Hubbry Logo
Work-upWork-upMain
Open search
Work-up
Community hub
Work-up
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Work-up
Work-up
Work-up
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In chemistry, work-up refers to the series of manipulations required to isolate and purify the product(s) of a chemical reaction.[1] The term is used colloquially to refer to these manipulations, which may include:

The work-up steps required for a given chemical reaction may require one or more of these manipulations. Work-up steps are not always explicitly shown in reaction schemes. Written experimental procedures will describe work-up steps but will usually not formally refer to them as a work-up.

Examples

[edit]

Isolation of benzoic acid

[edit]

The Grignard reaction between phenylmagnesium bromide (1) and carbon dioxide in the form of dry ice gives the conjugate base of benzoic acid (2). The desired product, benzoic acid (3), is obtained by the following work-up:[2]

Synthesis of benzoic acid with work-up step in red.
  • The reaction mixture containing the Grignard reagent is allowed to warm to room temperature in a water bath to allow excess dry ice to evaporate.
  • Any remaining Grignard reagent is quenched by the addition of water.
  • Dilute hydrochloric acid is added to the reaction mixture to protonate the benzoate salts, as well as to dissolve the magnesium salts. White solids of impure benzoic acid are obtained.
  • The benzoic acid is decanted to remove the aqueous solution of impurities, more water is added, and the mixture is brought to a boil with more water added to give a homogeneous solution.
  • The solution is allowed to cool slowly to room temperature, then in an ice bath to recrystallize benzoic acid.
  • The recrystallized benzoic acid crystals are collected on a Buchner funnel and are allowed to air-dry to give pure benzoic acid.

Dehydration of 4-methylcyclohexanol

[edit]

This dehydration reaction produces the desired alkene (3) from an alcohol (1). The reaction is performed in a distillation apparatus so the formed alkene product can be distilled off and collected as the reaction proceeds. The water produced by the reaction as well as some acid will co-distill, giving a distillate mixture (2). The product is isolated from the mixture by the following work-up:[3]

Synthesis of 4-methylcyclohexene with work-up step in red.
  • A concentrated solution of sodium chloride in water, known as a brine solution, is added to the mixture and the layers are allowed to separate. The brine is used to remove any acid or water from the organic layer. In this example the organic layer is the product, which is a liquid at room temperature.
  • The bottom aqueous layer is removed with a pipette and discarded.
  • The top layer is transferred to an Erlenmeyer flask where it is treated with anhydrous sodium sulfate to remove any remaining water.
  • The sodium sulfate is filtered out leaving the pure liquid product.

Synthesis of an amide

[edit]

The reaction between a secondary amine (1) and an acyl chloride (2) yields the desired amide (4) as shown below. The acyl chloride is added slowly to a solution of the amine and triethylamine in dichloromethane at 0 °C. The reaction is allowed to warm to room temperature and is stirred for 14 hours. The following manipulations are then performed on the crude reaction mixture (3) to isolate the desired product:[4]

Synthesis of an amide with work-up step in red.
  • A concentrated solution of sodium bicarbonate is added to the reaction mixture. This will promote the migration of impurities and byproducts to the aqueous layer and leave the product in the dichloromethane (organic layer). The aqueous and organic layers are allowed to separate. This process is typically performed in a separatory funnel.
  • The aqueous layer is collected and extracted once with dichloromethane.
  • The organic phase is collected and dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate.
  • The solid is filtered off and the organic layer is concentrated under reduced pressure to yield the desired amide.
  • Further purification is achieved by flash column chromatography.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Work-up

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
In , a work-up, also known as a reaction work-up, refers to the series of laboratory procedures performed after a to isolate and purify the desired product from the reaction mixture, typically by separating it from excess , catalysts, side products, and solvents. The primary purpose of a work-up is to transform the crude reaction mixture into a usable form, often yielding a crude product that can undergo further purification techniques such as recrystallization or . Common work-up methods rely on differences in between organic and aqueous phases, frequently employing a for extractions and washes. Typical steps include diluting the reaction mixture with an organic like , , or to facilitate , followed by sequential washes with to remove water-soluble impurities such as salts or acids. Additional washes may involve or carbonate solutions to neutralize acidic components, producing gas that requires careful venting to avoid pressure buildup in the . A (saturated ) wash is often used subsequently to "salt out" the organic layer, reducing the of in the and minimizing the amount of agent needed later. After washing, the organic layer is dried using agents such as or to remove trace water, then filtered or decanted to separate the drying agent. The solvent is subsequently evaporated, often via rotary evaporation, to yield the crude product. Variations in work-up procedures depend on the reaction type and product properties; for instance, solid products may be isolated by pouring the mixture onto ice water to induce , followed by , while liquid products typically require extraction with multiple portions of organic solvent. Challenges can arise with water-miscible solvents like or when dealing with polar products, necessitating adjustments such as alternative solvents or additional extractions to ensure efficient isolation.

Fundamentals

Definition

In , a work-up refers to the series of post-reaction manipulations designed to isolate and purify the desired product from the crude reaction mixture by separating it from byproducts, excess reagents, solvents, and other impurities. This process is particularly emphasized in , where it directly follows the reaction phase to transform the heterogeneous mixture resulting from synthesis into a usable form. The work-up phase distinctly commences after the reaction has reached completion, typically determined through monitoring techniques such as (TLC) or predetermined time intervals, marking a clear separation from the initial reaction setup and execution. Unlike the reactive conditions of the synthesis stage, work-up focuses solely on physical and chemical separations to recover the product without inducing further transformations. Key components of a work-up include the targeted separation of the product from unreacted starting materials, catalysts, and side products, often leveraging differences in between organic and aqueous phases. These steps are most commonly applied in batch reaction contexts, such as those conducted in round-bottom flasks or standard , rather than continuous flow systems where integrated processing may occur. In the broader synthesis workflow, work-up ensures the viability of isolated products for subsequent analysis or reactions.

Importance in Synthesis

Work-up plays a crucial role in maximizing yield during by effectively removing by-products, excess reagents, and impurities that could otherwise lead to losses during subsequent isolation or interfere with downstream reactions. For instance, in reaction optimization, impurities such as disubstituted side products can reduce overall yield if not addressed promptly, as seen in reactions where yields reached 93% but required careful post-reaction handling to prevent further complications. Similarly, steps in work-up adsorb residual water that might otherwise degrade sensitive products, though overuse of drying agents can inadvertently lower recovery by adsorbing the target compound itself. The impact of work-up on product purity is profound, as it prevents contamination that distorts characterization techniques like NMR or IR spectroscopy and hinders scalability in industrial applications. Unremoved impurities can broaden spectral peaks or introduce artifact signals, compromising structural confirmation, while in larger-scale processes, even minor contaminants may necessitate costly additional purifications. Proper work-up ensures high-purity isolates, enabling reliable analytical data and facilitating the transition from laboratory to production, where purity directly affects product efficacy and regulatory compliance. Efficiency in work-up is essential for reproducible results, as poorly executed procedures often result in low recovery rates due to material losses during extractions or evaporations—typically 1-2% per step—leading to yields below 94% even for successful reactions. In contrast, optimized work-up, such as using washes to minimize before , reduces the volume of solvents and agents needed, streamlining the process and enhancing overall experimental . Beyond laboratory outcomes, work-up contributes to principles by enabling targeted separations that minimize waste generation, aligning with metrics like the E-factor, which quantifies waste per unit of product. For example, efficient work-up in citrate synthesis reduced the E-factor from 105 to 7 kg waste/kg product through solvent recovery and simplified extractions, demonstrating how thoughtful post-reaction processing supports sustainable practices. In flow chemistry setups, advanced monitoring during work-up further diminishes waste by optimizing conditions in real-time, reducing the environmental footprint of synthetic routes.

Core Procedures

Quenching

Quenching serves as the critical initial step in the work-up of to deactivate excess reactive species, thereby halting the reaction and preventing undesired side reactions during subsequent isolation steps. This process neutralizes highly reactive intermediates, such as organometallic reagents or acidic/basic components, through or , ensuring the stability of the desired product. By converting these species into inert by-products like salts or hydrocarbons, quenching facilitates safe handling and transfer to downstream purification. Common quenching agents are selected based on the nature of the reactive species. For Grignard reagents (RMgX), is frequently used, leading to that produces the corresponding (RH) and magnesium hydroxide salts (Mg(OH)X). Organolithium reagents (RLi), being more reactive, are typically quenched with a saturated aqueous ammonium chloride (NH₄Cl) solution, which provides a mild proton source to generate RH and lithium/ammonium salts without excessive acidity. In reactions yielding basic mixtures, dilute (e.g., 1–3 N HCl) is added to protonate and neutralize bases, forming water-soluble ammonium or amine hydrochloride salts. These processes are often conducted under ice-cold conditions (0°C or below) to mitigate the highly exothermic heat release. The standard procedure entails slow, dropwise addition of the agent to the reaction flask under vigorous stirring, typically after confirming reaction completion via TLC or other analysis. Temperature is closely monitored to stay below 10–15°C, and any gas evolution—such as from organometallics—is observed to gauge progress and avoid pressure buildup. For organolithium , the reaction mixture is often siphoned slowly into excess aqueous NH₄Cl under inert atmosphere to ensure complete deactivation. Safety is paramount due to the exothermic and potentially vigorous nature of quenching. Cooling baths (e.g., ice-water or /acetone) are essential to control temperature spikes, and operations must occur in a to handle flammable gases like . Excess reagent should be minimized prior to quenching to reduce hazards, with particular caution for organolithium compounds where rapid addition can lead to violent reactions or unwanted by-products.

Extraction

In the work-up of , extraction follows to partition the neutralized mixture between immiscible solvents, transferring the desired into an organic phase while leaving aqueous impurities behind. The principle of liquid-liquid extraction exploits differences in compound between two immiscible liquid phases, typically an organic solvent and . Organic products, being nonpolar or weakly polar, preferentially dissolve in the organic layer, whereas polar byproducts, inorganic salts, and unreacted remain in the aqueous layer. Common organic solvents include (DCM), which forms the lower layer due to its higher density, and , which forms the upper layer and is often favored for its lower toxicity and ease of handling. The standard procedure begins by transferring the reaction mixture to a , followed by addition of the organic solvent in a volume roughly equal to or slightly greater than that of the aqueous phase. The funnel is then sealed and shaken vigorously for 1–2 minutes, with periodic venting through the stopcock to release built-up pressure from any gases or volatile components, ensuring safety in a . After shaking, the mixture is allowed to stand until the layers fully separate, typically within a few minutes, at which point the stopper is removed, and the lower layer (if DCM is used) or upper layer (if is used) containing the product is drained or poured into a receiving flask. Care must be taken to avoid formation, which can be minimized by gentle swirling if shaking causes persistent cloudiness. To achieve higher recovery yields, multiple extractions—typically three successive uses of smaller volumes—are preferred over a single extraction with a larger volume. This approach is more efficient because the distribution coefficient K=[solute]org[solute]aqK = \frac{[solute]_{org}}{[solute]_{aq}}, which quantifies the partitioning equilibrium of the solute between the organic and aqueous phases, rarely exceeds a value that allows complete transfer in one step; repeated partitioning progressively depletes the aqueous phase of the product, often leaving less than 5% behind after 2–3 cycles. Qualitatively, even for solutes with moderate KK values (e.g., 10–100), the cumulative effect ensures near-quantitative recovery without excessive use. A common variation is back-extraction, employed for ionic or highly polar compounds that inadvertently partition into the aqueous phase during initial extraction. In this method, the aqueous layer is treated to alter the compound's ionization state—such as acidification for carboxylate salts—making it more lipophilic, followed by re-extraction with fresh organic solvent to recover it into the organic phase. This technique is particularly useful in acid-base extractions, enhancing overall product isolation from complex mixtures.

Washing and Drying

Following extraction, the organic phase often contains residual water-soluble impurities and dissolved water, necessitating washing and drying steps to purify the product stream. Washing involves sequential rinses with aqueous solutions to selectively remove these contaminants without dissolving the organic solute. A common initial wash uses brine, a saturated sodium chloride (NaCl) solution, which removes polar impurities by leveraging the high ionic strength to partition water and hydrophilic species into the aqueous layer. For reactions involving acidic byproducts, a subsequent rinse with aqueous sodium bicarbonate neutralizes and extracts carboxylic acids or other acidic residues as water-soluble salts. If emulsions—stable mixtures of organic and aqueous phases—form during these washes, adding solid sodium chloride or using a centrifuge can break them by increasing the density difference between layers and promoting phase separation. Drying eliminates residual water from the washed organic phase, typically using anhydrous inorganic salts that adsorb moisture through hydration. Magnesium sulfate (MgSO₄) and sodium sulfate (Na₂SO₄) are widely employed; MgSO₄ forms hydrates like MgSO₄·7H₂O by coordinating water molecules to its central magnesium ion, while Na₂SO₄ transitions to Na₂SO₄·10H₂O via similar adsorption. MgSO₄ is preferred for its faster action and efficiency in low-water environments, whereas Na₂SO₄ offers higher capacity for larger water volumes but requires longer contact times. The drying procedure entails adding the anhydrous salt (approximately 0.1–0.3 g per mL of organic ) to the organic layer in an , followed by gentle swirling to ensure even distribution and clumping indicative of absorption. The mixture is allowed to stand for 15–30 minutes, depending on the and agent—shorter for , longer for —until no further clumping occurs and the solution appears clear. The drying agent is then removed by through fluted or vacuum filtration using a to avoid clogging and obtain a dry organic filtrate ready for subsequent processing.

Purification Methods

Concentration

Concentration in the work-up of involves the removal of excess solvents from the dried organic layer to yield a crude product concentrate, typically after extraction and steps. This process is essential to isolate the reaction products in a more manageable form prior to further purification. The primary method for concentration is rotary evaporation, also known as roto-vap, which employs reduced pressure to lower the of the , enabling efficient without excessive heating that could decompose thermally sensitive products. Key parameters include setting the water bath temperature below the boiling point of the product but high enough to volatilize the —often 40–60 °C for common organic solvents like or —while applying via a water aspirator or mechanical to achieve pressures around 20–100 mmHg. To prevent sudden or bumping, which can cause loss of material, anti-bump granules or chips are added to the flask before evacuation. Alternatives to rotary evaporation are selected based on product volatility or sensitivity. For volatile products, simple distillation under atmospheric or reduced pressure can effectively remove solvents without specialized equipment. Heat-sensitive compounds may instead be concentrated using a gentle stream of gas over the solution at ambient , minimizing thermal exposure while promoting in a . The concentration process is monitored by observing the diminution of solvent odor from the condenser or by periodically weighing the flask until a constant mass is achieved, indicating complete solvent removal. This ensures the crude concentrate is ready for subsequent handling without residual solvent interference.

Isolation Techniques

Isolation techniques in organic synthesis work-up involve separating the crude product from residual impurities after initial processing steps such as concentration, yielding a pure solid or liquid form suitable for or further use. These methods exploit differences in physical properties like , volatility, and phase behavior to achieve high purity without advanced . Crystallization, particularly recrystallization, is a primary isolation method where the crude product is dissolved in a minimal volume of hot in which it is highly soluble, such as or , and then cooled slowly to form pure as decreases. Impurities remain dissolved in the mother liquor or are removed via hot if insoluble. This process can be repeated for enhanced purity, with selection critical to maximize yield and minimize losses—ideally, the solvent should dissolve the compound well when hot but poorly when cold. Filtration follows crystallization or other separations to collect the isolated product, using for slower, clearer separations of liquids from solids or ( for rapid isolation of crystalline solids from the filtrate. In hot filtration, the solution is passed through fluted or a stemless under gentle to remove insoluble impurities while keeping the product dissolved, preventing premature in the filter. The collected solid is then washed with cold to remove adhering impurities and dried to constant mass. Sublimation provides a solvent-free isolation for volatile solids, heating the impure compound under reduced pressure to vaporize it directly, followed by on a cooled surface to deposit pure crystals. This technique suits compounds like or , where the temperature is controlled (e.g., 135–140°C for ) to sublime the product while non-volatile impurities remain behind. conditions lower the sublimation point, avoiding , and the process yields high-purity material by a single pass in many cases.

Chromatography and Distillation

, such as column or flash , is a widely used isolation technique for both solid and liquid products, separating compounds based on differential adsorption to a stationary phase (e.g., ) using a mobile phase solvent (e.g., hexane-ethyl acetate mixtures). The crude mixture is loaded onto the column, and fractions are collected based on order, often monitored by thin-layer (TLC). This method is essential for complex mixtures where recrystallization is insufficient. For liquid products, separates based on differences, using simple or fractional setups under atmospheric or reduced pressure to avoid . is preferred for heat-sensitive liquids, lowering s (e.g., to 50-100 °C at 10-50 mmHg). Yield calculation quantifies the efficiency of isolation by comparing the mass of the purified, dried product (actual yield) to the theoretical maximum based on the limiting reagent and reaction stoichiometry. The percentage yield is computed as % yield=(actual yieldtheoretical yield)×100\% \ yield = \left( \frac{\text{actual yield}}{\text{theoretical yield}} \right) \times 100, accounting for losses during work-up such as transfers, filtrations, or incomplete precipitation. For instance, in synthesizing diphenylmethanol, a theoretical yield of 23.57 g with an isolated mass of 13.2 g after recrystallization gives a 56% yield, highlighting typical work-up inefficiencies.

Practical Examples

Benzoic Acid Isolation

The isolation of via acid-base extraction is a standard procedure in work-ups, particularly when separating the acidic product from neutral byproducts in reaction mixtures. is commonly produced through oxidation reactions, such as the oxidation of , or of benzoate esters, where neutral impurities like arise from side reactions such as radical coupling or incomplete . In the Grignard synthesis route, for instance, reacts with CO₂ to form the salt, which upon initial acid work-up yields contaminated with from Wurtz-type coupling of the organomagnesium reagent. The crude mixture is dissolved in diethyl ether, a non-polar that solubilizes both and . The solution is then extracted with aqueous NaOH in a , selectively to form the water-soluble ion, which partitions into the aqueous phase while remains in the organic layer. The key deprotonation reaction is: \ceC6H5COOH+NaOH−>C6H5COONa+H2O\ce{C6H5COOH + NaOH -> C6H5COONa + H2O} The organic layer is subsequently washed with water to remove traces of aqueous base or salt. The combined aqueous extracts are acidified with HCl to reprotonate the , precipitating due to its reduced in acidic aqueous media: \ceC6H5COONa+HCl−>C6H5COOH+NaCl\ce{C6H5COONa + HCl -> C6H5COOH + NaCl} The precipitate is extracted back into fresh to eliminate water-soluble inorganic salts like NaCl, and the organic phase is dried over anhydrous to remove residual water before evaporating the solvent under reduced pressure. This yields as white crystalline solids. Purity is verified by analysis, with pure exhibiting a sharp of 122°C. This method demonstrates the utility of pH-controlled differences in extraction for purifying carboxylic acids.

Dehydration of 4-Methylcyclohexanol

The acid-catalyzed dehydration of 4-methylcyclohexanol proceeds via an E1 mechanism, involving of the alcohol, loss of water to form a secondary carbocation, and subsequent to yield , with the major product being 1-methylcyclohexene due to a 1,2-hydride shift forming a more stable tertiary , alongside minor such as 3-methylcyclohexene and 4-methylcyclohexene. The reaction is typically conducted using 85% as the catalyst at elevated temperatures (around 160–180°C), with concurrent simple to remove the volatile products (boiling point approximately 110°C for the major isomer) as they form, thereby shifting the equilibrium toward product formation in accordance with Le Châtelier's principle. Following the , the work-up begins by the reaction residue with ice water to dilute and neutralize residual , facilitating safe disposal while minimizing any potential or side reactions in the pot. The crude distillate, which contains the mixture, water, unreacted alcohol, and traces of , is then extracted with to isolate the organic components from the aqueous phase. The ether extract is washed sequentially with saturated aqueous solution to neutralize and remove the (forming water-soluble phosphate salts) and then with to eliminate residual water and improve . The organic layer is dried over anhydrous or to remove any remaining moisture, filtered, and the ether is removed by gentle or rotary evaporation. The resulting crude is further purified by under reduced pressure if necessary, collecting the product at approximately 110°C. A primary challenge in the work-up is the effective removal of the catalyst, which can co-distill with the product and lead to formation or contamination; the wash is crucial for converting the viscous acid into soluble species, preventing these issues. Another difficulty lies in separating the isomeric alkenes, which have closely similar physical properties (boiling points ranging from 101–110°C) and cannot be readily resolved by alone. Product composition is typically analyzed by (GC), which quantifies the isomer distribution—often showing 70–80% 1-methylcyclohexene, 15–20% 3-methylcyclohexene, and 5–10% 4-methylcyclohexene—while also assessing purity by detecting residual alcohol or . Overall yields are generally 70–80%, influenced by losses during extraction, , and , as well as incomplete conversion due to formation between water and the alcohol starting material. This process follows standard washing and drying protocols common to organic work-ups for eliminating unreacted materials and s.

Amide Synthesis

synthesis via nucleophilic acyl substitution typically involves the reaction of an acid chloride or anhydride with an to form the corresponding , with as a in the case of acid chlorides. The general reaction for acid chlorides proceeds as \ceRCOCl+RNH2−>RCONHR+HCl\ce{RCOCl + RNH2 -> RCONHR + HCl}, often carried out in dichloromethane (DCM) as the and in the presence of a base such as triethylamine (TEA) to scavenge the generated HCl and prevent of the . This method is widely adopted due to the high reactivity of acid chlorides, enabling efficient coupling under mild conditions at . The work-up begins with quenching excess amine by adding water to the reaction mixture, which hydrolyzes any unreacted acid chloride and dilutes the components. The mixture is then transferred to a and extracted with an organic solvent, typically DCM, to partition the product into the organic phase. To remove residual free , the organic layer is washed with dilute aqueous (e.g., 1 M), which protonates the and transfers it to the aqueous layer; multiple washes may be necessary for complete removal. Subsequently, the organic layer is washed with aqueous solution to neutralize and extract any remaining carboxylic acids or acidic impurities formed during the reaction. The washed organic layer is dried over an anhydrous salt such as (MgSO₄) to remove residual water, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford the as a solid. For amides that exhibit moderate water solubility, variations in the extraction solvent can enhance recovery; is often employed instead of DCM to improve partitioning of the product into the organic phase while maintaining compatibility with the washing steps. Similar work-up sequences apply to reactions involving acid anhydrides, where the byproduct is a rather than HCl, emphasizing the wash for efficient removal. This approach relies on extraction and to isolate the from common impurities like excess reagents and byproducts. Purity of the isolated is routinely verified using (IR) spectroscopy, which displays a characteristic amide carbonyl stretching band at approximately 1650 cm⁻¹, confirming successful formation of the .

References

  1. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Organic_Chemistry_Lab_Techniques_%28Nichols%29/04%253A_Extraction/4.07%253A_Reaction_Work-Ups
  2. https://openbooks.lib.msu.edu/orgchemlabmanual/chapter/reaction-workup-2/
  3. https://www.chem.rochester.edu/notvoodoo/pages/workup.php
  4. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00798
  5. https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/99-yield-friends-deception
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6272361/
  7. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41981-021-00140-x
  8. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Organic_Chemistry_Lab_Techniques_(Nichols)/04%3A_Extraction/4.07%3A_Reaction_Work-Ups
  9. http://www.orgsyn.org/demo.aspx?prep=CV7P0451
  10. https://orgsyn.org/demo.aspx?prep=cv8p0033
  11. https://rtong.people.ust.hk/Organic%20Reaction%20Workup.pdf
  12. http://www.chem.rochester.edu/notvoodoo/pages/reaction.php?page=quench
  13. https://orgsyn.org/Content/pdfs/procedures/CV5P0775.pdf
  14. https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/5-301-chemistry-laboratory-techniques-january-iap-2012/a0317f969aa17d5eb5aa9064d9c08df8_MIT5_301IAP12_Work_Handout.pdf
  15. https://openbooks.lib.msu.edu/orgchemlabmanual/chapter/extraction-2/
  16. https://people.clarkson.edu/~skrishna/Extraction_Theory_and_Practice.pdf
  17. https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/Sewanee%253A_The_University_of_the_South/Organic_Chemistry_Lab_Textbook/08%253A_Extraction/8.06%253A_Common_Extraction_Washes
  18. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Organic_Chemistry_Lab_Techniques_%28Nichols%29/04%253A_Extraction/4.06%253A_Step-by-Step_Procedures_For_Extractions
  19. https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=14947
  20. https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/Sewanee%253A_The_University_of_the_South/Organic_Chemistry_Lab_Textbook/03%253A_General_Techniques_for_Lab/3.02%253A_Drying_Agents
  21. https://elchemy.com/blogs/intermediates-solvents/sodium-sulfate-in-chemical-labs-applications-as-a-drying-agent
  22. https://www.chem.rochester.edu/notvoodoo/pages/tips.php?page=drying_methods
  23. https://orgchemboulder.com/Technique/Procedures/Drying/Drying.shtml
  24. https://cactus.utahtech.edu/smblack/chemlabs/Drying_an_Organic_Solution.pdf
  25. https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/5-301-chemistry-laboratory-techniques-january-iap-2012/pages/labs/transfer-and-manipulation/
  26. https://engineering.purdue.edu/Powerlab/Pages/MainPages/files/RotaryEvaporatorSOP2019.pdf
  27. http://chemistry.muohio.edu/gung/CHM244/pdfs/expt_7_2013.pdf
  28. https://www.ijddr.in/drug-development/laboratory-techniques-of-purification-and-isolation.pdf
  29. https://fjetland.cm.utexas.edu/courses/organiclab/Theory%20of%20Recrystallization.pdf
  30. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Organic_Chemistry_Lab_Techniques_%28Nichols%29/05%3A_Distillation/5.05%3A_Distillation_and_Boiling_Points
  31. https://www.organic-chemistry.org/synthesis/purification/chromatography.shtm
  32. https://www.athabascau.ca/science-and-technology/_documents/chem-360-lab-manual.pdf
  33. https://chem.libretexts.org/Ancillary_Materials/Laboratory_Experiments/Wet_Lab_Experiments/Organic_Chemistry_Labs/The_Synthesis_and_Characterization_of_Carbonyl_Compounds/7%3A_The_Grignard_Reaction_%28Experiment%29
  34. https://mason.gmu.edu/~sslayden/Lab/318/Grignard-experiment.pdf
  35. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Organic_Chemistry_Lab_Techniques_(Nichols)/04%3A_Extraction/4.08%3A_Acid-Base_Extraction
  36. https://sites.pitt.edu/~ceder/lab2/exp2text.html
  37. https://glaserr.missouri.edu/vitpub/teaching/212w00p/expt_2.pdf
  38. https://web.mnstate.edu/jasperse/Chem355/Acid-Base%20Extraction.pdf
  39. https://www.pc.maricopa.edu/chemistry/chemicals/benzoicacid.html
  40. https://personal.utdallas.edu/~scortes/ochem/OChem_Lab1/recit_notes/recit_exp25_alcoh_dehydr.pdf
  41. https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/US/en/product/aldrich/129801
  42. https://www.coursehero.com/file/13424650/Lab-Report-7/
  43. https://www.westfield.ma.edu/PersonalPages/cmasi/organic_lab/labs/4-methylcyclohexene.pdf
  44. https://faculty.chas.uni.edu/~manfredi/860-121/ORG%20LAB%20MAN%20S08.pdf
  45. https://edubirdie.com/docs/augusta-university/chem-1441-general-chemistry/113298-preparation-of-4-methylcyclohexene-from-dehydration-of-4-methylcyclohexanol
  46. https://www.studocu.com/en-us/document/university-of-alabama/elem-organic-chem-lab/lab-report-4-experiment-4/20245234
  47. https://www.organic-chemistry.org/synthesis/C1N/amides.shtm
  48. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Organic_Chemistry_(Morsch_et_al.)/21%3A_Carboxylic_Acid_Derivatives-_Nucleophilic_Acyl_Substitution_Reactions/21.07%3A_Chemistry_of_Amides
  49. https://commonorganicchemistry.com/Rxn_Pages/Amine_to_Amide/Amine_to_Amide_Index.htm
  50. http://www.chem.rochester.edu/notvoodoo/pages/workup.php?page=removing_amines
  51. https://www.fishersci.co.uk/gb/en/scientific-products/lab-reporter-europe/chemicals/amide-synthesis.html
  52. https://faculty.mercer.edu/goode_dr/biofilm/workup1/
  53. https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2016/11/23/quick_analysis_of_ir_spectra/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.