Community hub
0 subscribers7 pages, 0 posts
Recent from talks
All channels
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Welcome to the community hub built to collect knowledge and have discussions related to YugabyteDB.
Nothing was collected or created yet.
YugabyteDB
View on Wikipediafrom Wikipedia
 |
 | |
| Original authors | Kannan Muthukkaruppan, Karthik Ranganathan, Mikhail Bautin |
|---|---|
| Developers | Yugabyte, Inc. |
| Initial release | 2016 |
| Stable release | 2024.2 (Stable) 2.23 (Preview) / December 9, 2024 September 13, 2024 |
| Repository | |
| Written in | C++ |
| Operating system | Alma Linux 8.x and derivatives, MacOS |
| Platform | Bare Metal, Virtual Machine, Docker, Kubernetes and various container management platforms |
| Available in | English |
| Type | RDBMS |
| License | Apache 2.0 |
| Website | www |
YugabyteDB is a high-performance transactional distributed SQL database for cloud-native applications, developed by Yugabyte.[1]
Key Information
History
[edit]Yugabyte was founded by ex-Facebook engineers Kannan Muthukkaruppan, Karthik Ranganathan, and Mikhail Bautin. At Facebook, they were part of the team that built and operated Cassandra and HBase[2][3] for workloads such as Facebook Messenger and Facebook's Operational Data Store.[4]
The founders came together in February 2016 to build YugabyteDB.[5][6]
YugabyteDB was initially available in two editions: community and enterprise. In July 2019, Yugabyte open-sourced previously commercial features and launched YugabyteDB as open-source under the Apache 2.0 license.[7]
Funding
[edit]In October 2021, five years after the company's inception, Yugabyte closed a $188 Million Series C funding round to become a Unicorn start-up with a valuation of $1.3Bn[8]
| Series | Date Announced | Amount | Investors |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 10 Feb 2016 | $8M | Lightspeed Venture Partners, Jeff Rothschild[9][10] |
| A | 12 Jun 2018 | $16M | Lightspeed Venture Partners, Dell Technology Capital[11][12] |
| B | 09 Jun 2020 | $30M | Wipro Ventures, Lightspeed Venture Partners. Dell Technology Capital. 8VC [13][14] |
| B | 03 Mar 2021 | $48M | Wipro Ventures. Lightspeed Venture Partners. Greenspring Associates, Dell Technology Capital, 8VC[15][16] |
| C | 28 Oct 2021 | $188M | Wells Fargo Strategic Capital, Sapphire Ventures, Meritech Capital Partners, Lightspeed Venture Partners, Dell Technology Capital, 8VC[17][18][19] |
Architecture
[edit]YugabyteDB is a distributed SQL database that aims to be strongly transactionally consistent across failure zones (i.e. ACID compliance].[20][21] In CAP Theorem terms YugabyteDB is a Consistent/Partition Tolerant (CP) database.[22][23][24] YugabyteDB has two layers,[25] a storage engine known as DocDB and the Yugabyte Query Layer.[26]
DocDB
[edit]The storage engine consists of a customized RocksDB[26][27] combined with sharding and load balancing algorithms for the data. In addition, the Raft consensus algorithm controls the replication of data between the nodes.[26][27] There is also a Distributed transaction manager[26][27] and Multiversion concurrency control (MVCC)[26][27] to support distributed transactions.[27]
The engine also exploits a Hybrid Logical Clock[28][26] that combines coarsely-synchronized physical clocks with Lamport clocks to track causal relationships.[29]
The DocDB layer is not directly accessible by users.[26]
YugabyteDB Query Layer
[edit]Yugabyte has a pluggable query layer that abstracts the query layer from the storage layer below.[30] There are currently two APIs that can access the database:[27]
YSQL[31] is a PostgreSQL code-compatible API[32][33] based around v11.2. YSQL is accessed via standard PostgreSQL drivers using native protocols.[34] It exploits the native PostgreSQL code for the query layer[35] and replaces the storage engine with calls to the pluggable query layer. This re-use means that Yugabyte supports many features, including:
- Triggers & Stored Procedures[33]
- PostgreSQL extensions that operate in the query layer[33]
- Native JSONB support[33]
YCQL[36] is a Cassandra-like API based around v3.10 and re-written in C++. YCQL is accessed via standard Cassandra drivers[37] using the native protocol port of 9042. In addition to the 'vanilla' Cassandra components, YCQL is augmented with the following features:
- Transactional consistency - unlike Cassandra, Yugabyte YCQL is transactional.[38]
- JSON data types supported natively[39]
- Tables can have secondary indexes[40]
Currently, data written to either API is not accessible via the other API, however YSQL can access YCQL using the PostgreSQL foreign data wrapper feature.[41]
The security model for accessing the system is inherited from the API, so access controls for YSQL look like PostgreSQL,[42] and YCQL looks like Cassandra access controls.[43]
Cluster-to-cluster replication
[edit]In addition to its core functionality of distributing a single database, YugabyteDB has the ability to replicate between database instances.[44][45] The replication can be one-way or bi-directional and is asynchronous. One-way replication is used either to create a read-only copy for workload off-loading or in a read-write mode to create an active-passive standby. Bi-directional replication is generally used in read-write configurations and is used for active-active configurations, geo-distributed applications, etc.
Migration tooling
[edit]Yugabyte also provides YugabyteDB Voyager, tooling to facilitate the migration of Oracle and other similar databases to YugabyteDB.[46][47] This tool supports the migration of schemas, procedural code and data from the source platform to YugabyteDB.
See also
[edit]
References
[edit]- ^ "YugabyteDB System Properties". DB-Engines. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
- ^ "Karthik Ranganathan". Dataversity. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
- ^ Borthakur, Dhruba; Rash, Samuel; Schmidt, Rodrigo; Aiyer, Amitanand; Gray, Jonathan; Sarma, Joydeep Sen; Muthukkaruppan, Kannan; Spiegelberg, Nicolas; Kuang, Hairong; Ranganathan, Karthik; Molkov, Dmytro; Menon, Aravind (2011). "Apache hadoop goes realtime at Facebook". Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data. p. 1071. doi:10.1145/1989323.1989438. ISBN 9781450306614. S2CID 207188340. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
{{cite book}}:|website=ignored (help) - ^ "YugaByte Raises $8M in Series A Funding". FINSMES. 2 November 2017. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
- ^ "Yugabyte CTO outlines a PostgreSQL path to distributed cloud". VentureBeat. 26 July 2021. Retrieved 31 December 2021.
- ^ "Yugabyte expands its fully managed enterprise cloud service with $188M". VentureBeat. 28 October 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
- ^ "Yugabyte Expands Multi-Region Database Capabilities and Enterprise-Grade Security with YugabyteDB 2.5". businesswire.com. 12 November 2020. Retrieved 30 November 2024.
- ^ "Another cloud native SQL database unicorn: Yugabyte raises $188M Series C funding at $1.3B valuation". ZDNet. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
- ^ "YugaByte Raises $8M in Series A Funding". Finsmes. 2 November 2017.
- ^ "YugaByte Receives $8M Series A Round". VC News Daily. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
- ^ "YugaByte raises $16 Million to combine SQL and NoSQL in a single database". Technologies.org. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
- ^ "YugaByte's new database software rakes in $16 million so developers can move to any cloud". TechCrunch. 12 June 2018. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
- ^ "Another globally distributed cloud native SQL database on the rise: Yugabyte Raises $30 million in Series B Funding". ZDNet. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
- ^ "Yugabyte raises $30M for its cloud-native distributed SQL database". SiliconAngle. 9 June 2020. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
- ^ "Yugabyte raises $48M for open source SQL database alternative". VentureBeat. 3 March 2021. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
- ^ "Yugabyte Raises $48 Million Funding Round to Accelerate Distributed SQL Enterprise Adoption and Fuel Global Expansion". YahoonFinance. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
- ^ "Yugabyte's latest funding round values the distributed SQL system at $1.3bn". The Register. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
- ^ "Another cloud native SQL database unicorn: Yugabyte raises $188M Series C funding at $1.3B valuation". ZDNet. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
- ^ "High-performance database startup Yugabyte raises $188M in new funding round". Silicon Angle. 28 October 2021. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
- ^ "ACID Transactions". Devopedia. 18 August 2019. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
- ^ "ICT Solutions for local flexibility markets" (PDF). Academia de Studii Economice din Bucuresti. Proceedings of the IE 2020 International Conference. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
- ^ "YugaByteDB: A Distributed Cloud Native Database for a Highly Scalable Data Store". Open Source Foru. 14 September 2020. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
- ^ "Yugabyte Design Goals". Yugabyte.com. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
- ^ Galić, Zdravko; Vuzem, Mario (2020). "A Generic and Extensible Core and Prototype of Consistent, Distributed, and Resilient LIS". ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 9 (7): 437. Bibcode:2020IJGI....9..437G. doi:10.3390/ijgi9070437.
- ^ "Yugabyte Layered Architecture". Yugabyte. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
- ^ a b c d e f g Hirsch, Orhan Henrik. "Scalability of NewSQL Databases in a Cloud Environment" (PDF). Norwegian University of Science and Technology. NYNU Open. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
- ^ a b c d e f Budholia, Akash. "NewSQL Monitoring System". San Jose State University Scholar Works. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
- ^ "Hybrid Clock". Martin Fowler. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
- ^ "Distributed Transactions without Atomic Clocks" (PDF). Yugabyte. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
- ^ "Yugabyte DB 2.0 Ships Production-Ready Distributed SQL Database for Going Cloud Native". Integration Developer News. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
- ^ "Yugabyte Structured Query Language (YSQL)". Yugabyte. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
- ^ "Yugabyte Meets Developer Demand for Comprehensive PostgreSQL Compatibility with YugabyteDB 2.11". BusinessWire. 23 November 2021. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
- ^ a b c d "PostgreSQL Compatibility in YugabyteDB 2.0". Yugabyte. 17 September 2019.
- ^ "Client Drivers for YSQL". Yugabyte.
- ^ "Why We Built YugabyteDB by Reusing the PostgreSQL Query Layer". Yugabyte. 24 April 2020. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
- ^ "Yugabyte Cloud Query Language (YCQL)". Yugabyte. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
- ^ "Client drivers for YCQL". Yugabyte.
- ^ "ACID Transactions". Yugabyte.
- ^ "YCQL JSONB Data Type". Yugabyte. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
- ^ "YCQL Secondary Indexes". Yugabyte. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
- ^ "YugabyteDB: Postgres foreign data wrapper". Gruchalski. 8 November 2021. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
- ^ "YSQL Access Control". Yugabyte. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
- ^ "YCWL access Controls". Yugabyte. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
- ^ "Yugabyte Expands Multi-Region Database Capabilities and Enterprise-Grade Security with YugabyteDB 2.5". Business Wire. 12 November 2020. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
- ^ "xCLuster Replication". Yugabyte. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
- ^ "Yugabyte simplifies SQL database migration with YugabyteDB Voyager". siliconANGLE. 24 January 2023. Retrieved 15 March 2023.
- ^ "Yugabyte chomps into cloud migration". Techzine. 2 February 2023. Retrieved 15 March 2023.
External links
[edit]YugabyteDB
View on Grokipediafrom Grokipedia
Overview
Description and Purpose
YugabyteDB is an open-source, high-performance, transactional distributed SQL database developed by Yugabyte, Inc., designed to power mission-critical applications with resilience and scalability in cloud-native environments.[11] It addresses key limitations of traditional relational databases, such as challenges in horizontal scaling and geo-distribution, by providing PostgreSQL-compatible APIs that enable developers to build applications without vendor lock-in or the need for extensive rewrites.[12] The database originated in 2016, when it was initiated by former Facebook engineers Kannan Muthukkaruppan, Karthik Ranganathan, and Mikhail Bautin, who sought to tackle scalability bottlenecks in large-scale distributed systems.[3] Their experience at Facebook, where they worked on infrastructure for handling massive data volumes, informed the creation of a system that combines the familiarity of SQL with the robustness required for modern, distributed workloads.[4] Under the CAP theorem, YugabyteDB is classified as consistent and partition-tolerant (CP), ensuring strong consistency during network partitions while maintaining high availability for practical scenarios.[12] It is particularly suited for cloud-native applications that demand horizontal scaling across clusters, multi-region deployments for low-latency global access, and full ACID transaction compliance to support reliable data integrity.[13]Key Features
YugabyteDB offers horizontal scalability through automatic sharding, which partitions data into tablets distributed across nodes, enabling elastic scaling of reads and writes without application disruption.[14] This design allows clusters to grow seamlessly from single nodes to thousands, supporting increased workloads by adding commodity hardware or cloud instances.[15] Built-in geo-distribution facilitates low-latency global access by deploying clusters across multiple regions, with features like geo-partitioning ensuring data placement close to users for optimal performance.[16] It provides multi-region fault tolerance through synchronous replication and automatic failover, maintaining availability during regional outages without data loss.[17] The database ensures ACID-compliant transactions with strong consistency across distributed nodes, leveraging a consensus protocol to guarantee atomicity, consistency, isolation, and durability even in multi-shard operations.[18] YugabyteDB supports multiple APIs, including YSQL for PostgreSQL-compatible relational SQL workloads and YCQL for Cassandra-compatible semi-relational queries, allowing applications to use familiar interfaces without code changes.[19] Change Data Capture (CDC) enables real-time data integration by streaming inserts, updates, and deletes to external systems like Kafka via a gRPC-based connector, supporting analytics and replication pipelines.[20] In 2025 releases, YugabyteDB introduced vector search capabilities for AI and machine learning workloads, integrating pgvector extensions for efficient similarity searches on embeddings.[21] Performance benchmarks demonstrate YugabyteDB's scalability for AI applications, handling queries over 1 billion vectors from the Deep1B dataset with sub-second latency on distributed clusters.[22]History
Founding and Development
YugabyteDB was founded in 2016 in Sunnyvale, California, by Kannan Muthukkaruppan (co-founder and co-CEO), Karthik Ranganathan (co-founder and co-CEO), and Mikhail Bautin (co-founder and former Software Architect).[4][23][3] All three founders were former engineers at Facebook, where they gained extensive experience in building and scaling large distributed systems.[4] The primary motivation for creating YugabyteDB stemmed from the founders' encounters with scalability limitations in distributed storage engines like RocksDB during their time at Facebook, particularly in handling massive workloads for services such as messaging and social feeds.[6][24] Development began in February 2016 as a proprietary project aimed at constructing a high-performance, cloud-native distributed SQL database capable of supporting global-scale transactional applications.[3] Initially released in a closed-source format, YugabyteDB transitioned to fully open source under the Apache 2.0 license in July 2019 with version 1.3, making all enterprise features freely available to accelerate adoption and community contributions.[8] From its inception, the project focused on developing a resilient distributed database inspired by Google Spanner's architecture for true multi-region scalability, while ensuring wire-protocol compatibility with PostgreSQL for relational workloads and Apache Cassandra for wide-column stores. Mikhail Bautin served as Software Architect until November 2024.[25][26][27]Funding Rounds
Yugabyte, Inc., the company behind YugabyteDB, secured its initial significant funding in June 2018 with a $16 million round led by Dell Technologies Capital and Lightspeed Venture Partners.[28] This investment focused on expanding the company's reach to large enterprises by enhancing its distributed SQL database capabilities.[28] In June 2020, Yugabyte raised $30 million in an oversubscribed Series B round led by 8VC, with participation from Wipro Ventures and existing investors including Lightspeed Venture Partners and Dell Technologies Capital.[29] The funding supported accelerated product development and market expansion for its open-source distributed SQL database.[29] The company continued its growth trajectory in March 2021 with a $48 million funding round led by Lightspeed Venture Partners, including participation from Greenspring Associates and Dell Technologies Capital, which served as a Series C extension.[30] This was followed later that year in October by a $188 million oversubscribed Series C round led by Sapphire Ventures, valuing Yugabyte at $1.3 billion and involving investors such as Alkeon Capital, Meritech Capital, and Wells Fargo Strategic Capital, along with prior backers.[31][32] By the end of 2021, Yugabyte's total funding exceeded $282 million, enabling substantial enterprise expansion through accelerated hiring, research and development efforts focused on PostgreSQL compatibility, and enhanced go-to-market strategies.[31]Major Releases and Milestones
YugabyteDB achieved a significant milestone in July 2019 when it transitioned to being 100% open source under the Apache 2.0 license, releasing previously commercial enterprise features to the community with version 1.3.[8][33] This marked the database's full availability for distributed SQL development without proprietary restrictions.[33] In September 2019, YugabyteDB 2.0 reached general availability, introducing production-ready support for the YSQL API, which provides PostgreSQL-compatible querying and elevates the database from beta to stable for enterprise use.[34] This release solidified YugabyteDB's commitment to wire-compatible PostgreSQL semantics while maintaining its distributed architecture.[35] YugabyteDB follows a release cadence of major versions approximately every six months, with long-term support (LTS) editions provided annually for production stability.[36] In December 2024, the v2024.2 LTS release was launched, emphasizing enhanced reliability and support until December 2026, catering to deployments requiring extended maintenance.[33] Early 2025 brought v2.25 in January, featuring full compatibility with PostgreSQL 15—the first multi-version upgrade from PostgreSQL 11—and enabling zero-downtime in-place upgrades and downgrades between major PostgreSQL versions.[37] This jump addressed long-standing upgrade challenges in traditional PostgreSQL environments, supporting 15 key PostgreSQL 15 features like improved partitioning and MERGE statements.[38] In May of the same year, beta support for a MongoDB-compatible API was added via the DocumentDB PostgreSQL extension, allowing seamless migration of document-based workloads.[39] The v2025.1 release in July 2025 introduced AI-ready capabilities, including distributed vector search optimized for over 1 billion vectors with sub-second latency and 96.56% recall on benchmarks like Deep1B.[40][22] This enhancement, powered by a USearch-based indexing engine, positions YugabyteDB for scalable AI applications while preserving ACID guarantees.[41] In November 2025, YugabyteDB demonstrated its vector search capabilities by benchmarking 1 billion vectors on the Deep1B dataset, achieving sub-second latency and 96.56% recall.[22] Key milestones in 2025 include recognition as a Sample Vendor in Gartner's Hype Cycle for Data Management and Hype Cycle for Cloud Computing, highlighting its role in modern data infrastructure (as of September 2025).[42] Additionally, in July 2025, YugabyteDB celebrated a four-year collaboration with Rakuten Mobile, enabling petabyte-scale, cloud-native telecom infrastructure with demonstrated resilience in production.[43] These advancements underscore YugabyteDB's evolution toward hybrid transactional-analytical processing in distributed environments.[44]Architecture
Layered Design
YugabyteDB employs a modular, two-layer architecture that separates query processing from distributed storage and replication, enabling scalability and compatibility with existing applications. This design consists of the Query Layer for handling API requests and the DocDB layer for storage, transaction management, and integrated consensus and replication to ensure data durability across nodes.[45][46] The Query Layer serves as the interface for applications, providing wire-compatible APIs that allow seamless integration with PostgreSQL via YSQL or Apache Cassandra via YCQL, facilitating drop-in replacements without code changes. This layer focuses on parsing, optimizing, and executing queries while routing them to the appropriate storage components, maintaining SQL compatibility and supporting complex operations like joins and aggregations. In contrast, the DocDB layer handles the core distributed storage using a log-structured merge-tree (LSM-tree) based engine derived from RocksDB, managing transactions with ACID guarantees through multi-version concurrency control.[47][48][46] The separation of concerns in this architecture decouples application-facing logic from the intricacies of data distribution, allowing independent scaling of query processing and storage. The consensus and replication mechanism, integrated within DocDB, uses the Raft protocol to replicate data across tablet servers, ensuring fault tolerance and strong consistency without impacting the Query Layer's stateless operation. YugabyteDB clusters support multi-API configurations, where YSQL and YCQL can coexist on the same nodes, enabling hybrid workloads that leverage both relational and NoSQL paradigms.[49][50] Originally focused on YCQL for Cassandra compatibility, YugabyteDB evolved to include robust YSQL support starting with version 2.0 in 2019, marking the general availability of production-ready PostgreSQL-compatible features and broadening its appeal for SQL-centric applications.[34]DocDB Storage Engine
DocDB serves as the foundational distributed key-value storage engine in YugabyteDB, designed to handle persistent data across a cluster of nodes. It is built on a highly customized and optimized version of RocksDB, which employs a log-structured merge-tree (LSM-tree) architecture to achieve high write throughput and efficient storage utilization.[48] This LSM-tree foundation allows DocDB to manage data as ordered key-value pairs, supporting operations like inserts, updates, and deletes with minimal locking overhead. The storage model in DocDB is hybrid, combining in-memory and on-disk components for optimal performance. Writes are initially buffered in MemTables, which act as in-memory sorted maps to cache recent key-value pairs and enable fast access without immediate disk I/O.[51] Once a MemTable reaches its size limit, it becomes immutable and is flushed to disk as Sorted String Tables (SSTables), which provide persistent, immutable storage organized into blocks for efficient range scans and lookups.[51] Periodic compaction merges these SSTables to eliminate redundancies, reclaim space from deleted or overwritten data, and maintain read efficiency through structures like bloom filters that minimize unnecessary disk reads.[51] DocDB supports transactional semantics through Multi-Version Concurrency Control (MVCC), enabling snapshot isolation for concurrent reads and writes without blocking.[52] Each value in the key-value store includes hybrid timestamps that track versions, allowing transactions to read consistent snapshots while updates append new versions; old versions are garbage-collected once no active transactions reference them.[52] This approach ensures ACID compliance at the storage layer. At the data modeling level, DocDB treats relational data as JSON-like documents to bridge SQL and NoSQL paradigms. Rows are encoded as nested sub-documents, with primary keys using a hybrid scheme that combines a 16-bit hash component (for even distribution in sharded tables) and ordered range columns for efficient queries.[52] Non-primary columns are stored as sub-documents keyed by column IDs, supporting complex types like arrays and maps while preserving relational integrity.[52] For resilience, DocDB integrates with YugabyteDB's consensus mechanism, where each tablet—a horizontal partition of data—is replicated using the Raft protocol across multiple nodes.[53] By default, tablets maintain a replication factor of three, forming a Raft group with one leader and two followers to achieve quorum-based fault tolerance.[54] The leader coordinates writes to DocDB's storage while replicating logs to followers, ensuring data durability even if a minority of replicas fail.[53]Query Layer
The YugabyteDB Query Layer, also known as YQL, serves as the primary interface for applications to interact with the database using client drivers, handling query parsing, planning, optimization, and execution in a distributed manner.[47] It supports multiple APIs to accommodate diverse application needs, enabling compatibility with existing ecosystems while leveraging the underlying DocDB storage for data access. This layer is stateless and extensible, allowing for efficient distributed query processing across cluster nodes.[47] The YSQL API provides full PostgreSQL wire-compatibility, reusing a fork of the PostgreSQL query layer (version 15 as of 2025) to support standard SQL syntax, data types, queries, expressions, operators, functions, stored procedures, and extensions.[55] This compatibility extends to extensions like pgvector for vector similarity searches in AI applications, enabling storage and querying of high-dimensional vectors with distance functions such as cosine similarity.[56] In 2025, with the v2.25 preview release and subsequent v2025.1 stable series, YugabyteDB upgraded to PostgreSQL 15, introducing support for advanced features including the MERGE command for upsert operations and enhanced indexing capabilities like improved multi-column indexes.[57] Additionally, zero-downtime in-place upgrades from PostgreSQL 11-based versions to PostgreSQL 15 were enabled, minimizing operational disruptions during major version transitions.[58] The YCQL API offers compatibility with Apache Cassandra Query Language (CQL) version 3.4, supporting most standard Cassandra features such as data types, DDL, DML, and SELECT statements for semi-relational workloads.[59] It includes strongly consistent secondary indexes, a native JSON column type for document modeling, and distributed ACID transactions via the TRANSACTION statement block, which coordinates changes across multiple tables.[60] Query processing in the YQL layer occurs through distinct stages: the parser validates syntax and constructs parse trees with semantic analysis; the analyzer rewrites the query tree and resolves views using the system catalog; the planner generates an execution plan involving scans, joins, and sorts; and the executor processes the plan by pulling rows in batches across YB-TServers for efficiency.[47] Distributed joins are optimized via tablet co-location, where related tables or data slices are stored in the same tablet to reduce network overhead and enable local processing.[61] Optimization is handled by a cost-based optimizer (CBO) for YSQL, which estimates execution costs using advanced models that account for distributed factors like network latency, LSM-tree index lookups, and hash or range partitioning awareness.[62] This CBO, enabled by default in recent versions, selects plans that minimize total cost, incorporating statistics from table analysis for better performance in sharded environments.[63]Sharding and Consensus
YugabyteDB employs automatic sharding to distribute data across a cluster, dividing tables into smaller units called tablets based on the primary key. By default, tablets split automatically when they reach a size threshold of 128 MiB during the low phase of splitting (with fewer than one shard per node), 10 GiB for the high phase (with up to 24 shards per node), and 100 GiB for forced splits to maintain performance.[64][65] This process ensures horizontal scalability without manual intervention, as new tablets are created and balanced across nodes as data grows. Sharding supports two primary schemes: hash partitioning and range partitioning. In hash sharding, data is evenly distributed using a hash function on the shard key (typically the primary key or a specified column), mapping rows to one of up to 65,536 hash buckets that are then grouped into tablets for even load distribution across nodes via consistent hashing.[66] Range sharding, in contrast, partitions data into contiguous ranges based on the primary key's sort order, starting with a single tablet that splits dynamically as data volume increases, which is particularly efficient for range-based queries but risks hotspots if keys are not well-distributed.[66] Both schemes are handled transparently by the DocDB storage engine, with tablets serving as the fundamental unit of distribution and replication. Placement policies in YugabyteDB enable geo-distributed sharding by defining how tablets are assigned across fault domains such as zones and regions, configured via PostgreSQL-compatible tablespaces. These policies specify replica placement blocks (e.g., one replica per zone in multiple availability zones like us-east-1a, us-east-1b, us-east-1c, or across regions like us-east-1, ap-south-1, eu-west-2) to ensure resilience and low-latency access, with wildcards for flexible zone selection and support for multi-cloud setups.[67] Tablets are placed according to these policies at table creation, with automatic enforcement during splits and rebalancing to maintain fault tolerance, such as a replication factor of three across diverse locations. Leader election and rebalancing are orchestrated to maintain balanced distribution and availability. The YB-Master service manages metadata for tablet locations and performs load balancing by assigning and reassigning tablets across YB-TServers, including leader balancing to evenly distribute read/write leadership roles and re-replication in response to node failures or additions.[68] YB-TServers host the actual tablet data and handle local operations, while leader elections within each tablet's Raft group ensure quick failover, typically within seconds.[68] Consensus is integrated at the tablet level using a Raft-based protocol, where each tablet forms an independent Raft group with a leader replica coordinating writes and replicating logs to followers for durability.[69] This setup guarantees linearizable consistency for transactions, as writes are committed only after acknowledgment from a majority of replicas, preventing divergent states even during failures.[69] Scaling in YugabyteDB supports dynamic addition or removal of nodes without downtime, as the YB-Master automatically detects changes, rebalances tablets via load balancers, and migrates leaders or replicas to maintain placement policies and even distribution.[68]Replication and Resilience
Consensus Mechanism
YugabyteDB employs the Raft consensus protocol to manage fault-tolerant replication across distributed nodes, ensuring strong consistency for data stored in its DocDB storage engine. Raft operates on a per-tablet basis, where each tablet represents a shard of data replicated across multiple nodes. The protocol implements a leader-follower model, in which a designated leader node handles all client write requests, appending them to a replicated log and propagating these entries to follower nodes for synchronization. This log replication mechanism guarantees that committed operations are durably stored on a majority of replicas before acknowledgment, providing linearizable consistency for single-key operations.[70][69] Writes in YugabyteDB require acknowledgment from a quorum, typically a majority of replicas—for instance, at least two out of three nodes—to ensure durability and consistency even in the face of failures. Reads are served directly from the leader for strong consistency or can leverage leader leases to enable low-latency access from followers without compromising guarantees. The default configuration uses three replicas per tablet to balance fault tolerance and performance, though this can be adjusted up to a maximum of seven replicas to suit varying availability needs.[70][69] Raft's fault tolerance in YugabyteDB accommodates node failures and network partitions by requiring only a majority of nodes to remain operational for the system to continue processing requests. Upon detecting a leader failure through missed heartbeats, followers initiate an election to select a new leader, enabling automatic failover within a few seconds (typically around 2 seconds) to minimize disruption. This design ensures high availability without manual intervention.[70] To support causal consistency in distributed transactions spanning multiple tablets, YugabyteDB integrates hybrid logical clocks (HLCs) with Raft replication. HLCs combine physical wall-clock time with logical counters to assign monotonically increasing timestamps that capture causal relationships between operations, even across nodes with imperfect clock synchronization. During replication, write batches receive HLC timestamps, and transactions use these to order events correctly, ensuring that causally dependent reads reflect the latest committed writes while avoiding conflicts.[71][72]Cluster-to-Cluster Replication
Cluster-to-cluster replication in YugabyteDB, known as xCluster replication, enables asynchronous physical replication of data between independent YugabyteDB universes, supporting both YSQL and YCQL APIs for high-throughput scenarios across data centers or cloud regions.[73] This feature facilitates geo-distributed architectures by decoupling write operations from cross-region consensus, thereby reducing latency while maintaining data consistency through change data capture (CDC) streams derived from write-ahead logs (WAL).[73] Unlike intra-cluster synchronous replication handled by Raft consensus, xCluster operates asynchronously to prioritize performance in distributed environments.[73] At its core, xCluster employs a producer-consumer model where the source universe (producer) generates CDC streams from WAL records, which are then polled and applied by consumer processes in the target universe.[73] This horizontal scaling allows additional nodes to handle increased replication load without bottlenecks. Setup can be performed manually via theyb-admin command-line interface (CLI), involving steps such as creating replication streams, bootstrapping the target for initial schema and data synchronization, and configuring consumer streams.[73] For managed deployments, YugabyteDB Anywhere provides a user interface to configure replication groups, select tables or databases, and automate producer-consumer pairings across universes.[74]
Key features include support for one-way unidirectional replication (master-follower) or bi-directional multi-master setups, with modes varying from non-transactional (high-throughput, last-writer-wins conflict resolution) to transactional (ensuring ACID properties for read-only targets).[74] Replication lag is typically subsecond under normal conditions, monitored through metrics like applied log position and WAL retention, enabling proactive alerts.[73] Administrators can pause and resume replication streams via CLI or UI to accommodate maintenance, schema changes, or load balancing, while multi-region configurations ensure fault tolerance with as few as two data centers.[73][75]
Common use cases encompass active-passive disaster recovery, where the target cluster serves as a warm standby for rapid failover with minimal data loss, and global data synchronization to support low-latency reads from regional replicas without synchronous overhead.[75] In active-active deployments, bi-directional replication allows writes in multiple regions, syncing changes for distributed applications like e-commerce or IoT platforms requiring sub-regional responsiveness.[76] This contrasts with full backups by providing continuous, live data mirroring rather than periodic snapshots.[75]
In 2025, YugabyteDB version 2025.1 introduced enhancements such as automatic transactional xCluster DDL replication, enabling seamless propagation of schema changes like table creations or alterations across clusters without manual intervention, and support for TRUNCATE operations in replication streams.[57] Additionally, an updated API facilitates cross-data-center configurations in YugabyteDB Anywhere, improving automation for multi-region disaster recovery setups.[77] These updates build on prior capabilities to address operational complexities in hybrid cloud environments.[57]
Backup and Disaster Recovery
YugabyteDB provides robust backup and disaster recovery capabilities through its YBBackup tool, which enables distributed snapshots for full clusters, namespaces, or specific tables and keyspaces. These snapshots are created in-cluster using theyb-admin command, capturing a consistent view of data across all nodes at a hybrid timestamp with microsecond precision, minimizing coordination overhead by leveraging hard links to existing data files. While in-cluster snapshots are full but efficient due to their incremental nature via file linking, off-cluster backups support incremental updates starting from YugabyteDB v2.16, allowing for reduced storage and transfer costs when archiving to external locations.[78]
Point-in-time recovery (PITR) in YugabyteDB relies on write-ahead logging (WAL) retention, configurable via the timestamp_history_retention_interval_sec flag (default 900 seconds, adjustable up to days), enabling recovery to any timestamp within the retention window. This feature combines periodic snapshots with a "flashback" mechanism to rewind the database state, supporting read-only time travel queries via the yb_read_time session variable and writable clones through instant database cloning for zero-copy recovery. In v2025.1, PITR enhancements include support for vector indexes, facilitating recovery for AI workloads involving embeddings, and improved deadlock resolution during restores.[79][57]
Backups integrate with cloud storage providers such as AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage (GCS), and Azure Blob for off-cluster archiving, managed via YugabyteDB Anywhere's UI or API for scheduling and automation. Data in transit uses TLS encryption, while at-rest encryption for backups leverages native cloud services like S3 server-side encryption with AES-256. Disaster recovery workflows combine these backups with cluster-to-cluster replication to achieve low recovery point objectives (RPO) and recovery time objectives (RTO), often under one hour for critical scenarios like full cluster failures, by restoring from the latest snapshot and replaying WAL logs.[78][80][81]
Deployment and Operations
YugabyteDB Anywhere
YugabyteDB Anywhere (YBA) is an open-source, self-managed database-as-a-service platform designed for deploying and operating YugabyteDB clusters, known as universes, across diverse environments including on-premises infrastructure, public clouds such as AWS, Google Cloud Platform (GCP), and Microsoft Azure, as well as Kubernetes clusters.[82] It serves as an orchestration tool that automates the provisioning, scaling, and management of fault-tolerant distributed SQL databases, enabling organizations to handle single or multi-node, zone, region, and cloud provider failures while supporting xCluster replication for disaster recovery.[82] Key features of YugabyteDB Anywhere include comprehensive universe management, which allows for online horizontal and vertical scaling, software upgrades, and operating system patching without downtime. Monitoring is integrated with Prometheus for metrics collection and Grafana for visualization, complemented by the Performance Advisor tool that leverages AI-driven analysis to detect anomalies, optimize queries, and enhance observability for operational efficiency.[82][83] Auto-scaling capabilities enable dynamic resource adjustments, while security features encompass role-based access control (RBAC), encryption in transit using CA or self-signed certificates, and encryption at rest via cloud key management services (KMS) like AWS KMS, GCP KMS, Azure Key Vault, or HashiCorp Vault, along with LDAP and OIDC authentication.[82][77] Deployment of YugabyteDB Anywhere can be achieved through a user-friendly web UI, command-line interface (CLI), REST APIs, or Terraform provider, facilitating CLI- or UI-based provisioning of clusters in multi-cloud and hybrid setups.[82] It integrates seamlessly with Kubernetes operators to automate Day 2 operations such as scaling, upgrades, and management, with general availability of features like pause/resume operations and vertical disk scaling for master pods in Kubernetes environments.[77] In the v2025.1 release series, launched on July 23, 2025, YugabyteDB Anywhere introduced enhancements including general availability of the Yugabyte Kubernetes Operator for streamlined cluster automation, AI-powered observability via the Performance Advisor for smarter workload monitoring, and expanded security options such as PII filtering in support bundles using PgAudit log masking, AWS EBS disk encryption, and support for CipherTrust KMS in encryption at rest.[77][83] These updates also enable batching of rolling operations for faster upgrades and provide CLI availability for enhanced automation.[77] The release supports standard-term maintenance until July 23, 2026, and end-of-life on January 23, 2027.[84]Migration Tools
YugabyteDB Voyager is an open-source data migration tool designed to facilitate the transfer of schemas and data from legacy relational databases such as Oracle, PostgreSQL, and MySQL to YugabyteDB, enabling heterogeneous migrations across different database systems.[85] It unifies the migration workflow by providing capabilities for initial assessment, schema conversion, data export and import, and validation, thereby reducing the complexity of moving applications to a distributed SQL environment.[86] Voyager supports both offline and live migrations, allowing users to handle large-scale data transfers while minimizing application downtime through incremental synchronization.[87] The migration process with Voyager begins with an assessment phase, where the tool analyzes the source database schema for compatibility issues, such as unsupported data types or constraints, and generates a detailed report highlighting potential conversion challenges.[87] Following assessment, schema conversion occurs via theyb-voyager export schema command, which extracts DDL statements from the source and transforms them into YSQL-compatible formats—for instance, converting Oracle or MySQL schemas to PostgreSQL syntax while preserving features like indexes and foreign keys.[87] Data migration then proceeds with export and import phases: the export data command pulls data in parallel batches from the source, and import data loads it into YugabyteDB, supporting optimizations like adaptive parallelism for efficient handling of terabyte-scale datasets.[88] Validation is performed post-migration using commands like compare data to verify row counts and checksums between source and target, ensuring data integrity before cutover.[87]
For scenarios requiring continuous synchronization, CDC-based migration leverages Debezium connectors to enable real-time streaming of changes from source databases to YugabyteDB via an intermediate event queue like Kafka.[89] In live migrations with Voyager, CDC captures ongoing DML changes after an initial snapshot export, applying them incrementally to the target until the source is quiesced, which supports near-zero downtime transitions.[90] Debezium's source-specific connectors—for example, the MySQL or PostgreSQL variants—integrate seamlessly with YugabyteDB's YSQL API as the sink, allowing bidirectional or unidirectional replication pipelines for hybrid migration strategies.[91]
Best practices for migration emphasize pre-migration compatibility checks against YSQL, YugabyteDB's PostgreSQL-compatible query layer, to identify and resolve syntax or semantic differences early.[90] Post-migration, performance tuning involves analyzing query workloads with tools like compare-performance to optimize sharding and indexing, ensuring the distributed environment matches or exceeds source database efficiency.[92] Users are advised to test migrations in staging environments and monitor resource utilization during data import to avoid bottlenecks in cloud-native deployments.[90]
In 2025, Voyager saw expansions enhancing Oracle support and compatibility with YugabyteDB v2025.1, particularly in version v2025.8.2 (August 19, 2025) with the introduction of the --allow-oracle-clob-data-export flag for handling CLOB data types in offline migrations, v2025.9.3 (September 30, 2025) adding the compare-performance command for migration optimization, and v2025.10.1 (October 14, 2025) enhancing assessment reports for Oracle-specific elements, with the latest version v2025.11.1 released on November 11, 2025.[93] These updates include improved assessment reports and performance comparison tools that generate actionable insights for large-scale transfers, further streamlining migrations to distributed SQL architectures.[93]