Hubbry Logo
Stopped-flowStopped-flowMain
Open search
Stopped-flow
Community hub
Stopped-flow
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Stopped-flow
Stopped-flow
Stopped-flow
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Stopped-flow is one of a number of methods of studying the kinetics of reactions in solution. It is ideal for studying chemical reactions with a typical dead time on the order of 1 millisecond. In the simplest form of the technique, the solutions of two reactants are rapidly mixed by being forced through a mixing chamber, on emerging from which the mixed fluid passes through an optical observation cell. At some point in time, the flow is suddenly stopped, and the reaction is monitored using a suitable spectroscopic probe, such as absorbance, fluorescence or fluorescence polarization. The change in spectroscopic signal as a function of time is recorded, and the rate constants that define the reaction kinetics can then be obtained by fitting the data using a suitable model.

Stopped-flow as an experimental technique was introduced by Britton Chance[1][2] and extended by Quentin Gibson.[3] Other techniques, such as the temperature-jump method, are available for much faster processes.

Description of the Method

[edit]

Introduction

[edit]
Diagram of a stopped-flow instrument

Stopped-flow spectrometry enables the solution-phase study of chemical kinetics for fast reactions, typically with half-lives in the millisecond range. Initially, it was primarily used for investigating enzyme-catalyzed reactions but quickly became a staple in biochemistry, biophysics, and chemistry laboratories for tracking rapid chemical processes.

In its simplest form, a stopped-flow system rapidly mixes two solutions. Small volumes of each solution are driven into a high-efficiency mixer, initiating a fast reaction. The mixed solution then flows into the observation cell, displacing the remaining contents from the previous experiment or a washing step. The time it takes for the solution to travel from the mixing point to the observation point is referred to as the "dead time." The minimum injection volume depends on the size of the mixing cell.

Once enough solution has been injected to completely replace the previous one, the system reaches a stationary state, and the flow is stopped. This can be achieved using a stop syringe and hard-stop assembly. At this point, the instrument sends a "start signal," or trigger, to the detector so the reaction can be observed. The timing of the trigger is software-controlled, allowing users to synchronize it with the flow stop or slightly earlier to confirm that the stationary state has been reached.

Dead Time, Single-Mixing, Ratio-Mixing, & Sequential Mixing

[edit]

The performance of a stopped-flow instrument is determined to a large extent by its dead time. This is defined as the time between the reactants mixing and the observation beginning, and is essentially the age of the reaction as the reaction mixture enters the observation cell. The limiting factors in the dead time of a particular stopped-flow apparatus are the efficiency of the mixer, the distance between the mixer and the cell, and the flow rate of the reaction mixture at the instant at which flow is stopped. Depending on the dimensions of the observation cell used, modern stopped-flow instruments are typically capable of achieving dead times of between 0.5-1 milliseconds.

Single-mixing stopped-flow

The simplest operating mode of a stopped-flow instrument is with a single-mixing configuration. Two reactants are used; these are loaded into syringes and are forced through the mixer and optical cell by the action of a pneumatically controlled ram which drives the syringe plungers. The reaction mixture emerging from the optical cell enters a third (stop) syringe, and flow ceases when the stop syringe plunger contacts a trigger switch. This simultaneously stops the flow and starts data acquisition.

Normally, the two drive syringes are the same size, to achieve a mixing ratio of 1:1, but syringes of different sizes can be combined to obtain other mixing ratios up to 1:10 or 1:20. This so called asymmetric, or ratio mixing, is a common requirement in stopped-flow work.

Sequential-, or double-, mixing is a variation of stopped-flow in which two reactants are forced through a pre-mixer into an ageing loop. After a specified delay period, the mixed fluid is forced through a separate mixer with a third reactant, and the subsequent reaction is studied as in single-mixing. Sequential-mixing is used to investigate the behavior of reaction intermediates or short-lived transients.

Light Sources

[edit]

A non-ozone-producing xenon arc lamp is commonly used for most general stopped-flow experiments above 250 nm. Broad-spectrum xenon lamps are highly versatile, allowing users to select virtually any wavelength for absorbance or fluorescence studies, making them ideal for applications such as monitoring structural changes in proteins over time.

For far-UV applications, ozone-producing xenon arc lamps are available, but they require purging with pure nitrogen gas to prevent ozone buildup and optical degradation. Alternatively, mercury-xenon (Hg-Xe) lamps are well-suited for fluorescence experiments where the desired excitation wavelength corresponds to one of the intense mercury emission lines.

LED light sources are another popular and inexpensive choice for stopped-flow experiments, especially when only a single or a few specific wavelengths are needed.

Reactant Syringes (Drive Syringes)

[edit]

Two syringes are filled with solutions that remain inert until mixed. These drive syringes are coupled and simultaneously emptied into a mixing device, either by a single drive ram (piston) or independent stepping motors. Ratio mixing is easily achieved by using syringes with different volume capacities, enabling precise control over the proportions of the combined solutions. For applications requiring sequential mixing—such as preincubating two reagents before introducing a third—two independent drive rams can be employed to allow for more complex mixing sequences.

Laminar flow (left) produces little or no mixing, but turbulent flow (right) produces very rapid mixing

Mixing chamber

[edit]

Once the two solutions are expelled from their syringes, they enter a mixing system designed to ensure thorough mixing, typically using a geometry like a T-mixer. This setup promotes turbulent flow, which achieves complete mixing. In contrast, laminar flow would result in the solutions flowing side by side, leading to incomplete mixing.

Dead Time

[edit]

The dead time is the interval required for solutions to travel from the mixing point to the observation point, representing the portion of reaction kinetics that cannot be observed. A shorter dead time enhances instrument performance and enables the study of a wider range of reactions. Typical dead times range from 0.5 to 1 millisecond, depending on the instrument design.[4]

Dead time can be minimized by reducing the dimensions of the flow cell, but this approach has limitations due to the decreased signal-to-noise ratio caused by smaller observation windows and shorter pathlengths. The fluorescence quenching reaction between N-acetyltryptophanamide (NAT) and N-bromosuccinimide (NBS), as described by Peterman, is a commonly used method for measuring the dead time of a stopped-flow instrument.[5]

Observation Cell

[edit]
Stopped-flow observation head

The mixed reactants are delivered into an observation cell (flow cell) where the reaction can be monitored spectrophotometrically, typically using techniques such as absorbance, fluorescence, fluorescence anisotropy, or circular dichroism. It is increasingly common to combine several of these techniques for more comprehensive analysis.[6]

Flow cell cartridges are commonly available with absorbance pathlengths ranging from 1 to 10 mm and shorter fluorescence pathlengths of around 2 mm. Short pathlengths are particularly important for fluorescence measurements to minimize the inner filter effect. Modern stopped-flow instruments are designed to accommodate a variety of flow cell sizes to suit different experimental needs.

Stopping the Reaction

[edit]

Once sufficient solution has been injected to fully replace the previous contents in the observation cell, the mixture flows into a third syringe, known as the stop syringe. This syringe hits a volume-calibrated hard-stop assembly, halting the flow and bringing the system to a stationary state. At this moment, the detector is triggered to begin observing the reaction.

Accessories

[edit]

Stopped-flow spectrophotometers may function as stand-alone instruments, but they are often integrated into systems for circular dichroism (CD), absorbance, and/or fluorescence measurements, or equipped with various accessories to support specialized applications. Common stopped-flow accessories include:

  • Light Sources: Options include xenon (ozone- or non-ozone-producing), mercury-xenon (Hg-Xe), deuterium, and single-wavelength LED sources.
  • Monochromators: Diffraction grating-based monochromators are widely used and can be configured for precise fluorescence excitation or emission scanning.
  • Observation Cells: A range of flow cell sizes is available, typically with pathlengths spanning 1–10 mm.
  • Detectors: Photomultiplier tube (PMT) detectors are commonly used for their high sensitivity. Photodiode array (PDA) detectors are also available for simultaneous full-spectrum data acquisition.

Other popular add-ons or accessories include:

  • Fluorescence Polarization/Anisotropy Filters: For measuring molecular interactions or structural dynamics.
  • Anaerobic Accessories: For experiments conducted under inert atmospheres or in glove boxes.
  • Quench-Flow Adapters: Ideal for specialized experiments, such as hydrogen-deuterium exchange (HDX).

These accessories and configurations enhance the versatility of stopped-flow spectrophotometers, enabling their use across a broad range of applications in biochemistry, biophysics, and chemistry.

Continuous-Flow

[edit]
Diagram of continuous flow spectrometer for reactions with half times of a few milliseconds

The stopped-flow method evolved from the continuous-flow technique developed by Hamilton Hartridge and Francis Roughton[7] to study the binding of oxygen to hemoglobin. In the continuous-flow system, the reaction mixture was passed through a long tube, past an observation system (a simple colorimeter in 1923), and then discarded as waste. By moving the colorimeter along the tube and knowing the flow rate, Hartridge and Roughton were able to measure reaction progress at specific time intervals.

This innovation was groundbreaking for its time, demonstrating that processes occurring within milliseconds could be studied using relatively simple equipment, despite the limitations of instruments requiring seconds for each measurement. However, the method had significant practical constraints, particularly the need for large quantities of reactants, making it suitable mainly for studies on abundant proteins like hemoglobin. Today, the continuous-flow approach is considered obsolete for practical purposes, having been replaced by more efficient and versatile techniques like stopped-flow spectrometry.

Quenched-Flow

[edit]
Diagram of quenched flow apparatus for following reactions with half times of a few milliseconds

The stopped-flow method relies on the presence of spectroscopic properties to monitor reactions in real time. When such properties are unavailable, quenched-flow provides an alternative by using conventional chemical analysis.[8] Instead of a mechanical stopping system, the reaction is halted by quenching, where the products are immediately stopped by freezing, chemical denaturation, or exposure to a denaturing light source. Similar to the continuous-flow method, the time between mixing and quenching can be adjusted by varying the length of the reaction tube.

Comparison of stopped flow with quenched flow for nitrogenase from Klebsiella pneumoniae

The pulsed quenched-flow method, introduced by Alan Fersht and Ross Jakes,[9] eliminates the need for a long reaction tube. In this approach, the reaction is initiated as in a stopped-flow experiment, but quenching is performed using a third syringe, which delivers the quenching agent at a precise, pre-set time after initiation.

Quenched-flow has distinct advantages and disadvantages compared to stopped-flow. On the positive side, chemical analysis provides clear identification of the measured process, whereas spectroscopic signals in stopped-flow experiments may sometimes be ambiguous. However, quenched-flow is significantly more labor-intensive, as each time point must be measured individually. For example, in studies of nitrogenase catalysis from Klebsiella pneumoniae[10], the agreement in half-times showed that absorbance at 420 nm corresponded to Pi release, but obtaining this result through quenched-flow required 11 individual data points, highlighting the method's demanding nature.

Other Techniques

[edit]

Stopped-flow is only one of multiple biophysical techniques used to study the kinetics of biological systems. For a broader perspective, Zheng et al. (2015) review various analytical methods for investigating biological interactions, including stopped-flow analysis, surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy, affinity chromatography, and capillary electrophoresis. The article provides an overview of each technique’s principles, applications, advantages, and limitations.[11]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Stopped-flow

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Stopped-flow is a rapid mixing technique used in and biochemistry to study the kinetics of fast reactions in solution on timescales from milliseconds to seconds. It works by rapidly combining two or more reactant solutions in a mixing chamber, propelling the into an observation cell, and abruptly halting the flow with a mechanical stop, allowing real-time monitoring of the reaction via spectroscopic methods such as , , or , with dead times as short as 200 microseconds in modern instruments. The technique originated from earlier continuous-flow methods developed by Hamilton Hartridge and Francis Roughton in the 1920s for oxygen binding studies, but the stopped-flow variant was pioneered by Britton Chance starting in 1937 at the , where he built initial rapid-flow apparatuses to observe transient enzyme-substrate complexes and validate Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Chance refined the design in the 1940s, incorporating colorimetric detection, and by the 1950s, it had evolved into a key tool for studies, earning him the Paul Lewis Award in 1950 for advancements in rapid kinetics. Further innovations, such as Yves Dupont's introduction of stepping motors in 1983, improved precision and modularity, enabling commercial instruments with enhanced temperature control from -90°C to +85°C and multi-mixing capabilities. In practice, reactants are loaded into drive syringes and pushed at high speeds—often exceeding 10 m/s—into a high-efficiency mixer, such as a ball or slit design, achieving near-instantaneous mixing in microseconds before the flow stops, minimizing sample volumes to as little as 10 µl per experiment in microscale setups. This allows determination of rate constants, reaction orders, and intermediate species in solution-based processes that are too rapid for conventional methods. Stopped-flow has profoundly impacted research in mechanisms, where it elucidates binding events and conformational changes, as seen in studies of and reactions; protein stability and folding; ligand interactions in ; and inorganic reaction intermediates. Its versatility extends to biophysical applications like permeability and suspensions, making it a for understanding dynamic molecular processes with high and low sample consumption.

Introduction

Principle and Applications

The stopped-flow technique is a transient kinetic method designed to investigate fast chemical reactions in solution, particularly those with half-lives ranging from milliseconds to seconds. It enables the real-time observation of reaction progress by minimizing the time between mixing reactants and initiating detection. In its basic workflow, reactants are loaded into high-pressure drive syringes and rapidly mixed in a chamber, typically achieving homogeneity in microseconds via turbulent flow. The mixture then flows into an observation cell, where a stopping mechanism abruptly halts the flow, triggering to monitor kinetic changes. This process allows for the study of transient intermediates that are otherwise difficult to capture. Key applications of stopped-flow lie in biochemistry and chemistry, where it is employed to examine enzyme-substrate binding kinetics, protein pathways, ligand-receptor interactions, and the formation of transient during solution-phase reactions. For instance, it has been instrumental since the in analyzing the oxygen-binding dynamics of biological macromolecules like , providing insights into mechanisms. In protein-DNA interactions, such as those involving mismatch repair proteins, stopped-flow measures association rates (e.g., ~3 × 10^7 M^{-1} s^{-1}) and (e.g., ~1.4 s^{-1}). The technique offers advantages including high with dead times around 1 ms, minimal sample consumption (typically 3–150 µL), and seamless integration with spectroscopic detection methods like or . However, it is restricted to liquid-phase reactions and can introduce artifacts from incomplete mixing or impurities, such as fluorescent contaminants or background signals.

Historical Development

The stopped-flow technique was invented by Britton Chance in 1940 to investigate rapid , particularly the formation of enzyme-substrate complexes, employing early photoelectric detection for real-time monitoring. His seminal 1943 publication demonstrated the kinetics of the peroxidase enzyme-substrate compound, marking the first documented use of the method to confirm transient intermediates in biochemical reactions. In the 1950s, Quentin H. Gibson extended the technique at the , adapting it for measurements in studies of hemoglobin-oxygen binding dynamics. Gibson's design, detailed in his 1954 paper on rapid reaction apparatus, facilitated commercialization through the Durrum Company, which produced instruments based on his syringe-stopping mechanism, enabling broader adoption in biochemical research. During the and , stopped-flow evolved from mechanical drives to more reliable pneumatic systems, improving mixing speed and for complex kinetic studies. By the and , integrations with detection enhanced sensitivity for and ligand binding analyses, as exemplified in colchicine-tubulin interaction kinetics. Concurrently, stopped-flow microcalorimetry emerged, allowing calorimetric measurement of reaction enthalpies in milliseconds, with early implementations in batch microcalorimeters for thermodynamic profiling. Post-2020 advancements include microfluidic stopped-flow systems for single-molecule studies, enabling high-throughput observation of strand displacement reactions in compartmentalized droplets with millisecond resolution. Integration with cryo- has further advanced structural kinetics, capturing protein dynamics in time-resolved snapshots, as reviewed in 2022 publications on transient conformational changes. More recent developments as of 2025 include high-sensitivity stopped-flow (EPR) systems for monitoring millisecond-scale protein unfolding and dynamics, and integration with bio-small-angle (BioSAXS) for real-time structural analysis during reactions. A 2015 review by Zheng et al. highlighted the technique's expanded role in kinetics, underscoring its enduring impact.

Instrumentation and Operation

Components: Syringes, Mixing Chamber, and Observation Cell

The reactant syringes, also known as drive syringes, form the core of the sample delivery in stopped-flow instruments, typically consisting of two or three precision or plungers with capacities ranging from 1 to 10 mL. These syringes are driven by pneumatic systems or stepper motors, generating pressures up to 10 bar (with high-pressure variants reaching 100 bar or more) to achieve flow rates of 5-10 mL/s, enabling rapid expulsion of reactants into the mixing chamber. The design allows for adjustable volume ratios between syringes, supporting reactant proportions from 1:1 to 1:20 (or up to 1:100 in advanced models), which facilitates studies requiring unequal concentrations while minimizing sample waste. The mixing chamber is engineered for ultrafast turbulent mixing of the incoming reactant streams, commonly featuring a T-shaped or slit to promote chaotic flow with Reynolds numbers exceeding , ensuring homogeneity within microseconds. Constructed from inert materials such as or to withstand high pressures and resist , the chamber minimizes dead volume to less than 1 μL, reducing dilution artifacts and enabling dead times as low as 200 μs. Mixing efficiency typically surpasses 95% for small molecules under standard conditions, though it decreases for larger biomolecules like proteins due to increased solution , which can extend mixing times and require optimized flow parameters. Downstream of the mixing chamber, the observation cell, or flow cell, serves as the reaction containment and detection site, generally a transparent cuvette with a path length of 1-2 mm to optimize signal intensity for spectroscopic monitoring to the path. Its compact volume of 20-50 μL allows for rapid filling immediately after mixing, supporting millisecond-scale kinetic observations while accommodating low sample volumes (as little as 3-150 μL per shot depending on the setup). construction ensures compatibility with UV-visible wavelengths, and the cell's design integrates seamlessly with the stopping mechanism to halt flow abruptly, isolating the reaction mixture for time-resolved analysis.

Mixing Modes and Dead Time

In stopped-flow experiments, reactants are combined using various mixing modes to initiate reactions under controlled conditions. Single-mixing involves the rapid combination of two reactants from separate drive syringes, typically in a 1:1 volume ratio, which is ideal for studying bimolecular reactions such as enzyme-substrate interactions. This mode ensures efficient initiation of the reaction upon mixing in the chamber, with the flow propelled by pneumatic or stepper motor-driven syringes. For scenarios requiring non-stoichiometric conditions, ratio-mixing employs adjustable syringe volumes or concentrations to achieve mixing ratios ranging from 1:1 to 1:20, such as using excess relative to substrate to probe binding kinetics without saturation effects. An example is the refolding of monitored by , where varied ratios help isolate conformational changes. This flexibility allows optimization of final concentrations while minimizing sample volume usage. Sequential mixing, also known as double or multi-mixing, utilizes a three- or four-syringe configuration to combine reactants in multiple steps with programmable delays of 10-100 ms, enabling the study of multi-step reactions or transient intermediates. For instance, the first mix might form an initial complex, followed by a delayed addition of a third reactant to capture subsequent kinetics, as in complex protein binding events. This mode often incorporates an ageing loop to control the delay time precisely. The dead time in stopped-flow refers to the minimal observable reaction time, defined as the duration from complete mixing to the arrival of the solution at the observation cell, typically ranging from 0.5 to 1 ms in standard setups. It is influenced by factors including flow velocity (given by v=Ltv = \frac{L}{t}, where LL is the distance from mixer to cell and tt is transit time), mixer geometry, and reactant rates, which determine mixing efficiency. An approximation for dead time is: τdead≈VcellQ+Lv\tau_\text{dead} \approx \frac{V_\text{cell}}{Q} + \frac{L}{v} where VcellV_\text{cell} is the cell volume and QQ is the volumetric flow rate. Viscosity and dead volume between components further modulate this, with higher flow rates reducing transit time but potentially increasing backpressure. Advances in micro-mixer designs since 2010 have enabled dead times below 0.3 ms, such as 200 µs achieved with microcuvette accessories in commercial instruments, allowing observation of ultrafast macromolecular folding and binding events. These improvements stem from minimized dead volumes and enhanced mixing via turbulent flow in sub-millimeter channels.

Stopping Mechanism and Accessories

The stopping mechanism in stopped-flow instruments relies on a dedicated stop syringe, often the third syringe in the , which receives the mixed reactants after they pass through the mixing chamber and observation cell. When the of this stop syringe contacts a mechanical block or trigger switch—such as a copper trigger in the Auto-Stop mechanism—the drive pistons of the reactant syringes are abruptly halted, ceasing flow and simultaneously initiating . This design ensures that the reaction mixture fills the observation cell with minimal delay, typically achieving a dead time of less than 10 milliseconds. In pneumatically driven , three valves control high-pressure gas (e.g., at 8 bar) to actuate the and return , providing precise timing for the halt. To prevent backflow or artifacts during , equalization is maintained through the stop syringe's volume accommodation and optional hold features on the drive syringes. For instance, a regulator can sustain 2-4 bar on the drive rams post-stop, countering any differential that might reverse flow from the cell. The stop syringe, often 2.5 ml in capacity, includes a for controlled deceleration and can be software-emptied between shots to prepare for subsequent runs. In high-pressure variants, such as those operating up to 2000 bar, interlocks monitor and limit overpressurization via transducers and intensifiers. Accessories enhance the versatility of stopped-flow systems, with temperature control being a standard feature achieved through water jackets or circulator baths equipped with thermocouple probes, supporting ranges from -20°C to +85°C for studying temperature-dependent kinetics. Multi-wavelength detection is facilitated by programmable monochromators, filter wheels for scanning, and photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) like the Hamamatsu R928 for or R6095 for low-light , enabling simultaneous monitoring across UV-Vis spectra. Automated sample changers, often involving additional drive syringes (e.g., four-syringe configurations for sequential mixing), integrate with software for triggering, volume control, and ratio adjustments from 1:1 to 1:100, minimizing manual intervention and sample waste. These add-ons, such as anaerobic or sub-zero options, are pneumatically or stepper-motor driven for reproducibility in complex experiments.

Data Acquisition and Analysis

Detection Methods

Stopped-flow techniques primarily employ optical detection methods to monitor reaction progress following the cessation of flow in the observation cell. The most common approaches include absorbance spectroscopy in the ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) range (typically 220-800 nm) to track changes in chromophores, for detecting labeled molecules through excitation and emission, and light scattering to observe aggregation or conformational changes. Light sources for these detections often consist of continuous xenon or mercury-xenon arc lamps, which provide broad-spectrum illumination, while pulsed light-emitting diodes (LEDs) or lasers offer targeted excitation for , particularly in time-resolved applications. selection is achieved using monochromators for precise single- monitoring or photodiode/ arrays for multi- or full-spectrum acquisition, enabling real-time spectral analysis. These methods support time-resolved detection starting from as short as approximately 0.2 ms after mixing in modern instruments—limited by the instrument's dead time, which typically ranges from 0.2 ms to a few milliseconds—and extending to several minutes, capturing kinetic events across a wide temporal range. To optimize signal-to-noise ratios, experiments typically involve averaging data from 10 to 100 repeated shots, enhancing reliability without significantly prolonging overall measurement time. Advanced detection modalities include , which probes secondary structure alterations in biomolecules by measuring differential absorption of left- and right-circularly polarized light, and for analyzing vibrational modes in reaction mixtures. Raman integration in stopped-flow systems has advanced notably since 2015, with improved devices enabling time-resolved resonance Raman studies of enzymatic reactions at millisecond timescales.

Kinetic Modeling and Data Fitting

Kinetic modeling in stopped-flow experiments involves applying mathematical frameworks to interpret time-resolved signals and extract rate constants from reaction traces. For simple unimolecular reactions, such as the A → B, the concentration of reactant A follows the : [A]=[A]0e−kt[A] = [A]_0 e^{-kt} where [A]_0 is the initial concentration, k is the rate constant, and t is time. This model assumes of the signal, which is fitted to observed or changes. For bimolecular reactions where one reactant is in large excess, pseudo- conditions simplify the kinetics to an apparent process, allowing isolation of the second-order rate constant by varying the excess concentration. Complex mechanisms often require multi-exponential models to account for multiple phases, such as sequential or parallel steps in binding or . The general rate law for a bimolecular association is v = k [A][B], where v is the reaction velocity and k is the second-order rate constant. Under pseudo-first-order conditions with excess B, the observed rate constant becomes k_obs = k [B] + k_{-1}, where k_{-1} is the dissociation rate; plotting k_obs versus [B] yields k from the slope. These models are particularly useful in pre-steady-state kinetics, where transient intermediates are captured before reaching steady-state turnover, revealing rate-limiting steps in mechanisms. Data fitting typically employs (NLS) regression to minimize residuals between experimental traces and model predictions, often using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm for convergence. Software packages like Pro-K (from Applied Photophysics) and facilitate this by allowing exponential or custom model fits to single traces. For multi-wavelength datasets, global fitting simultaneously analyzes traces across wavelengths, linking parameters to mechanistic schemes and improving accuracy for spectral intermediates. Error analysis relies on chi-squared minimization, where the statistic χ² = Σ (observed - predicted)² / σ² quantifies goodness-of-fit, with σ as the signal noise; reduced χ² values near 1 indicate reliable parameter estimates. In studies, burst phase analysis identifies rapid pre-steady-state product formation followed by slower steady-state release, modeled as a biexponential with an initial burst proportional to active concentration. Noise handling includes baseline subtraction by mixing buffer with itself to establish pre-shot signal levels, reducing artifacts from or drift before fitting. Post-2020 advancements incorporate for fitting noisy single-shot data in microfluidic stopped-flow setups, where traditional NLS struggles with low signal-to-noise; neural networks or Gaussian processes optimize parameters from sparse datasets, enhancing throughput for .

Continuous-Flow Method

The continuous-flow method represents an early approach to studying rapid by continuously mixing reactants and driving the mixture through a long observation tube at a constant velocity. The reaction progress at any point along the tube corresponds to a specific time elapsed since mixing, calculated as the distance from the mixing chamber divided by the flow speed, enabling time resolutions from 1 to 100 ms. This technique allows for direct observation of reaction evolution without halting the flow, distinguishing it as a precursor to more efficient variants. Developed by Hartridge and Roughton in , the method was pioneered for investigating gas-liquid reactions, particularly the binding of to , where spectroscopic monitoring captured changes in optical properties as the mixture progressed through the tube. Observation occurs via multiple ports positioned at intervals along the tube, permitting sampling or detection at discrete reaction times. The setup employs high flow rates, typically in the range of mL/min, which necessitates substantial reactant volumes and results in considerable waste generation. While the continuous-flow method offers a relatively simple mechanical design and an exceptionally short dead time of approximately 0.1 ms—facilitating access to very fast kinetics—it has been rendered largely obsolete by its inefficiencies, including reactant consumption roughly 100 times greater than that of stopped-flow techniques due to the ongoing flow requirement. These drawbacks, combined with the advent of more sample-efficient alternatives, led to its widespread replacement by stopped-flow methods in the 1950s.

Quenched-Flow Technique

The quenched-flow technique is a kinetic method that enables the study of fast chemical reactions, particularly in biochemistry, by rapidly mixing reactants and then halting the reaction through chemical or physical for subsequent offline analysis. In this approach, two reactant solutions are mixed in a flow system, allowed to react for a controlled brief period (typically milliseconds), and then quenched to prevent further progression, preserving the reaction intermediates or products for detailed examination using techniques such as (HPLC), radioactivity assays, or . Quenching can be achieved chemically, for example by adding acids like or EDTA to denature enzymes or chelate metals, or physically by rapid freezing to -196°C in , which immobilizes biomolecules without altering their chemical state. This method is particularly suited for reactions lacking suitable spectroscopic signals, complementing direct observation techniques by providing snapshots of reaction progress at discrete time points. The instrumental setup typically employs a three-syringe system: two syringes deliver the reactants (e.g., enzyme and substrate), which are mixed in a chamber, while a third syringe introduces the quenching agent after a variable delay determined by the length of the reaction tubing or a pulsed mechanism. In the pulsed quenched-flow variant, introduced by Alan Fersht and Ross Jakes in 1975, a "chase" solution of excess substrate or quencher is injected at precise intervals (5–500 ms) to either advance or stop the reaction, allowing multiple time points from a single mixing event and improving efficiency for studying multi-step processes. The dead time, or minimum reaction duration before quenching, is around 3–5 ms, limited by mixing efficiency and flow rates, though modern designs with optimized tubing reduce this further. Following quenching, samples are collected in batches for offline analysis, making the process more labor-intensive than real-time spectroscopic methods but versatile for non-optical readouts. Applications of quenched-flow are prominent in enzymology, especially for processes like and nucleotide exchange where transient intermediates lack detectable optical changes. For instance, it has been used to dissect the pre-steady-state kinetics of protein-tyrosine phosphatases (PTPases) catalyzing , capturing phosphoenzyme intermediates via acid and MALDI-TOF analysis, revealing rate constants for and steps. Similarly, in nucleotide exchange on , such as Ric-8A-mediated activation of Gα subunits, allows quantification of GDP release and GTP binding rates through radiolabeled assays, elucidating chaperone-assisted dynamics without relying on . The technique's resolution suits these sub-second events, though it requires careful optimization to ensure complete . Introduced in the early by Herbert Gutfreund and for studying proteolytic mechanisms like trypsin-catalyzed , quenched-flow has evolved with modern cryogenic quenchers that minimize dead times to under 1 by rapid freezing, enhancing studies of unstable intermediates. However, challenges include potential incomplete leading to artifacts, sample dilution or loss during collection, and the need for multiple runs to build kinetic profiles, which can increase variability compared to automated stopped-flow systems.

Other Kinetic Methods

In addition to stopped-flow techniques that rely on rapid mixing to initiate reactions, several other methods enable the study of fast kinetics by perturbing systems through alternative means, such as photochemical excitation or thermal jumps, often achieving comparable or superior time resolutions for specific applications. employs a short, intense light pulse to initiate photochemical reactions, producing transient intermediates that can be monitored spectroscopically with to resolution, making it ideal for investigating rapid processes like geminate recombination in solution. This method contrasts with stopped-flow by avoiding mechanical mixing, instead leveraging photoexcitation for systems where light-sensitive reactants are involved. Temperature-jump (T-jump) methods rapidly perturb chemical equilibria through heating—via Joule heating or laser pulses—allowing relaxation kinetics to be observed on microsecond to millisecond timescales, particularly useful for non-mixable systems like protein folding studies in biophysics. Unlike stopped-flow's mixing-based approach, T-jump focuses on equilibrium shifts without introducing new reactants, providing insights into intrinsic rates in biological contexts. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) facilitates real-time monitoring of biomolecular binding kinetics on immobilized surfaces, with second-scale resolution, enabling the determination of association and dissociation rates without the need for solution mixing. It is particularly advantageous for studying interactions involving surface-bound ligands, such as antibody-antigen pairs, where label-free detection highlights affinity changes in native-like environments. More recently, (ESI-MS) has emerged for probing gas-phase kinetics, transferring ions from solution to vacuum for time-resolved analysis of reaction mechanisms, with applications in ion/ interactions post-2020. This technique complements liquid-phase methods like stopped-flow by isolating solvent-free dynamics, as reviewed in comparisons of biological rate measurements.

References

  1. https://www.biologic.net/topics/what-are-stopped-flows-and-how-do-they-help-chemists-and-biochemists-understand-high-speed-chemical-reactions/
  2. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry_Textbook_Maps/Supplemental_Modules_%28Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry%29/Kinetics/02%253A_Reaction_Rates/2.01%253A_Experimental_Determination_of_Kinetics/2.1.06%253A_Stopped_Flow
  3. https://www.asbmb.org/Asbmb.Web/media/files/atoday/ASBMBToday-2009-07.pdf
  4. https://www.biologic.net/overview-stopped-flow/
  5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313067828_Stopped-flow_techniques_in_SE_Harding_and_BZ_Chowdhry_Eds
  6. https://www.photophysics.com/applications/stopped-flow-applications/enzyme-kinetics/
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3168206/
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0076687918303896
  9. https://academic.oup.com/book/41698/chapter/353944995
  10. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.1955.0014
  11. https://www.jbc.org/article/S0021-9258(20)67732-8/fulltext
  12. https://www.jbc.org/article/S0021-9258(18)44929-0/fulltext
  13. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsbm.2013.0018
  14. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/1954/df/df9541700137
  15. https://www.nasonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/gibson-quentin.pdf
  16. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/05704927708060385
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021925819696031
  18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0165022X89900730
  19. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsfs.2023.0011
  20. https://journals.iucr.org/d/issues/2022/08/00/ij5004/
  21. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.03.26.645583v1
  22. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/3010/1/012155
  23. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25700721/
  24. https://jascoinc.com/products/spectroscopy/circular-dichroism/accessories/stopped-flow/
  25. https://academic.oup.com/book/41698/chapter/353944722
  26. https://www.hi-techsci.com/instruments/high-pressure-stopped-flow-system/
  27. https://www.artisantg.com/info/BioLogic_SFM400_Datasheet.pdf
  28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49644254_Compact_cost-efficient_microfluidics-based_stopped-flow_device
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229478184_Rapid_Scan_Stopped-Flow_Kinetics
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2556641/
  31. https://www.photophysics.com/media/e1ncgk1t/stopped-flow-brochure-updated-app_digital.pdf
  32. https://www.colorado.edu/lab/biochem-instruments/biochemical-biophysical-methods/fast-kinetics-reactions-and-conformational-changes
  33. https://www.photophysics.com/faqs/methods-techniques/stopped-flow-faqs/
  34. https://www.biologic.net/topics/stopped-flow-deadtime-all-you-need-to-know/
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9182321/
  36. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0185888
  37. https://www.photophysics.com/media/12slz5u3/sx20-user-manual.pdf
  38. https://www.hi-techsci.com/techniques/stopped-flow/
  39. https://kintekcorp.com/sf-300x
  40. https://www.cell.com/biophysj/fulltext/S0006-3495%2821%2902814-9
  41. https://portlandpress.com/biochemj/article/306/3/843/30842/A-stopped-flow-apparatus-for-infrared-spectroscopy
  42. https://naist.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/9717/files/RamanSpectr2017.pdf
  43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8254140/
  44. https://facilities.bioc.cam.ac.uk/files/media/enzyme_kinetics_app_note_final.pdf
  45. https://www.jbc.org/article/S0021-9258%2820%2978550-9/fulltext
  46. https://www.wavemetrics.com/products/igorpro/dataanalysis/curvefitting
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9601405/
  48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(69)16010-3
  49. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-010-1855-5_4
  50. https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/Pacific_Union_College/Kinetics/08%3A_Chemical_Kinetics/8.10%3A_Fast_Reactions_in_Solution
  51. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/bi00686a010
  52. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsbm.2022.0024
  53. https://biochem.du.ac.in/userfiles/downloads/Quench%20Flow%20MS-MS.pdf
  54. https://elifesciences.org/articles/19238
  55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2015.01.042
  56. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/porter-lecture-1.pdf
  57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-1669(97)80157-7
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.