Pyroraptor (meaning "fire thief") is an extinct genus of paravian dinosaur, probably a dromaeosaurid or unenlagiid, from the Late Cretaceous Ibero-Armorican island, of what is now southern France. It lived during the late Campanian and early Maastrichtian stages, approximately 72 million years ago. It is known from a single partial specimen that was found in Provence in 1992, after a forest fire. The animal was named Pyroraptor olympius by Allain and Taquet in 2000.

The first remains of P. olympius were discovered in southeastern France, at the La Boucharde locality of the Arc Basin in Provence. It was described and named by French paleontologists Ronan Allain and Philippe Taquet in 2000, the type species and so far the only species is Pyroraptor olympius. The generic name comes from πῦρ (pûr, Greek for "fire") and raptor (Latin for "thief"), since its remains were discovered after a forest fire that occurred in 1992. The specific name is derived from Mont Olympe, the mountain in Provence at the foot of which the animal's remains were unearthed.

The holotype specimen, MNHN BO001, consists of the second toe claw of the left foot. The assigned paratypes include the equivalent claw of the right foot; the left second metatarsal; another, more complete second toe claw; a right ulna (long forearm bone); and two teeth. Additional material was referred to Pyroraptor, including five pedal digits, one manual digit, a piece of a metacarpal, a right radius, a dorsal vertebra, and a tail vertebra.

Some teeth from the Iberian peninsula of North Eastern Spain have been compared to those referred to Pyroraptor, suggesting that Pyroraptor may have also inhabited Spain; however, a 2022 reevaluation of these teeth states that they cannot be confidently assigned to Pyroraptor and may belong to a whole different variety of European dromaeosaurids.

Finds of dromaeosaurid dinosaur remains are rare in Europe and typically provide little taxonomic information. The first dromaeosaurid fossils found in France were those of Variraptor mechinorum, described by Jean Le Lœuff and Eric Buffetaut. Allain and Taquet considered Variraptor mechinorum to be a nomen dubium on the basis that fossil material of the species was collected from localities different from that of the holotype, and that the material did not have enough diagnostic traits to warrant the naming of a new species. However, one of the authors that named Variraptor, Jean Le Lœuff, points out in a conversation that the same reasons given for considering Variraptor mechinorum to be a nomen dubium would apply to Pyroraptor olympius as well, since Pyroraptor's remains present the same problems.

In a 2009 description of new dromaeosaurid remains assigned to Variraptor mechinorum, Phornphen Chanthasit and Eric Buffetaut addressed the claims of Allain & Taquet by mentioning that the original description of Variraptor mechinorum very clearly distinguished the holotype from any referred material and argue that some of the material very clearly belongs to the same individual while also elucidating that the situation with Pyroraptor is quite similar. However, due to the disarticulated nature of Pyroraptor remains, it's unknown if they belong to the same individual. This suspicion is affirmed by a 2012 study that states the known Pyroraptor material to belong to at least two different individuals.

The other criticism of Allain and Taquet, that there are not enough diagnostic features to support the validity of Variraptor, is also addressed by the description of new and overlapping Variraptor remains from the same locality as the holotype Variraptor specimen, some of which are stated to undeniably belong to the holotype individual, thus adding new diagnostic traits and establishing the validity of Variraptor mechinorum. The authors also bring light to the fact that Allain and Taquet did not provide enough diagnosable traits to establish the holotype of Pyroraptor as a valid species, noting that most features stated for diagnosis are not unique to Pyroraptor but are simply widespread traits of dromaeosaurids. A 2012 study also agrees that Pyroraptor's "unique" traits are widespread features of dromaeosaurids, while also ruling out some of the other "unique traits" as results of preservation deformation.

Since the two existed at the same time and place, the possibility of a synonymy between Pyroraptor and Variraptor is raised but it is concluded that due to the current lack of overlap in material, this possible synonymy cannot yet be tested and more remains are needed.