Hubbry Logo
AutomationAutomationMain
Open search
Automation
Community hub
Automation
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Automation
Automation
from Wikipedia

Minimum human intervention is required to control many large facilities, such as this electrical generating station.

Automation describes a wide range of technologies that reduce human intervention in processes, mainly by predetermining decision criteria, subprocess relationships, and related actions, as well as embodying those predeterminations in machines.[1][2] Automation has been achieved by various means including mechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic, electrical, electronic devices, and computers, usually in combination. Complicated systems, such as modern factories, airplanes, and ships typically use combinations of all of these techniques. The benefit of automation includes labor savings, reducing waste, savings in electricity costs, savings in material costs, and improvements to quality, accuracy, and precision.

Automation includes the use of various equipment and control systems such as machinery, processes in factories, boilers,[3] and heat-treating ovens, switching on telephone networks, steering, stabilization of ships, aircraft and other applications and vehicles with reduced human intervention.[4] Examples range from a household thermostat controlling a boiler to a large industrial control system with tens of thousands of input measurements and output control signals. Automation has also found a home in the banking industry. It can range from simple on-off control to multi-variable high-level algorithms in terms of control complexity.

In the simplest type of an automatic control loop, a controller compares a measured value of a process with a desired set value and processes the resulting error signal to change some input to the process, in such a way that the process stays at its set point despite disturbances. This closed-loop control is an application of negative feedback to a system. The mathematical basis of control theory was begun in the 18th century and advanced rapidly in the 20th. The term automation, inspired by the earlier word automatic (coming from automaton), was not widely used before 1947, when Ford established an automation department.[5] It was during this time that the industry was rapidly adopting feedback controllers, Technological advancements introduced in the 1930s revolutionized various industries significantly.[6]

The World Bank's World Development Report of 2019 shows evidence that the new industries and jobs in the technology sector outweigh the economic effects of workers being displaced by automation.[7] Job losses and downward mobility blamed on automation have been cited as one of many factors in the resurgence of nationalist, protectionist and populist politics in the US, UK and France, among other countries since the 2010s.[8][9][10][11][12]

History

[edit]

Early history

[edit]
Ctesibius's clepsydra (3rd century BC)

It was a preoccupation of the Greeks and Arabs (in the period between about 300 BC and about 1200 AD) to keep accurate track of time. In Ptolemaic Egypt, about 270 BC, Ctesibius described a float regulator for a water clock, a device not unlike the ball and cock in a modern flush toilet. This was the earliest feedback-controlled mechanism.[13] The appearance of the mechanical clock in the 14th century made the water clock and its feedback control system obsolete.

The Persian Banū Mūsā brothers, in their Book of Ingenious Devices (850 AD), described a number of automatic controls.[14] Two-step level controls for fluids, a form of discontinuous variable structure controls, were developed by the Banu Musa brothers.[15] They also described a feedback controller.[16][17] The design of feedback control systems up through the Industrial Revolution was by trial-and-error, together with a great deal of engineering intuition. It was not until the mid-19th century that the stability of feedback control systems was analyzed using mathematics, the formal language of automatic control theory.[citation needed]

The centrifugal governor was invented by Christiaan Huygens in the seventeenth century, and used to adjust the gap between millstones.[18][19][20]

Industrial Revolution in Western Europe

[edit]
Steam engines promoted automation through the need to control engine speed and power.

The introduction of prime movers, or self-driven machines advanced grain mills, furnaces, boilers, and the steam engine created a new requirement for automatic control systems including temperature regulators (invented in 1624; see Cornelius Drebbel), pressure regulators (1681), float regulators (1700) and speed control devices. Another control mechanism was used to tent the sails of windmills. It was patented by Edmund Lee in 1745.[21] Also in 1745, Jacques de Vaucanson invented the first automated loom. Around 1800, Joseph Marie Jacquard created a punch-card system to program looms.[22]

In 1771 Richard Arkwright invented the first fully automated spinning mill driven by water power, known at the time as the water frame.[23] An automatic flour mill was developed by Oliver Evans in 1785, making it the first completely automated industrial process.[24][25]

A flyball governor is an early example of a feedback control system. An increase in speed would make the counterweights move outward, sliding a linkage that tended to close the valve supplying steam, and so slowing the engine.

A centrifugal governor was used by Mr. Bunce of England in 1784 as part of a model steam crane.[26][27] The centrifugal governor was adopted by James Watt for use on a steam engine in 1788 after Watt's partner Boulton saw one at a flour mill Boulton & Watt were building.[21] The governor could not actually hold a set speed; the engine would assume a new constant speed in response to load changes. The governor was able to handle smaller variations such as those caused by fluctuating heat load to the boiler. Also, there was a tendency for oscillation whenever there was a speed change. As a consequence, engines equipped with this governor were not suitable for operations requiring constant speed, such as cotton spinning.[21]

Several improvements to the governor, plus improvements to valve cut-off timing on the steam engine, made the engine suitable for most industrial uses before the end of the 19th century. Advances in the steam engine stayed well ahead of science, both thermodynamics and control theory.[21] The governor received relatively little scientific attention until James Clerk Maxwell published a paper that established the beginning of a theoretical basis for understanding control theory.

20th century

[edit]

Relay logic was introduced with factory electrification, which underwent rapid adaption from 1900 through the 1920s. Central electric power stations were also undergoing rapid growth and the operation of new high-pressure boilers, steam turbines and electrical substations created a large demand for instruments and controls. Central control rooms became common in the 1920s, but as late as the early 1930s, most process controls were on-off. Operators typically monitored charts drawn by recorders that plotted data from instruments. To make corrections, operators manually opened or closed valves or turned switches on or off. Control rooms also used color-coded lights to send signals to workers in the plant to manually make certain changes.[28]

The development of the electronic amplifier during the 1920s, which was important for long-distance telephony, required a higher signal-to-noise ratio, which was solved by negative feedback noise cancellation. This and other telephony applications contributed to the control theory. In the 1940s and 1950s, German mathematician Irmgard Flügge-Lotz developed the theory of discontinuous automatic controls, which found military applications during the Second World War to fire control systems and aircraft navigation systems.[6]

Controllers, which were able to make calculated changes in response to deviations from a set point rather than on-off control, began being introduced in the 1930s. Controllers allowed manufacturing to continue showing productivity gains to offset the declining influence of factory electrification.[29]

Factory productivity was greatly increased by electrification in the 1920s. U.S. manufacturing productivity growth fell from 5.2%/yr 1919–29 to 2.76%/yr 1929–41. Alexander Field notes that spending on non-medical instruments increased significantly from 1929 to 1933 and remained strong thereafter.[29]

The First and Second World Wars saw major advancements in the field of mass communication and signal processing. Other key advances in automatic controls include differential equations, stability theory and system theory (1938), frequency domain analysis (1940), ship control (1950), and stochastic analysis (1941).

Starting in 1958, various systems based on solid-state[30][31] digital logic modules for hard-wired programmed logic controllers (the predecessors of programmable logic controllers [PLC]) emerged to replace electro-mechanical relay logic in industrial control systems for process control and automation, including early Telefunken/AEG Logistat, Siemens Simatic, Philips/Mullard/Valvo [de] Norbit, BBC Sigmatronic, ACEC Logacec, Akkord [de] Estacord, Krone Mibakron, Bistat, Datapac, Norlog, SSR, or Procontic systems.[30][32][33][34][35][36]

In 1959 Texaco's Port Arthur Refinery became the first chemical plant to use digital control.[37] Conversion of factories to digital control began to spread rapidly in the 1970s as the price of computer hardware fell.

Significant applications

[edit]

The automatic telephone switchboard was introduced in 1892 along with dial telephones. By 1929, 31.9% of the Bell system was automatic.[38]: 158  Automatic telephone switching originally used vacuum tube amplifiers and electro-mechanical switches, which consumed a large amount of electricity. Call volume eventually grew so fast that it was feared the telephone system would consume all electricity production, prompting Bell Labs to begin research on the transistor.[39]

The logic performed by telephone switching relays was the inspiration for the digital computer. The first commercially successful glass bottle-blowing machine was an automatic model introduced in 1905.[40] The machine, operated by a two-man crew working 12-hour shifts, could produce 17,280 bottles in 24 hours, compared to 2,880 bottles made by a crew of six men and boys working in a shop for a day. The cost of making bottles by machine was 10 to 12 cents per gross compared to $1.80 per gross by the manual glassblowers and helpers.

Sectional electric drives were developed using control theory. Sectional electric drives are used on different sections of a machine where a precise differential must be maintained between the sections. In steel rolling, the metal elongates as it passes through pairs of rollers, which must run at successively faster speeds. In paper making paper, the sheet shrinks as it passes around steam-heated drying arranged in groups, which must run at successively slower speeds. The first application of a sectional electric drive was on a paper machine in 1919.[41] One of the most important developments in the steel industry during the 20th century was continuous wide strip rolling, developed by Armco in 1928.[42]

Automated pharmacology production

Before automation, many chemicals were made in batches. In 1930, with the widespread use of instruments and the emerging use of controllers, the founder of Dow Chemical Co. was advocating continuous production.[43]

Self-acting machine tools that displaced hand dexterity so they could be operated by boys and unskilled laborers were developed by James Nasmyth in the 1840s.[44] Machine tools were automated with Numerical control (NC) using punched paper tape in the 1950s. This soon evolved into computerized numerical control (CNC).

Today extensive automation is practiced in practically every type of manufacturing and assembly process. Some of the larger processes include electrical power generation, oil refining, chemicals, steel mills, plastics, cement plants, fertilizer plants, pulp and paper mills, automobile and truck assembly, aircraft production, glass manufacturing, natural gas separation plants, food and beverage processing, canning and bottling and manufacture of various kinds of parts. Robots are especially useful in hazardous applications like automobile spray painting. Robots are also used to assemble electronic circuit boards. Automotive welding is done with robots and automatic welders are used in applications like pipelines.

Space/computer age

[edit]

With the advent of the space age in 1957, controls design, particularly in the United States, turned away from the frequency-domain techniques of classical control theory and backed into the differential equation techniques of the late 19th century, which were couched in the time domain. During the 1940s and 1950s, German mathematician Irmgard Flugge-Lotz developed the theory of discontinuous automatic control, which became widely used in hysteresis control systems such as navigation systems, fire-control systems, and electronics. Through Flugge-Lotz and others, the modern era saw time-domain design for nonlinear systems (1961), navigation (1960), optimal control and estimation theory (1962), nonlinear control theory (1969), digital control and filtering theory (1974), and the personal computer (1983).

Advantages, disadvantages, and limitations

[edit]

Perhaps the most cited advantage of automation in industry is that it is associated with faster production and cheaper labor costs. Another benefit could be that it replaces hard, physical, or monotonous work.[45] Additionally, tasks that take place in hazardous environments or that are otherwise beyond human capabilities can be done by machines, as machines can operate even under extreme temperatures or in atmospheres that are radioactive or toxic. They can also be maintained with simple quality checks. However, at the time being, not all tasks can be automated, and some tasks are more expensive to automate than others. Initial costs of installing the machinery in factory settings are high, and failure to maintain a system could result in the loss of the product itself.

Moreover, some studies seem to indicate that industrial automation could impose ill effects beyond operational concerns, including worker displacement due to systemic loss of employment and compounded environmental damage; however, these findings are both convoluted and controversial in nature, and could potentially be circumvented.[46]

The main advantages of automation are:

  • Increased throughput or productivity
  • Improved quality
  • Increased predictability
  • Improved robustness (consistency), of processes or product
  • Increased consistency of output
  • Reduced direct human labor costs and expenses
  • Reduced cycle time
  • Increased accuracy
  • Relieving humans of monotonously repetitive work[47]
  • Required work in development, deployment, maintenance, and operation of automated processes — often structured as "jobs"
  • Increased human freedom to do other things

Automation primarily describes machines replacing human action, but it is also loosely associated with mechanization, machines replacing human labor. Coupled with mechanization, extending human capabilities in terms of size, strength, speed, endurance, visual range & acuity, hearing frequency & precision, electromagnetic sensing & effecting, etc., advantages include:[48]

  • Relieving humans of dangerous work stresses and occupational injuries (e.g., fewer strained backs from lifting heavy objects)
  • Removing humans from dangerous environments (e.g. fire, space, volcanoes, nuclear facilities, underwater, etc.)

The main disadvantages of automation are:

  • High initial cost
  • Faster production without human intervention can mean faster unchecked production of defects where automated processes are defective.
  • Scaled-up capacities can mean scaled-up problems when systems fail — releasing dangerous toxins, forces, energies, etc., at scaled-up rates.
  • Human adaptiveness is often poorly understood by automation initiators. It is often difficult to anticipate every contingency and develop fully preplanned automated responses for every situation. The discoveries inherent in automating processes can require unanticipated iterations to resolve, causing unanticipated costs and delays.
  • People anticipating employment income may be seriously disrupted by others deploying automation where no similar income is readily available.

Paradox of automation

[edit]

The paradox of automation says that the more efficient the automated system, the more crucial the human contribution of the operators. Humans are less involved, but their involvement becomes more critical. Lisanne Bainbridge, a cognitive psychologist, identified these issues notably in her widely cited paper "Ironies of Automation."[49] If an automated system has an error, it will multiply that error until it is fixed or shut down. This is where human operators come in.[50] A fatal example of this was Air France Flight 447, where a failure of automation put the pilots into a manual situation they were not prepared for.[51]

Limitations

[edit]
  • Current technology is unable to automate all the desired tasks.
  • Many operations using automation have large amounts of invested capital and produce high volumes of products, making malfunctions extremely costly and potentially hazardous. Therefore, some personnel is needed to ensure that the entire system functions properly and that safety and product quality are maintained.[52]
  • As a process becomes increasingly automated, there is less and less labor to be saved or quality improvement to be gained. This is an example of both diminishing returns and the logistic function.
  • As more and more processes become automated, there are fewer remaining non-automated processes. This is an example of the exhaustion of opportunities. New technological paradigms may, however, set new limits that surpass the previous limits.

Current limitations

[edit]

Many roles for humans in industrial processes presently lie beyond the scope of automation. Human-level pattern recognition, language comprehension, and language production ability are well beyond the capabilities of modern mechanical and computer systems (but see Watson computer). Tasks requiring subjective assessment or synthesis of complex sensory data, such as scents and sounds, as well as high-level tasks such as strategic planning, currently require human expertise. In many cases, the use of humans is more cost-effective than mechanical approaches even where the automation of industrial tasks is possible. Therefore, algorithmic management as the digital rationalization of human labor instead of its substitution has emerged as an alternative technological strategy.[53] Overcoming these obstacles is a theorized path to post-scarcity economics.[54]

Societal impact and unemployment

[edit]

Increased automation often causes workers to feel anxious about losing their jobs as technology renders their skills or experience unnecessary. Early in the Industrial Revolution, when inventions like the steam engine were making some job categories expendable, workers forcefully resisted these changes. Luddites, for instance, were English textile workers who protested the introduction of weaving machines by destroying them.[55] More recently, some residents of Chandler, Arizona, have slashed tires and pelted rocks at self-driving car, in protest over the cars' perceived threat to human safety and job prospects.[56]

The relative anxiety about automation reflected in opinion polls seems to correlate closely with the strength of organized labor in that region or nation. For example, while a study by the Pew Research Center indicated that 72% of Americans are worried about increasing automation in the workplace, 80% of Swedes see automation and artificial intelligence (AI) as a good thing, due to the country's still-powerful unions and a more robust national safety net.[57]

According to one estimate, 47% of all current jobs in the US have the potential to be fully automated by 2033.[58] Furthermore, wages and educational attainment appear to be strongly negatively correlated with an occupation's risk of being automated.[58] Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee argue that "there's never been a better time to be a worker with special skills or the right education, because these people can use technology to create and capture value. However, there's never been a worse time to be a worker with only 'ordinary' skills and abilities to offer, because computers, robots, and other digital technologies are acquiring these skills and abilities at an extraordinary rate."[59] Others however argue that highly skilled professional jobs like a lawyer, doctor, engineer, journalist are also at risk of automation.[60]

According to a 2020 study in the Journal of Political Economy, automation has robust negative effects on employment and wages: "One more robot per thousand workers reduces the employment-to-population ratio by 0.2 percentage points and wages by 0.42%."[61] A 2025 study in the American Economic Journal found that the introduction of industrial robots reduced 1993 and 2014 led to reduced employment of men and women by 3.7 and 1.6 percentage points.[62]

Research by Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael Osborne of the Oxford Martin School argued that employees engaged in "tasks following well-defined procedures that can easily be performed by sophisticated algorithms" are at risk of displacement, and 47% of jobs in the US were at risk. The study, released as a working paper in 2013 and published in 2017, predicted that automation would put low-paid physical occupations most at risk, by surveying a group of colleagues on their opinions.[63] However, according to a study published in McKinsey Quarterly[64] in 2015 the impact of computerization in most cases is not the replacement of employees but the automation of portions of the tasks they perform.[65] The methodology of the McKinsey study has been heavily criticized for being intransparent and relying on subjective assessments.[66] The methodology of Frey and Osborne has been subjected to criticism, as lacking evidence, historical awareness, or credible methodology.[67][68] Additionally, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) found that across the 21 OECD countries, 9% of jobs are automatable.[69]

Based on a formula by Gilles Saint-Paul, an economist at Toulouse 1 University, the demand for unskilled human capital declines at a slower rate than the demand for skilled human capital increases.[70] In the long run and for society as a whole it has led to cheaper products, lower average work hours, and new industries forming (i.e., robotics industries, computer industries, design industries). These new industries provide many high salary skill-based jobs to the economy. By 2030, between 3 and 14 percent of the global workforce will be forced to switch job categories due to automation eliminating jobs in an entire sector. While the number of jobs lost to automation is often offset by jobs gained from technological advances, the same type of job loss is not the same one replaced and that leading to increasing unemployment in the lower-middle class. This occurs largely in the US and developed countries where technological advances contribute to higher demand for highly skilled labor but demand for middle-wage labor continues to fall. Economists call this trend "income polarization" where unskilled labor wages are driven down and skilled labor is driven up and it is predicted to continue in developed economies.[71]

Lights-out manufacturing

[edit]

Lights-out manufacturing is a production system with no human workers, to eliminate labor costs. It grew in popularity in the U.S. when General Motors in 1982 implemented humans "hands-off" manufacturing to "replace risk-averse bureaucracy with automation and robots". However, the factory never reached full "lights out" status.[72]

The expansion of lights out manufacturing requires:[73]

  • Reliability of equipment
  • Long-term mechanic capabilities
  • Planned preventive maintenance
  • Commitment from the staff

Health and environment

[edit]

The costs of automation to the environment are different depending on the technology, product or engine automated. There are automated engines that consume more energy resources from the Earth in comparison with previous engines and vice versa.[citation needed] Hazardous operations, such as oil refining, the manufacturing of industrial chemicals, and all forms of metal working, were always early contenders for automation.[dubiousdiscuss][citation needed]

The automation of vehicles could prove to have a substantial impact on the environment, although the nature of this impact could be beneficial or harmful depending on several factors. Because automated vehicles are much less likely to get into accidents compared to human-driven vehicles, some precautions built into current models (such as anti-lock brakes or laminated glass) would not be required for self-driving versions. Removal of these safety features reduces the weight of the vehicle, and coupled with more precise acceleration and braking, as well as fuel-efficient route mapping, can increase fuel economy and reduce emissions. Despite this, some researchers theorize that an increase in the production of self-driving cars could lead to a boom in vehicle ownership and usage, which could potentially negate any environmental benefits of self-driving cars if they are used more frequently.[74]

Automation of homes and home appliances is also thought to impact the environment. A study of energy consumption of automated homes in Finland showed that smart homes could reduce energy consumption by monitoring levels of consumption in different areas of the home and adjusting consumption to reduce energy leaks (e.g. automatically reducing consumption during the nighttime when activity is low). This study, along with others, indicated that the smart home's ability to monitor and adjust consumption levels would reduce unnecessary energy usage. However, some research suggests that smart homes might not be as efficient as non-automated homes. A more recent study has indicated that, while monitoring and adjusting consumption levels do decrease unnecessary energy use, this process requires monitoring systems that also consume an amount of energy. The energy required to run these systems sometimes negates their benefits, resulting in little to no ecological benefit.[75]

Convertibility and turnaround time

[edit]

Another major shift in automation is the increased demand for flexibility and convertibility in manufacturing processes. Manufacturers are increasingly demanding the ability to easily switch from manufacturing Product A to manufacturing Product B without having to completely rebuild the production lines. Flexibility and distributed processes have led to the introduction of Automated Guided Vehicles with Natural Features Navigation.

Digital electronics helped too. Former analog-based instrumentation was replaced by digital equivalents which can be more accurate and flexible, and offer greater scope for more sophisticated configuration, parametrization, and operation. This was accompanied by the fieldbus revolution which provided a networked (i.e. a single cable) means of communicating between control systems and field-level instrumentation, eliminating hard-wiring.

Discrete manufacturing plants adopted these technologies fast. The more conservative process industries with their longer plant life cycles have been slower to adopt and analog-based measurement and control still dominate. The growing use of Industrial Ethernet on the factory floor is pushing these trends still further, enabling manufacturing plants to be integrated more tightly within the enterprise, via the internet if necessary. Global competition has also increased demand for Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems.[76]

Automation tools

[edit]

Engineers can now have numerical control over automated devices. The result has been a rapidly expanding range of applications and human activities. Computer-aided technologies (or CAx) now serve as the basis for mathematical and organizational tools used to create complex systems. Notable examples of CAx include computer-aided design (CAD software) and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM software). The improved design, analysis, and manufacture of products enabled by CAx has been beneficial for industry.[77]

Information technology, together with industrial machinery and processes, can assist in the design, implementation, and monitoring of control systems. One example of an industrial control system is a programmable logic controller (PLC). PLCs are specialized hardened computers which are frequently used to synchronize the flow of inputs from (physical) sensors and events with the flow of outputs to actuators and events.[78]

An automated online assistant on a website, with an avatar for enhanced human–computer interaction

Human-machine interfaces (HMI) or computer human interfaces (CHI), formerly known as man-machine interfaces, are usually employed to communicate with PLCs and other computers. Service personnel who monitor and control through HMIs can be called by different names. In the industrial process and manufacturing environments, they are called operators or something similar. In boiler houses and central utility departments, they are called stationary engineers.[79]

Different types of automation tools exist:

Host simulation software (HSS) is a commonly used testing tool that is used to test the equipment software. HSS is used to test equipment performance concerning factory automation standards (timeouts, response time, processing time).[80]

Cognitive automation

[edit]

Cognitive automation, as a subset of AI, is an emerging genus of automation enabled by cognitive computing. Its primary concern is the automation of clerical tasks and workflows that consist of structuring unstructured data.[citation needed] Cognitive automation relies on multiple disciplines: natural language processing, real-time computing, machine learning algorithms, big data analytics, and evidence-based learning.[81]

According to Deloitte, cognitive automation enables the replication of human tasks and judgment "at rapid speeds and considerable scale."[82] Such tasks include:

Recent and emerging applications

[edit]

CAD AI

[edit]

Artificially intelligent computer-aided design (CAD) can use text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate in 3D modeling.[83] AI CAD libraries could also be developed using linked open data of schematics and diagrams.[84] Ai CAD assistants are used as tools to help streamline workflow.[85]

Automated power production

[edit]

Technologies like solar panels, wind turbines, and other renewable energy sources—together with smart grids, micro-grids, battery storage—can automate power production.

Agricultural production

[edit]

Many agricultural operations are automated with machinery and equipment to improve their diagnosis, decision-making and/or performing. Agricultural automation can relieve the drudgery of agricultural work, improve the timeliness and precision of agricultural operations, raise productivity and resource-use efficiency, build resilience, and improve food quality and safety.[86] Increased productivity can free up labour, allowing agricultural households to spend more time elsewhere.[87]

The technological evolution in agriculture has resulted in progressive shifts to digital equipment and robotics.[86] Motorized mechanization using engine power automates the performance of agricultural operations such as ploughing and milking.[88] With digital automation technologies, it also becomes possible to automate diagnosis and decision-making of agricultural operations.[86] For example, autonomous crop robots can harvest and seed crops, while drones can gather information to help automate input application.[87] Precision agriculture often employs such automation technologies[87]

Motorized mechanization has generally increased in recent years.[89] Sub-Saharan Africa is the only region where the adoption of motorized mechanization has stalled over the past decades.[90][87]

Automation technologies are increasingly used for managing livestock, though evidence on adoption is lacking. Global automatic milking system sales have increased over recent years,[91] but adoption is likely mostly in Northern Europe,[92] and likely almost absent in low- and middle-income countries.[93][87] Automated feeding machines for both cows and poultry also exist, but data and evidence regarding their adoption trends and drivers is likewise scarce.[87][89]

Retail

[edit]

Many supermarkets and even smaller stores are rapidly introducing self-checkout systems reducing the need for employing checkout workers. In the U.S., the retail industry employs 15.9 million people as of 2017 (around 1 in 9 Americans in the workforce). Globally, an estimated 192 million workers could be affected by automation according to research by Eurasia Group.[94]

A soft drink vending machine in Japan, an example of automated retail

Online shopping could be considered a form of automated retail as the payment and checkout are through an automated online transaction processing system, with the share of online retail accounting jumping from 5.1% in 2011 to 8.3% in 2016. However, two-thirds of books, music, and films are now purchased online. In addition, automation and online shopping could reduce demands for shopping malls, and retail property, which in the United States is currently estimated to account for 31% of all commercial property or around 7 billion square feet (650 million square metres). Amazon has gained much of the growth in recent years for online shopping, accounting for half of the growth in online retail in 2016.[94] Other forms of automation can also be an integral part of online shopping, for example, the deployment of automated warehouse robotics such as that applied by Amazon using Kiva Systems.

Food and drink

[edit]
KUKA industrial robots being used at a bakery for food production

The food retail industry has started to apply automation to the ordering process; McDonald's has introduced touch screen ordering and payment systems in many of its restaurants, reducing the need for as many cashier employees.[95] The University of Texas at Austin has introduced fully automated cafe retail locations.[96] Some cafes and restaurants have utilized mobile and tablet "apps" to make the ordering process more efficient by customers ordering and paying on their device.[97] Some restaurants have automated food delivery to tables of customers using a conveyor belt system. The use of robots is sometimes employed to replace waiting staff.[98]

Construction

[edit]

Automation in construction is the combination of methods, processes, and systems that allow for greater machine autonomy in construction activities. Construction automation may have multiple goals, including but not limited to, reducing jobsite injuries, decreasing activity completion times, and assisting with quality control and quality assurance.[99]

Mining

[edit]

Automated mining involves the removal of human labor from the mining process.[100] The mining industry is currently in the transition towards automation. Currently, it can still require a large amount of human capital, particularly in the third world where labor costs are low so there is less incentive for increasing efficiency through automation.

Video surveillance

[edit]

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) started the research and development of automated visual surveillance and monitoring (VSAM) program, between 1997 and 1999, and airborne video surveillance (AVS) programs, from 1998 to 2002. Currently, there is a major effort underway in the vision community to develop a fully-automated tracking surveillance system. Automated video surveillance monitors people and vehicles in real-time within a busy environment. Existing automated surveillance systems are based on the environment they are primarily designed to observe, i.e., indoor, outdoor or airborne, the number of sensors that the automated system can handle and the mobility of sensors, i.e., stationary camera vs. mobile camera. The purpose of a surveillance system is to record properties and trajectories of objects in a given area, generate warnings or notify the designated authorities in case of occurrence of particular events.[101]

Highway systems

[edit]

As demands for safety and mobility have grown and technological possibilities have multiplied, interest in automation has grown. Seeking to accelerate the development and introduction of fully automated vehicles and highways, the U.S. Congress authorized more than $650 million over six years for intelligent transport systems (ITS) and demonstration projects in the 1991 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA). Congress legislated in ISTEA that:[102]

[T]he Secretary of Transportation shall develop an automated highway and vehicle prototype from which future fully automated intelligent vehicle-highway systems can be developed. Such development shall include research in human factors to ensure the success of the man-machine relationship. The goal of this program is to have the first fully automated highway roadway or an automated test track in operation by 1997. This system shall accommodate the installation of equipment in new and existing motor vehicles.

Full automation commonly defined as requiring no control or very limited control by the driver; such automation would be accomplished through a combination of sensor, computer, and communications systems in vehicles and along the roadway. Fully automated driving would, in theory, allow closer vehicle spacing and higher speeds, which could enhance traffic capacity in places where additional road building is physically impossible, politically unacceptable, or prohibitively expensive. Automated controls also might enhance road safety by reducing the opportunity for driver error, which causes a large share of motor vehicle crashes. Other potential benefits include improved air quality (as a result of more-efficient traffic flows), increased fuel economy, and spin-off technologies generated during research and development related to automated highway systems.[103]

Waste management

[edit]
Automated side loader operation

Automated waste collection trucks prevent the need for as many workers as well as easing the level of labor required to provide the service.[104]

Business process

[edit]

Business process automation (BPA) is the technology-enabled automation of complex business processes.[105] It can help to streamline a business for simplicity, achieve digital transformation, increase service quality, improve service delivery or contain costs. BPA consists of integrating applications, restructuring labor resources and using software applications throughout the organization. Robotic process automation (RPA; or RPAAI for self-guided RPA 2.0) is an emerging field within BPA and uses AI. BPAs can be implemented in a number of business areas including marketing, sales and workflow.

Home

[edit]

Home automation (also called domotics) designates an emerging practice of increased automation of household appliances and features in residential dwellings, particularly through electronic means that allow for things impracticable, overly expensive or simply not possible in recent past decades. The rise in the usage of home automation solutions has taken a turn reflecting the increased dependency of people on such automation solutions. However, the increased comfort that gets added through these automation solutions is remarkable.[106]

Laboratory

[edit]
Automated laboratory instrument
Automated laboratory instrument

Automation is essential for many scientific and clinical applications.[107] Therefore, automation has been extensively employed in laboratories. From as early as 1980 fully automated laboratories have already been working.[108] However, automation has not become widespread in laboratories due to its high cost. This may change with the ability of integrating low-cost devices with standard laboratory equipment.[109][110] Autosamplers are common devices used in laboratory automation.

Logistics automation

[edit]

Logistics automation is the application of computer software or automated machinery to improve the efficiency of logistics operations. Typically this refers to operations within a warehouse or distribution center, with broader tasks undertaken by supply chain engineering systems and enterprise resource planning systems.

Industrial automation

[edit]

Industrial automation deals primarily with the automation of manufacturing, quality control, and material handling processes. General-purpose controllers for industrial processes include programmable logic controllers, stand-alone I/O modules, and computers. Industrial automation is to replace the human action and manual command-response activities with the use of mechanized equipment and logical programming commands. One trend is increased use of machine vision[111] to provide automatic inspection and robot guidance functions, another is a continuing increase in the use of robots. Industrial automation is simply required in industries.

Industrial Automation and Industry 4.0

[edit]

The rise of industrial automation is directly tied to the "Fourth Industrial Revolution", which is better known now as Industry 4.0. Originating from Germany, Industry 4.0 encompasses numerous devices, concepts, and machines,[112] as well as the advancement of the industrial internet of things (IIoT). An "Internet of Things is a seamless integration of diverse physical objects in the Internet through a virtual representation."[113] These new revolutionary advancements have drawn attention to the world of automation in an entirely new light and shown ways for it to grow to increase productivity and efficiency in machinery and manufacturing facilities. Industry 4.0 works with the IIoT and software/hardware to connect in a way that (through communication technologies) add enhancements and improve manufacturing processes. Being able to create smarter, safer, and more advanced manufacturing is now possible with these new technologies. It opens up a manufacturing platform that is more reliable, consistent, and efficient than before. Implementation of systems such as SCADA is an example of software that takes place in Industrial Automation today. SCADA is a supervisory data collection software, just one of the many used in Industrial Automation.[114] Industry 4.0 vastly covers many areas in manufacturing and will continue to do so as time goes on.[112]

Industrial robotics

[edit]
Large automated milling machines inside a big warehouse-style lab room
Automated milling machines

Industrial robotics is a sub-branch in industrial automation that aids in various manufacturing processes. Such manufacturing processes include machining, welding, painting, assembling and material handling to name a few.[115] Industrial robots use various mechanical, electrical as well as software systems to allow for high precision, accuracy and speed that far exceed any human performance. The birth of industrial robots came shortly after World War II as the U.S. saw the need for a quicker way to produce industrial and consumer goods.[116] Servos, digital logic and solid-state electronics allowed engineers to build better and faster systems and over time these systems were improved and revised to the point where a single robot is capable of running 24 hours a day with little or no maintenance. In 1997, there were 700,000 industrial robots in use, the number has risen to 1.8M in 2017[117] In recent years, AI with robotics is also used in creating an automatic labeling solution, using robotic arms as the automatic label applicator, and AI for learning and detecting the products to be labelled.[118]

Programmable Logic Controllers

[edit]

Industrial automation incorporates programmable logic controllers in the manufacturing process. Programmable logic controllers (PLCs) use a processing system which allows for variation of controls of inputs and outputs using simple programming. PLCs make use of programmable memory, storing instructions and functions like logic, sequencing, timing, counting, etc. Using a logic-based language, a PLC can receive a variety of inputs and return a variety of logical outputs, the input devices being sensors and output devices being motors, valves, etc. PLCs are similar to computers, however, while computers are optimized for calculations, PLCs are optimized for control tasks and use in industrial environments. They are built so that only basic logic-based programming knowledge is needed and to handle vibrations, high temperatures, humidity, and noise. The greatest advantage PLCs offer is their flexibility. With the same basic controllers, a PLC can operate a range of different control systems. PLCs make it unnecessary to rewire a system to change the control system. This flexibility leads to a cost-effective system for complex and varied control systems.[119]

PLCs can range from small "building brick" devices with tens of I/O in a housing integral with the processor, to large rack-mounted modular devices with a count of thousands of I/O, and which are often networked to other PLC and SCADA systems.

They can be designed for multiple arrangements of digital and analog inputs and outputs (I/O), extended temperature ranges, immunity to electrical noise, and resistance to vibration and impact. Programs to control machine operation are typically stored in battery-backed-up or non-volatile memory.

It was from the automotive industry in the United States that the PLC was born. Before the PLC, control, sequencing, and safety interlock logic for manufacturing automobiles was mainly composed of relays, cam timers, drum sequencers, and dedicated closed-loop controllers. Since these could number in the hundreds or even thousands, the process for updating such facilities for the yearly model change-over was very time-consuming and expensive, as electricians needed to individually rewire the relays to change their operational characteristics.

When digital computers became available, being general-purpose programmable devices, they were soon applied to control sequential and combinatorial logic in industrial processes. However, these early computers required specialist programmers and stringent operating environmental control for temperature, cleanliness, and power quality. To meet these challenges, the PLC was developed with several key attributes. It would tolerate the shop-floor environment, it would support discrete (bit-form) input and output in an easily extensible manner, it would not require years of training to use, and it would permit its operation to be monitored. Since many industrial processes have timescales easily addressed by millisecond response times, modern (fast, small, reliable) electronics greatly facilitate building reliable controllers, and performance could be traded off for reliability.[120]

Agent-assisted automation

[edit]

Agent-assisted automation refers to automation used by call center agents to handle customer inquiries. The key benefit of agent-assisted automation is compliance and error-proofing. Agents are sometimes not fully trained or they forget or ignore key steps in the process. The use of automation ensures that what is supposed to happen on the call actually does, every time. There are two basic types: desktop automation and automated voice solutions.

Control

[edit]

Open-loop and closed-loop

[edit]

Fundamentally, there are two types of control loop: open-loop control (feedforward), and closed-loop control (feedback).

  • In open-loop control, the control action from the controller is independent of the "process output" (or "controlled process variable"). A good example of this is a central heating boiler controlled only by a timer, so that heat is applied for a constant time, regardless of the temperature of the building. The control action is the switching on/off of the boiler, but the controlled variable should be the building temperature, but is not because this is open-loop control of the boiler, which does not give closed-loop control of the temperature.
  • In closed loop control, the control action from the controller is dependent on the process output. In the case of the boiler analogy, this would include a thermostat to monitor the building temperature, and thereby feed back a signal to ensure the controller maintains the building at the temperature set on the thermostat. A closed loop controller therefore has a feedback loop which ensures the controller exerts a control action to give a process output the same as the "reference input" or "set point". For this reason, closed loop controllers are also called feedback controllers.[121]

The definition of a closed loop control system according to the British Standards Institution is "a control system possessing monitoring feedback, the deviation signal formed as a result of this feedback being used to control the action of a final control element in such a way as to tend to reduce the deviation to zero."[122]

Likewise; "A Feedback Control System is a system which tends to maintain a prescribed relationship of one system variable to another by comparing functions of these variables and using the difference as a means of control."[123]

Discrete control (on/off)

[edit]

One of the simplest types of control is on-off control. An example is a thermostat used on household appliances which either open or close an electrical contact. (Thermostats were originally developed as true feedback-control mechanisms rather than the on-off common household appliance thermostat.)

Sequence control, in which a programmed sequence of discrete operations is performed, often based on system logic that involves system states. An elevator control system is an example of sequence control.

PID controller

[edit]
A block diagram of a PID controller in a feedback loop, where r(t) is the desired process value or "set point", and y(t) is the measured process value

A proportional–integral–derivative controller (PID controller) is a control loop feedback mechanism (controller) widely used in industrial control systems.

In a PID loop, the controller continuously calculates an error value as the difference between a desired setpoint and a measured process variable and applies a correction based on proportional, integral, and derivative terms, respectively (sometimes denoted P, I, and D) which give their name to the controller type.

The theoretical understanding and application date from the 1920s, and they are implemented in nearly all analog control systems; originally in mechanical controllers, and then using discrete electronics and latterly in industrial process computers.

Sequential control and logical sequence or system state control

[edit]

Sequential control may be either to a fixed sequence or to a logical one that will perform different actions depending on various system states. An example of an adjustable but otherwise fixed sequence is a timer on a lawn sprinkler.

States refer to the various conditions that can occur in a use or sequence scenario of the system. An example is an elevator, which uses logic based on the system state to perform certain actions in response to its state and operator input. For example, if the operator presses the floor n button, the system will respond depending on whether the elevator is stopped or moving, going up or down, or if the door is open or closed, and other conditions.[124]

Early development of sequential control was relay logic, by which electrical relays engage electrical contacts which either start or interrupt power to a device. Relays were first used in telegraph networks before being developed for controlling other devices, such as when starting and stopping industrial-sized electric motors or opening and closing solenoid valves. Using relays for control purposes allowed event-driven control, where actions could be triggered out of sequence, in response to external events. These were more flexible in their response than the rigid single-sequence cam timers. More complicated examples involved maintaining safe sequences for devices such as swing bridge controls, where a lock bolt needed to be disengaged before the bridge could be moved, and the lock bolt could not be released until the safety gates had already been closed.

The total number of relays and cam timers can number into the hundreds or even thousands in some factories. Early programming techniques and languages were needed to make such systems manageable, one of the first being ladder logic, where diagrams of the interconnected relays resembled the rungs of a ladder. Special computers called programmable logic controllers were later designed to replace these collections of hardware with a single, more easily re-programmed unit.

In a typical hard-wired motor start and stop circuit (called a control circuit) a motor is started by pushing a "Start" or "Run" button that activates a pair of electrical relays. The "lock-in" relay locks in contacts that keep the control circuit energized when the push-button is released. (The start button is a normally open contact and the stop button is a normally closed contact.) Another relay energizes a switch that powers the device that throws the motor starter switch (three sets of contacts for three-phase industrial power) in the main power circuit. Large motors use high voltage and experience high in-rush current, making speed important in making and breaking contact. This can be dangerous for personnel and property with manual switches. The "lock-in" contacts in the start circuit and the main power contacts for the motor are held engaged by their respective electromagnets until a "stop" or "off" button is pressed, which de-energizes the lock in relay.[125]

This state diagram shows how UML can be used for designing a door system that can only be opened and closed.

Commonly interlocks are added to a control circuit. Suppose that the motor in the example is powering machinery that has a critical need for lubrication. In this case, an interlock could be added to ensure that the oil pump is running before the motor starts. Timers, limit switches, and electric eyes are other common elements in control circuits.

Solenoid valves are widely used on compressed air or hydraulic fluid for powering actuators on mechanical components. While motors are used to supply continuous rotary motion, actuators are typically a better choice for intermittently creating a limited range of movement for a mechanical component, such as moving various mechanical arms, opening or closing valves, raising heavy press-rolls, applying pressure to presses.

Computer control

[edit]

Computers can perform both sequential control and feedback control, and typically a single computer will do both in an industrial application. Programmable logic controllers (PLCs) are a type of special-purpose microprocessor that replaced many hardware components such as timers and drum sequencers used in relay logic–type systems. General-purpose process control computers have increasingly replaced stand-alone controllers, with a single computer able to perform the operations of hundreds of controllers. Process control computers can process data from a network of PLCs, instruments, and controllers to implement typical (such as PID) control of many individual variables or, in some cases, to implement complex control algorithms using multiple inputs and mathematical manipulations. They can also analyze data and create real-time graphical displays for operators and run reports for operators, engineers, and management.

Control of an automated teller machine (ATM) is an example of an interactive process in which a computer will perform a logic-derived response to a user selection based on information retrieved from a networked database. The ATM process has similarities with other online transaction processes. The different logical responses are called scenarios. Such processes are typically designed with the aid of use cases and flowcharts, which guide the writing of the software code. The earliest feedback control mechanism was the water clock invented by Greek engineer Ctesibius (285–222 BC).

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Automation is the creation and application of to monitor and control the production and delivery of products and services, minimizing intervention to enhance efficiency and precision. This encompasses mechanical systems, electrical controls, software algorithms, and that execute repetitive or complex tasks autonomously, from assembly lines to . Emerging during the Industrial Revolution with programmable looms and steam-powered machinery in the 18th and 19th centuries, automation advanced through 20th-century innovations like feedback control systems and electronic computers, enabling mass production and process optimization. Key milestones include the introduction of industrial robots in the 1960s and the integration of digital technologies in the late 20th century, which expanded automation beyond manufacturing into services, logistics, and information handling. In contemporary economies, automation significantly boosts and GDP growth by reducing costs and errors while scaling output, as evidenced by studies showing industrial contributing to higher across sectors. However, it sparks over job displacement, with indicating declines in and for routine manual and cognitive tasks—such as a 0.42% wage drop per additional robot per 1,000 workers in the U.S.—though offsetting gains arise from new roles in programming, , and innovation-driven sectors. Despite fears of widespread , historical patterns and cross-industry data reveal no net joblessness, as surges create for complementary human skills and expand economic activity.

Definition and Fundamentals

Core Principles

Automation operates on the principle of substituting human intervention with mechanized or computational processes to perform tasks with high precision and repeatability. At its foundation lies the , comprising sensors to measure system states, controllers to process data and compute adjustments, and actuators to implement changes, enabling the maintenance of desired outputs despite external disturbances. A key principle is feedback, particularly in closed-loop configurations, where output signals are continuously compared to setpoints, and signals drive corrective actions to minimize deviations. This mechanism, formalized in since the early 20th century, ensures stability, robustness, and adaptability, as seen in proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers that balance responsiveness and overshoot. Open-loop systems, by contrast, execute predefined sequences without real-time correction, suitable for simple, predictable tasks but vulnerable to inaccuracies. Determinism underpins automation's reliability, with programmed instructions yielding identical results under identical conditions, eliminating variability from human factors like fatigue or inconsistency. and further these principles: systems are structured in layers, from field-level devices handling basic functions to supervisory layers coordinating complex operations, facilitating and .

Types and Levels of Automation

Automation systems are commonly classified into three primary types based on their flexibility and suitability for production volumes: fixed, programmable, and flexible automation. Fixed automation, also known as hard automation, consists of dedicated machinery designed for continuous, high-volume production of a single or limited range of products with minimal variation. These systems employ specialized equipment like transfer lines and assembly machines, achieving high and low unit costs but requiring significant upfront and offering little adaptability to design changes. Examples include automated lines in automotive , where cycle times can be as low as seconds per part for outputs exceeding millions annually. Programmable automation supports of discrete products by using numerically controlled or computer-programmable machines that can be reconfigured via software or tooling changes for different items. This type balances efficiency with moderate flexibility, suitable for medium-volume runs, as seen in CNC machining centers and industrial robots reprogrammed for varied tasks, reducing setup times from hours to minutes compared to fixed systems. Flexible automation extends programmable systems by integrating computer controls, sensors, and software to handle high product variety and low volumes with minimal intervention or downtime, often approaching . It relies on advanced and adaptive algorithms, enabling rapid switches between products, as in flexible systems (FMS) where throughput flexibility ratios can exceed 10:1 for volume changes. Levels of automation are often conceptualized through hierarchical models like the automation pyramid, derived from the ISA-95 standard for enterprise-control system integration, which structures industrial control from physical processes to business logistics. This model delineates five core levels, emphasizing data flow and decision-making granularity. At Level 0, the physical production process occurs, involving raw materials and energy transformation without digital oversight. Level 1 encompasses sensing and manipulation via field devices such as sensors for acquisition (e.g., probes accurate to 0.1°C) and actuators like motors executing basic commands. Level 2 handles monitoring and supervisory control using programmable logic controllers (PLCs) and systems to regulate processes, maintaining variables within setpoints via feedback loops. Level 3 focuses on manufacturing operations management through systems like MES for scheduling, quality tracking, and execution, optimizing workflows across shifts. Level 4 integrates business planning via software for , , and enterprise-wide decisions, bridging operational data to financial outcomes.
LevelDescriptionKey ComponentsExample Functions
0Physical processMaterials, machineryChemical reactions, mechanical assembly
1Sensing & manipulatingSensors, actuatorsData measurement, valve control
2Monitoring & supervisingPLCs, HMIs, PID control, alarm management
3Operations managementMESProduction scheduling,
4Business planning coordination, forecasting
In -automation interaction, levels are alternatively framed as degrees of operator involvement, with a seminal 10-level scale proposed by Sheridan and Ferrell in 1974 for supervisory control systems, ranging from full (Level 10) to complete system with occasional human override (Level 1). This scale, refined in later works, underscores trade-offs in reliability and error rates, where higher automation reduces human workload but can introduce complacency risks, as evidenced by incidents where automation surprise led to 20-30% of errors in highly automated cockpits.

Historical Development

Pre-Industrial and Early Mechanization

Pre-industrial automation emerged through mechanical devices that harnessed natural forces or simple mechanisms to perform repetitive tasks, reducing reliance on manual labor. In around 2500 BCE, priests employed hidden levers and counterweights in temple statues to simulate divine responses, creating an illusion of autonomous movement. By the 1st century CE, advanced these concepts with pneumatic and hydraulic automata described in his Pneumatica and Automata, including automatic doors triggered by fire-heated vessels expanding air to open temple gates and vending machines dispensing measured holy water upon coin insertion. These inventions utilized principles of , siphons, and steam reaction forces, such as the —a spinning sphere demonstrating from boiling water—foreshadowing later power sources. Medieval innovations built on ancient knowledge, integrating gears, cams, and crankshafts into devices powered by water and wind. Watermills, documented in Roman texts but proliferated across by the , automated milling of grain and forging via overshot wheels coupled to camshafts that converted continuous rotation into intermittent hammer strikes, with records from 1086 noting over 5,000 in alone. Vertical-axis windmills, first evidenced in 12th-century Persia and adopted in by the 1180s, similarly mechanized grinding and drainage without human or animal propulsion, relying on sails to drive millstones through gear trains. Islamic engineers like the Banu Musa brothers in 850 CE detailed self-operating fountains and trick devices in Book of Ingenious Devices, while Al-Jazari's 1206 compendium described 100 machines, including a humanoid serving drinks via programmable cams on a rotated by weights. Early in the 17th and early 18th centuries transitioned toward and improved tools, enabling more reliable automation of industrial precursors. Mechanical clocks, emerging in European monasteries around 1270 with verge-and-foliot escapements, automated timekeeping for bells and schedules using falling weights to regulate gear oscillations, with over 3,000 installed in by 1300. Thomas Savery's 1698 pump and Thomas Newcomen's atmospheric automated mine by condensing to create lift, achieving 10-12 meter heads and pumping 3,600 gallons per hour in prototypes, though limited by low (about 0.5%). These devices, reliant on boilers and valves rather than natural flows, laid groundwork for scalable power independent of location, influencing later refinements despite high consumption.

Industrial Revolution and Mass Production

The , commencing in Britain around 1760, marked the transition from agrarian economies to industrialized ones through widespread , beginning in the sector. Early innovations automated labor-intensive processes: John Kay's in 1733 doubled weaving productivity by allowing a single weaver to operate broader looms, while James Hargreaves' , invented in 1764, enabled one worker to spin multiple threads simultaneously on a multi-spindle machine powered by hand or water. Richard Arkwright's , patented in 1769, introduced water-powered continuous spinning, facilitating the establishment of centralized factories like his in 1771, which employed over 300 workers and minimized reliance on skilled artisans by standardizing operations. These developments reduced human intervention in repetitive tasks, laying groundwork for automated production sequences. Steam power further decoupled manufacturing from geographic constraints of water sources, amplifying mechanization. Thomas Newcomen's atmospheric engine of 1712 initially pumped water from mines, but James Watt's 1769 improvements—adding a separate condenser for efficiency—enabled practical application to machinery by the 1780s. Watt's , introduced around 1788, provided early feedback control to regulate engine speed automatically, representing a rudimentary form of process automation. In textiles, Cartwright's of 1785 mechanized weaving entirely under steam or water power, increasing output dramatically; by 1830s, British mills produced over 300 million yards of cloth annually, displacing handloom weavers. This enforced division of labor, with machines handling precise, high-volume tasks, causal to productivity surges: British consumption rose from 5 million pounds in 1790 to 52 million by 1830. Mass production emerged as an extension of these principles, emphasizing standardization and interchangeability to scale output. In the United States, Eli Whitney's 1798 government contract for 10,000 muskets pioneered interchangeable parts, demonstrated successfully in 1801 by producing uniform components via specialized machine tools, reducing assembly time and skill requirements. This "American System of Manufacturing," refined in armories like Springfield by 1810s, automated component fabrication through jigs and gauges, enabling rapid repairs and volume production without custom fitting. By mid-19th century, such techniques spread to consumer goods, with Samuel Colt applying them to revolvers in 1836, yielding over 1,000 units weekly. Mechanization's causal impact—evident in Britain's GDP growth from 1% annually pre-1760 to 2% post—stemmed from machines' reliability over human variability, though it provoked resistance like the Luddite riots of 1811-1816 against job displacement. These advancements presaged modern automation by prioritizing machine-driven precision over manual dexterity.

20th Century Advancements

The moving , introduced by at his Highland Park plant on December 1, 1913, represented a foundational advancement in automotive automation. This system used chain-driven conveyors to transport vehicle chassis between 140 specialized workstations, reducing Model T production time from approximately 12 hours to 93 minutes and enabling output of over 1,000 vehicles per day by 1914. While primarily human-operated, the line incorporated fixed such as jigs and fixtures to standardize tasks, laying groundwork for scalable repetitive processes across industries. Mid-century developments shifted toward programmable machinery, beginning with (NC) systems in the 1940s. Pioneered for precision machining of aircraft components, the first NC machines used punched paper tape to direct motor-driven tools along predefined paths, addressing limitations of manual milling for complex curves like blades. By the , commercial NC adoption grew, with MIT's Servomechanisms demonstrating a functional in 1952 that interpolated between control points for smoother motion. These systems improved accuracy and repeatability in , reducing human error in defense and sectors. The introduction of industrial robots further accelerated automation in the 1950s and 1960s. patented the robotic arm in 1954, a hydraulic manipulator capable of programmed repetitive tasks such as . The first was installed in 1961 at a die-casting plant in , where it autonomously transferred hot metal parts from presses to coolant baths, operating 24 hours daily without fatigue. By the mid-1960s, installations expanded to and stacking operations, with GM deploying hundreds, demonstrating robots' viability for hazardous, high-volume tasks. Late-20th-century innovations included programmable logic controllers (PLCs), invented in 1968 by Dick Morley to replace cumbersome relay-based control panels in manufacturing. The Modicon 084, the first PLC, used ladder logic programming on solid-state memory, enabling flexible reconfiguration for automotive assembly lines without rewiring. Adopted rapidly by firms like GM, PLCs facilitated real-time sequencing of discrete events, boosting efficiency in batch processes. These tools, combined with evolving NC into computer numerical control (CNC) by the 1970s—incorporating minicomputers for direct code input—solidified automation's role in precision manufacturing, reducing labor costs and defects while scaling to electronics and consumer goods.

Post-2000 Digital and AI Integration

The post-2000 era in automation featured deepening integration of digital networks and , evolving from isolated control systems to interconnected ecosystems. This shift built on the digital revolution's foundations, incorporating Ethernet-based communication protocols for programmable logic controllers (PLCs) and supervisory control and (SCADA) systems by the early 2000s, enabling remote monitoring and data exchange across factory floors. By the mid-2000s, (ERP) software began seamlessly linking (OT) with (IT), facilitating data-driven optimizations in supply chains and production scheduling. The formalization of Industry 4.0 in 2011, initiated by Germany's Federal Ministry of Education and Research at the Hannover Fair, represented a pivotal milestone, promoting cyber-physical production systems that fuse physical machinery with digital simulations via the (IIoT). Core technologies included for scalable data processing, analytics for in operational datasets, and digital twins—virtual replicas of physical assets updated in real-time to simulate and predict performance. These advancements enabled , reducing unplanned downtime by up to 50% in adopting facilities through in sensor data streams. Artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning algorithms refined since the early 2000s, introduced adaptive capabilities to automation, surpassing rigid rule-based programming. Deep learning models, accelerated by breakthroughs like the 2012 architecture in image recognition, powered systems for automated quality inspection, achieving defect detection accuracies exceeding 95% in high-volume . has optimized robotic trajectories in dynamic environments, as seen in warehouse automation where AI-driven mobile robots navigate unpredictable layouts, boosting throughput by 20-30% compared to traditional methods. By 2023, AI integration in processes supported tools that iteratively refine product prototypes based on material constraints and performance simulations, shortening development cycles from months to days. This digital-AI convergence has extended to , processing data locally on devices to minimize latency in time-critical applications like autonomous assembly lines. Despite benefits in efficiency, implementation challenges include cybersecurity vulnerabilities in interconnected systems and the need for skilled retraining, with studies indicating that up to 45% of tasks could be automated via AI by 2030. Empirical data from adopters underscore causal links between AI deployment and gains, such as a 15-20% increase in output per worker in AI-enhanced factories, though outcomes vary by sector-specific integration quality.

Technical Foundations

Control Systems

Control systems in automation are mechanisms designed to manage, command, direct, or regulate the behavior of other devices or subsystems to achieve desired performance criteria, often involving the of data to adjust actuators dynamically. These systems typically integrate devices for monitoring variables, controllers for , and final control elements like valves or motors for , forming the core of automated operations in industries such as and chemical . In practice, control systems maintain variables—such as , , or speed—within specified tolerances by responding to deviations from setpoints, thereby ensuring stability and efficiency. Control systems are broadly classified into open-loop and closed-loop configurations. Open-loop systems operate without feedback, executing predefined actions regardless of output, as seen in sequences or basic timer-based cycles where external disturbances do not influence the control action. These are simpler and less costly but susceptible to inaccuracies from unmeasured variations, making them suitable for predictable environments like feeders under constant conditions. In contrast, closed-loop systems incorporate feedback by continuously measuring the process output via sensors and comparing it to the desired setpoint, adjusting inputs to minimize error; a regulating exemplifies this, where the activates or deactivates based on detected deviations. Closed-loop designs enhance accuracy and adaptability, compensating for disturbances like load changes, though they require reliable sensors and can risk instability if not properly tuned. Feedback control, the foundation of most closed-loop systems, operates by quantifying the error—the difference between the measured process variable and setpoint—and generating corrective signals to drive the error toward zero. This principle traces back to early mechanisms like James Watt's centrifugal governor in 1788, which used negative feedback to regulate steam engine speed, predating modern electronics but illustrating causal dynamics of stability through proportional response. In automation, feedback ensures robustness against uncertainties, with linear time-invariant (LTI) system theory providing analytical tools for predicting responses via impulse functions and transfer models. A prominent implementation is the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller, which computes control outputs as a of current error (proportional term for immediate response), accumulated past errors ( term to eliminate steady-state offsets), and predicted future errors via (for damping oscillations). Developed conceptually in the for ship and refined for industrial use by the mid-20th century, PID remains dominant in automation due to its simplicity, tunability via Ziegler-Nichols methods, and effectiveness in processes like in chemical reactors or speed in conveyor systems. Tuning parameters—Kp for proportionality, Ki for integration, Kd for differentiation—must balance responsiveness against overshoot, often requiring empirical adjustment or to avoid from excessive gain. Digital PID variants, implemented in microcontrollers, have proliferated since the , enabling precise automation in PLC-integrated environments while retaining analog principles.

Sensors and Actuators

Sensors serve as the input interfaces in automation systems, detecting physical phenomena such as , , position, and motion, and converting these into electrical signals for processing by control units. In closed-loop control architectures, sensors provide real-time feedback to maintain stability and precision, as deviations from setpoints trigger corrective actions. For instance, thermocouples exploit the Seebeck effect to produce millivolt-level voltages proportional to temperature gradients, enabling monitoring in furnaces up to 1700°C, while resistance temperature detectors (RTDs) offer accuracies of ±0.1°C through platinum wire resistance changes. Pressure sensors, including types that measure diaphragm deflection via resistive foil deformation, quantify forces in hydraulic systems or pipelines, with ranges spanning from to thousands of psi. Proximity sensors detect object presence without contact: inductive variants generate eddy currents in metals for detection distances up to 50 mm, capacitive sensors respond to changes for non-metals, and photoelectric types use interruption or reflection for versatile applications in conveyor sorting. Flow sensors, such as ultrasonic Doppler models, calculate velocity by shifts in reflected waves, critical for dosing in chemical processes. Actuators function as output mechanisms, transforming control signals—typically electrical or pneumatic—into mechanical motion or force to manipulate environments, such as positioning tools or regulating valves. Electric actuators, dominated by servo and motors, deliver precise via electromagnetic fields; brushless DC motors, for example, achieve efficiencies over 90% and speeds to 10,000 RPM in robotic arms. Pneumatic cylinders provide rapid linear extension using at 5-10 bar, suited for high-force tasks like clamping, though requiring clean air supplies to avoid . Hydraulic actuators leverage incompressible fluids for heavy loads, generating forces exceeding 100 tons in presses, but demand to prevent leaks. The synergy of and underpins feedback control in systems like programmable logic controllers (PLCs), where sensor inputs feed algorithms—such as proportional-integral-derivative (PID) loops—to modulate actuator outputs, minimizing errors in processes like synchronization. This enables automation scalability, from single-machine controls to factory-wide networks. Advancements since 2020 include miniaturized (micro-electro-mechanical systems) sensors integrating sensing and actuation on chips for vibration monitoring, and IoT-enabled smart variants with to process locally, reducing cabling and latency in Industry 4.0 deployments. The global sensors and actuators market, valued at $19.98 billion in 2025, reflects this growth, projected to expand at 11.26% CAGR to $34.06 billion by 2030, driven by demands for precision in electric vehicles and .

Software and Programming Tools

Software and programming tools form the core of modern automation systems, translating logical designs into executable instructions for controllers, robots, and embedded devices. These tools encompass specialized languages for programmable logic controllers (PLCs), general-purpose programming languages for custom applications, and frameworks for simulation and integration. Standardized by the international standard, PLC programming languages include (LD), which mimics electrical diagrams for intuitive logic representation; function block diagrams (FBD) for modular graphical programming; (ST) resembling high-level languages like Pascal; sequential function charts (SFC) for state-based processes; and instruction lists (IL) for compact assembly-like code. , the most widely adopted due to its familiarity to electricians and ease in -style circuits, executes scans in milliseconds to handle real-time inputs and outputs in industrial environments. For more complex or non-PLC automation, general-purpose languages such as C/C++ dominate embedded systems and real-time operating environments, enabling low-level hardware control and efficiency in resource-constrained devices like actuators and sensors. Python has gained traction for higher-level scripting, , and integration with libraries, facilitating and orchestration of automation workflows beyond strict real-time constraints. Java supports versatile system integration in distributed automation architectures, though its overhead limits use in time-critical embedded applications. In robotics and advanced automation, the (ROS), an open-source suite initiated in 2007 by researchers at Stanford and , provides modular tools for , message-passing, and package management, accelerating development of robot applications from perception to . ROS, now in its second major version (ROS 2, released in 2017 with improved real-time support and security), underpins thousands of robotic systems worldwide, emphasizing reusability over proprietary silos. Simulation and modeling tools like and enable virtual prototyping of control algorithms, allowing engineers to test dynamics, optimize parameters, and generate deployable code for automation hardware without physical risks. 's block-based environment supports multidomain for processes like and , integrating seamlessly with PLCs and embedding AI models for enhanced decision-making. These tools collectively prioritize reliability, with features for , , and hardware-in-the-loop testing to minimize deployment errors in safety-critical settings.

Key Technologies

Industrial Robotics and Cobots

Industrial robots are programmable machines designed for precise, repetitive tasks in manufacturing environments, typically operating in isolated areas separated from human workers by physical barriers to ensure safety. The first industrial robot, , was invented by in 1954 and installed at a plant in 1961 to handle die-casting operations, marking the beginning of automated production lines for hazardous and monotonous work. By 2024, global installations reached 542,000 units, more than double the figure from a decade earlier, with a total of 4.664 million industrial robots operational worldwide, reflecting sustained demand driven by needs for higher precision and throughput in sectors like automotive and . Key technologies in industrial robotics include articulated arms with multiple for complex motions, servo motors for accurate positioning, and end-effectors such as or welders tailored to specific applications. These systems rely on feedback loops from encoders and vision systems to maintain tolerances often below 0.1 millimeters, enabling tasks like assembly and that exceed consistency over extended periods. Programming typically involves teach pendants or offline , with integration into networks via protocols like for coordinated operation with other automated equipment. Collaborative robots, or cobots, emerged in the mid-1990s as an evolution prioritizing safe human-robot interaction without enclosures, first conceptualized in 1996 by researchers J. Edward Colgate and Michael Peshkin at to assist rather than replace workers. Unlike traditional industrial robots, cobots incorporate inherent safety features such as force-torque sensing to detect contact and reduce speed or stop motion, power and force limiting to cap impact energy below human injury thresholds, and algorithms compliant with standards like ISO/TS 15066. These enable shared workspaces, with rounded joints and lightweight construction—often under 20 kilograms—further minimizing risks, though payloads remain lower (typically 3-16 kilograms) and speeds capped at 250 mm/s compared to industrial robots' higher capacities. Cobots have gained traction for flexible automation in small-batch production, with installations comprising 10.5% of the market by 2023, facilitated by user-friendly programming via lead-through teaching or tablet interfaces that reduce setup times to hours rather than days. Adoption is evident in applications like machine tending and quality inspection, where human oversight complements robotic precision, though limitations in speed and payload restrict them to lighter duties versus the heavy-duty, high-volume roles of fenced industrial robots. Ongoing advancements integrate AI for adaptive behaviors, such as vision-guided grasping, enhancing versatility while maintaining certifications essential for deployment.

Programmable Logic Controllers and SCADA

Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs) are ruggedized industrial computers designed for real-time control of manufacturing processes, replacing traditional relay-based systems with programmable logic. The first PLC was conceptualized in 1968 by engineer Dick Morley in response to General Motors' need for a solid-state replacement for hardwired relay logic in automotive assembly lines, which required frequent reprogramming for production changes. The initial commercial model, Modicon 084, entered production in 1969, featuring limited memory of about 125 words and ladder logic programming to mimic relay diagrams. Key features include modular input/output (I/O) interfaces for sensors and actuators, deterministic scanning cycles for reliable execution, and resilience to harsh environments like vibration, dust, and temperature extremes. PLCs execute control logic in a continuous loop: reading inputs, processing programs, and updating outputs, enabling precise automation of machinery such as conveyor systems and robotic arms in factories. Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems provide higher-level oversight of industrial operations by aggregating data from field devices like PLCs for centralized monitoring and control. Originating in the early 1960s from telemetry applications in oil and gas pipelines for remote data transmission, SCADA evolved through the 1970s with minicomputers enabling networked architectures over proprietary protocols. Modern SCADA architectures comprise remote terminal units (RTUs) or PLCs at the field level, communication networks (e.g., Modbus, Ethernet/IP), historian databases for data logging, and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) for visualization via graphical dashboards and alarms. These systems facilitate real-time data acquisition, trend analysis, and supervisory commands, such as adjusting setpoints across distributed plants, while supporting protocols for interoperability. In manufacturing automation, PLCs handle localized, deterministic control of equipment, while integrates multiple PLCs for enterprise-wide visibility, enabling operators to detect anomalies, optimize processes, and respond to events like equipment failures. This hierarchical integration, often via OPC UA standards, reduces downtime by providing actionable insights; for instance, a system might poll PLC data every few seconds to generate reports on production throughput or . Adoption has grown with open standards, transitioning from isolated monolithic setups to cloud-connected systems, though vulnerabilities to cyberattacks necessitate robust cybersecurity measures like segmentation and . By 2024, PLC- combinations underpin over 80% of large-scale , driving efficiency gains through and reduced human intervention.

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Automation

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) integrate into automation systems to enable adaptive control, predictive analytics, and optimization beyond rigid programming. ML algorithms process sensor data streams to identify patterns, forecast anomalies, and adjust operations dynamically, supporting cyber-physical systems in Industry 4.0 frameworks. Deep learning models, viable for practical use following computational advances in the 2010s, enhance tasks like image-based quality control by achieving defect detection accuracies often exceeding 95% in manufacturing datasets. Reinforcement learning (RL) applies to sequential decision-making in robotics, where agents learn optimal policies via simulated environments, improving efficiency in tasks such as path planning and assembly. In , ML models analyze vibration, temperature, and usage data to predict equipment failures, shifting from reactive to proactive strategies. Empirical implementations demonstrate reductions in unplanned by 20-50% across sectors like and energy, though results vary with and model tuning. For process optimization, AI-driven techniques such as genetic algorithms and neural networks minimize and maximize throughput; for instance, RL has optimized chemical production processes by iteratively refining control parameters. In , ML enables collaborative robots (cobots) to adapt to variable environments, with vision systems using convolutional networks for real-time . Despite advancements, integration challenges persist, including data silos, between legacy systems and AI modules, and the need for interpretable models to ensure reliability in safety-critical automation. A 2023 survey indicated that while 89% of manufacturers view AI as essential for competitiveness, only 16% achieve targeted outcomes, highlighting gaps in workforce skills and trustworthy AI deployment. RL applications, while promising for complex control, require extensive simulation data and face sample inefficiency in real-world transfer. These limitations underscore the importance of hybrid approaches combining ML with traditional for robust automation.

Applications Across Sectors

Manufacturing and Assembly

Automation in and assembly involves the use of programmable machines, industrial robots, and computer-controlled systems to perform tasks such as , , , and part assembly with minimal human intervention. These systems enable high-precision operations, repetitive processes at high speeds, and consistent quality output, fundamentally transforming production from manual labor-intensive methods to integrated, flexible environments. Key technologies include fixed automation for high-volume production, programmable automation for , and flexible automation using for varied product lines. Industrial robots dominate assembly applications, handling tasks like , , and component insertion. In 2023, global installations reached 276,288 units, contributing to a worldwide operational stock exceeding 4 million robots, with manufacturing sectors accounting for the majority of deployments. Asia led with 73% of new installations, reflecting concentrated adoption in electronics and automotive assembly. In the United States, over 380,000 industrial robots operated in factories by 2023, primarily enhancing efficiency. The exemplifies advanced automation, where robotic assembly lines perform over 80% of and tasks on vehicles. Originating from Henry Ford's 1913 conveyor-based , modern lines integrate collaborative robots (cobots) and AI-driven vision systems for adaptive assembly, reducing cycle times and defects. Such implementations have boosted productivity by up to 70% in reconfigured facilities, as measured by output per employee. Computer numerical control (CNC) machines further automate and forming, enabling just-in-time production in sectors like and consumer goods. Automation yields measurable gains through reduced and rates, with studies indicating potential global output increases of 0.8 to 1.4 points annually from widespread adoption. However, requires upfront investments in integration, often offset by long-term cost savings in labor and materials. In assembly, pick-and-place robots achieve sub-millimeter accuracy, supporting trends in semiconductors and devices. Overall, these systems prioritize causal in repetitive, hazardous tasks, driving while demanding skilled oversight for programming and maintenance.

Agriculture and Food Production

Automation in agriculture integrates precision farming, autonomous vehicles, and robotic systems to enhance efficiency in crop cultivation, livestock management, and resource allocation. Precision agriculture employs GPS-guided machinery, soil sensors, and data analytics for variable-rate application of seeds, fertilizers, and pesticides, minimizing overuse and environmental runoff. These methods have demonstrated crop yield improvements of 15-20% alongside reductions in input costs by 25-30%. The global precision farming market reached USD 10.5 billion in 2024, with projections for 11.5% annual growth through 2034, driven by adoption of IoT devices and satellite imagery. Drones and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) facilitate real-time crop monitoring, pest detection, and targeted spraying, covering large areas with to assess plant health. Agricultural drones and robots generated USD 16.94 billion in market value in 2024, expected to expand to USD 102.15 billion by 2033 as scalability improves. Autonomous tractors and harvesters, equipped with and AI path planning, perform planting and harvesting with minimal human intervention, though challenges persist in delicate operations like due to variability in produce shape and ripeness. Robotic harvesters have achieved up to 90% success rates in controlled environments for strawberries and tomatoes since prototypes emerged in the early . In sectors, automation includes robotic milking systems that monitor cow health via sensors for condition and quality, reducing labor needs by up to 50% per animal. Automated feeding and environmental control systems use predictive algorithms to optimize feed distribution and ventilation, correlating with 10-15% gains in animal . Adoption of such technologies remains uneven, with drone and robotic usage below 5% in many regions as of 2024, limited by high upfront costs and requirements. Food production automation extends these principles into , where robotic arms handle sorting, cutting, and to ensure uniformity and hygiene. Vision-guided robots detect defects in produce at speeds exceeding human capabilities, reducing waste by 20-30% in packing lines. Smart systems, integral to both field and , achieve 40-60% higher water use efficiency through soil moisture sensors and weather-integrated controls. The broader agricultural market, encompassing applications, stood at USD 14.74 billion in 2024, forecasted to reach USD 48.06 billion by 2030 via advancements in collaborative robots compatible with wet and variable conditions. These systems collectively lower risks and enable 24/7 operations, addressing labor shortages in perishable goods handling.

Logistics and Supply Chain

Automation in logistics and supply chain encompasses the deployment of robotic systems, autonomous vehicles, and artificial intelligence to streamline warehousing, inventory management, transportation, and order fulfillment. These technologies address inefficiencies in manual processes, such as picking, sorting, and routing, by enabling faster throughput and reducing human error. For instance, automated guided vehicles (AGVs) and autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) transport goods within facilities, while AI algorithms optimize route planning and demand forecasting. A primary application is in operations, where AMRs and AGVs have seen widespread adoption. Over 70% of surveyed professionals have implemented or plan to implement these mobile s, which handle repetitive tasks like goods-to-person delivery, reducing picking times by up to 50% in large facilities. Amazon, a leader in this domain, operates more than 1 million s across its fulfillment centers, including systems derived from the acquired technology, which cut travel time by 10% and enhance order accuracy. AI integration further amplifies efficiency through and real-time optimization. In , AI-driven tools forecast demand, manage inventory levels, and automate quality checks, leading to shorter delivery times and cost reductions. Case studies demonstrate that AI in can minimize stockouts by 20-30% and optimize carrier selection to lower transportation costs. The global market, valued at USD 35.14 billion in 2024, is projected to reach USD 52.53 billion by 2029, reflecting accelerated adoption amid growth and labor constraints. Despite benefits, implementation challenges include high initial costs and integration with legacy systems, though returns manifest in and resilience against disruptions. Automated systems enable 24/7 operations and error-free processes, transforming supply chains into more agile networks capable of handling volatile demand.

Healthcare and Laboratory Automation

Automation in healthcare and laboratories integrates robotic systems, AI-driven diagnostics, and software to minimize , accelerate processing, and enhance diagnostic accuracy. Total laboratory automation () systems, which handle sample sorting, preparation, and analysis, reduce medical errors and specimen volume requirements while increasing throughput. In the United States, the laboratory automation market reached USD 2.18 billion in 2023 and is projected to grow at a 5.4% CAGR through 2030, driven by demands for faster turnaround times and precision in high-volume testing. Globally, the TLA sector is expected to expand from USD 5.68 billion in 2024 to USD 11.3 billion by 2034 at a 7.15% CAGR, reflecting advancements in integrated and . Robotic-assisted surgery represents a core application, with systems like the da Vinci enabling minimally invasive procedures through enhanced dexterity and visualization. Adoption in rose from 1.8% of procedures in 2012 to 15.1% in 2018, correlating with reduced complications in specialties such as and gynecology. The global surgical robotics market was valued at USD 4.31 billion in 2024, forecasted to reach USD 7.42 billion by 2030 at an 8.9% CAGR, as hospitals invest in systems that shorten recovery times and hospital stays. These technologies mitigate and , directly improving outcomes via precise instrument control, though initial costs and remain barriers to broader diffusion. In pharmacies, automated dispensing robots streamline preparation and distribution, cutting dispensing errors and discrepancies. Systems like the ROWA Vmax reduced error rates from 1.31% to 0.63% and stock-out ratios from 0.85% to 0.17% in settings. Centralized robots in early-adopting facilities lowered errors from 19 per 100,000 items to 7 per 100,000, allowing pharmacists to focus on clinical verification rather than manual counting. Such automation enhances by verifying doses via scanning and , reducing transcription and selection mistakes inherent in manual processes. Laboratory automation further bolsters efficiency through high-throughput analyzers and pipetting robots, which standardize workflows and diminish variability from manual handling. Implementation of has been shown to shorten turnaround times, curb random analytical errors, and optimize staff allocation by automating repetitive tasks. In coagulation labs, automated systems minimize pre-analytical errors like improper mixing, ensuring reliable results amid rising test volumes. Overall, these tools yield causal benefits in accuracy— accounts for up to 70% of lab mistakes, which automation systematically addresses via consistent mechanical execution—supporting scalable diagnostics without proportional staff increases.

Retail and Service Industries

Automation in retail encompasses self-checkout systems, inventory management robots, and AI-driven personalization tools, enhancing operational efficiency. The global retail automation market reached USD 27.62 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 30.51 billion in 2025, driven by technologies that streamline checkout and stocking processes. Self-service kiosks in quick-service restaurants (QSRs) have surged 43% in adoption over the past two years, allowing operators to increase order speed and average ticket sizes. In the United States, 66% of consumers prefer self-service options for their convenience, contributing to reduced labor needs at point-of-sale while boosting throughput. AI integration in retail operations, including chatbots and , supports inventory optimization and . By 2025, 80% of retail companies are expected to deploy AI chatbots for automated customer interactions, deflecting up to 70% of routine inquiries and yielding significant cost savings. The AI segment within retail automation is anticipated to reach USD 15.3 billion globally by 2025, facilitating personalized recommendations that drive sales without proportional increases in human staffing. Automated stores, such as those employing for cashierless shopping, exemplify how sensors and algorithms replace manual transaction handling, with early implementations demonstrating reduced shrinkage and faster flow. In , automation manifests through (RPA) for booking systems, delivery drones, and virtual assistants in and . The technologies market, encompassing and automated teller machines, is valued at USD 53.32 billion in 2025 and forecasted to expand to USD 131.83 billion by 2034, reflecting broad in sectors like banking and travel. In fast-food services, 71% of consumers report faster service via self-ordering s, prompting 60% to opt for them to minimize human contact, which in turn shifts labor from frontline roles to backend preparation. Studies on in restaurants indicate localized reductions at adoption sites, offset by productivity gains that expand overall service capacity and demand for complementary skilled roles elsewhere. These advancements yield productivity boosts, with contributing to annual labor growth of 0.5 to 3.4 percentage points when combined with AI across service sectors. However, direct effects include task displacement, as evidenced by a 0.42% decline per additional per 1,000 workers in affected U.S. industries, though broader economic reinvestment mitigates net job losses through . In retail and services, where routine tasks predominate, automation reallocates effort toward complex interactions, fostering efficiency without uniform contraction.

Economic Impacts

Productivity and Efficiency Gains

Automation enhances by enabling machines to perform tasks with greater speed, precision, and consistency than human labor, often operating continuously without or breaks. In , the adoption of industrial robots has been linked to measurable increases in output per worker, as robots handle repetitive and hazardous operations, allowing human workers to focus on higher-value activities. Empirical studies confirm these gains: analysis of data from 17 countries between 1993 and 2007 showed that robots raised annual labor growth by 0.36 percentage points and contributed 0.37 percentage points to GDP growth through heightened . More recent firm-level evidence indicates that each 1% increase in robot density boosts labor by approximately 0.018%, with effects persisting across sectors adopting automation technologies. Firms implementing automation report accelerated growth, alongside increases, as automated systems reduce production times and minimize errors. Efficiency improvements extend to resource utilization, with automation lowering waste and energy consumption per unit produced. Broader economic models project that integrating automation, including AI-driven tools, could add 0.5 to 3.4 percentage points to annual global growth, driven by task automation and process optimization. Replacing manual jobs with AI and robotics could potentially boost global GDP through higher productivity, with AI-powered agents and robots projected to generate up to $2.9 trillion in U.S. economic value by 2030. These gains are attributed to rises, where capital investments in robots and software yield outsized returns through scalable operations. However, realization depends on complementary factors like worker retraining and , as isolated automation may yield without systemic integration.

Cost Structures and Market Dynamics

Automation systems typically feature high fixed costs upfront, encompassing hardware (e.g., robotic arms and sensors costing $50,000 to $500,000 per unit), software integration, engineering design, and installation, which can total millions for large-scale implementations. These capital expenditures are offset by substantial reductions in variable costs, including labor (often 60-80% savings on repetitive tasks) and operational inefficiencies, enabling declines of 20-50% in automated processes. Maintenance and expenses persist as ongoing costs, though they represent a smaller fraction—typically 5-10% of initial investment annually—compared to pre-automation labor overheads. Return on investment (ROI) for automation projects is calculated as net savings divided by total costs, frequently yielding 120-400% over 3-5 years, with payback periods averaging 18 months to 3 years depending on utilization rates and industry. For instance, continuous 24/7 operations can recoup investments in as little as 9 months by replacing multiple shifts, as evidenced in high-volume production lines. Empirical studies confirm that automation's cost structure favors high-volume producers, where fixed costs amortize rapidly through scale, but imposes longer paybacks (up to 5 years) on low-throughput applications due to underutilization. In market dynamics, automation lowers marginal costs, enabling that amplify output without proportional expense increases, thereby boosting firm-level by 0.1-0.6% annually through broader . This cost advantage drives competitive displacement, as automating firms undercut non-adopters on price while expanding , with showing non-adopters suffer declines of 10-20% from intensified . Larger enterprises, better positioned to absorb upfront costs, exhibit higher rates (e.g., 41% for AI-related automation vs. 11% for small firms in the as of 2025), fostering where "superstar" firms—those with superior —dominate via automated scale advantages. accelerates diffusion, as laggards face erosion of margins, though small and medium enterprises (SMEs) encounter barriers like capital constraints, limiting their participation and perpetuating incumbency advantages. Overall, these dynamics enhance global efficiency but risk entrenching oligopolistic structures, with automated markups rising 5-15% for early adopters before commoditization pressures equalize gains, while lower costs for goods and services from automation can improve living standards if gains are broadly distributed.

Employment Effects: Displacement and Creation

Automation has displaced workers primarily in routine, repetitive tasks susceptible to , such as operations in , where industrial robots reduced demand for low-skilled manual labor by an estimated 0.4 percentage points annually in the U.S. from 1990 to 2007. Empirical analyses, including those by economists and Pascual Restrepo, decompose this effect into a "displacement channel" where automation substitutes for labor in existing tasks, contributing to slower growth in affected sectors; for instance, their model attributes about two-thirds of the U.S. prime-age male labor force participation decline since 1980 to automation-driven task displacement rather than trade or other factors. This displacement is most pronounced in middle-skill occupations involving predictable physical or cognitive routines, as evidenced by David Autor's research showing polarization of job markets where routine jobs declined by 7% from 1980 to 2016 while non-routine high- and low-skill roles grew. Conversely, automation generates new employment through a "reinstatement channel" by creating novel tasks that complement human labor, such as robot maintenance, , system oversight, AI supervision, and roles in the green economy, which have expanded job opportunities in and technical fields, with projections of up to 97 million new jobs globally by 2025. Historical patterns demonstrate this dynamic: despite waves of mechanization from the through computerization, overall rates in developed economies have not exhibited sustained rises attributable to automation; for example, U.S. unemployment averaged below 6% from 1948 to 2020 amid surges from tractors, assembly lines, and computers, as output growth induced demand for labor in emerging sectors like services and . Recent studies on AI-augmented automation reinforce complementarity over pure substitution, with PwC's 2025 analysis of global job postings finding that AI-exposed sectors grew 4.8 times faster in and job postings from 2016 to 2024, particularly in roles requiring human oversight of automated systems. Net employment effects hinge on the balance between displacement and creation, with indicating no long-term mass but transitional frictions; Acemoglu and Restrepo estimate that reinstatement effects offset roughly half of displacement in recent decades, though weaker in periods of rapid automation adoption like 1980–2016 compared to earlier eras. Projections for AI-driven automation through 2030 vary, but the World Economic Forum's 2025 report anticipates 92 million jobs displaced globally yet a net gain of 78 million new roles, driven by demand in green energy, digital access, and care economies, assuming reskilling mitigates mismatches. models suggest a temporary spike of 0.5 percentage points during AI transitions, followed by reallocation to higher-productivity positions, underscoring that historical precedents—where automation raised wages and in complementary tasks—temper fears of structural joblessness when institutional adjustments like training are in place.

Social and Societal Implications

Labor Market Transitions and Skill Requirements

Automation has induced shifts in labor market transitions by displacing workers from routine, codifiable tasks—predominantly in middle-skill occupations such as clerical, assembly, and roles—while fostering reallocation toward non-routine cognitive and interpersonal jobs. Empirical analyses indicate that regions or sectors with higher adoption experience elevated job-to-job transition rates among affected workers, as automation reduces demand for predictable manual or repetitive labor but prompts movement into complementary roles requiring adaptability. For instance, studies of deployment from 1990 to 2007 across U.S. commuting zones reveal no aggregate decline in labor demand but a reorientation, with displaced workers often transitioning to service-oriented positions, albeit with initial wage penalties averaging 0.4% per additional robot per 1,000 workers. Reemployment following automation-induced displacement varies by worker characteristics and policy context, with evidence showing prolonged unemployment spells for low-skill individuals lacking transferable skills, contrasted by quicker recoveries for those with technical aptitude. Data from 2010–2019 U.S. manufacturing sectors demonstrate that automation exposure correlates with a 1–2 percentage point rise in non-employment probability for prime-age males, yet overall labor force participation stabilizes as new tasks emerge, such as programming robots or overseeing automated systems. Recent projections through 2033 incorporate AI-driven automation, anticipating displacement in high-exposure occupations like data entry clerks (projected 10–15% decline) but offsetting gains in software development and AI maintenance roles, underscoring the need for targeted retraining to bridge transition frictions. Skill requirements have evolved under automation's influence, exhibiting patterns of skill-biased technological change that favor abstract problem-solving, creativity, and digital literacy over routine competencies. Peer-reviewed examinations confirm that automation technologies, including AI and robotics, exert downward pressure on wages for low- and medium-skill workers—evident in a 10–20% wage polarization since the 1980s—while premiumizing high-skill attributes like analytical reasoning and social intelligence, which complement machines rather than compete with them. By 2027, over two-thirds of core job skills are forecasted to transform, with demand surging for abilities in machine learning integration and data interpretation, as seen in analyses of gig platforms where automation substitutes middle-skill routine tasks but amplifies returns to soft skills by up to 15% in wage effects. This skill shift necessitates widespread upskilling, particularly in STEM-adjacent domains, to facilitate smoother transitions; however, barriers persist for older or less-educated workers, where empirical gaps in reskilling access exacerbate mismatches. on occupational mobility models under automation predicts that without intervention, labor reallocation could lag by 20–30% in demand shifts, as new roles demand hybrid human-AI competencies not innately held by incumbents in declining fields. Institutional factors, such as vocational programs emphasizing automation-resistant skills, have mitigated transitions in adaptable economies, reducing displacement duration by up to 25% in comparative studies.

Inequality and Wage Dynamics

Automation contributes to wage polarization by displacing workers in routine middle-skill occupations, such as clerical and production roles, while complementing non-routine high-skill cognitive tasks and low-skill manual services. This dynamic, evident in U.S. labor markets from 1980 to 2005, resulted in employment growth at the upper and lower quartiles alongside stagnation or decline in the middle, hollowing out median wages relative to extremes. Empirical decompositions attribute 50-70% of U.S. wage structure changes since the 1980s to relative declines for routine-task workers in high-automation industries, where task displacement outpaced reallocation to non-automatable roles. Skill-biased technological change exacerbates this by augmenting for college-educated workers in abstract problem-solving tasks, widening the skilled-unskilled gap. Studies estimate that computerization and automation accounted for much of the U.S. college premium's rise from the 1970s onward, as technologies disproportionately rewarded over manual ones. In firm-level data from (2002-2017), investments in automation and AI goods increased within-firm dispersion by substituting mid-tier roles, boosting executive pay relative to production workers. Cross-country analyses confirm mixed but generally positive correlations between automation exposure and income inequality, with stronger effects in advanced economies where routine tasks comprise larger shares of . These shifts elevate overall inequality measures, such as the , by channeling productivity gains toward capital owners and high-skill labor while stagnating low-end amid slow skill upgrading. Theoretical models predict automation raises returns to wealth and top-end labor, potentially decoupling labor shares from output growth and amplifying top-bottom ratios. For instance, U.S. data from 1980-2016 show automation-driven task displacement correlating with a declining , as capital substitutes for middle-skill inputs, benefiting firm profits over broad growth. Recent AI extensions, while differing from industrial automation, show no aggregate between-occupation inequality rise in countries (2014-2018) but reduced within-occupation dispersion, suggesting nascent complementarity effects that may evolve with diffusion. Critics, including analyses emphasizing institutional factors, contend automation explains only a fraction of stagnation since , attributing more to weakened unions and shifts than technological inevitability. Such views, often from labor-advocacy sources, underweight task-specific displacement evidence from econometric studies controlling for confounders like . Nonetheless, reallocation frictions—such as mismatched training—amplify short-term wage pressures for displaced workers, delaying equilibrium adjustments. Long-term, automation's net effect on average wages remains positive via efficiency gains, but distributional outcomes hinge on responses to demands rather than halting adoption.

Debunking Unemployment Hysteria

Fears of widespread , often termed the "Luddite fallacy," posit that automation inherently destroys more jobs than it creates, leading to persistent high . This view, historically articulated by figures like in his 1930 essay on "Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren," has resurfaced with advancements in and AI, with some projections claiming up to 47% of jobs at risk in developed economies. However, consistently refutes the notion of net job destruction, showing instead that automation drives productivity gains that expand economic output and labor demand. Historical precedents underscore this pattern. During the , mechanization in textiles and manufacturing displaced artisans but spurred job growth in factories, railways, and services, with the U.S. employment-to-population ratio rising from around 50% in 1800 to over 60% by 1900 amid rapid automation. Similarly, the 20th-century shift to computers and eliminated roles like typists and switchboard operators but generated millions of positions in , , and digital services; by 2016, only one of 270 U.S. occupations from the operators—had been fully automated away. Over two centuries of successive automation waves, labor's share of income has remained stable, and employment has grown in tandem with population and output, contradicting predictions of . Modern studies reinforce these outcomes. A 2024 analysis of adoption across countries found that a 1% increase in new robot installations per 10,000 workers correlates with a 0.037% to 0.039% reduction in rates, as lowers costs and boosts for complementary labor. Cross-national from 2000–2018 show no link between automation intensity and rising ; regions with higher robot density, like and , maintained low joblessness rates below 5%, while U.S. fluctuated due to business cycles rather than technology. The Institute's examination of occupational through 2016 concluded there is "no evidence that automation-driven... polarization has occurred in recent years," attributing stagnation more to policy and trade factors than job loss. While automation displaces specific tasks—such as assembly-line work, where robots offset about 1.2 million global manufacturing jobs by 1990—it simultaneously creates roles in programming, maintenance, and novel sectors like AI ethics and data curation. Productivity surges from these technologies reduce prices, elevate real wages, and stimulate consumption, fostering new industries; for instance, ATM deployment in the 1970s–1990s halved bank teller jobs per branch but doubled overall teller employment through branch expansion. Recent AI adoption data as of 2025 shows no "jobs apocalypse," with U.S. sectors embracing generative tools experiencing employment stability or growth, as measured by Bureau of Labor Statistics occupational trends for automation-vulnerable roles like cashiers and drivers, which have not declined net since 2010. The often stems from visible displacements overlooking indirect job creation, a amplified by media focus on short-term transitions rather than long-run equilibrium. Transition frictions, including mismatches, can elevate temporary by 0.3 percentage points during adoption peaks, but retraining and labor mobility historically mitigate these, as evidenced by post-automation wage premiums for adaptable workers. Policymakers attributing to automation overlook that net effects favor expansionary dynamics, with studies projecting AI could add 1–2% to annual GDP growth, sustaining employment through . Thus, while vigilance on equitable transitions is warranted, claims of inevitable mass joblessness lack empirical substantiation and ignore automation's role in historical .

Challenges and Limitations

Technical Constraints

Automation systems, particularly in , encounter fundamental technical constraints stemming from limitations in , manipulation, control, and learning capabilities. These constraints arise because current technologies struggle to replicate human-like adaptability in unstructured environments, where variables such as object variability, environmental noise, and dynamic conditions prevail. For instance, robust requires handling occlusions, noisy , and inferring latent object properties, yet algorithms often falter in real-world variability. Similarly, manipulation demands precise in uncertain settings, but robots exhibit difficulties in achieving stable outcomes for tasks like peg insertion or handling deformable materials. Perception challenges are pronounced in unstructured settings, where varying lighting conditions, complex motion, and high-volume data impede accurate environmental understanding. Robots must process vast video inputs using advanced models, but deep neural networks perform poorly on , such as detecting human falls or interpreting cluttered scenes with occlusions. This leads to partial , where inherent stochasticity (aleatoric ) and model knowledge gaps (epistemic ) complicate predictions, often requiring interactive methods to probe and reduce unknowns through actions. Dexterity and manipulation further constrain automation, as robots lack the fine in-hand skills for multi-object handling, tool use, or deformable items like fabrics, which demand human-level tactile feedback and adaptive grasping. Current grippers, even advanced ones, struggle with simultaneous or precise alignment under positional errors, limiting applications in assembly or service tasks. Control systems face kinematic and geometric bounds, alongside the need for real-time adaptation to stochastic forces, resulting in suboptimal performance in non-rigid or dynamic interactions. Learning algorithms exacerbate these issues through poor data efficiency and , necessitating vast real-world datasets that are costly to acquire due to hardware wear and trial-and-error risks. Simulators aid training but suffer from domain gaps in physics modeling, such as inaccurate or deformable dynamics, hindering sim-to-real transfer. across object poses, shapes, or tasks remains elusive without shared representations or , confining automation to narrow, structured domains rather than broad, variable ones.

The Automation Paradox

The automation paradox describes the counterintuitive dynamic wherein increasingly sophisticated automated systems, by efficiently managing routine tasks and minimizing human involvement, heighten the importance of human operators precisely when those systems encounter rare failures or anomalies. As automation reliability improves, operators tend to disengage from underlying processes, leading to skill degradation and reduced ability to diagnose or override issues effectively. This phenomenon, first articulated by aviation researcher Earl Wiener in the late 1980s, underscores that "the more reliable the automatic system, the more true system safety depends on the operator's ability to handle the rare emergencies." In practice, this paradox manifests in domains like aviation and process control, where automation handles 99% of operations flawlessly but falters in edge cases, leaving deskilled humans to intervene under time pressure. For example, in commercial aviation, widespread adoption of autopilot and flight management systems since the 1980s has correlated with incidents of "automation surprise," where pilots struggle with manual reversion due to unfamiliarity with aircraft dynamics, as documented in analyses of accidents like the 2013 Asiana Airlines Flight 214 crash, where crew over-reliance on automated thrust controls contributed to the stall. Similarly, in nuclear power plants, operators trained primarily on simulated normal operations have shown delayed responses during transients, exacerbating risks as seen in post-Fukushima reviews highlighting human-automation interface flaws. These cases illustrate how automation's success in steady-state conditions inversely amplifies vulnerability to deviations, often requiring supplemental training or "manual mode" simulations to maintain operator proficiency. Mitigating the paradox demands balanced system design, such as incorporating "resilience engineering" principles that preserve human oversight through periodic manual exercises and transparent automation logic, rather than opaque "" implementations. Recent extensions to AI-driven systems, including generative models, reinforce this: while algorithms excel at pattern-matching routine queries, human validation remains essential for outlier detection, as over-automation can erode and increase error propagation in high-stakes applications like autonomous vehicles, where disengagement data from 2019-2023 shows intervention rates spiking for non-standard scenarios. to address this leads to systemic brittleness, where apparent efficiency gains mask latent risks, prompting calls for hybrid human-AI architectures that prioritize operator augmentation over replacement.

Ethical and Safety Considerations

Automation systems, particularly industrial robots and autonomous machinery, pose safety risks including mechanical pinch points, unexpected collisions, and programming errors during human-robot interactions. Between 2015 and 2022, the U.S. (OSHA) recorded 77 robot-related workplace accidents, with 54 involving stationary robots and resulting in 66 injuries, predominantly finger amputations, crush injuries, and lacerations from unguarded moving parts. Annual robot accident rates in analyzed datasets ranged from 27 to 49 incidents, peaking in 2012, often due to inadequate safeguarding or failure to lock out systems during . Despite these hazards, empirical data indicate automation enhances overall workplace safety by minimizing human exposure to repetitive strain, toxic environments, and high-risk manual operations; for instance, automated sectors have seen injury rates drop as robots handle dangerous tasks like or heavy lifting. International standards such as ISO 10218-1:2011 outline requirements for the safe design, protective measures, and operational information of industrial robots, emphasizing risk assessments, speed and force limitations, and emergency stops to prevent harm. In the U.S., OSHA lacks dedicated robotics regulations but enforces general industry standards under 29 CFR 1910, including (Subpart O) and electrical safety (Subpart S), with guidelines stressing pre-operation evaluations and worker to mitigate interaction risks. Collaborative robots (cobots), designed for shared workspaces, incorporate power and force limiting to reduce injury severity, as per updated ISO 10218 provisions effective through 2025, which prioritize over physical barriers. Compliance with these frameworks has demonstrably lowered incident rates in compliant facilities, though lapses in implementation contribute to persistent accidents. Ethically, automation raises accountability challenges in autonomous decision-making, where opaque algorithms complicate attributing fault in malfunctions or errors, as seen in debates over liability fragmentation between designers, deployers, and operators. For instance, in autonomous incidents, establishing causation often requires dissecting black-box neural networks, prompting calls for explainable AI to enable causal tracing and fair apportionment of responsibility. Ethical frameworks urge principles, wherein developers proactively address foreseeable harms like biased data leading to discriminatory outcomes in automation, rather than deferring to post-hoc . Privacy erosion from pervasive automated monitoring in workplaces further complicates and , necessitating robust verification of system reliability to avoid undue erosion of human agency. These considerations underscore the need for causal realism in design, prioritizing verifiable safeguards over unproven assumptions of infallibility.

Industry 4.0 and IIoT

Industry 4.0, also known as the Fourth Industrial Revolution, represents the integration of cyber-physical systems, the Internet of Things (IoT), big data analytics, and artificial intelligence into manufacturing and industrial processes to create smart factories. The term was first introduced in 2011 as part of a high-tech strategy by the German government, emphasizing interconnected production systems that enable real-time data exchange and autonomous decision-making. Key features include horizontal and vertical system integration, where machines, sensors, and software communicate seamlessly to optimize operations, reduce waste, and enhance flexibility in response to market demands. The (IIoT) serves as a foundational element within Industry 4.0, focusing specifically on the deployment of IoT technologies in industrial environments to connect machinery, sensors, and control systems for data-driven insights. Unlike general IoT, which targets consumer applications, IIoT prioritizes rugged, secure connectivity tailored for harsh industrial conditions, enabling , remote monitoring, and process automation. For instance, IIoT platforms collect vast amounts of operational data from equipment, allowing algorithms to forecast failures and schedule interventions, thereby minimizing unplanned downtime by up to 50% in adopting facilities. Adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies, bolstered by IIoT, has accelerated globally, with the market valued at approximately $190.63 billion in 2025 and projected to reach $884.84 billion by 2034, driven by demands for efficiency in sectors like automotive and pharmaceuticals. By 2025, an estimated 50% of manufacturers are expected to implement IoT solutions, facilitating hyper-connected supply chains and customized production at scale. However, realization of these benefits requires addressing interoperability challenges, as diverse vendor standards can hinder seamless IIoT integration, underscoring the need for standardized protocols like OPC UA. Empirical evidence from implementations shows productivity gains of 15-20% through IIoT-enabled analytics, though outcomes vary based on compatibility and workforce upskilling.

Generative AI and Hyperautomation

Hyperautomation encompasses the orchestrated use of multiple automation technologies, such as (RPA), (AI), machine learning (ML), and , to automate end-to-end business and IT processes at scale. defines it as "a business-driven, disciplined approach that organizations use to rapidly identify, vet and automate as many business and IT processes as possible." This approach extends beyond traditional RPA by incorporating intelligent technologies to handle and decision-making tasks. The concept emerged as a key trend in 's 2020 strategic technology reports, driven by the need for enterprises to achieve operational efficiency amid pressures. Generative AI, which gained widespread adoption following the release of models like OpenAI's GPT-3.5 in November 2022 and subsequent iterations, enhances hyperautomation by enabling dynamic content and code generation for process optimization. These models can autonomously create scripts for RPA bots, generate for training ML algorithms, and draft process documentation or responses based on enterprise . For example, in , generative AI integrates with hyperautomation platforms to automate claims by extracting insights from unstructured documents and predicting approval outcomes, reducing manual intervention by up to 70% in some implementations. McKinsey reports that by 2025, nearly 80% of organizations have adopted generative AI, though measurable productivity gains in automation workflows remain limited to early adopters due to integration challenges and output reliability issues. The market for hyperautomation reflects accelerating demand, projected to reach USD 15.62 billion in 2025 and grow at a (CAGR) of 19.73% to USD 38.43 billion by 2030, fueled by generative AI's ability to address complex, cognitive tasks previously resistant to automation. Key applications include customer onboarding in banking, where generative AI analyzes applicant to auto-generate compliance checks and personalized workflows, and , where it simulates scenarios for predictive automation. In cloud ERP systems, hyperautomation combines RPA with AI to enable no-code workflow optimizations, reducing IT dependencies and streamlining processes such as document review and approvals. However, generative AI's propensity for hallucinations—generating plausible but inaccurate outputs—necessitates robust validation layers, such as oversight or hybrid ML models, to mitigate risks in high-stakes processes. Despite hype in vendor reports, from 2023-2025 indicates that full-scale hyperautomation deployments yield 20-30% efficiency improvements primarily in structured environments, with broader causal impacts on productivity still emerging as tools mature. Looking ahead, generative AI-driven hyperautomation is poised to evolve toward agentic systems capable of self-orchestrating multi-step processes with minimal , as seen in experimental platforms combining large models with RPA for adaptive fraud detection. This trend aligns with Industry 4.0 principles but underscores the need for standardized benchmarks to evaluate true automation depth, given overoptimistic projections from tech consultancies that often overlook deployment frictions like data silos and skill gaps.

Humanoid and Autonomous Systems

Humanoid robots, designed to mimic human form and dexterity for versatile task execution in unstructured environments, are advancing automation beyond specialized machinery. These systems integrate bipedal , multi-joint manipulation, and AI-driven to handle repetitive, hazardous, or precision work in factories, warehouses, and services. Key prototypes demonstrate capabilities like object grasping, walking on uneven , and basic assembly, though full remains limited by computational demands and reliability. Tesla's Optimus, a bipedal intended for unsafe or monotonous tasks, reached version 2.5 by September 2025, featuring improved mobility and end-to-end control for actions like folding laundry and sorting objects. The company targeted production of 5,000 units in 2025 for internal deployment, scaling to 50,000 in 2026, leveraging its automotive expertise for cost reduction to under $20,000 per unit. ' Atlas, transitioned to a fully electric design in 2024, excels in dynamic whole-body control, using from human motion data to perform feats like , torque-controlled manipulation, and part sequencing in Hyundai facilities. Other entrants, such as Figure AI and Agility Robotics, emphasize industrial pilots, with China's MIIT roadmap aiming for a complete by end-2025. Autonomous systems extend automation through self-governing operations in mobile and distributed setups, incorporating sensors, , and feedback loops for and without constant human input. In industrial contexts, these include automated guided vehicles (AGVs) evolving into fully autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) that optimize warehouse routing via real-time mapping and collision avoidance. NASA's advancements in algorithms enable robust for and terrestrial , while Toyota-Boston Dynamics collaborations integrate large behavior models for Atlas to achieve untethered locomotion and manipulation. Deployment faces hurdles: humanoids struggle with generalization across tasks due to high training data needs—often millions of simulated hours—and real-world variability, as scaling laws alone do not guarantee robustness without causal understanding of physics. Economic viability hinges on achieving labor cost parity; at current prototypes' $100,000+ price tags, they underperform cheaper fixed automation for repetitive jobs. Safety standards lag, with risks of unintended actions in shared spaces prompting calls for verifiable AI controls. Nonetheless, 2025 pilots in auto and signal a shift toward hybrid human-robot workflows, potentially displacing low-skill labor while augmenting complex assembly.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.