Hubbry Logo
Vortex liftVortex liftMain
Open search
Vortex lift
Community hub
Vortex lift
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Vortex lift
Vortex lift
Vortex lift
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Image showing formation of vortices behind the leading edge of a delta wing at high angle of attack
A cloud of smoke shows the roll-up of the vortex sheet shed from the whole trailing edge of a wing producing lift from attached flow, with its core aligned with the wing tip. Vortex lift has an additional vortex close to the body when shed by a leading edge root extension or closer to the tip when shed by a sweptback leading edge.

Vortex lift is that portion of lift due to the action of leading edge vortices.[1] It is generated by wings with highly sweptback, sharp, leading edges (beyond 50 degrees of sweep) or highly-swept wing-root extensions added to a wing of moderate sweep.[2] It is sometimes known as non-linear lift due to its rapid increase with angle of attack[3] and controlled separation lift, to distinguish it from conventional lift which occurs with attached flow.

How it works

[edit]

Vortex lift works by capturing vortices generated from the sharply swept leading edge of the wing. The vortex, formed roughly parallel to the leading edge of the wing, is trapped by the airflow and remains fixed to the upper surface of the wing. As the air flows around the leading edge, it flows over the trapped vortex and is pulled in and down to generate the lift.

A straight, or moderate sweep, wing may experience, depending on its airfoil section, a leading-edge stall and loss of lift, as a result of flow separation at the leading edge[4] and a non-lifting wake over the top of the wing. However, on a highly-swept wing leading-edge separation still occurs but instead creates a vortex sheet that rolls up above the wing producing spanwise flow beneath. Flow not entrained by the vortex passes over the top of the vortex and reattaches to the wing surface.[5] The vortex generates a high negative pressure field on the top of the wing. Vortex lift increases with angle of attack (AOA) as seen on lift~AOA plots which show the vortex, or unattached flow, adding to the normal attached lift as an extra non-linear component of the overall lift.[6] Vortex lift has a limiting AoA at which the vortex bursts or breaks down.

Applications

[edit]

Four basic configurations which have used vortex lift are, in chronological order, the 60-degree delta wing; the ogive delta wing with its sharply-swept leading edge at the root; the moderately-swept wing with a leading-edge extension, which is known as a hybrid wing; and the sharp-edge forebody, or vortex-lift strake.[7] Wings which generate vortex lift have been used on delta-winged research aircraft such as the Convair XF-92A and Fairey Delta 2. Early delta wing fighters such as the F-102, the F-106, and contemporaries such as Dassault's deltas had cambered leading edges that were blunt and did not generate significant vortexes. The Concorde supersonic airliner had sharp leading edges. Wings with vortex lift over the inboard section are the moderate-sweep wings with an easily identified LERX used on high-manoeuvrability combat aircraft, such as the Northrop F-5 and McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet. Vortex lift sharp forebody strakes are used on the General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon.

  • Lippisch DM-1 test glider, 64-degree delta which demonstrated vortex lift in wind tunnel when modified with sharp leading edge at NASA Langley Research Center in 1946
    Lippisch DM-1 test glider, 64-degree delta which demonstrated vortex lift in wind tunnel when modified with sharp leading edge at NASA Langley Research Center in 1946
  • F-106, a 60-degree delta: an early example with leading edge flow separation
    F-106, a 60-degree delta: an early example with leading edge flow separation
  • Concorde showing its ogive delta wing with high sweep angle at wing root: a highly developed shape with controlled flow separation
    Concorde showing its ogive delta wing with high sweep angle at wing root: a highly developed shape with controlled flow separation
  • Northrop F-5 a wing with moderate sweep: an early application of vortex lift using a LERX
    Northrop F-5 a wing with moderate sweep: an early application of vortex lift using a LERX
  • General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon vortices from sharp-edged wide forebody stabilize flow over entire aircraft including outboard wing
    General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon vortices from sharp-edged wide forebody stabilize flow over entire aircraft including outboard wing

Benefits and shortcomings

[edit]

Vortex lift provides high lift with increasing AoA at landing speeds and in manoeuvring flight. A high AoA needed to meet landing requirements has, in the past, restricted pilot visibility and led to design complications to accommodate a drooping nose, as in the case of the Fairey Delta 2 and Concorde. For moderate swept wings the addition of a LERX reduces wave drag and improves turning performance and enables a far wider range of flying attitudes.[8] The use of vortex lift is restricted by vortex breakdown or bursting and an inherent instability in yaw. There is considerable drag due to increased lift production and loss of leading edge suction that is part of normal attached flow round a leading edge.[9]

Among animals

[edit]

Animals such as hummingbirds, and bats that eat pollen and nectar, are able to hover. They produce vortex lift with the sharp leading edges of their wings and change their wing shapes and curvatures to create stability in the lift.[10]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Vortex lift

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Vortex lift is an aerodynamic phenomenon in which additional lift is generated on highly swept , such as delta , by the formation and stabilization of leading-edge vortices at high angles of attack, enabling sustained flight beyond angle of conventional . This mechanism arises when airflow separates at the sharp , creating a low-pressure vortex core that remains to the upper surface, inducing downward acceleration of and increasing the pressure differential across the . Unlike linear lift from flow, vortex lift is nonlinear and dominates at angles of attack above approximately 10–15 degrees, allowing with slender to achieve high lift coefficients without catastrophic . The leading-edge suction analogy, developed by NASA researcher Clarence Polhamus in 1966, provides a foundational theoretical framework for predicting vortex lift by equating it to the rearward redirection of suction forces that would occur in potential flow around the leading edge. In this model, the total lift coefficient CLC_L is the sum of potential lift CLp=Kpsin⁡αcos⁡αC_{L_p} = K_p \sin \alpha \cos \alpha and vortex lift CLv=Kvcos⁡αsin⁡2αC_{L_v} = K_v \cos \alpha \sin^2 \alpha, where α\alpha is the angle of attack and KpK_p, KvK_v are empirically derived constants depending on wing aspect ratio. This approach accurately captures the nonlinear increase in lift observed experimentally on sharp-edged delta wings up to angles of 20 degrees or more, though it requires adjustments for viscous effects like vortex breakdown, which limits lift at higher angles by causing the vortex to dissipate into turbulence. Discovered in the 1940s through wind tunnel tests on the DM-1 glider at Langley Research Center, vortex lift became critical for the design of supersonic and hypersonic in the 1950s and 1960s, addressing the challenges of low-speed on slender delta wings optimized for high-speed cruise. Key advancements include early mathematical models by French researcher Legendre in 1952 and refinements by Brown and Michael at in 1955, which highlighted the role of vortex-induced reattachment in delaying trailing-edge separation. Applications span military fighters like the F-16 and series, where vortex lift enhances maneuverability, to civilian supersonic transports such as the with its ogee-planform wing, and the Space Shuttle's double-delta configuration for reentry and stability. Ongoing focuses on computational modeling of unsteady vortex flows and control techniques to mitigate vortex breakdown, ensuring reliable in modern high-agility .

Principles and Mechanisms

Definition and Generation

Vortex lift refers to the additional generated by the low-pressure regions within stable vortices that form above lifting surfaces, particularly on at high angles of attack where conventional attached flow would otherwise lead to . This phenomenon provides a significant increment in lift beyond the linear regime of theory, enabling sustained flight at extreme attitudes. Unlike the lift from pressure differences across an attached , vortex lift arises from the rotational flow in separated vortices that remain attached to the surface, creating a effect that enhances overall circulation. The generation of vortex lift begins with flow separation at the leading edge of a swept wing under high-angle-of-attack conditions, where the oncoming airflow cannot follow the sharp edge and instead rolls up into a concentrated, recirculating vortex. This leading-edge vortex forms due to the spanwise pressure gradient and adverse pressure gradients, drawing fluid from the wing's root toward the tip and establishing a stable spiral structure that convects over the upper surface. The vortex core experiences low , which sucks the surrounding flow downward, effectively increasing the local angle of attack and augmenting lift through enhanced suction near the leading edge; the flow then reattaches farther aft, delaying full . Vortex lift requires specific aerodynamic conditions to manifest effectively, including high leading-edge sweep angles typically exceeding 50 degrees to promote the necessary spanwise flow component for vortex stability, subsonic to low speeds where effects are minimal, and angles of attack greater than approximately 15 degrees, at which point the attached separates. These prerequisites ensure the vortex remains coherent and attached rather than bursting prematurely, distinguishing vortex lift from other separated flow regimes. The phenomenon was first systematically observed in wind tunnel tests during the late 1940s and early 1950s, amid research on delta wings for emerging designs. Early experiments on the DM-1 glider in 1946 at NACA's Langley facility revealed that sharpening the leading edges dramatically increased maximum lift through vortex formation, while flight tests of the XF-92A delta-wing aircraft in 1948 confirmed controlled flight up to 45 degrees via this mechanism. These findings, building on prior observations of edge vortices in , laid the groundwork for incorporating vortex lift into high-performance .

Vortex Dynamics on Wings

The leading-edge vortex on a delta wing forms as a concentrated rotational flow originating from separation at the sharp leading edge, characterized by a stable axial core of high vorticity that extends chordwise over the upper surface. This primary vortex is fed and sustained by secondary vortices, typically counter-rotating pairs that form beneath the primary vortex along the chordwise direction and interact with the primary structure by displacing it upward and inward, thereby maintaining its coherence and intensity. The axial flow within the core can reach velocities up to three times the freestream speed, contributing to the vortex's persistence at high angles of attack. The interaction of this vortex with the wing geometry produces a pronounced suction peak on the upper surface directly beneath the vortex core, where low-pressure regions arise from the rotational flow, enhancing lift through favorable pressure distribution. As the angle of attack increases, the vortex core undergoes spanwise migration, typically shifting outward along the span (from approximately 0.58 to 0.61 of the semi-span for angles between 29° and 39°), which alters the load distribution and can lead to nonlinear aerodynamic responses. This migration influences the overall lift curve, with the vortex-induced suction accounting for a significant portion of the total lift, often up to 30% on slender wings. Flow topology around the vortex is best illustrated through streamlines and fields, which reveal a spiraling pattern within the core and a feed sheet of separated flow rolling up from the to form the rotational structure. The vortex remains attached to the due to the balance of adverse pressure gradients and centrifugal forces, with streamlines showing in the chordwise position of breakdown during dynamic motions. camber or leading-edge strakes play a critical role in stabilizing this topology; for instance, deflecting a leading-edge flap by 4° to 8° or adding highly swept strakes delays vortex breakdown and enhances coherence by augmenting the vortex strength at inboard stations, thereby extending the range of stable attachment at higher angles of attack. Several key parameters govern the strength and persistence of the leading-edge vortex. The Reynolds number has a relatively minor influence at high values (e.g., above 250,000), where vortex size and breakdown position show limited sensitivity, though higher Reynolds numbers can delay separation onset and shift the vortex origin downstream, promoting greater persistence. Mach number effects become prominent in compressible flows, with increasing Mach (e.g., from 0.4 to 0.6) reducing vortex strength by promoting earlier separation and upstream movement of the breakdown point, potentially eliminating vortex lift when Mach lines align with the leading edge. Aspect ratio, tied to leading-edge sweep, influences vortex formation such that lower values (high sweep, e.g., 70°–75°) enhance strength and forward positioning of breakdown compared to higher aspect ratios, where trailing-edge effects may weaken the structure beyond aspect ratios around 0.7.

Modeling and Analysis

Leading-Edge Vortex Theory

The theoretical foundations of leading-edge vortex lift trace their origins to slender wing theory, pioneered by Robert T. Jones in 1946, which analyzed low-aspect-ratio pointed wings by approximating the flow in crossflow planes normal to the spanwise axis, revealing nonlinear lift characteristics at high angles of attack due to tip and leading-edge vortex effects. This framework established that slender delta wings generate significant lift through vortex-dominated flows rather than traditional attached-flow mechanisms, setting the stage for subsequent models that explicitly incorporated vortex dynamics. By the , the theory evolved into vortex lattice methods, which discretized the wing surface into panels of bound vortices and modeled the trailing wake as free vortices, enabling numerical predictions of vortex lift on delta wings with improved accuracy for complex geometries. These methods, building on earlier lifting-line concepts from Prandtl and Falkner, transitioned from analytical approximations to computational tools, facilitating the analysis of separated flows without relying solely on slender-body simplifications. Central to these models are key assumptions that simplify the complex vortical flow. The approximation treats the airflow as outside the vortex core, neglecting effects and viscous dissipation to focus on inviscid pressure distributions. The frozen vortex assumption further posits a stable, conical vortex structure that remains attached and does not significantly convect or diffuse along the wing chord, allowing for steady-state predictions. However, these assumptions break down at the onset of vortex burst, where the vortex core destabilizes and expands, leading to a sudden loss of lift and rendering the models inaccurate beyond critical angles of attack typically around 25° to 30° for sharp-edged delta wings. A seminal contribution to vortex lift prediction is the leading-edge suction analogy proposed by Edward C. Polhamus in 1966, which interprets the nonlinear vortex-induced lift as the conversion of the leading-edge suction force—present in attached potential flow—into a normal force through the stabilizing influence of the leading-edge vortex. In attached flow over a sharp-edged wing, potential theory predicts a singular suction at the leading edge that contributes to both lift and induced drag; however, at high angles of attack, flow separation initiates a vortex that adheres to the upper surface, effectively relieving this suction while generating an equivalent low-pressure region that augments the normal force. The analogy equates the vortex action to a redirection of this suction force into a thrust-like component perpendicular to the wing, thereby increasing the total normal force without the associated drag penalty of the original suction. The derivation of this analogy proceeds in steps grounded in slender . First, the baseline solution for the is obtained, yielding a linear component from distributed loading and a separate leading-edge term that scales with of attack and planform shape. Second, under separated conditions, the leading-edge is suppressed due to -induced stagnation at the edge, but core's circulation produces a field that mimics the relieved force, directed to the local surface. Third, this force is resolved into components: a spanwise that balances the and a chordwise increment, assuming the remains fully developed and attached. Finally, the total is the sum of the (non-) lift and the contribution, with the latter exhibiting a quadratic dependence on of attack due to the strength's growth with sin²α, providing a semi-empirical means to extend linear theory into the nonlinear regime. Note that while coefficients are often used in derivation, the lift coefficients incorporate an additional cos α projection for consistency with axial force balance in slender theory. Validation of the leading-edge suction analogy came through comparisons with early NASA wind-tunnel tests on sharp-edged delta wings of aspect ratios ranging from 0.5 to 2.0, conducted at low speeds in facilities like the Langley 7- by 10-Foot Tunnel. For instance, at a 15° angle of attack, the predicted lift coefficients aligned closely with measured data, capturing the nonlinear rise in lift more accurately than prior models such as Gersten's slender body approach or Brown and Michael's free vortex sheet method. Across angles up to 25°, the theory showed excellent agreement for low-aspect-ratio wings (e.g., aspect ratio 1.0), with minor deviations at higher aspect ratios attributable to premature trailing-edge separation, confirming the analogy's utility for predicting vortex lift onset and magnitude in experimental regimes.

Lift Coefficient Formulations

The vortex lift component arises from the leading-edge suction analogy, which models the nonlinear lift increment due to the stable leading-edge vortex as equivalent to the suction force that would occur in a potential flow solution without separation, but redirected normal to the wing surface. In this framework, the vortex lift coefficient is formulated as CLv=Kvsin⁡2αcos⁡αC_L^v = K_v \sin^2 \alpha \cos \alpha, where α\alpha is the angle of attack and KvK_v is the vortex lift parameter representing the strength of the vortex contribution (empirically ~1.0-1.2 for sharp-edged delta wings depending on aspect ratio and sweep). This expression derives from integrating the tangential suction force along the leading edge in slender-wing potential flow theory, where the suction thrust coefficient CTC_T is proportional to sin⁡2α\sin^2 \alpha, and its normal component yields the cos⁡α\cos \alpha factor after projection. KvK_v is related to the potential parameter KpK_p via Kv≈Kp(1−KpKi)/cos⁡ΛLEK_v \approx K_p (1 - K_p K_i)/\cos \Lambda_{LE} for full suction recovery, where KiK_i is the induced-drag factor and ΛLE\Lambda_{LE} is the leading-edge sweep. The total lift coefficient combines the linear potential (vortex-free) contribution with the nonlinear vortex term, given by CL=CLp+CLvC_L = C_L^p + C_L^v, where CLp=Kpcos⁡2αsin⁡αC_L^p = K_p \cos^2 \alpha \sin \alpha is the attached-flow lift (with KpK_p the planform-dependent lift-curve slope factor from small-angle theory, typically 0.7-1.0 for low-aspect-ratio delta wings), leading to a characteristic nonlinear dependence on α\alpha that peaks before stall. Note that some references present the potential term as Kpsin⁡αcos⁡αK_p \sin \alpha \cos \alpha for normal force coefficients; the form here is projected to lift for consistency with slender wing theory. This additive structure captures the progressive buildup of vortex strength with increasing α\alpha, enabling higher maximum lift coefficients compared to linear theory. In practice, KpK_p is determined from wing geometry using lifting-surface theory, with values around 0.9 for 70° sweep delta wings at low speeds. Empirical corrections account for real-flow effects, such as subsonic , where the Prandtl-Glauert factor 1/1−M21 / \sqrt{1 - M^2}
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.