Hubbry Logo
HaplodiploidyHaplodiploidyMain
Open search
Haplodiploidy
Community hub
Haplodiploidy
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Haplodiploidy
Haplodiploidy
Haplodiploidy
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
In the Hymenoptera, the sex-determination system involves haploid males and diploid females. System for honey bee shown.
Part of a series on
Sex
Biological terms
Sexual reproduction
Sexuality
Sexual system

Haplodiploidy is a sex-determination system in which males develop from unfertilized eggs and are haploid, and females develop from fertilized eggs and are diploid.[1] Haplodiploidy is sometimes called arrhenotoky.

Haplodiploidy determines the sex in all members of the insect orders Hymenoptera (bees, ants, and wasps)[2] and Thysanoptera ('thrips').[3] The system also occurs sporadically in some spider mites, Hemiptera, Coleoptera (bark beetles), and rotifers.

In this system, sex is determined by the number of sets of chromosomes an individual receives. An offspring formed from the union of a sperm and an egg develops as a female, and an unfertilized egg develops as a male. This means that the males have half the number of chromosomes that a female has, and are haploid.

The haplodiploid sex-determination system has a number of peculiarities. For example, a male has no father and cannot have sons, but he has a grandfather and can have grandsons. Additionally, if a eusocial-insect colony has only one queen, and she has only mated once, then the relatedness between workers (diploid females) in a hive or nest will be on average 3⁄4. This means the workers in such monogamous single-queen colonies are significantly more closely related than in other sex determination systems where the relatedness of siblings is usually no more than 1⁄2. It is this point which drives the kin selection theory of how eusociality evolved.[4] Whether haplodiploidy did in fact pave the way for the evolution of eusociality is still a matter of debate.[5][6]

Another feature of the haplodiploidy system is that recessive lethal and deleterious alleles will be removed from the population rapidly because they will automatically be expressed in the males (dominant lethal and deleterious alleles are removed from the population every time they arise, as they kill any individual they arise in).[3]

Haplodiploidy is not the same thing as an X0 sex-determination system. In haplodiploidy, males receive one half of the chromosomes that females receive, including autosomes. In an X0 sex-determination system, males and females receive an equal number of autosomes, but when it comes to sex chromosomes, females will receive two X chromosomes while males will receive only a single X chromosome.

Mechanisms

[edit]

Several models have been proposed for the genetic mechanisms of haplodiploid sex-determination. The model most commonly referred to is the complementary allele model. According to this model, if an individual is heterozygous for a certain locus, it develops into a female, whereas hemizygous and homozygous individuals develop into males. In other words, diploid offspring develop from fertilized eggs, and are normally female, while haploid offspring develop into males from unfertilized eggs. Diploid males would be infertile, as their cells would not undergo meiosis to form sperm. Therefore, the sperm would be diploid, which means that their offspring would be triploid. Since hymenopteran mother and sons share the same genes, they may be especially sensitive to inbreeding: Inbreeding reduces the number of different sex alleles present in a population, hence increasing the occurrence of diploid males.

After mating, each fertile hymenopteran female stores sperm in an internal sac called the spermatheca. The mated female controls the release of stored sperm from within the organ: If she releases sperm as an egg passes down her oviduct, the egg is fertilized.[7] Social bees, wasps, and ants can modify sex ratios within colonies which maximizes relatedness among members and generates a workforce appropriate to surrounding conditions.[8] In other solitary hymenopterans, the females lay unfertilized male eggs on poorer food sources while laying the fertilized female eggs on better food sources, possibly because the fitness of females will be more adversely affected by shortages in their early life.[9][10] Sex ratio manipulation is also practiced by haplodiploid ambrosia beetles, who lay more male eggs when the chances for males to disperse and mate with females in different sites are greater.[11]

Sex determination in honey bees

[edit]
Honey bee workers are unusually closely related to their full sisters (same father) because of their haplodiploid inheritance system.

In honeybees, the drones (males) are entirely derived from the queen, their mother. The diploid queen has 32 chromosomes and the haploid drones have 16 chromosomes. Drones produce sperm cells that contain their entire genome, so the sperm are all genetically identical except for mutations. The male bees' genetic makeup is therefore entirely derived from the mother, while the genetic makeup of the female worker bees is half derived from the mother, and half from the father.[12] Thus, if a queen bee mates with only one drone, any two of her daughters will share, on average, 3⁄4 of their genes. The diploid queen's genome is recombined for her daughters, but the haploid father's genome is inherited by his daughters "as is". It is also possible for a laying worker bee to lay an unfertilised egg, which is always a male.

There are rare instances of diploid drone larvae. This phenomenon usually arises when there is more than two generations of brother-sister mating.[13] Sex determination in honey bees is initially due to a single locus, called the complementary sex determiner (csd) gene. In developing bees, if the conditions are that the individual is heterozygous for the csd gene, they will develop into females. If the conditions are so that the individual is hemizygous or homozygous for the csd gene, they will develop into males. The instances where the individual is homozygous at this gene are the instances of diploid males.[14] Diploid males do not survive to adulthood, as the nurse worker bees will cannibalize the diploid males upon hatching.[15]

While workers can lay unfertilized eggs that become their sons, haplodiploid sex-determination system increases the individual's fitness due to indirect selection. Since the worker is more related to the queen's daughters (her sisters) than to her own offspring, helping the queen's offspring to survive helps the spread of the same genes that the worker possesses more efficiently than direct reproduction.[16]

Batches of worker bees are short lived and are constantly being replaced by the next batch, so this kin selection is possibly a strategy to ensure the proper working of the hive. However, since queens usually mate with a dozen drones or more, not all workers are full sisters. Due to the separate storage of drone sperm, a specific batch of brood may be more closely related than a specific batch of brood laid at a later date. However, many other species of bees, including bumblebees, such as Bombus terrestris, are monandrous.[17] This means that sisters are almost always more related to one another than they would be to their own offspring, thus eliminating the conflict of variable relatedness present in honeybees.[18]

Sex determination in chalcidoid wasps

[edit]

In wasps of the genus Nasonia, a non-CSD method of sex determination has been documented. The most recent accepted model for this non-CSD system is called Maternal Effect Genomic Imprinting Sex Determination (MEGISD). This model involves a masculinizing/virilizing maternal effect gene that “imprints upon” the cytoplasmic component of oocytes, and an “unimprinted” paternal contribution (in female offspring) that provides a counter effect to virilization and allows for female development to occur. Since all diploid eggs become female (due to the factor originating in the male genetic contribution that prevents masculinization), this differs from CSD in that under CSD, diploid eggs can become males if they are homozygous or hemizygous.[19]

Relatedness ratios in haplodiploidy

[edit]

Relatedness is used to calculate the strength of kin selection (via Hamilton's rule).[20] The haplodiploidy hypothesis proposes that the unusual 3⁄4 relatedness coefficient amongst full haplodiploid sisters is responsible for the frequency of evolution of eusocial behavior in hymenopterans.[21] A eusocial worker helping her mother birth more sisters propagates more of her own genes than had she reproduced herself.

In normal sexual reproduction, the father has two sets of chromosomes, and crossing over takes place between the chromatids of each pair during the meiosis which produces the sperm. Therefore, the sperms are not identical, because in each chromosome of a pair there will be different alleles at many of the loci. But when the father is haploid all the sperms are identical (except for a small number where gene mutations have taken place in the germ line). So, all female offspring inherit the male's chromosomes 100% intact. As long as a female has mated with only one male, all her daughters share a complete set of chromosomes from that male. In Hymenoptera, the males generally produce enough sperm to last the female for her whole lifetime after a single mating event with that male.[20]

Relatedness coefficients in haplodiploid organisms are as follows, assuming that a female has only mated once. These ratios apply, for example, throughout a bee hive, unless some laying workers produce offspring, which will all be males from unfertilised eggs: in that case, average relatedness will be lower than shown.

Shared gene proportions in haplo-diploid sex-determination system relationships
Sex Female Male
Daughter 1⁄2 1
Son 1⁄2 —
Mother 1⁄2 1
Father 1⁄2 —
Sister 3⁄4 1⁄2
Brother 1⁄4 1⁄2
Maternal Aunt 3⁄8 3⁄4
Maternal Uncle 1⁄8 1⁄4
Paternal Aunt 1⁄4 —
Paternal Uncle 1⁄4 —
Niece (sister's daughter) 3⁄8 1⁄4
Niece (brother's daughter) 1⁄4 1⁄2
Nephew (sister's son) 3⁄8 1⁄4

Under this assumption that mothers only mate once, sisters are more strongly related to each other than to their own daughters. This fact has been used to explain the evolution of eusociality in many hymenopterans. However, colonies which have workers from multiple queens or queens which have mated multiple times will have worker-to-worker relatedness which is less than worker-to-daughter relatedness, such as in Melipona scutellaris.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Haplodiploidy

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Haplodiploidy is a in which males develop parthenogenetically from unfertilized, haploid eggs, while females develop from fertilized, diploid eggs, resulting in males possessing half the chromosome number of females. This mechanism, known as , is the ancestral and dominant mode of sex determination in the insect order , which includes over 150,000 species of , , and wasps. Haplodiploidy also occurs sporadically in other groups, such as some mites, , and scale insects, but it is most extensively studied and ecologically significant in the . The haplodiploid system creates distinctive patterns of genetic relatedness among family members, with full sisters sharing 75% of their genes on average—higher than the 50% relatedness between mothers and daughters or sisters in diploid systems—due to males transmitting their entire genome to daughters. This asymmetry in relatedness underpins W.D. Hamilton's influential hypothesis, which posits that haplodiploidy predisposes Hymenopteran species to the by enhancing the benefits of altruistic behaviors, such as workers forgoing reproduction to rear sisters rather than their own . Empirical studies, including analyses in eusocial colonies, have provided support for this framework, though debates persist on whether haplodiploidy alone sufficiently explains the order's 10–15 independent origins of . In addition to its role in social evolution, haplodiploidy imposes unique genetic constraints, particularly when combined with complementary sex determination (CSD) in many Hymenopteran lineages. Under CSD, sex is determined by heterozygosity at one or more complementary sex-determining loci; fertilized eggs homozygous at these loci develop into diploid males, which are typically inviable or sterile, leading to a substantial that can increase risk in small populations. Haplodiploidy also influences and reproductive conflicts within colonies, as workers—being more related to sisters than to brothers—often bias investment toward female offspring, a pattern observed across diverse eusocial taxa. Overall, these features make haplodiploidy a key model for understanding the interplay between , , and in social insects.

Definition and Occurrence

Core Definition

Haplodiploidy is a biological prevalent in certain arthropods, characterized by the development of males from unfertilized haploid eggs via , resulting in males that inherit their entire solely from their mother. In contrast, females develop from fertilized diploid eggs, acquiring genetic contributions from both parents and thus possessing two sets of chromosomes. This ploidy-based mechanism directly ties an individual's to its chromosomal complement, with haploidy invariably leading to development. Developmentally, haploid males typically exhibit modified , producing through an abortive process that avoids chromosomal reduction and instead generates genetically identical haploid clones of the male's . Diploid females, being fertile, undergo conventional to form haploid eggs capable of fertilization, and in some taxa, they retain the potential for under specific conditions. This asymmetry in underscores haplodiploidy's role in facilitating precise control over offspring sex ratios by the mother, who can selectively fertilize eggs. Unlike gonochoristic systems—where both sexes are diploid and sex is typically determined by heteromorphic sex chromosomes such as XY in males and XX in females—haplodiploidy decouples sex from balanced inheritance patterns, exposing male genomes entirely to selection without the masking effects of diploidy. In gonochoristic organisms, gametes from both sexes are haploid and recombine equally, whereas haplodiploidy introduces a maternal bias in male transmission, altering evolutionary dynamics of . The principles of haplodiploidy were first articulated in the mid- by Johann Dzierzon, who observed parthenogenetic male production in honeybees, positing that unfertilized eggs yield males. Subsequent validation came through August Weismann's experimental tests in the late , which integrated chromosome theory to elucidate the genetic underpinnings of this system.

Taxonomic Distribution

Haplodiploidy is most prominently distributed within the order , encompassing , bees, and wasps, where it serves as the predominant across the vast majority of its species. This order includes over 153,000 described species, representing a significant portion of affected by this mechanism. In , haplodiploidy is ancestrally arrhenotokous, with males developing from unfertilized haploid eggs and females from fertilized diploid eggs, and it is considered a defining feature of the clade's . Secondary occurrences of haplodiploidy appear in several other groups, including the order Thysanoptera (), the hemipteran suborder (such as in Aleyrodidae and certain scale insects in ), and the arachnid subclass Acari (particularly in prostigmatid and astigmatid mites). In Thysanoptera, which comprise around 6,000 , is primitive and widespread. Sternorrhyncha exhibits varied forms, with in (over 1,500 ) and paternal genome elimination—a related but distinct haplodiploid-like system—in many scale insects (approximately 8,000 ). In Acari, haplodiploidy has arisen multiple times, affecting diverse mite lineages but not the entire subclass, which includes over 50,000 described . Overall, approximately 15% of reproduce via some form of haplodiploidy. Phylogenetic analyses indicate that haplodiploidy has evolved independently at least 8–12 times across lineages, with estimates ranging up to two dozen when including variant mechanisms like paternal genome elimination. These multiple origins highlight its recurrent adaptive value, though losses or reversions are rare and poorly documented. The evolutionary timeline traces back to the early diversification of affected groups; for instance, in , the system likely originated near the base of the order, with fossil evidence from the period around 220 million years ago supporting the antiquity of the clade's reproductive mode. Cases outside true haplodiploidy include pseudohaplodiploid or parahaploid systems in non-arthropods like rotifers (phylum Rotifera) and certain coleopterans such as bark beetles (Scolytinae), where males may exhibit functional haploidy through mechanisms like elimination or elimination during development, but these do not strictly involve development from unfertilized eggs as in canonical . These debated instances underscore the boundaries of haplodiploidy, distinguishing it from analogous but genetically distinct sex-determination strategies.

Mechanisms of Sex Determination

Arrhenotokous System

In the arrhenotokous system of haplodiploidy, prevalent in the order , sex is determined by the fertilization status of eggs produced by diploid females, such as . Females store in a after mating and selectively release it to fertilize eggs as they are laid; unfertilized eggs develop parthenogenetically into haploid males, while fertilized eggs become diploid females. During , reduces the egg's chromosome number to haploid; unfertilized eggs thus remain haploid and undergo development without further reduction, producing males via equational divisions, whereas fertilization restores diploidy in eggs destined to become females through fusion with haploid . This mechanism is exemplified in the Apis mellifera, where unfertilized eggs laid by queens develop into haploid drones (males) that produce by and contribute only maternally derived genes to . Similar processes occur in (family Formicidae) and wasps (family ), where queens control fertilization to produce sterile female workers or reproductive females from diploid eggs and males from unfertilized ones, ensuring colony-level adjustment. Genetic control in Hymenoptera primarily relies on ploidy, but is refined by the complementary sex determiner (csd) gene, which acts as a locus with multiple alleles to prevent mismatched development. In haploid males, the single csd allele results in hemizygosity, triggering male development via a default pathway; in diploid individuals, heterozygosity at csd activates female-determining genes like fem and dsx, while homozygosity leads to male development. The csd protein's function depends on allele-specific recognition: diverse alleles bind cooperatively to promote femaleness, but identical alleles inactivate the protein, defaulting to maleness even in diploids. Recent research has identified the ANTSR gene, a long-noncoding RNA, as a conserved primary signal influencing sex determination in haplodiploid Hymenoptera, such as bees and ants, by regulating developmental pathways based on allele dosage. Diploid male anomalies arise when fertilized eggs are homozygous at the csd locus due to inbreeding, producing sterile males that often fail to mate effectively and are typically eliminated by workers in social species like honey bees, resulting in "shot brood" patterns of failed development. These diploid males carry two identical csd alleles, rendering them phenotypically male despite diploidy, and their production imposes a fitness cost by wasting reproductive resources. Numerous csd alleles, with over 100 unique alleles identified in various populations, maintain high heterozygosity in natural populations of Apis mellifera, minimizing the risk of diploid male production.

Variations in Other Taxa

While the arrhenotokous system dominates in , variations in haplodiploidy occur in other taxa, often involving distinct genetic mechanisms that deviate from ploidy-based sex determination. In (order Thysanoptera), a form of paternal genome elimination (PGE) renders males effectively haploid, though they develop from fertilized eggs. Under this system, males heterochromatinize and exclude the paternal during , transmitting only the maternal to , which contrasts with the direct unfertilized development in . This mechanism has evolved independently in and promotes asymmetric inheritance, with males functioning as haploid despite initial diploidy. Integrated , where unfertilized eggs produce diploid females through automixis, appears alongside haploid male production in certain non-Hymenopteran groups. In some oribatid mites (subphylum Acari), automictic restores diploidy in female offspring via meiotic mechanisms such as central fusion or terminal fusion, allowing parthenogenetic female production while maintaining haplodiploid male development from unfertilized eggs. Similarly, in (: Sternorrhyncha, family Aleyrodidae), select species exhibit integrated with haplodiploidy, where automixis in unfertilized eggs yields diploid females, coexisting with haploid males from unfertilized development, though this is less prevalent than in mites. Haplodiploidy in scale insects (: Coccoidea) frequently originates from interspecies hybridization, leading to sex-ratio distortions. Hybridization between species can trigger paternal genome loss or elimination, resulting in biased transmission where males inherit and pass on only maternal chromosomes, often causing female-biased or distorted progeny ratios due to genomic conflicts over . These hybrid-derived systems exemplify how unusual chromosomal mechanisms, such as XX-XO transitions or PGE, evolve in coccoids, amplifying intragenomic conflicts that skew sex ratios away from equilibrium. Experimental studies on thrips reveal environmental influences on sex determination, differing from the strictly genetic control in bees. For instance, temperature manipulations in Thrips tabaci demonstrate that higher temperatures (e.g., 30°C) increase female proportions and sex ratios (females:males), while lower temperatures (e.g., 15°C) reduce them, suggesting thermal effects on PGE or fertilization success rather than ploidy alone. These findings indicate that extrinsic factors can modulate sex allocation in thrips, potentially through impacts on endosymbionts or developmental thresholds, unlike the complementary sex determiner (csd) gene-driven system in Hymenoptera.

Genetic Relatedness

Relatedness Coefficients

In haplodiploid systems, the coefficient of relatedness rr, defined as the probability that a gene in one individual is identical by descent in another, exhibits distinct values among full siblings due to the haploid paternity. Full sisters share genes identical by descent with r=34r = \frac{3}{4}, comprising a maternal contribution of 14\frac{1}{4} and a paternal contribution of 12\frac{1}{2}. The maternal contribution arises because the diploid mother transmits one of her two alleles at each locus randomly to each daughter; the probability that both sisters receive the same maternal allele is 12\frac{1}{2}, and since the maternal genome constitutes half of each daughter's genome, this yields 12×12=14\frac{1}{2} \times \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{4}. The paternal contribution occurs because the haploid father transmits his entire single set of alleles identically to all daughters, resulting in complete identity by descent for the paternal half of the genome, or 12×1=12\frac{1}{2} \times 1 = \frac{1}{2}. This can be formalized using the average of path-specific relatedness coefficients, weighted by genomic contribution: rsisters=12rm+12rfr_{\text{sisters}} = \frac{1}{2} r_m + \frac{1}{2} r_f where rm=12r_m = \frac{1}{2} is the relatedness through the diploid mother (analogous to diploid-diploid siblings) and rf=1r_f = 1 through the haploid father, yielding rsisters=12×12+12×1=34r_{\text{sisters}} = \frac{1}{2} \times \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} \times 1 = \frac{3}{4}. For full brothers, both haploid males produced parthenogenetically from the diploid mother, the coefficient is rbrothers=12r_{\text{brothers}} = \frac{1}{2}, as each receives a random haploid set from the mother with a 12\frac{1}{2} probability of matching at any locus. The sister-brother coefficient is rsister-brother=14r_{\text{sister-brother}} = \frac{1}{4}, reflecting sharing only through the maternal line: the sister's paternal genes are not present in the brother, while her maternal genes match the brother's with probability 12×12=14\frac{1}{2} \times \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{4}. In diplodiploid systems, full siblings of either share genes identical by descent with r=12r = \frac{1}{2} on average, as both parents are diploid and contribute equally with rm=rf=12r_m = r_f = \frac{1}{2}, without the sex-specific skew from haploid males. These haplodiploid coefficients provide the genetic foundation for calculations under Hamilton's rule, rB>CrB > C, where evolves if the relatedness-weighted benefit to recipients exceeds the actor's . For instance, a forgoing (C=1C = 1) to rear full sisters (r=34r = \frac{3}{4}) gains indirect fitness if she enables more than 43\frac{4}{3} additional sisters (B>43B > \frac{4}{3}), as 34B>1\frac{3}{4} B > 1; in contrast, the same act toward full brothers (r=12r = \frac{1}{2}) requires B>2B > 2.

Sex-Specific Asymmetry

In haplodiploid systems, females exhibit a higher genetic relatedness to their full sisters (r = 3/4) compared to their own or brothers (r = 1/2 and r = 1/4, respectively), creating a significant that influences reproductive decisions. In contrast, males are equally related to their sisters and daughters (both r = 1/2) but completely unrelated to their brothers (r = 0), as they inherit no genes from their fathers. This disparity arises because males are haploid and transmit their entire only to daughters, while females, being diploid, pass on half their genes to both sons and daughters. Under standard Fisherian sex ratio theory, which predicts equal in sons and daughters due to symmetric relatedness, haplodiploidy adjusts expectations toward female-biased allocation. Specifically, the asymmetry favors a 3:1 female-to-male investment ratio from the female perspective, as workers or mothers prioritize sisters over brothers to maximize . This bias manifests in many haplodiploid species, where s deviate from 1:1 toward more females, particularly in structured mating environments like local mate competition. Empirical observations in haplodiploid Hymenoptera support this asymmetry, with workers in social species often favoring the rearing of sisters over brothers. For instance, empirical studies across numerous species of ants, bees, and wasps, including data from approximately 20 ant species, reveal colony sex investment ratios that are often female-biased, averaging around 3:1 under conditions of worker control, aligning with predictions from worker control over brood allocation rather than queen perspectives. In parasitoid wasps such as Nasonia vitripennis, females adjust offspring sex ratios toward females when multiple foundresses are present, reflecting the underlying relatedness incentives even in non-social contexts. The transmission biases in haplodiploidy also generate genetic conflicts between parents and offspring, particularly along mother-daughter versus father-son lines. Mothers transmit genes equally to sons and daughters, but daughters receive genes from both parents, creating potential discord over ; sons, inheriting solely from mothers, align more closely with maternal interests. Fathers, however, transmit their haploid exclusively to daughters, biasing paternal genes toward female-biased outcomes and exacerbating intragenomic conflicts in diploid females.

Evolutionary Implications

Kin Selection Dynamics

In haplodiploid systems, theory, as formalized by Hamilton's rule (rb>crb > c, where rr is the genetic relatedness between actor and recipient, bb is the fitness benefit to the recipient, and cc is the fitness cost to the actor), is modified by the elevated relatedness among siblings (r=3/4r = 3/4) compared to diploid systems (r=1/2r = 1/2). This asymmetry lowers the threshold for among sisters, as the required benefit-to-cost ratio (b/c>1/rb/c > 1/r) decreases from 2 in diploids to approximately 1.33 in haplodiploids, facilitating the evolution of cooperative behaviors directed toward full sisters. For instance, a can afford to incur a higher personal cost for a given benefit to her sister under haplodiploidy, promoting traits like resource sharing or defense that enhance . Beyond eusocial contexts, haplodiploidy influences kin-selected in solitary , where sisters occasionally cooperate in nest defense. In species like the Polistes dominula, related females may associate during nest founding to provide continuous guarding against predators, leveraging their r=3/4r = 3/4 relatedness to justify risky defensive actions that solitary females might avoid. Such behaviors increase nest survival without full social commitment, illustrating how haplodiploid relatedness supports low-level in non-colonial settings. Haplodiploidy also shapes conflict resolution through mechanisms like , where workers preferentially eliminate eggs laid by other workers over those from the queen, maintaining consistency with the haplodiploid system. In honeybees (Apis mellifera), this policing evolves because, under multiple queen , workers are on average more related to the queen's sons (brothers, r=1/4r = 1/4) than to nephews (sons of full sisters, r=3/8r = 3/8; average lower with patriline mixing), reducing reproductive conflict and stabilizing queen-worker dynamics under . Empirical studies confirm that policing rates are higher when queen frequency increases, diluting worker-sister relatedness and intensifying the incentive to favor queen . Theoretical models and simulations demonstrate that haplodiploidy accelerates the spread of kin-selected traits by enhancing positive assortment among . In agent-based simulations of colony dynamics, haplodiploid systems with high sister relatedness (r=3/4r = 3/4) yield lower critical benefit-cost ratios for invasion (e.g., b/c>4/3b/c > 4/3 for sister-directed help) compared to diploids, leading to faster fixation of cooperative alleles under accelerating in group productivity. These models adjust Hamilton's rule for sex-specific asymmetries, showing that haplodiploidy synergizes with factors like to promote , with simulations revealing bistable regions where eusocial traits dominate solitary ones more readily. Haplodiploidy is closely linked to the evolution of eusociality, a social organization characterized by cooperative brood care, overlapping generations, and reproductive division of labor with sterile castes. In 1964, William D. Hamilton proposed the haplodiploidy hypothesis, suggesting that the sex determination system creates an asymmetry in genetic relatedness: full sisters share three-quarters of their genes by descent, exceeding the half relatedness to their own offspring, thereby favoring the evolution of sterile female workers who altruistically aid in rearing sisters rather than reproducing themselves. This mechanism is thought to explain the high prevalence of eusociality in the Hymenoptera, where ants, bees, and wasps account for the majority of eusocial insect species. Empirical evidence supports this association, as has arisen multiple times within haplodiploid lineages, particularly in , with phylogenetic analyses indicating significantly higher transition rates to in these groups compared to diploid . For example, comparative studies across hexapod families reveal has evolved independently at least nine times in , occurring in multiple haplodiploid families such as , Formicidae, and , correlating with the persistence of haplodiploidy. This pattern underscores how the relatedness asymmetry can stabilize worker castes in species like honeybees and fire ants, where female-biased investment enhances colony fitness. Despite this, the hypothesis faces counterarguments, as eusociality has evolved independently in non-haplodiploid taxa, including diploid termites (Isoptera) and aphids (Hemiptera) that rely on cyclic parthenogenesis for reproduction. These examples demonstrate that haplodiploidy is neither universal nor essential for eusociality, with post-2020 models emphasizing that ecological pressures, such as resource predictability and defense needs, are often more decisive drivers. Phylogenetic tests yield mixed results, showing significant but not exclusive support for haplodiploidy's role. Recent gene dynamics research provides nuanced updates, illustrating how haplodiploidy promotes eusociality through enhanced transmission of altruism-promoting alleles in female-biased broods, even without extreme sex ratio distortions. A 2022 study found that this system lowers the altruism threshold by up to 30% relative to diploidy by ensuring haploid males pass such alleles to all daughters, thereby facilitating worker sterility in Hymenopteran societies. These insights highlight haplodiploidy's facilitative, rather than deterministic, influence on eusocial evolution.

References

  1. https://www.nature.com/articles/hdy1993157
  2. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/677283
  3. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.254.5030.442
  4. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.727124/full
  5. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0502271102
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221457451500084X
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4989469/
  8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3248733/
  9. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2023.1118748/full
  10. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-48332-9
  11. https://www.evolutionsgenetik.hhu.de/en/unsere-forschung/haplodiploidy-and-complementary-sex-determination
  12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299659481_August_Weismann_and_Ferdinand_Dickel_Testing_the_Dzierzon_System
  13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982217300593
  14. https://home.sandiego.edu/~gmorse/2017SBIOL348/Website/Discussions/Disc_06_Normark_2003.pdf
  15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7564875/
  16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32972305_Functional_haplodiploidy
  17. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093441
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11216367/
  19. https://extension.psu.edu/honey-bee-genetics-basics
  20. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adg4239
  21. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003458
  22. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13592-021-00861-x
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9630974/
  24. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-021822-010659
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5499200/
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10607665/
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/42108254_Genomic_conflict_in_scale_insects_The_causes_and_consequences_of_Bizarre_genetic_systems
  28. https://esj-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/1438-390X.12082
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351374621_Effect_of_temperature_on_the_sex_ratio_and_life_table_parameters_of_the_leek-L1_and_tobacco-associated_T_Thrips_tabaci_lineages_Thysanoptera_Thripidae
  30. https://www.rug.nl/research/gelifes/tres/_pdf/sh_eabiolet09.pdf
  31. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1108197
  32. https://academic.oup.com/evolut/article/76/2/292/6728491
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6546379/
  34. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2022.768392/full
  35. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/58/1/17/233334
  36. https://www.nature.com/articles/342796a0
  37. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0402506101
  38. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms1410
  39. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsbl.2019.0764
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3279739/
  41. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/comparative-social-evolution/sociality-in-aphids-and-thrips/6D821690940ED85CEA54AE2B05CCD796
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9543898/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.