Hubbry Logo
Proportioning valveProportioning valveMain
Open search
Proportioning valve
Community hub
Proportioning valve
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Proportioning valve
Proportioning valve
Proportioning valve
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A cross-section of a proportioning safety valve

A proportioning valve is a valve that relies on the laws of fluid pressure to distribute input forces to one or more output lines.

Proportioning valves are frequently used in cars and other road vehicles to reduce the brake fluid pressure to the rear brakes. Due to weight distribution during heavy braking, more pressure is needed for front brakes. A proportioning valve reduces the pressure in the hydraulic lines to the rear brakes relative to that supplied to the front brakes during this heavy braking.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Proportioning valve

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A proportioning valve is a hydraulic component in automotive braking systems, typically used in with front disc and rear , that restricts pressure to the rear wheels during panic stops to prevent rear wheel lockup while permitting unrestricted flow under normal braking conditions. It functions by balancing between the front and rear axles, ensuring optimal control and stability by accounting for transfer during deceleration, where more braking force is naturally directed to the front wheels. The valve operates via a spring-loaded mechanism: under low pressure, the spring keeps the piston open for equal fluid distribution; when pressure exceeds a threshold (typically 150-1200 psi, depending on adjustment), the piston shifts to proportionally reduce output to the rear , limiting lockup risk without affecting front brake performance. Key components include the piston, spring, and inlet/outlet ports, often integrated into a combination valve that also handles metering and warning functions for mixed brake setups. Types vary by application: fixed valves suit stock vehicles with preset ratios (e.g., 0.3-0.5 reduction for rear pressure), while adjustable models feature knobs or levers for tuning bias in performance or modified cars, allowing 10-20% variations in rear pressure via preload adjustments. Height-sensing variants, less common today, detect rear suspension compression to dynamically adjust based on load, and modern electronic proportioning (via ABS systems) uses sensors for precise, real-time control. Common symptoms of failure include uneven braking, spongy pedals, or rear lockup, often requiring reset via brake application or replacement to maintain safety.

Overview

Definition and Purpose

A proportioning valve is a hydraulic integrated into automotive systems that modulates fluid to the rear relative to the front , primarily by reducing rear during periods of heavy deceleration. This device ensures balanced braking force distribution, preventing excessive pressure buildup in the rear hydraulic lines that could otherwise lead to uneven stopping performance. The primary purpose of the proportioning valve is to avert rear wheel lockup, a condition that causes instability and potential skidding, particularly in configurations featuring front disc brakes and rear drum brakes where deceleration shifts forward. By reducing the hydraulic supplied to the rear brakes, it helps prevent rear wheel lockup while maintaining effective braking, promoting safer emergency stops and reducing the risk of loss of traction on the rear . Key benefits of the proportioning valve include enhanced overall stopping safety through sustained traction across all wheels and dynamic optimization of to accommodate weight transfer during braking maneuvers. This component emerged as an essential necessity in the mid-20th century alongside the transition to systems in automobiles during the , addressing the imbalances introduced by mixed brake types.

Basic Principles

During braking, the vehicle's center of gravity shifts forward due to deceleration forces, resulting in significant weight transfer from the rear axle to the front axle. This dynamic effect increases the normal load on the front tires, enhancing their friction capacity and allowing the front brakes to contribute up to 70-80% of the total stopping power, while the rear brakes' effectiveness diminishes to prevent skidding. Brake pressure requirements vary between axles due to differences in design and thermal performance. Front brakes, commonly disc configurations, can sustain higher hydraulic pressures because their open design facilitates superior dissipation via airflow and ventilation, reducing the risk of fade under intense use. Rear brakes, frequently drum types, operate in a more enclosed environment that limits release, necessitating lower to avoid overheating and premature lockup. Hydraulic principles govern how brake pressure is distributed, relying on the incompressibility of brake fluid as described by Pascal's law, which states that pressure applied to an enclosed fluid transmits equally throughout the system. To match the varying axle loads during braking, pressure must be proportioned accordingly, ensuring optimal force application without exceeding tire limits. The ideal brake balance ratio typically features 60-70% front bias for passenger sedans to align with their forward weight shift, though this is adjustable for vehicle types like trucks, where higher rear loads may require modifications to prevent rear bias instability. The proportioning valve plays a key role in achieving this balance by modulating rear pressure relative to the front.

Function and Operation

Mechanical Components

A typical proportioning valve consists of several key mechanical components that enable its role in regulating pressure. The valve body, commonly constructed from durable materials such as or , serves as the primary housing that encases the internal elements and facilitates mounting within the system, often near the . Central to the assembly is the spring-loaded , which functions as a movable barrier responsive to hydraulic differentials; it shifts to partially obstruct the flow path to the rear , thereby modulating distribution. Sealing elements, including O-rings and other gaskets, are integrated around the and ports to prevent fluid leakage and maintain system integrity under varying . Inlet and outlet ports provide the fluid pathways, with the inlet connecting to the supply and the outlet directing pressurized fluid to the rear circuit. The spring, coiled around or adjacent to the , imparts preload and a specific rate that establishes the activation threshold—typically in the range of 500-1000 psi—beyond which the piston begins to limit rear brake pressure. For practical integration, proportioning valves often incorporate bleeder screws to facilitate the removal of air bubbles during brake system maintenance. These features support the valve's overall purpose in achieving balanced braking without excessive rear wheel lockup.

Pressure Regulation Mechanism

The pressure regulation mechanism in a proportioning valve operates by allowing unrestricted flow to the rear during light to moderate braking, ensuring equal distribution initially. As pedal force increases and input rises, the valve maintains full pass-through until a predetermined threshold is reached, typically around 675 psi in adjustable models, where the mechanism begins to modulate output to prevent rear wheel lock-up. At this activation threshold, known as the knee-point, the incoming hydraulic exerts on a differential-area , overcoming the preload of an internal spring and causing the to displace. This movement partially closes the main inlet-outlet path, redirecting through a secondary, restricted path with a smaller effective area, which proportionally limits the transmitted to the rear . The spring provides resistance calibrated to the threshold, and once displaced, the maintains this restriction until input decreases, allowing the spring to return it to the open position. The resulting pressure curve features a linear or near-linear taper beyond the knee-point, where rear brake pressure increases at a reduced slope relative to the front—commonly 0.3 to 0.5 times the input pressure, such as a 0.43 ratio in many designs—ensuring balanced braking without excessive rear bias. This proportional reduction is governed by the geometry of the piston's differential areas, where the output pressure to the rear is effectively calculated as the threshold pressure plus the proportioning ratio multiplied by any additional input pressure above the threshold. In terms of , the restriction occurs through displacement that narrows the effective flow orifice, creating a across the valve while maintaining to avoid ; this ensures the rear pressure remains a fixed multiple of the input, promoting stable hydraulic response during events. A common failure mode involves the becoming stuck due to , , or seal degradation, which can result in uneven pressure distribution—either excessive rear pressure leading to lock-up or insufficient pressure causing reduced rear braking effectiveness. This is typically addressed through reset procedures, such as applying high pedal force to overcome the obstruction or manually centering the via access ports after depressurizing the system.

Types

Fixed Proportioning Valves

Fixed proportioning valves are non-adjustable devices preset by manufacturers to maintain a specific hydraulic pressure ratio between the front and rear brakes in original equipment manufacturer (OEM) systems. These valves are typically calibrated to deliver a rear brake pressure of approximately 0.4 times the front brake pressure in sedans, ensuring optimal braking balance for vehicles with front-heavy weight distribution and mixed disc/drum brake configurations. The factory-set ratio accounts for the vehicle's gross weight, center of gravity, and brake type, preventing rear wheel lockup during hard stops by gradually reducing pressure to the rear circuit once a threshold is reached. A key advantage of fixed proportioning valves lies in their simplicity and reliability, as they require no user intervention or adjustment, making them ideal for stock OEM applications. These valves are often integrated into combination units that also include metering and warning functions, streamlining installation and reducing potential failure points in the brake system. Their robust, simple mechanical design enhances long-term durability without the need for tools or periodic tuning. Fixed proportioning valves were standard in many vehicles from the to the , particularly those with diagonal split brake systems for improved safety, such as Ford Mustangs and various models equipped with front disc and rear brakes. In these setups, the valve ensured balanced pressure distribution across diagonally opposed wheels, maintaining vehicle stability during emergency braking. However, fixed proportioning valves have limitations in adaptability, as their preset calibration does not accommodate vehicle modifications such as suspension upgrades or larger sizes that alter or braking dynamics. Such changes can lead to suboptimal , potentially causing rear under-braking or instability, necessitating replacement with adjustable alternatives for modified vehicles.

Adjustable Proportioning Valves

Adjustable proportioning valves feature a manual adjustment mechanism, typically a knurled knob or screw, that enables users to vary the rear line ratio, often within a range allowing up to 57% reduction from input pressures of 100 to 1000 . These valves incorporate a spring-loaded that modulates based on the adjustment preload, with many models including a locking mechanism such as a to secure the setting against vibration. The design prioritizes compact, inline installation with standard ports like 1/8-27 NPT inlets and outlets, facilitating integration into custom circuits. In aftermarket applications, these valves are commonly employed in vehicles or modified street cars to fine-tune front-to-rear bias, compensating for variations in compounds, suspension geometry, or that differ from original equipment specifications. Tuning typically involves iterative track testing, starting with the valve set to minimum restriction and gradually increasing reduction while monitoring lockup tendencies and vehicle handling during repeated high-speed stops. Unlike fixed proportioning valves, which provide a static preset by manufacturers, adjustable models offer on-demand customization to optimize stopping performance under dynamic conditions. Prominent examples include the Wilwood 260-8419 knob-style , which provides infinitely variable adjustment via knob rotation for precise metering and supports reductions up to 57% for enhanced rear brake control in performance setups. Similarly, models from brands like Tuff Stuff and Speedway incorporate comparable knob adjustments, often paired with inline gauges during initial setup to verify output pressures and ensure balanced braking without rear wheel lockup. These valves are valued in motorsports for their ability to adapt to track-specific demands, such as higher rear bias on circuits with long straights. Installation of an adjustable proportioning valve requires mounting it inline on the rear line, typically between the distribution block and the rear , using fittings compatible with 3/16-inch tubing. Post-installation, the brake system must be thoroughly to remove air pockets, with the valve initially set to full open (minimum reduction) to facilitate fluid flow during the process from the through to the or drums. This ensures consistent pressure delivery and prevents spongy pedal feel, with final adjustments made after confirming no leaks and performing baseline braking tests.

Load-Sensing Proportioning Valves

Load-sensing proportioning valves (LSPVs) are specialized hydraulic devices designed to dynamically adjust pressure distribution in response to variations in load, particularly in trucks and vans where payload fluctuations are common. These valves integrate a mechanical linkage to the rear suspension , typically featuring a lever arm or torsion bar connected to the height, which senses suspension deflection caused by load changes. As the loads increase, such as when carrying trailers or , the linkage varies the spring preload on the valve's , thereby modulating the hydraulic delivered to the rear . This mechanism ensures that braking force remains proportional to the 's , preventing rear wheel lock-up under light loads while maximizing rear utilization under heavy loads. In operation, the LSPV functions in two primary phases relative to the input from the . Below a critical "knee point" , the allows near-equal front and rear (approximately 1:1 ) to initiate braking evenly. Above this point, a spring-loaded and rubber seal or ring restrict flow to the rear circuit, creating a reduced in the —typically adjusting from around 0.3 under unloaded conditions to 0.6 or higher when loaded—to optimize the front-to-rear braking force balance. This load-dependent adjustment is achieved through the torsion bar's twist angle or lever movement, which directly influences the 's force and the 's internal orifice size, thereby increasing rear line as rises. For instance, in heavy-load scenarios like , the system boosts rear to engage the full capacity, enhancing overall without compromising stability. LSPVs have been employed in commercial vehicles, such as delivery trucks and light-duty haulers, since the early to address the limitations of fixed-ratio valves in payload-variable applications. Notable examples include their introduction on 1982 Chevrolet C30 and K30 series trucks, where they provided selective proportioning based on height sensing, and widespread adoption in models like the NPR series from the mid- onward. These valves, often abbreviated as LSPV, were pioneered in engineering developments dating back to the late but gained prominence in commercial fleets for their ability to adapt to dynamic loads in real-time. Compared to fixed proportioning valves, LSPVs offer superior performance by automatically maintaining optimal across varying payloads, which reduces the risk of rear over-application and improves vehicle control during emergency stops. This adaptability not only enhances braking efficiency and safety but also contributes to reduced tire wear through minimized skidding and better overall system longevity in demanding commercial use.

History and Development

Early Innovations

The introduction of systems in the 1920s and 1930s marked a significant advancement over mechanical brakes, offering more consistent force distribution across wheels, yet these early designs often suffered from inherent imbalances. During hard braking, weight transfer shifted the vehicle's load forward, reducing traction at the rear wheels and causing premature lockup in configurations, which compromised stability and increased stopping distances. A foundational precursor to proportioning mechanisms appeared in the early 20th century with Louis Renault's 1902 patent for an internal expanding , which utilized friction shoes against a rotating to generate braking torque and influenced subsequent hydraulic integrations. However, proportioning valves as a specific solution emerged post-World War II amid the automotive boom, when rising vehicle speeds and weights demanded better front-rear balance to prevent rear lockup. Early fixed proportioning valves, which provided a constant reduction ratio without load sensing, were developed in the late , paving the way for more advanced designs. Key innovations in the 1950s focused on pressure-limiting devices to address these issues, particularly as manufacturers tested front disc brake conversions that amplified front braking efficiency relative to rear drums. Engineers at Bendix Corporation led these efforts, filing the first notable U.S. patent (US3159433A) in 1961 for a load-sensing brake proportioning valve that modulated rear brake pressure based on axle load via a diaphragm and piston assembly, issued in 1964. This design represented an early pressure regulation approach tailored for hydraulic systems. Initial adoption occurred through experiments by and Ford in the late 1950s for luxury models, where prototype disc/drum setups incorporated basic proportioning to optimize performance without rear bias. By the early , these valves appeared in production on select high-end vehicles, such as Ford's 1965 Thunderbird with optional discs, ensuring safer deceleration amid the era's performance demands.

Evolution in the 20th Century

In the , proportioning valves became essential in U.S. vehicles transitioning to front disc , as drum at the rear required modulation to prevent lockup and ensure balanced stopping. For instance, the 1965 , offered with optional front disc , incorporated a proportioning valve to adjust rear brake relative to the front, addressing the higher of discs under heavy braking. Similarly, vehicles from 1967 to 1970 equipped with front discs used dedicated proportioning valves alongside metering and distribution blocks to optimize brake bias. By the early 1970s, U.S. federal regulations and industry practices drove further refinements, including the integration of proportioning functions into combination valves that also handled pressure differential warnings. In 1971, manufacturers like consolidated separate metering, distribution, and proportioning valves into a single combination unit, which included a activator for dual-circuit failures. This design helped vehicles meet the performance requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 105 for systems, effective from 1968, by standardizing brake balance and ensuring compliance with stopping distance criteria. European manufacturers adopted proportioning valves earlier than their U.S. counterparts, often in the mid-1960s, driven by stringent safety priorities and quicker embrace of disc brake technology. Volvo, for example, integrated proportioning valves into models like the P1800 series by the late 1960s, with earlier variants from 1961 lacking them but subsequent updates ensuring rear pressure reduction for stability on front-disc setups. This proactive approach contrasted with U.S. timelines, as European regulations and engineering focused on crash avoidance from the outset of disc brake proliferation around 1960. The saw advancements in load-sensing proportioning valves, particularly for sport utility vehicles and trucks, to account for variable rear axle loads. introduced height-sensing variants on 1982 Chevrolet C/K30 series trucks, using a dual-mode valve that adjusted rear based on suspension height, improving braking on unloaded versus loaded configurations. These valves integrated with early (ABS) precursors, laying groundwork for dynamic control, though fixed mechanical types remained dominant until the 1990s. By the decade's end, the rise of (EBD) within widespread ABS adoption began diminishing reliance on fixed proportioning valves, as sensor-based systems offered more precise, adaptive modulation without mechanical components.

Applications and Integration

In Automotive Brake Systems

In automotive brake systems, the proportioning valve is integrated into the hydraulic circuit to regulate pressure distribution, typically installed between the and the rear wheel cylinders or . This placement ensures that from the passes through the valve before reaching the rear brakes, allowing it to limit excessive pressure to the rear axle during hard stops while maintaining full pressure for lighter braking. In vehicles with diagonal split systems—where one circuit controls the front left and rear right brakes, and the other the front right and rear left—this setup provides by isolating failures to half the , preventing total brake loss. Proportioning valves are particularly essential in hybrid brake configurations combining front disc brakes with rear drum brakes, as the self-energizing nature of drums can cause premature rear wheel lockup without pressure regulation. In such disc/drum hybrids, the valve activates above a specific "knee point" (often around 600-700 psi) to reduce rear line pressure to approximately 40-50% of the input, promoting balanced braking and vehicle stability. For all-disc brake systems without anti-lock braking (ABS), the valve may be bypassed or unnecessary if the rear discs are properly sized, though adjustable models can still fine-tune bias for optimal performance. Maintenance of proportioning valves involves periodic for leaks, corrosion, or internal sticking, with symptoms of failure including rear lockup during braking (indicating over-proportioning), uneven or shoe wear across axles, or a spongy pedal feel due to trapped . To test functionality, install gauges in the lines to measure input versus output during simulated braking, ensuring the reduces as designed; if discrepancies exceed 10-20%, adjustment or replacement is required. Resetting a tripped —common after —requires pressing the pedal several times with the engine running or using a dedicated bleeder tool to recenter the internal without air introduction. These valves were commonly fitted in 1970s-2000s pickups, such as the Ford F-150, where load-sensing variants adjusted rear brake pressure based on cargo or trailer weight to enhance stability and prevent skidding under variable loads. In GM trucks like the 1970-72 series, fixed proportioning valves maintained a 60/40 front/rear bias in disc/ setups, supporting safe hauling in work vehicles.

In Other Hydraulic Systems

While the term "proportioning valve" is primarily associated with automotive brake systems featuring a fixed-ratio piston-spring mechanism, analogous functions in industrial and other hydraulic applications are typically performed by proportional valves, which provide variable control based on electrical inputs. These proportional valves are used in hydraulic presses to regulate fluid pressure for uniform force during forming or stamping, and in like excavators to ratios to actuators for coordinated movements, enhancing efficiency and preventing overloads. Custom and non-standard applications extend the utility of proportioning valves into DIY hydraulic projects and specialized setups beyond standard braking. Enthusiasts in DIY hydraulics often adapt these valves for small-scale machinery, such as custom lifts or presses, to achieve controlled distribution in builds using off-the-shelf components. In contexts, they are employed for modulation systems, where the valve adjusts hydraulic pressure to the actuator for smoother engagement and disengagement, optimizing shift performance in high-speed vehicles without relying on electronic controls. These adaptations highlight the valve's versatility in experimental or performance-oriented hydraulic circuits.

Modern Alternatives and Limitations

Electronic Brakeforce Distribution

Electronic Brakeforce Distribution (EBD) is an advanced automotive braking technology that utilizes wheel speed sensors and an (ECU) to dynamically allocate braking force among individual wheels, supplanting the static ratios provided by traditional mechanical proportioning valves. This system integrates seamlessly with anti-lock braking systems (ABS) to ensure optimal force distribution based on real-time factors such as vehicle load, traction, and weight transfer during deceleration. By electronically modulating hydraulic pressure via valves, EBD prevents wheel lockup and maintains control, particularly addressing the tendency for rear wheels to lose traction under heavy braking. In operation, EBD continuously monitors wheel rotational speeds through ABS sensors to calculate slip ratios for each wheel. The ECU processes this data to detect discrepancies, such as excessive rear-wheel slip due to lighter load or poor adhesion, and responds by proportionally reducing or increasing brake pressure to the affected wheels using integrated modulators. For instance, during emergency braking on a wet surface, the system may limit rear brake force while maximizing front brake application to avoid skidding, all without driver intervention. This real-time adjustment occurs within milliseconds, leveraging the same hydraulic architecture as ABS but with enhanced logic for force balancing. The primary advantages of EBD lie in its adaptability to dynamic driving conditions, such as varying payloads in minivans or slippery roads, which mechanical valves cannot accommodate effectively. It enhances overall vehicle stability, shortens stopping distances in uneven load scenarios, and reduces wear on brake components by optimizing force application. EBD also improves in cornering by compensating for lateral weight shifts, contributing to better handling without compromising pedal feel. EBD systems began integrating into production vehicles in the mid-1990s, with early implementations by companies like in 1997 and Bosch in advanced ABS setups for models around the same period. By the early 2000s, EBD had become a standard feature in most new passenger vehicles worldwide, often bundled with (ESC), effectively rendering mechanical proportioning valves obsolete in modern designs. This widespread adoption has significantly elevated baseline braking performance across vehicle classes.

Comparison with Traditional Valves

Traditional mechanical proportioning valves function passively through fixed or adjustable mechanisms, such as spring-loaded pistons, to limit hydraulic pressure to the rear brakes and prevent lockup during standard braking scenarios. In comparison, (EBD) systems operate actively, using wheel speed sensors, steering inputs, and data to dynamically allocate braking force in real time, eliminating the need for physical adjustments or resets found in mechanical designs. A primary limitation of traditional valves is their static nature, which provides only a compromise bias unsuitable for varying loads or road conditions, potentially leading to suboptimal braking performance like rear wheel lockup under heavy loading. Additionally, these mechanical components are susceptible to over time, including spring that can cause uneven distribution and symptoms such as excessive rear or pulling during stops. During the transition to advanced braking technologies in the early , some vehicles integrated both mechanical proportioning valves and EBD for redundancy, ensuring reliable operation if electronic systems failed. Today, mechanical proportioning valves are largely legacy components, confined to restorations, custom builds, or low-cost vehicles lacking ABS integration.

References

  1. https://help.summitracing.com/knowledgebase/article/SR-00546/en-us
  2. https://www.speedwaymotors.com/the-toolbox/brake-proportioning-valve-reset-symptoms-bleeders-adjustment/134183
  3. https://shop.wilwood.com/blogs/news/how-does-a-proportioning-valve-work
  4. https://knowhow.napaonline.com/what-is-a-brake-proportioning-valve/
  5. https://www.brakes-shop.com/brakepedia/general/brake-proportioning-valves
  6. https://www.fordification.com/tech/propvalve101.htm
  7. https://nearyou.imeche.org/docs/default-source/Staffordshire-Area/vehicle-braking-systems.pdf?sfvrsn=0
  8. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/119947/1080312700-MIT.pdf?sequence=1
  9. https://www.allrotors.com/blog-65-which-brakes-are-more-important-front-or-rear-brakes
  10. https://web.eng.fiu.edu/allstar/Hydr02.htm
  11. https://help.summitracing.com/knowledgebase/article/SR-05295/en-us
  12. https://rennlist.com/forums/944-turbo-and-turbo-s-forum/1406915-brake-proportioning-valve-what-s-inside.html
  13. https://tiltonracing.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/98-1261-Brake-Proportioning-Valve.pdf
  14. https://fpautoparts.com/blog/disc-brake-conversions-understanding-gm-proportioning-valves-distribution-blocks-metering-blocks-and-combination-valves/
  15. https://www.cnbrakecylinder.com/what-is-a-brake-proportioning-valve/
  16. https://www.onallcylinders.com/2019/06/27/brake-proportioning-valves-101-how-they-work-which-style-to-choose/
  17. https://growthmarketreports.com/report/abs-delete-proportioning-valve-kit-market
  18. https://www.cjponyparts.com/mustang-brake-proportioning-valves-distribution-blocks/c/60030150/
  19. https://949racing.com/supermiata/tech-info/supermiata-brake-faq/
  20. https://www.wilwood.com/PDF/DataSheets/ds488.pdf
  21. https://www.speedwaymotors.com/Speedway-Polished-Adjustable-Brake-Proportioning-Valve%2C24060.html
  22. https://static.summitracing.com/global/images/instructions/leb-pbkt1000.pdf
  23. https://www.jegs.com/tech-articles/how-to-adjust-a-wilwood-proportioning-valve/
  24. https://www.sae.org/papers/approach-load-sensing-brake-proportioning-passenger-cars-light-trucks-660411
  25. https://oaji.net/articles/2014/766-1398016850.pdf
  26. https://www.sae.org/papers/a-dual-mode-height-sensing-brake-proportioning-valve-820026
  27. https://www.jackit.com/chevy-load-sensing-valve
  28. https://autorestorer.com/articles/restoring_mechanical_brakes_on_a_classic_car_and_history_of_their_usage-2018
  29. https://www.invent.org/inductees/louis-renault
  30. https://patents.google.com/patent/US3159433A/en
  31. https://www.hemmings.com/stories/disc-brakes-which-car-had-them-first/
  32. http://www.stangerssite.com/brakevalve.html
  33. https://www.motortrend.com/how-to/sucp-0206-disc-brake-conversion
  34. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-49/subtitle-B/chapter-V/part-571/subpart-B/section-571.105
  35. https://www.glenngoodspeed.com/volvo/brakevalve.htm
  36. https://4lifetimelines.com/blogs/knowledge-garage/the-history-of-automotive-brake-systems
  37. https://www.tirereview.com/understanding-and-diagnosing-electronic-brake-distribution/
  38. https://www.jotamachinery.com/what-is-a-proportioning-valve/
  39. https://thmhuade.com/the-role-of-proportioning-valves-in-load-sensitive-systems/
  40. https://www.emerson.com/en-us/automation/fluid-control-pneumatics/proportional-applications
  41. https://www.hydraulic-supply.com/hydraulic-power-control/hydraulic-valves-accessories/directional-control-valves/proportional.html
  42. https://thmhuade.com/how-hydraulic-proportional-valves-work-and-tips-proportional-valve/
  43. https://www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/content/920646/
  44. https://auto.howstuffworks.com/car-driving-safety/safety-regulatory-devices/electronic-brake-force-distribution.htm
  45. https://global.honda/en/newsroom/worldnews/1997/c970919d.html
  46. https://brainonboard.ca/safety-features/ebfd/
  47. https://www.brakeandfrontend.com/electronic-proportioning-valve-doing-more-with-less-hardware/
  48. https://www.r1concepts.com/blog/symptoms-of-bad-proportioning-valve/
  49. https://www.counterman.com/abs-update-electronic-brake-distribution-ebd/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.