Hubbry Logo
Sound DuesSound DuesMain
Open search
Sound Dues
Community hub
Sound Dues
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Sound Dues
Sound Dues
Sound Dues
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Map of the Danish coast line to the west, and the Swedish coast line to the east. From 1890.

The Sound Dues (or Sound Tolls; Danish: Øresundstolden) were a toll on the use of the Øresund, or "Sound" strait separating the modern day borders of Denmark and Sweden. The tolls constituted up to two thirds of Denmark's state income in the 16th and 17th centuries. The dues were introduced by King Eric of Pomerania in 1429 and remained in effect until the Copenhagen Convention of 1857 (with the sole exception of Swedish ships between 1658 and 1720). Tolls in the Great Belt had been collected by the Danish Crown at least a century prior to the establishment of the dues by Eric of Pomerania.[1]

History

[edit]

All foreign ships passing through the strait, whether en route to or from Denmark or not, had to stop in Helsingør and pay a toll to the Danish Crown. If a ship refused to stop, cannons in both Helsingør and Helsingborg could open fire and sink it. In 1567, the toll was changed into a 1–2% tax on the cargo value, providing three times more revenue. To keep the captains from understating the value of the cargo on which the tax was computed, the right to purchase the cargo at the stated value was reserved.

In order to avoid ships simply taking a different route, tolls were also collected at the two other Danish straits, the Great Belt and the Little Belt; sometimes non-Danish vessels were forbidden to use any other waterways but the Øresund, and transgressing vessels were confiscated or sunk.

The Sound Dues remained the most important source of income for the Danish Crown for several centuries, thus making Danish kings relatively independent of Denmark's Privy Council and aristocracy. However, the dues were an irritant to nations engaged in trade in the Baltic Sea, especially Sweden. Sweden had initially been exempted from the dues at the time of their introduction because it was then in the Kalmar Union along with Denmark. However, after the Kalmar War and the Treaty of Knäred in 1613 Denmark-Norway introduced dues on cargoes from Sweden's Baltic possessions and on non-Swedish ships carrying Swedish cargo. The friction over the Dues was an official casus belli (reason for war) of the Torstenson War in 1643.

In 1658, at the Treaty of Roskilde, Denmark-Norway had to cede her provinces east of the sound (Scania, Halland, Blekinge, Bohuslän, and the island of Ven) to Sweden as a consequence of the Second Northern War. Swedish shipping also became exempt from the Sound Dues by the terms of this treaty. The exemption was withdrawn after Sweden's defeat in the Great Northern War and the Treaty of Frederiksborg of 1720, although the eastern shore of the Sound was now Swedish.

Statistics

[edit]
Year Ships passing through

the Sound[2]

1479 795
1537 1897
1560 2731
1581 4262
1583 5400

Copenhagen Convention

[edit]
Main article: Copenhagen Convention of 1857

The Copenhagen Convention,[3] which came into force on 14 March 1857,[4] abolished the dues and all Danish straits were made international waterways free to all commercial shipping.[5]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Sound Dues

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Sound Dues, or Øresundstolden in Danish, were tolls levied by the Kingdom of Denmark on foreign vessels passing through the strait, the narrow waterway separating from and connecting the to the . Introduced in 1429 by King Eric of Pomerania to offset declining fishery revenues in the strait, the dues were calculated initially on a per-ship basis but later shifted to ad valorem taxation based on cargo value declared by skippers, with incentives for honest reporting to avoid inspections. Collection occurred primarily at on , where Castle served as a fortified toll station, enabling to enforce payments through naval power and deterring evasion despite the strait's strategic chokepoint status for Baltic trade. By the 16th and 17th centuries, the dues generated up to two-thirds of 's total state revenue, funding royal expenditures, fortifications, and naval maintenance while fostering resentment among trading nations like the , , and emerging powers such as Britain and the . This economic leverage contributed to diplomatic tensions and military conflicts, including exemptions negotiated by after victories in the 17th-century wars and repeated challenges during the , yet the system's profitability sustained it until international pressure mounted in the mid-19th century over free navigation principles. The dues were finally abolished by the 1857 Treaty for the Redemption of the Sound Dues, signed in by and major European powers including , , Britain, , and , which provided a one-time compensation of approximately 33.5 million in exchange for perpetual toll-free passage. The abolition marked a shift toward modern international maritime law, eliminating a medieval fiscal relic amid rising free- advocacy, though detailed records preserved in the Sound Toll Registers continue to offer invaluable data for economic historians studying early modern volumes and flows.

Establishment under Eric of Pomerania

Eric of Pomerania, serving as King Eric VII of Denmark from 1396 to 1439 as part of the Kalmar Union, introduced the Sound Dues in 1429 as a systematic toll on foreign vessels passing through the Øresund strait between Zealand and Scania. The levy targeted non-Danish ships, charging rates typically equivalent to 1-2% of cargo value or fixed sums based on vessel type and load, thereby asserting Danish sovereign control over the vital Baltic Sea gateway. This measure compensated for declining revenues from traditional sources, such as the herring fisheries in the Øresund, which had previously provided substantial royal income but diminished by the early 15th century due to overfishing and environmental shifts. To enforce collection, Eric initiated construction of the fortress Krogen (later expanded into Castle) on Zealand's coast near around 1423-1426, positioning it strategically to monitor and intercept traffic. The toll's legal basis drew from Denmark's longstanding claims to maritime dominion in the region, though it lacked formal international treaty ratification at inception and relied on naval patrols for compliance. Initial resistance from merchants prompted Eric to issue ordinances clarifying exemptions for Danish vessels and allies, while escalating enforcement through privateers when evasion occurred. The establishment marked a shift toward institutionalized extraction from , generating immediate fiscal relief amid 's broader conflicts, including wars with the (1426-1435), where dues collection funded military efforts. By formalizing the toll via royal decree rather than ad hoc seizures, embedded it within the Danish monarchy's administrative framework, setting precedents for hereditary succession of the revenue stream across subsequent rulers until its abolition in 1857.

Historical Precedents and Sovereign Rights

Denmark's assertion of sovereign rights over the strait derived from its medieval control of the bordering territories, including to the west and (then Danish) to the east, enabling treatment of the waterway as internal or subject to royal regulation. This jurisdictional claim extended to the Sound and the connecting and , with levying tolls on passing vessels as early as the fourteenth century, predating the formalized Sound Dues. Such authority was enforced through naval presence and customs stations, reflecting the era's principle that sovereigns could impose duties on transit through domains under their dominion, akin to river tolls in . The 1429 imposition of Sound Dues by King Eric of Pomerania built directly on these precedents, transitioning from ad hoc fees and lost herring fishery revenues—previously a key royal income source amid declining stocks—to a systematic cargo-based toll on non-Danish shipping. Denmark justified the levy as an exercise of territorial sovereignty, requiring ships to anchor at Helsingør (Elsinore) for inspection and payment, a practice upheld by de facto possession until territorial cessions in 1658 and later by international convention. While challenged by powers like the Hanseatic League, the dues' longevity—spanning over four centuries—affirmed the robustness of Denmark's claim, grounded in continuous enforcement rather than explicit treaty grants prior to the nineteenth century. This framework paralleled other medieval maritime tolls, such as those in the Adriatic under Venice, where control of straits justified passage fees absent modern notions of open seas.

Administration and Collection

Procedures and Exemptions

Ships passing through the were required to anchor at the toll station in , where Danish customs officials boarded vessels to verify documentation such as bills of lading and inspect for toll assessment. Shipmasters declared the value or composition of their , upon which the toll—typically 1% to 2% of the declared value from 1567 onward—was calculated and recorded in the Sound Toll Registers, alongside details like the passage date, shipmaster's name and residence, origin and destination ports, and the exact toll paid. To deter undervaluation, officials reserved the right to purchase the at the declared , aligning incentives for accurate self-declaration while allowing searches to curb , though evasion persisted at rates of 25-50% for bulk goods before stricter enforcement around 1618. Payments were made in cash or equivalent, with records maintained in approximately 700 volumes covering nearly 1.8 million passages from 1497 to , enabling systematic revenue tracking despite occasional delays and risks to shipping. Exemptions applied to Danish ships and goods throughout the toll's duration, as they were not subject to the levy imposed on foreign traffic. Swedish vessels and cargoes received temporary exemptions from roughly 1658, following the , until 1720 under the Treaty of Frederiksborg, after which they faced standard rates. Certain commodities, such as Russian raw exports including , , , and timber, were wholly exempt to facilitate trade flows, while specific Hanseatic privileges occasionally waived dues for league members or designated ports like and others in . Exempt passages were logged separately in the registers, often omitting detailed cargo quantities, reflecting negotiated diplomatic concessions rather than universal policy.

Enforcement Mechanisms and Infrastructure

The primary infrastructure for enforcing the Sound Dues was Kronborg Castle, located in (Elsinore) at the narrowest point of the strait, approximately 4 kilometers wide, which allowed Danish authorities to monitor and control maritime traffic entering or exiting the . Originally established as the fortress Krogen in the early 1420s under King Eric of Pomerania to secure toll collection following the 1429 union treaty among , , and , the site was rebuilt and expanded into a stronghold by Frederick II between 1574 and 1585, featuring robust fortifications including bastions, moats, and artillery emplacements designed to deter evasion or resistance. This strategic positioning compelled foreign vessels to anchor and submit to inspection, as bypassing the strait required navigating riskier alternative routes through the or , which were also subject to Danish oversight after 1429. Enforcement relied on a combination of administrative procedures and coercive power: upon approach, ships were signaled to halt via visual cues from the castle's towers or patrolling Danish vessels, after which officials boarded to verify manifests, assess value through self-declaration by the skipper, and levy tolls typically ranging from 1% to 2% of the declared value (with higher rates for certain like wine or luxury items). To mitigate underreporting, Danish granted the option to purchase the at the declared price, creating a self-regulating for accuracy, while non-compliance risked seizure, fines, or intervention by the castle's , which included soldiers and naval detachments capable of intercepting fleeing ships. Records from the Sound Toll Registers, maintained from 1497 onward, document over 200,000 passages annually by the , underscoring the system's efficiency in funneling —estimated at up to 1 million rigsdaler yearly by the 1600s—directly to the Danish via on-site payment in , , or promissory notes. Supporting infrastructure included auxiliary toll stations and signaling systems along the Danish coast, such as watchtowers and beacons to coordinate with , though the castle remained the central hub for processing and armed enforcement; evasion attempts, though rare due to the strait's geography, were met with pursuits by royal warships stationed nearby, as evidenced by sporadic 16th-century logs of intercepted vessels. This framework persisted with minimal evolution until the dues' abolition in , reflecting Denmark's monopolistic control over the passage without significant technological upgrades beyond basic fortification maintenance.

Economic Dimensions

Revenue Generation for Denmark

The Sound Dues generated significant revenue for the Danish crown by levying tolls on foreign vessels passing through the strait, typically calculated as 1 to 2 percent of the declared value, with rates occasionally reaching 5 percent for certain . This system, enforced primarily at , provided a steady stream that funded royal expenditures, naval maintenance, and fortifications such as Kronborg Castle. In the 16th and 17th centuries, the dues constituted up to two-thirds of Denmark's total state income, underscoring their role as a cornerstone of during periods of frequent warfare and territorial ambitions. Around 1600, annual collections averaged approximately 400,000 rigsdaler, comparable to revenues from crown lands and forming roughly half of overall state funds at the time. By the mid-17th century, relative importance declined to about one-third as crown lands were sold off amid fiscal pressures, though absolute yields grew with increasing Baltic trade volumes. Into the , revenues continued to rise modestly amid expanding commerce, reaching 2.25 million rigsdaler in 1840 and approximately 2.5 million rigsdaler annually by the mid-1850s, equivalent to a substantial portion of yearly state expenditures. This growth, averaging about 1 percent per year from 1830 to 1850, reflected denser shipping traffic despite evasion attempts and alternative routes around . The tolls' capitalization value was estimated at 33.5 to 35 million rigsdaler upon abolition in 1857, highlighting their enduring economic weight.

Quantitative Data and Trade Patterns

The Sound Dues generated revenue equivalent to up to two-thirds of Denmark's total state income during the 16th and 17th centuries, underscoring their role as a of royal finances amid limited alternative taxation mechanisms. This income stemmed primarily from ad valorem tolls assessed at 1-2% of cargo values, with adjustments for specific goods like or timber, collected systematically at based on declarations verified by customs officials. By the late , annual shipping volumes through the had expanded to 4,000-5,000 vessels, reflecting surging Baltic trade demands driven by Western European and . Trade patterns documented in the Sound Toll Registers reveal a consistent northbound flow of bulk raw materials from Baltic producers—predominantly Polish rye and (often exceeding 50% of outbound cargo value in peak decades), Scandinavian timber and iron, and Russian hemp, tar, and —directed toward processing and consumption centers in the , , and . Inbound cargoes, conversely, comprised manufactured and preserved goods such as Dutch and English cloth, and French salt for Baltic fisheries and preservation, and Southern European wines, with salt alone accounting for a substantial share of return due to its role in enabling grain exports. These asymmetries highlight the Baltic's specialization in primary exports, with aggregate cargo values peaking in the before stabilizing, as quantified through digitized registers encompassing over 1.3 million ship entries from onward.
PeriodKey Trade MetricApproximate Scale
Annual ship passages4,000–5,000 vessels
Share of state revenue from duesUp to 66%
1830–1850Annual revenue growth rate~1% per year
By the early , toll proceeds grew modestly at about 1% annually amid rising global trade, though volumes began declining post-1750 due to geopolitical disruptions, via alternative routes like the , and shifts toward steam-powered shipping bypassing the strait. The registers' data enable precise reconstructions, showing grain's dominance waning relative to industrial inputs like iron by the 1800s, as European economies industrialized and diversified Baltic sourcing.

Geopolitical Tensions

Reactions from European Powers

The introduction of the Sound Dues in the 1420s provoked immediate opposition from the , whose member cities viewed the tolls as an infringement on their dominant Baltic trade routes, leading to the Dano-Hanseatic War of 1426–1435.) During the conflict, Hanseatic forces captured key Danish strongholds like , compelling to grant concessions that temporarily reduced the dues' burden on League shipping, though the tolls themselves endured. The emerged as a principal adversary in the , leveraging its naval supremacy to contest Danish increases in the tolls; in 1611, King Christian IV's escalation prompted Dutch diplomatic pressure, resulting in treaties of 1613–1614 that forced Denmark to cancel the hikes and affirm favorable passage terms for Dutch vessels. This opposition intensified during the Second Northern War, where the Dutch fleet's intervention at the on November 8, 1658, shattered Danish control over the , securing exemptions for Swedish (and indirectly Dutch-influenced) shipping and underscoring the dues' role as a flashpoint for maritime powers seeking unimpeded Baltic access. Dutch statesmen consistently protested the dues as monopolistic barriers, rolling back Danish attempts at augmentation, such as in 1649, through a combination of military deterrence and bilateral negotiations. England lodged formal diplomatic protests against the dues as early as 1598, with Ambassador Lord Zouch instructed to challenge their legitimacy before the Danish court, framing them as unjust impediments to English merchants' trade. These grievances fueled Anglo-Danish tensions throughout the 17th century, contributing to naval clashes and alliances against Denmark, including the English Wars pitting Britain and Sweden against Denmark-Norway to curb Danish extortion in the Øresund.) By the 19th century, broader European discontent, voiced by powers like Britain, France, and the Netherlands, manifested in parliamentary inquiries and multilateral diplomacy, culminating in the 1857 Treaty for the Redemption of the Sound Dues, where Austria, Belgium, France, Great Britain, Hanover, the Hanseatic towns, Mecklenburg-Schwerin, the Netherlands, Oldenburg, Prussia, Russia, Sweden-Norway, and the German Zollverein collectively compensated Denmark to abolish the tolls permanently. Sweden's reactions oscillated, with exemptions granted post-1658 but renounced in the Treaty of Frederiksborg (1720) amid shifting alliances, reflecting pragmatic acceptance interspersed with wartime leverage against Danish claims.

Involvement in Conflicts and Diplomacy

The Sound Dues precipitated armed conflicts and diplomatic disputes, particularly with regional trading powers seeking to mitigate or eliminate the financial burden on Baltic commerce. In the (1643–1645), Swedish forces invaded Danish territories partly to challenge control over the , leading to the Peace of Brömsebro on August 13, 1645, which granted permanent exemption from the tolls for its merchant vessels. This concession reflected Denmark's weakened position after Swedish naval dominance disrupted toll collection, though the exemption underscored the dues' role as a strategic vulnerability in wartime. Subsequent Danish-Swedish hostilities, including the , saw fluctuating exemptions tied to battlefield outcomes; Sweden regained toll privileges after the in 1658 but lost them following the Treaty of Frederiksborg in 1720, obliging resumption of payments amid Denmark's alliances and Swedish overextension. Diplomatic efforts by the in the early focused on securing convoy protections and passage rights for grain shipments, as the dues exacerbated trade disruptions during conflicts like the , prompting negotiations to balance Danish enforcement with Dutch economic imperatives. England engaged in protracted diplomacy with -Norway during the late Tudor era (circa 1580s–1590s), where envoys contested Danish assertions of over the Sound, invoking principles of to argue against tolls as infringements on free navigation; these exchanges highlighted legal debates over dominion claims but yielded limited concessions, with English ships often paying reduced rates through ad hoc agreements. A related Sound controversy in 1532 involved trading interests pressuring via diplomatic channels to adjust collection practices amid Hanseatic and emerging competitors' protests. Such interactions often prioritized empirical trade data and naval leverage over abstract rights, with defending the dues as sovereign revenue essential to its fiscal stability.

Path to Abolition

Mounting International Pressure

By the early , the Sound Dues faced escalating opposition from major European maritime powers as Baltic trade volumes surged, rendering the tolls an increasingly burdensome impediment to free commerce. Britain, whose merchants accounted for a substantial share of passages—approximately 4,000 ships annually by —viewed the levies as that inflated shipping costs and distorted market efficiencies. The , long aggrieved by the dues dating to earlier exemptions negotiated under duress, joined in diplomatic remonstrations, arguing the tolls violated principles of open seas established in prior treaties. Prussian and other German states intensified protests amid rising and , with advocating retaliatory harbor fees on Danish vessels to counter the perceived monopoly on passage; this friction foreshadowed broader disputes. Russia, leveraging its Baltic interests, aligned with Britain in exerting concerted diplomatic leverage, particularly following the , when Denmark's neutrality highlighted vulnerabilities in control. French involvement, though secondary, supported multilateral calls for , reflecting broader continental discontent with Denmark's fiscal claims over international waterways. These pressures manifested in parliamentary debates and negotiations; British Commons discussions in 1857 underscored the tolls' obsolescence, with advocates decrying insufficient prior coercion to secure outright abolition without compensation. Alternative routes, such as Sweden's Göta Canal completed in the , eroded 's leverage by diverting some traffic, amplifying economic arguments against the dues' sustainability. The cumulative strain prompted to convene an international conference in , yielding the 1857 convention wherein the dues were redeemed for a lump-sum payment of 35 million Danish rigsdalers, apportioned primarily among Britain, (each about 30%), and (13%), in exchange for perpetual free passage. This resolution affirmed the straits' status as international waterways, averting potential armed confrontation while compensating for forfeited revenue streams.

Copenhagen Convention and Compensation

The Copenhagen Convention, concluded on February 14, 1857, between and the principal maritime powers of Europe—including , , , , , and the Hanseatic towns—formally abolished the Sound Dues effective March 14, 1857, transforming the , , and into free international waterways open to all nations without tolls. This agreement ended a tolling regime that had persisted since 1426, driven by mounting diplomatic pressure from powers reliant on Baltic trade, who viewed the dues as an obsolete barrier to free navigation amid expanding global commerce. In exchange for relinquishing the dues, Denmark received a one-time compensation of 33.5 million Danish rigsdalers (rix-dollars), equivalent to approximately 67 million contemporary Danish kroner, calculated as the capitalized of anticipated future toll revenues based on mid-19th-century averages of around 2.5 million rigsdalers annually, discounted at prevailing rates. The payment was apportioned among the signatory powers according to their proportional share of traffic over the preceding decades: and each contributed nearly 30 percent (roughly 10 million rigsdalers apiece), about 13 percent (approximately 4.4 million rigsdalers), with the remainder divided among , , and smaller North German states. Separate bilateral arrangements handled non-European or exempt parties; for instance, the , which had historically resisted full payment through diplomatic exemptions, concluded its own convention with in 1857 securing perpetual free passage without contributing to the European compensation pool. The funds, disbursed promptly via parliamentary appropriations in participating nations—such as Britain's Sound Dues Bill of 1857—provided with immediate liquidity to offset the loss of a that, while diminished to under 10 percent of state income by the , had nonetheless shaped for centuries. This settlement reflected a pragmatic acknowledgment of 's legal claims under historical treaties, balanced against the geopolitical reality that unilateral enforcement was untenable against naval superiority of the compensating powers.

Enduring Legacy

Long-Term Impacts on Danish Economy

The abolition of the Sound Dues in 1857, formalized by the Copenhagen Convention, deprived of an annual revenue stream estimated at approximately 1.3 million rigsdaler in the mid-1850s, though this figure had stagnated amid declining Baltic trade volumes and international evasion tactics. In compensation, received a one-time payment totaling 33.5 million rix-dollars (rigsdaler) from participating powers, equivalent to roughly 25–30 years of projected toll and about one year's state expenditures at the time. This provided fiscal breathing room, enabling debt reduction and limited investments in , but it shifted from a passive toll-based model—historically reliant on transit fees since the —to greater dependence on domestic taxation and alternative customs duties. Over the subsequent decades, the revenue gap exacerbated budgetary pressures, as Denmark's state finances transitioned fully to a tax-based system established after , with land and taxes filling much of the void amid rising public expenditures for and administrative needs. The loss coincided with agricultural and export-oriented reforms, where grain and livestock shipments to Britain—facilitated by the 1846 repeal of the —drove economic growth, with agricultural exports comprising 30% of production by 1870. This pivot mitigated some fiscal strain, as rising trade volumes through Danish ports offset the absence of tolls, though vulnerability to external pressures persisted, culminating in strains during the 1864 . Long-term, the abolition accelerated Denmark's economic modernization by ending reliance on an anachronistic monopoly rent, fostering incentives for gains in , where owner-occupier farming reached 75% of cultivated land by the late through reforms. However, it contributed to chronic deficits in the 1860s–1870s, prompting austerity measures and higher direct taxes that burdened rural households, while the later opening of the in 1895 further diminished potential transit-related gains from free passage. Overall, the policy enforced fiscal discipline amid Denmark's shift from agrarian stagnation to industrialized welfare foundations, with GDP growth averaging 1.2% annually from 1870 to 1913, though historians note the toll's demise underscored the limits of geographic rents in sustaining small-state economies without broad-based reforms.

Contemporary Historical Analysis

Modern historiography regards the Sound Dues as a paradigmatic case of state exploitation of a geographic chokepoint, yielding substantial fiscal benefits for while distorting regional trade dynamics and fostering long-term diplomatic frictions. Quantitative analyses derived from the surviving Sound Toll Registers—comprising over 1.8 million entries from 1497 to 1857—reveal that toll revenues peaked at approximately two-thirds of 's state income in the , funding naval maintenance and fortifications like those at Kronborg Castle. These registers, now digitized through projects such as Sound Toll Registers Online (STRO), enable granular reconstructions of commodity flows, with bulk goods like grain, timber, and iron dominating Baltic exports, underscoring the dues' role in channeling northern European commerce through Danish-controlled waters. Scholars in emphasize the dues' inefficiencies, including widespread —estimated to evade up to 20-30% of potential collections in later periods—and the diversion of trade routes via alternative paths like the , which reduced Denmark's leverage over time. This model, while rational from a mercantilist perspective, is critiqued for impeding broader Baltic integration and contributing to Denmark's relative to rising powers like Britain and the , whose shippers bore disproportionate burdens without exemptions until bilateral treaties. Recent econometric studies using register data link toll fluctuations to variables such as war disruptions and commodity price shocks, affirming causal ties between the dues and altered shipping patterns, such as increased Dutch dominance in the 17th century . In geopolitical , the abolition via the 1857 Copenhagen Convention is analyzed as a triumph of over absolutist toll regimes, with securing 33.5 million in compensation—equivalent to roughly 12 years of prior revenues—yet forfeiting future gains amid efficiencies and free-trade ideologies. Contemporary assessments, informed by 's designation of the registers as a "Memory of the World" in , highlight their enduring value for , allowing simulations of counterfactual trade scenarios without the dues, which suggest accelerated Danish industrialization might have ensued. However, some analyses caution against over-romanticizing abolition, noting persistent echoes in modern strait governance, such as voluntary user fees for navigation aids, though without coercive enforcement.

References

  1. https://tontinecoffeehouse.com/2019/06/24/the-sound-toll/
  2. https://www.guideservicedanmark.dk/history-time/sound-tolls-en
  3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0014292111000924
  4. https://fiscalmilitary.history.ox.ac.uk/article/having-fun-unique-source-sound-toll-registers-online
  5. https://opil.ouplaw.com/abstract/10.1093/law:oht/law-oht-116-CTS-357.regGroup.1/law-oht-116-CTS-357
  6. https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/1857-07-02/debates/fe82b28d-513a-4c21-9052-e465930f72fd/SoundDuesBill
  7. https://www.havneguide.dk/en/nordsjaelland/history-sound-tolls
  8. https://kronborg.dk/en/knowledge/history-of-kronborg
  9. https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1916/march/territorial-waters
  10. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP86T00608R000600140006-6.pdf
  11. https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1145
  12. https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/sound-taxation-on-the-use-of-self-declared-value
  13. https://conversableeconomist.com/2023/04/19/using-self-declared-value-for-taxation/
  14. https://www.soundtoll.nl/
  15. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08438714241238076
  16. https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1857/jun/05/sound-dues-committee
  17. https://tseg.nl/article/view/10802/11861
  18. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/696/
  19. https://kronborg.dk/en/knowledge/kings-and-queens/frederick-ii
  20. http://thethingsienjoy.blogspot.com/2011/10/kronborg-castle-and-sound-toll.html
  21. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/8295451.pdf
  22. https://www.nwo.nl/en/projects/1750102007005
  23. https://diving-rov-specialists.com/index_htm_files/arch_90-new-information-from-old-timbers.pdf
  24. https://eh.net/encyclopedia/an-economic-history-of-denmark/
  25. https://www.aagaardkommunikation.dk/en-ny-sag/
  26. https://eh.net/book_reviews/the-mother-of-all-trades-the-baltic-grain-trade-in-amsterdam-from-the-late-sixteenth-to-the-early-nineteenth-century/
  27. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Hanseatic-League/The-League-at-its-outset
  28. https://academic.oup.com/book/10273/chapter/296009788
  29. https://www.rmg.co.uk/collections/objects/rmgc-object-11772
  30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1874930
  31. https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/1857-03-17/debates/5756d40a-8d3d-45bf-807d-1c8afaa164a3/TheSoundDues
  32. https://www.amsweatherband.org/weatherband/articles/battle-of-the-ice-swedens-meteorological-defeat-of-denmark-in-1658/
  33. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3632889
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360515567_Claims_of_Dominion_and_the_Freedom_of_the_Sea_Diplomatic_Tensions_between_England_and_Denmark-Norway_in_the_late_Tudor_Period_Journal_on_European_History_of_Law_12
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241863267_Trading_interests_and_diplomacy_during_the_Sound_controversy_of_1532
  36. https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1968/january/maritime-denmark
  37. https://journals.uio.no/dhnbpub/article/view/12290
  38. https://politicsoftheenglishgraintrade.co.uk/2023/01/06/new-insights-from-a-quantitative-analysis-of-the-english-and-baltic-grain-trade-using-the-sound-toll-register/
  39. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352535644_North_Eurasian_Trade_in_World_History_1660-1860_The_Economic_and_Political_Importance_of_the_Baltic_Sea
  40. https://www.unesco.org/en/memory-world/sound-toll-registers
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.