Hubbry Logo
King County MetroKing County MetroMain
Open search
King County Metro
Community hub
King County Metro
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
King County Metro
King County Metro
King County Metro
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

King County Metro
A King County Metro bus operating on the RapidRide E Line in Downtown Seattle
FoundedJanuary 1, 1973; 52 years ago (1973-01-01)
Headquarters201 S. Jackson St., Seattle, Washington, U.S.
Service areaKing County, Washington
Service typeTransit bus, Vanpool, Paratransit
AllianceSound Transit
Routes237[1] (excluding routes operated by Metro under contract for another agency as of 2019)
Stops8,521[2] (year-end 2012)
Hubs13 transit centers
Fleet1,540[3]
Daily ridership302,900 (weekdays, Q2 2025)[4]
Annual ridership88,902,700 (2024)[5]
Fuel typeBattery electric, Diesel-electric hybrid, Electric trolleybus
Chief executiveMichelle Allison (General Manager)[6]
Websitekingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro

King County Metro, officially the King County Metro Transit Department and often shortened to Metro, is the public transit authority of King County, Washington, which includes the city of Seattle. It is the eighth-largest transit bus agency in the United States. In 2024, the system had a ridership of 88,902,700, or about 302,900 per weekday as of the second quarter of 2025. Metro employs 2,477 full-time and part-time operators and operates 1,540 buses.

King County Metro formally began operations on January 1, 1973, but can trace its roots to the Seattle Transit System, founded in 1939, and Overlake Transit Service, a private operator founded in 1927 to serve the Eastside. Metro is also contracted to operate and maintain Sound Transit's 1 Line Link light rail line and eight of the agency's Sound Transit Express bus routes along with the Seattle Streetcar lines owned by the City of Seattle. Metro's services include electric trolleybuses in Seattle, RapidRide enhanced buses on eight lines, commuter routes along the regional freeway system, dial-a-ride routes, paratransit services, and overnight “owl” bus routes.

History

[edit]
Seattle Street Railway's first streetcar at Occidental Avenue and Yesler Way with Mayor John Leary and city officials in the fall of 1884

A horse-drawn streetcar rail system debuted in Seattle in 1884 as the Seattle Street Railway. In 1918, the city of Seattle bought many parts of the Seattle Street Railway, on terms which left the transit operation in financial trouble.

In 1939, a new transportation agency, the Seattle Transit System, was formed, which refinanced the remaining debt and began replacing equipment with "trackless trolleys" (as they were known) and motor buses. The final streetcar ran on April 13, 1941.[7]

The Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle was created by a local referendum on September 9, 1958, as a regional authority tasked with management of wastewater and water quality issues in King County. The authority was formed after civic leaders, including those in the Municipal League, noted that solutions to regional issues were complicated by local boundaries and a plethora of existing special districts.[8] The state legislature approved the formation of a combined transportation, sewage, and planning authority in 1957, but the countywide referendum was rejected by a majority outside of Seattle. Metro, as the authority came to be called, was restricted to sewage management and given a smaller suburban jurisdiction ahead of the successful September referendum.[9] By 1967, the agency had completed its $125 million sewage treatment system, which diverted 20 million gallons (76 million liters) that had previously contaminated Lake Washington.[8][10]

After two failed attempts to enable it to build a regional rapid transit system, it was authorized to operate a regional bus system in 1972. The bus system was known as Metro Transit and began operations on January 1, 1973; other suggested names included King Area Rapid Transit (KART) and Seattle Metropolitan Area Rapid Transit (SMART).[11] Its operations subsumed the Seattle Transit System, formerly under the purview of the City of Seattle and the Metropolitan Transit Corporation, a private company serving suburban cities in King County. In the early 1970s, the private Metropolitan faced bankruptcy because of low ridership. King County voters authorized Metro to buy Metropolitan and operate the county's mass transit bus system.[citation needed] Metro Transit introduced its new services in September 1973, including a ride-free area in downtown and express routes on freeways (known as "Flyer" routes),[12] and a unified numbering scheme in 1977 that replaced named routes.[13] The agency introduced its first paratransit service in 1979, which was followed by buses equipped with wheelchair lifts in 1980.[14][15]

A hybrid electric King Country Metro bus passing a Link light rail train at University Street station (now Symphony station) in 2010

To address bus congestion in Downtown Seattle and prepare for a regional rapid transit system, Metro Transit proposed the construction of the Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel in the early 1980s. Excavation of the 1.3-mile (2.1 km) tunnel began in 1987 and was completed on September 15, 1990, with five stations under 3rd Avenue and Pine Street. The project cost $455 million to construct and used a fleet of 236 dual-mode diesel–electric buses manufactured in Italy by Breda. Buses on commuter routes would switch to electric trolleybus wires within the tunnel, which was also designed for future use by light rail trains.[16][17]

The Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle was overseen by a federated board of elected officials, composed of elected officials from cities throughout the region. Its representation structure was ruled unconstitutional in 1990 on the grounds of "one person, one vote" following a similar ruling in Board of Estimate of City of New York v. Morris.[18][19] In 1992, after gaining approval by popular vote, the municipality's roles and authorities were assumed by the government of King County.[8] The municipality's transit operations was a stand-alone department within the county until 1996, when it became a division of the newly created King County Department of Transportation. In August 2018, the county council approved legislation to separate Metro from the Department of Transportation, creating the King County Metro Transit Department effective January 1, 2019.[20]

After completion of the Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel project in 1990, attention was drawn again to developing a regional rail system. This interest led to the formation of the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (more commonly known as Sound Transit) which holds primary responsibility for planning and building high capacity transit in the counties of King, Pierce and Snohomish, in western Washington state.[21] Metro was contracted to operate Sound Transit's major light rail line, now the 1 Line of the Link light rail system, and several routes on its Sound Transit Express network.[22][23] The Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel would form a major part of the light rail line's route and required extensive renovations to support joint use between trains and buses. A two-year closure from 2005 to 2007 allowed for the installation of new rails and a lowered roadbed for level boarding.[24] The dual-mode Breda buses were replaced by diesel-electric hybrid buses within the tunnel and retrofitted for use on the city's trolleybus network.[25] Bus service in the tunnel ended on March 23, 2019, as part of the demolition of Convention Place station to prepare for an expansion of the Washington State Convention Center.[26] The transit tunnel remained owned and operated by Metro until it was transferred to Sound Transit in 2022.[27] Metro also operates two streetcar routes in Seattle under contract with Seattle Streetcar.

Ride Free Area

[edit]
A Downtown Seattle bus stop on Pine Street with a sign for the Magic Carpet zone, 1975

For almost 40 years, until 2012,[28] most of downtown Seattle was designated as a zero-fare zone, an area in which all rides on Metro vehicles were free, known as the "Ride Free" Area. Intended to encourage transit usage, improve accessibility and encourage downtown shopping, the zone was created in September 1973 and was originally called the "Magic Carpet" zone.[29][30] It was later renamed the Ride Free Area (RFA). The RFA extended from the north at Battery St. to S. Jackson St. on the south and east at 6th Avenue to the waterfront on the west.[31] Until 1987, the zone was in effect 24 hours a day, but in October of that year Metro began requiring fare payment within the zone during night-time hours, between 9 p.m. and 4 a.m., to reduce fare-related conflicts that sometimes led to assaults on drivers;[32] in February 1994, the RFA's hours were reduced further, with fare payment required between 7 p.m. and 6 a.m.[33]

A King County Auditor's Office report released in September 2009 found that Metro "can neither fully explain nor provide backup documentation for the operating cost savings that offset the fare revenues in the calculation of the annual charges to the City of Seattle for the city's Ride Free Area" and that some assumptions in the methodology Metro used to calculate the amount of lost fares were "questionable" and have not been updated to reflect changes to the fare structure and fare collection methods.[34]

A 1975 study found that while the Ride Free Area generally reduced bus travel times within the RFA itself, buses that traveled through the Ride Free Area to other destinations generally did not benefit. It also found that unloading outbound coaches once outside the RFA took additional time, though not entirely quantified vis-à-vis time saved within the RFA.[citation needed]

On September 29, 2012, the Ride Free Area was eliminated. All riders boarding in downtown must now pay as they board.[28]

Operations

[edit]

Routes

[edit]
An electric trolleybus on Route 7 in Seattle
See also: List of King County Metro bus routes

Metro has 139 bus routes that combine service patterns typical of both city and suburban bus networks, carrying over 280,000 daily passengers as of October 2024. The agency's ridership peaked at 425,000 daily passengers in October 2015.[35] The city network was descended in large part from the Seattle Transit system of converted streetcar routes. Most service is operated in a hub-and-spoke pattern centered either on downtown Seattle or the University of Washington, with lesser amounts of crosstown service. The suburban network typically operates on major streets between the regions employment and population centers.

Routes in the city network are numbered from 1 to 99. Because of the scattershot evolution of the system, there is no easily discernible pattern to the route numbers, although there are clusters in certain neighborhoods. Suburban routes follow a numbering system: 100–199 for South King County, 200–299 for the Eastside, 300–399 for North King County, and 900–999 for dial-a-ride and custom routes.[36][37]

The in-city routes with the highest ridership are the RapidRide D Line from downtown to Crown Hill via Uptown/Seattle Center and Ballard; the 7, traveling from downtown through the International District to the Rainier Valley; the 40, traveling from downtown through South Lake Union, Fremont, and Ballard to Northgate; the RapidRide C Line from South Lake Union and downtown to West Seattle's Alaska Junction and Westwood Village; the 36, traveling from downtown through the International District to Beacon Hill; the 5 from downtown via the Woodland Park Zoo and Greenwood/Phinney Ridge to Shoreline Community College; the 44, a crosstown route connecting the University District and Ballard; the 8, a crosstown route connecting Uptown/Seattle Center and South Lake Union with Capitol Hill, the Central District and Mount Baker; and the 70, connecting downtown to South Lake Union, Eastlake, and the University District.[citation needed]

The Metro-operated Seattle Streetcar routes are numbered in the 90s, with the South Lake Union Streetcar numbered 98 and the former bus replacement for the Waterfront Streetcar numbered 99.

The suburban system is more numerically organized. Roughly speaking, areas in South King County (from Burien and Des Moines through Renton and Maple Valley) are served by routes numbered in the 100s, areas in East King County (from Renton to Bothell) are served by routes numbered in the 200s, areas in North King County (from Bothell to Shoreline) are served by routes numbered in the 300s. The Metro-operated Sound Transit Express routes are numbered in the 500s.

Route numbers in the lower 900s (901–931) are used for Dial-a-Ride services, while shuttles connecting to the King County Water Taxi are numbered in the 700s.[citation needed] The dial-a-ride system is contracted to Hopelink, a non-profit organization.[38][39] Since 2003, Metro has contracted with senior charities to operate the Hyde Shuttle system, which provides free rides to elderly or disabled passengers in Seattle and other cities.[40][41] Metro formerly funded a shuttle system named Ride2 that served West Seattle and Eastgate using contracted private buses, which ended in 2019.[42][43] A set of three shuttle van services contracted out to private operators, including Via in the Rainier Valley, Community Ride, and Ride Pingo in Kent, were launched starting in 2019.[44][45] They were merged in 2023 under the "Metro Flex" brand with a shared livery.[42]

Metro is contracted to operate special custom buses. Custom routes that serve schools in Bellevue and on Mercer Island are numbered in the 800s (823, 824, 886–892) and routes serving the private Lakeside School and University Prep numbered in the higher 900s (980–995). Metro also operates custom routes to major employment sites (like Group Health Cooperative in Tukwila and the Boeing Everett Factory). Custom routes are also occasionally established to serve as shuttles for large local events, including Seattle Seahawks and Washington Huskies football games.

Since 2008, Metro has maintained an Emergency Snow Network plan to be implemented during major snowstorms and other periods of inclement weather. The network uses only 67 routes on high-frequency corridors with flat topography to compensate for a reduced number of drivers and workers. Several routes were also split between trunk routes using articulated buses and shuttles to serve hillier areas with smaller buses.[46] The network plan was first implemented during the February 2019 snowstorm.[1][47] In August 2019, the King County Council voted to waive transit fares during snow emergencies.[48] An earlier plan from the 1980s replaced Seattle–Eastside commuter routes with a set of routes that exclusively served predetermined park and ride lots.[49]

RapidRide

[edit]
Main article: RapidRide
RapidRide service features enhanced bus stops, articulated buses, and frequent service

King County Metro operates RapidRide, a network of limited-stop bus lines with some bus rapid transit features. All RapidRide routes have frequent service with frequencies of 10 minutes or better during peak commuting hours and 15 minutes during most off-peak hours and on weekends. Most lines (except the B and F lines) have late night and early morning service.

RapidRide stops are placed farther apart than typical Metro service to increase speed and reliability. Stops with heavier ridership have "stations" with an awning, seating, lighting, real time information signs to communicate estimate arrival times of RapidRide buses. Most stations and some stops in Downtown Seattle have ORCA card readers that allow passengers to pay before the bus arrives and board at any of the buses' three doors.[50] All lines use low-floor, articulated buses that are painted with a distinct red and yellow livery and have onboard Wi-Fi.

The RapidRide corridors are:

Freeway express services

[edit]
Metro express buses use an extensive network of bus-only infrastructure, such as the Evergreen Point Freeway Station on SR-520

Metro operates many regional routes serving park and rides, which travel on the region's extensive network of High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes.[51] This practice was pioneered at Seattle Transit as the Blue Streak express bus service running between Northgate Park & Ride and Downtown Seattle. Special stops called "freeway flyers" or freeway stations were constructed to allow efficient transfer between local and express buses.[52]

The first freeway flyer stop opened in 1975 at Montlake Boulevard and State Route 520.[53] Metro also takes advantage of new HOV direct-access ramps and freeway stations constructed by Sound Transit to improve speed and reliability of its commuter routes.[54][55]

Skip-stop spacing

[edit]

Metro uses skip-stop spacing on 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Avenues in Downtown Seattle, whereby buses skip every other bus stop. On 3rd Avenue, each bus route is assigned to Blue, Yellow, Red or Green stop groups and each bus stop has two color designations; in the northbound direction, every other bus stop is a Red/Yellow or Green/Blue stop, while in the southbound direction they are Green/Yellow and Red/Blue. On 2nd and 4th Avenues, routes are grouped into Orange and White stops. The bus stop color groupings are identified by a colored plate installed above or on the side of the bus stop sign. On 3rd Avenue only, there are additional colored markers one block ahead of each bus stop on the trolley overhead wires, to help bus drivers identify the colors of the upcoming bus stop.[56]

Night Owl services

[edit]

Metro operates a network of 13 routes with late-night "Night Owl" service, which is defined as having regular service between midnight and 5 am.[57] The Night Owl network is made up of some of Metro's most popular routes, and is designed to connect neighborhoods with major transportation hubs including downtown Seattle, Sea–Tac Airport, park & ride lots, transit centers, and Link stations (providing service during the hours when trains are not in service). The City of Seattle's transportation benefit district funds service on Night Owl routes that operate entirely within the city limits.[58]

Routes with Night Owl service include the 7, 36, 48, 49, 124, 160, 161, and the RapidRide A, C, D, E, G and H Lines.

Trailhead Direct

[edit]

King County Metro contracts with Hopelink to operate a weekend express shuttle between Seattle and hiking areas in the Cascade foothills called Trailhead Direct from April to October. The service, operated in partnership with the county's park and recreation department and private companies, is intended to relieve parking issues at popular trailheads at peak times.[59] It debuted in 2017 and was expanded the following year to cover three routes: Capitol Hill station to Mount Si; Mount Baker station to the Issaquah Alps; and a shuttle from North Bend to Mailbox Peak.[60][61] A fourth route, between Tukwila International Boulevard station, Renton, and Cougar Mountain, was added in 2019.[62] The service was suspended in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic and returned in 2021 with only two routes.[59] Due to staffing issues, service to the Issaquah Alps was suspended for the 2022 and 2023 seasons but returned in 2024.[63] The Trailhead Direct routes carried a total of 11,400 passenger trips in 2023 using a fleet of smaller buses with 14 to 32 seats.[64]

Fares

[edit]

King County Metro has had a flat rate fare structure for all riders since July 2018. The flat rate of $2.75 for adults and $1 for senior, disabled and qualified low-income passengers[65] replaced a previous system with two zones—divided between Seattle and the rest of the county—and peak period surcharges.[66] A separate rate of $1.50 was levied for youth passengers and ORCA Lift low-income passholders until September 2022; the ORCA Lift rate was lowered to $1 and the youth fare was eliminated as part of a statewide program.[67][68]

Fares can be paid using cash, a paper transfer, the e-purse or passes on ORCA cards, or the Transit Go smartphone app.[69] Monthly and daily passes are available for ORCA cards, including the PugetPass and inter-agency regional passes.[70] From 2020 to 2025, the inspection of fares by Metro personnel was suspended due to the COVID-19 pandemic and later changes in county policy to address racial bias.[35] The fare inspection and enforcement program resumed in March 2025 and consists of uniformed inspectors who board buses and request identification from non-paying passengers; a previous misdemeanor charge for four instances of non-payment was removed.[35][71]

The King County Metro fares as of September 1, 2022 are:[70]

Type Fare
Adult $3.00
Senior (65+) / Disabled / Medicare
(Regional Reduced Fare Permit required)		 $1
Low-income
(Income verified ORCA Lift card required)		 $1
Youth
(6–18 years)		 Free
Children
(5 and under)		 Free

Fare history

[edit]

Metro Transit initially had 38 fare zones that it inherited from its two predecessor operators, with a surcharge of 10 cents per zone crossing.[72] The fare system was overhauled in 1977 and simplified to two zones: one within Seattle and one for the rest of the county.[73] The fare change also introduced a one-hour pass for free transfers—either within the same hour or for a return trip on the same route—and monthly passes.[74]

One-way fare (Peak, 1 Zone), with year of rate change:[72]

  • 1973: 20¢
  • 1977: 30¢
  • 1979: 40¢
  • 1980: 50¢
  • 1982: 60¢ (
    peak fares
    introduced
    )
  • 1985: 65¢
  • 1989: 75¢
  • 1991: $1.00
  • 1993: $1.10
  • 1998: $1.25
  • 2001: $1.50
  • 2008: $1.75
  • 2009: $2.00
  • 2010: $2.25
  • 2012: $2.50
  • 2015: $2.75
  • 2018: $2.75 (
    peak fares
    discontinued
    )
  • 2025: $3.00

Facilities

[edit]
Main article: List of King County Metro facilities

Transit centers

[edit]

While Downtown Seattle is Metro's main transit hub, transit centers act as smaller regional hubs and are served by many bus routes. Some transit centers also offer a park and ride facility. Metro operates out of several transit centers located throughout King County, some of which are shared with Sound Transit and other county agencies.[75]

Park and ride lots

[edit]

In King County, Metro has 132 park and ride facilities containing a total of 24,524 parking stalls as of 2009.[76] Half of the lots are leased from other property owners such as churches.[75]

Metro began developing its park and rides in the 1970s using various funding sources, including federal grants.[77] By 1988, it had 37 lots across King County, mostly concentrated on the Eastside, and monitored property crimes with a team of four police officers and hired guards.[78] In the 1980s, Metro proposed co-locating its park and rides with commercial developments to encourage transit-oriented development and attract more riders.[79] In the 2000s, Metro opened its first park and ride garages as well as several lots that were integrated with housing and retail developments.[80][81]

Operations bases and facilities

[edit]

Metro stores and maintains buses at seven bases (garages), spread throughout its 2,134-square-mile (5,530 km2) operating area. In addition to the bases, maintenance of the fleet and operation of the system are supported by several other facilities.

Security

[edit]

The Metro Transit Police Department is a unit of the King County Sheriff's Office that provides security and law enforcement onboard Metro buses and at the agency's facilities. As of 2025, it has 65 officers out of 79 budgeted positions. Metro also contracts with private firms to provide uniformed security guards.[82] Following the 2024 stabbing of an operator in the University District, Metro proposed the adoption of separate compartments for bus drivers in newer buses that are scheduled to arrive in 2026.[82] The existing sneeze guards installed in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic are planned to be replaced on most buses with a more solid barrier.[83]

Funding

[edit]

The adopted 2025 budget for King County allocated $2.12 billion to Metro for operating and capital expenses related to its transit services. These include non-Metro services that the agency operates on behalf of other agencies.[84][85] King County Metro is the sole metropolitan county transit agency in Washington and is authorized by the state legislature to collect a sales tax of 0.9 percent across King County.[86][87] Prior to the 1999 approval of Initiative 695, the agency also collected a motor vehicle excise tax from the state government.[88] The sales tax is Metro's primary funding source, comprising 55.8 percent of anticipated revenue in 2025, followed by payments from Sound Transit.[85] The agency derives approximately 9 percent of its revenue from fares.[71][84]

Bus advertising, primarily in the form of vehicle wraps and banners, comprises a portion of Metro's revenue. The agency prohibits the sale of advertising space for political campaigns and public or social issues.[89] The policy was challenged as a violation of freedom of speech by organizations that had their requests to advertise on Metro buses rejected.[90] A 2016 lawsuit from the American Freedom Defense Initiative was decided in Metro's favor by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals and was declined to be heard by the United States Supreme Court.[91]

Operating costs

[edit]

The cost per boarding for Metro was $4.10 in 2005, compared to $2.50 among the country's 15 largest transit agencies and $2.97, the national average. Metro's cost per boarding is 38% above the national average.[92]

Metro's higher-than-average cost per boarding can be at least partially attributed to its high percentage of commuter routes, which run at peak hours only, and often only in one direction at a time. As of 2011, 100 of Metro's 223 routes are peak-only. These routes require significant deadheading (particularly on the one-way routes), as well as a very large part-time labor force, both of which drive up costs.[93]

Metro's lowest-cost route overall, route 4 (East Queen Anne to Judkins Park), had a cost per boarding of only $0.46 during peak hours in 2009. By way of contrast, Metro's peak-only route with the lowest cost per boarding was route 206 (Newport Hills to International School), at $2.04. Metro's highest cost route by this measure, route 149 (Renton Transit Center to Black Diamond), had a peak time cost of $34.47 per boarding. Route 149 serves the rural southeastern corner of King County.[94]

In 2007 it cost $3.64 per boarding to deliver service in the West (Seattle) subarea, $4.79 in the South subarea and $7.27 in the East subarea of King County.[92] At the end of 2008, the systemwide cost per boarding was $3.70.[76]

Transit Now

[edit]

In April 2006, King County Executive Ron Sims announced a program entitled "Transit Now" that provided for a 20 percent increase in transit service by the end of 2016 over 2006 service levels, measured in annual operating hours. In order to realize this growth, Transit Now proposed an increase in the local option sales tax for transit of one-tenth of one percent. The Transit Now ordinance,[95] passed by the King County Council on September 5, 2006, and signed by Executive Sims on September 11, 2006, forwarded the tax proposition to the voters and identified the programs to which operating revenue generated from the sales tax increase could be appropriated. The measure was approved by 56.62% of King County voters in the November 2007 general election. The service programs identified in the ordinance are as follows:

  1. Implementation of RapidRide routes in five arterial corridors.
  2. Increase service on high-ridership routes that provide frequent, two-way connections throughout the agency's service area.
  3. Service for growing areas in outlying suburban/[exurban] areas.
  4. Partnerships with cities and major employers to provide more service than could otherwise be provided through typical resources.
  5. Additional improvements such as expanded ride-share and paratransit services in King County.

Seattle Proposition 1 (2014)

[edit]

In November 2014, Seattle voters passed Proposition 1 with 59% support. It uses $45 million in new annual funds from a 0.1% sales tax raise and a $60 annual car-tab fee to add King County Metro bus service within the City of Seattle.[96]

Technology

[edit]

Collaborating with several local jurisdictions, Metro was an early adopter of Transit Signal Priority (TSP), a system that can extend green lights to allow buses to get through. The system can boost average speeds as much as 8% and is in use on several of the city's busiest corridors, including Aurora Avenue North, Rainier Avenue S and Lake City Way NE.[97] The system uses RFID tags that are read as buses approach a TSP equipped intersection. In 1998, the fleet was updated with an Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) system that utilizes battery-powered beacons that read the RFID tags and communicate the buses' location to Metro.

In 2010, the AVL system was replaced with a GPS-based system as part of a system-wide radio update.[98] As a part of the radio update Metro also added automated next stop signs and announcements to all buses.[99]

In 2010, Metro rolled out a new IP network based ITS infrastructure for its RapidRide service. Buses will communicate with roadside equipment using 802.11 wireless technology on the 4.9 GHz public safety band. A fiber optic backhaul connects access points and roadside equipment together to Metro's Communication Center. The system will extend the legacy RFID-based TSP system. It will also be used in conjunction with GPS technology to provide frequent and accurate location updates for next bus arrival signs at RapidRide stations.

The extent of Metro's application of intelligent transportation systems (ITS) for transit information available for customers has been limited to a few projects:

  • An early project called MyBus by the University of Washington (UW) utilized the tracking data to provide real-time bus information. This is now hosted by Metro under the name Tracker. An improved version of MyBus called OneBusAway, developed by UW graduate students Brian Ferris and Kari Watkins, combines Tracker information with Google Maps. OneBusAway continued to be maintained by the University of Washington Department of Computer Science, until a new nonprofit organization was founded to house and administer it in 2019.[100]
  • Transit Watch displays, like those found in airports and major train stations, are installed at some transit centers and transfer points to show real-time bus arrival information.
  • A pilot project provided bus information displays along a city arterial. Metro discontinued the project in 2005, citing the cost of maintenance and technical problems.[101]
  • Metro has a regional trip planner that provides itineraries for transit trips within King, Pierce, and Snohomish counties, including those on Sound Transit services, Washington State Ferries, the Seattle Center Monorail, and the Seattle Streetcar. Google Maps also provides trip planning using schedule data as part of their Google Transit service.

ORCA Card

[edit]
Main article: ORCA card

Metro is a participating agency in the regional smart card program called ORCA (One Regional Card for All). It was launched for public use on April 20, 2009, along with six other transit agencies in the region.[102][103]

Bus stop technology

[edit]

RapidRide stations as well as major bus stops in Downtown Seattle are also receiving what Metro calls a "Tech Pylon", a free standing wireless-capable kiosk, that has next bus arrival signs and an ORCA validator for off-board fare payment.[104][105]

Fleet

[edit]
Main article: King County Metro fleet

As of 2024, King County Metro operates with a total of 1,433 buses. [106] The fleet includes a mix of electric trolleybuses, diesel-electric hybrids, and battery electric buses. Buses range in size from 35-foot (11 m) shuttles to 60-foot (18 m), articulated buses on higher-demand routes.[107] The buses are painted in separate colors based on their vehicle type and intended services, with purple reserved for electric trolleybuses and red for RapidRide. The current livery and color scheme was adopted in 2004 and is intended to be replaced in 2025 with the introduction of a larger battery electric fleet.[108][109]

In 1978, Metro was the first large transit agency to order high-capacity articulated buses (buses with a rotating joint).[110] Today, King County Metro has one of the largest articulated fleets in North America (second only to MTA New York City Transit) and articulated buses account for about 42% of the agency's fleet.[2]

In 1979, the agency ordered some of the first wheelchair lift equipped coaches in the nation,[111][112] promising a completely new level of independence for disabled residents. Early lifts were severely flawed, but by the mid-1980s the lifts were generally reliable and were ordered on all new buses. Metro's entire fleet has been wheelchair-accessible since 1999 and all new buses have been low-floor since their introduction in 2003. The final high-floor buses were retired in 2020.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

King County Metro

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
King County Metro Transit, commonly referred to as Metro, is the public transportation division of King County, Washington, responsible for operating bus services, paratransit, vanpool programs, water taxis, the Seattle Streetcar, and contracted operations for Sound Transit light rail within King County. Formed in 1973 by absorbing the Seattle Transit System into the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle's transit operations, Metro has evolved into one of North America's largest transit agencies, managing a fleet of approximately 1,400 buses including the continent's second-largest trolleybus network. As of 2025, Metro records around 63 million annual passenger boardings, reflecting robust recovery and growth second only among major U.S. transit systems, supported by expansions like additional weekly bus trips and enhanced RapidRide corridors. The agency has earned three American Public Transportation Association awards as North America's Best Large Transit Agency for its service reliability and innovations in zero-emission vehicles. However, Metro grapples with persistent safety challenges, including assaults on operators—34 in 2023 and 15 in 2024—and incidents involving drugs and violence linked to urban vagrancy, prompting measures like protective barriers and route adjustments despite overall declines in some reported crimes.

History

Formation and Early Development

The Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, commonly known as Metro, was established by King County voters on September 9, 1958, following a proposal by attorney James R. Ellis in 1953 to tackle regional issues including and through a federated governmental structure. Initially focused on watershed-based rather than political boundaries, Metro's mandate expanded over time to encompass transportation as urban growth strained existing systems. On September 19, 1972, voters approved a measure authorizing Metro to develop a countywide bus system, passing a 0.3% increase from 5% to 5.3% by a margin of 115,398 to 80,171; this funded acquisition of private operators and service expansion. Metro Transit formally commenced operations on January 1, 1973, absorbing the city-owned for $6.5 million and the suburban Metropolitan Transit Corporation for $1.2 million, thereby unifying fragmented services tracing back to predecessors like the (established 1939) and Overlake Transit Service (1927). Early operations emphasized modernization and ridership growth under the 1972 "1980 Plan," which projected 54.3 million annual riders by 1980 through deployment of 550 new buses. Ridership doubled from levels to 66 million by 1980, supported by innovations such as introduction of articulated buses in , the "" downtown free-riding zone launched in September , and expansion of routes in 1977. The agency's first order of new 40-foot diesel buses—145 units from —arrived in June 1976, marking a shift from inherited aging fleets to purpose-built vehicles. These steps laid the foundation for , though challenges like funding constraints and suburban coordination persisted into the late .

Major Expansions and Restructuring

In the mid-2000s, King County voters approved Proposition 2 in November 2006, authorizing a 0.3% increase to fund Metro's Transit Now! plan, which expanded bus service by adding over 400,000 annual service hours and initiating the network of corridors. This expansion included the launch of the first lines, such as the A Line in 2011, featuring dedicated lanes, priority signaling, and enhanced stations to improve speed and reliability on high-demand routes. Subsequent restructurings integrated Metro's bus network with Sound Transit's expanding system. For instance, the East Link Connections project, phased implementation beginning in 2023, restructured routes to feed the 2 Line's opening, adding frequent service like enhanced Route 106 trips while eliminating redundancies post the East Link Starter Line extension in April 2024. Similarly, preparations for the South Link extension to Federal Way involved a 2025-proposed restructure under South Link Connections Phase 3, optimizing south King County routes for rail connections and increasing service efficiency. The 2021 adoption of the Metro Connects long-range plan outlined further expansions, targeting nearly 630 miles of frequent bus service countywide by 2050, supported by RapidRide upgrades on corridors like the G, I, and J lines, with the H Line launching in March 2023. Ongoing bus base expansions, including new facilities to accommodate a growing zero-emissions fleet targeted for 100% by 2035, have enabled these service increases amid rising demand. Recent service changes, such as the August 2025 Eastside updates adding over 900 weekly trips and five new routes, reflect iterative restructurings to address post-pandemic recovery and regional growth. The Ride Free Area (RFA) in was established by King County Metro in September 1973 as the "Magic Carpet" zone, permitting passengers to board and exit buses without paying fares within a bounded roughly from South Jackson Street to Roy Street and from First Avenue to Interstate 5. This policy aimed to stimulate , promote short lunchtime excursions by office workers, and ease downtown congestion by encouraging bus use for brief trips. Over subsequent decades, the RFA facilitated clustering of in the area, which correlated with elevated rates of non-revenue passengers, including those evading fares on routes extending beyond the zone under the pay-upon-exit system then in effect outside the RFA. Facing a budget in 2011–2012 that threatened widespread service cuts, Metro opted to terminate the RFA effective September 29, 2012, as part of a broader service restructuring to generate additional revenue without raising base fares. The elimination shifted all downtown routes to a pay-before-boarding model, aligning with regional transit practices and aiming to capture fares from prior free riders while simplifying operations and reducing boarding delays. Implementation involved public outreach, signage campaigns, and phased enforcement to mitigate confusion, though initial disruptions included longer dwell times at stops and rider noncompliance. Post-elimination, the policy preserved service levels amid fiscal constraints, with the change projected to yield millions in annual fare recovery by addressing systemic underpayment in the former free zone. Subsequent policy evolutions emphasized enforcement amid persistent fare evasion challenges. After the 2012 shift, Metro relied on intermittent inspections under a proof-of-payment framework, but suspended most fare enforcement during the COVID-19 pandemic starting in 2020, resulting in substantiated revenue shortfalls from widespread nonpayment. Fare evasion rates climbed, with audits indicating losses equivalent to reduced operational funding, prompting a resumption of inspections on March 31, 2025, beginning with verbal warnings and progressing to $125 citations for violations. This revival deploys two to three inspectors per shift on high-evasion routes, prioritizing education for first offenses while upholding exemptions for youth under 19 and reduced-fare programs like ORCA LIFT for low-income riders. These measures reflect a causal link between lax enforcement and fiscal strain, countering evasion without altering core fare structures or reintroducing free zones.

Governance and Administration

Organizational Structure and Oversight

King County Metro functions as a department of , with operational oversight provided by the King County Executive and legislative authority from the Metropolitan King County Council. The General Manager, who directs daily operations and strategic initiatives, is nominated by the County Executive and confirmed by the Council; Michelle Allison assumed this role on February 28, 2023. The King County Council exercises primary governance through its Regional Transit Committee (RTC), which reviews transit policies, service plans, budgets, and capital investments, making recommendations to the full for approval. Composed of elected councilmembers, the RTC ensures alignment with countywide mobility goals and regional coordination, including with agencies like . Additional advisory input comes from the Transit Advisory Commission, which provides recommendations to Metro staff and the General Manager on service improvements and equity in planning. Internally, Metro's centers on the (MLT), led by the and Deputy General Manager, which develops the biennial budget, sets policies, and oversees key divisions to advance service delivery and objectives. Core divisions include Bus Operations under Director Phil DeVault; Rail Division under Director Evan Inkster; Vehicle Maintenance under Director Chris Parrott; Safety, Security, and under Director Rebecca Frankhouser; Capital Division under Director Mark Ellerbrook; Mobility Division under Director Chris O’Claire; and support areas such as Finance and Administration led by Assistant Jeannie Miller, and Employee Services by Assistant Tamar Zere. Specialized units like Marine Division (Director Terry Federer) and Transit Facilities (Director Ade Franklin) handle waterborne transit and infrastructure maintenance, respectively, while Chief Administrative Officer David Eldred and Chief of Staff DeAnna Martin coordinate cross-divisional functions. This hierarchical setup enables responsive management of Metro's fleet of over 1,500 buses and related assets as of 2025.

Labor Relations and Workforce Dynamics

The primary labor union representing King County Metro's operational workforce, including bus operators, mechanics, and service attendants, is Local 587, the largest such local on the West Coast with approximately 4,000 active members as of archival records from the mid-2010s, though membership has remained substantial amid ongoing contracts. agreements with Local 587 are negotiated through King County's , which oversees contract administration and for Metro Transit employees. A three-year agreement ratified in August 2023 provided wage increases totaling about 17 percent over its term, alongside expanded training programs for career development and safety protocols. Workforce dynamics emphasize recruitment, retention, and equity initiatives, as outlined in Metro's annual (EEO) program updates, which track utilization of underrepresented groups in hiring and promotions. These efforts include mandatory training on gender equity, anti-discrimination policies, and removing barriers for women, immigrants, and people of color, aligning with broader King County personnel codes that prioritize ethical conduct and conflict prevention among employees. In July 2020, a circulated among Metro employees demanding stronger responses to racist incidents and greater diversity, reflecting internal pressures for cultural reforms amid public scrutiny. Labor disputes have occasionally arisen, particularly in contracted services like transit security, where SEIU Local 6 represents officers providing on-site protection for Metro facilities and vehicles; in September 2025, nearly 5,000 members authorized a after rejecting a proposed 30-cent hourly raise, citing insufficient compensation relative to safety risks and cost-of-living pressures in the area. Core operational staff under ATU Local 587 have maintained relative stability, with joint initiatives such as a 2025 safety task force reconvened in July to address operator assaults, vehicle maintenance, and rider incidents through structured action plans involving over 100 participants. No major work stoppages by bus operators have occurred in recent years, though contract expirations periodically prompt to avert disruptions.

Service Operations

Core Route Network and Service Types

![King County Metro Route 7 bus on Rainier Avenue][float-right] King County Metro's core route network consists of local fixed-route bus services that form the backbone of public transit in the county, providing connectivity between residential areas, commercial districts, and major transit centers. These routes operate on a grid-like structure in urban zones and more radial patterns in suburban and rural areas, with service spans typically from 12 to 18 hours daily, five to seven days a week, and peak frequencies of 15 to 30 minutes. The network emphasizes direct routings and multimodal connections to support daily commuting and essential travel needs. Routes are assigned numbers from 1 to 999 to reflect geographic focus, aiding riders in identifying service areas.
Route Number RangePrimary Service Area
1–99Seattle city limits
100–199South King County
200–299East King County (Eastside)
300–399North King County
900–999Custom or specialized local
For planning, operations, and performance assessment, core routes are grouped into three service families based on density, demand, and market characteristics: Urban Routes, Suburban Routes, and Rural/DART Routes. Urban Routes target high-density Regional Growth Centers, such as , , and the University District, where population and job densities exceed 15 persons plus jobs per acre, offering potential for very frequent service (every 10 minutes or better) and serving areas with strong transit-supportive land uses. Suburban Routes connect moderate-density cities and neighborhoods outside urban centers, balancing coverage with productivity metrics like passengers per platform hour. Rural and DART Routes address low-density outskirts, with at least 35% of mileage outside urban growth boundaries, incorporating deviations for on-demand pickups in underserved spots to extend reach efficiently. This classification evolved from earlier distinctions between Seattle Core routes—those entering Seattle's high-ridership urban core—and Non-Seattle Core routes operating elsewhere, now integrated into the Urban/Suburban/Rural framework to better align with varying market potentials and equity considerations. is evaluated using metrics including ridership, , load factors, and reliability, with thresholds adjusted by service family to ensure equitable . As of 2021, these guidelines guide service adjustments to maintain a cohesive network amid growing demand in dense corridors.

Specialized and Express Services

King County Metro operates express bus routes designed for efficient travel by making limited stops, primarily serving peak-period commuters between suburban origins and downtown Seattle or regional employment centers. Examples include Route 17, which provides nonstop service from Othello Station to downtown via Martin Luther King Jr. Way, and Route 21, offering express segments from the University District to downtown without intermediate stops. These routes typically operate on weekdays during morning and evening rush hours, with frequencies as low as every 15-30 minutes in peak direction. The network represents Metro's primary express and limited-stop service tier, incorporating features such as transit signal priority, off-vehicle fare collection via tap stations, queue jumps, and branded low-floor articulated buses for higher capacity and reliability. Launched starting in , the system includes eight active lines as of October 2025: A Line (Federal Way to Tukwila International Boulevard), B Line (Redmond to Bellevue), C Line ( to ), D Line (Ballard to ), E Line (Shoreline to ), F Line (Burien to Renton), G Line (First Hill/ to , initiated September 2024), and H Line (Burien to ). These corridors emphasize high-frequency service, with headways of 10-15 minutes during peak periods and extended hours, distinguishing them from standard local routes by prioritizing speed and directness along major arterials. Planned expansions, including the I Line (Renton to Auburn) and R Line ( to Rainier Beach), aim to further enhance connectivity by 2030. Specialized services complement express operations with targeted, flexible options for underserved or niche demands. Metro Flex delivers on-demand, app-based van service in select urban zones, such as Issaquah, where riders request pickups within defined geofenced areas; operations run weekdays from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. and Saturdays from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m., integrating with fixed routes for last-mile access. In rural areas, DART provides dial-a-ride with advance reservations for trips, serving communities lacking viable fixed-route options under ADA guidelines. Seasonal specialized routes like Direct offer express shuttles from urban transit hubs to trailheads in the Cascades, operating weekends from May to to manage parking congestion at sites such as . These services adapt to variable demand through technology and partnerships, maintaining overall system efficiency.

Paratransit and Accessibility Programs

King County Metro operates Access Transportation as its primary ADA complementary paratransit service, providing door-to-door rides via accessible vans for individuals whose disabilities prevent them from using fixed-route buses. Eligibility requires applicants aged 6 or older to complete a self-assessment form, obtain co-signature from a healthcare professional, and undergo a free in-person functional evaluation at Harborview Medical Center, with decisions issued within 21 days. The service covers areas within three-quarters of a mile of Metro bus and light rail routes, operating during the same hours as corresponding fixed-route services, which vary by location. Trips must be booked 1 to 7 days in advance either online through the Access Trip Manager portal or by calling 206-205-5000 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.; same-day or next-day bookings after 5 p.m. are not permitted. Fares match fixed-route pricing at $1.75 one-way for adults aged 19 and older, with free rides for youth under 18, personal care attendants, and service animals; a monthly pass costs $63, though Metro Customer Information must be contacted in advance for pass acceptance. In 2023, Access served over 12,000 registered participants, with approximately 8,900 unique users completing 750,000 boardings and traveling 5.5 million vehicle miles. To address capacity constraints and enhance flexibility, Metro launched the Metro Flex Access On-Demand pilot program in select areas, utilizing app-based booking through Via Transportation for eligible Access users seeking alternatives to traditional vans; it operates weekdays from 5 a.m. to 7 p.m. and weekends/holidays from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Looking ahead, Metro's "Future of Paratransit" initiative, informed by community surveys and an advisory committee, plans service model refinements for 2027–2032, focusing on efficiency, customer experience improvements like expanded technology and language access, and sustainable operations while adhering to ADA mandates. Broader accessibility programs emphasize ADA Title II compliance across all services, with Metro maintaining an ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan that assesses and updates public-facing facilities, programs, and vehicles for barrier removal, including annual progress reports. Fixed-route buses feature low-floor designs, wheelchair ramps or lifts, securement areas, and audio-visual announcements, enabling independent boarding for most riders with mobility impairments. A grievance procedure handles ADA complaints in writing, with responses from the ADA Services Administrator within 15 days and appeals to the Office of Equity & Social Justice; reasonable modification requests, such as policy adjustments, are evaluated case-by-case per federal guidelines. Metro also supports reduced-fare options via the Regional Reduced Fare Permit for certified disabled riders, promoting equitable access without compromising service integrity.

Fares and Passenger Revenue

Current Fare Structure and Payment Systems

King County Metro's fare structure, effective September 1, 2025, features a flat single-ride fare for most bus services, with reductions for eligible groups and free access for youth. Adult riders aged 19-64 pay $3.00 per single ride, reflecting a $0.25 increase from prior levels to align with regional partners like Sound Transit. Youth aged 18 and under ride free on all Metro services, a policy expanded to eliminate fares entirely for this group without requiring payment proof in most cases, though a Youth ORCA card is encouraged for seamless transfers.
Fare CategorySingle RideDay PassNotes
Adult (19-64)$3.00$6.00 (Regional, covers up to $3 value)Standard e-purse or pass option.
Youth (0-18)FreeFreeUnlimited rides; no fare payment required.
Senior (65+)$1.00$2.00 (Reduced Regional)Requires Regional Reduced Fare Permit (RRFP).
Disabled/Medicare$1.00$2.00 (Reduced Regional)Requires RRFP for validation.
ORCA LIFT (Income-qualified)$1.00$2.00 (Reduced Regional)Low-income program; eligibility based on household income up to 200% federal poverty level.
Monthly passes, such as the PugetPass, are available via e-purse with values scaled to trip costs (e.g., $108 for unlimited $3-value trips), providing cost savings for frequent riders. Specialized services like Access paratransit charge $1.75 per single ride for eligible disabled users. Transfers are valid for two hours across participating regional agencies when using compatible payment methods, with automatic fare media deductions handling upgrades to higher-cost services. Payment primarily occurs through the (One Regional Card for All) system, which integrates fares across King County Metro, , and other Puget Sound agencies. Riders tap ORCA cards on validators before boarding buses or entering stations, with no tap-off required for most services; funds deduct from stored e-purse value or passes. Cards can be loaded with $5 to $400 in e-purse value and purchased or reloaded at ticket vending machines accepting cash or credit/debit, or via the myORCA app and website. Alternative methods include the Transit GO mobile ticketing app, where users activate digital tickets shown to operators, valid for two-hour transfers on Metro buses. Cash payments require exact fare insertion into fareboxes, with no change returned and limited transfer issuance on select routes. Reduced fare eligibility, such as for ORCA LIFT or RRFP, necessitates pre-approved cards to avoid full charges.

Fare Evasion Rates and Enforcement Challenges

King County Metro suspended fare enforcement in March 2020 amid the and subsequent efforts to , , and practices for greater equity. Prior to the suspension, evasion rates on proof-of-payment routes, such as lines, ranged from 2.7% to 4.5% in 2019, with overall system estimates declining from 4.98% to 3.98% that year based on violation data and audits. These figures reflected active inspections by dedicated Fare Enforcement Officers, who issued citations resolvable via fines starting at $124 or alternatives like . The five-year enforcement hiatus contributed to substantial revenue shortfalls, with fares comprising only about 7-10% of operating costs by 2023-2024 despite 90 million annual bus boardings. Informal estimates during this period suggested evasion exceeding 30% on buses, though official Metro data on post-2020 rates remains limited due to the absence of systematic inspections. revenue totaled $73 million in 2024, underscoring the fiscal strain from non-payment, which disproportionately burdens taxpayers funding the remaining 90%+ of operations via sales taxes and grants. Enforcement challenges intensified under the Safety, Security, and Fare Enforcement (SaFE) Reform Initiative, launched to minimize involvement and address disproportionate citation impacts on unhoused individuals and low-income riders, as identified in 2019 audits. Auditors noted that pre-pause practices led to higher violation rates among vulnerable populations, prompting alternatives like fare loading or service hours over punitive fines. Safety risks for officers and drivers, including assaults amid rising onboard disorder, further complicated resumption, with unions advocating for renewed checks to deter non-payment and enhance system security. In March 2025, Metro restarted inspections with a phased approach: warnings for the first two violations starting March 31, followed by $20 fines (escalating to $40 if unpaid) from May 31, alongside options for resolution via payment plans or community service. This "lighter touch" model aims to balance revenue recovery—critical as adult fares rose to $3.00 on September 1, 2025—with equity, though critics argue it may insufficiently curb evasion without adequate staffing and real-time payment verification. Ongoing hurdles include ORCA card delays in fare loading and inconsistent proof-of-payment compliance on non-proof routes, potentially undermining enforcement efficacy.

Facilities and Infrastructure

Operations Bases and Maintenance Facilities

King County Metro maintains seven primary bus operations bases across King County, strategically positioned to support route coverage from urban to suburban areas like Shoreline, Bellevue, and Tukwila. These bases serve as hubs for bus storage, operator assignments, fueling, and light maintenance, with each typically handling 100-300 vehicles depending on shift demands and fleet allocation. The bases are part of the Central, East, North, and South campuses, enabling efficient dispatching for local, express, and services.
Base NameLocationKey Details
Atlantic Base1555 Airport Way S, Seattle, WA 98134Established 1941; primary hub for trolleybus operations and maintenance; undergoing refurbishment including concrete paving, drainage, and utility upgrades as of October 2024 to extend infrastructure life.
Central Base640 S Massachusetts St, Seattle, WA 98134Built 1941; focuses on central Seattle routes; integrated with Atlantic for shared campus resources.
Ryerson Base1220 4th Ave S, Seattle, WA 98134Opened 1987; handles central district operations and vehicle maintenance, including recent hydraulic lift replacements in eight bays completed under a $10 million project.
North Base2160 N 163rd St, Shoreline, WA 98133Constructed 1992, primarily underground to minimize surface footprint; supports northern King County and Shoreline routes with direct I-5 access.
East Base1975 124th Ave NE, Bellevue, WA 98005Operational since 1977; manages Eastside routes, including Sound Transit Express services and school specials; includes dedicated vehicle maintenance.
South Base12100 East Marginal Way S, Tukwila, WABuilt 1978; serves southern suburbs and airport-area routes; site of expansions including an Interim Base opened in recent years and South Annex Base designed for up to 250 battery-electric buses with green building certifications.
Vehicle maintenance occurs primarily at base-specific shops, such as those at East, Ryerson, and , handling routine inspections, repairs, and overhauls for Metro's fleet of over 1,400 buses. Specialized facilities include the Atlantic-Central Tire and Millwright Shop at 1555 Airport Way S for wheel and work, and Facilities at 11911 E Marginal Way S for building trades like and . The agency's Fixed Assets State of Good Repair Program, funded through measures, targets upgrades at these sites, including electrical infrastructure for zero-emission transitions, with ongoing work reported as of September 2024 across multiple bases. These investments address aging facilities, some dating to the mid-20th century, amid rising costs driven by fleet and increased service demands.

Transit Centers, Stops, and Park-and-Ride Lots

King County Metro's transit centers function as regional hubs for passenger transfers, integrating multiple bus routes with amenities like shelters, seating, and real-time information displays to streamline connections. These facilities support efficient boarding and are often co-located with parking or linked to other transit providers such as . Key transit centers include Aurora Village Transit Center in Shoreline (202 parking spaces, serving E Line, routes 303, 331, 346, and Community Transit lines); Burien Transit Center (488 spaces in an adjacent garage, serving F Line, routes 120, 131, 132, 631, and 560); Issaquah Transit Center (819 spaces, serving routes 208, 269, 271 and 554, 556); Redmond Transit Center (377 spaces, serving B Line, routes 221, 224, 250, DART 930, and 542, 545); and others such as Bellevue Transit Center (no dedicated free parking but pay options nearby, serving B Line and routes 226, 240, 241, 246, 249, 250, 271 plus lines), Kirkland Transit Center (no parking, serving routes 230, 231, 239, 245, 250, 255), Renton Transit Center (no dedicated parking but two nearby garages, serving F Line, routes 101, 105, 106, 107, 148, 153, 160, 240, DART 907, and 560, 566), and Totem Lake Transit Center (no free parking, serving routes 225, 239, 255, DART 930). Park-and-ride lots accommodate commuters by offering vehicle storage adjacent to bus access points, with Metro managing over 50 such facilities varying in capacity from under 50 spaces in smaller church-based lots to more than 1,000 in major sites. Prominent examples encompass Eastgate Park & Ride in Bellevue (1,614 spaces including 1,303 in a garage, serving routes 212, 218, 221, 226, 240, 241, 245, 246, 271, 989 and 554, 556, with EV charging and a pedestrian overpass); Issaquah Highlands Park & Ride (1,010 spaces, serving routes 218, 269 and 554, 556); Kenmore Park & Ride (603 spaces, serving routes 225, 322, 331, 372 and 522); Kingsgate Park & Ride (502 spaces, serving routes 225, 257, 930); Station (996 spaces, serving routes 150, 153, 161, 165, 160, 162, 168, 183, DART 914, 566, 567, and Sounder rail); Federal Way Downtown Station (1,190 spaces, serving A Line, routes 177, 181, 182, 183, 187, 193, DART 901, 903, 574, 577, 578, 586, and Pierce Transit lines); and Northgate area lots including Park & Ride A (443 spaces), B (139 spaces), and C at Thornton Place (350 spaces), all serving routes 40, 61, 67, 75, 303, 322, 345, 348, 365 and 1 Line , with some time-restricted free parking. Many lots experience high utilization, often exceeding 100% capacity at peak times, prompting temporary leased expansions and permit reservations for carpools, though some programs remain suspended. The broader stop network consists of approximately 29,826 bus stops distributed across King County, enabling extensive coverage from urban cores to suburban edges. Standard stops feature signage and route information, while high-volume locations—such as those along 3rd Avenue in Downtown Seattle or at major transfer points—include shelters, lighting, and digital arrival boards to enhance wait times and safety. Infrastructure upgrades, including four new stops on the SR 520 Montlake Lid opened on April 12, 2025, have bolstered access near key destinations like the University of Washington by integrating with highway lid pathways.

Fleet and Technological Integration

Bus Fleet Composition and Procurement

King County Metro maintains a fixed-route bus fleet of 1,417 vehicles as of January 2025, comprising various sizes and powertrains to serve urban, suburban, and express routes. The majority are diesel-hybrid electric buses, which dominate local and articulated services due to their efficiency in stop-and-go traffic, supplemented by electric trolleybuses on wired corridors and a small but expanding segment of battery-electric buses aligned with zero-emission goals. Trolleybuses, operating exclusively in Seattle's urban core, provide zero-emission service on overhead wire networks. The fleet composition is detailed as follows:
Powertrain and TypeLengthQuantity
Hybrid60
Hybrid438
Hybrid285
Diesel & Hybrid (operated for )90
Trolley110
Trolley65
Battery-Electric21
Battery-Electric20
Procurement occurs through competitive public bidding processes governed by King County regulations, typically involving requests for proposals (RFPs) to evaluate manufacturers on criteria such as cost, reliability, emissions compliance, and labor standards. Metro prioritizes zero-emission vehicles in recent acquisitions to achieve a 100% zero-emissions fleet by 2035, replacing aging hybrids and diesels with battery-electric and models. Key contracts include a 2024 agreement with for up to 395 low-floor battery-electric buses, commencing with 89 units in 2026 for the new Tukwila base; prior deals with for up to 120 battery-electric Xcelsior CHARGE buses since 2020; and a December 2024 pact with for up to 16 zero-emission buses, introducing the Polish manufacturer to the North American market. Planned acquisitions for 2025–2030 emphasize 484 battery-electric buses and 20 to support service expansion and infrastructure electrification.

Electrification Initiatives and Zero-Emissions Transition

King County Metro has committed to transitioning its bus fleet to 100% zero-emissions vehicles by 2035, accelerated from an initial 2040 target via county , positioning it among the few large U.S. transit agencies pursuing this timeline. The plan emphasizes battery-electric buses (BEBs) for non-trolley routes, supplemented by existing electric trolleybuses, with all new purchases restricted to zero-emission models starting in 2025. As of January 2024, Metro had incorporated 40 BEBs into service at its South Base, serving South King County routes. Procurement efforts include a March 2024 contract with for an initial 89 low-floor BEBs, with options extending to 395 units over five years, aimed at replacing aging diesel-hybrids. In December 2024, Metro signed its first U.S. contract with for four BEBs (two 40-foot and two 60-foot articulated models), expandable to 16, marking the manufacturer's North American entry. Federal support bolstered these acquisitions, including a July 2024 Federal Transit Administration grant of $6.7 million for additional BEBs and mechanic training. Infrastructure upgrades parallel fleet expansion, with the Interim South Base undergoing a $115 million project to accommodate 120 BEBs via parking and charging stations. As of April 2025, Metro's first fully electric base neared completion, enabling testing of charging systems for over 120 BEBs. However, September 2025 budget proposals signal delays, postponing full by over five years and prompting diversified purchases beyond exclusive BEB reliance to manage costs and supply constraints. These setbacks reflect broader fiscal pressures, including demands and risks, potentially shifting the zero-emissions deadline toward 2040.

Ticketing and Real-Time Technology

King County Metro primarily utilizes the ORCA (One Regional Card for All) contactless smart card system for fare payment, which is interoperable across Puget Sound regional transit agencies including buses, light rail, and ferries. The ORCA card supports stored-value fares, daily and monthly passes, and automatic two-hour transfer credits to reduce costs for multi-leg trips, with adult single-ride fares set at $3.00 as of the latest updates. Reduced fare options, such as ORCA LIFT for low-income riders and Regional Reduced Fare Permits for seniors, youth, and disabled individuals, are loaded onto eligible ORCA cards to provide discounted or free access. Alternative payment methods include the Transit GO Ticket mobile app, which enables contactless ticket purchases via credit/debit cards or / without needing physical cash or cards, and onboard cash payments (exact change required) for buses. Ticket vending machines at major stops and transit centers accept cash, credit, or debit for loading or single tickets. Fare enforcement, paused during the period, resumed with verbal reminders on March 31, 2025, and full enforcement including citations by May 31, 2025, verifying such as tapped cards or app tickets. For real-time technology, King County Metro integrates GPS-based vehicle tracking to provide arrival predictions through the OneBusAway platform, an open-source app and offering stop-specific estimates, route maps, and alerts for delays or disruptions. Users access real-time data by entering stop IDs, route numbers, or locations via the OneBusAway mobile app (available on and Android) or , which aggregates feeds from Metro's GPS systems for accuracy within minutes. The system supports features like trip planning and notifications, extending to interconnected agencies like , though predictions may vary in rural areas due to signal limitations. Complementary apps such as Transit provide similar real-time tracking but rely on the same underlying Metro data feeds. This technology, implemented since the early , has improved rider reliability by reducing wait time uncertainties based on empirical GPS positioning rather than fixed schedules alone.

Funding and Fiscal Management

Primary Revenue Sources and Tax Measures

King County Metro's primary operating revenue derives from a dedicated local sales and use tax, which state law permits counties to impose at rates up to 0.9% for public transportation purposes. This sales tax has historically accounted for over half of Metro's total revenue, funding the majority of bus and paratransit services across the county. Passenger fares contribute approximately 10% of revenue, supplemented by federal grants, interlocal contracts such as payments from Sound Transit for joint services, and minor sources like advertising and property taxes. Key tax measures supporting Metro include the Seattle Transit Measure, a voter-approved 0.15% sales tax increase enacted in November 2020, which generates over $50 million annually through early 2027 specifically for enhanced bus services within Seattle city limits. This measure extended and expanded prior funding commitments, adding service hours and frequency on high-demand routes. In July 2025, the King County Council approved a countywide 0.1% sales tax hike, known as the Safe and Stable Communities Sales Tax, projected to yield around $100 million yearly, with portions allocated to Metro operations amid a $160 million budget deficit; this council-enacted measure did not require voter approval under state law. These taxes reflect a reliance on regressive sales levies, which fluctuate with economic conditions and disproportionately burden lower-income households, prompting critiques of funding stability despite their role in averting service cuts. Voter-approved measures like the 2020 proposition have stabilized urban routes, while council actions in 2025 addressed broader fiscal pressures without ballot referral.

Budget Composition and Subsidy Levels

King County Metro's operating budget is predominantly funded by local sales taxes, interlocal contracts, and grants, with passenger fares contributing a minor portion. In the 2025 proposed budget, total operating expenditures reached $1.43 billion, while revenues totaled $1.29 billion, with the shortfall covered by fund balances or adjustments. Sales tax provided $718 million (approximately 56% of revenues), followed by service contracts with Sound Transit ($278 million) and the City of Seattle ($41 million), grants ($82 million), fares ($100 million across all modes), and other sources including property taxes and interest ($68 million). Expenditures are allocated primarily to bus operations ($936 million), operations ($213 million), services like ACCESS ($95 million), and other modes including DART shuttles, streetcars, vanpools, and marine divisions ($189 million). Personnel costs, encompassing operators and staff, dominate bus and rail operations, supplemented by fuel, parts, and administrative overhead. Capital budgets, separate from operations, emphasize fleet replacement and , funded via reserves, , and , totaling over $670 million in 2025 for projects like zero-emissions transitions and facility upgrades. Subsidy levels remain high, as fares recover only a small of operating costs, reflecting policy priorities for accessibility over revenue generation. King County policy mandates a minimum of 25%, with a target of 30%, where fares must cover that share of passenger-related expenses. However, actual recovery has fallen short post-pandemic; in 2023, fare revenue of $71 million yielded just 9% recovery against operating costs. For the 2025 budget, projected fares of $100 million equate to roughly 7% of total expenditures, with the balance subsidized via es (capped at 0.9% locally under state law) and contracts derived from regional taxes. This structure exposes Metro to fiscal volatility from sales tax fluctuations, prompting projections of shortfalls by 2028 absent revenue reforms.
Revenue Source (2025 Proposed)Amount ($ millions)Percentage of Revenues
71856%
Contract27822%
Fares1008%
Grants826%
Seattle Contract & Other1098%
The table illustrates the heavy reliance on tax-derived funds, underscoring subsidies as the core funding mechanism for service continuity.

Cost Escalation and Efficiency Critiques

King County Metro's operating expenses have escalated significantly in recent years, driven by labor contracts, fleet , and post-pandemic recovery challenges. In , total operating expenses reached $846.7 million, with bus services accounting for $671.7 million, while fare revenues covered only $75.6 million, yielding a far below the agency's policy minimum of 25%. By 2023, the recovery ratio had fallen to 8.8%, and it was projected at 7.8% for 2025 despite a $0.25 adult fare increase to $3.00 effective September 1, 2025. The proposed 2026-27 biennial operating budget totals approximately $3.03 billion, reflecting a $157 million increase over the 2025 biennialized figure, with major drivers including 385 additional full-time equivalents for service expansions and $632.5 million in subsidies to . Critics, including the Washington Policy Center, have attributed cost escalations to structural inefficiencies and mismanagement, noting that historical tax increases failed to deliver promised service expansions. For instance, a 2000 sales tax hike of 0.2% was projected to add 575,000 annual service hours but achieved only 36% of that target, while the 2006 Transit Now package, raising $40 million annually, delivered less than 20% of its 700,000-hour commitment. Ridership stagnated near 2007 levels despite a 67% revenue growth from $348 million in 2000 to $580 million in 2010, prompting arguments that Metro should prioritize route rationalization—eliminating duplicative or low-ridership services—over additional taxpayer funding. The , advocating market-oriented reforms, contends that equating higher budgets with inverts causal priorities, perpetuating a cycle of overpromising and underdelivering. Electrification initiatives exacerbate cost pressures, with $448 million allocated in 2025 alone and cumulative investments reaching $1.2 billion by 2028-29 to support 1,333 zero-emission buses by 2035. These expenditures, alongside revenues (0.9% rate) failing to match and growth, contribute to a projected $500 million biennial shortfall by 2028-29, potentially depleting reserves by 2030-31 absent interventions like service cuts or new taxes such as a countywide Transportation Benefit District levy. per passenger mile rose to $3.32 in 2022, higher than pre-pandemic peer averages, underscoring critiques of dependency—where taxes cover over 90% of costs—over incentives for gains like higher recovery or optimized scheduling. Proponents of argue this reflects causal failures in aligning incentives with ridership rather than expansive service mandates.

Performance and Impact Assessment

King County Metro's ridership experienced a sharp decline during the , dropping to less than 25% of pre-pandemic levels by mid-2020, with average weekday boardings falling to around 100,000 in summer 2020. Pre-pandemic, the system averaged approximately 400,000 weekday boardings in 2019. Annual unlinked passenger trips, a standard measure of boardings, totaled 78,886,848 in 2023 according to National Transit Database reporting. Recovery accelerated thereafter, with average weekday bus ridership rising nearly 14% between March 2023 and March 2024, yielding a net gain of over 30,000 daily boardings. By spring 2024, systemwide average weekday ridership had reached about 64% of 2019 levels, or roughly 256,000 boardings. Ridership recovery has varied geographically and by route, with stronger rebounds on lines serving Southeast Seattle and South King County, areas with higher proportions of essential workers who maintained travel during lockdowns. Downtown-oriented routes, particularly those affected by shifts, have lagged, contributing to about one-third of pre-pandemic ridership remaining unrecovered as of mid-2024. Growth continued into 2025, with an estimated 63 million boardings through August 31, up 4.5 million from the prior year's comparable period. This pace positioned Metro second in year-over-year ridership increase among U.S. agencies handling 50 million or more annual trips, per data. Factors include service restorations, population growth in outer areas, and competition from ride-hailing, though persistent operator shortages and vehicle issues have constrained full recovery.

Operational Efficiency Metrics

King County Metro assesses primarily through on-time performance, productivity ratios, and passenger loading standards, as outlined in its annual system evaluations. On-time performance, defined as buses arriving between 1.5 minutes early and 5.5 minutes late relative to scheduled times, averaged 79% during the first six months of 2023. This metric dipped to 78% over the 12-month rolling average ending in March 2024, reflecting ongoing challenges with traffic and staffing. By October 2025, on-time performance for buses and shuttles further declined to 77.1%, below the agency's internal target of at least 80%. Productivity is gauged by boardings per revenue hour, a standard indicator of service effectiveness that accounts for scheduled operating time excluding or recovery periods. System-wide rose approximately 19% during peak and off-peak periods and 13% during nights from fall 2022 to fall 2023, driven by ridership recovery post-COVID restrictions. Route-specific figures vary significantly; for instance, urban peak services averaged 17.4 to 29.5 boardings per revenue hour in fall 2023, while suburban peak routes ranged from 9.9 to 19.4 in spring 2023. lines, such as the E Line, achieved higher at around 39 boardings per hour off-peak.
Metric2023 (Jan-Jun)2024 (Fall)Notes
On-Time Performance79%78%Buses within 1.5 min early to 5.5 min late; goal ≥80%
Boardings per Hour (Urban Peak Example)13.9–27.217.4–29.5Increase reflects ridership growth; excludes non-revenue time
Passenger load factors, calculated as the ratio of passengers to available seating or standing capacity, indicate underutilization rather than overload in recent periods, with zero hours of chronic crowding requiring investment across evaluated routes in both 2023 and 2024. This aligns with service guidelines prioritizing load thresholds where standing loads exceed 120% of seated capacity for extended periods, though specific deadhead mile percentages or vehicle revenue mile efficiencies are not publicly detailed in annual evaluations. Reliability enhancements, including 26,850 hours of service adjustments for 59 routes in fall 2023–2024, aim to address schedule adherence gaps but highlight persistent inefficiencies from external factors like urban congestion. Operating cost metrics per boarding or passenger mile, tracked internally for cost-effectiveness, remain variable and tied to biennial budgets exceeding $2 billion, though granular 2023–2024 figures emphasize equity-adjusted evaluations over pure efficiency benchmarks.

Effects on Traffic Congestion and Emissions

King County Metro's contribution to alleviating stems primarily from mode substitution, where bus ridership displaces personal vehicle trips, potentially reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in the . National studies indicate that approximately one-third of transit miles would otherwise be driven in single-occupancy vehicles, implying that Metro's operations could avoid tens of millions of VMT annually depending on load factors and trip lengths. However, regional data reveal persistent congestion growth; Seattle's rose 9% from 2023 to 2024, driven by office returns and expansion, even as Metro added service hours and pursued bus priority improvements like queue jumps and lanes to enhance reliability. Metro's buses operating in mixed traffic contribute to delays—systemwide on-time performance hovered around 80% in 2023 despite adjustments for lighter post-pandemic loads—suggesting that without dedicated , transit can exacerbate rather than resolve peak-hour bottlenecks through and vehicle equivalents exceeding solo drivers when occupancy is low. Empirical assessments, including Puget Sound Regional Council modeling, project that expanded Metro service under long-range plans could cap VMT growth but not reverse it amid 1-2% annual increases and sprawling development patterns. On emissions, Metro facilitates greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions via avoided vehicle emissions from mode shift, with pre-pandemic estimates attributing 600,000 metric tons of CO2-equivalent annually to King County transit displacing trips, calculated using average trip distances of 5-7 miles and emission factors of 0.4-0.5 kg CO2 per passenger-mile for autos versus lower bus rates at scale. Post-2020 ridership declines—recovering to roughly 63 million boardings by August 2024 from peaks exceeding 200 million—have proportionally diminished this benefit, as lower utilization raises per-passenger emissions and limits substitution effects. Metro's diesel-hybrid fleet emitted around 80% of county government transit GHGs in recent inventories, though targets for 100% zero-emission buses by 2030 aim to eliminate tailpipe outputs, potentially amplifying net savings if paired with sustained ridership gains. Countywide transportation accounts for over 40% of GHGs, with Metro's role in denser land-use patterns indirectly curbing long-trip emissions, but causal analyses emphasize that high-occupancy efficiency—averaging 20-30 passengers per bus during peaks—is essential to outperform solo driving on a lifecycle basis, including upstream production.

Safety and Security

Incident Statistics and Crime Patterns

King County Metro records security incidents encompassing assaults, drug-related disturbances, thefts, and other violations of its , with data tracked through internal reporting systems and shared via public updates. Operator assaults dropped 56% in 2024 to 15 incidents from 34 in 2023, while early 2025 data showed only three such events in and . Passenger assaults totaled 31 in 2023, contributing to broader concerns over amid post-pandemic ridership recovery. Drug-related incidents, often involving public intoxication or possession on buses and at stops, declined 35% in 2024 to roughly 1,025 reports from 1,578 in 2023, reflecting enhanced enforcement and fare accountability measures. Overall security events fell 22% in the first eight months of 2024 to 3,789 compared to the same period in 2023, even as ridership increased, suggesting improved deterrence from expanded policing. King County Sheriff's Office data indicated a 225% rise in officer-initiated arrests on transit in 2024 versus 2023, targeting fare evasion and behavioral issues frequently tied to homelessness and substance use.
Category20232024Change
Operator Assaults3415-56%
Passenger Assaults31N/AN/A
Drug-Related Incidents1,578~1,025-35%
Overall Security Incidents (Jan-Aug)~4,8703,789-22%
Crime patterns reveal a concentration of assaults and disturbances during evening hours and on high-frequency routes in urban Seattle areas, often involving repeat offenders influenced by fentanyl use or untreated mental health conditions, though aggregate declines correlate with proactive interventions like bus barriers and increased patrols. Washington state recorded 97 violent transit incidents from 2021 to 2023, including five fatalities, positioning it among the higher-risk areas nationally per comparative analyses, with King County Metro bearing a significant share due to its dense service footprint. Notable escalations include the December 2024 fatal stabbing of operator Shawn Yim during a passenger altercation, underscoring vulnerabilities despite downward trends in reported metrics.

Security Protocols and Response Measures

King County Metro employs a combination of dedicated security personnel and reformed enforcement strategies to maintain order on its transit system. The Metro Transit Police Department, operated as a specialized unit of the King County Sheriff's Office, conducts data-driven patrols focused on high-risk areas such as the I-5 corridor, enforces state laws and the Metro Code of Conduct, and prioritizes responses to assaults on employees and through visible officer presence on buses and at facilities. Complementing this, Transit Security Officers—numbering over 140 following a more than doubling of staff from approximately 70—provide 24/7 coverage with expanded routes and operational areas to deter disruptions and support riders. Under the Safety, Security, and Fare Enforcement (SaFE) Reform Initiative launched in January 2021, Metro shifted toward a "Care and Presence" model emphasizing over punitive measures, including pilot programs at transit centers pairing security officers with behavioral health specialists for from 6 p.m. to 2 a.m. This includes deploying Safety Ambassadors in blue jackets for rider assistance and community engagement, alongside partnerships with external organizations for referrals to and services, while fare enforcement remains paused since the to prioritize equitable outcomes. The is enforced through multilingual signage and guidelines prohibiting , substance use, and , with reviews aimed at avoiding criminalization of minor infractions. For incident response, riders and operators are instructed to dial 911 for emergencies, while non-urgent issues are reported to bus drivers, via Metro's online portal, or by calling 206-553-3000. Metro Transit Police handles criminal responses with specialized units, including a K-9 team capable of detecting over 19,000 scents and a joint anti-terrorism task force with , ensuring rapid intervention across jurisdictions. Post-incident protocols involve reviewing events for injuries or damage, providing trauma-informed training to reduce response times, and offering expanded wellness resources such as and recovery programs for affected employees. In response to persistent challenges, including the fatal stabbing of bus operator Shawn Yim in September 2025, the King County Regional Transit Safety Task Force recommended enhanced coordination for prevention and deterrence, leading to a proposed $115 million investment over two years. This includes installing operator safety partitions fleet-wide within 12-18 months, mandatory and training for all frontline staff, and bolstering ambassador and police staffing at high-incident locations for quicker interventions. Operator surveys following assaults inform iterative improvements, reflecting a data-driven approach to refining protocols amid rising demands from increased ridership and behavioral incidents.

Controversies and Debates

Service Reliability and Public Complaints

King County Metro measures service reliability primarily through on-time performance, defined as buses arriving between 1.5 minutes early and 5.5 minutes late relative to scheduled times. In the first half of 2023, systemwide on-time performance averaged 79%, remaining stable compared to 2022 levels despite ongoing challenges. By 2024, this metric fluctuated between 78% and 81%, with a 12-month rolling average of 78% recorded in March, reflecting persistent pressures from external factors. Key contributors to unreliability include , seasonal road construction, and operational constraints such as workforce shortages, which prompted Metro to remove trips across multiple routes in fall 2023 to maintain trip completion rates above 98%. Construction-related delays notably intensified during summer 2025, exacerbating bunching—where multiple buses arrive in clusters—and leading to detours on affected corridors. Metro has responded by piloting advanced service management tools on high-frequency lines to enforce headways, adjusting schedules to add recovery time on 59 underperforming routes (requiring an estimated 26,850 additional annual hours in 2024), and collaborating with local jurisdictions on spot infrastructure improvements like signal prioritization and queue jumps. Public complaints have centered on chronic delays, "ghost buses" (unplanned no-shows due to operator shortages or mechanical issues), and inconsistent service affecting commuters' schedules, particularly on peak-hour routes navigating dense urban . In response to rider frustration and oversight, King County Metro implemented real-time issue relaying in 2025 to reduce bunching incidents and passed in March 2025 mandating enhanced tracking of cancellations, improved rider notifications via apps, and quarterly reporting on reliability data to address transparency gaps. reviews have noted Metro's overall of congestion as effective at a system level but recommended deeper root-cause analysis beyond symptoms like bunching to prevent recurrence.

Equity Claims Versus Empirical Outcomes

King County Metro promotes equity through policies emphasizing service prioritization in areas with high populations of low-income residents, communities of color, and speakers, including the use of "targeted universalism" in its 2021–2023 Strategic Plan to address disparities via -informed investments. The agency's Equity Impact Review process integrates quantitative on demographics and qualitative input to guide decisions, such as expanding ORCA LIFT reduced-fare subsidies for households below 200% of the federal poverty level, which cost $54 annually for unlimited rides as of 2021. These efforts aim to enhance access for transit-dependent individuals, with Metro claiming to lead with equity by directing resources toward underserved routes and fare reforms like the 2019 SaFE initiative, which decriminalized initial violations to mitigate disproportionate impacts on marginalized groups. Empirical evidence partially supports increased usage from subsidies: fully subsidized annual passes doubled low-income residents' rides compared to $1.50 reduced fares, per a 2021 evaluation, while a offering six months of free transit to at-risk low-income individuals in King County demonstrated sustained trip increases post-subsidy. Rider surveys indicate lower-income users (under $25,000 annually) comprise a significant portion of boardings and report higher overall service satisfaction than higher-income riders, reflecting greater reliance on buses for essential travel. Despite these gains, outcomes reveal unresolved systemic gaps contradicting full equity realization. Rising housing costs have displaced low-income households and communities of color to South King County suburbs, where sprawl results in sparser routes, longer headways, and reduced job access—exacerbating "spatial mismatch" for low-wage workers who face commute times 20–30% higher than in central . Metro's own Long-Range Plan acknowledges persistent equity shortfalls, with over 20% of residents below 200% lacking viable transit options due to land-use patterns beyond agency control, such as low-density zoning limiting service efficiency. further highlighted disparities, as low-income and minority-heavy areas experienced steeper ridership drops and slower recoveries tied to economic vulnerability, with multinomial models showing suburban low-income clusters most affected by service reductions. Fare reforms intended to promote equity have yielded mixed results: while reducing citations benefited low-income evaders, a 2018 Metro study found the prior enforcement model issued disproportionately high fines to marginalized riders, but post-reform data on revenue loss and evasion rates—estimated at 10–20% systemwide—suggests added fiscal strain without commensurate access improvements. Overall, targeted interventions boost individual ridership but fail to close structural divides, as suburban transit deserts persist and subsidies mask underlying inefficiencies in service delivery to equity-priority zones.

Political Funding Battles and Taxpayer Burden

King County Metro's funding relies heavily on revenue, with approximately 60% of its budget derived from local taxes rather than fares, which cover only about 25% of operating costs. This structure has sparked ongoing political contention, as proponents of expansion argue for tax hikes to prevent service reductions, while critics highlight the regressive nature of sales taxes and question the agency's efficiency in delivering value to taxpayers. In 2014, amid threats of bus cuts due to budget shortfalls, county executives proposed increases and alternative levies like vehicle registration fees to bolster Metro's funding, prompting opposition from groups decrying the added burden on low-income households and motorists without commensurate improvements in service reliability or cost controls. Public polls at the time reflected resistance to car tab fee hikes specifically earmarked for Metro, with a KING 5 survey showing majority opposition among residents. Similar debates resurfaced in voter rejections of broader transit funding packages, such as a 2015 initiative that would have committed additional federal matching funds but failed due to concerns over escalating taxpayer costs estimated at billions over decades. Recent efforts underscore persistent fiscal pressures, including a June 2025 proposal for a 0.1% sales tax increase to raise $100 million annually for Metro expansions and road repairs, aimed at addressing structural deficits projected to exceed $160 million. This followed the King County Council's July 2025 approval of a separate 0.1% sales tax hike for public safety, pushing the combined rate toward 10.55% and amplifying critiques of cumulative tax layering on consumers. Taxpayer advocates, including think tanks like the Washington Policy Center, have pointed to Metro's operational metrics—such as a cost of 99 cents per passenger-mile—as evidence that subsidies remain high relative to peers, fueling demands for reforms like better enforcement before additional levies. The taxpayer burden is quantified in Metro's low farebox recovery, leaving the remainder—often exceeding $500 million annually for fixed-route services—to be covered by sales taxes and general funds, which critics argue disproportionately impacts non-riders and strains county budgets amid competing priorities like public safety. These dynamics have led to hybrid solutions, such as tapping reserves to avert 2020 cuts, but underscore a pattern where political pushes for growth outpace voter-approved revenue stability, resulting in repeated ballot and legislative skirmishes over fiscal accountability.

References

  1. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/about
  2. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/travel-options/bus
  3. https://www.historylink.org/File/20968
  4. https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/King_County_Metro
  5. https://kingcountymetro.blog/2025/10/23/king-county-metro-ridership-growth-second-highest-among-nations-largest-transit-agencies/
  6. https://kingcountymetro.blog/2024/12/06/king-county-metro-has-second-fastest-rider-increase-in-u-s/
  7. https://www.kiro7.com/news/investigates/kiro-7-investigates-your-safety-public-transit/6X2IVOA575DOFGU3PMKKQNLKGY/
  8. https://komonews.com/news/local/metro-sees-rise-in-ridership-and-drop-in-safety-incidents-but-concerns-linger-shootings-drugs-fentanyl-assaults-attacks-fights-homeless-traffic-transit
  9. https://www.kuow.org/stories/what-s-the-future-of-safety-on-king-county-transit-depends-who-you-ask
  10. https://www.historylink.org/file/7813
  11. https://www.bettertransport.info/pitf/transitnow.htm
  12. https://www.seattle.gov/documents/Departments/SDOT/TransitProgram/RapidRide/2017_09_RRProgram_FactSheet.pdf
  13. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/programs-and-projects/east-link-connections
  14. https://cdn.kingcounty.gov/-/media/king-county/depts/metro/documents/about/data-and-reports/2025/transit-development-plan-2025-2030.pdf?rev=ba44f9bc665b45c6b06e1eadccd7baea&hash=A11946B55585A70BFC5ABD1F996E6965
  15. https://kingcountymetro.blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/King-County-Metro-Long-Range-Plan-Metro-Connects-July-2021.pdf
  16. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/programs-and-projects/bus-base-expansion
  17. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/routes-and-service/service-change
  18. https://metro.kingcounty.gov/am/history/history-1970.html
  19. https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/warning-seattles-free-ride-zone-coming-to-an-end/
  20. https://allianceforpioneersquare.org/wp/2012/09/changes-to-metro-service-september-29-not-just-the-end-of-the-ride-free-area/
  21. https://www.soundtransit.org/get-to-know-us/news-events/news-releases/transit-agencies-city-host-open-house-elimination-ride
  22. https://allianceforpioneersquare.org/wp/2012/04/ride-free-area-update/
  23. https://kingcountymetro.blog/2025/01/06/king-county-metro-to-resume-fare-inspection-in-march-2025/
  24. https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/transportation/metro-to-resume-fare-inspections-aboard-buses/
  25. https://www.theurbanist.org/2025/03/28/king-county-metro-resuming-fare-enforcement-on-march-31/
  26. https://kingcountymetro.blog/2023/02/28/michelle-allison-confirmed-as-king-county-metro-general-manager/
  27. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/about/leadership
  28. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/council/governance-leadership/county-council/committees/regional-transit-committee
  29. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/about/advisory-groups/transit-advisory-commission
  30. https://archiveswest.orbiscascade.org/ark:80444/xv29092
  31. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/executive/governance-leadership/labor-relations/labor-contracts
  32. https://kingcountymetro.blog/2023/08/16/king-county-metros-largest-union-approves-3-year-labor-contract-with-higher-salaries-and-expanded-training-opportunities/
  33. https://employees.metrotransit.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2025-EEO-Program-Report-Update.pdf
  34. https://employees.metrotransit.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/2024-EEO-Program-Report-Update.pdf
  35. https://www.king5.com/article/news/local/protests/king-county-metro-employees-make-demands-for-change-end-racism/281-32a334a3-1753-4c5a-bdbd-da1bcd6559a8
  36. https://komonews.com/news/local/king-county-metro-sound-transit-security-guards-to-potentially-go-on-strike-seeking-higher-wages-public-safety-seattle
  37. https://mynorthwest.com/local/king-county-security-strike/4127237
  38. https://kingcountymetro.blog/2025/07/08/atu-local-587-and-metro-put-safety-first-as-task-force-reconvenes/
  39. https://kingcounty.legistar.com/gateway.aspx?m=l&id=/matter.aspx?key=21338
  40. https://cdn.kingcounty.gov/-/media/king-county/depts/metro/documents/about/policies/2021-11-17-metro-service-guidelines.pdf
  41. https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/transportation/qa-how-bus-route-numbers-are-determined/
  42. https://metro.kingcounty.gov/advisory-groups/service-guidelines-task-force/pdf/report-and-recommendations-appendix5-10-2015.pdf
  43. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/routes-and-service/schedules-and-maps/017
  44. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/routes-and-service/schedules-and-maps/021
  45. https://kingcountymetro.blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/King-County-Metro-Service-Guidelines-July-2021.pdf
  46. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/travel-options/bus/rapidride
  47. https://theurbanist.org/2024/09/13/metro-launches-rapidride-g/
  48. https://www.issaquahwa.gov/3428/Metro-Flex
  49. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/travel-options/accessible-services/access-transportation
  50. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/programs-and-projects/future-of-paratransit
  51. https://city.ridewithvia.com/metro-flex-aod
  52. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/about/policies/ada
  53. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/travel-options/accessible-services
  54. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/fares-and-payment/prices
  55. https://kingcountymetro.blog/2025/07/28/king-county-metro-water-taxi-and-seattle-streetcar-adult-fares-change-sept-1-2025/
  56. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/fares-and-payment/reduced-fares/orca-lift
  57. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/fares-and-payment/ways-to-pay
  58. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/fares-and-payment/ways-to-pay/orca-cards
  59. https://kingcountymetro.blog/2025/05/27/king-county-metro-fully-resumes-fare-enforcement-may-31/
  60. https://publicola.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/0053-REPORT-Annual-Report-on-King-County-Metro-Fare-Enforcement-Fare-Violation-Programs-1.pdf
  61. https://www.trainsfare.eu/seattles-king-county-metro-struggles-with-34-bus-fare-evasion/
  62. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/about/policies/safe-reform-initiative
  63. https://digital.lib.washington.edu/bitstreams/fcf69631-cf57-4575-8ad2-4a9226caed3b/download
  64. https://mynorthwest.com/chokepoints/king-county-metro-fare/4094839
  65. https://seattletransitblog.com/2025/07/31/metro-and-seattle-streetcar-fares-increasing-on-sept-1/
  66. https://seattletransitblog.com/tag/fare-enforcement/
  67. https://gis-kingcounty.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/metro-bus-bases-in-king-county-bus-bases-point
  68. https://directory.kingcounty.gov/GroupDetail.asp?GroupID=20350
  69. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241010475791/en/Granite-and-King-County-Metro-Announce-Atlantic-Base-Refurbishment-Project
  70. https://directory.kingcounty.gov/GroupDetail.asp?GroupID=20370
  71. https://directory.kingcounty.gov/GroupDetail.asp?GroupID=20400
  72. https://directory.kingcounty.gov/GroupDetail.asp?GroupID=20390
  73. https://directory.kingcounty.gov/GroupDetail.asp?GroupID=20380
  74. https://directory.kingcounty.gov/GroupDetail.asp?GroupID=20870
  75. https://directory.kingcounty.gov/GroupDetail.asp?GroupID=20500
  76. https://directory.kingcounty.gov/GroupDetail.asp?GroupID=20900
  77. https://kingcountymetro.blog/2024/09/24/september-2024-update-metros-fixed-assets-state-of-good-repair-program/
  78. https://www.psrc.org/media/8882
  79. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/rider-tools/parking-locations
  80. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/about/data-and-reports/park-and-ride-usage
  81. https://kingcounty.gov/-/media/king-county/depts/metro/documents/about/data-and-reports/2017/2017-par17q4.pdf
  82. https://www5.kingcounty.gov/sdc/?Layer=transitstop_point
  83. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/routes-and-service/schedules-and-maps
  84. https://kingcountymetro.blog/2025/04/09/new-king-county-metro-bus-stops-opening-on-the-montlake-lid-april-12/
  85. https://kingcountymetro.blog/2025/06/10/king-county-metro-to-install-operator-safety-partitions-fleetwide/
  86. https://www.kingcounty.gov/en/dept/executive-services/about-king-county/business-operations/finance-business-operations/procurement-payables
  87. https://www.gillig.com/2024/03/18/gillig-awarded-historic-contract-to-supply-king-county-metro-with-up-to-395-battery-electric-buses/
  88. https://www.newflyer.com/2020/01/king-county-metro-agrees-to-purchase-up-to-120-zero-emission-battery-electric-xcelsior-charge-buses-from-new-flyer-marks-a-milestone-achievement-toward-2040-commitment/
  89. https://www.solarisbus.com/en/press/solaris-signs-first-contract-for-electric-bus-deliveries-to-the-united-states-of-america-2263
  90. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/programs-and-projects/zero-emissions
  91. https://cdn.kingcounty.gov/-/media/king-county/depts/metro/documents/about/data-and-reports/2022/zero-emission-bus-fleet-transition-plan-may-2022.pdf?rev=ab92ebfdf7a14ea388515333e8033bd0&hash=02B74D00028B65CA7F763A22EF9851F7
  92. https://cdn.kingcounty.gov/-/media/king-county/depts/metro/documents/projects/zero-emissions-fleet/electrification-onepage.pdf?rev=7ad43f1375254c28884c8e5a0b7c5a89
  93. https://kingcountymetro.blog/2024/12/23/king-county-metro-signs-landmark-deal-to-welcome-new-bus-manufacturer-to-north-america-expand-zero-emission-fleets/
  94. https://www.metro-magazine.com/10233462/solaris-to-provide-king-county-metro-battery-electric-buses
  95. https://kingcountymetro.blog/2024/07/10/federal-funds-to-add-more-battery-electric-buses-to-king-county-metros-fleet/
  96. https://www.stantec.com/en/projects/united-states-projects/k/king-county-metro-progressive-base-electrification
  97. https://kingcountymetro.blog/2025/04/22/moving-at-lightning-speed-king-county-metros-100-zero-emission-bus-base-nears-completion/
  98. https://www.theurbanist.org/2025/09/24/king-county-metro-delays-electrification/
  99. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/fares-and-payment/ways-to-pay/transit-go-ticket
  100. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/rider-tools/mobile-and-web-apps
  101. https://pugetsound.onebusaway.org/wiki/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
  102. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.joulespersecond.seattlebusbot&hl=en_US
  103. https://pugetsound.onebusaway.org/
  104. https://onebusaway.org/
  105. https://metro.kingcounty.gov/am/future/pdfs/20140321-metro-finances.pdf
  106. https://www.washingtonpolicy.org/publications/detail/citizens-guide-to-king-county-metro-proposition-1-to-extend-and-increase-seattles-transportation-benefit-district-sales-tax
  107. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/executive/governance-leadership/king-county-executive/news/archive/2016/september/7-metro-connects
  108. https://www.theurbanist.org/2025/09/22/king-county-council-frontrunner-peter-kwon-averse-to-taxes-bold-plans/
  109. https://www.seattle.gov/transportation/projects-and-programs/programs/transit-program/seattle-transit-measure
  110. https://kingcountymetro.blog/2020/11/04/seattle-voters-support-funding-for-transit/
  111. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/council/governance-leadership/county-council/newsroom/2025/07-22-tax-vote
  112. https://www.theurbanist.org/2025/06/03/king-county-floats-sales-tax-bump-to-fund-metro-roads/
  113. https://www.seattleclimate.org/strategies/alternatives-to-driving/transit-that-works/king-county-metro
  114. https://cdn.kingcounty.gov/-/media/king-county/depts/executive/performance-strategy-budget/budget/2025/2025-proposed-budget-book/08_metro.pdf?rev=e0e74c3177d645cb8d1e7d7038d1ca36&hash=37473DE3594DF53208B60AC9B6F1DBC5
  115. https://cdn.kingcounty.gov/-/media/king-county/depts/metro/documents/about/budget/king-county-metro-fares-and-revenue.pdf?rev=cdb90cdd17934ec1a08edbb23dfab144&hash=55164610E92326E2DEB239DE506E216E
  116. https://kingcounty.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=13327159&GUID=4AFF4C49-BBAB-4B0F-A2BF-3DF594A73D4E
  117. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/about/data-and-reports/-/media/king-county/depts/metro/documents/about/data-and-reports/2021/system-evaluation.pdf
  118. https://seattletransitblog.com/tag/ridership/
  119. https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/transit_agency_profile_doc/2023/00001.pdf
  120. https://cdn.kingcounty.gov/-/media/king-county/depts/metro/documents/about/data-and-reports/2024/2024-system-evaluation.pdf?rev=4c1b3fab720049ea8c28079e50a3dca2&hash=9A675590F1479A11010C4AB8C018156D
  121. https://www.theurbanist.org/2024/08/14/where-did-king-county-metros-ridership-go/
  122. https://seattletransitblog.com/2024/05/20/metro-update-on-ridership-recovery-and-service-planning/
  123. https://cdn.kingcounty.gov/-/media/king-county/depts/metro/documents/about/data-and-reports/2023/system-evaluation.pdf
  124. https://app.powerbigov.us/view?r=eyJrIjoiZDMwMWExOTMtOTY3ZC00MTU5LTgxMDgtODM4MTZiYTExMzJkIiwidCI6ImJhZTUwNTlhLTc2ZjAtNDlkNy05OTk2LTcyZGZlOTVkNjljNyJ9
  125. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/79400/dot_79400_DS1.pdf
  126. https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/data/seattle-congestion-increased-9-in-2024-as-workers-returned-to-office/
  127. https://www.climatesolutions.org/article/1590119179-king-county-council-steps-forward-clean-energy-transit
  128. https://www.apta.com/wp-content/uploads/Standards_Documents/APTA-SUDS-CC-RP-001-09_Rev-1.pdf
  129. https://cdn.kingcounty.gov/-/media/king-county/depts/executive/climate-office/documents/2025scap/kc_ghg_webversion.pdf?rev=57feaeb0f876467ea609bf65414a8caa&hash=539AE499BA8569CC348C5C21A9F4A337
  130. https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/transportation/how-seattle-area-transit-is-pushing-back-against-crime/
  131. https://www.masstransitmag.com/safety-security/press-release/55287574/king-county-metro-transit-king-county-metro-drug-incident-reports-down-35-percent-from-2023-to-2024
  132. https://komonews.com/news/local/king-county-metro-council-support-more-police-safety-protections-transit-public-transportation-special-meeting-drivers-riders-passengers-protection-amalgamated-transit-union-587-atu
  133. https://www.kiro7.com/news/study-wa-one-10-most-dangerous-states-public-transit-safety/QR6QAOWF2JHQJOOPIFUMXEG53A/
  134. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/sheriff/courts-jails-legal-system/police-partnership-program/partnerships/metro
  135. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/rider-tools/rider-safety
  136. https://kingcountymetro.blog/2025/10/06/moving-forward-with-security-improvements-in-king-county/
  137. https://www.king5.com/article/news/local/king-county-metro-seeks-major-safety-investment-after-driver-fatal-stabbing/281-72ee936a-19ff-49c7-b65a-9efa5be3ae34
  138. https://www.theurbanist.org/2025/07/03/metro-bus-reliability-dips-as-summer-construction-season-hits/
  139. https://kingcountymetro.blog/2025/03/28/king-county-metro-reduces-bus-bunching/
  140. https://www.theurbanist.org/2025/03/19/king-county-wants-fewer-ghost-buses/
  141. https://kingcounty.gov/en/independents/governance-and-leadership/government-oversight/auditors-office/reports-papers/reports/2019/transit-reliability
  142. https://kingcountymetro.blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/King-County-Metro-Strategic-Plan-for-Public-Transportation-2021-2023-July-2021.pdf
  143. https://issuu.com/metro-transit/docs/metro-service-guidelines-111721/s/15196452
  144. https://catalog.results4america.org/case-studies/subsidized-transit-king-county-wa
  145. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166046222000436
  146. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/about/data-and-reports/-/media/king-county/depts/metro/documents/about/data-and-reports/2019/2019-rider-non-rider-survey-final.pdf
  147. https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/about/mobility-framework
  148. https://www.urban.org/features/unequal-commute
  149. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03611981221116366
  150. https://transportationchoices.org/fare-enforcement-equity-and-social-justice-at-railvolution/
  151. https://cdn.kingcounty.gov/-/media/king-county/depts/metro/documents/about/policies/2019-10-metro-mobility-framework-report.pdf?rev=9bd6d385c6464994b389648732d82f16&sc_lang=so-so&hash=D4B8338B583CE99AD8B2E2697D367FFC
  152. https://www.washingtonpolicy.org/publications/detail/king-5-poll-residents-dont-support-car-tab-fee-hike-for-metro
  153. https://www.washingtonpolicy.org/publications/detail/king-county-officials-seek-tax-increases-to-avoid-their-own-planned-bus-service-cuts
  154. https://ballotpedia.org/King_County_Transportation_District_Sales_Tax_and_Vehicle_Registration_Fee%2C_Proposition_1_%28April_2014%29
  155. https://shiftwa.org/seattle-officials-trumpeting-another-vote-to-raise-metro-taxes/
  156. https://www.kuow.org/stories/remembering-death-seattles-major-transit-initiative
  157. https://www.reddit.com/r/SeattleWA/comments/1m6jnq7/king_county_council_expected_to_approve_new_sales/
  158. https://westseattleblog.com/2025/07/king-county-council-votes-to-raise-sales-tax-one-tenth-of-one-percent-to-help-fund-public-safety-services/
  159. https://www.thecentersquare.com/washington/article_f26f0329-cde2-4ab2-ae3a-7fe9c6b98869.html
  160. https://mynorthwest.com/dave-ross-blog/king-county-councilmember-wants-metro-funding-to-take-advantage-of-seattles-rapid-growth/2466
  161. https://www.changewashington.org/seattle-style-cronyism-makes-dow-constantine-the-6-million-man/
  162. https://cdn.kingcounty.gov/-/media/king-county/depts/metro/documents/about/data-and-reports/2014/metro-transit-finances-overview-02-03-14.pdf?rev=e8d6ef4d6bb348d8b250dd19666c9746&hash=DF9E554D19ED312C1E6AC5E3C0D24CE1
  163. https://www.transittalent.com/articles/index.cfm?story=King_County_%25242_Billion_Transit_Plan_11-11-2024
  164. https://www.theurbanist.org/2020/11/20/newly-approved-metro-budget/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.