Hubbry Logo
Medi-CalMedi-CalMain
Open search
Medi-Cal
Community hub
Medi-Cal
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Medi-Cal
Medi-Cal
Medi-Cal
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The California Medical Assistance Program (Medi-Cal or MediCal) is the California implementation of the federal Medicaid program serving low-income individuals, including families, seniors, persons with disabilities, children in foster care, pregnant women, and childless adults with incomes below 138% of federal poverty level. Benefits include ambulatory patient services, emergency services, hospitalization, maternity and newborn care, mental health and substance use disorder treatment, dental (Denti-Cal), vision, and long-term care and support.[1] Medi-Cal was created in 1965 by the California Medical Assistance Program a few months after the national legislation was passed.[2] Approximately 15.28 million people were enrolled in Medi-Cal as of September 2022,[3] or about 40% of California's population; in most counties, more than half of eligible residents were enrolled as of 2020.[4] As of 2025, about 56% of children in California use the program.[5]

Eligibility

[edit]

Medi-Cal provides health coverage for people with low income and limited ability to pay for health coverage, including the aged, blind, disabled, young adults and children, pregnant women, persons in a skilled nursing or intermediate care home, and persons in the Breast and Cervical Cancer Treatment Program (BCCTP).[6][7][8] People receiving federally funded cash assistance programs, such as CalWORKs (a state implementation of the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program), the State Supplementation Program (SSP) (a state supplement to the federal Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program), foster care, adoption assistance, certain refugee assistance programs, or In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) are also eligible.[6][8]

Until January 1, 2024, when asset limits for Medi-Cal were abolished in favor of income limits, Medi-Cal imposed asset limits on certain prospective enrollees.[9] Medi-Cal individuals who received long-term supportive services or who enroll in Medi-Cal through certain disabilities were subject to asset tests. This limit depended on the number of individuals being considered for coverage; for one enrollee, this limit was $2,000, while for two enrollees, the limit was $3,000.[10] Each additional individual being considered resulted in an additional $150 of permitted assets, up to a total of ten individuals covered. If applicants possessed property whose total value exceeded the allowed amount, they were required to reduce ("sell down") their assets through activities such as purchasing clothes, purchasing home furnishings, paying medical bills, paying a home mortgage, paying home loans, and paying off other debts.[10]

Beginning in 2014 under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), those with family incomes up to 138% of the federal poverty level became eligible for Medi-Cal (pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(10)(A)(i)(VIII)), and individuals with higher incomes and some small businesses may choose a plan in Covered California, California's health insurance marketplace, with potential government subsidies.[11][12] Medi-Cal has open enrollment year-round.

Lawful permanent residents (green card holders) are eligible for full-scope Medi-Cal in California regardless of their date of entry if they meet all other eligibility requirements, even if they have been in the United States for less than 5 years. Beginning in 2024, people without a lawful immigration status who meet the requirements for Medi-Cal are eligible for full-scope Medi-Cal.[13] Previously, meeting eligibility requirements other than immigration status qualified them restricted-scope Medi-Cal limited to emergency and pregnancy-related services only[14] unless they qualified for the Young Adult Expansion (YAE) or Older Adult Expansion (OAE), which allowed individuals ages 19–26 or those over the age of 50 full-scope benefits regardless of immigration status.[15][16]

Application process

[edit]

There are multiple ways to apply for Medi-Cal: one can apply at a Social Services office or over the phone by calling your nearest social service office, or one can apply online (the most common). Most websites make the application process clear and cohesive. They also allow for the user to select different languages to best navigate the website.

Individuals in need of Medi-Cal often need help with their use of the online application process and face barriers, including[17]

  • Rejection of applications due to insufficient explanation
  • Repeated requests for additional documentation throughout the application process
  • Unclear next steps and transitions in the application process, both for applications submitted directly to Medi-Cal and those initiated through Covered California
  • Difficulty accessing support and personalized assistance, including in-language help and resources for Spanish- and Mandarin-speaking applicants
  • Challenges in navigating Medi-Cal eligibility and enrollment during significant life transitions, such as aging out of foster care, transitioning off a parent’s health insurance plan, giving birth, getting a divorce, or losing or gaining employer-sponsored insurance.
  • Sometimes, individuals don’t have access to the internet or experience confusion.

Online applications seem to pose difficulty for those who aren’t tech-savvy. People can apply in-person or over the phone to avoid such confusion.[18]

Benefits

[edit]

Medi-Cal health benefits include ambulatory patient services, emergency services, hospitalization, maternity and newborn care, mental health and substance use disorder treatment, dental (Denti-Cal), vision, and long-term care and supports.[1] California is one of a few US states that provide Medicaid dental benefits to adults.[19]

A patchwork of supplemental programs has grown up to fill in some of the gaps, including Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC), a designation that refers to hundreds of health clinics and systems that operate in underserved, low-income and uninsured communities.

Administration

[edit]

Medi-Cal fee for service

[edit]

As of December 2022, 2.2 million people were enrolled in Medi-Cal fee-for-service, representing about 14.5% of all enrollees.[3] In the fee-for-service arrangement, health care providers submit claims to the Medi-Cal program for services rendered.[20]

Medi-Cal managed care

[edit]

Most beneficiaries receive Medi-Cal benefits from contracted Medicaid managed care organizations (MCOs). As of January 2018, 10.8 million people were enrolled in a Medi-Cal managed care plan, representing about 81% of all enrollees.[21]

California has several models of managed care which are designated at the county level:[22]

  • a County Organized Health System (COHS) model, with one health plan per county,
  • a "two plan model" with one community health plan and one commercial health plan in the county,
  • a geographic managed care model with multiple plans per county,
  • a regional managed care model with 1-2 commercial health plans in many counties,
  • and unique one-county models in San Benito, Imperial counties and the bi-county plan "CenCal Health" in San Luís Obispo and Santa Barbara.

In Denti-Cal, the majority of beneficiaries are covered through fee-for-service arrangements, where the state pays dentists directly for services, instead of the managed care model.[19] However, more than 879,000 Denti-Cal enrollees do receive dental care through managed care plans started as experimental alternatives in the 1990s: in Los Angeles County where managed care plans are optional for beneficiaries, and in Sacramento County where they are mandatory.[19] Eleven counties had no Denti-Cal providers or no providers willing to accept new child patients covered by Denti-Cal: Del Norte, Tehama, Yuba, Sierra, Nevada, Amador, Calaveras, Alpine, Mariposa, Mono and Inyo counties.[19] Delta Dental, operating in the same building as DHCS' Denti-Cal division, enrolls dentists into DentiCal, processes claims by dentists, pays dentists and authorizes treatments, and also handles customer service operations and outreach.[19]

Bridge to Reform waiver

[edit]

In 2011, CMS approved a Section 1115 Medicaid waiver called Bridge to Reform. The program included an expansion of the patient-centered medical home primary care approach,[23] an expansion of coverage with the Low Income Health Program (LIHP), and incentive pay-for-performance to hospitals via the Delivery System Reform Incentive Pool (DSRIP).[24] It also made enrollment in managed care plans (as opposed to fee-for-service programs) mandatory for people with disabilities with the intention of improving care coordination and reducing costs.[25] The DSRIP program showed improvements in quality of care and population health, with less improvement in cost of care.[26]

Renewal of the waiver in 2015 extended the program to 2020 in an initiative called Medi-Cal 2020,[27] with additional programs including additional alternative payment systems, the Dental Transformation Initiative, and the Whole Person Care program focused on high-risk, high-utilizing recipients.[28] In the negotiation with CMS, several proposals were dropped.[29]

Contractual requirements

[edit]

Medi-Cal enforces requirements on MCOs with contracts, with boilerplate versions posted online;[30] these contracts the primary way that the state affects the operations, quality, and coverage of managed care plans.[31] In 2005, the California Health Care Foundation recommend various steps to improve the plans, which resulted in some changes to the contracts.[31]

Government agencies

[edit]

Medi-Cal is jointly administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), while the county welfare department in each of the 58 counties is responsible for local administration of the Medi-Cal program.[32][33] C4Yourself and CalWIN are statewide online application systems that allows you to apply for benefits.[34][35]

Law

[edit]

Federal law mostly consists of the Social Security Amendments of 1965 which added Title XIX to the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.), and related California law mostly consists of California Welfare and Institutions Code (WIC) Division 9, Part 3, Chapter 7 (WIC § 14000 et seq.). Federal regulations are mostly found in Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 42, Chapter IV, Subchapter C (42 CFR 430 et seq.); while California's regulations are contained in California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22, Division 3 (22 CCR § 50005).

Costs

[edit]

Medi-Cal costs are estimated at $73.9 billion ($16.9 billion in state funds) in 2014–15. For comparison, the entire California state budget in 2014-2015 is $156 billion, of which about $108 billion was general funds (not allocated for special expenditures, such as bonds).[37]

[edit]

Long-Term Care Partnership

[edit]

The Long-Term Care Partnership Program is a public-private partnership between states and private insurance companies, designed to reduce Medicaid expenditures by delaying or eliminating the need for some people to rely on Medicaid to pay for long-term care services. To encourage the purchase of private partnership policies, long-term care insurance policyholders are allowed to protect some or all of their assets from Medicaid spend-down requirements during the eligibility determination process, but they still must meet income requirements.[38] The California Partnership for Long-Term Care Program links Medi-Cal and the In-Home Supportive Services program, i.e., private long-term care insurance and health care service plan contracts that cover long-term care for aged, blind, or disabled persons.[39]

Covered California

[edit]
Main article: Covered California

Covered California is the health insurance marketplace in California, the state's implementation of the American Health Benefit Exchange provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

Indigent health programs

[edit]
Further information: Welfare in California § Indigent programs

Since 1933, California law has required counties to provide relief to the poor, including health care services and general assistance.[40] County indigent medical programs can be categorized as California Medical Service Program (CMSP) and Medically Indigent Service Program (MISP) counties.[41] There are 34 CMSP counties and 24 MISP counties. The CMSP county programs are largely managed by the state, whereas MISP counties manage their own programs with their own rules and regulations. Many patients from both the CMSP and MISP county programs transitioned to Medi-Cal when the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act took effect in 2014.[42]

IHSS

[edit]

IHSS is a Medi-Cal program.[43] IHSS offers home care services to eligible people over the age of 65, the blind, and/or disabled as an alternative to out-of-home care in California.[44]

Quality of care metrics

[edit]

Medi-Cal reports quality metrics, broadly similar to the HEDIS metrics from the NCQA.

In 2017, it reported on 13 of the 20 frequently reported from the CMS Medicaid/CHIP Child Core Set and 15 of 19 frequently reported from the CMS Medicaid Adult Core Set.[45]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Medi-Cal

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Medi-Cal is California's state-administered Medicaid program, enacted in 1966 shortly after the federal program's creation under the Social Security Amendments of 1965, to furnish health care services—including physician visits, hospital stays, prescription drugs, and long-term care—to eligible low-income individuals, families, children, pregnant women, the elderly, and people with disabilities. The program, overseen by the Department of Health Care Services, enrolls roughly 15 million beneficiaries as of 2025, covering about one-third of California's population through a mix of fee-for-service and managed care plans, with the latter dominating to control costs via capitated payments to health plans. Jointly funded by federal matching dollars (typically 50% or more) and state general funds, Medi-Cal expenditures have ballooned to over $140 billion annually in total outlays by the mid-2020s, driven by expansions under the Affordable Care Act, inclusion of undocumented immigrants regardless of status since 2024, and rising pharmacy and provider reimbursement costs, prompting recurrent budget shortfalls exceeding $6 billion in state fiscal years. While it has markedly increased access to care for vulnerable groups, reducing uncompensated hospital burdens, the program grapples with persistent fraud—such as inflated billing for unprovided services leading to multimillion-dollar settlements—and access barriers like provider shortages and long wait times in managed care networks, amid critiques that unchecked growth incentivizes dependency and strains fiscal resources without commensurate health outcome improvements.

History

Establishment and Initial Implementation (1966–1990s)

Medi-Cal, California's implementation of the federal program, was established through the California Medical Assistance Program, enacted in response to Title XIX of the , which created nationwide. Governor Edmund G. "Pat" Brown signed the state legislation, making Medi-Cal effective on March 1, 1966, with services beginning shortly thereafter to provide health coverage for low-income residents. In its inaugural year, the program enrolled an average of 1,181,053 individuals, representing approximately 6% of 's population, primarily those qualifying through cash welfare assistance categories such as Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), Old Age Assistance, Aid to the Blind, and Aid to the Totally Disabled. Initial eligibility was strictly limited to individuals receiving categorical cash aid, with and asset tests aligned to federal guidelines, excluding most adults without dependents unless they met medically needy criteria in later adjustments. Benefits encompassed mandatory services including inpatient and outpatient care, physician services, and services, and early periodic screening for children, funded jointly by federal and state contributions at a matching rate initially around 50% for . Administration fell to county welfare departments for eligibility determinations, with the state overseeing provider payments through a model, though fiscal pressures soon prompted early cost-control efforts. Enrollment expanded gradually amid economic fluctuations and policy tweaks, reaching 2,174,486 beneficiaries by 1970 (11% of the population) and 2,920,719 by 1980 (12%), driven by recessions increasing welfare rolls and minor state expansions for the medically needy. Under (1967–1975), implementation included reimbursement limits and provider fee reductions to curb rising costs, while marked the introduction of California's first Medi-Cal plans in select counties to promote efficiency. By 1982, selective contracting was implemented to negotiate lower rates, and the 1980s saw federal mandates expand coverage to more pregnant women and children, boosting enrollment to 3,745,552 by 1990 (13% of the population). These developments reflected Medi-Cal's evolution from a welfare-tied safety net to a broader mechanism, though persistent funding debates highlighted tensions between access and fiscal restraint.

Major Expansions and Reforms (2000s–Present)

In the early , Medi-Cal enrollment grew modestly from approximately 6 million beneficiaries in 2000 to about 6.5 million by 2005, driven by economic downturns increasing eligibility alongside incremental expansions for specific groups such as children and pregnant women, though the program grappled with rising costs exceeding $25 billion annually by mid-decade. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's administration responded with the 2005 Medi-Cal Redesign initiative, which aimed to curb expenditures projected to reach $32 billion by 2006 through measures including expanded enrollment in plans—covering over 50% of beneficiaries by 2006—fee schedule freezes for providers, enhanced fraud detection, and restructured services to prioritize home-based options over institutional care. These reforms, enacted via state legislation amid a $6 billion deficit, sought to sustain coverage without broad eligibility cuts, though critics argued they shifted burdens to providers via reduced reimbursements averaging 20-30% below Medicare rates. By 2010, facing ongoing fiscal strains and anticipating federal health reform, secured a federal Section 1115 known as "Bridge to Reform," approved on November 19, 2010, which facilitated early expansions and delivery system innovations ahead of the (ACA). The enabled the creation of Low-Income Health Programs (LIHPs) in 14 counties, providing coverage to roughly 800,000 uninsured adults with incomes up to 133% of the federal poverty level (FPL) starting in 2011, funded by a combination of state general funds, federal matching, and local provider taxes; it also piloted accountable care organizations and quality-based payments to improve outcomes in chronic disease management. This bridged to the ACA's expansion, which fully adopted via Senate Bill 2 (2013), extending full-scope Medi-Cal to adults aged 19-64 with incomes up to 138% FPL effective January 1, 2014, without dependent children—a population previously ineligible except during brief 2005-2009 pilots that covered up to 1.6 million before recessionary cutbacks. The ACA expansion propelled Medi-Cal enrollment from 7.5 million in 2013 to over 10 million by , with federal funding covering 100% of costs for new enrollees through , tapering to 90% thereafter, though state costs rose to $20 billion annually by amid debates over long-term sustainability given per-enrollee expenditures averaging $5,000-$6,000 yearly for expansion adults. Subsequent reforms under Governor (2011-2019) emphasized penetration, reaching 85% of enrollees by , and integration of physical and behavioral health services, while addressing provider shortages through targeted reimbursements for physicians aligned with Medicare rates during 2013-2015. These changes, informed by waiver evaluations showing improved access metrics like reduced emergency department reliance by 8-10% in pilot areas, positioned Medi-Cal as one of the nation's largest payers, serving nearly one-third of Californians by 2020.

Post-ACA Transformations and CalAIM Initiative

Following the enactment of the (ACA) in 2010, opted into the expansion provision, extending Medi-Cal eligibility to low-income adults aged 19–64 with incomes up to 138% of the federal poverty level (FPL), regardless of parental status, effective January 1, 2014. This expansion targeted previously uncovered childless adults, leading to a surge in enrollment; Medi-Cal's total enrollees grew from approximately 7.5 million in 2013 to over 12 million by 2020, with the adult expansion population accounting for much of the increase among those under 65. Post-expansion transformations included a accelerated shift to models, where by 2017 over 90% of Medi-Cal beneficiaries were enrolled in managed care plans, emphasizing coordinated care and cost containment amid rising caseloads. These changes built on pre-ACA pilots but intensified under the ACA's financial incentives, which covered 100% of expansion costs initially, tapering to 90% by 2020. Enrollment uptake among eligible adults reached 67.8% in 2014 and 87.6% by 2015, facilitated by streamlined applications via and reduced administrative barriers. However, challenges emerged, including provider network adequacy strains and higher utilization rates among new enrollees, prompting further reforms in service integration and preventive care emphasis. The California Advancing and Innovating Medi-Cal (CalAIM) initiative, launched by the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) on January 1, 2022, represents a cornerstone of post-ACA evolution, aiming to overhaul through multi-year delivery system, program, and payment reforms phased in until 2027. CalAIM's three primary goals are to better identify and manage member risks via whole-person care addressing ; improve care coordination across physical, behavioral, and social services; and establish an equitable, sustainable system reducing institutionalization and . Key CalAIM components include Enhanced Care Management (ECM), providing intensive case management for high-needs individuals with conditions like or , and Community Supports such as housing navigation services reimbursable under Medi-Cal. Additional initiatives target justice-involved populations for reentry support and behavioral health integration, with initial implementations like ECM and certain supports rolling out statewide in 2022 for voluntary enrollees. By 2023, participation had expanded, though implementation hurdles such as provider capacity and data interoperability persist, as noted in DHCS evaluations. CalAIM leverages federal Section 1115 waiver authorities to enable non-medical services, positioning Medi-Cal as a model for addressing upstream factors like housing instability, which correlate with 20–30% of health outcomes in vulnerable populations.

Eligibility and Enrollment

Eligibility Criteria and Categories

Medi-Cal eligibility requires individuals to be residents, possess eligible status (such as U.S. , , or qualified immigrant status under ), and meet thresholds tied to the federal level (FPL), which vary by category. Through December 31, 2025, determinations rely solely on without asset tests, a temporary suspension enacted during the emergency and extended. Categories are divided into Modified (MAGI)-based groups, which use IRS-aligned calculations ( plus nontaxable Social Security benefits and tax-exempt interest), and non-MAGI groups for aged, blind, or disabled populations. Priority follows a federal , assigning individuals to the highest-eligible group first, such as former foster youth over general adults. MAGI-based categories cover most non-elderly, non-disabled applicants and emphasize family composition and age. Children under 19 qualify with household up to 266% FPL generally, though limits reach 317% FPL for infants under 1 year and include continuous 12-month coverage regardless of income changes. Pregnant women access coverage up to 213% FPL under rules, extending through pregnancy and 60 days postpartum, or up to 322% FPL via the Medi-Cal Access Program (MCAP) for those exceeding standard limits but with limited pregnancy-related services. Parents and caretaker relatives of dependent children qualify with up to 138% FPL, aligning with expansion parameters, while childless adults aged 19-64 also fall under this 138% threshold ($21,597 annually for an individual in 2025). Former foster youth aged 18-26 receive full-scope coverage without income limits if they aged out of care. Non-MAGI categories apply to aged (65+), blind, or individuals, using countable income after deductions for work expenses, premiums, and impairments. Eligibility often links to (SSI) receipt, providing automatic enrollment for SSI/SSP beneficiaries whose federal benefit is $943 monthly in 2025, supplemented by state payments varying by living arrangement. The Aged, Blind, and Federal Level (ABD FPL) program covers those with countable income up to 100% FPL ($15,650 annually for an individual in 2025) who do not qualify for SSI, with defined per criteria (inability to engage in substantial gainful activity due to impairment lasting 12+ months). Working individuals may access up to 250% FPL under specific programs. Medically needy pathways exist for those exceeding income limits, where high medical expenses enable eligibility through a spend-down mechanism that reduces countable income below thresholds; in the Medically Needy program for community (non-institutional) settings, when only one spouse is eligible and the couple lives together, the share of cost (SOC) is calculated using the combined countable monthly income of both spouses (including the ineligible spouse's income) minus the maintenance need level for a couple ($934 per month as of recent years; individual level is $600). The resulting positive amount is the monthly SOC the eligible spouse must pay toward medical bills before Medi-Cal covers the remainder. Long-term care cases follow separate spousal impoverishment rules with income allowances for the community spouse. Maintenance need levels should be verified with the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) as they may adjust.
CategoryIncome MethodologyTypical Limit (% FPL, 2025)Key Qualifications
Children (under 19)133–317% (higher for infants)Household includes child; continuous coverage
Pregnant Women/MCAPUp to 213% (322% MCAP)Pregnancy-related; postpartum extension
Adults 19–64 (parents or childless)138%No dependent children for expansion group
Aged/Blind/DisabledNon- (countable after deductions)100% (or SSI levels; up to 250% working disabled)SSA disability definition; SSI linkage
Special groups include refugees, recipients needing institutional or home-based services (with income up to 300% SSI for waivers), and medically fragile children under California Children's Services up to 600% FPL for targeted treatments. All categories exclude undocumented immigrants from full-scope benefits, though emergency services are available regardless of status.

Application Process and Verification

Applications for Medi-Cal can be submitted year-round through the online BenefitsCal portal, by mailing a downloadable form available in multiple languages, by phone, or in person at local social services offices. Applicants must provide information on household composition, income, residency in , citizenship or immigration status, and other factors relevant to eligibility categories. County eligibility workers or the state's automated system initially screen applications to determine potential qualification under Modified (MAGI) rules or non-MAGI programs for groups like the aged, blind, or disabled. Verification prioritizes electronic data matches over paper documents to streamline processing, particularly for MAGI eligibility covering most children, pregnant individuals, and expansion adults up to 138% of the federal poverty level. Self-attestation is accepted upfront for income, household size, and residency, followed by cross-checks against federal and state databases including IRS tax returns, records for , and the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program for non-citizens. Income data is deemed reasonably compatible if it falls within 10% of attested amounts as of June 2024; discrepancies trigger requests for explanations or supporting documents like wage statements before denying eligibility. Residency is verified via state systems like the California Health Eligibility and Enrollment Resource System (CalHEERS); unresolvable cases rely on self-attestation. Non-MAGI verification is more document-intensive, requiring proof of assets (e.g., statements, deeds) not applicable under MAGI rules, as well as medical evidence for claims processed through Social Security or state determinations. Citizenship and identity must be verified electronically via SSA or SAVE, with mandatory paper submission (e.g., passports, birth certificates) if matches fail. Applicants in these categories face ex-parte reviews ensuring all resources are within 90 days of the application date. Standard processing timelines mandate decisions within 45 days for non- applications and 90 days if evaluation is needed, though counties may request additional verification extending this if applicants fail to respond promptly. Notices of approval, denial, or pending status are sent, with denials appealable through county fair hearings; temporary coverage may be available for pending cases via county offices. Post-enrollment reverification occurs annually or upon reported changes, using similar electronic methods to maintain accuracy.

Enrollment Trends and Post-Pandemic Redeterminations

Medi-Cal enrollment grew substantially during the under the federal continuous coverage requirement enacted via the , which halted routine eligibility redeterminations and disenrollments in exchange for enhanced federal funding. Prior to the pandemic, enrollment stood at approximately 12.6 million in early 2020. This figure rose steadily as economic disruptions increased eligibility, reaching a peak of about 15.8 million by March 2023, reflecting a nearly 25% increase driven by job losses, expanded , and the suspension of verification processes. By May 2023, immediately before redeterminations resumed, certified eligibles totaled 15,973,004. Post-pandemic redeterminations, or "unwinding," commenced on April 1, 2023, following the end of the public health emergency, requiring to verify eligibility for its entire caseload within a 14-month federal deadline. The state processed nearly 11 million renewals, leading to approximately 2 million disenrollments by mid-2025. Initial waves saw rapid losses, with 225,000 disenrolled by July 1, 2023, and cumulative figures exceeding 1.8 million by late 2023 after adjustments for appeals and data updates. Disenrollments varied by category, with higher rates among adults due to income fluctuations and lower among children, who retained broader eligibility pathways. A large share of disenrollments—estimated at 85.2% from June 2023 to July 2024—stemmed from procedural issues, such as enrollees failing to respond to renewal notices or provide required documentation, rather than confirmed ineligibility based on income or residency. This pattern aligns with national trends, where about one-third of processed cases nationwide resulted in termination, often exacerbated by administrative burdens and outreach challenges. California implemented flexibilities, including auto-renewals for data-matched cases and extended response periods, to mitigate losses among eligible individuals, but coverage gaps persisted for some due to transitions to marketplace plans or uninsurance. By December 2024, enrollment had stabilized at roughly 14.9 million, down from the peak but 2.3 million above pre- levels, sustained by state expansions like full-scope coverage for undocumented adults implemented in 2024. As of July 2024, nearly 15 million remained enrolled, with ongoing monthly renewals and fiscal pressures from higher-than-expected caseloads contributing to budget shortfalls. These trends underscore the tension between maintaining access for eligible populations and ensuring fiscal sustainability through accurate eligibility verification.

Benefits and Coverage

Core Covered Services

Medi-Cal is required by federal law to cover a specified set of mandatory benefits to receive federal financial participation, forming the foundation of its service package for eligible beneficiaries. These core services focus on essential medical needs, with coverage determined by medical necessity and delivered through or arrangements. The mandatory core covered services include:
  • Inpatient and outpatient hospital services, encompassing acute care, surgical procedures, and emergency treatment to address serious illnesses and injuries.
  • Physician services, provided by licensed medical doctors for diagnosis, treatment, and preventive care, including primary and specialist consultations.
  • Nursing facility services for individuals aged 21 and older, covering room, board, and skilled nursing care in certified facilities for those requiring long-term custodial or rehabilitative support.
  • Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment (EPSDT) services for beneficiaries under 21, which mandate comprehensive screenings, vision, dental, and hearing services, plus any medically necessary treatments without typical federal benefit limits.
  • Laboratory and X-ray services, including diagnostic tests, imaging, and pathology to support accurate medical evaluation and monitoring.
  • Family planning services and supplies, such as contraceptives, counseling, and sterilization procedures (with required waiting periods and counseling), available without copayments.
  • Federally qualified health center (FQHC) and rural health clinic (RHC) services, delivered at prospective payment system rates to ensure access in underserved areas.
  • Home health services, limited to part-time or intermittent skilled nursing, therapy, and aide care for homebound patients when institutionalization is not required.
  • Nurse-midwife services for prenatal, delivery, and postpartum care, promoting access to non-physician providers.
  • Certified nurse practitioner services, including pediatric and family practitioners for primary care and specialized pediatric needs.
  • Non-emergency medical transportation (NEMT) to ensure access to covered services, arranged through county or plan mechanisms.
These services are provided without in emergencies and must meet federal standards for quality and accessibility, though state-specific rules govern and provider participation. For expansion adults under the , coverage aligns with essential health benefits benchmarked to state plan services, reinforcing the core package.

Optional and Enhanced Benefits

Medi-Cal includes a variety of optional benefits beyond the federally mandated services, which states may elect to provide under guidelines. These encompass dental services for adults (beyond emergency care), optometric and ophthalmic services, chiropractic care, , , , speech therapy, , and non-emergency medical transportation. Prescription drugs represent another key optional benefit, with Medi-Cal covering a formulary of medications subject to for certain therapies. These services aim to address preventive, rehabilitative, and chronic care needs, though coverage levels and prior authorizations vary by service to manage costs. Historically, fiscal pressures have led to temporary reductions in optional benefits; for instance, in , eliminated coverage for , adult dental (non-emergency), , incontinence supplies, and psychological services due to budget shortfalls under Assembly Bill X3 5. Subsequent restorations occurred, with adult dental benefits reinstated effective January 1, 2010, for emergency services and expanded thereafter, reflecting state priorities to mitigate access gaps despite ongoing budgetary debates. Such adjustments underscore the optional nature of these benefits, where state decisions balance federal against fiscal constraints. Enhanced benefits in Medi-Cal extend beyond traditional optional services through targeted initiatives, notably the California Advancing and Innovating Medi-Cal (CalAIM) framework, implemented statewide starting January 1, 2022, via a Section 1115 waiver. A primary enhancement is Enhanced Care Management (ECM), a person-centered service for members with complex needs, including , severe mental illness, or high utilization; it provides up to 12 months of intensive coordination by a lead care manager, focusing on care transitions, housing navigation, and social supports. ECM eligibility targets subgroups like those experiencing aging out or frequent hospitalizations, with services delivered by plans to reduce institutionalization. Complementing ECM, CalAIM's Community Supports (CS) introduce optional, non-medical interventions as "in lieu of" traditional services, such as medically tailored meals for nutrition insecurity, sobering centers for substance use recovery, recuperative care post-hospitalization, and reentry services for justice-involved individuals. These enhancements, funded through federal dollars with state oversight, aim to integrate social determinants into care delivery, though implementation varies by county and plan, with evaluations tracking outcomes like reduced visits. As of 2025, CalAIM expansions continue to phase in additional supports, prioritizing equity for underserved populations without supplanting core benefits.

Exclusions, Limitations, and Cost-Sharing

Medi-Cal excludes coverage for services deemed non-medically necessary or outside the program's scope, such as experimental or investigational procedures, cosmetic surgery unless required for trauma, congenital defects, or disease-related disfigurement, personal comfort items, treatments, non-medically necessary home or vehicle modifications, private-duty nursing except when deemed essential, circumcisions for individuals over 31 days old unless medically indicated, custodial care, and chronic for Medicare-eligible beneficiaries. Additional exclusions encompass non-ACIP/CDC-recommended vaccines, protective or cosmetic eyeglasses, and progressive lenses beyond basic needs. Coverage limitations apply to ensure services align with medical necessity and program guidelines; all benefits must be provided by participating providers and, in settings, coordinated through a provider except for emergencies, , nurse , or services. care is restricted to terminally ill enrollees with a of six months or less to live, while newborn coverage post-delivery is limited to the birth month plus one additional month if not yet enrolled in Medi-Cal. Certain therapies face quantity caps, including a maximum of two visits per calendar month for speech therapy, , , , care, or among adults, though children under 21 are exempt from these visit limits. Medi-Cal imposes no premiums on enrollees and eliminated nominal copayments for covered services effective July 1, 2022, to reduce access barriers and comply with federal regulations without requiring costly tracking systems, as copayments were previously non-enforceable and not retained by the state. However, certain non-MAGI enrollees—typically those with incomes exceeding maintenance need levels, such as $1,801 monthly for an individual or $2,433 for a couple as of April 1, 2025—face a share-of-cost (SOC) requirement, functioning as a monthly where beneficiaries must cover the first specified amount of medical expenses before Medi-Cal reimburses remaining eligible costs, with the SOC recalculated monthly based on countable income minus standard deductions. Exemptions from SOC apply to MAGI-based eligibility groups, children, pregnant individuals, and those in institutional settings, while proposed federal changes in the 2025 reconciliation bill could introduce up to $35 per-service cost-sharing for expansion adults at 100-138% of the federal poverty level starting potentially in 2028, though these remain pending enactment as of October 2025.

Administration and Delivery

Organizational Structure and Oversight

The Medi-Cal program is administered by the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), established as the single state agency under federal statutes to oversee program operations, policy development, and financing. DHCS operates under the executive branch of the state government, with its director appointed by the and subject to confirmation; the agency reports directly to the Governor's office while coordinating with the California Health and Human Services Agency for broader health policy alignment. Internally, DHCS is structured around a Director's Office that sets strategic direction, supported by divisions including Medi-Cal Policy for benefit design and waivers, Operations for contracting and oversight of health plans, Eligibility and Enrollment for verification processes, and specialized units for behavioral health, fiscal intermediary services, and information systems. Federal oversight is primarily exercised by the within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which approves California's Medicaid State Plan, waivers (such as those under Section 1115 for initiatives like CalAIM), and amendments to ensure adherence to federal eligibility, coverage, and fiscal rules. CMS conducts audits, monitors compliance through data reporting requirements, and can withhold federal for non-compliance, as demonstrated in recent guidance on state-directed payments and eligibility verification to curb improper enrollments. At the state level, the provides legislative oversight through annual budget appropriations—totaling over $140 billion in state and federal funds for fiscal year 2024-25—and statutory changes to program scope, such as recent reductions enacted in the 2025-26 budget cycle amid cost overruns exceeding projections by billions. The Legislature's Joint Legislative Budget Committee and committees review DHCS proposals and performance metrics, while counties serve as local administrative agents for eligibility determinations and claims processing under DHCS delegation, reimbursed via the County-Based Medi-Cal Administrative Activities program since 1995. DHCS maintains internal quality and accountability mechanisms, including a Comprehensive Quality Strategy that outlines monitoring of plans and providers, though federal and state auditors have highlighted ongoing challenges in detection and cost controls.

Fee-for-Service Model

In the Medi-Cal fee-for-service (FFS) model, the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) reimburses enrolled providers directly for each covered service delivered to eligible beneficiaries, without intermediary managed care organizations bearing financial risk. This contrasts with capitation-based managed care, where plans receive fixed payments per enrollee regardless of service volume; in FFS, beneficiaries have direct access to any enrolled Medi-Cal provider, including specialists, without a gatekeeper or prior authorization for most specialist visits, unlike managed care plans which typically require referrals. In the fee-for-service model, also known as straight Medi-Cal, referrals from a primary care physician are not required to access specialists. However, selecting a primary care physician is recommended for ongoing care coordination, preventive services, and situations where a referral may facilitate access or streamline treatment. FFS applies primarily to beneficiaries exempt from mandatory managed care enrollment, such as certain foster youth, American Indians/Alaska Natives opting out, and those in counties without full managed care penetration, though recent expansions have shifted most enrollees—over 83% as of 2021—into managed care plans. Reimbursement rates under FFS are set by DHCS and updated monthly as maximum allowable amounts, varying by service type; for instance, behavioral health fee schedules for fiscal year 2025-26 specify rates for mental health plan reimbursements. Providers bill through the state's fiscal intermediary, with some facing a 5% payment reduction as of June 2024, excluding certain exempt services and facilities. Pharmacy benefits, carved out from managed care since January 2022 under the Medi-Cal Rx program, operate via FFS administration to centralize drug utilization review and cost controls, processing claims for over 13 million enrollees statewide. DHCS oversees FFS operations, including provider enrollment, claims , and access monitoring, with requirements for providers to update directories by July 1, 2025, to enhance transparency. FFS accounts for a notable share of program expenditures, though exact proportions fluctuate with enrollment shifts; for example, mandatory transitions from FFS to for non-exempt adults began January 1, 2023, reducing FFS reliance. This model incentivizes service volume over coordination, potentially contributing to higher utilization costs compared to , as evidenced by national analyses showing FFS's fee-per-service structure lacks built-in incentives for preventive care efficiency.

Managed Care Dominance and Contracts

has become the predominant delivery model for Medi-Cal services, with 86% of enrollees participating in one of six models as of 2022. This shift accelerated in the through legislative expansions, such as Assembly Bill 360 in 1991, which mandated enrollment in select counties to control costs and improve care coordination amid rising caseloads. By contrast, remains limited to initial enrollment periods, specific populations like recipients, and certain rural or specialized services, allowing direct access to any enrolled Medi-Cal provider, including specialists, without a gatekeeper or prior authorization for most visits, unlike managed care plans which typically require referrals from primary care providers, comprising roughly 14% of beneficiaries. The California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) oversees through capitated contracts with health plans, where plans receive fixed per-member-per-month payments to cover comprehensive services, incentivizing efficiency but raising concerns over potential underutilization of care. Contracts are standardized via boilerplate agreements, updated periodically; the current version applies to calendar year 2024 onward across all models, including provisions for quality metrics, equity initiatives under CalAIM, and financial accountability. DHCS procures plans through competitive requests for proposals (RFPs), with recent awards finalized for 21 counties starting January 2024, involving five commercial plans alongside county-organized systems. Medi-Cal employs varied models tailored to county characteristics: County Organized Health Systems (COHS) in 30 rural and semi-rural counties, where publicly operated plans like L.A. Care or Partnership HealthPlan dominate; the Two-Plan Model in 14 urban counties, pairing a local initiative with a commercial insurer; and others like or the Regional Model for flexibility in smaller areas. Approximately 24 plans hold contracts, serving over 12 million enrollees in capitated arrangements that integrate physical, behavioral, and sometimes long-term services. These contracts emphasize preventive care and network adequacy but have faced scrutiny for provider reimbursement rates that deter participation, potentially limiting access.

Key Waivers and Special Programs

Medi-Cal operates several Section 1115 demonstration waivers and Section 1915(c) home and community-based services (HCBS) waivers, enabling the state to expand coverage, test innovations, and provide targeted long-term support beyond standard requirements. These waivers allow flexibility in eligibility, benefits, and delivery models, often focusing on vulnerable populations such as the aged, disabled, and those with behavioral health needs, while aiming to reduce institutionalization and improve care coordination. The flagship Section 1115 waiver is the California Advancing and Innovating Medi-Cal (CalAIM) demonstration, approved by the (CMS) on December 29, 2021, and effective through December 31, 2026, succeeding the earlier Medi-Cal 2020 framework. CalAIM authorizes a suite of reforms, including Enhanced Care Management for high-needs beneficiaries, Community Supports addressing health-related social needs (such as housing navigation and sobering centers), and In Lieu of Services permitting non-medical alternatives to traditional care. It also facilitates reentry services for justice-involved individuals, treatment incentives, and integration of physical, behavioral, and social services to promote whole-person care and reduce disparities. The waiver pairs with a Section 1915(b) authority for delivery, emphasizing value-based payments and strategies. Among Section 1915(c) HCBS waivers, the Home and Community-Based Alternatives (HCBA) Waiver targets individuals at risk of nursing facility placement, offering case management, personal care, and respite services to over 5,000 enrollees as of recent data, with priority for those medically certified for institutional care. The Waiver (ALW) serves aged, blind, and disabled adults in assisted living facilities, providing enhanced supportive services to prevent or delay institutionalization. The Medi-Cal Waiver Program (MCWP) focuses on terminally ill adults, delivering hospice-level care in home or community settings through contracted providers. Additional waivers include the Multipurpose Senior Services Program (MSSP) for frail seniors and the HCBS Waiver for the Developmentally Disabled, both emphasizing community-based alternatives to institutional care. Emerging initiatives under recent approvals include the Behavioral Health Community-Based Organized Networks of Equitable Care and Treatment (BH-CONNECT) waiver, effective January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2029, which expands community behavioral health services and addresses social determinants for Medi-Cal beneficiaries with needs. These programs collectively serve targeted subgroups, with enrollment capped under (c) authorities to manage costs, though CalAIM's broader scope applies statewide to the general Medi-Cal population.

Fiscal Dimensions

Funding Mechanisms and Federal-State Matching

Medi-Cal, California's implementation of the program, operates under a joint federal-state financing structure in which the federal government provides for qualifying state expenditures without a predetermined cap. The federal share is determined by the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP), a formula based on each state's relative to the national average, with a minimum rate of 50 percent mandated by law. For , the regular FMAP has remained at 50 percent since fiscal year 2025, meaning the federal government reimburses half of eligible Medi-Cal costs, such as those for traditional eligibility groups including low-income children, pregnant women, and aged, blind, or disabled individuals. Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, elected to expand Medi-Cal eligibility to adults with incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level, attracting an enhanced FMAP for this newly eligible population. This enhanced rate began at 100 percent federal funding from 2014 to 2016, then phased down to a permanent 90 percent starting in 2020, significantly higher than the state's and reducing the state burden for expansion enrollees, who comprised over 4 million beneficiaries as of 2025. Federal matching applies to administrative costs at a lower rate of 50 percent nationwide, though certain targeted case management or waiver services may qualify for higher shares under specific approvals. The state's matching share draws primarily from the General Fund but increasingly incorporates non-General Fund sources to leverage federal dollars more efficiently. In 2025-26, Medi-Cal's total projected spending reached $197 billion, with the state General Fund covering approximately 15-20 percent of net costs after federal matching, supplemented by provider taxes—such as those on organizations and hospitals—that generated billions in dedicated revenue while complying with federal limits on permissible financing mechanisms. contributions fund specific services like in some counties, but these too draw federal matching when certified as allowable state expenditures. This structure incentivizes state spending, as each qualifying dollar expended generates at least an equal federal reimbursement, though it exposes to fiscal risks from enrollment growth or federal policy changes.

Program Costs and Budgetary Growth

Medi-Cal's total expenditures reached $121.9 billion in 2021-22, encompassing federal, state, and local funds to cover core health services for nearly 15 million enrollees. By 2024-25, total spending had risen to an estimated $161 billion, with the state's General Fund contribution at $37.8 billion, reflecting a 50% federal-state/local split. This growth trajectory continued into 2025-26, with projections of $39 billion in General Fund spending, a $1.2 billion increase from the prior year, amid total expenditures approaching $188 billion to $197 billion depending on final adjustments. Historical data illustrates accelerated budgetary expansion, particularly post-2014 implementation and pandemic-era policies. Total spending grew from $89.2 billion in 2016-17 to $121.9 billion in 2021-22, a exceeding 6%, driven by enrollment surges from 10-11 million to over 14 million during due to suspended redeterminations. The elimination of asset limits for eligibility, phased in from July 2022 and fully effective January 1, 2024, further boosted senior enrollment by over 3 million overall since 2020, with seniors costing approximately $15,000 per enrollee annually due to high long-term services and supports utilization. Pharmacy expenditures nearly doubled from 2018-19 to 2023-24, contributing half of that increase from specialty drugs like those for hepatitis C and .
Fiscal YearTotal Expenditures (Billions)General Fund (Billions)Key Notes
2016-17$89.2~$20.5 (est. 23%)Pre-ACA full effects stabilization
2020-21$115.6N/A enrollment spike begins
2021-22$121.9$25.6Post-ACA expansion baseline
2024-25$161 (enacted; $174.6 est.)$37.8Asset test removal impacts
2025-26188−188-197 (proj.)$39Includes 35, wage hikes
Projections indicate sustained pressure, with General Fund costs forecasted to reach $48.8 billion by 2028-29, implying an 8.6% average annual growth rate from 2024-25 levels, outpacing general and state revenue trends. Primary drivers include 3%-5% annual increases in provider rates and service utilization, caseload growth from expansions to undocumented immigrants and higher-asset seniors, a $1 billion initial hit from the October 2024 , and 35's reallocation adding $2-3 billion annually by shifting organization taxes toward services. These factors have led to shortfalls, such as a $6.2 billion overrun in early 2025, prompting legislative backfills and highlighting fiscal strains amid declining non-General Fund revenues like the organization tax. Per-enrollee spending varies significantly, with disabled and elderly groups averaging $20,000+ nationally but elevated in due to comprehensive benefits, contrasting lower child rates around $2,000-$3,000. Overall, Medi-Cal's share of the state budget has expanded, comprising about 10%-12% of General Fund outlays in recent years, underscoring debates on amid enrollment stabilizing near 14.5 million post-redeterminations.

Economic Impact on California Taxpayers

California taxpayers fund Medi-Cal primarily through the state's General Fund, which accounted for $37.6 billion of the program's $174.6 billion total expenditures in the 2024-25 fiscal year. This sum comprised about 17.8 percent of the state's $211.5 billion General Fund budget for that period, underscoring Medi-Cal's dominant claim on tax revenues derived from income, sales, and other state levies. Projections for 2025-26 anticipate General Fund contributions rising to $42.1 billion amid total costs reaching $188.1 billion, reflecting sustained upward pressure from enrollment growth and service demands. Key expansions have amplified this taxpayer burden. Coverage extended to all income-eligible immigrants regardless of legal status adds an estimated $8.5 billion annually to General Fund outlays, leveraging federal matching funds at a roughly 50 percent rate but requiring equivalent state financing. Similarly, eliminating asset tests for long-term care eligibility on January 1, 2024, triggered explosive enrollment increases—particularly among higher-asset households—driving up long-term services costs by billions, with federal dollars covering about 62 percent of overall Medi-Cal expenditures in recent years while the remainder falls on state taxpayers. Cost overruns have compounded fiscal strains, including a $6.2 billion shortfall in 2025 exceeding budgeted projections, attributed to elevated enrollment nearing 15 million, rising prices, and post-pandemic utilization trends. Per-enrollee spending in Medi-Cal, approximately $11,600 based on 2024 data, surpasses the national average of $7,909, contributing to California's above-average program costs despite federal offsets. Strategies to draw federal matching funds, such as hiking the organization tax in 2023 and 2024, have generated billions in revenue—yielding over $10 billion across those fiscal years—but these provider taxes indirectly burden taxpayers via elevated premiums and care costs, as plans recoup levies from enrollees and employers. Passage of Proposition 35 in November 2024 further reduced available offsets from such taxes, heightening direct General Fund reliance and potential future tax hikes or spending trade-offs in areas like and .

Quality, Outcomes, and Efficiency

Health Outcomes and Empirical Metrics

Medi-Cal enrollees experience higher rates of potentially avoidable hospitalizations compared to those with private insurance, with Medi-Cal rates approximately twice as high for conditions amenable to outpatient management, such as complications and , reflecting gaps in timely access and coordination. Avoidable visits among Medi-Cal members average around 60 per 1,000 member-years across regions, with rural areas showing lower rates but urban disparities persisting due to provider network limitations. Statewide data on preventable hospitalizations for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions, tracked by the California Department of Public Health, indicate rates of 1,500 to 2,000 per 100,000 population annually for adults, exceeding national Medicaid averages and correlating with socioeconomic factors like poverty concentration in enrollee demographics. In chronic disease management, Medi-Cal managed care plans demonstrate HEDIS performance scores in the 70-80% range for metrics like diabetes HbA1c control and hypertension blood pressure management, outperforming other domains such as behavioral health but lagging behind commercial benchmarks by 10-20 percentage points. Preventive care metrics reveal underutilization, particularly for pediatric enrollees; the 2022 Preventive Services Report documented that fewer than 70% of children under age 2 received recommended well-child visits, and millions annually miss vaccinations or developmental screenings, contributing to higher downstream morbidity in vaccine-preventable diseases. rates, such as for women aged 50-74, hover at 60-65% in Medi-Cal versus 75% in employer-sponsored plans, per accountability data. Empirical studies on mortality link California's Medicaid expansions, including Medi-Cal's 2014 ACA implementation, to a roughly 4% annual reduction in all-cause adult mortality rates relative to non-expansion states, with effects most pronounced in low-income groups through improved treatment access. 00252-8/fulltext) However, post-expansion analyses show no significant gains in self-reported status or functional outcomes compared to privately insured peers, and avoidable mortality from conditions like declined modestly (2-5%) only for specific ethnic subgroups. Demonstration programs integrating under Medi-Cal have yielded localized improvements, such as 10-15% reductions in emergency admissions for high-risk enrollees, but scalability remains limited by administrative burdens. Overall, while coverage expansions correlate with mortality declines versus the uninsured baseline—where lack of elevates death risk by 40%—Medi-Cal outcomes trail private in efficiency metrics, underscoring causal challenges in translating enrollment to sustained gains amid provider shortages and care fragmentation.

Access to Care and Provider Participation

Medi-Cal enrollees frequently encounter barriers to timely access to care, including extended wait times for appointments and administrative hurdles in maintaining coverage. In 2023, only 60.9 percent of non-urgent specialist appointments in Medi-Cal plans met state standards of 15 business days, compared to 75.3 percent for appointments within 10 business days. These delays are exacerbated by provider shortages, particularly for specialists, with initiatives like partnerships between community clinics and academic health systems in areas such as Sacramento aiming to reduce wait times through coordinated referrals. Additionally, enrollees face challenges in contacting support services, with reports of hour-long phone wait times and frequent disconnections when seeking assistance for eligibility or claims. Coverage disruptions due to paperwork burdens further limit access, as eligible individuals lose benefits despite meeting income criteria, often from difficulties navigating county offices or renewal processes. Provider participation in Medi-Cal remains constrained primarily by reimbursement rates that lag behind Medicare and private insurance benchmarks, discouraging acceptance of enrollees. State efforts have targeted increases, setting rates for select services at no less than 87.5 percent of Medicare levels by eliminating prior reductions under Assembly Bill 97, with further boosts implemented in 2024 and planned for 2025 via Proposition 35 funding. Despite these adjustments, rates generally remain lower than commercial payers, contributing to reduced willingness among physicians to treat Medi-Cal patients, as economic incentives favor higher-paying insurances. Proposed federal cuts under measures like H.R. 1 could exacerbate this by capping state supplements to provider payments, potentially diminishing participation and restricting enrollee options. These dynamics manifest acutely in rural areas, where physician shortages have intensified, with retiring providers in Northern California not being replaced and primary care gaps persisting despite statewide workforce initiatives. Approximately seven million Californians reside in health professional shortage areas, with rural regions facing the most severe deficits in both primary and specialty care. Non-reimbursement for travel in field-based services adds further disincentives for providers serving remote enrollees. Programs like CalAIM seek to enhance access through expanded community-based services, but empirical evidence of broad improvements in provider engagement remains limited amid ongoing fiscal pressures.

Fraud, Waste, Abuse, and Inefficiencies

The Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (MFCU), operating under the state Attorney General's office, investigates and prosecutes provider , as well as patient abuse and neglect in long-term care facilities, within the Medi-Cal program. Between fiscal years 2021 and 2023, the unit secured 180 indictments, 221 convictions, 65 civil settlements and judgments, and $544 million in recoveries related to Medi-Cal cases. These efforts target schemes such as billing for non-rendered services, kickbacks, and falsified claims, though recoveries represent only a portion of estimated losses, as undetected likely exceeds documented amounts based on historical patterns in large-scale public programs. High-profile cases illustrate systemic vulnerabilities. In September 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a civil suit against Health Plan (IEHP), a major Medi-Cal managed care contractor, alleging it submitted false statements to retain over $320 million in overpayments from Medi-Cal expansion funds intended for low-income adults; instead, IEHP allegedly diverted surpluses to non-qualifying administrative and operational expenses, violating federal reimbursement rules. Earlier in 2025, owners of three medical companies settled for $10 million over fraudulent Medi-Cal billing practices, while a pharmaceutical manufacturer and its CEO agreed to pay millions for improper drug pricing schemes inflating reimbursements. Such incidents highlight risks in managed care dominance, where contractors handle billions in capitation payments with limited real-time oversight. Improper payments, encompassing overpayments, underpayments, and ineligible claims, contribute to waste. Nationally, Medicaid's 2024 improper payment rate stood at 5.09% under the Payment Error Rate Measurement (PERM) program, equating to tens of billions annually, with California—as the program's largest state implementation—facing amplified exposure due to its 15 million enrollees and $150 billion-plus annual expenditures. California-specific audits reveal persistent eligibility errors, including chronic over-enrollments where beneficiaries retain coverage despite income changes, as flagged in state auditor reports on Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) processes. A 2022 CMS program integrity review of California identified three areas of non-compliance for fiscal years 2019–2021, including inadequate oversight of third-party liability and provider screening, leading to recommendations for enhanced controls. Inefficiencies exacerbate abuse through administrative gaps. DHCS audits of plans, such as 2024 reviews of Community Health Group and , found inconsistent reporting of suspected , waste, or abuse within mandated timelines, with some cases delayed or under-investigated. audits have surged, overwhelming providers with demands for extensive documentation on specialty drug claims, often resulting in recoupments for minor discrepancies rather than outright , signaling bureaucratic overload in claims . Broader state investigations, including a 2024 State Auditor report, substantiated waste in agency operations tied to Medi-Cal, such as improper hiring and inefficient , underscoring how program scale—expanded via waivers and eligibility redeterminations post-pandemic—strains verification mechanisms. Despite federal mandates for detection via analytics and pre-payment reviews, implementation lags contribute to unchecked overutilization, with critics noting that PERM rates undercount errors by excluding certain and eligibility categories.

Controversies and Criticisms

Sustainability and Over-Expansion Debates

Critics of Medi-Cal's expansions argue that the program's rapid growth has exceeded California's fiscal capacity, contributing to multi-billion-dollar shortfalls and necessitating proposed cuts or enrollment freezes. In 2024-25, Medi-Cal faced a $6.2 billion shortfall driven by "unprecedented" cost increases, including higher enrollment after expansions and elevated pharmacy expenditures. The elimination of asset tests for eligibility on January 1, 2024, led to an explosion in enrollment among higher-income seniors, with spending on this group surging as affluent individuals qualified by divesting assets into exempt categories like homes and vehicles. A focal point of over-expansion debates centers on the 2022-2024 phased extension of full-scope to undocumented immigrants, which added approximately 1.6 million enrollees by 2025 and imposed annual state General Fund costs of $8.4 to $8.5 billion. Proponents, including state advocates, contend these measures reduce and improve outcomes for low-income non-citizens, potentially lowering overall uncompensated care burdens. However, fiscal analysts and Republican lawmakers highlight the strain on taxpayers amid California's broader deficits, arguing that prioritizing non-citizens diverts resources from citizens and exacerbates provider shortages due to low reimbursement rates. In response to revenue shortfalls and unexpectedly high expenditures, Governor Newsom's May 2025 revision proposed freezing new enrollments for undocumented adults aged 19-59 starting in 2027, while preserving coverage for children and existing adults, signaling acknowledgment of limits. Broader sustainability concerns include Medi-Cal's overall enrollment surpassing 15 million by 2025—about one-third of California's population—and projected General Fund spending exceeding $30 billion annually, fueled by factors like sustained pandemic-era protections and drug price inflation. The Legislative Analyst's Office has warned that without reforms, such as enhanced cost controls or federal matching adjustments, ongoing expansions risk deeper state deficits, particularly vulnerable to federal policy shifts like those in H.R. 1, which could cut federal funding by billions. Critics from organizations like the Paragon Health Institute describe these trends as "reckless," positing that Medi-Cal's low-barrier eligibility incentivizes dependency and crowds out private market efficiencies, though empirical data on long-term fiscal trajectories remains contested amid short-term health access gains.

Political and Ideological Perspectives

Progressive advocates portray Medi-Cal as a cornerstone of social equity, emphasizing its role in expanding coverage to over 15 million enrollees by 2024 through implementations and state-specific extensions, such as eligibility for undocumented immigrants starting in 2022 for those aged 50 and older. They argue that these measures have significantly reduced uninsured rates among low-income populations, framing the program as a successful model of government intervention to address healthcare disparities, though some express concerns that it falls short of comprehensive national reforms like single-payer systems. This perspective often highlights empirical gains in access, with polls showing broad public support across parties for maintaining expansions, including 50% of Republicans viewing it favorably in some surveys. Conservatives, in contrast, frequently characterize Medi-Cal as an entrenched welfare mechanism that fosters dependency and strains state finances, critiquing its rapid growth—costs ballooning to over $140 billion annually by 2024-2025—driven by generous federal matching funds that incentivize over-expansion without corresponding efficiency reforms. They point to instances of mismanagement, such as eligibility expansions amid shortfalls, prompting Republican calls for state audits in 2025 to probe and waste, arguing that the program's structure crowds out private market incentives and delivers suboptimal outcomes compared to targeted assistance. This view aligns with broader skepticism of as "just another welfare program," where federal-state dynamics perpetuate fiscal irresponsibility, with only a slim majority of Republicans (54%) endorsing it as rather than . Libertarian critiques extend these concerns to fundamental objections against government-dominated healthcare, positing that Medi-Cal's model distorts price signals, stifles innovation, and imposes coercive mandates akin to those in the ACA, leading to higher costs and reduced provider participation without genuine market competition. Proponents of this ideology advocate deregulating insurance markets and emphasizing personal responsibility, viewing programs like Medi-Cal as barriers to a freer system where consumer-driven reforms could yield better access and quality, though empirical implementation remains limited in policy debates. In California's Democrat-led , these ideological tensions manifest in unilateral expansions despite fiscal critiques, underscoring partisan divides where progressive priorities prevail amid warnings of long-term unsustainability.

Comparative Effectiveness Versus Private Alternatives

Medi-Cal reimburses providers at rates substantially lower than commercial insurance, typically 25% to 85% of private payer levels for physician services in , resulting in lower participation rates among providers compared to those accepting commercial plans. This disparity contributes to greater difficulty for Medi-Cal enrollees in scheduling appointments and accessing timely care, with patients nationwide experiencing more barriers than those with private coverage. In , fewer specialists accept Medi-Cal patients relative to commercial insured individuals, exacerbating wait times and reliance on departments for non-urgent needs. Health outcomes for Medi-Cal beneficiaries lag behind those with private , even after adjusting for socioeconomic factors. For instance, Medicaid-covered infants in the U.S. exhibit higher mortality rates (5.30 deaths per 1,000 live births) compared to privately insured infants (2.75 per 1,000), a pattern observed in data reflecting national trends. Chronic disease management is poorer under Medi-Cal, with lower rates of control among enrollees than among commercially insured individuals. Studies indicate Medicaid patients are admitted to hospitals with more advanced conditions, such as later-stage cancers, leading to higher mortality risks and increased heart attack complications relative to private holders. While some self-reported surveys suggest comparable or higher satisfaction with Medi-Cal access versus private plans, these findings contrast with objective metrics like procedure rates and survival outcomes, where private insurance facilitates more timely interventions. expansions, including California's, have improved coverage over uninsurance but fail to match private insurance efficacy in reducing mortality or enhancing preventive care utilization for low-income populations. Low reimbursement incentives under Medi-Cal drive inefficiencies, such as reduced invasive cardiac procedures for eligible patients compared to commercial counterparts. Cost-effectiveness analyses reveal Medi-Cal spends less per enrollee than private plans but yields inferior returns in health improvements, with higher societal costs from delayed treatments and poorer long-term outcomes. Private insurance's higher payments align provider incentives with , fostering broader networks and competition absent in Medi-Cal's and models. Empirical evidence underscores that shifting low-income adults to subsidized private options could enhance access and rates without net coverage loss.

References

  1. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/medi-cal/Pages/default.aspx
  2. https://www.chcf.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/MediCalFactsFiguresAlmanac08052024.pdf
  3. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/dataandstats/Pages/Medi-Cal-Eligibility-Statistics.aspx
  4. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/medi-cal/Pages/Medi-Cal_EHB_Benefits.aspx
  5. https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/5075
  6. https://calmatters.org/health/2025/03/medi-cal-shortfall-worsens/
  7. https://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-bonta-announces-68-million-settlement-against-four-health-care
  8. https://calbudgetcenter.org/resources/qa-whats-behind-californias-rising-medi-cal-spending/
  9. https://mcweb.apps.prd.cammis.medi-cal.ca.gov/file/manual?fn=00medi-cal.pdf
  10. https://www.chcf.org/resource/60-years-of-medicaid/
  11. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/dataandstats/statistics/Documents/Historic-Growth-Brief.pdf
  12. https://luskincenter.history.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/66/2024/09/Zdencanovic-et-al.-Medi-Cal-and-the-Politics-of-Healthcare-Policy-in-California.pdf
  13. https://www.medicaid.gov/sites/default/files/2019-12/ca-amrp-16.pdf
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4194922/
  15. https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/2013/health/ACA/medi-cal-expansion-021913.pdf
  16. https://www.chcf.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/PDF-CaringForMedicallyIndigentAdults.pdf
  17. https://www.ppic.org/blog/how-has-the-medi-cal-program-changed-over-the-past-three-decades/
  18. https://www.chcf.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/PDF-MediCalFactsAndFigures2009.pdf
  19. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/medi-cal/Documents/MCRedesignInitiatives/MCRdsgnFctSht1_12_05Fin.pdf
  20. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/provgovpart/Documents/A%2520Bridge%2520to%2520Reform%25206-10-2010.pdf
  21. https://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/pdf/2013/medi-cal_expansion13.pdf
  22. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/dataandstats/statistics/Documents/Expansion_Adults_201610.pdf
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4769999/
  24. https://www.kff.org/medicaid/the-california-health-care-landscape/
  25. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/individuals/Pages/AffordableCareActLinks.aspx
  26. https://www.ppic.org/publication/the-medi-cal-program/
  27. https://www.ppic.org/blog/medi-cal-has-expanded-health-coverage-in-california/
  28. https://www.kff.org/medicaid/status-of-state-medicaid-expansion-decisions/
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5637669/
  30. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/CalAIM/Pages/CalAIM.aspx
  31. https://www.chcf.org/resource/calaim-explained-five-year-plan-transform-medi-cal/
  32. https://partnershiphp.org/Community/Pages/CalAIM.aspx
  33. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/Pages/BH-CalAIM-Webpage.aspx
  34. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/CalAIM/Pages/Initiatives.aspx
  35. https://www.chcf.org/resource/calaim-in-focus/calaim-explained/
  36. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/CalAIM/Pages/Timelines.aspx
  37. https://www.chcf.org/resource/calaim-in-focus/
  38. https://www.chcf.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/MediCalExplainedSPAWaivers_AuthoritiesChart.pdf
  39. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/Medi-Cal/Pages/qualify.aspx
  40. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/Get-Medi-Cal/Pages/coverage-for-all.aspx
  41. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/medi-cal/eligibility/Documents/Co-OPS-Sup/RevisedMAGIHierarchy.pdf
  42. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/HACCP/Documents/Program-Income-Eligibility-Comparison2025.pdf
  43. https://www.healthforcalifornia.com/covered-california/income-limits
  44. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/formsandpubs/forms/Forms/MCED/PUB10.pdf
  45. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/medi-cal/eligibility/letters/Documents/25-01.pdf
  46. https://www.disabilityrightsca.org/publications/determining-eligibility-under-the-aged-blind-disabled-federal-poverty-level-abd-fpl
  47. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/Medi-Cal/Pages/eligibility-chart.aspx
  48. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/Medi-Cal/Pages/apply.aspx
  49. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/medi-cal/eligibility/letters/Documents/25-03.pdf
  50. https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/eligibility/downloads/california-verification-plan-final.pdf
  51. https://stgenssa.sccgov.org/debs/program_handbooks/medi-cal/assets/05Apps/Verifications.htm
  52. https://stgenssa.sccgov.org/debs/program_handbooks/medi-cal/assets/08Transitions/Transitioning_from_MAGI_to_Non_Magi_or_APTC.htm
  53. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/medi-cal/eligibility/Pages/InfoPendingMedi-calApps.aspx
  54. https://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/californians-health-coverage-sources-when-public-health-emergency-ends/
  55. https://www.ppic.org/blog/as-a-pandemic-medi-cal-policy-ends-some-californians-will-fall-through-the-cracks/
  56. https://www.chcf.org/resource/key-takeaways-medi-cal-redetermination-data-june-august-2023/
  57. https://www.chcf.org/resource/lessons-medi-cal-unwinding-enrollee-experiences-renewals/
  58. https://calmatters.org/health/2023/07/medi-cal-eligibility-california-review/
  59. https://www.kff.org/medicaid/medicaid-enrollment-and-unwinding-tracker/
  60. https://calbudgetcenter.org/resources/universal-health-coverage-in-california-progress-and-key-policy-actions/
  61. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-25-107413
  62. https://cpehn.org/publications/californias-implementation-of-federal-flexibilities-during-the-medicaid-unwinding-reduced-racial-ethnic-and-linguistic-disparities-in-medi-cal-redeterminations-rates/
  63. https://www.chcf.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Medi-CalUnwindingLessonsRecommendations-1.pdf
  64. https://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/medi-cal-enrollment-by-district-and-county-2024/
  65. https://www.aurrerahealth.com/blog/lessons-learned-from-californias-medi-cal-unwinding
  66. https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/benefits/mandatory-optional-medicaid-benefits
  67. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/medi-cal/Documents/Benefits-Chart.pdf
  68. https://www.macpac.gov/subtopic/mandatory-and-optional-benefits/
  69. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/medi-cal/Pages/Benefits_services.aspx
  70. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/medi-cal/eligibility/letters/Documents/cI09-02.pdf
  71. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/CalAIM/ECM/Pages/Home.aspx
  72. https://calaim.dhcs.ca.gov/pages/enhanced-care-management
  73. https://providerlibrary.healthnetcalifornia.com/medi-cal/provider-manual/benefits/principal-exclusions-limitations.html
  74. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/Documents/Budget-Highlights-Add-Docs/FS/DHCS-Copayments-Fact-Sheet.pdf
  75. https://canhr.org/understanding-the-share-of-cost-for-medi-cal/
  76. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/ltc/Documents/Share-of-Cost-Guidance-Revised-3.16.2020.docx
  77. https://www.kff.org/medicaid/tracking-the-medicaid-provisions-in-the-2025-budget-bill/
  78. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/medi-cal/eligibility/letters/Documents/I25-18.pdf
  79. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/Pages/AboutUs.aspx
  80. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/Documents/Organization-Charts/DHCS-Exec-Staff-Org-Chart.pdf
  81. https://www.chcf.org/resource/medi-cal-federal-government/
  82. https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/cms-issues-guidance-strengthen-oversight-medicaid-state-directed-payments
  83. https://san.com/cc/cms-increasing-medicaid-oversight-to-prevent-benefits-for-noncitizens/
  84. https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2025/5083/Considering-Medi-Cal-102425.pdf
  85. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/provgovpart/Pages/CMAA.aspx
  86. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/Documents/Draft-2025-Comprehensive-Quality-Strategy-Report.pdf
  87. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/formsandpubs/laws/Documents/2019-Access-Monitoring-Plan.pdf
  88. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/individuals/Pages/Medi-Cal-Managed-Care-FAQS.aspx
  89. https://www.altaregional.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/medi-cal_ffs_and_managed_care_final_5.27.21.pdf?1623447658
  90. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/Pages/ContinuityofCareFAQ.aspx
  91. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/MH/Pages/Fiscal-Year-2025-26-Medi-Cal-Behavioral-Health-Fee-Schedules-FY25-26.aspx
  92. https://mcweb.apps.prd.cammis.medi-cal.ca.gov/rates
  93. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/medi-cal/Pages/DHCS_Notice_Feb11_09.aspx
  94. https://medi-calrx.dhcs.ca.gov/cms/medicalrx/static-assets/documents/faq/Medi-Cal_Rx_Transitioning_Medi-Cal_Pharmacy_Services_from_Managed_Care_to_FFS_FAQs.pdf
  95. https://www.sheppardhealthlaw.com/2021/01/articles/drug-and-pharmaceutical-law/california-to-transition-medi-cal-pharmacy-benefits-to-fee-for-service/
  96. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/provgovpart/Pages/Provider-Directory-Reqs.aspx
  97. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/dataandstats/statistics/Pages/Medi-Cal_Fee-for-Service_Expenditures.aspx
  98. https://www.macpac.gov/medicaid-101/provider-payment-and-delivery-systems/
  99. https://www.chcf.org/resource/medi-cal-facts-figures-almanac/
  100. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/Pages/Medi-CalManagedCare.aspx
  101. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/provgovpart/Pages/MMCDBoilerplateContracts.aspx
  102. https://www.cmadocs.org/newsroom/news/view/ArticleId/50000/DHCS-finalizes-Medi-Cal-managed-care-contracts-for-2024-and-beyond
  103. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/Documents/MMCD-Cnty-Map.pdf
  104. https://www.lhpc.org/managed-care
  105. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/CalAIM/Pages/MCP-RFP.aspx
  106. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/Pages/medi-calwaivers.aspx
  107. https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/section-1115-demo/demonstration-and-waiver-list/81046
  108. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/provgovpart/Pages/CalAIM-1115-and-1915b-Waiver-Renewals.aspx
  109. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/ltc/Pages/Home-and-Community-Based-%28HCB%29-Alternatives-Waiver.aspx
  110. https://www.kff.org/medicaid/state-indicator/federal-matching-rate-and-multiplier/
  111. https://www.macpac.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/EXHIBIT-6-FMAP-and-Enhanced-FMAP-by-State-FYs-2022%25E2%2580%25932025.pdf
  112. https://www.chcf.org/resource/medi-cal-explained-medi-cal-financing-spending/
  113. https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/5083
  114. https://www.chcf.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/MediCalExplainedFinancingSpending.pdf
  115. https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/4941
  116. https://jasonsisney.substack.com/p/jan-10-budget-noted-medi-cal-cost
  117. https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/5010
  118. https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/5026
  119. https://www.kff.org/medicaid/a-look-at-variation-in-medicaid-spending-per-enrollee-by-group-and-across-states/
  120. https://www.itup.org/itup-blog-key-highlights-in-californias-final-fy-2024-25-budget-act/
  121. https://calmatters.org/health/2025/03/medi-cal-budget-shortfall/
  122. https://paragoninstitute.org/medicaid/medi-cal-amity-californias-reckless-expansion-of-medicaid-long-term-care-to-the-affluent/
  123. https://paragoninstitute.org/medicaid/californias-insurance-tax-shuffle-how-federal-money-ends-up-paying-for-medicaid-for-illegal-immigrants/
  124. https://cpehn.org/assets/uploads/2025/05/Preventable_Hospitalizations_Report_042025_UPDATED.pdf
  125. https://hcai.ca.gov/visualizations/avoidable-emergency-department-visits-vary-widely-across-california/
  126. https://data.chhs.ca.gov/dataset/rates-of-preventable-hospitalizations-for-selected-medical-conditions-by-county
  127. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/Documents/QPHM-ALL-Domains-and-Health-Equity-0124.pdf
  128. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/dataandstats/reports/Documents/CA2021-22-Preventative-Services-Report.pdf
  129. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/dataandstats/reports/Pages/MMCDQualPerfMsrRpts.aspx
  130. https://keck.usc.edu/news/medicaid-expansion-linked-to-reductions-in-mortality-according-to-usc-research/
  131. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9327742/
  132. https://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/newsroom/blog/new-ucla-evaluation-shows-improved-outcomes-medi-cal-patients-under-demonstration-program
  133. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11066981/
  134. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8796736/
  135. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/dataandstats/reports/Documents/CA2023-24-Medi-Cal-Managed-Care-Physical-Health-External-Quality-Review-Technical-Report-Vol9-F1.xlsx
  136. https://www.chcf.org/resource/how-cut-wait-times-specialists-medi-cal/
  137. https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-08-07/medi-cal-medicaid-phone-calls-california
  138. https://calbudgetcenter.org/resources/medi-cal-coverage-loss-stings-californians-paperwork-challenges-persist/
  139. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/Pages/Medi-Cal-Targeted-Provider-Rate-Increases.aspx
  140. https://www.cmadocs.org/newsroom/news/view/ArticleId/50784/FAQ-What-is-the-status-of-the-2024-and-2025-Medi-Cal-rate-increases-160
  141. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/blog/2022/medicaid-reimbursement-rates-are-racial-justice-issue
  142. https://www.chcf.org/resource/how-massive-federal-cuts-will-create-unprecedented-challenges-medi-cal-patients-providers/
  143. https://www.chcf.org/resource/new-survey-highlights-worsening-shortage-physicians-rural-northern-california/
  144. https://californiahealthline.org/news/article/california-primary-care-shortage-persists-workforce-report-years-later/
  145. https://latino.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/LPPI-CPS-White-Paper-Design-Layout-reduced.pdf
  146. https://www.chcs.org/resource/addressing-travel-costs-for-providers-of-field-based-services-in-medi-cal/
  147. https://oig.hhs.gov/reports/all/2025/california-medicaid-fraud-control-unit-2023-inspection/
  148. https://oag.ca.gov/dmfea/medical
  149. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/united-states-files-suit-against-california-based-health-plan-alleged-false-claims
  150. https://www.kellergrover.com/news/whistleblower-law/whistleblowers-needed-to-call-out-medi-cal-fraud-billions-of-state-taxpayer-dollars-at-stake/
  151. https://www.cms.gov/data-research/monitoring-programs/improper-payment-measurement-programs/payment-error-rate-measurement-perm/perm-error-rate-findings-and-reports
  152. https://information.auditor.ca.gov/reports/agency/137
  153. https://www.cms.gov/files/document/california-fy-2022-pi-focused-review-final-report.pdf
  154. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/Documents/2025-Molina-Audit-Report.pdf
  155. https://www.pharmhealthlaw.com/single-post/2024/09/16/a-wave-of-extensive-medi-cal-audits-overwhelms-california-pharmacies/
  156. https://www.auditor.ca.gov/reports/i2024-1/
  157. https://paragoninstitute.org/medicaid/medicaids-true-improper-payments-likely-double-those-reported-by-cms/
  158. https://budget.house.gov/press-release/california-to-spend-84-billion-this-year-on-health-care-for-illegal-aliens
  159. https://www.ppic.org/blog/californias-medi-cal-expansion-is-lowering-poverty-among-undocumented-immigrants/
  160. https://calmatters.org/health/2025/05/newsom-freeze-medi-cal-undocumented-immigrants/
  161. https://ihpl.llu.edu/blog/medi-cal-coverage-undocumented-immigrants-california-what-will-happen-progress-made-over-years
  162. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4195152/
  163. https://www.chcf.org/resource/poll-californian-attitudes-medi-cal-covered-ca-federal-cuts/
  164. https://www.sierradailynews.com/state/assembly-republicans-demand-audit-of-medi-cal-amid-financial-crisis-and-mismanagement-concerns/
  165. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kr1zPOKvC94
  166. https://www.kff.org/from-drew-altman/the-collision-of-medicaid-world-views/
  167. https://www.cato.org/commentary/health-policy-cults-misplaced-faith-government
  168. https://www.libertarianism.org/essays/libertarian-vision-for-healthcare
  169. https://www.chcf.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/PDF-ComparingCPTCodePayments.pdf
  170. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6452575/
  171. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2951930/
  172. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10576209/
  173. https://www.macpac.gov/subtopic/managed-cares-effect-on-outcomes/
  174. https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/report/studies-show-medicaid-patients-have-worse-access-and-outcomes-the
  175. https://www.physiciansforreform.org/minority-outreach/medicaid-worst-medical-outcomes-america/
  176. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2780540
  177. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9377505/
  178. https://pnhp.org/news/medicaid-coverage-worse-than-private-insurance/
  179. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/blog/2022/how-differences-medicaid-medicare-and-commercial-health-insurance-payment-rates-impact
  180. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11068085/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.