Hubbry Logo
Adjunct professorAdjunct professorMain
Open search
Adjunct professor
Community hub
Adjunct professor
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Adjunct professor
Adjunct professor
Adjunct professor
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

An adjunct professor is a type of academic appointment in higher education who does not work at the establishment full-time. The terms of this appointment and the job security of the tenure vary in different parts of the world, but the term is generally agreed to mean a bona-fide part-time faculty member in an adjunct position at an institution of higher education.

Terminology

[edit]

An adjunct professor may also be called an adjunct lecturer, an adjunct instructor, or adjunct faculty. Collectively, they may be referred to as contingent academic labor. The rank of sessional lecturer in Canadian universities is similar to the US concept.

Americas

[edit]
Main article: Adjunct professors in North America

In the United States, an adjunct is, in most cases, a non-tenure-track faculty member.[1][2] However, it can also be a scholar or teacher whose primary employer is not the school or department with which they have adjunct status.[3] Adjunct professors make up the majority of instructors in higher education (post-secondary) institutions. As with other part-time workers, they are paid less than full-time professors and do not receive employee benefits such as health insurance or an office.[4] In most cases, adjunct professors need a master's degree, but in some cases only require a bachelor's degree and relevant experience.[5] However, over a third have a doctoral degree.[6] In many universities, the title "adjunct professor" (or variations thereof, such as "adjunct associate professor") implies a PhD or other terminal degree; those with a master's or bachelor's degree may receive the title of "adjunct lecturer". In 2018 the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) expressed concern that only a quarter of university positions are tenure-track, with implications for job security and academic freedom.[7] The AAUP analysis determined that 73% of university teaching positions in the United States are non-tenure track.[7]

In Canada, adjunct professors are often nominated in recognition of active involvement with the appointing institution. At the same time, they are employed by the government, industry, a profession, or another institution.[8] The term "course lecturer," rather than "adjunct," is used if the appointment is strictly to teach one or more courses. In contrast, the US uses this title for all instructors.

In Argentina and Brazil, the designation professor adjunto implies stable employment.

Europe

[edit]

In Portugal, the designation professor adjunto implies stable full-time employment in a polytechnic university.

In parts of Spain, the term professor adjunto refers to a non-tenured position.

In Hungary, there exists a similar term adjunktus, as well as adiunkt in Poland, although only the term is similar, as adjunktus in Hungarian means full-time employed assistant professor, not a bona fide lecturer.

In Finland, the Docents' Union of Finland recommend the term adjunct professor or associate professor in English as a translation of the title of docent.[9] However, the official translation used by the universities granting the title is "Title of Docent". A docentship should be regarded as an educational title not connected with the employment rank as such, rather an assurance of the level of expertise, to enable the person to advance further in their academic career. The rank of a docent entitles scientists to be principal investigators, lead research groups, and act as the supervisors of doctoral students.

Some universities in The Netherlands have adjunct professors, where the title applies to the highest ranking variant of associate professor, thus having quite a distinct interpretation from the American use of the term.

In Italy, the term adjunct professor is used to translate the title of Professore a contratto.

In France, the term adjunct professor refers to “Chargé de cours”.

In Germany, the term adjunct professor translates to the title of außerplanmäßiger Professor and is abbreviated apl. Prof.

South Asia

[edit]

In Bangladesh, private universities follow the title adjunct professor or adjunct associate professor to imply non-tenure faculty members.

In Pakistan, adjunct (assistant/associate) professors are also considered as non-regular faculty members, and usually, posts are given to Pakistani overseas scientists under a faculty development program.

Southeast Asia and Oceania

[edit]

In Australia, the term adjunct is reserved for academics and researchers from outside the university who have a close association with the university, e.g., through supervision of PhD students, recognized by an honorary title reflective of their rank and standing (adjunct lecturer, senior lecturer, associate professor or professor).[10][11][12][13]

In Thailand, adjunct (assistant/associate) professors are considered "non-regular officers".

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Adjunct professor

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
An adjunct professor is a part-time instructor hired on short-term contracts by colleges and universities primarily to teach specific undergraduate or courses, without the , administrative service, or tenure eligibility typical of full-time faculty positions. These roles often attract individuals with professional expertise in fields like , , or industry, who supplement their primary careers with , though many rely on adjunct work as their main income amid limited tenure-track opportunities. In U.S. higher education, adjunct and other contingent now hold about 68 percent of instructional appointments as of fall 2023, up from 47 percent in 1987, reflecting institutional shifts toward cost containment through flexible staffing. conditions frequently include per-course pay averaging $3,900, minimal health benefits or retirement contributions, and precarious renewal dependent on enrollment, fueling debates over labor exploitation, diminished , and potential erosion of quality due to overburdened instructors juggling multiple institutions.

Definition and Terminology

Core Definition

An adjunct professor is a non-tenure-track faculty member in higher education institutions, typically employed on a temporary, part-time, or limited-term to teach specific courses rather than to engage in comprehensive academic roles. These positions lack the and permanence associated with tenure-track appointments, with adjuncts often hired per semester or without guarantees of renewal or promotion pathways. Unlike full-time tenure-track professors, who are expected to contribute to , service, and institutional alongside , adjunct professors' primary obligation is instructional delivery for designated classes, with minimal or no involvement in departmental committees, , or scholarly output. This contractual structure distinguishes adjunct roles empirically by their narrow scope and absence of long-term institutional integration, reflecting universities' operational needs for targeted expertise without committing to fixed overhead. In the United States, contingent faculty such as adjuncts comprise approximately 68 percent of all instructional staff at colleges and universities as of fall 2023, underscoring their dominance in modern higher education staffing. This prevalence stems from institutions' requirements for adaptable labor to accommodate variable student enrollment, specialized course demands, and budgetary constraints, enabling efficient without the inflexibility of permanent hires. Adjunct professors are distinguished from tenure-track faculty primarily by their lack of eligibility for tenure, absence of mandated research or service duties beyond teaching, and reliance on per-course or short-term renewable contracts that offer no job security or structured promotion ladder. Tenure-track positions, in contrast, provide a probationary period leading to indefinite tenure, require balanced commitments to research, teaching, and institutional service, and enable advancement through ranks such as assistant, associate, and full professor with associated salary increases and protections. In comparison to visiting professors, typically hold ongoing part-time appointments without a fixed end date, though these remain contingent and unbenefited, often drawing from individuals whose primary employment lies outside academia to provide specialized instruction. Visiting professors, however, are usually seconded temporarily—often for one —from another institution, handling a full load akin to tenure-track while retaining their home affiliation, with appointments emphasizing scholarly exchange rather than supplementary labor. Clinical professors differ from adjuncts in their focus on professional fields such as or , where they integrate practical training with , frequently in full-time non-tenure-track roles that may include patient care or legal practice obligations and sometimes allow for renewable long-term contracts. Adjuncts, by extension, are not inherently linked to clinical or practice-based contexts and instead serve as adjuncts to the core faculty through limited, expertise-driven contributions without such integrated professional duties. The designation "adjunct professor" overlaps terminologically with "" or "instructor" but underscores part-time status and the importation of external professional expertise, such as from industry, contrasting with full-time lecturers who may commit primarily to without tenure prospects. Instructors generally occupy entry-level ranks requiring less advanced credentials, like a rather than a , and carry lower prestige, while adjunct titles may confer nominal professorial status despite comparable or inferior compensation structures. This usage in U.S. academia crystallized in the , coinciding with part-time faculty comprising roughly 20% of instructional staff early in the decade amid expanding enrollment demands.

Historical Development

Early Origins

In 19th-century American universities, the practice of hiring part-time instructors emerged to incorporate practical expertise into curricula, particularly in burgeoning professional fields. Law schools, transitioning from apprenticeships to formal instruction, frequently employed part-time professors who were practicing attorneys to teach courses, a model prevalent in the latter half of the century as professionalized. This arrangement provided access to real-world knowledge without the fiscal burden of full-time salaries for all teaching roles, supplementing a core faculty often drawn from or general scholars in earlier liberal arts colleges. Medical education followed a parallel path, with early schools relying on part-time preceptorships and instructors—typically local physicians—before full-time faculty became standard, reflecting resource constraints during the expansion of formal training in the early to mid-1800s. These positions arose amid institutional growth post-independence, when universities faced increasing demand for specialized courses but lacked sufficient permanent staff or funding to expand tenured-like roles comprehensively. Such adjunct-like arrangements predated formalized tenure protections, which the outlined in its 1915 Declaration of Principles on and following the organization's founding that year. Prior to this, faculty employment was often temporary or probationary, with part-time hires filling gaps in instruction driven by enrollment surges and curricular diversification, without the job security later afforded to full-time academics.

Post-World War II Expansion

The Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944, known as the , provided educational benefits including tuition, supplies, and stipends to returning veterans, enabling over 2.2 million to enroll in colleges and universities by the late 1940s and contributing to a nationwide enrollment surge that exceeded capacity at many institutions. This democratization of higher education created acute faculty shortages, as full-time tenure-track positions could not scale rapidly enough to meet demand without diluting established tenure systems or requiring extensive hiring processes. Institutions responded by increasing reliance on adjunct faculty—typically part-time or temporary instructors from professional fields—to deliver instruction in overflow classes, particularly in introductory and vocational courses, thereby maintaining operational flexibility amid the boom. In the and , the establishment and expansion of public systems amplified this trend, as states invested in accessible two-year institutions to support workforce retraining and local economic needs, doubling the number of such colleges between 1954 and 1974. These systems prioritized scalability for fluctuating enrollments driven by and federal initiatives like the , hiring with practical expertise to teach credit and non-credit programs without committing to permanent full-time roles. State extensions and urban campuses similarly employed to extend offerings to non-traditional students, allowing institutions to absorb growth while preserving resources for core research faculty. By 1970, (AAUP) data showed that approximately 25% of faculty positions fell outside the tenure stream, with adjunct and non-tenure-track roles comprising a growing share—often 20-30% in rapidly expanding and state sectors—to handle the influx without proportional increases in full-time hires. This period marked the initial institutionalization of adjunct labor as a structural response to enrollment pressures, setting precedents for flexible staffing in U.S. higher education. Beginning in the 1970s, U.S. higher education institutions faced escalating budget constraints following the oil crises of and , which strained state economies and prompted reductions in public funding for colleges and universities. This fiscal pressure led administrators to prioritize cost efficiencies, favoring the hiring of part-time adjunct faculty over more expensive tenure-track positions, as adjuncts offered lower compensation without long-term commitments. By the late , contingent appointments—encompassing both part-time adjuncts and full-time non-tenure-track roles—accounted for approximately 47 percent of faculty positions, marking a departure from the predominantly tenure-track model of prior decades. The intensified this trend, dubbed "adjunctification," driven by the rapid expansion of community colleges and for-profit institutions, which disproportionately relied on adjunct labor to meet enrollment surges without proportional investments in permanent . Tenure-track hiring declined as institutions adapted to ongoing state , with public funding per student dropping amid competing budgetary priorities like corrections and . Administrative staffing, meanwhile, expanded significantly—outpacing both faculty growth and enrollment in many cases—diverting resources from instructional budgets and reinforcing the shift toward flexible adjunct staffing models. By fall 2023, contingent comprised about 68 percent of U.S. instructional staff, reflecting the entrenched nature of adjunct reliance across public, private nonprofit, and for-profit sectors. Recent projections indicate overall for postsecondary teachers will grow 7 percent from 2024 to 2034, faster than the national average, fueled by rising demand for flexible instruction amid enrollment fluctuations and the proliferation of programs. Causal factors persist, including volatile enrollment patterns exacerbated by demographic shifts and economic cycles, which adjuncts' short-term contracts help institutions navigate by enabling rapid adjustments to student numbers without fixed overhead. This flexibility, while adaptive in uncertain markets, has sustained adjunctification despite critiques of its long-term effects on instructional continuity.

Roles and Responsibilities

Teaching and Instructional Duties

Adjunct professors' primary instructional responsibilities revolve around direct engagement, encompassing the development of syllabi and materials tailored to predefined course objectives, delivery of lectures or facilitating discussions, and assessment of via grading , quizzes, exams, and participation. These duties emphasize execution of established curricula rather than original , with adjuncts typically assigned to teach introductory or lower-division courses where enrollment demands fluctuate. In practice, adjuncts commonly handle 1 to 4 courses per semester or term at a single institution, allowing focus on instructional delivery while accommodating external commitments. Approximately half of adjunct faculty teach one or two courses per term, reflecting part-time status and institutional limits to prevent overload. Office hours are provided but often restricted in duration compared to full-time faculty, primarily for addressing inquiries on rather than extended advising. Variations in duties may include supervising laboratory sessions in STEM fields or adapting instruction for online or hybrid formats, particularly post-2020 amid remote learning shifts. However, , such as revising course content or learning outcomes, remains infrequent for adjuncts, as these tasks are predominantly allocated to tenure-track or full-time personnel. In the United States, adjunct and part-time faculty deliver most undergraduate courses, comprising a significant share—often cited as over 50%—of instructional hours, particularly in and high-enrollment sections. This prevalence underscores their role in scaling teaching capacity amid growing student numbers, though it limits deeper pedagogical innovation.

Non-Teaching Obligations and Limitations

Adjunct professors are generally exempt from research obligations that tenure-track must fulfill, as their appointments prioritize without allocated time, , or criteria for scholarly output. Contracts for such positions explicitly limit duties to instruction, excluding expectations for , grant pursuits, or unless separately compensated or affiliated with external roles. This distinction stems from institutional designs that reserve research-intensive responsibilities for full-time , enabling adjuncts to maintain external professional practices without academic publication pressures. Participation in committee service, student advising, and departmental is rare and often contractually restricted for , differing sharply from full-time who bear these as core service components. typically lack voting rights in senates or curriculum committees, with inclusion limited to advisory or non-voting capacities at select institutions, reflecting a broader exclusion from shared to streamline decision-making among permanent staff. When involved, such service may require additional stipends, underscoring its non-mandatory status beyond teaching. Minimal non-teaching obligations for adjuncts include adherence to standards, such as maintaining qualifications for course delivery and submitting to periodic evaluations for compliance and . These requirements ensure alignment with institutional quality metrics without extending to broader administrative or policy formulation roles. Such limitations facilitate adjunct specialization in , avoiding the administrative overload that could compromise instructional focus.

Employment Conditions

Compensation and Economic Realities

Adjunct are typically compensated on a per-course or per-credit-hour basis, reflecting the part-time and contingent nature of the role. Surveys from 2023-2024 indicate average pay per three-credit course ranges from $2,500 to $5,000, with medians around $3,700 to $3,900. For adjuncts teaching a full load of eight courses per —common at multiple institutions to approximate full-time effort—annual earnings often fall between $25,000 and $32,000, frequently below the federal for a of four (approximately $30,000 in 2023). Compensation varies significantly by discipline, driven by market supply and demand dynamics. Fields like STEM and command higher rates, often 20-50% above humanities averages, due to greater demand and specialized expertise requirements, whereas oversupply of PhD holders in humanities and social sciences depresses pay. Regional differences further influence rates, with urban and high-cost states such as and New York offering 4,000−4,000-5,000 per course, compared to 2,000−2,000-3,000 in rural or Midwestern areas. Institution type also plays a role, as research universities pay more than community colleges, where adjunct rates can dip below $2,500 per course amid budget constraints and higher teaching volumes. These structures align with the part-time designation, where adjunct roles supplement primary employment for many holders. U.S. data on postsecondary teachers shows that over 50% work part-time, and a substantial portion—estimated at 40-60% in surveys—hold multiple jobs to achieve financial viability, including non-academic roles or full-time positions elsewhere. This reflects labor market realities where adjunct positions fill instructional gaps without committing to full-time salaries averaging 80,000−80,000-100,000 for tenure-track equivalents.

Benefits, Perquisites, and Incentives

Adjunct professors generally receive sparse non-monetary benefits, with access to and plans far less common than for full-time . A 2022 American Federation of Teachers (AFT) survey of over 1,000 adjuncts found that fewer than half reported employer-provided , often leaving them reliant on personal resources or spousal coverage. Similarly, a 2019 American Association of University Professors (AAUP) analysis indicated that only 36 percent of adjunct contributed to or plans, typically due to eligibility thresholds tied to course loads or duration of service. These figures underscore a systemic gap, as full-time routinely receive subsidized coverage and defined-contribution matching, reflecting institutions' prioritization of cost containment amid reliance on contingent labor. Certain perquisites vary by institution and contract, providing limited offsets. Tuition waivers or remission for personal or dependent education represent one such incentive; for example, at the , adjunct faculty can submit forms for tuition waivers applicable during active teaching semesters. Similarly, some like Central New Mexico Community College extend partial waivers to part-time instructors for up to four credit hours annually if not pursuing degrees. privileges and campus facilities access may also be granted via partial ID badges, enabling resource use during employment periods but often excluding full privileges like secure labs or administrative support, as noted in AAUP policy statements advocating for equitable access. Scheduling flexibility serves as a key market incentive, particularly attracting working professionals, retirees, or those with primary non-academic careers who value adjunct roles for supplemental income without fixed hours or long-term obligations. This perk aligns with the part-time nature of positions, allowing alignment with external commitments, though it comes at the expense of opportunities afforded to tenure-track faculty. Empirical variability in these benefits incentivizes adjuncts to negotiate or "shop" across institutions, yet overall reinforces their role as a low-cost labor pool for higher education.

Job Security, Contracts, and Precarity

Adjunct professors are typically appointed on fixed-term contracts lasting one semester or one , with renewal decisions made shortly before the subsequent term and no automatic expectation of continuation or eligibility for tenure. Approximately 75% of adjunct faculty report employment guarantees limited to term-by-term arrangements, and only 10% hold multi-year contracts. This contractual framework, driven by institutions' need to align staffing with variable enrollment and funding, results in frequent non-renewals, contributing to elevated turnover as positions are reallocated based on immediate departmental demands rather than long-term commitments. The inherent in these arrangements stems from ' dependence on fluctuating student enrollment and institutional budgets, which directly dictate course availability and hiring. Declines in enrollment, such as those projected amid demographic shifts and recent economic pressures, prompt swift cuts to adjunct positions, as universities prioritize cost control without tenure-related obligations. This vulnerability was acutely evident during the , when part-time faculty faced the largest reductions—exceeding 6% at many bachelor's, master's, and associate-degree institutions—amid abrupt shifts to remote instruction and shortfalls. received scant institutional aid for these transitions, with just 7% compensated for online course adaptations, underscoring how external shocks amplify the risks of contingent . While the market dynamics of adjunct labor encourage short-term adaptability by tying employment to performance and demand, empirical surveys reveal that precarity is largely involuntary for most. Over 63% of part-time express a for full-time roles, indicating that the flexibility of adjunct work—often cited by a minority with external commitments—does not offset the instability for the majority reliant on it as primary . This structure reflects causal pressures from an oversupply of qualified candidates relative to tenured slots, perpetuating high competition and renewal uncertainty.

Regional Variations

North America

In the United States, higher education institutions demonstrate the greatest regional dependence on adjunct and contingent , with 68 percent of all positions classified as contingent in fall 2021, encompassing both part-time and full-time non-tenure-track roles. This figure rose from approximately 47 percent in 1987, reflecting a sustained shift toward temporary appointments driven by institutional cost controls and enrollment expansion, including in the for-profit sector where adjunct reliance often exceeds 90 percent. For-profit institutions, which proliferated from the through the , contributed significantly to adjunct growth by prioritizing flexible, low-overhead staffing models to accommodate rapid program scaling. Federal oversight of adjunct employment remains minimal, with no comprehensive national regulations governing compensation, contracts, or working conditions in higher education, leaving primary authority to states and institutions. State-level policies exhibit notable variations, particularly in community colleges, which employ adjuncts at rates often surpassing 60 percent; for instance, mandates competitive hiring processes and recent enrollment declines have intensified adjunct job insecurity, while other states like those in the Midwest offer differing contract renewal norms without uniform minimum pay standards. In , contingent faculty usage mirrors the U.S. pattern in scale at many institutions, with sessional and contract instructors forming a substantial and increasing proportion of teaching staff, though centralized national data is limited compared to U.S. surveys. Provincial variations provide stronger structural supports, notably in where faculty associations such as QUFA integrate adjuncts into bargaining units, enabling collective negotiations for improved terms over fragmented U.S.-style arrangements. This unionized framework, prevalent in 's public universities, contrasts with weaker protections elsewhere in and fosters higher stability for contingent roles amid similar economic pressures.

Europe

In European higher education systems, the term "adjunct professor" is infrequently used, with analogous roles more commonly designated as visiting lecturers, temporary instructors, or country-specific titles such as Lektor in and chargé de cours in , which prioritize injecting domain-specific expertise into curricula rather than addressing chronic staffing shortages through low-cost labor. These positions often arise from needs like coverage or interdisciplinary , as seen in the where visiting lecturers are recruited for short-term contributions to specialized modules, facilitating external perspectives without displacing permanent tracks. In , temporary faculty appointments, governed by the Higher Education Ordinance, serve similar purposes and may extend indefinitely until a fixed end date, underscoring a focus on targeted augmentation over perpetual contingency. European frameworks contrast sharply with North American models by embedding stronger safeguards against precarity, primarily through the EU Fixed-Term Work Directive (1999/70/EC), which prohibits the misuse of successive fixed-term contracts and requires equivalent treatment in pay, working conditions, and employment benefits compared to permanent staff unless objectively justified. This directive influences national implementations, limiting indefinite renewals and promoting pathways to permanence; for instance, Germany's Academic Fixed-Term Contract Act (Wissenschaftszeitvertragsgesetz) caps qualifying fixed-term employment at six years (or nine with prior experience) to foster career progression rather than entrapment in instability. In , chargé de cours roles, while temporary, operate under labor code provisions that curtail chaining of short-term contracts beyond two years total without conversion risks, emphasizing merit-based expertise over exploitative part-time dominance. Prevalence of such temporary roles remains lower than in North America, with permanent tenure-like tracks prevailing for core faculty; OECD analyses indicate that while fixed-term academic positions constitute 20-40% of staff in select countries like the Netherlands, EU-wide trends favor regulated transitions to stability, averting the part-time overload seen elsewhere. In the UK, despite some hourly-paid lecturing, institutional responses to union pressures have yielded fractional contract guarantees, as at the University of the Arts London where fixed-term associate lecturers gain re-employment rights, reflecting broader adherence to anti-abuse norms. Sweden's Employment Protection Act further constrains temporary hires to explicit needs like project funding or substitutions, with higher education ordinances prohibiting fixed-term professorships outright to preserve job security. These mechanisms, rooted in causal protections against market-driven casualization, sustain higher baseline stability, though critics note persistent qualification-phase vulnerabilities in research-intensive systems.

Asia, South Asia, and Oceania

In , adjunct professors, referred to as hijōkin kyōju (non-regular professors), typically hold fixed-term or part-time positions without tenure, often teaching specific courses on a per-lecture basis. Compensation structures include payments of approximately 150,000 yen per or class, as seen in academic job listings from institutions like . These roles emphasize flexibility for universities facing enrollment fluctuations, with duties focused on instruction rather than . In , adjunct faculty are commonly appointed as visiting or part-time experts, drawing from industry and other academic institutions to supplement core staff. For instance, Peking University's National School of Development lists adjunct professors such as economists and policymakers who contribute specialized knowledge without full-time commitments. This model aligns with state-driven priorities for practical expertise in rapidly expanding higher education, though detailed employment data remains limited compared to full-time faculty. In , adjunct and visiting faculty positions prioritize industry professionals for teaching courses tied to their domain expertise, including conventional higher education and skill-based vocational programs. Guidelines from regulatory bodies, as discussed in analyses, aim to bridge academia-industry gaps by requiring adjuncts to deliver content directly related to their professional backgrounds, often on short-term contracts. Universities like and actively recruit such faculty to enhance program relevance in competitive private sectors. Australia employs "casual academic staff" as the primary equivalent to adjuncts, with their usage expanding faster than continuing faculty roles, particularly for undergraduate teaching, as documented in 2016 sector analyses. A 2024 study of five universities revealed that casuals in disciplines like and frequently undertake workloads matching or exceeding standard teaching loads, often under hourly contracts with a 25% casual loading to offset lack of benefits. This casualization reflects privatization pressures in a government-subsidized , where private providers also proliferate adjunct-like roles. In , sessional lecturers and adjuncts serve part-time functions, akin to casual appointments, with universities such as maintaining rosters of adjunct professors from external organizations for targeted contributions. These positions support flexible staffing in public institutions amid growing private higher education enrollment. Privatization trends across and parts of have fueled adjunct reliance, with data indicating the region's fastest global expansion in private higher education from the to , necessitating cost-effective faculty supplementation in emerging markets. Unlike more precarious Western models, many Asian adjunct roles benefit from oversight in , providing structured pay floors and industry prestige, though comprehensive metrics are scarce due to uneven reporting.

Advantages

Institutional Benefits

Institutions employ adjunct professors to gain staffing flexibility, allowing adjustments to enrollment variations and program demands without the long-term obligations of tenure-track hires. Adjunct contracts, typically term-limited and terminable without cause, enable scalable , contrasting with the of tenured faculty that imposes fixed costs regardless of fluctuating needs. This approach mitigates risks from unpredictable student numbers, such as sudden increases in elective courses or decreases in majors, by permitting on-demand hiring rather than overstaffing permanent positions. From 1990 to 2012, part-time faculty roles grew 121%, outpacing full-time growth by threefold, supporting such adaptive strategies amid rising enrollments. Cost efficiencies arise from lower compensation structures, with averaging $2,700 to $3,000 per course without benefits, versus prorated full-time faculty salaries of $60,000–$100,000 annually including benefits for equivalent teaching loads. Institutional analyses indicate these substitutions yield 20–30% savings in faculty compensation per course relative to tenure-track equivalents. Adjunct hiring also provides access to practitioner expertise, drawing professionals from industry for specialized courses without full-time recruitment. These instructors deliver up-to-date field knowledge, supplementing core in dynamic disciplines like or .

Advantages for Adjunct Faculty

Adjunct positions provide scheduling flexibility that enables individuals to balance with other careers, responsibilities, or activities. This part-time structure allows adjuncts to pursue diverse professional interests without the rigid demands of full-time academia, with surveys showing that 32% of respondents preferred adjunct status specifically for the flexibility to engage in other pursuits. Such arrangements are particularly valued by retirees, who often use adjunct roles to supplement fixed incomes while maintaining intellectual engagement on a limited basis, as the reduced hours align with post-retirement lifestyles. The role also offers lower entry barriers for PhD holders seeking academic involvement without navigating the competitive tenure-track process, providing a direct avenue to . Adjuncts frequently report higher personal in instructional delivery, as they face fewer institutional mandates for output or extracurricular commitments that burden full-time peers. Moreover, exemption from extensive faculty , committee service, and mandatory contributes to reduced administrative oversight and lower reported job stress levels among some compared to tenure-track . This streamlined focus on duties allows for an undiluted emphasis on pedagogical activities, serving as an intellectual outlet insulated from broader bureaucratic entanglements.

Potential Gains for Students

Adjunct professors frequently contribute recent professional experience from industry or practice, allowing them to deliver practical insights and real-world applications that complement theoretical instruction provided by full-time . This exposure equips students with skills aligned to current workforce demands, particularly in applied fields such as , , and sciences, where adjuncts' concurrent outside academia ensures relevance. Empirical analysis of settings reveals that leveraging industry backgrounds enhance student perceptions of course utility and connectivity to . Research indicates that well-supported adjuncts can positively influence student retention and academic performance when integrated into broader success initiatives. For instance, adjuncts' involvement in program planning has been linked to improved rates by fostering targeted advising and adjustments that address needs. In introductory courses, adjunct instruction correlates with higher initial grades and increased enrollment in subsequent related classes, suggesting motivational effects on persistence. The precarious nature of short-term contracts may incentivize adjuncts to emphasize student-centered teaching strategies, as reappointment often depends on evaluations tied to instructional effectiveness rather than research output. This focus can result in greater dedication to classroom preparation and feedback, potentially elevating learning outcomes in high-enrollment courses where adjuncts predominate. Such dynamics counter assumptions of uniform quality decline, with evidence from varied institutional contexts showing adjuncts' adaptability yielding targeted gains in student engagement.

Criticisms and Controversies

Claims of Exploitation and Low Pay

Adjunct faculty compensation is frequently cited as of exploitation, with per-course pay typically ranging from $2,500 to $5,000, often resulting in annual earnings under $25,000 for those piecing together a full load across multiple institutions. A 2022 American Federation of Teachers (AFT) survey found that nearly 25% of adjuncts earn below the federal line, while 38% rely on government assistance programs such as food stamps or to meet basic needs. Critics, including labor advocates, contend that this pay structure exploits highly educated workers by assigning them core instructional responsibilities comparable to those of tenured faculty, yet without proportional remuneration, health benefits, or retirement contributions, effectively subsidizing institutional budgets through underpaid labor. These low wages arise from basic economic dynamics in the academic labor market, where universities hold monopsonistic power over contingent positions and exploit an oversupply of PhD holders to minimize costs— can cost up to 80% less than full-time hires. The production of doctoral degrees has outpaced demand for tenure-track roles for decades; in most and fields, newly minted PhDs exceed available faculty positions by factors of 5:1 or more annually, while even in STEM, only about 20% secure academic research or teaching jobs within five years of graduation. This glut stems from universities' incentives to train students as low-cost labor for research and teaching, perpetuating a cycle that depresses wages without constituting deliberate but rather a predictable outcome of mismatched incentives in higher education's . Participation in adjunct roles is largely voluntary, with many entrants prioritizing schedule flexibility over higher but more rigid full-time alternatives, often treating as a secondary pursuit alongside primary careers in industry, writing, or consulting. Surveys indicate that a significant portion of —particularly retirees, professionals transitioning fields, or those with spousal support—opt into these positions precisely for their part-time nature, which allows balancing multiple streams or personal commitments unavailable in tenure-track paths requiring extensive and administrative duties. While poverty-level pay affects a minority trapped in full dependency on adjuncting, the broader market offers alternatives outside academia, underscoring that low compensation reflects individual choices within a competitive equilibrium rather than coercive exploitation.

Impacts on Educational Quality and Continuity

The reliance on adjunct faculty has been associated with disruptions to educational continuity, primarily due to high turnover rates that limit sustained student advising and mentoring. Adjunct instructors often face precarious contracts, leading to frequent departures between semesters, which interrupts long-term student relationships essential for academic guidance and career preparation. Empirical analyses indicate that this instability correlates with reduced student persistence and retention, as transient faculty provide less consistent support compared to tenure-track counterparts who maintain ongoing involvement. Several peer-reviewed studies link higher proportions of adjunct-taught courses to diminished student outcomes, including lower graduation rates and grades. For instance, research on community colleges found that students exposed to part-time instructors experienced declining grades over time relative to those taught by full-time faculty, attributing this to reduced course preparation and feedback. A broader econometric confirmed adjuncts yield worse performance metrics, such as reduced subject interest and success, compared to full-time instructors. These effects are particularly pronounced in introductory courses, where foundational mentoring shapes retention; one study estimated that heavy adjunct reliance decreases STEM major persistence by 1.5%. However, evidence does not uniformly indicate decline, with some analyses showing can achieve comparable or superior short- and long-term student performance when institutional conditions support their efficacy. In contexts where part-time instructors receive adequate resources, they have demonstrated the largest positive impacts on academic outcomes, outperforming even assistant professors in certain metrics. Positive effects on enrollment and program accessibility further suggest that enhance access without inherent quality deficits, particularly in high-demand fields. Causal factors appear tied to adjunct marginalization rather than instructional incompetence; isolation from departmental integration exacerbates turnover and limits , hindering mentoring continuity. Institutions that foster adjunct inclusion in planning and peer networks report improved indicators, implying structural remedies could mitigate disruptions. Concurrently, administrative expansion—often termed "bloat"—diverts resources from instruction, correlating with stagnant rates and elevated costs more directly than faculty composition alone. Between 1987 and 2012, non-instructional staff grew by 28% while faculty increased only 6%, contributing to inefficiencies that overshadow adjunct-specific challenges. This suggests that over-reliance on adjuncts reflects deeper resource misallocation, where administrative proliferation undermines overall educational coherence beyond teaching staff turnover.

Unionization Efforts and Labor Disputes

Unionization efforts among adjunct professors gained momentum in the 2010s, driven by campaigns from organizations such as the (SEIU) through its Faculty Forward initiative and the (AFT), which targeted contingent faculty at public and private institutions nationwide. These drives focused on securing higher wages, health benefits, and job protections, with notable successes including a 2016 vote at where adjuncts approved SEIU Local 500 representation by a margin of 82-36, and a 2018 contract ratification at the that delivered pay increases and enhanced security for part-time faculty. However, national penetration remained limited, with victories concentrated at select public universities and community colleges, while many private institutions resisted or defeated organizing bids due to legal challenges and administrative opposition. Labor disputes escalated through strikes centered on compensation and employment stability, particularly in the late and early . Adjuncts at initiated what became the longest U.S. adjunct strike in 2023, lasting over 40 days amid protests against course cuts and inadequate working conditions, though the action ended without a full resolution on pay equity. In 2023 alone, adjunct faculty struck at 12 campuses, often securing modest wage gains but highlighting persistent precarity, as seen in the 2022 and walkout over expired contracts and stalled negotiations on benefits. The amplified these vulnerabilities, with surveys revealing that 25% of adjuncts earned below the federal poverty line annually and faced widespread contract nonrenewals—termed "hidden layoffs"—as institutions restructured amid enrollment drops and remote demands, prompting renewed calls for union protections that were unevenly met. Economic analyses of these efforts underscore trade-offs, as union contracts typically elevate labor costs—through mandated floors and benefits—which can pressure universities to reduce adjunct hiring or raise tuition to offset expenses, potentially shrinking overall part-time positions despite per-job improvements. Resistance to persists among a of , often rooted in preferences for professional and skepticism of bargaining's efficacy in academia's competitive PhD labor market, where individualized negotiations or alternative paths are viewed as more aligned with personal agency than dues-paying membership. This , compounded by fears of retaliation in non-unionized settings, has contributed to uneven organizing success, with some faculty opting out even in pro-union environments.

Reforms and Future Directions

Policy and Structural Reforms

Proposed policy reforms for adjunct professors emphasize establishing minimum compensation thresholds and benefit eligibility criteria to address remuneration disparities. In , Assembly Bill 736, enacted in , mandates a compensation floor for adjunct faculty qualifying as professional exempt employees, requiring either a monthly salary equivalent to twice the state for a full-time workweek or a minimum of $117 per hour in , rising to $126 in 2021 and $135 thereafter. This measure prevents reclassification of adjuncts as hourly non-exempt workers under labor laws, while setting a pay standard that has resulted in raises exceeding 45% for some faculty in unionized settings. Similarly, union contracts in systems like the have implemented per-course minimums, such as $4,469 for a three-credit course as of 2019, aiming to align adjunct pay more closely with living wages. Benefit mandates, often tied to workload thresholds (e.g., eligibility for health coverage after teaching a certain number of hours), have been piloted in states like , where adjuncts may seek partial reimbursements for self-purchased insurance, though full coverage remains rare without exceeding part-time caps. Evaluations of these reforms reveal mixed outcomes regarding feasibility and impacts. While minimum pay floors enhance short-term for adjuncts, they impose budgetary strains on institutions, particularly smaller colleges, where compliance with salaried requirements under AB 736 has proven challenging and led to operational adjustments rather than widespread adoption. Proponents argue that such increases improve retention by making adjunct roles more competitive with other sectors, potentially elevating instructional quality through reduced turnover and greater preparation time. However, institutional responses often involve cost-shifting, with limited evidence of reinvestment in full-time positions; instead, savings from adjunct reliance historically fail to translate into tenure-track expansions. Empirical data from post-reform implementations indicate modest gains in satisfaction and persistence without triggering a revival of traditional tenure systems. For instance, artifacts from higher education institutions show that tiered compensation increases correlated with improved adjunct retention rates, though broader student outcome metrics remain influenced by adjunct-heavy staffing models. These reforms have not reversed overreliance on contingent labor, as efforts to mandate higher full-time/part-time ratios (e.g., California's proposed 75/25 standard) require significant public funding and face vetoes due to fiscal constraints. Overall, while pay and benefit floors demonstrate feasibility in targeted legislative and contractual contexts, their scalability is limited by rising operational costs, which may contribute to tuition increases or hiring constraints absent offsetting revenue.

Alternative Models and Market Responses

Online platforms such as and have enabled independent instructors to deliver courses directly to learners, circumventing traditional institutional reliance on adjunct faculty by allowing subject-matter experts to monetize expertise on a per-course or gig-like basis. These models parallel gig-economy structures, where educators select projects based on demand rather than fixed appointments, with platforms handling enrollment and payments; for instance, instructors on such sites report higher profit potential through customizable content compared to adjunct pay. This shift reduces the need for colleges to hire adjuncts for niche or scalable subjects, as students opt for affordable, self-paced alternatives amid rising tuition costs. Coding bootcamps represent another market-driven innovation, offering intensive, short-term programs (typically 3-5 months) focused on job-ready skills like , often at under $11,000 per course with employment rates averaging 71%, exceeding some university outcomes. These programs employ hybrid roles blending industry professionals with teaching duties, minimizing traditional adjunct usage by prioritizing practical training over broad academic staffing; bootcamp graduates frequently double their incomes within five years, drawing learners away from degree programs that depend on contingent faculty. Despite challenges like AI disruptions prompting some closures in 2025, bootcamps persist as viable alternatives, pressuring universities to innovate rather than expand adjunct hires. Competition from for-profit providers and has intensified amid enrollment declines, with U.S. undergraduate numbers dropping nearly 20% from 2010 to 2023 and a projected 15% reduction in traditional college-age students by 2025, favoring low-cost options like trade schools growing at 4.9% annually. This market dynamic encourages flexible, performance-based contracts for , emphasizing student choice in credentials such as stackable micro-credentials over mandated tenure tracks, as institutions adapt to budgetary strains without regulatory overhauls. In 2025, trends indicate broader adoption of on-demand faculty models, where professionals fill hybrid slots amid shrinking cohorts, prioritizing efficiency and outcomes over .

References

  1. https://peopleadmin.com/blog/what-is-the-difference-between-a-tenured-professor-and-an-adjunct-professor/
  2. https://www.aaup.org/background-facts-contingent-faculty-positions
  3. https://www.science.org/content/article/faculty-positions-tale-two-systems-tenure-v-adjunct
  4. https://www.aaup.org/academe/issues/spring-2025/data-snapshot-tenure-and-contingency-us-higher-education-fall-2023
  5. https://www.insidehighered.com/sites/default/files/2024-06/IHE_Adjunct%2520Faculty%2520Compensation%2520Models%2520%25281%2529.pdf
  6. https://www.aaup.org/academe/issues/winter-2021/do-adjuncts-have-academic-freedom-or-why-tenure-matters
  7. https://www.aaup.org/external-news/us-colleges-are-overusing-and-underpaying-adjunct-professors
  8. https://tophat.com/glossary/a/adjunct-professor/
  9. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/education/adjunct-teaching
  10. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1246736.pdf
  11. https://www.bestcolleges.com/blog/adjunct-vs-tenured-professor/
  12. https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-a-tenure-track-professor-and-an-adjunct-professor-What-is-the-difference-between-an-adjunct-professor-and-a-visiting-professor
  13. https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-an-adjunct-and-a-visiting-professor
  14. https://denison.edu/academics/provost/feature/151589
  15. https://academicpersonnel.ucmerced.edu/resources/academic-titles/visiting-and-adjunct
  16. https://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/please-explain-tenured-non-tenured-positions-professor-vs-clinical-professor.880258/
  17. https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-a-clinical-associate-professor-and-a-professor
  18. https://tophat.com/blog/instructor-vs-professor/
  19. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/finding-a-job/lecturer-vs-professor
  20. https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8246/how-do-lecturers-differ-from-professors-in-large-universities
  21. https://www.aaup.org/reports-publications/aaup-policies-reports/policy-statements/status-part-time-faculty
  22. http://www2.uwstout.edu/content/lib/thesis/2013/2013rebmanc.pdf
  23. https://wilj.law.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1270/2012/02/katcher.pdf
  24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/367429
  25. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2156587211427404
  26. https://www.aaup.org/about/history-aaup
  27. https://sueishaqlab.org/2021/03/26/a-brief-history-of-the-brief-history-of-academic-tenure/
  28. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/jiuspa/article/download/41392/43325/110807
  29. https://time.com/3915231/student-veterans/
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10201940/
  31. https://unionpenumbra.org/article/the-exploitation-and-marginalization-of-contingent-and-adjunct-labor/
  32. https://www.aaup.org/academe/issues/fall-2022/american-higher-educations-past-was-gilded-not-golden
  33. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED255267.pdf
  34. https://time.com/4078143/community-college-history/
  35. https://www.cuny.edu/about/history/the-postwar-expansion/
  36. https://www.aaup.org/NR/rdonlyres/3B21B7EB-86D7-498D-9498-10978175B5DA/0/TenureTeachersRpt.pdf
  37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/466648
  38. https://www.cbpp.org/research/state-budget-and-tax/state-higher-education-funding-cuts-have-pushed-costs-to-students
  39. https://philmagness.com/2015/08/whats-really-behind-adjunctification-in-u-s-higher-ed/
  40. https://mndaily.com/294316/campus/hiring-of-administrative-employees-outpaces-faculty-enrollment/
  41. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/education-training-and-library/postsecondary-teachers.htm
  42. https://www.tiaa.org/content/dam/tiaa/institute/pdf/research-report/2021-06/tiaa-institute-employment-volatility-in-the-academic-workforce-rd-181-canche-june-2021-3.pdf
  43. https://www.fau.edu/artsandletters/new-pdfs/al-adjunct.pdf
  44. https://faculty.temple.edu/sites/faculty/files/2021-22_ADJUNCTHANDBOOK.pdf
  45. https://www.tiaa.org/public/institute/publication/2018/adjunct-faculty-survey-2018
  46. https://apo.ucla.edu/policies-forms/the-call/professorial-series/adjunct-professor-series
  47. https://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/aa_partimefaculty0310.pdf
  48. https://www.oah.org/best-practices/standards-for-the-employment-of-part-time-adjunct-and-contingent-faculty/
  49. https://ulife.vpul.upenn.edu/careerservices/blog/2019/03/28/to-adjunct-or-not-to-adjunct-that-is-the-question/
  50. https://theccwh.org/joint-committee-issues-standards-part-time-adjunct-faculty/
  51. https://www.aft.org/position/academic-staffing/accreditation-standards-academic-staffing
  52. https://accreditationcollaborative.com/know-how-adjunct-faculty-play-a-crucial-role-in-accreditation/
  53. https://blog.cengage.com/spotlight-on-adjunct-faculty-in-2024/
  54. https://www.smcknight.com/2025-salary-trends-for-adjunct-professors-vs-tenured-faculty-a-growing-divide/
  55. https://www.elbowpatchmoney.com/the-disciplinary-hierarchy-of-college-professor-pay/
  56. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/pay-salary/adjunct-professor-salary
  57. https://data.aaup.org/pt-faculty-pay/
  58. https://www.zippia.com/adjunct-instructor-jobs/demographics/
  59. https://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/media/2022/qualitylifereport_feb2022.pdf
  60. https://www.aaup.org/academe/issues/spring-2019/data-snapshot-what-do-we-know-about-adjunct-faculty-retirement-savings
  61. https://www.cod.edu/about/humanresources/pdf/information_guide_for_part_time_faculty.pdf
  62. https://www.cnm.edu/depts/hr/benefits/tuition-waiver-and-reimbursement
  63. https://www.aft.org/reports/army-temps-aft-adjunct-faculty-quality-worklife-report
  64. https://www.aaup.org/reports-publications/aaup-policies-reports/topical-reports/status-non-tenure-track-faculty
  65. https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeltnietzel/2025/10/24/as-financial-woes-mount-more-universities-turn-to-staff-layoffs/
  66. https://www.highereddive.com/news/adjunct-college-faculty-taking-the-biggest-hit-from-pandemic-job-losses/597587/
  67. https://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/2023/Contingent_Faculty_Survey_2022_interactive.pdf
  68. https://www.aaup.org/academe/issues/2009-issues-1/who-are-part-time-faculty
  69. https://www.aaup.org/academe/issues/spring-2023/data-snapshot-tenure-and-contingency-us-higher-education
  70. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/faculty-issues/2023/03/27/contingent-faculty-grad-workers-growing-part-colleges
  71. https://philmagness.com/2015/08/for-profits-community-colleges-and-adjuncting/
  72. https://digitalcommons.umassglobal.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1175&context=edd_dissertations
  73. https://orgtheory.wordpress.com/2016/06/27/the-real-story-behind-the-adjunct-labor-market-in-academia/
  74. https://www.gao.gov/blog/2018/11/14/colleges-and-universities-rely-heavily-on-contingent-faculty
  75. https://edsource.org/2022/adjuncts-often-find-ladder-leads-to-nowhere-in-california-community-colleges/667635
  76. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1064688.pdf
  77. https://universityaffairs.ca/opinion/the-exploitation-trap-of-hope-labour/
  78. https://archives.universityaffairs.ca/opinion/margin-notes/sessional-instructors-what-we-know-so-far/
  79. https://qufa.ca/about/
  80. https://hechingerreport.org/canada-treats-its-adjunct-professors-better-than-the-us-does-and-it-pays-off-for-students/
  81. https://academicpositions.com/career-advice/german-academic-job-titles-explained
  82. https://hr.admin.ox.ac.uk/visitors
  83. https://sulf.se/en/work-salary-and-benefits/fixed-period-employment/fixed-period-employment-in-higher-education/
  84. https://www.hengeler.com/fileadmin/news/BF_Letter/07_FixedTermEmploymentContracts_2013-07.PDF
  85. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/02/the-state-of-academic-careers-in-oecd-countries_dc11b29d/ea9d3108-en.pdf
  86. https://www.ucu.org.uk/article/8032/Greater-security-for-hourly-paid-lecturers-at-University-of-the-Arts
  87. https://www.su.se/old-staff/personnel/2.258/1-general-rules-1.198347
  88. https://www.gew.de/index.php?eID=dumpFile&t=f&f=119032&token=7825416320bf5da05db74eced250f93e02ea8786&sdownload=&n=Fixed-Term-Contracts-Guide-2021-A5-web.pdf
  89. https://jrecin.jst.go.jp/seek/SeekJorDetail?fn=0&ln=1&id=D125011741&ln_jor=1
  90. https://en.nsd.pku.edu.cn/faculty/adjunct/index.htm
  91. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/onkar-singh/professor-of-practice-and-adjunct-faculty/
  92. https://www.alliance.edu.in/faculties/category/visiting-faculty/
  93. https://www.amrita.edu/international/international-adjunct-faculty/
  94. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/07/06/use-casual-adjunct-instructors-spreads-australia
  95. https://melbourne-cshe.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/5165571/Occasional-Paper-Characteristics-of-casual-academic-staff-in-selected-universities-29-Nov-24.pdf
  96. https://www.aut.ac.nz/study/study-options/hospitality-tourism-and-events/research/current-research/adjunct-professors-in-the-school-of-hospitality-and-tourism
  97. https://wenr.wes.org/2023/11/higher-education-privatization-in-south-asia-current-trends-and-future-outlook
  98. https://www.scup.org/resource/adjunct-faculty-can-increase-student-success/
  99. https://www.tiaa.org/content/dam/tiaa/institute/pdf/insights-report/2019-07/tiaa-institute-2018-adjunct-faculty-survey-november-2018.pdf
  100. https://www.interfolio.com/resources/blog/are-adjunct-appointments-harming-higher-ed/
  101. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271930547_Predicting_the_Satisfaction_and_Loyalty_of_Adjunct_Faculty
  102. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1223&context=efl_etds
  103. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1087&context=english_etds
  104. https://users.nber.org/~confer/2003/si2003/papers/ls/bettinger.pdf
  105. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00915521211026677
  106. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343777733_The_Impact_of_Industry_Expert_Adjuncts_on_Students%27_Course_Experiences
  107. https://iacis.org/iis/2018/4_iis_2018_77-86.pdf
  108. https://krex.k-state.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/b2378f19-8a82-4815-979a-7bae1d41fce8/content
  109. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/btl/files/bettinger_long_2010_does_cheaper_mean_better_-_impact_of_using_adjuncts_-_restat.pdf
  110. https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/how-and-why-do-adjunct-instructors-affect-students-academic-outcomes.html
  111. http://www.mariazhu.com/uploads/1/2/5/4/125452305/zhu_eer_revised_2021.pdf
  112. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED518186.pdf
  113. https://www.ccsu.edu/sites/default/files/document/HikelandKean.pdf
  114. https://www.aft.org/news/report-shows-alarming-poverty-among-adjunct-faculty
  115. https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2021/06/22/how-phd-job-crisis-built-system-and-what-can-be-done-about-it-opinion
  116. http://hechingerreport.org/oversupply-phds-threaten-american-science/
  117. https://www.academia.stackexchange.com/questions/14729/why-is-it-that-adjunct-faculty-positions-pay-so-little
  118. https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/phd-problem
  119. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1376716.pdf
  120. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364731807_Effects_of_Part-Time_Faculty_Employment_on_Community_College_Graduation_Rates
  121. https://www.highereddive.com/news/adjunct-instructors-can-cause-lower-grades-for-students/532033/
  122. https://cepa.stanford.edu/content/do-college-instructors-matter-effects-adjuncts-students-interests-and-success
  123. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272775721000959
  124. http://www.nrmera.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/2-Danaei-2019.pdf
  125. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1043951X18301147
  126. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ920734.pdf
  127. https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/easyblog/supporting-adjunct-faculty-advance-student-success.html
  128. https://students.bowdoin.edu/bowdoin-review/features/death-by-a-thousand-emails-how-administrative-bloat-is-killing-american-higher-education/
  129. https://www.nas.org/articles/5_Consequences_of_Administrative_Bloat
  130. https://jamesgmartin.center/2023/12/administrative-bloat-makes-colleges-worse/
  131. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1733&context=jcba
  132. https://www.hunter.cuny.edu/pending-migration/ncscbhep/youve-been-with-the-professors-an-examination-of-higher-education-work-stoppage-data-past-and-present.pdf
  133. http://www.mcdanielfreepress.com/2016/06/11/adjunct-faculty-votes-in-favor-of-union/
  134. https://www.press.jhu.edu/newsroom/why-we-all-should-care-about-unionization-adjunct-faculty-higher-ed
  135. https://www.chronicle.com/article/do-unions-help-adjuncts/
  136. https://ihe.uga.edu/news/stories/2015/organizing-professoriate-faculty-unions-historical-perspective
  137. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/dec/10/part-time-faculty-columbia-college-longest-strike
  138. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2023-06-16-why-colleges-should-pay-attention-to-strikes-by-their-most-precarious-teachers
  139. https://thefora.org/index.php?topic=3221.0
  140. https://www.aft.org/news/aft-report-pandemic-intensified-job-insecurity-adjuncts
  141. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2022/02/24/survey-adjuncts-finds-pandemic-made-their-situation-worse
  142. https://www.highereddive.com/news/aft-pandemic-worsened-adjunct-facultys-struggles-with-low-wages-job-inse/619637/
  143. https://hechingerreport.org/as-adjuncts-unionize-for-better-wages-and-benefits-some-college-costs-could-rise/
  144. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1314&context=jcba
  145. https://www.reddit.com/r/Adjuncts/comments/11aml6v/whats_with_antiunion_sentiment_along_adjuncts/
  146. https://www.quora.com/Are-college-professors-protected-by-labor-unions
  147. https://crookedtimber.org/2013/12/05/when-professors-oppose-unions/
  148. https://uscatholic.org/articles/201904/despite-catholic-social-teaching-not-all-universities-welcome-adjunct-faculty-unions/
  149. https://www.californiaworkplacelawblog.com/2020/09/articles/wage-and-hour/ab-736-expands-professional-exemption/
  150. https://natlawreview.com/article/ab-736-expands-professional-exemption
  151. https://www.scufacultyunited.org/the-union-difference
  152. https://psc-cuny.org/clarion/2019/november/explaining-adjunct-raises/
  153. https://edsource.org/2022/health-care-benefits-key-battleground-for-californias-adjunct-community-college-faculty/667378
  154. https://cluecho.com/17595/news/ab-736-makes-it-impossible-for-clu-to-make-adjuncts-salaried-employees/
  155. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/01/05/study-looks-impact-adjunct-hiring-college-spending-patterns
  156. https://edsource.org/2024/undoing-overreliance-on-part-time-faculty-could-reverse-decline-of-california-community-colleges/710803
  157. https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/2021-06/Cost-Savings-or-Cost-Shifting-Contingent-Faculty-November-2016.pdf
  158. https://research.com/software/best-online-teaching-platforms
  159. https://buildfire.com/udemy-alternatives-for-instructors/
  160. https://www.ecampusnews.com/campus-leadership/2024/12/16/what-trends-will-higher-ed-embrace/
  161. https://generalassemb.ly/blog/how-coding-bootcamps-are-changing-the-job-market/
  162. https://www.bestcolleges.com/news/rise-and-fall-of-coding-bootcamps/
  163. https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/learning-with-their-feet-student-enrollment-trends-in-postsecondary-education-by-college-quality/
  164. https://www.edvisorly.com/university-insights/enrollment-cliff
  165. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/public-sector/2025-us-higher-education-trends.html
  166. https://www.highereddive.com/news/6-higher-education-trends-to-watch-in-2025/736866/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.