Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Veteran
View on Wikipedia

A veteran (from Latin vetus 'old') is a person who has significant experience (and is usually adept and esteemed) and expertise in an occupation or field.[1]
A military veteran is a person who is no longer serving in the armed forces.[2]
A topic of interest for researchers has been the health of military personnel after leaving the military, particularly those who served in combat areas. This concern stems from veterans in countries like the US and Australia, being disproportionately over-represented in psychological and substance abuse disorders relative to the general population. In Australia, the Department of Veterans' Affairs provides a proactive service to address 'real life' health care problems in the veteran community.[3]
Public attitude towards veterans
[edit]


Military veterans often receive special treatment in their respective countries. War veterans are generally treated with great respect and honour, although negative feelings towards veterans may be held in certain situations: veterans of unpopular or lost conflicts may be discriminated against. In some countries (e.g., Germany after 1945), veterans are neither honoured in any special way by the general public, nor have their dedicated Veterans Day, although events are sometimes orchestrated by minority groups.
The way veterans are portrayed in the media is likely to contribute to public attitudes.[4] A small scale survey in 2020 indicated several ways in which veterans themselves feel that their representation in the media could be improved, by avoiding certain stereotypes.[4]
Many countries have longstanding traditions, ceremonies, and holidays to honour their veterans. In Commonwealth member states, Remembrance Day is held on November the 11th and is focused mostly on the veterans who died in service. A red or white Poppy is worn on the lapel (for remembrance or for peace, respectively) in the weeks up to the date, and wreaths and flowers laid at memorials to the dead.
In Russia, a tradition was established after World War II where newly married couples would on their wedding day visit a military cemetery. In France, for instance, those wounded in war are given the first claim on any seat on public transit. Most countries have a holiday such as Veterans Day to honour their veterans, along with the war dead.
In Zimbabwe, the term veteran is used for political purpose and may not actually refer to someone that participated in a war, but rather to someone who feels entitled to some benefit because of association with a cause for which there had been an actual war.[5]
Veterans' experiences around the world
[edit]The examples and perspective in this section deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. (August 2023) |
Congo-Kinshasa
[edit]Some veterans from the Belgian commitment of the Congolese to World War II live in communities throughout the Congo.[6] Though they received compensation from the government during the rule of the dictator Mobutu Sese Seko, after his overthrow they no longer receive pensions.[6]
United Kingdom
[edit]Ex-service is British terminology for veterans, which refers to those who have served in the British Empire or Commonwealth Armed Forces.[7][8][9]
Britain, with its historic distrust of standing armies, did little for its veterans before the 19th century. It did set up two small hospitals for them in the 1680s. In London and other cities the streets teemed with disabled or disfigured veterans begging for alms.[10]
The First World War focused national attention on veterans, especially those who had been partly or wholly disabled.[11] The King's National Roll Scheme (KNRS) was an employment program for disabled veterans of the First World War. Kowalsky says it was practical, innovative, and ahead of its time and was the most important piece of legislation enacted for disabled veterans in interwar Britain. In addition to direct aid, it stimulated a national discussion regarding the need for employment programs for disabled veterans and the responsibility of the state, setting up a future demand for more benefits.[12]
In the 21st century, Britain has one of the highest densities of veterans in a major country, with 13 million in 2000, or 219 per 1,000 population.[13]
United States
[edit]
In the United States, a veteran is a person who has served in the armed forces (including the Reserve and certain members of the United States National Guard) and was discharged under conditions other than dishonorable.[14][15] A common misconception is that only those who have served in combat or those who have retired from active duty can be called military veterans.[citation needed]
In 1990, 40% of young Americans had a veteran for a parent; this decreased to 16% in 2014.[16] In 2016, of the veterans who were born outside of the United States, Mexican and Filipino Americans made up the two largest populations, with 3% of all veterans having been born outside of the United States.[17] As of 2017 there are some 21 million American veterans.[18]
According to the Pew Research Center, "Among men, only 4% of millennials [born 1981-96] are veterans, compared with 47%" of men in their 70s and 80s, "many of whom came of age during the Korean War and its aftermath."[19]
Veterans' benefits in the United States
[edit]President Abraham Lincoln, in his second inaugural address in 1865 towards the end of the American Civil War, famously called for good treatment of veterans: "[T]o care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow, and his orphan". The American Civil War produced veterans' organizations, such as the Grand Army of the Republic and United Confederate Veterans. The treatment of veterans changed after the First World War. In the years following, discontented veterans became a source of instability. They could quickly organize, had links to the army and often had arms themselves. The Bonus Army of unemployed veterans was one of the most important protest movements of the Great Depression, marching on Washington, D.C. to get a claimed bonus now that Congress had promised them decades in the future.
Each state of the United States sets specific criteria for state-specific veterans' benefits. For federal medical benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals, prior to 7 September 1980 the veteran must have served at least 180 days of active duty, after the above-mentioned date the veteran must have served at least 24 months. However, if the veteran was medically discharged and receives a VA service-connected disability stipend, the time limits are not applicable.
American veteran experience after World War II
[edit]
After the Second World War, in part due to the experience of the First World War, most of the participating states set up elaborate veterans' administrations. Within the United States, it was veterans groups, like the American Legion and Veterans of Foreign Wars organization, that pushed for and got the G.I. Bill enacted. These gave veterans access to free or subsidized education and health care. The newly educated GIs created a significant economic impact, and with the aid of VA loans were able to buy housing and establish themselves as part of a growing American middle class. The explosion of the suburbs created sufficient housing for veterans and their families.
American veteran experience after OEF and OIF
[edit]Many veterans of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom have had to face challenges unique to warfare in the 21st century. One significant difference between OEF and OIF and previous wars is a greater dependence on reservists and repeat deployments. Up to 80% of troops deployed at the beginning of OEF were part of the National Guard and Reserve[20] and about 40% of currently serving military members have been deployed more than once.[21] This has meant that many deployed troops, not being as "steeped in military culture"[22] have had more difficult transitions into military life, and for many the increased redeployment rate has meant more transitions, more uncertainty, longer terms, and shorter dwell times, all of which contribute to greater stress.
Due to medical advances, warfare in the 21st century tends to yield more survivors with severe injuries which soldiers in previous wars would have died from.[21] This means that, though fewer service members die, more return from war with injuries more serious, and in turn more emotionally devastating, than ever before. Among these injuries is the increasingly common traumatic brain injury, or TBI, the effects of which can range from a mild concussion to amnesia and serious neurological damage.[23]
Female veterans in the U.S.
[edit]Women have served in the United States military for over two hundred years. Some female veterans perceive themselves as discriminated against by their male counterparts and, as such, women who have served in the armed forces have sometimes been known as "the invisible veterans".[24] Women were not fully recognized as veterans until after WWII, and prior to this they were not eligible for VA benefits. The current percentage of U.S. Veterans who are women is more than 8 percent. Women make up nearly 11.6 percent of OEF/OIF/OND Veterans.[25] A tri-state (Washington, Idaho, Oregon) women veterans conference in Pendleton, Oregon, in April 2008, attracted 362 women veterans, according to the East Oregonian newspaper. A growing number of states are recognizing June 12 as Women Veterans Day, either through proclamation or legislative action.
On August 5, 2011, Erica Borggren was appointed Director of the Illinois Department of Veterans Affairs and has been "creating a new Women Veterans Program to help address the issue that women veterans often do not self-identify as veterans and do not take advantage of veterans' benefits to the same extent as their male peers."[26] She gathered in a webcast panel moderated by Stacey Baca with Dr. Rebecca J. Hannagan and Kimberly Mitchell at the Pritzker Military Library on January 24, 2013, to discuss important issues facing female veterans in today's military.[26]
African American veterans in the U.S.
[edit]African Americans have participated in every war fought by or within the United States. Black veterans from World War I experienced racial persecution on returning to the U.S. from overseas, particularly in Southern cities.[27] Black veterans from World War II continued to be denied equality at home despite President Harry S. Truman's desegregation of the military after World War II. Black veterans went on to play a central role in the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s.[28] The National Association for Black Veterans is an organization that provides advocacy and support for African American and other minority veterans.[29]
Health effects of military service and treatment for veterans
[edit]The effect of active military service can be profound and lasting, and some veterans have found it difficult to adjust to normal life again. Figures from 2009 showed that twice as many veterans were in prison than there were British troops currently in Afghanistan. Homelessness, street-sleeping and relationship breakdown are also commonly reported.[30][31] Research done by the UK homelessness charity CRISIS (1994) and the Ex-Services Action Group (1997) both found that a quarter of homeless people had previously served in the armed forces.[32] The Times newspaper reported on 25 September 2009 that in England and Wales the number of "military veterans in jail has more than doubled in six years".[33] Another Times article of the same date quoted the veterans mental health charity Combat Stress[34] as reporting a 53% increase in referrals from doctors.
Suicide
[edit]Risks
[edit]In Australia, Canada, the U.K., and the U.S., military veterans of all ages carry a substantially elevated suicide risk relative to the general population,[35][36][37][38][39] particularly younger veterans.[35][37][40][38]
In Canada, Denmark, the U.K., and the U.S., deployment to a war zone (unless in a combat role) has not been associated with an increased risk of suicide.[41][42][43][44] A study of the U.S. army found that the career stage carrying the greatest risk was initial military training.[45]
Research in several countries has found that the personnel most at risk include those who: had a troubled childhood;[43] are of low rank;[46][41][47][48] have close-combat roles in war;[41] and/or leave service soon after joining.[46][40] Other risk factors common to military life include depression,[49] posttraumatic stress disorder,[46] alcohol misuse,[46][50] bullying[51][52][53][54] and sexual harassment.[55][48][56]
Examples
[edit]An article in the London Metro on 28 January 2010, 'Veterans prone to suicide', cited a report by the Mental Health Foundation saying that more needed to be done to care for UK veterans of the Afghanistan War.[57] Many had "plunged into alcohol problems, crime and suicide" upon their return.
In the U.S., the suicide rate among veterans is 300% the national average.[58] They account for 30% of the suicides in the US annually.[59]
According to a 2015 report by the Japanese Ministry of Defense, 56 Japan Self Defense Force members had committed suicide after serving in overseas missions to Iraq and the Indian Ocean. Defense officials stated that 14 deaths were due to mental illness, 13 to family or financial problems and three to official duties.[60]
Post-traumatic stress disorder
[edit]Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is a condition that affects a significant number of veterans. Studies involving veterans with combat-related PTSD indicate that between 4-17% of United States veterans have been diagnosed with PTSD. Their United Kingdom counterparts, however, have significantly lower numbers of just 3-6%.[61]
New treatment programs are emerging to assist veterans suffering from post-combat mental health problems such as depression and PTSD. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), is becoming an important method for the treatment of mental health issues among veterans, and is currently considered the standard of care for depression and PTSD by the United States Department of Defense. CBT is a psychotherapeutic approach that aims to change the patterns of thinking or behavior that responsible for patient's negative emotions and in doing so change the way they feel. It has been proven to be an effective treatment for PTSD among war veterans. Recently, online programs that pair CBT with therapist interaction have also proven effective in treating mental health problems among veterans. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) is also an effective and noninvasive, drug-free treatment for PTSD, although it has not been tested against specific military traumatic exposure for efficacy.[citation needed]
Veterans under the age of 25 are at higher risk for PTSD than veterans older than 25. Younger veterans with severe PTSD are at higher risk for metabolic syndrome and suicide.[59]
Music therapy provides veterans with a way to express themselves, escape from anxiety, and helps them cope with their PTSD. In Mike Lawson "Music and Science Meet…Music Therapy", Lawson explains "Modern music therapy became a norm in the Veteran's Administration hospitals during and after both World Wars. In its most basic form the playing of recordings on the Victrola in WW I, hospitals had measurable positive effects on the wounded and shell-shocked patients. This began the use of a somewhat primitive music therapy in all American military hospitals."[62]
Other disorders
[edit]Veterans are at higher risk than the general population for several disorders, especially younger veterans (those younger than 25). Younger veterans are at increased risk for substance use disorders, including alcohol use disorder, and mental illnesses in general.[59]
Help for veterans
[edit]
Necessity has resulted in a number of sources of help being made available for veterans. Many of these are independent, charitable organisations, and in some countries the aftercare and rehabilitation services provided by Governments have been inadequate.[63] This may be because they do not wish to give attention to the negative effects of military service and the difficulties of readjustment to civilian life for it may have an adverse impact upon recruitment for their armed forces. Nevertheless, help is available and veterans should feel able to make contact and ask for assistance or advice to the broad network of organizations, and to appropriate legislators, without feeling that this is a weakness. Military service can be a profoundly unnatural experience and it is likely that some help may be needed in debriefing and rehabilitation into the community, whether it be medical, psychological, practical or financial. There were an estimated 57,849 homeless veterans in the United States during January 2013, accounting for 12 percent of all homeless adults. Just under 8 percent of homeless U.S. veterans are female.[64]
See also
[edit]- Demobilization
- List of veterans' organizations
- Social history of soldiers and veterans in the United States
- Veterans studies
References
[edit]- ^ "Veteran - Define Veteran at Dictionary.com". Dictionary.com. Retrieved 20 May 2016.
- ^ "Veteran". Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Merriam-Webster, Inc. Retrieved 19 July 2019.
- ^ Department of Veterans' Affairs (29 August 2023). "Statement from the Department of Veterans' Affairs - Veterans' MATES program - Update". Retrieved October 3, 2023.
- ^ a b Pitchford-Hyde J, Parry K (2020-09-07). "Veterans and the Media: A pilot survey report on how UK veterans perceive media representations about military and post-military experiences". eprints.whiterose.ac.uk. doi:10.5518/100/49. Retrieved 2020-09-08.
- ^ "The Politics of Disruption: War Veterans and the Local State In Zimbabwe". Archived from the original on 8 September 2016. Retrieved 20 May 2016.
- ^ a b McCrummen, Stephanie (4 August 2009). "Nearly Forgotten Forces of WWII". The Washington Post. Washington Post Foreign Service.
- ^ "Ex-service definition and meaning". Collins English Dictionary. Collins Dictionary. Retrieved 17 February 2020.
- ^ "Veterans guaranteed job interviews". BBC News. 6 February 2020. Retrieved 17 February 2020.
- ^ Iversen A, Dyson C, Smith N, Greenberg N, Walwyn R, Unwin C, et al. (June 2005). "'Goodbye and good luck': the mental health needs and treatment experiences of British ex-service personnel". The British Journal of Psychiatry. 186 (6). Cambridge University Press: 480–486. doi:10.1192/bjp.186.6.480. PMID 15928358.
A cross-sectional telephone survey of 496 'vulnerable' ex-service personnel selected from an existing epidemiological military cohort.
- ^ Brumwell S (2002). "Home from the Wars". History Today. 52 (3): 41–46.
- ^ Deborah Cohen, War Come Home: Disabled Veterans in Britain & Germany, 1919-1939 (2001)
- ^ Kowalsky M (2007). "'This Honourable Obligation': The King's National Roll Scheme for Disabled Ex-Servicemen 1915-1944". European Review of History. 14 (4): 567–584. doi:10.1080/13507480701752201. S2CID 143103327.
- ^ Dandeker C, Wessely S, Iversen A, Ross J (January 2006). "What's in a Name? Defining and Caring for 'Veterans,'". Armed Forces & Society. 32 (2): 161–177. doi:10.1177/0095327x05279177. S2CID 143745365.
- ^ "U.S.C. Title 38 - VETERANS' BENEFITS". www.govinfo.gov. U.S. Government Publishing Office. Retrieved 11 January 2020.
- ^ "What is a Veteran? The Legal Definition". VA.org. 2015-09-10. Retrieved 2020-10-12.
- ^ "America's love affair with uniformed men is problematic". The Economist. 28 October 2017.
- ^ Zong J, Batalova J (13 October 2016). "Immigrant Veterans in the United States". Migration Information Source. Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved 9 April 2018.
- ^ C.K. (4 October 2017). "The rhetorical power of "support our troops"". The Economist.
- ^ "How Millennials today compare with their grandparents 50 years ago". Pew Research Center. March 16, 2018.
- ^ Darwin, Jaine, Kenneth Reich. "Citizen Soldiers Changed Forever: The Impact of OEF/OIF on Reserve and National Guard Troops and their Families" SOFAR USA
- ^ a b "Returning Home from Iraq and Afghanistan: Preliminary Assessment of Readjustment Needs of Veterans, Service Members, and Their Families" Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2010
- ^ Friedman, MJ. "Veterans' Mental Health in the Wake of War." The New England Journal of Medicine, v352 n13 (2005): 1287-90
- ^ Bass, Elizabeth, and Heidi Golding "The Veterans Health Administration's Treatment of PTSD and Traumatic Brain Injury Among Recent Combat Veterans" Washington, DC: Congress of the United States, Congressional Budget Office, 2012
- ^ Willenz, June A. (1994): "Invisible Veterans" Educational Record, v75 n4 p40-46, American Council on Education
- ^ "Facts and Statistics about Women Veterans - Women Veterans Health Care". Archived from the original on 2013-01-14. Retrieved 2013-01-11.
- ^ a b "Citizen Soldier: Change and Challenges--Women in Today's Military" Pritzker Military Library Webcast January 24, 2013 Chicago, IL
- ^ Maxine D. Rogers, et al., Documented History of Rosewood, Florida in January 1923, op.cit., pp.4-6 Archived May 15, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, accessed March 28, 2008; Clarence Lusane (2003), Hitler's Black Victims, p. 89.
- ^ ""Equality of Treatment and Opportunity": Executive Order 9981". Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. 20540 USA. Retrieved 2023-12-04.
- ^ "The National Association for Black Veterans, Inc (NABVETS)". Military Consumer. 2013-06-17. Retrieved 2023-12-04.
- ^ Tsai J, Rosenheck RA (2015-01-01). "Risk factors for homelessness among US veterans". Epidemiologic Reviews. 37 (1): 177–195. doi:10.1093/epirev/mxu004. PMC 4521393. PMID 25595171.
- ^ Tsai J, Harpaz-Rotem I, Pietrzak RH, Southwick SM (2012-05-29). "The role of coping, resilience, and social support in mediating the relation between PTSD and social functioning in veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan". Psychiatry. 75 (2): 135–149. doi:10.1521/psyc.2012.75.2.135. PMID 22642433. S2CID 31803599.
- ^ "Veterans-uk.info". Archived from the original on 2010-07-18. Retrieved 2010-02-02.
- ^ "Login". Archived from the original on June 4, 2011. Retrieved 20 May 2016.
- ^ "The Veterans' mental health charity - Combat Stress - Combat Stress". Retrieved 20 May 2016.
- ^ a b Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (29 September 2021). "Serving and ex-serving Australian Defence Force members who have served since 1985: suicide monitoring 2001 to 2019". aihw.gov.au. Retrieved 26 August 2022.
- ^ Department of National Defence (2022-05-11). "2021 Report on Suicide Mortality in the Canadian Armed Forces (1995 to 2020)". www.canada.ca. Retrieved 2022-08-30.
- ^ a b Simkus K, Hall A, Heber A, VanTil L (2020-06-18). "2019 Veteran Suicide Mortality Study". Veterans Affairs Canada. Retrieved 2022-08-30.
- ^ a b US Department of Veterans Affairs (Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention) (September 2021). "2001-2019 National Suicide Data Appendix". va.gov. Retrieved 30 August 2022.
- ^ US Department of Veterans Affairs (Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention) (September 2021). "2021: National Veteran Suicide Prevention Annual Report" (PDF). va.gov. Retrieved 30 August 2022.
- ^ a b Kapur N, While D, Blatchley N, Bray I, Harrison K (March 2009). Hotopf M (ed.). "Suicide after leaving the UK armed forces--a cohort study". PLOS Medicine. 6 (3) e26. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000026. PMC 2650723. PMID 19260757.
- ^ a b c Department of National Defence (2022-05-11). "2021 Report on Suicide Mortality in the Canadian Armed Forces (1995 to 2020)". www.canada.ca. Retrieved 2022-08-30.
- ^ Vedtofte MS, Elrond AF, Erlangsen A, Nielsen AB, Stoltenberg CD, Marott JL, et al. (October 2021). "Combat Exposure and Risk of Suicide Attempt Among Danish Army Military Personnel". The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 82 (6) 20m13251. doi:10.4088/JCP.20m13251. PMID 34644465. S2CID 238859228.
- ^ a b Pinder RJ, Iversen AC, Kapur N, Wessely S, Fear NT (July 2012). "Self-harm and attempted suicide among UK armed forces personnel: results of a cross-sectional survey". The International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 58 (4): 433–439. doi:10.1177/0020764011408534. PMID 21693487. S2CID 17096673.
- ^ Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center (AFHSC) (June 2012). "Deaths by suicide while on active duty, active and reserve components, U.S. Armed Forces, 1998-2011". MSMR. 19 (6): 7–10. PMID 22779434.
- ^ Ursano RJ, Kessler RC, Stein MB, Naifeh JA, Aliaga PA, Fullerton CS, et al. (July 2016). "Risk Factors, Methods, and Timing of Suicide Attempts Among US Army Soldiers". JAMA Psychiatry. 73 (7): 741–749. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0600. PMC 4937827. PMID 27224848.
- ^ a b c d Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (29 September 2021). "Serving and ex-serving Australian Defence Force members who have served since 1985: suicide monitoring 2001 to 2019". aihw.gov.au. Retrieved 26 August 2022.
- ^ Ministry of Defence (31 March 2022). "Suicides in the UK regular armed forces: Annual summary and trends over time" (PDF). gov.uk. Retrieved 26 August 2022.
- ^ a b Department of Defense (30 September 2020). "Annual suicide report" (PDF). Defense Suicide Prevention Office. Retrieved 26 August 2020.
- ^ Goodwin L, Wessely S, Hotopf M, Jones M, Greenberg N, Rona RJ, et al. (July 2015). "Are common mental disorders more prevalent in the UK serving military compared to the general working population?". Psychological Medicine. 45 (9): 1881–1891. doi:10.1017/S0033291714002980. PMID 25602942. S2CID 3026974.
- ^ Irizar P, Leightley D, Stevelink S, Rona R, Jones N, Gouni K, et al. (June 2020). "Drinking motivations in UK serving and ex-serving military personnel". Occupational Medicine. 70 (4): 259–267. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqaa003. PMC 7305700. PMID 31961932.
- ^ Brunstein Klomek A, Sourander A, Gould M (May 2010). "The association of suicide and bullying in childhood to young adulthood: a review of cross-sectional and longitudinal research findings". Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 55 (5): 282–288. doi:10.1177/070674371005500503. PMID 20482954. S2CID 23962627.
- ^ Koeszegi ST, Zedlacher E, Hudribusch R (April 2014). "The War against the Female Soldier? The Effects of Masculine Culture on Workplace Aggression". Armed Forces & Society. 40 (2): 226–251. doi:10.1177/0095327X12460019. ISSN 0095-327X. S2CID 145747427.
- ^ Østvik K, Rudmin F (2001-01-01). "Bullying and Hazing Among Norwegian Army Soldiers: Two Studies of Prevalence, Context, and Cognition". Military Psychology. 13 (1): 17–39. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.567.7985. doi:10.1207/S15327876MP1301_02. ISSN 0899-5605. S2CID 40886078.
- ^ Cooper C, Gee D (27 May 2021). "Has the Time Come for an All-Adult Army?". rusi.org. Retrieved 2022-08-30.
- ^ British army (2015). "Sexual harassment report 2015" (PDF). gov.uk. Retrieved 2018-03-08.
- ^ Magnusson Hanson LL, Nyberg A, Mittendorfer-Rutz E, Bondestam F, Madsen IE (September 2020). "Work related sexual harassment and risk of suicide and suicide attempts: prospective cohort study". BMJ. 370 m2984. doi:10.1136/bmj.m2984. PMC 7463167. PMID 32878868.
- ^ "28 January 2010: Alcohol misuse, suicide and imprisonment – the price of failing to look after our veterans, warns charity". Archived from the original on 2010-03-01. Retrieved 2010-02-02.
- ^ Jaffe G (February 1, 2013). "VA study finds more veterans committing suicide". Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 4, 2013.
- ^ a b c Meade BJ, Glenn MK, Wirth O (March 29, 2013). "Mission Critical: Getting Vets With PTSD Back to Work". NIOSH: Workplace Safety and Health. Medscape and NIOSH.
- ^ "Self-Defense Force Suicides". Tokyo: NHK World. 2015-06-09. Archived from the original on April 22, 2019.
- ^ Richardson LK, Frueh BC, Acierno R (January 2010). "Prevalence estimates of combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder: critical review". The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 44 (1): 4–19. doi:10.3109/00048670903393597. PMC 2891773. PMID 20073563.
- ^ Lawson M (12 August 2017). "Music and Science Meet...Music Therapy". School Band and Orchestra (SBO) Magazine.
- ^ Durboraw A (2010). Combat veterans rights: to the Department of Veterans Affairs, benefits, medical services, compensation, appeals, etc. Pittsburgh, PA: Dorrance Publishing Co. ISBN 978-1-4349-0409-6.
- ^ "The 2013 Annual Homeless Assessment report (AHAR) to Congress" (PDF). The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. p. 42.
Further reading
[edit]- Alcalde, Ángel. "War Veterans and Fascism during the Franco Dictatorship in Spain (1936–1959)." European history quarterly 47.1 (2017): 78-98.
- Alcalde, Ángel. War Veterans and Fascism in Interwar Europe (Cambridge University Press, 2017)
- Alcalde, Ángel, and Xosé M. Núñez Seixas, eds. War Veterans and the World after 1945: Cold War Politics, Decolonization, Memory (Routledge, 2018) 15 studies by experts, worldwide coverage.
- Carr, Richard. "Veterans of the First World War and Conservative Anti-appeasement." Twentieth Century British History 22.1 (2011): 28-51.
- Cohen, Deborah. War Come Home: Disabled Veterans in Britain & Germany, 1919-1939 (2001)
- Crotty, Martin, Neil J. Diamant, and Mark Edele. The Politics of Veteran Benefits in the Twentieth Century: A Comparative History (Cornell UP, 2020).
- Diamant, Neil J. Embattled glory: Veterans, military families, and the politics of patriotism in China, 1949–2007 (Rowman & Littlefield, 2010).
- Diehl, James M. The thanks of the fatherland: German veterans after the Second World War (U of North Carolina Press, 2000) online.
- Dixon, John. "The Welfare of People's Liberation Army Veterans and Dependants in China, 1949-1979." Armed Forces & Society 9.3 (1983): 483-494.
- Durflinger SM (2010). Veterans with a Vision: Canada's War Blinded in Peace and War. UBC Press. ISBN 978-0-7748-1855-1.
- Dwyer, Philip. "War Stories: French Veteran Narratives and the 'Experience of War' in the Nineteenth Century." European History Quarterly 41.4 (2011): 561-585. online
- Edele M (2009). Soviet Veterans of the Second World War A Popular Movement in an Authoritarian Society, 1941-1991. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Incorporated. ISBN 978-0-19-160808-7.
- Greig, Matilda. Dead Men Telling Tales: Napoleonic War Veterans and the Military Memoir Industry, 1808–1914 (Oxford UP, 2021) ISBN 9780192896025,
- Hartley, Janet. "Veterans and empire: a comparison of British and Russian treatment of veterans in the later eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries." Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research 100.400 (2022): 14-31. online
- Hobe, Alexander. "The Europeanization of Honour: Wehrmacht Veterans and European Integration in the 1950s." Journal of Modern European History 22.3 (2024): 318-334. in West Germany online
- Hurcombe, Martin. "The War Generation and Generation Wars: French Veterans and the Association des Écrivains Combattants, 1919–1945." Journal of War & Culture Studies 12.2 (2019): 121-138. online
- Islam, Azharul, et al. "Autobiographical memory of war veterans: A mixed-studies systematic review." Memory Studies 14.2 (2021): 214-239.
- Koenig, Christoph. "Loose cannons: war veterans and the erosion of democracy in Weimar Germany." Journal of Economic History 83.1 (2023): 167-202. online
- Mann G (2006). Native sons: West African veterans and France in the twentieth century. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. ISBN 978-0-8223-8781-7.
- Millington C (2012). From Victory to Vichy: Veterans in Inter-War France. Manchester: Manchester University Press. ISBN 978-0-7190-8550-5.
- Moore, Aaron William. "The problem of changing language communities: veterans and memory writing in China, Taiwan, and Japan." Modern Asian Studies 45.2 (2011): 399-429. How their memories get misunderstood by postwar audiences
- Muir, Kristy. "Public Peace, Private Wars: the psychological effects of war on Australian veterans." War & Society 26.1 (2007): 61-78.
- Petiteau, Natalie. "Survivors of war: French soldiers and veterans of the Napoleonic armies." in Soldiers, Citizens and Civilians: Experiences and Perceptions of the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, 1790–1820 (Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2009) pp. 43–58.
- Phillips, Rita, Vince Connelly, and Mark Burgess. "Representations of British Armed Forces Veterans in the Press." Journal of Political & Military Sociology 47.1 (2020): 77-98. online
- Pratt, Rod, and Jeff Hopkins-Weise. "Queensland's 'Sons of Empire'--Veterans of forgotten wars." Queensland History Journal 24.7 (2020): 642-654; in Australia online
- Starke, Peter. "The Impact of War on Welfare State Development in Germany." in Warfare and Welfare: Military Conflict and Welfare State Development in Western Countries, edited by Herbert Obinger et al. (Oxford University Press, 2018) pp. 36–66.
- Swift, David, and Oliver Wilkinson, eds. Veterans of the First World War: Ex-Servicemen and Ex-Servicewomen in Post-War Britain and Ireland (Routledge, 2019) https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056949
- Wilson, Evan. The Horrible Peace: British Veteran and the End of the Napoleonic Wars (U of Massachusetts Press, 2023) ISBN 9781625347343.
- Winegard, Timothy C. " 'Now it is all over... I am practically No-Body': Indigenous Veterans of Canada and Australia and the Great War for Civilization." First World War Studies 10.1 (2019): 12-30.
- Wirtschafter, Elise Kimerling. "Social misfits: veterans and soldiers' families in servile Russia." Journal of Military History 59.2 (1995): 215-235. online
- Woloch, Isser. The French Veteran from the Revolution to the Restoration (U of North Carolina Press, 1979).
Veterans in the United States
[edit]- Altschuler, Glenn, and Stuart Blumin. The GI Bill: The new deal for veterans (Oxford University Press, 2009) after 1945
- Burtin, Olivier. "The History of veterans' policy in the United States." Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 45.2 (172 (2020): 239-260. online
- Logue, Larry M., and Michael Barton, eds. The Civil War Veteran: A Historical Reader (NYU Press, 2007) 31 essays by experts. online
- McConnell, Stuart Charles. Glorious Contentment: The Grand Army of the Republic, 1865-1900 (U North Carolina Press, 1992) online
- Marten, James. Sing Not War: The Lives of Union and Confederate Veterans in Gilded Age America (U of North Carolina Press, 2011)
- Ortiz, Stephen R., ed. Veterans' policies, veterans' politics: new perspectives on veterans in the modern United States (UP of Florida, 2012) online.
- Pencak, William A., ed. Encyclopedia of the Veteran in America (2 vol. ABC-CLIO, 2009) online; a major scholarly resource
- Pencak W (1989). For God & country: the American Legion, 1919-1941. Boston: Northeastern University Press. ISBN 978-1-55553-050-1.
- Resch, John P. Suffering Soldiers: Revolutionary War Veterans, Moral Sentiment, and Political Culture in the Early Republic (U of Massachusetts Press, 1999)
- Resch, John P., et al. eds. Americans at War: Society, Culture, and the Homefront (4 vol. (Macmillan, 2005), 400 encyclopedic articles, with coverage of veterans from colonial era to 2005.
External links
[edit]
Media related to Veterans at Wikimedia Commons
Veteran
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Terminology
Etymology and Historical Usage
The term "veteran" derives from Latin veterānus, denoting an old or experienced soldier, which stems from vetus ("old" or "aged").[2] This entered English circa 1500 via Middle French vétéran, initially describing a person with extensive military experience rather than strictly a former servicemember.[7] In ancient Roman military usage, veterānus referred to a soldier who had fulfilled the required service term—ordinarily 20 years of active duty for legionaries, plus five years as a reservist (veterānus sub vexillō)—and received an honorable discharge (missiō honesta).[8] Such individuals were often granted praemia (bonuses in land or cash) and resettled in coloniae to maintain imperial stability and reward loyalty, contrasting sharply with tirō (a novice recruit without battle-hardened expertise).[9][10] Through the medieval and early modern eras, the concept persisted for long-serving troops, with English records from 1548 applying "veteran" adjectivally to units or individuals seasoned by prolonged warfare.[7] By 1577, it encompassed ex-servicemen, emphasizing post-duty status while retaining the emphasis on accrued combat wisdom; this evolution facilitated later institutional recognitions of military retirees in European armies.[7][11]Legal and Eligibility Criteria
In the United States, federal law defines a veteran as a person who served in the active military, naval, air, or space service and was discharged or released under conditions other than dishonorable, as codified in 38 U.S.C. § 101(2). This statutory definition serves as the baseline for eligibility across most federal benefits and recognitions administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Active service excludes periods of inactive duty training for Reserves or National Guard unless activated for federal duty, though as of 2016, retirees with 20 or more qualifying years in the National Guard or Reserves may qualify for official veteran status if they meet other criteria. Eligibility hinges on the character of discharge, with "other than dishonorable" encompassing honorable, general under honorable conditions, and certain other-than-honorable discharges that are not punitive; dishonorable or bad conduct discharges from courts-martial typically disqualify individuals. For enlistees after September 7, 1980, or those entering active duty after October 16, 1981, additional requirements may apply for certain benefits, such as serving 24 continuous months or the full period for which called or ordered to active duty, excluding those with service-connected disabilities.[12] These criteria ensure veteran status reflects substantive military commitment rather than mere enrollment, though determinations can involve case-by-case VA reviews of service records for borderline cases.[13] Internationally, no uniform legal standard exists, with criteria varying by nation; for instance, the European Organisation of Military Associations defines a veteran broadly as anyone who served in national armed forces for any duration, emphasizing service over discharge type.[5] In contrast, countries like the United Kingdom require service in the armed forces with an honorable equivalent discharge for benefits eligibility under the Armed Forces Covenant, while others, such as Australia, include Commonwealth veterans with specific wartime or peacetime service thresholds. These national frameworks prioritize empirical verification of service records to prevent unsubstantiated claims, reflecting causal links between verified duty and post-service entitlements.Variations by Country and Service Type
In the United States, federal law defines a veteran as any person who served in the active military, naval, air, or space service and was discharged or released under conditions other than dishonorable, encompassing personnel from all branches including the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, and Space Force, with no minimum service duration required beyond active duty periods.[1] This excludes National Guard or reserve members unless called to active federal duty, though certain wartime activations qualify them.[14] Peacetime service counts equally to wartime, but auxiliary roles like merchant mariners are recognized only for specific historical periods, such as World War II.[15] The United Kingdom adopts a broader threshold, classifying as a veteran anyone who served at least one day in His Majesty's Armed Forces, including regular forces, reserves, or merchant mariners who saw duty in designated operations from 1939 onward, applying uniformly across Army, Royal Navy, Royal Air Force, and Royal Marines branches.[16] This inclusive approach prioritizes self-identification and lifetime status without mandating combat exposure or honorable discharge equivalents, though eligibility for benefits may hinge on service character and duration for specific programs.[17] Australia's definition, per the Department of Veterans' Affairs, includes any person who served in the Australian Defence Force as a permanent member or eligible reservist, covering Army, Navy, and Air Force across full-time, part-time, or cadet roles, with veteran status granted regardless of deployment or combat involvement as long as service meets operational readiness criteria.[18] In Canada, Veterans Affairs Canada limits the term to former Canadian Armed Forces members who completed basic training and received an honourable release, applicable to all branches but excluding those with solely reserve training without activation, emphasizing post-service well-being over minimal service thresholds.[19] These variations reflect national priorities: the U.S. and Canada stress active duty and discharge quality for benefit access, while the U.K. and Australia emphasize inclusivity for reserves and short-service personnel to foster ongoing societal recognition.[20]Historical Context of Veterans
Ancient and Pre-Modern Veterans
In ancient civilizations such as Mesopotamia and Egypt, military service was often tied to conscription or short-term levies, with little evidence of formalized post-service benefits for veterans; soldiers typically returned to civilian roles like farming or labor without state-supported pensions or land grants.[21] In Sumerian city-states around 3000–2000 BCE, armies comprised citizen-soldiers mobilized for specific conflicts, after which they reintegrated into society without documented ongoing support, reflecting the episodic nature of warfare in these agrarian polities.[22] Similarly, ancient Egyptian forces, reliant on pharaonic levies and later mercenaries, provided no systematic veteran care, as the state's military focus remained on defense rather than long-term welfare.[23] Ancient Greece offered minimal structured support for veterans, as hoplite infantry—citizen-soldiers serving in phalanxes—generally returned to their estates or trades post-campaign, with benefits limited to potential spoils or civic honors rather than pensions.[24] Medical treatment for wounds occurred during active service, using techniques like warm water irrigation observed as early as the Trojan War era (circa 1200 BCE), but post-discharge care relied on family or community resources, with no centralized system.[25] Psychological reintegration involved rituals to address combat-induced fear (phobos), yet these were ad hoc, not veteran-specific entitlements.[26] The Roman Republic and Empire marked a significant advancement in veteran provisions, establishing one of the earliest systematic frameworks for rewarding long-term service to foster loyalty and settlement in frontier provinces. Legionaries, after 20–25 years of service, received honesta missio discharge with cash gratuities (praemia)—typically 3,000–5,000 denarii for auxiliaries and up to 13,000 for legionaries—supplemented by personal savings, campaign bonuses, and tax exemptions including citizenship for non-Romans.[27][28] Land grants in military colonies (coloniae) were common from the late Republic onward, with emperors like Augustus formalizing funding via the aerarium militare in 6 CE, a dedicated treasury financed by a 5% inheritance tax to ensure reliable payouts amid fiscal strains from conquests. These measures, totaling substantial sums equivalent to decades of wages, aimed to prevent unrest by integrating veterans as civilian stabilizers, though corruption and uneven distribution occasionally led to revolts, such as the 14 CE mutinies demanding secured benefits.[27] In pre-modern medieval Europe, veteran support devolved from Roman precedents into a patchwork of feudal obligations and ecclesiastical charity, lacking state-wide pensions and emphasizing personal patronage over institutional care. Knights, as noble vassals, held fiefs in exchange for military service under the feudal system emerging by the 9th century, but upon injury or retirement, they depended on estate revenues or lordly goodwill rather than guaranteed entitlements; disabled common soldiers often faced destitution, resorting to begging or banditry without formal disability aid.[29] Monastic hospitals and orders like the Knights Hospitaller provided sporadic wound care from the Crusades era (1095–1291 CE), but this targeted pilgrims and combatants alike, not exclusively post-service veterans, underscoring the era's decentralized, kin-based welfare absent centralized fiscal mechanisms.[30] This contrasts with Rome's model, as feudal ties prioritized ongoing allegiance over discharge rewards, contributing to social instability from unmoored ex-fighters.[29]Veterans in World Wars and Colonial Conflicts
The First World War mobilized approximately 70 million soldiers from around 40 countries, producing roughly 10 million military deaths and 20 million wounded or otherwise incapacitated.[31] [32] Returning veterans often contended with untreated shell shock, amputations, and respiratory ailments from gas and trench conditions, alongside widespread unemployment in the interwar economic turmoil. In the United States, initial support included a $60 discharge allowance, supplemented by the 1924 World War Adjusted Compensation Act granting deferred bonuses, yet the Great Depression prompted the 1932 Bonus Army march of over 40,000 veterans demanding immediate payment, met with federal eviction.[33] [34] European powers established dedicated ministries; Britain's Ministry of Pensions administered scaled disability payments, though inflation diminished their value and psychological injuries received minimal formal recognition until the 1922 report on neurasthenia.[35] Colonial contingents formed a substantial portion of mobilized forces, with Britain deploying over 1 million Indian troops and France sending about 440,000 Africans to European fronts, alongside millions in labor roles across empires.[36] [37] These veterans typically received inferior pensions and repatriation aid compared to metropolitan soldiers, reflecting racial and imperial distinctions that prioritized European lives; demobilization in African and Asian territories avoided metropolitan-style unrest due to enforced colonial hierarchies rather than equitable reintegration.[38] World War II escalated mobilization to over 100 million personnel, incurring 21-25 million military deaths amid industrialized warfare involving aerial bombing, mechanized fronts, and Pacific island campaigns.[39] In the United States, 16.4 million served, with the 1944 GI Bill providing tuition, home loans, and unemployment stipends to roughly 8 million, enabling unprecedented educational and economic advancement but excluding many women and minorities initially.[40] [41] [42] Allied nations varied in support; Britain's 1944 welfare reforms expanded pensions, while Soviet veterans endured minimal state aid amid Stalinist purges and reconstruction demands. Colonial forces again contributed disproportionately, such as 2.5 million Indians and 200,000 West Africans for Britain, yet post-war decolonization movements highlighted unfulfilled promises of equality, with many facing delayed or denied benefits. In standalone colonial conflicts like the Second Boer War (1899-1902), Britain mobilized 450,000 troops against Boer republics, suffering 22,000 deaths from combat and disease, with veterans reintegrated via standard imperial pensions but burdened by the war's domestic unpopularity and exposure to guerrilla tactics that foreshadowed future insurgencies. French veterans of the Algerian War (1954-1962) similarly grappled with inadequate psychological care for torture-related trauma and political marginalization, as associations lobbied for recognition into the late 20th century.[43] These experiences underscored causal disparities in veteran status acquisition and support, driven by national interests over universal entitlement.[44]Post-Cold War and Contemporary Conflicts
The Persian Gulf War of 1990–1991 represented the first major U.S. military engagement following the end of the Cold War, with approximately 700,000 American service members deployed to the region during Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm.[45] This conflict featured rapid coalition advances against Iraqi forces, resulting in 148 U.S. combat deaths and 145 non-combat deaths, a stark contrast to the scale of casualties in prior world wars.[46] Veterans from this era, often termed Gulf War I veterans, numbered around 800,000 eligible personnel, with subsequent health concerns like undiagnosed illnesses prompting specialized VA research and presumptive service connection rulings.[45] The September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks initiated the Global War on Terror, leading to prolonged U.S. interventions in Afghanistan from 2001 to 2021 and Iraq from 2003 onward, encompassing Operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, and subsequent missions.[47] Over 2.7 million U.S. service members were deployed to these theaters, with roughly 40% experiencing multiple deployments and more than 7,000 fatalities alongside 53,000 wounded in action.[48] [49] These wars marked the longest sustained U.S. military operations in history, shifting from conventional battles to counterinsurgency and asymmetric warfare against non-state actors, including extensive use of improvised explosive devices that produced distinct injury patterns compared to earlier conflicts.[50][51] Post-1991 veterans emerged from an all-volunteer force established after the Vietnam era, with increased integration of women—comprising about 17% of Gulf War-era veterans—and greater reliance on National Guard and Reserve components activated for federal service on multiple occasions.[52] [53] This professionalized structure, absent conscription, supported expeditionary operations across the Balkans, Somalia, and later against ISIS in Iraq and Syria, though veteran numbers from these smaller interventions remain proportionally limited.[52] By 2023, veterans from the broader Gulf War era (1990 onward, including post-9/11 conflicts) constituted 43% of the living U.S. veteran population, totaling about 7.8 million individuals, reflecting a younger, more diverse cohort amid an overall decline in the proportion of veterans relative to the general populace.[54] Official data on the U.S. veteran population, including projections from models such as VetPop, are provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics; these highlight key trends including an overall declining veteran population due to aging cohorts, an increasing proportion of female veterans, and growing racial/ethnic diversity.[55] These service members' experiences underscored adaptations in military doctrine toward precision strikes, special operations, and coalition partnerships, influencing post-service reintegration challenges distinct from those of drafted forces in 20th-century total wars.[51]Acquisition of Veteran Status
Service Requirements and Duration
In the United States, federal law defines a veteran as any person who served in the active military, naval, air, or space service and was discharged or released under conditions other than dishonorable, without specifying a minimum duration of service as a prerequisite for the status itself. However, eligibility for many Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits, such as healthcare and compensation, imposes minimum active-duty service requirements, particularly for those who entered service after September 7, 1980.[56] These typically mandate 24 months of continuous creditable active duty or the full period for which the individual was called or ordered to active duty, excluding non-creditable periods like basic training alone.[57] [58] Exceptions to the 24-month threshold include discharges for service-connected disability, hardship, early-out programs, or when the obligated service period was shorter than 24 months, such as for certain officer commissions or selective service activations.[58] For enlistees before September 8, 1980, no minimum service length is required for basic VA benefit eligibility, though wartime service often qualified with as little as 90 days of active duty including one day during a designated wartime period (e.g., World War II or Vietnam eras).[56] [59] Reserve and National Guard members generally acquire veteran status through federal active-duty periods outside of drill or training, such as deployments lasting at least 180 days on orders, or qualifying combat service.[60] Service requirements emphasize "active duty" over reserve or inactive status, with creditable time calculated by subtracting unauthorized absences, desertion, or non-duty periods from total enlistment.[58] State-level definitions may diverge, sometimes incorporating shorter thresholds for local honors or property tax exemptions, but federal criteria predominate for benefits. Internationally, veteran status acquisition hinges on national laws; in conscription-based systems like those in Israel (32 months for men) or South Korea (18-21 months), completion of the mandatory term typically suffices, whereas volunteer-based militaries like the United Kingdom's require honorable discharge from any active service duration without uniform minimums for recognition.[57][61]Discharge Classifications and Their Consequences
In the United States Armed Forces, military discharges are characterized based on the member's conduct and performance during service, as governed by Department of Defense Instruction 1332.14 and applicable service regulations. These characterizations fall into administrative separations or punitive discharges imposed by courts-martial, directly influencing eligibility for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits such as disability compensation, healthcare, education assistance via the GI Bill, and home loans.[62][63] Eligibility generally requires a discharge under "other than dishonorable conditions," but the VA conducts case-by-case reviews for borderline cases, excluding statutory bars like desertion in wartime or conscientious objection without prior approval.[13][64] Administrative discharges include:- Honorable Discharge: Awarded for satisfactory service meeting or exceeding standards, typically after completing the term of enlistment or for medical/early separation with good conduct. Recipients receive full VA benefits, including priority healthcare enrollment, 100% GI Bill eligibility (up to 36 months of education benefits), and VA home loan guarantees without funding fee waivers required.[62][65]
- General Discharge (Under Honorable Conditions): Issued for minor misconduct, unsatisfactory performance, or failure to meet standards, but without serious offenses warranting punitive action. While eligible for most VA benefits like disability compensation and healthcare, restrictions apply; for instance, Post-9/11 GI Bill eligibility requires at least 30 continuous days of service without a dishonorable discharge, and some state benefits may be limited.[66][67]
- Other Than Honorable (OTH) Discharge: The most severe administrative separation, often for patterns of misconduct such as drug abuse, security violations, or unauthorized absences exceeding 30 days. It presumptively bars VA benefits, though veterans can apply for a character of discharge determination; approval rates vary, with recent VA policy changes as of October 1, 2024, easing barriers for certain cases by considering post-service factors like trauma or error.[68][63]
| Discharge Type | Issuing Authority | Key Consequences for Benefits |
|---|---|---|
| Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) | Special Court-Martial | Bars most VA benefits, including GI Bill and disability pay; limited emergency healthcare only. Cannot upgrade via Discharge Review Board if awarded by general court-martial.[62][67] |
| Dishonorable Discharge | General Court-Martial | Complete ineligibility for VA benefits; equates to felony-level separation, forfeiting all federal veteran entitlements like pensions and burial honors.[63][64] |
Honorary or Non-Combat Veteran Designations
Non-combat veterans receive official recognition for military service performed in support capacities without direct engagement in hostilities, qualifying them for veteran status based on honorable active duty rather than combat exposure. In the United States, eligibility under 38 U.S.C. § 101(2) requires active military, naval, air, or space service followed by discharge or release under conditions other than dishonorable, encompassing roles such as medical personnel, engineers, logisticians, and administrative staff deployed to operational areas.[1][70] These individuals access core benefits like VA healthcare enrollment and burial honors, though certain preferences, such as priority group 1 for non-combat service, may differ from combat veterans.[71] In the United Kingdom and Australia, similar criteria apply, defining veterans as former armed forces members with honorable service, including non-combat positions like intelligence analysts or base support during conflicts; the UK's Armed Forces Covenant extends recognition without mandating combat, while Australia's Department of Veterans' Affairs bases eligibility on qualifying service periods in the Australian Defence Force, irrespective of combat involvement.[72] Non-combat service often constitutes the majority of military roles, with U.S. data indicating that only about 10-15% of personnel in recent conflicts like Iraq and Afghanistan experienced direct combat, yet all honorable discharges confer veteran designation.[73] Honorary veteran designations represent exceptional grants of status to individuals without standard active duty or combat service, typically reserved for long-term reserve contributions or extraordinary civilian support to the military. In the U.S., Congress conferred honorary veteran status on philanthropist Zachary Fisher in 1999 for his extensive support to armed forces families and facilities, allowing burial eligibility at Arlington National Cemetery despite no personal service.[74] Legislative efforts, such as the 2015-2016 proposals in H.R. 1384 and the National Defense Authorization Act, sought to extend honorary status to up to 200,000 National Guard and Reserve retirees with at least 20 years of service but insufficient active duty points for full retirement, recognizing their cumulative commitment without equating it to active-duty veteran privileges.[75][76] Such designations remain limited and do not universally confer benefits like pensions, emphasizing symbolic acknowledgment over substantive entitlements. Other nations rarely employ honorary categories, prioritizing empirical service records over exceptional civilian or reserve honors.Government-Provided Benefits and Support
Financial Pensions and Compensation
In the United States, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) administers two primary forms of financial support for veterans: disability compensation for service-connected injuries or illnesses, and a needs-based pension for wartime veterans with limited income. Disability compensation provides tax-free monthly payments based on a disability rating from 0% to 100%, assigned in 10% increments following a VA examination and evidence review; eligibility requires an honorable discharge and a condition incurred or aggravated during active duty.[12] For 2025, effective December 1, 2024, payments reflect a 2.5% cost-of-living adjustment (COLA); a single veteran rated at 10% receives $175.51 monthly, while 100% yields $3,831.30, with additional amounts for dependents such as spouses or children.[77][78] VA pension benefits, distinct from disability compensation, target wartime veterans aged 65 or older, or those permanently disabled from non-service-connected causes, with income and net worth below specified thresholds—$159,240 net worth limit for 2025, excluding primary residence and vehicle.[79] Unlike disability payments, pensions are means-tested and calculated after deducting countable income and medical expenses from the maximum annual rate, often resulting in lower monthly amounts; for instance, a single veteran with no dependents receives up to $1,413 monthly before offsets.[80] Veterans cannot receive both full disability compensation and pension simultaneously if the disability is service-connected, as compensation takes precedence due to its non-means-tested nature and higher typical payouts.[80] Military retirement pay, separate from VA benefits, is available to career service members with 20+ years of active duty or qualifying reserve service, paid by the Department of Defense at rates tied to rank and years served—e.g., 50% of base pay for 20 years, up to 100% for 40 years under high-three or blended systems. Concurrent receipt rules allow disabled retirees to receive both full retirement and VA compensation above 50% rating since 2014 expansions, though offsets apply for lower ratings via Combat-Related Special Compensation. Fraud in VA compensation claims, while present, involves isolated cases rather than systemic abuse; a 2022 Justice Department action recovered over $100 million from a fraudulent scheme, but veteran advocacy groups emphasize that rising claim approvals reflect expanded recognition of conditions like PTSD, not widespread gaming.[81] Overpayments, often due to unreported income changes, affected some veterans in 2025, leading to debts collected via benefit offsets or tax refund intercepts, though scams mimicking VA overpayment notices have separately targeted beneficiaries.[82] Internationally, systems vary: Australia's Department of Veterans' Affairs offers service pensions means-tested similarly to U.S. VA pensions, plus incapacity payments for disabilities; the UK's War Disablement Pension compensates service-related impairments at flat rates adjusted annually; Canada's Veterans Affairs provides disability awards as lump sums or annuities, with income-tested support for low-income veterans. These frameworks prioritize service connection for higher, non-means-tested aid, akin to U.S. models, though eligibility durations and payout scales differ by national service requirements.[83]| Disability Rating | Monthly Payment (Single Veteran, No Dependents, 2025) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $175.51 [78] |
| 50% | $1,102.04 [77] |
| 100% | $3,831.30 [84] |
Healthcare and Disability Services
The United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) operates the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), the largest integrated healthcare system in the country, serving approximately 9 million enrolled veterans through 1,380 facilities, including 170 medical centers and over 1,000 outpatient clinics.[85] VHA provides a comprehensive array of services, encompassing preventive care, inpatient and outpatient treatments, mental health support, specialty care such as oncology and cardiology, and long-term care options like nursing homes.[86] Eligibility for VA healthcare is prioritized based on service-connected disability ratings, with higher priority groups (e.g., those with 50% or greater disability) receiving care at no cost, while lower-priority veterans may face copayments scaled to income.[57] Empirical comparisons indicate that VHA care matches or exceeds non-VA care in clinical quality metrics, such as adherence to evidence-based guidelines for conditions like hypertension and diabetes, and in patient safety indicators, including lower rates of hospital-acquired infections.[87][88] Disability services under VA include tax-free monthly compensation payments tied to service-connected disability ratings, determined through medical evaluations and claims processing by the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA).[77] For fiscal year 2024, compensation rates—adjusted by a 3.2% cost-of-living increase effective December 1—ranged from $171.23 for a 10% rating (no dependents) to $3,831.30 for a 100% rating, with additional amounts for dependents and special monthly compensation for severe cases like loss of limbs.[89] VBA processed over 2.5 million disability claims in 2024, granting benefits to 1.1 million veterans and survivors, reflecting record-high approvals amid expanded presumptive conditions for exposures like burn pits under the PACT Act of 2022.[90][91] These benefits integrate with healthcare via priority access for rated disabilities, including prosthetics, rehabilitation, and adaptive equipment, though access audits reveal persistent challenges like appointment wait times exceeding 20 days in some regions, prompting increased community care referrals under the MISSION Act of 2018.[92][93] VA disability adjudication emphasizes causal links between service and impairments, requiring evidence of nexus, but systemic issues include fraud vulnerabilities, with investigations identifying cases of exaggerated claims in a program disbursing $193 billion annually, where average payments reached $25,046 per disabled veteran in 2024.[94] Peer-reviewed analyses affirm higher value in VHA delivery for cardiovascular and primary care outcomes compared to private sector equivalents, attributing this to integrated electronic health records and performance metrics, despite criticisms of bureaucratic delays.[95][96] Overall, these services aim to mitigate service-induced harms, with empirical data supporting efficacy in reducing mortality from treatable conditions among enrollees.[87]Education, Employment, and Housing Assistance
The United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) administers education benefits primarily through the GI Bill programs, which originated with the Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944 and have evolved to support postsecondary education and vocational training for eligible veterans.[97] The Post-9/11 GI Bill (Chapter 33), enacted in 2008, provides comprehensive coverage including up to 100% of in-state public tuition and fees, a monthly housing allowance based on the Department of Defense Basic Allowance for Housing, and up to $1,000 annually for books and supplies for veterans with at least 36 months of active duty service after September 10, 2001.[65] Eligibility requires an honorable discharge and specified service periods, with benefits transferable to dependents under certain conditions.[98] Empirical analyses indicate that the Post-9/11 GI Bill has boosted veteran college enrollment and degree attainment, with one study finding it increased graduate enrollment through financial incentives and led to higher long-term earnings compared to pre-2008 benefits.[99] Completion rates vary by institution type: approximately 41% of beneficiaries at four-year for-profit colleges earned degrees within six years, compared to higher rates at public and nonprofit institutions, particularly flagship public universities, after adjusting for veteran demographics.[100] These outcomes reflect causal links between benefit generosity and educational investment, though challenges persist in for-profit sectors where completion lags by up to 15 percentage points.[101] For employment assistance, the VA's Veteran Readiness and Employment (VR&E) program, also known as Chapter 31, targets veterans with service-connected disabilities by offering personalized evaluations, vocational counseling, job training, resume development, and workplace accommodations to facilitate suitable employment.[102] Launched under the Vocational Rehabilitation Act and expanded over decades, VR&E serves those with at least a 10% disability rating or employment handicaps, providing up to 48 months of support including self-employment tracks.[103] Complementary initiatives like the Transition Assistance Program (TAP), mandated by Congress in 2013, deliver pre-separation workshops on resume building, job searching, and civilian career mapping, often in partnership with the Department of Labor.[104] Veteran unemployment rates have trended below civilian averages, dropping to 2.8% in 2022 from 8.7% in 2010, with specialized military training correlating to higher civilian earnings and employment probabilities per 2025 Census data.[105][106] VR&E participants show improved outcomes, including sustained employment post-training, though longitudinal studies highlight disparities for those with mental health or substance use conditions, where program enrollment reduces but does not eliminate labor market barriers.[107] Federal hiring preferences, such as veterans' priority under 5 U.S.C. § 2108, further aid public sector entry, with evidence of positive impacts from targeted interventions on post-service economic reintegration.[108] Housing support includes VA-backed home loans, which guarantee financing for eligible veterans without down payments or private mortgage insurance, enabling purchases, refinances, or adaptations since the program's inception in 1944.[109] Over 90 million loans have been issued historically, with 2024 reforms under the VA Home Loan Program Reform Act enhancing flexibility to prevent default and homelessness.[110] For those at risk, the HUD-Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) program integrates rental vouchers with VA case management, while the Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) offers rapid re-housing and financial aid.[111] In fiscal year 2024, VA efforts permanently housed 47,925 veterans experiencing homelessness—exceeding goals by 16.9%—with 96% retention in housing, contributing to a national veteran homelessness count of 32,882, the lowest on record and a 7.5% decline from 2023.[112][113] These results stem from coordinated outreach, with 42,064 unsheltered veterans engaged, underscoring the efficacy of bundled services in addressing root causes like disability and economic instability over standalone aid.[114]Health Outcomes from Military Service
Physical Injuries and Long-Term Effects
Military service exposes personnel to physical injuries primarily through combat, training, and operational demands, with musculoskeletal injuries (MSKIs) comprising over 95% of cases due to mechanical energy transfer.[115] These injuries, including sprains, strains, and back or shoulder trauma from repetitive lifting and carrying, affect a substantial portion of veterans and often lead to chronic conditions.[116] Approximately one in ten living U.S. veterans sustained serious injuries during service, with three-quarters occurring in combat zones.[117] Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a prevalent combat-related injury, with over 185,000 U.S. veterans receiving VA care diagnosed with at least one instance, the majority classified as mild.[118] Between 2000 and 2019, nearly 414,000 service members worldwide sustained TBI, contributing to long-term risks such as accelerated brain aging and elevated stroke incidence among post-9/11 veterans.[119] Probable TBI history occurs in about 24.5% of surveyed U.S. veterans, independently associating with adverse physical outcomes.[120] Amputations, frequently resulting from explosive devices, affected over 1,300 U.S. service members with full or partial limb loss from 2001 to 2010 in Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts.[121] Around 7.4% of major limb injuries in these wars led to amputation, comparable to historical conflict rates but heightened by improvised explosive devices.[122] Sensory impairments, including tinnitus and hearing loss from blasts and noise exposure, further compound injury burdens.[116] Long-term effects manifest as chronic musculoskeletal pain (MSP), arthritis, and disability, with veterans experiencing higher prevalence and duration of limitations than civilians.[123] MSKIs drive chronic disability in service members transitioning to veteran status, often persisting with psychological comorbidities that amplify physical decline.[124] Compulsory military service correlates with enduring negative physical health impacts, including reduced overall fitness and increased chronic illness risk.[125] Deployment-related exposures and injuries elevate lifetime cardiovascular and respiratory vulnerabilities, underscoring causal links from service-induced trauma.[126]Mental Health Conditions Including PTSD
Veterans experience elevated rates of certain mental health conditions attributable to the stresses of military service, particularly combat exposure, deployment-related trauma, and physical injuries such as traumatic brain injury (TBI). Empirical data from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) indicate that post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety disorders, and substance use disorders (SUD) are among the most prevalent, often co-occurring and persisting long-term. These conditions arise causally from factors like direct combat involvement, witnessing casualties, and blast-induced neurological changes, rather than generalized "service" alone, with prevalence varying by conflict era and individual exposure levels.[127][128][129] PTSD, characterized by intrusive memories, avoidance behaviors, hyperarousal, and negative alterations in cognition and mood following exposure to actual or threatened death, serious injury, or sexual violence, affects a significant minority of veterans. In fiscal year 2024, among 5.8 million VA-served veterans, 14% of men and 24% of women received a PTSD diagnosis, with lifetime prevalence estimated at 7-8% overall but reaching 23% among VA users. For Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom (OIF/OEF) veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan, rates range from 11-20%, driven by high combat intensity including improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and urban warfare, compared to lower figures in earlier eras like Vietnam where 11% of combat veterans still report intrusive symptoms decades later. Risk escalates with specific exposures such as firing weapons in combat (odds ratio up to 2.5) or witnessing injuries/deaths, and is compounded by mild TBI from blasts, which shares overlapping symptoms like irritability and concentration deficits but distinct neurological underpinnings.[130][131][132] Depression and anxiety disorders frequently comorbid with PTSD, with VA data showing 17-26% of veterans diagnosed with depression and anxiety rates around 10%, higher in younger OIF/OEF cohorts (e.g., 21% depression in VA service users). These conditions correlate with combat severity, where Iraq/Afghanistan veterans report the greatest trauma burden and adverse outcomes relative to Vietnam or Gulf War eras, including elevated anger and mood dysregulation. Substance use disorders, particularly alcohol (14% prevalence) and cannabis, serve as maladaptive coping mechanisms, affecting 14% of U.S. veterans per 2023 surveys, with those having SUD facing 3-4 times higher depression odds; nearly three-quarters of veterans with SUD struggle with alcohol specifically.[133][134][135] Long-term empirical tracking reveals persistence without intervention, as Vietnam veterans demonstrate with ongoing PTSD-depression comorbidity, while recent conflicts show rising diagnoses (e.g., PTSD rates in OIF/OEF veterans increased 4-7 times over two years post-deployment). Factors like younger age at service (<25 years) and active-duty status amplify risks across disorders, underscoring the need for exposure-specific assessments over broad screenings.[136][137][138]Suicide Rates, Risk Factors, and Empirical Data
Veterans in the United States exhibit suicide rates approximately 1.5 to 1.7 times higher than those of non-veteran adults, based on age- and sex-adjusted comparisons from national data. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) reported 6,392 veteran suicides in 2021, with an age-adjusted rate of about 32 per 100,000 for veterans versus 20 per 100,000 for the general population, reflecting a persistent disparity driven by service-related stressors rather than broader societal trends alone. This elevated risk persists across eras of service but has shown notable increases among post-9/11 veterans, with rates rising 95% for those aged 18-34 from 2001 to 2020, even as civilian rates in comparable demographics stabilized or declined modestly. Female veterans face a relatively higher multiplier, with rates 2.1 times those of non-veteran women, underscoring sex-specific vulnerabilities not fully explained by demographic factors.[139][140][141] Empirical analyses confirm that veteran suicides disproportionately involve firearms, accounting for over 70% of cases in recent VA data, compared to about 50% in the civilian population, a causal link tied to military training in weapon handling and post-service ownership patterns. Rural residency amplifies risk, with veterans in non-metropolitan areas showing rates up to twice the urban veteran average, attributable to limited mental health access and isolation rather than confounding variables like poverty alone. Older veterans (aged 55+) comprise the largest absolute number of suicides, yet younger cohorts (18-34) display the steepest per capita increases, correlating with recent deployments and transitions out of service. VA data from 2017-2020 indicate veteran rates 1.57 to 1.66 times civilian rates, with no convergence despite expanded prevention efforts, suggesting structural barriers in reintegration over mere prevalence of mental disorders.[139][142] Key risk factors include recent military separation, which elevates vulnerability in the first year post-discharge due to loss of structure, camaraderie, and purpose, with most attempts occurring after leaving service. Combat exposure shows mixed associations; while direct deployment correlates weakly with ideation, it intensifies risk when comorbid with PTSD or traumatic brain injury (TBI), as evidenced by longitudinal studies of post-9/11 cohorts. Preexisting mental health conditions like depression or anxiety, often exacerbated by service, predict chronic risk, alongside acute triggers such as anger dysregulation and suicidal planning. Military sexual trauma (MST) independently doubles odds among affected subgroups, particularly women, independent of combat history. Protective factors, including social contribution and religiosity, mitigate ideation, but empirical models emphasize firearm access and substance use as proximal enablers, with overdoses comprising 5% of veteran suicides in 2021.[143][144][145]| Demographic Group | Suicide Rate per 100,000 (Veterans) | Comparison to Non-Veterans | Source Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Veterans | ~32 | 1.5-1.7 times higher | 2021 |
| Female Veterans | ~2.1 times civilian female rate | Elevated relative risk | 2020-2021 |
| Post-9/11 (18-34) | Increased 95% (2001-2020) | Diverging from civilians | 2001-2020 |
| Rural Veterans | Up to 2x urban veteran rate | Access-related disparity | 2021 |