Hubbry Logo
RotiferRotiferMain
Open search
Rotifer
Community hub
Rotifer
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Rotifer
Rotifer
Rotifer
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Rotifera
Temporal range: Middle Jurassic–Recent Possible Devonian and Permian records
Bdelloid rotifer (Bdelloidea)
Pulchritia dorsicornuta (Monogononta)
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Subkingdom: Eumetazoa
Clade: ParaHoxozoa
Clade: Bilateria
Clade: Nephrozoa
Clade: Protostomia
Clade: Spiralia
Clade: Gnathifera
Phylum: Rotifera
Cuvier, 1798
Classes and other subgroups

and See text.

The rotifers (/ˈroʊtɪfərz/, from Latin rota 'wheel' and -fer 'bearing'), sometimes called wheel animals or wheel animalcules,[1] make up a phylum (Rotifera /roʊˈtɪfərə/) of microscopic and near-microscopic pseudocoelomate animals.

They were first described by Rev. John Harris in 1696, and other forms were described by Antonie van Leeuwenhoek in 1703.[2] Most rotifers are around 0.1–0.5 mm (0.0039–0.0197 in) long (although their size can range from 50 μm (0.0020 in) to over 2 mm (0.079 in)),[1] and are common in freshwater environments throughout the world with a few saltwater species.

Some rotifers are free swimming and truly planktonic, others move by inchworming along a substrate, and some are sessile, living inside tubes or gelatinous holdfasts that are attached to a substrate. About 25 species are colonial (e.g., Sinantherina semibullata), either sessile or planktonic. Rotifers are an important part of the freshwater zooplankton, being a major foodsource and with many species also contributing to the decomposition of soil organic matter.[3] Genetic evidence indicates that the parasitic acanthocephalans are a highly specialised group of rotifers.[4]

Most species of the rotifers are cosmopolitan, but there are also some endemic species, like Cephalodella vittata to Lake Baikal.[5] Recent barcoding evidence, however, suggests that some 'cosmopolitan' species, such as Brachionus plicatilis, B. calyciflorus, Lecane bulla, among others, are actually species complexes.[6][7] In some recent treatments, rotifers are placed with acanthocephalans in a larger clade called Syndermata.

In June 2021, biologists reported the restoration of bdelloid rotifers after being frozen for 24,000 years in the Siberian permafrost.[8][9] The earliest record of the rotifer clade is of an acanthocephalan from the Middle Jurassic of China.[4] Earlier purported fossils of rotifers have been suggested in Devonian[10] and Permian[11] fossil beds.

Taxonomy and naming

[edit]
See also: List of bilaterial animal orders

John Harris first described the rotifers (in particular a bdelloid rotifer) in 1696 as "an animal like a large maggot which could contract itself into a spherical figure and then stretch itself out again; the end of its tail appeared with a forceps like that of an earwig".[2] In 1702, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek gave a detailed description of Rotifer vulgaris and subsequently described Melicerta ringens and other species.[12] He was also the first to publish observations of the revivification of certain species after drying. Other forms were described by other observers, but it was not until the publication of Christian Gottfried Ehrenberg's Die Infusionsthierchen als vollkommene Organismen in 1838 that the rotifers were recognized as being multicellular animals.[12]

In the landmark monograph on The Rotifera (1886–9) by C.T. Hudson, assisted by P.H. Gosse,[13] 400 British and foreign species were included; by 1912, the total reached 607 species.[14] About 2,200 species of rotifers have now been described. Their taxonomy is currently in a state of flux. One treatment places them in the phylum Rotifera, with three classes: Seisonidea, Bdelloidea and Monogononta.[15] The largest group is the Monogononta, with about 1,500 species, followed by the Bdelloidea, with about 350 species. There are only two known genera with four species of Seisonidea.[16]

The Acanthocephala, previously considered to be a separate phylum, have been demonstrated to be modified rotifers. The exact relationship to other members of the phylum has not yet been resolved.[17] One possibility is that the Acanthocephala are closer to the Bdelloidea and Monogononta than to the Seisonidea; the corresponding names and relationships are shown in the cladogram below.

The Rotifera, strictly speaking, are confined to the Bdelloidea and the Monogononta. Rotifera, Acanthocephala and Seisonida make up a clade called Syndermata.[18] The findings of a fossil called Juracanthocephalus shares features with both Seisonidea and Acanthocephala, suggesting that they are sister groups.[19]

Giribet & Edgecombe (2020)[20] and Brusca et al. (2023)[21] accept the following classification:

Etymology

[edit]

The word rotifer is derived from a Neo-Latin word meaning 'wheel-bearer'[22] due to the corona around the mouth that in concerted sequential motion resembles a wheel (although the organ does not actually rotate).

Anatomy

[edit]
Anatomy of a bdelloid rotifer

Rotifers have bilateral symmetry and a variety of different shapes. The body of a rotifer is divided into a head, trunk, and foot, and is typically somewhat cylindrical. The trunk contains visceral organs, and often, sensory antennae. There is a well-developed cuticle, found everywhere except in the corona, which is secreted by a fibrous layer in the syncytial epidermis. This fibrous layer may be thick and rigid, giving the animal a box-like shape, or flexible, giving the animal a worm-like shape; such rotifers are respectively called loricate and illoricate. Loricate fibrous layers are often composed of multiple plates or rings, and may bear spines, ridges, or other ornamentation. Certain species have superficial rings in the body wall imitating segments. Also, sub-epidermal muscles, which may be circular, longitudinal, or traversing the pseudocoel to the visceral organs. This large fluid-filled pseudocoel contains certain muscles and mesenchymal ameboid cells.[23] Their cuticle is nonchitinous and is formed from sclerotized proteins.

The two most distinctive features of rotifers (in females of all species) are the presence of corona on the head, a structure ciliated in all genera except Cupelopagis, and the presence of mastax. In the more primitive species, the corona forms a simple ring of cilia around the mouth from which an additional band of cilia stretches over the back of the head. In the great majority of rotifers, however, this has evolved into a more complex structure.

Modifications to the basic plan of the corona include alteration of the cilia into bristles or large tufts, and either expansion or loss of the ciliated band around the head. In genera such as Collotheca, the corona is modified to form a funnel surrounding the mouth. In many species, such as those in the genus Testudinella, the cilia around the mouth have disappeared, leaving just two small circular bands on the head. In the bdelloids, this plan is further modified, with the upper band splitting into two rotating wheels, raised up on a pedestal projecting from the upper surface of the head.[24]

The trunk forms the major part of the body, and encloses most of the internal organs. The foot projects from the rear of the trunk, and is usually much narrower, giving the appearance of a tail. The cuticle over the foot often forms rings, making it appear segmented, although the internal structure is uniform. Many rotifers can retract the foot partially or wholly into the trunk. The foot ends in from one to four toes, which, in sessile and crawling species, contain adhesive glands to attach the animal to the substratum. In many free-swimming species, the foot as a whole is reduced in size, and may even be absent.[24] Rotifers move by swimming with the coronal cilia and/or foot-assisted leech-like creeping.[23]

Nervous system

[edit]

Rotifers have a small bilobed cerebral ganglion, effectively its brain, located just above the mastax, from which a number of paired nerves extend throughout the body, namely, sense organs, mastax, muscles, and viscera.[23] The number of nerves varies among species, although the nervous system usually has a simple layout.[24]

The nervous system comprises about 25% of the roughly 1,000 cells in a rotifer.[25]

Rotifers typically possess one or two pairs of short dorsal antennae, and with usually paired eyespots (and possibly up to five eyes). The eyes are simple in structure, sometimes with just a single photoreceptor cell. In addition, the bristles of the corona are sensitive to touch, and there are also a pair of tiny sensory pits lined by cilia in the head region, as well as bristles and papillae.[23][24]

Retrocerebral organ

[edit]

Despite over 100 years of research, rotifer anatomy still has many poorly understood components. One of the more mysterious organs in rotifers is the "retrocerebral organ" (RCO), which still remains very enigmatic in its morphology, function, development, and evolution. Lying close to the brain, this organ usually consists of one or more glands and a sac or reservoir. The sac drains into a duct before opening through pores on the uppermost part of the head. Current data shows a wide diversity in structure and potential function.[26] In some species it is reduced or may even be absent completely. Benthic species have larger RCO's than planktonic species. Despite this diversity, positional correspondence of RCOs strongly suggests homology.[24][25][27]

A 2023 study using transmission electron microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy has illuminated the fine structure of this organ further. The study, the first of its kind, investigated the RCO in one species, Trichocerca similis. It was determined to be a syncytial organ, composed of a posterior glandular region, an expansive reservoir, and an anterior duct. The glandular portion has an active cytoplasm with paired nuclei, abundant rough ER, ribosomes, Golgi, and mitochondria. Secretion granules accumulate at the anterior end of the gland where they undergo homotypic fusion to create larger granules with numerous "mesh-like" contents. These contents gradually fuse into tubular secretions that accumulate in the reservoir, awaiting secretion. Cross-striated longitudinal muscles form a partial sleeve around the reservoir and may function to squeeze the secretions through the gland's duct that often penetrates through the cerebral ganglion.[27]

Retrocerebral organ secretions

[edit]

Much like the organ itself, the precise function and biochemical makeup of the secretions is still unknown. The small size of rotifers and small volume of the secretions makes isolation immensely difficult. The secretions have some similarities to the hydrogel secretions that form gelatinous housings in some rotifer species. Ultrastructure analysis of T. similis secretions showed them to be a series of tube-like secretions with a highly filamentous framework. This is highly suggestive of a glycosaminoglycan structure- proteins with negatively charged polysaccharide chains forming proteoglycan molecules. These molecules are standard in vertebrate and invertebrate gelatins such as mucus.[27]

Despite recent advancements in understanding RCO organ and secretion ultrastructure, the exact function of the organ is still ultimately unclear. The leading hypotheses are that the RCO secretes a mucus-like substance that aids in benthic locomotion, adhesion, and/or reproduction (i.e., attachment of eggs to a substrate), although more research is needed to explore function and evaluate the homology between species.[27]

Digestive system

[edit]
Scanning electron micrographs showing morphological variation of bdelloid rotifers and their jaws.
Rotifer colonies
Colonial rotifers, tentatively identified as Conochilus. The colony is less than 1 mm in diameter, but visible to the naked eye.
Colony of Sinantheria socialis on an Elodea densa leaf. Note heart-shaped corona of individuals.

The coronal cilia create a current that sweeps food into the mouth. The mouth opens into a characteristic chewing pharynx (called the mastax), sometimes via a ciliated tube, and sometimes directly. The pharynx has a powerful muscular wall and contains tiny, calcified, jaw-like structures called trophi, which are the only fossilizable parts of a rotifer. The shape of the trophi varies between different species, depending partly on the nature of their diet. In suspension feeders, the trophi are covered in grinding ridges, while in more actively carnivorous species, they may be shaped like forceps to help bite into prey, pierce it inside the pharynx, and retain only the edible portions to be consumed. The diet of carnivorous species comprises mainly protozoa and small metazoans. In rotifer species that trap their prey, there is a funnel shaped structure around the mouth, and lobes turn inward to contain the prey and draw it to the mouth and pharynx.[23] In some ectoparasitic rotifers, the mastax is adapted to grip onto the host, although, in others, the foot performs this function instead.[24]

Behind the mastax lies an oesophagus, which opens into a stomach where most of the digestion and absorption occurs. The stomach opens into a short intestine that terminates in a cloaca on the posterior dorsal surface of the animal. Up to seven salivary glands are present in some species, emptying to the mouth in front of the oesophagus, while the stomach is associated with two gastric glands that produce digestive enzymes.[24] Digestion is extracellular and the stomach absorbs the nutrients.[23]

A pair of protonephridia open into a bladder that drains into the cloaca. These organs expel water from the body, helping to maintain osmotic balance.[24]

Individual rotifers
Philodina rugosa
Ptygura pilula
Brachionus quadridentatus

Biology

[edit]

The coronal cilia pull the animal, when unattached, through the water.

Like many other microscopic animals, adult rotifers frequently exhibit eutely—they have a fixed number of cells within a species, usually on the order of 1,000.

Bdelloid rotifer genomes contain two or more divergent copies of each gene, suggesting a long-term asexual evolutionary history.[28] For example, four copies of hsp82 are found. Each is different and found on a different chromosome excluding the possibility of homozygous sexual reproduction.

Feeding

[edit]
Video of rotifer feeding, probably of the genus Cephalodella
Video of a bdelloid rotifer feeding

Rotifers eat particulate organic detritus, dead bacteria, algae, and protozoans. They eat particles up to 10 micrometres in size. Like crustaceans, rotifers contribute to nutrient recycling. For this reason, they are used in fish tanks to help clean the water, to prevent clouds of waste matter. Rotifers affect the species composition of algae in ecosystems through their choice in grazing. Rotifers may compete with cladocera and copepods for planktonic food sources.

Reproduction and life cycle

[edit]

Rotifers are dioecious and reproduce sexually or parthenogenetically. They are sexually dimorphic, with the females always being larger than the males. In some species, this is relatively mild, but in others the female may be up to ten times the size of the male. In parthenogenetic species, males may be present only at certain times of the year (Monogononta), or absent altogether (Bdelloidea).[23][24]

The female reproductive system consists of one or two ovaries, each with a vitellarium gland that supplies the eggs with yolk. Together, each ovary and vitellarium form a single syncitial structure in the anterior part of the animal, opening through an oviduct into the cloaca. Unlike ectolecithal groups like Platyhelminthes, yolk is supplied to the ovum not by separate yolk cells but by flow-through cytoplasmic bridges. Males do not usually have a functional digestive system, and are therefore short-lived, often being sexually fertile at birth. They have a single testicle and sperm duct, associated with a pair of glandular structures referred to as prostates (unrelated to the vertebrate prostate). The sperm duct opens into a gonopore at the posterior end of the animal, which is usually modified to form a penis. The gonopore is homologous to the cloaca of females, but in most species has no connection to the vestigial digestive system, which lacks an anus.[23][24]

In the genus Asplanchna also the females lacks an anus, but have kept the cloacal opening for excretion and the release of eggs.[29]

The phylum Rotifera encloses three classes that reproduce by three different mechanisms: Seisonidea only reproduce sexually; Bdelloidea reproduce exclusively by asexual parthenogenesis; Monogononta reproduce alternating these two mechanisms ("cyclical parthenogenesis" or "heterogony"). Parthenogenesis (amictic phase) dominates the monogonont life cycle, promoting fast population growth and colonization. In this phase males are absent and amictic females produce diploid eggs by mitosis which develop parthenogenetically into females that are clones of their mothers. Some amictic females can generate mictic females that will produce haploid eggs by meiosis. Mixis (meiosis) is induced by different types of stimulus depending on species. Haploid eggs develop into haploid dwarf males if they are not fertilized and into diploid "resting eggs" (or "diapausing eggs") if they are fertilized by males. Such eggs are often dispersed by winds or birds.[23][30]

Fertilization is internal. The male either inserts his penis into the female's cloaca or uses it to penetrate her skin, injecting the sperm into the body cavity. The egg secretes a shell, and is attached either to the substratum, nearby plants, or the female's own body. A few species, such as members of the Rotaria, are ovoviviparous, retaining the eggs inside their body until they hatch. The zygote undergoes modified spiral cleavage.[23][24]

Most species hatch as miniature versions of the adult. Sessile species, however, are born as free-swimming larvae, which closely resemble the adults of related free-swimming species. Females grow rapidly, reaching their adult size within a few days, while males typically do not grow in size at all.[24]

The life span of monogonont females varies from two days to about three weeks.

Loss of sexual reproduction system

[edit]

'Ancient asexuals': Bdelloid rotifers are assumed to have reproduced without sex for many millions of years. Males are absent within the species, and females reproduce only by parthenogenesis.

However, a new study provided evidence for interindividual genetic exchange and recombination in Adineta vaga, a species previously thought to be anciently asexual.[31]

Recent transitions: Loss of sexual reproduction can be inherited in a simple Mendelian fashion in the monogonont rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus: This species can normally switch between sexual and asexual reproduction (cyclical parthenogenesis), but occasionally gives rise to purely asexual lineages (obligate parthenogens). These lineages are unable to reproduce sexually due to being homozygous for a recessive allele.[32]

Resting eggs

[edit]

Resting eggs enclose an embryo encysted in a three-layered shell that protects it from external stressors.[33][34] They are able to remain dormant for several decades and can resist adverse periods (e.g., pond desiccation or presence of antagonists).[35][36] When favourable conditions return and after an obligatory period of diapause which varies among species, resting eggs hatch releasing diploid amictic females that enter into the asexual phase of the life cycle.[30][37]

Anhydrobiosis

[edit]

Bdelloid rotifer females cannot produce resting eggs, but many can survive prolonged periods of adverse conditions after desiccation. This facility is termed anhydrobiosis, and organisms with these capabilities are termed anhydrobionts. Under drought conditions, bdelloid rotifers contract into an inert form and lose almost all body water; when rehydrated they resume activity within a few hours. Bdelloids can survive the dry state for long periods, with the longest well-documented dormancy being nine years. Rotifers can also undergo other forms of cryptobiosis, notably cryobiosis which results from decreased temperatures. In 2021, researchers collected samples from remote Arctic locations containing rotifers which when thawed revealed living specimens around 24,000 years old.[9] While in other anhydrobionts, such as the brine shrimp, this desiccation tolerance is thought to be linked to the production of trehalose, a non-reducing disaccharide (sugar), bdelloids apparently cannot synthesise trehalose. In bdelloids, a major cause of the resistance to desiccation, as well as resistance to ionizing radiation, is a highly efficient mechanism for repairing the DNA double-strand breaks induced by these agents.[38] This repair mechanism likely involves mitotic recombination between homologous DNA regions.[38]

Predators

[edit]

Rotifers fall prey to many animals, such as copepods, fish (e.g. herring, salmon), bryozoa, comb jellies, jellyfish, starfish, and tardigrades.[39]

Genome size

[edit]

The genome size of a bdelloid rotifer, Adineta vaga, was reported to be around 244 Mb.[40] The genomes of Monogononts seem to be significantly smaller than those of Bdelloids. In Monogononta the nuclear DNA content (2C) in eight different species of four different genera ranged almost fourfold, from 0.12 to 0.46 pg.[41] Haploid "1C" genome sizes in Brachionus species range at least from 0.056 to 0.416 pg.[42]

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Rotifer

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Rotifers (phylum Rotifera) are a diverse group of microscopic, multicellular aquatic invertebrates, typically ranging in size from 50 to 2,000 micrometers, that inhabit freshwater, marine, and moist terrestrial environments worldwide. These pseudocoelomate animals possess a complete digestive system, specialized organ systems including a brain and sensory organs, and a distinctive anterior structure called the corona—a wheel-like ring of cilia that generates currents for feeding on microorganisms and detritus while also aiding in locomotion. With approximately 2,000 to 2,200 described species, rotifers play key ecological roles as primary consumers in aquatic food webs, contributing to nutrient cycling and serving as prey for larger organisms. The body of a rotifer is divided into three main regions: the head (corona-bearing), trunk, and foot, with a syncytial providing flexibility and protection. Most species are free-living and planktonic, though some are sessile or parasitic, and they exhibit remarkable adaptability to transient habitats such as temporary ponds. Rotifers are classified into three classes: Monogononta (the largest, with cyclical ), Bdelloidea (all-female, reproducing asexually via and known for desiccation tolerance), and Seisonidea (parasitic on crustaceans). Their reproductive strategies, including amictic (asexual) and mictic (sexual potential) phases in monogononts, allow rapid population growth under favorable conditions. Notable for their evolutionary significance, rotifers have been studied as model organisms for aging, resistance, and due to the bdelloids' ancient . Despite their small size, often resembling , rotifers are true metazoans with complex behaviors, such as foot secretion for attachment and corona retraction in response to threats.

Overview

General description

Rotifers are microscopic, multicellular animals belonging to the Rotifera, characterized as pseudocoelomates with a fluid-filled that is not fully lined by . These organisms typically measure between 0.1 and 0.5 mm in length, though sizes can range from 50 to 2000 μm, and over 2,000 species have been described worldwide. Primarily aquatic, rotifers exhibit bilateral symmetry and unsegmented bodies, distinguishing them as a unique group among small . A hallmark feature of rotifers is the ciliated corona, a wheel-like structure at the anterior end formed by rings of cilia that beat in a coordinated manner. This corona serves dual purposes for locomotion, propelling the animal through , and feeding, by creating currents that draw in particles, often creating the of rotating wheels—hence the name derived from Latin for "wheel-bearer." The corona's rhythmic motion is a key morphological trait not found in other micrometazoans. The phylum Rotifera is divided into three main classes: Monogononta, which is the most diverse with approximately 1,500 capable of both sexual and ; Bdelloidea, comprising about 350 exclusively asexual known for their resilience; and Seisonidea, a small group of four parasitic . Unlike nematodes, which share pseudocoelomate body organization but lack the corona and have a more elongate, unadorned form, or tardigrades, which possess a distinct lobopodial without ciliary feeding structures, rotifers are readily identified by their ciliated anterior disk and overall compact, often cylindrical morphology.

Habitat and distribution

Rotifers exhibit a , inhabiting a wide array of aquatic and semi-aquatic environments worldwide. They are particularly ubiquitous in freshwater systems, including lakes, ponds, rivers, and temporary water bodies, where they thrive in diverse conditions from oligotrophic to eutrophic waters. Marine rotifers, though less abundant than their freshwater counterparts, are commonly found in nearshore waters, estuaries, and brackish environments. Additionally, certain , especially bdelloids, occupy semi-terrestrial habitats such as mosses, lichens, soils, and leaf litter, often in moist microenvironments. The highest diversity of rotifers occurs in tropical freshwater habitats, where is elevated due to favorable climatic conditions and varied aquatic ecosystems. Bdelloid rotifers are especially prevalent in temporary pools and ephemeral water bodies, owing to their tolerance for , which allows persistence in fluctuating environments. Some rotifers also inhabit extreme settings, including acidic hot springs and polar ice, demonstrating remarkable resilience to harsh physicochemical conditions. For instance, bdelloid species have been documented in glacial ice across and Antarctic freshwater ecosystems. Within these habitats, rotifers display varied microhabitat preferences, categorized as planktonic, periphytic, or benthic. Planktonic forms are free-floating in open water columns, contributing to the community in lakes and rivers. Periphytic rotifers attach to submerged surfaces like aquatic vegetation, stones, or artificial substrates in littoral zones. Benthic species dwell on or within sediments at the bottom of water bodies, often in slower-flowing or stagnant areas. Adaptations to environmental variability are evident in species, such as those in the Brachionus, which tolerate wide ranges in estuarine habitats.

Taxonomy

Etymology

The name Rotifera derives from the combination of rota ("") and ferre ("to bear"), referring to the wheel-like appearance created by the rapid, rotating motion of cilia in the corona, the ciliated structure around the of these microscopic animals. This was formally established for the by French naturalist in 1817, marking the recognition of rotifers as a distinct group of multicellular . Prior to Cuvier's classification, rotifers were observed and described under early , earning the "wheel animalcules" due to their spinning ciliary action, as noted in detailed accounts by Dutch microscopist in a 1702 letter to the Royal Society. Leeuwenhoek's observations highlighted their motility and form, likening the corona to rotating wheels, which influenced subsequent descriptive terminology. Historically, rotifers were initially grouped with worms or protozoans; for instance, Carl Linnaeus included three rotifer species under genera like Hydra, Serpula, and Tubipora within the class Zoophyta in his 1758 Systema Naturae, treating them as infusorians rather than a separate phylum. By the early 19th century, advancements in microscopy led to their separation as a unique phylum, with Christian Gottfried Ehrenberg in 1838 confirming their multicellular nature and distinguishing them from single-celled organisms.

Classification and phylogeny

Rotifers are classified within the phylum Rotifera, whose phylogenetic position within is debated; recent molecular phylogenies place it within the clade , often as sister to or near based on molecular and morphological analyses. The phylum encompasses three main classes: Monogononta, , and Seisonidea. Monogononta is the largest class, comprising approximately 1,800 species primarily found in freshwater and marine environments, subdivided into orders such as Ploimida and Flosculida, with families like Brachionidae exemplifying diverse morphologies. includes about 450 species, all obligately parthenogenetic, organized into orders like Bdelloida with families such as Philodinidae and Habrotrochidae, noted for their desiccation-resistant lifestyles. Seisonidea is the smallest class, with only 4 known species in the genera Seison and Paraseison, ectoparasitic on marine crustaceans and lacking a corona. Phylogenetically, Rotifera forms the clade Syndermata alongside , with molecular data indicating as a possible to or the entire , supported by shared traits like the syncytial tegument. This relationship has been robustly established through analyses of 18S rRNA gene sequences and other molecular markers, resolving Rotifera as non-monophyletic without in early studies but confirming their close alliance in modern phylogenies. Within Rotifera, molecular phylogenies using 18S rRNA and multi-locus data support the monophyly of the three classes, though relationships among them vary, with Seisonidea often basal. stand out for their ancient , persisting without or males for over 60 million years, as evidenced by genomic and data. Historically, rotifers were first systematically classified by in the under names reflecting their wheel-like corona, initially grouped with infusorians or worms. By the 19th and early 20th centuries, they were recognized as a distinct based on morphological traits like the mastax, but uncertainties persisted regarding their affinities to nematodes or other pseudocoelomates. The advent of in the late 20th century, particularly 18S rRNA sequencing, revolutionized understanding, placing Rotifera firmly within and clarifying intra-phylum relationships while highlighting debates over superphylum placement.

Anatomy

Body structure

Rotifers possess a distinctive tripartite body plan divided into an anterior head, a central trunk, and a posterior foot. The head features a prominent corona, a ciliated disc that aids in feeding and locomotion. The trunk forms the main body, accommodating the internal organs within a pseudocoelomate cavity. The foot is typically telescopic, ending in one or more toes or spurs that facilitate attachment to substrates. The body wall consists of a syncytial covered by a thin, flexible composed of scleroproteins, which provides protection and allows for flexibility in movement. Beneath the lies a layer of muscle fibers, including circular and longitudinal types, enabling the contraction and extension of body regions. The pseudocoelom serves as a fluid-filled cavity that acts as a , supporting the organs and facilitating body movements. A key internal feature is the mastax, a muscular located in the anterior trunk, equipped with trophi—specialized, jaw-like grinding structures that vary morphologically across species to suit different feeding strategies. For instance, incudate trophi feature anvil-shaped rami for crushing, while malleate trophi include hammer-like mallei for grinding softer particles, as seen in genera like Keratella. These structures are composed of hardened, sclerotized elements derived from the . Sexual dimorphism in rotifers is generally limited, with males and females exhibiting similar body plans in most cases; however, in the class Monogononta, males are notably dwarfed, often much smaller and more simplified than females, lacking certain organs like a full digestive system. Rotifer sizes typically range from 50 μm to over 2 mm in length, with body shapes showing considerable variation: some species, such as those in the genus Synchaeta, adopt a nearly spherical form adapted for planktonic life, while others, like Flinia, display elongated, funnel-like bodies with posterior spines.

Nervous and sensory systems

The nervous system of rotifers consists of a suprapharyngeal ganglion, often referred to as the , positioned dorsally in the head behind the corona. This connects to a pair of ventrolateral nerve cords that extend posteriorly along the body. These connect to various ganglia, including those associated with the mastax and foot. Rotifers possess various sensory organs adapted to their aquatic environment. Ocelli, or simple eyespots, are present in some species and enable phototaxis by detecting light direction and intensity. Chemoreceptors, including olfactory sensory areas, are located on the corona to sense chemical gradients in the water. Mechanoreceptors, such as tactile bristles and setae on the corona and other body surfaces, detect water currents and mechanical disturbances. The retrocerebral organ is a glandular structure positioned posterior to the , characterized by secretory cells that produce and release substances through a duct. Its precise role remains under investigation, but it is associated with neuroendocrine functions. With a total of approximately 100–200 neurons, the rotifer reflects the animals' microscopic scale and supports efficient, rapid signaling essential for escape responses to threats.

Digestive system

The digestive system of rotifers consists of a continuous, complete alimentary canal extending from the , located at the center of the anterior corona, through a buccal tube to the posterior . The corona's cilia create water currents that facilitate filter-feeding, drawing in particles such as , unicellular , and , with selective ingestion favoring sizes up to approximately 10 μm. Food enters the muscular , or mastax, via the buccal tube, where it is ground by the trophi—chitinous, jaw-like structures unique to rotifers and varying in morphology across for taxonomic identification. These trophi, the only readily fossilizable parts of rotifers, mechanically break down ingested material before it passes into a short leading to the . Enzymatic digestion primarily occurs in the syncytial and subsequent short, straight intestine, where glandular cells secrete hydrolytic enzymes such as proteases and lipases to break down extracellularly. Digesta transit rapidly through the gut, with evacuation times typically ranging from 20 to 25 minutes at 25°C, enabling high feeding rates in nutrient-poor environments. Undigested waste is discharged via the , a terminal chamber shared with the excretory and reproductive systems. In female monogonont rotifers, a vitellarium adjacent to the digestive tract stores nutrients derived from digestion for , supporting egg production. Structural variations exist among rotifer classes; for instance, bdelloids possess simpler, trophi adapted for scraping microbial films from substrates rather than grinding suspended particles.

Reproductive system

Rotifers exhibit diverse reproductive anatomies across their three major classes, reflecting adaptations to different reproductive strategies. The gonads are typically located in the pseudocoelom, with associated ducts leading to the , which is shared with the digestive system. The retrocerebral organ, situated posterior to the , produces glandular secretions hypothesized to support reproductive processes, including egg attachment and potentially development, though its precise biochemical role remains unclear. In the class Monogononta, which comprises the majority of rotifer species, females possess a single formed as a syncytial mass of germ cells and a distinct vitellarium that synthesizes cells to nourish developing oocytes. These structures unite to form a germovitellarium, with an conveying eggs to the for release. Males in Monogononta are haploid, diminutive, and short-lived, featuring a single testis that produces delivered via a and penis for of mictic female eggs. Bdelloidea, an entirely parthenogenetic class, lack males entirely, with no observations of despite extensive study. Females have a single, well-differentiated paired with a vitellarium, producing diploid eggs that develop ameiotically and are laid through the . The ancient loss of sexuality in bdelloids is supported by genomic evidence of absent meiotic machinery and extensive , which may compensate for the lack of , alongside the absence of functional sperm-producing structures. In contrast, Seisonidea display a more primitive condition with obligate and well-developed males of similar size to females. Both sexes possess paired gonads, consisting of ovaries in females and testes in males, marking a key distinction from the unpaired gonads in other rotifer classes.

Physiology and behavior

Feeding mechanisms

Rotifers primarily employ a ciliated structure known as the corona for capturing food particles by generating water currents. The corona, located at the anterior end, consists of rings of cilia that beat in a coordinated manner to create a vortex, drawing water and suspended particles toward the in an incurrent flow. In solitary species, this ciliary action entraps microscopic food items such as , , and within the vortex, facilitating filter feeding. In colonial forms like Sinantherina socialis, individuals coordinate their coronae to establish discrete incurrent and excurrent chimneys, enhancing collective particle collection efficiency. Once particles enter the mouth, they are directed to the mastax, where specialized trophi—complex, chitinous jaws—process the . Trophi exhibit diverse morphologies adapted to specific diets; for instance, malleoramate trophi, characterized by robust unci and manubria with a prominent fulcrum, function in grinding tougher items like and . In contrast, virgate trophi, featuring elongated and asymmetrical manubria, enable piercing and pumping actions suited for softer prey such as protozoans. Predatory species like Asplanchna utilize raptorial trophi types, including incudate or forcipate forms, to grasp and consume larger prey such as other rotifers or small through active lunging and suction. Selective feeding in rotifers involves discrimination at the corona, where sensory receptors detect particle characteristics upon contact, allowing rejection of unsuitable items before ingestion. The ciliary mesh of the corona acts as a filter, typically entrapping particles between 1–10 μm, while larger or inedible objects are deflected; for example, Brachionus plicatilis exhibits clear size-dependent preferences, ingesting optimal algal sizes while avoiding extremes. In laboratory settings, rotifers often show broader opportunistic diets compared to wild populations, where environmental constraints lead to more specialized particle selection based on availability. Rotifers maintain high metabolic rates, with mass-specific oxygen consumption typically around 0.3–3% of dry body weight per day, necessitating continuous feeding to sustain demands. This elevated supports rapid but limits starvation tolerance, with feeding interruptions quickly reducing assimilation efficiency and growth. Consequently, adequate food supply directly influences , as seen in Brachionus plicatilis, where optimal feeding regimes yield population growth rates up to 0.5 day⁻¹, while deficiencies halve this rate and impair overall fitness.

Locomotion and movement

Rotifers exhibit diverse modes of locomotion adapted to their freshwater and marine environments, primarily utilizing ciliary structures and the foot for movement. Free-swimming , such as those in the orders Monogononta and , propel themselves through water using the corona—a ciliated organ at the anterior end that generates a rotary motion. The coordinated beating of corona cilia creates a helical path, with speeds typically ranging from 0.17 to 0.54 mm/s across various freshwater , enabling efficient navigation in planktonic habitats. In addition to swimming, many rotifers crawl on substrates using the foot, a posterior equipped with cilia and secretions for traction. The foot often features a telescopic extension, allowing it to retract and extend for secure attachment to surfaces like or . In bdelloid rotifers, such as Philodina species, pedal glands within the foot produce that forms trails, facilitating leech-like creeping locomotion where the animal alternately attaches its toes and anterior rostrum to the substratum. Escape responses in rotifers involve rapid maneuvers triggered by sensory cues, enhancing survival against predators. Upon detection via mechanoreceptors, species like Keratella reverse the beat direction of corona cilia, producing powerful backward jets that propel the animal away from threats at increased velocities. These responses are brief but effective, often lasting seconds before resuming normal ciliary activity. Sessile rotifers, including colonial forms, minimize active movement by permanent attachment. In species like Sinantherina socialis (Flosculariidae), individuals form spherical colonies attached to aquatic plants via stalks secreted from specialized glands, with the corona used minimally for orientation rather than propulsion. This stationary lifestyle contrasts with mobile congeners, emphasizing rotifers' adaptability in locomotion strategies.

Reproduction and life cycle

Asexual reproduction

Asexual reproduction in rotifers occurs primarily through , a process in which unfertilized eggs develop into offspring. In this mode, amictic females produce diploid eggs via , which hatch directly into genetically identical female clones without requiring fertilization. This form of reproduction is characteristic of both major rotifer classes, though it manifests differently across taxa. Bdelloid rotifers are renowned for their obligate parthenogenesis—though recent genomic studies have suggested evidence of rare or genetic exchange in some species—representing one of the longest known periods of in animals, estimated at 40–80 million years based on molecular and evidence. Unlike typical sexual lineages, bdelloid genomes lack evidence of , with structures incompatible with recombination and no signs of large-scale heterozygosity loss. Genetic diversity in bdelloids is sustained through alternative mechanisms, including genome fragmentation into numerous small chromosomes that facilitate allelic divergence and extensive (HGT), where up to 8-10% of genes are acquired from non-metazoan sources such as , fungi, and . In monogonont rotifers, follows a cyclic , dominating under favorable environmental conditions such as adequate food and low . Amictic females produce successive generations of diploid offspring, enabling rapid population expansion. Generation times are short, typically 1-2 days at optimal temperatures around 25°C, allowing females to begin within 2 days of hatching and peak output around day 5 of their 2-week lifespan. The advantages of asexual reproduction in rotifers include accelerated through clonal proliferation and the elimination of time and energy costs associated with mate location and . This efficiency supports high densities and quick of transient habitats, contributing to the ecological success of rotifers in diverse aquatic environments.

Sexual reproduction

In monogonont rotifers, occurs during a distinct phase of the life cycle, initiated when amictic females transition to producing mictic females under specific conditions. Mictic females are diploid and produce haploid eggs through ; these eggs develop parthenogenetically into haploid males if unfertilized, or into diploid embryos if fertilized by males. This process contrasts with the preceding asexual phase by introducing and . Males in monogonont rotifers are typically dwarfed compared to females, with a reduced body size, a single testis connected to a duct, and specialized copulatory organs for . They are short-lived, surviving only a few days, and in many species, possess a vestigial or absent digestive system, rendering them non-feeding and reliant on stored energy for . The shift to the mictic phase is triggered by environmental cues such as population crowding, which releases chemical signals (pheromones) that induce amictic females to produce mictic daughters. In some , additional factors like short photoperiods or changes can modulate this transition, promoting during unfavorable conditions. The class Seisonidea represents a minority of rotifers and exhibits obligatory gonochoristic reproduction, with distinct males and females present continuously and no parthenogenetic phase. Fertilization is internal, occurring via copulation, and both sexes are morphologically similar in size to monogonont females, with well-developed digestive systems in males.

Dormancy and adaptations

Rotifers exhibit remarkable dormancy strategies that enable survival in fluctuating environments, particularly through diapausing resting eggs in monogonont species and anhydrobiosis in bdelloid species. These adaptations allow populations to persist during periods of environmental stress, such as or extreme temperatures, before resuming activity under favorable conditions. In monogonont rotifers, resting eggs are thick-shelled diapausing embryos produced via , providing resistance to , cold, and other stressors. These eggs can remain viable for decades, encased in a durable shell that protects against and thermal extremes. Hatching is triggered by environmental cues, including changes in , chemical signals from the , and light exposure, which initiate transcriptional events leading to development. Bdelloid rotifers, in contrast, achieve dormancy through anhydrobiosis, a state of extreme tolerance unique among multicellular animals for its prevalence across the class. During , bdelloids contract into a compact "tun" shape via muscle retraction, reducing body volume and minimizing water loss while entering metabolic arrest. This process involves the accumulation of late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins, which stabilize cellular structures and prevent damage from dehydration, along with other protective mechanisms that facilitate upon rehydration. Notably, bdelloids lack , a common protectant in other desiccation-tolerant organisms, relying instead on LEA proteins and vitrification-like states for survival. Individuals can endure anhydrobiosis for years, reviving rapidly when water returns. The ancient loss of in bdelloids—though recent evidence suggests possible rare sexual events—has contributed to their tolerance by eliminating the need for aquatic mating phases vulnerable to drying, allowing entry into anhydrobiosis at any life stage. However, this asexual mode risks —the irreversible accumulation of deleterious mutations—potentially mitigated by frequent (HGT), which introduces genetic diversity from environmental sources. Evidence of HGT in bdelloid genomes supports its role in maintaining adaptability despite the absence of . These mechanisms integrate seamlessly into rotifer life cycles, enabling alternation between active phases of rapid parthenogenetic and dormant phases tailored to ephemeral habitats like temporary ponds or mosses. In monogononts, resting eggs bridge unfavorable periods, while bdelloids' flexible anhydrobiosis supports colonization of transient water bodies, ensuring persistence in unpredictable environments.

Ecology

Environmental roles

Rotifers function as primary consumers in freshwater ecosystems, grazing on , , and organic detritus to transfer energy through food webs. Their feeding activity helps regulate populations, thereby controlling algal blooms that could otherwise lead to and oxygen depletion in lakes and ponds. As recyclers, rotifers play a vital role in biogeochemical cycles due to their short generation times and high excretion rates, releasing bioavailable and back into the water column. This process supports the by fueling bacterial growth and , with global estimates indicating rotifers contribute approximately 0.12 million tons of and 0.17 million tons of annually to bog systems alone. In broader freshwater habitats, their rapid turnover enhances availability for higher trophic levels without accumulating excess . Rotifers are effective bioindicators of water quality owing to their sensitivity to pollutants, dissolved oxygen fluctuations, and nutrient enrichment, allowing rapid detection of environmental stress. Recent studies highlight rotifer community shifts under climate warming, with thermophilic species increasing, and the use of eDNA for enhanced monitoring of their responses to stressors as of 2024. Communities dominated by certain rotifer taxa, such as Lecane or Trichocerca, signal oligotrophic conditions, while shifts toward Brachionus species indicate eutrophication or contamination. In monitoring programs, including those aligned with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency assessments of zooplankton, rotifers help evaluate aquatic health and guide remediation efforts. In , rotifers such as plicatilis and B. rotundiformis serve as essential live feed for marine and larvae, providing optimal size (50–300 μm) and digestibility to support early development and survival. Their nutritional enrichment with and vitamins further improves larval growth rates in species like seabass and . Additionally, rotifers are widely used as model organisms in , enabling standardized assays for toxicity screening of chemicals and effluents due to their short life cycles and reproducible responses to stressors like and pesticides.

Predators and interactions

Rotifers face significant predation pressure from a variety of aquatic organisms, including larger invertebrates such as copepods and cladocerans, which actively consume them as part of their diet. Fish larvae, particularly in freshwater and marine environments, also prey heavily on rotifers, often targeting smaller species during early developmental stages. Protozoans, especially ciliates, serve as micro-predators that ingest rotifers, contributing to population control in microbial communities. Within the rotifer phylum itself, species of the genus Asplanchna exhibit cannibalistic behavior, preying on smaller or conspecific individuals, which can regulate population dynamics in dense assemblages. To counter these threats, rotifers have evolved several defensive strategies, primarily morphological and behavioral. Many species, such as those in the genus , produce inducible spines or helmets in response to predator kairomones, enhancing their gape-limited escape from ingestion by predators like Asplanchna. These structures increase body length and rigidity, reducing vulnerability without excessive energy costs in low-risk environments. Behavioral defenses include alterations in swimming speed and patterns, such as reduced activity to minimize encounter rates, and occasional schooling or grouping to dilute individual risk. Parasitism represents another major biotic interaction, with nematodes, fungi, and bacteria infecting rotifers and often causing population declines. Certain fungi exhibiting Lagenidiaceae characteristics are common endoparasites that proliferate in high-density conditions, leading to infection rates up to 85-95% or more in cultured or natural blooms, ultimately causing host death through spore production. Bacterial pathogens, including Vibrio species, can also invade, particularly in stressed populations, exacerbating mortality. Symbiotic relationships involving rotifers are less common but include epibiosis, where organisms such as or attach to rotifer loricae, potentially providing or nutrient exchange without significant harm to the host. Rare mutualistic interactions occur, for instance, between certain rotifers and algal epibionts like Colacium, where the alga benefits from mobility on the rotifer while supplying supplementary nutrition, enhancing host survival in nutrient-poor waters.

Evolution and genetics

Phylogenetic relationships

Rotifers, along with the acanthocephalans (spiny-headed worms), form the monophyletic Syndermata, a relationship strongly supported by both morphological and molecular data, including analyses of nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences. This grouping is characterized by shared traits such as the complex jaw-like structure known as trophi and epidermal syncytia. Within the broader metazoan phylogeny, Syndermata is positioned within the , often as a to Platyhelminthes based on phylogenomic studies using expressed sequence tags. However, the exact placement remains debated, with some ribosomal RNA and multi-gene analyses supporting inclusion within , a superphylum defined by trochophore-like larvae and lophophore feeding structures in certain members. A notable anomaly in rotifer phylogeny is the bdelloid lineage, which represents one of the most ancient asexual clades among animals, with no evidence of males or for approximately 40-80 million years, challenging traditional views on the evolutionary costs of . However, recent genomic analyses (e.g., 2022 study on Macrotrachella quadricornifera) have reported signatures consistent with facultative , such as allele sharing indicative of , though males remain unobserved and the interpretation remains debated. Bdelloids have diversified into over 450 species despite this, incorporating genetic material through (HGT) from non-metazoan sources such as fungi and bacteria, comprising up to 10% of their active genes and aiding adaptations like tolerance. Evidence of their resilience includes viable bdelloids revived from 24,000-year-old , demonstrating long-term survival in desiccated or frozen states. This HGT-driven evolution contrasts with the cyclic in monogonont rotifers and underscores bdelloids' role in debates on asexual persistence. Key evolutionary innovations in rotifers include the corona, a ciliated head structure for feeding and locomotion that likely evolved from a lophophore-like ancestral apparatus common in lophotrochozoans, enabling efficient particle capture in aquatic environments. Complementing this, the trophi—a sclerotized, articulated masticatory apparatus—has diversified into at least nine distinct types across rotifer taxa, reflecting adaptations to varied diets from soft to tougher , with ultrastructural variations supporting clade-specific feeding strategies. The fossil record of rotifers is sparse due to their microscopic size and soft-bodied nature, with the earliest definitive records consisting of bdelloid-like specimens preserved in Eocene (approximately 40 million years ago) Dominican amber. Earlier traces include Late Cretaceous eggs potentially attributable to rotifers and a Middle Jurassic acanthocephalan that hints at Syndermata's deeper origins. Molecular clock estimates, calibrated using ribosomal genes, suggest the divergence of Syndermata from other spiralians approximately 500–1,100 million years ago (best estimate around 800 Ma).

Genome characteristics

Rotifer genomes vary significantly in size, with haploid values typically ranging from 0.05 to 0.4 pg across , corresponding to approximately 50–400 Mb of . This range reflects adaptations to diverse aquatic and semi-terrestrial environments, with smaller often observed in fast-reproducing monogononts and larger ones in bdelloids. For instance, flow cytometry measurements in the plicatilis reveal haploid sizes from 0.056 pg to 0.416 pg, highlighting intraspecific variation linked to ecological factors. Bdelloid rotifer genomes exhibit unique structural features, including evidence of ancient whole-genome duplication that results in a tetraploid-like organization, with paired homologous chromosomes and extensive allelic divergence. This structure is thought to arise from repeated cycles of desiccation-induced double-strand DNA breaks during anhydrobiosis, followed by repair mechanisms that incorporate foreign DNA, leading to rampant (HGT). Genomes of bdelloid species, such as Adineta vaga, have been fully sequenced at approximately 218 Mb, containing about 8–10% non-metazoan genes acquired via HGT from , fungi, and , which contribute to stress tolerance. Additionally, transposable elements (TEs) are abundant and dynamic in bdelloid genomes, comprising up to 35% in some assemblies and driving through insertions and rearrangements, particularly in non-coding regions. In contrast, monogonont rotifer genomes maintain a diploid state with cyclical , alternating between asexual and sexual reproduction phases that involve and . The genome of calyciflorus, a common monogonont, has been assembled at 129.6 Mb, featuring genes associated with sex determination, such as those regulating mictic (sexual) versus amictic (asexual) female production in response to environmental cues like . These genomes generally show lower HGT rates than bdelloids and more conventional eukaryotic organization, with meiotic machinery intact to facilitate occasional sexual cycles. Recent advances in rotifer genomics include CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing protocols developed in the 2020s, enabling efficient, heritable knockouts in species like Brachionus manjavacas to study gene function. These tools have revealed insights into DNA repair mechanisms, particularly in bdelloids, where desiccation-tolerant pathways involving HGT-acquired genes enhance resistance to ionizing radiation and oxidative stress, with implications for understanding aging processes in multicellular organisms. For example, 2023 studies demonstrated over 90% editing efficiency, facilitating investigations into stress response genes that prolong lifespan under adverse conditions. As of 2025, ongoing research includes analyses of recombination patterns in bdelloid genomes, further exploring mechanisms beyond strict asexuality, and applications of gene editing to investigate HGT-acquired genes in stress responses.

References

  1. https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/phyla/rotifera/rotifera.html
  2. https://sites.evergreen.edu/vms/rotifera-bg/
  3. https://opened.cuny.edu/courseware/lesson/747/student/?section=3
  4. https://web.augsburg.edu/~capman/bio152/nematodes-rotifers-annelids/
  5. https://scholarworks.utep.edu/context/open_etd/article/4899/viewcontent/Brown_utep_0459D_14200.pdf
  6. https://lanwebs.lander.edu/faculty/rsfox/invertebrates/bdelloidea.html
  7. https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php/Rotifers
  8. https://winvertebrates.uwsp.edu/leiden_361_2015.html
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4004354/
  10. https://oertx.highered.texas.gov/courseware/lesson/1753/student/?section=3
  11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/rotifera
  12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/rotifera
  13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/rotifera
  14. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-021-07857-y
  15. https://jan.ucc.nau.edu/allred/bio190/pseudocoelomate/lesson.html
  16. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Rotifera/
  17. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470015902.a0029251
  18. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/11250000902773484
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366586786_The_Species_Diversity_of_Tropical_Freshwater_Rotifers_Rotifera_Monogononta_in_Relation_to_Environmental_Factors
  20. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01082.x
  21. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00792-025-01390-6
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227640701_Rotifers_as_Indicators_of_Climate_Change_in_the_Antarctic_Environments
  23. https://bioone.org/journals/zoological-science/volume-34/issue-1/zs160108/Meiofaunal-Richness-in-Highly-Acidic-Hot-Springs-in-Unzen-Amakusa/10.2108/zs160108.full
  24. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1017599206332
  25. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20614216/
  26. https://www.etymonline.com/word/Rotifera
  27. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstl.1704.0045
  28. https://www.biologydiscussion.com/invertebrate-zoology/phylum-rotifera/phylum-rotifera-taxonomic-history-characteristics-and-affinities/32922
  29. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-00020-w
  30. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02338837
  31. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8703095/
  32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S105579030600131X
  33. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abg4216
  34. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wm-biology2/chapter/phylum-rotifera/
  35. https://biocyclopedia.com/index/general_zoology/phylum_rotifera.php
  36. https://www.biologydiscussion.com/animals-2/fresh-water-animals/rotifers-shape-structure-and-development/34353
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/trophis
  38. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Rotifer-trophi-types-a-Malleate-trophi-b-Incudate-trophi-c-d-Virgate-trophi-e_fig3_304451687
  39. https://academic.oup.com/icb/article/42/3/660/724027
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5098970/
  41. http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/72046/1/63.pdf
  42. https://sites.highlands.edu/faculty-jchristi/wp-content/uploads/sites/68/2017/11/Flatworms.pdf
  43. https://faculty.ucr.edu/~legneref/invertebrate/rotifera.htm
  44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369166958_Fine_structure_of_the_retrocerebral_organ_in_the_rotifer_Trichocerca_similis_Monogononta
  45. https://www.pubs.ext.vt.edu/600/600-105/600-105.html
  46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226104272_A_study_of_rotifer_feeding_and_digestive_processes_using_erythrocytes_as_microparticulate_markers
  47. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ivb.12396
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/monogononta
  49. https://encyclopediaofarkansas.net/entries/rotifers-14616/
  50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/bdelloidea
  51. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00025879
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6886742/
  53. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=2000GT6R.TXT
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/brachionus-calyciflorus
  55. https://aslopubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lno.12199
  56. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00025847
  57. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00025755
  58. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01825525
  59. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229610078_Effect_of_Food_Quantity_and_Quality_on_Population_Growth_Rate_and_Digestive_Activity_in_the_Euryhaline_Rotifer_Brachionus_plicatilis_MA14ller
  60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286932375_Respiration_and_Production_of_Rotifers
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226734495_Swimming_speed_and_Reynolds_numbers_of_eleven_freshwater_rotifer_species
  62. https://lanwebs.lander.edu/faculty/rsfox/invertebrates/philodina.html
  63. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0166445X98000745
  64. https://www.nies.go.jp/chiiki1/protoz/morpho/rotifera/r-sinant.htm
  65. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=7247
  66. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12326
  67. https://www.sciencenews.org/article/bdelloids-no-sex-over-40-million-years
  68. https://www.cam.ac.uk/news/the-benefits-of-80-million-years-without-sex
  69. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1156407
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5305283/
  71. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/657685
  72. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3233/NHA-200104
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7611971/
  74. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-10-108
  75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240591336_Parthenogenesis_in_Rotifers_The_Control_of_Sexual_and_Asexual_Reproduction
  76. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6686465/
  77. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251286188_Dwarf_males_in_monogonont_rotifers
  78. https://aslopubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.4319/lo.2009.54.6.1845
  79. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3881751
  80. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226633571_Old_and_new_data_on_Seisonidea_Rotifera
  81. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7721884/
  82. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22395100/
  83. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25703093/
  84. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7649794/
  85. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10809525/
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7329468/
  87. https://www.mcb.harvard.edu/department/news/meselson-lab-publishes-evidence-of-sexual-reproduction-in-bdelloid-rotifers/
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4255686/
  89. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022098115000234
  90. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7943196/
  91. https://books.byui.edu/Invertebrate_Life/fcgpzmbrtl?language_id=en
  92. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304389422023342
  93. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326537710_Ecology_of_rotifers_and_their_unappreciated_source_of_nitrogen_and_phosphorus_in_temperate_northeastern_American_bogs
  94. https://harvardforest1.fas.harvard.edu/publications/pdfs/Bledzki_FAL_2018.pdf
  95. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385945376_Warming_of_shallow_temperate_lakes_consequences_for_rotifer_community_composition_and_population_dynamics
  96. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X23010725
  97. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/aheh.19870150507
  98. https://www.epa.gov/national-aquatic-resource-surveys/indicators-zooplankton
  99. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232252287_The_rotifer_Brachionus_plicatilis_An_emerging_bio-tool_for_numerous_applications
  100. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2020.626071/full
  101. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0166445X10003735
  102. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00045996
  103. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.1957
  104. https://evidentscientific.com/en/insights/rotifers-an-introduction-to-the-microscopic-world-of-wheel-animals
  105. https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.73.9.3233
  106. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-08772-7
  107. https://academic.oup.com/plankt/article/35/3/461/1505372
  108. https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00271/38251/36437.pdf
  109. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-49919-1
  110. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376648441_A_checklist_of_epibiont_and_parasite_ciliates_Ciliophora_associated_to_rotifers_Rotifera
  111. https://aslopubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.4319/lo.2001.46.4.0871
  112. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-10-533
  113. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088618
  114. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2654452/
  115. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055790306000510
  116. https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/article/66/2/256/2449704
  117. https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.0050087
  118. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9208647/
  119. https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003035
  120. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982216000816
  121. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(21)00694-2
  122. https://miller.biology.utah.edu/courses/2015/handouts/lab08.pdf
  123. https://academic.oup.com/icb/article/55/2/179/744212
  124. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226382070_Fossil_Habrotrochid_rotifers_in_Dominican_amber
  125. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-021-01845-2
  126. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3087684/
  127. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4632278/
  128. https://elifesciences.org/articles/63194
  129. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1755-0998.12768
  130. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3622358/
  131. https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001888
  132. https://www.cell.com/trends/genetics/fulltext/S0168-9525%2824%2900028-3
  133. https://bmcbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12915-023-01807-8
  134. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168952524000283
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.