Hubbry Logo
Suillus luteusSuillus luteusMain
Open search
Suillus luteus
Community hub
Suillus luteus
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Suillus luteus
Suillus luteus
Suillus luteus
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Suillus luteus
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Fungi
Division: Basidiomycota
Class: Agaricomycetes
Order: Boletales
Family: Suillaceae
Genus: Suillus
Species:
S. luteus
Binomial name
Suillus luteus
(L.) Roussel (1796)
Synonyms[2]
  • Boletus luteus L. (1753)
  • Boletus volvatus Batsch (1783)
  • Cricunopus luteus (L.) P.Karst. (1881)
  • Viscipellis luteus (L.) Quél. (1886)
  • Ixocomus luteus (L.) Quél. (1888)
  • Boletopsis lutea (L.) Henn. (1898)
Suillus luteus
Mycological characteristics
Pores on hymenium
Cap is convex
Hymenium is adnate or subdecurrent
Stipe has a ring
Spore print is brown
Ecology is mycorrhizal
Edibility is edible

Suillus luteus is a species of bolete fungus commonly referred to as slippery jack or sticky bun. The fungus was originally assigned to Boletus by Carl Linnaeus in 1753, before being made the type species of Suillus in 1796. The slimy cap is typically up to 10 cm (4 in) wide and conical before flattening. A membranous partial veil connects the cap to the stem when young. Yellow tubes extend downward from the underside of the cap, which spores escape through. The pale stem is up to 10 cm (4 in) tall and 3 cm (1+1⁄4 in) thick, bearing small dots near the top. Unlike most other boletes, it bears a distinctive membranous ring, tinged brown to violet on the underside.

A common fungus native all across Eurasia from Ireland to Korea, it has been introduced widely elsewhere, including North and South America, southern Africa, Australia and New Zealand. The fungus grows in coniferous forests in its native range, and pine plantations in countries where it has become naturalized. It forms symbiotic ectomycorrhizal associations with living trees by enveloping the tree's underground roots with sheaths of fungal tissue. The fruit bodies are often produced in large numbers above ground in summer and autumn.

The mushroom is edible, though not as highly regarded as other boletes. It is commonly prepared and eaten in soups, stews or fried dishes. The slime coating, however, may cause indigestion if not removed before eating. It is often sold as a dried mushroom.

Taxonomy

[edit]

The species was one of the many first described in 1753 by the "father of taxonomy" Carl Linnaeus, who, in the second volume of his Species Plantarum, gave it the name Boletus luteus.[3] The specific epithet is the Latin adjective lūtěus, meaning "yellow".[4] The fungus was reclassified as (and became the type species of) the genus Suillus by French naturalist Henri François Anne de Roussel in 1796.[5] Suillus is an ancient term for fungi, and is derived from swine.[6] In addition to the British Mycological Society approved name "slippery jack",[7] other common names for this bolete include "pine boletus" and "sticky bun"—the latter referring to its resemblance to the pastry.[8]

"Boletus luteus", illustrated by Christiaan Sepp

German naturalist August Batsch described Boletus volvatus (the specific epithet derived from the Latin volva, meaning "sheath", "covering" or "womb")[4] alongside B. luteus in his 1783 work Elenchus Fungorum. Batsch placed both of these species, along with B. bovinus and the now obsolete names Boletus mutabilis and B. canus, in a grouping of similar boletes he called "subordo Suilli".[9] Boletus volvatus is now considered a synonym of Suillus luteus.[2] Several authors have placed the slippery jack in other genera: Finnish mycologist Petter Karsten classified it as Cricunopus luteus in 1881—the genus Cricinopus defined by yellow adnate tubes;[10] Lucien Quélet classified it as Viscipellis luteus in 1886,[11] and Ixocomus luteus in 1888; and Paul Christoph Hennings placed it in the section Cricinopus of the genus Boletopsis in 1900.[12]

In works published before 1987, the slippery jack was written fully as Suillus luteus (L.:Fr.) Gray, as the description by Linnaeus had been name sanctioned in 1821 by the "father of mycology", Swedish naturalist Elias Magnus Fries. The starting date for all the mycota had been set by general agreement as 1 January 1821, the date of Fries's work. Furthermore, as Roussel's description of Suillus predated this as well, the authority for the genus was assigned to British botanist Samuel Frederick Gray in the first volume of his 1821 work A Natural Arrangement of British Plants.[13] The 1987 edition of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature changed the rules on the starting date and primary work for names of fungi, and names can now be considered valid as far back as 1 May 1753, the date of publication of Linnaeus's work.[14] In 1986, a collection of fruit bodies from Sweden was designated as the neotype of Suillus luteus.[15]

In their 1964 monograph on North American Suillus species, Alexander H. Smith and Harry Delbert Thiers classified S. luteus in the series Suilli of the section Suillus in genus Suillus. This group is characterized by the presence of either a ring on the stipe (or stem), a partial veil adhering to the cap margin, or a "false veil" not attached to the stipe but initially covering the tube cavity.[16] Species closely related to Suillus luteus include S. pseudobrevipes (a sister species), S. brevipes and S. weaverae (formerly Fuscoboletinus weaverae).[17] A genetic study of nucleotide DNA reinforced the species' monophyly and low genetic divergence, with material of S. luteus from the United Kingdom, Austria, Germany and North America forming a clade, in contrast with some other species, such as S. granulatus, which were shown to be polyphyletic.[18]

Chemical analysis of pigments and chromogens showed that Suillus was more closely related to Gomphidius and Rhizopogon than to other boletes, and hence Suillus luteus and its allies were transferred from the Boletaceae to the newly circumscribed family Suillaceae in 1997.[19] Molecular studies have reinforced how distantly related these fungi are from Boletus edulis and its allies.[20]

Description

[edit]
Young fruit bodies have a partial veil that encloses the pores.
In maturity, the partial veil rips away from the cap, remaining on the upper stipe as a well-developed, membranous ring.

The cap is chestnut, rusty, olive brown, or dark brown in color with a diameter of 4–10 centimetres (1+1⁄2–4 in), rarely up to 20 cm.[21] The cap has a distinctive conical shape, later flattening out. It is slimy to the touch, bare, smooth, and glossy even when dry, and the cuticle is easily peeled off. The tiny, circular pores of the tubes are initially yellow but turn olive to dark yellow with maturity. Like the skin of the cap, they can be readily peeled away from the flesh.[22]

Tubes comprising the hymenophore on the underside of the cap are 3–7 mm (1⁄8–1⁄4 in) deep, with an attachment to the stipe ranging from adnate to somewhat decurrent. The pores are tiny, numbering 3 per mm in young specimens and 1–2 per mm in maturity.[16] The stipe is 5–10 cm (2–4 in) tall and 2–3 cm (3⁄4–1+1⁄4 in) wide.[23] It is pale yellow and more or less cylindrical but may bear a swollen base. A membranous partial veil initially links the stipe with the edge of the cap. When it ruptures, it forms a membranous, hanging ring.[22] The top side of the ring is whitish, while the underside is characteristically dark brown to violet. This species is one of the few members of the genus Suillus that have such a ring.[22] Above the ring, the stipe features glandular dots—minute clumps of pigmented cells. Below the ring, the stipe is dingy white, sometimes streaked with brownish slime.[24] In humid conditions, the ring has a gelatinous texture.[16] The white flesh of the entire fungus does not discolour when damaged, and is soft—particularly in mature specimens.[22] It has a "pleasant" taste and lacks any distinctive odour.[16]

The spore print is ochre or clay coloured, the elongated elliptical spores measuring 7–10 by 3–3.5 μm.[23] Basidia (spore-producing cells) are four spored, with dimensions of 14–18 by 4–5 μm. Cystidia are present on both the tube faces (pleurocystidia) and edges (cheilocystidia), either scattered or, more rarely, as bundles. They measure 20–35 by 5–7 μm and have a narrow club shape. Clamp connections are not present in the hyphae of S. luteus.[16]

Similar species

[edit]
Suillus granulatus, a frequent lookalike

Good field characteristics for the species include the slimy brown cap, glandular dots on the upper stipe, and prominent purplish ring. A frequent lookalike is S. granulatus, which is another common, widely distributed and edible species occurring in the same habitat; it is yellow fleshed and exudes latex droplets when young, but most conspicuously bears neither a partial veil nor a ring.[25] Other than that, S. luteus is unlikely to be confused with other mushrooms, especially if its preferred habitat under pine trees and the whitish partial veil are considered. In Europe, the related S. grevillei is found under larch and has a yellow cap, while immature fruit bodies of Gomphidius glutinosus may look comparable from above but have gills rather than pores underneath.[22] In North America, Suillus borealis and S. pseudobrevipes also have partial veils, but lack the distinctive ring of S. luteus.[6] S. cothurnatus forms a band-like ring on the stipe that tends to be brownish rather than purplish.[26]

In some specimens of S. luteus, the partial veil separates from the stipe (rather than the cap margin), leaving cottony patches of veil hanging from the cap margin. In this state, fruit bodies can be confused with those of S. albidipes. Unlike S. luteus, however, S. albidipes does not have glandular dots on its stipe.[16]

Distribution and habitat

[edit]
Growing under host tree, Finland

Suillus luteus can be found all over the Northern Hemisphere. Native to Eurasia, it is widespread across the British Isles.[27] To the east it has been recorded from Pakistan, where it was found along canals in Dashkin in the district of Astore,[28] and as far east as South Korea.[25] It has also been widely introduced elsewhere by way of pine plantations around the globe. It is very commonly found in Monterey pine (Pinus radiata) plantations, despite the tree being native to California and hence not in the fungus' native range.[29] In North America it is found in the northeastern, northwestern, and southwestern United States.[6] According to Ernst Both,[30] it was Charles Horton Peck who first suggested in 1887 that the fungus was introduced to the state of New York on Pinus sylvestris.[31] DNA studies show that the North American populations differ little genetically from European populations, supporting the idea that the fungus arrived to North America relatively recently as a result of human activity.[26] Suillus luteus is found in coastal and mountainous pine forests and exhibits a tolerance of the northern latitudes. Southern Hemisphere locales where the slippery jack grow with plantation pines include South America, Africa, Australia, and New Zealand.[32] In southwestern Australia, the bolete is limited to areas of greater than 1000 mm (40 in) annual rainfall.[33] It has been recorded as far north as the Darling Downs and southern Queensland,[34] and occasionally in Tasmania.[35] The fungus fruits in spring, summer and fairly prolifically in autumn, following periods of wet weather. Mushrooms can appear in large troops or fairy rings.[22]

In Ecuador, Pinus radiata plantations were planted extensively around Cotopaxi National Park, and Suillus luteus boletes appear in abundance year-round. A 1985 field study estimated production to be 3000–6000 mushrooms per hectare—up to 1,000 kilograms (2,200 lb) (dry weight) of mushrooms hectare per year. This continuous production contrasts with the bolete's seasonal appearance elsewhere. The fungus is not found in adjacent areas of native vegetation.[36] The fruiting is so bountiful that the harvest of slippery jacks has become the main reason that pine plantations are established or maintained in parts of Ecuador.[37]

In southern Brazil, it has been recorded in plantations of slash pine (P. elliottii) in the municipalities of Pelotas, Nova Petrópolis and Canela in Rio Grande do Sul, and Colombo in Paraná.[38] It is particularly common in plantations in Patagonia.[39] Suillus luteus is the commonest bolete encountered in the Falkland Islands, where it is found in windbreaks and gardens.[40]

In South Africa, Suillus luteus has been occasionally recorded under pines in Bloemfontein, Johannesburg and Royal Natal National Park.[41]

Ecology

[edit]
Depicted on a 1964 Soviet Union postage stamp

Suillus luteus is a pioneer species that typically establishes itself in the early stages of forest succession.[42] The fungus forms mycorrhizal associations with various species of pine, including Scots pine (P. sylvestris), black pine (P. nigra),[43] and Macedonian pine (P. peuce) in Europe,[44][45] and red pine (P. resinosa) and white pine (P. strobus) in North America.[46] An in vitro experiment demonstrated that the species could form an ectomycorrhizal association with Aleppo pine (P. halepensis), a key species used in reforestation in the Mediterranean.[47] A study of the ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with a lodgepole pine (P. contorta) invasion front near Coyhaique, Chile, showed that many invasive trees were supported by S. luteus as the sole mycorrhizal partner.[48]

The ectomycorrhizae formed between the fungus and host plant can be influenced by soil microorganisms present in the mycorrhizosphere. For example, soil bacteria from the genera Paenibacillus and Burkholderia alter the branching structure of the root, whereas Bacillus species increase root growth and mycorrhizal colonization.[49] The fungus does not require a specific soil but seems to prefer acidic and nutrient-deficient soil.[22] Suillus luteus produces hydroxamic acid-based siderophores, which are compounds that can chelate iron and extract it from the soil in nutrient-poor conditions.[50] Ignacio Chapela and colleagues analysed the carbon uptake of S. luteus in Ecuador, concluding pine plantations accompanied by S. luteus deplete carbon stored in the soil and raising concerns that these might not be a remedy for rising carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere.[51]

The fungus has been shown to provide a protective effect against heavy metal toxicity when associated with the host Pinus sylvestris, preventing copper accumulation in the needles, and protecting seedlings against cadmium toxicity.[52][53] Owing to its frequent rate of sexual reproduction and the resulting extensive gene flow within populations, the fungus can rapidly evolve a trait to tolerate otherwise toxic levels of heavy metals in the environment.[54] The genetic basis of this adaptation—intriguing to researchers investigating the bioremediation potential of metal-adapted plants and their fungal associates[55]—are contained in the genome sequence of S. luteus, published in 2015.[56]

Suillus luteus fruit bodies are sometimes infested with larvae, though not nearly as often as S. granulatus or B. edulis.[22] Damage from maggots is much more common in warmer months, and rare late in the season with cooler weather.[27] In a Finnish study, researchers found that 70–95% of fruit bodies collected from typical forest habitats were infested with larvae; the most common species were the flies Mycetophila fungorum, Pegomya deprimata, and Pegohylemyia silvatica.[57] In contrast, other studies have shown that fruit bodies collected from pine plantations are relatively free of larvae.[58] The fungus produces microscopic crystals of oxalic acid at the surface of its hyphae, a feature that is thought to help deter grazing by the springtail species Folsomia candida.[59]

Edibility

[edit]
Slippery jack mushrooms collected in Ukraine

Suillus luteus is an edible mushroom, but the slime/pileipellis must be removed.[60][61] Although some authors regard it as one of low quality,[6][62] and generally inferior to co-occurring species such as Boletus pinophilus,[63] the species is considered a delicacy in Slavic cultures (known as maslyata in Russian or maslyuky in Ukrainian or maślaki in Polish, deriving from words meaning "buttery"). It was highly regarded in Calabria, even more than Boletus edulis, until the 1940s when increased interest in the latter species eclipsed the former.[64] Mushrooms conforming to Suillus luteus are exported from Chile to Italy,[64] and, since the 1970s, the United States.[65] As of 2002, harvesters in Chile were paid on average US$0.5 per kilogram of fruit bodies.[66]

In Burundi, Suillus luteus mushrooms are sold to Europeans as cepes in Bujumbura but not generally eaten by the Barundi.[67] Based on samples collected from Chile, the boletes contain (as a percentage of dry weight) 20% protein, 57% carbohydrates, 6% fat, and 6% ash.[68] Pinus radiata plantations in southeastern Australia have become tourist attractions as people flock to them in autumn to pick slippery jacks and saffron milk-caps (Lactarius deliciosus);[69] Belanglo State Forest in particular has attracted large numbers of Polish foragers.[70]

Slippery jacks do not keep for long after picking,[22] Zeitmar considers them unsuitable for drying,[21] as their water content is too high. They are suited for frying,[21] or cooking in stews and soups, either alone or with other mushroom species.[71] Puréeing the mushroom is not recommended, however: "We once made the mistake of running it through a blender to make a soup. The result was a substance recommending itself for use when hanging wallpaper."[26] S. luteus and other Suillus species may cause allergic reactions in some people[72] or digestive problems that appear to result from consuming the slimy skin.[26] The fungus is better cooked before eating, and some authors recommend discarding the glutinous cuticle and tubes before cooking.[24][73] Moreover, the skin can spoil other fungi with which slippery jacks are collected.[21]

Inexpensive powdered S. luteus fruit bodies are sometimes added to the more expensive B. edulis mushroom soup powder, a fraudulent practice that is difficult to detect by microscope because the tissues are no longer intact.[74] This adulteration can be determined chemically, however, by testing for increased levels of the sugar alcohols arabitol and mannitol.[75] The practice can also be determined with a DNA-based method that is sensitive enough to detect the addition of 1–2% of S. luteus to B. edulis powder.[76]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Suillus luteus

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Suillus luteus, commonly known as the slippery jack or pine bolete, is an ectomycorrhizal bolete fungus in the family Suillaceae, distinguished by its viscid, reddish-brown to yellow-brown cap measuring 4–12 cm in diameter, pale yellow pores that darken with age, and a yellowish stem 3–10 cm long adorned with glandular dots and a partial veil remnant that often stains purplish-brown. This species forms symbiotic associations primarily with pines (Pinus spp.), aiding in nutrient absorption for the host trees while deriving carbohydrates in return, and it fruits gregariously in late summer to fall in coniferous forests. Native to Eurasia, it has been introduced worldwide through pine plantations, making it one of the most widespread members of the genus Suillus. Taxonomically, S. luteus belongs to the order Boletales within the phylum Basidiomycota, with the species first described as Boletus luteus by Carl Linnaeus in 1753 and later reclassified under Suillus by Samuel Frederick Gray in 1821; it serves as the type species for the genus. Morphologically, the cap is convex to plane, often radially streaked and glutinous when moist, while the flesh is pale yellow to white and does not change color when cut. The pore surface features 2–4 angular pores per millimeter, and microscopically, the spores are ellipsoid, measuring 6–10 × 2–2.5 µm, with cylindrical cystidia present. Synonyms include Ixocomus luteus and Boletus luteus. Ecologically, S. luteus plays a crucial role in forest ecosystems as an ectomycorrhizal partner, enhancing pine resistance to environmental stresses such as drought and heavy metals, and it is often found in acidic, sandy soils under species like Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris), red pine (Pinus resinosa), and eastern white pine (Pinus strobus). Its distribution spans northern temperate and boreal regions of Europe, Asia, and North America, with introductions to the Southern Hemisphere via commercial forestry, where it supports pine invasions and influences soil microbial communities. The fungus is also notable for hosting a diverse virome, including up to 33 mycoviruses, some potentially transmissible to other organisms, which may impact its ecological interactions. Although considered edible and commercially valuable after thorough cooking—often with the slimy cap skin removed to avoid digestive upset—S. luteus should be identified carefully to distinguish it from similar, potentially toxic boletes. The genus Suillus is emerging as a model for studying ectomycorrhizal evolution and ecology due to its specificity to Pinaceae hosts and abundance in managed forests.

Taxonomy

Classification

Suillus luteus was first described by Carl Linnaeus in his Species Plantarum in 1753 under the name Boletus luteus, placing it within the broad genus Boletus that encompassed many boletes at the time. This original description highlighted its yellow pores and association with pines, though without the detailed microscopic analysis common in modern taxonomy. The basionym Boletus luteus L. remains the foundational name for the species. The genus Suillus was first proposed by French naturalist Henri François Anne de Roussel in 1796, who reclassified the fungus as Suillus luteus (L.), but it was validly published by Samuel Frederick Gray in 1821 as Suillus luteus (L. : Fr.), with the name sanctioned by Elias Magnus Fries. This transfer recognized distinguishing features such as the glutinous cap and partial veil forming a ring, separating it from other Boletus species. Suillus luteus serves as the type species for the genus Suillus, defining its morphological and ecological archetype. Several historical synonyms exist, including Boletus volvatus Batsch (1783) and Ixocomus luteus (L.) Quél., reflecting early taxonomic variations based on veil remnants and cap texture. The taxonomic placement of Suillus luteus evolved further with advances in molecular systematics. In 1997, Helmut Besl and Andreas Bresinsky established the family Suillaceae to accommodate Suillus and related genera, based on chemotaxonomic analyses of pigments and molecular markers like rDNA sequences, distinguishing it from the Boletaceae. This reclassification positioned Suillus luteus within the order Boletales, suborder Suillineae, emphasizing its phylogenetic distance from classic boletes like Boletus edulis. Subsequent multigene phylogenies, incorporating ITS, LSU, and protein-coding loci, confirm its basal placement in the Suillaceae clade, underscoring ectomycorrhizal adaptations with Pinaceae hosts. As of 2022, Suillus luteus is assessed as Least Concern on the IUCN Red List (assessed 2020, errata version published 2022), reflecting its widespread distribution, stable populations, and lack of significant threats in native and introduced ranges.

Etymology

The genus name Suillus derives from the Latin word sus, meaning "pig" or "swine," alluding to the slimy, greasy texture of the caps in species of this genus, which resembles pigskin. The specific epithet luteus is a Latin adjective meaning "yellow" or "muddy yellow," referring to the characteristic yellowish hue of the mushroom's cap and pore surface. In English-speaking countries, Suillus luteus is commonly known as slippery jack, due to the viscid cap, or sticky bun, evoking its glutinous appearance and the bun-like shape of the fruiting body; regional variations include names like "pine bolete" in North America.

Description

Macroscopic features

The fruiting body of Suillus luteus, commonly known as the slippery jack, is a robust bolete characterized by its slimy cap and glandular-dotted stipe, typically forming in late summer to autumn under conifers. The cap (pileus) measures 4–10 cm in diameter, rarely exceeding 12 cm, with a convex to broadly convex shape when young that flattens with age, often retaining an inrolled margin. Its surface is glutinous to viscid when moist, becoming shiny and bald when dry, and features a reddish-brown to yellow-brown coloration, sometimes darker at the center and radially streaked, fading to tan in maturity. The stipe (stem) is 3–12 cm long and 1–3 cm thick, usually equal or slightly tapered at the base, with a pale yellow to whitish hue that may brown below, adorned with prominent cinnamon-brown glandular dots. A distinctive partial veil forms a prominent, often flaring ring near the midpoint, initially white and gelatinous, which darkens to purple, violet, or purplish-gray with age and may collapse into a skirt-like structure. The flesh is pale yellow to white, firm in the stipe and softer in the cap, unchanging when exposed. The hymenophore consists of angular to round pores, 1–4 per mm, that are adnate to slightly decurrent, starting pale yellow and deepening to olive-brown or grayish yellow with maturity; the tubes beneath are 3–10 mm deep and whitish to pale yellow when young. Slime production is notable on the cap surface during wet conditions, contributing to the species' slippery texture, while overall color shifts from vibrant yellows and browns in youth to duller, more subdued tones as the fruiting body matures. The spore print is ochre.

Microscopic features

The basidiospores of Suillus luteus are smooth, boletoid-fusiform to elliptic in shape, measuring 7–10 × 2.5–3.5 μm, and produce a cinnamon-brown to ochraceous spore print. Under microscopy, they appear hyaline to pale yellowish in KOH and nearly hyaline with a pronounced sheath in Melzer's reagent. Basidia are subclavate to clavate, four-sterigmate, and typically 14–24 × 4–7.7 μm in size, appearing yellowish in both KOH and Melzer's reagent. Pleurocystidia and cheilocystidia occur on the hymenial surfaces and tube edges, often in gelatinized bundles that may be abundant or rare; they are cylindric to clavate or fusiform, thin-walled, smooth, and measure 20–75 × 4–12 μm, with brownish contents in KOH. Caulocystidia on the stipe surface form fascicles with bister-like contents, contributing to the gelatinous texture. The hyphal structure includes a gelatinous tube trama with divergent hyphae and an interwoven, hyaline, non-amyloid pileus trama; the pileipellis is an ixocutis of narrow (2–4 μm), tangled, gelatinous filaments that are hyaline in KOH and pale yellowish in Melzer's. Clamp connections are absent throughout. The partial veil, composed of gelatinous hyphae and cystidial elements, leaves membranous to cottony ring remnants on the stipe, a trait reinforced microscopically by the clustered caulocystidia. Within the genus Suillus, S. luteus is distinguished by its combination of gelatinized cystidial bundles, ixocutis pileipellis, and lack of clamp connections, alongside the subfusiform spores and four-spored basidia without amyloid reactions.

Similar species

Suillus luteus can be distinguished from the closely related Suillus grevillei primarily by the presence of a partial veil that leaves a prominent ring or annular zone on the stipe, whereas S. grevillei lacks any such veil or ring remnant. Both species have viscid to slimy caps when moist, but S. grevillei is typically associated with larch trees rather than pines, providing a habitat-based differentiation. Another similar species, Suillus bovinus, shares the slimy cap texture and pine habitat with S. luteus, but it lacks the partial veil and ring, and its pores are larger, darker (often cinnamon to brown), and more boletinoid in appearance. The absence of the ring and the pore coloration serve as key macroscopic identifiers to separate S. bovinus from S. luteus. Suillus luteus differs from non-Suillus boletes such as Boletus edulis in several features: its cap is distinctly slimy when wet, unlike the dry, smooth cap of B. edulis, and it possesses a partial veil remnant on the stipe, which B. edulis lacks. Additionally, the pores of S. luteus are yellow and angular, contrasting with the white to cream pores of B. edulis that mature to yellow-brown, and S. luteus is more strictly associated with pines. The combination of cap slime, stipe ring, and exclusive pine mycorrhizae reliably avoids confusion with B. edulis.

Distribution and habitat

Native range

Suillus luteus is native to Eurasia, with its original distribution extending across Europe from Ireland and the British Isles eastward to Russia, and into Asia as far as Korea, primarily in temperate climatic zones where coniferous forests predominate. This range reflects its adaptation to cool, moist environments associated with pine-dominated woodlands. Within its native habitats, S. luteus exhibits high density, particularly in stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris), where it can form extensive fruiting aggregations during autumn, contributing to its status as one of the most abundant boletes in these forests across Europe and western Asia. For instance, in Scandinavian and central European pine plantations, fruiting bodies often emerge in clusters, reflecting the fungus's strong ectomycorrhizal affinity with P. sylvestris. This abundance has been noted in ecological surveys of temperate pine ecosystems, emphasizing its role as a characteristic species in these regions.

Introduced range

Suillus luteus has been introduced to multiple continents outside its native Eurasian range, primarily through human activities associated with pine forestry. These introductions occurred via the transport of pine seedlings or soil containing fungal spores and mycelium, often as part of reforestation and plantation establishment efforts dating back to the 19th century. In North America, the fungus is now widespread, particularly in the Pacific Northwest, where it forms associations with introduced pine species such as Pinus contorta and Pinus ponderosa in managed forests and plantations. It likely arrived with European pine stock used in reforestation projects, and it has become a common sight under these trees in regions like British Columbia and Oregon. The species has also established in South America, notably in pine plantations of Argentina, Chile, Ecuador, and Peru. In Patagonian Pinus ponderosa stands in Argentina, S. luteus is a dominant ectomycorrhizal partner, with fructification influenced by factors like low canopy cover, high soil moisture, and herbaceous understory, leading to variable but substantial production in suitable conditions. In Ecuador, it occurs abundantly in Pinus radiata plantations near areas like Cotopaxi National Park. Introductions to Australia and New Zealand took place in the mid-19th century, coinciding with the establishment of exotic pine plantations, particularly Pinus radiata and Pinus contorta. The fungus is now well-established in these managed forests, where it supports pine growth. It has also been introduced to southern Africa via similar pine plantation efforts. In non-native regions, S. luteus maintains a stable presence in pine-dominated ecosystems but exhibits potential invasiveness by aiding the expansion of non-native pines beyond plantations. Its spores disperse via wind and animal mycophagy, enabling colonization of natural habitats and contributing to broader pine invasions, as observed in Patagonia, New Zealand, and other areas.

Ecology

Ectomycorrhizal associations

Suillus luteus primarily forms ectomycorrhizal associations with species in the genus Pinus, particularly two-needle pines such as Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine) and Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine). These symbiotic relationships involve the fungal hyphae enveloping the short roots of pine seedlings to create a protective mantle and penetrating between root cortical cells to form the Hartig net, facilitating bidirectional nutrient exchange where the fungus supplies phosphorus and nitrogen to the host tree in return for carbohydrates. The fungus exhibits high host specificity, showing strong compatibility with two-needle pines while demonstrating limited or incompatible interactions with other pine subgroups or non-pine hosts. As an early colonizer, S. luteus is particularly effective in disturbed or stressed environments, such as mine spoils or nutrient-poor soils, where it aids pine establishment by rapidly forming associations that enhance seedling survival and growth. Recent research from 2024 highlights differential development strategies in the association between S. luteus and Pinus massoniana, where inoculation promotes plant growth and root colonization under varying nutrient conditions, though mature ectomycorrhizal structures like fully developed Hartig nets are not always observed; instead, mycelial networks and partial Hartig net-like formations support enhanced biomass accumulation and trace element uptake.

Ecological roles

Suillus luteus plays a significant role in iron acquisition within forest ecosystems by producing hydroxamate siderophores, such as fusigen, ferricrocin, and coprogen, which chelate iron and facilitate its uptake for both the fungus and its pine hosts. These siderophores enhance nutrient availability in iron-limited soils, contributing to improved plant growth and fungal metabolism. The fungus also provides protection to pine trees against heavy metal toxicity in contaminated environments. For instance, cadmium-tolerant strains of S. luteus reduce Cd uptake in pine seedlings by immobilizing the metal in extraradical mycelium, thereby alleviating toxicity symptoms. Similarly, zinc-tolerant ecotypes counteract Cd and Zn toxicity by enhancing phosphorus uptake and limiting metal translocation to pine shoots, enabling better survival in polluted soils. This protective function extends to other metals like copper, where adapted isolates maintain pine vigor under elevated Cu levels. Additionally, S. luteus inoculation has been shown to confer aluminum tolerance to Pinus massoniana seedlings under Al stress by promoting growth and limiting Al uptake, as demonstrated in a 2025 study. In soil nutrient cycling, S. luteus contributes to the decomposition of organic matter, particularly through protease activity that mobilizes nitrogen and other nutrients, supporting forest ecosystem productivity. As an early-stage ectomycorrhizal partner in pine plantations, it facilitates forest succession by promoting initial tree establishment in nutrient-poor or disturbed sites, influencing fungal community dynamics and soil health. Recent research from 2023 to 2025 has highlighted additional ecological insights. A virome analysis of S. luteus revealed a diverse array of mycoviruses, including novel partitiviruses and fusariviruses, suggesting potential evolutionary implications for fungal adaptation and host interactions. The genus Suillus, including S. luteus, has emerged as a model system for studying ectomycorrhizal ecology, with genomic resources enabling investigations into symbiosis evolution, nutrient cycling, and community assembly. A 2025 study in Inner Mongolia examined diversity drivers of Suillus communities in Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica forests, identifying soil pH, moisture, and phosphorus as key factors influencing species richness and distribution across gradients. Due to its prevalence in metal-polluted young pine plantations, S. luteus shows potential as a bioindicator for assessing soil contamination levels, particularly zinc and cadmium, aiding in monitoring environmental health in afforested areas.

Reproduction and life cycle

Suillus luteus reproduces sexually via basidiospores produced on the hymenium of its fruiting bodies, which typically emerge in late summer to autumn in association with pine hosts. The fungus employs a bipolar mating system, characterized by a single mating-type locus with multiple alleles, promoting high outcrossing rates among compatible homokaryons derived from germinated spores. This system ensures genetic diversity, as evidenced by trans-specific polymorphism at the homeodomain (HD) mating-type locus and excess heterozygosity in natural populations. Fruiting bodies often develop gregariously in troops or, less commonly, in fairy rings, facilitating efficient spore release. Basidiospores are dispersed primarily by wind, enabling long-distance transport up to 1000 meters from source populations, while animals contribute through mycophagy, with viable spores recovered from fecal matter of mammals such as deer and rodents. These spores form persistent soil banks, remaining viable for years and supporting rapid colonization of new pine seedlings. The life cycle commences with basidiospore germination, yielding monokaryotic primary mycelium that extends along pine roots. Upon mating of compatible strains, dikaryotic secondary mycelium forms, establishing ectomycorrhizal associations and producing rhizomorphs for resource exploration. Environmental cues trigger primordia formation from aggregated hyphae, leading to maturation of fruiting bodies within days to weeks, completing the cycle through renewed spore production. Sequencing of the S. luteus genome in 2015 has advanced understanding of its reproductive genetics, revealing genes involved in mating compatibility, spore development, and symbiotic interactions that underpin its life cycle dynamics.

Edibility and uses

Culinary preparation

Suillus luteus, commonly known as the slippery jack, is considered edible but of low culinary quality due to its slimy texture and mild flavor. To prevent gastric upset, the glutinous cap skin must be removed before cooking, along with the porous tubes underneath if present. Once peeled, the mushroom can be sliced and prepared by frying, which helps to dry out the moisture and enhance its subtle, nutty taste. Common culinary applications include incorporating it into soups, stews, or mixed vegetable dishes, where its spongy texture absorbs flavors without overpowering them. The mushroom improves in palatability with age or drying, as the slime diminishes and the aroma develops richer, woodsy notes suitable for powders in sauces or broths. For optimal harvesting, foragers should target young specimens with intact veils, typically found in pine forests during late summer to fall, as older ones become excessively slimy and prone to insect damage. In Europe, it holds regional popularity among wild mushroom enthusiasts, particularly in Eastern European traditions like Polish foraging for use in barley soups, and in Scandinavian cuisine where it is known as smörsopp and added to hearty fried potato dishes.

Nutritional value

_Suillus luteus fruiting bodies, when analyzed on a dry weight basis, consist of approximately 20% protein, 57% carbohydrates, 4% fat, and 6% ash. This composition highlights its role as a nutrient-dense food source, with carbohydrates forming the predominant macronutrient and protein content comparable to many legumes. The low fat level contributes to its suitability for low-calorie diets. The mushroom is particularly rich in essential minerals, including potassium and phosphorus. Potassium concentrations can reach up to 47,700 mg/kg dry matter in the cap flesh, while phosphorus is present in significant amounts as one of the major elements, often enriched relative to soil levels. These minerals support various physiological functions, such as electrolyte balance and bone health. Fresh Suillus luteus is a good source of B vitamins, including thiamine (B1), riboflavin (B2), niacin (B3), and pyridoxine (B6), though levels can vary with environmental factors and processing. Caloric value is low, typically around 25–35 kcal per 100 g of fresh weight, aligning with its high moisture content exceeding 85%. Beyond macronutrients and vitamins, Suillus luteus contains bioactive compounds such as polysaccharides, which exhibit potential antioxidant and immunomodulatory properties. Acid-extracted polysaccharides from the fruiting bodies have been characterized for their structural features, including glucose-rich backbones. These compounds contribute to its inclusion in some commercial mushroom powders marketed for nutritional supplements.

Potential risks and benefits

Suillus luteus is generally regarded as non-toxic and safe for consumption when properly identified and prepared, though it has been implicated in a significant portion of reported mushroom poisonings, primarily manifesting as gastrointestinal disturbances such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. In a study analyzing 457 cases of mushroom poisoning in Poland, 400 involved edible species including S. luteus, often linked to mild to moderate gastric upset rather than severe toxicity. These symptoms are frequently attributed to the mushroom's high content of mucilaginous substances in the cap and pores, which can cause indigestion if not removed by peeling and discarding the tubes before cooking. Additionally, like many edible mushrooms, S. luteus may pose risks for individuals with allergies or sensitivities, potentially triggering reactions ranging from mild discomfort to anaphylaxis, though specific cases for this species are rare and not well-documented. Misidentification remains a key safety concern, as S. luteus can be confused with other boletes, some of which exhibit red staining or other features indicative of toxicity, such as species in the Boletus genus containing potentially harmful compounds. While no deadly look-alikes are commonly reported for S. luteus, foragers are advised to confirm the absence of blue bruising, the presence of a partial veil remnant, and association with pines to avoid errors. On the benefits side, recent research highlights the antioxidant potential of S. luteus extracts, with ethyl acetate fractions demonstrating strong free radical scavenging activity against DPPH and ABTS radicals, achieving EC₅₀ values of 0.15% and 0.23%, respectively, attributed to phenolic compounds. These properties suggest possible protective effects against oxidative stress, though clinical applications remain unexplored due to limited medicinal studies on the species. Extracts also exhibit antimicrobial activity, supporting their use in biopreservation techniques; fermentation with lactic acid bacteria like Liquorilactobacillus uvarum LUHS245 has shown efficacy in inhibiting molds and yeasts, reducing microbial loads in mushroom preparations. Regarding conservation, S. luteus holds a Least Concern status on the IUCN Red List, reflecting its widespread abundance in coniferous forests and plantations with no major threats identified. Sustainable foraging is encouraged, emphasizing selective harvesting to preserve mycelial networks and avoiding overcollection in localized areas to support ecological balance.

References

  1. https://www.mushroomexpert.com/suillus_luteus.html
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10470027/
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4206787/
  4. https://www.first-nature.com/fungi/suillus-luteus.php
  5. https://www.indexfungorum.org/names/NamesRecord.asp?RecordID=120823
  6. https://www.speciesfungorum.org/Names/SynSpecies.asp?RecordID=120823
  7. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00987949
  8. https://redlist.info/iucn/species_view/120823
  9. https://sites.google.com/site/scottishfungi/species-profiles/suillus-grevillei-larch-bolete
  10. http://www.mobot.org/mobot/latindict/keyDetail.aspx?keyWord=luteus
  11. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/luteous
  12. https://www.mushroom-appreciation.com/slippery-jacks.html
  13. https://www.mykoweb.com/boletes/species/Suillus_luteus.html
  14. https://sites.google.com/site/scottishfungi/species-profiles/suillus-luteus-slippery-jack
  15. https://www.mushroomexpert.com/suillus.html
  16. https://www.foragingcoursecompany.co.uk/post/foraging-guide-slippery-jack
  17. https://www.griby.org/en/suillus_luteus.htm
  18. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3962&context=etd
  19. https://pringlelab.botany.wisc.edu/pubs/Towards%2520management%2520of%2520invasive%2520ectomycorrhizal%2520fungi.pdf
  20. https://linnet.geog.ubc.ca/Atlas/Atlas.aspx?sciname=Suillus%2520luteus
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112708005690
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352264279_Understanding_introduction_history_Genetic_structure_and_diversity_of_the_edible_ectomycorrhizal_fungus_Suillus_luteus_in_Patagonia_Argentina
  23. https://www.herbazest.com/fungi/slippery-jack
  24. https://fungimap.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Australian-Suillus-identification.pdf
  25. https://teara.govt.nz/en/exotic-forestry/page-2
  26. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.15660
  27. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.70608
  28. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1890/14-1100.1
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5065116/
  30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016864960100215X
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11697944/
  32. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/AEM.71.11.7279-7284.2005
  33. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10080587
  34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20981471/
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0269749109000025
  36. https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02082.x
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1287625/
  38. https://bmcplantbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12870-024-06026-z
  39. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/AEM.03191-15
  40. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/13/12/2162
  41. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-and-infection-microbiology/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1229859/full
  42. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.19700
  43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12412363/
  44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/suillus-luteus
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11045321/
  46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0953756209812653
  47. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267743625_Molecular_Taxonomical_Re-classification_of_the_Genus_Suillus_Micheli_ex_S_F_Gray_in_South_Korea
  48. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/GCA_000827255.1
  49. https://totallywilduk.co.uk/2022/03/04/slippery-jack-suillus-luteus-identification/
  50. https://foragerchef.com/the-original-slippery-jack-suillus-luteus/
  51. https://zombiemyco.com/pages/slippery-jack-suillus-luteus
  52. https://lacasadelassetas.com/blog/en/suillus-luteus-delicious-sticky-ringed-boletus/
  53. https://www.fao.org/4/y5489e/y5489e08.htm
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0009254118301311
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002364381400471X
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141813024069460
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7599650/
  58. https://www.fs.usda.gov/nrs/pubs/gtr/gtr_nrs79.pdf
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11988316/
  60. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/11/12/1800
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342410834_ANTIOXIDANT_ANTIMICROBIAL_AND_ANTI-PROLIFERATIVE_ACTIVITY_OF_SUILLUS_LUTEUS_L_ROUSSEL_EXTRACTS_SUILLUS_LUTEUS_LROUSSEL_EKSTRESI%27NIN_ANTIOKSIDAN_ANTIMIKROBIYAL_VE_ANTI-PROLIFERATIF_AKTIVITESI
  62. https://colfungi.org/taxon/urn:lsid:indexfungorum.org:names:120823/general-information
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.