Hubbry Logo
TERPROMTERPROMMain
Open search
TERPROM
Community hub
TERPROM
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
TERPROM
TERPROM
TERPROM
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

TERPROM (terrain profile matching) is a military navigation Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS) employed on aircraft and missiles, which uses stored digital elevation data combined with navigation system and radar altimeter inputs to compute the location of an aircraft or missile above the surface of the Earth. It is also used as a warning system to prevent aircraft from flying too close to the ground. The acronym TERPROM has become a trademark in its own right.[citation needed]

TERPROM was initially conceived in 1977 within the Bristol-based Guided Weapons New Projects Office of British Aerospace as a private venture project. The private venture status continued until the mid-1980s. British Aerospace later received a MoD funded contract to advise the Government on the development options and applications of tactical cruise missiles. [citation needed]

TERPROM utilises Terrain Referenced Navigation to provide aircraft with a Predictive Ground Collision Avoidance System (PGCAS) as well as Obstruction Warning and Cueing (OWC)

TERPROM is produced by Atlantic Inertial Systems, Plymouth, UK, formerly a subsidiary of BAE Systems, acquired in December 2009 by Goodrich Corporation, itself bought by United Technologies Corporation in 2012 branded as Collins Aerospace.[1] As of 2020, the company merged with Raytheon to become Raytheon Technologies (RTX).

TERPROM has been fitted, and used operationally, on the following platforms:

Customised versions are available for fixed wing fast jet, fixed wing transport, rotary wing and missile platforms.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

TERPROM

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
TERPROM (Terrain Profile Matching) is a digital terrain system employed in military aviation for terrain-referenced navigation and ground proximity warning, utilizing stored digital terrain elevation data alongside aircraft navigation inputs and radar altimeter measurements to deliver precise positioning and controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) protection. Developed specifically for tactical military operations, TERPROM integrates inertial and GPS data with pre-loaded terrain maps to enable functions such as Referenced Navigation (TRN), which correlates real-time altitude profiles with digital elevation models for accurate guidance in GPS-denied environments. It also incorporates advanced safety features, including the Predictive Ground (PGCAS) for early warnings of potential terrain impacts and Advanced Terrain Avoidance Cueing (ATAC) to assist pilots in low-level flight maneuvers. Additional capabilities encompass Obstruction and Wires Warning and Cueing (OWWC) for hazard detection, Database Terrain Following (DBTF) for automated low-altitude routing, air-to-ground ranging, and Awareness Display (TAD) for enhanced on cockpit interfaces. In production since 1991, TERPROM has been adopted by 26 nations worldwide (as of 2024) and integrated into more than 5,000 , including fast jets, transporters, pilot trainers, and rotary-wing platforms. Available as either a with external map storage or a self-contained (LRU), the system supports operations in challenging terrains like urban areas and flights, reducing reliance on while improving mission safety and tactical effectiveness. Ongoing developments include support for higher-resolution Digital Terrain Elevation Data (DTED) Level 2, integration with forward-looking sensors for real-time terrain mapping, and enhancements to PGCAS for (Auto GCAS) compatibility.

History and Development

Origins and Conception

TERPROM, a terrain-referenced system, was conceived in the mid-1970s by (BAe) as part of efforts to develop advanced guidance technologies for military applications, with initial work tied to the Long Range Stand Off Missile (LRSOM) project in 1975 and further conceptualization around 1977 for terrain-aided during low-level flights. This initiative emerged within BAe's guided weapons division, focusing on creating a system capable of providing precise positioning without reliance on external signals like GPS, which was not yet mature or ubiquitous for military use. The primary motivations for TERPROM's development stemmed from the demands of covert military operations, particularly for aircraft and missiles operating at low altitudes to evade enemy radar detection and leverage terrain masking for survivability. In contested environments, traditional inertial navigation systems (INS) suffered from cumulative drift over extended missions, limiting their effectiveness for terrain-following maneuvers in adverse weather or nighttime conditions, while a lack of real-time terrain awareness increased risks of ground collision or navigational errors. Early challenges in conceiving TERPROM included ensuring compatibility with existing INS hardware, achieving reliable performance over varied s—particularly flat or featureless areas where profile matching was degraded—and integrating high-resolution digital terrain elevation data without excessive computational demands. These issues were addressed through initial flight trials on platforms like the , , and Jetstream aircraft between 1975 and 1980, laying the groundwork for real-time implementation. The project transitioned from private venture efforts to formal support via a () contract in the early to mid-1980s, specifically aimed at applications in tactical cruise missiles, which provided the necessary funding and collaboration to advance prototyping and integration with military systems. This backing enabled further trials, including those on Tornado aircraft in 1988-1989, marking the shift toward operational viability.

Key Milestones and Evolution

The prototype development of TERPROM in the marked the initial integration of radar altimeters with digital elevation models (DEMs) to enable profile matching for low-altitude . Flight trials commenced in 1980 aboard and aircraft, incorporating inertial systems, continuous-wave reference altimeters, and Vinten cameras for data capture, with real-time route processing using magnetic and cassette tapes. By 1985, the system had been delivered to for F-16 evaluations, focusing on night attack and low-cost enhancements, while trials on the at Boscombe Down demonstrated robust performance in and following. In the , TERPROM transitioned to production in under Atlantic Inertial Systems, with operational testing on military platforms such as the and helicopter, achieving high reliability in tactical scenarios. Expansion to international partners included 1987 trials with the Royal Netherlands Air Force's F-16 Night Falcon program and 1989 evaluations on US F-16s in , yielding position accuracies of 20-30 meters. The mid- saw the development of the TERPROM TAWS variant for , broadening its application across fixed-wing and rotary platforms while maintaining selection by 14 nations for over 5,000 installations worldwide. The 2000s brought evolutionary upgrades to TERPROM, including tighter integration with inertial navigation systems (INS) for continuous position corrections and the refinement of correlation algorithms to enhance matching precision in varied terrains. These advancements supported broader in fast jets, transports, and helicopters, leveraging stored DEMs and aircraft sensor inputs for improved tactical utility. Ownership shifted when Atlantic Inertial Systems, a former subsidiary and TERPROM producer in Plymouth, UK, was acquired by in December 2009 for $375 million. Goodrich itself was acquired by Corporation in July 2012, integrating TERPROM into . Further corporate evolution occurred in November 2018 when UTC acquired , merging operations to form , which continued TERPROM development. The 2020 merger of UTC and created Raytheon Technologies. In July 2023, Raytheon Technologies rebranded as , under which continues to oversee the system as of 2025. As of 2025, enhancements emphasize GPS-denied operations, employing terrain-referenced navigation with Kalman filter-based for drift-free positioning and low-level flight, alongside support for higher-resolution map data.

System Components

Hardware Elements

The core sensors in TERPROM systems primarily include a , which provides real-time measurements of the aircraft's height above the terrain by emitting radio waves and analyzing the reflected signals to determine elevation profiles. This sensor is essential for acquiring accurate, low-altitude terrain data during flight. Additionally, TERPROM integrates with the aircraft's (INS) to obtain position estimates, combining INS-derived baro-inertial altitude above mean with radar altimeter inputs for enhanced accuracy. Processing units in TERPROM consist of embedded computers housed within a self-contained (LRU), designed for real-time terrain correlation computations. These units handle the intensive processing of sensor data against stored digital elevation models, such as formats, using onboard memory for map storage to support navigation updates. Interfaces for TERPROM ensure seamless compatibility with aircraft , including support for and buses to exchange data with navigation systems, as well as analog/video outputs for pilot displays and cueing. These interfaces enable the system to receive INS and altimeter inputs while providing terrain-referenced position corrections and warnings. TERPROM hardware features a ruggedized suited for applications, operating in environmental conditions typical of high-performance .

Software and Data Integration

TERPROM relies on high-resolution digital databases to perform its terrain-based computations, primarily utilizing the global standard developed by the (NGA) and other agencies. These databases provide profiles essential for matching real-world with stored maps, with DTED levels offering varying resolutions to balance accuracy and storage needs: Level 1 at approximately 100-meter post spacing for broad coverage and Level 2 at 30 meters for enhanced detail in operational areas. Recent upgrades to the TERPROM core have incorporated DTED Level 2 as standard, with ongoing developments enabling integration of higher-resolution data variants to improve performance in complex terrains. The software architecture of TERPROM is designed for flexibility and efficiency, available either as a standalone software suite or integrated into a self-contained (LRU) for hardware deployment. This modular approach facilitates updates to algorithms and databases without overhauling the entire system, supporting real-time processing of elevation profiles extracted from onboard storage. The system processes terrain data at rates sufficient for tactical operations, typically correlating profiles in milliseconds to generate solutions, with optimized to hold mission-specific subsets for reduced latency and power consumption. Integration protocols in TERPROM enable seamless fusion with external navigation systems, including GPS when available for initial positioning or hybrid modes, and for velocity inputs that enhance profile alignment during low-altitude flight. These protocols incorporate error modeling to account for database inaccuracies, such as discrepancies up to several meters, by estimating uncertainties in both the primary navigation source (e.g., INS) and the terrain map through techniques like Kalman filtering, thereby refining position estimates in GPS-denied environments. This data handling ensures robust performance by cross-validating inputs from radar altimeters and other sensors against the stored profiles.

Operational Principles

Terrain Profile Matching Process

The Terrain Profile Matching Process in TERPROM involves generating a linear sequence of terrain height measurements from the aircraft's flight path and comparing it against pre-stored digital elevation models (DEMs) to determine the most accurate position. Radar altimeter data provides real-time above-ground-level (AGL) altitudes, which are subtracted from barometric or (INS) derived mean (MSL) altitudes to yield terrain clearance profiles along the track. This creates a one-dimensional "profile" representing variations, often within a defined search area analogous to a narrowing of probable positions to efficiently limit computational scope. The matching technique employs correlation analysis to align the measured profile with candidate profiles extracted from the DEM, identifying the location that minimizes differences or residuals between observed and predicted heights. In acquisition mode, TERPROM uses a batch-processing approach similar to Terrain Contour Matching (TERCOM), where multiple altimeter samples form the profile and are compared across a region of interest using metrics like Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD). The best-fit position is selected as the one yielding the lowest residual error, effectively estimating lateral and along-track offsets from the INS-provided initial position. Position error estimation relies on cross-correlation functions to quantify profile similarity. For a measured height profile h(t)h(t) and mapped data m(t)m(t), the R(τ)R(\tau) at shift τ\tau (corresponding to position offset) is given by: R(τ)=∫h(t)⋅m(t+τ) dtR(\tau) = \int h(t) \cdot m(t + \tau) \, dt The τ\tau maximizing R(τ)R(\tau) indicates the alignment, with residuals minimized to refine positioning accuracy. In practice, discrete sums replace the for sampled data, and extensions handle two-dimensional searches for cross-track errors. Following acquisition, the system transitions to a track mode using recursive filtering, such as an , to continuously update the position. Matches occur cyclically every 1 to 5 seconds, depending on and sensor rates, integrating brief INS inputs for initial hypotheses while outputting corrections to bound INS drift errors, typically reducing positional uncertainty to under 50 meters in varied terrain.

Sensor Fusion and Error Correction

TERPROM employs sensor fusion techniques to integrate data from multiple sources, including the (INS), , and pre-stored digital terrain elevation data, enabling optimal state estimation for . This process relies on a to combine these inputs, where terrain profile matching serves as a primary measurement for updating the solution. The filter estimates the aircraft's position, velocity, and attitude by minimizing uncertainties across sensors, providing a robust output even in GPS-denied environments. Key error sources in TERPROM include INS drift, which can accumulate up to 0.8 nautical miles per flight hour due to gyroscope and accelerometer biases, and inaccuracies in the terrain database arising from elevation measurement variances or outdated surveys. To address INS drift, the Kalman filter compensates by fusing terrain-referenced measurements, reducing positional errors by providing drift-free updates relative to the terrain profile, effectively limiting degradation to less than 1-2 km per hour in operational scenarios. Terrain database errors are handled through probabilistic models within the filter, which account for elevation uncertainties by estimating covariances in the measurement noise, allowing the system to weigh reliable data more heavily during state updates. The core of this error correction is the Kalman filter's state update equation, which refines the predicted state based on the between actual and predicted measurements: x^k∣k=x^k∣k−1+Kk(zk−Hkx^k∣k−1)\hat{x}_{k|k} = \hat{x}_{k|k-1} + K_k (z_k - H_k \hat{x}_{k|k-1}) Here, x^k∣k\hat{x}_{k|k} is the updated state estimate at time kk, x^k∣k−1\hat{x}_{k|k-1} is the prior prediction, KkK_k is the Kalman gain that optimally balances model and measurement uncertainties, zkz_k represents the measurement vector (incorporating heights and terrain-matched profiles), and HkH_k is the observation matrix linking the state to measurements. This recursive process ensures continuous correction, with the gain KkK_k derived from covariance propagation to handle varying error statistics in real-time. Through these mechanisms, TERPROM achieves significant accuracy improvements, delivering a horizontal (CEP) of less than 30 meters in varied terrains, assuming digital terrain elevation data at Digital Land Mass Survey level 1 resolution. This performance validates the system's ability to maintain precise over extended periods without external aids.

Core Functions

Terrain Referenced Navigation (TRN)

Terrain Referenced Navigation (TRN) is the core navigation function of the TERPROM digital terrain system, providing autonomous positioning for in GPS-denied environments by correlating real-time terrain measurements with a preloaded digital elevation map (). The system uses inputs from the aircraft's to measure height above ground and compares these profiles against the onboard database to estimate and correct errors in the (INS), achieving drift-free navigation over extended periods. This process enables precise location updates without external references, making TRN essential for low-level, high-threat operations where signals may be jammed or unavailable. TRN operates in two primary modes to support diverse mission profiles: acquisition mode for initial position fixation and track mode for ongoing corrections. In acquisition mode (also known as single fix mode), the system performs a coarse to align the aircraft's predicted position with the database over approximately 5 km. Track mode (continuous mode) then provides high-rate updates using a , typically every 100 m (about 3 Hz at high speeds), with a prediction mode to maintain accuracy during temporary data interruptions. In flight trials, this has achieved (CEP) of 20-30 meters over flat . For fast jets operating at speeds over 500 knots, TERPROM employs optimized high-speed algorithms to process data rapidly during terrain-following maneuvers. At low altitudes—often below 200 feet for masking—the system prioritizes precision to maintain accurate positioning while evading detection. Accuracy in TRN is fundamentally tied to terrain variability, as distinctive features enhance reliability. In regions with significant , such as hilly or mountainous areas, the system delivers high-fidelity updates due to the rich in the profiles. Conversely, uniform or flat , including deserts or plains, reduce effectiveness, potentially limiting TRN performance and necessitating fallback to uncorrected INS data. When GPS is intermittently available, TRN integrates it for hybrid validation, accelerating acquisition and refining overall accuracy by cross-checking against satellite-derived positions.

Predictive Ground Collision Avoidance (PGCAS)

The Predictive Ground Collision Avoidance System (PGCAS) serves as a critical safety component within the TERPROM digital terrain system, aimed at preventing (CFIT) by anticipating potential impacts through forward flight path analysis. PGCAS employs a mechanism that projects the aircraft's anticipated against digital elevation models (DEMs) derived from stored data, forecasting collisions up to 30-60 seconds ahead based on current position, , and inputs. This predictive process simulates future states using nominal propagation techniques, identifying conflicts when the projected path intersects within defined clearance buffers, such as a pilot-selectable minimum clearance (MTC) height. Alert levels in PGCAS are structured around time-to-impact thresholds to ensure progressive escalation of warnings, enabling pilots to respond before critical situations develop. Visual cues include a flashing break X symbol on the heads-up display (HUD) or (MFD), along with textual alerts like "GND PROX," while auditory signals deliver imperative commands such as repeated "PULL UP! PULL UP!" announcements. These activations occur when the forecasted penetrates the MTC, typically providing 1.1 seconds of advance notice relative to visual symbology onset, with testing validating reliability across varied flight attitudes. Advanced capabilities of PGCAS extend beyond alerts to include automatic terrain-following adjustments that dynamically modify flight parameters for safer navigation, as well as integration with autopilot systems to execute evasive maneuvers autonomously. In operational setups, the system can trigger recovery sequences, such as a roll to wings-level followed by a 5-g pull-up, incorporating lateral avoidance for complex terrain while minimizing control effort—requiring up to 28% less than alternative methods in simulations. TRN-derived position data serves as a key input to refine these projections for heightened precision. Trials of PGCAS have demonstrated substantial effectiveness in mitigating CFIT risks, with flight evaluations on platforms like the F-16 across 60 sorties from 1995 to 1998 confirming timely warnings and low false alarm rates that have prevented aircraft losses and fostered pilot trust. Overall, the system has proven highly successful in reducing accident numbers associated with terrain encounters.

Applications and Deployments

Fixed-Wing and Rotary-Wing Aircraft

TERPROM has been widely integrated into to support low-level strike and penetration missions, leveraging its terrain referenced navigation (TRN) capabilities for precise ground avoidance in contested environments. The system was contracted by the in 1990 for deployment on the F-16 Fighting Falcon reserve fleet, where it functions as a digital terrain system to enhance navigational accuracy and collision avoidance during high-speed operations. Similarly, the multirole strike aircraft, operated by the (RAF), incorporates TERPROM as a core element of its avionics suite, enabling safe terrain-following flight at altitudes as low as 200 feet in adverse weather or GPS-denied scenarios. The builds on this foundation with an upgraded (GPWS) derived from the Tornado's TERPROM implementation, providing pilots with real-time terrain alerts during supersonic low-level dashes exceeding 500 knots. In operational contexts, these fixed-wing integrations have proven vital for RAF and USAF missions requiring terrain masking to evade enemy defenses. US Air Force F-16s have benefited from TERPROM's terrain profiling in large-scale strike packages, where the system's error correction minimizes (CFIT) risks amid intense anti-aircraft fire. Tailored TERPROM variants support low-level operations in rugged environments, maintaining mission effectiveness in GPS-jammed scenarios. Adaptations for rotary-wing aircraft address the unique demands of slower, more maneuverable platforms, with software modifications accounting for rotor downwash effects and lower operational altitudes to support (NOE) flying. A dedicated rotary-wing variant of TERPROM was developed in the late , integrating with avionics to provide advanced terrain avoidance cues (ATAC) and wire strike warnings at speeds around 150 knots. This configuration fuses data with digital elevation models to enable pilots to skim terrain contours during missions, adjusting for dynamic hover and transitional flight profiles. Overall, these platform-specific enhancements ensure TERPROM's TRN core function delivers reliable performance across speed differentials, from jet dash speeds to loiter, while prioritizing pilot situational awareness in manned operations.

Missile and Unmanned Systems

TERPROM has been integrated into several guided missile systems, notably the Franco-British /SCALP-EG cruise missiles, where it facilitates low-altitude, terrain-hugging flight paths to minimize radar detection during deep-strike missions. The navigation employs digital TERPROM alongside inertial and GPS inputs for autonomous , enabling precise targeting of high-value assets in all weather conditions. As of 2025, European programs continue to rely on this integration, with resuming production of /SCALP missiles to meet ongoing defense demands. In unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), TERPROM supports operations in GPS-jammed environments by providing -referenced for loitering munitions and reconnaissance drones, enhancing endurance and target acquisition without external signals. These applications leverage TERPROM's ability to match real-time profiles against pre-loaded digital elevation data, allowing sustained low-level flight in contested areas. TERPROM's autonomy in these systems relies on pre-programmed profiles that incorporate real-time corrections from onboard sensors, ensuring drift-free positioning even during extended missions. hardware variants have been developed to suit the size and power constraints of unmanned platforms, integrating compact processors with existing inertial systems for seamless operation. Global examples include its adoption in the Australian Defence Force's PC-21 trainer program, where TERPROM provides advanced terrain navigation for training in diverse environments. In , ongoing missile enhancements under programs like demonstrate TERPROM's role in modernizing precision strike capabilities as of 2025.

Advantages, Limitations, and Future Developments

Operational Benefits and Challenges

TERPROM enables high operational autonomy in electronic warfare environments by providing GPS-denied capabilities, allowing aircraft to sustain accurate positioning and terrain following without reliance on satellite signals that may be jammed or spoofed. This independence from external aids enhances mission continuity in contested , where traditional GNSS-dependent systems would fail. Additionally, TERPROM improves by integrating terrain-referenced (TRN) and predictive ground collision avoidance (PGCAS) to deliver real-time terrain profiling and forward-looking threat alerts, reducing the risk of (CFIT). Despite these advantages, TERPROM faces performance challenges in flat or urban terrains, where low-relief landscapes result in non-unique terrain profiles that degrade accuracy and increase navigation errors. In such environments, the system's ability to match measured altitude profiles against digital elevation models (DEMs) diminishes, potentially leading to slower error convergence in the underlying . Moreover, integration with legacy aircraft hardware poses computational demands, as the real-time processing of high-resolution data requires sufficient onboard resources, complicating retrofits on older platforms. Cost considerations represent another operational hurdle, with initial integration expenses driven by the need for adaptation and hardware interfaces, though these are offset over the lifecycle by reduced requirements and lower needs due to enhanced features. TERPROM's accuracy further depends on regularly updated DEMs to account for environmental changes, ensuring reliable performance in dynamic operational theaters. Compared to traditional ground proximity warning systems (GPWS), TERPROM provides superior predictive capabilities by anticipating terrain hazards using pre-loaded elevation data, rather than issuing reactive alerts based solely on immediate sensor inputs.

Ongoing Enhancements and Variants

In recent years, the TERPROM Digital Terrain System (DTS) has emerged as a key modern variant, enhancing traditional -referenced through improved digital and integration capabilities. Developed by , the DTS leverages higher-resolution Digital Elevation Data (DTED) Level 2 at 30-meter intervals, which surpasses the previous Level 1 resolution and boosts precision in varied terrains. This variant supports both fixed-wing and rotary-wing platforms, providing terrain awareness and collision avoidance without reliance on . Following the 2018 merger forming from and , enhancements in the 2020s have focused on software optimizations and modular integrations to extend TERPROM's applicability. These include upgrades for seamless compatibility with modern architectures, such as open systems approaches that facilitate easier updates and reduced lifecycle costs. While specific machine learning for automated database updates remains under broader terrain navigation research, Collins has emphasized predictive ground (PGCAS) integrations with automatic ground collision avoidance, tested for low-level operations in helicopters and jets. Emerging research into AI-assisted variants of digital terrain systems, including those akin to TERPROM DTS, incorporates adaptive algorithms to refine terrain matching in real-time. For instance, AI enhancements in terrain-aided for advanced jet trainers improve through algorithm selection. Integration with (SAR) is being explored in related terrain systems to augment elevation data with imaging for better feature extraction. Prospective developments aim to adapt TERPROM for high-speed platforms, including potential compatibility with hypersonic vehicles through robust . Security enhancements, such as quantum-resistant protocols, are under consideration in , aligning with broader trends. Testing milestones in 2024-2025 have demonstrated notable accuracy improvements in GPS-denied settings; for example, AI-assisted trials achieved enhanced positioning errors below GNSS thresholds via simulations and real-world data, supporting TERPROM's evolution for tactical missions. These advancements underscore ongoing efforts to maintain TERPROM's edge in denied environments.

References

  1. https://www.collinsaerospace.com/what-we-do/industries/military-and-defense/navigation/weapons-products/guidance-navigation-control/terprom-digital-terrain-system
  2. https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=7846
  3. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376284276_The_TerpromR_Digital_Terrain_System_DTS
  4. https://modernbattlespace.com/2024/06/12/why-digital-terrain-systems-are-mission-critical-for-modern-pilots/
  5. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA217512.pdf
  6. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-D301-PURL-LPS47002/pdf/GOVPUB-D301-PURL-LPS47002.pdf
  7. https://joast.org/index.php/joast/article/view/649
  8. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/42542/000095012309063974/c92809exv99w1.htm
  9. https://investors.rtx.com/static-files/b7b5543c-f8ec-4305-a739-62233a17a2e6
  10. https://investors.rtx.com/news-releases/news-release-details/united-technologies-announces-intention-separate-three
  11. https://prd-sc102-cdn.rtx.com/-/media/ca/t/terpromr/terpromr-terrain-awareness-and-warning-system-taws.pdf?rev=dbe606ee1aa6424abb77396255b24f7d&hash=270BECFD1B37B8AC0328E1E8360BB571
  12. https://www.edn.com/goodrich-terprom-terrain-referenced-navigation-to-equip-airbus-a400m/
  13. https://prd-sc102-cdn.rtx.com/-/media/ca/t/terpromr/terpromr-digital-terrain-system-fixed-wing.pdf?rev=5634201bccde41cdb9a464b65952fb13&hash=B47C9C20594E10E2DE485F6458FE284F
  14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4350744_Latest_development_of_the_TERPROMR_Digital_Terrain_System_DTS
  15. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19930003132/downloads/19930003132.pdf
  16. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0abc/6394c9600b2ea5ce761090331b3cfc004580.pdf
  17. https://peerj.com/articles/cs-3118/
  18. https://www.navlab.net/Publications/Terrain_Navigation_Principles_Application.pdf
  19. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42405-024-00881-8
  20. https://joast.org/index.php/joast/article/view/649/659
  21. https://digital-library.theiet.org/doi/pdf/10.1049/ic%253A19980389?download=true
  22. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA618503.pdf
  23. http://www.aviationtoday.com/2003/06/01/typhoon-europes-finest/
  24. https://www.aviationpros.com/home/press-release/10397035/ais-markets-the-terprom-digital-terrain-navigation-system-for-fixed-wing-and-helicopter-platforms-at-the-dubai-airshow
  25. https://www.defenseadvancement.com/projects/storm-shadow-scalp-eg/
  26. https://osmp.ngo/model/storm-shadow-scalp-eg/
  27. https://defense-update.com/20050127_storm-shadow.html
  28. https://www.mbda-systems.com/products/deep-strike/storm-shadow-scalp
  29. https://www.unmannedsystemstechnology.com/2012/06/goodrich-to-exhibit-latest-sensors-and-composite-uav-components-at-eurosatory/
  30. https://www.[researchgate](/page/ResearchGate).net/publication/376284276_The_TerpromR_Digital_Terrain_System_DTS
  31. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/utc-aerospace-systems-terprom-to-equip-australian-defense-force-pc-21s-with-advanced-terrain-navigation-300283565.html
  32. https://bulgarianmilitary.com/2025/07/10/storm-shadow-strikes-back-europe-ramps-up-missile-output/
  33. http://www.joast.org/index.php/joast/article/view/649/659
  34. https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2010-07-17/goodrichs-ais-studies-terprom-trainers
  35. https://www.collinsaerospace.com/news/stories/2024/10/modular-open-systems-the-future-of-flight-for-the-us-army
  36. https://www.academia.edu/127506163/AI_assisted_Digital_Terrain_System_for_an_Advanced_Jet_Trainer
  37. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/2293701
  38. https://eprint.iacr.org/2024/667
  39. https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/12/6/501
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.