Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Blue Shield International
View on Wikipedia
The Blue Shield, formerly the International Committee of the Blue Shield, is an international organization founded in 1996 to protect the world's cultural heritage from threats such as armed conflict and natural disasters.[1] Originally intended as the "cultural equivalent of the Red Cross",[2][3] its name derives from the blue shield symbol designed by Jan Zachwatowicz, used to signify cultural sites protected by the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in Armed Conflict.
Key Information
The Blue Shield's mission statement is in their statutes. It is a network of committees of dedicated individuals across the world that is “committed to the protection of the world's cultural property, and is concerned with the protection of cultural and natural heritage, tangible and intangible, in the event of armed conflict, natural- or human-made disaster.”
Blue Shield is a close partner organization with the UN, United Nations peacekeeping and UNESCO and in cooperation with the International Committee of the Red Cross.[4][5][6]
History
[edit]Following the Second World War, which saw extensive damage and widespread theft of cultural heritage throughout Europe and Asia, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) was founded in 1946 with the official aim of promoting peace, development, and dialogue through cultural exchange and preservation. At the behest of the Netherlands,[7] UNESCO helped draft and sponsor the Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, the first widely ratified international treaty that focused exclusively on the protection of cultural property in armed conflict; it entered into force on 7 August 1956, obligating states parties to protect cultural property in both peacetime and war, including those located in combatant nations.
The International Committee of the Blue Shield (ICBS) was established in 1996 by the four major non-governmental heritage organisations,[8] which represent professionals active in the fields of archives, libraries, monuments and sites, and museums:
- ICA: International Council on Archives
- ICOM: International Council of Museums
- ICOMOS: International Council on Monuments and Sites
- IFLA: International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions
to further the protection of heritage in conflict. Article 27.3 of the 1954 Hague Convention Second Protocol (1999)[9] explicitly mentions the International Committee of the Blue Shield as an advisory body to the Committee for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict.[10] The four organisations worked together to prepare for, and respond to, emergency situations that could affect cultural heritage. They were joined in 2005 by the CCAAA (Co-ordinating Council of Audiovisual Archives Associations), who later left in 2012. The 'founding four' supplied a Secretariat for the organisation which rotated once every three years between them. Julien Anfruns was President of the International Committee of the Blue Shield (ICBS) between 2009 and 2013.
By 2000, national committees had begun to form to protect cultural heritage in their countries.[11] In 2006, a conference Towards Solid Organisation: Infrastructure and Awareness was held at the Hague in the Netherlands, attended by the national committees and the ICBS.[12] At this event, the Hague Accord was written, establishing the Association of National Committees of the Blue Shield (ANCBS) to coordinate the work of the national committees.[11] The ANCBS came into formal existence in 2008:[13] Karl von Habsburg was appointed as the first President. During this time, he undertook a number of fact finding missions[14] to countries in conflict to learn more about the damage to their cultural heritage.
While in many wars the freedom of movement of the United Nations personnel is significantly restricted due to security concerns, Blue Shield is considered to be particularly suitable due to its structure enabling it to act flexibly and autonomously in particularly dangerous armed conflicts. Joris Kila, art historian for Blue Shield and the "Competence Center for Cultural Heritage" at the University of Vienna, sums it up as follows: "Unesco and other institutions consider it too dangerous to inspect the places in Libya themselves, whether they are damaged or not. So Karl von Habsburg and I decided that we had to do it ourselves. We were in Ras-Almergib, a site right next to Leptis Magna, where a radar and air defense station of the Gaddafi troops was destroyed, less than 15 meters away from a Roman fort that remained intact. The ancient site was on our list."[15]
-
ANCBS Fact Finding Mission Egypt, 2011. Karl von Habsburg is on the right.
-
ANCBS Fact Finding mission to Egypt, 2011 - Karl von Habsburg
-
Blue Shield First Assessment Mission to Libya, September 28 to 30, 2011. Karl von Habsburg is on the left, and Hafed Walda on the right.
In terms of cultural property protection, there is therefore intensive cooperation between Blue Shield, the United Nations and UNESCO.[16][17][18] The cooperation between UNESCO and Blue Shield International is to be further strengthened, according to the then Director General of UNESCO Irina Bokova. "UNESCO and Blue Shield International share a common goal" and "We seek to protect cultural property, and, by extension, humanity's cultural legacy", said Bokova in October 2017 at a conference of Blue Shield International.[19]
In 2016, ICBS and ANCBS amalgamated to become simply “The Blue Shield”, amending the ANCBS statutes to reflect these changes, and registering the Blue Shield as an Association in the Netherlands.[20] These statutes were formally approved by the Blue Shield General Assembly (2017) in Vienna.[21]
Language preservation is also protection of cultural heritage, as former President Habsburg stated. "Today, on average, we lose one language in the world every six weeks. There are approximately 6800 languages. But four per cent of the population speaks 96 per cent of the languages, and 96 per cent of the population speaks four per cent of the languages. These four per cent are spoken by large language groups and are therefore not at risk. But 96 per cent of the languages we know are more or less at risk. You have to treat them like extinct species."[22]
A special concern of Blue Shield International is the protection of cultural heritage during military peace operations. 40 lecturers and participants from America, Denmark, Lebanon, Italy, Croatia, Slovakia and Austria had the opportunity at the "Blue Helmet Forum 2019" to deal with the topic. Experiences of the US Army, operational experience in Iraq and Afghanistan and the establishment of a separate Italian cultural property unit were also discussed. Karl von Habsburg spoke about the need to protect cultural property not only during and after conflicts, but also outside of armed conflicts.[23]
In 2020, Blue Shield International and the UN peacekeeping forces in Lebanon, in collaboration with the Lebanese armed forces, completed a month-long project to secure and protect the cultural property damaged after the August 4th explosions in Beirut.[24][25]
Composition
[edit]

The Blue Shield is formed from national committees around the world, coordinated by an International Board - Blue Shield International (BSI). BSI maintains a list of national committees on their website.[26]
The BSI Board is formed from nine people. There are four nominated representatives from ICA, ICOM, ICOMOS, and IFLA. The General Assembly also votes in four members who have stood for election from national committees. A new board is appointed every three years at the General Assembly. Karl von Habsburg was appointed as the first President of the Blue Shield at the 2017 General Assembly; and Peter Stone was appointed as the vice-president. In 2020, Habsburg stepped down, having Chaired the organisation since 2008 (initially as President of ANCBS). He was replaced by Stone at the August 2020 General Assembly.[27]
In support of Peter Stone's work in cultural property protection, Newcastle University funded the first full-time Secretariat for the organisation in 2017, consisting of one full-time staff member - Dr Emma Cunliffe and one part time member - Dr Paul Fox stepped down the end of December 2019, and was replaced by Dr Michael Delacruz.
Mission and areas of activity
[edit]
The Blue Shield is a network of committees of dedicated individuals across the world that is:
committed to the protection of the world's cultural property, and is concerned with the protection of cultural and natural heritage, tangible and intangible, in the event of armed conflict, natural- or human-made disaster.[28]
The key goals of the Blue Shield are laid out in Article 2 of the Blue Shield Statutes 2016.[29] They are to:
- protect cultural and natural heritage – tangible and intangible – from the effects of conflict and environmental disaster;
- promote the ratification of, respect for, and implementation of, the 1954 Hague Convention and its two Protocols;
- raise awareness of the importance of protecting heritage in emergency situations;
- promote and provide relevant training (to heritage professionals, the armed forces, other emergency responders, and those involved in preventing the illicit trafficking of looted objects);
- promote community engagement with and participation in protecting cultural property (CP);
- encourage co-operation with, and between, other relevant entities involved in emergency situations.
The work of the Blue Shield is underpinned by international law[30] – in particular, the 1954 Hague Convention on the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict and its two Protocols of 1954 and 1999, which are considered to be part of international humanitarian law (IHL). IHL, also known as the Law of War or Law of Armed Conflict, is a set of rules which seek, for humanitarian reasons, to limit the effects of armed conflict on people and property. This primary context is also informed by a number of other international legal instruments, by the international cultural protection agenda as set by the UN and UNESCO, and by international initiatives regarding environmental disaster such as the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. Although the 1954 Hague Convention and its two Protocols refer to cultural property, recognising the developments in our understanding of culture across the world, and the different ways it manifests, the Blue Shield deals with the broader concept of cultural heritage.
Blue Shield's mission and goals are delivered through six proactive areas of activity.[31] With respect to cultural property protection (CPP) in the event of armed conflict and natural/human-made disasters, the Blue Shield works in the areas of:
- Proactive protection and risk preparedness;
- Emergency response;
- Stabilisation, post-disaster recovery, and long-term/ongoing support activities;
- Legal compliance, policy, and their implementation;
- Capacity building activities, and education and training in support of the Blue Shield's Areas of Activity;
- Co-ordination – of Blue Shield members and with partner organisations.
The Blue Shield realises these Areas of Activity in the following national and international contexts:
- Contributing the development and delivery of plans and actions for proactive planning, emergency response, stabilisation, post-disaster recovery, and long-term/ongoing support activities at the national and international level, coordinating support to affected national committees from the international community as requested.
- Promoting and developing understanding of the international laws which underpin the Blue Shield's work
- Contributing to the development of policies in relation to national and international cultural protection agendas, and promoting their implementation.
- Developing policy for the Blue Shield, and interpreting and implementing it at the national level. BSI recognises that its work must be interpreted in a national context, taking account of national legislation and policy.
- Working with partners to support capacity building activities and develop and deliver education and training materials and courses in support of the Blue Shield's Areas of Activity.
- Co-ordinating the work of the Blue Shield national committees, and national / international partners. Blue Shield does not work in isolation. International partners include: UNESCO, ICA, ICOM, ICOMOS, IFLA and other international heritage organisations; NATO and other multi-national forces; and other international organisations involved in cultural property protection. National partners include: government departments, national ministries of defence, emergency response units, and other national organisations involved in CPP, such as national committees or branches of ICA, ICOM, ICOMOS, IFLA, and the National Commissions of UNESCO.
The Blue Shield formally adopted the Four Tier Approach[32] to the protection of cultural property in the event of armed conflict at its 2017 General Assembly, describing the four times when heritage professionals aim to work with armed forces to protect cultural property.
Blue Shield International is committed to providing training in cultural property protection for members of armed forces around the world, and lists NATO amongst its partners.[33] In addition to their work with NATO,[34][35] in 2017-2018, they contributed to training for national armed forces in Georgia,[36][37] peacekeeping forces deployed by Fiji,[38][39] and ran exercises at an international workshop in Austria.[40]
Logo
[edit]
ICBS adopted the emblem of the 1954 Hague Convention that designates cultural property that should be protected, and for identification of those working to protect it – the blue shield. The cultural emblem is a protective symbol used during armed conflicts, and its use is restricted under international law. In order to avoid confusion with the emblem, the ANCBS adopted a new symbol - they took up the emblem of the Convention as a symbol of their protective work, but lightened the royal blue, and set it in a cyan blue circular background. The strapline of ANCBS was "Protecting The World's Cultural Heritage During Emergency Situations".
When ICBS and ANCBS merged in 2016, the decision was taken to re-brand to symbolise the new Blue Shield organisation. In 2018, a new logo was formally adopted by the Blue Shield International Board. The Blue Shield logo is the royal blue shield emblem of the 1954 Hague Convention, set within a mid-blue circle, symbolising both Blue Shield's roots and focus on the Hague Convention and armed conflict, and the wider remit it encompasses today.[41] As part of the rebranding, the Blue Shield changed its strapline to "Protecting Heritage in Crisis".
The Blue Shield logo is used as a visible sign to indicate the Blue Shield International Board and shows the officially registered national committees of the Blue Shield across the world. It should be used to raise the visibility of the name and logo of the Blue Shield organisation by linking its name and organisation to activities of those it works with.[41]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ "Blue Shield International: History".
- ^ Boylan, Patrick (1993). Review of the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict (The Hague Convention of 1954). [Online]: UNESCO. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
- ^ Boylan, Patrick (2001). The Concept of cultural protection in times of armed conflict: from the crusades to the new millennium. In: Neil Brodie and Kathryn Walker Tubb (eds), Illicit Antiquities. The theft of culture and the extinction of archaeology. One World Archaeology. pp. 43–108.
- ^ UNIFIL - Action plan to preserve heritage sites during conflict, 12 Apr 2019.
- ^ The ICRC and the Blue Shield signed a Memorandum of Understanding, 26 February 2020.
- ^ Friedrich Schipper: "Bildersturm: Die globalen Normen zum Schutz von Kulturgut greifen nicht" (German - The global norms for the protection of cultural property do not apply), In: Der Standard, 6 March 2015.
- ^ Toman, Jiri (1996). The Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict. Legal Monographs and Treatises. 11. Dartmouth Publishing Company, Brookfield. ISBN 978-1855217935.
- ^ "ICOM and the International Committee of the Blue Shield". ICOM. Archived from the original on 23 March 2020. Retrieved 27 June 2016.
- ^ "UNESCO Legal Instruments: Second Protocol to the Hague Convention of 1954 for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict 1999".
- ^ "UNESCO: Armed Conflict and Heritage. Partners".
- ^ a b Bogoeski, Krste (18 May 2016). "Twenty Years of the International Committee of the Blue Shield (1996-2016) in Dojran" (PDF). Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology at Ss. Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje. pp. 20–24. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 April 2022 – via Blue Shield International.
- ^ "ICBS Meetings, the 2004 Torino Declaration and 2006 Hague Accord creating ANCBS". 18 June 2006. Archived from the original on 23 October 2021. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
- ^ "Founding Conference on ANCBS, The Hague, December 2008".
- ^ "Blue Shield Missions". Blue Shield International. Archived from the original on 8 April 2020. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
- ^ Joris Kila in Monument Men der Gegenwart. Schutz vor Bomben und Plünderungen., (German) In: Kölner Stadt Anzeiger, 20 February 2014.
- ^ Eric Gibson: "The Destruction of Cultural Heritage Should be a War Crime". The Wall Street Journal, 2 March 2015.
- ^ Roger O'Keefe, Camille Péron, Tofig Musayev, Gianluca Ferrari: Protection of Cultural Property. Military Manual. UNESCO, 2016, pp. 73ff.
- ^ Sabine von Schorlemer: Kulturgutzerstörung. Die Auslöschung von Kulturerbe in Krisenländern als Herausforderung für die Vereinten Nationen., (German), 2016, S. 785ff.
- ^ UNESCO Director-General calls for stronger cooperation for heritage protection at the Blue Shield International General Assembly. UNESCO, 13 September 2017.
- ^ "Blue Shield Statutes (2016)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 February 2022. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
- ^ "General Assembly 2017, Vienna, Austria". 30 September 2017.
- ^ Interview with Karl von Habsburg (German) in RP-Online, 18 October 2018.
- ^ "Blue Helmet Forum 2019 - Protection of Cultural Heritage in Peace Operations", Austrian Armed Forces
- ^ UN peacekeepers in partnership with the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) and Blue Shield International in Lebanon
- ^ "Beirut: Habsburg koordiniert Kulturgüterschutz" (German: Beirut - Habsburg coordinates the protection of cultural property)
- ^ "National Committees Around the Globe". Blue Shield International. Archived from the original on 16 January 2021. Retrieved 5 September 2024.
- ^ "Blue Shield General Assembly 2020". The Blue Shield. Blue Shield International. August 2020. Archived from the original on 14 January 2021. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
- ^ Article 2.1, Blue Shield Statutes 2016
- ^ Blue Shield Statutes 2016.
- ^ "Blue Shield International: Who we are". 29 August 2021.
- ^ "Blue Shield: What we Do". 17 June 2014.
- ^ Stone, Peter G. (2013). "A four-tier approach to the protection of cultural property in the event of armed conflict". Antiquity. 87 (335): 166–177. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00048699. S2CID 143218182.
- ^ "Blue Shield International: Partners". Archived from the original on 4 April 2019. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
- ^ Blue Shield International (19 September 2018). "BSI invited to speak at 11th CIMIC Units Commanders' Conference".
- ^ Blue Shield International (23 November 2017). "Blue Shield to assist in NATO Exercise Trident Jaguar 2018".
- ^ Culture Sector (4 October 2018). "Training course on the protection of cultural property in the event of armed conflict in Georgia". UNESCO.
- ^ Blue Shield International (28 October 2018). "Blue Shield International supports training in Georgia with UNESCO". Blue Shield International.
- ^ "Partnering with the Fiji Military for Cultural Property Protection". UNESCO Office in Apia. 25 November 2018.
- ^ "Blue Shield International Facebook post". Facebook. 23 November 2018.
- ^ Blue Shield International (19 November 2018). "CPP features prominently at Coping with Culture Conference".
- ^ a b "The Blue Shield Logo: Guidance for Use".
Further reading
[edit]- George P. Mackenzie (2000). "Working for the Protection of the World's Cultural Heritage: The International Committee of the Blue Shield". In: Journal of the Society of Archivists. 24(1), Routledge & The Society of Archivists, pp. 5–10, ISSN 1465-3907.
- Marie-Thérèse Varlamoff (2002). "The Blue Shield Initiative: Joining Efforts to Preserve our Cultural Heritage in Danger". In: LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries. 12(2–3), Utrecht Publishing & Archiving Services, pp. 275–282, ISSN 1435-5205.
- T. Aglassa (c. 2002) "Blue Shield in Benin Archived 23 October 2021 at the Wayback Machine". In: ICOM Cultural Heritage Disaster Preparedness and Response
- Corine Koch (Übers., Ed.) (2003). A Blue Shield for the Protection of our Endangered Cultural Heritage. International Preservation Issues Number Four. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, Paris, ISBN 2-91-274302-8.
- Ross Shimmon (2004). "The International Committee of the Blue Shield 1998–2004: An Overview". In: Alexandria: The Journal of National and International Library and Information Issues. 16(3). Ashgate Publishing & the British Library, pp. 133–141, ISSN 0955-7490.
- Kryste Bogoeski (2016). "Twenty Years Blue Shield (1996 - 2016) Archived 23 October 2021 at the Wayback Machine"
- Patty Gerstenblith, and Nancy C. Wilkie (2017). "The U.S. Committee of the Blue Shield and the Blue Shield Movement", NATO Legal Gazette 38 Archived 2 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine, 70-79.
- Peter G. Stone. (2013). "A four-tier approach to the protection of cultural property in the event of armed conflict". Antiquity, 87(335), 166-177. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00048699.
- Peter G. Stone (2017). Protecting cultural property in the event of armed conflict: the work of the Blue Shield Archived 23 October 2021 at the Wayback Machine, Adelaide Law School Research Unit on Military Law and Ethics RUMLAE Research Paper No. 17–02
- Emma Cunliffe, Paul Fox and Peter G Stone. 2018. "The Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict: Unnecessary Distraction or Mission-Relevant Priority? Archived 4 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine" NATO OPEN 2 (4) Summer 2018
External links
[edit]- The Blue Shield website
- National Committees around the world on the Blue Shield website Archived 16 January 2021 at the Wayback Machine
- Blue Shield International on Facebook
- Blue Shield International on Twitter
- UNESCO: Armed Conflict and Heritage
- The 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict and its two Protocols (1954, 1999)
Blue Shield International
View on GrokipediaHistorical Development
Founding and Legal Basis
The International Committee of the Blue Shield (ICBS) was established on September 26, 1996, in The Hague, Netherlands, by the four principal international non-governmental organizations in the field of cultural heritage: the International Council on Archives (ICA), the International Council of Museums (ICOM), the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS), and the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA).[5] This formation aimed to coordinate global efforts for the protection of cultural property during armed conflicts and peacetime threats, serving as the cultural heritage counterpart to the International Committee of the Red Cross.[5] The ICBS was headquartered in The Hague to align with the legal framework governing its mandate.[5] In 2006, the Association of National Committees of the Blue Shield (ANCBS) was founded to represent and support emerging national Blue Shield committees worldwide.[5] On January 1, 2016, the ICBS merged with the ANCBS to form Blue Shield International, enhancing its operational capacity through a unified structure that integrates international oversight with national implementation networks.[5] This amalgamation addressed the growing need for coordinated responses to escalating threats against cultural heritage, such as those observed in conflicts in Iraq, Mali, and Syria.[5] Blue Shield International's legal foundation rests on the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, ratified by 137 states parties as of 2023, which designates the Blue Shield as the distinctive emblem for identifying and safeguarding cultural property under international humanitarian law.[1] The Convention, adopted on May 14, 1954, and its two protocols (1954 and 1999), obligate states to prevent the destruction of cultural heritage during hostilities and provide mechanisms for its protection, with Blue Shield International facilitating compliance through advisory and operational roles without direct enforcement powers.[3] The emblem's deployment is strictly regulated to maintain its protective status, prohibiting commercial or unrelated use to preserve its neutrality and efficacy in crisis situations.[3]Key Milestones and Organizational Changes
The International Committee of the Blue Shield (ICBS) was established in 1996 in Paris as an emergency action coordination body, founded by the International Council of Museums (ICOM), International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS), International Council on Archives (ICA), and International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA), with UNESCO and the International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM) as partners.[14] This followed initial discussions in February 1994 by experts in the Netherlands to address gaps in implementing the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict.[14] In 1999, the ICBS was recognized as an advisory body to the Intergovernmental Committee under the Second Protocol to the Hague Convention.[5] The Association of National Committees of the Blue Shield (ANCBS) was founded in December 2008 to coordinate the growing network of national Blue Shield committees, facilitate communication, promote awareness, and build capacity among them, with formal statutes adopted in 2009.[15] [5] In 2014, the ICBS and ANCBS agreed to merge during their joint General Assembly in Rome, aiming to streamline operations and enhance global coordination.[15] The merger was completed in 2016, forming Blue Shield International (initially "The Blue Shield") with new statutes that integrated the advisory and coordination functions of both entities into a unified non-governmental organization.[5] [15] This structural change expanded the organization's scope beyond armed conflict to include natural disasters and peacetime threats, with full implementation and rebranding occurring in 2017, including the adoption of the 1954 Convention's emblem within a blue circle to symbolize broader protective efforts.[16] By 2018, a formalized logo was introduced to reflect the unified identity.[5]Organizational Framework
Composition and Governance
Blue Shield International (BSI) is a non-governmental, non-profit organization registered under Dutch law, comprising a network of national committees coordinated by an international board.[1][17] Its governance is outlined in the 2016 Statutes, which define its mission, structure, and operational principles, emphasizing coordination among national entities for cultural heritage protection.[17][18] The BSI Board consists of a president, four elected members typically drawn from national committee leadership, and designated representatives from its four founding international non-governmental organizations: the International Council of Museums (ICOM), International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS), International Council on Archives (ICA), and International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA).[17][19] These representatives ensure alignment with the heritage sectors represented by the founders, which established the framework for Blue Shield activities since the 1990s.[17] Decision-making authority resides with the General Assembly, which elects the president and board members, oversees strategic direction, and approves key policies.[17] National committees, operating independently but adhering to BSI statutes, implement activities at the local level and report to the board for international coordination.[17][20] As of 2025, the board includes:- Peter Stone, President (elected August 2020), UNESCO Chair in Cultural Property Protection and Peace at Newcastle University, with prior roles as UK Blue Shield Chair since 2012.[19]
- Anna Puhr, Secretary and Elected Board Member (elected 2025), Deputy Secretary-General of Blue Shield Austria, specializing in cultural heritage in crises.[19]
- Klaus Weschenfelder, Elected Board Member and Treasurer (since May 2020, re-elected 2023), art historian focused on disaster risk management.[19]
- Ömer Dabanlı, Elected Board Member, Associate Professor at Istanbul Technical University and founding President of Blue Shield Türkiye since 2021.[19]
- Hamady Gaye, Elected Board Member (re-elected 2023), Secretary General of Senegal Blue Shield and heritage curator.[19]
- Medea Ekner, Board Member (ICOM representative), Director General of ICOM since June 2023.[19]
- Sharon Memis, Board Member (IFLA representative), Secretary General and CEO of IFLA since June 2023.[19]
- Carlos Eduardo Serrano Vásquez, Board Member (ICA representative), Executive Director of ICA.[19]
- Michał Wosiński, Board Member (ICOMOS representative), heritage consultant and Principal Archaeology Specialist at Jacobs.[19]
National Committees and International Network
Blue Shield International coordinates a global network of national committees, which form the primary operational units for implementing heritage protection at the country level. As of 2023, there are 30 accredited national committees, with ongoing accreditation processes for additional ones in countries such as Armenia, Croatia, Italy, Sweden, and Ukraine.[21] These committees typically comprise experts from heritage sectors including museums, archives, libraries, audiovisual collections, monuments, and archaeological sites, often in collaboration with national government bodies and emergency response entities.[17][13] National committees focus on localized activities such as risk assessments, emergency planning, training programs, and advocacy to prevent damage to cultural property from armed conflicts, natural disasters, or other threats.[1] They submit annual reports on their initiatives and align efforts with international humanitarian law, particularly the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict.[22] Examples of active committees include those in Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States, spanning Europe, the Americas, Asia, and other regions.[23][24] The international network is governed by the Blue Shield International Board, which ensures coordination, facilitates expertise sharing, and convenes general assemblies for strategic planning and reporting among committees.[17] This framework emerged from the 2016 merger of the International Committee of the Blue Shield (ICBS), focused on emblem administration and advocacy, with the Association of National Committees of the Blue Shield (ANCBS), which handled committee coordination, resulting in a streamlined, unified organization incorporated under Dutch law with its secretariat at Newcastle University in the United Kingdom.[14] The merger enhanced responsiveness by integrating global oversight with national implementation, enabling joint missions, resource pooling, and standardized protocols across the network.[14]Objectives and Principles
Core Mission
Blue Shield International's core mission centers on safeguarding the world's cultural property, encompassing both cultural and natural heritage in tangible and intangible forms, particularly during armed conflicts, natural disasters, or human-made catastrophes. Established as a neutral, non-governmental, and non-profit entity, it coordinates global efforts to mitigate threats to heritage sites, artifacts, and traditions that are integral to human identity and continuity. This mission derives directly from the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, which Blue Shield International promotes through advocacy for ratification, respect, and practical implementation by states and armed forces.[25][9] The organization's approach emphasizes proactive measures, such as risk assessments, emergency preparedness, and capacity-building initiatives, to enhance resilience before crises escalate. It prioritizes the inseparability of cultural heritage from affected populations, viewing protection not merely as preservation of objects but as a means to support community recovery and cultural identity. Ethical principles underpin this work, including strict neutrality, independence, impartiality, and a non-profit ethos, ensuring operations remain free from political influence while respecting diverse cultural contexts. These commitments are formalized in documents like the 2016 Articles of Association and the 2001 Strasbourg Charter, which guide collaborative actions with governments, NGOs, and military entities.[25][9] In pursuit of its mission, Blue Shield International fosters international cooperation to raise awareness of heritage vulnerabilities and deliver targeted training for professionals, including heritage experts, policymakers, and military personnel. This includes encouraging local community involvement in protection efforts and facilitating rapid response mechanisms to address immediate threats, such as looting or destruction during conflicts. By operating through a network of national committees, the organization translates global standards into localized actions, aiming to prevent irreversible losses that armed conflicts have historically inflicted on sites like ancient temples or libraries.[25][10]Protective Mechanisms and Protocols
The protective mechanisms and protocols of Blue Shield International are anchored in the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, supplemented by its 1954 First Protocol and 1999 Second Protocol, which establish legal obligations for states parties to safeguard cultural heritage during armed conflicts and occupations.[26] These frameworks mandate peacetime preparations such as compiling inventories of cultural property, marking eligible sites and movable items with the distinctive Blue Shield emblem, installing emergency safeguards like fire suppression systems, and appointing national authorities to oversee implementation.[26] During hostilities, protocols require belligerents to respect and refrain from directing attacks against marked property unless imperative military necessity justifies otherwise, with provisions for temporary evacuation to designated refuges if threats escalate.[26] Deliberate violations, including attacks on protected sites, constitute war crimes under international humanitarian law.[27] Central to these mechanisms is the regulated use of the Blue Shield emblem—a royal blue and white shield—to signal protected status and facilitate recognition by military forces. The emblem may be displayed singly for general protection of cultural property, personnel involved in its safeguarding, or transport convoys; repeated three times in a triangular formation for special protection of immovable sites, shelters, or refuges; or outlined with a red border for enhanced protection under the Second Protocol.[27][26] Its application is strictly controlled: in peacetime, it is limited to preparatory, educational, or small-scale uses without implying legal protection; during conflict, only authorized markings confer immunity, and any misuse—such as false designation or commercial exploitation—is prohibited and punishable as a grave breach.[27] Blue Shield International coordinates emblem deployment through its national committees, ensuring compliance and training programs for heritage professionals and armed forces.[26] Enhanced protection, introduced by the 1999 Second Protocol, elevates safeguards for cultural property of utmost importance to humanity, such as irreplaceable monuments or archives, requiring state nomination, vetting by the UNESCO-administered Committee for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, and unanimous approval.[28][26] Sites under this regime, like the Historic Centre of Vienna (added in 2002), receive absolute immunity from hostile acts except in cases of unavoidable military necessity, with violations treated as war crimes irrespective of circumstances; as of October 2018, 82 states had ratified the Protocol, enabling its application in interstate and non-international conflicts.[26][28] Blue Shield International supports this through advocacy for ratifications, risk assessments, and joint exercises with militaries to embed protocols in operational doctrines.[9] Blue Shield's protocols emphasize proactive risk reduction, including digital inventories and contingency planning, while upholding ethical principles of neutrality, impartiality, and collaboration with governments, NGOs, and local communities to avoid politicization and ensure effective on-ground execution.[9] These measures extend to natural and human-made disasters, adapting Hague frameworks for post-conflict stabilization and recovery, though enforcement relies on state compliance and international monitoring.[26]Operational Activities
Missions and Emergency Responses
The International Committee of the Blue Shield (ICBS) and its associated national committees undertake fact-finding and assessment missions to evaluate threats to cultural heritage in zones of conflict or political upheaval, aiming to document damages, identify protection needs, and facilitate coordinated responses. These missions provide independent verification where official reports may be limited or inaccessible.[29][30] In Egypt, during the instability following the 2011 revolution, the Association of National Committees of the Blue Shield (ANCBS) conducted a fact-finding mission, including a visit to the ancient site of Memphis on February 14, 2011, to assess risks to archaeological heritage.[29] A follow-up mission occurred in 2012.[31] In Libya, amid the aftermath of the 2011 civil war, ICBS dispatched an initial emergency assessment mission from September 28 to 30, 2011, to independently gauge the state of cultural property, as no prior neutral evaluations existed.[30] A second mission followed in November 2011 to further evaluate conditions and support recovery planning.[32] For natural disasters and crises, Blue Shield national committees implement rapid emergency responses, including damage stabilization and salvage operations. In summer 2021, committees in Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, Czech Republic, and Turkey activated protocols to protect heritage sites from floods, wildfires, and tornados.[33] ICBS supports these efforts by compiling and disseminating emergency management resources, such as the 2022 guide on preparatory planning, crisis response, and post-disaster recovery for cultural heritage in conflicts and calamities.[34] Collaborations, including memoranda of understanding with entities like Cultural Emergency Response, enhance on-ground capabilities for urgent interventions.[35] These activities emphasize proactive risk mitigation alongside immediate action to preserve irreplaceable cultural assets.[36]Advocacy, Training, and Capacity Building
Blue Shield International conducts advocacy to promote adherence to international legal frameworks for cultural heritage protection, including the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict and its protocols.[20] This involves providing policy advice to governments, encouraging the development of national policies that integrate heritage safeguarding into peacetime and conflict preparedness, and collaborating with armed forces to foster awareness of legal obligations under the laws of armed conflict.[37] For instance, BSI advocates for proactive measures to prevent damage, emphasizing the humanitarian dimensions of heritage protection through targeted courses and partnerships, such as a 2024 release highlighting its relevance to broader humanitarian ecosystems.[8] In training initiatives, BSI delivers custom-designed programs since 2017, focusing on cultural property protection strategies, international law, risk assessment, and inventory management to equip participants for emergencies.[38] These courses target heritage sector professionals and military personnel, often in collaboration with organizations like the International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM) and the International Council of Museums (ICOM), including joint efforts such as the UN Training Service Industry Cultural Property Protection course.[38] Examples include the Third Cultural Property Protection Course held in Curragh, Ireland, aimed at enhancing practical skills for implementing convention obligations.[38] National committees complement these by organizing specialized sessions, such as those on disaster risk reduction for Swedish cultural heritage professionals.[39] Capacity building forms a core component, enabling states to fulfill Hague Convention duties through education, material development, and support for national networks.[38] BSI facilitates this via partnerships that deliver training resources and attend events like national workshops on the 1954 and 1970 UNESCO conventions.[40] In 2023, national committees executed over 60 training courses and events, engaging hundreds of participants in topics ranging from emergency response to policy integration.[21] These efforts prioritize peacetime preparation to mitigate risks from armed conflicts or disasters, with BSI coordinating knowledge-sharing to strengthen global implementation.[41]Symbolic Elements
The Blue Shield Emblem
The Blue Shield emblem is the distinctive protective symbol established under the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, consisting of a blue escutcheon shape on a white background.[4] It designates cultural property—such as monuments, archaeological sites, museums, libraries, and archives—as well as transport vehicles, equipment, and personnel tasked with safeguarding such property during armed conflicts.[3] The emblem's design draws from heraldic traditions, with the blue and white colors evoking neutrality and protection akin to the Red Cross emblem for medical services.[4] Three primary variants exist to denote varying levels of protection: a single blue shield for general protection of cultural property meeting the Convention's criteria; a group of three blue shields arranged triangularly for special protection of selected immovable cultural property, shelters, or transport; and a blue shield outlined by a detached external red band for enhanced protection of property inscribed on the International Register established by the 1999 Second Protocol to the Hague Convention.[4] General protection applies to cultural property of great importance to the cultural heritage of peoples, while special and enhanced protections require additional peacetime safeguards and international notification.[3] International humanitarian law strictly regulates the emblem's use, permitting it only on property or persons explicitly designated under the Convention and its Protocols; unauthorized display or misuse, such as for non-cultural purposes or by non-parties, is prohibited and may constitute a war crime.[4] Parties to the conflict must respect and protect marked items from attack, seizure, or destruction, though the emblem does not confer immunity if the property is used for military purposes.[3] Blue Shield International, formed in 2009, incorporates the emblem into its organizational logo by enclosing a single blue shield within a mid-blue circular frame, distinguishing it from the protective variants to avoid implying direct operational safeguarding authority reserved for states or authorized entities.[42] This adaptation symbolizes the organization's coordination role under Article 17 of the 1954 Convention, which mandates an international body to publicize the Convention's principles and facilitate protection efforts.[5]Evaluations and Challenges
Achievements and Case Studies
Blue Shield International has coordinated numerous fact-finding and assessment missions to evaluate damage to cultural heritage in conflict and disaster zones, facilitating targeted protection efforts. In 2011, following the Libyan civil war, the organization conducted its first emergency assessment mission from September 28 to 30, led by figures including Karl von Habsburg, to survey sites such as archaeological remains in Leptis Magna and Tripoli's museums, identifying looting and structural damage while recommending immediate safeguarding measures to local authorities and UNESCO.[30] A second mission in November 2011 built on these findings, emphasizing civil-military cooperation to prevent further illicit trafficking and destruction.[32] Similarly, in response to the 2011 Egyptian revolution, Blue Shield dispatched a fact-finding mission in February 2011 (with follow-up activities noted into 2012), assessing vulnerabilities at sites like Memphis and coordinating with Egyptian heritage officials to bolster security against unrest-induced threats, including potential looting at the Egyptian Museum.[15] These missions underscored the organization's role in rapid response, contributing to enhanced site inventories and international advocacy for Hague Convention implementation.[43] In more recent operations, Blue Shield International has addressed ongoing conflicts and natural disasters. Exploratory missions to Ukraine in early 2023, including a second visit around the war's first anniversary in February, focused on integrating cultural property protection into military protocols, training personnel, and evacuating artifacts from frontline areas.[7] Post-earthquake assessments in Türkiye and Syria in 2023 evaluated heritage losses, such as damage to ancient mosques and churches, and supported recovery planning through partnerships with local committees.[44] A 2023 mission to Mayotte after Tropical Cyclone Chido prioritized salvaging underwater and coastal heritage, demonstrating adaptability to climate-related threats.[7] Broader achievements include expanding to 31 national committees by 2023, enabling localized capacity building, such as NATO workshops in February and October 2023 that trained forces from multiple countries on heritage safeguards.[44] The organization influenced UN Security Council Resolution 2347 in 2017, which condemned attacks on cultural heritage and called for global action against trafficking.[5] In 2016, Blue Shield's advocacy supported the International Criminal Court's first prosecution of cultural property destruction as a war crime in Mali.[5] The September 2024 "Shielding the Past" conference in Bucharest marked 70 years of the Hague Convention, training representatives from 18 committees on risk management and fostering new national entities.[45] These efforts highlight Blue Shield's evolution from coordination body to active operator, though outcomes depend on host nation cooperation and enforcement of international law.[5]Criticisms, Limitations, and Controversies
The International Committee of the Blue Shield (ICBS), established in 1996, has operated without dedicated funding from its inception, relying instead on the resources and networks of its four founding member organizations: the International Council of Museums (ICOM), the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS), the International Committee of the Blue Shield, and the International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM).[46] This structural limitation has constrained its ability to conduct independent, large-scale operations, positioning it primarily as a coordinating body rather than an operational entity with enforcement powers.[47] Financial shortcomings persist, with ongoing resource constraints threatening the expansion of activities such as emergency missions and advocacy efforts.[47] Critics have noted that these limitations hinder proactive interventions, particularly in protracted conflicts where cultural sites face systematic destruction despite the Hague Convention's framework. For instance, the emblem's visibility and respect are not guaranteed, as belligerents may ignore markings, and the ICBS lacks mechanisms to compel compliance beyond diplomatic appeals.[48] Misuse of the Blue Shield emblem represents another operational challenge, as unauthorized or improper application—such as affixing it without competent authority approval—can dilute its protective intent and invite legal repercussions under the 1954 Hague Convention and its protocols.[49] Reports of such misuse are directed to bodies like the International Committee of the Red Cross for investigation, but enforcement remains dependent on national legislation, often leading to inconsistent outcomes.[50] The ICBS emphasizes strict neutrality to sidestep political entanglements, which, while preserving credibility, may restrict engagement in ideologically divided conflicts where heritage protection intersects with geopolitical disputes.[6] Overall, the absence of binding authority and universal state adherence to the underlying conventions—coupled with emblem-related vulnerabilities—underscores broader critiques of the system's reliance on voluntary cooperation, rendering it reactive rather than preventive in high-risk scenarios.[51]References
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blue_Shield_Fact_Finding_Mission_Egypt_2012_Habsburg-Lothringen.jpg