Triangle Center

Triangle CenterMain

Community hub

Triangle Center

8 pages, 0 posts

0 subscribers

Recent from talks

Be the first to start a discussion here.

Recent from talks

Be the first to start a discussion here.

Contribute something

About hubMembersContent overviewUpdatesRules

Main reference articles

Triangle Center

View on Wikipedia

from Wikipedia

The Triangle Center is primarily an office complex with several restaurants and a coffee shop in downtown Lexington, Kentucky. Originally envisioned as a shopping and dining complex bound by Broadway, East Main and South Mill Streets, it was constructed by the Webb Cos, to complement adjacent Victorian Square which had opened only one year prior.^[2]

It was first announced on October 1, 1984, by the Webb Cos. as a "festival marketplace" with boutiques, shops, and food kiosks.^[3] The Festival Marketplace, as it was first named, was a combined effort by the developer with the Lexington Financial Center to replace the failed Galleria project. It was to be modeled after Harbor Place in Baltimore, Maryland, Waterside in Norfolk, Virginia, Faneuil Hall in Boston, Massachusetts and Toledo, Ohio's Portside.

The open-air yet enclosed 114,000 sq ft (10,600 m²). structure would contain numerous small shops, a food court with a common dining area and a restaurant or a nightclub.^[3] A farmers market was also considered as a tenant.

In addition to the marketplace, $7.5 million in state aid was announced by then-Governor Martha Layne Collins towards the construction of a six-level parking structure that would serve Festival Marketplace and the Lexington Financial Center.^[3]

References

[edit]

^ Google Maps
^ Gaines, John. "Webbs Announce Plans for 3-story Office Building." 27 October 1984. Herald-Leader [Lexington]. 5 December 2006.
^ ^a ^b ^c Duke, Jacqueline. "Marketplace, office tower planned Webb project will replace the Galleria." 2 October 1984. Herald-Leader [Lexington]. 5 December 2006.

View on Grokipedia

from Grokipedia

In geometry, a triangle center is a point in the plane of a triangle whose trilinear coordinates are defined symmetrically in terms of the triangle's side lengths and angles, often serving as a point of concurrency for certain lines or cevians related to the triangle.^[1] These centers exhibit key properties such as homogeneity (scaling invariance under side length multiplication), bisymmetry (invariance under side label swaps), and cyclicity (cyclic permutation of coordinates), which ensure their consistent geometric behavior across different triangles.^[1] The most notable triangle centers, known since ancient Greek geometry, include the centroid (intersection of the medians, dividing each in a 2:1 ratio and acting as the center of mass), the orthocenter (intersection of the altitudes, located inside acute triangles and outside obtuse ones), the circumcenter (intersection of the perpendicular bisectors, equidistant from all vertices as the center of the circumcircle), and the incenter (intersection of the angle bisectors, center of the incircle tangent to all sides).^[2] The orthocenter, centroid, and circumcenter lie on the Euler line in general triangles, with the centroid dividing the segment from orthocenter to circumcenter in a 2:1 ratio.^[2] Beyond these, thousands of additional centers exist, defined by more complex symmetric functions, such as the Spieker center (incenter of the medial triangle) or the Feuerbach point (point of tangency between the incircle and the nine-point circle).^[3] The comprehensive study of triangle centers is facilitated by the Encyclopedia of Triangle Centers (ETC), an online database compiled by mathematician Clark Kimberling at the University of Evansville, which originated from his 1998 book cataloging 400 centers and has since expanded to over 72,000 entries, each documented with trilinear, barycentric, and tripolar coordinates, geometric constructions, and relational properties like isogonal conjugates.^[3] This resource underscores the richness of triangle geometry, where centers reveal symmetries, concurrencies, and transformations, bridging elementary properties with advanced Euclidean research.^[3]

Core Concepts

Formal Definition

A triangle center is a point in the plane of a given triangle

ABC

that can be expressed using homogeneous barycentric coordinates

(x : y : z)

, where

x

y

, and

z

are real numbers not all zero, typically defined as symmetric functions of the side lengths

a = BC

b = CA

c = AB

, or related quantities such as the angles

A

B

C

, semiperimeter

s

, inradius

r

, circumradius

R

, or area

\Delta

.^[3] These coordinates are homogeneous, satisfying

f(ta, tb, tc) = t^n f(a, b, c)

for some integer degree

n

, and symmetric under cyclic permutation, such as

f(a, b, c) = f(b, c, a)

.^[3] Equivalently, in trilinear coordinates, the point corresponds to directed distances from the sidelines

BC

CA

AB

, with barycentric coordinates related by scaling with the side lengths, e.g., if trilinears are

x : y : z

, then barycentrics are

a x : b y : c z

.^[3] The default domain for a triangle center is the interior and boundary of the reference triangle

ABC

, as this region captures the primary geometric and metric properties relevant to concurrency of cevians, intersections of lines, and tangency points within the triangle's structure.^[3] This standard choice ensures the center's position aligns with the triangle's intrinsic features, such as those defined by altitudes or angle bisectors, without requiring extensions beyond the convex hull for most applications.^[3] Triangle centers can be extended to other domains, including the excentral triangle (formed by the excenters), the tangential triangle (formed by the points of tangency of the incircle with the sides), and the circumcircle, where centers map via transformations that preserve geometric relations.^[3] For instance, under these mappings, a center in the original triangle corresponds to a point in the extended domain that maintains analogous symmetry or concurrency properties relative to the transformed figure.^[3] Certain domain symmetries preserve the status of points as triangle centers, notably isotomy, which inverts the barycentric coordinates (e.g.,

u : v : w

becomes

1/u : 1/v : 1/w

), and isogonal conjugation, which reflects the point over the angle bisectors of the triangle.^[3] These operations pair centers or map them to themselves while retaining their defining functional form.^[3] For normalized barycentric coordinates where

a + b + c = 1

, the Cartesian position of the center is given by the weighted average

\mathbf{P} = a \mathbf{A} + b \mathbf{B} + c \mathbf{C},

representing the masses at vertices

A

B

C

that balance at

\mathbf{P}

.^[3]

Barycentric Coordinates

Barycentric coordinates provide a fundamental method for locating points within a triangle by expressing them as weighted averages of the vertices' positions. Introduced by August Ferdinand Möbius in his 1827 work Der barycentrische Calcül, these coordinates assign non-negative masses

a

b

, and

c

to vertices

A

B

, and

C

of triangle

ABC

, respectively, such that the position vector of point

P

is given by

\mathbf{P} = \frac{a\mathbf{A} + b\mathbf{B} + c\mathbf{C}}{a + b + c}.

This formulation arises from the concept of balancing masses at the vertices, where the coordinates

a : b : c

determine the relative influences of each vertex on

P

's location.^[4]^[5] Barycentric coordinates can be represented in two forms: homogeneous, denoted as

(a : b : c)

, where scaling by a positive constant yields the same point, and normalized, where

a + b + c = 1

, providing absolute weights directly usable in computations. The normalized form corresponds to areal coordinates, in which the coordinate

a

equals the ratio of the signed area of subtriangle

PBC

to the area of

ABC

, and similarly for

b

and

c

. This equivalence stems from the fact that the areas reflect the "influence" or mass distribution geometrically.^[6]^[5] For triangle centers, barycentric coordinates offer significant advantages, including invariance under affine transformations, which preserve ratios of areas and thus the coordinate values regardless of shearing or scaling of the triangle. They also facilitate proofs of concurrency, such as in Ceva's theorem, by simplifying the algebraic conditions for lines intersecting at a single point through linear equations like

ux + vy + wz = 0

. Every triangle center possesses a unique set of normalized barycentric coordinates, up to the scaling inherent in the homogeneous representation, allowing precise identification and computation.^[6]^[7] To convert barycentric coordinates

(u, v, w)

to Cartesian coordinates, one solves the system

(u, v, w, 1)^\top = M (x, y, 1)^\top

, where

M

is the matrix formed by the homogeneous Cartesian coordinates of the vertices, yielding the position in the plane. Additionally, barycentric coordinates relate to trilinear poles via the polar line equation

x/u + y/v + z/w = 0

for a point

P(u : v : w)

, connecting them to trilinear coordinates used in projective triangle geometry.^[5]

Historical Context

Early Developments

The study of triangle centers originated in ancient Greek geometry, where mathematicians identified fundamental points arising from constructions involving medians, altitudes, angle bisectors, and perpendicular bisectors. Archimedes, around 250 BCE, investigated the centroid as the center of gravity for a uniform triangular lamina, though the proof that it lies at the intersection of the medians was provided later by Apollonius of Perga in the 3rd century BCE.^[8] Similarly, the circumcenter—the point equidistant from all three vertices and center of the circumcircle—was recognized in ancient Greek geometry, with related circle constructions described in Euclid's Elements around 300 BCE.^[8] The orthocenter, intersection of the altitudes, was recognized as a concurrency point in ancient Greek geometry, though explicitly described later by commentators like Pappus of Alexandria in the 4th century AD.^[9] During the Renaissance, interest in optimization problems led to further discoveries. In the 17th century, Evangelista Torricelli addressed a challenge posed by Pierre de Fermat: finding the point inside a triangle that minimizes the total distance to the three vertices, now known as the Fermat-Torricelli point. Torricelli provided a geometric solution around 1640, constructing equilateral triangles outwardly on each side of the given triangle and connecting the new vertices to the opposite original vertices; these lines concur at the point, forming 120° angles with one another.^[10] This work highlighted symmetry in minimizing paths, influencing later variational geometry. Key milestones in the 18th century included Leonhard Euler's investigations in the 1760s, where he formalized the orthocenter's role within the Euler line, proving that the orthocenter, centroid, and circumcenter are collinear in any triangle, with the centroid dividing the segment from orthocenter to circumcenter in a 2:1 ratio.^[11] Euler's discovery unified these points through concurrency and collinearity, shifting focus from isolated constructions to relational properties. The 19th century marked advances toward systematic analysis. Concurrently, Gian Francesco Malfatti employed early coordinate methods akin to trilinear coordinates in his 1803 analysis of inscribed circles (Malfatti circles), using algebraic expressions based on distances to sides to locate circle centers, paving the way for homogeneous coordinate systems in triangle geometry.^[12] These developments evolved from ad hoc geometric constructions—driven by practical concerns like statics and optimization—to a more systematic study emphasizing symmetry, concurrency, and coordinate representations, setting the stage for comprehensive classifications in later centuries.

20th-Century Advances

The 20th century marked a significant shift in the study of triangle centers, transitioning from isolated discoveries to systematic cataloging and theoretical frameworks that leveraged computational tools and formal classifications. Building on classical points identified in earlier eras, mathematicians began exploring broader families of centers through advanced geometric transformations and coordinate systems. A pivotal contribution came from J. F. Rigby, whose 1980s and 1990s works on isogonal conjugates and related configurations expanded understanding of center symmetries, including unpublished notes on triangle centers and associated cubic curves from 1993.^[13] Similarly, mid-century developments, such as A. van Obel's theorem on barycentric ratios in cevian configurations (formalized around the 1930s but influential through the 1950s), provided foundational tools for analyzing concurrency and center locations in binary cevian systems.^[14] The most transformative advance occurred in the late 20th century with Clark Kimberling's initiation of the Encyclopedia of Triangle Centers (ETC) in 1994, which formalized the modern notion of a triangle center as a point expressible in barycentric or trilinear coordinates. This effort culminated in the 1998 publication of Triangle Centers and Central Triangles, cataloging an initial 400 centers and establishing a standardized indexing system (X(n)) that facilitated ongoing discoveries.^[3] By the close of the century, Kimberling introduced classifications distinguishing major centers based on their coordinate expressions, notably separating polynomial centers—those definable via polynomial functions in side lengths a, b, c—from transcendental ones requiring non-polynomial forms, enabling deeper algebraic analysis.^[15] Entering the 21st century, these foundations spurred institutional growth, including the launch of Forum Geometricorum in 2001 by Paul Yiu at Florida Atlantic University, an open-access journal dedicated to triangle geometry that published seminal papers on center properties and relations.^[16] Computational integration further accelerated progress; by the 2000s, tools like GeoGebra incorporated ETC data via Perl scripts (fully embedded since 2011), allowing interactive visualization and verification of thousands of centers.^[17] As of 2025, the ETC has expanded to over 72,000 entries, reflecting the century's legacy of rigorous enumeration and its enduring impact on geometric research.^[3]

Specific Examples

Centroid and Incenter

The centroid of a triangle is the intersection point of its three medians, where each median connects a vertex to the midpoint of the opposite side.^[18]^[19] The centroid divides each median in a 2:1 ratio, with the longer segment nearer to the vertex.^[20] In barycentric coordinates relative to the triangle's vertices, the centroid is represented as (1:1:1).^[6] The position of the centroid

G

can be computed using the formula

\mathbf{G} = \frac{\mathbf{A} + \mathbf{B} + \mathbf{C}}{3},

where

\mathbf{A}

\mathbf{B}

, and

\mathbf{C}

are the position vectors of the vertices.^[18] This point divides the triangle into three smaller triangles of equal area, each comprising one-third of the total area.^[18] As the balance point or center of mass for a triangle of uniform density, the centroid plays a key role in concepts of equilibrium and mass distribution.^[18] The incenter of a triangle is the point where its three angle bisectors intersect.^[21]^[22] The angle bisector theorem states that an angle bisector divides the opposite side into segments proportional to the adjacent sides.^[23] In barycentric coordinates, the incenter has coordinates (a:b:c), with a, b, and c denoting the lengths of the sides opposite vertices A, B, and C, respectively.^[24] Its position

I

is given by

\mathbf{I} = \frac{a\mathbf{A} + b\mathbf{B} + c\mathbf{C}}{a + b + c}.

^[21] The incenter serves as the center of the incircle, the largest circle tangent to all three sides of the triangle.^[21] The inradius

r

is calculated as

r = \frac{\Delta}{s}

, where

\Delta

is the area of the triangle and

s

is the semiperimeter.^[21]

Orthocenter and Circumcenter

The orthocenter of a triangle is the point where the three altitudes intersect. To construct it, drop perpendiculars from each vertex to the line containing the opposite side, and their concurrence yields the orthocenter. In barycentric coordinates with respect to the reference triangle, the orthocenter has coordinates

(\tan A : \tan B : \tan C)

, where

A

B

, and

C

are the angles at the respective vertices.^[6] The orthocenter serves as the orthologic center for the reference triangle and its orthic triangle, meaning the perpendiculars from the vertices of one to the sides of the other concur at this point.^[25] It also lies on the Euler line of the triangle, which connects the orthocenter, centroid, and circumcenter, with the centroid dividing the segment from orthocenter to circumcenter in the ratio 2:1.^[26] The circumcenter is the point where the perpendicular bisectors of the sides intersect, serving as the center of the circumcircle that passes through all three vertices. One construction method involves drawing the perpendicular bisector of each side, which is the locus of points equidistant from the endpoints; their intersection is the circumcenter.^[27] In barycentric coordinates, it has coordinates

(\sin 2A : \sin 2B : \sin 2C)

, where

A

B

, and

C

are the angles at the respective vertices.^[6] The radius

R

of the circumcircle satisfies

R = \frac{a}{2 \sin A}

, as derived from the extended law of sines.^[28] In an acute triangle, both the orthocenter and circumcenter lie inside the triangle. In a right triangle, the orthocenter coincides with the right-angled vertex, while the circumcenter is the midpoint of the hypotenuse. In an obtuse triangle, the orthocenter lies outside, whereas the circumcenter also lies outside but on the side opposite the obtuse angle.

Fermat-Torricelli Point

The Fermat-Torricelli point of a triangle is the point that minimizes the total distance from itself to the three vertices.^[29] For a triangle with all angles less than 120°, this point lies in the interior and is characterized by the property that the angles formed by the lines connecting it to the vertices—namely ∠APB, ∠BPC, and ∠CPA—are each exactly 120°.^[29] If one angle of the triangle is 120° or greater, the Fermat-Torricelli point coincides with the vertex of that angle, as any other position would increase the total distance sum.^[15] The problem of locating this point was posed by Pierre de Fermat in the early 17th century and independently solved geometrically by Evangelista Torricelli in the 1640s, with the solution later published by Vincenzo Viviani in 1659.^[29] Torricelli's construction involves erecting outward equilateral triangles on each side of the given triangle ABC, say with new vertices D, E, F opposite A, B, C respectively; the lines AD, BE, and CF then concur at the Fermat-Torricelli point P.^[29] This method leverages the 60° angles of the equilateral triangles to produce the 120° angles at P, ensuring the minimizing property.^[30] In barycentric coordinates with respect to triangle ABC, the Fermat-Torricelli point has homogeneous coordinates proportional to \sin(A + 60^\circ) : \sin(B + 60^\circ) : \sin(C + 60^\circ), which can equivalently be expressed using cosines via the identity \sin(A + 60^\circ) = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \cos A + \frac{1}{2} \sin A.^[15] The minimal total distance sum PA + PB + PC can be determined using a variant of Viviani's theorem applied to the constructed equilateral triangles: in the unfolded configuration, this sum equals the straight-line distance from a vertex of one outer equilateral triangle to the opposite vertex of the original triangle, which is also equal to the altitude of that equilateral triangle relative to the base side.^[30] For example, in an equilateral triangle with side length a, the point coincides with the centroid (and all other classical centers), and the minimal sum is a \sqrt{3}.^[29]

Classifications and Generalizations

Kimberling Centers

The Encyclopedia of Triangle Centers (ETC), compiled by mathematician Clark Kimberling, serves as a comprehensive online database cataloging thousands of triangle centers, each assigned a unique numerical index denoted as X(n). This indexing begins with X(1) for the incenter and extends sequentially to X(72,000) as of the October 14, 2025 update, encompassing a vast array of points defined through barycentric, trilinear, or areal coordinates.^[3] The ETC originated from Kimberling's earlier work in the 1990s and has evolved into an essential resource for geometers, providing detailed properties such as coordinate expressions, geometric constructions, and interrelations among centers.^[31] Centers in the ETC are ordered primarily by the complexity of their barycentric coordinates, where lower indices correspond to simpler polynomial degrees or forms in terms of side lengths a, b, c or angles, followed by alphabetical ordering of associated names or definitions for ties in complexity.^[3] This systematic approach facilitates discovery and comparison, prioritizing fundamental centers before more intricate ones. For instance, X(2) is the centroid with barycentric coordinates (1:1:1), X(3) is the circumcenter with coordinates (a²(b² + c² - a²) : b²(c² + a² - b²) : c²(a² + b² - c²)), and X(4) is the orthocenter.^[31] Key features of the ETC include advanced search functionality allowing users to query centers by exact barycentric or trilinear coordinates, symmetry groups, or incidence properties, as well as documentation of isogonal conjugates—pairs of centers related by reflection over the angle bisectors, such as the orthocenter X(4) and circumcenter X(3).^[3] The database also highlights cevian nests, trilinear polars, and dynamic visualizations for select centers, enhancing exploratory analysis. Since the 20th-century advances in triangle geometry, Kimberling's curation has centralized disparate discoveries into a unified framework.^[31] Post-2020 updates to the ETC have incorporated over 30,000 new entries, driven by computational geometry tools and contributions from researchers like Peter Moses and Randy Hutson, addressing previous limitations in enumerating higher-complexity centers and integrating recent findings from symbolic computation.^[3] These expansions, including automated generation of coordinate-based searches, have made the resource more accessible and complete, bridging gaps in manual cataloging efforts.^[32]

Polynomial and Regular Centers

Polynomial triangle centers are defined as points in the plane of a triangle whose barycentric coordinates are expressed as polynomials in the side lengths

a

b

, and

c

, often with integer coefficients, or more generally as rational functions thereof. These coordinates typically adopt the cyclic form

f(a,b,c) : f(b,c,a) : f(c,a,b)

, where

f

is a homogeneous polynomial of some degree

d

, ensuring the representation remains consistent under vertex relabeling. While some centers may incorporate angles

A

B

C

in polynomial expressions, the standard algebraic framework emphasizes side lengths to maintain polynomiality, as angles introduce transcendental elements unless expressed trigonometrically in a polynomial-compatible manner. This structure contrasts with transcendental centers, which involve non-polynomial operations such as roots, logarithms, or inverse trigonometric functions in their coordinates.^[33]^[34] A prominent example is the centroid, with barycentric coordinates

1 : 1 : 1

, representing a constant (degree-0) polynomial that is invariant and symmetric. Other low-degree instances include the incenter (

a : b : c

, degree 1) and the Nagel point (

s-a : s-b : s-c

, where

s

is the semiperimeter, also degree 1). Higher-degree polynomial centers, such as the circumcenter with coordinates

a^2(b^2 + c^2 - a^2) : b^2(c^2 + a^2 - b^2) : c^2(a^2 + b^2 - c^2)

(degree 4), illustrate how increasing polynomial degree captures more complex geometric loci while preserving algebraic computability. These examples highlight the role of homogeneity in maintaining the triangle's scale invariance.^[33] Regular centers form a symmetric subclass of polynomial centers, where the barycentric coordinates are invariant under arbitrary vertex permutations, resulting in fully symmetric polynomial forms in

a

b

, and

c

. Such symmetry arises from expressions like elementary symmetric polynomials (e.g.,

a + b + c

abc

), leading to centers that treat all vertices equivalently and often lie on symmetry axes in equilateral triangles. This invariance simplifies derivations in invariant theory and ensures the centers' positions are unaltered by relabeling, distinguishing them from asymmetric polynomial centers.^[33]^[35] Key properties of polynomial and regular centers include closure under linear combinations: if two centers have polynomial barycentric coordinates, any constant linear combination thereof yields another polynomial center of degree at most the maximum of the originals. This algebraic closure enables systematic construction of families, such as those along polylines defined by linear relations in the coordinates. Furthermore, relations among these centers, including collinearities or concyclicities, can be verified computationally using Gröbner bases to resolve the polynomial ideals generated by their barycentric equations, providing a rigorous algebraic framework for discovery and proof.^[33]^[36]

Major and Transcendental Centers

In triangle geometry, major centers represent a class of points where the barycentric or trilinear coordinates depend solely on the angles of the triangle, expressed as

X = f(A) : f(B) : f(C)

for some function

f

of a single angle. This definition, introduced by Clark Kimberling, highlights centers that solve specific functional equations in the plane of the triangle, distinguishing them from more general polynomial forms by their angular symmetry. Unlike lower-degree polynomial centers, major centers often involve higher-complexity expressions that arise in advanced constructions, such as reflections or intersections on the Euler line. A prominent example is the de Longchamps point, denoted X(20) in the Encyclopedia of Triangle Centers (ETC), which serves as the reflection of the orthocenter over the circumcenter and has trilinear coordinates

\cos A - \cos B \cos C : \cos B - \cos C \cos A : \cos C - \cos A \cos B

, illustrating the angular dependence. These centers facilitate the study of isogonal and isotomic transformations but pose challenges in explicit computation due to the non-algebraic nature of angle functions in terms of side lengths.^[37]^[38] Transcendental centers, in contrast, defy algebraic representation in barycentric coordinates, requiring non-algebraic functions such as trigonometric inverses, exponentials, logarithms, or elliptic integrals for their definition. According to Kimberling's classification in the ETC glossary, a center qualifies as transcendental if no algebraic function

f(a, b, c)

exists such that the coordinates are

f(a, b, c) : f(b, c, a) : f(c, a, b)

, where

a, b, c

are side lengths. This category includes isogonic centers, which emerge from constructions involving equal angles, such as the 1st isogonic center (X(13), also known as the Fermat-Torricelli point), with trilinear coordinates

\csc(A + \pi/3) : \csc(B + \pi/3) : \csc(C + \pi/3)

. These coordinates implicitly involve arccosines when expressing angles in terms of sides via the law of cosines, underscoring their transcendental essence through inverse trigonometric operations. Other examples encompass the Hofstadter points X(359) and X(360), defined via iterative processes that evade polynomial closure.^[37]^[3] The properties of major and transcendental centers present unique computational hurdles: major centers demand angle-based evaluations, often requiring numerical approximation for specific triangles, while transcendental ones resist closed-form algebraic manipulation, complicating symbolic computations in software like GeoGebra or Cinderella. In the ETC, which catalogs over 72,000 centers as of October 2025, transcendental centers remain rare, comprising fewer than 1% of entries, primarily due to the prevalence of algebraic constructions in classical geometry. Recent advancements post-2015 have introduced additional transcendental centers derived from dynamical systems, such as elliptic billiards, where periodic orbits yield points like those in triangular loci that incorporate non-algebraic invariants from chaotic iterations. These developments, explored in studies of billiard dynamics, extend the scope of transcendental centers beyond static geometry into iterative and probabilistic frameworks.^[3]^[39]

Special Cases and Properties

Isosceles and Equilateral Triangles

In isosceles triangles, the bilateral symmetry along the altitude from the apex to the base causes many triangle centers to coincide on this altitude, reducing the dimensionality of their positions compared to scalene triangles. Specifically, the centroid, orthocenter, incenter, and circumcenter all lie on this line, which also serves as the median, angle bisector, and perpendicular bisector to the base. This alignment simplifies computations and highlights the role of symmetry in constraining center locations; for instance, the Euler line degenerates to this single altitude, with the centroid dividing the segment from orthocenter to circumcenter in a 2:1 ratio. The precise order of these centers along the altitude varies with the apex angle: In acute isosceles triangles (apex angle less than 90°), the orthocenter is nearest the apex, followed by the incenter, centroid, and circumcenter; in obtuse isosceles triangles (apex angle greater than 90°), the circumcenter lies outside nearest the apex, followed by the incenter and centroid inside toward the base, with the orthocenter outside beyond the base.^[40]^[1] The equilateral triangle represents the ultimate degeneracy of this symmetry, where all classical triangle centers—the centroid, orthocenter, incenter, circumcenter, and others—coincide at a single central point due to the threefold rotational symmetry. In barycentric coordinates, this common position simplifies to (1:1:1, reflecting the equal weighting of the vertices. This coincidence extends to most centers cataloged in standard references, as the symmetric side lengths and angles force distinct definitions to yield the same locus.^[1]^[3] Such degeneracies in isosceles and equilateral cases provide valuable properties for studying triangle centers, including increased overlap that aids in verifying general coordinate formulas and barycentric expressions. For example, plugging equilateral parameters into arbitrary center formulas should yield the (1:1:1) coordinates, serving as a consistency check. In equilateral triangles with side length

a

and height

h = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} a

h=23

a, the inradius is $r = \frac{h}{3}$ and the circumradius is $R = \frac{2h}{3}$ , illustrating how these metrics align at the shared center. These special cases also act as testing grounds for proposing new centers, as their behavior in the limit of approaching 60° angles can confirm or refute generalizations from scalene configurations.^[41]^[3]

Excenters and Brocard Points

The excenters of a triangle are the centers of its excircles, each tangent to one side and the extensions of the other two sides. There are three excenters, denoted

I_a

I_b

, and

I_c

, opposite vertices

A

B

, and

C

respectively, along with the incenter forming a set of four points.^[42] In barycentric coordinates with respect to the reference triangle, these are given by

I_a = (-a : b : c)

I_b = (a : -b : c)

, and

I_c = (a : b : -c)

, where

a

b

, and

c

are the side lengths opposite the respective vertices.^[15] The exradius opposite vertex

A

, denoted

r_a

, is computed as

r_a = \Delta / (s - a)

, where

\Delta

is the area of the triangle and

s

is its semiperimeter.^[43] The three excenters serve as the vertices of the excentral triangle, an acute triangle whose sides are perpendicular to the angle bisectors of the original triangle and whose orthocenter is the incenter of the reference triangle.^[44] In this configuration, the excenters function as triangle centers within the tangential domain, where coordinates are adapted to account for the excircles' tangency properties, enabling extensions of standard center definitions to external bisectors.^[44] Brocard points, in contrast, are defined as interior points

\Omega

and

\Omega'

where the angles formed with the sides are equal: for the first Brocard point,

\angle \Omega AB = \angle \Omega BC = \angle \Omega CA = \omega

, and for the second,

\angle \Omega' AC = \angle \Omega' CB = \angle \Omega' BA = \omega

, with

\omega

the Brocard angle.^[45] The cotangent of the Brocard angle satisfies

\cot \omega = (a^2 + b^2 + c^2)/(4 \Delta)

.^[46] Their trilinear coordinates, such as

c/b : a/c : b/a

for the first point, depend on the cyclic ordering of vertices, lacking the symmetry under permutation required for standard triangle centers.^[45] This asymmetry means Brocard points are excluded from the core class of triangle centers, as their positions reverse under relabeling of vertices, violating domain invariance.^[45] A notable property is the Brocard porism, which describes a one-parameter family of triangles inscribed in a fixed circumcircle and circumscribed about a fixed inellipse, all sharing the same Brocard angle

\omega

.^[15] Excenters fit within extended formal definitions of centers via their role in the excentral triangle, while Brocard points do not due to their orientation dependence.^[45]

Symmetry and Invariance

Triangle centers are defined as points whose trilinear or barycentric coordinates take the form

f(a,b,c) : f(b,c,a) : f(c,a,b)

, where

f

is a nonzero homogeneous function of the side lengths

a, b, c

of the reference triangle

ABC

, ensuring invariance under cyclic permutation of the vertices.^[47] This bisymmetry property—meaning

f(a,b,c) = f(b,c,a) = f(c,a,b)

—guarantees that the point remains fixed when the labels of the vertices are cyclically permuted, reflecting the intrinsic symmetry of the triangle's vertex set. Such centers are thus loci that respect the equilateral symmetry group of order three generated by vertex cycles, distinguishing them from asymmetric points like individual vertices. Beyond cyclic permutations, triangle centers exhibit invariance under similarity transformations, which preserve angles and proportional distances, as their defining functions depend solely on side length ratios rather than absolute scales. Under affine transformations, which preserve parallelism and ratios along lines, certain centers maintain their relative positions due to the homogeneous nature of barycentric coordinates, though not all preserve Euclidean distances. In coordinate representations, bisymmetry manifests as the coordinates being unchanged up to scalar multiples under even permutations of the vertices, reinforcing the center's role as a symmetric locus within the triangle. Alternative terminology distinguishes "points of concurrency" as intersections of three cevians (one from each vertex) from broader "centers," which emphasize symmetric loci invariant under the full permutation group of the vertices.^[15] Key properties include isotomic conjugates, which pair centers whose barycentric coordinates are reciprocals of each other—for instance, the incenter

X(1)

and its isotomic conjugate

X(75)

—preserving the set of valid centers under this inversion with respect to the side midpoints.^[15] Binary systems further organize paired points, such as those related by reflection or midpoint constructions, maintaining symmetry within families like the Euler line. However, not all symmetric points qualify as interesting centers; trivial or uninteresting ones, such as the vertex opposite the longest side, exhibit only partial symmetries without the full cyclic invariance, rendering them geometrically peripheral.^[15] These criteria ensure that recognized centers capture essential geometric invariances rather than ad hoc loci.

Advanced and Extended Topics

Non-Euclidean Geometries

In hyperbolic geometry, classical triangle centers such as the orthocenter continue to exist and can be defined analogously to their Euclidean counterparts, though they frequently lie outside the triangle due to the negative curvature of the space.^[48] For instance, the orthocenter is the intersection point of the altitudes, but in acute hyperbolic triangles, it resides in the interior, similar to Euclidean geometry.^[49] Barycentric coordinates, which are fundamental for locating centers in Euclidean triangles, are adapted to hyperbolic geometry through hyperbolic barycentric (or gyrobarycentric) coordinates, often formulated within the Beltrami-Klein disk model to embed Euclidean-like computations into the hyperbolic plane. In spherical geometry, triangle centers are constrained to the surface of the sphere, where geodesics are great circle arcs, leading to distinct positional behaviors compared to planar cases. The circumcenter, for example, serves as the spherical midpoint of the arcs forming the sides and is the pole of the small circle passing through the three vertices, ensuring it lies within the spherical triangle for small enough configurations. Homogeneous coordinates for these centers are expressed using generalized trigonometric functions, such as sines of angular excesses, to account for the positive curvature. A key property distinguishing non-Euclidean triangle centers from Euclidean ones is the absence of affine invariance, as transformations preserving parallelism and ratios do not generally exist in curved spaces, altering how centers respond to deformations. Additionally, transcendental centers—those defined via non-algebraic functions—become more prevalent, owing to the reliance on hyperbolic or spherical trigonometric functions like secants and cosecants in coordinate expressions, which introduce transcendental dependencies not dominant in the Euclidean affine framework. As an illustrative example, the Fermat-Torricelli point in spherical geometry minimizes the sum of geodesic distances to the vertices, analogous to its Euclidean role, but it is constructed by forming spherical equilateral triangles on the sides and connecting vertices, with the concurrence point yielding 120-degree spherical angles at the minimizer when all triangle angles are less than 120 degrees. Recent advancements in the 2020s have addressed gaps in understanding by exploring analogs in elliptic geometry, where triangle centers are defined projectively on the elliptic plane (a quotient of the sphere), using coordinates invariant under antipodal identification and incorporating elliptic trigonometric functions for incenters and orthocenters. These developments, including analyses of center existence in geodesic triangles across uniform curvatures, highlight how non-Euclidean settings reveal new concurrency properties absent in flat space.^[49]

New Centers from Existing Ones

Triangle centers can be generated from existing ones through conjugation operations, which preserve the property of being a triangle center. The isogonal conjugate of a point

P

with respect to triangle

ABC

is obtained by reflecting the cevians

AP

BP

, and

CP

over the respective angle bisectors at vertices

A

B

, and

C

; the lines joining each vertex to the reflections of

P

concur at the isogonal conjugate

Q

.^[3] This operation maps interior points to interior points and transforms known centers into new ones, such as the isogonal conjugate of the circumcenter

X(3)

being the orthocenter

X(4)

.^[3] In trilinear coordinates, if

P

has coordinates

(x : y : z)

, its isogonal conjugate has coordinates

\left( \frac{1}{x} : \frac{1}{y} : \frac{1}{z} \right)

.^[3] The isotomic conjugate provides another conjugation method, defined by reflecting the point over the midpoints of the sides of

ABC

, or equivalently, by ensuring the cevians through the conjugate divide the sides in ratios symmetric with respect to the midpoints.^[3] This swaps roles in a manner analogous to side permutations and generates new centers from existing ones, for instance, mapping the incenter

X(1)

to the point

X(75)

.^[3] In barycentric coordinates

(x : y : z)

, the isotomic conjugate is

\left( \frac{1}{x} : \frac{1}{y} : \frac{1}{z} \right)

.^[50] Both conjugations maintain concurrency properties essential to triangle centers. New centers also arise from linear combinations in barycentric coordinates, where the coordinates of a point are affine combinations of those of known centers, yielding points along lines joining them. Barycentric coordinates serve as a tool for such blends, as they represent points as weighted averages of the vertices.^[3] For example, points on the Euler line, such as the nine-point center

X(5)

, can be expressed as linear combinations of the centroid

X(2)

and orthocenter

X(4)

, specifically

X(5) = 3 \cdot X(2) + X(4)

in normalized barycentrics.^[3] The set of triangle centers is closed under isogonal and isotomic conjugations, as well as linear combinations in barycentrics, allowing infinite families to be generated from a finite set of seed centers.^[37] A key method for constructing higher-degree centers involves cevian nestings, where a cevian triangle is formed from cevians through an initial center, and further nestings create anticevian triangles or successive layers, yielding new concurrence points that qualify as centers.^[37] These nestings produce families of conjugates, including Ceva and isoconjugates, expanding the catalog of centers systematically.^[37]

Computational and Symbolic Aspects

The Encyclopedia of Triangle Centers (ETC), maintained by Clark Kimberling, serves as a primary online database for querying over 72,000 triangle centers, enabling users to search by barycentric coordinates, trilinear forms, or properties such as isogonal conjugates.^[3] This resource facilitates computational exploration by providing symbolic representations and links to related centers, supporting automated verification of identities through integrated search algorithms.^[3] Symbolic software like Mathematica and SageMath aids in simplifying barycentric coordinates for triangle centers, where coordinates are expressed as weighted sums relative to vertex masses.^[51] In Mathematica, the TriangleCenter function computes centers such as the orthocenter or incenter for a given triangle, automatically handling barycentric normalization and simplification via polynomial reduction.^[52] Similarly, SageMath supports barycentric computations through its geometry module, allowing algebraic manipulation of center expressions to identify patterns or reduce complexity in coordinate forms.^[6] Gröbner bases provide an algorithmic framework for resolving polynomial identities in triangle geometry, enabling the elimination of variables to verify relations among center coordinates.^[53] Applied to systems defining triangle centers, these bases simplify multivariate equations derived from Ceva's theorem or concurrency conditions, confirming algebraic dependencies without manual expansion.^[54] Symbolic computation tools automate the discovery of conjugates, such as isogonal or harmonic pairs, by systematically applying transformations to barycentric expressions. For instance, the Discoverer program identifies new harmonic conjugates through exhaustive search of polynomial relations, yielding properties like collinearity with existing centers.^[55] Verification of major centers, defined by angle-dependent functions, relies on certified symbolic methods that generate machine-checked proofs for properties like trilinear polarity.^[36] Efforts toward a certified version of the ETC, using the Coq proof assistant, have formalized definitions and properties for thousands of centers as of 2016.^[36] GeoGebra offers practical visualization through its TriangleCenter command, which dynamically plots centers like the centroid (index 2) or circumcenter (index 3) for user-defined triangles, supporting scripts for interactive exploration.^[56] Scripts in GeoGebra enable scripted animations of center loci under vertex dragging, aiding intuition for properties in various triangle types.^[57] Numerical stability poses challenges in computing centers for obtuse triangles, where the circumcenter lies outside the triangle, leading to ill-conditioned perpendicular bisector intersections due to near-collinear points.^[58] Off-center approximations, such as midpoint offsets, enhance robustness by avoiding exact circumcenter calculations, reducing sensitivity to floating-point errors in obtuse configurations.^[58]

History

Media collections

Triangle Center

Recent from talks

Recent from talks

Contribute something

Contribute something

Media Pages

Timelines

Articles

Notes collections

Notes

Notes

Days in Chronicle

Triangle Center

References

See also

Triangle Center

Core Concepts

Formal Definition

Barycentric Coordinates

Historical Context

Early Developments

20th-Century Advances

Specific Examples

Centroid and Incenter

Orthocenter and Circumcenter

Fermat-Torricelli Point

Classifications and Generalizations

Kimberling Centers

Polynomial and Regular Centers

Major and Transcendental Centers

Special Cases and Properties

Isosceles and Equilateral Triangles

Excenters and Brocard Points

Symmetry and Invariance

Advanced and Extended Topics

Non-Euclidean Geometries

New Centers from Existing Ones

Computational and Symbolic Aspects

References

Add your contribution

Related Hubs

Contribute something