Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Wikiversity
View on WikipediaWikiversity is a Wikimedia Foundation project[2][3] that supports learning communities, their learning materials, and resulting activities. It differs from Wikipedia in that it offers tutorials and other materials for the fostering of learning, rather than an encyclopedia. It is available in many languages.
Key Information
One element of Wikiversity is a set of WikiJournals which publish peer-reviewed articles in a stable, indexed, and citable format comparable with academic journals. These can be copied to Wikipedia, and are sometimes based on Wikipedia articles.
As of November 2025, there are Wikiversity sites active for 18 languages[1] comprising a total of 166,967 articles and 1,155 recently active editors.[4]
History
[edit]Wikiversity's data phase officially began on August 15, 2006, with the English language Wikiversity.
The idea of Wikiversity began with the initial development of the Wikiversity community within the Wikibooks project. However, when it was nominated for deletion from Wikibooks, soon there was a proposal to make Wikiversity an independent Wikimedia project,[5] with the fundamental goal to broaden the scope of activities within the Wikimedia community to include additional types of learning resources in addition to textbooks.
Two proposals were made. The first project proposal was not approved (2005) and the second, modified proposal, was approved (2006).[6] The launch of Wikiversity was announced at Wikimania 2006 as an idea to "host learning communities, so people who are actually trying to learn".[7]
Project details
[edit]Wikiversity is a center for the creation of and use of free learning materials, and the provision of learning activities.[8][9] Wikiversity is one of many wikis used in educational contexts,[10] as well as many initiatives that are creating free and open educational resources.
The primary priorities and goals for Wikiversity are to:
- Create and host a range of free-content, multilingual learning materials/resources, for all age groups in all languages.
- Host scholarly/learning projects and communities that support these materials.[11]
The Wikiversity e-Learning model places emphasis on "learning groups" and "learning by doing". Wikiversity's motto and slogan is "set learning free",[12][13] indicating that groups/communities of Wikiversity participants will engage in learning projects. Learning is facilitated through collaboration on projects that are detailed, outlined, summarized or results reported by editing Wikiversity pages. Wikiversity learning projects include collections of wiki webpages concerned with the exploration of a particular topic.[14] Wikiversity participants are encouraged to express their learning goals, and the Wikiversity community collaborates to develop learning activities and projects to accommodate those goals.[15] The Wikiversity e-Learning activities give learners the opportunity to build knowledge.[16][17] Students have to be language-aware in order to be able to correct their classmates. By doing this, students develop their reflection skills. Secondly, they enable students to be autonomous deciding what to write or edit, also when and how to do it. Students are able to free resort to any mean of support. At the same time, it fosters cognitive development, engaging students to collaborate.[citation needed]
Learning resources are developed by an individual or groups, either on their own initiative, or as part of a learning project.[18] Wikiversity resources include teaching aids, lesson plans, curricula, links to off-site resources, course notes, example and problem sets, computer simulations, reading lists, and other as devised by participants – but do not include final polished textbooks. Texts useful to others are hosted at Wikibooks for update and maintenance.[19] Learning groups with interests in each subject area create a web of resources that form the basis of discussions and activities at Wikiversity. Learning resources can be used by educators outside of Wikiversity for their own purposes, under the terms of the GFDL and a Creative Commons license (like Wikipedia).
Wikiversity "administrators" are metaphorically referred to as "custodians".[20]
Wikiversity also allows original research (in contrast to Wikipedia which does not).[16][21] Such research content may lack any peer review.[21]
WikiJournals
[edit]
Several WikiJournals operate with an academic journal format on the Wikiversity website (under the WikiJournal User Group). Submitted articles are subjected to peer review by external experts before publication of an indexed, citable, stable version in the journal, and an editable version in Wikipedia. They are wholly free, offering open access to readers and charging no publication fee to authors (diamond open access).[22] Some articles are written from scratch, and others are adapted from Wikipedia articles.[23] They therefore aim to encourage experts to contribute content creation and improvement (as authors and peer reviewers), and provide an additional quality control mechanism for existing Wikipedia content.[24] This activity started with WikiJournal of Medicine in 2014.[25] The sister journals WikiJournal of Science and WikiJournal of Humanities both began publishing in 2018.[23][26] The WikiJournal User Group received an open publishing award in November 2019.[27]
WikiDebates
[edit]WikiDebates on Wikiversity allow compiling arguments of both sides on controversial topics such as the legality of cannabis, to create an overview. For fairness, users are encouraged to add arguments of their opposing view too.[28][29]
Languages
[edit]There are currently seventeen different Wikiversities: Arabic, Chinese, Czech, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hindi, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Russian, Slovene, Spanish, and Swedish (locked since 17 June 2021); Wikiversity projects in other languages are being developed at the "beta" multilingual hub.[30]
For newly established specific language Wikiversities to move out of the initial exploratory "beta" phase, the new Wikiversity community must establish policies governing research activities. Wikiversity may act as a repository of research carried out by the Wikimedia Research Network, or others who are involved in wiki-based, or other research. Wikiversity hosts original research in addition to secondary research, unless a specific language group decides upon no research. It is expected that researchers will respect and update guidelines for appropriate research through a community consensus process.[31][32] Currently the English Wikiversity hosts more than 376 research pages.[33]
As of November 2025, there are wikiversity sites for 18 languages of which 18 are active and 0 are closed.[1] The active sites have 166,967 articles,[4] There are 3,485,130 registered users of which 1,155 are recently active.[4]
The top ten Wikiversity language projects by mainspace article count:[4]
| № | Language | Wiki | Content pages | Pages | Edits | Admins | Users | Active users | Files |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | German | de | 75,751 | 146,551 | 1,057,472 | 7 | 40,598 | 82 | 2,764 |
| 2 | English | en | 37,724 | 240,222 | 2,734,578 | 10 | 3,017,091 | 397 | 40,725 |
| 3 | French | fr | 17,049 | 54,039 | 974,776 | 9 | 78,807 | 57 | 83 |
| 4 | Chinese | zh | 7,942 | 18,535 | 323,383 | 5 | 17,700 | 217 | 0 |
| 5 | Italian | it | 5,374 | 28,349 | 281,887 | 5 | 45,894 | 31 | 10 |
| 6 | Czech | cs | 4,556 | 14,264 | 143,955 | 4 | 18,533 | 54 | 1 |
| 7 | Portuguese | pt | 4,543 | 24,662 | 177,825 | 3 | 43,073 | 141 | 102 |
| 8 | Russian | ru | 4,229 | 22,081 | 163,178 | 3 | 36,065 | 24 | 405 |
| 9 | error: language code: beta not recognized | beta | 3,501 | 28,639 | 373,607 | 6 | 54,530 | 38 | 1 |
| 10 | Spanish | es | 2,049 | 15,152 | 178,103 | 3 | 61,804 | 30 | 0 |
For a complete list with totals see Wikimedia Statistics:[34]
Reception
[edit]PCWorld reported the Wikiversity project in 2007, when the most popular course was on film-making. It compared the project to Massachusetts Institute of Technology's "MIT OpenCourseWare", noting however that while free, MIT's offering was "not free enough for Wikiversity".[35]
In their 2008 book on Empowering Online Learning, Curtis Bonk and Ke Zhang noted that if "the Wikimedia Foundation can nurture credible resources and communities within Wikiversity, it will send serious shock waves throughout higher education."[36] Steven Hoffman, in his 2010 book on teaching humanities, wrote that Wikiversity could do for higher education what Wikipedia had done "for the traditional encyclopedia". Hoffman noted that Wikiversity courses could look much like traditional online university courses, except that they were open in every sense. He did not expect Wikiversity to replace traditional universities, but could supplement them for "retiring baby boomers" spending time and energy on "education as leisure".[37]
The Association for Psychological Science noted in 2018 that Wikipedia, often "Internet users' first source of information", is constantly changing in search of accuracy, accompanied in this by Wikiversity, its "lesser-known sister site".[38]
J. Rapp et al., writing in 2019, commented that Wikiversity allowed readers to become active contributors; writing materials "can be regarded as a learning task for advanced Wikiversity authors in general." They noted that the Wikijournals differed from conventional journals in being transparent about reviewers' backgrounds, possibly facilitating interdisciplinary discussion, and in revealing the stages in the development of an article (by versioning).[39]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b c Wikimedia's MediaWiki API:Sitematrix. Retrieved November 2025 from Data:Wikipedia statistics/meta.tab
- ^ Jimbo Wales (2006). "Welcome speech". Wikimania. Archived from the original on 2007-12-26. Retrieved 2006-08-12.
- ^ Jimbo Wales (2006-08-04). "Wikimedia Opening Plenary". Supload.com. Archived from the original on 2013-10-20. Retrieved 2014-01-17.
- ^ a b c d Wikimedia's MediaWiki API:Siteinfo. Retrieved November 2025 from Data:Wikipedia statistics/data.tab
- ^ Reswik (2006-08-22). "Wikiversity:History of Wikiversity". Wikiversity. Archived from the original on 2021-04-26. Retrieved 2014-01-17.
- ^ Invadinado~foundationwiki (2013-03-25). "Resolution Wikiversity". Wikimedia Foundation. Archived from the original on 2014-09-13. Retrieved 2014-01-17.
- ^ "Opening Plenary (transcript)". Wikimania. 2007-02-17. Archived from the original on 2018-11-19. Retrieved 2014-01-17.
- ^ Nystedt, Dan (2007-08-04). "Wikiversity Gains Momentum". PC World. Archived from the original on 2016-12-25.
- ^ Foster, Andrea L. (2005-12-16). "Wikipedia, the Free Online Encyclopedia, Ponders a New Entity: Wikiversity". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Archived from the original on 27 December 2005.
- ^ Piotr, Konieczny (January 2007). "Wikis and Wikipedia as a Teaching Tool" (PDF). International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 4 (1): 19. ISSN 1550-6908. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2008-05-28. Retrieved 2008-03-19.
- ^ "Approved Wikiversity project proposal". Wikiversity. Archived from the original on 2009-08-19. Retrieved 2007-02-14.
- ^ "Wikiversity:Learning". Wikiversity. Archived from the original on 2009-07-27. Retrieved 2007-02-14.
- ^ "Wikiversity learning model". Wikiversity. Archived from the original on 2009-07-24. Retrieved 2007-02-14.
- ^ Wikiversity learning projects portal Archived 2009-08-03 at the Wayback Machine, Wikiversity
- ^ Friesen, Norm; Hopkins, Janet (2008-09-27). "Wikiversity; or education meets the free culture movement: An ethnographic investigation". First Monday. 13 (10). doi:10.5210/fm.v13i10.2234.
- ^ a b Singh, Satendra (March 2013). "Use of Wikiversity and role play to increase student engagement during student-led physiology seminars". Advances in Physiology Education. 37 (1): 106–107. doi:10.1152/advan.00096.2012. ISSN 1043-4046. PMID 23471258. S2CID 12294204.
- ^ Hladnik, Miran; Polajnar, Jernej (2016-12-21). "Wikiji v izobraževanju - Po desetih letih izkušenj". Andragoška Spoznanja. 22 (4): 73. doi:10.4312/as.22.4.73-83. ISSN 2350-4188.
- ^ Kennedy, Ian; Pass, Delia; Cadir, Roxan (26 March 2007). One Laptop Per Teacher: Content and Curriculum for (in-service) Teacher Training. pp. 2564–2569. ISBN 9781880094617. Archived from the original on 19 July 2011. Retrieved 18 December 2007.
{{cite book}}:|website=ignored (help) - ^ "Wikiversity:What Wikiversity is not". Wikiversity. Archived from the original on 2009-08-06. Retrieved 2007-02-14.
- ^ "Wikiversity:Custodianship - Wikiversity".
- ^ a b Nentwich, Michael; König, René (2012). Cyberscience 2.0: Research in the Age of Digital Social Networks, Volume 11 of Interaktiva, Schriftenreihe des Zentrums für Medien und Interaktivität, Gießen. Interaktiva Series. Campus Verlag. p. 95. ISBN 9783593395180.
- ^ Shafee, Thomas (2017-11-24). "Wikipedia-integrated publishing: a comparison of successful models". Health Inform. 26 (2). Archived from the original on 2018-11-06. Retrieved 2018-10-23.
- ^ a b Editorial Board (2018-06-01). "The aims and scope of WikiJournal of Science". WikiJournal of Science. 1 (1): 1. doi:10.15347/wjs/2018.001. hdl:20.500.11820/d69c8176-2254-4ef6-aece-fcc2dbb301ac. ISSN 2470-6345.
- ^ Shafee, Thomas; Das, Diptanshu; Masukume, Gwinyai; Häggström, Mikael (2017-01-15). "WikiJournal of Medicine, the first Wikipedia-integrated academic journal". WikiJournal of Medicine. 4 (1). doi:10.15347/wjm/2017.001. ISSN 2002-4436.
- ^ Masukume, Gwinyai; Heilman, James; Häggström, Mikael (24 May 2016). "Why getting medical information from Wikipedia isn't always a bad idea". The Conversation. Archived from the original on 2016-05-25. Retrieved 2016-05-26.
- ^ Miles, Dudley; et al. (2018). "Æthelflæd, Lady of the Mercians". WikiJournal of Humanities. 1 (1): 1. doi:10.15347/wjh/2018.001. ISSN 2639-5347.
- ^ "Open publishing awards in category open publishing models". openpublishingawards.org. Archived from the original on 2019-12-20. Retrieved 2019-11-13.
- ^ "Wikidebate - Wikiversity". en.wikiversity.org. Archived from the original on 2021-07-09. Retrieved 2021-07-07.
- ^ "Wikidebate/Guidelines - Wikiversity". Archived from the original on 2021-07-09. Retrieved 2021-07-07.
- ^ "Wikiversity". beta.wikiversity.org. Archived from the original on 2015-09-19. Retrieved 2022-02-07.
- ^ "Scope of research on Wikiversity (in development)". Multingual Wikiversity hub. Archived from the original on 2009-08-15. Retrieved 2007-02-14.
- ^ "Wikiversity research guidelines (in development)". Multilingual Wikiversity hub. Archived from the original on 2009-09-07. Retrieved 2007-02-14.
- ^ "Category:Research". Wikiversity. Archived from the original on 2013-10-02. Retrieved 2013-08-31.
- ^ "Wikiversity Statistics". Meta.Wikimedia.org. Archived from the original on 4 September 2020. Retrieved 11 September 2020.
- ^ Nystedt, Dan (4 August 2007). "Wikiversity Gains Momentum". PCWorld. Archived from the original on 20 September 2020. Retrieved 5 June 2019.
- ^ Bonk, Curtis J.; Zhang, Ke (2008). Empowering Online Learning: 100+ Activities for Reading, Reflecting, Displaying, and Doing. John Wiley & Sons. p. 192. ISBN 978-0-7879-8804-3.
- ^ Hoffman, Steven J. (2010). Teaching the Humanities Online: A Practical Guide to the Virtual Classroom: A Practical Guide to the Virtual Classroom. Taylor & Francis. p. 170. ISBN 978-1-317-45898-2.
- ^ "Students Learn Science Communication Through Wikiversity". Aps Observer. 31 (7). Association for Psychological Science. 29 August 2018. Archived from the original on 10 August 2019. Retrieved 18 November 2019.
- ^ Froehlich, Annette (2019). Embedding Space in African Society: The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 2030 Supported by Space Applications. Springer. pp. 248–249. ISBN 978-3-030-06040-4.
External links
[edit]- Wikipedia:List of Wikiversities
- Wikiversity annual activity
- English Wikiversity annual activity
- The Wikiversity multilingual portal – with links to all Wikiversity sites.
- The English language Wikiversity (in beta phase)
- "Resources for Professional Development"[dead link] Prepared for the Fall conference of the Missouri Juvenile Justice Association, October—2006, Office of State Courts Administrator, Division of Judicial Education P48.
- "Conference Review" by Peter Mulholland; Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care; Vol.4, Issue 4, 2006. (pdf version)
- Topps, D. "Sharing medical educational resources using free and open-source software." in 7th Annual WONCA Rural Health Conference – Transforming Rural Practice Through Education. 2006. Seattle, WA, USA.
- "Access to Global Learning: A Matter of Will" by Steven R. Van Hook; Education Resources Information Center; (ERIC Document No. ED492804); April 27, 2006.
- "Using Wiki to Promote Collaborative Learning in Statistics Education" by Dani Ben-Zvi; Technology Innovations in Statistics Education; Volume 1, Issue 1, 2007, Article 4; Page 4. (pdf version Archived 2007-09-01 at the Wayback Machine)
- "Bootstrapping a Semantic Wiki Application for Learning Mathematics" by Claus Zinn.
- "Beyond Difference: Reconfiguring Education for the User-Led Age" by Axel Bruns; Proceedings ICE 3: Ideas, Cyberspace, Education.
- "The Challenges and Successes of Wikibookian Experts and Wikibook Novices: Classroom and Community Collaborative Experiences"[dead link]by Suthiporn Sajjapanroj, Curt Bonk, Mimi Lee and Meng-Fen Grace Lin.
- Marieke Guy (October 2006). "Wiki or Won't He? A Tale of Public Sector Wikis". Ariadne (49). Archived from the original on 2009-09-11. Retrieved 2007-12-18.
- "New-Media Art Education and Its Discontents" by Trebor Scholz.
- "Wikiversity; or education meets the free culture movement: An ethnographic investigation" by Norm Friesen, Janet Hopkins.
- Beta Wikiversity
Wikiversity
View on GrokipediaBackground
Overview
Wikiversity is a project of the Wikimedia Foundation, launched on August 15, 2006, that serves as a dedicated platform for the creation and hosting of free learning materials, projects, and research suitable for all educational levels from primary to advanced studies.[5] This initiative fosters an open environment where volunteers worldwide collaborate to develop educational content, emphasizing accessibility and no-cost participation without requiring credentials or formal enrollment.[7] Unlike Wikipedia, which prioritizes encyclopedic summaries of existing knowledge, Wikiversity focuses on interactive and original educational resources, including peer-reviewed materials that support both formal curricula and informal self-directed learning. Its core approach promotes "learning by doing" through community-driven activities, enabling users to contribute as learners, teachers, or researchers in a shared space.[7] As of November 2025, Wikiversity encompasses 166,527 total articles across its multilingual versions and over 3.5 million registered users, aligning with the broader Wikimedia mission to democratize knowledge and education globally.[8][9][10][11] The platform's primary components consist of portals for thematic organization, courses for guided instruction, and research pages for ongoing collaborative inquiries, all built on wiki technology to encourage iterative improvement. It complements other Wikimedia projects, such as Wikibooks, by extending into dynamic learning experiences beyond static textbooks.[5]Goals and Principles
Wikiversity's primary goals center on promoting original research, collaborative learning projects, and multilingual accessibility to advance global education. It serves as a dedicated platform for creating and hosting free-content, multilingual learning materials and resources suitable for all age groups and levels, while also fostering learning communities and research initiatives.[12] These objectives emphasize empowering individuals to engage in educational activities without barriers, drawing on the free culture movement to produce and share knowledge openly. Core principles guiding Wikiversity include openness, with all content released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), enabling free copying, modification, and redistribution while requiring attribution to original authors.[13] The project encourages neutrality in educational content through collaborative editing, though it permits non-neutral perspectives in research contexts provided biases and conflicts of interest are fully disclosed.[14] Additionally, it promotes user-generated curricula, allowing participants to develop and revise courses, lesson plans, and activities without formal credentials or fees.[7] Wikiversity's pedagogical model integrates e-learning with wiki-based collaboration, supporting self-paced study via accessible portals and resources alongside structured courses organized within topical "schools" such as history or mathematics.[7] This approach facilitates flexible participation, where users can explore materials independently or join community-driven projects to build knowledge collectively. A distinctive emphasis lies on research ethics, mandating adherence to high scholarly standards that prohibit unethical practices like deception, harm to participants, or plagiarism.[15] Scholarly outputs undergo community-led peer review, often facilitated by a dedicated Review Board and templates for evaluation, with requirements for transparent sourcing, verifiable methods, and proper attribution to ensure integrity.[15] These norms align with the Wikimedia Foundation's overarching principles of free knowledge and global accessibility.[16]History and Development
Conception and Early Proposals
The concept of Wikiversity emerged within the Wikimedia community in the early 2000s, building on the launch of Wikibooks in July 2003 as a platform for open-content textbooks. Community members soon recognized limitations in Wikibooks' focus on static resources, leading to discussions about expanding into interactive learning materials, collaborative courses, and original research activities that could not fit within traditional textbook formats. These early ideas were explored in forums on the Wikimedia Meta-wiki and Wikibooks talk pages, where participants proposed a dedicated space for dynamic educational content beyond encyclopedic neutrality. By 2005, these discussions coalesced into concrete proposals for an independent project named Wikiversity. Key proponent Robert Scott Horning initiated the formal push with a detailed email on the Wikimedia Foundation mailing list on August 16, 2005, outlining a re-launch as a sister project to foster e-learning communities using existing MediaWiki tools without requiring major software overhauls. Community forums on Wikibooks and Meta-wiki amplified the call, arguing for Wikiversity as a venue for courses, experiments, and scholarly debates that would complement rather than compete with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. A dedicated Wikiversity section on Wikibooks faced a deletion vote in August 2005, highlighting the need for separation to avoid scope conflicts.[17] The formal proposal submitted to Meta-wiki in late 2005 emphasized Wikiversity's role as a multilingual hub for free learning resources, including multimedia course materials and research collaborations, while explicitly distinguishing it from Wikipedia by permitting non-encyclopedic content such as opinion-based debates and experimental projects. Proponents like Anthere (Florence Devouard) presented the idea at Wikimedia events, such as the September 2005 meeting in Pretoria, to garner support. However, debates centered on defining the project's boundaries, with strong opposition to any degree-granting or credentialing functions to maintain focus on supplementary, non-formal educational resources accessible to diverse learners. The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees rejected the initial proposal on November 13, 2005, citing concerns over overly ambitious scopes like full online courses, prompting calls for a refined version.[18][19] This early vision for Wikiversity was influenced by broader open education movements, such as MIT OpenCourseWare, which demonstrated the potential for freely sharing course materials to democratize access to knowledge.[20]Launch and Key Milestones
The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved the creation of Wikiversity through Resolution 2006-39A on July 30, 2006, authorizing it as a beta project focused on learning resources and collaborative research.[21] The project was publicly launched on August 15, 2006, with the English-language site going live and initial content migrated from Wikibooks to establish foundational learning modules.[4] This launch was announced during the keynote speech at Wikimania 2006 in Cambridge, Massachusetts, highlighting Wikiversity's role in expanding Wikimedia's educational offerings. In its early beta phase, Wikiversity introduced research pages in August 2006 to facilitate collaborative scholarly activities, alongside the development of guidelines for user-generated learning materials during a six-month testing period.[4] Significant content growth followed in 2007, with the creation of structured learning projects and portals that organized resources by subject areas, marking the site's transition from beta to stable operation. By 2016, Wikiversity celebrated its 10th anniversary on August 15.[22] During the 2020s, Wikiversity adapted to global challenges, particularly the COVID-19 pandemic, by expanding resources for remote learning, including dedicated modules on workflow transformations and co-creative educational strategies to support disrupted schooling worldwide.[23] Technical advancements included ongoing migrations to updated versions of the MediaWiki software, ensuring compatibility with modern web standards, and testing on the beta.wikiversity.org site for new features like improved search and resource categorization.[24] In August 2025, the project marked its 19th anniversary since launch. Throughout 2025, Wikiversity continued developing new learning resources, such as the Reformation Workshop and modules on understanding misbelief.[4][25]Project Features
Learning Resources and Structure
Wikiversity organizes its educational content through a hierarchical framework that mirrors the structure of virtual academic departments, facilitating systematic exploration and development of learning materials. Portals serve as primary entry points, offering user-friendly introductions to broad subject areas and linking to underlying resources; for example, the Social Sciences portal provides a dashboard-like overview akin to a university school.[26] These portals connect to schools, which group content by major disciplines such as medicine or humanities, followed by more focused topics, structured courses, and individual resource pages that deliver specific instructional elements.[27][28] This layered approach—schools as broad faculties, topics as sub-disciplines, courses as guided pathways, and pages as modular units—supports collaborative expansion while avoiding redundancy through guidelines that limit subcategories and promote standalone, studyable units.[29] Learning resources on the platform encompass a variety of formats tailored to active and self-directed education. Lecture notes, often sequenced as subpages within courses, present core concepts in a structured, digestible manner similar to classroom presentations. Multimedia tutorials integrate audio, video, and interactive media to illustrate complex ideas and cater to diverse learning styles. Quizzes, enabled by a specialized extension, provide immediate feedback for knowledge assessment and skill reinforcement. Collaborative projects, including hands-on exercises and group research, emphasize "learn by doing" to foster practical application and community involvement.[30][31] To enhance discoverability across this extensive repository, Wikiversity employs robust navigation tools. The main page dynamically generates lists and guides, allowing users to browse by schools, resource types, projects, or completion levels for quick orientation. Search functionality supports keyword queries and alphabetical indexing of resources, streamlining access to specific materials. Categorization systems create hierarchical indexes that function as automatic tables of contents, with editable category pages enabling descriptions and interconnections to organize thousands of pages efficiently without overlap.[32][33][34] Content creation adheres to policies that prioritize educational value and originality while permitting strategic imports. Guidelines encourage original contributions like interactive lessons, activities, and projects over static encyclopedic entries, with courses required to follow finite structures (e.g., semester-like paths with exercises and evaluations) to ensure pedagogical focus. Imported materials from affiliated Wikimedia projects, such as Wikipedia articles, must be attributed, adapted for learning contexts, and preserved with edit histories to maintain licensing compliance and avoid direct duplication. Non-educational or promotional content is prohibited, reinforcing the platform's commitment to verifiable, teaching-oriented resources.[29][35][36]Special Initiatives
Wikiversity hosts several special initiatives designed to foster advanced research, structured discourse, and user-driven educational projects, extending beyond standard learning resources to support scholarly collaboration and critical analysis.[37] One prominent initiative is the WikiJournals, a suite of peer-reviewed, open-access academic journals integrated with Wikipedia to bridge academic publishing and encyclopedic knowledge. Launched in 2014 with the WikiJournal of Medicine, which focuses on medical and biomedical topics, the project expanded in 2018 to include the WikiJournal of Science, covering science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, and the WikiJournal of Humanities, addressing arts, social sciences, and related fields. In 2023, the suite further expanded to include the WikiJournal of PPB, focusing on psychology, psychiatry, and behavioral sciences.[38][39][40][41] By 2025, these journals had published over 60 peer-reviewed articles collectively, including more than 21 in Medicine, 35 in Science, and 7 in Humanities, with content licensed under Creative Commons for free reuse and adaptation.[42] Articles undergo rigorous peer review by at least two independent experts, ensuring scientific soundness while allowing direct integration of approved versions into Wikipedia for broader dissemination.[43] Another key program is WikiDebate, a platform for organizing structured discussions on controversial topics to enhance critical thinking and argument analysis. Established as a collaborative learning tool, WikiDebate structures debates around binary questions, presenting hierarchical arguments for and against a proposition, along with potential refutations, without mandating resolution or consensus.[44] This format encourages contributors to compile balanced, evidence-based points from diverse perspectives, fostering skills in logical reasoning and fallacy recognition rather than advocacy.[45] By 2025, the initiative encompassed numerous active debates across categories like philosophy, science, and social issues, with ongoing community edits demonstrating sustained engagement.[46] Additional initiatives include research portfolios, which enable user-led studies through digital ePortfolios that collect artifacts such as ideas, evidence, reflections, and feedback for personalized learning and assessment.[47] These portfolios support experiential, self-directed research projects, aligning with Wikiversity's emphasis on practical scholarship. Furthermore, Wikiversity integrates with broader Wikimedia outreach efforts, providing educator toolkits that adapt its resources for classroom use, including guides for incorporating wiki-based activities into curricula.[48][49] Over time, these initiatives have evolved with increasing submissions and institutional recognition; for instance, WikiJournals' content from the Medicine edition has been indexed in PubMed Central, facilitating discoverability in academic databases and contributing to their growth as credible scholarly outlets.[50] The WikiJournal User Group, overseeing these journals, reports steady expansion in article pipelines and community involvement, reflecting broader adoption within Wikimedia's ecosystem by 2025.[42]Multilingual Operations
Language Versions
Wikiversity supports multilingual learning through 17 active language editions as of November 2025, enabling contributors worldwide to develop educational resources in their native languages. The English edition stands as the largest, emphasizing research-intensive content, collaborative experiments, and advanced scholarly projects that leverage the platform's open structure for academic exploration.[3] Prominent among the editions are the German, French, and Spanish versions, which maintain robust communities focused on subject-specific courses and interactive modules. Additional editions, including Chinese and Arabic, extend access to non-Western educational contexts, adapting materials to cultural and linguistic nuances while adhering to Wikiversity's core principles of open knowledge sharing.[3] Non-English editions often prioritize localized curricula tailored to regional educational needs. This approach ensures relevance and applicability for local users, contrasting with the English edition's broader, research-oriented scope.[51] The Swedish edition has experienced low activity since 2021, leading to a closure proposal that was rejected in 2023; it remains open but with limited contributions as of November 2025.[52] Language editions originate through Wikimedia's structured incubation process, where proposals are submitted via the Language Committee for evaluation, requiring demonstrated community support and localized technical preparations before launch; the first non-English editions debuted in 2006, expanding beyond the initial English prototype.[53]Usage and Growth Statistics
Wikiversity maintains a global repository of 166,557 learning modules across 17 active language editions as of late 2025, reflecting its role as a collaborative platform for educational content.[54] The project also reports 1,209 recently active editors worldwide, with contributions spanning diverse subjects from basic literacy to advanced research simulations.[54] Page view trends indicate steady growth since 2020, particularly in the English edition, which recorded 317 million views over the preceding 12 months ending October 2025, marking an 84.68% year-over-year increase driven by expanded online educational access.[55] The English Wikiversity dominates content creation, hosting the majority of resources with 37,136 dedicated learning modules that facilitate original scholarly exploration.[54] In contrast, smaller language editions offer niche resources tailored to local needs; for instance, Urdu-focused materials within the English edition include interactive lessons on numbers and language basics, serving as accessible entry points for non-English speakers despite limited dedicated sites.[56] Wikimedia Statistics reports highlight retention challenges in non-English editions, where active editor numbers remain low—such as 120 in German compared to 370 in English—contributing to uneven content distribution across languages.[54] Growth patterns demonstrate resilience amid global educational shifts, with annual increases in active editors from approximately 800 in 2020 to 1,209 in 2025, fueled by surges in contributions during the 2020 online learning transition prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic.[57] This period saw heightened engagement, as educators and learners turned to open platforms for supplemental materials, resulting in a 52.17% year-over-year rise in the English edition's average monthly active editors by 2025.[57] Overall, these metrics underscore Wikiversity's adaptation to digital learning demands while revealing opportunities for bolstering participation in underrepresented languages.[54]Impact and Reception
Academic and Community Perspectives
Academic scholars have drawn parallels between Wikiversity and initiatives like MIT OpenCourseWare, viewing both as pivotal in the open educational resources movement, though Wikiversity emphasizes collaborative, community-driven content creation over MIT's structured course archives.[58] In a 2007 analysis, Wikiversity was highlighted for its potential to serve as a multidimensional platform for learning and research, contrasting with MIT OpenCourseWare's more static repository of university-level materials.[58] By 2009, researchers at the University of Art and Design Helsinki and Tampere University positioned Wikiversity as a disruptor of conventional educational hierarchies, enabling global capacity building through open wiki-based pedagogy that fosters knowledge creation and participation rather than passive acquisition.[59] This perspective aligns with broader 2008-2010 analyses that praised Wikiversity for integrating free culture principles into education, allowing learners to co-author resources and challenge traditional gatekept knowledge structures.[60] Within Wikimedia communities, Wikiversity has received positive feedback for supporting original research and collaborative learning projects, with participants in forums and mailing lists noting its role in hosting ethical, scholarly investigations that extend beyond encyclopedic content.[61] Educators have integrated Wikiversity into university classrooms to enhance student engagement, such as at the University of Canberra where it facilitated applied learning in psychology courses through wiki-based activities.[62] Similarly, at the University of Tampere, instructors used Wikiversity to teach digital knowledge creation in upper comprehensive and university settings, promoting democratic participation and peer-reviewed outputs.[63] These integrations underscore community endorsements of Wikiversity as a tool for experiential learning, where students contribute to live resources like WikiJournals for peer-reviewed scholarship. Media outlets have spotlighted Wikiversity's contributions to open learning, with a 2009 First Monday article emphasizing its transformative potential as an accessible platform for adult education and free schools, empowering diverse global participants to build educational content collaboratively.[59] In recognition of its enduring impact, 2025 anniversary reflections from the Wikimedia Foundation celebrated Wikiversity's nearly two decades of fostering open learning communities that democratize access to knowledge worldwide.[64] Wikiversity has garnered endorsements through partnerships with educational organizations, including collaborations with Wiki Education to connect universities and Wikimedia projects for enhanced outreach in the United States.[65] It is frequently cited in scholarly works on open pedagogy, such as a 2013 study in Advances in Physiology Education that lauded its use in collaborative role-playing exercises to boost student engagement in science courses,[66] and a 2008 Journal of Interactive Media in Education article that highlighted its alignment with participative, developmental research methodologies.[67] These citations affirm Wikiversity's high-impact role in advancing open, student-centered pedagogical practices alongside non-governmental organizations focused on sustainable development education.[68] As of November 2025, Wikiversity hosts sites in 18 languages with approximately 166,527 articles and 1,170 recently active editors, indicating sustained community engagement and global impact.Challenges and Future Directions
Wikiversity faces significant challenges in maintaining active participation, particularly in non-English language versions, where editor retention remains low due to limited community size and persistent inactivity. For instance, the Swedish Wikiversity has experienced no active editors since October 2020 and lacks local administrators, leading to unchecked vandalism and spambots that undermine content integrity.[52] This issue extends across other non-English sites, where small contributor pools struggle to sustain ongoing development, exacerbating scalability problems amid modest overall growth in page views and edits.[69] Content quality is another ongoing concern, stemming from its reliance on volunteer-driven peer review processes that, while community-led and aimed at verifiability, lack a fully formalized publishing system comparable to traditional academic outlets. The distributed review model, involving templates for flagging methodological or ethical issues, helps mitigate risks like fringe theories or pseudoscience, but it remains vulnerable to inconsistent scrutiny without external institutional oversight.[15] Critics argue this approach can harbor lower rigor, as volunteer reviewers may not always match the expertise or structured evaluation of professional journals, potentially allowing biased or unverified material to persist.[70] Wikiversity also contends with competition from structured educational platforms like Khan Academy, which offer polished, video-based lessons and personalized learning paths that attract users seeking immediate, curriculum-aligned resources over collaborative, open-ended content creation. This rivalry highlights Wikiversity's struggle to differentiate its wiki-based model in a crowded online learning landscape. A notable criticism arose from the 2021 proposal to close the Swedish Wikiversity, which led to a soft close in 2023, spotlighting broader sustainability issues such as administrative voids and inability to combat spam, raising questions about the viability of low-activity language versions without dedicated support.[52] Debates on research rigor further intensify, with some viewing Wikiversity's original research as less authoritative than traditional journals due to its open, non-hierarchical review, potentially limiting academic credibility and integration into formal scholarship. Looking ahead, Wikiversity's future directions include exploring AI-assisted content moderation to enhance efficiency in detecting vandalism and improving review processes, drawing from broader Wikimedia initiatives to balance human oversight with automated tools.[71] Plans for expanded mobile accessibility aim to leverage Wikimedia's ongoing design updates, such as responsive interfaces and better widget support, to reach more users on handheld devices.[72] Deeper integration with the Wikimedia knowledge graph, via Wikidata, could enable richer linking of learning resources to structured data, facilitating dynamic, interconnected educational materials.[73] Key areas for improvement involve updating outdated sections, such as those lacking recent citations on topics like cognitive benefits of learning, to maintain relevance and verifiability. Efforts to increase contributor diversity are also prioritized, aligning with Wikimedia-wide programs that promote inclusive editing frameworks to attract underrepresented groups and foster broader participation.[74]References
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:What_is_Wikiversity%3F
- https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/States_of_Wikiversities
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:History_of_Wikiversity
- https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikiversity
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Main_Page/Layout
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Welcome
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Special:Statistics
- https://de.wikiversity.org/wiki/Spezial:Statistik
- https://fr.wikiversity.org/wiki/Sp%C3%A9cial:Statistiques
- https://es.wikiversity.org/wiki/Especial:Estad%C3%ADsticas
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Mission
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Copyrights
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Policies
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Research_guidelines
- https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikiversity/Rejected_proposal
- https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikiversity
- https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Resolution:Wikiversity
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Colloquium/archives/October_2016
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/COVID-19/Workflow_Transformation
- https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Move_Beta_Wikiversity_to_Incubator_2
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Main_Page/News
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Portal:Social_Sciences
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Major_portals
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Hierarchy
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Content_development
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Help:Resource_types
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Learning_projects
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Browse
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Categories
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:FAQ/Categorization
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Import
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Help:Creating_educational_content_at_Wikiversity/3
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wiki_Journal
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Medicine
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Science
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Humanities
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_PPB
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group/Publishing
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikidebate
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikidebate/Guidelines
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Category:Wikidebates
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wiki_Resources/ePortfolio
- https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Education/Toolkit
- https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2011/Documentation/Outreach_to_educational_institutions
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Medicine/Applications/PubMed_Central
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Open_Educational_Resources/Localization
- https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Swedish_Wikiversity
- https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Language_proposal_policy
- https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikiversity/Table
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Introduction_to_Urdu/Numbers
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Original_research
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Higher_education_for_sustainable_development
- https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Collective_learning
- https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Shut_down_Wikiversity
- https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Multigenerational/Artificial_intelligence_for_editors
- https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Developing_a_wiki-integrated_workflow_to_build_a_living_review_on_just_sustainability_transitions