Hubbry Logo
Springfield Model 1866Springfield Model 1866Main
Open search
Springfield Model 1866
Community hub
Springfield Model 1866
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Springfield Model 1866
Springfield Model 1866
Springfield Model 1866
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Springfield Model 1866 breech

Key Information

The Springfield Model 1866 was a rifle made by the Springfield Armory between 1866 and 1873 featuring the Allin-designed trapdoor breech-loading mechanism, a refinement of the Springfield Model 1865. Originally developed as a means of converting rifle muskets to breechloaders, the Allin modification ultimately became the basis for the definitive Springfield Model 1873, the first breech-loading rifle adopted by the United States War Department for manufacture and widespread issue to U.S. troops.

The Model 1866 corrected problems encountered with the prototypical Springfield Model 1865, in particular a simplified and improved extractor and a superior .50 caliber centerfire cartridge (the Model 1865 used a .58 caliber rimfire cartridge with mediocre ballistics), among many other less significant changes. It employed a robust version of the trapdoor breechblock design originated by Erskine S. Allin, Master Armorer at Springfield.

Approximately 25,000 .58 caliber Springfield Model 1863 rifled muskets were converted by Springfield Armory for use by U.S. troops, the barrels being relined and rifled to .50 caliber and the trapdoor breech system affixed. The rifle was chambered for the powerful centerfire .50-70 Government cartridge (.50 caliber 450-grain (29 g) bullet; 70 grains (4.5 g) of black powder). Though a significant improvement over the extractor of the Model 1865 Springfield Rifle, the Model 1866 extractor was still excessively complicated and the extractor spring was somewhat prone to breakage. However, it is a misconception that a broken extractor disabled the weapon. In the official 1867 government user booklet “Description and Rules for the Management of the Springfield Breech-Loading Rifle Musket, Model 1866”, the following is stated regarding a broken extractor and/or ejector: “It should be understood that the ejector and friction springs are convenient rather than necessary, and that the piece is not necessarily disabled if one or both of them should break, for the shell can be easily removed by the fingers after being loosened by the extractor hook.” Furthermore, the cleaning rod of the rifle can be used quite effectively to remove a stuck case in an emergency. Thus it is clear that this weapon is not as easily disabled as is sometimes believed.

The Model 1866 was issued to U.S. troops in 1867, and was a major factor in the Wagon Box Fight and the Hayfield Fight, along the Bozeman Trail in 1867. The rapid rate of fire that could be achieved disrupted the tactics of attacking Sioux and Cheyenne forces, who had faced muzzle-loading rifles during the Fetterman massacre only a few months before. The new rifles contributed decisively to the survival and success of severely outnumbered U.S. troops in these engagements.

See also

[edit]
Preceded by United States Army rifle
1866-1868 		Succeeded by

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Springfield Model 1866

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Springfield Model 1866 was a single-shot breech-loading rifle produced at the from 1866 to approximately 1873, converting surplus Civil War-era Model 1861 muzzle-loading rifle-muskets using Master Armorer Erskine S. Allin's to chamber the new .50-70 metallic centerfire cartridge. This "Second Allin" conversion, formally adopted by the U.S. Army following evaluations by ordnance boards, addressed reliability issues from the earlier 1865 rimfire prototype by incorporating a more robust hinged and extractor for improved handling of the centerfire round. Approximately 25,000 such rifles were manufactured, serving as a transitional arm that enabled rapid modernization of the arsenal at low cost without full replacement of existing stocks. The Model 1866 saw its first combat in 1867 during the near , where its breech-loading design demonstrated advantages over traditional muskets in frontier conflicts against Native American forces, though it was later superseded by the refined Model 1873 in .45-70 caliber.

Development

Origins of the Allin Conversion

Following the , the U.S. Ordnance Department faced the challenge of modernizing its vast stockpile of approximately one million .58-caliber percussion muzzle-loading rifle-muskets, primarily Springfield Model 1861s, without the expense of manufacturing entirely new arms. In mid-1865, Erskine S. Allin, Master Armorer and superintendent at the federal , was directed to devise a practical breech-loading conversion system that preserved the existing barrels and stocks while enabling the use of metallic cartridges. Allin's solution involved milling away the upper rear portion of the barrel to create a chamber and affixing a hinged, spring-loaded —known as the "trapdoor"—that swung upward to load cartridges, a design emphasizing simplicity, durability, and minimal alteration to proven components. Allin formalized his through U.S. Patent No. 49,959, granted on September 19, 1865, which detailed the breechblock's pivot, latch, and extractor integration for reliable operation with . This patent built on earlier experimental breech systems tested by the Ordnance Department but prioritized cost-efficiency, as full replacement rifles like the Sharps or Henry would have strained federal budgets amid postwar reconstruction. Initial prototypes underwent rigorous trials at and in late 1865, demonstrating superior gas sealing and reduced fouling compared to competing conversions like the Snider or Remington , though early models retained the .58 for compatibility. The origins of the Allin Conversion thus reflected pragmatic engineering amid fiscal constraints, with Allin receiving $1 for assigning his patent rights to the , underscoring the design's alignment with priorities over commercial innovation. Conversions commenced in December 1865, yielding about 5,000 Model 1865 rifles as proof-of-concept pieces, which informed refinements in the subsequent Model 1866 production. This approach not only extended the service life of wartime arms but established the as a foundational U.S. mechanism through the 1870s.

Improvements from the Model 1865 Prototype

The Springfield Model 1866 incorporated several key enhancements to rectify the operational shortcomings of the Model 1865 prototype, which suffered from unreliable extraction and a fragile breech action during limited testing. Chief among these was a redesigned breechblock mechanism featuring a simplified extractor and a reinforced , which improved reliability and reduced the complexity that had plagued the earlier version's extraction process. Another critical upgrade involved the barrel configuration, where a .50-caliber liner sleeve was inserted into the original .58-caliber muzzleloading barrel, enabling compatibility with the more robust .50-70 Government centerfire cartridge rather than the problematic .58-caliber rimfire round used in the 1865 prototype. This shift addressed frequent jamming and inconsistent ignition issues inherent in the rimfire ammunition, while the sleeved barrel maintained structural integrity without requiring full replacement of existing stocks. These modifications collectively resulted in a more streamlined and durable action, facilitating smoother loading and ejection under field conditions, though the overall conversion process still relied on milling out the rear barrel section to accommodate the hinged breech. Approximately 25,000 Model 1863 rifle-muskets were adapted to this configuration, marking the transition from experimental prototype to standardized production arm.

Design and Features

Breech Mechanism and Cartridge

The Springfield Model 1866 employed a trapdoor breech-loading mechanism designed by Erskine S. Allin, master armorer at , which converted existing .58-caliber muzzle-loading rifle-muskets by removing the upper rear portion of the barrel and replacing it with a hinged . This , secured atop the barrel, operated via a thumb-actuated cam that pivoted it upward and forward to expose the chamber for cartridge insertion and extraction. The design incorporated an extractor to remove spent cases, facilitating reliable cycling. Relative to the preceding Model 1865 prototype, the 1866 iteration simplified the breechblock construction, reducing the number of machining steps from approximately 56 and eliminating the complex, prone-to-rattling components of the earlier toothed extractor-ejector system. The barrel was reamed smooth internally and fitted with a .50-caliber liner of or steel, which was then rifled to accept the new . These modifications enhanced mechanical reliability and transitioned the arm from rimfire to centerfire ignition, supporting improved ballistic performance. The chambered the cartridge, a rimmed centerfire black powder round featuring a .50-caliber (0.512-inch ) 450-grain lead bullet seated over 70 grains of powder for standard loads. This delivered a of about 1,260 feet per second and of 1,488 foot-pounds, offering greater and accuracy than the .58 used in prototypes. The cartridge case measured 1.75 inches in length, with an overall loaded length of roughly 2.25 inches, and its rimmed base ensured positive headspace and extraction within the system.

Barrel and Stock Configuration

The barrel of the Springfield Model 1866 consisted of modified .58-caliber barrels from existing Springfield rifled muskets, relined with a brazed iron or liner to achieve a .50-caliber bore compatible with the centerfire cartridge. The relining process entailed reaming the original barrel to roughly .64 , inserting the liner, and then it with three lands and grooves featuring a right-hand twist of one turn in 42 inches. Standard rifle barrels measured 36.6 inches in bore length, with the rear portion milled to accept the . The stock was fashioned from , utilizing Civil War-era stocks that were internally altered to fit the new breech mechanism while preserving the external full-length configuration. It employed three Model 1863-style barrel bands spaced 11 1/16 inches apart to secure the barrel, maintaining a traditional profile. The assembled achieved an overall length of 55 15/16 inches, complemented by a 38 5/8-inch threaded cleaning rod of varying diameters. Short rifle variants featured shortened barrels and stocks with two bands, while cadet rifles used thinner stocks on abbreviated barrels, rendering them more susceptible to damage. These configurations prioritized conversion efficiency over new manufacturing, reflecting post-Civil War resource constraints at Springfield Armory.

Accessories and Bayonet Compatibility

The Springfield Model 1866 trapdoor rifle, as a conversion of surplus Model 1861 and 1863 percussion muskets, retained the original bayonet lug at the muzzle, ensuring full compatibility with the U.S. Model 1855 socket bayonet that had equipped those earlier rifles. This bayonet, characterized by its 18-inch triangular blade and angular socket calibrated for .58-caliber bores, fitted securely over the Model 1866's barrel without alteration, as the conversion process preserved the muzzle dimensions despite the shift to .50-70 centerfire cartridges. Approximately 25,574 Model 1866 rifles were produced between 1866 and 1867, all issued with this standard bayonet pattern, which remained in service through subsequent trapdoor models until the adoption of the Model 1903. No unique accessories were developed exclusively for the Model 1866; instead, it utilized standard U.S. Army infantry equipment adapted from percussion-era designs. Leather slings, secured by swivels on the lower barrel band and the stock's forend, were standard for transport and field carry, mirroring those on Model 1863 muskets. The rifle's full-length stock and 40-inch barrel also accommodated the original ramrods from converted muskets, primarily for cleaning the bore rather than loading, given the breech mechanism's efficiency with metallic cartridges. Bayonet scabbards, typically of leather with metal fittings, were issued separately but conformed to pre-existing patterns compatible with the Model 1855 blade.

Production

Conversion Process at Springfield Armory

The Springfield Model 1866, designated as the Second Allin Conversion, transformed surplus .58-caliber Model 1863 rifle-muskets into breech-loading rifles chambered for the metallic cartridge, with conversions conducted at from 1867 to 1869 under the direction of Master Armorer Erskine S. Allin. This process prioritized economical reuse of existing components, retaining the original lockplates (typically dated 1863–1865), ramrods, leather slings, and bayonet lugs compatible with the M1855 pattern, while focusing modifications on the barrel and breech to enable rapid reloading from a at 8–10 rounds per minute. The barrel alteration began by milling or cutting out the rear portion of the .58-caliber tube to expose the breech area, followed by reaming the bore to approximately .64 to accept an iron liner . This was inserted, brazed securely in place, and then rifled with three grooves to achieve the final .50- dimensions suitable for the centerfire cartridge, enhancing accuracy over the original while minimizing material waste. A simplified hinged breechblock, featuring a cam-locking mechanism, was then fastened to the modified breech via hinges and a , differing from the more complex rack-and-pinion design of the 1865 prototype by offering greater reliability and ease of operation for extracting spent cases. Stock adjustments were minimal, primarily involving inlet modifications to accommodate the new without altering the overall length or profile significantly, ensuring compatibility with existing drill practices. Approximately 52,000 units underwent this conversion, though some accounts cite 25,000–50,000 based on issuance , with the Armory employing standard machining tools like mills, reamers, and rifling benches for precision work.

Production Quantities and Timeline

The Springfield Model 1866 trapdoor rifles were produced through conversions of surplus Civil War-era Model 1861 percussion muskets at the , with the primary timeline spanning 1867 to 1868. Unlike later models, Model 1866 rifles were not assigned serial numbers during manufacture.
YearRifles ProducedCadet Rifles Produced
186749,257320
18681,796104
Total51,053424
These figures reflect the Armory's records, yielding a combined total of approximately 51,477 units when including variants, though contemporary estimates often round to 52,000 conversions overall. Production tapered off in 1868 as focus shifted to the improved Model 1868, which addressed ongoing issues with the 1866's cartridge and extractor design. The conversions utilized existing barrels sleeved to .50-70 centerfire specifications, enabling rapid output but limiting total volume to available musket stocks.

Variants

Cadet Rifle

The Springfield Model 1866 Rifle was a specialized variant of the standard conversion rifle, designed for training purposes at U.S. military academies, particularly the at West Point. This version featured a scaled-down configuration compared to the full-sized Model 1866, with a shorter barrel length of approximately 26.75 inches and an overall length of about 48.25 inches, making it lighter and more manageable for use while retaining the centerfire cartridge for compatibility with standard ammunition. The breech mechanism remained the Allin design, hinged at the rear and operated by a pivoting block, but the lockplate was uniquely thinner and dated 1867, distinguishing it from production models. Production occurred exclusively at between 1867 and 1868, with a total of 424 units manufactured: 320 in 1867 and 104 in 1868. Of these, approximately 300 were shipped directly to the for drill and instruction, reflecting its role in familiarizing cadets with the emerging breech-loading technology without the full weight and length of infantry rifles. Unlike the standard Model 1866 rifles, which lacked serial numbers, the cadet variant's limited production emphasized its experimental and training-oriented purpose rather than widespread field deployment. The Cadet Rifle's design prioritized instructional utility over combat durability, incorporating a stock with a straight grip and iron furnishings similar to the parent model, but proportioned for reduced and easier handling during marksmanship . It was compatible with the Model 1855 socket , allowing for bayonet drills, though its primary application was range practice with the .50-70 cartridge to instill proficiency in loading and firing the system. This variant represented an early adaptation of the trapdoor conversion for educational needs, bridging the transition from muzzle-loading muskets to modern breechloaders in military programs.

Short Rifle Export Model

The Short Rifle Export Model of the Springfield Model 1866 was a specialized variant produced by shortening barrels on approximately 1,500 rifles that had sustained muzzle damage during refurbishment. These arms originated from a larger batch of over 20,000 used Model 1866 rifles being overhauled at Springfield Armory in 1870-1871 for potential resale abroad, amid European demand spurred by the Franco-Prussian War. The damage, often from obstructions causing swelling or ruptures, necessitated cutting about 4 inches from the original 40-inch barrels, resulting in a length of roughly 36 inches while retaining the .50-70 Government cartridge and trapdoor breech mechanism. To accommodate the reduced barrel length, these short rifles were fitted with modified stocks derived from shortened M1863 Type I components, configured as two-band designs for lighter handling compared to the standard three-band Model 1866 rifle-musket. This adaptation maintained armory-quality assembly, distinguishing genuine examples from later civilian cut-downs by firms like Bannerman, which often used mismatched parts and lack proper band spacing. None were adopted for U.S. military service, as the modifications were a pragmatic response to export-oriented repairs rather than domestic needs. Export records indicate these short rifles joined broader shipments of refurbished Model 1866 arms to , where roughly half of the total overhauled production—part of the approximately 52,000 original Model 1866 rifles manufactured from 1866 to 1869—was directed, though many were reportedly destroyed post-war or saw limited combat use. The variant's scarcity today stems from this foreign disposition and attrition, with surviving specimens valued by collectors for their historical tie to U.S. surplus sales during a pivotal European conflict.

Operational History

Early Deployments and Indian Wars

The Springfield Model 1866 rifles entered U.S. Army service in 1867, with approximately 26,000 units issued domestically from a total production of 52,000 conversions completed between 1867 and 1869. These allocations prioritized infantry regiments deployed to remote Western outposts, replacing obsolete muzzle-loading muskets amid escalating conflicts with Plains tribes. The rifles' .50-70 centerfire cartridge and trapdoor breech system facilitated quicker reloading—up to eight rounds per minute under ideal conditions—compared to the two to three rounds per minute of percussion rifles, providing a tactical edge in prolonged skirmishes. Early deployments centered on the and Territories, where units guarded vital supply routes like the during (1866–1868). Soldiers at forts such as and Fort C. F. Smith received the Model 1866 for patrol and hay-cutting details, exposing them to ambushes by and forces numbering in the hundreds. The weapon's effective range of up to 600 yards suited the open-range engagements typical of frontier warfare, allowing defenders to engage attackers from fortified positions before closing distances. Throughout the late 1860s Indian Wars, the Model 1866 demonstrated durability in harsh conditions, including extreme cold and dust, though its single-shot design limited offensive pursuits against mobile warriors. By enabling sustained fire from cover, it helped secure early footholds in contested territories, influencing subsequent variants.

Specific Engagements: Hayfield and Wagon Box Fights

The Hayfield Fight occurred on August 1, 1867, approximately three miles north of Fort C. F. Smith in the , during against and forces opposing the . A detachment of 26 soldiers from the 18th Infantry Regiment under Sigmund J. Sternberg, along with 11 civilian hay cutters, faced an attack by an estimated 500 to 800 warriors led by chiefs such as Roman Nose and . The defenders, recently equipped with Springfield Model 1866 breech-loading rifles chambered in .50-70, utilized the weapons' rapid reloading capability—firing up to 10 rounds per minute compared to the 2-3 of muzzle-loading muskets—to maintain continuous fire from improvised barricades of haystacks and overturned wagons. This firepower inflicted heavy casualties on the attackers, estimated at 10 to 100 killed, while the U.S. side suffered 3 soldiers and 3 civilians killed, with 3 soldiers wounded. The engagement highlighted the Model 1866's tactical advantages in defensive positions, as the allowed soldiers to reload without exposing themselves fully, a critical factor against massed charges. Approximately 700 of these rifles had been rushed to frontier posts earlier in 1867, replacing obsolete percussion muskets and enabling the outnumbered force to repel assaults that lasted several hours until reinforcements from Fort C. F. Smith arrived. Eyewitness accounts noted the rifles' reliability under sustained fire, though ammunition expenditure was high, with defenders firing thousands of .50-70 centerfire cartridges. One day later, on August 2, 1867, the unfolded about six miles northwest of in the , involving 51 soldiers of the 27th Infantry under Captain James Powell and 26 civilian woodcutters escorting a supply train. and warriors, numbering 400 to 1,500 and again including Roman Nose, assaulted the group as they offloaded logs, prompting the defenders to form a corral from 14 emptied wagon boxes reinforced with sawn timber. Armed primarily with Springfield Model 1866 rifles, supplemented by a few Henry repeating rifles among civilians, the troops delivered volleys at ranges as close as 50 yards, leveraging the breech-loaders' speed to fire an estimated 2,000 rounds in the first 20 minutes alone. The attack faltered after three hours, with U.S. losses at 5 soldiers and 1 civilian killed, 2 soldiers wounded, and Indian casualties reported at 60 or more killed. These consecutive victories, enabled by the Model 1866's conversion from Civil War-era barrels to a hinged breech for metallic cartridges, demonstrated the rifle's combat effectiveness against superior numbers, influencing subsequent U.S. Army adoption of breech-loaders. The fights' outcomes contributed to waning Indian momentum in , as the weapons' sustained fire rate disrupted traditional tactics reliant on close-range charges. Post-battle analyses by Army ordnance officers credited the rifles' design for preventing annihilation, though some reports noted challenges with cartridge extraction in dusty conditions.

Performance and Criticisms

Combat Effectiveness and Achievements

The Springfield Model 1866 demonstrated notable combat effectiveness in its early deployments during the Indian Wars, particularly through its breech-loading mechanism that enabled rapid reloading from prone or covered positions. Issued to U.S. Army troops in 1867, the rifle's .50-70 metallic cartridge and design allowed a firing rate of 8 to 10 rounds per minute, a significant improvement over muzzle-loading predecessors that required soldiers to expose themselves during reloading. This capability proved decisive in defensive engagements where numerical inferiority demanded sustained fire without vulnerability. In the Hayfield Fight on August 1, 1867, near Fort C. F. Smith in , approximately 20 soldiers and civilians armed primarily with the Model 1866 repelled attacks by an estimated 800 to 1,000 Lakota, , and warriors. The defenders inflicted heavy casualties—reportedly up to 100 killed—while suffering only three fatalities, leveraging the rifle's quick reloading to maintain fire from improvised barricades of hay stacks. The engagement highlighted the Model 1866's role in enabling outnumbered forces to hold high ground until reinforcements arrived, marking one of its first combat validations. The on August 2, 1867, near in , further underscored the rifle's achievements, as a detachment of about 32 soldiers and civilians, equipped with Model 1866 rifles and supplemented by a few Henry repeaters, withstood assaults by over 1,000 , , and under . By firing through holes punched in wagon boxes for cover, the defenders achieved a kill ratio estimated at 60 to 1, with only five U.S. casualties against hundreds of native losses, owing to the trapdoor's facilitation of high-volume fire without standing exposure. These outcomes contributed to the strategic success of the defenses, demonstrating the Model 1866's superiority in frontier skirmishes and influencing subsequent U.S. Army adoption of breech-loaders.

Reliability Problems and Design Flaws

The Springfield Model 1866 rifle, as a conversion from earlier muzzle-loaders, exhibited persistent extraction difficulties despite improvements over the Model 1865 , including a simplified U-shaped spring extractor. Copper-cased cartridges, standard at the time, expanded excessively upon firing due to the cartridge's design and black powder combustion, often causing spent cases to stick tightly in the chamber from residue buildup and if stored improperly. The extractor's reliance on gripping only the case rim—rather than the full case body—frequently failed to overcome this adhesion, necessitating manual removal with a knife blade, , or other improvised tool, which disrupted firing rates during engagements. Extractor springs proved vulnerable to and breakage under repeated stress from rapid or field conditions, further compromising mechanical reliability and requiring armorer intervention. The breech mechanism itself was prone to accumulation in the and block, potentially hindering smooth operation and contributing to jams, particularly in dusty or wet environments common to frontier service. Barrel conversions, which involved reaming .58-caliber tubes to accept .50-caliber liners, sometimes resulted in inconsistent chamber tolerances that amplified case-sticking issues. These flaws, while mitigated somewhat by the Model 1866's sturdier spring-based extraction over the 1865's toothed , underscored the limitations of hasty post-Civil adaptations and prompted Ordnance Department redesigns, culminating in the Model 1868 with refined and extractor components. Production of approximately 52,335 rifles between 1866 and 1869 highlighted the design's interim role, but field reports confirmed extraction and jamming as recurrent deficiencies until the shift to brass cases in the 1880s and later iterations.

Adoption Controversies and Congressional Scrutiny

The adoption of the Springfield Model 1866 encountered opposition due to discrepancies between expert evaluations and political influences favoring domestic production. In June 1866, the U.S. Army convened the Laidley Board, chaired by Maj. Gen. George D. Ramsay and including ordnance experts, to evaluate breech-loading rifle systems for replacing surplus Civil War-era muzzleloaders. After testing prototypes including the Remington Rolling Block, Sharps, and others, the board recommended the Remington design as superior in reliability and manufacturing potential. Erskine S. Allin, superintendent of the , countered this by lobbying to prioritize his conversion method, arguing it would economize by existing .58-caliber rifle-muskets at approximately $5 per unit rather than procuring new arms. Allin's advocacy highlighted the armory's capacity to produce 50,000 conversions annually using government-owned machinery and stockpiles, avoiding reliance on private contractors like E. Remington & Sons. acceded in July 1866 via an appropriations act authorizing up to 50,000 conversions, sidestepping the board's findings and mandating production. This override precipitated a minor in congressional circles, with critics decrying from armory interests and potential favoritism toward federal facilities over competitive bidding. Figures in the and questioned whether cost-driven expediency compromised long-term military readiness, as the trapdoor's hinged breech was viewed by some as a provisional fix prone to extraction issues observed in earlier prototypes. Despite scrutiny, no formal investigation ensued, and production commenced in , yielding 52,335 rifles by 1869.

Legacy and Modern Assessment

Influence on Subsequent US Rifles

The Springfield Model 1866's trapdoor breech mechanism, refined from Erskine S. Allin's initial 1865 prototype, established a foundational design for U.S. Army single-shot rifles by enabling the conversion of existing percussion muzzleloaders to breechloaders using metallic cartridges. This hinged breechblock, which swung upward to expose the chamber, prioritized simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and reliability over complexity, allowing the Ordnance Department to rapidly modernize inventories post-Civil War without discarding surplus arms. Approximately 25,000 Model 1863 rifle-muskets were converted to the 1866 configuration, demonstrating the mechanism's practicality for large-scale adaptation. Subsequent iterations built directly on this design, incorporating incremental improvements to address early limitations such as extraction reliability and receiver strength. The Model 1868 featured a reinforced receiver and simplified for better durability, while the Model 1870 introduced a gooseneck hammer for improved . These evolutions culminated in the Model 1873, the fifth major refinement of Allin's system, which adopted the cartridge and became the standard U.S. , with production continuing at until the early 1890s. The 's persistence reflected its proven performance in frontier service, influencing U.S. military to favor economical rifles suited to tactics and logistical constraints over more advanced . Overall, the 1866 model's mechanism shaped Springfield Armory's production for over 25 years, with total trapdoor rifle output exceeding 500,000 units by 1892, when the bolt-action Krag-Jørgensen finally supplanted it. This lineage underscored a doctrinal emphasis on robust, maintainable arms for use, delaying widespread adoption of magazine-fed designs until and improved manufacturing justified the shift. The design's longevity validated Allin's approach amid competing breech systems, as its minimal parts count facilitated field repairs and using existing tooling.

Collectibility, Replicas, and Contemporary Evaluations

The Springfield Model 1866 holds significant appeal among collectors of U.S. longarms due to its rarity and pivotal role in the transition from muzzleloaders to breechloading cartridge rifles. As a Second Allin conversion, it represents one of the earliest standardized centerfire arms adopted by the U.S. military, with production limited primarily to conversions of existing percussion muskets, resulting in relatively few surviving examples compared to later variants. Market values for good to very good condition originals typically range from $800 to $1,250 as of mid-2024, influenced by factors such as , (.50-70 Government), and provenance tied to Indian Wars service. Auction records and appraisals confirm values around $700–$800 for standard specimens, with exceptional pieces commanding premiums at venues like Rock Island Auction Company. Reproductions of the Model 1866 remain scarce, as commercial manufacturers prioritize later trapdoor designs with more refined receivers and .45-70 chambers for broader shooting appeal. Firms such as Davide Pedersoli produce faithful replicas of general Springfield trapdoor rifles, including U.S. Army and cavalry models, but these emulate post-1868 iterations with improved extractors and full breech blocks rather than the 1866's conversion-specific hinged trapdoor affixed to unmodified musket receivers. Uberti offers a Springfield Trapdoor Rifle modeled after the 1873 redesign, suitable for black powder cartridge enthusiasts but lacking the 1866's distinctive early conversion features like the retained three-band configuration. Collectors and reenactors often resort to original parts kits, custom restorations via specialists like Lodgewood Manufacturing, or non-firing replicas from Denix for display, underscoring the model's niche status without widespread functional duplicates. Modern assessments view the Model 1866 as an economical engineering success that salvaged surplus Civil War muskets amid post-war budget constraints, yet flawed by inherent limitations of its conversion origins. Ordnance experts praise its simple, robust —superior to many contemporaneous breechloaders like the Remington in adaptability—but note persistent extraction failures from the primitive ejector and overall excessive weight exceeding 9 pounds, which hindered frontline utility. The design's delicacy for rough field use prompted rapid iteration to the Model 1868, rendering it obsolete within two years of adoption, though its brief combat record in engagements like the 1867 demonstrated adequate accuracy at 100–300 yards with .50-70 loads. Among shooters today, it earns favor for reliability with modern smokeless loads when properly maintained, offering sub-MOA potential from benchrests, but its historical verdict emphasizes transitional innovation over enduring excellence.

References

  1. https://www.americanrifleman.org/content/origins-of-the-trapdoor-springfield-the-allin-conversions/
  2. https://www.nramuseum.org/guns/the-galleries/the-american-west-1850-to-1900/case-18-hunting-and-military-arms-on-the-western-frontier/us-springfield-allin-conversion-model-1866.aspx
  3. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA471224.pdf
  4. https://www.nps.gov/spar/learn/historyculture/trapdoor-rifle.htm
  5. https://www.rifleshootermag.com/editorial/springfield-trapdoor-rifle-historic-review/504307
  6. http://library.centerofthewest.org/digital/api/collection/p17097coll13/id/219/download
  7. https://www.nps.gov/spar/learn/historyculture/evolution-of-the-breechloader.htm
  8. https://www.militaryrifles.com/usspringfield1865
  9. https://www.americanrifleman.org/content/150-years-of-the-trapdoor-springfield/
  10. https://www.gunsandammo.com/editorial/americas-first-50-springfield-model-66-needle-rifle-50-70/247939
  11. https://www.armscollectors.com/trapdoor/m66.html
  12. https://worldbayonets.com/Bayonet_Identification_Guide/socket_bayonets/sockets_p5.html
  13. https://www.trackofthewolf.com/?p=bayonet-springfield
  14. https://www.dixiegunworks.com/index/page/product/product_id/438/category/458/category_chain/392%2C439%2C440%2C458/product_name/BE0215%2BBayonet%2BFor%2B.58%2BC.W.%2BMusket%252C%2B1855%252C1861%252C%2B1868%2B-1870%252C%2B%2526%2B1863%2BRifles%2B%2BLIMIT%2BOF%2B10
  15. https://scott-duff.com/the-springfield-armory-model-1866-rifle-second-allin-conversion-and-the-wagon-box-fight-part-2-of-2/
  16. https://www.nps.gov/spar/learn/historyculture/u-s-springfield-trapdoor-production-serial-numbers.htm
  17. https://npshistory.com/publications/spar/serial-nos.pdf
  18. https://www.si.edu/object/springfield-armory-model-18671866-us-cadet-trapdoor-rifle%253Anmah_417393
  19. https://www.si.edu/object/springfield-armory-model-18671866-us-cadet-trapdoor-rifle%253Anmah_417394
  20. https://americansocietyofarmscollectors.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Cadet-muskets-Hanes-vol-118.pdf
  21. https://www.armscollectors.com/trapdoor/production.html
  22. https://guns.fandom.com/wiki/Springfield_Model_1866
  23. https://www.truewestmagazine.com/article/a-new-old-needle-gun/
  24. https://www.codyfirearmsexperience.com/firearms-history/1864-1890-indian-wars/
  25. https://www.facebook.com/FortLaramieNHS/posts/first-introduced-in-1865-as-the-allin-conversion-the-springfield-was-modified-fr/1051830417124921/
  26. https://www.gunsmagazine.com/our-experts/the-other-trapdoor-the-50-70/
  27. https://www.hearmyselftalkhistory.com/featured-firearm/springfield-model-1866
  28. https://www.nps.gov/bica/learn/historyculture/hayfield-fight.htm
  29. https://www.wyohistory.org/encyclopedia/wagon-box-fight-1867
  30. https://www.jamesmountainantiques.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Ammunition-and-Accoutrements-at-the-Wagon-Box-Fight.pdf
  31. https://sheridanmedia.com/news/111992/accounts-of-the-wagon-box-fight/
  32. https://codyfirearmsexperience.com/firearms-history/1864-1890-indian-wars/
  33. https://www.fortphilkearny.org/wagon-box-battle-history
  34. https://forum.cartridgecollectors.org/t/the-switch-from-copper-cases-to-brass/8658?page=3
  35. https://www.quora.com/How-were-extraction-problems-with-Springfield-rifles-eventually-resolved-and-why-werent-these-solutions-available-during-the-Battle-of-the-Little-Bighorn
  36. https://americansocietyofarmscollectors.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Post-civil-war-cavalry-carbines-Vagnetti-vol-118.pdf
  37. https://www.gunpartscorp.com/blog/post/springfield-trapdoor-102
  38. https://armyhistory.org/the-springfield-model-1873-rifle/
  39. https://www.justanswer.com/appraisals/dk9cp-19-1866-2nd-allin-conversion-springfield-trapdoor-rifle.html
  40. https://www.rockislandauction.com/detail/57/3243/springfield-armory-us-1866-allin-conversion-rifle-5070
  41. https://www.davidepedersoli.com/en/products/springfield-trapdoor
  42. https://www.uberti-usa.com/cartridge-rifles/springfield-trapdoor-rifle
  43. https://www.lodgewood.com/M1866-2nd-Allin-Springfield-Trapdoor_p_6462.html
  44. https://replicaweaponry.com/replica-guns/denix-rifle-replicas/
  45. https://gunsmithingclubofamerica.com/restoring-a-springfield-model-1866-2nd-allin-conversion-part-1/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.