Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Separable space
View on WikipediaIn mathematics, a topological space is called separable if it contains a countable dense subset; that is, there exists a sequence of elements of the space such that every nonempty open subset of the space contains at least one element of the sequence.
Like the other axioms of countability, separability is a "limitation on size", not necessarily in terms of cardinality (though, in the presence of the Hausdorff axiom, this does turn out to be the case; see below) but in a more subtle topological sense. In particular, every continuous function on a separable space whose image is a subset of a Hausdorff space is determined by its values on the countable dense subset.
Contrast separability with the related notion of second countability, which is in general stronger but equivalent on the class of metrizable spaces.
First examples
[edit]Any topological space that is itself finite or countably infinite is separable, for the whole space is a countable dense subset of itself. An important example of an uncountable separable space is the real line, in which the rational numbers form a countable dense subset. Similarly the set of all length- vectors of rational numbers, , is a countable dense subset of the set of all length- vectors of real numbers, ; so for every , -dimensional Euclidean space is separable.
A simple example of a space that is not separable is a discrete space of uncountable cardinality.
Further examples are given below.
Separability versus second countability
[edit]Any second-countable space is separable: if is a countable base, choosing any from the non-empty gives a countable dense subset. Conversely, a metrizable space is separable if and only if it is second countable, which is the case if and only if it is Lindelöf.
To further compare these two properties:
- An arbitrary subspace of a second-countable space is second countable; subspaces of separable spaces need not be separable (see below).
- Any continuous image of a separable space is separable (Willard 1970, Th. 16.4a); even a quotient of a second-countable space need not be second countable.
- A product of at most continuum many separable spaces is separable (Willard 1970, p. 109, Th 16.4c). A countable product of second-countable spaces is second countable, but an uncountable product of second-countable spaces need not even be first countable.
We can construct an example of a separable topological space that is not second countable. Consider any uncountable set , pick some , and define the topology to be the collection of all sets that contain (or are empty). Then, the closure of is the whole space ( is the smallest closed set containing ), but every set of the form is open. Therefore, the space is separable but there cannot have a countable base.
Cardinality
[edit]The property of separability does not in and of itself give any limitations on the cardinality of a topological space: any set endowed with the trivial topology is separable, as well as second countable, quasi-compact, and connected. The "trouble" with the trivial topology is its poor separation properties: its Kolmogorov quotient is the one-point space.
A first-countable, separable Hausdorff space (in particular, a separable metric space) has at most the continuum cardinality . In such a space, closure is determined by limits of sequences and any convergent sequence has at most one limit, so there is a surjective map from the set of convergent sequences with values in the countable dense subset to the points of .
A separable Hausdorff space has cardinality at most , where is the cardinality of the continuum. For this closure is characterized in terms of limits of filter bases: if and , then if and only if there exists a filter base consisting of subsets of that converges to . The cardinality of the set of such filter bases is at most . Moreover, in a Hausdorff space, there is at most one limit to every filter base. Therefore, there is a surjection when
The same arguments establish a more general result: suppose that a Hausdorff topological space contains a dense subset of cardinality . Then has cardinality at most and cardinality at most if it is first countable.
The product of at most continuum many separable spaces is a separable space (Willard 1970, p. 109, Th 16.4c). In particular the space of all functions from the real line to itself, endowed with the product topology, is a separable Hausdorff space of cardinality . More generally, if is any infinite cardinal, then a product of at most spaces with dense subsets of size at most has itself a dense subset of size at most (Hewitt–Marczewski–Pondiczery theorem).
Constructive mathematics
[edit]Separability is especially important in numerical analysis and constructive mathematics, since many theorems that can be proved for nonseparable spaces have constructive proofs only for separable spaces. Such constructive proofs can be turned into algorithms for use in numerical analysis, and they are the only sorts of proofs acceptable in constructive analysis. A famous example of a theorem of this sort is the Hahn–Banach theorem.
Further examples
[edit]Separable spaces
[edit]- Every compact metric space (or metrizable space) is separable.
- Any topological space that is the union of a countable number of separable subspaces is separable. Together, these first two examples give a different proof that -dimensional Euclidean space is separable.
- The space of all continuous functions from a compact subset to the real line is separable.
- The Lebesgue spaces , over a measure space whose σ-algebra is countably generated and whose measure is σ-finite, are separable for any .[1]
- The space of continuous real-valued functions on the unit interval with the metric of uniform convergence is a separable space, since it follows from the Weierstrass approximation theorem that the set of polynomials in one variable with rational coefficients is a countable dense subset of . The Banach–Mazur theorem asserts that any separable Banach space is isometrically isomorphic to a closed linear subspace of .
- A Hilbert space is separable if and only if it has a countable orthonormal basis. It follows that any separable, infinite-dimensional Hilbert space is isometric to the space of square-summable sequences.
- An example of a separable space that is not second-countable is the Sorgenfrey line , the set of real numbers equipped with the lower limit topology.
- A separable σ-algebra is a σ-algebra that is a separable space when considered as a metric space with metric for and a given finite measure (and with being the symmetric difference operator).[2]
Non-separable spaces
[edit]- The first uncountable ordinal , equipped with its natural order topology, is not separable.
- The Banach space of all bounded real sequences, with the supremum norm, is not separable. The same holds for .
- The Banach space of functions of bounded variation is not separable; note however that this space has very important applications in mathematics, physics and engineering.
Properties
[edit]- A subspace of a separable space need not be separable (see the Sorgenfrey plane and the Moore plane), but every open subspace of a separable space is separable (Willard 1970, Th 16.4b). Also every subspace of a separable metric space is separable.
- In fact, every topological space is a subspace of a separable space of the same cardinality. Only countably many points need to be added: the points of the countable dense subset of the separable space. A construction is given in (Sierpiński 1952, p. 49); this construction additionally embeds every Hausdorff space into a separable Hausdorff space.
- The set of all real-valued continuous functions on a separable space has a cardinality equal to , the cardinality of the continuum. This follows since such functions are determined by their values on dense subsets.
- From the above property, one can deduce the following: If X is a separable space having an uncountable closed discrete subspace, then X cannot be normal. This shows that the Sorgenfrey plane is not normal.
- For a compact Hausdorff space X, the following are equivalent:
- X is second countable.
- The space of continuous real-valued functions on X with the supremum norm is separable.
- X is metrizable.
Embedding separable metric spaces
[edit]- Every separable metric space is homeomorphic to a subset of the Hilbert cube. This is established in the proof of the Urysohn metrization theorem.
- Every separable metric space is isometric to a subset of the (non-separable) Banach space l∞ of all bounded real sequences with the supremum norm; this is known as the Fréchet embedding. (Heinonen 2003)
- Every separable metric space is isometric to a subset of C([0,1]), the separable Banach space of continuous functions [0,1] → R, with the supremum norm. This is due to Stefan Banach. (Heinonen 2003)
- Every separable metric space is isometric to a subset of the Urysohn universal space.
For nonseparable spaces:
- A metric space of density equal to an infinite cardinal α is isometric to a subspace of C([0,1]α, R), the space of real continuous functions on the product of α copies of the unit interval. (Kleiber & Pervin 1969)
References
[edit]- ^ Donald L. Cohn (2013). Measure Theory. Birkhäuser Advanced Texts Basler Lehrbücher. Springer Science+Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6956-8. ISBN 978-1-4614-6955-1., Proposition 3.4.5.
- ^ Džamonja, Mirna; Kunen, Kenneth (1995). "Properties of the class of measure separable compact spaces" (PDF). Fundamenta Mathematicae: 262. arXiv:math/9408201. Bibcode:1994math......8201D.
If is a Borel measure on , the measure algebra of is the Boolean algebra of all Borel sets modulo -null sets. If is finite, then such a measure algebra is also a metric space, with the distance between the two sets being the measure of their symmetric difference. Then, we say that is separable iff this metric space is separable as a topological space.
- Heinonen, Juha (January 2003), Geometric embeddings of metric spaces (PDF), retrieved 6 February 2009
- Kelley, John L. (1975), General Topology, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-90125-1, MR 0370454
- Kleiber, Martin; Pervin, William J. (1969), "A generalized Banach-Mazur theorem", Bull. Austral. Math. Soc., 1 (2): 169–173, doi:10.1017/S0004972700041411
- Sierpiński, Wacław (1952), General topology, Mathematical Expositions, No. 7, Toronto, Ont.: University of Toronto Press, MR 0050870
- Steen, Lynn Arthur; Seebach, J. Arthur Jr. (1995) [1978], Counterexamples in Topology (Dover reprint of 1978 ed.), Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-486-68735-3, MR 0507446
- Willard, Stephen (1970), General Topology, Addison-Wesley, ISBN 978-0-201-08707-9, MR 0264581
Separable space
View on GrokipediaDefinition
Formal definition
A topological space is separable if it contains a countable dense subset .[1][4] This definition presupposes familiarity with the basic elements of topology, including the collection of open sets that form the topology on and the closure operator , which assigns to each subset its smallest closed superset.[6] A subset is dense in if , meaning that intersects every nonempty open set (i.e., ).[4] Equivalently, the closure condition ensures that is "everywhere dense," with points of accumulating at every point of .[6] Separability is inherently a topological property, determined solely by the open sets of the space and independent of the cardinality of the underlying set at the outset.[1] For example, the rational numbers form a countable dense subset of the real numbers under the standard topology.[4]Equivalent characterizations
A topological space is separable if and only if its density character , where the density character is defined as the smallest cardinality of any dense subset of . In sequential spaces, separability is equivalent to the existence of a countable dense subset such that every point of is the limit of a convergent sequence with terms in . This follows from the fact that in sequential spaces, the closure of a set coincides with its sequential closure.[7] In any topological space, separability implies the existence of a countable subset that intersects every closed subset of with nonempty interior (take to be the countable dense subset itself, as it intersects the nonempty interior, which is open).Examples
Basic separable spaces
Euclidean spaces provide a fundamental example of separable spaces. The space , equipped with the standard Euclidean topology, is separable because the subset consisting of all points with rational coordinates in each component is countable and dense in .[8] This density follows from the fact that every open ball in contains points with rational coordinates, allowing to approximate any point arbitrarily closely.[9] Any countable topological space is inherently separable, as the space itself forms a countable dense subset.[10] For instance, consider a countable set endowed with the discrete topology, where every subset is open; here, the entire space serves as the countable dense subset, since its closure is the space itself.[11] In the realm of infinite-dimensional spaces, the Hilbert space of square-summable real sequences is separable. A countable dense subset consists of all sequences with only finitely many nonzero entries, each of which is rational; this set is countable as a countable union over finite supports of countable products of rationals, and it is dense because any sequence in can be approximated by truncating its tail and rationalizing its finite initial segment to within any desired norm.[12]Basic non-separable spaces
One basic example of a non-separable topological space is the uncountable discrete space, where an uncountable set is equipped with the discrete topology in which every subset is open.[13] In this space, the singleton sets form an uncountable family of pairwise disjoint nonempty open sets. A countable dense subset would need to intersect every nonempty open set, but it can intersect at most countably many of these singletons, leaving uncountably many open singletons untouched by its closure, so no such dense subset exists.[13] Another standard non-separable space is , the Banach space of all bounded real-valued sequences equipped with the supremum norm .[14] To see its non-separability, consider the uncountable family of sequences that are the characteristic functions of singletons in an uncountable index set, or more simply, the set of all sequences with entries in , which has cardinality . The open balls of radius around these distinct sequences are pairwise disjoint, as the supremum norm distance between any two distinct such sequences is 1. Thus, any countable subset can intersect at most countably many of these balls, implying no countable dense subset exists.[14] The ordinal space with the order topology provides a third fundamental example of non-separability. Here, is the first uncountable ordinal, and the topology is generated by open intervals for ordinals . The singleton sets for each successor ordinal (where for some ) form an uncountable collection of pairwise disjoint nonempty open sets, as each such singleton is the open interval . Since there are uncountably many successor ordinals below , a countable dense subset cannot intersect all of them, preventing its closure from being the entire space. These examples illustrate the failure of separability through the presence of uncountably many pairwise disjoint nonempty open sets, which no countable set can densely approximate.Relations to other separation axioms
Separability versus second countability
A second-countable space is a topological space that possesses a countable basis for its topology, meaning there exists a countable collection of open sets such that every open set in the space is a countable union of elements from this collection.[15] Second countability implies separability in any topological space. To see this, consider the countable basis ; by the axiom of countable choice, select a point for each . The set is countable. For density, take any nonempty open set ; then contains some basis element , so , ensuring intersects every nonempty open set.[16] However, separability does not imply second countability. A classic counterexample is the Sorgenfrey line, which is the real line equipped with the lower limit topology generated by the basis of half-open intervals .[17] The Sorgenfrey line is separable because the set of rational numbers is dense in it. For any nonempty basic open set , the density of in with the standard topology guarantees a rational , so intersects every basic open set.[18] Nevertheless, the Sorgenfrey line is not second countable. Suppose for contradiction that it has a countable basis . For each , the open interval contains and is itself a basic open set. Select such that . Any such must satisfy , because basis elements containing are of the form with , and for , it is necessary that . Thus, if , then . The map is therefore an injection from the uncountable set into the countable set , a contradiction.[19]Separability in metric spaces
In metric spaces, separability is equivalent to second countability.[10] This equivalence arises from the structure of the metric topology. If is a separable metric space, it contains a countable dense subset . The collection of all open balls centered at these points with rational radii forms a countable basis for the topology, as every open set is a union of such balls and the set is countable.[10] Conversely, if is second countable with countable basis , select a point for each ; the set is countable and dense, since every nonempty open set contains some and thus intersects .[10] The Urysohn metrization theorem reinforces this alignment: every second countable regular Hausdorff space is metrizable, implying that separable metric spaces inherit second countability as a defining feature under regularity.[20] Representative examples include the real line with its standard metric, which is separable via the dense rationals and thus second countable, and the sequence spaces for , which are separable Banach spaces with countable dense subsets like rational sequences with finite support.[21] In contrast to general topological spaces, where the properties may diverge, the metric imposes their coincidence.[10]Cardinality and general properties
Cardinality bounds
In separable metric spaces, the cardinality of the underlying set is at most the cardinality of the continuum . To see this, let be a countable dense subset of . The map defined by is injective, since if , then and have the same distances to every point in the dense set , implying by density. As , it follows that .[22] The real line with the standard topology achieves this bound, having cardinality while being separable via the rationals .[22] In regular separable topological spaces (without assuming metrizability), the cardinality is at most . This follows from separability implying density character , and for regular spaces the weight satisfies . Since any topological space satisfies (as points are separated by their neighborhood filters into the power set of a base of size ), the bound holds. Without the regularity assumption, even in Hausdorff spaces, larger cardinalities up to are possible.[23][24] This bound is sharp: the Stone-Čech compactification of the natural numbers has cardinality and is separable, as embeds densely into it and is countable.[25] Separability also imposes restrictions on certain point sets. For instance, the set of isolated points in a separable space has cardinality at most . If is isolated, then is open, so any dense subset must intersect , implying . Thus, all isolated points lie in the countable dense set.[22]Embedding properties
A fundamental embedding property of separable metric spaces is their ability to be completed to a complete separable metric space. Specifically, every separable metric space admits an isometric embedding into its metric completion , which is a complete metric space, and the image of is dense in ; moreover, since has a countable dense subset, so does .[26] This completion process preserves the separability while adding completeness, allowing the study of Cauchy sequences and limits within a nicer ambient space. Another key result is the homeomorphic embedding of any separable metric space into the Hilbert cube , which is itself a compact, complete, separable metric space. This embedding is constructed using a countable basis for the topology of , defining continuous functions by , and mapping ; the resulting map is a homeomorphism onto its image.[27] The Hilbert cube thus acts as a universal target space, containing homeomorphic copies of all separable metric spaces as subspaces. Separable completely metrizable spaces, known as Polish spaces, further exemplify these properties. Every separable metric space embeds homeomorphically into a Polish space, typically via its completion, which equips the space with a compatible complete metric while retaining separability. Polish spaces are particularly useful in descriptive set theory and analysis due to their rich structure. In the broader context of non-metric separable topological spaces, the countable dense subset inherent to separability allows such spaces to be viewed as subspaces of more structured environments, though embeddings into complete metric spaces generally require additional conditions like regularity and second countability. However, the metric case remains the primary setting where these embedding theorems apply robustly.Special topics
Constructive mathematics
In constructive mathematics, particularly in Errett Bishop's framework, the real line is separable, with the rationals forming a countable dense subset. This density is proved constructively: for any real and positive rational , there exists a rational such that , constructed explicitly from the Cauchy sequence defining with its modulus of convergence.[28] Unlike classical mathematics, where equality of reals is decidable via LEM, constructive reals lack decidable equality, but this does not affect the proof of density. Bishop's approach emphasizes "completely presented" sets, where objects are given by explicit constructions allowing decidable membership and equality. For example, the rationals are completely presented, enabling effective approximations. In constructive topology, spaces like the reals are often treated as countably based metric spaces, where the basis of open intervals with rational endpoints is enumerable, supporting separability without non-effective choices.[28] The distinction from classical separability lies in the requirement for all proofs to provide explicit constructions, avoiding non-constructive existence principles. For instance, while classical proofs may use LEM implicitly, Bishop-style constructive analysis proves key results like completeness and separability using only computable methods, underpinning theorems such as uniform continuity on compact sets. This framework aligns with algorithmic verifiability, treating reals via Cauchy sequences of rationals with explicit moduli, ensuring effective approximations without a "weakened" sense of separability—the property holds fully constructively.[28] Note that other schools of constructive mathematics, such as Brouwer's intuitionism, may handle topological properties differently, potentially requiring additional principles for certain results.Further examples
The space of continuous real-valued functions on the compact interval , denoted and equipped with the supremum norm , is a separable metric space. By the Weierstrass approximation theorem, any continuous function on can be uniformly approximated by polynomials; moreover, the subset consisting of polynomials with rational coefficients forms a countable dense subset, establishing separability.[29] In probability theory, the standard Borel space on — comprising the interval with its Borel -algebra — is a separable metric space, as is a Polish space and its Borel -algebra inherits the separability properties of the underlying metric structure.[30] This separability facilitates the study of measurable functions and stochastic processes on such spaces, ensuring the existence of countable dense sets for integration and convergence arguments. A contrasting advanced example is the space of all Radon measures on , which serves as the continuous dual of and can be equipped with the total variation norm. This space is non-separable, as the set of Dirac delta measures forms an uncountable discrete subset under this norm — with for distinct — necessitating an uncountable dense subset to approximate all such points.[31] In functional analysis, the separability of a Hilbert space guarantees the existence of a countable orthonormal basis, allowing elements to be represented as infinite linear combinations with square-summable coefficients and enabling applications like Fourier series expansions.[32] Conversely, non-separability arises in uncountable products of separable spaces, such as the product where ; this space is compact by Tychonoff's theorem but non-separable, highlighting how separability fails under uncountable products and restricting properties like metrizability despite compactness.[33]References
- https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Uncountable_Discrete_Space_is_not_Separable
