Hubbry Logo
NBA salary capNBA salary capMain
Open search
NBA salary cap
Community hub
NBA salary cap
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
NBA salary cap
NBA salary cap
from Wikipedia

The NBA salary cap is the limit to the total amount of money that National Basketball Association (NBA) teams are allowed to pay their players. Like the other major professional sports leagues in North America, the NBA has a salary cap to control costs and benefit parity, defined by the league's collective bargaining agreement (CBA). This limit is subject to a complex system of rules and exceptions and is calculated as a percentage of the league's revenue from the previous season. Under the CBA ratified in July 2017, the cap will continue to vary in future seasons based on league revenues. For the 2024–25 season, the cap is set at $140.588 million.[1]

Half of major American leagues (NFL, NHL) have hard caps while the NBA and MLB have soft salary caps. Hard salary caps forbid teams from going above the salary cap. Soft salary caps allow teams to go above the salary cap, but will subject such teams to reduced privileges in free agency. Teams that go above the luxury tax cap are subject to the luxury tax (a tax on every dollar spent over the luxury tax cap).

History

[edit]

The NBA had a salary cap in the mid-1940s, but it was abolished after only one season. The league continued to operate without such a cap until the 1984–85 season, when one was instituted in an attempt to level the playing field among all of the NBA's teams and ensure competitive balance for the League in the future. Before the cap was reinstated, teams could spend whatever amount of money they wanted on players, but in the first season under the new cap, they were each limited to $4.6 million in total payroll.[2]

Under the 2005 CBA, salaries were capped at 57 percent of basketball-related income (BRI) and lasted for six years until June 30, 2011.[3] The next CBA, which took effect in 2011, set the cap at 51.2 percent of BRI in 2011–12, with a 49-to-51 band in subsequent years.[4][5]

To ensure the players get their share of the BRI, teams are required to spend 90 percent of the salary cap each year. The salary cap for the 2022–23 season is $123.655 million (minimum team salary, which is set at 90 percent of the Salary Cap, is $111.290 million).[6] The league's newest CBA, which took effect with the 2023–24 season, requires teams to meet the 90% salary floor at the start of preseason training camp.[7]

In December 2016, the league and the players' union reached a tentative agreement on a new CBA, with both sides ratifying it by the end of that month.[8] This agreement was set to run through the 2023–24 season, with either side able to opt out after the 2022–23 season.[9][10] The league and union reached agreement on a new CBA that took effect in 2023–24.[11]

Soft versus hard caps

[edit]

Unlike the NFL and NHL, the NBA features a so-called soft cap, meaning that there are several significant exceptions that allow teams to exceed the salary cap to sign players. This is done to allow teams to keep their own players, which, in theory, fosters fan support in each individual city. By contrast, the NFL and NHL salary caps are considered hard, meaning that they offer relatively few (if any) circumstances under which teams can exceed the salary cap. The NBA and MLS version of the "soft" cap does, however, offer less leeway to teams than that of Major League Baseball. MLB allows teams to spend as much as they want on salary, but it penalizes them a percentage of the amount by which they exceed the soft cap. The percentage increases as the number of consecutive years a team exceeds the cap grows, resetting only when a team falls under the cap.[15]

Luxury tax

[edit]

While the soft cap allows teams to exceed the salary cap indefinitely by re-signing their own players using the "Larry Bird" family of exceptions, there are consequences for exceeding the cap by large amounts. A luxury tax payment is required of teams whose payroll exceeds a certain "tax level", determined by a complicated formula, and teams exceeding it are punished by being forced to pay bracket-based amounts for each dollar by which their payroll exceeds the tax level.

While most NBA teams hold contracts valued in excess of the salary cap, few teams have payrolls at luxury tax levels. The tax threshold in 2005–06 was $61.7 million. In 2005–06, the New York Knicks' payroll was $124 million, putting them $74.5 million above the salary cap, and $62.3 million above the tax line, which Knicks owner James Dolan paid to the league. Tax revenues are normally redistributed evenly among non-tax-paying teams, so there is often a several-million-dollar incentive to owners not to pay the luxury tax.

The luxury tax level for the 2008–09 season was $71.15 million.[16] For the 2009–10 season, the luxury tax level was set at $69.92 million.[17] The luxury tax level for the 2010–11 and 2012–13 NBA seasons was $70,307,000.[18]

The 2011 CBA instituted major changes to the luxury tax regime. The previous CBA had a dollar-for-dollar tax provision system, which remained in effect through the 2012–13 season. Teams exceeding the tax level were punished by being forced to pay one dollar to the league for each dollar by which their payroll exceeded the tax level. Starting in 2013–14, the tax changed to an incremental system. Under the current system, tax is assessed at different levels based on the amount that a team is over the luxury tax threshold.[19] The scheme is not cumulative—each level of tax applies only to amounts over that level's threshold. For example, a team that is $8 million over the tax threshold will pay $1.50 for each of its first $5 million over the tax threshold, and $1.75 per dollar for the remaining $3 million. Starting in 2014–15, "repeat offenders", subject to additional penalties, are defined as teams that paid tax in previous seasons. In the first season, repeat offenders from in all previous three seasons paid a stiffer tax rate; from 2015 to 2016 thereafter, teams paying taxes in three out of four years are subject to the higher repeater rate.[20] As in the previous CBA, the tax revenue is divided among teams with lower payrolls.[21] However, under the new scheme, no more than 50% of the total tax revenue can go exclusively to teams that did not go over the cap.[5] Initial reports did not specify the use of the remaining 50% under the 2011 CBA,[5] but it was later confirmed that this amount would be used to fund revenue sharing for the season during which tax was paid.[22]

For the 2013–14 season, the luxury tax threshold was set at $71.748 million. The Brooklyn Nets, whose payroll for that season was projected to be over $100 million, would face a luxury tax bill above $80 million, resulting in a total payroll cost of $186 million.[23]

Tax levels from 2023–24

[edit]
Amount over tax threshold Standard tax per excess dollar Repeat offender tax per excess dollar
$5 million to $9,999,999 $1.75 $2.75
$10 million to $14,999,999 $2.50 $3.50
$15 million to $19,999,999 $3.25 $4.25
Over $20 million $3.75 + $0.50 per $5 million $4.75 + $0.50 per $5 million

The NBA's newest CBA, which took effect for the 2023–24 season, significantly changed the tax regime. First, the luxury tax brackets, which had been fixed amounts since 2013–14, now change each season by the same percentage as the salary cap. More significantly, a second tax "apron" has been introduced, which for 2023–24 was expected to be triggered at about $17.5 million over the tax line. Teams above the second apron face new restrictions on player movement, which will be discussed in later sections.[11]

Exceptions

[edit]

Because the NBA's salary cap is a soft one, the NBA allows for several important scenarios in which a team can sign players even if their payroll exceeds the cap. The exceptions are as follows:

Mid-level exception

[edit]

Once a year, teams can use a mid-level exception (MLE) to sign a player to a contract for a specified maximum amount. The amount of the MLE and its duration depend on the team's cap status. In the 2017 CBA, the MLE was initially set at $8.406 million in the 2017–18 season for teams that are over the cap either before or after the signing, but under the luxury tax apron, set at $6 million above the tax line. Teams can use this exception to offer contracts of up to four years. Teams above the apron have an MLE initially set at $5.192 million, allowing contracts of up to three years. Teams with cap room, which were ineligible for the MLE before the 2011 CBA, have an MLE initially set at $4.328 million that allows two-year contracts. In subsequent seasons, all MLE amounts will be determined by applying the percentage change of the salary cap to the previous exception amount.[24]

Before the 2011 NBA, the MLE was equal to the average NBA salary for all teams over the cap; teams with cap room were then ineligible for the MLE.[5] The Mid-Level Exception for the 2008–09 NBA season was $5.585 million.[16] The MLE was $5.854 million for the 2009–10 NBA regular season.[17]

Under the 2017 NBA, the apron was initially set at $6 million above the tax line for the 2017–18 season. In a new feature, the apron changes from season to season, with the percentage change (up or down) set at half of the rate of change of the cap for that season.[10]

The 2023 CBA introduces major changes to the MLE regime. As noted earlier, the 2023 CBA introduces a second tax apron, initially at about $17.5 million above the tax line for 2023–24. Use of the taxpayer MLE now makes the second apron a hard salary cap. Also, teams that are above the second apron cannot use the MLE to sign free agents; they also cannot sign free agents whose contracts have been bought out by their previous teams. The 2023 CBA also increases the non-taxpayer MLE by 7.5% from 2022–23, when the maximum starting salary on such a contract was $10.49 million. The cap room MLE, which had been $5.401 million in 2022–23, will increase by 30%, with its maximum contract length increased to three years.[11][25]

Bi-annual exception

[edit]

The bi-annual exception can currently be used by teams below the apron to sign a free agent to a contract starting at $3.29 million.[24] Like the mid-level exception, the bi-annual exception can also be split among more than one player, and can be used to sign players for up to two years; raises were originally limited to 8% per year, but in the 2017 CBA are limited to 5%. This exception was referred to as the "$1 million exception" in the 1999 CBA, although it was valued at $1 million for only the first year of the agreement.

An example of the bi-annual exception was the Los Angeles Lakers' signing of Karl Malone to a contract before the 2003–04 season.

The exception was eliminated for teams above the tax apron following the 2011 NBA lockout as many high spending teams were using this as a tool to gain top paid players.[5]

A team cannot use this exception in consecutive years; a team that used it in 2016–17 (under the 2011 CBA) could not use it in 2017–18 (under the 2017 CBA). It also cannot be used by a team that has already used an MLE in the same season. Additionally, once a team uses the bi-annual exception, the tax apron (from 2023–24, the first apron) becomes a hard salary cap for the remainder of that season.[24]

Rookie exception

[edit]

The NBA allows teams to sign their first-round draft choices to rookie "scale" contracts even if their payroll exceeds the cap.

Second-round pick exception

[edit]

The 2023 CBA created the second-round pick exception which allows teams to sign their second-round draft picks for up to four years without counting against the cap until July 31 of the player's first season.[26]

The first second-round pick exception was executed by the Sacramento Kings when they signed No. 34 overall pick Colby Jones.[27]

Two-way contracts

[edit]

The 2017 CBA introduced two-way contracts between NBA teams and players in the NBA G League (formerly the D-League). Before the 2017 CBA, all D-League players were contracted directly with the league, and all D-League players could be called up by any NBA team, regardless of whether they were affiliated with the player's D-League team. Now, each NBA team can sign two players to contracts that allow them to assign the players to the G League without risk of being "poached" by another NBA team. The players signed to such deals benefit by receiving a considerably higher salary than other G League players while in that league, as well as earning a prorated share of the NBA minimum rookie salary for each day they are with their contracted NBA team. Salaries of two-way players are not included in salary cap calculations.[28] Additionally, a team can convert a two-way contract to a standard NBA contract at any time, with the player's salary becoming the NBA minimum for the player's years of service, prorated from the time of the conversion;[29] a converted contract also does not count in cap calculations.[28]

The 2023 CBA increased the number of two-way slots to three for each team.[11]

Exhibit 10

[edit]

Related to the two-way contract, and also introduced in the 2017 CBA, is an attachment to the standard NBA contract known as Exhibit 10. A contract that contains this attachment may be converted to a two-way contract at the team's option. Exhibit 10 can be used only in one-year, non-guaranteed contracts for the minimum NBA salary, with no bonuses except for an "Exhibit 10 bonus" of $5,000 to $50,000. The bonus is paid if the player is waived by his NBA team, signs with the G League, is assigned to that NBA team's G League affiliate, and remains with the affiliate at least 60 days. The bonus is not counted against the salary cap, but is counted in overall league salaries. Each NBA team is limited to six active contracts that contain Exhibit 10 at any given time.[29]

The 2023 CBA increased the maximum Exhibit 10 bonus to $75,000.[25]

Larry Bird exception

[edit]

Perhaps the most well-known of the NBA's salary cap exceptions is the Larry Bird exception, so named because the Boston Celtics were the first team permitted to exceed the salary cap to re-sign one of their own players (in that case, Larry Bird). Free agents who qualify for this exception are called "qualifying veteran free agents" or "Bird Free Agents" in the CBA, and this exception falls under the terms of the Veteran Free Agent exception. In essence, the Larry Bird exception allows teams to exceed the salary cap to re-sign their own free agents, at an amount up to the maximum salary. To qualify as a Bird free agent, a player must have played three seasons without being waived or changing teams as a free agent. Players claimed after being amnestied have their Bird rights transferred to their new team. Other players claimed off waivers are not eligible for the full Bird exception, but may qualify for the early Bird exception. Prior to an arbitrator ruling in June 2012, all players that were waived and changed teams lost their Bird rights.[30][31] This means a player can obtain "Bird rights" by playing under three one-year contracts, a single contract of at least three years, or any combination thereof. It also means that when a player is traded, his Bird rights are traded with him, and his new team can use the Bird exception to re-sign him. Since the 2011 CBA, Bird-exception contracts can be up to five years in length, down from six under the 2005 CBA.[5][24]

Early Bird exception

[edit]

The lesser form of the Larry Bird exception is the "early Bird" exception. Free agents who qualify for this exception are called "early qualifying veteran free agents", and qualify after playing two seasons with the same team. Players that are traded or claimed off waivers have their Bird rights transferred to their new team. Prior to an arbitrator ruling in June 2012, all players that were waived and changed teams lost their Bird rights.[30][31] Using this exception, a team can re-sign its own free agent for either 175% of his salary the previous season, or the NBA's average salary, whichever is greater. Early Bird contracts must be for at least two seasons, but can last no longer than four seasons. If a team agrees to a trade that would make a player lose his Early Bird Rights, he has the power to veto the trade.

A much-publicized example for this was Devean George, who vetoed his inclusion into a larger trade during the 2007–08 season that would have sent him from the Dallas Mavericks to the New Jersey Nets.

Non-Bird exception

[edit]

"Non-qualifying free agents" (those who do not qualify under either the Larry Bird exception or the early Bird exception) are subject to the non-Bird exception. Under this exception, teams can re-sign a player to a contract beginning at either 120% of his salary for the previous season, or 120% of the league's minimum salary, whichever amount is higher. Contracts signed under the Non-Bird exception can last up to four years (down from six under the 2005 CBA).

Minimum Salary Exception

[edit]

Teams can sign players for the NBA's minimum salary even if they are over the cap, for up to two years in length. In the case of two-year contracts, the second-season salary is the minimum salary for that season. The contract may not contain a signing bonus. This exception also allows minimum-salary players to be acquired via trade. There is no limit to the number of players that can be signed or acquired using this exception.

Traded Player Exception

[edit]

Ordinarily a team cannot engage in a trade which would leave it $100,000 above the salary cap, regardless of whether the trade reduces or increase its overall payroll, and requires exceptions in order to do so. The traded player exception is one of such.

The exception allows a team to trade for any player, or number of players, as long as their collective incoming salary does not exceed a set amount, which is based on whether if the team pays the luxury tax after the trade, and the collective outgoing (of the players the team is trading away) salary. Taxpaying teams can absorb up to 125% of the outgoing salary + $100,000, and for non-taxpayers the amount is as follows:

Outgoing Salary Incoming Salary Allowed
$0–$6,533,333 175% of the outgoing salary + $100,000
$6,533,334–$19.6 million Outgoing salary + $5,000,000
>$19.6 million 125% of the outgoing salary + $100,000

Also, if a team trades away players with higher salary than of the players they acquire in return, the traded player exception allows them to acquire players with salaries not exceeding such difference + $100,000, for up to one year after the trade in which they acquired such a credit.[32][33]

The 2023 CBA imposes severe trading restrictions on teams that are above the second tax apron. They are not allowed to send cash out in trades and cannot take in more salary than they send out. Also, while NBA teams are normally allowed to trade draft picks up to seven years in the future, the seventh year will not be available to teams above the second apron.[11]

Disabled Player Exception

[edit]

Allows a team that is over the cap to acquire a replacement for a disabled player who will be out for either the remainder of that season (for in-season injuries/deaths) or the next season (if the disability occurs during the offseason). The maximum salary of the replacement player is either 50% of the injured player's salary, or the mid-level exception for a non-taxpaying team, whichever is less. This exception requires an NBA-designated doctor to verify the extent of the injury. Under the 2005 CBA, a team could sign a player under this exception for five years; since the 2011 CBA, it has been allowed only for one year.[5]

Note that while teams can often use one exception to sign multiple players, they cannot use a combination of exceptions to sign a single player.

Reinstatement

[edit]

A player banned from the league for a drug-related offense who is reinstated may be re-signed by his prior team for a salary up to his previous salary.[20]

Individual contracts under the CBA

[edit]

The maximum player salary is based on the number of years that player has played and the total of the salary cap. The maximum salary of a player with 6 or fewer years of experience is either $25,500,000 or 25% of the total salary cap (projected for 2017–18), whichever is greater. For a player with 7–9 years of experience, the maximum is $30,600,000 or 30% of the cap, and for a player with 10+ years of experience, the maximum is $35,700,000 or 35% of the cap.[20][34] There is an exception to this rule: a player is able to sign a contract for 105% of his previous contract, even if the new contract is higher than the league limit.[35]

The 2017 CBA made a subtle change to the determination of maximum salaries. Under the 2011 CBA, the salary cap was based on players receiving 44.74% of the league's basketball-related income (BRI), while the calculation of maximum salaries used a lower figure of 42.14% of BRI. This difference was eliminated in the 2017 CBA, with the same 44.74% of BRI used for both cap and maximum salary calculations.[10] The 2023 CBA adds league licensing revenue to the definition of BRI, which is expected to boost the salary cap by at least $2 million.[11]

Rookie scale salary

[edit]

First-round draft choices are assigned salaries according to their draft position. The first overall pick receives more than the second pick, the second more than the third, and so on. Each contract is for two years, with a team option for the third and fourth seasons (CBAs before 2011 provided for three-year contracts with an option for the fourth season), with built-in raises every year to compensate for increases in the average salary. A team may elect to exceed rookie scale for a drafted player that was unsigned for which they retained his draft rights three seasons after the draft. The contract would be for at least three seasons, with a maximum value up to the team's available cap room.[36]

In 2017, the scale for lottery picks was as follows:

Second-round picks are not subject to a scale, and technically can be paid anywhere from the minimum to the maximum contract amount. In practice, they rarely receive more than the minimum.[37]

Prior to the 2017 CBA, the rookie scales for each season were negotiated into the agreement. For the current agreement, only the rookie scales for the 2017–18 season were determined in advance. In subsequent seasons, the percentage change in the salary cap will be applied to all dollar amounts in the previous season's scale. Amounts that are expressed as a percentage of salary, such as the allowable salary change from the third to the fourth season of the rookie contract, remain the same from season to season.[38]

Designated Player

[edit]

Since the 2011 CBA, each NBA team has been able to nominate a player on his rookie contract to receive a "Designated Player" contract extension. A Designated Player is eligible for a five-year contract extension, instead of being held to the standard four-year restriction.[5] From 2011 through the 2016–17 season, a team could only allocate a single Designated Player contract at any one time (if a team had already extended a rookie contract by using the Designated Player extension, they could not create a second Designated Player contract until the current contract expired, or until the player moved to a different team); however the 2011 CBA allowed teams to sign a second Designated Player from another team in addition to the one they already had. All teams were limited to having a maximum of two Designated Players contracted on their roster at any time (one that they had created from one of their own rookie contracts and one acquired from another team).[39]

Under the 2017 CBA, the "Designated Player" limit remained at two, but in a new feature, teams are now able to create Designated Player contracts from their own veteran contracts. In addition, teams may now use their Designated Player slots on any combination of their own rookie contracts, their own veteran contracts, or players acquired in trades.[9]

The 2023 CBA allows teams to offer supermax contracts to all players eligible for them, as long as the teams do not violate other cap rules in the process. Previously, teams could not have more than one "Derrick Rose Rule" player (see below) on their rosters if they did not draft at least one of them; this notably prevented the Boston Celtics from trading for Anthony Davis when they had Kyrie Irving on their roster. One beneficiary of the new rule was expected to be the Cleveland Cavaliers, which became able to sign Evan Mobley to a Rose Rule supermax after the 2023–24 season if he qualified for the contract. Under previous rules, the Cavaliers could not have done so because Darius Garland (drafted by the team) and Donovan Mitchell (acquired by trade) had Rose Rule supermax contracts.[11]

"Derrick Rose" Rule

[edit]
In a rule named after Derrick Rose, accomplished players coming off their rookie contract could earn more money in the 2011 CBA.

A Designated Player coming off his rookie contract may be eligible to earn 30% of the salary cap (rather than the standard 25%) if he attains certain criteria. Through the 2017–18 season, in order to be eligible, the player must be voted to start in two All-Star Games, or be named to an All-NBA Team twice (at any level), or be named MVP. Officially titled the "5th Year 30% Max Criteria",[40] it has been dubbed (and is more commonly known as) the "Derrick Rose Rule" after the 2011 MVP,[41] due to the fact that when the criteria were introduced, Rose was the only player in the NBA eligible to sign the maximum extension (due to his MVP award).[42] The reasoning for the rule is to suitably reward players being extended off their rookie contract who are considered to be of a higher "caliber" than their peers, without restricting them to the lower (25%) salary level.[43] A player may sign a "5th Year, 30% Max" contract before the final year of his rookie contract and before fulfilling the criteria needed to receive the 30% salary grade. Should the player fail to fulfill the criteria before the start of his Designated Player contract, he will receive the standard five-year, 25% Designated Player contract. James Harden of the Los Angeles Clippers and Anthony Davis of the Los Angeles Lakers had such a clause in their contract extensions, but both failed to meet the criteria.[44] The only player in the NBA who was attempting to qualify for a full 30% contract in 2013–14 was Paul George, who signed a provisional 30%/five-year contract in September 2013. George, who had made the All-NBA third team in 2012–13,[45] qualified by again making the All-NBA third team.[46]

The 2017 CBA changed the qualification criteria for "5th Year, 30% Max" contracts. Players who come off rookie contracts at the end of the 2017–18 season, or later, must meet any of the following criteria to qualify:[47]

  • Selection to an All-NBA team (at any level) in the player's fourth season, or in two of the three seasons between his second and fourth seasons.
  • Selection as Defensive Player of the Year in the player's fourth season, or in two of the three seasons between his second and fourth seasons.
  • Selection as MVP in any season from the player's second onward.

These criteria are identical to those for the veteran player extensions introduced in the 2017 CBA. Had these criteria been part of the 2011 CBA, Rose would still have qualified for a 30% contract, as he was in his third NBA season when he was named MVP.

5/30% Contracts
[edit]

The following players have signed five-year/30% contracts:[40]

Under the 2011 CBA
  • Derrick Rose (signed with the Chicago Bulls; was later traded to the New York Knicks during the last year on that deal) until 2017 (qualified by winning the 2011 MVP award)[48]
  • Blake Griffin (signed with the L.A. Clippers; was later traded to the Detroit Pistons in 2018) signed through 2018 (qualified by making the All-NBA second team in 2011–12 and 2012–13)
  • Paul George (signed with Indiana Pacers; since has been traded to the Oklahoma City Thunder and then to the Los Angeles Clippers prior to the 2019 season) signed until 2019 (qualified by making the All-NBA third team in 2012–13 and 2013–14)[45][46]
Under the 2017 CBA
  • Luka Dončić (signed with the Dallas Mavericks in the 2021 offseason), signed from 2022 to 2023 through 2026–27. Under the current 5/30% criteria, he was the first player to have been eligible for such a contract before signing, as he had been named to the All-NBA first team in 2019–20 and 2020–21.[49]
5/25% Contracts
[edit]

In addition the following players are known to have signed five-year/25% contracts:[40]

Kevin Love was eligible for a designated player contract, but the Minnesota Timberwolves opted[51] for a 4-year contract (with a player option year included, potentially allowing him to become an unrestricted free agent) instead.[52] During Kevin Durant's final five seasons with the Oklahoma City Thunder (2011–2016), he received a Designated Player level salary. His contract was initially drawn up before the lockout—during which the Derrick Rose Rule was implemented—but was officially approved under the provisions of the 2005 CBA[53] by the NBA after the lockout. This led some people[54] to question whether the Thunder had (with NBA approval) effectively signed two players as their Designated Player, as both were contracted for 5 years.

"Supermax" Rule

[edit]

A provision in the 2017 CBA allows teams to create Designated Player contracts for their own veteran players, officially known as the "Designated Veteran Player Extension" (DVPE).[10] It came to be called the "Kevin Durant Rule", because it was seen as a reaction to a wave of veteran superstars leaving their teams in free agency, capped off by Durant's departure from the Thunder to the Golden State Warriors in the 2016 offseason. Such contracts are also commonly described as or called "supermax". The 2011 CBA allowed all of the teams that were trying to lure Durant to offer him the same initial salary of $26.5 million.[9]

For a veteran player to qualify for such an extension, he must be entering his eighth or ninth season in the NBA, and have either:

  • made the All-NBA team (at any level) in either the season immediately before signing the extension, or two of the three previous seasons;
  • been named NBA Defensive Player of the Year in either the season immediately before signing the extension, or two of the three previous seasons; or
  • been named NBA MVP at least once in the previous three seasons.

Additionally, the team offering the extension must have originally drafted the player, or obtained him in a trade while he was on his rookie contract.[9]

Players who qualify can be offered contracts with a starting salary between 30 and 35% of the salary cap. The extension cannot last more than five years after the expiration of the player's current contract (or five years for a player who is a free agent when signed), but can be negotiated and signed one year before the current contract expires. The extension can be offered to a team's own free agent as well as a player with time left on his contract.[10] Additionally, once a player signs a DVPE, he cannot be traded for one year.[55]

Ironically, while the rule was intended to encourage star players to stay with their current teams, the first major move by an NBA team involving a player eligible for the DVPE was the Sacramento Kings' trade of DeMarcus Cousins to the New Orleans Pelicans during the 2017 All-Star break. Cousins' contract with the Kings was not set to expire until 2018, but he was eligible to sign a DVPE after the 2016–17 season for up to $209 million over five years, a financial commitment that the Kings were apparently unwilling to make.[55]

By the end of the 2018–19 season, Sports Illustrated writer Andrew Sharp began a story on the supermax rule with the following sentence: "If you've been paying attention to the NBA for the past two years, it goes without saying that the NBA's "supermax" contracts have been a failure." First, he noted that supermax money was not enough to discourage superstars on small-market teams from seeking to join title contenders, even for noticeably less money. Sharp argued that the rule in fact created more problems than it solved:[56]

Teams who develop and retain homegrown superstars will find themselves rewarded with uniquely-bloated salary caps and stiff luxury tax payments. Meanwhile, superstars who decide to stay loyal will be asked to spend their prime with shorthanded rosters and handicapped front offices.

Sharp's colleague Rohan Nadkarni questioned the DVPE eligibility criteria, as key players like Klay Thompson and Karl-Anthony Towns are not eligible despite their excellent performances.[57]

Players eligible for the supermax
[edit]

Following the announcement of the 2016–17 All-NBA team, four players were eligible to sign DVPE contracts during the 2017 offseason. All four were named to one of the three All-NBA teams for that season; two were already eligible under the new criteria.[58]

Harden and Westbrook would not have qualified under the standard DVPE criteria because both signed extensions to their contracts in the 2016 offseason, Harden for two years and Westbrook for one. The players' union and owners negotiated a special dispensation allowing them to sign DVPE contracts should they otherwise qualify.[58]

The next player to qualify for a supermax contract was Anthony Davis, who at the time had played his entire NBA career with the New Orleans Pelicans. He qualified by being named to the All-NBA first team in 2017–18, enabling the Pelicans to offer him a five-year extension worth up to $230 million, effective with the 2019–20 season.[59] Davis also became the first player to publicly turn down a supermax offer, notifying the Pelicans during the 2018–19 season that he would not accept a supermax deal and also requesting a trade.[60] Davis would ultimately be traded to the Los Angeles Lakers after the 2018–19 season.[61]

During the 2019 season, four further players qualified for supermax deals. Damian Lillard and Kemba Walker both qualified to immediately sign supermax deals by making a 2018–19 All-NBA Team. While Giannis Antetokounmpo would not have become a free agent until the 2021 offseason, he became eligible to sign a supermax deal in 2020 by making All-NBA Teams in both 2017–18 and 2018–19;[62] he would later meet another supermax criterion by being named the 2019 MVP.[63] Rudy Gobert became eligible by claiming Defensive Player of the Year honors for the second straight season.[64] The Charlotte Hornets did not offer Walker a supermax deal, instead sending him to the Boston Celtics in a sign-and-trade deal in the 2019 offseason.[65] Gobert signed a five-year extension with the Utah Jazz in the 2020 offseason, but chose not to take the full supermax of $228 million, instead opting for $205 million to give the team more cap room.[66]

Supermax contracts
[edit]

The first player to sign a supermax contract was Stephen Curry, who agreed to a new five-year DVPE deal with the Warriors, worth $201 million, that ran through the 2021–22 season. Curry signed the contract once the NBA's free agency moratorium ended on July 6, 2017.[67]

Shortly thereafter, James Harden agreed on a DVPE with the Rockets. At the time of signing, his current contract had two years remaining with total pay of $59 million; the extension added another $170 million over four seasons, ending in 2022–23.[68]

The next supermax signing was that of John Wall, who agreed later in July to a four-year, $170 million extension that began in 2019–20.[69] In late September, Russell Westbrook became the fourth and final supermax signing of the 2017 offseason, signing a five-year, $205 million extension that started in 2018–19.[70]

Damian Lillard agreed to a four-year, $196 million extension with the Portland Trail Blazers during the 2019 offseason. The extension starts in 2021–22 and includes a player option for 2024–25.[71]

Giannis Antetokounmpo agreed to a five-year, $228 million extension with the Milwaukee Bucks during the 2020 offseason. The extension started in 2021–22 and includes a player option for 2025–26.[72]

During the 2023 offseason, Jaylen Brown signed a five-year, $304 million supermax extension with the Boston Celtics, the largest contract in NBA history.[73] That contract was surpassed by his teammate Jayson Tatum the following offseason, who also signed a supermax extension with the Celtics for five years, $315 million.[74]

Over-38 rule

[edit]

The cap also includes a provision to close a potential loophole that would provide incentives for teams to skirt the cap by signing an older player to a long-term deal that would not end until after the team expects the player to retire. Cap analyst Larry Coon outlined how this potential loophole would work:[75]

For example, suppose the Non-Taxpayer Mid-Level exception is $9 million. With 5% raises, a three-year contract would total $28.35 million. But if they added a fourth year to the contract, the salary would total $38.7 million. If the player retires after three seasons and continues drawing his salary for the additional season, then he effectively will be paid $38.7 million for three years' work. In essence, they are giving the player a three-year contract with additional deferred compensation.

To address this issue, CBAs since at least the 1990s have included what is now called the "over-38 rule", under which certain contracts that extend past the player's 38th birthday[a] are presumed to cover seasons following the player's expected retirement. The age threshold that triggered this rule was originally set at 35, changed to 36 in the 1999 CBA, and changed again to 38 in the 2017 CBA. The salary for any years that come after the player's 38th birthday is presumed to be deferred compensation, and is shifted for cap purposes to the under-38 seasons of the deal, with the over-38 year(s) being referred to as "zero years" in the CBA. If the player continues to play under the deal (proving the presumption of retirement wrong), the salary that had originally been treated as deferred is distributed evenly over the remaining years of the contract, starting with the second season before the zero years. This rule had been a larger issue before the 2011 CBA, which limited the maximum contract length to 5 years.[75]

While the threshold age was changed in the 2017 CBA, the mechanics of the rule remained the same. Notably, several members of the union's executive committee at the time the 2017 CBA was negotiated were older players who were seen as potential major beneficiaries of a change to an over-38 rule. For example, the change to an over-38 rule gave union president Chris Paul, scheduled to become a free agent after the 2016–17 season, a potential gain of nearly $50 million over the life of his next contract. Similarly, executive committee members LeBron James and Carmelo Anthony, who could opt out of their current contracts after the same season, had the potential for similar gains with this change.[9][10]

Options

[edit]

Many NBA contracts are structured with options for either the player or the team. An option simply gives the party that controls the option the right to extend the contract for one more season at a salary no less than the prior year's amount.

Free agency

[edit]
Gilbert Arenas, pictured here in 2008, was able to receive a bigger contract as a restricted free agent by leaving the Golden State Warriors for the Washington Wizards in 2003, prompting the "Gilbert Arenas Rule".

There are two types of free agency under the NBA's Collective Bargaining Agreement: Unrestricted and Restricted. Rather than spending salaries on teams like Major League Baseball, the NBA has a policy that strictly prohibits it using the salary cap in that fashion.

Unrestricted free agent

[edit]

An unrestricted free agent is free to sign with any team that they choose to.

Restricted free agent

[edit]

A restricted free agent is subject to his current team's Right of First Refusal, meaning that the player can be signed to an offer sheet by another team, but his current club reserves the right to match the offer and keep the player. An offer sheet is a contract offer of at least two years made by another team to a restricted free agent.[20] The player's current club has three days to match the offer or they lose the player to the new team; the CBA prior to 2011 allowed seven days.[76]

For first-round draft picks, restricted free agency is only allowed after a team exercises its option for a fourth year, and the team makes a Qualifying Offer at the Rookie-scale amount after the fourth year is completed. For any other player to be a restricted free agent, he must be at most a three-year NBA veteran, and his team must have made a Qualifying Offer for either 125% of his previous season's salary or the minimum salary plus $200,000, whichever offer is higher.[20]

Teams are limited in what they can offer an unrestricted free agent with two years or less experience. The maximum first-year salary in an offer sheet is the mid-level exception. The second-year salary can be raised a maximum of 4.5%. The third year salary is limited to the maximum a team has available in their salary cap. The salary in the fourth season may increase (or decrease) by up to 4.1% of the salary in the third season. The offer sheet can only increase in the third season if it provides the highest salary allowed in the first two seasons, the contract is fully guaranteed, and it contains no bonuses.[20][77] A player's original team can use the Early Bird exception or their Mid-Level exception to re-sign the player.[20]

If the raise in the third season is greater than 4.5% of the first year, the offering team must be able to fit the average of the entire contract under their cap. Through the 2016–17 season, the accounting was different for the player's original team, where the player's salary for a given year—not the contract's average—was counted against the cap. In some cases, the offering team could exploit a loophole to create what is referred to as a poison pill for the player's original team, potentially forcing the original team to pay the luxury tax by the third season, as the Houston Rockets did in order to sign Jeremy Lin and Ömer Aşık away from the New York Knicks and Chicago Bulls, respectively. This could discourage them from matching the offer sheet.[78][79]

The 2017 CBA changed the accounting rules for the player's original team in this scenario. If the original team matches, and has enough cap space to absorb the average annual salary of the offer, it can choose to take cap hits of either the actual contract payouts or the average of the contract in each season.[10]

Before the 2005 CBA, the original team could only use an exception to re-sign a player who had been drafted in the first round. The 2005 CBA allowed teams to use exceptions on non-first-round picks, with the extension named the "Gilbert Arenas Rule". In 2003, Gilbert Arenas, who had been a second-round pick in 2001, signed a six-year, $60 million contract with the Washington Wizards after his original team, the Golden State Warriors, were unable to match the offer since they were over the salary cap.[80]

July moratorium

[edit]

Players on a team's season-ending roster remain under contract with their respective team until the start of the new league year on July 1.[81] From 6 pm Eastern Time (UTC−4) on June 30 and through the first few days of July, teams may begin negotiating with free agents, but trades cannot be made and most free agents cannot be signed; this is known as the "moratorium period".[82] Contracts that are allowed during this period are limited to:

  • Rookie scale contracts to first-round draft picks.
  • A second-round draft pick can accept a required tender, which is a one-year contract that teams are required to offer in order to retain their rights to the player.
  • A restricted free agent can accept a qualifying offer from his previous team.
  • A restricted free agent finishing the fourth season of his rookie scale contract can accept a maximum qualifying offer. The actual amount is not determined until the end of the moratorium.
  • Teams may sign players to contracts of one or two years for the minimum salary.
  • Teams may sign players to two-way contracts, convert a two-way contract to a standard NBA contract, or convert a standard NBA contract with an Exhibit 10 bonus to a two-way contract[20]

During the moratorium, teams are restricted from commenting on deals.[83] Teams and players can reach verbal agreements, but they are not binding. Contracts can be signed once the moratorium ends.[20] In 2015, DeAndre Jordan had reached a verbal agreement to sign with the Dallas Mavericks, but changed his mind at the end of the moratorium and re-signed with the Los Angeles Clippers.[84] A year later, the moratorium period was shortened from 10 to 5 days in what was unofficially called the "DeAndre Jordan Rule". The change was intended to discourage parties from backing out of their agreements.[85]

Cap holds

[edit]

The end of a free agent's contract does not remove him from a team's cap calculations. During the free agency period (from July 1 until the player signs with a team, or the free agent's former team renounces its rights), each free agent carries a specified salary cap charge for his last team, most often called a "cap hold". Normally, the cap hold can be no more than a player's maximum salary, or less than his minimum salary, based on years of service. The only exception is for free agents who made the minimum salary in the previous season; if the league reimbursed the team for a portion of his salary in the last season of his contract, the reimbursement is not counted in the cap hold. Apart from these restrictions, the cap hold varies based on the status of the free agent and his salary in the previous season:[86]

  • Bird free agent:
    • If not coming off a rookie scale contract, and salary was at or above the estimated average salary,[b] 150% of previous salary.
    • If not coming off a rookie scale contract, and salary was below the estimated average salary, 190% of previous salary.
    • If coming off the fourth season of a rookie scale contract, and salary was at or above the estimated average salary, 250% of previous salary.
    • If coming off the fourth season of a rookie scale contract, and salary was below the estimated average salary, 300% of previous salary.
    • If coming off the third season of a rookie scale contract, the maximum amount that the team can pay under the Bird exception.
  • Early Bird:
    • If coming off the second season of a rookie scale contract, the maximum amount that the team can pay under the Bird exception.
    • Otherwise, 130% of previous salary.
  • Non-Bird: 120% of previous salary.

The 2017 CBA increases some cap holds from those found in the 2011 CBA as follows:[10]

  • Unsigned first-round draft picks: 120% of rookie scale (up from 100%)
  • Bird free agent (as of the 2018–19 season):
    • If coming off the fourth season of a rookie scale contract, and salary was at or above the estimated average salary, 250% of previous salary (up from 200%).
    • If coming off the fourth season of a rookie scale contract, and salary was below the estimated average salary, 300% of previous salary (up from 250%).

Sign and trade agreements

[edit]

When a team is willing to sign an upcoming free agent, but the player's current team wants something in return, it might be in the best interest of both clubs to execute a sign-and-trade deal. This occurs when one team signs one of its free agents and immediately trades that player to another team. A sign-and-trade is beneficial to both the player and the teams; the player receives a bigger contract than he might ordinarily get from a team that he would like to play for, while the trading club gets something in return for a free agent, and the recipient of the trade gets the player they desire. Sign-and-trades are a reality in the NBA because of the CBA's rules: unlike baseball, where teams losing free agents are compensated with draft picks or cash, NBA teams that lose free agents receive no compensation.

When a team initiates a sign-and-trade agreement, it must trade the signed player immediately; teams cannot renege on the arrangement and keep the player for themselves, using the other team's financial situation to leverage the signee into a more favorable deal for themselves. Also, the contract signed before the trade must be for at least 3 years, with the first year guaranteed. Because of the contract length requirement, the signing team cannot use an exception that cannot be used to offer a contract of 3 or more years.[88]

Since the 2011 CBA, the signed player must have been on the roster of his previous team at the end of the last regular season. Previous agreements allowed teams to sign-and-trade any player to whom they held Bird rights, which do not automatically disappear with a player's retirement—for example, in July 2010, the Los Angeles Lakers still held Bird rights to John Salley, who had not played since 2000. In the 2007–08 season, two teams used sign-and-trades on players who had been out of the league. The Dallas Mavericks signed Keith Van Horn out of retirement as part of a package to acquire Jason Kidd, and the Lakers did the same with Aaron McKie to facilitate their deal for Pau Gasol.[89]

The 2011 CBA put further restrictions on sign-and-trades, with these restrictions maintained in the 2017 and 2023 CBAs. Since the 2013–14 season, the payroll of the receiving team cannot exceed the so-called "apron" (as of 2017–18 set at $6 million above the tax line; this became the first tax apron for 2023–24 and beyond) as a result of the trade, and a team that has used the taxpayers' MLE cannot receive a player in a sign-and-trade in that season. Additionally, the apron becomes a hard salary cap for the first season after the signing. Teams above the apron before the trade cannot receive a player unless the trade leaves the team below the apron.[88]

Trading and the salary cap

[edit]
  • Teams below the salary cap may trade without regard to salary, as long as they don't end up more than $100,000 above the cap following a trade.
  • Teams above the cap (or teams below the cap but would end up more than $100,000 over the cap following a trade) cannot acquire more than 125% plus $100,000 of the salary they trade away. Under the 2011 CBA, teams that remain below the luxury tax threshold even after the trade can acquire the lesser of 150% plus $100,000, or 100% plus $5 million, of the salary they trade away.[5] There is no lower limit—teams may divest themselves of as much salary as they wish (or can convince another team to take on) in a trade.
  • No free agent signed in the offseason can be traded until December 15 of that year or until three months have passed (whichever comes later), a rule that prevents teams from signing free agents with the intent of using them strictly as trade fodder. For draft picks this moratorium lasts 30 days.
  • If teams acquire a player in a trade, they are allowed to trade that player straight-up for another individual player immediately. However, if teams wish to package that player with another and trade for a more expensive player, they must wait 60 days before doing so.

The tight salary-matching rules of the 2005 CBA often required what NBA cap analyst Larry Coon called "trade ballast"—extra players added to a deal solely for salary matching, who would typically be waived by their new teams. Under that CBA, such players were restricted from rejoining their original teams for 30 days during the season or 20 days in the offseason. This led to what Coon called "wink-wink deals where players are traded with the full expectation of returning later." A notable example of such a deal occurred in the 2009–10 season, in which the Cleveland Cavaliers included Zydrunas Ilgauskas in their trade with the Washington Wizards for Antawn Jamison. Ilgauskas was waived a week later without ever appearing in a game for the Wizards, and re-signed with Cleveland after the 30-day waiting period passed. Since the 2011 CBA, a player acquired in a trade and waived by his new team cannot re-sign with his original team until one year after the trade or July 1 after the expiration of his contract, whichever is sooner.[5]

Base year compensation

[edit]

Certain players in the first few months of a new contract are subject to base year compensation (BYC). The intent of BYC is to prevent teams from re-signing players to salaries specifically targeted to match other salaries in a trade (in other words, salary should be based on basketball value, not trade value). A BYC player's trade value as outgoing salary is 50% of his new salary, or his previous salary, whichever is greater. BYC applies only to players who re-sign with their previous team and receive a raise greater than 20%. It also applies only when (and as long as) the team is over the salary cap. Since the 2011 CBA, players subject to BYC cannot be traded before January 15 except in a sign-and-trade, and BYC is only applied to outgoing salary in sign-and-trade deals.[5]

Waivers

[edit]

NBA teams can release a player to the waiver wire, where he can stay for 48 hours (during the regular season). While he is on waivers, other teams may claim him, for his existing salary. If he is not claimed, he is said to have "cleared waivers", and is treated like any free agent, able to sign with any team (with the special restriction noted above for players who were traded and then waived).

Players waived after March 1 are not eligible to be on a team's playoff roster.[90] The deadline was March 23 during the lockout-shortened 2011–12 season.[20]

Released players

[edit]

Released/waived players with guaranteed contracts continue to be included in their former team's payroll. Players whose contracts are guaranteed are included in team salary in the amount they made while they were with the team. Players on non-guaranteed "summer contracts" are not included in team salary unless they make the regular season roster.

If another team signs a released player who had a guaranteed contract (as long as the player has cleared waivers), the player's original team is allowed to reduce the amount of money they still owe the player (and lower their team payroll) by the right of set-off. This is true if the player signs with any professional team—it does not even have to be an NBA team. The amount the original team gets to set off is limited to one-half the difference between the player's new salary and a pro-rated share of the minimum salary for a one-year veteran (if the player is a rookie, then the rookie minimum is used instead).

Stretch provision

[edit]

Both the 2005 and 2011 CBAs contained a so-called "stretch" provision regarding the payment of guaranteed money to waived players and its effect on the salary cap; the 2011 provisions were kept in the 2017 CBA.

Under the 2005 CBA, players and teams could alter the schedule of payments to waived players by mutual agreement. The remaining guaranteed salary was equally spread across the remaining years of the player's contract.[5]

The 2011 CBA dramatically changed this regime. While contracts signed under the 2005 CBA remained under the original scheme, different rules apply to contracts signed since the 2011 CBA went into effect. Today, when a team waives a player, it can spread the remaining guaranteed salary (and its accompanying cap hit) over twice the remaining length of the contract, plus one year. According to Coon, "if a team has an underperforming player with one season remaining at $12 million, the team can waive him and stretch his salary across three seasons at $4 million per season."[5]

Amnesty clause

[edit]

The NBA Amnesty Clause provided franchises a means of escaping a contractual obligation to a player whose performance falls far short of the extremely large salary they initially agreed to pay him.

Under the 2005 CBA, one player could be waived prior to the start of the 2005–06 season and not count toward the luxury tax. Unlike the 2011 CBA, the player still counted under the salary cap.[5] The 2005 amnesty provision was derisively named the "Allan Houston Rule", but his team, the New York Knicks, did not actually use the measure on Houston—they instead applied it to Jerome Williams because Allan Houston later retired for medical reasons the same season.[91] Jerome Williams retired from the NBA just two days after being waived under the amnesty clause.

Under the 2011 Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), each franchise was allowed to waive one player prior to the start of any season between the 2011–12 and 2015–16 seasons. The remaining salary still contractually owed was not included in the salary cap or luxury tax totals of the team terminating his employment. Only players signed prior to the 2011–12 season could be "amnestied,"[92] and the clause could be exercised during the seven days following the NBA's July moratorium period on player transactions.[c][20] The clause's provisions allowed a rival team to claim an amnestied player at a significantly (often, dramatically) reduced salary; the waiving team only had to pay the player the remaining balance. The team with the highest bid would acquire the player; if unclaimed, the player would become a free agent.[5] Teams over the salary cap could only acquire an amnestied player if he became a free agent, and the offer would be limited to the veteran's minimum contract.[93]

Season Season the amnesty clause was exercised.
Team Team that exercised the clause.
Player Player that was amnestied by the team.
Next team The team the player joined after being amnestied.
Bid amount The bid amount used by the next team if the player was claimed off waivers. All unclaimed players become free agents.
* Denotes the team claimed the player off waivers (i.e. he was not a free agent).
Denotes the player was not selected to join a new team (i.e. retirement) and/or was not bid on.
Players amnestied under the 2005 CBA
Season Team Player Ref
2005–06 Dallas Mavericks Michael Finley [94]
Los Angeles Lakers Brian Grant
Portland Trail Blazers Derek Anderson
Orlando Magic Doug Christie
New York Knicks Jerome Williams
Milwaukee Bucks Calvin Booth
Houston Rockets Clarence Weatherspoon
Philadelphia 76ers Aaron McKie
Indiana Pacers Reggie Miller
Toronto Raptors Alonzo Mourning
Boston Celtics Vin Baker
Phoenix Suns Howard Eisley
Chicago Bulls Eddie Robinson
Detroit Pistons Derrick Coleman
Minnesota Timberwolves Fred Hoiberg
New Jersey Nets Ron Mercer
Miami Heat Wesley Person
Memphis Grizzlies Troy Bell
Players amnestied under the 2011 CBA
Season Team Player Next team Bid amount Ref
2011–12 Orlando Magic Gilbert Arenas Memphis Grizzlies [20]
Golden State Warriors Charlie Bell Italy Juvecaserta Basket
New York Knicks Chauncey Billups Los Angeles Clippers* $2,000,032
Cleveland Cavaliers Baron Davis New York Knicks
New Jersey Nets Travis Outlaw Sacramento Kings* $12,000,000
Indiana Pacers James Posey — (Retired)[I]
Portland Trail Blazers Brandon Roy Minnesota Timberwolves[II]
2012–13 Philadelphia 76ers Elton Brand Dallas Mavericks* $2,100,000 [95]
Minnesota Timberwolves Darko Miličić Boston Celtics [96]
Dallas Mavericks Brendan Haywood Charlotte Bobcats* $2,000,500 [97]
Houston Rockets Luis Scola Phoenix Suns* $13,500,000 [98]
Phoenix Suns Josh Childress Brooklyn Nets [99]
Washington Wizards Andray Blatche Brooklyn Nets [100]
Denver Nuggets Chris Andersen Miami Heat [101]
Los Angeles Clippers Ryan Gomes Germany Artland Dragons [102]
2013–14 Los Angeles Lakers Metta World Peace New York Knicks [103]
Charlotte Bobcats Tyrus Thomas Iowa Energy [104]
Milwaukee Bucks Drew Gooden Washington Wizards [105]
Toronto Raptors Linas Kleiza Turkey Fenerbahçe Ülker [106]
Miami Heat Mike Miller Memphis Grizzlies [107]
2014–15 Chicago Bulls Carlos Boozer Los Angeles Lakers* $3,200,000 [108]
Note
  1. ^ Posey retired from the NBA before he could find another team that he could play for. He became an assistant coach for the Canton Charge in the D-League in the 2013–14 season.
  2. ^ Roy initially retired from basketball due to persistent knee injuries and was then amnestied by Portland. However, after a year of inactivity, he returned to the NBA.

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The NBA salary cap is a league-imposed limit on the total amount of money that each of the 30 (NBA) teams can allocate to player salaries, bonuses, and certain benefits during a single season, primarily to foster competitive balance by curbing the financial advantages of larger-market franchises. Established as part of the NBA's Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) between the league and the (NBPA), the cap is calculated annually based on projected basketball-related income (BRI) from sources such as ticket sales, media rights, and merchandising, with a maximum year-over-year increase of 10% under the current 2023 CBA. For the 2025-26 season, the stands at $154.647 million, while the threshold—beyond which teams incur escalating penalties—is $187.895 million; teams must also meet a minimum floor of 90% of the cap to ensure equitable . Unlike hard caps in leagues such as the or NHL, the NBA operates a soft cap system, permitting teams to exceed the limit via specific exceptions including the mid-level exception (up to $14.104 million for non-taxpaying teams in 2025-26), sign-and-trade transactions, and rights that allow unrestricted re-signing of veteran players. The 2023 CBA, effective through the 2029-30 season, enhanced financial restrictions by introducing two "aprons" above the threshold—the first at $195.945 million and the second at $207.824 million for 2025-26—which impose hard caps on certain roster maneuvers like signing free agents or using trade exceptions for high-spending teams, aiming to prevent superteam formations and promote broader parity.

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

The NBA salary cap is an annual financial limit imposed on each team, representing the maximum aggregate amount that can be allocated to player salaries, bonuses, and certain benefits during a given league . This cap is established through the 's collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the NBA and the (NBPA), ensuring standardized rules across all 30 teams. The primary purpose of the salary cap is to foster competitive balance by restricting spending disparities, thereby preventing wealthier owners or large-market teams from dominating through excessive payrolls and promoting parity throughout . It also safeguards the financial health of franchises by tying player compensation directly to league-wide streams, such as basketball-related (BRI), which includes ticket sales, , and merchandising. Introduced in the 1984–85 season amid escalating player salaries following the 1976 NBA-ABA merger, the cap addressed concerns over economic instability and unequal competition that threatened the league's viability. Economically, the salary cap constrains total player salaries league-wide to approximately 50% of BRI, with the per-team cap figure projected annually based on estimated revenue growth to maintain this split within a 49–51% band. This mechanism includes provisions for adjustments, such as freezing the cap if actual BRI falls below predefined thresholds, to protect the revenue-sharing equilibrium amid fluctuations like economic downturns or reduced . While teams operate under a "soft" cap that allows limited exceptions to exceed it, a penalty applies for overages, further incentivizing adherence to promote overall league equity.

Soft Cap Mechanics

The NBA salary cap operates as a soft cap, permitting teams to exceed the established limit through designated exceptions, in contrast to hard caps in leagues like the and NHL, where any overage is strictly prohibited regardless of circumstances. This flexibility is embedded in the league's Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), allowing teams to retain talent and build competitive rosters without being entirely constrained by the cap figure. For instance, under the 2023 CBA, the salary cap for the 2023-24 season was set at $136.021 million, yet teams could surpass this threshold using mechanisms like Bird rights, which enable re-signing of qualifying veteran players at market value even if the team lacks cap space. The core mechanics of the soft apply at the start of each league year, typically July 1, when team salary sheets are calculated to determine compliance. Teams beginning the year below the gain access to exceptions that permit signings or trades pushing above the limit, while teams already over the face severe limitations, such as ineligibility for most exceptions except those tied to their own players' rights. This structure promotes parity by encouraging prudent spending early in but allows established contenders to invest in roster continuity. The 's application is annual, resetting each season based on projected league revenues, with overages not carrying forward as permanent penalties beyond associated taxes. A team's total for cap purposes aggregates all active player contracts, including base salaries, likely bonuses (incentives deemed probable to be earned), and a portion of unlikely bonuses (limited to 15% of the first-year unless fully guaranteed). holds—estimated placeholders for unrestricted free agents based on their prior or market averages—are also included to prevent teams from artificially lowering their figure by letting players walk without accounting for potential re-signing costs. These elements ensure the reflects realistic spending potential rather than just committed contracts. Compared to other major North American sports leagues, the NBA's soft cap fosters greater spending on star retention, as seen with mechanisms like Bird rights, enabling perennial contenders like the or to maintain high payrolls without rebuilding. In the and NHL, hard caps enforce absolute limits—$255.4 million for the NFL in 2024 and $88 million for the NHL in 2024-25—eliminating exceptions and promoting annual roster turnover. , by contrast, imposes no salary cap, relying solely on a (competitive balance tax) starting at $241 million for 2025, which allows unlimited spending but penalizes excesses through . The 2023 CBA introduced enhanced restrictions via first and second aprons—thresholds set $7 million and $17.5 million above the line, respectively—to curb repeated overages by high-spending teams. Exceeding the second apron, projected at $188.9 million for 2024-25, triggers severe limitations, such as bans on using certain exceptions, aggregating salaries in trades, or signing players previously on competitive rosters, effectively hardening the soft cap for serial contenders and promoting broader league parity.

Annual Cap Calculation

The NBA salary cap for each season is calculated as 44.74% of the league's projected basketball-related income (BRI) for that year, minus projected player benefits, divided by the number of teams (30). This percentage, established under the 2011 agreement and retained in subsequent agreements including the 2023 CBA, represents a reduction from the prior approximate 50% player split to account for league operational costs and benefits. BRI encompasses all generated from basketball operations shared league-wide, including gate receipts (ticket sales net of certain arena costs), media rights fees, sponsorships, , licensing, and arena-related income such as concessions, parking, luxury suites, and club seats, excluding non-basketball sources like property taxes or non-NBA events. The projection of BRI occurs annually prior to the season, with the NBA and the (NBPA) negotiating the figure based on audits of the prior year's actual BRI and estimates of future revenue streams, such as deals or ticket sales trends; this projection is finalized and the is set effective July 1. For the 2025–26 season, this process resulted in a of $154.647 million. To align actual revenues with projections, the CBA includes an mechanism under which 10% of players' salaries is withheld throughout the season and held in ; if actual BRI exceeds projections, the full amount is repaid to players plus any overage up to their guaranteed 51% share, but if BRI falls short, a portion (up to 10%) may be forfeited by players and distributed to teams. Midseason adjustments to the are rare but can occur in extraordinary circumstances, such as the 2011 lockout, which shortened the 2011–12 season and led to a revised of $58 million after negotiations. Historically, the salary cap has grown substantially alongside league revenues, rising from $3.6 million in the 1984–85 season—the first year of implementation—to $140.588 million in 2024–25, with the 2025–26 projection marking a 10% increase driven by expanded media rights and other BRI growth. This trajectory reflects the NBA's evolving , where BRI has ballooned from under $200 million in the mid-1980s to over $10 billion annually by 2024–25.

Historical Development

Origins and Early Implementation

Prior to the introduction of the modern salary cap, the NBA experienced rapid salary escalation following the 1976 merger with the (ABA), which expanded the league to 22 teams and boosted revenues through new television contracts and increased popularity. In the late 1970s, rookie salaries for top picks were modest; for instance, earned $460,000 in his 1979-80 debut season with the . However, by the early 1980s, star players commanded significantly higher pay, as evidenced by Johnson's 1981 extension—a 25-year, $25 million deal averaging $1 million annually starting in 1984—reflecting average league salaries surpassing $300,000 amid competitive bidding and limited financial oversight. This unchecked growth strained smaller-market teams, prompting owners to seek mechanisms for cost control to ensure league-wide financial viability. Tensions culminated in the 1983 collective bargaining agreement (CBA), negotiated after a threatened player strike and owner lockout, which established the NBA's first comprehensive revenue-sharing system and instituted the modern salary cap effective for the 1984-85 season. The cap was set at $3.6 million per team, calculated as the greater of a fixed amount or 53% of projected basketball-related income (BRI) divided equally among teams, guaranteeing players at least 53% of league revenues while incorporating minimum salaries starting at $65,000. This soft cap included exceptions to accommodate existing contracts and the college draft system, allowing teams like the Boston Celtics to re-sign Larry Bird via what became known as Bird rights—an exception permitting teams to exceed the cap for qualifying veteran players who had served three consecutive years without entering free agency. The agreement also reinforced the amateur draft as the primary player allocation method, aiming to promote parity. Early implementation revealed challenges with the soft cap's exceptions, which enabled circumvention through deferred payments and incentive-laden contracts, undermining the system's intent to equalize spending. The 1988 CBA extended the framework but did not resolve these issues, as teams exploited loopholes to retain talent. Bird rights were further clarified in subsequent negotiations, with the 1995 CBA formalizing their structure to limit abuse while tying the cap more rigidly to a 53% BRI split (with provisions allowing up to 57% under certain conditions). Despite these adjustments, the cap stabilized league finances by curbing payroll disparities and preventing insolvency for overleveraged franchises, though it sparked legal pushback. The system's impact was tested in player lawsuits, including a 1995 antitrust challenge filed by the (NBPA) in U.S. District Court, alleging improper BRI deductions totaling approximately $75 million league-wide, which affected the calculation of the 1994-95 and violated Sherman Act principles by restraining competition. The suit sought to dismantle the cap and draft, but courts upheld it as a product of exempt from antitrust scrutiny, affirming the NBA's labor framework. This litigation highlighted ongoing tensions but ultimately reinforced the cap's role in fostering economic balance.

Key Collective Bargaining Agreements

The 1999 Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), ratified following the 1998-99 lockout, established the modern framework for the by setting player salaries at 57% of basketball-related income (BRI). This agreement introduced the mid-level exception, permitting teams above the to sign one to a worth up to the average player salary, thereby providing flexibility for roster building without fully bypassing the cap. Additionally, it implemented the rookie scale, standardizing for first-round draft picks based on draft position with predetermined salary ranges over four years, aiming to control costs for young talent while ensuring competitive pay. The 2005 CBA extended and refined the prior structure, introducing maximum salaries scaled by years of service: 25% of the for players with 0-6 years, 30% for 7-9 years, and 35% for 10 or more years, which encouraged player retention and long-term planning. It also added protections for players over 38, limiting guarantees on multi-year contracts to the portion falling before age 40 to mitigate risk for teams signing aging stars. provisions were refined, setting the threshold at 61% of BRI with a dollar-for-dollar penalty, while maintaining the overall player share at 57% of BRI to promote parity. The 2011 CBA, emerging from another lockout, hardened the soft mechanics by escalating rates—starting at $1.50 per dollar over the threshold and rising progressively—and introducing a repeater of $1 per dollar for teams paying in three of the prior four years, intensifying penalties for repeat high spenders. It expanded the amnesty clause, allowing each of the 30 teams one use to waive a player (with full payment but no or hit), totaling 30 league-wide applications over the agreement's term to alleviate burdensome contracts. The 2017 CBA addressed the massive salary cap spike from the 2016 TV rights deal, which had projected a 32% increase, by implementing cap smoothing to limit annual growth to 10% (or 7% in some cases) through 2023-24, stabilizing team planning and avoiding market distortion. It introduced the designated veteran player rule, enabling teams to offer one qualifying player a supermax up to 35% of the (previously 30%), fostering star retention. Two-way contracts were also added, allowing up to three per team for players splitting time between the NBA and G League at reduced pay, enhancing development without full roster impact. The current 2023 CBA, effective through the 2029-30 season, introduces a second apron set at $17.5 million above the line, imposing severe trade and signing restrictions on exceeding teams to curb superteam formations. It includes a frozen cap provision if BRI dips by 10% or more from projections, halting increases to protect financial stability amid revenue fluctuations.

Recent Evolutions (2011–Present)

The , lasting from July to December, resulted in a new agreement (CBA) that fundamentally altered the salary cap system to promote financial sustainability and competitive balance. The agreement reduced the players' share of basketball-related income (BRI) from 57% under the prior CBA to 51.15% for the 2011-12 season, establishing a 49-51% band thereafter, with adjustments tied to revenue projections and a 1% for player benefits. It also introduced the concept of levels within the framework, creating a first $4 million above the tax threshold that imposed restrictions such as limits on signing free agents with Bird rights and cash trades, escalating penalties for teams exceeding these levels to deter excessive spending. Additionally, the CBA implemented cap projection mechanisms and withholdings up to 10% of salaries to stabilize annual cap growth and mitigate potential spikes from revenue fluctuations, though these proved insufficient for later surges. The 2016-17 season marked a dramatic escalation in the salary cap due to a nine-year, $24 billion national television rights deal with and Turner Sports that took effect that year, injecting unprecedented revenue into BRI. This led to a 34% cap increase to $94.1 million from $70 million the prior season—far exceeding the typical 4-8% annual growth—creating widespread opportunities for cap-space teams to pursue high-profile free agents. However, the sudden influx triggered "cap space hell," a term describing the chaos for over-cap teams unable to match the new spending power, resulting in panicked overpayments for mid-tier players (e.g., multi-year deals exceeding $15 million annually for role players) and long-term roster imbalances that haunted franchises for years. The 2023 CBA, ratified after negotiations amid rising media revenues, built on prior frameworks by enhancing restrictions around high spending, particularly through the second apron—a new threshold approximately $17.5 million above the line for 2023-24, escalating to higher gaps in subsequent years. Teams exceeding the second apron face severe limitations, including ineligibility for sign-and-trade deals, prohibitions on using mid-level exceptions to sign free agents, and bans on aggregating salaries in s, all designed to prevent sustained superteam constructions. For repeat offenders—teams paying the in three of the prior four seasons—these penalties intensify, with restrictions extending to frozen first-round draft picks (sliding back up to eight spots if conveyed) and inability to acquire players via exceptions, aiming to enforce parity without a hard cap. These apron rules have sparked controversies among players and executives, with complaints centering on their rigidity in limiting roster flexibility and discouraging long-term contention for mid-market teams. In 2025, reports highlighted how the second apron prompted contenders like the to trade key veterans to avoid penalties, leading players to argue it fragments rosters prematurely and reduces competitive depth by incentivizing early rebuilds over sustained title pursuits. Looking ahead, the NBA projects the salary cap to reach $166 million for the 2026-27 season, up from $154.6 million in 2025-26, driven by expanding media deals and global streams, though this figure remains subject to final BRI audits conducted annually to verify income sources and ensure accurate cap calculations. These audits, mandated under the CBA, scrutinize local and national to maintain the 49-51% BRI split, potentially influencing future cap trajectories amid ongoing debates over revenue transparency.

Financial Implications

Luxury Tax System

The luxury tax system in the NBA imposes a financial penalty on teams whose total team salary exceeds the league's luxury tax threshold, which stands at 121.5% of the . For the 2024-25 season, this threshold is set at $170.814 million. Unlike a hard cap, the system allows teams to surpass the threshold but levies escalating penalties to curb outsized spending by wealthier franchises. The primary purpose of the is to promote competitive balance without rigidly enforcing a hard , deterring excessive payrolls that could otherwise allow large-market teams to dominate talent acquisition while generating revenue to subsidize lower-revenue clubs. Collected taxes are pooled by and redistributed exclusively to teams that conclude the season with payrolls below the threshold, aiding smaller-market operations in maintaining financial viability. Taxes are calculated marginally on the amount exceeding the threshold, with progressive rates applied in brackets—for instance, the initial $5 million overage incurs a rate of $1.50 per dollar spent, escalating thereafter. "" teams, defined as those exceeding the threshold in at least three of the prior four seasons, receive amplified rates across all brackets to further penalize habitual overspenders. Since the system's introduction under the 1999 Collective Bargaining Agreement (effective 2001-02), NBA teams have collectively paid over $4.2 billion in luxury taxes through the 2024-25 season. A prominent case is the ' $176.9 million payment in the 2023-24 season, the highest single-year total to date amid their contending roster. The 2023 CBA introduced refinements, including provisions that incorporate frozen or restricted shares of mid-level exceptions into tax payroll calculations for teams operating near or above thresholds, enhancing oversight on exception usage. In the 2024-25 season, 10 teams paid a total of $461 million in luxury taxes, with the aprons influencing contenders like the Celtics to avoid certain trades.

Tax Thresholds and Rates

The luxury tax threshold, also known as the tax line, is established annually at 121.5% of the NBA , rounded to the nearest $1,000. For the 2025–26 season, with a salary cap of $154.647 million, the threshold stands at $187.895 million. This level serves as the point above which teams incur escalating penalties on every dollar of team salary exceeding it, calculated based on the team's payroll as of the final day of the regular season. Under the 2023 collective bargaining agreement (CBA), effective from the 2023–24 season, the employs a progressive structure with marginal rates applied to scaled brackets. The brackets, previously fixed at $5 million intervals, now adjust annually by the same percentage increase as the to preserve their relative impact; for example, the initial bracket size begins at approximately $5 million in 2023–24 and expands proportionally thereafter. Non-repeater teams—those not classified as paying the tax in three of the prior four seasons—face rates starting at $1.50 per dollar over the threshold in the first bracket, escalating through intermediate levels (such as $2.00–$2.50 in subsequent brackets) up to $4.00 per dollar for amounts exceeding $20 million over the threshold or the second apron level. teams incur steeper penalties, with rates beginning at $2.50 in the first bracket and rising to $6.25 for deep overages, effectively adding a multiplier of $1.00–$2.25 across brackets compared to non-repeaters. To demonstrate the calculation, consider a non-repeater team with a $10 million overage in a season where the first two brackets are each $5 million: the tax would be ($5 million × $1.50) + ($5 million × $2.50) = $7.5 million + $12.5 million = $20 million. Payments are due in two installments—half by late June and the remainder by mid-September following the season—with the total amount reflecting any mid-season adjustments for trades or contracts but finalized on end-of-season payroll. Prior to the 2023 CBA, under the 2017 agreement, tax rates were less punitive and used static $5 million brackets without annual scaling. Non-repeaters paid $1.00 per dollar for the first $5 million over, $1.25 for the next $5 million, $1.50 for the following $5 million, $1.75 for the subsequent $5 million, $2.50 for $20–30 million over, $3.25 for $30–40 million over, and $3.75 beyond that. Repeaters added $0.50 per dollar in the first four brackets and $1.00 in the latter three, resulting in maximum rates up to $4.75. These fixed rates, in place since 2011–12 with minor tweaks, were designed to deter moderate overspending but allowed high-end teams like the Golden State Warriors to pay over $150 million in tax during the 2019–20 season without prohibitive escalation. The 2023 CBA's adjustments aim to intensify deterrence for sustained high spending, with rates and brackets projected to rise in tandem with the —expected to grow 10% annually through 2029–30—potentially widening brackets to $6–7 million by 2025–26 while maintaining the progressive multipliers. All collected revenue is redistributed entirely to the 23–25 teams that finish below the threshold, allocated pro-rata based on each team's "tax distribution share," calculated as the difference between the and their actual team salary (with a minimum share for teams near the cap). This mechanism, unchanged since 2005, incentivizes under-spending teams to approach the cap more closely, with over 90% of tax funds typically flowing to low-revenue franchises to bolster league-wide competitive balance.

Second Apron Restrictions

The second apron is a salary threshold introduced in the 2023 Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), set approximately $17.5 million above the luxury tax line (adjusted annually), which equates to $207.824 million for the 2025–26 season. Teams exceeding this level face stringent non-financial restrictions designed to limit roster-building flexibility beyond mere tax payments. Key restrictions for second-apron teams include prohibitions on sign-and-trade transactions unless the acquiring team drops below the apron after the deal; inability to aggregate multiple player salaries when sending out contracts in trades; bans on including cash considerations in outgoing trades; and a freeze on the mid-level exception, locking it at the previous season's value rather than allowing annual adjustments. These rules effectively restrict teams to minimum-salary signings and one-for-one trades with exact salary matches, severely hampering their ability to reshape rosters midseason. In addition to immediate operational limits, the second apron imposes long-term penalties on repeat offenders. Any team finishing a season above the threshold has its first-round draft pick seven years in the future frozen, rendering it untradeable until six months after the subsequent draft lottery. If the team exceeds the second apron in at least two of the following four seasons, that frozen pick is forfeited and moved to the end of the second round. For instance, teams over the apron in the 2025–26 season would face restrictions on their 2032 first-round pick. The primary purpose of these restrictions is to curb prolonged "dynasty" spending by high-payroll teams, promoting competitive balance by deterring sustained aggressive financial maneuvers, such as those attempted by the and following the 2023 CBA ratification. In practice, the second apron has notably impacted contenders during the 2024–25 season, with teams like the operating under a hard cap at the threshold, forcing them to forgo using certain exceptions and limiting options for roster tweaks. Players and executives have voiced concerns over the reduced flexibility, arguing it constrains veteran mobility and forces premature roster overhauls, though proponents highlight its role in fostering broader league parity.

Salary Exceptions

Mid-Level and Bi-Annual Exceptions

The mid-level exception (MLE) serves as a primary mechanism for NBA teams exceeding the salary cap to sign free agents without Bird rights, allowing them to add rotational talent while adhering to agreement (CBA) limits. There are three variants of the MLE, each tailored to a team's financial position relative to the cap and thresholds: the non-taxpayer MLE, the taxpayer MLE, and the room MLE. For the 2025-26 season, the non-taxpayer MLE permits teams above the salary cap but below the first ($195.945 million) to sign one or more players to contracts starting at up to $14.104 million in the first year. The taxpayer MLE, available to teams above the first but below the second ($207.824 million), limits starting salaries to $5.685 million and restricts contracts to a maximum of two years with 5% annual raises. In contrast, the room MLE applies to teams with sufficient cap space below the cap and allows starting salaries up to $8.781 million over a maximum of three years with 5% raises. These exceptions cannot be combined with other salary exceptions except for minimum-salary contracts, ensuring teams do not circumvent cap restrictions through aggregation beyond specified limits. Contracts signed using the non- or room MLE can extend up to four years with annual raises capped at 8%, providing flexibility for mid-tier acquisitions. Under the 2023 CBA, teams above the second are prohibited from using any MLE, while first- teams face restrictions, such as the inability to use the full non- MLE if the signing would exceed the threshold; in such cases, the exception is "frozen" at the level or partial amounts to avoid hard-capping the team. The bi-annual exception (BAE) offers an additional tool for cap-strapped teams, usable only every other season by those above the but below the first . For 2025-26, the BAE allows starting salaries up to $5.135 million over a maximum two-year contract with 5% raises, totaling up to $10.509 million. Like the MLE, the BAE cannot be combined with other exceptions beyond minimums and is unavailable to second- teams under the 2023 CBA. Historically, MLE and BAE values scale with the salary cap, which has grown significantly; for instance, the non-taxpayer MLE rose from $9.258 million in 2020-21 to $14.104 million in 2025-26, reflecting cap increases driven by media revenue. Teams like the have frequently utilized these exceptions for role players, such as signing Caleb Martin to a four-year, $32 million deal using the non-taxpayer MLE in 2023 before his departure. The 2023 CBA's apron restrictions limit repeat usage for high-spending teams, forcing strategic decisions to preserve flexibility.

Bird Rights Exceptions

Bird rights, formally known as the exception, enable NBA teams to exceed the to re-sign their own unrestricted s, up to the player's maximum allowable salary under the agreement (CBA). Named after legend , the exception originated in the 1983 CBA to address concerns that strict cap rules would prevent teams from retaining star players; the Celtics were the first to use it in 1984 to re-sign Bird himself after he became a , despite being over the cap. This mechanism promotes player loyalty and roster continuity by allowing incumbent teams a in free agency negotiations. To qualify for Bird rights, a player must have spent at least three consecutive seasons with the team, including the prior season, without being waived or qualifying as a in between; time on the team's roster, even if injured or on a , counts toward eligibility. These rights transfer with the player in trades, enabling the acquiring team to use upon free agency. Once earned, full Bird rights permit a of up to five years with 8% annual raises, starting at up to the player's max (typically 25%, 30%, or 35% of the cap based on service time). Bird rights operate in tiers based on tenure, with varying contract lengths, raise percentages, and salary limits relative to the player's prior earnings or league maximums. Early Bird rights apply after two consecutive seasons, allowing a four-year deal with 7.5% raises and a first-year salary up to the greater of 175% of the previous salary or 80% of the applicable max salary. Non-Bird rights, for players with one to less than two years of service, permit a three-year contract with 5% raises and a first-year salary capped at 120% of the prior salary or 108% of the max salary. These tiers ensure graduated benefits, incentivizing longer tenures while capping short-term retentions to maintain competitive balance. Under the 2023 CBA, Bird rights cannot be combined with the mid-level exception (MLE) for the same player, as each exception serves distinct purposes—Bird for incumbents and MLE for external signings—though teams may use both for different players if under the apron thresholds. Apron restrictions add complexity: teams above the second apron ($207.824 million for 2025-26) cannot use Bird rights in sign-and-trade transactions, as such deals would violate aggregation and salary matching rules designed to curb superteam formations. First-apron teams face milder limits, like reduced salary matching flexibility, but retain full Bird usage for direct re-signings. Historically, the Celtics leveraged Bird rights to retain through the 1980s, anchoring their dynasty amid cap constraints. In modern eras, stars like have utilized them repeatedly; for instance, James re-signed with the in 2014 using full Bird rights for a two-year, $42.5 million extension, preserving cap flexibility with a player option. These examples illustrate how Bird rights facilitate star retention without fully circumventing the cap system.

Other Contract Exceptions

The rookie exception permits teams to sign their first-round draft picks to predetermined scale contracts without regard to the salary cap, providing roster flexibility for developing talent. These contracts are slotted based on draft position, with Year 1 salaries fixed by the NBA's annual scale; for subsequent years, teams may increase the salary by up to 120% of the prior year's amount, extending for a maximum of four years total. For instance, the No. 1 pick in the 2025 signed a four-year deal starting at approximately $13.8 million in Year 1, with options for raises in Years 2-4 under this exception. The minimum salary exception allows teams to sign veteran players to contracts at or above the league's minimum salary scale, regardless of cap space, and can be used an unlimited number of times to fill roster spots cost-effectively. Minimum salaries vary by years of service, with the 2025-26 scale setting the base at $1.366 million for players with zero years of experience, rising to $3.901 million for those with 10 or more years. This exception is particularly valuable for contending teams over the , enabling them to add depth without impacting financial flexibility significantly. Traded player exceptions (TPEs) arise when a team trades away a player without acquiring equivalent salary in return, creating a one-year credit equal to the outgoing player's salary that can be used to absorb incoming salaries in future trades. Under pre-2023 rules, teams could acquire players earning up to 125% of the TPE value plus $100,000; the 2023 CBA updated this to 125% plus $250,000 for most teams, enhancing trade utility. TPEs expire after one year unless used, providing temporary relief for cap-strapped teams to facilitate deals. However, teams above the second apron face restrictions, limited to acquiring players earning no more than the incoming salary amount to prevent circumvention of apron penalties. Additional exceptions include the second-round pick exception, which enables teams to sign undrafted or second-round draftees to worth up to 120% of the applicable minimum without cap space, often structured as multi-year deals to build depth. For the 2025-26 season, this equates to roughly $1.64 million in Year 1 for a , with the exception not counting against the cap until August 1 of the signing year. The disabled player exception (DPE) further aids injury-impacted rosters, allowing teams to replace a player deemed medically unable to play for at least half the season with a up to 105% of the injured player's prior-year or the non-taxpayer mid-level exception value, whichever is lower, for up to one year. This provision ensures continuity, as seen when the utilized multiple DPEs in 2024 following injuries.

Player Contracts

Maximum Salary Rules

The maximum salary rules under the NBA's Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) establish tiered limits on individual player compensation as a percentage of the league's salary cap, designed to promote competitive balance while allowing top performers to earn commensurate with their experience. For players with 0–6 years of service, the maximum is 25% of the cap; for those with 7–9 years, it rises to 30%; and for players with 10 or more years, it reaches 35%. These percentages apply to the first-year salary of a new contract, with subsequent years limited to 5% annual raises for standard maximums (8% for designated veteran extensions). For the 2025–26 season, with a salary cap of $154.647 million, this translates to a 25% maximum of $38.662 million, underscoring the escalating value of elite talent in a growing league economy. A player's years of service, which determine eligibility for higher tiers, are calculated based on NBA experience, crediting a full year if the player appears on an NBA active or inactive list for at least one day during the regular season of a year. This includes time spent in the NBA or its developmental leagues, and certain international service may qualify toward credits that indirectly influence minimum salary thresholds, though maximum eligibility primarily hinges on NBA tenure. The count resets or adjusts upon free agency, ensuring that service accumulates progressively to unlock higher earning potential without retroactive international adjustments dominating the formula. In determining the maximum annual , only base and likely bonuses are included in the cap hit calculation; unlikely bonuses—those contingent on improbable achievements like individual awards or team performance milestones—are excluded unless earned. This distinction allows teams flexibility in structuring incentives without immediately inflating cap usage, though all bonuses must be clearly defined and verifiable under CBA guidelines. The over-38 rule imposes additional restrictions on contracts for aging players to mitigate risk for teams signing long-term deals with veterans. The rule limits maximum contract lengths—three years for players aged 38 or older at signing, and two years for extensions beginning in their age-38 season—and for qualifying contracts of four or more years that extend two or more years past age 38, it accelerates cap hits by attributing salaries from the post-38 seasons to the earlier years of the contract. This front-loading prevents excessive deferral of compensation to later years when the player may retire or underperform. Historically, prior to the 1995 CBA, maximum salaries were a flat amount not scaled by , often capping at around 100–150% of the average league salary to curb disparities, but lacking the nuanced tiers that now reward . The 2023 CBA retained these core maximum salary structures unchanged from prior agreements, though it integrated them with stricter apron thresholds that limit team-building options around high-salary players, such as prohibiting salary aggregation in trades for second- teams.

Designated Veteran Extensions

The Designated Veteran Player Extension, commonly known as the supermax, allows eligible NBA players to sign contracts that exceed the standard maximum limits, enabling teams to retain star performers with elevated compensation. These extensions are governed by the NBA's Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) and provide for a starting of up to 35% of the in the first year of the , with annual raises of 8% over the contract's duration. For the 2025-26 season, with the set at $154.647 million, this equates to a maximum first-year of approximately $54.126 million. The extension can span up to five new seasons (or six total years including remaining contract time), making it one of the longest permissible contract lengths in the league. Eligibility for a Designated Veteran Extension requires a player to have seven or eight years of NBA service and one or two years remaining on their current contract at the time of signing. To qualify for the full 35% starting salary, the player must meet performance criteria: earning All-NBA honors in two of the previous three seasons (for those with seven years of service) or in one of the previous three seasons (for those with eight years), winning the Defensive Player of the Year (DPOY) award in any of the previous three seasons, or winning the (MVP) award in any of the previous three seasons. If these supermax criteria are not met, the player can still sign a Designated Veteran Extension at 30% of the cap, but the 35% tier incentivizes exceptional individual achievement. Each team is limited to only one Designated Veteran Player at a time, preventing multiple supermax deals on the same roster. The foundations of these extensions trace back to the "" rule, introduced in the 2011 CBA, which originally permitted players completing their rookie-scale contracts to earn up to 30% of the cap if they achieved MVP, All-NBA, or DPOY honors in the prior three seasons—named after , the youngest MVP at the time, to accommodate injury-impacted careers. The modern supermax evolved with the 2017 CBA, which expanded the concept to veteran players by adding the 35% scale for Designated Veteran Extensions, aiming to reward sustained excellence while tying pay to league revenue growth. A prominent example is , who signed a five-year, $228.2 million supermax extension with the in December 2020 after qualifying via multiple All-NBA and MVP selections, averaging about $45.6 million annually but escalating to $54.1 million in 2025-26. These extensions operate independently of Bird rights, which allow teams to exceed the cap to re-sign their own free agents but cap at 30% for standard max deals; the Designated Veteran scale cannot stack additional Bird-based increases beyond the eligibility thresholds. Teams above the second apron threshold face restrictions, including inability to aggregate salaries in trades involving the Designated Player or use certain exceptions, limiting roster flexibility for contending squads.

Rookie and Minimum Contracts

Rookie scale contracts apply to all first-round draft picks and provide standardized salary structures based on draft position to protect s from overpaying unproven talent while ensuring competitive compensation. These contracts span four years, with the first two s fully guaranteed and the third and fourth s consisting of options that must be exercised by of the preceding year. Salaries can range from 80% to 120% of the predetermined scale amount for each draft slot, allowing flexibility in negotiations without exceeding the slotted maximum. The scale amounts are calculated annually as fixed percentages of the league's projected , with the No. 1 overall pick's first-year salary set at approximately 9% of the ; for the 2025-26 , this equates to $13.918 million for the top selection. The rookie scale promotes parity by tying compensation to draft order, where higher picks receive progressively larger shares—declining from about 9% of the for the No. 1 selection to roughly 2.5% for the No. 30 pick in . For instance, in 2025-26, the No. 30 pick's first-year scale is around $3.866 million, adjustable within the 80-120% band. This structure, unchanged in the 2023 CBA from prior agreements, ensures teams cannot offer above-scale deals to first-rounders, contrasting with second-round picks who negotiate freely but often sign minimum or two-way deals due to constraints. The scale also includes likely incentives, such as performance bonuses, but these do not count against the unless deemed likely to be earned. Minimum salary contracts serve as the floor for non-scale players, including undrafted , second-round picks, or veterans without Bird rights, and are tiered by years of service (YOS) to reward . For the 2025-26 season, the base minimum for 0 YOS is $1,278,719, representing about 80% of the minimum scale derived from the scale's lower end, while increase incrementally: approximately $2.05 million for 1 YOS, up to $3.65 million for 10+ YOS. Players with 10 or more years of receive the greater of the 10-YOS minimum or a 10% raise over their prior season's , providing a safeguard against salary regression for established veterans signing new deals. These amounts are defined in the CBA's Exhibit A as percentages of the (e.g., 0 YOS at roughly 0.82% of the cap), ensuring they rise with league revenue growth. Two-way contracts, introduced in the 2017 CBA and retained in 2023, allow teams to allocate up to three roster spots for developing players who split time between the NBA and G League, with a maximum of $647,000 for 2025-26—half the 0-YOS minimum. These deals are limited to players with three or fewer years of NBA experience and cannot exceed two seasons, offering a pathway for second-round or undrafted without fully committing cap space; time spent in the G League does not accrue full NBA service credit. Additionally, Exhibit 10 contracts invite up to 20 players per team, paying a nominal amount (up to $75,000 under the 2023 CBA) and potentially converting to two-way or standard minimum deals if the player impresses. The rookie scale inherently protects teams from long-term risk for over-38 players, as it applies only to young draftees ineligible for that rule.

Free Agency Process

Types of Free Agents

In the (NBA), free agents are classified primarily into unrestricted and restricted categories based on their years of service and the actions taken by their prior team under the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA). Unrestricted free agents (UFAs) are players who can negotiate and sign with any team without restrictions from their previous employer. This status typically applies to players with three or more years of NBA service at the end of their contract, allowing them to enter free agency freely unless their team elects to retain rights through other mechanisms like Bird rights. UFAs may sign contracts exceeding the using applicable exceptions, providing flexibility for teams above the cap to pursue them. Restricted free agents (RFAs) are generally players with fewer than three years of NBA service whose teams extend a qualifying offer to retain the right to any external offer sheet. Under the 2023 CBA, the qualifying offer is a one-year contract calculated as 135% of the player's prior salary or the applicable minimum salary plus $200,000, whichever is greater, for non-first-round picks. This allows the original team to competing offers, but RFAs can still sign offer sheets with other teams, subject to matching. For example, first-round draft picks become RFAs after their rookie scale contract without needing a qualifying offer, while other players require it to enter restricted status. The 2023 CBA introduced restrictions impacting RFAs, prohibiting teams above the first threshold from signing offer sheets to restricted free agents exceeding that apron level, which limits competitive bidding and protects incumbent teams from losing talent to high-spending rivals. Other categories include players completing two-way contracts. Due to having fewer than three years of service, they become restricted free agents if their team issues a qualifying offer, allowing the team to match any offer sheet for a standard contract. If no qualifying offer is made, they enter unrestricted free agency eligible for standard NBA contracts. International exceptions apply to players with no prior NBA service who have played professionally abroad; these individuals enter as UFAs and can be signed using specific exceptions like the taxpayer mid-level exception without counting against the cap in the same manner as domestic players.

Moratorium and Offer Periods

The NBA free agency process begins with a moratorium period, typically spanning from June 30 to July 6 each year, during which teams are prohibited from finalizing signings or trades despite being permitted to negotiate contracts with players and other teams. This freeze ensures that figures remain static, allowing teams to assess their financial positions without immediate commitments. The moratorium facilitates preparatory discussions but halts official roster changes, building on the classifications of unrestricted and restricted free agents established earlier in the process. Player contract extensions can commence as early as July 1, providing a narrow window for incumbent players to secure deals before the broader free agency market opens at 6:00 PM ET on July 6. Once free agency officially starts, teams may execute signings, though the salary cap sheets—detailing each team's financial status—are not finalized until July 7, which can lead to provisional agreements subject to later adjustments. New free agent signings executed before September 15 cannot be traded until December 15, but other trades may proceed after the moratorium ends. For restricted free agents (RFAs), teams may receive offer sheets from other clubs starting July 6, triggering a 48-hour matching window for the player's original team to retain them by matching the terms. Historically, "poison pill" offer sheets referred to contracts with back-loaded salary structures—low in the early years and significantly higher in later years (often under provisions like the Gilbert Arenas provision for players with limited experience)—which were easier for the offering team to absorb but harder for the original team to match due to salary cap constraints, luxury tax implications, or trade difficulties. To prevent such exploitative "poison pill" offers, the agreement (CBA) imposes restrictions, such as limiting the salary disparity between the first and second years of RFA offers to 20%. These rules promote competitive balance during the offer period. Historically, the moratorium was shortened from an eight-day period to seven days in the 2017 CBA to accelerate the free agency timeline and reduce uncertainty. The 2023 CBA further refined the process by introducing first and second apron thresholds, which impose signing restrictions on teams exceeding these levels during the moratorium and offer periods, aiming to curb spending excesses while maintaining flexibility for competitive rosters.

Cap Holds and Bird Rights Application

Cap holds serve as temporary salary reservations on a team's cap sheet during the offseason, acting as placeholders for unrestricted, restricted, or two-way free agents who were on the team's roster at the end of the prior season. These holds estimate the potential cost of re-signing those players, ensuring that teams cannot artificially generate cap space by allowing free agents to enter the market without accounting for their possible return. By applying these reservations, the NBA prevents salary dumping, where a team might release players to sign external talent and then use exceptions to exceed the cap for re-signings. A team can clear a cap hold by renouncing the player's rights, which forfeits the ability to go over the cap to re-sign them, or by the player signing with another team; alternatively, using Bird rights to re-sign the player replaces the hold with the actual contract salary. The calculation of cap holds depends on the player's status and rights level. For a full unrestricted not on a scale contract, the hold is 190% of the prior salary if it exceeded the average, or 150% if below; Early rights yield 175% or 130%, respectively. Restricted receive a hold of 125% of their previous salary, while non- get 120% of the average player salary. Players coming off scale contracts with rights have a hold of 130% of their final scale year. These amounts reflect the NBA's intent to approximate realistic re-signing costs, promoting fair competition by limiting cap manipulation. Bird rights enable teams to exceed the salary cap to retain qualifying free agents, and cap holds facilitate this by reserving space that aligns with the rights' benefits. With full Bird rights—earned after three seasons without signing elsewhere—a team can re-sign the player to up to the maximum salary (35% of the cap for 10+ years of service), replacing the hold without cap penalty. This mechanism rewards loyalty and continuity, as the hold prevents the team from using the reserved space for other signings unless they renounce the rights. For instance, a team holding full Bird rights on a star like would apply a substantial hold based on his prior earnings, allowing the Clippers to prioritize his retention over the cap in past offseasons, even as they navigated implications. The 2023 Collective Bargaining Agreement maintains the established framework for cap holds and Bird rights but integrates them with new thresholds, which indirectly heighten their impact on high-spending teams. Teams projecting above the first ($195.945 million for 2025-26) face restrictions on exceptions and trades, making cap holds more burdensome as they contribute to breaches and limit flexibility. This design discourages excessive spending while preserving Bird rights' core function, though it compels teams like the Clippers—often near or above aprons—to strategically renounce lesser holds to create room without losing key Bird-eligible players.

Trades and Salary Matching

Trade Eligibility Rules

Trade eligibility in the NBA is governed by the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), which outlines restrictions on when and how players and draft picks can be moved between teams. Players under contract are generally eligible to be traded immediately upon signing, subject to specific exceptions based on contract type and timing. For instance, players who sign as free agents cannot be traded until the later of three months after signing or December 15 of the league year. Offer sheets signed by restricted free agents become trade-eligible only after one full year if matched by the original team. No-trade clauses (NTCs) provide additional protection for veteran players, allowing them to proposed trades. These clauses are commonly included in maximum-salary contracts for players with significant experience and tenure. To qualify for an NTC, a player must have at least eight years of NBA service, including four with the current team, and negotiate it into a new contract rather than an extension. As of the 2025-26 season, players such as , , and hold active NTCs. The Stepien Rule prohibits teams from trading away first-round draft picks in consecutive future drafts, ensuring each franchise retains at least one first-round selection in any two-year span. Named after former owner , whose aggressive trading left the team without picks for years, this rule applies regardless of whether the picks are a team's own or acquired from others. Teams can circumvent it by trading picks in alternate years or including protections, but it fundamentally aims to prevent long-term . Trade timing operates on a year-round basis with key restrictions to align with the league calendar. In-season trades are permitted from the start of the until the deadline, typically set for early February (e.g., February 6 in 2025). Following the deadline, no player trades occur until the offseason after the conclude, except during the brief July moratorium from July 1 to July 6, when most transactions are frozen pending final and audits. Summer trading resumes immediately after the draft and moratorium, allowing deals involving newly selected players once they sign their rookie contracts (ineligible for 30 days post-signing). Under the 2023 CBA, teams exceeding the second apron face heightened restrictions on trading future first-round picks. Such teams cannot trade their first-round picks seven years into the future; the furthest allowable is six years out. This measure, effective starting in the 2024-25 league year, aims to limit asset hoarding by high-spending contenders and promote competitive balance. For example, a team above the second apron in 2025 cannot deal its 2032 first-round pick. Specific provisions address unique contract scenarios, such as the poison pill provision in rookie scale contract extensions, introduced in the 2011 CBA and effective since the 2012-13 season. This provision applies when a player who has signed a rookie scale extension is traded before the extension takes effect (typically before July 1 of the first year of the extension). For salary-matching purposes, the outgoing salary from the trading team is the player’s current-year salary, while the incoming salary for the acquiring team is the average of the current-year salary and the salaries over each year of the extension (including option years, but excluding unlikely incentives). This discrepancy significantly complicates salary matching and makes such trades difficult or impossible. International players follow standard trade eligibility rules once signed to NBA , with no distinct trade-specific exemptions. However, their entry via the draft imposes initial restrictions: undrafted international free agents over age 22 can sign directly, becoming immediately tradable upon execution, while drafted internationals adhere to contract timelines, including the 30-day post-signing hold. Rights to unsigned international draftees can be traded indefinitely until renounced.

Salary Matching Requirements

In NBA trades, salary matching requirements ensure that the total salaries of players received by a team do not exceed specified limits relative to the salaries of players sent out, promoting financial balance across the league. For teams operating below the , incoming player salaries cannot exceed the outgoing salaries, a rule designed to prevent cap circumvention while allowing room for roster construction. Teams above the , however, face more flexible but still regulated parameters: prior to the 2023 Agreement (CBA), they could receive up to 125% of their outgoing salaries plus $100,000. The 2023 CBA introduced tiered restrictions based on a team's position relative to the luxury tax aprons, phasing in stricter matching over time to curb excessive spending by contending teams. For the 2023-24 season, teams below the first apron (projected at $178,132,000) retain the standard 125% plus $100,000 allowance. Teams between the first and second aprons ($188,931,000) are limited to 110% plus $100,000, while those above the second apron must match salaries exactly at 100%, with no ability to aggregate multiple outgoing salaries to acquire a single incoming player. Starting in the 2024-25 season, these limits tighten further for higher-spending teams: the 110% threshold drops to 100% for teams above the first apron ($195.945 million for 2025-26), emphasizing parity and restricting roster maneuvering for luxury tax payers. Base year compensation applies specifically to teams below the when trading a player in the first year of a multi-year , prorating the outgoing to discourage aggressive acquisitions. In such cases, the player's for matching purposes is their first-year amount divided by the total years of the ; for instance, a player on a four-year deal with a $10 million first-year would count as $2.5 million outgoing for the sending team, though the receiving team must still match the full $10 million incoming. This mechanism, unchanged by the 2023 CBA, ensures under-cap teams cannot easily flip newly signed players without significant cost. Teams may also include considerations in trades to facilitate matching, up to a maximum of $7.964 million for the 2025-26 season (adjusted annually based on the ), though restrictions limit or prohibit cash outflows for higher-spending teams—those above the first cannot send more than the minimum player salary, and second- teams are barred from sending any . This tool provides minor flexibility for salary imbalances without directly impacting the cap. A representative example is the September 2023 trade sending Jrue Holiday from the Milwaukee Bucks to the Portland Trail Blazers, where Holiday's $33.4 million salary was matched by incoming players Robert Williams III ($12.4 million) and Malcolm Brogdon ($22.5 million), totaling approximately 104%—well within the 125% allowance available to the Bucks, who were below the first apron at the time. This deal highlighted how apron tiers influence trade construction, as subsequent legs involving apron-proximate teams like the Boston Celtics navigated tighter matching to finalize the acquisition.

Trade Exceptions

Trade exceptions, formally known as traded player exceptions (TPEs), provide teams with a tool to circumvent strict salary matching requirements in trades by allowing the acquisition of player salaries up to the exception's value without those salaries impacting the team's or luxury tax payroll. These exceptions are particularly valuable for teams over the cap, enabling them to add talent without needing equivalent outgoing salary, thus facilitating roster improvements in a constrained financial environment. TPEs are created when a team sends out more salary in a trade than it receives, with the exception's value equaling the difference between the outgoing and incoming salaries. This often occurs in salary dumps, where a offloads an undesirable to another franchise in exchange for draft picks, cash considerations (up to the annual limit of $7.964 million for the 2025-26 season), or minimal salary, generating a TPE for the full or partial value of the dumped salary. For instance, if a trades a $20 million player for $5 million in salary, it creates a $15 million TPE; the receiving might then buy out and waive the acquired player to clear cap space, though the TPE remains with the originating . TPEs cannot be created through waivers or buyouts alone, as those do not involve a exchange. In usage, a TPE permits a team to acquire one or multiple players whose combined first-year salaries do not exceed the exception's value, without requiring salary matching from outgoing players. The acquired salaries do not count toward the team's at the time of the trade, though they will in future seasons unless traded again. TPEs expire one year from the date of creation, providing a defined window for deployment, and cannot be used to acquire cash or combined with other TPEs or exceptions in a single deal. They also cannot be traded to other teams. Multi-team trades, limited to up to four participating franchises, often incorporate TPEs to balance salaries across multiple exchanges, enhancing flexibility in complex deals. Sign-and-trade transactions serve as a related hybrid mechanism, where a team signs its own using Bird rights to exceed the , then immediately trades the player; this can generate a TPE for the sending team if incoming salary falls short, allowing the receiving team to absorb the contract via cap space or their own exception. Under the 2023 CBA's apron restrictions, teams exceeding the second apron threshold ($207.824 million for 2025-26) face severe limitations on TPEs: they cannot create exceptions by aggregating multiple players' salaries, cannot utilize pre-existing TPEs from prior seasons. These rules aim to curb spending by high-payroll contenders, forcing exact salary matches in trades and restricting access to exceptions that could otherwise enable salary dumps or acquisitions. The prevalence of TPEs surged after the 2011 CBA, which expanded their flexibility by easing aggregation rules and shortening no-trade periods for acquired players, leading to more frequent use in roster maneuvers. A prominent historical example is the ' creation of a $47 million TPE stemming from the 2013 acquisition of and from the , which the Nets leveraged in subsequent salary dumps to manage their bloated payroll amid the trade's financial fallout.

Waivers and Player Releases

Waiver Claim Process

When a team releases a player with a guaranteed under the NBA's Collective Bargaining Agreement, the player enters a 48-hour period during which other teams may submit claims to acquire them. This process ensures that released players are not immediately available to the highest bidder, instead prioritizing competitive balance by favoring struggling teams. The period begins at 5 p.m. ET on the day of the release and allows claims to be placed via the league office. Waiver priority is determined by reverse order of the current season's standings, with the team holding the worst record claiming first, followed by the second-worst, and so on; tied teams are ordered by reverse order of their previous season's standings or position if applicable. If multiple teams submit claims for the same player, the highest-priority team (worst record) is awarded the player, and all lower-priority claims are voided. Once submitted, a claim cannot be withdrawn, promoting strategic among front offices. Claiming a player directly impacts a team's situation based on its cap status. Teams operating under the can claim the player outright, adding the full remaining salary to their cap sheet and gaining immediate roster without needing additional mechanisms. Over-the-cap teams, however, must possess a traded player exception equivalent to or greater than the player's salary to complete the claim, as it otherwise counts fully against their cap and luxury tax payroll; without such an exception, these teams cannot claim unless the contract allows for immediate re-release without penalty. This rule prevents cap-strapped contenders from easily talent from rebuilding squads. Special considerations apply to non-guaranteed or partially guaranteed contracts, where low-priority teams frequently claim players to block rivals from later signing them as free agents after the guarantee date passes, often re-waiving them shortly thereafter to avoid long-term financial commitment. In contrast, players bought out from international leagues bypass the waiver process entirely and enter the market as unrestricted free agents, avoiding the 48-hour hold. For NBA-released players, under-cap teams can integrate claimed players instantly, while over-the-cap claims resolve at the end of the waiver period. The 2023 CBA maintained these core waiver mechanics without alteration, continuing practices from prior agreements. For instance, during the 2024 offseason, the used their high waiver priority to claim center Paul Reed from the , adding frontcourt depth at a cap hit of approximately $7.7 million for the 2024-25 season. Similarly, the claimed forward Trey Jemison II from the in July 2024 for bench versatility. These moves illustrate how waivers serve as a low-cost avenue for roster enhancement, particularly for non-contenders.

Stretch Provision

The stretch provision allows NBA teams to waive a player whose contract includes remaining guaranteed salary and spread that salary's impact on the team's over multiple future seasons, thereby reducing the annual cap hit while still obligating the team to pay the full amount to the player according to the original schedule. This option applies only if the player has more than $500,000 in aggregate remaining guaranteed base compensation, as teams cannot stretch contracts with $500,000 or less remaining (which are paid semi-monthly per the original schedule) or restretch a deal that has already been stretched by a prior team. Under the rule, the cap hit for the remaining guaranteed salary is calculated by dividing the total amount by a stretch period equal to twice the number of remaining contract years plus one additional year. For instance, a player with three years and $30 million remaining on their contract would have the cap hit spread over seven years at roughly $4.3 million annually, rather than the full $10 million per year. Any salary the waived player earns from signing with another NBA offsets the waiving 's cap charge dollar-for-dollar in that , though the waiving remains responsible for paying the difference between the original amount and the offset. Introduced as part of the 2011 Collective Bargaining Agreement, the stretch provision was designed to give teams greater flexibility in shedding burdensome contracts without immediate severe cap penalties, particularly for underperforming or injured players. A prominent example occurred in 2018 when the waived , who had approximately $18.8 million left for his final season; using the stretch, they spread that amount over three years at about $6.3 million per year on the cap, though subsequent adjustments via further reduced the effective hit. This tool is typically employed to alleviate pressure from "bad contracts," but teams above the salary cap s—such as the first apron at $195.945 million or second at $207.824 million for the 2025-26 season—face amplified constraints, as the stretched amounts fully count toward those thresholds and can trigger stricter trade and signing limitations.

Buyouts and Amnesty (Historical)

A in the NBA occurs through a mutual agreement between a player and their team to terminate the remaining portion of the player's , allowing the player to become a while receiving a negotiated portion of their guaranteed , often ranging from 50% to 75% of the outstanding amount depending on the deal. The team pays this reduced amount in cash but removes the player's full from its books for and purposes immediately after the process clears, providing financial relief without ongoing cap obligations. Following the , the player is placed on waivers for 48 hours; if unclaimed, they enter the market, though the original team cannot claim them off waivers. The amnesty clause, introduced in the 2011 Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), offered each team a one-time opportunity during the CBA's term (through the 2015-16 season) to waive a player under contract signed before the 2011 lockout, with the player's full salary excluded from the team's and calculations while still being paid by the team. This provision applied to contracts predating the lockout and could be used only once per team, resulting in up to 30 possible amnesties league-wide, though not all teams utilized it. Notable uses included the waiving in December 2011 to clear $80 million in salary, the amnestying in July 2012 to shed $21 million over two years, and the releasing in 2013, among others between 2012 and 2016. Unlike standard buyouts, amnestied players entered an auction process where teams with cap space could bid on their remaining contracts, with the highest bidder acquiring the player while the original team continued payments off the books. Following the expiration of the amnesty clause with the 2017 CBA, buyouts became the primary mechanism for teams seeking cap relief, often used by non-contenders to shed salary and by contenders to acquire veteran talent at a reduced cost, as seen in the 2023-24 season when the agreed to a with , allowing him to sign with the for the playoffs. The stretch provision, introduced alongside in 2011, served as a complementary tool for spreading waived salary over multiple years but did not fully replace the one-time amnesty benefit. Once signed by a new as a , the player generally faces standard free-agent trade restrictions, such as being untradeable for up to three months if the signing team uses a exception, though cap-space signings allow earlier eligibility; a 30-day untradeable period applies in specific post-waiver scenarios but is not universal. The 2023 CBA did not revive the , maintaining its historical status as a limited tool from the prior agreement, but it introduced restrictions on the market to curb spending by high-payroll teams, prohibiting those above the first or second from signing players whose prior salary exceeded the non-taxpayer mid-level exception (approximately $12.9 million in 2024-25). These rules have inadvertently revitalized the market by making trades more difficult for contenders, leading to increased activity post-trade deadline as teams pivot to waivers and buyouts for roster upgrades, with trends showing more veterans like and securing short-term deals in 2024.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.