Hubbry Logo
Sister stationSister stationMain
Open search
Sister station
Community hub
Sister station
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Sister station
Sister station
Sister station
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In broadcasting, sister stations or sister channels are radio or television stations operated by the same company, either by direct ownership or through a management agreement.[1]

Radio sister stations will often have different formats, and sometimes one station is on the AM band while another is on the FM band. Conversely, several types of sister-station relationships exist in television; stations in the same city will usually be affiliated with different television networks (often one with a major network and the other with a secondary network), and may occasionally shift television programs between each other when local events require one station to interrupt its network feed.

Sister stations in separate (but often nearby) cities owned by the same company may or may not share a network affiliation. For example, WNYW and WWOR-TV, in New York City and Secaucus, New Jersey, are both owned by Fox Corporation. WNYW is a Fox owned-and-operated station; WWOR-TV is a MyNetworkTV owned-and-operated station. WPSG in Philadelphia and KBCW in San Francisco were the flagship stations of The CW until 2023 and are owned by CBS Television Stations. In addition, stations in different cities affiliated with the same network, but not sharing an ownership tie, may refer to each other informally as sister stations.

Sister networks or sister channels, in many cases, are cable or satellite channels which are launched to either broadcast series which either premiered on the main network but has been moved out of the higher-priority schedule (such as TV Land or Boomerang), fulfill a specific niche of content which would not be fulfilled on the main network (such as the Nick Jr. Channel[2] or Nicktoons) or broadcast to a wider audience than the main network (such as CNN International or Al Jazeera English). However, in other cases, these cable or satellite channels may only share common ownership.

The establishment and proliferation of sister networks on cable, satellite and internet providers has become easier and more commercially profitable over the history of such media venues.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Sister station

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A sister station is a radio or television broadcast station owned and operated by the same company or entity as one or more other stations, typically within the same or adjacent markets, enabling shared operational resources such as programming syndication, production, and promotional efforts. This arrangement contrasts with network affiliates, which share content through licensing rather than direct . The practice of establishing sister stations evolved alongside the growth of in the United States, beginning in the 1920s as early radio networks like and formed and acquired owned-and-operated stations to expand national reach. The Radio Act of 1927 established the (FRC) to regulate broadcasting in the , including measures to prevent monopolistic practices. Significant expansion occurred after the (FCC) eased multiple ownership restrictions starting in 1984, allowing entities to own more than seven AM and seven FM stations nationwide, followed by the , which removed national caps entirely and permitted up to eight stations per market under local limits. These changes spurred industry consolidation, with major groups like and operating hundreds of sister stations as of 2025 that often feature complementary formats—such as news-talk on AM paired with music on FM—to target diverse audiences while optimizing costs. Sister stations play a key role in local media ecosystems by facilitating and emergency coverage, as seen during when one station's signal relays another's content to broader areas. However, FCC rules continue to impose local ownership caps—such as no more than two TV stations per designated market area (DMA) or eight radio stations in larger markets—to promote viewpoint diversity, with ongoing quadrennial reviews assessing their impact on and . As of 2025, the FCC's ongoing quadrennial review includes discussions on relaxing these limits in response to digital .

Definition and Terminology

Core Definition

A sister station in broadcasting refers to two or more radio or television stations owned by the same parent company, which may be situated in the same market, adjacent markets, or different markets to enable the leveraging of through centralized operations. This structure allows the parent entity to manage multiple outlets efficiently, reducing operational redundancies while extending coverage across geographic areas. Key characteristics of sister stations include shared under a single corporate umbrella, the potential for distributing syndicated programming across outlets, advertising efforts, and centralized of administrative functions. These elements facilitate coordinated decision-making, such as bulk of content or equipment, which enhances overall efficiency without necessitating identical formats or local in every market. The primary purpose of establishing sister stations is to achieve cost reductions via shared resources like programming libraries and support, while simultaneously expanding market reach without the need for complete duplication of facilities in each location. This approach emerged in the early alongside the growth of the industry, as companies sought to consolidate holdings amid expanding airwave allocations. Representative examples include AM/FM radio pairs owned by the same company, where the stations may complement each other in format or coverage, and clusters of television network affiliates under one owner serving distinct regional audiences. Sister stations differ from network affiliates in that the latter involve a contractual relationship between an independent broadcaster and a national network for the carriage of programming, without any ownership tie to the network itself. In contrast, sister stations share direct by the same entity, enabling integrated management and resource sharing across the stations. Owned-and-operated (O&O) stations represent a specific of where a directly owns and operates the station it affiliates with, often concentrated in major markets to align closely with the network's production and distribution hub. stations, however, encompass a broader category of co-owned outlets under a single corporate owner—such as a media group rather than the network—which may operate in multiple markets and carry varying network affiliations or operate independently. While arrangements focus on the technical and operational aspect of simultaneously transmitting identical programming across multiple outlets or frequencies to maximize coverage without altering content uniqueness, sister stations emphasize structure and may involve only partial or selective content sharing rather than full duplication. The concept of a duopoly applies specifically when two sister stations are co-owned within the same Designated Market Area (DMA), a configuration permitted by (FCC) rules provided the stations' service contours do not overlap or one is not among the top-four rated outlets by audience share, allowing for consolidated operations in a single local market. In distinction, multi-market sister stations extend ownership across separate DMAs, facilitating national-scale synergies without the local market constraints of a duopoly.

Historical Development

Origins in Broadcasting

The concept of sister stations originated in the early days of American radio broadcasting during the 1920s, as the rapid proliferation of stations—reaching over 600 by 1924—created severe interference and spectrum scarcity on the limited available airwaves. To address this chaos, where thousands of unlicensed broadcasters competed for frequencies, the Radio Act of 1927 established the Federal Radio Commission (FRC) to license stations and allocate wavelengths based on the public interest, convenience, and necessity standard, thereby stabilizing the industry and facilitating organized network structures. This regulatory framework did not impose restrictions on multiple station ownership at the time, allowing companies to acquire and operate several outlets to efficiently utilize the scarce spectrum. Building on this foundation, the formation of major radio networks in the late marked the practical emergence of sister station groups, where a single entity owned multiple affiliated or directly controlled stations to distribute programming nationwide. The , launched on November 15, 1926, by the Radio Corporation of America (RCA) in partnership with and Westinghouse, exemplified this trend; RCA acquired AT&T's existing toll network and owned key AM stations such as WEAF in New York and WJZ in Newark, forming the core of NBC's Red and Blue networks that content across these sister outlets. Similarly, the Columbia Broadcasting System (CBS), founded in 1927 as the United Independent Broadcasters and reorganized under , began consolidating stations to compete with , creating early clusters of owned and operated facilities. The further solidified these developments by replacing the FRC with the permanent , which continued to oversee licensing without initial limits on network ownership, enabling the expansion of such groups. These early sister station arrangements were primarily motivated by the need to overcome limitations and achieve national reach in an before television dominance, as networks used lines to link owned stations and affiliates for syndicated programming like and , thereby maximizing audience exposure for sponsors. RCA's control of multiple AM stations, for instance, provided the infrastructure for to deliver consistent content across regions, turning fragmented local broadcasts into a unified national medium. This consolidation not only addressed technical constraints but also laid the groundwork for the commercial radio model's growth, with networks owning a handful of flagship sister stations to anchor broader affiliate chains.

Evolution in the Digital Age

The of broadcast ownership rules in the under the Reagan administration marked a pivotal shift, enabling greater concentration of sister stations among fewer owners to foster competition with emerging media. In 1984, the (FCC) established a national cap of 12 AM and 12 FM radio stations per owner, relaxing prior restrictions that had limited holdings to as few as seven stations nationwide, which spurred initial growth in multi-station ownership groups. By 1992, amid ongoing financial pressures on stations, the FCC further eased these limits by adopting numerical local radio ownership rules based on market size—allowing up to three AM and three FM stations in large markets (those with 30 or more commercial stations), subject to a 25 percent share cap—while also relaxing national caps to 20 AM and 20 FM stations by 1994 and eliminating some local duplication rules, thereby accelerating the formation of regional sister station networks. The dramatically amplified this trend by eliminating national ownership caps on radio stations altogether, removing barriers that had previously constrained expansion and leading to widespread mergers. This legislation facilitated mega-consolidations, such as Clear Channel Communications (later rebranded as ), which expanded from 40 stations in to over 1,200 by the early , creating vast portfolios of sister stations that dominated local markets and reduced the number of independent owners from approximately 5,100 to 3,800 within five years. These changes prioritized , allowing sister stations to share resources more efficiently but raising concerns about reduced local diversity in programming. The digital transition in the transformed sister station dynamics by integrating traditional broadcasting with new technologies, enabling cross-platform operations beyond analog limits. The rollout of in the mid-2000s permitted multicast programming, where a single frequency could support multiple sister channels—such as a primary alongside digital subchannels for niche content—enhancing content distribution for ownership groups without additional spectrum needs. Concurrently, the FCC-mandated shift to digital TV signals, completed in , unlocked subchannels for television sister stations, allowing affiliates to broadcast additional programming streams and fostering radio-TV pairings under to share digital assets like websites and apps. Online streaming further bridged these platforms, with sister stations leveraging internet distribution to extend reach and synchronize content across radio, TV, and mobile devices. In the , and the rise of streaming services intensified consolidation pressures, prompting ownership groups to acquire more sister stations for survival in a fragmented media landscape. As traditional cable and over-the-air viewership declined, broadcasters pursued scale to negotiate better carriage deals and invest in digital infrastructure, exemplified by Sinclair Broadcast Group's growth to 191 television stations across 89 markets by late 2019. This era's mergers emphasized multi-platform synergies, where sister stations pooled resources for unified streaming services and , adapting to audience shifts while navigating ongoing FCC reviews of ownership limits. As of 2025, these reviews continued, with the FCC launching its 2022 quadrennial regulatory review in September to assess broadcast ownership rules amid streaming competition, and a federal appeals court in July vacating portions of the local television ownership rule, including the prohibition on owning two top-four stations in a market, potentially enabling further consolidation.

Operational Aspects

Programming and Content Sharing

Sister stations, owned by the same parent company, frequently share programming to leverage , including syndicated shows distributed across multiple markets, centralized news feeds for television, and techniques in radio where a single DJ records segments tailored for various stations. This approach is enabled by structures that facilitate internal content distribution without the need for external syndication agreements. In radio, allows a centralized broadcaster to pre-record announcements, transitions, and commentary that are inserted into automated playlists for sister stations in different markets, simulating live local programming. For instance, major owners like use this method extensively, with one DJ potentially voicing for dozens of outlets to cover off-peak hours. Syndicated radio content, which can comprise 25-30% of programming during certain time slots like morning drive on stations with common ownership, further supports this by providing uniform shows like talk programs or music blocks that air identically across affiliated sister stations. Television sister stations often share national news feeds while customizing for regional audiences, such as inserting local or events into a standardized format. Groups like and Nexstar employ shared operations, where content from a central hub is adapted for local insertion, including common ad slots that allow unified commercial breaks across markets. For example, in 2018, Sinclair required anchors at multiple sister stations to deliver identical scripted segments, ensuring brand consistency in political commentary. These strategies yield significant benefits, including reduced production costs through resource pooling—such as sharing reporters and video clips among 40-50 daily items in Nexstar's New York state stations—and enhanced branding that maintains a cohesive corporate identity across diverse markets. In radio, common ownership increases syndicated content usage by up to 8% at the market level, enabling efficiencies that free up budgets for other programming. However, challenges arise in balancing with local , as over-reliance on shared content can diminish market-specific coverage, leading to viewer or listener perceptions of . To address this, many groups adopt hybrid schedules, such as Raycom's statewide newscasts in that blend national feeds with regional inserts, or simulcasted local news on sister duopolies like those in Sinclair's operations, preserving some community focus amid cost pressures.

Resource and Infrastructure Management

Sister stations often utilize shared services agreements (SSAs) to centralize operational functions, including teams, systems for ad scheduling, and engineering support, allowing efficient coordination across multiple outlets owned by the same entity. These agreements facilitate administrative oversight from a single point, reducing duplication in tasks such as inventory management and compliance reporting, particularly in small- to mid-sized markets where nearly half of local television markets employ such arrangements. For instance, in , an affiliate shares engineering personnel and facilities with a co-owned affiliate to streamline maintenance and technical operations. Infrastructure management among sister stations frequently involves co-located transmitter sites to optimize signal distribution and minimize development costs, as multiple stations can share tower space and power systems while operating on distinct frequencies. Cloud-based tools further enable remote management, allowing centralized control of schedules, monitoring, and systems from regional facilities without on-site hardware at each station. This approach supports for groups operating dozens of stations, such as those under major broadcasters, by integrating software for real-time diagnostics and updates across networks. Human resources coordination emphasizes cross-station talent sharing, where personnel like engineers, IT specialists, and administrative staff rotate or provide support across outlets, often managed through regional hubs that oversee multiple markets. These hubs, typically located in larger metropolitan areas, handle training, staffing allocation, and performance oversight to maintain consistency in operations. Such practices enhance flexibility, enabling rapid deployment of expertise during peak demands or emergencies. Efficiency gains from these shared models include significant cost savings, with from bulk purchasing of equipment like transmitters and antennas, as well as software licenses for platforms. For example, consolidated in SSAs allows media groups to negotiate volume discounts on broadcast hardware, lowering capital expenditures while maintaining . These metrics underscore the administrative benefits that complement broader programming synergies in multi-station portfolios.

Ownership Regulations

In the United States, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulates the ownership of sister stations through local and national limits established under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which aimed to promote competition while allowing consolidation. For radio stations, local ownership rules permit an entity to own up to eight commercial stations in markets with 45 or more stations, with no more than five in the same service (AM or FM); in smaller markets, the limits scale down, such as up to seven stations in markets with 30-44 stations. For television stations, the local multiple ownership rule generally allows ownership of up to two stations within the same Designated Market Area (DMA) if their predicted Grade B contours do not overlap, following the vacatur of the Top-Four Prohibition by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on July 23, 2025; otherwise, only one station is permitted per DMA. Nationally, television ownership is capped at 39% of U.S. television households, with a 50% discount applied to the audience reach of Ultra High Frequency (UHF) stations. As of November 2025, the FCC's 2022 Quadrennial Review is ongoing, with a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking issued in September 2025 seeking comment on whether to retain, modify, or eliminate local ownership rules. Local Marketing Agreements (LMAs), also known as time brokerage agreements, enable a company to control the programming and operations of another station without full ownership, effectively creating sister station-like arrangements. Under FCC rules, LMAs are attributable toward ownership limits if a party with a cognizable interest in one station brokers more than 15% of the weekly broadcast time of another station in the same market or DMA, counting the brokered station as owned by the broker for compliance purposes. In , the FCC tightened these rules by attributing Joint Sales Agreements (JSAs) in local television markets, treating them as cognizable interests under ownership caps to prevent circumvention of limits if the broker sells more than 15% of the brokered station's weekly advertising time. Internationally, ownership regulations for sister stations vary, with the emphasizing transparency and limits on concentration through the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD), revised in 2018. The AVMSD requires member states to ensure audiovisual media service providers disclose ownership structures and prevents actions creating dominant positions or monopolies in media markets, particularly addressing cross-border dominance by limiting excessive audience shares held by single entities. The 2024 European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) further requires media service providers to make publicly accessible up-to-date information on beneficial owners to enhance transparency and curb . The FCC enforces these rules through mandatory quadrennial reviews under Section 202(h) of the 1996 Act, assessing whether limits remain necessary in the amid evolving media landscapes. During merger approvals, the FCC requires applicants to demonstrate compliance or divest stations exceeding caps, with ongoing monitoring to prevent violations.

Antitrust Considerations

In the United States, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the exercise oversight over mergers involving sister radio stations under Section 7 of the Clayton Act, which prohibits acquisitions whose effect may substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly. These agencies conduct pre-merger reviews to evaluate potential anticompetitive effects, particularly in local markets where sister stations operate. To assess , they apply the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), calculated as the sum of the squares of each firm's in a defined geographic area, such as a local radio market; under the 2023 Merger Guidelines, mergers resulting in a post-merger HHI above 1,800 (highly concentrated) with an increase of more than 100 points are presumed likely to enhance market power. In radio contexts, this analysis focuses on competition for within metropolitan areas, treating radio spot as a distinct . A prominent example of such enforcement occurred in the early 2000s with the proposed merger of Clear Channel Communications and AMFM Inc., which would have created the largest radio group in the U.S. with over 1,200 stations. The DOJ challenged the transaction, alleging it would substantially lessen competition in at least 36 local radio advertising markets where post-merger HHIs exceeded 1,800 and increases surpassed 200 points. To resolve antitrust concerns, the companies agreed to divest 99 radio stations across 27 markets in 2000—the largest radio divestiture in history at the time—followed by additional sales of 14 stations in five markets in 2001, restoring competitive balance by preventing undue concentration. Antitrust scrutiny of sister station arrangements primarily addresses risks of reduced local competition in , where consolidated ownership limits advertisers' by eliminating rival stations that could offer alternative rates or packages. Additionally, such mergers raise concerns about diminished programming diversity, as centralized control may prioritize uniform content over varied local formats, potentially homogenizing viewpoints and reducing options for audiences. Internationally, similar principles apply, as seen in the where the (CMA) reviews media mergers under the Enterprise Act 2002 for public interest considerations, including media plurality—the availability of a diverse range of voices and opinions. The CMA can block or impose remedies if a transaction harms plurality; for instance, in 2007, its predecessor, the Competition Commission, required British Sky Broadcasting (controlled by ) to divest its 17.9% stake in ITV to below 7.5%, citing the holding's potential to unduly influence and reduce viewpoint diversity in commercial television. This enforcement parallels U.S. efforts to safeguard competition while distinguishing from sector-specific caps, such as the FCC's basic local radio ownership limits, which serve as a complementary but separate regulatory layer.

Notable Examples and Case Studies

Major Media Conglomerates

Major media conglomerates leverage sister station networks to achieve extensive national coverage while adhering to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) ownership limits, enabling efficient content distribution and resource sharing across affiliated outlets. These entities operate clusters of commonly owned or controlled stations in multiple markets, using syndication and shared programming to amplify reach without violating local or national caps. By maximizing allowable holdings in designated market areas (DMAs), conglomerates like iHeartMedia, Sinclair Broadcast Group, and Cumulus Media create interconnected networks that blend local relevance with national-scale influence. iHeartMedia stands as the largest U.S. radio broadcaster, owning over 860 stations across 160 markets, which facilitates robust national syndication through its platform and podcast network. This structure allows sister stations to share syndicated shows, such as over 80 hit programs with more than 1 million monthly downloads, reaching over 330 million unique listeners monthly as of 2025 and enabling seamless promotion of events like the annual iHeartRadio Jingle Ball Tour. By clustering stations in key markets, optimizes advertising revenue and content delivery, with its digital audio group generating $342 million in revenue in the third quarter of 2025 alone. Sinclair Broadcast Group dominates the television sector with ownership, operation, or service provision to 185 stations in 86 markets as of , affiliated with major networks like ABC, , , and , allowing for coordinated content dissemination across its portfolio. The company is particularly noted for its approach to political content sharing, mandating uniform segments—such as conservative-leaning commentary—across sister stations to promote a consistent viewpoint, a practice that has drawn scrutiny for influencing narratives. This shared enhances national political messaging while maintaining the appearance of localized broadcasting, as seen in coordinated responses to national events like the 2025 controversies surrounding ABC affiliates. Cumulus Media operates 419 owned-and-operated radio stations in 90 markets as of 2025, focusing on duopoly strategies in mid-sized markets where it owns pairs of stations to consolidate operations and capture dominant audience shares. These duopolies enable sister stations to share infrastructure, sales teams, and programming, such as Westwood One syndicated content, boosting efficiency in competitive environments like those with 15-29 stations where FCC rules permit up to six commercial holdings. In the third quarter of 2025, Cumulus reported steady performance in these markets, with digital and multiplatform revenues underscoring the value of clustered sister station synergies for national ad campaigns. To attain national coverage, these conglomerates navigate FCC regulations through strategic compliance with local ownership caps—such as limits of two to eight stations per market based on size for radio, and two per DMA for television—while utilizing syndication and joint operating agreements for broader reach without exceeding the 39% national audience cap for . Sinclair, for instance, employs affiliated entities to manage additional stations beyond direct limits, ensuring extensive footprint; and Cumulus similarly cluster holdings in permissible configurations to syndicate content nationwide, fostering amid ongoing FCC quadrennial reviews that assess these rules' in a digital era. This approach allows sister stations to function as integrated units, sharing feeds and promotions to deliver unified national messaging.

Regional and Independent Networks

Regional and independent networks represent smaller-scale groupings of sister stations, typically owned by non-conglomerate entities that prioritize localized operations within specific U.S. geographic areas. These networks often consist of clusters in one or a few markets, enabling shared resources like back-office support while maintaining distinct programming tailored to community needs. Unlike larger national entities, they navigate FCC rules that permit multiple stations per market to foster localism and , allowing independent operators to build stronger ties with regional audiences. A prominent example is (formerly Entercom), which operates regional clusters in Northeast markets such as New York, , and , as part of its portfolio exceeding 220 stations nationwide following its 2024 emergence from bankruptcy and 2025 focus on digital integration. In these areas, sister stations like 1010 WINS in New York and WILK in Wilkes-Barre/Scranton share coverage, including , , and community events, to serve hyper-local listeners while leveraging centralized digital platforms for broader reach. This approach enhances efficiency without diluting market-specific content. Family-owned independent operators, such as Hubbard Broadcasting, exemplify community-focused networks with approximately 33 radio stations and 16 television stations across select U.S. markets like Minneapolis-St. Paul and Phoenix. Hubbard emphasizes local engagement through stations like KS95 (KSTP-FM), which has provided continuous regional music and news since the 1960s, and WTOP in Washington, D.C., offering 24/7 updates on area issues to strengthen community bonds. These groups maintain hands-on management to reflect listener preferences, contrasting with national conglomerates' tendency toward standardized formats. Market-specific adaptations are a hallmark of these networks, particularly in diverse border regions where bilingual programming addresses cultural needs. For instance, Radio Bilingüe, an independent Spanish-language public radio service, operates studios in border areas like Fresno and Salinas, delivering tailored content such as "Comunidad Alerta" for local alerts and music programs featuring regional genres like norteño to over half a million listeners. This strategy allows sister affiliates to adapt shared resources for linguistic and cultural relevance, preserving localized control amid shared infrastructure.

References

  1. https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/sister-station
  2. https://www.dxcentralonline.com/glossary-of-dx-related-terms
  3. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-73/subpart-H/section-73.3555
  4. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Radio-Act-United-States-1927
  5. https://broadcasting.fandom.com/wiki/CBS
  6. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1984/07/26/FCC-ends-seven-station-rule/3182459662400/
  7. https://www.fcc.gov/media/radio/history-of-commercial-radio
  8. https://www.iheartmedia.com/stations
  9. https://www.cumulusmedia.com/
  10. https://www.nab.org/documents/filings/NABCommentsHurricaneMichael%28121718%29.pdf
  11. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/01/29/2020-00671/20102014-quadrennial-regulatory-review-rules-and-policies-to-promote-new-entry-and-ownership
  12. https://www.broadcastlawblog.com/2025/09/articles/fcc-begins-quadrennial-review-of-its-local-ownership-rules-for-radio-and-tv-should-the-fcc-relax-broadcast-ownership-rules-based-on-competitive-factors/
  13. https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf
  14. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2003/04/29/network-oos-versus-affiliates/
  15. https://www.videoageinternational.net/2024/01/09/cover-stories/affiliates-an-inscrutable-tv-model-key-to-u-s-networks/
  16. https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?def_id=17-USC-1981291027-1404361744&term_occur=999&term_src=title:17:chapter:1:section:111
  17. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/10/22/2020-21319/amendment-of-the-commissions-rules-regarding-duplication-of-programming-on-commonly-owned-radio
  18. https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/fccs-review-broadcast-ownership-rules
  19. https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/radio-act-of-1927/
  20. https://earlyradiohistory.us/sec019.htm
  21. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/radio-broadcasting-industry
  22. https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/fcc-17-40a1.pdf
  23. https://www.nytimes.com/1992/03/13/business/the-media-business-fcc-loosens-restrictions-on-owning-radio-stations.html
  24. https://www.npr.org/2019/06/07/730323196/one-more-scoop-of-vanilla-a-new-proposal-looks-to-loosen-radio-ownership-rules
  25. https://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/Statements/2000/stgt045.html
  26. https://xperi.com/blog/20-years-of-hd-radio-the-evolution-of-digital-broadcasting-technology/
  27. https://www.fcc.gov/general/digital-television
  28. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1116481/000111648120000013/sbgi-20191231.htm
  29. https://www.newscaststudio.com/2025/08/05/broadcast-ownership-groups-argue-survival-requires-consolidation-amid-streaming-competition/
  30. https://radioinsight.com/headlines/309417/fcc-begins-quadrennial-review-of-ownership-caps/
  31. https://www.wiley.law/alert-Federal-Court-Vacates-Portions-of-Local-Television-Ownership-Rule
  32. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2014/03/26/shared-operations-and-news-production/
  33. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2014/03/26/groupwide-news-sharing/
  34. https://www.premierenetworks.com/
  35. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/02/business/media/sinclair-news-anchors-script.html
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281266647_An_exploration_of_shared_services_agreements_within_US_local_television_markets
  37. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-14-558.pdf
  38. https://www.engineeringradio.us/blog/2014/03/filtering-for-co-located-fm-transmitters/
  39. https://www.florical.com/cloud-based-master-control/
  40. https://www.weathercompany.com/media/max-cloud/
  41. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/business/media/local-tv-stations-cut-costs-by-sharing-news-operations.html
  42. https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-414418A1.pdf
  43. https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/eighth-circuit-vacates-fccs-top-four-station-ownership-rule
  44. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/07/08/2025-12603/national-television-multiple-ownership-rule
  45. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/47/73.3555
  46. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2004/08/26/04-19468/attribution-of-joint-sales-agreements-in-local-television-markets
  47. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=10805130-3923-4885-b7e0-9274bd869254
  48. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1083/oj/eng
  49. https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-begins-review-national-ownership-cap
  50. https://www.justice.gov/atr/horizontal-merger-guidelines-0
  51. https://www.justice.gov/atr/case-document/file/492046/dl
  52. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2023_merger_guidelines_final_12.18.2023.pdf
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228272330_Is_Radio_Advertising_a_Distinct_Local_Market_An_Empirical_Analysis
  54. https://www.justice.gov/atr/case/us-v-clear-channel-communications-and-amfm
  55. https://www.justice.gov/archive/opa/pr/2000/July/415at.htm
  56. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2001/02/27/01-87/clear-channel-communications-inc-and-amfm-inc-merger-settlement
  57. https://www.justice.gov/archives/atr/speech/doj-analysis-radio-mergers
  58. https://www.antitrustinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Media-Chapter-from-AAI-Transition-Report_100520082052.pdf
  59. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6900e39e87219d3b21b9aa9c/mergers_guidance_on_the_CMA_s_jurisdiction_and_procedure.pdf
  60. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2007/oct/02/media.citynews
  61. https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-02-245A1.pdf
  62. https://www.iheartmedia.com/
  63. https://www.iheartmedia.com/press/iheartmedia-rings-holiday-season-its-iconic-2025-national-iheartradio-jingle-ball-tour
  64. https://investors.iheartmedia.com/news-releases/news-release-details/iheartmedia-reports-2025-third-quarter-financial-results
  65. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20251110640876/en/iHeartMedia-Inc.-Reports-Results-for-2025-Third-Quarter
  66. https://sbgi.net/company-overview/
  67. https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/sinclair-broadcasting-jimmy-kimmel-b2828982.html
  68. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2025-09-18/what-are-nexstar-and-sinclair-the-abc-affiliate-owners-who-issued-statements-against-jimmy-kimmel
  69. https://www.wiley.law/alert-FCC-Approves-Broadcast-Ownership-NPRM-Advancing-2022-Quadrennial-Review
  70. https://www.cumulusmedia.com/2025/10/30/cumulus-media-reports-operating-results-for-the-third-quarter-2025/
  71. https://www.americanactionforum.org/insight/fcc-broadcast-and-radio-rules-protecting-americans-or-outdated/
  72. https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-414931A1.pdf
  73. https://audacyinc.com/markets/
  74. https://www.audacy.com/stations
  75. https://www.audacy.com/press/audacy-reports-2025-first-quarter-results
  76. https://hubbardbroadcasting.com/our-markets/radio/
  77. https://www.radiobilingue.org/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.