Hubbry Logo
First Barons' WarFirst Barons' WarMain
Open search
First Barons' War
Community hub
First Barons' War
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
First Barons' War
First Barons' War
First Barons' War
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

First Barons' War
Part of the First Hundred Years' War

King John of England (left) in battle with the troops of Louis of France (right)
Date1215–1217
Location
England
Result

Victory of the English monarchy

Belligerents
Kingdom of England
Commanders and leaders

The First Barons' War (1215–1217) was a civil war in the Kingdom of England in which a group of rebellious major landowners (commonly referred to as barons) led by Robert Fitzwalter waged war against King John. The conflict resulted from King John's disastrous wars against King Philip II of France which led to the collapse of the Angevin Empire, and John's subsequent refusal to accept and abide by Magna Carta, which John had sealed on 15 June 1215.

The rebellious barons, faced with an uncompromising king, turned to King Philip's son Louis, who in 1216 sailed to England with an army despite his father's and the pope's disapprovals. Louis captured Winchester and soon controlled over half of the English kingdom.[1] He was proclaimed "King of England" in London by the barons, although he was never actually crowned.

Louis's ambitions of ruling England faced a major setback in October 1216, when John's death led to the rebellious barons deserting Louis in favour of John's nine-year-old son Henry III, and the war dragged on. Louis's army was finally beaten at the Battle of Lincoln on 20 May 1217. After a fleet assembled by his wife Blanche of Castile attempted to bring him French reinforcements but was defeated off the coast of England on 24 August 1217, he was forced to make peace on English terms. He signed the Treaty of Lambeth and surrendered the few remaining castles that he held. The treaty had the effect of Louis agreeing he had never been the legitimate king of England. That formalised the end of the civil war and the departure of the French from England.[2]

Background

[edit]

On 15 June 1215 King John was forced to put his seal to "The Articles of the Barons" by a group of powerful barons who were no longer willing to tolerate John's failed leadership and despotic rule. In exchange, the barons renewed their fealty to John on 19 July. A formal document to record the agreement was drafted by the royal chancery on 15 July; this was the original Magna Carta. "The law of the land" is one of the great watchwords of Magna Carta by standing in opposition to the king's mere will.

Magna Carta holds clauses that theoretically noticeably reduce the authority of the king, such as Clause 61, the "security clause", which allows a group of 25 barons to override the king at any time by means of force,[3][4] a medieval legal process known as distraint that was normal in feudal relationships, albeit had never been applied to a king. After numerous months of half-hearted attempts to reach a settlement in the summer of 1215, open conflict was unleashed amongst the rebel barons' alliance and the loyalist factions of the Kingdom of England.

Course of events

[edit]

French intervention

[edit]

The war began over Magna Carta but quickly turned into a dynastic war for the throne of England. The rebel barons, faced with a powerful king, turned to Louis, the son and heir apparent of King Philip II of France and the grandson-in-law of King Henry II of England. The Norman Conquest had occurred 149 years before, and the relationship between England and France was not as simply adversarial as it later became. The contemporary document the Annals of Waverley saw no contradiction in stating that Louis was invited to invade to "prevent the realm being pillaged by aliens."

In November 1215 Louis sent the barons a contingent of knights to protect London. However, even at that stage he also agreed to an open invasion, despite the discouragement from his father and from Pope Innocent III. That came in May 1216, when watchmen on the coast of Thanet detected sails on the horizon, and on the next day John and his armies saw Louis's troops disembark on the coast of Kent.

John decided to escape to Winchester, and so Louis had little resistance on his march to London. He entered London, also with little resistance, and was openly received by the rebel barons and citizens of London and was proclaimed (though not crowned) king at St Paul's Cathedral. Many nobles gathered to give homage to him, including Alexander II of Scotland, who held fiefs in England. Many of John's supporters, sensing a tide of change, moved to support the barons. Gerald of Wales remarked: "The madness of slavery is over, the time of liberty has been granted, English necks are free from the yoke."

Pursuing John, Louis led his army south from London on 6 June, arriving the following day in Reigate where he found the castle abandoned. He moved onwards to Guildford Castle on 8 June, which surrendered immediately. Farnham Castle initially closed its gates but surrendered as the French started to lay siege. He met resistance only when he reached Winchester Castle on 14 June, but it fell after a ten-day siege. Louis's campaign continued, and by July about a third of England had fallen under his control.[5]

First siege of Dover

[edit]

In the meantime, Philip taunted Louis for trying to conquer England without first seizing its key port at Dover. The royal castles at Canterbury and Rochester, their towns, and indeed, most of Kent had already fallen to Louis. However, when he moved on to Dover Castle on 25 July, it was prepared. Its constable, Hubert de Burgh, had a well-supplied garrison of men.[6]

The first siege began on 19 July, with Louis taking the high ground to the north of the castle. His men successfully undermined the barbican and attempted to topple the castle gate, but de Burgh's men managed to repel the invaders, blocking the breach in the walls with giant timbers. (After the siege the weak northern gate was blocked and tunnels were built in that area, to St John's Tower, and the new Constable's Gate and Fitzwilliam's Gate.)

In the meantime, Louis's occupation of Kent was being undermined by a guerrilla force of Wealden archers raised and led by William of Cassingham. After three months spent besieging the castle and a large part of his forces being diverted by the siege, Louis called a truce on 14 October and returned to London.

Sieges of Windsor and Rochester

[edit]

Apart from Dover, the only castle to hold out against Louis was Windsor Castle, where 60 loyalist knights survived a two-month siege, despite severe damage to the structure of its lower ward. That was immediately repaired in 1216 by Henry III, who further strengthened the defences with the construction of the western curtain wall, much of which survives today. The damage was caused possibly by the castle having been besieged by the barons in 1189, less than 30 years earlier.

In 1206 John had spent £115[a] on repairs to Rochester Castle, and he had even pre-emptively held it during the year of the negotiations leading up to Magna Carta, but the charter's terms had forced him to hand it back into the custody of Stephen Langton, Archbishop of Canterbury, in May 1215. The rebel barons had then sent troops under William d'Aubigny to the castle, to whom its constable Reginald de Cornhill opened the castle's gates. Thus, during October 1215 on his marching from Dover to London, John found Rochester in his way and on 11 October began besieging it in person.

The round tower (centre) and two square towers (left and right) of Rochester Castle.

The rebels were expecting reinforcements from London, but John sent fire ships out to burn the bridge over the Medway to stall the advance. Robert Fitzwalter rode out to stop the king and fought his way onto the bridge but was eventually beaten back into the castle. John also sacked Rochester Cathedral, took anything of value and stabled his horses in it, all as a slight to Langton. Orders were then sent to the men of Canterbury.

Five siege engines were erected, and work was carried out to undermine the curtain wall. John's forces entered and held the bailey in early November and began attempting the same tactics against the keep, including undermining the south-eastern tower. The mine-roof was supported by wooden props, which were then set alight using pig fat. On 25 November John had sent a writ to the justiciars saying, "Send to us with all speed by day and night, forty of the fattest pigs of the sort least good for eating so that we may bring fire beneath the castle".[7] The fire caused one entire corner of the keep to collapse. The rebels withdrew behind the keep's cross-wall but still managed to hold out. A few were allowed to leave the castle but on John's orders had their hands and feet lopped off as an example.

The castle was taken on 30 November 1215 by starvation and not by force. John set up a memorial to the pigs and a gallows with the intention of hanging the whole garrison, but one of his captains, Savari de Mauléon, persuaded him not to hang the rebels since hanging those who had surrendered would set a precedent if John ever surrendered; only one man was hanged (a young bowman who had previously been in John's service). The remainder of the rebel barons were taken away and imprisoned at various royal-held castles, such as Corfe Castle. Of the siege, the Barnwell Chronicle states "No one alive can remember a siege so fiercely pressed and so manfully resisted" and "There were few who would put their trust in castles".

Death of King John

[edit]

In October 1216 John contracted dysentery, and he died at Newark Castle, Nottinghamshire,[8][9] and with him the main reason for the fighting. Louis now seemed much more of a threat to baronial interests than John's nine-year-old son, Henry. Pierre des Roches, Bishop of Winchester, and a number of barons rushed to have the young Henry crowned as King of England. London was held by Louis (it was his seat of government) and therefore could not be used for this coronation so, on 28 October they brought the boy from Devizes Castle to Gloucester Abbey in front of a small attendance presided over by Papal Legate Guala Bicchieri. They crowned Henry with a necklace of gold.

On 12 November Magna Carta was reissued in Henry's name with some of the clauses omitted, including clause 61. The revised charter was sealed by Henry's regent William Marshal. A great deal of the country was loyal to Louis, with the southwest of England and the Midlands favouring Henry. Marshal was highly respected, and he asked the barons not to blame Henry for his father's sins. The prevailing sentiment, helped by self-interest, disliked the idea of depriving a boy of his inheritance. Marshal also promised that he and the other regents would rule by Magna Carta. Furthermore, he managed to get support from the pope, who had already excommunicated Louis.

Louis's defeats

[edit]
Map of the war right before the second Battle of Lincoln, May 1217

William Marshal slowly managed to get most barons to switch sides from Louis to Henry and attack Louis. The two opposing sides fought for about a year. On 6 December 1216 Louis took Hertford Castle but allowed the defending knights to leave with their horses and weapons. He then took Berkhamsted Castle in late December, which again allowed the royal garrison to withdraw honourably with their horses and weapons.

By early 1217, Louis decided to return to France for reinforcements. He had to fight his way to the south coast through loyalist resistance in Kent and Sussex, losing part of his force in an ambush at Lewes, with the remainder pursued to Winchelsea and were saved from starvation only by the arrival of a French fleet.

The Second Battle of Lincoln in 1217.

Since the truce had been arranged with Dover, the Dover garrison had repeatedly disrupted Louis's communication with France, and so Louis sailed back to Dover to begin a second siege. The French camp, set up outside Dover Castle in anticipation of the siege, was attacked and burned by William of Cassingham and Oliver fitz Regis just as the fleet carrying the reinforcements arrived. Louis was forced to land at Sandwich and march to Dover, where he began his siege in earnest on 12 May 1217. The siege diverted so much of Louis's forces that Marshal and Falkes de Breauté were able to attack and heavily defeat pro-Louis barons at Lincoln Castle on 20 May, in what became known as the Second Battle of Lincoln.

Marshal prepared for a siege against London next. In the meantime, Louis suffered heavy defeats in the naval Battle of Sandwich at the hands of William's ally and Dover's constable Hubert de Burgh. Louis's reinforcement convoy under Eustace the Monk was destroyed, making it nearly impossible for Louis to continue fighting.

Aftermath

[edit]

After a year and a half of war, most of the rebellious barons had defected.[10] That and the defeat of the French in 1217 forced Louis to negotiate. A few of Henry's supporters held out for unconditional surrender, but William Marshal successfully argued for the more moderate terms.

At the Treaty of Lambeth, which was signed on 11 September 1217, Louis had to give up his claim to be the King of England and agree that he had never been the legitimate king. The principal provisions of the treaties were an amnesty for English rebels, but the barons who had joined Louis had to pay the French prince 10,000 marks to expedite his withdrawal. Louis surrendered the few remaining castles that he had held and exhorted to his allies—Scottish and Welsh troops under Alexander II and Llywelyn the Great respectively—to lay down their arms. Louis also agreed to not attack England again.[11]

Museums

[edit]
  • Dover Castle, which saw vast sieges in 1216 and 1217, has an exhibition in the Napoleonic casemates at the castle's north, roughly the site of the section of wall that was breached in the 1216 siege.[12]
  • Rochester City Museum contains a model of the castle keep under siege.

Things to also see

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ Harding 1993, p. 10.
  2. ^ Arlidge & Judge 2014, p. 19.
  3. ^ Turner 2009, p. 189.
  4. ^ Danziger & Gillingham 2004, pp. 261–262.
  5. ^ Morgan, Gavin (10 June 2016). "When Guildford Castle Fell to the Invading French 800 Years Ago This Week". The Guildford Dragon. Retrieved 16 July 2019.
  6. ^ Hanley 2017, p. 109.
  7. ^ Contemporary source quoted in Salter (2000).
  8. ^ Fryde et al. 1986, p. 37.
  9. ^ Warren 1991, pp. 254–255.
  10. ^ "Kingston, treaty of" A Dictionary of British History. Ed. John Cannon. Oxford University Press, 2009
  11. ^ Tout 2018, p. 16.
  12. ^ "New: Dover Castle Under Siege". Dover Castle. English Heritage. Retrieved 13 October 2025.

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

First Barons' War

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The First Barons' War (1215–1217) was a civil war in the Kingdom of England pitting rebellious barons against King John, triggered by his repudiation of the Magna Carta charter that sought to curb his arbitrary rule, fiscal exactions, and military failures. The barons, having armed themselves and captured key castles like Rochester, invited Prince Louis of France to invade and claim the throne, exploiting John's excommunication and losses in Normandy and Anjou to the Capetian kings. John's sudden death from dysentery in October 1216 transformed the conflict into a struggle over his nine-year-old son Henry III's minority government, with papal loyalists and moderates rallying under regent William Marshal, Earl of Pembroke. Key events included Louis's landing in Kent, the siege of Dover Castle by French forces, and naval clashes that disrupted rebel supply lines, culminating in the decisive royalist victory at the Second Battle of Lincoln in May 1217, where Marshal's forces routed the Franco-baronial army. The war ended with the Treaty of Lambeth in September 1217, by which Louis withdrew in exchange for concessions, allowing Henry III's reissue of a modified Magna Carta that entrenched baronial influence and foreshadowed parliamentary developments, though the rebels' bid for dynastic overthrow ultimately failed due to fractured alliances and Marshal's strategic acumen.

Prelude to Conflict

King John's Foreign Policy Failures

Upon his accession to the throne on 6 April 1199 following the death of his brother Richard I, King John inherited the , encompassing , , Anjou, Maine, Touraine, Poitou, and much of Aquitaine, alongside lordships in Ireland and Wales. These continental holdings, which generated significant revenue—Normandy alone contributing substantially more than to royal coffers—were immediately threatened by , who exploited John's disputes with vassals like Arthur of Brittany and logistical failures in defense. By 1204, Philip's systematic campaigns had culminated in the conquest of , with key fortresses like falling after prolonged sieges, as John prioritized domestic issues and failed to mount an effective counteroffensive from . Determined to reclaim lost territories, John pursued a reconquest strategy from 1202 onward, allying with figures like Emperor Otto IV and levying resources for expeditions into and Anjou. This effort peaked in the 1214 campaign, where John's forces advanced into western while his allies engaged Philip in the north; however, the decisive on 27 July 1214 saw Philip's army rout the Anglo-Imperial coalition, capturing key leaders and shattering the offensive. The defeat not only confirmed the permanent loss of Anjou and other remaining Angevin lands in northern but also exposed the fragility of John's diplomatic coalitions, as former allies like Renaud of Boulogne submitted to Philip, leaving England isolated on the continent. These military reversals imposed acute financial pressures, as the crown's traditional revenues from French duchies evaporated, forcing reliance on English taxation to sustain ongoing conflicts and forces. John imposed multiple scutages—commutations of for cash—reaching three marks per knight's fee in 1214 alone, alongside tallages on boroughs and Jewish lenders, and a carucage (plough-tax) yielding over £20,000 in 1210. expansions, covering up to a quarter of by 1215, generated fines for encroachments that barons viewed as punitive rather than restorative, with total war-related exactions from 1207–1214 exceeding £100,000 annually at times, far outstripping predecessors like Henry II. While justified by the crown as necessary for recovery efforts, these demands—unaccompanied by territorial gains—fostered perceptions of fiscal overreach, undermining baronial confidence in John's capacity to protect feudal interests abroad.

Domestic Grievances and Baronial Discontent

King John's administration frequently violated established feudal customs through exorbitant financial demands on the , including inflated payments for rights that often exceeded traditional limits by factors of ten or more; for example, John de Lacy faced a of 7,000 for his earldom, compared to the customary relief of £100 for a whole barony (with 100 shillings applying to a knight's fee), as established in Magna Carta Clause 2. Similarly, wardships were exploited by assigning minors' lands to royal favorites or mismanaging estates to extract additional revenues, while arbitrary amercements from eyres and judicial proceedings served as pretexts for disinheritance and heavy fines, eroding the reciprocal obligations inherent in feudal tenure where lords provided in exchange for defined services. These practices, levied without consistent regard for , fostered resentment among barons who viewed them as breaches of the mutual trust underpinning the feudal pyramid, prompting complaints that John's fiscal innovations prioritized personal enrichment over customary reciprocity. The suspected murder of Arthur of Brittany, John's nephew and rival claimant to the Angevin inheritance, further alienated key nobles; Arthur, captured in 1202 and imprisoned at Falaise, vanished in April 1203 amid rumors—contemporary chronicles attribute his death to blinding and subsequent demise ordered by John himself—which led to defections such as that of William des Roches, seneschal of Anjou, and eroded loyalty among Anglo-Norman elites wary of John's ruthlessness toward potential threats. Instances of arbitrary imprisonment compounded this, as John detained barons like Eustace de Vescy on flimsy pretexts of treason, confiscating lands without trial and using hostages—including those from Welsh and Scottish allies—for extortion, mutilating some (such as blinding and castration) to enforce compliance, actions that violated feudal norms against such cruelties and signaled a tyrannical disregard for noble privileges. John's protracted conflict with the papacy intensified baronial discontent by undermining royal legitimacy and disrupting societal order; refusing to accept Innocent III's appointee as in 1207, John faced an on 24 March 1208 suspending sacraments across , followed by his personal on 29 November 1209, which absolved subjects from oaths of and portrayed John as spiritually illegitimate. During the interdict, John seized ecclesiastical revenues and properties, leasing bishoprics to loyalists and imposing tallages on church lands, which not only strained finances but also alienated pious barons who suffered spiritual deprivation—baptisms, burials, and masses halted—while perceiving John's defiance as causal that invited divine disfavor and weakened the crown's to demand feudal dues. By 1212, this ecclesiastical crisis merged with fiscal grievances, culminating in a documented baronial conspiracy to assassinate or abandon John during a Welsh campaign, highlighting how his overreach eroded the reciprocal legitimacy feudal lords expected from their .

Negotiation and Repudiation of Magna Carta

The rebel barons, having renounced homage to King John in May 1215 and captured in the same month, compelled the king to negotiate terms for reconciliation. These talks, which began at meadow near Windsor on 10 June 1215, culminated there on 15 June 1215, when John affixed his great seal to , a comprising 63 clauses primarily safeguarding feudal privileges of the baronial class rather than establishing universal rights. Key provisions limited royal taxation by capping inheritance reliefs at conventional feudal rates (clause 2), prohibiting and aid levies without common counsel except in specified cases (clause 12), and mandating for freemen against arbitrary imprisonment or dispossession without lawful judgment by peers or country law (clauses 39 and 40). Clause 1 ensured the English church's freedom from secular interference, including free election of bishops, reflecting baronial leverage amid the ongoing papal . These concessions addressed specific grievances over John's fiscal exactions and judicial abuses but were tailored to magnate interests, entrenching their tenure rights and curbing royal discretion in feudal matters without extending protections to the broader populace of villeins or merchants. John, viewing the charter as extracted under duress and incompatible with his authority, promptly dispatched envoys to seeking absolution from its oaths. On 24 August 1215, Innocent issued the bull Dudum Pontificatus, annulling as a "shameful and demeaning" surrender that violated the feudal order, infringed John's divine-right prerogatives, and compelled him to swear unlawful oaths. The pope's rationale rested on John's prior submission as a papal in 1213, which had lifted England's and secured Innocent's allegiance against domestic rebels, framing the barons' actions as tyrannical overreach rather than legitimate reform. This papal endorsement enabled John to repudiate the charter publicly by September 1215, excommunicating leading barons and rallying ecclesiastical support to isolate the rebels diplomatically. The swift repudiation exposed the baronial coalition's underlying fragility, as Magna Carta's feudal focus failed to garner wider allegiance from clergy, minor tenants, or foreign powers, who perceived it as a partisan bargain rather than a principled constitutional limit. John's strategic of papal authority exploited the barons' miscalculation of international dynamics, where Innocent prioritized monarchical stability and crusading interests over lay challenges to , thereby fracturing rebel unity before open warfare ensued.

Outbreak and Escalation

Baronial Rebellion in

In early May 1215, following the failure of negotiations over grievances outlined in the "Articles of the Barons," a coalition of northern and eastern magnates formally renounced their homage to King John at , , marking the onset of open rebellion in southern and eastern . , lord of Little Dunmow in , was elected as their commander, adopting the title marshal of the Army of God and the Holy Church to frame the uprising as a defense of ecclesiastical and baronial rights against royal overreach. This force, comprising approximately 600-2,000 knights drawn primarily from feudal obligations among discontented tenants-in-chief, coalesced rapidly due to shared fiscal burdens from John's Angevin campaigns and exactions like scutage and forest fines. The rebels achieved swift territorial gains by securing strategic eastern strongholds, including in , which changed hands amid local defections from royal custodians weakened by John's absentee governance and mercenary dependencies. Similar opportunism allowed control over other minor fortifications in and the , exploiting divisions in the royal shrieval administration where many officials held divided loyalties or insufficient garrisons. The uprising's momentum drew in midland barons like William de Mowbray but elicited scant support from the broader populace, including knights, clergy below episcopal ranks, or urban communes, as the insurgents prioritized feudal restoration over wider reforms. King John's response underscored the crown's tactical vulnerabilities: with treasury depleted from the 1214 Bouvines debacle and reliant on foreign mercenaries whose payment lagged, he dispersed his field forces to avoid decisive engagement, withdrawing southward while authorizing localized reprisals. This evasion, lasting through late spring, permitted baronial consolidation in the southeast but revealed the rebellion's fragility, as John's naval assets and papal alliance remained untapped assets for counteroffensives.

Seizure of London and Appeal to Foreign Powers

On 17 May 1215, rebel barons under seized control of London in a bloodless coup, entering primarily through open gates such as with around 500 knights while most citizens attended church services. The operation succeeded due to collusion from wealthier Londoners, including merchants aggrieved by King John's heavy taxation and arbitrary impositions, who provided tacit support without widespread armed resistance, though the held out under royal control. This occupation of England's economic hub furnished the barons with a vital financial and logistical base, enabling them to sustain their defiance amid John's preparations for counteroffensives from Windsor. The city's resources, derived from and tolls, contrasted with the barons' limited rural holdings, underscoring their strategic reliance on urban sympathy rooted in shared fiscal burdens rather than ideological alignment. Facing John's papal-backed excommunication of the barons and mobilization of mercenaries in late , the rebels sought external military validation by inviting Prince Louis of to claim the English throne. Louis, son of King Philip II, held a dynastic claim through his wife , granddaughter of Henry II and thus niece to John via Eleanor's lineage, which the barons invoked to legitimize their offer despite the Capetian house's longstanding rivalry with the Plantagenets over continental territories. This appeal, formalized by autumn , reflected the barons' self-interested calculus: unable to prevail domestically without superior forces, they prioritized ousting John to safeguard feudal privileges and estates over preserving national sovereignty, enlisting French aid that promised reinforcement but risked subjugation to a foreign . In November , Louis dispatched knights to bolster London's defenses, signaling initial French commitment driven by expansionist ambitions rather than endorsement of baronial grievances. The barons' maneuver exposed the rebellion's fragility, as their invitation bypassed John's nine-year-old son Henry in favor of a continental claimant, prioritizing immediate tactical advantage amid John's alien mercenaries over hereditary continuity—a choice indicative of feudal maneuvering for leverage against royal authority rather than a coherent defense of constitutional principles. Contemporary chroniclers noted the barons' desperation, with the appeal serving to deter John's sieges by threatening invasion, yet it alienated potential English allies wary of French overlordship and highlighted causal dependence on dynastic opportunism over indigenous resolution. This external pivot, while providing short-term respite, entrenched the conflict's trajectory toward foreign intervention, as the barons traded autonomy for promised succor from a power historically antagonistic to English independence.

Course of the War

Early Royalist Setbacks and Sieges

Following the repudiation of Magna Carta and the outbreak of open rebellion, King John launched counteroffensives in late 1215 to reclaim rebel strongholds, beginning with Rochester Castle, a strategic point blocking access to London. Rebel forces under commanders including William d'Aubigny had garrisoned the castle with approximately 100 knights, serjeants, and crossbowmen prior to John's approach. John arrived on 13 October 1215 with a royal army bolstered by mercenaries recruited from the southeast, initiating a siege that highlighted both baronial defensive resilience and royal determination. The royal forces deployed five major engines for bombardment, breaching the outer defenses and forcing defenders into the great keep. To overcome the keep, John's engineers mined beneath the southeastern corner turret, propping the tunnel with timber before igniting it using fat rendered from 40 pigs, which caused the structure to partially collapse. Despite these innovations, the garrison held out for about seven weeks until compelled surrender around late 1215, marking a royal victory but at the cost of significant time and resources that delayed broader advances. John financed the campaign through emergency feudal levies, exemptions, and papal-backed revenues, enabling sustained mercenary employment amid fiscal strains from prior wars. The prolonged Rochester engagement represented an early royalist setback in momentum, as barons exploited the diversion to launch retaliatory sieges against loyalist positions, including in November 1215. At Windsor, rebel forces besieged the royal garrison, which endured the assault, but the action tied down defenders and inflicted mutual attrition through skirmishes and supply disruptions. Similar pressures at sites like Reading Castle, which fell briefly to rebels, underscored empirical losses on both sides, with documented casualties from and close assaults exacerbating resource depletion. John's subsequent maneuvers incorporated punitive tactics against rebel territories, including targeted devastation of estates in eastern to deny provisions and compel submissions. These scorched-earth measures, involving the destruction of mills, crops, and villages, causally contributed to localized desertions and growing among peripheral supporters, though they failed to fracture core baronial cohesion immediately. Royal resilience persisted through tactical adaptability, yet the interconnected sieges strained , foreshadowing the war's protracted nature without decisive early resolution.

French Military Intervention

In May 1216, Prince Louis of France, responding to an invitation from English barons opposed to King John, launched an invasion to claim the English throne. His fleet arrived at the Isle of Thanet on 21 May, carrying a substantial army aboard approximately 700 vessels. The landing encountered minimal resistance, as King John's forces withdrew, allowing Louis to advance unopposed initially. Louis's forces swiftly secured key locations in southeastern . London, a major rebel stronghold, welcomed him on 2 June, where he was proclaimed king by the barons, establishing it as his headquarters. surrendered on 14 June after brief resistance, further consolidating French control over strategic points. Naval support from figures like facilitated the crossing and protected coastal advances, integrating baronial ships under French command. The intervention's opportunistic character stemmed from Louis's personal ambitions amid John's dynastic vulnerabilities, rather than altruistic aid to baronial grievances. Barons subordinated their to foreign leadership, pledging to Louis and providing troops, which diluted claims of defending English autonomy against royal overreach. This reliance on continental forces enabled rapid territorial gains in the southeast but highlighted internal divisions, as not all rebels fully committed, foreshadowing loyalty fractures.

Death of John and Shift in Leadership

King John succumbed to dysentery on 19 October 1216 at , during a retreat from Lincoln amid ongoing royalist setbacks against French and rebel forces. His death, at age 48 or 49, removed the central figure whose tyrannical reputation had fueled much of the baronial rebellion, though it did not immediately halt the conflict. John's nine-year-old son, Henry, was proclaimed king on the same day at Devizes Castle, , and crowned nine days later on 28 October 1216 at using a circlet from his mother, , as the regalia in remained under rebel control. The coronation was overseen by the papal legate Guala Bicchieri, who endorsed Henry's legitimacy and shifted ecclesiastical support toward the royalists by excommunicating Prince Louis of France and the rebel barons. , 1st , a veteran noble renowned for loyalty across four reigns, assumed effective regency, leveraging his military prestige to rally disparate royalist factions. This transition revitalized royalist morale through the symbolic purity of a untainted by John's excesses and bolstered by papal authority, prompting defections among fence-sitting barons who viewed Louis increasingly as a foreign usurper rather than a liberator. Yet the rebels, entrenched in their alliance with Louis—who controlled and much of the southeast—persisted, as their grievances stemmed from entrenched power imbalances predating John, ensuring the war's underlying dynamics of territorial control and constitutional demands endured without swift resolution.

Royalist Victories and French Reversals

Following the death of King John in October 1216 and the subsequent stabilization of royalist leadership under William Marshal as for nine-year-old Henry III, royalist forces achieved a pivotal victory at the Second Battle of Lincoln on 20 May 1217. Marshal, recognizing the strategic importance of —held by loyalist castellans but besieged by approximately 400 French knights and English rebels led by Thomas, Count of Perche—marshaled an army of 400 knights, 250 crossbowmen, and supporting infantry from Newark. His tactical acumen shone in adapting to : crossbowmen seized the city's gates through concentrated volleys and positioned themselves on rooftops to target enemy horses and troops, enabling knights to charge and trap the besiegers. The battle unfolded with fierce street fighting, culminating in the death of , who refused surrender, and the capture of numerous rebel leaders, including Saer de Quincy, Earl of Winchester, and , Earl of Hereford, alongside claims of up to 300 knights taken prisoner per contemporary chronicler Roger of Wendover. Royalist casualties were light, though exact figures remain unrecorded in primary accounts, while the French-rebel force suffered heavy losses, including key commanders like Reginald de Coccy and the flight of survivors toward . This triumph, derisively termed the "Fair of Lincoln" by the victors due to the ransoms gained, freed the imprisoned castle garrison, restored royal control over the north, and shattered French-baronial morale, prompting defections among wavering allies. Complementing the land victory, royalists secured maritime dominance at the Battle of Sandwich on 24 August 1217, where a fleet of 18 large ships and 20 smaller vessels, dispatched under Marshal's orders and commanded by Hubert de Burgh, intercepted a French convoy of 10 warships and 60 supply craft led by the notorious . English tactics involved throwing quicklime to blind opponents before boarding, resulting in the capture of most vessels and the beheading of after his concealment failed. With minimal recorded English losses against significant French captures—over 100 prisoners towed back—the engagement severed Louis VIII's supply lines from the continent, exacerbating shortages for his remaining forces and further eroding the cohesion of the French-baronial alliance reliant on overseas reinforcements. These mid-1217 successes under Marshal's oversight reversed earlier setbacks, reclaiming key territories and exposing the vulnerabilities of Prince Louis's expeditionary force, which had initially capitalized on baronial discontent but struggled against unified royalist resolve.

Resolution and Treaties

Battle of Lincoln and Naval Engagements

The Battle of Lincoln took place on 20 May 1217, when royalist forces under the regency of William Marshal assaulted the city of Lincoln, which was held by a Franco-baronial garrison led by Thomas, of Perche. The royalists comprised approximately 400 knights and 250 crossbowmen, supported by additional . Falkes de Bréauté played a crucial role by leading a detachment of crossbowmen through a gate into the city, enabling them to target enemy horses and disrupt the defenders' mounted forces. This infiltration facilitated the opening of the gates for the main royalist army, leading to intense where the of Perche was killed and around 300 knights captured, including prominent figures such as Saer de Quincy, Earl of Winchester, and , . Royalist casualties were minimal, with only one notable death reported. The victory at Lincoln routed the Franco-baronial forces, allowing royalists to plunder the city and secure a key northern stronghold, which shifted momentum by depriving Prince Louis of a strategic base and yielding valuable ransoms from prisoners. Concurrently, royalist naval efforts culminated in the Battle of Sandwich on 24 August 1217, where a fleet commanded by Hubert de Burgh intercepted a French led by the mercenary off the coast. De Burgh's ships, numbering around 16 warships and merchant vessels, maneuvered against the wind before deploying powdered lime to blind and incapacitate French crews, followed by ramming, boarding with grappling hooks, and severing rigging to seize control. This naval engagement resulted in the capture or destruction of ten large French warships and sixty smaller supply vessels, with common French soldiers and sailors massacred while knights were spared for ransom; was executed on the spot. By preventing the landing of reinforcements and supplies intended for Louis's forces, particularly amid the ongoing siege at Dover, the battle severed French , compelling Louis to negotiate and marking a decisive causal turn toward dominance.

Siege of Dover and Final Stalemate

In July 1216, Prince Louis of initiated a siege of , a strategically vital fortress controlling access to from the Continent, held by royalist constable Hubert de Burgh with a of approximately 140 knights and men-at-arms. Louis's forces, numbering several thousand including rebel barons, employed siege engines such as mangonels and perriers for , alongside operations to undermine the walls, achieving partial breaches in the outer defenses. De Burgh's defenders repelled assaults through determined sorties and counter-mining, enduring tactics that cut off resupply by land and sea, yet maintaining resistance without surrender despite Louis's threats of execution. The siege persisted for over two months until Louis agreed to a truce on 14 October 1216, shortly after King John's death on 19 October, allowing the prince to redirect efforts toward consolidating control amid shifting allegiances among English barons. This temporary halt exposed the French expedition's logistical vulnerabilities, as Dover's continued royalist hold disrupted communications and reinforcements from . De Burgh's success stemmed from the castle's robust fortifications, including its elevated position and inner bailey, which withstood the era's and prevented a decisive breach despite the besiegers' numerical superiority. Renewed French pressure in 1217, following royalist gains elsewhere, led to a second siege commencing on 12 May, with Louis deploying advanced trebuchets—the first recorded use in —for intensified bombardment. However, the English naval victory at Sandwich on 24 August 1217 destroyed a French relief fleet of 70 ships under , severing Louis's supply lines and exacerbating attrition among the besiegers. Facing mounting desertions and supply shortages, Louis sought a truce, marking Dover's prolonged defense as a pivotal factor in the war's stalemate by denying the invaders a secure continental foothold. The failure to capture Dover highlighted internal divisions within the baronial-French alliance, as rebel leaders prioritized regional strongholds over coordinated assaults, compounded by overextended supply chains that strained Louis's expeditionary force of around 7,000-10,000 men. Contemporary chroniclers noted the barons' reluctance to commit fully, with some shifting loyalty post-John's death, underscoring how de Burgh's tenacious hold—sustained by limited but timely royalist provisioning—exploited these fissures to prolong the conflict into irresolution.

Treaty of Lambeth and Ceasefire

The negotiations culminating in the commenced in late August 1217, shortly after the royalist naval victory at Sandwich on 24 August, which intercepted French reinforcements and isolated Prince Louis's expeditionary force. Facing mounting defeats—including the loss at Lincoln in May—and severed supply lines during the ongoing siege of Dover, Louis sought terms to extricate himself without total humiliation. The talks were facilitated by William Marshal, effective regent for the nine-year-old Henry III, and Pandulf, whose excommunications had alienated many rebels and aligned the church with the royalist cause. Signed on 11 September 1217 at , the treaty compelled Louis to renounce all pretensions to the English , affirm he had never held legitimate title, and withdraw his approximately 1,000 knights and supporting troops by 6 October, with hostages provided as surety. Rebel barons and their adherents were obliged to restore royal castles, perform homage and fealty to Henry III, and disband alliances with ; in exchange, they received general pardons, restitution of estates (save for a few crown loyalists' forfeitures), and amnesty from prosecution for wartime actions. The document omitted any binding commitment to reinstate the full of 1215, prioritizing instead the cessation of hostilities over unresolved constitutional grievances. From the royalist perspective, the treaty underscored the monarchy's resilience, achieved through Marshal's strategic acumen and papal diplomacy that neutralized foreign intervention and fragmented baronial unity. Baronial supporters viewed it as a partial safeguard, securing personal security and property against annihilation, though it fell short of imposing structural limits on royal authority. This ceasefire effectively dismantled the French-backed insurgency, restoring nominal Plantagenet legitimacy without ceding sovereignty to rebel demands.

Aftermath

Political Realignments and Pardons

The Treaty of Lambeth, signed on 12 September 1217, included an amnesty for English rebels who had allied with Prince Louis VIII of France, enabling their reintegration upon swearing fealty to the nine-year-old King Henry III and surrendering occupied royal properties. This provision, overseen by regent William Marshal, 1st Earl of Pembroke, encouraged defections among barons previously committed to the French cause, realigning political loyalties toward the crown after King John's death in October 1216 had shifted momentum. Marshal's pragmatic diplomacy, leveraging his reputation as a loyalist knight, secured submissions from figures like Robert Fitzwalter, leader of the Twenty-Five Barons, thereby averting prolonged fragmentation. Die-hard adherents who persisted in resistance, such as certain commanders at key fortresses, faced land forfeitures and exclusion from pardons to compel compliance and deter future disloyalty. Marshal's enforced these measures selectively, prioritizing restoration of royal custodies—over a dozen major , including those in the southeast and , were reclaimed by late 1217 through negotiation or coercion. This recovery directly bolstered fiscal stability, as crown revenues from castle demesnes and associated feudal incidents resumed, countering the war's disruptions to administrative control and foreign influences. By countering residual French sympathies among holdouts, Marshal's regency consolidated power without wholesale proscriptions, fostering a unified under oath-bound allegiance that underpinned short-term governance. This approach, rooted in conditional clemency rather than retribution, marked a causal pivot from wartime division to post-conflict cohesion, with empirical evidence in the swift return of custodianships signaling effective enforcement.

Reissue of Magna Carta under Henry III

The reissue of on 6 November 1217 at Westminster, under the nine-year-old Henry III and his regents William Marshal and papal legate Guala Bicchieri, served primarily as a conciliatory measure to secure the allegiance of former rebels following the . This version, distinct from the 1215 charter, contained approximately 37 clauses rather than the original 63, excising provisions specific to King John's personal rule, such as those addressing his particular abuses, and separating forest-related regulations into a companion . The omissions underscored a pragmatic feudal orientation, prioritizing verifiable remedies for baronial grievances over expansive enforcement mechanisms. Central to the modifications was the deliberate exclusion of the 1215 charter's clause 61, which had empowered a of 25 barons to compel royal compliance through coercive measures including of castles and lands; this "security clause" was viewed by royalists as inherently subversive and incompatible with monarchical authority. In its place, the 1217 text introduced limited surety provisions, such as clause 15 mandating personal sureties or pledges for appearances by free men unable to pay fines, and clause 9 restricting of debtor lands while preserving royal claims on movable goods—mechanisms that channeled through established royal s and oaths rather than independent baronial oversight, thereby reinforcing control. These adjustments favored feudal elites by standardizing reliefs, wardships, and scutages (e.g., clauses 2–8 fixing dues and limits) but offered no broader safeguards for non-nobles, reflecting the charter's roots in aristocratic contract rather than universal rights. Papal endorsement further positioned the reissue as a restorative instrument aligned with royal legitimacy, not opposition to monarchy; Guala, acting on behalf of , actively promoted it to heal divisions exacerbated by Innocent III's prior annulment of the 1215 version. Historians note that this endorsement, coupled with the regency's loyalist composition, contradicts interpretations framing the as inherently anti-royal, instead highlighting its role in feudal reconciliation by binding barons to homage without ceding ultimate . The document's feudal focus—emphasizing precise dues like three marks for knight's fee reliefs (clause 2)—remained confined to elite interests, eschewing abstract liberties in favor of contractual specificity enforceable via processes.

Legacy and Interpretations

Constitutional and Institutional Impacts

The regency of William Marshal from September 1216 to his death in May 1219 demonstrated the capacity of royal institutions to function effectively during a monarch's minority, restoring centralized authority after the disruptions of rebellion and foreign invasion. By leveraging feudal loyalties and papal legitimacy, Marshal's council coordinated military campaigns that expelled French forces and subdued rebel barons, thereby reestablishing the crown's dominance over disparate lordships without conceding permanent baronial oversight. This success contrasted with John’s earlier failures, illustrating how competent administration—rooted in the exchequer's fiscal mechanisms and justiciar's judicial oversight—could sustain monarchical power independent of the king's personal character, setting a precedent for handling subsequent minorities such as that of Henry III himself until 1227. Institutionally, the war accelerated the formalization of feudal councils as deliberative bodies for taxation and counsel, evolving from ad hoc assemblies into recurrent "parliaments" under Henry III, though these remained instruments of royal initiative rather than baronial veto. Provisions in the 1215 requiring "common counsel of the realm" for scutages and aids, reaffirmed in the 1217 reissue, embedded the principle of consultative consent in , prompting administrative refinements like standardized local governance and expanded royal charters to towns for economic recovery. Yet this evolution preserved feudal hierarchies, with councils comprising tenants-in-chief advising on revenues rather than embodying , thus reinforcing the monarchy's role as convener while enabling fiscal reforms that bolstered crown revenues post-1217. However, the war's resolution entrenched latent divisions between crown loyalists and reformist barons, as pardons under the in September 1217 failed to eradicate resentments over arbitrary taxation and judicial overreach, sowing seeds for the Second Barons' War in 1263–1267. While Marshal's regime achieved short-term institutional stability through pragmatic concessions, the underlying causal tension—barons' demands for legal predictability clashing with royal fiscal imperatives—highlighted limits to monarchical reinforcement, as unchecked regency powers later fueled Henry III's autocratic tendencies and further rebellions.

Historiographical Perspectives on Tyranny and Rebellion

Traditional Whig historiography, prominent in the nineteenth century, framed the First Barons' War as a righteous against King John's tyrannical rule, with positioned as a foundational document advancing constitutional liberties and limiting arbitrary power. Historians like emphasized the barons' role in resisting despotism, portraying the conflict as a pivotal step toward and individual rights, often projecting modern onto medieval feudal disputes. This interpretation privileged narrative continuity from baronial resistance to later English constitutional developments, downplaying the charter's primary focus on feudal customs and baronial privileges over broader egalitarian principles. Twentieth-century scholarship introduced revisionist critiques, challenging the caricature of John as an uniquely malevolent tyrant and highlighting his administrative competence amid fiscal pressures from the Angevin empire's contraction after the 1204 loss of . Figures such as Petit-Dutaillis reassessed John as a whose harsh measures, including elevated scutages and judicial manipulations, reflected pragmatic responses to inherited debts and papal interdicts rather than innate cruelty, while portraying the barons as opportunistic elites prioritizing self-preservation and regional over principled opposition to tyranny. These views underscore the barons' invitation of French Prince Louis VIII in 1216 as evidence of disloyalty driven by personal grievances, not ideological commitment to , thus questioning the war's portrayal as a proto-liberal crusade. Debates persist on the conflict's avoidability, with some attributing escalation to John's overreach—such as his 1214 punitive campaigns and refusal to honor Magna Carta's concessions—exacerbated by , while others stress baronial intransigence and the structural decline of Angevin lordship, where fragmented loyalties and economic strains rendered compromise elusive. Revisionists like George Stow argue that John's legal acumen, evident in his adept use of procedures, counters narratives of unchecked , framing the rebellion as elite factionalism amid inevitable imperial retrenchment rather than a binary of tyranny versus liberty. Contemporary historiography shifts toward empirical analyses of , regional variations in allegiance, and institutional dynamics, eschewing moralized depictions of in favor of causal factors like vulnerabilities and the interplay of local power networks with royal fiscal demands. This approach, informed by detailed archival studies, reveals the war's contingency on contingent events such as John's 1216 death and French naval setbacks, rather than inevitable clashes of principle, thereby critiquing earlier teleological accounts that retrofitted medieval events to justify modern constitutional myths.

References

  1. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/english-civil-war-1215-1217
  2. https://historymedieval.com/king-johns-rebellion-the-first-barons-war/
  3. https://www.historyhit.com/was-louis-the-uncrowned-king-of-england/
  4. https://www.worldhistory.org/Henry_III_of_England/
  5. https://history.lincoln.ac.uk/2018/07/30/the-battle-of-lincoln-1217-the-greatest-knight-saves-england/
  6. https://www.historytoday.com/archive/john-lackland-loss-normandy-1204
  7. https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/places/dover-castle/history-and-stories/angevin-empire/
  8. https://sevenswords.uk/battle-of-bouvines/
  9. https://www.historyextra.com/period/medieval/king-john-and-the-french-invasion-of-england/
  10. https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/articles/zcg66g8
  11. https://magnacartaresearch.org/read/magna_carta_1215/Clause_16?com=aca
  12. https://thehistoryofengland.co.uk/resource/magna-carta-the-great-charter-of-liberties-of-king-john-1215/
  13. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/medieval/magna.asp
  14. https://scholarship.law.ua.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1266&context=fac_articles
  15. https://history.hanover.edu/courses/excerpts/344mc.html
  16. https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/doc/Jn_HistoricalNotes/section/Arthur%2520of%2520Brittany/index.html
  17. https://historytheinterestingbits.com/2015/01/20/arthur-of-brittany/
  18. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/making-legal-history/reexamining-king-john-and-magna-carta/CC6C5A2F301B14DB17C49AFFB3A5CDF0
  19. https://cchahistory.ca/journal/CCHA1946-47/Mackinnon.pdf
  20. https://www.reading.ac.uk/gcms/-/media/project/functions/research/graduate-centre-for-medieval-studies/documents/rms198503-b-feeney-the-effects-of-king-johns-scutages-on-eastanglian-subjects.pdf?la=en&hash=13565BF0985C7276247275260D815DF1
  21. https://supremecourt.nsw.gov.au/documents/Publications/Speeches/Pre-2015-Speeches/Spigelman/spigelman_22042015.pdf
  22. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/resources/magna-carta/british-library-magna-carta-1215-runnymede/
  23. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=12495&context=journal_articles
  24. https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1197&context=gradschool_dissertations
  25. https://www.bl.uk/stories/blogs/posts/shameful-and-demeaning-the-annulment-of-magna-carta
  26. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-ecclesiastical-history/article/pope-innocent-iii-and-the-annulment-of-magna-carta/FF1823A4A58DF1B0F846A49B03F0EDCF
  27. https://magnacarta.cmp.uea.ac.uk/read/feature_of_the_month/Apr_2015
  28. https://magnacartaresearch.org/read/feature_of_the_month/May_2015_4
  29. https://thehistoryjar.com/2024/07/12/medieval-colchester/
  30. http://www.essexrecordofficeblog.co.uk/magna-carta-essex-connections-the-fighting-that-followed/
  31. https://magnacarta.cmp.uea.ac.uk/read/itinerary/The_Outbreak_of_War
  32. https://www.historynet.com/1215-and-all-that/
  33. https://magnacartaresearch.org/read/itinerary/The_rebels_seize_London
  34. https://adamsmith-private.squarespace.com/s/Magna-Carta-JTF-w4m9.pdf
  35. https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofEngland/Forgotten-Invasion-Of-England-1216/
  36. https://englishhistory.net/middle-ages/first-barons-war-1215-1217/
  37. https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/places/dover-castle/history-and-stories/the-sieges-of-dover/
  38. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/magna-carta-facts-myths-and-legacies
  39. https://the-past.com/feature/battle-for-magna-carta-the-first-barons-war-1215-1217/
  40. https://www.timeref.com/episodes/the_first_barons_war.htm
  41. https://magnacartaresearch.org/read/itinerary/John_and_the_siege_of_Rochester__week_one
  42. https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/places/rochester-castle/history/
  43. https://www.heritagedaily.com/2021/04/rochester-castle-the-castle-that-defied-king-john-in-the-barons-war/138706
  44. https://www.historyextra.com/period/medieval/king-john-facts-life-death/
  45. https://academic.oup.com/book/7904/chapter/153168461
  46. https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/inspire-me/blog/blog-posts/5-sieges-from-englands-past/
  47. https://www.anglo-norman-texts.net/media/2022/03/Short-Anonymous-Chronicle-of-1214-16.pdf
  48. https://europeanroyalhistory.wordpress.com/2022/06/14/june-14-1216-prince-louis-of-france-captures-winchester/
  49. https://thehistoryqueen.wordpress.com/2019/01/21/eustace-the-monk/
  50. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/43095505.pdf
  51. https://www.historyextra.com/period/medieval/henry-iii-facts-king-john-monarch-royal-magna-carta/
  52. https://finerollshenry3.org.uk/content/commentary/reign_intro.html
  53. https://englishhistory.net/middle-ages/henry-iii/
  54. https://www.historyhit.com/1217-william-marshal-saves-england-lincoln/
  55. https://www.deremilitari.org/RESOURCES/SOURCES/wendover.htm
  56. https://thehistorypress.co.uk/article/englands-first-great-naval-victory/
  57. https://deremilitari.org/2014/02/the-battle-of-sandwich-and-eustace-the-monk/
  58. https://deremilitari.org/2014/03/the-battle-of-lincoln-1217-according-to-roger-of-wendover/
  59. https://deremilitari.org/2014/04/dover-castle-and-the-great-siege-of-1216/
  60. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/war-of-sieges/
  61. https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/inspire-me/blog/blog-posts/the-great-siege-of-dover-castle-1216/
  62. https://warhistory.org/%40msw/article/the-use-of-mining-in-sieges-early-13th-century-england
  63. https://castellogy.com/sites/sites-south-east/dover-castle
  64. https://www.archontology.org/nations/uk/england/king_england/01_louis_france.php
  65. https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofEngland/King-Henry-III/
  66. https://warhistory.org/%40msw/article/the-regency-of-william-the-marshal
  67. https://catherinehanley.co.uk/historical-background/the-battle-of-lincoln-1217/
  68. https://magnacarta800th.com/history-of-the-magna-carta/battles/restoring-royal-authority/
  69. https://historiamag.com/1217-and-the-ideals-of-chivalry/
  70. https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofEngland/Second-Battle-Of-Lincoln/
  71. https://oll.libertyfund.org/pages/magna-carta-an-historical-introduction
  72. https://www.bsswebsite.me.uk/History/MagnaCarta/magnacarta-1217.html
  73. https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5065&context=buffalolawreview
  74. https://descartes-agonistes.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/schuster-scirev-ch-3.pdf
  75. https://www.jstor.org/stable/175095
  76. https://www.magnacharta.com/talks/bad-king-john-and-magna-carta-some-revisionist-perspectives-2/
  77. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/04/20/the-rule-of-history
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.