Hubbry Logo
H-reflexH-reflexMain
Open search
H-reflex
Community hub
H-reflex
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
H-reflex
H-reflex
H-reflex
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The H-reflex (or Hoffmann's reflex) is a reflectory reaction of muscles after electrical stimulation of sensory fibers (Ia afferents stemming from muscle spindles) in their innervating nerves (for example, those located behind the knee). The H-reflex test is performed using an electric stimulator, which gives usually a square-wave current of short duration and small amplitude (higher stimulations might involve alpha fibers, causing an F-wave, compromising the results), and an EMG set, to record the muscle response. That response is usually a clear wave, called H-wave, 28-35 ms after the stimulus, not to be confused with an F-wave. An M-wave, an early response, occurs 3-6 ms after the onset of stimulation. The H and F-waves are later responses. As the stimulus increases, the amplitude of the F-wave increases only slightly, and the H-wave decreases, and at supramaximal stimulus, the H-wave will disappear. The M-wave does the opposite of the H-wave. As the stimulus increases the M-wave increases. There is a point of minimal stimulus where the M-wave is absent and the H-wave is maximal.

H-reflex is analogous to the mechanically induced spinal stretch reflex (for example, knee jerk reflex). "The primary difference between the H-reflex and the spinal stretch reflex is that the H-reflex bypasses the muscle spindle, and, therefore, is a valuable tool in assessing modulation of monosynaptic reflex activity in the spinal cord."[1] Although stretch reflex gives just qualitative information about muscle spindles and reflex arc activity, if the purpose of the test is to compare performances from different subjects, H-reflex should be used. In that case, in fact, latencies (ms) and amplitudes (mV) of H-wave can be compared.

H-reflex amplitudes measured by EMG are shown to decrease significantly with applied pressure such as massage and tapping to the cited muscle. The amount of decrease seems to be dependent on the force of the pressure, with higher pressures resulting in lower H-reflex amplitudes. H-reflex levels return to baseline immediately after pressure is released except in high pressure cases which had baseline levels returned within the first 10 seconds.[2]

After about 5 days in zero gravity, for instance in orbit around Earth, the h-reflex diminishes significantly. It is generally assumed that this is due to a marked reduction in the excitability of the spinal cord in zero gravity. Once back on Earth, a marked recovery occurs during the first day, but it can take up to 10 days to return to normal. The H-reflex was the first medical experiment completed on the International Space Station.[3][4]

History

[edit]

It was first described by Paul Hoffmann (hence the name) in 1910.[5]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

H-reflex

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The H-reflex, also known as the Hoffmann reflex, is an electrically induced monosynaptic reflex that serves as a physiological analog to the mechanically elicited , allowing direct assessment of Ia afferent-to-alpha motoneuron synaptic transmission in the . It is elicited by low-intensity percutaneous electrical stimulation of a mixed peripheral , such as the posterior for the , which selectively activates group Ia afferents and bypasses the itself to produce a measurable electromyographic response in the target muscle. First described by German physiologist Paul Hoffmann in , the H-reflex has become a cornerstone tool in for evaluating spinal excitability, nerve conduction across proximal segments like roots and plexuses, and central modulation of reflexes. The H-reflex pathway mirrors the circuit and is modulated by various inhibitory and excitatory mechanisms, with its amplitude reflecting motoneuron pool excitability. It finds applications in diagnosing neuromuscular disorders, assessing , and facilitating rehabilitation through techniques like to promote spinal plasticity.

Physiology

Definition and Basic Mechanism

The H-reflex, also known as the Hoffmann reflex, is an electrically elicited monosynaptic reflex that serves as an analog to the mechanically induced . It is evoked by submaximal electrical stimulation of Ia afferent fibers within a mixed peripheral , producing a biphasic response on (EMG). This response includes an early M-wave, representing the direct activation of motor axons with a latency of approximately 3–6 ms, followed by a later H-wave, which reflects the reflex activation of motor neurons with a latency of about 28–35 ms in lower limb muscles such as the soleus and shorter latencies (around 17–20 ms) in muscles like the flexor carpi radialis. The core mechanism of the H-reflex bypasses the muscle spindle's mechanical stretch by directly stimulating Ia afferent fibers originating from muscle spindles. These afferents form monosynaptic connections with alpha motor neurons in the , leading to excitatory postsynaptic potentials that trigger a muscle . The amplitude of the H-wave provides a measure of the excitability of the spinal motoneuron pool, as it depends on the number of motor neurons recruited by the afferent volley. As stimulus intensity increases from submaximal levels, the H-reflex amplitude initially rises due to recruitment of more Ia afferents but subsequently decreases because of collision between the orthodromic (reflex) volley traveling toward the muscle and the antidromic (back-propagating) motor volley from direct axon activation. At supramaximal intensities, the H-wave is extinguished entirely, overwhelmed by the maximal M-wave, which reflects full activation of motor axons. This stimulus-response dynamic underscores the H-reflex's utility as a quantifiable electrical counterpart to the , enabling precise evaluation of spinal reflex excitability without mechanical perturbation.

Neural Pathway and Reflex Arc

The neural pathway of the H-reflex begins with electrical stimulation of Ia afferent fibers within a peripheral nerve, such as the for the H-reflex. These Ia fibers, originating from primary endings, conduct action potentials orthodromically to the dorsal horn of the , typically at the L5-S1 segments for lower limb reflexes. Upon entering the , the Ia afferents synapse directly onto alpha motor neurons located in the ventral horn, forming a monosynaptic connection that bypasses in the primary pathway. The reflex arc encompasses both afferent and efferent components, with the incoming Ia signals triggering excitation of alpha motor neurons, whose axons then exit via the ventral root to reinnervate the target muscle, generating the H-wave on . A key modulatory element is primary afferent (PAD), mediated by that depolarize the central terminals of Ia afferents, leading to presynaptic inhibition that reduces transmitter release and reflex . The basic H-reflex arc operates entirely at the spinal level without supraspinal involvement, although descending pathways can modulate it during voluntary movement. The monosynaptic nature of the H-reflex is evidenced by its consistent latency, reflecting the direct Ia-to-motoneuron linkage without interneuronal delays, and the absence of interneurons in the core pathway. This allows estimation of Ia afferent conduction velocity (CV) using the formula: CV=dtH−tMCV = \frac{d}{t_H - t_M} where CVCV is in m/s, dd is the distance from stimulation site to spinal cord entry in meters, tHt_H is the H-reflex latency in seconds, and tMt_M is the M-wave latency in seconds; this calculation verifies involvement of fast-conducting Ia fibers by isolating the afferent conduction time (t_H - t_M approximates the time for the Ia afferent signal to travel to the spinal cord plus synaptic delay). The H-reflex is absent or reduced in conditions affecting the Ia-motoneuron synapses, such as peripheral neuropathies that impair Ia conduction or synaptic transmission.

Measurement Techniques

Stimulation and Recording Methods

of the H-reflex typically employs a constant-current electrical stimulator that delivers square-wave pulses with a duration of 0.1 to 1 ms and intensities ranging from 10 to 50 mA. These pulses are applied via surface electrodes positioned over the target nerve, such as the posterior in the for the or the at the for the flexor carpi radialis (FCR). To optimize the H-wave while minimizing interference from the direct M-wave, stimulation intensity is set to a submaximal level, often 20-50% of that required to elicit the maximum M-wave (M-max). Recording of the H-reflex involves surface (EMG) electrodes placed in a belly-tendon montage over the target muscle, such as the soleus, with the active electrode on the muscle belly and the reference on the tendon, spaced approximately 2 cm apart. The electrodes connect to an EMG amplifier with a of 10-5000 Hz and a gain of 100-1000 µV to capture the evoked potentials clearly. Signals are digitized at a sampling rate exceeding 2 kHz for accurate waveform analysis, and the H/M ratio is computed as the peak-to-peak amplitude of the H-wave divided by that of the M-wave to normalize for motoneuron pool excitability. Standard protocols utilize single-pulse or paired-pulse delivered at intervals of at least 10 seconds to prevent post-activation depression, with 10-20 trials averaged to reduce background noise and enhance signal reliability. Safety protocols emphasize currents below 50 mA to avoid burns or cardiac interference, along with low rates (0.3-1 Hz at rest) to minimize subject discomfort. Recent advancements include multiplexed recording devices, such as a 2025 compact signal distributor with 10 output channels, enabling simultaneous H-reflex elicitation and capture from multiple muscles to improve clinical and reduce variability from sequential testing.

Factors Affecting H-reflex Amplitude

The amplitude of the H-reflex is modulated by a variety of intrinsic and extrinsic factors that influence the excitability of the spinal , necessitating careful control in experimental and clinical assessments to ensure reliable interpretation. Intrinsic factors primarily involve neural mechanisms within the reflex pathway, while extrinsic factors encompass biomechanical and environmental influences. These modulations highlight the sensitivity of the H-reflex to physiological context, affecting its utility as a probe of spinal excitability. Post-activation depression, also known as rate-dependent depression, is a key where repeated of Ia afferents leads to a progressive reduction in H-reflex due to presynaptic inhibition of Ia terminals. This phenomenon is evident at frequencies of 1-5 Hz, with H-reflex suppression reaching approximately 67% at 1 Hz and 88% at 5 Hz in healthy individuals, reflecting mechanisms such as depletion and enhanced primary afferent . An empirical model describes this decay as an , where the ratio of the nth H-reflex to the first (H_n / H_1) approximates e^(-k × (n-1)), with k representing the depression constant and n the pulse number in paired or train stimuli. Background electromyographic (EMG) activity represents another intrinsic modulator, where increasing voluntary contraction facilitates the pool, leading to a linear rise in H-reflex proportional to the level of ongoing muscle . This enhancement occurs through heightened excitatory drive to motoneurons, independent of changes in presynaptic inhibition. Extrinsic factors include muscle length and tension, which alter Ia afferent sensitivity and reflex gain; the H-reflex amplitude is typically larger at shortened muscle lengths compared to stretched positions, as lengthening increases post-activation depression and recurrent inhibition, thereby suppressing reflex responses. Environmental conditions such as microgravity also exert significant effects, with H-reflex excitability decreasing by about 35% shortly after exposure to during space missions, as observed in studies aboard the , and recovering to baseline within 10 days post-return. Cutaneous inputs provide a specific example of sensory modulation, where applied to the via circumferential compression at 40-45 mmHg reduces unconditioned H-reflex amplitude by approximately 55%, an effect attributed to presynaptic inhibition of Ia afferents that reverses within one minute after pressure release. Age-related changes contribute to a progressive decline in H-reflex amplitude, with the H/M ratio decreasing by about 1-2% per decade after age 30, primarily linked to motoneuron loss and reduced spinal excitability. This decline manifests as lower maximal H-reflex responses relative to the direct muscle response (M-wave), underscoring the impact of neural remodeling on integrity in older adults.

Clinical and Research Applications

Diagnostic Uses in Neuromuscular Disorders

The H-reflex serves as a valuable electrophysiological tool in diagnosing neuromuscular disorders by assessing the integrity of the Ia afferent-motoneuron monosynaptic pathway, particularly in the , where abnormalities such as reduced amplitude or absence indicate proximal lesions like S1 radiculopathy or . In S1 radiculopathy, a reduced or absent H-reflex reflects disruption at the level, while in peripheral neuropathies, such as diabetic , the H/M ratio often falls below normal thresholds, signifying axonal loss or conduction slowing. Prolonged H-reflex latency exceeding approximately 35 ms (normal range ~25-35 ms, mean 28-31 ms, adjusted for and age), suggests demyelination, as seen in Guillain-Barré syndrome, where early absence or delay of the correlates with proximal nerve involvement. In (SCI), H-reflex testing reveals distinct patterns across phases; post-acute hyperactivity, marked by an elevated H/M ratio, indicates due to loss of descending inhibition and enhanced motoneuron excitability below the . This elevation in H-reflex amplitude reflects spinal disinhibition, aiding in quantifying severity. In (ALS), alterations in H-reflex excitability, such as increased H/M ratios or absence, correlate with progressive motoneuron degeneration, providing an early marker of involvement before overt clinical weakness. Bilateral H-reflex testing enhances early detection of lumbosacral , with side-to-side amplitude asymmetry serving as an early indicator of involvement. A 2020 systematic review highlights the prognostic utility of the H-reflex in traumatic SCI for monitoring motor recovery and . Threshold values for interpretation include a normal H/M ratio of 0.3-0.7 in the at rest, reflecting balanced motoneuron pool excitability; ratios below 0.3 suggest afferent or efferent pathway compromise, while asymmetry exceeding 20% in amplitude indicates unilateral pathology, such as . These metrics, derived from standardized stimulation protocols, allow clinicians to differentiate central from peripheral lesions when integrated with nerve conduction studies.

Applications in Motor Control and Rehabilitation

The H-reflex serves as a key tool in motor control research to evaluate dynamic changes in spinal excitability during locomotion. In healthy individuals, soleus H-reflex amplitude is phase-dependently modulated, with notable depression during the early stance and swing phases of gait, primarily attributed to presynaptic inhibition of Ia afferents. This modulation reflects adaptive spinal mechanisms that optimize muscle activation for efficient movement. A 2022 review highlights the H-reflex's role in probing central pattern generator (CPG) modulation, demonstrating how afferent feedback integrates with spinal networks to fine-tune locomotor rhythms in humans. In rehabilitation, H-reflex conditioning protocols, including biofeedback-based operant , have been applied to normalize excitability in survivors, targeting reduction through targeted downregulation of the soleus H-reflex. These interventions promote functional recovery by enhancing voluntary control and decreasing , with studies showing significant improvements in motor function over periods. In aging populations, H-reflex measurements track neuromuscular adaptations to resistance , where increases in the H/M ratio indicate enhanced spinal motoneuron excitability and strength gains, supporting interventions to counteract sarcopenia-related declines. Recent advancements include 2024 studies on rate-dependent depression (RDD) of the H-reflex, which reveal impaired spinal inhibitory mechanisms in , offering a for monitoring disease progression and potential links to glycemic control through early detection of sensory-motor deficits. In , post-fatigue H-reflex modulation provides insights into recovery dynamics, with persistent alterations in reflex excitability correlating to extended restoration timelines after intense exercise. Additionally, H-reflex assessments in simulated microgravity environments have demonstrated stable reflex responses, unaffected by acute exposure to altered gravity.

History and Development

Discovery and Early Studies

The H-reflex was first described by German physiologist Paul Hoffmann in 1918 through experiments involving electrical stimulation of human nerves, such as the , where he observed a late reflex wave distinct from the direct muscle response, which he termed the "Hoffmann wave." This finding was reported in his seminal paper "Über die Beziehungen der Sehnenreflexe zur willkürlichen Bewegung und zum Tonus," published in Zeitschrift für Biologie, highlighting the reflex's role in tendon responses and its potential analogy to stretch reflexes. Hoffmann's work built on his earlier 1910 studies of human reflexes but provided the foundational electrical elicitation method for the specific late-wave observation. The reflex was more systematically confirmed in humans by John W. Magladery and David B. McDougal Jr. in 1950, who elicited it in the through submaximal electrical stimulation of the , identifying it as an electrically evoked counterpart to the . Their studies, published in the Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital, established key electromyographic (EMG) characteristics, including the reflex's latency and amplitude dependence on stimulus intensity. In the 1950s, experiments further validated the H-reflex's monosynaptic nature in humans through latency measurements—typically 28-32 ms for the soleus—and collision techniques, where orthodromic and antidromic impulses interfered, confirming a single synaptic delay akin to animal models. These methods, advanced by Magladery and collaborators, demonstrated the reflex's reliance on Ia afferent fibers synapsing directly onto alpha motoneurons. Post-World War II advancements in EMG technology, including improved amplifiers and recording electrodes, facilitated routine human H-reflex testing by the 1960s, shifting the focus from animal preparations to clinical and physiological applications in awake subjects.

Advancements in Methodology

In the 1970s, advancements in H-reflex methodology focused on normalizing reflex measurements to account for variations in motoneuron pool excitability and peripheral factors during voluntary contractions. Upton et al. introduced the H/M ratio as a key metric, where the amplitude of the maximum H-reflex (H_max) is divided by the maximum M-wave (M_max) amplitude, enabling more reliable comparisons across conditions and subjects by mitigating influences like electrode placement or stimulus intensity fluctuations. This normalization technique became widely adopted for assessing spinal excitability in active states, building on earlier passive reflex studies. The 1980s saw the development of paired-stimulus paradigms to investigate inhibitory mechanisms, particularly presynaptic inhibition and homosynaptic depression. By delivering two closely spaced stimuli to elicit a first H-reflex (H1) followed by a second (H2), researchers quantified depression as the H2/H1 ratio, revealing frequency-dependent reductions in Ia afferent efficacy that reflect central spinal modulation. These methods, exemplified in studies of voluntary movement onset, provided insights into dynamic reflex suppression without relying on single-pulse variability. Concurrently, the marked a shift from invasive needle electrodes for recording to non-invasive surface (EMG), enhancing clinical accessibility and reducing patient discomfort while maintaining signal fidelity for routine testing. Entering the 2000s, techniques revolutionized H-reflex analysis by improving and artifact rejection through advanced filtering and averaging algorithms. These computational methods allowed for clearer isolation of reflex components in noisy environments, such as during locomotion or multi-muscle recordings, surpassing analog limitations of prior decades. A 2006 methodological review by Stein and Thompson emphasized strategies for stimulus artifact minimization, including optimized configurations and timing adjustments, which further refined reliability in experimental settings. Recent developments in the 2020s have integrated H-reflex protocols with (TMS) to probe corticospinal-spinal interactions in . A 2022 review highlighted how concurrent TMS-H-reflex paradigms reveal supraspinal influences on reflex gain, aiding studies of balance and adaptation in healthy and impaired populations. By 2025, multiplexed EMG devices facilitated simultaneous multi-site H-reflex testing across large cohorts, supporting population-level analyses of spinal excitability variations in and rehabilitation.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC522151/
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6123946/
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3005210/
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3732897/
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11611807/
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2278388/
  7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK541028/
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1388245710002737
  9. https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1113/JP283706
  10. https://www.siumed.edu/sites/default/files/2021-11/Clinical%20neurophysiology%20-%20H%20reflex.pdf
  11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7712283/
  12. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1155/je/6690943
  13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20417153/
  14. https://bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1756-0500-4-102
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/h-reflex
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11128292/
  17. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3966862/
  18. https://journals.lww.com/neur/abstract/1998/46020/a_study_of_h_reflex_in_amyotrophic_lateral.7.aspx
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380733080_H-reflex_as_an_Outcome_Measure_in_Individuals_with_Spinal_Cord_Injury_-A_Systematic_Review
  20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/hoffmann-reflex
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3078869/
  22. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00236201
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2018729/
  24. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36571622/
  25. https://www.neuroscigroup.us/articles/JNNSD-5-126.php
  26. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/rehabilitation-sciences/articles/10.3389/fresc.2021.742030/full
  27. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/japplphysiol.01185.2001
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11621664/
  29. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/10.1152/japplphysiol.00680.2024
  30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1050641113000618
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/hoffmann-reflex
  32. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00229859
  33. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15414383/
  34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13310166/
  35. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17031251/
  36. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2022.921490/full
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.