Hubbry Logo
HelictiteHelictiteMain
Open search
Helictite
Community hub
Helictite
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Helictite
Helictite
Helictite
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Rare "fishtail" helictites in the Caverns of Sonora near Sonora, Texas
A helictite at Treak Cliff Cavern in Derbyshire

A helictite is a speleothem (cave-formed mineral) found in a limestone cave that changes its axis from the vertical at one or more stages during its growth. Helictites have a curving or angular form that looks as if they were grown in zero gravity. They are most likely the result of capillary forces acting on tiny water droplets, a force often strong enough at this scale to defy gravity.

Helictites are, perhaps, the most delicate of cave formations. They are usually made of needle-form calcite and aragonite. Helictite forms have been described in several types: ribbon helictites, saws, rods, butterflies, "hands", curly-fries, and "clumps of worms". They typically have radial symmetry. They can be easily crushed or broken by the slightest touch. Because of this, helictites are rarely seen within arm's reach in tourist caves.

Timpanogos Cave National Monument in Utah has one of the largest collections of these formations in the world. Large numbers are also in the Jenolan Caves in Australia and in the Pozalagua Cave in Karrantza, Spain. A remarkable suite of helictites also occurs in Asperge Cave, France. Can also be found in Black Chasm Cavern in California, USA.

Formation

[edit]
Diagram of dripstone cave structures (helictites are labeled H)

The growth of helictites is still quite enigmatic. To this day, there has been no satisfactory explanation for how they are formed. Currently, formation by capillary forces is the most likely hypothesis, but another hypothesis based on wind formation is also viable.[1]

Capillary forces

[edit]

The most likely hypothesis explains helictites as a result of capillary forces. If the helictite has a very thin central tube where the water flows as it does in straws, capillary forces would be able to transport water against gravity. This idea was inspired by some hollow helictites. However, the majority of helictites are not hollow. Despite this, droplets can be drawn to the tips of existing structures and deposit their calcite load almost anywhere thereon. This can lead to the wandering and curling structures seen in many helictites.[2][3]

Wind

[edit]

Another hypothesis names the wind in the cave as the main reason for the strange appearance. Drops hanging on a stalactite are blown to one side, so the dripstone grows in that direction. If the wind changes, the direction of growth changes too. However, this hypothesis is problematic because wind directions change frequently. The wind in caves depends on air pressure changes outside, which in turn depend on the weather. The wind direction changes as often as the weather conditions outside change. But the dripstones grow very slowly – several centimeters in 100 years – meaning that the wind direction would have to stay steady for long periods of time, changing for every fragment of a millimeter of growth. A second problem with this idea is that many caves with helictites have no natural entrance through which wind could enter.

Piezoelectric forces

[edit]

Another hypothesis that has been proposed is that slowly changing geological pressure causing stresses on the crystals at the base alters the piezo electrostatic potential and causes particle deposition to be oriented in some relationship to the prevailing pressure orientation.

Bacterial

[edit]

A recent hypothesis, which is supported by observation, is that a prokaryotic bacterial film provides a nucleation site for mineralization process.[4]

Helictite growth

[edit]
Helictites at Jenolan Caves in Australia

A helictite starts its growth as a tiny stalactite. The direction of the end of the straw may wander, twist like a corkscrew, or the main part may form normally while small helictites pop out of its side like rootlets or fishhooks. In some caves, helictites cluster together and form bushes as large as six feet tall. These bushes grow from the floor of the cave. When helictites are found on cave floors, they are referred to as heligmites, though there is debate as to whether this is a genuine subcategory.

For an unknown reason, when the chemical composition of the water is slightly altered, the single crystal structure can change from a cylindrical shape to a conical one. In some of these cases, each crystal fits into the prior one like an inverted stack of ice cream cones.

Helictite formations in Wyandotte Caves, Indiana, United States

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Helictite

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A helictite is a type of , or formation, characterized by its contorted, twisting shape that grows in any direction, often defying gravity. These slender, branch-like structures, resembling threads, beads, worms, or antlers, typically consist of or and develop on ceilings, walls, floors, or even atop other formations like soda straws. The term derives from the Greek word (spiral or twist), combined with the suffix -ite for mineral formations, reflecting their spiraling morphology. Unlike stalactites, which grow downward due to dripping , helictites form in areas of minimal seepage where draws mineral-rich through tiny central channels, coating the surface and allowing growth in irregular directions. This process results in their enigmatic, gravity-resistant orientations, with not dripping off but instead promoting lateral or upward extension. Scientific studies indicate that microbial biofilms, including prokaryotes like Proteobacteria and gliding such as Myxococcales, play a key role in their formation by nucleating precipitation, raising local pH, and influencing directional growth through and . Helictites are found in karst caves worldwide, such as in and in , where they contribute to the diverse array of subterranean mineral structures. Their complex development distinguishes them from classical speleothems, highlighting both abiotic capillary forces and biogenic influences in cave ecosystems.

Overview

Definition

Helictites are speleothems—mineral deposits formed in —primarily composed of or , that develop in environments through irregular, twisting, branching, or spiraling growth oriented in any direction, defying the influence of . These formations typically appear as thin, thread-like structures or more elaborate contortions resembling worms, antlers, or beads, often emerging from cave walls, ceilings, or floors. The term "helictite" originates from the Greek words helix (spiral) and lithos (stone), reflecting their coiled, stone-like morphology. It was first coined in 1886 by C.S. Dolley in his description of specimens from in , marking the initial scientific recognition of these distinctive cave features. In contrast to stalactites, which elongate downward from ceilings via dripping water, or stalagmites, which build upward from floor splashes, helictites exhibit horizontal, upward, or looping extensions driven by internal forces rather than gravitational drip. They arise from the precipitation of dissolved as water, saturated with minerals, seeps through narrow central channels within the structure, gradually depositing layers that enable their erratic growth.

Physical Characteristics

Helictites are typically thin, tubular structures with diameters ranging from 1 to several millimeters, though some can exceed 1 cm in width, and lengths varying from less than 1 cm up to 40 cm or more in exceptional cases. Larger specimens, such as rod-like forms, may reach lengths of about 1 meter and diameters up to 20 mm. These dimensions contribute to their delicate, thread-like or worm-like appearance, often forming branching patterns that resemble bushes or fingers. In cross-section, helictites exhibit radial , featuring a hollow central canal that is typically 0.2 to 0.35 mm in diameter, through which mineral-laden water flows. This internal structure is surrounded by concentric layers of deposition, resulting in smooth, twisted shafts that may end in bulbous tips. Composed primarily of , they have a of approximately 2.71 g/cm³, giving them a translucent to opaque quality depending on thickness and inclusions. Impurities can impart colors such as , clear, gray, , , or red hues from iron oxides, enhancing their varied aesthetic. Their texture often includes loosely cemented crystallites, leading to a fragile composition with thin walls that make them highly susceptible to breakage. Human touch alone can crush or snap them, and even minor air currents or vibrations from seismic activity exacerbate this vulnerability, often resulting in broken specimens observed in cave environments. This fragility underscores the role of forces in their development, as the fine internal channels require minimal disturbance for sustained growth.

Types and Morphology

Common Forms

Helictites exhibit a range of common morphological forms that highlight their structural diversity, primarily driven by within their internal channels. These forms are typically observed in or compositions and often occur in clusters on walls, ceilings, or floors, where growth tips are enlarged to facilitate deposition. Ribbon helictites are characterized by their flat, ribbon-like twists, typically measuring 5 mm wide and about 1 mm thick, with lengths up to 20 mm. These structures consist of flattened, needle-form arranged in twinned pairs of crystallites, forming short stems that twist irregularly. They are commonly found in clusters within caves, such as Jubilee Cave in Jenolan, . Rod or "stick" helictites appear as straight to gently curving cylindrical forms, often protruding at angles of 30° to 60° from vertical surfaces. These can reach lengths of up to 1 m and diameters of about 20 mm, resembling slender sticks or rods with a central channel. They frequently grow in dense clusters, as observed in the Temple of Baal within Orient Cave, Jenolan. Bush or "shrub" helictites manifest as branching clusters that resemble or , with multiple stems diverging from a central point to form intricate, -like arrays. These can grow to heights of up to 1.8 m, featuring enlarged tips for deposition and a delicate, antler-like appearance in or . Notable examples include large bushes in , where they form branching patterns up to 1.4 m across. Spiral or "curly" helictites display tightly coiled forms akin to corkscrews or vermiform twists, with diameters varying from thread-like fineness to several millimeters. These structures often bifurcate and curl in multiple directions, commonly appearing in clusters with beaded or worm-like segments. They are widespread in -rich environments, such as those in Ochtinská Cave, , where spirals reach several centimeters in length. Helictites exhibit a range of atypical morphological variations beyond their standard tubular forms, often resulting from specific dynamics and environmental factors within caves. Butterfly helictites consist of paired, wing-like extensions emerging from a central stem, forming broad wedge-shaped structures that may include a stalactitic tail; these can appear as single folded wings or twinned open wings, with internal micro-channels facilitating growth. Hand or fist helictites feature clustered, finger-like projections arranged in planar, twinned pairs that resemble mittened hands, complete with a distinct translucent "hand" section and "wrist," typically lacking the stalactitic tail seen in other variants. Clumps of "worms" represent irregular, worm-shaped aggregates of vermiform helictites, which often grow initially horizontal before upturning vertically, with enlarged canals at the bends and lengths reaching up to several meters in vertical portions. While helictites share some superficial similarities with other speleothems, they are distinct in structure and rigidity. Anthodites, in contrast, form as needle-like, outward-radiating clusters of long, feathery from a common base, lacking the twisting, capillary-tube morphology of helictites. appears as a soft, flowstone-like deposit with a milky-white, paste-like texture when wet—resembling —and consists of aggregates of fine crystals, differing fundamentally from the rigid, twisting forms of helictites. Rare compositional variants of helictites involve rather than the typical , particularly in certain cave environments, which can result in more fibrous textures and clear crystalline cores often coated with darker minerals like . These helictites may exhibit altered growth patterns, such as underwater deposition with thick external layers, highlighting how influences morphological expression.

Occurrence

Geological Settings

Helictites primarily develop in limestone caves featuring low water flow, where saturated slowly percolates through fractures and tiny pores in the carbonate bedrock. These environments are typically part of broader systems dominated by dissolution along joints and bedding planes, allowing for the gradual seepage of mineral-rich solutions without significant or rapid drainage. Hydrological conditions essential for helictite formation include very low seepage rates, ensuring that water emerges as a thin film rather than discrete drips, which would promote gravity-influenced vertical structures. Stable relative near 100% is also critical, as it minimizes and maintains of in the solutions, preventing the preferential downward growth seen in stalactites. Associated geological features include zones below the or vadose areas above it, where percolating waters achieve supersaturation through degassing, generally under neutral to slightly alkaline conditions and stable temperatures. These settings often occur in drier passages relative to active streams, with constant thermal regimes that support long-term mineral deposition. Cave ecosystems conducive to helictites are characteristically low in nutrients, promoting slow deposition processes that can persist over , potentially influenced by microbial activity. However, these fragile formations remain highly vulnerable to hydrological disruptions, such as sudden flooding from heavy recharge events or during prolonged dry periods, which can halt growth or cause structural damage. In such environments, forces and subtle air currents influence the directional patterns observed in helictite development.

Notable Locations and Examples

Helictites are prominently featured in in , , where dense clusters of these delicate formations adorn the chambers, particularly in the Chimes Chamber, with hundreds of helictites up to 10 inches long. The site, encompassing Hansen Cave, Middle Cave, and Timpanogos Cave, was established as a in 1922 to protect its features and speleothems from disturbance. In , in host extensive displays of helictites, including ribbon varieties and spiral projections in chambers such as the Temple of Baal, Orient Cave, and Ribbon Cave. The Imperial Chamber showcases intricate limestone formations alongside helictites, enhancing the site's status as part of the UNESCO World Heritage-listed Greater Blue Mountains Area. Pozalagua Cave in Karrantza, , contains the world's largest concentration of helictite aggregates, with thousands of these eccentric stalactites twisting in multiple directions across its chambers. The cave was discovered in by quarry workers during blasting operations, revealing a hidden system rich in these formations. Delicate spiral helictites are a hallmark of Asperge Cave in , where arrays of these structures have been extensively studied for their growth dynamics and potential microbial influences. Research highlights variations in precipitation rates among crystal sectors, providing insights into their non-vertical development. Black Chasm Cavern in , , features a unique chamber known as the Landmark Room, often described as a "helictite heaven" due to its vast coverage of millions of these formations, some exhibiting colored variants from mineral impurities. Designated a in 1976, the site preserves the largest helictite display in the United States. Conservation of helictites faces significant threats from tourism, including physical breakage from accidental contact and elevated levels that alter microclimates and inhibit growth. With typical growth rates below 0.1 mm per year—often ranging from 0.01 to 0.07 mm annually—these formations recover slowly from damage, underscoring the need for strict visitor management in show caves.

Formation Mechanisms

Capillary Forces

Capillary forces represent the primary accepted mechanism driving the formation of helictites, enabling the non-vertical growth of these speleothems through the action of hydrostatic pressure and on calcite-saturated . In this process, seeps through a central tube within the helictite, typically 0.1 to 1 mm in diameter, under the influence of hydrostatic pressure differences between the water source and the growth tip. Surface tension then propels small droplets or films of this solution against , allowing deposition of calcite at the tip regardless of orientation. The key physical principle underlying this upward or sideways flow is the Laplace pressure, which arises from the curvature of the meniscus in the narrow capillary tube and can overcome gravitational forces. This pressure difference is given by the equation ΔP=2σr\Delta P = \frac{2\sigma}{r} where σ\sigma is the surface tension of the water (approximately 0.072 N/m at 20°C) and rr is the radius of the capillary tube. For typical tube radii on the order of 0.1 mm, ΔP\Delta P can reach several kilopascals, sufficient to drive fluid ascent over distances of centimeters to meters in low-flow cave environments. This mechanism was first experimentally demonstrated through artificial growth of analogous structures using supersaturated solutions. Supporting evidence for capillary-driven growth includes the hollow interiors observed in many helictites, with central channels confirmed via microtomography to have diameters of 150–200 μm, facilitating internal fluid transport. The characteristic twisting morphology often results from partial blockages in the tube or fluctuations in hydrostatic pressure, causing asymmetric deposition and directional changes. Microstructural analysis further reveals stacked calcite crystals with varying sizes at bends, indicative of capillary-influenced precipitation rates. However, not all helictites possess hollow central tubes, as some exhibit solid or complex channel networks, implying that capillary forces may operate in conjunction with supplementary mechanisms to account for all observed growth patterns.

Wind and Air Currents

Wind and air currents have been proposed as a secondary mechanism influencing the orientation and bending of helictites, primarily by deflecting minute droplets at the growing tips or causing asymmetric of moisture. Subtle airflows, typically ranging from 0.1 to 1 m/s, can exert enough force on these small droplets—often less than 1 mm in —to shift their position, leading to preferential deposition of on one side and subsequent curvature in the speleothem's growth direction. This wind-control theory originated in early 20th-century speleological studies, with researchers attributing helictite distortions to varying air movements that push water drops sideways during deposition. For instance, observations in Wyandotte Cave, Indiana, suggested that seasonal patterns—inward during winter and outward during summer—correlated with observed bends in helictite orientations. Evidence for this mechanism includes occasional alignments of helictite clusters with prevailing cave winds at specific sites, such as in certain passages of , where subtle drafts appear to guide growth directions. However, modern observations indicate inconsistent support, as adjoining helictites often exhibit divergent orientations despite uniform , and many form in still-air environments remote from detectable currents. While air currents may amplify primary capillary forces by enhancing uneven evaporation at the growth tip, they cannot fully account for helictites in enclosed spaces or those growing upward against gravity, where airflow is negligible.

Piezoelectric Effects

One proposed mechanism for the formation and curvature of helictites involves piezoelectric effects arising from mechanical stresses on calcite crystals. Calcite, the predominant mineral in most helictites, possesses piezoelectric properties that generate an electric charge when subjected to mechanical deformation. This charge separation can create localized electric fields that polarize deposition sites, influencing the direction of crystal growth independent of gravity. According to this hypothesis, stresses from the weight of overlying rock or internal growth forces alter the electric properties at the crystal base, promoting asymmetric precipitation of ions and leading to the twisted morphologies characteristic of helictites. The key concept centers on asymmetric growth along the crystal's c-axis, where charge separation under stress directs attraction preferentially, resulting in curved or irregular extensions. In environments, lithostatic pressures from overlying formations typically range from 0.1 to 10 MPa, sufficient to induce measurable piezoelectric responses in calcite. Laboratory experiments confirm that natural calcite samples, including monocrystals and limestone variants, produce polarization voltages under applied stresses of 1-5 MPa, with piezoelectric coefficients ranging from 0.098 to 0.735 mV·cm²/kgf depending on the material. These effects include synchronous voltage increases with stress and post-stress relaxation, demonstrating the potential for dynamic to affect deposition. Evidence for the piezoelectric hypothesis derives primarily from the observed in and its relevance to contexts, including helictites. Studies have linked such properties to natural geological settings, where mechanical stresses could generate fields influencing crystal orientation in cave minerals. However, direct field observations remain limited, as helictites occur in diverse cave systems regardless of seismic activity. Criticisms of the piezoelectric mechanism highlight its rarity as a dominant driver in stable environments, where stresses may be insufficient or too uniform to produce significant curvature. Measuring electric fields and charge effects within humid, dark caves poses substantial challenges, and recent petrologic analyses favor and geochemical processes over electrical influences for most helictite fabrics. This hypothesis is often considered supplementary, potentially combining with to explain complex growth patterns.

Biological Influences

Bacterial biofilms formed by prokaryotes such as species play a key role in helictite formation by providing sites for precipitation. These biofilms, consisting of microbial communities embedded in extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), facilitate the oriented attachment of crystals, contributing to the irregular, twisting morphologies characteristic of helictites. A 2015 study on helictites from Asperge Cave in France identified dense bacterial films dominated by Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Actinobacteria covering the structures, confirming their role in mineral deposition through microscopic and molecular analyses. Similarly, research in the Grave Grubbo gypsum cave in Italy isolated Bacillus and other genera from speleothem surfaces, demonstrating their ability to induce calcite precipitation in vitro via biofilm-mediated processes. Isotopic analyses of these biogenic carbonates, including elevated δ¹³C values indicative of microbial respiration, align with signatures observed in known biologically influenced deposits, supporting a biogenic contribution to helictite growth. Microbial activity in these biofilms alters local pH through metabolic processes like urea hydrolysis or organic acid production, creating supersaturated conditions that drive calcite precipitation and provide organic templates for the directional, non-gravitational twisting observed in helictites. Biofilm densities in cave environments can reach up to 10⁶ cells/g of rock, enabling efficient nucleation and sustained mineral accretion along complex growth paths. Post-2019 research has expanded understanding of microbial diversity, suggesting that symbiotic fungi may enhance these processes by producing additional EPS that stabilize mineral templates and further modify microenvironments for precipitation, as evidenced in biospeleothems from caves. These findings highlight a broader of and fungi directing helictite development, integrating briefly with physical forces like to produce observed morphologies.

Growth Processes

Initial Development

Helictites initiate their growth as diminutive stalactite-like structures or from thin coatings on walls or ceilings, where percolating begins to form a narrow capillary tube through seepage rather than dripping. This starting point often arises from the partial obstruction of an existing stalactite's central channel by , such as , prompting the development of secondary, micron-scale channels along the outer layers that facilitate lateral or irregular flow. In such settings, the initial tube, typically hollow and soda-straw-like, emerges from hydrostatic pressure driving mineral-laden outward through these pores in the . Nucleation of the helictite's foundational calcite occurs when groundwater, supersaturated with respect to CaCO₃ due to CO₂ degassing in the cave environment, reaches calcium concentrations exceeding approximately 0.5 mmol/L and precipitates onto a seed crystal, impurity particle, or micro-imperfection on the host rock or adjacent speleothem surface. This precipitation forms the initial mineral nucleus, around which successive layers of calcite deposit via evaporation and cooling, establishing the tube's wall without reliance on gravity-directed drips. The process favors sites with low nucleation barriers, such as existing carbonate surfaces, ensuring the early structure remains slender and tubular. Early growth proceeds at subdued rates of 0.01–0.07 per year, reflecting the limited of seepage compared to drip-fed speleothems, and results in the elongation of a delicate hollow stem typically 1–5 in diameter within the first 100–500 years. During this phase, deposition aligns largely vertically under partial gravitational influence, building a linear extension from the point. As the internal structure matures and seepage volumes stabilize, growth transitions to irregular orientations, with and forces overtaking gravitational alignment to dictate the path.

Directional Changes and Patterns

As helictites develop beyond their initial stem, tube clogs from impurities or variations in can force the mineral-laden solution to breakthrough in a new direction, resulting in sharp bends of 90 to 180 degrees. These sudden directional shifts occur at the wetted growth tip due to local fluctuations in solution flow or pressure, leading to random azimuths that defy . Repeated cycles of such blockages and breakthroughs, combined with ongoing deposition, gradually form more complex spirals or bush-like structures over timescales of thousands of years, consistent with observed growth rates of 0.01 to 0.07 mm per year. Branching emerges as secondary tubes initiate at the tips of primary growth axes, often creating "Y" or "T" junctions where multiple subindividual rays serve as new foci for deposition. This process can produce antler-like forms with bifurcating branches, sometimes developing into intricate bushes with numerous branches per structure, as seen in examples up to 15 cm thick. The overall patterns exhibit random orientations, arising from the cumulative effects of forces, minor air currents, and episodic pulses of that alter flow dynamics at the tip. Spirals specifically may result from screw dislocations in the lattice, layering deposits in a helical fashion during prolonged growth phases. Helictite lengths typically reach a maximum of 2 to 3 meters before structural instability or environmental constraints halt further extension, with growth axes potentially shifting direction multiple times along the structure due to these intermittent water pulses. Such evolutionary changes contribute to the diverse morphologies observed, emphasizing the role of dynamic internal processes in shaping mid-to-late stage development.

References

  1. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/caves/speleothems.htm
  2. https://www.nps.gov/maca/learn/nature/stalactites-stalagmites-and-cave-formations.htm
  3. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15525
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0009281914000336
  5. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dep2.199
  6. http://www.speleonics.com.au/jills/pastpapers/helicat/
  7. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-I29-PURL-gpo130364/pdf/GOVPUB-I29-PURL-gpo130364.pdf
  8. https://helictite.caves.org.au/pdf1/36.1.Rowling.pdf
  9. https://www.mindat.org/min-859.html
  10. http://st1.asflib.net/JNS/AUNat/ASF/ASF-ConfProc/ASF-23rd-ConfMat-2001-CaveOdyssey/ASF-CP23-CataloguingHelictites.pdf
  11. https://www.nps.gov/media/photo/gallery-item.htm?pg=0&id=d2b7f458-bfb9-48b0-a151-d1af91b0793e&gid=010C066B-155D-4519-3E5242C717C769DA
  12. https://pubs.usgs.gov/wsp/1899k/report.pdf
  13. https://caves.org/virtualcave/moonmilk/
  14. https://caves.org/virtualcave/helictites/
  15. https://kgs.uky.edu/kgsweb/olops/pub/kgs/xsp7reduce.pdf
  16. https://npshistory.com/publications/cave/guidebook.pdf
  17. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/sepm/jsedres/article-pdf/68/3/378/2812257/378.pdf
  18. https://encompass.eku.edu/honors_theses/1042/
  19. https://www.nps.gov/tica/learn/nature/cave.htm
  20. https://sydney.com.au/m/jenolan-caves.htm
  21. https://tourism.euskadi.eus/en/cultural-heritage/caves-of-pozalagua/webtur00-content/en/
  22. https://www.showcaves.com/english/es/showcaves/Pozalagua.html
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4625141/
  24. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/dep2.199
  25. https://inspiredimperfection.com/adventures/black-chasm-cavern/
  26. https://helictite.caves.org.au/pdf1/40.2.Smith.pdf
  27. https://helictite.caves.org.au/pdf5/26.01.Issue.Screen.pdf
  28. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009281914000336
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10069778/
  30. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/624919
  31. https://journals.indianapolis.iu.edu/index.php/ias/article/download/4885/4729/0
  32. https://npshistory.com/publications/wica/nrr-2009-087.pdf
  33. https://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/downloads/44/44_p0117_p0128.pdf
  34. https://caves.org/wp-content/uploads/Publications/Bulletin/Vol%252052%2520num%25202.pdf
  35. https://travaux-racovitza.com/journals/downloads/87/art10.pdf
  36. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep15525
  37. https://caves.org/journal-of-cave-and-karst-studies/jcks-articles/involvement-of-bacteria-in-the-origin-of-a-newly-described-speleothem-in-the-gypsum-cave-of-grave-grubbo-crotone-italy/
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6691740/
  39. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.913452/full
  40. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01648-5
  41. https://ackma.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/andy-sez/as20.pdf
  42. https://ackma.org/Proceedings/andysez/as20.html
  43. https://legacy.caves.org/pub/journal/PDF/V65/v65n2-Self.pdf
  44. https://geoinfo.nmt.edu/publications/monographs/bulletins/downloads/117/Bulletin117.pdf
  45. https://www.nps.gov/wica/learn/nature/cave-formations-speleothems.htm
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.