Hubbry Logo
United States Olympic & Paralympic CommitteeUnited States Olympic & Paralympic CommitteeMain
Open search
United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee
Community hub
United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee
United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee
from Wikipedia

Key Information

U.S. Paralympics
a division of the USOPC
U.S. Paralympics a division of the USOPC logo
National Paralympic Committee
Country United States
CodeUSA
RecognizedJanuary 23, 2001; 24 years ago (2001-01-23)
Continental
association
APC
HeadquartersColorado Springs, Colorado
PresidentDr. Cheri Blauwet[2]
Websitewww.usopc.org/paralympic-sport-development

The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) is the National Olympic Committee (NOC) and the National Paralympic Committee (NPC) for the United States. It was founded in 1895 and is headquartered in Colorado Springs, Colorado. The USOPC is one of only four NOCs in the world that also serve as the National Paralympic Committee for their country. The USOPC is responsible for supporting, entering and overseeing U.S. teams for the Olympic Games, Paralympic Games, Youth Olympic Games, Pan American Games, Parapan American Games and Junior Pan American Games and serves as the steward of the Olympic and Paralympic Movements in the United States.

The Olympic Movement is overseen by the International Olympic Committee (IOC). The IOC is supported by 35 international federations that govern each sport on a global level and the 207 National Olympic Committees that oversee Olympic sport as a whole in their respective nations, and national federations that administer each sport at the national level (called national governing bodies, or NGBs, in the United States). The National Paralympic Committee is the sole governing body responsible for the selection and training of all athletes participating in the Paralympic Games.

The USOPC is one of 207 NOCs and 176 NPCs within the international Olympic and Paralympic movements. Forty-seven NGBs are members of the USOPC. Fifteen of the NGBs also manage sports on the Paralympic program (there are fewer Paralympic sports in the world). While the USOPC governs four Paralympic sports (cycling, skiing, swimming, and track & field), five other Paralympic sports are governed by U.S. members of International Paralympic Federations (wheelchair basketball, boccia, goalball, powerlifting, and wheelchair rugby).

Unlike most other nations, the United States government does not have a ministry of sports and does not fund its Olympic committee. This is in part due to the taboo of mixing sports and politics in the U.S. The USOPC was reorganized by the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act, originally enacted in 1978. It is a federally chartered nonprofit corporation and does not receive federal financial support (other than for select Paralympic military programs). Pursuant to the Act, the USOPC has the exclusive right to use and authorize the use of Olympic-related marks, images and terminology in the United States. The USOPC licenses that right to sponsors as a means of generating revenue in support of its mission.[3][4]

Founded as the American Olympic Committee (AOC) and having been known since the 1960s as the United States Olympic Committee (USOC), the organization changed its name to the USOPC on June 20, 2019, becoming the first Olympic Committee in the world to include the word Paralympic in its name.[5]

History

[edit]
U.S. Olympic Committee headquarters in Colorado Springs, Colorado
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee logo
Team USA logo
U.S. Olympic Team logo

Upon the founding of the International Olympic Committee in 1894, the two American IOC members – James Edward Sullivan and William Milligan Sloane – formed a committee to organize the participation of American athletes in the 1896 Summer Olympics, in Athens, Greece. In 1921, the committee adopted a constitution and bylaws to formally organize the American Olympic Association.

From 1928 to 1953, its president was Avery Brundage, who later went on to become the president of the IOC, the only American to do so.

In 1940, the AOA changed its name to the United States of America Sports Federation and, in 1945, changed it again to the United States Olympic Association. In 1950, federal mandate allowed the USOA to solicit tax-deductible contributions as a private, non-profit corporation. After several constitutional revisions were made to the federal charter in 1961, the name was changed to the United States Olympic Committee.

The Amateur Sports Act of 1978 (later renamed in the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act) established the USOPC, then referred to as the USOC (United States Olympic Committee), as the coordinating body for all Olympic-related athletic activity in the United States, specifically relating to international competition. The USOPC was also given the responsibility of promoting and supporting physical fitness and public participation in athletic activities by encouraging developmental programs in its member organizations. The provisions protect individual athletes, and provide the USOPC's counsel and authority to oversee Olympic and Paralympic business in the United States.

The public law not only protects the trademarks of the IOC and USOPC, but also gives the USOPC exclusive rights to the words "Olympic", "Olympiad" and "Citius, Altius, Fortius", as well as commercial use of Olympic and Paralympic marks and terminology in the United States, excluding Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, which fall under the authority of separate NOCs and NPCs.

One of the many revolutionary elements contained within the legislation was the Paralympic Amendment – an initiative that fully integrated the Paralympic Movement into the USOPC by Congressional mandate in 1998.

U.S. Paralympics, a division of the USOPC, was founded in 2001. In addition to selecting and managing the teams which compete for the United States in the Paralympic Games, U.S. Paralympics is also responsible for supporting Paralympic community and military sports programs around the country. In 2006, the USOPC created the Paralympic Military Program with the goal of providing Paralympic sports as a part of the rehabilitation process for injured soldiers.[6][7] Through the U.S. Olympic Committee Paralympic Military Program, USOPC hosted the Warrior Games for wounded service personnel from 2010 to 2014, until the organization of the event was taken on by the Department of Defense in 2015.[8][9]

The USOPC moved its headquarters from New York City to Colorado Springs on July 1, 1978. The USOPC headquarters moved to its present location in downtown Colorado Springs in April 2010, while the previous site – located just 2 miles (3 km) away – remains a U.S. Olympic Training Center.

In October 2007, the ARCO Training Center in Chula Vista, California (see below) was closed temporarily due to the Harris Fire, one of many that ravaged southern California.[10]

After convening in 2010 the Working Group for Safe Training Environments,[11] the USOPC formed the Safe Sport program to address child sexual abuse, bullying, hazing and harassment and emotional, physical and sexual misconduct within its domain.[12]

In February 2011, the USOPC launched an anti-steroid campaign in conjunction with the Ad Council called "Play Asterisk Free" aimed at teens. The campaign first launched in 2008 under the name "Don't Be An Asterisk".[13][14]

The state-of-the-art United States Olympic & Paralympic Museum was officially opened in Colorado Springs on July 30, 2020.[15]

The USOPC remains one of the only National Olympic Committees in the world to receive no government funding.[16][17][18][19][20]

Governance

[edit]

The USOPC is governed by a 16-member board of directors, led by a chairman, and has a professional staff, headed by a CEO. The USOPC also has three constituent councils to serve as sources of opinion and advice to the board and USOPC staff, including the Athletes' Advisory Council (AAC), National Governing Bodies Council (NGBC), and Multi-Sport Organizations Council. The AAC and NGBC each have three representatives on the board, while six members of the board are independent. The USOPC CEO and all US members of the IOC and IPC (Anita DeFrantz, James Easton, and Angela Ruggiero) are ex officio members of the board.

The USOPC named Scott Blackmun CEO on January 6, 2010. Blackmun previously served as acting chief executive officer (2001), senior managing director of sport (2000), and general counsel (1999). He also serves on the IOC's Marketing Commission and on the board of the National Foundation for Fitness, Sports, and Nutrition.[21] He retired in 2018 and was replaced by Sarah Hirshland.

On October 2, 2008, Lawrence F. Probst III was elected chairman of the USOPC board of directors. Probst also serves on the IOC's International Relations Commission, a post he assumed by IOC appointment on March 10, 2011.[22] Probst retired in 2019 and was replaced by Susanne Lyons.

National Governing Body members

[edit]

National Governing Bodies are organizations that look after all aspects of their individual sports. The NGBs are responsible for the training, competition and development of athletes for their sports, as well as nominating athletes to the U.S. Olympic, Paralympic, Youth Olympic, Pan American, and Para-Pan American Teams. There are currently 39 Olympic summer sport NGBs in the United States and eight Olympic winter sport NGBs.[23] Sport climbing, skateboarding, and surfing were added to the Olympic roster of sports for the 2020 Olympics in Tokyo, Japan. Some Olympic sports are not featured in the Paralympics, that is why there are more solely Olympic NGBs rather than those that manage both Olympic and Paralympic divisions. Additionally, some Paralympic sports, like wheelchair basketball, boccia, goalball, powerlifting, and wheelchair rugby, are governed by U.S. members of International Paralympic Federations.

National Governing Body Summer
or Winter
Olympic
program?
Paralympic
program?
Headquarters
USA Archery Summer yes yes Colorado Springs, Colorado
USA Badminton Summer yes yes Anaheim, California
USA Baseball Summer yes no Durham, North Carolina
USA Basketball Summer yes no Colorado Springs, Colorado
U.S. Biathlon Winter yes yes New Gloucester, Maine
USA Bobsled and Skeleton Winter yes no Colorado Springs, Colorado
U.S. Bowling Congress Summer no no Arlington, Texas
USA Boxing Summer yes no Colorado Springs, Colorado
American Canoe Summer yes no Fredericksburg, Virginia
USA Cheer (affiliated) Summer no no Memphis, Tennessee
USA Cricket (affiliated) Summer no[a] no Dallas, Texas
USA Climbing Summer yes no Salt Lake City, Utah
USA Curling Winter yes yes Stevens Point, Wisconsin
USA Cycling Summer yes yes Colorado Springs, Colorado
USA Dance (affiliated) Summer no no Colorado Springs, Colorado
USA Diving Summer yes no Indianapolis, Indiana
US Equestrian Summer yes yes Lexington, Kentucky
US Fencing Summer yes yes Colorado Springs, Colorado
USA Field Hockey Summer yes no Virginia Beach, Virginia
U.S. Figure Skating Winter yes no Colorado Springs, Colorado
USA Football (affiliated) Summer no[b] no Indianapolis, Indiana
USA Golf Summer yes no St. Augustine, Florida
USA Gymnastics Summer yes no Indianapolis, Indiana
USA Hockey Winter yes yes Colorado Springs, Colorado
USA Judo Summer yes yes Colorado Springs, Colorado
USA Karate Summer yes no Colorado Springs, Colorado
USA Kickboxing (affiliated) Summer no no Huntley, Illinois
USA Lacrosse (affiliated) Summer no[a] no Sparks, Maryland
USA Luge Winter yes no Lake Placid, New York
USA Modern Pentathlon Summer yes no Colorado Springs, Colorado
USA Muaythai (affiliated) Summer no no Houston, Texas
US Polo Association (affiliated) Summer no no Lake Worth, Florida
Orienteering USA (affiliated) Summer no no Arlington, Virginia
USA Racquetball Summer no no Colorado Springs, Colorado
USA Roller Sports Summer no no Lincoln, Nebraska
US Rowing Summer yes yes Princeton, New Jersey
USA Rugby Summer yes no Boulder, Colorado
US Sailing Summer yes yes Portsmouth, Rhode Island
USA Shooting Summer yes yes Colorado Springs, Colorado
USA Skateboarding Summer yes no Santa Monica, California
U.S. Ski & Snowboard Winter yes yes Park City, Utah
U.S. Soccer Federation Summer yes yes Chicago, Illinois
USA Softball Summer yes yes Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
US Speedskating Winter yes no Kearns, Utah
US Squash Summer no[a] no New York, New York
USA Surfing Summer yes no San Juan Capistrano, California
USA Swimming Summer yes no Colorado Springs, Colorado
USA Synchro Summer yes no Indianapolis, Indiana
USA Table Tennis Summer yes yes Colorado Springs, Colorado
USA Taekwondo Summer yes no Colorado Springs, Colorado
USA Team Handball Summer yes no Colorado Springs, Colorado
US Tennis Summer yes yes White Plains, New York
USA Track & Field Summer yes no Indianapolis, Indiana
USA Triathlon Summer yes yes Colorado Springs, Colorado
USA Ultimate (affiliated) Summer no no Colorado Springs, Colorado
Underwater Society of America (affiliated) Summer no no Daly City, California
USA Volleyball Summer yes yes Colorado Springs, Colorado
USA Water Polo Summer yes no Huntington Beach, California
USA Water Ski Summer no no Polk City, Florida
USA Weightlifting Summer yes no Colorado Springs, Colorado
USA Wrestling Summer yes no Colorado Springs, Colorado

Fundraising efforts

[edit]

The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit corporation supported by American individuals and corporate sponsors. Unlike most other nations, the USOPC does not receive direct government funding for Olympic programs[24] (except for select Paralympic military programs).[citation needed]

The USOPC's main sources of revenue are television broadcast rights, sponsorships and philanthropy in the form of major gifts and direct mail income. Additional funding comes from the government for Paralympic programming, as well as other sources such as the city of Colorado Springs and the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Foundation.

The USOPC asks for contributions from time to time using public service announcements and other direct solicitations. Also, some proceeds from sales in its online store benefit the committee.

The USOPC currently does not hold telethons or other fundraising events, but has in the past.[25]

Criticism

[edit]

There has been some financial conflict between the USOPC and International Olympic Committee (IOC), with some pointing out the frequent leadership changes of USOPC, and USOPC trying to broadcast the Olympics using its own television network, which the IOC discouraged. USOPC president Peter Ueberroth allegedly stonewalled a negotiation between IOC and USOPC to discuss the revenue sharing of the US broadcasts with IOC. Under a long-standing contract, the USOPC has received a 20 percent share of global sponsorship revenue and a 12.75 percent cut of U.S. broadcast rights deals (not that much given the fact that the USOPC is the only NOC in the world not to receive government funding, other countries fund their Olympic Committees, plus more than a half of the Olympic global sponsors are American companies, but the USOPC received only 20% (not 50%) of sponsorship revenue).[18][19][20] The IOC believed the USOPC share, set out in an open-ended contract dating to 1996, was excessive and should be renegotiated. The USOPC argued that it saved the Olympic movement by hosting the most financially successful Games in the history of the Olympics in 1984. In the 1980s, after the disastrous and unprofitable 1976 and 1980 Olympics, many believed the Olympic movement was in decline. However, the U.S. hosted the most financially successful games without government funding (unlike Montreal 1976 and Moscow 1980) and revitalized the Olympic movement. The failure of the 2012 and 2016 US Olympic bids[26] was partly blamed by some on USOPC.[27][28][29] For instance, NBC television executive Dick Ebersol said after the failed 2016 bid, "This was the IOC membership saying to the USOPC there will be no more domestic Olympics until you give more to the IOC".[30] A new revenue-sharing agreement was signed in 2012.[31]

USOPC has also been criticized for not providing equal funding to Paralympic athletes, compared to Olympic athletes. In 2003, a lawsuit was filed by American Paralympic athletes Tony Iniguez, Scot Hollonbeck and Jacob Heilveil.[32] They alleged that the USOPC was underfunding American Paralympic athletes. Iniguez cited the fact that the USOPC made health care benefits available to a smaller percentage of Paralympians, provided smaller quarterly training stipends and paid smaller financial awards for medals won at the Paralympics. American Paralympians saw this as a disadvantage for Paralympic athletes, as nations such as Canada and the United Kingdom support Paralympians and Olympians virtually equally. The USOPC did not deny the discrepancy in funding, but contended that this was due to the fact that it did not receive any government financial support. As a result, it had to rely on revenue generated by the media exposure of its athletes. Olympic athletic success resulted in greater exposure for the USOPC than Paralympic athletic achievements. The case was heard by lower courts, who ruled that the USOPC has the right to allocate its finances to athletes at different rates. The case was appealed to the Supreme Court,[33] who on September 6, 2008, announced that it would not hear the appeal. However, during the time the lawsuit had lasted (from 2003 to 2008), the funding of Paralympic athletes more than tripled. In 2008, $11.4 million was earmarked for Paralympic athletes, up from $3 million in 2004.[32] In 2018, the USOPC announced it would increase its Operation Gold Awards for U.S. Paralympic athletes to be equal to payments earned by U.S. Olympic athletes.[34]

In 2003, Wade Exum, the United States Olympic Committee's director of drug control administration from 1991 to 2000, gave copies of documents to Sports Illustrated that revealed that some 100 American athletes failed drug tests from 1988 to 2000, arguing that they should have been prevented from competing in the Olympics but were nevertheless cleared to compete; among those athletes were Carl Lewis, Joe DeLoach and Floyd Heard.[35][36][37][38] Before showing the documents to Sports Illustrated, Exum tried to use them in a lawsuit against USOC, accusing the organization of racial discrimination and wrongful termination against him and cover-up over the failed tests. His case was summarily dismissed by the Denver federal Court for lack of evidence. The USOC claimed his case "baseless" as he himself was the one in charge of screening the anti-doping test program of the organization and clarifying that the athletes were cleared according to the rules.[39][40]

Carl Lewis broke his silence on allegations that he was the beneficiary of a drugs cover-up, admitting he had failed tests for banned substances, but claiming he was just one of "hundreds" of American athletes who were allowed to escape bans, concealed by the USOC. Lewis has acknowledged that he failed three tests during the 1988 US Olympic trials, which under international rules at the time should have prevented him from competing in the 1988 Summer Olympics.[41] Former athletes and officials came out against the USOC cover-up. "For so many years I lived it. I knew this was going on, but there's absolutely nothing you can do as an athlete. You have to believe governing bodies are doing what they are supposed to do. And it is obvious they did not," said former American sprinter and 1984 Olympic champion, Evelyn Ashford.[42]

Exum's documents revealed that Carl Lewis had tested positive three times at the 1988 Olympics trials for minimum amounts of pseudoephedrine, ephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine, which were banned stimulants. Bronchodilators are also found in cold medication. Due to the rules, his case could have led to disqualification from the Seoul Olympics and suspension from competition for six months. The levels of the combined stimulants registered in the separate tests were 2 ppm, 4 ppm and 6 ppm.[39] Lewis defended himself, claiming that he had accidentally consumed the banned substances. After the supplements that he had taken were analyzed to prove his claims, the USOC accepted his claim of inadvertent use, since a dietary supplement he ingested was found to contain "Ma huang", the Chinese name for Ephedra (ephedrine is known to help weight loss).[39] Fellow Santa Monica Track Club teammates Joe DeLoach and Floyd Heard were also found to have the same banned stimulants in their systems, and were cleared to compete for the same reason.[43][44] The highest level of the stimulants Lewis recorded was 6 ppm, which was regarded as a positive test in 1988 but is now regarded as negative test. The acceptable level has been raised to ten parts per million for ephedrine and twenty-five parts per million for other substances.[39][45] According to the IOC rules at the time, positive tests with levels lower than 10 ppm were cause of further investigation but not immediate ban. Neal Benowitz, a professor of medicine at UC San Francisco who is an expert on ephedrine and other stimulants, agreed that "These [levels] are what you'd see from someone taking cold or allergy medicines and are unlikely to have any effect on performance."[39] Following Exum's revelations the IAAF acknowledged that at the 1988 Olympic Trials the USOC indeed followed the correct procedures in dealing with eight positive findings for ephedrine and ephedrine-related compounds in low concentration. Additionally, in 1988 the federation reviewed the relevant documents with the athletes' names undisclosed and stated that "the medical committee felt satisfied, however, on the basis of the information received that the cases had been properly concluded by the USOC as 'negative cases' in accordance with the rules and regulations in place at the time and no further action was taken".[46][47]

In the run-up to the 2012 Summer Olympics, it was discovered that the American uniforms for the Games' opening and closing ceremonies, designed by Ralph Lauren, were manufactured in China. This sparked criticism of the USOPC from media pundits, the public and members of Congress.[48]

In 2018, the USOPC came under fire for its complicity in the sexual assault and abuse of women and girls at the hands of former USA Gymnastics national team doctor Larry Nassar.[49] Olympian Aly Raisman released a public statement accusing the committee of failing "to acknowledge its role in this mess."[50] In the wake of Nasar's convictions, more than 150 lawsuits are pending against people and institutions related to the case, including the USOPC.[51] In May 2018, the USOPC was accused of knowingly participating in sex trafficking in a class-action lawsuit. In response, the committee said it was "aggressively exploring and implementing new ways to enhance athlete safety".[52][53][54]

Training facilities

[edit]
The grounds of the training facilities in Colorado Springs

The USOPC operates Olympic Training Centers at which aspiring Olympians prepare for international competition:

Although catered toward elite athlete training, these complexes are also open to the public (the only Olympic training facilities in the world to be open to the public) and offer a variety of services, including tours and regular camps and competitions for various domestic and international sport programs.

Additionally, the USOPC partners with 16 elite training sites across the country, to provide U.S. athletes with Olympic-caliber facilities that positively impact performance. Facilities with U.S. Olympic training site designation have invested millions of dollars in operating, staffing, equipment and training costs. These sites are often selected to host U.S. Olympic Team Trials and support Team USA athletes prepare for the Olympic Games.

Awards

[edit]

The USOPC administers a number of awards and honors for individuals and teams who have significant achievements in Olympic and Paralympic sports, or who have made contributions to the Olympic and Paralympic movement in the U.S.[55]

  • USOPC Athlete of the Year – Awards are given annually to the top overall male athlete, female athlete, Paralympic athlete, and team, from among the USOPC's member organizations.
  • USOPC Coach of the Year – Awards are given annually to the top national, developmental, Paralympic, and volunteer coaches, and for achievement in sports science.
  • U.S. Olympic Hall of Fame – The Hall of Fame honors Olympic and Paralympic athletes, teams, coaches, and others who have demonstrated extraordinary service to the U.S. Olympic movement.
  • U.S. Olympic Spirit Award – This award is given biennially to athletes demonstrating spirit, courage, and achievement at the Olympic and Paralympic Games.
  • Jack Kelly Fair Play Award – Presented annually to an athlete, coach or official in recognition of an outstanding act of fair play and sportsmanship displayed during the past year.
  • Rings of Gold Award – Awards are presented annually in honor of an individual and a program dedicated to helping children develop their Olympic or Paralympic dreams and reach their highest athletic and personal potential.
  • Olympic Torch Award – Presented annually to an individual who has positively impacted the Olympic Movement and has contributed to promoting the Olympic Ideals throughout the U.S.

When a US athlete wins an Olympic medal, as of 2016, the USOPC paid the winner $25,000 for gold, $15,000 for silver, and $10,000 for bronze.[56] The USOPC increased the payouts by 25% to $37,000 for gold, $22,500 for silver, and $15,000 for bronze beginning in 2017.[57] These numbers are significantly lower than in other countries, where Olympic gold medalists receive up to $1 million from their governments for a gold medal.[58][59] Since 2018, payouts to Paralympic athletes have been the same as to the Olympians. The International Paralympic Committee noted that "'Operation Gold Awards' for [American] Paralympic athletes [would] be increased by as much as 400 percent."[60]

ANOC Awards

[edit]

Partnerships

[edit]

The USOPC generates support from two principal types of Olympic sponsorship: worldwide and domestic. Each level of sponsorship grants companies different marketing rights and offers exclusive use of designated Olympic and Team USA images and marks. Under the domestic sponsorship program, the USOPC also has special partnerships with various licensees, suppliers and outfitters that provide vital services and products to support Team USA. Across all levels of sponsorship, the USOPC is committed to preserving the values of the Olympic properties and protecting the exclusive rights of Olympic sponsors.

Worldwide

[edit]

Created by the International Olympic Committee in 1985, the Olympic Partners TOP program is the highest level of Olympic sponsorship, granting exclusive worldwide marketing rights to the Olympic Games and Winter Olympic Games. Managed by the IOC, the TOP program supports the OCOGs, NOCs and the IOC.

Operating on a four-year term in line with each Olympic quadrennium, the TOP program features approximately 10 worldwide Olympic Partners, with each receiving exclusive global marketing rights within a designated product or service category.

US Domestic

[edit]

The Olympic Games domestic sponsorship program grants marketing rights within the host country or territory only. Under the direction of the IOC, the USOPC manages the domestic program within the United States. Like the worldwide TOP program, the domestic sponsorship program operates on the principle of product-category exclusivity. Approximately 20 corporations currently participate in the U.S. domestic sponsorship program, which enables the USOPC to deliver increased funding and equitable distribution to National Governing Bodies. The establishment of these long-term domestic partnerships helps generate independent financial stability for American athletes while ensuring the viability of the Team USA on the international stage.

Licensees

[edit]

The USOPC has granted licensing rights to nearly three dozen companies to manufacture and distribute official licensed products, which convey the rich history of American culture and commemorates the Olympic Movement. These companies are referred to as licensees and pay a royalty for each item sold bearing any related Olympic, USOPC or Team USA marks.

Media coverage

[edit]

NBCUniversal has held the American broadcasting rights of the Summer Olympics since 1988, and the broadcasting rights of the Winter Olympics since 2002. In 2011, NBC agreed to a $4.38 billion contract with the International Olympic Committee to broadcast the 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2020 Games. On May 7, 2014, NBC agreed to a $7.75 billion contract with the IOC to broadcast the 2022, 2024, 2026, 2028, 2030, and 2032 Games. As such, NBC Olympics is the IOC's, and by extension the Olympic movement's, highest revenue stream.[62] The IOC distributes Olympic broadcast revenue through Olympic Solidarity – the body responsible for managing and administering the share of the television rights of the Olympic Games. Under the current format, the revenue is allocated to the NOCs – including the USOPC – the local organizing committee and International Federations.[63]

In 2009, the USOPC and Comcast announced plans for The U.S. Olympic Network, which would have aired Olympic-sports events, news, and classic footage. However, the USOPC met opposition from the International Olympic Committee, which preferred to deal with NBCU (and its then-new Universal Sports joint venture). Later, Comcast purchased NBCUniversal, and eventually Universal Sports was discontinued, with interim programming agreements to air events on NBCSN and Universal HD made. On July 1, 2017, NBCUniversal launched the Olympic Channel on the former channel space of Universal HD; the USOPC is a partial operating partner in the network with the NBC Sports Group and it contains archived content from the USOPC.[64][65]

Relationship between IOC and USOPC

[edit]

In May 2012, USOPC's leaders negotiated a resolution with the IOC, addressing a decades-long revenue sharing debate and paving the way for a peaceful future between the two bodies. The new agreement elevates the USOPC's global perception and restructures how worldwide Olympic sponsorship and U.S. TV revenues are shared, while providing for USOPC contributions to Olympic Games costs.

The agreement, revising 27-year-old terms governing the USOPC's shares of worldwide Olympic sponsorship and U.S. broadcast rights revenue, preserves the USOPC's future revenue at current levels and includes an escalator for inflation. Under the terms of the new agreement, the USOPC is guaranteed seven percent of the U.S. broadcast revenue and 10 percent of the IOC's global sponsorship revenue. The agreement guarantees the USOPC approximately $410 million per quadrennium, plus inflation and a percentage of revenue from new growth areas, beginning in 2020.[66]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) is a nonprofit organization that serves as both the National Olympic Committee and National Paralympic Committee for the United States, responsible for selecting, training, and fielding American teams for the Olympic Games, Paralympic Games, Pan American Games, and Parapan American Games. Founded in 1894 and headquartered in Colorado Springs, Colorado, the USOPC coordinates with over 30 national governing bodies for individual sports to promote athletes' competitive excellence, rights, safety, and wellness while upholding the integrity of sport. Under its auspices, Team USA has achieved unparalleled success in international competition, accumulating the highest number of medals in Olympic history and demonstrating dominance in recent Games, including 126 medals at the 2024 Paris Olympics—the most at a non-domestic event since 1984—and 105 at the corresponding Paralympics. The organization maintains training facilities in Colorado Springs and Lake Placid, New York, and supports elite athlete development through funding, medical resources, and anti-doping compliance, contributing to the U.S. status as the preeminent Olympic and Paralympic power. The USOPC has also been defined by efforts to address athlete protection amid high-profile abuse scandals, notably the case of former USA Gymnastics physician Larry Nassar, whose crimes exposed institutional oversight failures and prompted congressional intervention via the 2020 Empowering Olympic, Paralympic, and Amateur Athletes Act, which mandated the creation of the independent U.S. Center for SafeSport to investigate misconduct and enforce safety protocols across Olympic sports. Despite these reforms, the Center for SafeSport has drawn criticism for protracted investigations and uneven enforcement, highlighting ongoing challenges in balancing high-performance sport with robust safeguarding mechanisms.

History

Founding and Early Years

The United States Olympic Committee (USOC), the predecessor organization to the current United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee, emerged from American efforts to engage with the newly revived modern Olympic Games. In 1894, Princeton University professor William Milligan Sloane attended the International Olympic Congress in Paris convened by Pierre de Coubertin, becoming the primary U.S. representative and advocate for participation in the inaugural 1896 Athens Games. Sloane organized the first U.S. team of 14 athletes—drawn mainly from Princeton University and the Boston Athletic Association—without formal trials or government backing, relying on personal solicitations and private funding to cover travel and expenses across the Atlantic. The delegation competed in track and field, tennis, weightlifting, and shooting, securing 20 medals including 11 golds, which established early U.S. dominance despite the rudimentary logistics. These initial endeavors formalized into the American Olympic Committee (AOC) in 1896, a loose entity focused on athlete selection, fundraising from private donors and groups like the Amateur Athletic Union, and logistical coordination for Olympic delegations. The AOC managed U.S. entries for the 1900 Paris Olympics, where 19 athletes won 19 medals amid disorganized events spread across world's fair expositions, and the 1904 St. Louis Games, hosted domestically but embedded within the Louisiana Purchase Exposition, which featured over 600 U.S. competitors yet suffered from poor international turnout and funding shortfalls covered by exposition organizers rather than dedicated Olympic resources. Persistent challenges included internecine rivalries among athletic bodies, strict amateurism rules limiting athlete support, and inconsistent financing, often requiring appeals for $25,000 or more per Games from philanthropists and universities. By the early 1920s, as Olympic participation expanded and required sustained administration, the AOC reorganized into the American Olympic Association (AOA) at a November 1921 meeting of the New York Athletic Club, creating a more structured body to centralize governance, enhance fundraising, and represent U.S. interests with the International Olympic Committee. This shift addressed prior fragmentation, though the AOA continued operating without federal incorporation until later decades, emphasizing voluntary contributions and alignment with IOC standards on amateur eligibility.

Mid-20th Century Expansion

Following the resumption of the Olympic Games after World War II, the American Olympic Association—renamed the United States of America Sports Federation in 1940—further evolved its structure. In 1945, it adopted the name United States Olympic Association (USOA), reflecting a broader mandate to coordinate U.S. efforts in international amateur sports amid the post-war economic expansion that boosted domestic athletic programs. A pivotal development occurred in when enacted 805, granting the USOA a federal charter as a . This legislation authorized tax-deductible contributions, sustained growth through private donations and corporate support, which had previously been limited by the organization's informal status. The charter formalized its role as the national coordinator for Olympic-related activities, facilitating expanded administrative capacity and alignment with emerging national sports federations. By the late 1950s and early 1960s, rising popularity of college and Olympic sports, driven by Cold War-era competition—particularly evident in the U.S. narrowly edging the Soviet Union in the 1952 Helsinki medal count (76 to 71)—prompted internal reforms. In 1961, comprehensive constitutional revisions culminated in renaming the USOA to the United States Olympic Committee (USOC), solidifying a more professionalized governance framework to manage growing athlete pipelines and training initiatives. This period also saw physical expansion, including the USOC's relocation to new offices at 57 Park Avenue in New York City in 1960.

Late 20th Century Reforms and Challenges

The Amateur Sports Act of 1978, signed into law by President Jimmy Carter on November 8, established the modern framework for the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) by designating it as the sole coordinating body for amateur athletic activity aimed at Olympic competition, resolving longstanding jurisdictional disputes among organizations like the Amateur Athletic Union (AAU), which had previously held a monopoly on athlete selection and training. The Act mandated the recognition of independent National Governing Bodies (NGBs) for each Olympic sport, required at least 20 percent athlete representation on USOC and NGB boards through entities like the Athletes' Advisory Council (AAC)—whose origins traced to athlete organizing efforts in the early 1970s—and emphasized equitable funding distribution, grievance procedures, and open competition without discrimination. These reforms shifted from fragmented, AAU-dominated control to a more decentralized yet coordinated system, incorporating sports medicine initiatives via a dedicated USOC division to address injury prevention and performance enhancement. Despite these structural advances, the USOC faced immediate external challenges, including the 1980 boycott of the Moscow Olympics ordered by President Carter in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, which barred over 200 qualified U.S. athletes from competing and strained relations with the International Olympic Committee (IOC). Funding remained a persistent issue, as the USOC—unlike most national Olympic committees—received no direct federal appropriations and relied heavily on private sponsorships and corporate partnerships, a model tested by the need to support 35 NGBs amid rising training costs; the 1984 Los Angeles Games generated a $225 million surplus invested in athlete programs, but distribution disputes arose over allocations favoring high-profile sports. Doping emerged as a growing threat in the 1980s, with the USOC implementing initial urine testing protocols at national trials, yet enforcement was inconsistent, as evidenced by overlooked positive results in sports like track and field, contributing to international scrutiny amid state-sponsored programs in rival nations. In the 1990s, governance challenges intensified, including a 1991 scandal where the USOC allegedly paid severance packages totaling over $500,000 to two executives to facilitate hiring a new director, prompting calls for greater transparency and accountability in board selections and financial oversight. The shift toward professional athlete eligibility—accelerated by IOC decisions allowing pros in sports like basketball (1992 Dream Team) and tennis—challenged the USOC's amateur ethos, requiring NGBs to revise eligibility rules while balancing funding for emerging talents against established stars. Aggressive trademark enforcement of terms like "Olympic" led to lawsuits against domestic entities, from youth programs to commercial uses, alienating some stakeholders and highlighting tensions between revenue protection and grassroots support. Anti-doping efforts advanced with enhanced testing and the USOC's collaboration toward what became the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency in 2000, but revelations of systemic lapses, including unpunished violations, underscored enforcement gaps amid broader Olympic scandals like the 1998-1999 Salt Lake City bidding controversy. The 1998 amendments to the Act began integrating Paralympic sports more fully under USOC oversight, waiving certain NGB requirements to streamline operations, though implementation revealed coordination hurdles with disability-specific organizations.

21st Century Integration and Modernization

In the early 2000s, the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) deepened its involvement in Paralympic sports through agreements with U.S. Paralympics, assuming responsibility for training and sending teams to the Paralympic Games while maintaining separate operational structures. This laid the groundwork for fuller integration, culminating in a unanimous board decision on June 20, 2019, to rename the organization the United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC), the first national Olympic committee worldwide to incorporate "Paralympic" in its title. The change reflected the USOPC's longstanding management of both Olympic and Paralympic teams and aimed to enhance visibility, unified branding, and resource allocation for Paralympic athletes, including updates to signage at facilities in Colorado Springs. The Empowering Olympic, Paralympic, and Amateur Athletes Act of 2020 (EOPAAA) marked a significant modernization of the USOPC's legal framework by amending the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act, mandating greater athlete protections, independent board representation, and enhanced oversight of national governing bodies (NGBs) to address safe sport violations exposed by scandals such as those involving USA Gymnastics. EOPAAA also established the Commission on the State of U.S. Olympics & Paralympics, which in March 2024 issued its report, "Passing the Torch: Modernizing Olympic, Paralympic, and Grassroots Sports in America," recommending reforms like strengthened athlete commissions, diversified funding models beyond NGB reliance, and improved pathways from grassroots to elite levels to adapt to 21st-century challenges including equity and accountability. Under its strategic plan, the USOPC has pursued initiatives such as expanded collegiate partnerships for Paralympic inclusion, guided by athlete and expert input, and holistic athlete support programs including mental health resources and post-career transitions. In 2024, the organization supported 835 athletes for the Paris Olympic and Paralympic Games, securing 126 medals, while launching partnerships like one with Guild for education and career aid, demonstrating operational modernization amid ongoing congressional scrutiny.

Organizational Structure

The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) is governed by a 16-member Board of Directors responsible for strategic oversight and policy direction, with operations managed by a professional staff led by Chief Executive Officer Sarah Hirshland, who assumed the role in June 2018 and received a five-year contract extension in June 2024. The Board Chair, Gene Sykes, provides leadership to the board, which includes ex-officio non-voting members such as the CEO and all American IOC and IPC members. Board composition ensures stakeholder representation: three directors from the Team USA Athletes’ Commission, three from the National Governing Bodies Council, two at-large athlete-elected seats, and five independent directors, with terms typically beginning January 1 of odd-numbered years per the USOPC Bylaws. Recent updates effective January 1, 2025, include term renewals for directors Donna De Varona, Dexter Paine, and Daria Schneider, alongside departures of Dr. Cheri Blauwet and John Naber, leaving two independent seats vacant to be filled by early 2025. Six constituent councils, including the Athletes’ Advisory Council (AAC) and National Governing Bodies Council (NGBC), serve as advisory bodies to the Board and staff, offering consensus views from athletes, NGBs, and affiliates on governance, ethics, and operational matters. The USOPC maintains formal bylaws, governance documents, and compliance mechanisms, including dispute resolution processes for athletes and NGBs, to enforce ethical standards and oversight without direct government funding, distinguishing it from most national Olympic committees.

Board and Leadership

The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) is governed by a 16-member Board of Directors, which provides strategic oversight and sets policies for the organization's operations, including athlete support, national governing body coordination, and international relations. The board's composition includes three representatives elected by the Athletes' Advisory Council, three elected by the National Governing Bodies Council, six independent directors, the CEO as an ex officio member, and all U.S. members of the International Olympic Committee serving ex officio. This structure ensures representation from athletes, sports organizations, and external expertise while maintaining alignment with Olympic and Paralympic governance standards. Gene Sykes serves as Chair of the Board, a position he assumed on January 1, 2023, following his election in July 2022 to succeed Susanne Lyons. Sykes, who previously held roles in higher education administration and international sports diplomacy, also serves as a member of the International Olympic Committee, contributing to the board's ex officio IOC contingent. Other ex officio IOC members on the board include Anita L. DeFrantz, a longtime Olympic administrator and former rower, and Allyson Felix, a retired track and field athlete with multiple Olympic medals, who joined the board in late 2024. The executive leadership team, headed by Chief Executive Officer Sarah Hirshland, manages day-to-day operations and implements board directives. Hirshland, appointed CEO in June 2018, oversees a professional staff focused on athlete development, funding, and event preparation; her contract was extended for five years in June 2024 amid preparations for future Olympic cycles. Recent board updates, including the addition of Mung Chiang in January 2025 to fill an independent seat vacated by Sykes's transition to full IOC duties, reflect ongoing efforts to incorporate diverse expertise from fields like technology and academia. The board also features athlete-elected directors such as Donna de Varona, a two-time Olympic medalist in swimming, and National Governing Bodies representatives like Virginia Sung, ensuring direct input from competitive and administrative stakeholders.

Congressional Oversight and Legislation

The Amateur Sports Act of 1978 (Public Law 95-606), signed into law by President Jimmy Carter on November 8, 1978, established the United States Olympic Committee (USOC, predecessor to the USOPC) as the national coordinating body for amateur athletic activity, granting it exclusive authority over Olympic-related competitions, trademarks, and the recognition of national governing bodies (NGBs) for individual sports. This legislation resolved jurisdictional disputes among sports organizations following the 1980 U.S. boycott of the Moscow Olympics and centralized governance to enhance preparation for international events, while prohibiting federal funding for the USOC itself but allowing indirect support through other channels. The Act was substantially amended and recodified as the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act (Public Law 105-225) in 1998, named after its original sponsor, Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK), who had advocated for unified amateur sports governance since the 1970s. These revisions expanded the USOC's mandate to include Paralympic sports, required NGBs to adhere to standards for athlete safety and fair competition, and reinforced congressional authority to oversee compliance without direct operational control, as the USOPC remains a private nonprofit corporation chartered by Congress. The Empowering Olympic, Paralympic, and Amateur Athletes Act of 2020 (Public Law 116-189), enacted on October 30, 2020, following congressional investigations into abuse scandals within NGBs such as USA Gymnastics, introduced enhanced accountability measures including mandatory athlete representation on USOPC and NGB boards (at least 40% for decision-making panels), independent arbitration for athlete grievances, and increased funding for the U.S. Center for SafeSport. This law empowers Congress to decertify non-compliant NGBs, remove or dissolve the USOPC board for fiduciary or ethical failures, and mandate biennial reports on governance and athlete protections, thereby strengthening legislative leverage over the organization in response to documented lapses in internal oversight. Congressional oversight occurs primarily through committees such as the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee and the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which conduct hearings on issues like doping, financial transparency, and athlete welfare, as evidenced by post-2020 scrutiny leading to the establishment of the independent Commission on the State of the U.S. Olympics and Paralympics in 2022. The Commission's 2024 report, mandated by the 2020 Act, recommended further reforms including full independence for the Team USA Athletes' Commission from USOPC influence, underscoring ongoing legislative interest in balancing the organization's autonomy with public accountability for federal-chartered responsibilities.

National Governing Bodies and Sport Management

Oversight of NGBs

The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) exercises oversight over National Governing Bodies (NGBs), the sport-specific organizations it recognizes to manage Olympic and Paralympic disciplines within the United States. Under the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act of 1998, which amended the Amateur Sports Act of 1978, the USOPC is empowered to certify one NGB per sport on the Olympic or Paralympic program, granting exclusive rights for team selection, national championships, and international representation while requiring adherence to the Olympic Charter, USOPC Bylaws, and federal standards for open competition, nondiscrimination, and athlete grievance procedures. This framework positions the USOPC as the central coordinator, ensuring NGBs align with broader amateur sports development goals without direct operational control over daily activities. Certification and ongoing compliance form the core of USOPC oversight, with all NGBs recognized as of January 1, 2021, initially deemed certified pending reviews by the USOPC's Certification Review Group. NGBs must demonstrate robust governance, including majority athlete representation on boards, conflict-of-interest policies, and financial transparency, as outlined in USOPC standards derived from the Ted Stevens Act. The USOPC conducts periodic audits to verify adherence, evaluating areas such as ethical conduct, athlete rights, and operational effectiveness; for instance, initial audits identified mostly policy update needs but also higher-risk issues like inadequate conflict disclosures or athlete input mechanisms, necessitating corrective plans. Noncompliance can result in probation, funding withholding, or decertification, as stipulated in USOPC Bylaws Section 8, though revocations remain rare due to the emphasis on collaborative remediation. Athlete protection represents a heightened focus of oversight, particularly following high-profile abuse scandals that exposed gaps in prior NGB self-regulation. The USOPC mandates NGB implementation of the U.S. Center for SafeSport's Code, an independent entity established by the 2017 Protecting Young Victims from Sexual Abuse Act, which handles investigations into sexual misconduct, emotional, and physical abuse across the Olympic movement. SafeSport conducts mandatory audits of NGBs for abuse-prevention policies, training, and reporting protocols, with findings requiring remediation; the USOPC's Office of Athlete Safety supports this by fostering misconduct-free cultures and integrating safe environment standards into NGB funding criteria. In 2020, the USOPC allocated $2.5 million to bolster NGB compliance in athlete services and operations across 50 bodies, tying support to verifiable progress in safety and ethics. The National Governing Bodies Council, comprising NGB leaders, advises the USOPC on collective challenges like resource allocation and policy harmonization, promoting sustained competitive excellence without supplanting direct oversight. The Empowering Olympic, Paralympic, and Amateur Athletes Act of 2020 further strengthens accountability by requiring comprehensive USOPC review of every NGB certification by 2028, incorporating athlete feedback and performance metrics to address systemic issues like declining participation or governance lapses. This layered approach balances autonomy for sport-specific expertise with enforceable standards, though critics in congressional reports have noted enforcement inconsistencies, prompting calls for enhanced transparency in audit outcomes and decertification thresholds.

USOPC-Managed Sports

The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) directly manages high-performance programs for sports without a certified National Governing Body (NGB), fulfilling its statutory obligations under the Ted Stevens Amateur Sports Act to promote athletic development and international competition. In these cases, the USOPC assumes responsibilities typically delegated to NGBs, including athlete identification, selection criteria, training support, and compliance with codes of conduct. This internal management model applies to emerging Olympic sports pending NGB certification and specific Paralympic disciplines, enabling streamlined oversight and resource allocation from USOPC facilities in Colorado Springs. For Olympic sports, the USOPC has handled interim governance for disciplines like breaking, which debuted at the 2024 Paris Games without a dedicated NGB; the organization coordinated athlete resources, high-performance planning, and contacts for breakers. Similarly, ski mountaineering, set for its Olympic introduction at the 2026 Milan-Cortina Winter Games, falls under USOPC internally managed sports (IMS) protocols, with published athlete and staff selection procedures ensuring qualification pathways and background checks. These efforts address gaps in sport-specific infrastructure for new additions to the Olympic program, prioritizing rapid development toward medal contention. Paralympic sports under direct USOPC management include para-cycling, para Nordic skiing (biathlon and cross-country), and para swimming, for which the organization operates as the de facto NGB. U.S. Paralympics, a division of the USOPC, oversees elite athlete pipelines for these events, integrating them into broader Team USA strategies for summer and winter Paralympic Games. This structure contrasts with the 16 Paralympic sports governed by combined Olympic-Paralympic NGBs or five handled by high-performance management organizations, allowing the USOPC to centralize efforts in areas lacking specialized entities. As of 2023, surveys indicated involvement from athletes across seven internally managed sports, reflecting the USOPC's adaptive role in bridging organizational voids while maintaining accountability through policies like speak-up mechanisms and dispute resolution tailored to IMS. This direct involvement has supported targeted growth, such as in para powerlifting contacts routed through IMS directors, ensuring alignment with International Paralympic Committee standards.

Athlete Representation and Commissions

The Team USA Athletes' Commission, formerly known as the Athletes' Advisory Council, serves as the primary representative body for approximately 5,000 active Olympic and Paralympic athletes affiliated with the United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC). Composed of elected athlete representatives from national governing bodies (NGBs), Paralympic sport organizations, and independent athletes, the commission broadens communication between athletes and USOPC leadership while providing input and advice to the USOPC board of directors on policy, governance, and athlete welfare issues. Representatives are selected through periodic elections restricted to eligible athletes, such as those with at least 10 years of international competition experience in their sport, ensuring direct athlete voice in decision-making processes. The commission operates with a degree of independence formalized through a memorandum of understanding with the USOPC, allowing it to control its own operations and advocate for athlete interests without direct USOPC oversight. This structure enables the commission to address concerns ranging from training resources to rule interpretations, with members including both Olympic and Paralympic athletes to reflect the integrated nature of USOPC programs. For instance, Paralympic sports maintain dedicated representatives, such as those for Nordic skiing or powerlifting, facilitating sport-specific input into broader USOPC strategies. Complementing the commission is the Paralympic Advisory Council, which specifically advises the USOPC board and management on matters related to Paralympic programming, resource allocation, and athlete development to enhance opportunities for athletes with disabilities. Athlete representation extends to dispute resolution via the USOPC Athlete Ombuds office, established by Congress in 1998 to provide confidential, independent assistance at no cost to athletes navigating rules, policies, or conflicts within the Olympic and Paralympic movement. The ombuds facilitates fact-finding and mediation for concerns such as eligibility disputes or governance issues, operating separately from USOPC enforcement bodies to ensure impartiality. These mechanisms collectively uphold athlete rights to voice and representation within USOPC governance and NGBs, as outlined in USOPC policies that mandate athlete input in decision-making bodies. Elections for commission seats occur biennially or as needed per sport, with results determining alternates and primary representatives to maintain continuity. This framework has evolved to prioritize athlete-led initiatives, including recommendations for greater autonomy, reflecting ongoing efforts to balance administrative efficiency with direct athlete accountability.

Athlete Development and Support

Training Programs and Facilities

The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) maintains dedicated training infrastructure to support elite athlete preparation, including two primary U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Training Centers (OPTCs) in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and Lake Placid, New York. These facilities provide residential accommodations, specialized venues, medical services, and performance support for Olympic and Paralympic athletes across multiple disciplines. The Colorado Springs OPTC, established following the USOPC's headquarters relocation in 1978, spans a 35-acre campus with dormitories, on-site dining, and training areas for sports such as swimming, shooting, fencing, gymnastics, wrestling, and track cycling, including an official velodrome. The Lake Placid OPTC offers a resident program with on-site dormitories tailored for approved athletes, emphasizing high-altitude and winter sports training environments. Beyond the OPTCs, the USOPC designates numerous Training Sites nationwide, which receive investments in facilities, staffing, and equipment to host national teams and foster athlete development. Notable examples include the Chula Vista Elite Athlete Training Center in California, a 155-acre complex supporting over a dozen summer Olympic and Paralympic sports with cross-training capabilities, originally developed as a USOPC facility in 1995 before transitioning to city ownership while retaining its training site status. Other sites, such as the VELO Sports Center in Carson, California, and Lakeshore Foundation in Birmingham, Alabama, provide specialized venues like velodromes and adaptive sports facilities, enabling localized high-performance training coordinated with National Governing Bodies (NGBs). The USOPC's training programs emphasize long-term athlete development through the American Development Model (ADM), which promotes age-appropriate training, quality coaching, sustained physical activity, and athlete safety to build foundational skills from youth levels upward. High-performance initiatives, managed by the USOPC's sport performance division in collaboration with NGBs, allocate resources for athlete selection, performance planning, and holistic support, directing nearly half of the organization's budget toward elite programming that addresses physical, mental, and professional needs. Complementary offerings include sport-specific camps at the Colorado Springs OPTC, coaching education to enhance NGB capabilities, and sports medicine services with on-site clinics, exemplified by an expanded partnership with UCHealth in May 2025 for comprehensive care at the Colorado Springs facility. These programs integrate Paralympic athletes seamlessly, leveraging shared facilities and unified support systems to optimize preparation for international competition.

Funding and Scholarships for Athletes

The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) allocates significant resources to direct athlete funding, primarily through performance-based stipends and grants aimed at supporting training, competition, and living expenses for elite Olympic and Paralympic competitors. In 2022, the USOPC distributed $16 million in direct athlete stipends to 1,565 athletes, alongside $5.6 million via the Operation Gold program for high placements in international events. Operation Gold provides tiered cash awards, with amounts varying by sport, event significance, and quadrennial cycle; for instance, in archery for 2025 (the first year of a new Olympic cycle), first-place finishers receive $6,250, scaling down for lower podium positions. These stipends are disbursed through national governing bodies (NGBs) to qualified athletes meeting criteria such as top-eight finishes in World Championships or equivalent competitions, ensuring funds target proven performers while supplementing often limited personal incomes. In March 2025, the USOPC announced a landmark $100 million endowment initiative, seeded by philanthropist Ross Stevens, to deliver $200,000 in total benefits to every athlete selected for the U.S. Olympic or Paralympic Team starting with the 2026 Milan-Cortina Games and extending through at least 2032. This package includes a $100,000 cash grant distributed over four years, plus enhanced medical coverage, mental health services, and career transition support, marking a shift toward more comprehensive, long-term financial stability amid criticisms that prior funding models inadequately addressed athletes' post-competition needs. The program applies uniformly to both Olympic and Paralympic participants, with eligibility tied to Games selection rather than prior performance metrics. For educational support, the USOPC administers the Team USA Tuition Grants, awarding over $800,000 annually in need-based assistance to cover tuition for Olympic and Paralympic athletes pursuing higher education. These grants enable in-state tuition rates at partnering institutions and are available to active athletes balancing training demands, without performance prerequisites beyond Team USA affiliation. Complementing these, the Team USA Fund channels donor contributions to offset living, training, and healthcare costs not covered by stipends, prioritizing under-resourced athletes across disciplines. Overall, approximately 82% of the USOPC's budget directly funds athlete programs, though distribution relies on NGB administration, which can introduce variability in access.

Health, Wellness, and Protection Initiatives

The USOPC maintains an Office of Athlete Safety dedicated to fostering environments free of misconduct and abuse within Olympic and Paralympic sports. This office supports the independent U.S. Center for SafeSport, established by Congress in 2017 under the Empowering Olympic, Paralympic, and Amateur Athletes Act, which handles investigations and resolutions of abuse allegations across the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Movement. The USOPC's Athlete Safety & Advocacy Action Plan, outlined in 2021, includes measures to enhance SafeSport's effectiveness, such as evaluating arbitration processes and reforming governance to prioritize athlete input. In medical health support, the USOPC operates sports medicine clinics at its training centers in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and Lake Placid, New York, providing specialized care in areas like orthopedics, cardiology, and concussion management. Eligible athletes receive health insurance and access to a nationwide network of top-tier providers through four designated national medical centers, including an extension with UF Health through 2028 for performance care. The organization hosts annual events like the 2025 USOPC-NGB Medical Conference to train healthcare providers on Olympic-specific protocols. Wellness programs emphasize mental health, with a Psychological Services team of 15 full-time providers offering counseling, performance optimization, and crisis intervention via a 24/7 helpline (1-719-866-2255) and teletherapy options. The Mental Health Task Force, active since at least 2020, developed a 60-page emergency action plan in 2022 for handling athlete crises and expanded provider registries for localized care. Additional initiatives include a Women's Health Taskforce addressing issues like relative energy deficiency in sport (RED-S) through webinars and resources, as well as post-career support via the Pivot Program for transitioning athletes. These efforts aim to integrate holistic well-being into high-performance training, though implementation relies on coordination with national governing bodies.

Financial Operations

Revenue Generation and Fundraising

The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) derives its funding solely from private sources, including broadcast rights allocations from the International Olympic Committee (IOC), sponsorship and licensing revenues, and philanthropic contributions, without reliance on federal government appropriations. In 2024, total revenue achieved a record $496.96 million, reflecting heightened commercial interest following Team USA's performance at the Paris Olympic and Paralympic Games. This marked an increase from $256 million in 2023, driven by cyclical Olympic-year dynamics and expanded partnerships. Broadcast revenue constituted the largest share at $213.64 million (43% of total), stemming from the USOPC's negotiated portion of U.S. media rights fees remitted to the IOC, primarily under agreements with NBCUniversal that extend through multiple Olympic cycles. Sponsorships and licensing generated $188.83 million (38%), encompassing domestic corporate deals and global partners via the IOC's TOP (The Olympic Partner) program. The USOPC added eight new sponsors ahead of the 2024 Games, including Michelob ULTRA, Cisco, Autodesk, AXS/Eventim, Cedars-Sinai, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Guild, and Google, alongside longstanding contributors.
Revenue CategoryAmount (millions USD, 2024)Percentage
Broadcast revenue213.6443%
Sponsorships and licensing188.8338%
Contributions, net65.1213%
Investment income20.094%
Other9.282%
Fundraising efforts, channeled through the affiliated U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Foundation (USOPF), yielded $65.12 million in net contributions (13% of total revenue) in 2024. Over the four-year Olympic-Paris cycle, the USOPF secured $225 million in commitments, an 80% rise from the prior quadrennium, with 2024 fundraising alone exceeding the 2023 record by more than $25 million and supported by over 51,700 unique donors—a 46% year-over-year increase. Notable initiatives included targeted campaigns for athlete programs, such as $1.3 million for mental health resources, $8.2 million for the Performance Innovation Fund, $5 million for sports medicine, and $2.3 million for career and education support; the Digital Annual Fund raised $244,000 during the Paris cycle. The foundation's largest single gift, a $25 million donation from Mark and Mary Stevens, underscored major philanthropy as a key driver. These funds directly finance athlete stipends, training grants, and operational needs, independent of public taxation.

Budget Allocation and Expenditures

The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) directs the bulk of its expenditures toward program services supporting elite athlete development and Olympic and Paralympic operations, with these comprising 86.8% of total expenses ($334,212,000 out of $385,012,000) in 2024. This allocation reflects the organization's mandate under the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act to prioritize high-performance programs without reliance on federal appropriations, instead drawing from self-generated revenues such as sponsorships and broadcasting rights shares from the International Olympic Committee. Athlete excellence initiatives dominate the budget, capturing 70% of program expenses, while sport advancement and community growth each receive 15%. Key components of athlete excellence funding include direct grants to athletes and National Governing Bodies (NGBs), medical care, and event preparation; in 2024, this encompassed $139 million in grants, including $17 million in stipends distributed to 1,436 athletes and $17 million in medical benefits for 1,429 athletes. NGB grants, which support training, competitions, and adaptive sports organizations, totaled $78.63 million within broader athlete services, with 67.7% ($75.39 million) allocated to Olympic sports and the remainder to Paralympic efforts. Sport advancement expenditures, at $49,657,000, emphasize safe sport compliance, anti-doping measures, and athlete representation, including $20 million combined with NGBs for U.S. Center for SafeSport operations. Community growth funding of $50,708,000 facilitates partnerships for grassroots engagement and movement-wide initiatives. A comparable structure prevailed in 2023, where program expenses reached $243,914,000 (85% of total $287,043,000), with athlete excellence again at 70% ($169,823,000) covering stipends, NGB support, and well-being programs. Over the 2021-2024 quadrennium leading to the Paris Games, total expenses exceeded $1.34 billion, with 58.4% devoted to athlete excellence ($787 million), underscoring sustained emphasis on performance enhancement amid rising operational costs.
Expense Category (2024 Program Services)AmountPercentage of Program Expenses
Athlete Excellence$233,937,00070%
Sport Advancement$49,657,00015%
Community Growth$50,708,00015%
Total Program Expenses$334,212,000100%
Administrative and fundraising costs, comprising the remaining 13.2% of 2024 expenses, support governance, compliance, and revenue generation efforts essential to the USOPC's independent financial model. Allocations prioritize empirical performance outcomes, with NGB funding often tied to medal potential and development metrics to maximize U.S. competitiveness.

Recent Financial Growth and Milestones

In 2024, the United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) achieved record revenue of $497 million, surpassing the previous high of $458 million set in 2021, primarily driven by income from the Paris Olympic and Paralympic Games including broadcast rights, sponsorships, and special event revenue. Expenses totaled $385 million, yielding a $112 million operating surplus and enabling $234 million in investments toward athlete programs, including $139 million in direct grants. This marked a stark turnaround from 2023, when revenue stood at $256 million against $287 million in expenses, resulting in a $31 million deficit amid non-Games-year operations. A key milestone was the USOPC becoming the first National Olympic Committee to exceed $1 billion in total assets, reaching $1.018 billion by December 31, 2024, up from $971 million at the end of 2023, bolstered by investment income of $43 million and asset contributions. The U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Foundation (USOPF), the Committee's primary fundraising arm, raised $85 million in 2024—$25 million more than in 2023—securing $225 million in multi-year commitments and including a record single $25 million donation, reflecting heightened donor engagement tied to Team USA's medal hauls in Paris.
YearRevenue ($M)Expenses ($M)Surplus/Deficit ($M)Key Notes
2021459346+113Tokyo Games recovery year
2023256287-31Non-Games year
2024497385+112Paris Games peak, record assets >$1B
These figures underscore the cyclical nature of USOPC finances, with Olympic cycles generating outsized gains from domestic media deals—particularly with NBCUniversal—and corporate partnerships, while off-years rely more on foundation-driven philanthropy and investments.

International Engagements

Relationship with IOC and IPC

The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) operates as the National Olympic Committee (NOC) for the United States, with formal recognition from the International Olympic Committee (IOC) under the Olympic Charter, which grants it exclusive rights to select and enter athletes for the Olympic Games and to represent the nation in the Olympic Movement. This recognition, rooted in the USOPC's federally chartered status via the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act (36 U.S.C. ch. 2205), obligates the organization to promote the fundamental principles of Olympism, facilitate athlete participation, and adhere to IOC mandates on governance, including anti-doping protocols and non-discrimination policies. The USOPC's bylaws explicitly require it to enforce and comply with all IOC rules and regulations, ensuring alignment with international standards for team selection, event bidding, and the protection of Olympic symbols and trademarks within the United States. In practice, this involves coordinating with IOC-recognized international federations for sport-specific compliance and disseminating policy updates to support effective preparation for the Games. Correspondingly, the USOPC serves as the National Paralympic Committee (NPC), recognized by the International Paralympic Committee (IPC), which assigns it sole authority over U.S. Paralympic team formation, athlete classification, and participation in both summer and winter Paralympic events. As the NPC, the USOPC acts as the national governing body for three Paralympic sports—Para cycling, Para Nordic skiing, and Para swimming—while overseeing elite programming through its U.S. Paralympics division, established in 2001 to centralize development efforts. This integrated NOC-NPC structure positions the USOPC as one of only four national bodies globally managing both Olympic and Paralympic operations under a single entity, a framework it advanced by being the first to incorporate "Paralympic" into its official name and branding following the 2020 rebranding. The USOPC maintains these ties through strategic partnerships with the IPC, mirroring its IOC engagements, including joint compliance with anti-doping via the World Anti-Doping Agency and collaborative athlete protection initiatives. In addition to regulatory adherence, the USOPC actively strengthens bilateral relations by hosting international forums, such as the Games Preparation Regional Forum attended by representatives from 40 NOCs, and supporting IPC-aligned development programs that enhance global coaching standards and sport sustainability. These efforts underscore the USOPC's role in bridging domestic operations with the broader Olympic and Paralympic ecosystems, without direct government funding, relying instead on private revenues to fulfill its international commitments.

Hosting and Bidding for Games

The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) oversees the domestic process for bidding to host the Olympic and Paralympic Games, evaluating city proposals and advancing a single U.S. candidate to the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and International Paralympic Committee (IPC). This role includes coordinating with local organizing committees on feasibility, funding, and infrastructure while ensuring compliance with international standards. Bids require demonstrated public and governmental support, as evidenced by historical withdrawals tied to referendums or polls showing opposition. The U.S. has hosted the Olympic Games eight times prior to 2028, surpassing all other nations, with Paralympic competitions held concurrently since the 1984 Los Angeles Games marked the first full integration. Successful hosts are detailed below:
Games TypeYearHost City
Summer1904St. Louis
Summer1932Los Angeles
Winter1932Lake Placid
Winter1960Squaw Valley
Winter1980Lake Placid
Summer1984Los Angeles
Summer1996Atlanta
Winter2002Salt Lake City
Summer2028Los Angeles (scheduled)
Notable bidding outcomes highlight risks of over-reliance on projected economic benefits versus fiscal and environmental costs. Denver secured the 1970 IOC vote for the 1976 Winter Olympics but withdrew on November 15, 1972, after a referendum passed by 59% rejecting $35 million in state funding due to taxpayer burden and ecological impacts from venue development. Chicago's USOPC-backed bid for the 2016 Summer Games advanced to IOC consideration but was eliminated October 2, 2009, in the first ballot with 18 votes, amid critiques of venue readiness and international perceptions of U.S. entitlement post-2002 Salt Lake scandal. For 2024 Summer Games, the USOPC selected Boston in January 2015 following a competitive domestic process, but withdrew support July 27, 2015, after Mayor Martin Walsh cited polls showing 52% opposition and demanded bid revisions for cost transparency. This shift enabled Los Angeles, initially eyed for 2024, to negotiate directly with the IOC under post-2016 reforms emphasizing sustainable, low-cost models; LA was awarded 2028 rights unopposed July 31, 2017, leveraging existing venues to cap costs at $4.9 billion privately funded. No U.S. bid has advanced for Winter Games since 2002, reflecting venue scarcity and public wariness of debt from prior hosts.

Global Partnerships and Compliance

The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) fosters global partnerships with entities central to the Olympic and Paralympic ecosystems, including international sports federations (IFs), the Association of National Olympic Committees (ANOC), and continental associations, to advance athlete interests, sustainability, and international coordination. These collaborations enable the USOPC to influence policy, share best practices, and support joint initiatives beyond direct IOC and IPC ties. Through the International Olympic Committee's Olympic Partner (TOP) programme, the USOPC benefits from worldwide sponsorship agreements that provide financial resources and marketing exclusivity across Olympic and Paralympic events; longstanding TOP partners include Coca-Cola, Visa, and Samsung, contributing to revenue sharing with national committees like the USOPC. Additional global alignments involve consulting firms such as Deloitte, which serves as a Worldwide Olympic and Paralympic Partner, aiding in strategic advisory for international operations. Compliance with international regulations forms a core obligation of the USOPC, as outlined in its bylaws requiring adherence to the Olympic Charter, IPC Constitution, and associated rules governing athlete eligibility, event participation, and ethical standards. The organization enforces the World Anti-Doping Code via the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA), which conducts testing, education, and investigations in alignment with World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) protocols and International Standards. The USOPC's National Anti-Doping Policy, updated effective January 1, 2021, mandates that its National Governing Bodies (NGBs) assist WADA, the IOC, the IPC, and IFs in anti-doping enforcement, including sample collection and results management. Athlete sponsorship and advertising during Olympic and Paralympic periods are regulated under IOC Rule 40 and IPC Athlete Sponsorship Regulations, with defined blackout dates—such as February 27 to March 17, 2026, for the Milano Cortina Paralympic Winter Games—to protect official partners. In July 2024, WADA launched a compliance audit of USADA over U.S. legal barriers to extraterritorial testing of non-U.S. athletes, raising potential risks to American hosting bids for the 2028 Los Angeles and 2034 Winter Olympics, as the framework prioritizes national sovereignty in enforcement. The USOPC's Ethics and Compliance team monitors NGB conformity with these global mandates alongside domestic laws like the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act.

Performance and Achievements

Olympic Medal Tallies and Dominance

The United States has accumulated the most Olympic medals of any nation, surpassing 3,000 total medals across Summer and Winter Games by the conclusion of the 2024 Paris Olympics, marking the first time any country achieved this milestone. This tally includes approximately 2,765 medals from Summer Olympics alone, far exceeding the Soviet Union's 1,010 as the next highest. In gold medals, the U.S. leads with over 1,100 across both seasons, reflecting sustained excellence driven by the USOPC's investment in athlete development, training facilities, and high-performance programs. U.S. dominance is most pronounced in the Summer Olympics, where Team USA has topped the overall medal table in eight consecutive Games through Paris 2024, securing 126 medals (40 gold, 44 silver, 42 bronze) despite tying China in golds—the tiebreaker favoring more silvers. Historically, the U.S. has won the most golds in 18 of 29 Summer editions since 1896, with exceptions often tied to geopolitical factors like the 1980 boycott or Soviet peaks in the 1970s-1980s. Swimming and track & field have been pivotal, accounting for over a third of U.S. medals in Paris, underscoring depth in individual and team events. In contrast, Winter Olympic performance shows less hegemony, with 324 total medals (110 golds) as of 2024, placing the U.S. behind Norway and others in all-time winter tallies. The U.S. finished second in golds at the 2018 PyeongChang Games but dropped to fifth in Beijing 2022, highlighting challenges in snow and ice sports relative to European powerhouses. Nonetheless, the USOPC has expanded winter training initiatives, contributing to streaks like four consecutive medals in women's ice hockey golds from 1998 to 2018.
Summer OlympicsGoldSilverBronzeTotal
2016 Rio463738121
2020 Tokyo394133113
2024 Paris404442126
This table illustrates recent consistency, with Paris yielding the highest U.S. total since 1984, bolstered by broad-based successes across 25 sports. The USOPC attributes such outcomes to strategic funding and collegiate pipelines, where nearly 82% of 2020 medalists had university ties.

Paralympic Successes

The United States has achieved notable success in the Paralympic Games through its national team, managed by U.S. Paralympics as a division of the USOPC, with consistent top-five finishes in recent Summer Paralympics medal tables. This performance stems from substantial investments in athlete development, high-performance training facilities, and sport-specific programs that emphasize classification accuracy and competitive preparation. Historically, the U.S. topped the medal standings at the 1984 Summer Paralympics, which it co-hosted in Stoke Mandeville (UK) and New York, earning a leading position amid expanded participation. In the 2024 Paris Summer Paralympics, Team USA recorded its strongest non-domestic result with 105 medals (36 gold, 42 silver, 27 bronze), securing third place overall behind China (94 gold) and Great Britain (49 gold). This edged out the 104 medals from the 2020 Tokyo Games, where the U.S. also finished third in total medals despite placing fourth in golds, highlighting sustained competitiveness against nations with larger state-funded programs like China.
Paralympic GamesGoldSilverBronzeTotalOverall Rank
Paris 20243642271053rd
Tokyo 20202532471043rd (total)
U.S. Paralympians have excelled in team sports and individual events requiring precision and endurance. The women's wheelchair basketball team, for instance, claimed gold in 2016 (Rio), 2020 (Tokyo), and 2024 (Paris), leveraging USOPC-supported national team residencies for tactical superiority. In swimming and athletics, athletes like Mallory Weggemann (multiple golds in para swimming across 2012–2020) and Tatyana McFadden (19 medals in wheelchair racing from 2004–2020, including four golds in 2016) have set benchmarks, with McFadden's hauls reflecting advancements in adaptive equipment and coaching. Winter Paralympics successes include five gold medals in para ice hockey (2002, 2010, 2014, 2018, 2022), underscoring cross-seasonal depth. These outcomes correlate with USOPC initiatives like the Paralympic Military Program, which has integrated veteran athletes into medal-winning pipelines.

Awards, Honors, and Recognitions

The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) administers a range of awards to recognize exceptional performances, sportsmanship, and contributions within the Olympic and Paralympic spheres. These honors, often presented annually, highlight athletes, teams, coaches, and community figures who exemplify dedication, innovation, and ethical conduct in sport. The programs serve to perpetuate the legacy of American excellence in international competition while fostering broader participation and development. Central to these recognitions is the U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Hall of Fame, established in 1983 to induct outstanding athletes, teams, coaches, and contributors whose accomplishments have significantly advanced the movements. As of 2025, the Hall has enshrined over 150 individuals and entities, with the Class of 2025 including 12 athletes, two teams, and notable figures for their influence on Team USA's success. Inductees are selected based on criteria such as medal counts, record-setting feats, and lasting impact, with ceremonies held in Colorado Springs. The Olympic & Paralympic Torch Award, one of the USOPC's most esteemed community honors, is bestowed upon individuals demonstrating exemplary leadership and positive influence on the Olympic and Paralympic ecosystems, often through advocacy, administration, or philanthropy. Recent recipients include Anita DeFrantz in 2025 for her roles in rowing governance and International Olympic Committee membership. Additional key awards encompass the Jack Kelly Fair Play Award, recognizing acts of outstanding sportsmanship, such as the 2022 U.S. Olympic Figure Skating Team's demonstration of integrity amid doping challenges; the annual SportsMan, SportsWoman, and Team of the Year designations for top Olympic and Paralympic performers; and the Rings of Gold Award for contributions elevating specific sports. These accolades are determined by panels of experts, emphasizing verifiable achievements like medals and ethical standards over subjective metrics.

Partnerships and Commercial Activities

Corporate Sponsorships and Licensees

The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) derives substantial revenue from corporate sponsorships and licensing agreements, which collectively generated $188.8 million in 2024, supporting athlete programs and operational needs. These partnerships include exclusive deals with brands providing apparel, services, and merchandise rights, often structured as multi-year contracts aligned with Olympic cycles. Sponsorships emphasize categories such as outfitting, technology, and transportation, while licensing permits approved companies to manufacture and sell Team USA-branded products, ensuring quality control and revenue sharing. Key corporate sponsors encompass official partners like Nike, which serves as the exclusive apparel outfitter since 2005, supplying uniforms, footwear, and training gear through agreements extended across multiple Games, including provisions for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. Other prominent partners include Comcast for media and connectivity, Delta Air Lines for travel, Google for digital services, Honda as the official automotive partner since June 2025, and Starbucks for food and beverage support. Additional collaborators, such as Fanatics for e-commerce retail, Ralph Lauren for select apparel, and Omega for timing equipment, provide specialized endorsements that enhance Team USA's visibility and functionality. Licensing agreements authorize a broad array of companies to produce official merchandise, categorized by product type to avoid conflicts with primary sponsors. Notable licensees include New Era for headwear under a multi-year deal covering multiple Olympic editions, Warner Brothers for accessory bags and backpacks, and Fanatics for broader retail distribution. Other examples encompass Bioworld for apparel accessories, Topps for trading cards, and Chubbies for casual wear, with the USOPC enforcing strict guidelines on design approval and sales channels to protect brand integrity. These arrangements not only monetize intellectual property but also distribute revenue to national governing bodies and athletes via programs like the Athlete Marketing Platform, which notifies participants of category protections.
CategoryExamples of Licensees/Sponsors
Apparel & AccessoriesNike (outfitter), Ralph Lauren (outfitter), New Era (headwear), Chubbies (casual wear)
Bags & LuggageWarner Brothers (backpacks, totes), Apolis (bags)
Collectibles & MediaTopps (cards), Forever Collectibles (memorabilia)
Services & TechComcast (media), Google (digital), Honda (automotive)
Such commercial activities underscore the USOPC's reliance on private sector funding, comprising a significant portion of its non-IOC revenue stream, amid efforts to expand domestic partnerships ahead of future Games.

Media Rights and Coverage

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) and International Paralympic Committee (IPC) retain ownership of global media rights for the Olympic and Paralympic Games, granting territorial rights in the United States to NBCUniversal under long-term agreements that serve as a primary revenue source for the United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) through revenue sharing. NBCUniversal has held exclusive U.S. broadcasting rights for the Summer Olympics since 1988 and the Winter Olympics since 2002, with extensions ensuring coverage through 2036 across television, digital streaming via Peacock, and other platforms. In May 2014, NBCUniversal secured rights through 2032 in a deal valued at approximately $7.75 billion, followed by a $3 billion extension announced on March 13, 2025, covering the 2034 Salt Lake City Winter Games and 2036 Summer Games, which includes Paralympic events. This arrangement, negotiated directly between the IOC and NBCUniversal, provides the USOPC with a substantial portion of the fees—such as $213.6 million in broadcast revenue in 2024 alone—enabling athlete funding and operations, as the USOPC's revenue-sharing formula from U.S. media deals has historically exceeded distributions to other National Olympic Committees. NBCUniversal delivers comprehensive coverage, including live and delayed broadcasts on NBC, USA Network, CNBC, and extensive streaming, with Paralympic programming integrated into the Olympic package; for the Paris 2024 Paralympics, it provided over 1,500 hours total and more than 140 hours of television airtime, drawing 15.4 million total U.S. viewers. The USOPC supports this through media relations, Team USA content on its website and social channels covering nearly 700 competitions annually, and partnerships like the July 2024 collaboration with Google and NBCUniversal to enhance athlete storytelling via AI tools during the Paris Games.

Domestic Collaborations and Events

The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) collaborates extensively with National Governing Bodies (NGBs), certifying and overseeing organizations responsible for administering individual Olympic and Paralympic sports within the United States. These NGBs, numbering in the dozens and covering disciplines such as track and field, swimming, and gymnastics, manage athlete development, national competitions, and team nominations, while the USOPC allocates approximately 82% of its budget to direct support including training facilities, sports medicine, coaching education, and health insurance. This partnership ensures compliance with the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act, with the USOPC providing governance resources, such as trainings and task forces, to enhance NGB operations and athlete welfare. Additional domestic collaborations include initiatives with educational institutions and the military. In partnership with the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Office of Inclusion, the USOPC launched a program in fall 2022 to advance Paralympic sports across three disciplines at U.S. colleges and universities, engaging schools, conferences, and NGBs to promote participation and development. The USOPC also supports high school, collegiate, and military Paralympic programming, fostering grassroots access to adaptive sports through integrated pathways. These efforts align with broader NGB cooperation, including annual events like the USOPC-NGB Medical Conference, which in February hosted over 365 professionals, NGB representatives, and athletes to address health and performance standards. Key domestic events organized or co-hosted by the USOPC include the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Team Trials, quadrennial competitions to select national squads. For the 2024 cycle, trials spanned multiple sports and venues, such as USA Track & Field's event from June 21 to 30 at Hayward Field in Eugene, Oregon, and USA Gymnastics trials from June 27 to 30. Paralympic-specific trials, like U.S. Paralympics Swimming from June 27 to 29, similarly occur across U.S. sites to ensure fair qualification. The USOPC also facilitates training site events, where many facilities have hosted trials, world cups, or championships, and promotes national observances like Olympic & Paralympic Day on June 23, celebrating unity through community programs. Through platforms like USOPC SportsLink, NGBs network with U.S. venues and sports commissions to secure hosting for such events.

Controversies and Criticisms

Sexual Abuse Scandals and SafeSport Implementation

The Larry Nassar sexual abuse scandal, involving the former USA Gymnastics national team doctor, exposed significant failures in oversight by the United States Olympic Committee (USOC, predecessor to the USOPC). Nassar sexually assaulted over 250 athletes under the guise of medical treatment between 1996 and 2016, with reports of abuse dating back to at least 2015 that were not adequately addressed by USA Gymnastics or the USOC. A 2018 independent review commissioned by the USOC found that the organization had received warnings about Nassar as early as 2015 but delayed action, contributing to prolonged harm; this led to the firing of a top USOC executive for mishandling the response. In response, USA Gymnastics and the USOPC agreed to a $380 million settlement in December 2021 with Nassar survivors, acknowledging institutional shortcomings in protecting athletes. Beyond gymnastics, sexual misconduct allegations have surfaced across other USOPC-governed national governing bodies (NGBs), highlighting systemic vulnerabilities in Olympic sports. A 2019 Senate investigation revealed the USOC's broader failures to safeguard athletes from abuse, including inadequate reporting mechanisms and a culture prioritizing medals over safety. Reports of sexual abuse and misconduct in Olympic sports increased by 55% from 2018 to 2019, with over 1,290 open cases tracked by the U.S. Center for SafeSport by September 2019. More recently, in December 2024, a U.S. Olympic coach was placed on leave amid sexual abuse allegations, and in April 2025, the USOPC fired a biathlon coach and director following a SafeSport investigation into abuse claims. In direct response to the Nassar scandal and related pressures, Congress passed the Protecting Young Victims from Sexual Abuse and Safe Sport Authorization Act of 2017, establishing the independent U.S. Center for SafeSport to investigate and resolve allegations of sexual misconduct in Olympic and Paralympic sports. The USOPC, required to fund the Center with at least $7.25 million annually as of subsequent legislation, oversees NGB compliance with SafeSport policies, including mandatory reporting, training, and the Minor Athlete Abuse Prevention Policy (MAAPP), which all NGBs and the USOPC must implement by January 1, 2025. The Center maintains a Centralized Disciplinary Database of sanctioned individuals and handles all sexual misconduct reports involving USOPC athletes, coaches, or staff, aiming to enforce the SafeSport Code's prohibitions on abuse. Despite these measures, implementation challenges persist, with critics noting delays in case resolutions and ongoing abuse reports indicating incomplete cultural reform within the USOPC ecosystem. The USOPC's Office of Athlete Safety promotes prevention through education and policy enforcement, but a 2020 Government Accountability Office report highlighted inefficiencies in the Center's processes, such as inconsistent application of temporary sanctions during investigations. Senate-led reforms in 2020, including the Empowering Olympic, Paralympic, and Amateur Athletes Act, decertified USA Gymnastics temporarily and imposed direct congressional oversight on the USOPC to ensure accountability, reflecting persistent concerns over the organization's historical deference to NGB autonomy at the expense of athlete protection.

Athlete Protest Policies and Political Neutrality

The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) has developed policies on athlete demonstrations that permit peaceful expressions related to racial and social justice at domestic events, while deferring to international rules at the Games to uphold a degree of political neutrality. In December 2020, following consultations with athletes and in response to demands amid national discussions on racial injustice, the USOPC announced it would no longer impose sanctions on athletes for such demonstrations, provided they remain peaceful and respectful. This shift amended prior practices where athletes risked discipline under team agreements for actions like kneeling, as seen in the 2019 Pan American Games incident involving U.S. track athletes who faced internal review but no formal Olympic-level punishment. At U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Trials, the policy explicitly allows gestures such as kneeling during the national anthem, raising a fist on the podium, or wearing armbands with messages like "Black Lives Matter," as outlined in March 2021 guidance distributed to athletes and national governing bodies. The USOPC emphasized education on these rules to avoid disruptions, stating that any violations would trigger proportionate responses ranging from warnings to potential exclusion from events, but only if they interfere with competition or safety. This approach applies uniformly to Olympic and Paralympic athletes under USOPC oversight, aligning with the International Paralympic Committee's (IPC) Handbook provisions mirroring IOC restrictions. At the Olympic and Paralympic Games, however, USOPC athletes are bound by IOC Rule 50 of the Olympic Charter and IPC equivalents, which prohibit "any kind of demonstration or political, religious or racial propaganda" on the field of play, podium, or official venues, including during medal ceremonies or anthems. The USOPC has committed not to impose additional punishments beyond those from the IOC or IPC, effectively shielding athletes from domestic sanctions even if international bodies act, as demonstrated during the Tokyo 2020 Games (held in 2021) where U.S. athletes performed pre-competition gestures like fist raises without USOPC repercussions. The organization advocated for Rule 50 reforms through the IOC Athletes' Commission but criticized the resulting 2021 guidelines as insufficient, arguing they failed to enable meaningful change while retaining bans on podium protests. This framework has raised questions about political neutrality, as the Olympic movement's foundational principle under Rule 50 seeks to insulate the Games from partisan advocacy to foster global unity, yet the USOPC's selective endorsement of social justice expressions—often aligned with specific domestic political narratives—has been viewed by some as eroding that impartiality. Critics, including analyses of IOC enforcement inconsistencies, contend that permitting symbolic acts like kneeling conveys ideological positions under the guise of human rights advocacy, potentially politicizing Team USA's representation and conflicting with the Charter's intent for non-propaganda. The USOPC maintains its policy supports athlete rights without endorsing content, focusing enforcement on non-disruptive acts, though no formal challenges to its domestic leniency have led to sanctions as of 2025.

Transgender Eligibility and Fair Play Debates

In July 2025, the United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) amended its Athlete Safety Policy to prohibit transgender women who underwent male puberty from competing in women's categories at Olympic and Paralympic events, requiring them instead to participate in men's or open divisions. This policy shift directed the USOPC's 54 national governing bodies to revise their eligibility rules accordingly, emphasizing competitive fairness and athlete safety over prior inclusion-focused frameworks. The change followed a February 2025 executive order by President Trump mandating restrictions on transgender participation in women's sports at federally funded institutions, providing regulatory cover amid ongoing litigation risks. The policy addressed empirical evidence of retained physiological advantages in transgender women post-transition, including 10-12% greater strength and speed compared to cisgender women, stemming from male puberty's irreversible effects on skeletal structure, muscle mass, and cardiovascular capacity. Peer-reviewed analyses confirm that testosterone suppression for 1-3 years reduces but does not eliminate these edges, with transwomen retaining up to 9% advantages in running and 17% in strength-based events relative to female peers. Such disparities, rooted in sex-based dimorphism rather than identity, have fueled arguments that inclusion in female categories undermines fair play, as evidenced by cases like swimmer Lia Thomas, a biological male who dominated NCAA women's events in 2022 after transitioning, prompting backlash from female competitors over displaced opportunities. Critics, including advocacy groups like Lambda Legal, contended the USOPC's restrictions discriminate against transgender athletes and ignore self-identification in sport, potentially violating anti-discrimination laws, though these claims overlook biological causation in performance gaps documented across sports science. Proponents, drawing from first-principles of sex-segregated competition designed to level playing fields, hailed the policy as a safeguard for female athletes' rights, aligning with international bodies like World Athletics and World Aquatics that impose puberty-based criteria. The USOPC's prior stance, which prioritized broad participation without puberty thresholds, had drawn scrutiny for enabling such imbalances, as seen in Paralympic contexts where similar eligibility debates persist absent uniform enforcement. Ongoing debates highlight tensions between empirical fairness—supported by longitudinal studies showing minimal mitigation of male advantages via hormone therapy—and demands for inclusion, with some national governing bodies like USA Ultimate expressing concerns over impacts on transgender members. Legal challenges loom, as transgender advocates prepare suits alleging bias, yet the policy reflects a causal recognition that sex-based categories exist to counteract inherent dimorphisms, not to accommodate identity shifts. This evolution marks a departure from academia-influenced inclusion models, which often downplay biological data due to ideological pressures, toward evidence-driven standards prioritizing verifiable performance equity.

Governance Failures and Reform Efforts

The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) has historically operated as a private nonprofit with congressionally granted monopoly powers under the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act of 1978, which limited external regulation and fostered governance shortcomings, including inadequate oversight of national governing bodies (NGBs) that enabled persistent athlete safety failures. Congressional investigations, such as the 2018 bipartisan House probe, identified systemic prioritization of institutional reputation over athlete welfare, with the USOPC failing to enforce accountability across its network of over 40 NGBs. These lapses contributed to delayed responses to misconduct reports and uneven enforcement of ethical standards, prompting criticism that the USOPC's self-regulatory model lacked sufficient checks. In anticipation of legislative pressure, the USOPC initiated internal governance reforms beginning in November 2018, enacting a multi-phase bylaws overhaul described as the most sweeping in its history. Phase 1 and Phase 2 amendments, approved in 2019, increased athlete representation to at least one-third of board seats and established independent audit and ethics committees. Phase 3, finalized in 2022, codified direct elections for athlete directors and enhanced transparency in NGB decertification processes. These changes aimed to bolster athlete input and ethical compliance but were criticized for relying on voluntary adoption by NGBs, revealing gaps in enforcement authority. Congressional intervention culminated in the Empowering Olympic, Paralympic, and Amateur Athletes Act of 2020, signed into law on October 30, 2020, which amended the 1978 Act to impose mandatory safeguards. The legislation granted the USOPC explicit authority to decertify non-compliant NGBs, required minimum athlete-majority safe sport committees within each, and empowered Congress to dissolve the USOPC board for repeated failures in athlete protection or governance. It also formalized funding mechanisms for the independent U.S. Center for SafeSport and mandated biennial audits of USOPC finances and operations. Ongoing reform scrutiny persisted, with the bipartisan Commission on the State of the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee, established in 2022, issuing 12 recommendations in March 2024 to address structural inefficiencies. Key proposals included granting full independence to the Team USA Athletes' Commission to amplify athlete voices free from USOPC influence, redirecting the USOPC to focus exclusively on high-performance elite athletes, and creating a separate federal entity for grassroots and youth sports development. The commission also urged direct congressional funding for SafeSport to insulate it from USOPC budgetary control, citing persistent implementation challenges in NGB compliance. The USOPC endorsed the athlete commission independence while committing to collaborate on broader changes, though critics argue these build on prior reforms without fully resolving the monopoly's inherent conflicts.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.