Hubbry Logo
76 mm divisional gun M1942 (ZiS-3)76 mm divisional gun M1942 (ZiS-3)Main
Open search
76 mm divisional gun M1942 (ZiS-3)
Community hub
76 mm divisional gun M1942 (ZiS-3)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
76 mm divisional gun M1942 (ZiS-3)
76 mm divisional gun M1942 (ZiS-3)
76 mm divisional gun M1942 (ZiS-3)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The 76-mm divisional gun M1942 (ZiS-3) (Russian: 76-мм дивизионная пушка обр. 1942 г. [ЗиС-3]) (GRAU index: 52-P-354U) was a Soviet 76.2 mm divisional field gun used during World War II. ZiS was a factory designation and stood for Zavod imeni Stalina ("factory named after Stalin"), the honorific title of Artillery Factory No. 92, which first constructed this gun.

Key Information

History

[edit]

Artillery Factory No. 92 began designing the ZiS-3 at the end of 1940. The ZiS-3 combined the light carriage from the 57 mm ZiS-2 anti-tank gun and the powerful 76.2 mm barrel from the F-22USV, the previous divisional field gun. The addition of a muzzle brake reduced recoil and prevented damage to the light carriage upon firing. Producing a ZiS-3 cost only a third of the time and two-thirds of the money of a F-22USV by making greater use of casting, stamping and welding.

V. G. Grabin, the chief designer of Soviet medium caliber guns, initiated the gun's development without state approval, and the prototype was hidden from the state. Marshal Grigory Kulik, commander of Soviet artillery, had ordered a halt to the production of light 45 mm anti-tank guns and 76.2 mm divisional field guns in the belief that they were inadequate; the Soviets overestimated the armour protection of the latest German heavy tanks from propaganda about the Neubaufahrzeug multi-turreted prototype tank.

The beginning of the Great Patriotic War revealed that the pre-war 76 mm guns overmatched German armour; in some cases even 12.7 mm DShK machine guns were adequate. Most of the 76 mm guns were lost early in the war; some captured examples armed German Panzerjäger self-propelled guns. Marshal Kulik ordered the F-22USV back into production. At Artillery Factory No. 92, Grabin put the ZiS-3 into mass production in December 1941.

The factory's ZiS-3 stockpile grew and went unused as the Red Army refused to accept the guns without the usual acceptance trials. Grabin convinced the army to issue the guns for impromptu testing at the front, where it proved superior to existing divisional field guns. A subsequent demonstration impressed Joseph Stalin, who praised the weapon as "a masterpiece of artillery systems design." The ZiS-3 underwent an official five-day acceptance trial in February 1942, and was then accepted into service as divisional field gun model 1942 (full official name). Grabin worked to increase production at Artillery Factory No. 92. Conveyor assembly lines admitted the use of low-skilled labour without significant quality loss. Experienced laborers and engineers worked on complicated equipment and served as brigade leaders; they were replaced on the production line by young factory workers who were exempt from conscription, producing a new generation of skilled labourers and engineers. More than 103,000 ZiS-3s were produced by the end of the war, making it the most numerous Soviet field gun during the war.

Mass production of the ZiS-3 ceased after the war. It was replaced by the 85 mm D-44 divisional field gun. The D-44 had better anti-armour capabilities, but inferior mobility due to its increased weight.

The Finns captured 12 units, and designated them 76 K 42.

Derivatives

[edit]

At least one ZiS-3 was produced at the Reșița Works in Reșița, Romania, during 1943. This Romanian-produced copy was tested against several Romanian-designed prototypes as well as some foreign models, until eventually one of the Romanian prototypes was selected for serial production as the 75 mm Reșița M1943. This gun had incorporated a number of features from the ZiS-3. At least 375 75 mm Reșița M1943 guns were produced by Romania, including three prototypes; the gun was later mounted on the Mareșal tank destroyer.[4]

Self-propelled mounts

[edit]

The SU-76 was an assault gun mounting the ZiS-3 on the chassis of a T-70 light tank. More than 14,000 were produced between 1942 and 1945. The Romanian TACAM R-2 tank destroyer was a R-2 tank converted to mount the ZiS-3 in a three-sided fighting compartment. The KSP-76 was a wartime light assault car mounting the ZiS-3; it did not advance beyond the prototype stage.

Ammunition data

[edit]
Available ammunition
Type Model Weight, kg HE weight, g
Armour-piercing projectiles (muzzle velocity 700 m/s)
APHE BR-350A 6.3 155
AP (solid) BR-350SP 6.5 N/A
Composite Armour-piercing projectiles (muzzle velocity up to 950 m/s)
From April 1943 BR-350P 3.02 N/A
Developed after World War II BR-350N 3.02 N/A
High explosive and fragmentation shells (muzzle velocity 680 m/s)
HE/Fragmentation steel OF-350 6.2 710
HE/Fragmentation steely iron OF-350A 6.2 640
Fragmentation steely iron O-350A 6.21 540
HE/Fragmentation OF-350B 6.2 540
HE/Fragmentation OF-363 6.2 540
HE F-354 6.41 785
HE F-354M 6.1 815
HE developed in France F-354F 6.41 785
Other projectiles (muzzle velocity up to 680 m/s)
HEAT, developed after World War II BK-354 7 740
HEAT, from May 1943 BP-350M 3.94 623
Shrapnel Sh-354 6.5 85
Shrapnel Sh-354T 6.66 85
Shrapnel Sh-354G 6.58 85
Shrapnel Sh-361 6.61 85
Chemical OH-350 6.25
Incendiary long-range Z-350 6.24 240
Incendiary Z-354 4.65 240
Smoke long-range D-350 6.45 N/A
Smoke steely iron D-350A 6.45 N/A
Armour penetration table
AP Projectile BR-350A
Distance, m Meet angle 60°, mm Meet angle 90°, mm
100 67 82
500 61 75
1000 55 67
1500 49 60
2000 43 53
These data were obtained by Soviet methods of armour penetration measurement (penetration probability equals 75%).
They are not directly comparable with western data of similar type.

Combat history

[edit]

The tactical characteristics of the 76.2-mm guns (M1939 and 1942) are their high rate of fire, good muzzle velocity, and great maneuverability. These guns are employed in close support of infantry ( tanks), and especially for direct fire. Their primary missions are destruction of personnel and neutralization of infantry weapons in the open; antipersonnel barrages; destruction of tanks, vehicles, embrasures, and dragon's teeth by direct fire; and harassing fire. Secondary missions are accompanying barrages and concentrations; neutralization of artillery and mortars; establishment of smoke screens; and destruction of wire. Exceptional missions are fire reconnaissance, destruction of light materiel with indirect fire, and destruction of minefields.

Technical Manual, TM 30-530[5]

Soviet soldiers liked the ZiS-3 for its extreme reliability, durability, and accuracy. The gun was easy to maintain and use by novice crews. The light carriage allowed the ZiS-3 to be towed by trucks, heavy jeeps, like American Lend-Lease-supplied Dodge WC-51/WC-52, simply called the 'Dodge 3/4'-tons by Soviet troops – or even manually hauled by the crew if required.

The gun was also quite popular with the German Wehrmacht. The gun was introduced into German service as the 7.62 cm Feldkanone 288(r) and factories were retooled to produce ammunition for it. Unlike its predecessors, there exists no conversion to use the grenade cartridge of the 7.5 cm PaK 40 with a larger propellant charge to improve armor penetration capabilities. This is because in case of the M1936 F-22 and the M1939 F-22 USV the increased recoil was counteracted by adding a muzzle brake, which was not possible for the ZiS-3, which already had one.

The ZiS-3 had good anti-armour capabilities. Its armour-piercing round could knock out any early German light and medium tank. The frontal armour of later tanks, like the Tiger I and later the Panther, however, were immune to the ZiS-3[citation needed].

A ZiS-3 battery had four guns, with three batteries making a division or battalion. Independent anti-tank regiments consisted of six batteries with no divisions. A staff battery included a fire-control section.

The ZiS-3 saw combat service with North Korean forces during the Korean War (1950–1953).[6] It was also deployed by the People's Armed Forces for the Liberation of Angola (FAPLA) during the Angolan Civil War and the South African Border War[7] and by Tanzania People's Defence Force during the Uganda–Tanzania War in 1978–1979.[8]

Post-Cold War

[edit]

The ZiS-3 was exported to Soviet allies during the Cold War, who in turn exported it to Third World countries. In Europe, Austria received about 36 of them in 1955 and kept them in service until 1991 under the designation PaK-M42.[9] In the 1990s, both the Croatian Army and the Army of the Republic of Serb Krajina used it.[10]

In 2014, at least one ZiS-3 was used by pro-Russian separatists against the Ukrainian Armed Forces during the War in Donbas.[11]

In 2016, the gun remained in active service with the armies of at least six sovereign nations: Cambodia, Nicaragua, Namibia, Sudan, Mozambique, and Tanzania.[12] Mozambique at the time operated the largest number of ZiS-3s, with 180 in service.[13]

By 2020, the gun only remained in active service with Cambodia, Namibia, Nicaragua, and Sudan.[14] A number of other nations, including Russia[15] and Zimbabwe, retain functioning ZiS-3s to fire gun salutes during ceremonial occasions.[16]

Conflicts

[edit]

Operators

[edit]

Current operators

[edit]

Former operators

[edit]
[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

76 mm divisional gun M1942 (ZiS-3)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The 76 mm divisional gun M1942 (ZiS-3) was a Soviet 76.2 mm towed piece developed in late 1940 and early 1941, entering in 1941 and becoming the standard divisional gun for the from 1942 onward during . Designed by chief engineer Vasily G. Grabin and his team at Artillery Factory No. 92 (Zavod imeni Stalina, or ZiS) without initial state authorization, the ZiS-3 combined the barrel of the earlier F-22 USV gun with the lighter, more mobile carriage of the 57 mm ZiS-2 , enabling rapid wartime manufacturing using existing tooling and components. Its prototype was secretly tested and approved just before the German invasion in , with the first combat use occurring during the in late 1941. Weighing 1,200 kg in firing position and 1,850 kg when towed, the gun featured a 51.6 barrel length of 3,895 mm (including ), a maximum range of 13.29 km with high-explosive shells, and a up to 25 rounds per minute, supported by a of five to seven personnel. It utilized versatile 76.2 mm ammunition compatible with older stocks, including armor-piercing rounds capable of penetrating up to 110 mm of armor at 500 meters, making it highly effective against early- and mid-war German tanks like the and IV. Production exceeded 103,000 units by the end of , primarily at Factory No. 92 and later at Factory No. 235, at a cost roughly half that of preceding models due to simplified construction with only about 700 parts. This massive output—far surpassing any other Soviet —equipped nearly every Soviet division, with batteries typically consisting of four to six guns, and it also armed over 12,000 self-propelled guns. Renowned for its reliability, ease of maintenance, high mobility (towable by trucks or horses over rough terrain), and dual role as both support against and direct anti-tank fire, the ZiS-3 proved instrumental in key operations such as Stalingrad, , and the advance to , earning respect from German forces who nicknamed it the "crash boom." After the war, mass production ceased by 1946, but the ZiS-3 remained in Soviet service until the 1950s, replaced by the 85 mm D-44; it was widely exported to nations, , , and others, seeing action in the , , conflicts, and African wars into the 1980s, with some units still used for ceremonial salutes today.

Development and Production

Development

In the early , the Soviet required an updated divisional piece that was lightweight, mobile, and capable of engaging both field fortifications and armored threats, a need intensified by the German invasion on June 22, 1941, which captured key carriage factories for the existing 76 mm F-22 gun and disrupted supply lines. This crisis prompted designers to prioritize simplicity and rapid production to bolster frontline defenses. The ZiS-3 was conceived and developed by Vasily Grabin, chief designer at Factory No. 92 in Gorky, who initiated the project on his own authority in May 1941 to address these gaps. Grabin's team adapted the lightweight split-trail carriage from the 57 mm ZiS-2 anti-tank gun and paired it with a modified barrel derived from the F-22USV universal field gun, enhancing anti-tank performance while retaining compatibility with existing 76 mm ammunition stocks. A major innovation was the barrel's simplified construction, employing stamped steel components alongside casting and welding techniques, which cut production time to under 1,500 man-hours and costs significantly compared to the F-22USV's. Development proceeded in secrecy during late 1941 amid wartime pressures, with military trials beginning in October 1941 and the first batch of 50 guns sent to the front in December 1941. A demonstration to in July 1941 had already secured informal approval for initial production. Frontline evaluations confirmed reliability, paving the way for its official acceptance into service on February 12, 1942, as the 76 mm divisional gun M1942 (ZiS-3).

Production

The ZiS-3 entered in December 1941 at Factory No. 92 in Gorky, the primary manufacturing site, where chief designer Vasily Grabin oversaw initial output despite initial resistance from military authorities. To meet wartime demands amid the German advance, production was expanded through evacuations of equipment and personnel to additional facilities in the Urals and , ensuring continuity despite logistical challenges. This adaptation allowed for rapid scaling, with total production exceeding 103,000 units from 1941 to 1945. Key to the gun's high output were cost-saving measures in , particularly for the barrel, which was simplified to require fewer operations compared to its predecessor, the F-22. This reduction, achieved through greater use of stamping, , and casting, enabled factories to prioritize quantity over complexity. Peak production occurred in 1943–1944, supporting the Red Army's needs across multiple fronts. By 1945, output had met wartime demands, but the ZiS-3's simplicity ensured it remained economical to produce. , limited manufacturing continued into the primarily for export to allied nations, though Soviet domestic production ceased shortly after victory.

Design

Barrel and Firing Mechanism

The ZiS-3 featured a 76.2 mm caliber barrel with a total length of approximately 3,245 mm (L/42.6), including a rifled portion measuring 2,570 mm equipped with 32 grooves to impart spin to the . The breech mechanism was a semi-automatic vertical sliding , allowing efficient reloading during sustained fire while maintaining reliability in field conditions. The barrel was constructed from high-quality to withstand the pressures of firing, with non-stressed components such as the utilizing stamped for weight savings without compromising structural integrity. The firing mechanism employed a percussion-type system, where a struck the primer to initiate ignition. Integrated with this was a variable recoil system consisting of a hydraulic buffer positioned below the barrel and a spring recuperator above it, effectively managing forces through a split-trail configuration that enhanced stability during operation. This setup enabled a sustained of 12-15 rounds per minute, with trained crews capable of bursts up to 25 rounds per minute. For aiming, the gun integrated a PG-1 panoramic sight for applications and a basic for direct engagements, allowing versatility across combat roles.

Carriage and Mobility Features

The ZiS-3 utilized a split-trail design adapted from the lighter ZiS-2 57 mm anti-tank gun, featuring tubular steel trails that provided structural integrity while minimizing weight and production complexity. This incorporated two wheels fitted with pneumatic tires, enabling reliable towing by either horse teams or trucks across varied terrain, with the trails serving dual purposes as bracing elements in the firing position and towing arms during transport. The lightweight construction emphasized mobility, allowing the gun to be rapidly repositioned by its without heavy mechanical assistance. Key to its operational flexibility were the carriage's elevation and traverse capabilities, offering a vertical adjustment from -5° to +37° for engaging low or elevated targets, and a horizontal traverse of 54° total for quick aiming adjustments without extensive repositioning of the entire piece. These features, combined with the gun's low profile, facilitated both direct anti-tank fire and indirect support roles in dynamic battlefield conditions. Mobility was further enhanced by the system's overall mass of 1,200 kg in the firing position, which permitted a standard six-man crew to manhandle the gun over short distances for fine adjustments or evasion maneuvers. When towed by , it could achieve speeds up to 50 km/h on roads, supporting rapid deployment in divisional operations. The design also included a foldable armored shield of 4.5 mm thickness, providing the crew with essential protection against shrapnel and small-arms fire while folding away for transport to reduce drag. The carriage's engineering allowed for exceptionally rapid transition from travel to firing configuration, achievable in under one minute by a trained through simple actions like spreading the trails, lowering the wheels, and securing the spade anchors. This efficiency, rooted in the shared components with the ZiS-2, contributed to the ZiS-3's reputation for reliability and ease of handling in combat environments.

Specifications

Dimensions and Weight

The ZiS-3 was designed with compact dimensions that allowed for relatively easy handling and deployment by units, contributing to its widespread use despite the harsh conditions of battlefields. Its light weight relative to other divisional guns of the era enabled towing by light trucks or even horses, facilitating quick repositioning during combat. Key physical characteristics of the standard ZiS-3 included an overall length of 6.1 m (20 ft) in the travel position, with a barrel length of 3.895 m (12 ft 9 in) including , equivalent to 51.6 calibers. The gun's width measured 1.65 m (5 ft 5 in) and height 1.38 m (4 ft 6 in). In terms of mass, the ZiS-3 weighed 1,200 kg (2,646 lb) in firing position and approximately 1,850 kg (4,079 lb) in towing configuration (including limber). It required a of 5 to 7 personnel for standard operation.

Armament and Sights

The primary armament of the 76 mm divisional gun M1942 (ZiS-3) consisted of a single 76.2 mm L/51.6 barrel, derived from the earlier F-22USV model but adapted with a muzzle brake to reduce recoil. The barrel featured right-hand twist rifling to impart spin stabilization to projectiles. For targeting, the ZiS-3 utilized a panoramic telescope, such as the PG-1 model, enabling indirect fire with a magnification of 2.5× and a field of view of 14°. Direct fire was supported by mechanical sights, effective for engagements between 100 and 2,000 meters. Auxiliary tools included a dedicated fuze-setter for adjusting shell fuzes prior to loading, handled by one crew member, enhancing preparation efficiency for variable-time or impact fuzes. Unlike some contemporary tank-mounted guns, the ZiS-3 lacked a , relying solely on its main ordnance for all fire roles. The barrel's maintenance requirements were modest, with an operational life of approximately 3,000 to 4,000 effective shots before relining became necessary, contributing to the gun's reputation for reliability in prolonged campaigns.

Variants

Derivatives

The ZiS-3 influenced several non-Soviet adaptations, particularly in Axis-allied and post-war communist states, where its simple design and effective performance were replicated with modifications for local , production constraints, or tactical needs. The Romanian 75 mm Reșița Model 1943 represented a significant wartime adaptation, blending the ZiS-3's recoil mechanism and split-trail carriage with the vertical sliding breech and barrel profile of the German 7.5 cm Pak 40 anti-tank gun to ensure compatibility with standard German 75 mm ammunition. Developed by Colonel Valerian Nestorescu at the Reșița Works starting in 1942, prototypes were tested and adopted in 1943 as the "Tunul Antitanc DT-UDR 26, cal. 75 mm, md. 1943," with an initial order for 1,100 units placed in December 1943; approximately 400 were completed by the end of 1944 before production halted due to advancing Soviet forces. This derivative maintained the ZiS-3's lightweight mobility at 3,150 pounds but featured a slightly shorter barrel length of 8.2 feet, resulting in a reduced maximum range of 12 km compared to the original ZiS-3's 13 km, primarily due to the caliber reduction and adjusted ballistics. The German 7.62 cm Pak 36(r) was a direct adaptation using captured ZiS-3 guns, mounting them on Pak 35/36 carriages for anti-tank use; over 1,400 were converted from 1942 onward. In the post-war era, manufactured the Type 54 76 mm as a licensed copy of the ZiS-3, incorporating minor updates such as simplified tooling for domestic steel and component production to facilitate mass output in state arsenals. Introduced in the mid-1950s following the , the Type 54 retained the core dimensions, 25-round-per-minute firing rate, and multi-role capabilities of the ZiS-3, serving as a backbone for artillery in conflicts including the and the 1979 . Other adaptations included the Czechoslovak M-52 76 mm gun, a licensed ZiS-3 variant produced from with minor modifications for local production. These adaptations emphasized the ZiS-3's ease of manufacture while addressing regional logistical variations.

Self-Propelled Mounts

The SU-76M served as the primary Soviet self-propelled mount for the ZiS-3 gun, utilizing a lengthened derived from the to enhance mobility for support roles. Production commenced in 1943 at several factories, including and Plant No. 38, resulting in 14,292 units manufactured by June 1945. The design featured an open-top fighting compartment at the rear, with the ZiS-3 gun fixed in a that limited horizontal traverse to 16 degrees total (8 degrees left and right) to accommodate the compact mounting. Armor protection was minimal, with the casemate front up to 35 mm and sides 15-25 mm thick, prioritizing lightweight construction over heavy defense. Romanian forces developed the as a dedicated by converting the of the R-2 light tank (a local variant of the Czechoslovak LT vz. 35) to carry the ZiS-3 gun, addressing the need for mobile anti-tank capability late in the war. A total of 21 units were completed in 1944 at the workshops, with the turret removed to install a three-sided, open-top superstructure for the gun. Adaptations included a fixed gun mount with approximately 30 degrees of traverse and elevation limits of +15 to -5 degrees, while retaining the original engine for speeds up to 25 km/h; armor thickness reached a maximum of 25 mm on the hull. The KSP-76 represented a effort to create a self-propelled mount for the ZiS-3, built on a wheeled GAZ-68 for potential airborne or scout support, though it remained experimental and did not enter production. Developed in 1944 as a single unit by the Gorky Automobile Plant, it featured an open-top armored hull with the gun centered for fire support, weighing about 5.3 tons and offering 37 degrees of traverse. Armor was thin at 7-16 mm, emphasizing air-droppable mobility over protection, with testing limited to wartime evaluations that highlighted stability issues during movement.

Ammunition

Projectile Types

The ZiS-3 fired a range of fixed ammunition types compatible with its 76.2 mm barrel, utilizing brass or semi-combustible steel cartridges loaded with various projectiles for anti-personnel, anti-armor, and special effects roles. High-Explosive (HE) Shells
The primary high-explosive fragmentation projectile was the OF-350, a steel-bodied shell weighing 6.23 kg and filled with approximately 621 g of TNT or amatol equivalent for blast and fragmentation effects against soft targets and fortifications. It achieved a muzzle velocity of 680 m/s when fired from the ZiS-3. Variants like the OF-350A used steely iron construction with 621 g of Schneiderit or amatol. Armor-Piercing (AP) Shells
Armor-piercing high-explosive (APHE) rounds included the BR-350A and BR-350B, designed for penetrating armored vehicles with kinetic impact followed by internal detonation. The BR-350A weighed 6.3 kg and contained 150 g of TNT, while the BR-350B weighed 6.5 kg with 36 g of explosive filler. These were fitted with base-detonating fuzes such as the MD-5 or MD-7. High-Explosive Anti-Tank (HEAT) Shells
The BP-353A was a shaped-charge for defeating armor through explosive jet formation, weighing 3.9 kg with a filling of 580 g of trotyl/cyclonite mixture and a BM impact . It maintained consistent performance across ranges due to its non-velocity-dependent design. Other Projectile Types
Shrapnel shells like the Sh-354 were anti-personnel rounds containing about 260 lead balls (each 12.7 mm in ) ejected by a 85 g black powder bursting charge, weighing approximately 6.5 kg overall and using time or impact fuzes such as the T-6. Smoke projectiles, including the D-350, weighed 6.45 kg and dispersed white phosphorus (380-505 g) upon bursting to create screening clouds, initiated by a P-4 mechanical time . Incendiary rounds such as the Z-350-based UZ-354, at 6.24 kg, employed nine blocks for igniting flammable targets like structures or fuel, with a T-6 time . Fuze Types
Common fuzes included the contact/impact KTM-1, a nose-detonating model for point initiation on HE and AP shells. For airburst effects on shrapnel or HE rounds, variable time fuzes like the GT-7 provided timed or proximity detonation above ground.

Ballistic Performance

The ZiS-3 demonstrated solid ballistic performance as a divisional gun, balancing artillery and anti-tank roles through its 76.2 mm caliber and efficient propellant charges. When firing high-explosive shells at a 45° elevation, it achieved a maximum range of 13.29 km, enabling effective indirect fire support in divisional operations. For direct fire against armored targets, the effective engagement range was limited to about 1,000 m with armor-piercing ammunition, where the muzzle velocity of the BR-350 series APHE rounds reached 680 m/s, providing sufficient kinetic energy for medium-threat engagements without excessive barrel wear. Penetration capabilities varied by projectile and impact conditions, with the BR-350B APHE round serving as a representative example. At 1,000 m and a 0° impact angle, it could penetrate 61 mm of homogeneous armor plate; at a 30° angle, this dropped to 49 mm. These figures rendered the ZiS-3 highly effective against the side armor of Soviet tanks (45 mm thick at near-vertical angles), allowing reliable defeats at combat distances up to 1,500 m, but inadequate for the frontal armor of German heavy tanks like the Panther (effective thickness approximately 140 mm due to 55° sloping) or (100 mm flat), which required closer ranges or specialized ammunition for success. Ballistic trajectory for to 1 km resulted in a of roughly 1.5 seconds, influenced by initial velocity and minimal elevation, facilitating quick follow-up shots in dynamic battles. Under standard environmental conditions, the ZiS-3 maintained high accuracy, with vertical dispersion limited to 0.5 mil at 1 km, attributable to precise sight mechanisms and stable barrel harmonics. This precision supported both point-target anti-tank work and area suppression, though , , and variability could marginally increase spread in field use.

Operational History

Service

The ZiS-3 entered service with the in late 1941, with the first 50 units produced and deployed to the front during the , where prototypes provided critical divisional artillery support against German advances. By early 1942, following official acceptance trials, ramped up, enabling widespread deployment from the onward, where concentrations of ZiS-3 guns on the east bank of the Volga River delivered effective high-explosive and anti-tank fire to bolster Soviet defenses. In the in July 1943, the ZiS-3 excelled in its anti-tank role, forming the backbone of Soviet anti-tank brigades with densities of 16-30 guns per kilometer across deep defensive belts. These units, equipped with ZiS-3s capable of penetrating approximately 75 mm of armor at 500 meters, destroyed the majority of German tanks and assault guns during the offensive, significantly blunting the Panzer spearheads and contributing to the failure of . The gun's versatility allowed it to engage targets at close range in ambushes, preserving Soviet armored reserves for counterattacks. By the end of the , over 100,000 ZiS-3s had been produced, equipping the majority of Soviet divisional and forming the most numerous in the Army's inventory. This high output compensated for battlefield losses, estimated in the tens of thousands amid intense fighting, ensuring sustained availability despite attrition. The gun's lightweight design, at 1,200 kg in firing position and 420 kg lighter than its predecessor, facilitated rapid redeployment by or truck, allowing crews to maneuver quickly across fluid front lines and switch between indirect support and direct anti-tank fire. During the in April-May 1945, ZiS-3 batteries provided essential artillery preparation and close support, bombarding German positions in the and urban fighting, aiding the final Soviet assault on the capital. Throughout the war, the ZiS-3 demonstrated reliability in diverse roles, including kills of German Tiger I tanks in 1943 using armor-piercing rounds at short ranges, where its 76.2 mm projectile could penetrate the heavy tank's side or rear armor.

Post-World War II Conflicts

The ZiS-3 saw continued service in the Korean War (1950-1953), where North Korean and Chinese forces employed it for artillery barrages and anti-tank roles against UN armored units. North Korean People's Army batteries used the gun's 76 mm projectiles to target advancing South Korean and American tanks, leveraging its mobility and rapid fire rate in defensive positions along the 38th parallel. Chinese People's Volunteer Army units integrated ZiS-3s into their divisional artillery, contributing to counter-battery fire during major offensives like the Battle of the Chosin Reservoir, where its 13.3 km maximum range proved effective against exposed UN supply lines. In the (1975-2002), Soviet and Cuban-supplied ZiS-3 units supported the People's Armed Forces for the Liberation of Angola (FAPLA) in conventional artillery operations against rebels. Cuban advisors integrated the guns into forward batteries during engagements like Operation FOX in December 1983, where ZiS-3 fire halted South African incursions near the border. Captured examples from clashes demonstrated the gun's role in direct-fire anti-tank ambushes, with South African forces seizing several for . By the late , ZiS-3s remained active at battles such as Cuito Cuanavale, providing indirect support to Cuban-FAPLA defenses against armored assaults. During the Uganda-Tanzania War (1978-1979), Tanzanian People's Defence Force artillery units utilized ZiS-3s as siege guns in the counteroffensive that toppled Idi Amin's regime. The guns supported infantry advances on and , firing high-explosive rounds to suppress Ugandan positions and destroy fortifications along the front. Tanzanian batteries, drawn from Cold War-era Soviet stockpiles, provided mobile in the war's decisive phases, contributing to the rapid collapse of Ugandan defenses by April 1979. It was also used by Arab states in the and Arab-Israeli Wars for support and anti-tank roles. In the 2014 Donbas conflict, pro-Russian separatists reactivated at least one ZiS-3 from Ukrainian reserves for direct-fire support against government positions near . Surplus ZiS-3s underwent refurbishments in the 1970s and 1980s, with nations and Soviet allies upgrading barrels and integrating modern fuzes for improved reliability in proxy wars. These adaptations extended the gun's lifespan by enhancing projectile accuracy and reducing misfires, allowing integration with contemporary fire-control systems in export models.

Operators and Legacy

Historical Operators

The ZiS-3 served as the primary divisional gun of the from its adoption in February 1942 until the , when it was replaced by the 85 mm D-44 divisional gun, with over 103,000 units produced by the end of . Mass production ended in 1945, but the gun remained in widespread service with Soviet forces for decades thereafter. Within the , the supplied thousands of ZiS-3 guns to allies including , , and from 1945 through 1989 as part of standardized military equipment. In , the gun was employed by border patrol units into the postwar period and redesignated as the Kanone Modell 1943 for service with the Nationale Volksarmee. In , manufactured copies of the ZiS-3, designated as the Type 54, which entered service with the following Soviet technical assistance in the early . received ZiS-3 guns through Soviet aid and utilized them extensively during the (1950–1953), with continued employment in its forces afterward. also acquired Type 54 variants via postwar Soviet and Chinese military assistance starting in the . Soviet exports extended to the and through military aid programs in the 1950s and 1970s, with ZiS-3 deliveries documented to , , , and . In and , shipments of the 76 mm ZIS-3 were part of broader arms packages to support aligned regimes. Angola's rebels operated ZiS-3 s during the , obtained through captures from government forces or transfers from non-communist sources. Overall, the ZiS-3 reached numerous countries through direct aid, remnants, and resales by states, contributing to its enduring global proliferation.

Modern Use and Legacy

In the 21st century, the ZiS-3 continues to see limited operational roles in a handful of nations, primarily due to its simplicity, low maintenance requirements, and availability of surplus ammunition in developing countries. As of 2025, maintains ZiS-3 guns for training purposes within its armed forces, leveraging the weapon's ease of use for basic instruction. holds a small number in reserve stocks, with approximately 12 units reported in inventory for potential defensive roles. In , the guns are employed ceremonially, including for firing salutes during official events. and retain examples for parades and historical displays, such as Russia's 2025 exhibition commemorating the 1941 Moscow parade. No significant deployments of the ZiS-3 have been reported in major conflicts between 2021 and 2025, reflecting its obsolescence against contemporary threats like precision-guided munitions and advanced armored vehicles; however, it retains value for cost-effective training in resource-constrained militaries. The ZiS-3's legacy endures as a hallmark of Soviet innovation, praised by as a " of systems design" for its balance of firepower, mobility, and mass-producibility during . Its design influenced post-war divisional gun concepts, emphasizing lightweight carriages and high-rate fire that informed successors like the 85 mm D-44, while promoting the integration of anti-tank and roles in a single platform. Production of the original ZiS-3 ceased in 1945, with over 103,000 units built, but unlicensed copies and derivatives persisted in developing nations into the late . Culturally, the gun symbolizes Soviet resilience in narratives, frequently depicted in films, documentaries, and memorials as an emblem of the Red Army's dominance on the Eastern Front.

References

  1. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/zis-3.htm
  2. https://weaponsystems.net/system/929-76mm+ZiS-3
  3. https://www.militaryfactory.com/armor/detail.php?armor_id=373
  4. https://odin.tradoc.army.mil/WEG/Asset/M1942_
  5. https://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_76_2mm_divisional_gun_1942_ZiS3.html
  6. https://www.tankarchives.com/2014/01/world-of-tanks-today-in-history-vasiliy.html
  7. https://en.topwar.ru/79209-divizionnaya-pushka-zis-3-biografiya-rekordsmena.html
  8. https://www.flamesofwar.com/Default.aspx?tabid=107&art_id=1001
  9. https://www.tankarchives.com/2016/10/zis-3-trials.html
  10. https://www.imfdb.org/wiki/76_mm_divisional_gun_M1942_%28ZiS-3%29
  11. https://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/korea/nkor.pdf
  12. https://odin.tradoc.army.mil/WEG/Asset/ZiS-2_
  13. https://www.quartermastersection.com/russian/artillery/873/76mmM42
  14. https://ditsong.org.za/en/76-2mm-divisional-field-gun-model-1942-ussr-and-the-peoples-republic-of-china/
  15. https://www.military-references.com/wp-content/uploads/books/spg/ussr/artillery_guns/zis-3/Soviet_76-mm_ZIS-3_battalion_cannon.pdf
  16. http://theminiaturespage.com/boards/msg.mv?id=533285
  17. https://www.militaryfactory.com/armor/detail.php?armor_id=928
  18. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/artillery-towed.htm
  19. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/su-76.htm
  20. https://onwar.com/wwii/tanks/ussr/su018su76.html
  21. https://www.militaryfactory.com/armor/detail.php?armor_id=924
  22. http://www.worldwar2.ro/arme/?article=242
  23. https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/gaz-68-ksp-76/
  24. http://ww2data.blogspot.com/2015/07/soviet-explosive-ordnance-76mm.html
  25. https://ww2db.com/weapon.php?q=174
  26. http://www.weapon.df.ru/ammo/76mm/divis1-e.html
  27. http://ww2data.blogspot.com/2015/07/soviet-explosive-ordnance-76mm_27.html
  28. http://ww2data.blogspot.com/2015/08/soviet-explosive-ordnance-76mm.html
  29. http://ww2data.blogspot.com/2015/08/soviet-explosive-ordnance-76mm_24.html
  30. http://ww2data.blogspot.com/2015/08/soviet-explosive-ordnance-76mm_10.html
  31. http://www.panzer-war.com/page58.html
  32. https://www.tankarchives.com/2023/03/how-to-kill-t-34.html
  33. https://thesovietarmourblog.blogspot.com/2020/12/soviet-towed-anti-tank-guns.html
  34. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD1083677.pdf
  35. https://www.worldwarphotos.info/gallery/germany/1944-1945/russian-artillery-76mm-zis-3-gun-in-action-berlin-1945/
  36. https://en.topwar.ru/185955-kitajskaja-protivotankovaja-artillerija-v-korejskoj-vojne.html
  37. https://www.hrw.org/reports/archives/africa/ANGOLA94N.htm
  38. https://www.jemimafawr.co.uk/2019/11/01/the-great-angolan-gecko-hunt-operation-fox-december-1983/
  39. https://wwiiafterwwii.wordpress.com/2015/09/06/t-34-in-angola-1970s-1980s/
  40. https://wwiiafterwwii.wordpress.com/2017/11/24/wwii-weapons-in-tanzania/
  41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318729848_Towed_Anti-Tank_Guns_Renaissance_of_Almost_Forgotten_Weapons_in_Ukrainian_Conflict
  42. https://stalin-line.by/en/ekspozitsiya-2/field-emplacements/item/345-the-76-mm-divisional-gun-m1942-zis-3
  43. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp80t00913a000100700001-1
  44. https://wwiiafterwwii.wordpress.com/2023/04/21/wwii-firearms-in-east-germanys-other-armed-forces/
  45. https://wwiiafterwwii.wordpress.com/2017/04/21/north-korea-wwii-weapons-after-the-korean-war/
  46. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP85T00840R000102850001-2.pdf
  47. https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/76_mm_divisional_gun_M1942_%28ZiS-3%29
  48. https://armyrecognition.com/archives/archives-land-defense/2021/cambodian-army-still-uses-soviet-world-war-2-zis-3-antitank-guns
  49. https://defenceweb.co.za/security/african-militaries/namibia-defence-force/
  50. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COAVQHLb4sU
  51. https://en.iz.ru/en/1986180/2025-11-07/exhibition-military-equipment-dedicated-anniversary-1941-parade-opened-red-square
  52. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/video/3d-spies-of-wwii/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.