Hubbry Logo
Compounding of steam turbinesCompounding of steam turbinesMain
Open search
Compounding of steam turbines
Community hub
Compounding of steam turbines
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Compounding of steam turbines
Compounding of steam turbines
from Wikipedia

In steam turbine design, compounding is a method of extracting steam energy in multiple stages rather than a single one. Each stage of a compounded steam turbine has its own set of nozzles and rotors. These are arranged in series, either keyed to the common shaft or fixed to the casing. The arrangement allows either the steam pressure or the jet velocity to be absorbed incrementally.[1][2]

Purpose

[edit]

Compounded steam turbines are used to reduce rotor speeds to achieve optimal operating revolutions per minute. The steam produced in the boiler has sufficiently high enthalpy when superheated. In all turbines the blade velocity is directly proportional to the velocity of the steam passing over the blade. Now, if the entire energy of the steam is extracted in one stage, i.e. if the steam is expanded from the boiler pressure to the condenser pressure in a single stage, then its velocity will be very high. Hence the velocity of the rotor (to which the blades are keyed) can reach to about 30,000 rpm, which is too high for practical uses due to very high vibration. Moreover, at such high speeds the centrifugal forces are immense, and can damage the structure. Hence, compounding is needed. The high velocity steam just strikes on a single ring of rotor that causes wastage of steam ranging 10% to 12%. To overcome the wastage of steam, compounding of steam turbines are used.

Types

[edit]

In an impulse steam turbine, compounding can be achieved in the following three ways:

  1. Velocity compounding
  2. Pressure compounding
  3. Pressure-Velocity Compounding

In a reaction turbine, compounding can be achieved only by pressure compounding.

In general, the types of steam turbine include:

  1. Impulse: There is no change in the pressure of the steam as it passes through the moving blades. There is change only in the velocity of the steam flow.
  2. Reaction: There is change in both pressure and velocity as the steam flows through the moving blades.

Velocity compounding of impulse turbine

[edit]
Fig-1: Schematic Diagram of Curtis Stage Impulse Turbine

The velocity compounded Impulse turbine was first proposed by C.G. Curtis to solve the problem of single stage Impulse turbine for use of high pressure and temperature steam.

The rings of moving blades are separated by rings of fixed blades. The moving blades are keyed to the turbine shaft and the fixed blades are fixed to the casing. The high pressure steam coming from the boiler is expanded in the nozzle first. The Nozzle converts the pressure energy of the steam into kinetic energy. The total enthalpy drop and hence the pressure drop occurs in the nozzle. Hence, the pressure thereafter remains constant.

This high velocity steam is directed on to the first set (ring) of moving blades. As the steam flows over the blades, due to the shape of the blades, it imparts some of its momentum to the blades and loses some velocity. Only a part of the high kinetic energy is absorbed by these blades. The remainder is exhausted on to the next ring of fixed blade. The function of the fixed blades is to redirect the steam leaving from the first ring of moving blades to the second ring of moving blades. There is no change in the velocity of the steam as it passes through the fixed blades. The steam then enters the next ring of moving blades; this process is repeated until practically all the energy of the steam has been absorbed.

A schematic diagram of the Curtis stage impulse turbine, with two rings of moving blades, and one ring of fixed blades is shown in figure 1. The figure also shows the changes in the pressure and the absolute steam velocity as it passes through the stages.

Where:

= pressure of steam at inlet
= velocity of steam at inlet
= pressure of steam at outlet
= velocity of steam at outlet

In the above figure there are two rings of moving blades separated by a single of ring of fixed blades. As discussed earlier the entire pressure drop occurs in the nozzle, and there are no subsequent pressure losses in any of the following stages. Velocity drop occurs in the moving blades and not in fixed blades.

Velocity diagram

[edit]

As shown in the above diagram there are two rings of moving blades separated by a ring of fixed blades. The velocity diagram in figure 2, shows the various components of steam velocity and the blade velocity of the moving blades.

Where:

= absolute velocity of steam
= relative velocity of steam
= Blade velocity
= Nozzle angle
= Blade entrance angle
= Blade exit angle
= fluid exit angle

From the above figure it can be seen that the steam, after exiting from the moving blades, enters into the fixed blades. The fixed blades redirect the steam into the next set of moving blades. Hence, steam loses its velocity in multiple stages rather than in a single stage.

Optimum velocity

[edit]

It is the velocity of the blades at which maximum power output can be achieved. Hence, the optimum blade velocity for this case is:

where is the number of stages.

This value of optimum velocity is 1/n times that of the single stage turbine. This means that maximum power can be produced at much lower blade velocities.

However, the work produced in each stage is not the same. The ratio of work produced in a 2-stage turbine is 3:1 as one move from higher to lower pressure. This ratio is 5:3:1 in three stage turbine and changes to 7:5:3:1 in a four-stage turbine.

Disadvantages of velocity compounding

[edit]
  • Due to the high steam velocity there are high friction losses.
  • Work produced in the low-pressure stages is much less.
  • The designing and fabrication of blades that can withstand such high velocities is difficult.

Pressure compounding of impulse turbine

[edit]
Fig-3: Schematic Diagram of Pressure compounded Impulse Turbine

The pressure compounded Impulse turbine is also called a Rateau turbine, after its inventor. This is used to solve the problem of high blade velocity in the single-stage impulse turbine.

It consists of alternate rings of nozzles and turbine blades. The nozzles are fitted to the casing and the blades are keyed to the turbine shaft.

In this type of compounding, the steam is expanded in a number of stages, instead of just one (nozzle) in the velocity compounding. It is done by the fixed blades which act as nozzles. The steam expands equally in all rows of fixed blade. The steam coming from the boiler is fed to the first set of fixed blades i.e. the nozzle ring. The steam is partially expanded in the nozzle ring. Hence, there is a partial decrease in pressure of the incoming steam. This leads to an increase in the velocity of the steam. Therefore, the pressure decreases and velocity increases partially in the nozzle.

This is then passed over the set of moving blades. As the steam flows over the moving blades, nearly all its velocity is absorbed. However, the pressure remains constant during this process. After this it is passed into the nozzle ring and is again partially expanded. Then it is fed into the next set of moving blades, and this process is repeated until the condenser pressure is reached.

This process has been illustrated in figure 3 where the symbols have the same meaning as given above.

It is a three-stage pressure compounded impulse turbine. Each stage consists of one ring of fixed blades, which act as nozzles, and one ring of moving blades. As shown in the figure, pressure drop takes place in the nozzles and is distributed in many stages.

An important point to note here is that the inlet steam velocities to each stage of moving blades are essentially equal. It is because the velocity corresponds to the lowering of the pressure. Since, in a pressure compounded steam turbine, only a part of the steam is expanded in each nozzle. The steam velocity is lower than in the previous case. It can be explained mathematically from the following formula i.e.

where,

= absolute exit velocity of fluid
= enthalpy of fluid at exit
= absolute entry velocity of fluid
= enthalpy of fluid at entry

One can see from the formula that only a fraction of the enthalpy is converted into velocity in the fixed blades. Hence, velocity is less as compared to the previous case.

Velocity diagram

[edit]
Fig-4: Velocity Diagram of Pressure compounded Impulse Turbine

The velocity diagram shown in figure 4 gives detail about the various components of steam velocity and Blade velocity.

where, symbols have the same meaning as given above.

An important point to note from the above velocity diagram is that the fluid exit angle (δ) is 90⁰. This indicates that the whirl velocity of fluid at exit of all stages is zero, which is in compliance with the optimum velocity concept (as discussed earlier).

The ratio of work produced in different stages is similar to the above type.

Disadvantages of pressure compounding

[edit]
  • Since there is pressure drop in the nozzles, it has to be made air-tight.
  • They are much larger at 34 inches

Pressure-velocity compounded impulse turbine

[edit]
Fig-5: Schematic Diagram of Pressure-Velocity compounded Impulse Turbine

It is a combination of the above two types of compounding. The total pressure drop of the steam is divided into a number of stages. Each stage consists of rings of fixed and moving blades. Each set of rings of moving blades is separated by a single ring of fixed blades. In each stage there is one ring of fixed blades and 3–4 rings of moving blades. Each stage acts as a velocity compounded impulse turbine.

The fixed blades act as nozzles. The steam coming from the boiler is passed to the first ring of fixed blades, where it gets partially expanded. The pressure partially decreases and the velocity rises correspondingly. The velocity is absorbed by the following rings of moving blades until it reaches the next ring of fixed blades and the whole process is repeated once again.

This process is shown diagrammatically in figure 5.

where, symbols have their usual meaning.

Pressure compounding of reaction turbine

[edit]
Fig-6: Schematic Diagram of Pressure compounded Reaction Turbine

As explained earlier a reaction turbine is one in which there is pressure and velocity loss in the moving blades. The moving blades have a converging steam nozzle. Hence when the steam passes over the fixed blades, it expands with decrease in steam pressure and increase in kinetic energy.

This type of turbine has a number of rings of moving blades attached to the rotor and an equal number of fixed blades attached to the casing. In this type of turbine the pressure drops take place in a number of stages.

The steam passes over a series of alternate fixed and moving blades. The fixed blades act as nozzles i.e. they change the direction of the steam and also expand it. Then steam is passed on the moving blades, which further expand the steam and also absorb its velocity.

This is explained in figure 6.

where symbols have the same meaning as above.

Velocity diagram

[edit]
Fig-7: Velocity Diagram of Pressure Compounded Reaction turbine

The velocity diagram given in figure 7 gives a detail about the various components of steam velocity and blade velocity (symbols have the same meaning as above).

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Compounding of turbines is a design technique that divides the total energy extraction from expanding into multiple stages across successive sets of nozzles and , rather than a single stage, to achieve practical rotor speeds and higher overall efficiency. This approach is necessary because a single-stage impulse operating on high-pressure would result in excessively high blade velocities and rotor speeds, often exceeding 30,000 rpm, leading to impractical mechanical stresses, vibrations, and material limitations. The primary types of compounding include velocity compounding, pressure compounding, and pressure-velocity compounding, each addressing the steam expansion differently to optimize energy transfer. In velocity compounding, the full drop occurs in an initial set of fixed nozzles, producing high-velocity steam that then passes through multiple rows of moving blades alternated with fixed guide blades, gradually absorbing without further reduction across the moving blades. This method, pioneered in Curtis turbines, reduces the initial high steam velocity impact on blades but incurs higher losses in the additional blade rows, making it less efficient for large expansions. Pressure compounding, utilized in designs like Rateau and Zoelly turbines, distributes the total across multiple nozzle stages, with steam partially expanding in each row before entering the corresponding moving s, thereby limiting the velocity increase at each blade row to manageable levels. Here, the impulse principle dominates, as the occurs primarily in stationary nozzles, and moving blades experience minimal pressure change. Pressure-velocity compounding integrates both methods by employing multiple nozzle stages, each followed by several rows of moving and fixed blades, allowing incremental pressure drops combined with multi-row velocity absorption per stage. This hybrid approach minimizes the number of stages required for a given , resulting in a more compact turbine design while balancing efficiency and mechanical feasibility. Overall, enhances performance by reducing wastage (typically 10-12% savings compared to single-stage designs), lowering rotor speeds to 1,500-3,600 rpm for direct generator coupling, and mitigating issues like and structural . In modern power plants, compounded often feature high-pressure, intermediate-pressure, and low-pressure sections in series, with 5-10 stages per section, enabling efficient conversion of from cycles into electrical power.

Purpose and Fundamentals

Purpose of Compounding

Compounding in steam turbines refers to the process of dividing the total expansion of steam—either through pressure drops or velocity reductions—across multiple stages rather than a single stage, allowing for more controlled energy extraction. This method arranges the steam's expansion or the utilization of its kinetic energy in several successive rings of nozzles and blades, enabling the turbine to operate at practical rotational speeds while capturing a greater portion of the available energy. Single-stage steam turbines, such as the impulse design pioneered by in , face significant limitations when handling high-pressure steam, as the large pressure drop in one stage generates extremely high steam velocities, resulting in rotor speeds exceeding 20,000 to 30,000 rpm. These excessive speeds lead to intense mechanical stresses, including high centrifugal forces, vibrations, and potential structural damage, while also causing inefficiencies like steam wastage of 10% to 12% due to incomplete energy transfer in a single rotor ring. Additionally, such high speeds necessitate complex reduction gearing, which introduces further energy losses and limits applicability to low-power uses. The introduction of compounding addressed these challenges by enabling multi-stage designs that became practical for higher power outputs and broader industrial applications, building on early innovations like de Laval's single-stage turbine and Charles Parsons' 1884 reaction turbine. By the late 1890s, engineers such as Charles G. Curtis and Auguste Rateau developed compounding techniques that reduced rotor speeds to more manageable levels, around 1,000 to 3,000 rpm in early commercial units, making steam turbines viable for electricity generation and marine propulsion. Compounding enhances overall turbine efficiency by allowing each stage to operate closer to optimal conditions, where steam velocities match blade speeds more effectively without resorting to supersonic flows that erode blades and reduce performance. This staged approach minimizes energy losses from friction and turbulence, leading to lower specific steam consumption—typically reducing it by enabling more complete expansion and heat utilization—compared to single-stage designs, which achieve relatively low efficiency. As a result, compounded turbines support higher pressure ratios from modern boilers while improving thermodynamic reversibility and reducing operational costs through better fuel economy.

Impulse and Reaction Turbines

Impulse turbines operate on the principle where steam expands fully in stationary nozzles, converting thermal energy into kinetic energy that impinges directly on the rotor blades, with no further pressure drop occurring across the moving blades themselves. This design results in the rotor blades primarily deflecting the high-velocity steam jet to extract momentum, akin to a series of curved buckets receiving an impulsive force from the incoming flow. The impulse turbine was pioneered by Gustaf de Laval, who introduced the first practical single-stage version in 1884 using converging-diverging nozzles to accelerate steam efficiently. Later developments, such as Charles G. Curtis's velocity-compounded impulse stage in the 1890s, built on this foundation to address speed limitations through multiple blade rows. In contrast, reaction turbines function by allowing to expand partially in the stationary nozzles and continue expanding within the rotor blades, generating a reaction force similar to a effect, with drops occurring across both fixed and moving passages. The rotor blades in this configuration act as expanding nozzles, accelerating the and producing a rearward force that drives the , much like the symmetrical flow through alternating and rotor channels. This type was invented by in 1884, marking the debut of the multi-stage reaction that emphasized gradual energy extraction. Key differences between impulse and reaction turbines include the velocity ratios, where impulse designs typically require higher steam-to-blade velocity ratios for optimal performance, leading to simpler sealing arrangements due to minimal pressure differentials across the rotor. Reaction turbines, however, achieve higher efficiency at lower rotational speeds through distributed expansion but necessitate more numerous blades to manage the continuous pressure gradient. These distinctions make impulse turbines particularly suitable for velocity and pressure compounding methods to mitigate excessive single-stage speeds, while reaction turbines primarily rely on pressure compounding for their inherent gradual expansion process.

Velocity Compounding

Principles in Impulse Turbines

Velocity compounding in impulse turbines involves a single across an initial set of fixed nozzles, producing high-velocity steam that then passes through multiple rows of moving alternated with fixed guide blades (reversing vanes), gradually absorbing the without further reduction in the moving . This method, known as the Curtis stage, limits the blade speed to a of the steam jet velocity, typically one-fourth for two blade rows, making it suitable for high-velocity applications while keeping speeds practical. The configuration features one row of fixed nozzles followed by two or more rows of moving blades on the same rotor disk, with inter-row fixed guide vanes that redirect the flow to impart whirl for the next moving row without additional nozzles. enters the nozzles at , expands fully to achieve supersonic velocities (often 700-1000 m/s), impinges on the first moving blades to transfer , exits with reduced , is turned by the fixed vanes, and then enters the second moving blades for further energy extraction. This setup extracts work via the impulse principle, where the total drop occurs in the nozzles, and blades deflect the flow with minimal change. Invented by and patented in 1896, velocity compounding addressed the high rotor speeds of single-stage de Laval turbines by distributing velocity absorption across multiple rows, enabling larger power outputs and applications in early electrical generation and . The first commercial vertical turbine, a 500 kW unit, was installed in 1903. The work extracted per stage follows the , given by u(Vw1+Vw2)u (V_{w1} + V_{w2}), where uu is the blade speed, and Vw1V_{w1}, Vw2V_{w2} are the inlet and outlet whirl components; for multiple rows, this sums the contributions, with efficiency optimized by matching blade speeds to progressive velocity reductions. Unlike pressure compounding, which stages the pressure drop across multiple nozzle sets to control velocities, velocity compounding uses a single expansion but multiplies blade rows to manage high initial speeds, resulting in higher friction losses but fewer stages and a more compact design.

Velocity Diagrams and Analysis

In velocity-compounded impulse turbines, the velocity diagram for the stage shows a high absolute inlet velocity V1V_1 from the nozzles at angle α1\alpha_1, resolving into whirl Vw1=V1cosα1V_{w1} = V_1 \cos \alpha_1 and flow Vf1=V1sinα1V_{f1} = V_1 \sin \alpha_1. For the first moving blade row, the relative inlet velocity is Vr1=V1uV_{r1} = V_1 - u (vectorially), and assuming frictionless blades, the relative outlet Vr2V_{r2} has the same magnitude but changed direction, leading to absolute outlet velocity V2V_2 with whirl Vw2V_{w2} often negative (opposing rotation). The fixed guide vanes then redirect V2V_2 to V3V_3 with restored whirl Vw3Vw1V_{w3} \approx V_{w1} but reduced magnitude for the second row, where similar triangles apply, further reducing exit velocity V4V_4. This multi-triangle diagram ensures cumulative ΔVw\Delta V_w across rows contributes to torque, with total work uΔVwu \sum \Delta V_w. Analysis across the stage reveals a halving of velocity per moving row ideally, with inlet velocities decreasing downstream due to extraction, optimizing for speeds around 200-400 m/s while handling jet speeds up to 1000 m/s. The stage is η=u(Vw1+Vw3Vw2Vw4)12V12\eta = \frac{u (V_{w1} + V_{w3} - V_{w2} - V_{w4})}{\frac{1}{2} V_1^2}, accounting for input, though actual values drop due to ( ηn0.9\eta_n \approx 0.9, ηb<1\eta_b < 1). Compared to single-stage, this distributes velocity changes, allowing pressure ratios up to 10:1 per stage without excessive rotor speeds (e.g., 3000-5000 rpm). Enthalpy-entropy diagrams show the full isentropic expansion in the initial nozzles (single step on h-s chart), followed by constant-pressure kinetic energy absorption in blades, with residual exit kinetic energy often carried to the next stage. Losses primarily stem from blade path friction accumulating over rows and incomplete whirl recovery in guides, rather than nozzle inefficiencies; for two rows, diagram symmetry assumes β1=β2\beta_1 = \beta_2 (blade angles), minimizing relative velocity losses. Multi-row vector summation thus balances high initial Δh\Delta h extraction with practical mechanics.

Advantages, Disadvantages, and Optimization

Velocity compounding in impulse turbines reduces blade tip speeds to approximately 250-400 m/s, compared to 500-1000 m/s in single-stage designs, lowering centrifugal stresses and enabling direct coupling to generators at 1500-3600 rpm while extracting significant work from high-velocity steam. This method is effective for initial or control stages handling large enthalpy drops, requiring fewer stages (e.g., one Curtis stage replaces 3-4 pressure stages), resulting in compact, cost-effective designs suitable for low-pressure sections or small turbines. However, the high steam velocities cause increased friction losses in multiple blade rows (up to 20-30% efficiency penalty), blade erosion from wet steam droplets, and higher noise from supersonic flows. It is less efficient for large overall expansions, as later rows extract diminishing work, and requires precise blade profiling to avoid flow separation. Optimization focuses on the velocity ratio ρ=u/V1\rho = u / V_1, ideally ρ0.25\rho \approx 0.25 for two rows (or 1/(2n)1/(2n) for n rows), derived by maximizing η\eta via dη/dρ=0d\eta / d\rho = 0, with nozzle angle α120\alpha_1 \approx 20^\circ. This yields peak efficiency around 80-85%, as shown in performance curves, but drops if ρ>0.3\rho > 0.3 due to excessive exit whirl losses. Designs limit to 2-3 rows to curb ; in practice, velocity is applied in high-flow, low-pressure sections for balanced .

Pressure Compounding

Principles in Impulse Turbines

In pressure compounding for impulse turbines, the total of the is divided across multiple stages, each consisting of its own set of fixed and moving blades. This mechanism allows for partial expansion in each row, which converts a portion of the 's into at a controlled , rather than a single large expansion that would produce excessively high speeds. By staging the pressure reduction, the inlet to each subsequent stage remains manageable, preventing the structural challenges associated with supersonic flows in a single . The configuration typically employs Rateau staging, featuring alternating rings of fixed nozzles (diaphragms) and moving blades mounted on the rotor, with interstage seals to minimize leakage. This approach, developed independently by Auguste Rateau and Robert Zoelly in the late 1890s and early 1900s, marked a significant advancement in turbine design. In this setup, enters the first nozzle ring at , expands partially to accelerate, impinges on the moving blades to impart , and then proceeds to the next for further expansion. The pressure ratio per stage is designed approximately as the overall inlet-to-outlet pressure ratio raised to the power of 1/n (where n is the number of stages) to achieve balanced drops, ensuring consistent work extraction across stages. This arrangement, sometimes combined with Parsons-like elements in hybrid designs, facilitates efficient energy transfer while maintaining blade speeds within material limits. Rateau's multi-stage impulse , patented around 1896-1898, addressed the limitations of single-stage de Laval turbines by distributing the expansion, thus allowing for larger, more powerful units suitable for industrial and marine applications, enabling the handling of higher inlet pressures, such as those up to around 10-15 bar typical in the early , without inducing prohibitive velocities or centrifugal stresses on the blades. The work extracted per stage follows the impulse-momentum principle, given by the enthalpy drop h1h2=u(Vw1+Vw2)h_1 - h_2 = u (V_{w1} + V_{w2}), where uu is the blade speed and Vw1V_{w1}, Vw2V_{w2} are the whirl components of the absolute and relative velocities, respectively; this is averaged over stages to optimize overall performance. Unlike velocity compounding, which relies on a single followed by multiple blade rows to re-impart and absorb , pressure compounding emphasizes staged drops to control initial velocities from the nozzles, resulting in fewer losses but requiring more stages and precise sealing. This focus on pressure staging enhances efficiency for high-pressure applications by avoiding the energy dissipation inherent in repeated velocity additions.

Velocity Diagrams and Analysis

In pressure-compounded impulse turbines, the velocity diagram for each stage resembles that of a single-stage impulse turbine but features a reduced inlet steam velocity V1V_1 due to the partial pressure drop ΔP\Delta P allocated across multiple nozzles rather than a full expansion in one nozzle. The typically consists of velocity triangles at the inlet and outlet of the moving blades, where the absolute inlet velocity V1V_1 is directed at a nozzle α1\alpha_1, resolving into whirl component Vw1=V1cosα1V_{w1} = V_1 \cos \alpha_1 and flow component Vf1=V1sinα1V_{f1} = V_1 \sin \alpha_1. As steam passes through the blades, the relative velocity remains constant in the ideal case (no ), but the whirl component changes to Vw2V_{w2} at the exit, with the absolute exit velocity V2V_2 carrying residual that is redirected by the subsequent fixed nozzles to re-accelerate the steam for the next stage. This staged vector summation ensures that the change in whirl velocity ΔVw=Vw1Vw2\Delta V_w = V_{w1} - V_{w2} per stage contributes to without excessive blade speeds. The overall analysis of these diagrams across multiple stages reveals a progressive decrease in nozzle angles α1\alpha_1 and inlet velocities downstream, as the available drop diminishes with each partial expansion, optimizing energy extraction while minimizing losses from high-velocity impacts. The work output per is given by uΔVwu \Delta V_w, where uu is the blade speed, and the total turbine is expressed as \eta = \sum \frac{u \Delta V_w}{\Delta h_{\text{[stage](/page/The_Stage)}}}, summing contributions from all and accounting for a reheat-like effect where recovered in inter-stage nozzles partially reheats the flow, improving thermodynamic recovery. This multi-stage vector approach contrasts with single-stage designs by distributing the velocity changes, allowing for higher overall ratios without prohibitive rotor velocities. Enthalpy-entropy (h-s) diagrams, such as Mollier charts, illustrate the staged expansion process in pressure compounding, showing discrete pressure drops across each (isentropic lines) followed by constant-pressure lines through the blades, with the total expansion path approximating the isentropic curve through incremental steps. This visualization highlights how partial expansions reduce generation compared to a single large drop. The primary losses in this configuration arise from inefficiencies, such as that reduces the actual output below the isentropic value (V1=2ΔhnozzleV_1 = \sqrt{2 \Delta h_{\text{nozzle}}}
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.