotic resources involve non-living components like minerals, atmospheric gases, and solar . Ecologically, resource availability governs via limiting factors—conditions whose scarcity restricts abundance, distribution, or growth rates beyond which further increases yield no proportional response, as articulated in . Common limiting factors include food supply, water availability, nesting sites, and predation pressure, which can operate as density-dependent (intensifying with population size, e.g., for mates) or density-independent (unaffected by density, e.g., seasonal droughts reducing ). The aggregate of these defines (K), the maximum sustainable population size for a species in a given , fluctuating with resource renewal rates; for instance, in microbial experiments, K aligns closely with nutrient influx limits, demonstrating causal linkage between input and equilibrium density. In community ecology, interspecific competition for shared resources can lead to competitive exclusion unless mitigated by resource partitioning, where coexisting species diverge in resource use to minimize overlap—temporally (e.g., differing foraging times), spatially (e.g., vertical stratification in forest canopies), or trophically (e.g., beak size variations in Darwin's finches exploiting seed sizes from 0.5 mm to over 15 mm). A well-documented case involves Caribbean Anolis lizards, where species partition perch heights and insect prey sizes: trunk-ground species target larger prey on low perches, while crown-giant species focus on smaller arboreal insects, enabling six sympatric species' coexistence on a single island without exclusion. Such partitioning, observable in fossil records and field manipulations reducing competitor densities to boost focal species' performance, underscores how resource heterogeneity fosters biodiversity by stabilizing coexistence through reduced competitive intensity. Empirical studies, including long-term monitoring of Serengeti predators, confirm partitioning extends to mammals, with lions specializing on wildebeest (over 70% of diet) versus cheetahs on Thomson's gazelle, correlating with bite force and pursuit speed adaptations to prey mass ranges of 100-900 kg.

Computing and Technological Contexts

In computing, a resource denotes any hardware or software element of limited availability that a computer can access to execute tasks, such as (CPU) cycles, (RAM), storage devices, and (I/O) peripherals. These components enable problem-solving through and analysis, with focused on efficient allocation to maximize while minimizing waste. Resource necessitates , as overuse by one can degrade overall throughput, a rooted in the finite nature of physical hardware constraints. Operating systems employ techniques to assign these assets to concurrent processes, ensuring isolation and preventing that could lead to system instability. Common methods include first-come, first-served (FCFS) scheduling for , where processes are queued in arrival order, and shortest job first (SJF), which favors tasks with minimal execution duration to reduce average wait times. Allocation graphs track dependencies to detect potential deadlocks, where processes indefinitely await mutually held resources, prompting preemptive reclamation or banker’s algorithm simulations for safe states. Deallocation occurs upon process termination, recycling resources for reuse, with modern kernels like implementing paging to abstract physical limits via demand paging and swapping. In distributed and paradigms, resources extend to networked assets like bandwidth and virtual machines, provisioned dynamically to scale with demand. platforms deliver compute resources—including virtual CPUs (vCPUs), gigabytes of RAM, and terabytes of storage—as services, with providers optimizing via load balancing and auto-scaling to handle variable workloads without overprovisioning. , for instance, specifies container resource requests and limits in manifests, enforcing CPU shares (e.g., millicores) and bounds to guarantee across clusters. This model decouples users from underlying hardware, fostering elasticity but introducing challenges in metering usage for billing, often tracked in real-time via metrics like requests per second (RPS) and latency. Technological contexts broaden resources to encompass , integrating hardware (servers, routers), software (databases, applications), and human elements for lifecycle from creation to archival. In enterprise settings, resource pools support , where hypervisors like allocate slices of physical servers to multiple tenants, enhancing utilization rates from under 15% in siloed environments to over 70% in pooled configurations. Efficiency metrics, such as CPU utilization percentages and I/O throughput in megabytes per second (MB/s), guide optimization, with empirical studies showing that poor allocation correlates with up to 30% higher energy consumption in data centers.

Management and Policy

Market Mechanisms vs. Central Planning

Market mechanisms for operate through decentralized , where rights enable individuals and firms to respond to signals reflecting supply, , and , thereby incentivizing efficient use, conservation, and . In contrast, central planning substitutes administrative commands and quotas for prices, with state bureaucrats directing resource distribution based on aggregated data and political priorities, often lacking real-time information on local conditions or consumer preferences. The , first articulated by in 1920, posits that without market-generated prices for capital goods and , central planners cannot rationally compare costs and benefits to allocate resources optimally, leading to inevitable waste and misallocation. extended this in 1945 by emphasizing the "knowledge problem": much relevant information about resources—such as tacit local knowledge of or machinery maintenance—is dispersed and cannot be centralized effectively, whereas prices serve as a summary statistic aggregating this knowledge across millions of actors. These theoretical critiques highlight how markets harness and to approximate efficient outcomes, while planning relies on fallible top-down directives prone to errors and corruption. Historical evidence from centrally planned economies underscores these limitations. In the , from the 1930s through the 1980s, Gosplan's five-year plans directed vast resources toward and military production, resulting in chronic shortages of agricultural and consumer goods; for example, grain production stagnated despite massive inputs, contributing to famines like the 1932-1933 , where up to 5 million perished amid export quotas that prioritized ideology over output. By 1989, in the USSR had effectively declined, with resource misallocation evident in unused factory capacity and , factors that precipitated the system's collapse in 1991. In sectors, regimes demonstrably outperform state control. A study of the Bakken formation found that privately owned oil parcels generated 2-3 times more production per acre than federally owned ones between 2005 and 2015, attributed to owners' incentives for rapid extraction and technological investment absent in bureaucratic management. Venezuela's of oil fields under from 2007 onward led to a 40% drop in production by 2016, from mismanagement and expropriation deterring investment, whereas Norway's partially market-oriented state fund, established in 1990, has preserved oil revenues through fiscal discipline and involvement, yielding returns exceeding $100,000 by 2020.
AspectMarket MechanismsCentral Planning
Information UseDecentralized via prices aggregating dispersed knowledgeCentralized but incomplete, ignoring tacit/local data
Incentives drives efficiency and substitutionBureaucratic targets foster waste and short-termism
Resource Outcomes (e.g., )Higher yields under private ownership (Bakken: 2-3x federal)Declines post-nationalization (: -40% 2007-2016)
AdaptabilityResponds to via (e.g., boom)Rigid quotas lead to shortages (USSR grain failures)
Empirical cross-country analyses confirm that economies with stronger property rights and market institutions achieve better resource utilization; for instance, resource-rich nations with rule-of-law indices above 1.5 (World Bank metric) exhibit 1.5-2% higher annual GDP growth than those below 0.5, mitigating the "" through secure private incentives rather than state monopolies. While proponents of planning cite wartime mobilizations as successes, these were temporary and often relied on pre-existing market structures, failing to scale sustainably without reverting to prices post-crisis. Overall, market mechanisms have proven superior in fostering long-term resource stewardship, as evidenced by sustained declines in real prices since , driven by technological adaptation absent in planned systems.

Sustainable Utilization: Evidence and Critiques

Iceland's implementation of individual transferable quotas (ITQs) in fisheries since the late 1970s provides empirical evidence of successful sustainable utilization, where harvest levels were aligned with stock replenishment rates through market-based allocation. By 2021 assessments, the system had reduced fishing effort by over 50% from pre-ITQ peaks, enabling recovery of key stocks like cod and haddock, with 90% of monitored species deemed sustainably exploited. Economic outcomes included fleet consolidation, lowering operational costs per unit catch by incentivizing efficient operators to acquire quotas from less viable ones. This property-rights approach mitigated the tragedy of the commons by internalizing externalities, contrasting with prior open-access regimes that caused serial depletions. In forestry, sustained —aiming for annual harvests matching growth increments—has shown mixed viability in select temperate zones, such as parts of and , where certified operations under systems like the maintained timber volumes while preserving biodiversity metrics from 1990 to 2020 data. However, long-term monitoring reveals implementation gaps, with only 20-30% of global managed forests achieving verifiable non-declining yields due to inconsistent application of growth models. Critiques emphasize that sustainable utilization often underperforms in practice due to failures, including weak and in developing regions, where illegal extraction exceeds quotas by 30-50% annually despite frameworks. Short-term political incentives prioritize extraction revenues over replenishment, exacerbating depletion in weakly institutionalized settings, as evidenced by persistent in non-ITQ global fisheries where 35% of stocks remain overexploited per 2022 FAO reports integrated into analyses. Command-and-control regulations frequently impose disproportionate costs—up to 10-20% of resource value in compliance—without proportional ecological gains, favoring innovation-stifling bureaucracies over adaptive market signals. In sustained yield , models overlook discounting effects and ecological feedbacks, yielding economically suboptimal rotations that undervalue alternative land uses like conservation. Even successes like ITQs face equity critiques, with quota consolidation concentrating wealth among 10-20% of initial holders by 2010s, potentially undermining social legitimacy without complementary redistribution. Overall, underscores that institutional quality, rather than intent alone, determines outcomes, with property rights outperforming vague mandates in causal tests of resource .

Innovation and Resource Substitution

Innovation in resource utilization often manifests through technological substitutions that replace scarce or depleting materials with more abundant alternatives, thereby mitigating perceived shortages. Economist argued that human ingenuity serves as the "ultimate resource," enabling societies to invent solutions that increase effective resource supplies over time, as demonstrated by declining real prices of commodities like metals and fuels despite rising consumption. This process counters Malthusian predictions of inevitable scarcity by fostering efficiency gains and novel inputs, such as shifting from wiring to fiber optics in , which reduced demand while expanding capacity. Historical precedents illustrate successful substitutions across sectors. In the , whale oil for lighting was largely supplanted by derived from , averting depletion of whale populations and stabilizing lighting costs; by 1860, U.S. production exceeded whale oil supply, with prices falling over 90% in real terms by the 1880s. Similarly, in , post-World War II electrolytic tinplating reduced tin usage in beverage cans by up to 50% per unit, from 1.5 pounds of tinplate per can in the 1930s to less than 0.01 pounds by the 1980s, allowing continued production amid tin supply constraints. Energy transitions provide further evidence: dominated as a substitute for wood in the , followed by displacing in transportation after 1900, with global oil production rising from 150,000 barrels per day in 1900 to over 100 million by 2020 without exhausting reserves due to exploration and efficiency innovations. Empirical data supports the efficacy of such substitutions in alleviating . Technological advancements have historically lowered extraction costs and enabled or synthetic alternatives; for instance, aluminum production costs dropped 95% between 1885 and 1900 through process innovations like the Hall-Héroult method, making bauxite-derived aluminum viable from abundant ores. In , hybrid seeds and fertilizers substituted land-intensive farming, boosting global grain yields from 1.2 tons per in 1960 to 4.0 tons by 2020, effectively expanding arable "resource" capacity without proportional land increases. Studies indicate that innovation-driven substitution has compensated for resource constraints in developed economies, improving air and while sustaining growth, though outcomes depend on institutional incentives for R&D rather than central mandates. exemplifies potential in energy: it substituted fossil fuels in during the oil crises, with countries like achieving over 70% nuclear reliance by 1980, reducing oil imports by 80% and stabilizing prices. Challenges persist, as not all substitutions occur seamlessly; the shows that efficiency gains can increase total consumption, necessitating complementary policies. Nonetheless, long-term trends affirm Simon's thesis: between 1980 and 2018, prices of key resources like and fell in real terms amid doubling, attributable to ingenuity rather than geological windfalls. Future prospects hinge on accelerating R&D in areas like advanced batteries substituting rare earths or fusion energy bypassing fossil dependencies, underscoring that policy should prioritize markets fostering innovation over .

Key Debates and Controversies

The Scarcity Debate: vs.

The debate centers on whether finite natural resources impose inevitable limits on and , or if ingenuity and market mechanisms can perpetually expand effective resource availability. posits that expansion outpaces resource production, leading to recurrent crises, while contends that and substitution render a solvable problem rather than an absolute constraint. Thomas Malthus's 1798 An Essay on the Principle of Population argued that population grows geometrically (e.g., doubling every 25 years) while food supply increases arithmetically, necessitating "positive checks" like , , and war to maintain equilibrium. Neo-Malthusians extended this in the , with Paul Ehrlich's 1968 The Population Bomb forecasting hundreds of millions starving in the and 1980s due to outstripping and fertilizers. The 1972 Limits to Growth report by the modeled colliding with fixed resource stocks, predicting societal collapse by the mid-21st century absent drastic interventions. Cornucopians, exemplified by in his 1981 book The Ultimate Resource, counter that human minds drive discovery, efficiency gains, and new supplies, treating people as the ultimate resource rather than a burden. emphasized that signals incentivize , such as hydraulic fracturing expanding reserves or Haber-Bosch synthesizing for fertilizers, which tripled global crop yields since 1900 despite population rising from 1.6 billion to over 8 billion. Empirical trends support this: real prices of commodities like metals and energy have declined over the long term, reflecting technological progress outpacing depletion, as documented in resource analyses. A pivotal test was the 1980 Simon-Ehrlich wager, where Ehrlich selected five metals (copper, chromium, nickel, tin, ) betting their inflation-adjusted prices would rise by 1990 due to ; Simon won as prices fell an average of 50%, attributable to new mining technologies and . Extending such analysis, commodity price indices show no sustained upward trend in signals over the , contradicting Malthusian forecasts; for instance, global oil production rose from 3.5 million barrels per day in 1930 to over 100 million by 2023 amid population quadrupling, via exploration and efficiency. Historical critiques of highlight its failure to anticipate the Industrial Revolution's productivity surges, which lifted incomes and food output beyond arithmetic limits through and crop breeding. Neo-Malthusian predictions, often amplified in academic and media circles prone to alarmism, have repeatedly erred—e.g., Ehrlich's famines did not materialize due to yields increasing 2-3 fold in and from 1960-1990. Cornucopians attribute this to induced : prompts substitution (e.g., plastics replacing metals) and dematerialization (e.g., LEDs reducing energy per lumen by 90% since 2000). While localized scarcities persist, global data indicate abundance via , challenging deterministic models that undervalue . The debate persists, with neo-Malthusians citing climate externalities and as modern checks, yet cornucopian evidence from declining resource intensity (e.g., GDP per unit of use doubling since 1990 in nations) suggests ongoing decoupling of growth from depletion. Source biases warrant caution: environmental advocacy often prioritizes catastrophe narratives over falsified predictions, whereas market-oriented analyses align more closely with observed trends of falling real costs and expanding frontiers.

Resource Curse and Institutional Factors

The resource curse, also termed the paradox of plenty, describes the empirical pattern wherein nations endowed with abundant natural resources, particularly extractive commodities like oil and minerals, exhibit slower long-term economic growth, higher inequality, and increased conflict propensity relative to resource-scarce peers. Cross-country regressions by Sachs and Warner, analyzing data from 1971 to 1989, revealed that a one-standard-deviation increase in the ratio of natural resource exports to GDP correlated with approximately 1% lower annual per capita GDP growth, after controlling for factors like initial income and trade openness. This negative association persists even when excluding outliers, underscoring a robust statistical link rather than mere correlation with geography or other confounders. Institutional quality emerges as a pivotal mediator, determining whether resource rents foster productive or rent-seeking predation. In environments with producer-friendly institutions—characterized by secure property rights, impartial contract enforcement, and checks on executive power—resource booms incentivize diversification and accumulation, potentially yielding a "resource ." Conversely, grabber-friendly institutions, prone to and , amplify the curse by diverting revenues toward patronage networks, crowding out non-resource sectors via effects (appreciation of real exchange rates eroding manufacturing competitiveness), and exacerbating fiscal volatility from price swings. Mehlum, Moene, and Torvik's 2006 model formalizes this threshold: resource abundance interacts positively with institutional strength, such that the curse manifests selectively in weakly governed states, with empirical tests on 1970–1990 data confirming that high resource dependence reduces growth only among nations scoring low on producer-oriented institutional measures like bureaucratic quality and indices. Comparative cases illustrate this dynamic starkly. , discovering offshore oil in 1969, leveraged pre-existing strong institutions—including democratic accountability and fiscal prudence—to establish the Government Pension Fund Global in 1990, which by 2023 held over $1.5 trillion in assets, equivalent to roughly 300% of GDP, insulating the economy from volatility and funding public goods without inflationary spending. This approach sustained average annual GDP growth of 2.5% from 1990 to 2020, alongside low perceptions (ranking 4th globally in 2023 indices). , holding the world's largest proven oil reserves (over 300 billion barrels as of 2021), exemplifies institutional failure: post-1999 nationalizations under Chávez and Maduro centralized rents in state-owned , fostering (e.g., $2–4 billion embezzled in currency controls by 2013 estimates) and policy reversals, culminating in exceeding 1 million percent in 2018 and a 75% GDP contraction from 2013 to 2021. Resource dependence, peaking at 95% of exports in the 2000s, interacted with weakened —evidenced by arbitrary expropriations and judicial politicization—to entrench and , contrasting Norway's decentralized, transparent management. Recent scholarship reinforces that institutional reforms can attenuate the curse, though endogeneity challenges persist: high-quality (e.g., via independent resource funds or bodies) correlates with 0.5–1% higher growth in resource-rich panels from 1990–2015, per IMF analyses, but reverse —where booms erode institutions—necessitates instrumental variable approaches confirming bidirectional effects. Studies across 50+ resource exporters find no universal when disaggregating by governance quartiles, with top-quartile institutions yielding positive resource-GDP elasticities. Critically, while academic consensus attributes much of the variance to institutions over resource type or volatility alone, mainstream narratives sometimes underemphasize agency in governance failures, attributing outcomes excessively to external shocks despite evidence of policy choices as primary drivers in cases like .

Environmental Regulations and Economic Growth

Environmental regulations aimed at conserving natural resources, such as limits on emissions, extraction quotas, and habitat protections, impose direct compliance costs on industries reliant on resource inputs like mining, forestry, and fossil fuels, often leading to reduced investment and productivity in those sectors. Empirical analyses indicate that these regulations can have statistically significant adverse effects on trade flows, employment levels, plant relocations, and overall productivity, particularly in pollution-intensive industries. For instance, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency assessments of regulations like the Clean Air Act amendments have estimated measurable economic burdens, including higher energy prices and compliance expenditures that, while not crippling the national economy, contribute to slower growth in regulated sectors by diverting capital from expansion to abatement technologies. The Porter Hypothesis posits that stringent environmental regulations can offset these costs by spurring innovation in cleaner technologies, potentially enhancing long-term competitiveness and growth—a "weak" version focusing on increased innovation and a "strong" version claiming net productivity gains. Testing of this hypothesis across multiple studies reveals support for the weak form, where regulations correlate with higher patenting in green technologies, but limited evidence for the strong form, as innovation compensation rarely fully counters compliance burdens. Meta-analyses of over 100 publications on regulation and competitiveness confirm mixed results, with effects varying by country development level and regulation type, but often showing no overall boost to firm-level or national growth metrics like GDP. In resource-dependent economies, such as those reliant on or minerals, regulations exacerbating input costs—through permitting delays or carbon pricing—have been linked to and subdued economic expansion. OECD evaluations estimate that a 10% rise in prices from regulatory measures reduces manufacturing by less than 1%, yet amplifies foreign firm entry in less-regulated markets, underscoring competitiveness erosion without commensurate domestic gains. Cross-country evidence further suggests that while regulations may improve , they inhibit quantity-based in developing regions, where institutional weaknesses amplify costs relative to benefits. Overall, rigorous studies prioritize compliance cost effects over offsets, indicating that overly stringent or poorly designed regulations tend to hinder resource sector contributions to aggregate growth.

References

  1. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/resource
  2. https://www.uttyler.edu/ceefl/files/what-economics-is-about-basics-econ-system-9-12.pdf
  3. https://courses.ems.psu.edu/eme810/node/738
  4. https://www.uagrantham.edu/blog/a-guide-to-organizational-resources-and-how-to-manage-them/
  5. https://www.csusb.edu/sites/default/files/5.Unit3_.5Lesson1TypesofResources.pdf
  6. https://www.law.wvu.edu/files/d/27b7e09b-1dae-4ec5-9dca-0a334b004bac/2021-8-11-water-as-property-richardson.pdf
  7. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/resource
  8. https://www.valueflo.ws/concepts/resources/
  9. https://articles.outlier.org/economic-resources-examples
  10. https://www.econlib.org/library/Topics/College/productiveresources.html
  11. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/resource_n
  12. https://www.etymonline.com/word/resource
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3275781/
  14. https://www.khanacademy.org/economics-finance-domain/ap-microeconomics/basic-economic-concepts/ap-economics-introduction/a/scarcity-article
  15. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/subjective-theory-of-value.asp
  16. https://mises.org/online-book/introduction-austrian-economics/4-subjective-theory-value
  17. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/scarcity-principle
  18. https://microventures.com/the-scarcity-principle
  19. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/economics/09/austrian-school-of-economics.asp
  20. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/factors-production.asp
  21. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.18574/nyu/9781479833818.003.0007/html
  22. https://www.higherrockeducation.org/glossary-of-terms/classical-economics
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9226380/
  24. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/neoclassical.asp
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/resource-economics
  26. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w15836/w15836.pdf
  27. https://growthlab.hks.harvard.edu/files/growthlab/files/cid_working_paper_233.pdf
  28. https://www.econ.iastate.edu/ask-an-economist/what-definition-natural-resource
  29. http://data.un.org/Glossary.aspx?q=natural%2Bresources
  30. https://www.nifa.usda.gov/topics/natural-resource-economics
  31. https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Economics/Introductory_Comprehensive_Economics/Economics_%28Boundless%29/36%253A_Natural_Resource_Economics/36.01%253A_Introduction_to_Natural_Resource_Economics
  32. https://extension.psu.edu/renewable-and-nonrenewable-resources/
  33. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/resource-types/
  34. https://www.eia.gov/kids/energy-sources/nonrenewable.php
  35. https://shalemag.com/2025-global-oil-trends/
  36. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/oil-reserves-by-country
  37. https://www.e-education.psu.edu/egee102/node/1932
  38. https://energynow.com/2024/11/ranked-top-10-countries-by-value-of-all-their-natural-resources/
  39. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/are-natural-resources-a-curse-a-blessing-or-a-double-edged-sword/
  40. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987123000622
  41. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/humancapital.asp
  42. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/hr/how-is-human-resource-different-from-other-resources-like-land-and-physical-capital/
  43. https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-are-human-resources-in-the-economy.html
  44. https://www.nber.org/books-and-chapters/human-capital-theoretical-and-empirical-analysis-special-reference-education-first-edition
  45. https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/HumanCapital.html
  46. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/540801550153933986/pdf/Measuring-Human-Capital.pdf
  47. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/human-capital
  48. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2021/12/the-human-side-of-productivity_6f546267/5f391ba9-en.pdf
  49. https://one.oecd.org/document/EDU/EDPC%282022%292/en/pdf
  50. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/human-capital-at-work_486c0289-en.html
  51. https://www.dallasfed.org/educate/everyday/capital
  52. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/capital-resources-examples
  53. https://www.tutor2u.net/economics/reference/what-are-capital-goods
  54. https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/glossary/capital-accumulation/
  55. https://www.karlwhelan.com/Macro2/slides-9.pdf
  56. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/intangibleasset.asp
  57. https://www.wipo.int/en/web/intangible-assets
  58. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/accounting/intangible-assets/
  59. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/informational-resource
  60. https://study.com/academy/lesson/information-economics-definition-importance-examples.html
  61. https://oceantomo.com/intangible-asset-market-value-study/
  62. https://www.wipo.int/web/office-russia/w/news/2024/new-wipo-data-show-intangible-asset-investment-growing-fast-spreading-globally
  63. https://www.pcecompanies.com/resources/how-to-value-your-intangible-assets-methods-factors-and-key-considerations
  64. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2021/07/defining-intangible-investments-grow-knowledge-economy/
  65. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/key-components-civilization/
  66. https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/world-history/world-history-beginnings/birth-agriculture-neolithic-revolution/a/introduction-what-is-civilization
  67. http://research.shca.ed.ac.uk/honour-in-greece/2018/01/29/why-we-hate-the-rich-according-to-aristotle/
  68. https://theimaginativeconservative.org/2012/12/aristotle-and-economic-crisis.html
  69. https://bigthink.com/thinking/aristotle-telos-money/
  70. https://www.athensjournals.gr/humanities/2018-5-1-6-Stone.pdf
  71. https://ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art6/
  72. https://mts.intechopen.com/redirector/articles/ancient-greco-roman-views-of-ecology-sustainability-and-extinction-aristotle-stoicism-pliny-the-elde
  73. https://www.britannica.com/event/Industrial-Revolution
  74. https://history.alberta.ca/energyheritage/coal/early-coal-history-to-1900/the-steam-engine-the-industrial-revolution-and-coal.aspx
  75. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/2201/coal-mining-in-the-british-industrial-revolution/
  76. https://wp.lancs.ac.uk/lettersandthelamp/sections/the-industrial-revolution-coal-mining-and-the-felling-colliery-disaster/
  77. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/industrialization-labor-and-life/
  78. https://www.ffa.org/ffa-new-horizons/labor-day-how-the-industrial-revolution-changed-agriculture/
  79. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/industrial-revolution-and-technology/
  80. https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/rationing-and-food-shortages-during-the-first-world-war
  81. https://www.theworldwar.org/learn/about-wwi/baking-during-time-crisis
  82. https://www.history.com/articles/food-rationing-in-wartime-america
  83. https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/material-drives-on-the-world-war-ii-home-front.htm
  84. https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/restrictions-and-rationing-on-the-world-war-ii-home-front.htm
  85. https://www.fdrlibrary.org/great-depression-facts
  86. https://drought.unl.edu/dustbowl/
  87. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/about/history/brief-history-nrcs
  88. https://fdr.blogs.archives.gov/2018/06/20/fdr-and-the-dust-bowl/
  89. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1969-1976/oil-embargo
  90. https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/oil-shock-of-1973-74
  91. https://www.energypolicy.columbia.edu/publications/the-1973-oil-crisis-three-crises-in-one-and-the-lessons-for-today/
  92. https://www.britannica.com/event/Arab-oil-embargo
  93. https://www.chicagofed.org/publications/chicago-fed-letter/1994/october-86
  94. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/economics/factors-of-production/
  95. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/scarcity.asp
  96. https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Economics/Introductory_Comprehensive_Economics/Economics_%28Boundless%29/09%253A_Production/9.01%253A_The_Production_Function
  97. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w5398/w5398.pdf
  98. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/db955e35-2dc1-5632-bf18-ae667786f57f
  99. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-contribution-of-human-capital-to-economic-growth/
  100. https://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/article/10.11648/j.jhrm.20251302.11
  101. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wm-microeconomics/chapter/the-production-function/
  102. https://analystprep.com/study-notes/cfa-level-2/capital-deepening-and-technological-progress/
  103. https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/051115/what-capital-relation-factors-production.asp
  104. https://www.biologyonline.com/dictionary/limiting-factor
  105. https://www.khanacademy.org/science/hs-bio/x230b3ff252126bb6:ecology-and-natural-systems/x230b3ff252126bb6:an-organisms-niche/a/limiting-factors-of-organism-distributions
  106. https://byjus.com/biology/biotic-and-abiotic/
  107. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/ecosystem/
  108. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/introduction-environmental-science/limiting-factors
  109. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/limiting-factors/
  110. https://study.com/learn/lesson/population-limiting-factors-overview-types-examples.html
  111. https://populationeducation.org/what-factors-determine-the-carrying-capacity-of-an-ecosystem/
  112. https://bio.libretexts.org/Sandboxes/tholmberg_at_nwcc.edu/Introduction_to_Environmental_Science/5%253A_Human_Population_and_Resources/5.2%253A_Carrying_Capacity
  113. https://fiveable.me/fundamentals-ecology/unit-5/carrying-capacity-resource-limitation/study-guide/t2DTvdpcyAXtrQgv
  114. https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/resource-partitioning-and-why-it-matters-17362658/
  115. https://www.thoughtco.com/resource-partitioning-4588567
  116. https://www.khanacademy.org/science/ap-biology/ecology-ap/community-ecology/a/niches-competition
  117. https://bio.libretexts.org/Workbench/General_Ecology_Ecology/Chapter_15%253A_Competition/15.4%253A_Ecological_Consequences_of_Competition
  118. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2656.13346
  119. https://www.computerhope.com/jargon/r/resource.htm
  120. https://www.hpe.com/us/en/what-is/compute-resources.html
  121. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/operating-systems/resource-management-in-operating-system/
  122. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/operating-systems/resource-allocation-techniques-for-processes/
  123. https://www.tutorialspoint.com/resource-allocation
  124. https://aws.amazon.com/what-is/compute/
  125. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/configuration/manage-resources-containers/
  126. https://cloud.google.com/learn/what-is-cloud-computing
  127. https://www.techtarget.com/searchdatacenter/definition/IT
  128. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/resource-allocation
  129. https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/hayek-the-use-of-knowledge-in-society-1945
  130. https://mises.org/library/book/economic-calculation-socialist-commonwealth
  131. https://publish.iupress.indiana.edu/read/the-failure-of-soviet-economic-planning/section/3b6e72c2-2036-4e84-88de-8a4f5ca1a775
  132. https://tnsr.org/2018/02/assessing-soviet-economic-performance-cold-war/
  133. https://csgs.kcl.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Parker-paper.pdf
  134. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0962629816301445
  135. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-025-05085-3
  136. https://eml.berkeley.edu/~jsteinsson/teaching/markets.pdf
  137. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308597X21004474
  138. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2017/12/sustaining-iceland-s-fisheries-through-tradeable-quotas_279cbe93/46f8d776-en.pdf
  139. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308597X1930346X
  140. https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/1/3/pgac102/6625051
  141. https://experts.esf.edu/esploro/outputs/graduate/The-Effectiveness-of-Forest-Management-Plans/99872618104826
  142. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/1211706
  143. https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/tragedy-of-the-commons-impact-on-sustainability-issues
  144. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901119300802
  145. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389768232_Policymaking_Issues_Sustainable_Management_of_Natural_Resources
  146. https://open.library.ubc.ca/soa/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/831/items/1.0075427
  147. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainable-food-systems/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1670997/epub
  148. https://www.cato.org/economic-development-bulletin/julian-simon-was-right-half-century-population-growth-increasing
  149. https://www.masterresource.org/simon-julian/human-ingenuity-ultimate-resource/
  150. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691003818/the-ultimate-resource-2
  151. https://www.resources.org/archives/resources-in-americas-future/
  152. https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/2167/1/RR-84-09.pdf
  153. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24000270
  154. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/171471/1/wp-03-027_rev.pdf
  155. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921800916311429
  156. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/economic-aspects/nuclear-power-and-energy-security
  157. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0957178724000572
  158. https://media.rff.org/documents/RFF-IB-00-tahvonen.pdf
  159. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229398647_Neo-Malthusians_and_Cornucopians_put_to_the_test_Global_2000_and_The_Resourceful_Earth_revisited
  160. https://fee.org/articles/scarcity-or-abundance-a-debate-on-the-environment/
  161. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-malthus-is-still-wrong/
  162. https://ourworldindata.org/simon-ehrlich-bet
  163. https://media.rff.org/documents/RFF-DP-05-14.pdf
  164. https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2013/12/31/258687278/a-bet-five-metals-and-the-future-of-the-planet
  165. https://stephenkirchner.substack.com/p/the-simon-ehrlich-wager-over-124
  166. https://www.nber.org/papers/w5398
  167. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01045.x
  168. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2007/wp0755.pdf
  169. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2981510
  170. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10668-023-04279-6
  171. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988322004790
  172. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1093/reep/rex013
  173. https://www.epa.gov/environmental-economics/working-paper-impacts-environmental-regulation-us-economy
  174. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10438599.2016.1202521
  175. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/695613
  176. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/assessing-the-economic-impacts-of-environmental-policies_bf2fb156-en.html
  177. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/environmental-science/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.896892/full
  178. https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12302-025-01069-x
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.