Hubbry Logo
HadrosauridaeHadrosauridaeMain
Open search
Hadrosauridae
Community hub
Hadrosauridae
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Hadrosauridae
Hadrosauridae
Hadrosauridae
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Hadrosaurids
Temporal range: Late Cretaceous, 86.3–66 Ma
Mounted skeleton of Edmontosaurus annectens, Oxford University Museum
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Clade: Dinosauria
Clade: †Ornithischia
Clade: †Ornithopoda
Clade: †Hadrosauromorpha
Family: †Hadrosauridae
Cope, 1869
Type species
†Hadrosaurus foulkii
Leidy, 1858
Subgroups
Synonyms
  • Trachodontidae (Lydekker, 1888)
  • Saurolophidae (Brown, 1914)
  • Lambeosauridae (Parks, 1923)
  • Cheneosauridae (Lull & Wright, 1942)
  • Ornithotarsidae (Cope, 1871)

Hadrosaurids (from Ancient Greek ἁδρός (hadrós) 'stout, thick' and σαύρα (saúra) 'lizard'), also hadrosaurs or duck-billed dinosaurs, are members of the ornithischian family Hadrosauridae. This group is known as the duck-billed dinosaurs for the flat duck-bill appearance of the bones in their snouts. The ornithopod family, which includes genera such as Edmontosaurus and Parasaurolophus, was a common group of herbivores during the Late Cretaceous Period.[1] Hadrosaurids are descendants of the Late Jurassic/Early Cretaceous iguanodontian dinosaurs and had a similar body layout. Hadrosaurs were among the most dominant herbivores during the Late Cretaceous in Asia and North America, and during the close of the Cretaceous several lineages dispersed into Europe, Africa, and South America.

Like other ornithischians, hadrosaurids had a predentary bone and a pubic bone which was positioned backwards in the pelvis. Unlike more primitive iguanodonts, the teeth of hadrosaurids are stacked into complex structures known as dental batteries, which acted as effective grinding surfaces. Hadrosauridae is divided into two principal subfamilies: the lambeosaurines (Lambeosaurinae), which had hollow cranial crests or tubes; and the saurolophines (Saurolophinae), identified as hadrosaurines (Hadrosaurinae) in most pre-2010 works, which lacked hollow cranial crests (solid crests were present in some forms). Saurolophines tended to be bulkier than lambeosaurines. Lambeosaurines included the aralosaurins, tsintaosaurins, lambeosaurins and parasaurolophins, while saurolophines included the brachylophosaurins, kritosaurins, saurolophins and edmontosaurins.

Hadrosaurids were facultative bipeds, with the young of some species walking mostly on two legs and the adults walking mostly on four.[2][3]

History of discovery

[edit]
Illustration of Trachodon mirabilis teeth

Ferdinand Vandeveer Hayden, during expeditions near the Judith River in 1854 through 1856, discovered the very first dinosaur fossils recognized from North America. These specimens were obtained by Joseph Leidy, who described and named them in 1856; two of the several species named were Trachodon mirabilis of the Judith River Formation and Thespesius occidentalis of the "Great Lignite Formation". The former was based on a collection of teeth whilst the latter on two caudal centra and a phalanx. Although most of the Trachodon teeth turned out to belong to ceratopsids, the holotype and remains of T. occidentalis would come to be recognized as the first recognized hadrosaur specimens. Around the same time in Philadelphia, on the other side of the continent, geologist William Parker Foulke was informed of numerous large bones accidentally uncovered by farmer John E. Hopkins some twenty years earlier. Foulke obtained permission to investigate the now scattered fossils in 1858, and these specimens as well were given to Leidy. They were described in the same year as Hadrosaurus foulkii, giving a slightly better picture of the form of a hadrosaur. Leidy provided additional description in a 1865 paper.[4] Among his 1858 work Leidy briefly suggested that the animal was likely amphibious in nature; this school of thought about hadrosaurs would come to be dominant for over a century to come.[5]

From the mid 19th century through much of the 20th century, hadrosaurs were considered aquatic animals which subsisted on soft water plants

Further discoveries such as "Hadrosaurus minor" and "Ornithotarsus immanis" would come from the East, and Edward Drinker Cope led an expedition to the Judith River Formation where Trachodon was found. Upon the fragments discovered he named seven new species in two genera, as well as assigning material to Hadrosaurus.[4] Cope had studied the jaws of hadrosaurs and come to the conclusion that the teeth were fragile and could have been dislodged incredibly easily. As such, he supposed the animals must have fed largely on soft water plants; he presented this idea to the Philadelphia Academy in 1883, and this idea would come to be very influential on future study.[4][5] Research would continue in the Judith River area for years to come, but the formation never yielded much more than fragmentary remains, and Cope's species as well as Trachodon itself would in time be seen as of doubtful validity. The Eastern states, too, would never yield particularly informative specimens. Instead, other sites in the American West would come to provide many very complete specimens that would form the backbone of hadrosaur research. One such specimen was the very complete AMNH 5060 (belonging to Edmontosaurus annectens), recovered in 1908 by the fossil collector Charles Hazelius Sternberg and his three sons in Converse County, Wyoming. It was described by Henry Osborn in 1912, who dubbed it the "Dinosaur mummy". This specimen's skin was almost completely preserved in the form of impressions. The skin around its hands, thought to represent webbing, was seen as further bolstering the idea that hadrosaurs were very aquatic animals.[4]

Cope had planned to write a monograph about the group Ornithopoda, but never made much progress towards it before his death. This unrealized endeavor would come to be the inspiration for Richard Swann Lull and Nelda Wright to work on a similar project decades later. Eventually they realized the whole of Ornithopoda was too broad of a scope, until eventually it was narrowed down to specifically North American hadrosaurs. Their monograph, Hadrosaurian Dinosaurs of North America, was published in 1942, and looked back at the whole of understanding about the family. It was designed as a definitive work, covering all aspects of their biology and evolution, and as part of it every known species was re-evaluated and many of them redescribed. They agreed with prior authors on the semi-aquatic nature of hadrosaurs, but re-evaluated Cope's idea of weak jaws and found quite the opposite. The teeth were rooted in strong batteries and would be continuously replaced to prevent them getting worn down. Such a system seemed incredibly overbuilt for the job of eating soft Mesozoic plants, and this fact confused the authors. Though they still proposed a diet of water plants, they considered it likely this would be supplemented by occasional forrays into browsing on land plants.[4]

Skeleton of Maiasaura posed with a nest; the naming of this genus was one of numerous important developments in the Dinosaur Renaissance

Twenty years later, in 1964, another very important work would be published, this time by John H. Ostrom. It challenged the idea that hadrosaurs were semi-aquatic animals, which had been held since the work of Leidy back in the 1850s. This new approach was backed using evidence of the environment and climate they lived in, co-existing flora and fauna, physical anatomy, and preserved stomach contents from mummies. Based on evaluation of all this data, Ostrom found the idea that hadrosaurs were adapted for aquatic life incredibly lacking, and instead proposed they were capable terrestrial animals that browsed on plants such as conifers. He remained uncertain, however, as to the purpose of the paddle-like hand Osborn had described, as well as their long and somewhat paddle-like tails. Thus he agreed with the idea that hadrosaurs would have taken refuge from predators in water.[5] Numerous important studies would follow this; Ostrom's student Peter Dodson published a paper about lambeosaur skull anatomy that made enormous changes to hadrosaur taxonomy in 1975, and Michael K. Brett-Surman conducted a full revision of the group as part of his Graduate studies through the 1970s and 1980s. John R. Horner would also begin to leave his impact on the field, including with the naming of Maiasaura in 1979.[6][7][8][9][10][11]

Hadrosaur research experienced a surge in the decade of the 2000s, similar to the research of other dinosaurs. In response to this, the Royal Ontario Museum and the Royal Tyrrell Museum collaborated to arrange the International Hadrosaur Symposium, a professional meeting about ongoing hadrosaur research that was held at the latter institution on September 22 and 23 in 2011. Over fifty presentations were made at the event, thirty-six of which were later incorporated into a book, titled Hadrosaurs, published in 2015. The volume was brought together primarily by palaeontologists David A. Eberth and David C. Evans, and featured an afterword from John R. Horner, all of whom also contributed to one or more of the studies published therein.[12] The first chapter of the volume was a study by David B. Weishampel about the rate of ornithopod research over history, and the interest in different aspects of it over that history, using the 2004 volume The Dinosauria as the source of data on the amount of works published in each decade. Various periods of high and low activity were found, but the twenty-first century was found to overwhelmingly be the most prolific time, with over two-hundred papers published. The advent of the internet was cited as a likely catalyst for this boom. Hadrosaur research experienced high levels of diversity within the decade, with previously uncommon subjects such as growth, phylogeny, and biogeography experiencing more attention, though the functional morphology of hadrosaurids was found to have declined in study since the Dinosaur Renaissance.[13]

Distribution

[edit]
Map of various hadrosaur taxa across North America

Hadrosaurids likely originated in North America, before shortly dispersing into Asia. During the late Campanian-Maastrichtian, a saurolophine hadrosaurid migrated into South America from North America, giving rise to the clade Austrokritosauria, which is closely related to the tribe Kritosaurini.[14] During the late early Maastrichtian, several lineages of Lambeosaurinae from Asia migrated into the European Ibero-Armorican Island (what is now France and Spain), including Arenysaurini and Tsintaosaurini.[15] One of these lineages later dispersed from Europe into North Africa, as evidenced by Ajnabia, a member of Arenysaurini.[16]

Classification

[edit]

The family Hadrosauridae was first used by Edward Drinker Cope in 1869, then containing only Hadrosaurus.[17] Since its creation, a major division has been recognized in the group between the hollow-crested subfamily Lambeosaurinae and the subfamily Saurolophinae, historically known as Hadrosaurinae. Both of these have been robustly supported in all recent literature. Phylogenetic analysis has increased the resolution of hadrosaurid relationships considerably, leading to the widespread usage of tribes (a taxonomic unit below subfamily) to describe the finer relationships within each group of hadrosaurids.[18]

Lambeosaurines have also been traditionally split into Parasaurolophini and Lambeosaurini.[19] These terms entered the formal literature in Evans and Reisz's 2007 redescription of Lambeosaurus magnicristatus. Lambeosaurini is defined as all taxa more closely related Lambeosaurus lambei than to Parasaurolophus walkeri, and Parasaurolophini as all those taxa closer to P. walkeri than to L. lambei. In recent years Tsintaosaurini and Aralosaurini have also emerged.[20]

The use of the term Hadrosaurinae was questioned in a comprehensive study of hadrosaurid relationships by Albert Prieto-Márquez in 2010. Prieto-Márquez noted that, though the name Hadrosaurinae had been used for the clade of mostly crestless hadrosaurids by nearly all previous studies, its type species, Hadrosaurus foulkii, has almost always been excluded from the clade that bears its name, in violation of the rules for naming animals set out by the ICZN. Prieto-Márquez defined Hadrosaurinae as just the lineage containing H. foulkii, and used the name Saurolophinae instead for the traditional grouping.[18]

Phylogeny

[edit]

Hadrosauridae was first defined as a clade, by Forster, in a 1997 abstract, as simply "Lambeosaurinae plus Hadrosaurinae and their most recent common ancestor". In 1998, Paul Sereno defined the clade Hadrosauridae as the most inclusive possible group containing Saurolophus (a well-known saurolophine) and Parasaurolophus (a well-known lambeosaurine), later emending the definition to include Hadrosaurus, the type genus of the family. According to Horner et al. (2004), Sereno's definition would place a few other well-known hadrosaurs (such as Telmatosaurus and Bactrosaurus) outside the family, which led them to define the family to include Telmatosaurus by default. Prieto-Marquez reviewed the phylogeny of Hadrosauridae in 2010, including many taxa potentially within the family.[18] The family is now formally defined in the PhyloCode as "the smallest clade containing Hadrosaurus foulkii, Lambeosaurus lambei, and Saurolophus osborni".[21] The two main subfamilies of Lambeosaurinae and Saurolophinae belong to the clade Euhadrosauria (sometimes called Saurolophidae), defined as "the smallest clade containing Lambeosaurus lambei and Saurolophus osborni, provided it does not include Hadrosaurus foulkii".[21] This clade excludes basal hadrosaurids such as Hadrosaurus and Yamatosaurus but self-destructs if Hadrosaurus is descended from the last common ancestor of Lambeosaurus and Saurolophus.[21]


Premaxilla of Eotrachodon, the taxon named by Prieto-Marquez et al. 2016

Below is a cladogram from Prieto-Marquez et al. 2016. This cladogram is a recent modification of the original 2010 analysis, including more characters and taxa. The resulting cladistic tree of their analysis was resolved using Maximum-Parsimony. 61 hadrosauroid species were included, characterized for 273 morphological features: 189 for cranial features and 84 for postcranial features. When characters had multiple states that formed an evolutionary scheme, they were ordered to account for the evolution of one state into the next. The final tree was run through TNT version 1.0.[22]

Skull of Lambeosaurus, the type taxon of Lambeosaurinae
Skull of Saurolophus, the type taxon of Saurolophinae

The following cladogram is from Ramírez-Velasco (2022), including most recently named taxa.[23]

Hadrosauridae

Hadrosaurus

Nanyangosaurus

Eotrachodon

Aquilarhinus

Yamatosaurus

Euhadrosauria
Saurolophinae
Lambeosaurinae

Anatomy

[edit]
Edmontosaurus skull, Oxford University Museum of Natural History

The most recognizable aspect of hadrosaur anatomy is the flattened and laterally stretched rostral bones, which gives the distinct duck-bill look. Some members of the hadrosaurs also had massive crests on their heads, probably for display and/or to make noises.[18] In some genera, including Edmontosaurus, the whole front of the skull was flat and broadened out to form a beak, which was ideal for clipping leaves and twigs from the forests of Asia, Europe and North America. However, the back of the mouth contained thousands of teeth suitable for grinding food before it was swallowed. This has been hypothesized to have been a crucial factor in the success of this group in the Cretaceous compared to the sauropods.

Skin impressions of multiple hadrosaurs have been found.[24] From these impressions, the hadrosaurs were determined to be scaled, and not feathered like some dinosaurs of other groups.

Hadrosaurs, much like sauropods, are noted for having their manus united in a fleshy, often nail-less pad.[25]

The two major divisions of hadrosaurids are differentiated by their cranial ornamentation. While members of the Lambeosaurinae subfamily have hollow crests that differ depending on species, members of the Saurolophinae (Hadrosaurinae) subfamily have solid crests or none at all. Lambeosaurine crests had air chambers that may have produced a distinct sound and meant that their crests could have been used for both an audio and visual display.

Paleobiology

[edit]

Diet

[edit]
Main article: Hadrosaur diet
Early restoration by Charles R. Knight of hadrosaurs as semi-aquatic animals that could only chew soft water plants, a popular idea at the time.

While studying the chewing methods of hadrosaurids in 2009, the paleontologists Vincent Williams, Paul Barrett, and Mark Purnell found that hadrosaurs likely grazed on horsetails and vegetation close to the ground, rather than browsing higher-growing leaves and twigs. This conclusion was based on the evenness of scratches on hadrosaur teeth, which suggested the hadrosaur used the same series of jaw motions over and over again.[26] As a result, the study determined that the hadrosaur diet was probably made of leaves and lacked the bulkier items, such as twigs or stems, that might have required a different chewing method and created different wear patterns.[27] However, Purnell said these conclusions were less secure than the more conclusive evidence regarding the motion of teeth while chewing.[28]

The hypothesis that hadrosaurs were likely grazers rather than browsers appears to contradict previous findings from preserved stomach contents found in the fossilized guts in previous hadrosaur studies.[28] The most recent such finding before the publication of the Purnell study was conducted in 2008, when a team led by University of Colorado at Boulder graduate student Justin S. Tweet found a homogeneous accumulation of millimeter-scale leaf fragments in the gut region of a well-preserved partially grown Brachylophosaurus.[29][30] As a result of that finding, Tweet concluded in September 2008 that the animal was likely a browser, not a grazer.[30] In response to such findings, Purnell said that preserved stomach contents are questionable because they do not necessarily represent the usual diet of the animal. The issue remains a subject of debate.[31]

Edmontosaurus dentary with teeth, typical of hadrosauridae

Mallon et al. (2013) examined herbivore coexistence on the island continent of Laramidia, during the Late Cretaceous. It was concluded that hadrosaurids could reach low-growing trees and shrubs that were out of the reach of ceratopsids, ankylosaurs, and other small herbivores. Hadrosaurids were capable of feeding up to a height of 2 m (6 ft 7 in) when standing quadrupedally, and up to a height of 5 m (16 ft) bipedally.[32]

Coprolites (fossilized droppings) of some Late Cretaceous hadrosaurs show that the animals sometimes deliberately ate rotting wood. Wood itself is not nutritious, but decomposing wood would have contained fungi, decomposed wood material and detritus-eating invertebrates, all of which would have been nutritious.[33] Examination of hadrosaur coprolites from the Grand Staircase-Escalante indicates that shellfish such as crustaceans were also an important component of the hadrosaur diet.[34]

It's thought that chewing behaviour may have changed throughout life in hadrosaurids. Very young specimens show simple cup shapes occlusion zones, or areas where the teeth contact one another in chewing, whereas in adulthood there is a "dual function" arrangement with two distinct areas of different tooth wear. This change during growth may have helped transition from a diet of softer plants when young to more tough and fibrous ones during adulthood. It's thought the transition between states, characterized by a more gradual transition from one wear state to another, occurred at different times in the growth of different species; in Hypacrosaurus stebingeri it did not occur until a nearly adult stage, whereas in a saurolophine specimen likely less than a year old from the Dinosaur Park Formation the transition had already begun.[35]

Neurology

[edit]
A 1905 diagram showing the small size of an Edmontosaurus annectens brain (bottom; alongside that of Triceratops horridus, top) commented on in early sources

Hadrosaurs have been noted as having the most complex brains among ornithopods, and indeed among ornithischian dinosaurs as a whole.[36][37][38] The brains of hadrosaurid dinosaurs have been studied as far back at the late 19th century, when Othniel Charles Marsh made an endocast of a specimen then referred to Claosaurus annectens; only basic remarks were possible but it was noted that the organ was proportionally small.[39] John Ostrom would give a more informed analysis and review in 1961, pulling on data from Edmontosaurus regalis, E. annectens, and Gryposaurus notabilis (then considered a synonym of Kritosaurus). Though still obviously small, Ostrom recognized that the brains may be more significantly developed than expected, but supported the view that dinosaur brains would have only filled some of the endocranial cavity, limiting possibility of analysis.[40] In 1977 James Hopson introduced the use of estimated encephalization quotients to the topic of dinosaur intelligence, finding Edmontosaurus to have an EQ of 1.5, above that of other ornithischians including earlier relatives like Camptosaurus and Iguanodon and similar to that of carnosaurian theropods and modern crocodilians but below that of coelurosaurian theropods. Reasonings suggested for their comparably high intelligence were the need for acute senses in the lack of defensive weapons, and more complex intraspecific behaviours as indicated by their acoustic and visual display structures.[36]

The advent of CT scanning for use in palaeontology has allowed for more widespread application of this without the need for specimen destruction. Modern research using these methods has focused largely on hadrosaurs. In a 2009 study by palaeontologist David C. Evans and colleagues, the brains of lambeosaurine hadrosaur genera Hypacrosaurus (adult specimen ROM 702), Corythosaurus (juvenile specimen ROM 759 and subadult specimen CMN 34825), and Lambeosaurus (juvenile specimen ROM 758) were scanned and compared to each other (on a phylogenetic and ontogenetic level), related taxa, and previous predictions, the first such large-scale look into the neurology of the subfamily. Contra the early works, Evans' studies indicate that only some regions of the hadrosaur brain (the dorsal portion and much of the hindbrain) were loosely correlated to the brain wall, like modern reptiles, with the ventral and lateral regions correlating fairly closely. Also unlike modern reptiles, the brains of the juveniles did not seem to correlate any closer to the brain wall than those of adults. It was cautioned, however, that very young individuals were not included in the study.[37]

Endocast of an Amurosaurus brain in right lateral (A), dorsal (B), and ventral (C) views

As with previous studies, EQ values were investigated, although a wider number range was given to account for uncertainty in brain and body mass. The range for the adult Hypacrosaurus was 2.3 to 3.7; the lowest end of this range was still higher than modern reptiles and most non-maniraptoran dinosaurs (nearly all having EQs below two), but fell well short of maniraptorans themselves, which had quotients higher than four. The size of the cerebral hemispheres was, for the first time, remarked upon. It was found to taking up around 43% of endocranial volume (not considering olfactory bulbs) in ROM 702. This is comparable to their size in saurolophine hadrosaurs, but far larger than in any ornithischians outside of Hadrosauriformes, and all large saurischian dinosaurs; maniraptors Conchoraptor and Archaeopteryx, an early bird, had very similar proportions. This lends further support to the idea of complex behaviours and relatively high intelligence, for non-avian dinosaurs, in hadrosaurids.[37]

Amurosaurus, a close relative of the taxa from the 2009 study, was the subject of a 2013 paper once again looking into a cranial endocast. A nearly identical EQ range of 2.3 to 3.8 was found, and it was again noted this was higher than that of living reptiles, sauropods and other ornithischians, but different EQ estimates for theropods were cited, placing the hadrosaur numbers significantly below even more basal theropods like Ceratosaurus (with an EQ range of 3.31 to 5.07) and Allosaurus (with a range of 2.4 to 5.24, compared to only 1.6 in the 2009 study);[37][38] more bird-like coelurosaurians theropods such as Troodon had stated EQs higher than seven. Additionally, the relative cerebral volume was only 30% in Amurosaurus, significantly lower than in Hypacrosaurus, closer to that of theropods like Tyrannosaurus (with 33%), though still distinctly larger than previously estimated numbers for more primitive iguanodonts like Lurdusaurus and Iguanodon (both at 19%). This demonstrated a previously unrecognized level of variation in neuro-anatomy within Hadrosauridae.[38]

Reproduction

[edit]
Eggs of the species Hypacrosaurus stebingeri

Neonate sized hadrosaur fossils have been documented in the scientific literature.[41] Tiny hadrosaur footprints have been discovered in the Blackhawk Formation of Utah.[41]

In a 2001 review of hadrosaur eggshell and hatchling material from Alberta's Dinosaur Park Formation, Darren Tanke and M. K. Brett-Surman concluded that hadrosaurs nested in both the ancient upland and lowlands of the formation's depositional environment. The upland nesting grounds may have been preferred by the less common hadrosaurs, like Brachylophosaurus and Parasaurolophus. However, the authors were unable to determine what specific factors shaped nesting ground choice in the formation's hadrosaurs. They suggested that behavior, diet, soil condition, and competition between dinosaur species all potentially influenced where hadrosaurs nested.[41]

Sub-centimeter fragments of pebbly-textured hadrosaur eggshell have been reported from the Dinosaur Park Formation. This eggshell is similar to the hadrosaur eggshell of Devil's Coulee in southern Alberta as well as that of the Two Medicine and Judith River Formations in Montana, United States. While present, dinosaur eggshell is very rare in the Dinosaur Park Formation and is only found in two different microfossil sites. These sites are distinguished by large numbers of pisidiid clams and other less common shelled invertebrates, like unionid clams and snails. This association is not a coincidence, as the invertebrate shells would have slowly dissolved and released enough basic calcium carbonate to protect the eggshells from naturally occurring acids that otherwise would have dissolved them and prevented fossilization.[41]

In contrast with eggshell fossils, the remains of very young hadrosaurs are somewhat common. Tanke has observed that an experienced collector could discover multiple juvenile hadrosaur specimens in a single day. The most common remains of young hadrosaurs in the Dinosaur Park Formation are dentaries, bones from limbs and feet, as well as vertebral centra. The material showed little or none of the abrasion that would have resulted from transport, meaning the fossils were buried near their point of origin. Bonebeds 23, 28, 47, and 50 are productive sources of young hadrosaur remains in the formation, especially bonebed 50. The bones of juvenile hadrosaurs and fossil eggshell fragments are not known to have been preserved in association with each other, despite both being present in the formation.[41]

Growth and development

[edit]
Juvenile specimen of the genus Maiasaura

The limbs of the juvenile hadrosaurs are anatomically and proportionally similar to those of adult animals.[41] However, the joints often show "predepositional erosion or concave articular surfaces",[41] which was probably due to the cartilaginous cap covering the ends of the bones.[41] The pelvis of a young hadrosaur was similar to that of an older individual.[41]

Evidence suggests that young hadrosaurs would have walked on only their two hind legs, while adults would have walked on all four.[2] As the animal aged, the front limbs became more robust in order to take on weight, while the back legs became less robust as they transitioned to walking on all four legs.[2] Furthermore, the animals' front limbs were shorter than their back limbs.[2]

Daily activity patterns

[edit]

Comparisons between the scleral rings of several hadrosaur genera (Corythosaurus, Prosaurolophus, and Saurolophus) and modern birds and reptiles suggest that they may have been cathemeral, active throughout the day at short intervals.[42]

Pathology

[edit]

Spondyloarthropathy has been documented in the spine of a 78-million year old hadrosaurid.[citation needed] Other examples of pathologies in hadrosaurs include healed wounds from predators, such as those found in Edmontosaurus annectens, and tumors such as Langerhans cell histiocytosis, hemangiomas, desmoplastic fibroma, metastatic cancer, and osteoblastomas, found in genera such as Brachylophosaurus and Edmontosaurus.[43][44] Osteochondrosis is also commonly found in hadrosaurs.[45]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Hadrosauridae

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Hadrosauridae, commonly known as the duck-billed dinosaurs or the cows of the Cretaceous, is a clade of large, herbivorous ornithischian dinosaurs within the suborder Ornithopoda that flourished during the Late Cretaceous epoch, spanning the Campanian and Maastrichtian stages from approximately 83.6 to 66 million years ago. Defined as the most recent common ancestor of Hadrosaurus foulkii, Edmontosaurus regalis, Saurolophus osborni, and Lambeosaurus lambei and all of its descendants, this family is renowned for its specialized adaptations, including a flattened, duck-like bill for cropping vegetation and complex dental batteries capable of grinding tough plant material with up to thousands of teeth in continuous replacement. These features enabled hadrosaurids to become one of the most abundant and diverse groups of large herbivores toward the end of the Mesozoic, often outcompeting other dinosaurian herbivores in their ecosystems. Taxonomically, Hadrosauridae is divided into two main subfamilies: Hadrosaurinae, which includes crestless or solid-crested forms like Edmontosaurus and Saurolophus, and Lambeosaurinae, characterized by hollow cranial crests used potentially for vocalization or display, such as in Parasaurolophus and Lambeosaurus. Originating likely in Asia during the early Late Cretaceous, hadrosaurids dispersed widely across Laurasia, with fossils documented in North America, Europe, and Asia, and some reaching northern Patagonia in South America by the Maastrichtian. Their evolutionary success is attributed to rapid growth rates, social behaviors inferred from bonebeds, and adaptability to diverse environments, from coastal floodplains to marine-influenced settings, though they ultimately went extinct during the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction event at the end of the Maastrichtian. Notable genera such as Hadrosaurus, the first recognized ornithopod dinosaur from North America, highlight their biogeographic importance and role in understanding Late Cretaceous dinosaur diversification.

Taxonomy and Phylogeny

Naming and Definition

The family Hadrosauridae was formally established by the American paleontologist Edward Drinker Cope in 1869, based on the type genus Hadrosaurus foulkii, originally described by Joseph Leidy in 1858 from remains discovered in New Jersey. The name derives from the Greek words hadros, meaning "thick," "stout," or "sturdy," and sauros, meaning "lizard," reflecting the robust build of these ornithopod dinosaurs. Cope's original definition emphasized their affinities within Ornithopoda, grouping them as advanced, herbivorous dinosaurs with specialized cranial features adapted for processing vegetation. Hadrosauridae is diagnosed by several key synapomorphies that set it apart from other iguanodontians, including the development of complex dental batteries in the maxilla and dentary, where hundreds of teeth are arranged in functional series for continuous replacement and efficient grinding of tough plant matter. Additional defining traits include retroverted quadrates, which allow for a broad oral gape and transverse jaw movement, and the absence of a preorbital fenestra in the skull, contributing to a more solid facial structure compared to more basal ornithopods. These features underscore the family's adaptation for terrestrial herbivory and distinguish it from earlier iguanodontians like Iguanodon. In the early 20th century, debates arose over the potential paraphyly of Hadrosauridae, fueled by taxonomic instability from the proliferation of genera named on fragmentary or immature specimens, which blurred boundaries with related ornithopods and led some researchers to question whether all duck-billed forms shared a common ancestry. This uncertainty was compounded by limited phylogenetic frameworks at the time, with forms like Anatosaurus and Trachodon often synonymized or reassigned. The taxonomy was stabilized through influential revisions, notably the 1942 handbook by Richard Swann Lull and Nelda Wright, which consolidated the group based on shared morphological traits, paving the way for later cladistic studies that confirmed Hadrosauridae as a monophyletic clade stemming from a common ancestor in the Late Cretaceous.

Classification

Hadrosauridae is divided into two principal subfamilies: Saurolophinae, characterized by the absence of crests or the presence of solid bony crests on the skull, and Lambeosaurinae, distinguished by hollow crests formed by the nasal and premaxillary bones. Saurolophinae includes genera such as Edmontosaurus, with its flat skull lacking a crest, and Prosaurolophus, featuring a small solid crest. Lambeosaurinae encompasses genera like Corythosaurus, with a backward-curving hollow crest, and Parasaurolophus, known for its long tubular crest extending backward from the skull. Over 40 valid genera of Hadrosauridae have been recognized, with type species assigned based on diagnostic cranial and postcranial features, though some remain poorly known or contested. Notable examples include Hadrosaurus foulkii, the type genus with a robust build and no crest; Gryposaurus notabilis, featuring a high nasal boss; and Brachylophosaurus canadensis, a basal saurolophine with a short skull. Within Lambeosaurinae, valid genera such as Hypacrosaurus altispinus and Lambeosaurus lambei exhibit prominent hollow crests varying in shape. Several historical names are considered nomina dubia due to inadequate type material, such as Trachodon mirabilis, based solely on isolated teeth indistinguishable from other ornithopods. Taxonomic revisions have resolved numerous synonyms through comparative osteology and phylogenetic analysis. For instance, Anatosaurus, previously recognized for species like A. annectens and A. copei, has been merged into Edmontosaurus as junior synonyms, based on shared cranial proportions and postcranial morphology. Similarly, Anatotitan has been synonymized with Edmontosaurus regalis, reflecting ontogenetic variation rather than generic distinction. Non-hadrosaurid hadrosauroids, such as Iguanodon, serve as outgroups in cladistic analyses, highlighting the derived features uniting crown Hadrosauridae, including a deepened maxilla and complex dental battery. The family exhibits strict monophyly, supported by synapomorphies like the expanded premaxilla forming a duck-like bill. Recent discoveries, such as the basal lambeosaurine Ajnabia odysseus from the Maastrichtian of Morocco, further affirm this monophyletic framework while expanding known diversity. Additional finds as of 2025, including Bonapartesaurus rionegrensis from Argentina (2023) and Ahshislesaurus wimani from New Mexico, USA (2025), continue to highlight Gondwanan and North American diversity.

Evolutionary Relationships

Hadrosauridae represents a derived clade of ornithopod dinosaurs within the larger group Ornithischia, positioned as advanced herbivores that evolved sophisticated dental and cranial adaptations for processing tough vegetation. Phylogenetic analyses consistently place Hadrosauridae as a derived clade within Iguanodontia, forming part of the broader Ornithopoda, with origins of hadrosauroids tracing back to the early Late Cretaceous during the Cenomanian stage approximately 100 million years ago. This positioning underscores their evolution from earlier iguanodontian ancestors, marking a transition toward more specialized browsing strategies in terrestrial ecosystems. Key phylogenetic studies have refined the relationships within Hadrosauridae, highlighting its internal structure and broader connections. For instance, Horner et al. (2004) provided a foundational analysis that recovered Hadrosauridae as a monophyletic group branching from basal ornithopods, with strong support for its distinction from non-hadrosaurid iguanodontians based on shared derived traits like complex dental batteries. Building on this, Prieto-Márquez (2010) conducted a comprehensive skull-based phylogeny using both parsimony (yielding a strict consensus tree with 85% clade support) and Bayesian methods (posterior probabilities averaging 0.95 for major nodes), confirming Hadrosauridae's position within Ornithopoda and incorporating global taxa to resolve intercontinental dispersals. More recent work, such as the 2022 analysis of Mexican hadrosauroids, integrates additional southern taxa like Velafrons coahuilensis, reinforcing the clade's Laurasian origins while updating basal relationships with bootstrap values exceeding 70% in parsimony analyses. The internal cladogram of Hadrosauridae reveals a basal split into two primary subfamilies: Saurolophinae (lacking elaborate crests) and Lambeosaurinae (featuring hollow cranial crests), supported by synapomorphies such as retromolar shelf development in the former and supratemporal fenestra modifications in the latter. This dichotomy is robust across methodologies, with Prieto-Márquez (2010) reporting decay indices of 3-5 steps for the subfamily node in parsimony trees and Bayesian posterior probabilities of 1.0, indicating high congruence. Basal genera like Hadrosaurus foulkii often occupy a position outside this split, serving as a stem to both subfamilies. Evolutionarily, the earliest hadrosauroids appeared around 100 million years ago in the Cenomanian, exemplified by basal forms like Protohadros stormi, which exhibit transitional features toward true hadrosaurid dental complexity. True Hadrosauridae diversified rapidly from approximately 80 million years ago through the Campanian and Maastrichtian stages (80-66 Ma), achieving peak diversity in North American and Asian faunas before their extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) boundary around 66 million years ago, likely due to the Chicxulub impact and associated environmental catastrophes. This timeline reflects adaptive radiations tied to angiosperm proliferation, enabling hadrosaurids to dominate herbivorous niches until the mass extinction event.

History of Study

Early Discoveries

The initial recognition of hadrosaurid dinosaurs in North America came in 1858, when paleontologist Joseph Leidy described the nearly complete skeleton of Hadrosaurus foulkii from marl pits in Haddonfield, New Jersey, marking the first such discovery outside Europe and providing the earliest substantial evidence of ornithopod dinosaurs on the continent. This specimen, unearthed by William Parker Foulke earlier that year, consisted of about two-thirds of the skeleton, including limbs, vertebrae, and parts of the skull and pelvis, allowing Leidy to reconstruct it as a large, bipedal herbivore akin to the European Iguanodon. Leidy's description emphasized its robust build and dental battery, establishing Hadrosaurus as the type genus for the group and sparking widespread interest in North American Mesozoic reptiles. During the intense rivalry known as the Bone Wars (1877–1892), Othniel Charles Marsh expanded on these findings by naming the family Hadrosauridae in 1881, formally classifying advanced ornithopods like Hadrosaurus based on shared cranial and dental features. Marsh's contributions included the 1872 description of Claosaurus agilis (initially as Hadrosaurus agilis) from the Smoky Hill Chalk of Kansas, a partial skeleton that highlighted transitional traits between basal ornithopods and more derived forms. These discoveries, driven by competitive field expeditions, amassed numerous hadrosaurid fragments from the Western Interior, solidifying the family's distinct identity amid the era's rapid taxonomic proliferation. Early 20th-century excavations revealed exceptional preservation, such as the 1908 "Trachodon mummy" (now Edmontosaurus annectens, AMNH 5060) found by Charles H. Sternberg and his sons in Wyoming's Lance Formation, which preserved skin impressions, muscle outlines, and gut contents, offering unprecedented insights into hadrosaurid integument and anatomy. Detailed in 1912, this specimen depicted a polygonal scale pattern and a tail fin-like structure, initially fueling debates on locomotion but later reinterpreted as a terrestrial adaptation. In Europe, initial hadrosaurid finds included the discovery of Telmatosaurus transsylvanicus in Romania's Hațeg Basin in 1895, initially named Limnosaurus transsylvanicus by Franz Nopcsa in 1899 and renamed Telmatosaurus in 1903, representing the continent's first well-documented hadrosaurid and suggesting insular dwarfism in Late Cretaceous island ecosystems. Concurrently, Louis Dollo's 1883 analysis of Bernissart Iguanodon fossils proposed a semi-aquatic lifestyle for advanced ornithopods, including hadrosaurs, based on webbed feet and tail morphology, a misconception that influenced early reconstructions until terrestrial evidence emerged.

Modern Research and Recent Findings

Following the foundational monograph by Lull and Wright in 1942, which synthesized early knowledge of North American hadrosaurians, mid-20th-century research shifted toward expanded field efforts, particularly post-World War II excavations in the Hell Creek Formation that uncovered abundant Edmontosaurus remains, enhancing understanding of late Maastrichtian diversity. In the 21st century, advanced imaging techniques like computed tomography (CT) scanning have refined interpretations of cranial crests, building on Weishampel's 1981 acoustic models by revealing internal nasal passages and supporting hypotheses of vocal resonance in lambeosaurines such as Parasaurolophus. Similarly, stable isotope analysis of tooth enamel has provided insights into hadrosaurid diets, showing niche partitioning among sympatric species in formations like Hell Creek, where carbon and oxygen ratios indicate variations in resource use between hadrosaurs and ceratopsians. Recent discoveries have extended the known range and phylogeny of Hadrosauridae. In 2016, the basal hadrosaurid Eotrachodon orientalis was described from the Santonian Eutaw Formation in Alabama, representing one of the earliest and most primitive members of the clade in eastern North America. The 2020 description of Ajnabia odysseus from the Maastrichtian phosphates of Morocco marked the first definitive hadrosaurid in Africa, suggesting transatlantic oceanic dispersal from Europe during the Late Cretaceous. In 2023, fossils from the Maastrichtian Dorotea Formation in Chilean Patagonia yielded Gonkoken nanoi, a non-hadrosaurid hadrosauroid interpreted as a relict population, extending the southern distribution of duck-billed dinosaurs to subantarctic latitudes. In 2025, Ahshiselsaurus wimani was described as a new hadrosaurid species from the Campanian of northwest New Mexico, representing a large duck-billed dinosaur up to nine tons. Additionally, large hadrosaurid footprints were reported from the Maastrichtian Nemegt Formation in the Gobi Desert, Mongolia, indicating the presence of massive individuals. Biogeographic analyses in 2022 further clarified dispersal patterns, integrating Mexican hadrosauroids like Velafrons and Latirhinus into phylogenetic frameworks that support an Asian origin for basal hadrosaurids followed by divergence and spread across Laramidia.

Distribution and Temporal Range

Geographic Distribution

Hadrosauridae exhibited their greatest diversity and abundance in western North America, particularly across the Late Cretaceous landmass of Laramidia, which stretched from present-day Alaska to Mexico along the western margin of the continent. Fossil sites in this region, including the Judith River Formation of Montana, the Dinosaur Park Formation of Alberta, and the Hell Creek Formation of Montana and Wyoming, have yielded numerous genera such as Gryposaurus, Parasaurolophus, and Edmontosaurus, underscoring the family's dominance as large herbivores in coastal plain and floodplain environments. In Asia, hadrosaurid fossils are widespread, with significant occurrences in China, Mongolia, and Russia, reflecting dispersal from North America via the Beringian land bridge during the Late Cretaceous. China's Shandong Province, particularly the Wangshi Group, has produced over a dozen genera, including Shantungosaurus and Zhuchengosaurus, often from dense bonebeds indicating gregarious behavior in fluvial settings. In Mongolia, the Nemegt Formation has preserved well-known taxa like Saurolophus, while Russia's Far East, including the Udurchukan Formation, hosts Kundurosaurus, a saurolophine with close affinities to North American forms. European hadrosaurid remains are rarer and typically represent insular populations on fragmented landmasses in the Tethys Sea region. In Romania, the Hațeg Basin's Sânpetru Formation has yielded Telmatosaurus transsylvanicus, a basal hadrosaurid exhibiting dwarfism consistent with island biogeography. Spain's Tremp Formation preserves Arenysaurus ardevoli, a lambeosaurine from the late Maastrichtian, highlighting endemism in the Ibero-Armorican island arc. Recent discoveries include multiple skeletons of the hadrosauroid Tethyshadros insularis in northeastern Italy's Villaggio del Pescatore quarry, indicating an established insular population in the paleo-Mediterranean. Extensions into the Southern Hemisphere are limited but notable, with partial hadrosaurid remains reported from Antarctica's James Ross archipelago, including a distal tibia from the López de Bertodano Formation on Vega Island, though their identification remains tentative amid debates over Gondwanan dispersal. In South America, fossils from Argentina's Allen and Anacleto Formations include Secernosaurus koerneri, a hadrosaurine indicating northward migration into Patagonia, with recent subantarctic Chilean sites from the early Maastrichtian Dorotea Formation revealing relict hadrosauroids that suggest prolonged survival of duck-billed lineages. Africa's record is sparse but groundbreaking, with Ajnabia odysseus, Minqaria bata, and Taleta taleta, lambeosaurines from Morocco's late Maastrichtian phosphates representing a diverse radiation of small-bodied hadrosaurids on the continent. Dispersal patterns for Hadrosauridae primarily involved overland migration from their North American origin to Asia across the Beringian land bridge by the late Santonian, enabling faunal exchange evident in shared saurolophine clades. Incursions into Europe likely occurred via similar northern routes or coastal pathways, while the African presence of Ajnabia supports transatlantic oceanic dispersal, possibly via rafting on vegetation mats, as a rare example of marine barrier crossing for non-avian dinosaurs. Southern Hemisphere records imply additional dispersals, potentially southward along western Gondwanan margins, though the mechanisms remain under investigation.

Stratigraphic Range

The origins of Hadrosauroidea, the broader clade encompassing Hadrosauridae, trace back to the Early Cretaceous, with the earliest known representatives appearing during the Albian to Cenomanian stages approximately 100 to 94 million years ago. A prominent example is Probactrosaurus mazongshanensis from the Mazongshan Formation in China, which exemplifies the basal diversification of hadrosauroids in eastern Asia during this interval. These early forms represent transitional ornithopods bridging iguanodontians and the more derived duck-billed dinosaurs, with subsequent radiations including taxa like Bactrosaurus and Gilmoreosaurus in the Cenomanian-Turonian. Hadrosauridae itself, the advanced duck-billed dinosaurs, emerged later in the Late Cretaceous, with their stratigraphic range spanning the late Santonian through the Maastrichtian stages, from roughly 83 to 66 million years ago. The family underwent a significant radiation during the late Campanian to Maastrichtian, achieving peak diversity around 75 to 70 million years ago, particularly in North America and Asia, where multiple genera such as Edmontosaurus, Saurolophus, and Lambeosaurus coexisted. This diversification is evidenced by abundant fossil assemblages in key formations, including the Campanian Oldman Formation in Alberta, Canada, which yields hadrosaurids like Gryposaurus and Coronosaurus in fluvial and floodplain deposits; the contemporaneous Two Medicine Formation in Montana, USA, famous for Maiasaura and its nesting sites; and the Maastrichtian Nemegt Formation in Mongolia, preserving advanced forms such as Saurolophus angustirostris in riverine environments. These units highlight the temporal progression of hadrosaurid dominance in continental ecosystems across the Northern Hemisphere. All hadrosaurid lineages terminated at the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) boundary approximately 66 million years ago, coinciding with the global mass extinction event that eliminated non-avian dinosaurs. No hadrosaurids survived into the Paleogene, despite occasional reports of potential post-boundary finds that have been re-dated to the Maastrichtian, such as the 2023 discovery of Gonkoken nanoi from the early Maastrichtian Dorotea Formation in Chilean Patagonia, which represents a relict population rather than a survivor. The stratigraphic placement of hadrosaurid-bearing strata relies on biostratigraphic correlations, often integrating index fossils from associated marine deposits, such as ammonites from the Baculites compressus and Didymoceras cheyennense zones in North American sections, alongside magnetostratigraphic data from polarity chrons like C31r to C29r. These methods enable precise tying of non-marine hadrosaurid horizons to the global geologic timescale, confirming their confinement to the final 20 million years of the Cretaceous.

Anatomy and Morphology

General Body Plan

Hadrosaurids were large ornithischian dinosaurs characterized by body lengths ranging from 6 to 12 meters in adults, with estimated masses of 1 to 4 metric tons, though some taxa like Shantungosaurus exceeded 14 meters and approached 16 tons. Juveniles were predominantly bipedal, relying on powerful hindlimbs for locomotion, while adults exhibited facultative quadrupedality, enabling weight distribution across all four limbs during slow movement or resting, facilitated by robust forelimbs. The postcranial skeleton of hadrosaurids featured a robust axial column, including a short neck with approximately 12 cervical vertebrae and a reinforced sacrum of 8–9 vertebrae for pelvic support. Appendicular elements were sturdy, with forelimbs shorter than hindlimbs; the manus included a prominent, hoof-like third digit for load-bearing in quadrupedal stance, while neural spines along the dorsal vertebrae were robust and increased slightly in height posteriorly. The pelvic girdle was adapted for weight support, with broad ilia featuring short preacetabular processes and deep acetabula, complemented by hindlimb modifications such as a reduced fibula distally and a massive tibia to enhance stability during bipedal progression. Skin impressions preserved with hadrosaurid fossils reveal a covering of non-overlapping scales and tubercles, devoid of feathers, with pebbly textures on limbs and larger polygonal or hexagonal scales (2–6 mm) forming grid-like patterns on the tail, occasionally interspersed with prominent shield-shaped features up to 80 mm long. Recent findings in Edmontosaurus annectens also document a fleshy midline structure along the dorsal region and hoof-like pads on the digits, further detailing integumentary and locomotor adaptations. Subfamily variations in body plan were subtle, as the postcranial skeleton remained morphologically conservative overall, but saurolophines tended toward more robust limb proportions suited to terrestrial locomotion, whereas lambeosaurines displayed lighter builds, with neural crest structures potentially shifting the center of mass to affect postural balance.

Cranial and Dental Features

The skulls of hadrosaurids exhibit specialized morphology adapted for efficient herbivory and potential display functions, featuring a kinetic quadrate that enables pleurokinesis, allowing lateral and transverse movements of the upper jaw relative to the braincase. This kinesis facilitates a complex chewing mechanism, with the quadrate articulating in a way that permits the maxillopalatine unit to flex outward during occlusion. A prominent circumnarial depression on the lateral surface of the skull, particularly in hadrosaurines, accommodated an inflatable nasal diverticulum, likely aiding in visual signaling. In lambeosaurines, the skull is further modified by hollow cranial crests formed by elongated premaxillae and nasals, enclosing tortuous nasal passages; for instance, in Parasaurolophus walkeri, the nasal tube within the crest reaches lengths of up to 1.8 meters in large individuals, potentially functioning in acoustic resonance. These crests contrast with the solid, supraorbital-based structures in some saurolophines, such as the low, arched crests in Kritosaurus, which lack internal pneumatic spaces. The dental system of hadrosaurids is characterized by a highly derived battery comprising multiple rows of tightly packed, diamond-shaped teeth, with up to 60 tooth families per dentary in adults, each containing 3–5 successional teeth, resulting in approximately 300 teeth per lower jaw ramus and over 1,500 total across both jaws. This battery forms through ontogenetic addition of tooth positions, evolving from a simpler iguanodontian gomphosis into a unique structure where teeth are suspended by periodontal ligaments rather than fused to the bone, allowing continuous eruption and replacement. Teeth sharpen themselves through differential wear during attrition, with enamel oriented medially on the occlusal surface to create shearing edges as opposing teeth grind against each other. Replacement occurs dynamically in waves, with histological evidence of resorption by successor teeth and a high turnover rate to balance wear from abrasive plant material. Jaw mechanics in hadrosaurids involve pleurokinetic flexion, where the upper jaw bows laterally during the power stroke, combined with medial rotation of the dentary facilitated by robust pterygoid flanges that guide transverse motion for pulverizing tough vegetation. This system enables a grinding action across the dental battery, with the predentary bone at the mandibular symphysis aiding in cropping. Sensory features include large orbits relative to skull size, supported by sclerotic rings that indicate adaptation for diurnal vision with enhanced acuity in bright light. In crested forms, the elongated nasal passages within lambeosaurine crests likely amplified sounds through resonance, as inferred from their convoluted geometry and pneumatic structure.

Paleobiology

Diet and Feeding

Hadrosaurids were obligate herbivores, primarily consuming a diet of tough, fibrous vegetation including ferns, cycads, conifers, and emerging angiosperms, as inferred from dental adaptations and associated plant fossils in their habitats. Direct evidence from coprolites attributed to hadrosaurids, such as those from the Late Cretaceous Two Medicine Formation, reveals ingested materials dominated by woody plant matter, including decayed wood rich in lignocellulose, alongside occasional animal supplements like crustaceans for added nutrients. Their feeding strategy emphasized selective browsing at low to moderate heights, facilitated by a combination of bipedal and quadrupedal postures. In quadrupedal stance, hadrosaurids could reach vegetation up to approximately 2 meters from the ground, while bipedal rearing allowed access to heights of up to 5 meters, enabling exploitation of understory and mid-canopy plants without significant overlap with contemporaneous herbivores like ceratopsids. The beak-like predentary bone at the front of the lower jaw functioned to clip and select foliage precisely, cropping tough stems and leaves efficiently before processing in the cheek region. The hadrosaurid jaw mechanism was highly specialized for handling abrasive vegetation, featuring a dental battery with hundreds of diamond-shaped teeth arranged in functional columns that continuously replaced worn individuals. This structure enabled powerful transverse (side-to-side) grinding motions, as evidenced by dental microwear patterns showing predominantly low-angle scratches consistent with shearing tough, silica-rich plants such as horsetails. Microwear analysis further indicates complex jaw movements, including palinal (back-and-forth) and lateromedial (side-to-side) components, which maximized efficiency in pulverizing fibrous material into digestible pulp. Stable isotope analysis of hadrosaurid tooth enamel provides insights into dietary composition and ecological partitioning. Carbon-13 (δ¹³C) values typically reflect a diet dominated by C3 plants—such as ferns, cycads, and shade-tolerant angiosperms—with minimal input from rarer C4 grasses, indicating a preference for forested understory niches. Nitrogen-15 (δ¹⁵N) signatures suggest primarily herbivorous trophic levels, while variations in δ¹³C between subfamilies, such as lower values in lambeosaurines compared to hadrosaurines, point to niche partitioning, with the former possibly favoring more closed-canopy environments and the latter open woodlands. Early hypotheses posited a semi-aquatic lifestyle for hadrosaurids, partly due to their broad mouths and inferred aquatic browsing, but this has been largely resolved in favor of predominantly terrestrial feeding based on trackway evidence. Numerous hadrosaurid trackways from formations like the Lower Cretaceous of Canada and the Upper Cretaceous Cantwell Formation demonstrate efficient quadrupedal and bipedal gaits on land, with no consistent indicators of swimming or subaqueous foraging, supporting ground-level herbivory near water bodies rather than in them.

Sensory and Neurological Adaptations

Endocranial casts from hadrosaurid fossils, such as those of the lambeosaurine Amurosaurus riabinini, reveal a relatively enlarged cerebrum compared to basal ornithopods, with encephalization quotients (EQ) estimated at approximately 0.3 to 0.5 based on brain-to-body mass ratios. This expansion is particularly evident in the cerebral hemispheres, which occupy about 43% of the total endocranial volume in lambeosaurines like Parasaurolophus and Corythosaurus, indicating enhanced processing capabilities relative to other non-avian dinosaurs. The olfactory bulbs, moderately expanded and connected via a prominent olfactory tract, suggest a robust sense of smell adapted for detecting vegetation or conspecifics over distances. The visual system in hadrosaurids, inferred from orbital morphology and phylogenetic comparisons with archosaurs, included a binocular field of overlap around 30°, allowing limited depth perception while prioritizing a broad monocular field for environmental monitoring. Color discrimination was likely tetrachromatic, similar to modern birds, enabling perception of red, green, blue, and possibly ultraviolet wavelengths; this is supported by genetic evidence of a red-sensitive opsin gene conserved in the archosaur lineage since the Triassic. Auditory adaptations are highlighted by the tubular cranial crests of lambeosaurines, which served as resonance chambers; acoustic models indicate amplification of low-frequency calls in the 200-500 Hz range, suitable for intraspecific communication over distances, as demonstrated through finite element simulations of nasal passage acoustics. The vestibular system, comprising three orthogonally oriented semicircular canals visible in endocranial reconstructions, supported precise head stabilization and agile movements during terrestrial locomotion. The relative brain enlargement hints at neural substrates potentially underpinning social coordination observed in fossil assemblages.

Reproduction and Growth

Hadrosaurids engaged in colonial nesting, as evidenced by multiple egg clutches found in close proximity within the same stratigraphic horizons, such as those in the Two Medicine Formation of Montana associated with Maiasaura peeblesorum. These clutches typically contained 15 to 20 eggs arranged in circular or trough-shaped depressions, suggesting coordinated group nesting behaviors to enhance protection against predators. Evidence for parental care in hadrosaurids derives from nest structures containing crushed eggshells and associated hatchling remains, indicating that adults likely brooded over eggs to regulate temperature and humidity in open-nest environments. The eggshell microstructure, characterized by relatively low porosity and thick calcite layers, supports this inference by implying vulnerability to desiccation without adult intervention, consistent with observations in Maiasaura nests where hatchlings measured approximately 1 meter in length upon emergence and remained nest-bound initially. Ontogenetic development in hadrosaurids featured rapid juvenile growth, with bone histology revealing annual growth increments of 1 to 2 meters per year during early stages, slowing thereafter and reaching an asymptote by 8 to 10 years of age as indicated by multiple lines of arrested growth (LAGs) in long bones. Sexual maturity occurred around 5 to 7 years, coinciding with the onset of LAGs and subtle sexual dimorphism, such as larger cranial crests in presumed males of lambeosaurine genera like Parasaurolophus. Hadrosaurid reproductive strategies appear to have been iteroparous, with individuals capable of multiple breeding seasons over their extended lifespans, aligning with a K-selected approach that emphasized high parental investment per offspring rather than high fecundity. This is supported by the gregarious nesting patterns and evidence of post-hatching care, contrasting with semelparous alternatives and reflecting adaptations to stable, resource-rich environments.

Behavior and Pathology

Hadrosaurids likely lived in large social groups, as evidenced by extensive bonebeds containing the remains of thousands of individuals from the same species and age class. For instance, monodominant assemblages of Maiasaura peeblesorum in the Two Medicine Formation of Montana suggest herds numbering in the thousands, with individuals dying together possibly due to environmental catastrophes like flash floods. Similarly, trackways from the Cantwell Formation in Denali National Park, Alaska, preserve thousands of hadrosaurid footprints representing multigenerational herds, including adults, subadults, juveniles, and very young individuals, indicating extended parental care and year-round residency in polar environments rather than long-distance migration. Inferences about daily activity patterns come from preserved scleral rings in the eyes of several hadrosaurid genera, including Corythosaurus, Prosaurolophus, and Saurolophus. These structures indicate cathemeral behavior, with activity occurring sporadically throughout both day and night, similar to some modern herbivores adapted to variable foraging conditions. Articulated skeletons occasionally preserve postures suggesting rest, such as flexed limbs and recurved necks, though these may reflect postmortem contraction rather than active sleep positions. Evidence of predation includes healed bite marks on hadrosaurid bones attributable to tyrannosaurids. In Edmontosaurus annectens, facial scars and tail vertebrae show punctures and grooves matching Tyrannosaurus rex dentition, with bone remodeling indicating survival and recovery from non-fatal attacks. Pathological conditions in hadrosaurids are well-documented, often linked to trauma or infection. Osteomyelitis, characterized by bone inflammation and abscess formation, appears in cases like a Hypacrosaurus stebingeri femur with delayed healing and vascular disruption following fracture. Healed fractures are common, affecting a significant portion of specimens—particularly in tails and limbs—with callus formation showing incomplete repair in many instances. Arthritis, including septic and crystal-induced forms, occurs in older individuals; for example, a senescent Gobihadros mongoliensis exhibits calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease (CPPD) in vertebral joints, alongside growth cessation markers. Tumor-like growths, such as benign osteoblastomas and hemangiomas, have been identified in hadrosaurid bones, though not specifically in crests. Crests in lambeosaurine hadrosaurids likely served display functions, supported by biomechanical analyses of nasal passage resonance. Studies of Parasaurolophus and related genera demonstrate that crests acted as low-frequency sound resonators for auditory signaling during mating or social interactions, with visual prominence enhancing species recognition.

References

  1. https://www.science.org/content/article/cows-cretaceous
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10275600/
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8076177/
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6209292/
  5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228761051_A_HISTORICAL_AND_BIOGEOGRAPHICAL_EXAMINATION_OF_HADROSAURIAN_DINOSAURS
  6. http://www.dinochecker.com/dinosaurfaqs/what-is-hadrosauridae
  7. https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/159/2/435/2622978
  8. https://repository.si.edu/bitstream/handle/10088/18173/paleo_1989MBS_PhD_stuffed.pdf
  9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0195667120303657
  10. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-36169-6
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/396005330_A_new_saurolophine_hadrosaurid_Ornithischia_Hadrosauridae_from_the_Upper_Cretaceous_Campanian_Hunter_Wash_Member_Kirtland_Formation_San_Juan_Basin_New_Mexico
  12. https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2022/3707-iguanodontian-phylogeny
  13. https://pure.johnshopkins.edu/en/publications/hadrosauridae-4
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0195667122001318
  15. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/paleobiology/article/morphological-innovation-and-the-evolution-of-hadrosaurid-dinosaurs/4D62321E0AE849C957D5D37BC052D666
  16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S019566710300048X
  17. https://www.app.pan.pl/archive/published/app51/app51-077.pdf
  18. https://www.lindahall.org/experience/digital-exhibitions/paper-dinosaurs/08-first-north-american-fossils/10-the-new-jersey-hadrosaurus-1858/
  19. http://oceansofkansas.com/Marsh72.html
  20. https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/dinodiscoveriesna.html
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3807589/
  22. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/paleobiol/article/34/4/534/86496/stable-isotope-evidence-for-changes-in-dietary
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195667120303657
  24. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adg2456
  25. https://www.earth.com/news/nine-ton-giant-dinosaur-with-duck-like-face-discovered-in-new-mexico/
  26. https://www.sci.news/paleontology/gobi-desert-hadrosaurid-footprints-13626.html
  27. https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/159/2/503/2622982
  28. https://www.nps.gov/articles/aps-17-1-3.htm
  29. https://bioone.org/journals/acta-palaeontologica-polonica/volume-53/issue-1/app.2008.0103/New-Hadrosaurid-Dinosaurs-from-the-Uppermost-Cretaceous-of-Northeastern-China/10.4202/app.2008.0103.full
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6728324/
  31. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036849
  32. https://palass.org/publications/palaeontology-journal/archive/36/2/article_pp361-385
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1631068309000864
  34. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-02490-x
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232663398_The_first_duck-billed_dinosaur_Family_Hadrosauridae_from_Antarctica
  36. https://www.prehistoric-wildlife.com/species/secernosaurus/
  37. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-53447-9
  38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1342937X2500156X
  39. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1631068305000837
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2686654/
  41. https://econtent.unm.edu/digital/api/collection/bulletins/id/695/download
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6403247/
  43. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-23754-0
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5699823/
  45. https://doi.org/10.1017/pab.2019.17
  46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262945825_An_ontogenetic_perspective_on_locomotion_in_the_Late_Cretaceous_dinosaur_Maiasaura_peeblesorum_Ornithischia_Hadrosauridae
  47. http://palaeontologia.pan.pl/Archive/1984_46_119-141_18-25.pdf
  48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329871616_Postcranial_osteology_of_the_hadrosaurid_dinosaur_brachylophosaurus_canadensis_from_the_late_cretaceous_of_montana
  49. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031295
  50. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adw3536
  51. https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ar.20978
  52. https://www.uv.es/pe/2008_2/132/intro.htm
  53. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/BA5F0809133845325E397883BD2CB17E/S0094837300002165a.pdf/evolution_of_cranial_display_structures_in_hadrosaurian_dinosaurs.pdf
  54. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1061&context=peabody_museum_natural_history_postilla
  55. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-16056-3
  56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4964017/
  57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321134892_Histological_evidence_for_a_dynamic_dental_battery_in_hadrosaurid_dinosaurs
  58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271767499_Hadrosauroid_Jaw_Mechanics_and_the_Functional_Significance_of_the_Predentary_Bone
  59. https://www.fossilera.com/pages/about-hadrosaurs
  60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247855588_Nasal_cavity_homologies_and_cranial_crest_function_in_Lambeosaurine_Dinosaurs
  61. https://bmcecol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6785-13-14
  62. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/sepm/palaios/article/22/5/554/145922/THE-PALEOBIOLOGICAL-IMPLICATIONS-OF-HERBIVOROUS
  63. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-11538-w
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3637170/
  65. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0812631106
  66. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.325_129d
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2708679/
  68. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0067182
  69. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/40662326_Hadrosaur_trackways_from_the_Lower_Cretaceous_of_Canada
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6076232/
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3827337/
  72. https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.20984
  73. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02724634.2023.2295518
  74. https://www.sci.news/paleontology/dinosaurs-bird-like-color-vision-04076.html
  75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254314088_Egg_clutches_and_embryos_of_two_Hadrosaurian_dinosaurs
  76. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0142829
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5960587/
  78. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232687826_The_bone_histology_of_the_hadrosaurid_dinosaur_Maiasaura_peeblesorum_Growth_dynamics_and_physiology_based_on_an_ontogenetic_series_of_skeletal_elements
  79. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/earth-science/articles/10.3389/feart.2019.00050/full
  80. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/40661601_Dinosaur_Reproduction_and_Parenting
  81. http://www.gspauldino.com/Dinoreproductionfastlane.pdf
  82. https://serc.carleton.edu/research_education/mt_geoheritage/sites/augusta_choteau/paleontology.html
  83. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article/42/8/719/131672/Herd-structure-in-Late-Cretaceous-polar-dinosaurs
  84. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1200043
  85. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/paleosoc/paleobiol/article/33/2/201/140456/The-opisthotonic-posture-of-vertebrate-skeletons
  86. https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.25069
  87. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290310286_Paleopathology_in_Late_Cretaceous_Hadrosauridae_from_Alberta_Canada
  88. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-91366-1
  89. https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2010.00719.x
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.