Hubbry Logo
Closed setClosed setMain
Open search
Closed set
Community hub
Closed set
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Closed set
Closed set
from Wikipedia

In geometry, topology, and related branches of mathematics, a closed set is a set whose complement is an open set.[1][2] In a topological space, a closed set can be defined as a set which contains all its limit points. In a complete metric space, a closed set is a set which is closed under the limit operation. This should not be confused with closed manifold.

Sets that are both open and closed are called clopen sets.

Definition

[edit]

Given a topological space , the following statements are equivalent:

  1. a set is closed in
  2. is an open subset of ; that is,
  3. is equal to its closure in
  4. contains all of its limit points.
  5. contains all of its boundary points.

An alternative characterization of closed sets is available via sequences and nets. A subset of a topological space is closed in if and only if every limit of every net of elements of also belongs to In a first-countable space (such as a metric space), it is enough to consider only convergent sequences, instead of all nets. One value of this characterization is that it may be used as a definition in the context of convergence spaces, which are more general than topological spaces. Notice that this characterization also depends on the surrounding space because whether or not a sequence or net converges in depends on what points are present in A point in is said to be close to a subset if (or equivalently, if belongs to the closure of in the topological subspace meaning where is endowed with the subspace topology induced on it by [note 1]). Because the closure of in is thus the set of all points in that are close to this terminology allows for a plain English description of closed subsets:

a subset is closed if and only if it contains every point that is close to it.

In terms of net convergence, a point is close to a subset if and only if there exists some net (valued) in that converges to If is a topological subspace of some other topological space in which case is called a topological super-space of then there might exist some point in that is close to (although not an element of ), which is how it is possible for a subset to be closed in but to not be closed in the "larger" surrounding super-space If and if is any topological super-space of then is always a (potentially proper) subset of which denotes the closure of in indeed, even if is a closed subset of (which happens if and only if ), it is nevertheless still possible for to be a proper subset of However, is a closed subset of if and only if for some (or equivalently, for every) topological super-space of

Closed sets can also be used to characterize continuous functions: a map is continuous if and only if for every subset ; this can be reworded in plain English as: is continuous if and only if for every subset maps points that are close to to points that are close to Similarly, is continuous at a fixed given point if and only if whenever is close to a subset then is close to

More about closed sets

[edit]

The notion of closed set is defined above in terms of open sets, a concept that makes sense for topological spaces, as well as for other spaces that carry topological structures, such as metric spaces, differentiable manifolds, uniform spaces, and gauge spaces.

Whether a set is closed depends on the space in which it is embedded. However, the compact Hausdorff spaces are "absolutely closed", in the sense that, if you embed a compact Hausdorff space in an arbitrary Hausdorff space then will always be a closed subset of ; the "surrounding space" does not matter here. Stone–Čech compactification, a process that turns a completely regular Hausdorff space into a compact Hausdorff space, may be described as adjoining limits of certain nonconvergent nets to the space.

Furthermore, every closed subset of a compact space is compact, and every compact subspace of a Hausdorff space is closed.

Closed sets also give a useful characterization of compactness: a topological space is compact if and only if every collection of nonempty closed subsets of with empty intersection admits a finite subcollection with empty intersection.

A topological space is disconnected if there exist disjoint, nonempty, open subsets and of whose union is Furthermore, is totally disconnected if it has an open basis consisting of closed sets.

Properties

[edit]

A closed set contains its own boundary. In other words, if you are "outside" a closed set, you may move a small amount in any direction and still stay outside the set. This is also true if the boundary is the empty set, e.g. in the metric space of rational numbers, for the set of numbers of which the square is less than

  • Any intersection of any family of closed sets is closed (this includes intersections of infinitely many closed sets)
  • The union of finitely many closed sets is closed.
  • The empty set is closed.
  • The whole set is closed.

In fact, if given a set and a collection of subsets of such that the elements of have the properties listed above, then there exists a unique topology on such that the closed subsets of are exactly those sets that belong to The intersection property also allows one to define the closure of a set in a space which is defined as the smallest closed subset of that is a superset of Specifically, the closure of can be constructed as the intersection of all of these closed supersets.

Sets that can be constructed as the union of countably many closed sets are denoted Fσ sets. These sets need not be closed.

Examples

[edit]
  • The closed interval of real numbers is closed. (See Interval (mathematics) for an explanation of the bracket and parenthesis set notation.)
  • The unit interval is closed in the metric space of real numbers, and the set of rational numbers between and (inclusive) is closed in the space of rational numbers, but is not closed in the real numbers.
  • Some sets are neither open nor closed, for instance the half-open interval in the real numbers.
  • The ray is closed.
  • The Cantor set is an unusual closed set in the sense that it consists entirely of boundary points and is nowhere dense.
  • Singleton points (and thus finite sets) are closed in T1 spaces and Hausdorff spaces.
  • The set of integers is an infinite and unbounded closed set in the real numbers.
  • If is a function between topological spaces then is continuous if and only if preimages of closed sets in are closed in

See also

[edit]
  • Clopen set – Subset which is both open and closed
  • Closed map – A function that sends open (resp. closed) subsets to open (resp. closed) subsets
  • Closed region – Connected open subset of a topological space
  • Open set – Basic subset of a topological space
  • Neighbourhood – Open set containing a given point
  • Region (mathematics) – Connected open subset of a topological space
  • Regular closed set

Notes

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ Rudin, Walter (1976). Principles of Mathematical Analysis. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-054235-X.
  2. ^ Munkres, James R. (2000). Topology (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-181629-2.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
In topology, a closed set is a subset of a topological space whose complement is an open set. Equivalently, a set is closed if it contains all its limit points. In first-countable spaces such as metric spaces, it is closed if the limit of every convergent sequence in the set belongs to the set. Closed sets exhibit key properties that mirror those of open sets in complementary fashion: the and the entire space are closed, arbitrary intersections of closed sets are closed, and finite unions of closed sets are closed. In metric spaces, common examples include closed balls, which consist of all points at a less than or equal to a fixed from a center, as well as the integers within the real numbers under the standard . These concepts are foundational in and , enabling the study of continuity, , and convergence without relying on specific metrics. Sets that are both open and closed, termed clopen sets, arise in disconnected spaces and play a role in understanding topological connectedness.

Core Concepts

Definition

In , a CC of a XX is defined as closed if its complement XCX \setminus C is open. Equivalently, CC is closed if it contains all of its limit points. A point pXp \in X is a limit point of CC if every open neighborhood of pp intersects CC at some point other than pp itself. This condition ensures that CC encompasses all points that are "arbitrarily close" to it in the topological sense, without relying on distances. The definition assumes familiarity with the basic structure of topological spaces, where open sets form a collection closed under arbitrary unions and finite intersections, and neighborhoods are open sets containing a given point. The concept of closed sets originated in the early 20th-century development of , particularly through Felix Hausdorff's work, which generalized notions from metric spaces to abstract topological spaces. In his 1914 book Grundzüge der Mengenlehre, Hausdorff introduced closed sets as foundational elements, defined axiomatically to preserve topological invariance and overcome the restrictions of metric-based approaches, such as those limited to Euclidean spaces. This framework allowed for the study of continuity and convergence in broader settings.

Relation to Open Sets

In any topological space, the collection of closed sets forms precisely the family of complements of open sets, establishing a fundamental duality between the two concepts. Specifically, a CC of the space XX is closed its complement XCX \setminus C is open. This equivalence arises directly from the definition of a , where the open sets satisfy the s of including the and the whole , being closed under arbitrary unions, and closed under finite intersections; the corresponding properties for closed sets—containing the and whole , closed under arbitrary intersections, and closed under finite unions—follow by taking complements. This duality ensures that the is inherently closed under complements, meaning that the complement of any is closed and vice versa, which is a key structural underpinning the theory of . A special case of this duality occurs with , which are subsets that are simultaneously open and closed. The \emptyset and the entire XX are always clopen in any , as their complements are each other and both satisfy the axioms. In general, clopen sets represent partitions that respect the without boundaries in the open-closed sense. In connected topological spaces, this duality takes on added significance: the only clopen sets are \emptyset and XX itself. A is connected if it cannot be expressed as the union of two nonempty disjoint open sets, which equivalently means it admits no nontrivial clopen subsets; any proper nonempty clopen set would disconnect the space by serving as both an open and closed partition. This uniqueness highlights the role of connectedness in restricting the duality's manifestations. The open-closed duality also lays the groundwork for concepts like the interior and boundary of a set, where the interior is the largest open contained within it, and the boundary can be intuitively viewed as the difference between the closure (the smallest closed set containing it) and the interior, though these are explored further elsewhere. This relation reinforces the symmetric framework of , allowing proofs and properties to be dualized by complementation.

Properties

Set Operations

In topological spaces, closed sets exhibit specific algebraic properties under set operations, forming a family that is stable under certain unions and intersections. The collection of all closed sets in a topological space XX is closed under arbitrary intersections and finite unions, meaning the result of such an operation remains closed. This stability arises from the duality between closed sets and open sets, where a set is closed its complement is open. The of any collection of closed sets, whether finite or infinite, is itself closed. To see this, suppose {Fi:iI}\{F_i : i \in I\} is an arbitrary family of closed subsets of XX. Then the complements {Fic:iI}\{F_i^c : i \in I\} are open sets. The complement of the intersection is given by (iIFi)c=iIFic,\left( \bigcap_{i \in I} F_i \right)^c = \bigcup_{i \in I} F_i^c, which is open as an arbitrary union of open sets. Therefore, iIFi\bigcap_{i \in I} F_i is closed. In contrast, the union of finitely many closed sets is closed, but arbitrary (infinite) unions need not be. For a finite collection {F1,,Fn}\{F_1, \dots, F_n\} of closed sets, the complements {F1c,,Fnc}\{F_1^c, \dots, F_n^c\} are open, and the complement of the union is (k=1nFk)c=k=1nFkc,\left( \bigcup_{k=1}^n F_k \right)^c = \bigcap_{k=1}^n F_k^c, a finite of open sets, which is open. Thus, k=1nFk\bigcup_{k=1}^n F_k is closed. However, in spaces such as the real numbers with the standard , an infinite union of closed sets may fail to be closed. These properties distinguish closed sets from open sets, which are instead closed under arbitrary unions but only finite intersections.

Closure Operator

In a (X,τ)(X, \tau), the closure of a AXA \subseteq X, denoted cl(A)\mathrm{cl}(A) or A\overline{A}, is defined as the of all closed sets in XX that contain AA. This makes cl(A)\mathrm{cl}(A) the smallest closed set containing AA with respect to inclusion. Equivalently, cl(A)=AA\mathrm{cl}(A) = A \cup A', where AA' is the set of all limit points of AA. The closure operator cl\mathrm{cl} satisfies three fundamental properties: it is extensive, idempotent, and monotonic. Extensiveness: For any AXA \subseteq X, Acl(A)A \subseteq \mathrm{cl}(A).
Proof: By definition, cl(A)\mathrm{cl}(A) is the of all closed sets containing AA. Each such closed set contains AA, so their intersection also contains AA. Thus, Acl(A)A \subseteq \mathrm{cl}(A).
Monotonicity: If ABXA \subseteq B \subseteq X, then cl(A)cl(B)\mathrm{cl}(A) \subseteq \mathrm{cl}(B).
Proof: The family of closed sets containing BB is a of the family of closed sets containing AA, since any closed set containing BB also contains AA. The over a smaller family yields a larger or equal set, so cl(B)cl(A)\mathrm{cl}(B) \supseteq \mathrm{cl}(A).
Idempotence: For any AXA \subseteq X, cl(cl(A))=cl(A)\mathrm{cl}(\mathrm{cl}(A)) = \mathrm{cl}(A).
Proof: First, cl(A)cl(cl(A))\mathrm{cl}(A) \subseteq \mathrm{cl}(\mathrm{cl}(A)) by extensiveness. For the reverse inclusion, note that cl(A)\mathrm{cl}(A) is closed (as an intersection of closed sets) and contains AA, so it is one of the closed sets in the intersection defining cl(A)\mathrm{cl}(A). Thus, cl(A)cl(cl(A))\mathrm{cl}(A) \supseteq \mathrm{cl}(\mathrm{cl}(A)), since cl(cl(A))\mathrm{cl}(\mathrm{cl}(A)) is the smallest closed set containing cl(A)\mathrm{cl}(A), and cl(A)\mathrm{cl}(A) is already closed and contains itself. Combining both directions gives equality.
A subset AXA \subseteq X is closed if and only if cl(A)=A\mathrm{cl}(A) = A. If AA is closed, then cl(A)=A\mathrm{cl}(A) = A by the definition of closure as the smallest closed set containing AA. Conversely, if cl(A)=A\mathrm{cl}(A) = A, then AA equals its closure, which is always closed as an intersection of closed sets, so AA is closed. The closure operator in a topological space satisfies the Kuratowski closure axioms, which provide a complete axiomatic characterization. These four axioms, formulated by Kazimierz Kuratowski, are:
  1. cl()=\mathrm{cl}(\emptyset) = \emptyset (the empty set has empty closure).
  2. Acl(A)A \subseteq \mathrm{cl}(A) for all AXA \subseteq X (extensiveness).
  3. cl(cl(A))=cl(A)\mathrm{cl}(\mathrm{cl}(A)) = \mathrm{cl}(A) for all AXA \subseteq X (idempotence).
  4. cl(AB)=cl(A)cl(B)\mathrm{cl}(A \cup B) = \mathrm{cl}(A) \cup \mathrm{cl}(B) for all A,BXA, B \subseteq X (additivity).
    Any operator satisfying these axioms defines a unique topology on XX via the closed sets as the fixed points of the operator (sets AA with cl(A)=A\mathrm{cl}(A) = A). Monotonicity follows as a theorem from axioms 2 and 4.

Examples

Standard Topological Spaces

In the real line R\mathbb{R} equipped with the standard topology generated by open intervals, closed intervals of the form [a,b][a, b] where aba \leq b are closed sets, as their complements (,a)(b,)(-\infty, a) \cup (b, \infty) consist of open intervals and are thus open. The set of integers Z\mathbb{Z} is also closed in this topology, since its complement RZ\mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Z} is a union of open intervals (n,n+1)(n, n+1) for nZn \in \mathbb{Z}, making the complement open. Singletons {x}\{x\} for xRx \in \mathbb{R} are closed, as their complements R{x}\mathbb{R} \setminus \{x\} are open, being the union of (,x)(-\infty, x) and (x,)(x, \infty). In Euclidean spaces Rn\mathbb{R}^n with the standard topology induced by the Euclidean metric, closed balls {xRn:xcr}\{x \in \mathbb{R}^n : \|x - c\| \leq r\} for center cRnc \in \mathbb{R}^n and radius r>0r > 0 are closed sets, containing all their limit points. Hyperplanes, defined as affine subspaces of n1n-1, such as {xRn:ax=b}\{x \in \mathbb{R}^n : a \cdot x = b\} for a0a \neq 0 and bRb \in \mathbb{R}, are closed, as they are the inverse images of singletons under continuous linear functionals. Compact subsets like the nn-spheres Sn={xRn+1:x=1}S^n = \{x \in \mathbb{R}^{n+1} : \|x\| = 1\} are closed in Rn+1\mathbb{R}^{n+1}, since compact sets in Hausdorff spaces are closed. In the discrete topology on a set XX, where every subset is open, every subset is also closed, as the complement of any subset is open by definition. Conversely, in the on XX, the only open sets are \emptyset and XX, so the only closed sets are also \emptyset and XX, with all proper nonempty subsets neither open nor closed. These examples illustrate how closed sets depend on the , with the closure operator verifying that a set equals its closure in these cases.

Metric and Normed Spaces

In metric spaces, a subset CC is closed if and only if it contains the limit of every convergent sequence with terms in CC. This sequential characterization arises because metric spaces are first-countable, meaning each point has a countable neighborhood basis, allowing sequences to detect limit points effectively. To see the equivalence, suppose CC is closed; then its complement is open, so if a sequence in CC converges to xx, xx cannot lie in the complement, hence xCx \in C. Conversely, if CC is not closed, there exists a limit point xCx \notin C; since the metric induces a first-countable topology, a sequence in CC can be constructed converging to xx, contradicting the assumption. This proof leverages the completeness of Cauchy sequences in the ambient space only indirectly, as convergence in metric spaces implies the sequence is Cauchy, but the characterization holds for any metric space, complete or not. An equivalent distance-based characterization states that CC is closed if for every xCx \notin C, there exists ε>0\varepsilon > 0 such that the open ball B(x,ε)B(x, \varepsilon) intersects CC emptily. This formulation directly ties to the openness of the complement: the empty intersection ensures B(x,ε)XCB(x, \varepsilon) \subseteq X \setminus C, confirming no sequence from CC can approach xx. In metric spaces, these criteria generalize the topological notion of closed sets by exploiting the metric's structure for explicit constructions via distances and sequences. In normed vector spaces, where the metric is induced by the norm d(x,y)=xyd(x, y) = \|x - y\|, closed sets retain the sequential characterization: a subspace is closed if it contains limits of all convergent sequences within it. For instance, the closed unit ball {x:xp1}\{x : \|x\|_p \leq 1\} in the p\ell^p spaces (for 1p1 \leq p \leq \infty) is closed, as it is the preimage of the closed interval [0,1][0, 1] under the continuous norm function. Unlike general topological spaces, where sequential criteria may fail in non-first-countable settings, the metric from the norm ensures such equivalences hold reliably.

Advanced Relations

Complementarity and Boundaries

In , the boundary of a AA of a XX, denoted A\partial A, is defined as the of the closure of AA and the closure of its complement: A=cl(A)cl(XA)\partial A = \mathrm{cl}(A) \cap \mathrm{cl}(X \setminus A). This captures the points that serve as the interface between AA and its complement. Equivalently, a point xXx \in X belongs to A\partial A if every open neighborhood of xx intersects both AA and XAX \setminus A. A subset AXA \subseteq X is closed it contains its boundary, that is, AA\partial A \subseteq A. This condition ensures that all limit points on the "edge" of AA are included within AA itself, aligning with the definition of closed sets as those containing all their limit points. In contrast, a set AA is open its boundary is disjoint from it: AA=\partial A \cap A = \emptyset. Here, no boundary points lie inside AA, meaning every point in AA has a neighborhood entirely contained within AA. The term "" is often used as a synonym for boundary in topological contexts, emphasizing the same set-theoretic . In the study of manifolds, the boundary acquires additional structure: a manifold with boundary is a locally homeomorphic to either or a closed half-space, where the boundary consists of those points homeomorphic to the "" of the half-space, such as Rn1×{0}\mathbb{R}^{n-1} \times \{0\}. These boundary components represent the "edges" or limiting surfaces of the manifold, distinct from interior points. Points of adherence of a set AA, also known as the closure cl(A)\mathrm{cl}(A), include all points where neighborhoods intersect AA; the boundary A\partial A specifically highlights those adherence points shared with the complement, underscoring the closed set's inclusion of such interfaces.

Connections to Compactness and Continuity

In any , a of a is compact. To see this, let KK be a compact of a XX, and let CKC \subseteq K be closed in XX. Consider an open cover {Uα}\{U_\alpha\} of CC. Since CC is closed, its complement XCX \setminus C is open. The collection {Uα}{XC}\{U_\alpha\} \cup \{X \setminus C\} then forms an open cover of KK. By compactness of KK, there exists a finite subcover, say U1,,UnU_1, \dots, U_n and possibly XCX \setminus C. Removing XCX \setminus C if present yields a finite subcover of CC, proving CC compact. A fundamental characterization of continuity in topology states that a function f:XYf: X \to Y between topological spaces is continuous if and only if the preimage f1(V)f^{-1}(V) of every closed set VYV \subseteq Y is closed in XX. This is equivalent to the more common definition that the preimage of every open set in YY is open in XX, since the complement of a closed set is open and preimages preserve complements: if VV is closed, then YVY \setminus V is open, so f1(YV)=Xf1(V)f^{-1}(Y \setminus V) = X \setminus f^{-1}(V) is open, implying f1(V)f^{-1}(V) is closed. This closed-set criterion provides an alternative perspective on continuity, emphasizing preservation of closure under preimages, which is particularly useful in proofs involving limits or closures. In Hausdorff topological spaces, every compact subset is closed. To prove this, let XX be Hausdorff and KXK \subseteq X compact. For any xXKx \in X \setminus K, the Hausdorff property ensures that for each yKy \in K, there exist disjoint open neighborhoods UyU_y of xx and VyV_y of yy. The collection {Vy:yK}\{V_y : y \in K\} covers KK, so by compactness, a finite subcollection Vy1,,VynV_{y_1}, \dots, V_{y_n} covers KK. Then U=i=1nUyiU = \bigcap_{i=1}^n U_{y_i} is an open neighborhood of xx disjoint from KK, showing XKX \setminus K is open and thus KK closed. The converse—that every closed set is compact—does not hold in general but is true in specific settings, such as finite-dimensional via the Heine-Borel theorem. In metric spaces, compactness is closely tied to sequential compactness, where a set is sequentially compact if every sequence has a convergent subsequence. For the Euclidean space Rn\mathbb{R}^n with the standard metric, the Heine-Borel theorem asserts that a subset is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded. One direction follows from general properties: compact sets in metric spaces are closed (as limits of convergent sequences lie in the set) and bounded (by covering with balls of fixed radius and using finite subcovers). The converse requires a proof sketch: assume KRnK \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n is closed and bounded, so it lies in some closed ball B(0,R)\overline{B(0, R)}. Proceed by induction on dimension. For n=1n=1, consider an open cover {Uα}\{U_\alpha\} of [a,b][a, b]. Let S={x[a,b][a,x]S = \{x \in [a, b] \mid [a, x] admits a finite subcover from {Uα}}\{U_\alpha\}\}. Let t=supSt = \sup S. Some UβU_\beta contains tt and an interval (tϵ,t+ϵ)(t - \epsilon, t + \epsilon) for ϵ>0\epsilon > 0. Then [a,t+ϵ/2][a, t + \epsilon/2] admits a finite subcover, implying t=bt = b and thus [a,b][a, b] has a finite subcover. For higher nn, project onto coordinate hyperplanes and use induction, ensuring the projection's finite cover lifts back via closedness. This sequential compactness in Rn\mathbb{R}^n underpins many applications in analysis, such as uniform continuity on compact sets.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.