Hubbry Logo
David StahelDavid StahelMain
Open search
David Stahel
Community hub
David Stahel
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
David Stahel
David Stahel
David Stahel
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

David Stahel (born 1975 in Wellington, New Zealand) is a historian, author and senior lecturer in history at the University of New South Wales.[1] He specialises in German military history of World War II. Stahel has authored several books on the military operations of the first six months of the Eastern Front, including on the launching of Operation Barbarossa, the Battle of Kiev (1941) and the Battle for Moscow.

Key Information

Education and career

[edit]

Stahel completed an honours degree at Monash University and Boston College. He has an MA in War Studies from King's College London and a PhD in 2007 from the Humboldt University of Berlin. He joined the University of New South Wales Canberra in 2012.[2][3]

Military historian of Nazi Germany

[edit]

Stahel has authored several books on the military operations on the Eastern Front, including Operation Barbarossa, the Battle of Kiev (1941) and the Battle of Moscow; all books were published by Cambridge University Press. Reviewing Stahel's Kiev 1941: Hitler's Battle for Supremacy in the East for the New Republic, the historian Richard Evans notes that "the story of the Battle of Kiev has been told many times, but seldom in such detail as it is in David Stahel’s book", at the same time "convey[ing] extremely complex military action with exemplary clarity". The reviewer writes:[4]

Unlike more traditional military historians, Stahel is acutely aware of the wider context of the action, from Hitler’s overall aims for the war to the importance of logistics for the outcome; from the murderous racism and ruthless pragmatism with which the German leaders, military as well as political, condemned so many Soviet civilians to starve and so many Jewish inhabitants to terrible death, to the postwar disputes among historians and retired generals over Hitler’s strategy.

Evans commends Stahel for his "refreshing realism" in not "following traditional military historians’ often overly positive and simplistic descriptions of 'great' generals and 'decisive' battles" and exploring "convincingly if not entirely originally" how the foundations of the German war efforts were already beginning to crumble by the time of the victory at Kiev heralded in Nazi propaganda as decisive.[4]

Publications

[edit]

Books

[edit]
  • Operation Barbarossa and Germany's Defeat in the East (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009). ISBN 9780521768474
  • Kiev 1941. Hitler's Battle for Supremacy in the East (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012). ISBN 9781107014596
  • Nazi Policy on the Eastern Front, 1941: Total War, Genocide, and Radicalization (ed., with Alex J. Kay and Jeff Rutherford) (Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2012). ISBN 9781580464079
  • Operation Typhoon. Hitler's March on Moscow (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013). ISBN 9781107035126
  • The Battle for Moscow (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015). ISBN 9781107087606
  • Joining Hitler's Crusade: European Nations and the Invasion of the Soviet Union (ed.) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017). ISBN 9781108225281
  • Mass Violence in Nazi-Occupied Europe (ed., with Alex J. Kay) (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 2018). ISBN 9780253036803
  • Retreat from Moscow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2019). ISBN 9780374249526
  • Hitler's Panzer Generals: Guderian, Hoepner, Reinhardt and Schmidt Unguarded (Cambridge University Press, 2023). ISBN 9781009282819

Essays

[edit]
  • 'Radicalizing Warfare: The German Command and the Failure of Operation Barbarossa' in Alex J. Kay, Jeff Rutherford and David Stahel (eds.), Nazi Policy on the Eastern Front, 1941: Total War, Genocide, and Radicalization (Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2012), pp. 19–44.

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

David Stahel

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
David Stahel (born 1975 in Wellington, New Zealand) is a military historian specializing in the operations of the on the during World War II, and he serves as an associate professor in the School of Humanities & Social Sciences at UNSW Canberra, in Australia. He earned an in history from , an MA in War Studies from King's College London, and a PhD from in 2007. Stahel is best known for his on Operation Barbarossa, the German invasion of the Soviet Union launched in June 1941, where he argues that the campaign was fundamentally flawed and doomed to failure from the outset due to inherent German strategic overextension, logistical shortcomings, and internal dysfunctions, rather than primarily external factors such as Lend-Lease aid to the Soviets or harsh winter conditions. His analyses emphasize the rapid attrition of German forces during the initial phases, challenging traditional narratives that portray Barbarossa as a near-success thwarted only by later contingencies. Through a series of acclaimed books, including and Germany's Defeat in the East (2009), : Hitler's Battle for Supremacy in the East (2012), and Retreat from Moscow: A New History of Germany's Winter Campaign, 1941-1942 (2019), Stahel draws on extensive archival research from to reexamine key battles and operational decisions, highlighting the 's progressive exhaustion and the strategic miscalculations of its leadership. His work has been praised for providing a more nuanced, ground-level perspective on the , influencing by shifting focus from to the gritty realities of frontline warfare and resource depletion.

Early Life and Education

Childhood and Family Background

David Stahel was born in Wellington, New Zealand, in 1975. He grew up in Melbourne, Australia.

Undergraduate and Postgraduate Studies

David Stahel completed his undergraduate studies with an in history from in Melbourne, Australia, where he developed a foundational interest in . He also undertook studies at in the United States, broadening his academic exposure to international perspectives on history during this period. Following his undergraduate education, Stahel pursued postgraduate studies in war-related disciplines to deepen his expertise in military history. He earned a in War Studies from King's College London, an institution renowned for its programs in strategic and military affairs, which likely honed his focus on conflict dynamics. Stahel culminated his formal education with a in history from in , , awarded in 2007. His doctoral thesis examined German military operations during , specifically centering on and the broader dynamics of Germany's campaign in the East, providing the scholarly groundwork for his later revisionist interpretations of the .

Academic Career

Positions at Universities

Following his , Stahel joined the in 2012 as an in the School of Humanities & Social Sciences. He currently holds the position of in history at , where he continues his research on World War II operations. No visiting or adjunct positions are documented in available sources.

Teaching and Administrative Roles

David Stahel serves as an Associate Professor in History at the (UNSW) , where he contributes to the educational programs in the School of Humanities & Social Sciences. In this capacity, he has taught a range of courses focused on military history, particularly those centered on World War II and related themes, including Perfect Storms: Disasters that Changed the World (2013), World War II: Battles Won and Lost (2017), World War II: Total War (2018), and Warlords of War World II (2019). These courses emphasize the strategic and operational aspects of global conflicts, with a notable emphasis on European military operations during the . In addition to his teaching responsibilities, holds the administrative position of Deputy Head of School (Education) within the School of Humanities & Social Sciences at UNSW Canberra. This role involves overseeing educational initiatives and curriculum development in history and , supporting the school's broader mission in and conflict research. While specific details on thesis supervision or teaching awards are not publicly detailed in available university records, his position underscores his involvement in mentoring and administrative leadership in academic history programs.

Research Focus

Specialization in WWII Eastern Front

David Stahel's scholarly work centers on the 's military operations against the Soviet Union during World War II, particularly from the launch of in June 1941 through subsequent campaigns on the Eastern Front. His research delves into the operational dynamics of these conflicts, examining how German forces conducted large-scale invasions and battles amid logistical and strategic challenges. This focus stems from his position as an associate professor at the , where he has built a reputation for detailed analyses of the Wehrmacht's wartime activities. A key aspect of 's specialization is his emphasis on , which involves dissecting the and of , such as the initial phases of the 1941 invasion and the . He prioritizes understanding the internal mechanics of German army groups, including 's movements and the coordination between infantry, , and supporting units. This approach highlights the day-to-day realities of combat, resource allocation, and command decisions that shaped the course of the . Stahel's methodology relies heavily on to ground his interpretations in contemporary evidence. He extensively utilizes German military records, including war diaries (Kriegstagebücher) from various army commands, , and situation reports archived in institutions like the German Federal Archives. Additionally, he incorporates such as soldiers' diaries and letters, which provide insights into the human elements of the 's experiences on the front lines. These sources allow for a granular reconstruction of events, emphasizing the perspectives of participants rather than postwar narratives.

Methodological Approach to Military History

David Stahel's methodological approach to military history is characterized by a granular examination of , particularly daily war diaries and logistical records of the , rather than relying on high-level strategic overviews or . This bottom-up analysis allows him to reconstruct operational realities on the with a high degree of precision, drawing on archival materials from to highlight day-to-day challenges faced by frontline units. For instance, in his study of the 1941 summer campaign, Stahel utilizes war diaries from the Panzer groups of to document the progressive attrition and logistical breakdowns that plagued German advances. Central to Stahel's is a deliberate challenge to romanticized narratives of German military efficiency and the supposed invincibility of during . By sifting through these , he dismantles myths of seamless operational success, instead emphasizing the inherent vulnerabilities and inefficiencies within the Wehrmacht's structure from the outset of . This approach contrasts with traditional historiography, which often portrays the German army as a model of tactical brilliance, by foregrounding evidence of early and systemic failures derived directly from contemporary records. Stahel's methodology prioritizes an in-depth focus on internal German dynamics, such as , resource allocation, and , while deliberately avoiding broader geopolitical influences like . This internal lens enables a concentrated analysis of how self-inflicted contributed to operational outcomes, providing a more nuanced understanding of the 's performance without external attributions. His specialization in operations underscores this method, as seen in his consistent use of German logistical records to trace the erosion of .

Major Publications

Books on Operation Barbarossa

David Stahel has authored several influential monographs examining the 's operations during Operation Barbarossa, the 1941 invasion of the Soviet Union. These works, published primarily by , provide detailed analyses based on archival sources and challenge traditional narratives of the campaign's early successes. His books focus on operational histories, drawing from German military records to highlight logistical and strategic challenges faced by the invaders. His first major book on the topic, Operation Barbarossa and Germany's Defeat in the East (, 2009), covers the planning, preparation, and the first nine weeks of the invasion, focusing on the from . The volume argues that were already overstretched by late summer, with mounting casualties and supply issues signaling an impending stalemate rather than victory. Stahel utilizes primary sources such as war diaries and intelligence reports to reconstruct the campaign's timeline, emphasizing how environmental factors and Soviet resistance contributed to early setbacks. A paperback edition was released in 2013. In Kiev 1941: Hitler's Battle for Supremacy in the East (, 2012), Stahel delves into the , a pivotal in September 1941 that resulted in massive Soviet losses but diverted resources from the central advance. The book details the tactical decisions by , including the role of Panzer Group 1 under Ewald von Kleist, and critiques the strategic trade-offs that weakened the overall Barbarossa effort. It draws on untranslated German documents to provide a granular account of the battle's execution and aftermath, positioning it as a pyrrhic victory for the . Stahel's Operation Typhoon: Hitler's March on Moscow, October 1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2013) analyzes the final German offensive toward Moscow in the autumn of 1941, known as Operation Typhoon. This work examines how deteriorating weather, exhausted troops, and Soviet counteroffensives halted the advance, using Army Group Center's records to illustrate command failures under Fedor von Bock. The book underscores the campaign's culmination as a point of no return for German ambitions on the Eastern Front, with a focus on the logistical breakdowns that preceded the Soviet winter counterattack. An e-book edition followed shortly after the hardcover release.

Other Works and Contributions

In addition to his foundational works on , David Stahel has produced several monographs examining subsequent phases of the German campaign on the , particularly the drive toward . His 2015 book, The Battle for Moscow: The German Offensive against the Soviet Union, 1941, provides a detailed analysis of and the ensuing , drawing on German military records to argue that logistical failures and overextension led to the 's strategic collapse in late 1941. This work has been translated into multiple languages, including Portuguese (A batalha por Moscou, 2015) and Polish (Bitwa o Moskwę, 2018), extending its reach to international audiences. Similarly, Operation Typhoon: Hitler's March on Moscow, October 1941 (2013) focuses on the initial phases of the , highlighting command decisions and troop movements based on primary sources. Stahel extended his examination of the in Retreat from : A New History of Germany's Winter Campaign, 1941-1942 (2019), which chronicles the 's disorganized withdrawal and internal crises following the failed assault on the . This book, published by Farrar, Straus and Giroux, incorporates archival materials to emphasize the human and material costs of the retreat, and it has appeared in Spanish as La Retirada de Moscú (2021). Stahel's editorial contributions include co-editing Nazi Policy on the , 1941: Total War, Genocide and Radicalization (2012) with Alex J. Kay and Jeff Rutherford, a collection of essays exploring the ideological and operational dimensions of German conduct during the . Regarding later operations, Stahel contributed to the historiography of the Battle of Stalingrad through his role as editor of The Cambridge Companion to the Nazi-Soviet War (2025), which features a dedicated chapter on "Stalingrad and the Eastern Front, 1942" by Adrian E. Wettstein, integrating Stahel's broader framework on dynamics. His journal articles further illuminate these periods; for instance, "British ‘Lend-Lease’ Aid to the USSR and the in the Light of Soviet and German Sources" (2021, ) assesses Allied support's impact on Soviet defenses during the Moscow battle. Other articles, such as "‘The sheer number of Russians is smothering us’: a ’s Private Letters on the Road to Moscow (October 1941–January 1942)" (2022, Journal of Slavic Military Studies), analyze personal correspondences to reveal frontline perspectives on the campaign's failures. Stahel has also engaged in collaborative projects and public outreach on WWII history. He contributed a chapter to The German-Soviet War: Combat, Occupation, and Legacies (2021), a volume edited by Jeff Rutherford and Robert von Maier that addresses broader themes of the , including and long-term impacts. In terms of conferences and media, Stahel has participated in discussions on platforms like WW2TV, delivering talks such as "Operation Barbarossa to the " (2021), which touch on transitional operations leading to later battles. Additionally, he has appeared in podcasts and interviews, including a New Books Network episode on Retreat from Moscow (2019), where he elaborates on his research methodologies for Eastern Front studies. These contributions underscore his role in fostering interdisciplinary dialogues on the war's military and historical dimensions.

Key Arguments and Interpretations

Critique of German Strategy in Barbarossa

David Stahel argues that Operation Barbarossa was unavoidably doomed to failure from its inception due to fundamental strategic flaws inherent in German planning and execution. He contends that the operation's vast scope led to severe overextension of German forces, as the immense distances of the Soviet Union outpaced the Wehrmacht's capacity to maintain coherent advances across multiple army groups. This overextension was compounded by logistical inadequacies, including insufficient supply lines, reliance on overstretched rail networks, and a lack of preparation for the campaign's demands, which Stahel describes as a "logistics crisis" that undermined the entire offensive by late summer 1941. His examination, drawn from primary archival records, reveals that these internal weaknesses rendered the invasion unsustainable regardless of initial tactical successes. Central to Stahel's critique is the role of Adolf Hitler's ideological objectives, which imposed unrealistic goals on the military campaign. Hitler envisioned as a conquest to secure (living space) in the East and eradicate Bolshevism, prioritizing racial and expansionist aims over feasible military strategy. This ideological framework resulted in overambitious objectives, such as the simultaneous pursuit of economic resources, territorial gains, and the destruction of Soviet political structures, which diverted focus from achievable aims and ensured strategic incoherence. Stahel emphasizes that these goals, rooted in Hitler's worldview, blinded German leadership to the operation's inherent limitations, making defeat a self-inflicted outcome. Stahel minimizes the influence of external factors, such as Soviet aid through , in explaining the campaign's failure, instead attributing the defeat primarily to German strategic errors and internal dynamics. He posits that the Soviet Union's resilience stemmed from its own vast resources and the 's self-sabotaging overreach, rather than significant foreign assistance in the critical early phases of 1941. This perspective underscores Stahel's view of as a strategically flawed endeavor, where German miscalculations—driven by ideology and poor logistics—sealed its fate independently of Soviet external support.

Views on Wehrmacht's Operational Failures

David Stahel argues that the 's operational failures during Operation Barbarossa were primarily driven by internal logistical and tactical shortcomings, which became evident in the campaign's early phases. He emphasizes the overextension of as a critical issue, noting that the rapid advances of outpaced the army's ability to maintain across vast distances, leading to dangerous shortages from unceasing operational demands. According to Stahel, every operational success limited German potential to concentrate resources for subsequent advances, as losses mounted and supply lines became increasingly strained. In addition to logistical strains, Stahel highlights the 's underestimation of Soviet reserves as a fundamental planning error rooted in and an erroneous understanding of warfare in eastern Europe. This miscalculation allowed Soviet forces to mount persistent resistance, undermining the German expectation of a and contributing to the campaign's early demise. He contends that by , Germany's inability to win was assured, with the prodigious internal problems of the vital revealing the operation's inherent flaws from the outset. Stahel further attributes the 's downfall to internal self-destruction through poor decision-making and resource mismanagement, describing a command crisis over how to continue the war after initial plans failed to end Soviet resistance rapidly. The 's flawed decisions, including erratic strategic shifts, exacerbated these issues, as the army entered a drastic cycle of improvisation amid unprecedented losses. He asserts that while the Wehrmacht demonstrated operational brilliance in the opening months, it could not compensate for strategic miscalculations or the unhinged grand strategy pursued by the , with each success essentially setting the stage for ultimate failure through ineffective resource allocation. Stahel's analysis consistently prioritizes these German-side factors, avoiding reliance on external elements like or .

Reception and Influence

Critical Reception of His Works

David Stahel's works on the , particularly his analyses of and subsequent campaigns, have received widespread praise from scholars for their meticulous use of and for challenging established narratives of German military prowess. Historians have commended Stahel for his detailed examination of records, which reveals internal logistical and strategic shortcomings that traditional accounts often overlook. For instance, military historian described Stahel's Kiev 1941: Hitler's Battle for Supremacy in the East as a "brilliant contribution" that ranges widely over strategic debates and provides exemplary clarity in conveying complex military actions, distinguishing it from more conventional histories by emphasizing broader socio-political contexts. Reviews in academic and professional journals have similarly highlighted Stahel's ability to explode myths, such as the notion of a near-victory for Germany in the 1941 summer offensive, through rigorous archival research primarily from German sources. A review in Central European History noted that Stahel's Operation Barbarossa and Germany's Defeat in the East is solidly researched and features a controversial yet strongly argued thesis portraying the invasion as fundamentally flawed from the outset rather than merely botched in execution. Despite this acclaim, Stahel's interpretations have faced criticism for potentially overemphasizing German operational incompetence and internal dynamics while downplaying the role of Soviet resilience and external factors in the campaign's outcome. Reviewers have pointed out limitations in source diversity, particularly the heavy reliance on German archives, which may skew assessments of and contributions to the 's setbacks. For example, in a review of Retreat from Moscow: A New History of Germany's Winter Campaign, , the author acknowledged Stahel's engaging narrative and fresh perspective but critiqued the book's wider framing as sometimes problematic, including inaccuracies about Hitler's views on and the inherent difficulty in evaluating Soviet actions without more . An Air Mail review of the same work further noted that while Stahel's arguments are convincing and lucid, the emphasis on debunking the strategic significance of the somewhat diminishes the subject's broader importance, and the extensive length may deter general readers. These critiques suggest that, although Stahel's focus on Wehrmacht failures provides valuable , a more balanced incorporation of could strengthen his overall analysis.

Impact on Historiography

Stahel's research has contributed to a notable shift in the of the during , moving toward an that highlights German military vulnerabilities and logistical overextension rather than narratives centered on Soviet heroism or . His analyses underscore how the 's internal strains, such as depleted resources and command inflexibility, precipitated early strategic failures in , thereby reframing the campaign as doomed by inherent German weaknesses from its inception. This perspective has encouraged historians to prioritize the Wehrmacht's operational dynamics over external factors, influencing a broader reevaluation of the 1941 invasion as a catalyst for German collapse rather than a near-victory thwarted by Soviet resilience. In revisionist debates on the , Stahel's work has played a pivotal role by promoting examinations of the 's internal collapse, including the failure of under Hitler's rigid orders and the exhaustion of frontline units during the . Scholars have recognized his contributions as part of a that complicates traditional turning-point narratives, such as those emphasizing battles like or Stalingrad, instead positing the summer of 1941 as the decisive moment of German defeat due to overambitious objectives and resource mismanagement. This has spurred discussions on the interplay between high command decisions and battlefield realities, with Stahel's emphasis on archival evidence from German sources fostering a more nuanced understanding of authoritarian military structures. Stahel's publications have been widely cited in subsequent scholarly works, establishing him as a leading authority on the German side of the alongside figures like , and his pioneering archival research on Barbarossa has informed analyses in volumes such as those exploring Nazi policy and total war on the Eastern Front. For instance, his books are referenced in debates on the invasion's cataclysmic nature and in studies drawing on his findings to argue for the strategic defeat of Germany prior to major . Furthermore, his works have been adopted in academic curricula, appearing in university syllabi for courses on World War II's Eastern Front, such as at Ohio State University, where Operation Barbarossa and Germany's Defeat in the East is included as recommended reading in the course bibliography for examining . This integration reflects his enduring influence in shaping educational approaches to the topic, prioritizing critical analysis of over outdated myths.

References

  1. https://www.amazon.com/stores/author/B0028ONUK8
  2. https://www.unsw.edu.au/staff/david-stahel
  3. https://research.unsw.edu.au/people/associate-professor-david-stahel
  4. https://www.cambridge.org/core_title/gb/340188
  5. https://jmss.org/article/download/58187/43784/158533
  6. https://www.cmc.edu/magazine/summer-2014/cmc-alum-authors-book-on-hitlers-invasion-of-the-soviet-union
  7. https://us.macmillan.com/author/davidstahel
  8. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/operation-barbarossa-and-germanys-defeat-in-the-east/F6A6D6C530FA3B02E3A382169062BD1E
  9. https://www.amazon.com/Retreat-Moscow-Germanys-Campaign-1941-1942/dp/0374249520
  10. https://researchcentre.army.gov.au/about-us/contributor-biographies/david-stahel
  11. https://newbooksnetwork.com/david-stahel-retreat-from-moscow-a-new-history-of-germanys-winter-campaign-1941-1942-fsg-2019
  12. https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/2957275.David_Stahel
  13. https://landconferencemi.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/uss-silversides-brochure.pdf
  14. https://www.military-history.us/2020/03/book-review-by-lindsay-gudridge-operation-barbarossa-and-germanys-defeat-in-the-east-by-david-stahel/
  15. https://grokipedia.com/page/david_stahel
  16. https://www.unsw.edu.au/canberra/about-us/our-schools/hass/our-research/war-studies
  17. https://www.unsw.edu.au/canberra/about-us/our-schools/hass/our-research/conflict-society
  18. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6536795-operation-barbarossa-and-germany-s-defeat-in-the-east
  19. https://research.unsw.edu.au/people/associate-professor-david-stahel/publications
  20. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-the-nazisoviet-war/9D91136070060C830CA3B2E367904E61
  21. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/jj.17957859
  22. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toXO86IhSko
  23. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/central-european-history/article/operation-barbarossa-and-germanys-defeat-in-the-east-by-david-stahel-cambridge-cambridge-university-press-2009-cloth-9900-isbn-9780521768474/D5F85BB642A893D5D2C15511F6D8123F
  24. https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=55197
  25. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/nazi-policy-on-the-eastern-front-1941/radicalizing-warfare-the-german-command-and-the-failure-of-operation-barbarossa/114E754B09E03BE5E04C1869FDB9A076
  26. https://www.amazon.com/Kiev-1941-Hitlers-Battle-Supremacy/dp/1107610141
  27. https://www.wsj.com/articles/retreat-from-moscow-review-repelling-the-winter-invaders-11573832975
  28. https://airmail.news/issues/2019-12-7/point-of-no-return
  29. https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=58297
  30. https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=54868
  31. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/688790
  32. https://student-journals.ucl.ac.uk/slovo/article/1272/galley/1257/view/
  33. https://www.amazon.com/Battle-Moscow-David-Stahel/dp/1107087600
  34. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13518046.2024.2373647
  35. https://ascnet.osu.edu/storage/request_documents/5165/History%203670%20Course%20Change.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.