Welcome to the community hub built on top of the TXS 0506+056 Wikipedia article.
Here, you can discuss, collect, and organize anything related to TXS 0506+056. The
purpose of the hub is to connect people,...
TXS 0506+056 was first discovered as a radio source in 1983.[15] It was identified as an active galaxy in the 1990s, and a possible blazar in the early 2000s.[16] By 2009 it was regarded as a confirmed blazar and catalogued as a BL Lac object.[17] Gamma rays from TXS 0506+056 were detected by the EGRET and Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope missions.[16][18][19]
The gamma-ray flux from TXS 0506+056 is highly variable, by at least a factor of a thousand, but on average it is in the top 4% of brightest gamma-ray sources on the sky.[6][22] It is also very bright in radio waves, in the top 1% of sources.[6] Given its distance, this makes TXS 0506+056 one of the most intrinsically powerful BL Lac objects known, particularly in high-energy gamma rays.[6][22]
On September 22, 2017, the IceCube Neutrino Observatory detected a high energy muon neutrino, dubbed IceCube-170922A.[7] The neutrino carried an energy of ~290 tera–electronvolts (TeV); for comparison, the Large Hadron Collider can generate a maximum energy of 13 TeV.[23] Within one minute of the neutrino detection, IceCube sent an automated alert to astronomers around the world with coordinates to search for a possible source.[7]
A search of this region in the sky, 1.33 degrees across, yielded only one likely source: TXS 0506+056, a previously-known blazar, which was found to be in a flaring state of high gamma ray emission.[7][6] It was subsequently observed at other wavelengths of light across the electromagnetic spectrum, including radio, infrared, optical, X-rays and gamma-rays.[7][24] The detection of both neutrinos and light from the same object was an early example of multi-messenger astronomy.[11]
A search of archived neutrino data from IceCube found evidence for an earlier flare of lower-energy neutrinos in 2014-2015 (a form of precovery), which supports identification of the blazar as a source of neutrinos.[22] An independent analysis found no gamma-ray flare during this earlier period of neutrino emission, but supported its association with the blazar.[6] The neutrinos emitted by TXS 0506+056 are six orders of magnitude higher in energy than those from any previously-identified astrophysical neutrino source.[6]
The observations of high energy neutrinos and gamma-rays from this source imply that it is also a source of cosmic rays, because all three should be produced by the same physical processes,[25] though no cosmic rays from TXS 0506+056 have been directly observed.[11] In the blazar, a charged pion was produced by the interaction of a high-energy proton or nucleus (i.e. a cosmic ray) with the radiation field or with matter.[7] The pion then decayed into a lepton and the neutrino. The neutrino interacts only weakly with matter, so it escaped the blazar.[7] Upon reaching Earth, the neutrino interacted with the Antarctic ice to produce a muon, which was observed by the Cherenkov radiation it generated as it moved through the IceCube detector.[7]
Analysis of 16 very long baseline radio array 15-GHz observations between 2009 and 2018 of TXS 0506+056 revealed the presence of a curved jet or potentially a collision of two jets, which could explain the 2014-2015 neutrino generation at the time of a low gamma-ray flux and indicate that TXS 0506+056 might be an atypical blazar.[26]
In 2020, a study using MASTER global telescope network found that TXS 0506+056 was in an 'off' state in the optical spectrum 1 minute after the alert for IceCube-170922A event and switched back on 2 hours later. This would indicate that the blazar was in a state of neutrino efficiency.[27]
^Douglas, James N; Bash, Frank N; Bozyan, F. Arakel; Torrence, Geoffrey W; Wolfe, Chip (1996). "The Texas Survey of Radio Sources Covering -35.5 degrees < declination < 71.5 degrees at 365 MHz". The Astronomical Journal. 111: 1945. Bibcode:1996AJ....111.1945D. doi:10.1086/117932.
^Lawrence, C. R; Bennett, C. L; Garcia-Barreto, J. A; Greenfield, P. E; Burke, B. F (1983). "5 GHz observations of sources in the Arecibo 611 MHz survey". The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 51: 67. Bibcode:1983ApJS...51...67L. doi:10.1086/190840.
^Lister, M. L; Aller, M. F; Aller, H. D; Homan, D. C; Kellermann, K. I; Kovalev, Y. Y; Pushkarev, A. B; Richards, J. L; Ros, E; Savolainen, T (2013). "Mojave. X. Parsec-Scale Jet Orientation Variations and Superluminal Motion in Active Galactic Nuclei". The Astronomical Journal. 146 (5): 120. arXiv:1308.2713. Bibcode:2013AJ....146..120L. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/146/5/120. S2CID119270093.
^De Angelis, Alessandro; Pimenta, Mario (2018). Introduction to particle and astroparticle physics (multimessenger astronomy and its particle physics foundations). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78181-5. ISBN978-3-319-78181-5.