Hubbry Logo
Hrant DinkHrant DinkMain
Open search
Hrant Dink
Community hub
Hrant Dink
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Hrant Dink
Hrant Dink
Hrant Dink
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Hrant Dink (Armenian: Հրանդ Տինք; Western Armenian pronunciation: [ˈhɾantʰ ˈdiŋkʰ]; 15 September 1954 – 19 January 2007) was a Turkish-Armenian intellectual, editor-in-chief of Agos, journalist, and columnist.[1] As editor-in-chief of the bilingual Turkish-Armenian newspaper Agos, Dink was a prominent member of the Armenian minority in Turkey best known for advocating Turkish–Armenian reconciliation and human and minority rights in Turkey. He was often critical of both Turkey's denial of the Armenian genocide and of the Armenian diaspora's campaign for its international recognition.[2][3] Dink was prosecuted three times for denigrating Turkishness, while receiving numerous death threats from Turkish nationalists.[2][4][5][6]

Key Information

Dink was assassinated in Istanbul on 19 January 2007 by Ogün Samast, a 17-year-old Turkish nationalist. Dink was shot three times in the head dying instantly. Photographs of the assassin flanked by smiling Turkish police and gendarmerie, posing with the killer side by side in front of the Turkish flag, surfaced. The photos sparked a scandal in Turkey, prompting a spate of investigations and the removal from office of those involved.[7][8] Samast was later sentenced to 22 years in prison by a Turkish court. He was released on parole for "good behaviour" on 15 November 2023, after spending 16 years and 10 months in prison.[9]

At Dink's funeral, over one hundred thousand mourners marched in protest of the assassination, chanting, "We are all Armenians" and "We are all Hrant Dink". Criticism of Article 301 became increasingly vocal after his death, leading to parliamentary proposals for repeal. The 2007–2008 academic year at the College of Europe was named in his honour.

Early life

[edit]

Hrant Dink was born in Malatya on 15 September 1954, the eldest of three sons to Sarkis Dink (known as Haşim Kalfa), a tailor from Gürün, Sivas, and Gülvart Dink, from Kangal, Sivas.[10] His father's gambling debts led to the family's move to Istanbul in 1960, where they sought a new beginning.[10] Sarkis Dink's gambling continued in İstanbul, however, and one year after their move, Dink's parents separated, leaving the seven-year-old Dink and his brothers without a place to live. Dink's grandmother enrolled the boys at the Gedikpaşa Armenian Orphanage; Dink often noted his grandfather, who spoke seven languages and read constantly, as the role model and father figure who inspired his love of letters.[10]

The Gedikpaşa Armenian Orphanage, an institution run by the Armenian Evangelical Community, was to be home to Hrant Dink for the next ten years.[11] The orphanage children spent their summers at the Tuzla Armenian Children's Camp, on the Marmara beachfront in a suburb of İstanbul, building and improving the summer camp during their stay.[12] The Tuzla Armenian Children's Camp played a significant role in Hrant Dink's life, both personally, as he met his future wife as a child and later married her at the Camp, and professionally, as the government-led closing of the Camp in 1984 was one of the factors that raised Dink's awareness of the issues of the Armenian community and eventually led to his becoming an activist.[11][12]

Dink received his primary education at the Hay Avedaranagan İncirdibi Protestant Armenian Primary School and Bezciyan School and his secondary education at the Üsküdar Surp Haç Armenian High School, working as a tutor at the same time.[13]

During his senior year, he was expelled from the Üsküdar Surp Haç, and completed his high school degree at the Şişli Public High School.[10] Hrant Dink continued his education at Istanbul University, where he studied zoology and became a sympathizer of TİKKO, the armed faction of the Maoist TKP-ML.[11][14] Around this time, in 1972, he legally changed his name (to Fırat Dink), along with two Armenian friends, Armanek and İstepan, to disassociate their factional activities from the Armenian community.[14] His friend Armanek Bakırcıyan, who changed his name to Orhan Bakır, later rose in TİKKO to membership of the central committee, took part in armed struggle in Eastern Turkey and was killed during fighting in 1978.[10] Having fallen in love, Hrant Dink parted ways with his friends and remained at the sympathizer level, completing his bachelor's degree in zoology and enrolling in the Philosophy Department for a second bachelor's degree, which he did not complete.[11][14]

Rakel Yağbasan, childhood friend, future wife

[edit]

Dink met his future wife, Rakel Yağbasan, when she came to the Tuzla Armenian Children's Camp at age nine in 1968.[15] Born in 1959 in Silopi, Cizre, Rakel was one of 13 children of Siyament Yağbasan, head of the Varto clan and Delal Yağbasan who died when Rakel was a child.[15]

In 1915, the Varto clan had received orders to relocate along with the rest of the Armenian population in the region, but they were attacked during the journey.[15] Five families from the clan escaped to nearby Mount Cudi and settled there, remaining without any contact to the outside world for 25 years.[13] Eventually they re-established contact and largely assimilated into the nearby Kurdish population, speaking Kurdish exclusively, although they retained knowledge of their Armenian origin and Christian beliefs.[13] Armenian Protestant lay preacher Hrant Güzelyan (also known as Küçükgüzelyan), who was running a program for relocating Anatolian Armenians to İstanbul, visited the clan and brought back around 20 children to the Tuzla Camp, including Rakel and two of her brothers.[16][17]

Staying at the Tuzla Camp during summers and at the Gedikpaşa Orphanage during winters, Rakel learned Turkish and Armenian, and finished primary school.[15] Because Rakel was registered as a Turk, not as an Armenian, she was not allowed to enroll at Armenian community schools and her father did not give permission for her to attend a Turkish school past then-compulsory 5th grade.[13] Not able to obtain further formal schooling, Rakel was privately tutored by instructors at the Gedikpaşa Orphanage.[13]

Rakel's father, Siyament Yağbasan, at first opposed Hrant Dink's marriage proposal since the Varto clan traditionally practiced endogamy, but eventually relented when elders of the Armenian community, including Patriarch Kalustyan, applied pressure and Rakel declared that she would marry no one else.[13] Hrant Dink and Rakel Yağbasan got married in a civil ceremony at the Tuzla Camp on 19 April 1976 when they were 22 and 17, respectively.[12][18] One year later, at Rakel Dink's insistence, the couple conducted a church wedding ceremony on 23 April 1977.[18] Hrant and Rakel Dink had three children: Delal, Arat, and Sera.[19]

Religious beliefs

[edit]

Dink was baptized and married within the Armenian Apostolic Church, but was educated and sheltered at Armenian Protestant institutions and received his introduction to religion within the Protestant sphere.[20] Dink was a member of the Armenian Evangelical Church of Gedikpaşa, Istanbul, as well as a member by birth in the Armenian Apostolic Church.[20][21] He regarded both churches as part of his culture and said that he was not someone who dealt heavily with religious rituals.[20] Keeping the duality to the end, his funeral service was held in the Apostolic Church, by Patriarch Mutafyan, with Protestant ministers delivering eulogies at the burial.[22]

After university

[edit]

Having graduated from the university, Hrant Dink completed his military service in Denizli; not being promoted to sergeant despite his full marks on the examination caused him to weep.[11] Whether his not being promoted was due to his association with TİKKO or his Armenian heritage, the discrimination he felt was one of the turning points on his way to activism.[10][23] Returning to İstanbul, Dink established "Beyaz Adam" (literally "White Man"), a bookstore in the Bakırköy district with his brothers Hosrop and Yervant in 1979.[23][24][25] Encouraging students to browse and borrow needed books, the store gained recognition by word of mouth and gradually expanded into a multi-location bookstore and publishing house that specialized in textbooks, children's books, atlases and dictionaries.[24][25] After the 1980 coup d'état, when it became difficult for Turkish citizens to obtain passports for travel abroad, Dink's brother Hosrop started traveling to Beirut and then to Europe by using falsified identification papers, and when he was caught in the act, Hrant Dink was also taken into custody as an associate.[11] Soon afterwards, Dink was questioned twice again by the police, once when a former resident of the Tuzla Camp was investigated for possible connections to ASALA, an Armenian terrorist organization, and again when Hrant Güzelyan, who ran the Tuzla Camp, was arrested and charged with anti-Turkish propaganda, and had ASALA demand his release when they occupied the Turkish Consulate General in Paris and took hostages.[11] He played professional football with Taksim SK, which is the Armenian Community team, in the 1982–83 season.[26]

Tuzla Armenian Children's Camp

[edit]

Dink, together with his wife Rakel, took over the management of the Tuzla Armenian Children's Camp at the time of Güzelyan's arrest, while continuing in the bookstore business with his brothers.[11][17] In 1979, the General Directorate of Foundations started a court action to annul Gedikpaşa Armenian Protestant Church's ownership of the camp, based on a 1974 ruling by the Court of Appeals that made it impossible for minority foundations to own real estate beyond what they possessed in 1936.[12] After a five-year legal battle, the court ruled that the land should be returned to its previous owner and in 1984 the camp was closed down.[12] The closure of the camp, where over 22 years around 1,500 children stayed affected Dink deeply and over the years he wrote about the camp often:[12]

"I went to Tuzla when I was 8. I poured my labour in there for 20 years. I met my wife Rakel there. We grew up together. We were married in the camp. Our children were born there... After the September 12 coup, our camp manager was arrested on the claim that he was raising Armenian militants. A wrongful claim. None of us was brought up to be a militant. My friends and I, each of us old charges of the camp, rushed to fill the job to save the camp and the orphanage from shutting down. But then, one day they handed us a paper from a court... 'We just found out that your minority institutions don't have a right to buy real estate. We never should have given you that permission way back then. This place will now revert to its old owner.' We fought for five years and we lost... Little chance we had with the state as the contester. Hear my plea, brothers, sisters!.."[27]

The Tuzla Armenian Children's Camp was the subject of an exhibit by the Turkish Human Rights Organization in 1996, the materials from which was published in book form in 2000, with a foreword by Orhan Pamuk and an afterword by Hrant Dink.[27] In 2001 the camp grounds were sold to a local businessman who intended to build a house on the site until Dink contacted him and let him know that the land had belonged to an orphanage.[17] The businessman offered to donate the land back, but the law at the time did not permit it.[17] At the time of Dink's death in 2007, the camp grounds continued to stand empty, awaiting the new Foundation law that was passed at the end of 2006 but was vetoed and returned to parliament by President Sezer.[17]

Editor of Agos

[edit]

Dink was one of the founders of Agos weekly, the only newspaper in Turkey published in Armenian and Turkish, serving as its editor-in-chief from its founding in 1996 until his death in 2007.[28] The first issue appeared on 5 April 1996 and was hailed by Patriarch Karekin II as a զատիկ (Easter) gift.[29]

Agos was born out of a meeting called by Patriarch Karekin II when mainstream media started linking Armenians of Turkey with the illegal Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK).[29] A picture of PKK's leader Abdullah Öcalan and an Assyrian priest appeared in a Turkish daily, with the caption "Here's proof of the Armenian-PKK cooperation".[30] Patriarch Karekin II asked the attendees at the meeting what needed to be done and the opinion that emerged from the meeting was that the Armenians in Turkey needed to communicate with the society at large.[29] The group held a widely covered press conference, followed by monthly press events and eventually formed Agos.[29]

Dink had not been a professional journalist until founding Agos.[29] Up to that point, he had contributed occasional articles and book reviews to local Armenian language newspapers and corrections and letters to the editor to the national dailies.[23] He soon became well known for his editorials in Agos and also wrote columns in the national dailies Zaman and BirGün.[31]

Up to the founding of Agos, the Armenian community had two main newspapers, Marmara and Jamanak, both published only in Armenian.[32] By publishing in Turkish as well as Armenian, Hrant Dink opened up the channels of communication to the society at large for the Armenian community.[29] After Agos started its publication, the participation of Armenians in the political-cultural life in Turkey increased greatly, and public awareness in Turkey of the issues of the Armenians started to increase.[29] Always willing to speak on the issues faced by Armenians, Hrant Dink emerged as a leader in his community and became a well-known public figure in Turkey.[33]

At its inception, Agos started with a circulation of 2,000, and at the time of Hrant Dink's death had reached a circulation of around 6,000.[29] Influential beyond its circulation, often applauded greatly by some and criticized heavily by others, Agos became a paper whose editorial viewpoint was sought after.[34]

Editorial policy

[edit]

Dink's unique perspective has been described as a "four way mirror", simultaneously empathetic to people of the Armenian diaspora, citizens of Armenia, Turkish Armenians, and citizens of Turkey.[29] Under Dink's editorship, Agos concentrated on five major topics: Speaking against any unfair treatment of the Armenian community in Turkey, covering human rights violations and problems of democratization in Turkey, carrying news of developments in Armenia, with special emphasis on the Turkey-Armenia relations, publishing articles and serials on the Armenian cultural heritage and its contributions to the Ottoman Empire and Turkey, criticizing malfunctions and non-transparency in the Armenian community institutions.[29]

As a leftist activist, Dink often spoke and wrote about the problems of democratization in Turkey, defending other authors such as Nobel laureate Orhan Pamuk and novelist Perihan Mağden who came under criticism and prosecution for their opinions.[35] In a speech Hrant Dink delivered on 19 May 2006, at a seminar jointly organized in Antalya by the Turkish Journalists' Association and the Konrad Adenauer Foundation, he said:

"I think the fundamental problems in Turkey exist for the majority as well . Therefore, ..., I will speak for the majority, including myself in it and dwell on where, we, as Turkey, are headed."[36]

Acting as a voluntary spokesperson for the Armenian community in Turkey, Dink, through Agos, addressed the particular prejudices, injustices and problems the community faced in its interaction with the Turkish society and state.[29] Agos, through Dink's pen, criticized discrimination against Armenians found in Turkish mainstream media, publicized the problems faced by Armenian foundations, and spoke against cases of destruction of the Armenian cultural heritage.[14][27][37]

Dink, however, has been criticized for promoting antisemitic themes of blaming Dönme converts for the genocide.[38]

Armenian issues

[edit]

Dink hoped his questioning would pave the way for peace between the two peoples:

"If I write about the [Armenian] genocide it angers the Turkish generals. I want to write and ask how we can change this historical conflict into peace. They don't know how to solve the Armenian problem."[4]

He defended his constant challenge of established notions:

"I challenge the accepted version of history because I do not write about things in black and white. People here are used to black and white; that's why they are astonished that there are other shades, too."[4]

Dink was one of Turkey's most prominent Armenian voices and, despite threats on his life, he refused to remain silent. He always said his aim was to improve the difficult relationship between Turks and Armenians.[39] Active in various democratic platforms and civil society organizations, Hrant Dink emphasized the need for democratization in Turkey and focused on the issues of free speech, minority rights, civic rights and issues pertaining to the Armenian community in Turkey. He was a very important peace activist. In his public speeches, which were often intensely emotional, he never refrained from using the word genocide when talking about the Armenian genocide, a term fiercely rejected by Turkey.[35]

At the same time, he felt the term genocide had a political meaning, rather than a historical one, and he was critical of Armenian diaspora campaigning governments for official recognition of the genocide.[29][40] In 2005, he accused Germany of using the genocide to block Turkey's entry to the European Union, stating that he was ashamed, as an Armenian, that such manner of drama and political maneuvering should continue into the present day, and stating that he shared from the heart the pain of the Turkish families and Muslim families as part of the process he called yüzleşme or Turkey's confronting its past.[41]

Dink featured prominently in the 2006 genocide documentary film Screamers in which he explains:

"There are Turks who don't admit that their ancestors committed genocide. If you look at it though, they seem to be nice people... So why don't they admit it? Because they think that genocide is a bad thing which they would never want to commit, and because they can't believe their ancestors would do such a thing either."[42]

Dink believed that diaspora Armenians should be able to live free of the weight of historical memory (the "residues of the past"), considering first and foremost the needs of the living majority (he said "eyes of the other side").[29]

Indicating that a show of empathy would have nothing to do with accepting or refusing the genocide, Dink called for dialogue:

"Turkish-Armenian relations should be taken out of a 1915 meters-deep well."[29]

By pointing out issues of rhetorical discourse that hampered Armenian-Turkish dialogue, he believed these obstacles could be overcome to the benefit of Turkish Armenians.[29]

He was opposed to the French law that makes denial of Armenian genocide a crime. He was planning to go to France to commit this crime, when the law came into effect.[43]

According to Dink, Agos helped the development of the Armenian community such that it helped triple the participation in the last Patriarchal elections, trained many journalists, became the community's face to Turkish society and cultivated many friends. He voiced his intention for an "Institute of Armenian Studies" in Istanbul.[29] He tried to make it the democratic, opposition voice of Turkey, a voice used to inform the public of the injustices committed against the Armenian community. One of the major aims of the newspaper was to contribute to a dialogue between the Turkish and Armenian communities, as well as between Turkey and Armenia.[citation needed]

Policy view

[edit]

Dink promoted a policy of wider integration of Turkish-Armenians into the wider Turkish society. Critical of state injustices, he often underlined the fact that a stronger Turkey would be achieved through the elimination of discrimination. Even after his conviction for speaking of the Armenian genocide, Dink continued to value his community, city, and country, noting often that his analysis and criticism was in the interest of strengthening the country. He concentrated on the mismanagement of community institutions, tried to promote obtaining rights through legal means, and was always open to compromise, once noting, "After all, Turkey is very reluctant to concede rights to its majority as well."[29]

In his latest conference, held in Malatya Association of Entrepreneurs, Dink claimed that the Kurds were now falling in for the traps that the Armenians fell in the past. He stated that "English, Russian, German, and French are playing the same game again in this land. In the past, the Armenian people trusted them, thought they would rescue them from the cruelity [sic!] of the Ottoman. But they were wrong, because they finished their business and they left. And they left brothers of this land as enemies".[citation needed] He claimed that the US is now playing the same game, and this time Kurds are falling for it. He said "That is America. Comes, minds its own business, and when he is done, leaves. And then people here, scuffle within themselves".[44][45]

Prosecution for denigrating Turkishness

[edit]

Dink was prosecuted three times for denigrating Turkishness under Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code.[2][4][5] He was acquitted the first time, convicted and received a suspended 6-month jail sentence the second time, which he had appealed at the European Court of Human Rights. At the time of his death, the prosecutor's office was preparing to press charges in a third case.

The first charge under the previous version of Article 301, then called Article 159, stemmed from a speech he delivered at a panel hosted by human rights NGO Mazlum-Der in Şanlıurfa on 14 February 2002.[46] Speaking at the "Global Security, Terror and Human Rights, Multiculturalism, Minorities and Human Rights" panel, Dink and another speaker, lawyer Şehmus Ülek, faced charges for denigrating Turkishness and the Republic.[47] In the speech, Dink had stated:

"Since my childhood, I have been singing the national anthem along with you. Recently, there is a section where I cannot sing any longer and remain silent. You sing it, I join you later. It is: Smile at my heroic race... Where is the heroism of this race? We are trying to form the concept of citizenship on national unity and a heroic race. For example, if it were Smile at my hard-working people..., I would sing it louder than all of you, but it is not. Of the oath I am Turkish, honest and hard-working, I like the 'honest and hard-working' part and I shout it loudly. The I am Turkish part, I try to understand as I am from Turkey."[48]

On 9 February 2006, Dink, and Şehmus Ülek, who stood trial for another speech at the same panel, were acquitted of all charges.[49]

The second charge under 301 was pressed for Dink's article called "Getting to know Armenia" (13 February 2004), in which he suggested to diaspora Armenians that it was time to rid themselves of their enmity against Turks, a condition he considered himself free of, keeping himself emotionally healthy while at the same time knowing something of discrimination. His statement, "replace the poisoned blood associated with the Turk, with fresh blood associated with Armenia"[50] resulted in a six-month suspended sentence.[14]

Dink defended himself vigorously against the charges:

"This trial is based on a total misunderstanding," Dink told Reporters Without Borders. "I never meant to insult Turkish citizens. The term in question was taken out of context and is only symbolic. The real subject of the article is the Armenian diaspora who, once they have come to terms with the Turkish part of their identity, can seek new answers to their questions from independent Armenia.[51]

In a February 2006 interview with the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), Dink spoke about his 2005 conviction for denigrating Turkishness in a criminal court:

"This is a political decision because I wrote about the Armenian genocide and they detest that, so they found a way to accuse me of insulting Turks."[4]

In the same CPJ interview, he explained that while he had always been a target of Turkish nationalists, the past year had seen an increase in their efforts:

"The prosecutions are not a surprise for me. They want to teach me a lesson because I am Armenian. They try to keep me quiet."[4]

His appeal of the ruling that found him guilty was rejected by a Turkish court in May 2006.[52] Having exhausted internal appeal mechanisms, Dink appealed to the European Court of Human Rights for an overturn of the ruling on 15 January. The appeal suggests that Article 301 compromises freedom of expression and that Dink has been discriminated against because of his Armenian ethnicity. Dink's family has the right to decide whether or not to proceed with the appeal after his death.[53]

In September 2006, another case was opened against Dink on charges of 'denigrating Turkishness' under Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code, which Amnesty International considered to be "part of an emerging pattern of harassment against the journalist exercising his right to freedom of expression."[54] The charge was brought against him by the Istanbul Prosecutor's Office after he referred to the 1915 massacre of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire as genocide during a 14 July 2006 interview with Reuters:[54][55]

"Of course I'm saying it's a genocide, because its consequences show it to be true and label it so. We see that people who had lived on this soil for 4,000 years were exterminated by these events."[54]

The charges were also leveled at Serkis Seropyan and Dink's son Arat Dink, as the holder of Agos's publishing license and executive editor, respectively.[56] On 14 June 2007, the case against Hrant Dink was dropped due to his death, though proceedings for Serkis Seropyan and Arat Dink were scheduled for 18 July 2007.[56]

In September 2010, the European Court of Human Rights found that Turkish authorities have violated Dink's freedom of speech (Article 10 ECHR) by criminal proceedings against him for alleged denigration of Turkish identity and in reality, for criticizing the state institutions' denial of the view that the events of 1915 amounted to genocide.[57]

Assassination

[edit]
Main article: Assassination of Hrant Dink

Dink was assassinated in Istanbul around 12:00 GMT on 19 January 2007, as he returned to the offices of Agos.[58] The killer was reported to have introduced himself as an Ankara University student who wanted to meet with Dink. When his request was rejected, he waited in front of a nearby bank for a while.[59][60] According to eyewitnesses, Dink was shot by a man of 25 to 30 years of age, who fired three shots at Dink's head from the back at point blank range before fleeing the scene on foot. According to the police, the assassin was a man of 18 to 19 years of age. Two men had been taken into custody in the first hours of the police investigation, but were later released.[61] Another witness, the owner of a restaurant near the Agos office, said the assassin looked about 20, wore jeans and a cap and shouted "I shot the infidel" as he left the scene.[62][63] Hrant Dink's wife and daughter collapsed when they heard the news, and were taken to the hospital.

Funeral

[edit]

Dink's funeral service was held on 23 January 2007 in the Surp Asdvadzadzin Patriarchal Church in the Kumkapı neighborhood of Istanbul. Dink's funeral ceremony developed into a demonstration at which over 100,000 marched chanting "We are all Armenians". Along the way thousands of people leaned out of their office windows and threw flowers.[64]

A panorama from Halaskargazi Boulevard in the Şişli district of Istanbul. Over 100,000 mourners marched in Dink's funeral, protesting his assassination. The office of the Agos newspaper, where Dink was gunned down, is near the right edge of the image; it is the first building to the right of the one with the large black banner.

Trial

[edit]

The Dink murder trial opened in Istanbul on 2 July 2007. Eighteen people were charged at Istanbul Heavy Penal Court No 14 in connection with the journalist's assassination.[65] Since the main suspect, Ogün Samast was younger than 18, the hearing was not public. Reportedly, the defendants Yasin Hayal and Erhan Tuncel repeated their testimonies given to the security forces and prosecutor. The court decided to release the defendants Osman Altay, Irfan Özkan, Salih Hacisalihoglu and Veysel Toprak to be tried without remand and adjourned the hearing to 1 October.

On 25 July 2011, Samast was convicted of premeditated murder and illegal possession of a firearm by Istanbul's Heavy Juvenile Criminal Court. He was sentenced to 22 years and 10 months in prison,[66][67] and could be eligible for parole in 2021,[68] after serving two thirds of his sentence. Another suspect, Yasin Hayal, was convicted of ordering the murder and was sentenced to life imprisonment.

In July 2014, the Turkish Supreme Court ruled that the investigation into the killing had been flawed, thus paving the way for trials of police officials and other public authorities. In the pursuit of this case hearings were held, and in January 2017 Ali Fuat Yılmazer, the former head of Turkey's police intelligence branch, gave testimony that the killing was "deliberately not prevented" and security authorities in Istanbul and Trabzon were responsible.[69]

The trials, based on two indictments dated 2015 and 2017 charging a total of 78 defendants, lingered on for several years. The 14th Heavy Penal Court in Istanbul finally issued its verdict during the 130th hearing on 26 March 2021. Former police chiefs Yılmazer and Ramazan Akyürek were issued life sentences for premeditated murder. 26 defendants were sentenced to jail for various periods, while others were either acquitted or their judicial cases were separated from the murder trial. An appeals court upheld most of the rulings on 5 May 2022, as 11 defendants were still in prison as part of the judicial process.[70]

The family of Dink released a statement on 26 March 2021, announcing that the verdicts "could be able to convince neither themselves nor the public," while their lawyer stressed that several public officials who took part in the murder were not even put on trial.[71]

After serving 16 years and 10 months of his prison sentence of 22 years and 10 months, Samast was released on parole "for good behaviour" on 15 November 2023.[9]

On the 6th of December, an Istanbul court imposed an international travel ban on Samast.[72] The next week, on December 13, Samast applied for a name change, saying "At a young age, I got involved in a grave incident. As a result, I face difficulties within society. I cannot find peace; I want to be forgotten". His proposed name was widely circulated in the Turkish press.[73]

Dink v. Turkey

[edit]

In 2011 the European Court of Human Rights ruled that Turkey had failed to protect Hrant Dink's life and freedom of expression. He had received death threats from ultranationalists after writing articles concerning Turkish-Armenian identity, the Armenian origins of one of Atatürk's adopted daughters and the role of Turkey in the genocide of Armenians during World War I.[74]

Awards

[edit]

Taner Akçam's 2012 book The Young Turks' Crime Against Humanity is dedicated to Dink and to Vahakn Dadrian.[79]

The Hrant Dink Foundation now hosts an annual Hrant Dink Award ceremony to recognize other human rights activists.[80][81]

Legacy

[edit]
Plaque outside Agos' office in honor of Hrant Dink

According to Vicken Cheterian,

It was the courage of Hrant Dink that transformed this struggle [over the Armenian genocide] into an internal debate within Turkey. For a decade he engaged Turkish public opinion and the intellectual class, questioning their silence. He paid the highest price for his daring; he was threatened, harassed, and eventually murdered. Yet, he won. He succeeded in making the Armenian genocide a Turkish issue, a debate necessary for freedom of expression, of justice and democratisation inside Turkey.[82]

See also

[edit]
Wikinews has related news:

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Hrant Dink

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Hrant Dink (15 September 1954 – 19 January 2007) was a Turkish citizen of Armenian origin who founded and served as of Agos, a bilingual Turkish-Armenian weekly newspaper established in 1996 to address the concerns of 's Armenian community and foster dialogue on historical grievances. Born in , he relocated to as a child and later pursued activism centered on reconciling Armenian and Turkish narratives, particularly regarding the mass deportations and deaths of in , which he urged to acknowledge without denialism impeding national progress. Dink's writings, including a 2004 column employing a to advise to shed historical "impurity" tied to , resulted in his 2005 conviction under Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code for "insulting Turkishness," a suspended six-month sentence upheld on appeal that exemplified the penal code's use against expressions challenging official historical interpretations. Despite appeals to the , the case highlighted restrictions on minority voices in , where such laws prioritized state-sanctioned narratives over individual dissent. On 19 January 2007, Dink was fatally shot outside Agos's office by 17-year-old ultranationalist Ogün Samast, an assassination linked to backlash against Dink's perceived threats to Turkish , with subsequent investigations uncovering by radical networks and allegations of security lapses or by state elements. His death provoked widespread protests in , drawing tens of thousands to his funeral with chants rejecting ethnic division, yet it also exposed persistent ultranationalist undercurrents resistant to revisiting Ottoman-era policies toward . The enduring legacy includes the Hrant Dink Foundation, dedicated to combating discrimination and promoting truth-oriented historical reckoning, though trials for his killers have faced prolonged delays and incomplete accountability.

Early Life and Background

Birth, Family, and Childhood

Hrant Dink was born on September 15, 1954, in , , to Armenian parents. He was the eldest of three sons, with his father working as a originally from Gürün in . When Dink was five years old, his family relocated from to in search of better economic opportunities. Soon after, his parents proved unable to adequately care for their children due to financial hardships, leading to the placement of Dink and his two younger brothers in the Gedikpaşa Armenian Orphanage in . Dink spent much of his childhood in the orphanage, which served as a communal home for Armenian children in the city, shaping his early experiences within Turkey's Armenian minority community. During summers, he attended the Armenian Children's Camp, where activities fostered a sense of cultural continuity and peer bonds among participants. These formative years in institutional care amid familial separation influenced his later perspectives on and minority identity in .

Education and Early Influences

Hrant Dink moved to from at age seven and spent approximately ten years in an orphanage run by the , where he received early care and a Christian emphasizing values. He attended primary and secondary schools within the Armenian Protestant educational system, including the Bezciyan junior high school and the Surp Hac Tibrevank boarding school, completing his high school there. This environment instilled in him a strong sense of Armenian amid Turkey's minority challenges, fostering an early awareness of communal and religious heritage. During his final year of secondary schooling at an Armenian institution, Dink faced expulsion due to perceived left-wing political sympathies, prompting him to finish his education at another school. These experiences highlighted tensions between individual and institutional within the Armenian , influencing his later for open dialogue over . Dink pursued higher education at University's Faculty of Science, earning a degree in while also studying , though he did not complete the latter amid shifting personal priorities toward . His academic background in the natural sciences initially sparked interests in biological , but orphanage-rooted and exposure to redirected him toward journalism and , prioritizing empirical observation of societal dynamics over abstract theorizing.

Personal Relationships and Religious Evolution

Hrant Dink was sent by his impoverished parents to the Gedikpaşa in at the age of six, where he received his early education and formed lasting personal bonds. There, he met his future wife, Rakel Yagbasan, originally from the Armenian Varto tribe in southeastern Turkey's Silopi region, during summers at the Armenian Children's Camp. The couple married shortly after completing , establishing a family grounded in shared experiences and Armenian heritage. Dink and Rakel had three children: Delal (born 1978), Arat (born 1979), and Sera (born 1986). Their family life provided emotional refuge amid Dink's professional risks, as he later reflected in writings that emphasized drawing strength from his wife and children during times of threat. Dink also maintained ties with his brothers, Hosrop and Yervant, reflecting a close-knit familial network despite early separation from his parents in Malatya. Dink's religious formation occurred primarily within the Armenian Evangelical (Protestant) tradition, distinct from the dominant ; he received a solid Christian education at the Gedikpaşa Evangelical Church's Badanegan Doon boarding home and was confirmed as a member of that congregation. Although baptized and married in the Apostolic Church, his upbringing and affiliations leaned toward the Evangelical emphasis on personal faith and , which shaped his lifelong commitment to ethical over rigid . This foundation evolved into a broader, reconciliatory , where Dink advocated for to integrate while preserving identity, critiquing insular fixations on as "residues of the past" that hindered progress. His faith informed an inclusive stance, positioning him as a "bridge" between Turkish and Armenian communities, prioritizing and mutual understanding over sectarian divides, even as it drew criticism from traditionalists in both the Armenian Church and . Dink's approach reflected a maturation from orphanage-rooted to a pragmatic ethic of and , evident in his Agos editorials urging to confront shared humanity with Turks beyond religious or ethnic animosities.

Professional Beginnings

Initial Activism and Community Work

In the 1980s, Hrant Dink and his wife Rakel Dink took over the administration of the Armenian Children's Camp, also known as Camp Armen, an institution established in 1963 by the Armenian Protestant Church for orphaned and underprivileged Armenian children in . The camp, located on land donated for this purpose, offered summer programs focused on education, cultural activities, and personal development for approximately 1,500 children over its history, including Dink himself as a participant during his . Under their management, the Dinks worked to maintain the facility's operations amid financial and legal pressures, providing a space for Armenian to engage with their heritage in a context of minority marginalization in . The camp encountered significant obstacles, including ownership disputes with the Turkish state, which claimed the property lacked proper title documentation despite its charitable origins. By the late 1980s, authorities seized the site, leading to its closure and eventual repurposing, an action that Dink later described as part of broader encroachments on Armenian communal assets. This experience highlighted the challenges faced by Turkey's Armenian minority in preserving independent institutions, with the camp's fate reflecting state policies toward non-Muslim properties post-1930s and 1970s-1980s nationalizations. Into the early 1990s, prior to founding Agos, Dink contributed to the Armenian community through writing for the Istanbul-based Armenian daily Marmara, where he reviewed Turkish books addressing Armenian history and identity under the pseudonym "Chutak" (meaning ""). These pieces aimed to bridge awareness of Armenian narratives within the diaspora press, fostering internal community reflection on assimilation and cultural retention. Concurrently, Dink operated a bookstore with his brothers in Istanbul's Pangaltı district, stocking works that supported Armenian literary and historical discourse. This period marked his shift toward public intellectual engagement, emphasizing over in minority advocacy.

Founding Agos Newspaper

In April 1996, Hrant Dink co-founded Agos, a bilingual weekly newspaper published in both Turkish and Armenian, marking the first such publication in since the establishment of the in 1923. The inaugural issue appeared on April 5, 1996, with Dink serving as alongside a group of associates including fellow Armenian intellectuals and activists. The newspaper's founding aimed to highlight the challenges confronting Turkey's Armenian minority, such as pressures and limited public discourse on ethnic issues, while informing the Turkish majority about Armenian perspectives and fostering intercultural understanding. Agos sought to bridge linguistic divides by targeting Armenians who had lost fluency in their ancestral language due to state policies and to advocate for without alienating the mainstream audience, positioning itself as a voice for integration rather than . This initiative reflected Dink's belief in open dialogue as a means to address historical grievances and contemporary , drawing initial support from Istanbul's Armenian community despite skepticism from both Armenian nationalists wary of collaboration with Turkish society and Turkish authorities suspicious of minority advocacy.

Journalistic Career and Editorial Role

Agos Operations and Bilingual Approach

Agos was founded in April 1996 by Hrant Dink and a group of associates in , with the explicit mission of addressing the challenges faced by Turkey's Armenian minority and communicating these issues to the wider Turkish public. As Turkey's sole publication in both Turkish and Armenian languages, it operated as a , emphasizing open discussion of sensitive topics related to and cultural preservation. The outlet maintained a modest scale, with approximately 18 staff members and a regular circulation of around 4,000 to 6,000 copies per week prior to Dink's 2007 , after which sales briefly peaked at 50,000 copies amid heightened public interest. The bilingual structure of Agos—featuring primary content in Turkish alongside dedicated Armenian-language sections, typically four pages out of 16 in each issue—served as a deliberate mechanism to bridge linguistic and communal divides. This approach enabled Turkish readers to engage directly with Armenian viewpoints on integration, historical grievances, and societal tensions, while sustaining readership within the Armenian community through native-language reporting. Dink, as from until his , leveraged this format to advocate for transparency and , positioning Agos as a platform that challenged assimilation pressures on minorities without isolating them from mainstream discourse. The newspaper's operations, based in Istanbul's Armenian-populated district, prioritized on local community affairs alongside broader analyses of Turkish-Armenian relations, despite financial constraints typical of niche ethnic publications.

Coverage of Armenian-Turkish Issues

Agos, founded by Hrant Dink on April 5, 1996, as a bilingual Turkish-Armenian , focused on elucidating the challenges faced by Turkey's Armenian minority to the broader Turkish public, including restrictions on minority ' property rights exemplified by the 1936 confiscation of sites like Camp Armen. The publication's dual-language format facilitated between Armenian and Turkish communities, reporting on cultural preservation, historical grievances, and contemporary while avoiding isolationist narratives. Dink's editorial stance emphasized reconciliation over adversarial demands, as articulated in his April 23, 1996, essay "23.5 April," which proposed marking the commemoration not as a full but as "23.5" to symbolize acknowledgment of alongside hope for mutual empathy and future coexistence between Turks and . He argued that required deeper before fully confronting the 1915 events, critiquing both official denialism and pressures that hindered internal Turkish societal processing of the past. Coverage extended to investigative reports challenging taboos, such as the February 2004 Agos article revealing the Armenian origins of Sabiha Gökçen, Atatürk's adopted daughter and a Turkish aviation icon, which prompted nationalist backlash but underscored Dink's commitment to historical transparency as a prerequisite for national healing. In columns like those from June 2006, Dink drew parallels between Armenian experiences and other minority issues, such as Kurdish conflicts, advocating coexistence through empathy rather than retribution, stating, "I do not hold the slightest grudge against the Turkish people... because of what happened in the past." This approach positioned Agos as a platform for fostering Turkish self-reflection on events like the Adana massacres of 1909, prioritizing causal understanding of intercommunal violence over punitive international campaigns. Dink consistently urged Armenian communities, particularly the , to temper aggressive recognition efforts, suggesting in writings that such tactics exacerbated Turkish defensiveness and impeded genuine , while maintaining that open discussion of the within could transform denial into . Agos thereby covered Armenian-Turkish issues not as zero-sum conflicts but as opportunities for shared progress, with Dink viewing democratization and free expression as foundational to addressing historical causal chains, including state policies post-1915 that marginalized minorities.

Policy Positions on Integration and Nationalism

Dink advocated for the integration of Turkey's Armenian community by encouraging public expression of ethnic identity alongside commitment to Turkish citizenship, rejecting the historical pattern of concealment under assimilationist pressures. Through Agos, he promoted bilingual discourse to bridge Armenian and Turkish perspectives, fostering civic participation rather than isolation or subordination. He viewed true integration as requiring reciprocal acknowledgment of shared societal spaces, where minorities contribute openly without fear of reprisal, as evidenced by his campaigns against discriminatory practices targeting in education and media. In critiquing nationalism, Dink opposed Turkish variants that enforced ethnic homogeneity and suppressed minority narratives, such as denial of historical events and laws like Article 301, which he challenged in court to defend pluralistic expression. He similarly faulted nationalism for fixating on victimhood and unilateral demands for recognition, arguing it hindered dialogue by treating Turks collectively as perpetrators rather than potential partners in healing. In a 2006 Agos column, he metaphorically described diaspora Armenians' "poisoned blood" laden with intergenerational hatred, urging them to "leave this poison at the border" during visits to to enable forward-looking relations over entrenched antagonism. This stance drew backlash from diaspora groups, who accused him of diluting advocacy, yet Dink maintained it stemmed from a pragmatic need to prioritize living ' futures over perpetual grievance. Dink's positions emphasized causal links between unresolved nationalisms and ongoing alienation, positing that integration demanded Turks confront historical responsibilities without defensiveness, while relinquished maximalist for constructive engagement. He proposed incremental goodwill measures, like cultural exchanges and joint historical commissions, over abrupt policy impositions, believing such steps would erode nationalist barriers empirically through interpersonal trust-building. His framework prioritized causal realism in policy, attributing persistent ethnic tensions to unaddressed traumas rather than inherent incompatibilities, and advocated empirical validation via community-level interactions over ideological absolutism.

Intellectual Views and Controversies

Stance on Armenian Historical Events

Hrant Dink consistently affirmed that the events of 1915 constituted the , describing the arrests of Armenian intellectuals on April 24, 1915, as the onset of a catastrophe that resulted in approximately 1.5 million Armenian deaths through massacres and deportations. He critiqued Turkish official terminology such as "" or "forced migration" for evading the moral weight of the historical reality, arguing that relabeling did not alter the profound severance of from their millennia-old Anatolian heritage. In his 1996 essay "23.5 April," Dink juxtaposed the Armenian commemoration of with Turkey's , proposing that the latter holiday incorporate Armenian children to symbolize shared futures and empathy across communities. He wrote, "If 23 April is to belong to all children, then I say let it also, in some form, belong to the children of ," emphasizing reconciliation through generational unity rather than perpetual division. This reflected his broader view that historical acknowledgment should foster constructive dialogue, not vengeance, prioritizing Turkey's democratization and normalized relations with to enable open historical inquiry. Dink argued that living Turks bore no direct guilt for the atrocities but that perpetuated injustice, advocating conscience-driven remembrance over legalistic demands alone. In a 2005 article marking the genocide's 90th anniversary, he envisioned a future where "on everyone in these lands will join together in remembrance… our shared pain will give rise to a multitude of joys," framing mutual recognition as a pathway to healing rather than confrontation. He urged pulling Turkish-Armenian ties from a " meters-deep well" of enmity, critiquing both state and certain fixations on retribution as obstacles to progress.

Critiques of Diaspora Activism and Turkish Denialism

Hrant Dink critiqued activism for its emphasis on aggressive international campaigns seeking formal recognition of the 1915 , arguing that such external political pressure hardened Turkish resistance and impeded constructive dialogue within . He contended that these efforts, often pursued through resolutions in foreign parliaments, treated the issue as a tool for rather than a pathway to mutual understanding, thereby alienating potential Turkish sympathizers and reinforcing nationalist backlash. Dink, who himself the genocide's , prioritized fostering among Turks through internal over diaspora-driven confrontation, believing the former could lead to organic acknowledgment once achieved greater democratic maturity. Regarding Turkish denialism, Dink condemned the official state position and societal taboos surrounding the 1915 events, which he saw as rooted in fear and insecurity that perpetuated a cycle of historical suppression and inhibited national self-reflection. His writings in Agos highlighted how not only distorted Turkish historical education but also fueled extremism, as evidenced by the threats and prosecutions he faced under Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code for discussing Armenian suffering. However, Dink differentiated between enforced denial by authorities and the potential for reckoning, critiquing the former for blocking while cautioning that tactics inadvertently bolstered it by framing the issue as an existential threat to Turkish identity. He advocated for Turks to confront the past through shared humanity rather than legal or punitive impositions, positing that denial's persistence stemmed from undemocratic structures that prioritized state narratives over individual conscience. Dink's balanced critiques drew ire from both sides: diaspora groups viewed his rejection of their recognition strategies as insufficiently militant, while Turkish nationalists branded his calls for acknowledgment as betrayal. In a 2006 column, he urged Armenians to release the "madness of the blood-tie" that bound them to perpetual victimhood, arguing that clinging to unresolved trauma mirrored the denialism he opposed by preventing forward-looking integration. This stance reflected his broader philosophy that true resolution required transcending binary antagonism, with neither diaspora absolutism nor Turkish obfuscation serving justice or healing.

Reactions from Armenian and Turkish Perspectives

Within the Armenian community, particularly among activists, Dink's advocacy for Turkish-Armenian through internal Turkish acknowledgment of the 1915 events—rather than prioritizing international legislative recognitions—drew criticism for being overly conciliatory and potentially weakening demands for formal justice. He argued that campaigns for foreign resolutions often hardened Turkish denialism, proposing instead that help Turks "share the pain" of the to enable mutual , a stance some viewed as shifting responsibility onto victims. Despite this, many and segments of the praised his courage in confronting denial from within, seeing his bilingual Agos editorials as a bridge for , though hardline elements dismissed his critiques of aggressive as naive or compromising. From the Turkish perspective, Dink's explicit references to the 1915 Armenian deaths as "genocide" provoked intense backlash from ultranationalists, who interpreted his writings as an insult to Turkish identity and national unity, resulting in multiple prosecutions under Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code for "denigrating Turkishness." Nationalists issued public death threats and vilified him as a traitor, with campaigns in media and online forums amplifying calls for his punishment, framing his calls for historical reckoning as disloyalty amid Turkey's official stance rejecting the genocide label in favor of wartime relocations. While liberal and intellectual circles in Turkey valued his push for confronting taboos to foster democracy, the dominant nationalist reaction reinforced a climate of intolerance, culminating in his 2007 assassination by a teenager influenced by such rhetoric.

Prosecutions Under Article 301

Hrant Dink faced multiple prosecutions under Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code, which criminalizes the "denigration of Turkishness," stemming from his editorials in the bilingual newspaper Agos that addressed Armenian-Turkish historical tensions and identity issues. The provision, enacted in June 2005 as part of penal code reforms, required prosecutorial approval from the Justice Minister but was frequently invoked against journalists discussing sensitive topics like the 1915 Armenian deportations and massacres. In one prominent case, Dink was indicted in 2005 for a February 13, 2004, Agos article titled "The Secret of the Spilled Blood," in which he argued that diaspora Armenians harbored a "collective psychosis" from genocide trauma, metaphorically carrying "the Turk as an enemy in their spiritual genes" and urged them to relinquish such enmity for integration in Turkey. Prosecutors interpreted the passage as insulting Turkish identity, leading to charges under Article 301/2. On October 7, 2005, Istanbul's Şişli Second Magistrate's Court convicted Dink of a six-month prison sentence, suspended for five years with probation, fining him approximately 100 new Turkish lira (about $80 at the time). Dink appealed the verdict, but Turkey's upheld the conviction on July 13, 2006, affirming that the article's language denigrated Turkishness despite Dink's intent to promote reconciliation between and Turks. A separate case emerged in late 2005 following public backlash to the initial article, with another indictment under Article 301 for similar writings; this trial remained ongoing at the time of Dink's on January 19, 2007. These proceedings drew international criticism from organizations like the , which highlighted Article 301's role in intimidating minority voices, though Turkish authorities defended it as necessary for national unity. Dink publicly lamented the prosecutions, stating in court that they misconstrued his calls for to abandon victimhood narratives as anti-Turkish, exacerbating his vulnerability amid rising ultranationalist threats. While some parallel Article 301 cases against other writers were dismissed, Dink's conviction stood as a rare upheld penalty, underscoring patterns noted by press freedom monitors.

Specific Charges, Trials, and Convictions

Hrant Dink was prosecuted multiple times under Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code, which penalized "insulting Turkishness," primarily for articles in Agos discussing Armenian-Turkish reconciliation and historical grievances. These cases stemmed from interpretations of his writings as denigrating Turkish national identity, despite Dink's stated intent to promote dialogue and urge communities to release longstanding resentments toward Turks. One prominent case began on February 25, 2004, when Dink was indicted for an Agos article in which the prosecutor, Muhittin Ayata, claimed Dink aimed to "criticize and humiliate Turkish national identity." On October 7, 2005, the Şişli Second Instance Court convicted him of violating Article 301, imposing a six-month prison sentence that was suspended on condition of no further offenses within five years. Dink appealed, arguing the article encouraged Armenians to overcome historical animosities for integration in Turkey. In July 2006, Turkey's upheld the conviction and in this case, rejecting Dink's defense that his expressions fell within protected speech on historical and cultural issues. Dink faced additional charges under Article 301; for instance, he was acquitted in a separate on February 9, 2006, related to similar writings. At the time of his assassination on January 19, 2007, another Article 301 against him was ongoing, further highlighting the pattern of legal scrutiny over his editorial content. These proceedings drew criticism from international observers for chilling dissent on and history, with the later ruling in related cases that such convictions lacked a "pressing social need" under Article 10 of the . Dink served no actual prison time, but the suspended sentence and public stigmatization amplified threats from ultranationalist groups.

Implications for Free Speech Debates

The prosecutions of Hrant Dink under Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code, which criminalizes "insulting Turkishness," exemplified how vague provisions on national identity could be invoked to stifle public discourse on historical events involving minorities, thereby chilling journalistic inquiry into topics like Armenian assimilation and the events of 1915. In February 2006, Dink received a six-month suspended sentence for an article urging ethnic Armenians to mentally detach from their ancestral homeland to integrate as Turkish citizens, a ruling that critics argued conflated opinion with criminal denigration despite lacking intent to incite hatred. This case fueled debates on whether such laws safeguard societal cohesion or enable state-sanctioned suppression of dissenting historical narratives, as the provision's broad language allowed prosecutors to target expressions perceived as challenging official historiography without requiring proof of harm. Internationally, Dink's trials amplified scrutiny of 's free expression standards, particularly amid its accession negotiations, where Article 301 was cited as incompatible with the emphasizing robust protections for speech under Article 10 of the . Organizations such as and condemned the law for fostering among writers addressing taboo subjects, with Dink's —upheld despite appeals—illustrating a pattern of over 60 similar cases against intellectuals by 2007, often resulting in convictions that deterred open debate on and . The later ruled in Dink v. Turkey (2010) that the state's failure to protect him from foreseeable threats following the prosecution violated his expression rights, underscoring how legal actions could indirectly embolden private violence against critics. Dink's experience contributed to broader free speech discourse by highlighting causal links between penalizing "" laws and escalated risks to vulnerable journalists, as ultranationalist reactions to his columns—exacerbated by publicized trials—preceded his January 19, 2007, assassination, prompting calls for Article 301's abolition rather than mere amendment. While amended the article in 2008 to require Justice Ministry approval for prosecutions, reducing but not eliminating its application—over 400 cases were filed by 2010—the reform was deemed insufficient by watchdogs, as it preserved the underlying threat to empirical discussions of ethnic history and identity. These developments informed arguments that prioritizing national honor over verifiable historical analysis undermines democratic accountability, with Dink's case serving as a cautionary benchmark in global debates on reconciling cultural sensitivities with unrestricted public reasoning.

Assassination and Immediate Aftermath

The Killing and Perpetrator

Hrant Dink was assassinated on January 19, 2007, at approximately 3:00 p.m. local time outside the offices of the bilingual Turkish-Armenian newspaper Agos in the district of . The assailant fired three shots at close range, striking Dink in the head and causing instantaneous death. The direct perpetrator was Ogün Samast, a 17-year-old high school dropout from with ties to ultranationalist circles. Samast confessed to the killing, stating that he acted out of anger over Dink's writings, which he viewed as insults to Turkish identity, particularly comments urging to forget traumatic historical events rather than deny them. He had been incited by Yasin Hayal, a local Islamist-nationalist figure previously convicted in a bombing, who provided the and encouraged the act as retaliation for Dink's perceived betrayal of Turkishness. Samast fled immediately after the shooting, traveling by bus toward . He was apprehended on , 2007, in , approximately 32 hours later, during a joint police-gendarmerie operation. Upon capture, Samast was photographed posing with Turkish flags alongside security personnel, an image that drew widespread condemnation for appearing to celebrate the act. In 2011, a sentenced him to 22 years and 10 months for premeditated and illegal possession.

Funeral and Public Response

Hrant Dink's funeral service was held on January 23, 2007, at the Surp Asdvadzadzin Patriarchal Church in Istanbul's Kumkapı neighborhood, followed by a massive procession to the Balıklı Armenian Cemetery. Estimates of attendance ranged from tens of thousands to over 100,000 mourners, including Turks, Armenians, and members of other ethnic and religious groups, marking one of the largest public demonstrations in modern Turkish history. The procession featured poignant displays of , with crowds chanting slogans such as "We are all ," "We are all Hrant Dink," and "Shoulder to shoulder against ," reflecting a rare moment of cross-community unity in response to the . Some mourners carried placards denouncing and calling for justice, while others expressed grief through silence and tears, underscoring widespread shock at the killing of a prominent for . Dink's wife, Rakel, delivered an emotional urging continued pursuit of truth and , emphasizing that her husband's legacy would endure despite the violence. Public response extended beyond the funeral, igniting national and international debates on , free speech, and in . Spontaneous vigils formed immediately after the outside Agos newspaper's offices, evolving into broader protests against intolerance. The event drew condemnation from Turkish intellectuals, politicians, and media, with figures like Nazlı Ilıcak highlighting a collective sense of shame among Muslim Turks over the murder. Abroad, particularly within the , it amplified concerns about ongoing threats to Turkish-Armenian dialogue and press freedom. Despite this outpouring, a minority of nationalist voices celebrated the killing online and in small gatherings, revealing deep societal divisions.

Investigations, Trials, and Accountability

Domestic Murder Trials and Convictions

The primary perpetrator, Ogün Samast, was tried in a and convicted of premeditated murder on July 25, 2011, receiving a sentence of 22 years and 10 months in prison. The main adult trial, conducted by the 6th Heavy Penal Court, concluded on January 17, 2012, with Yasin Hayal—identified as the instigator who supplied the weapon and motivated Samast—sentenced to aggravated for procuring and inciting the murder. Erhan Tuncel, a police informant and alleged accomplice, was acquitted of direct involvement in the murder but received 10 years and 6 months for a prior unrelated bombing offense. The court explicitly rejected claims of an organized criminal network or broader conspiracy behind the killing. Subsequent proceedings separated cases for further examination. In a 2019 verdict by the 5th Heavy Penal Court, the murder was reclassified as , leading to Erhan Tuncel's and a sentence of 99 years and 6 months for his role in coordinating aspects of the plot. A significant escalation occurred in the March 26, 2021, ruling by the 14th Heavy Penal Court, which convicted 26 individuals—primarily public officials including former police chiefs and officers—of charges such as membership in a criminal , of office, and in preventing the despite prior warnings. Sentences ranged from life imprisonment to lesser terms for aiding the crime or failing to act, though 37 defendants were acquitted, including some high-ranking Trabzon police officials. Retrials stemming from appeals continued into 2025. On February 7, 2025, the 14th Heavy Penal Court sentenced nine defendants to in a retrial, including Muharrem Demirkale for premeditated and others for aiding or constitutional violations; additional sentences included 12 years and 6 months for Yavuz Karakaya on aiding charges. However, on January 9, 2025, the same court dismissed terrorism-related charges against seven defendants, including Samast, Hayal, and Tuncel, citing the .

Allegations of State Involvement and Deep State Theories

Allegations emerged during investigations and trials that elements within Turkey's security apparatus, including police and intelligence, possessed prior knowledge of threats against Hrant Dink but failed to act, raising questions of or deliberate . In February 2006, provincial intelligence recorded informant reports indicating Yasin Hayal's intention to travel to and assassinate Dink, with this information relayed to police and (MİT) officials; however, no protective measures were implemented despite Dink's own reports of threats in Agos newspaper articles. Dink had been convicted in 2005 under Article 301 for "insulting Turkishness" over comments on Armenian identity, after which MİT agents reportedly warned him privately of dangers but testified only under restricted conditions in later probes, with broader MİT involvement uninvestigated. The 2012 Istanbul Heavy Penal Court verdict convicted shooter Ogün Samast and instigator Yasin Hayal but acquitted 19 defendants, including police informant Erhan Tuncel and other officials accused of aiding the plot or negligence, ruling the murder an isolated act without elements despite prosecutorial evidence of a network tied to ultranationalist groups. Human Rights Watch described this as a "travesty of justice" that shielded state collusion, citing destroyed evidence of Ergenekon connections and ignored warnings from security forces. In May 2013, Turkey's appeals court overturned the ruling, affirming a criminal conspiracy and noting "strong evidence" of state officials' involvement per the prosecutor's report, prompting a retrial focused on complicity. By 2016, charges were filed against dozens of Trabzon and Istanbul gendarmerie and police personnel for abuse of office and tampering, though higher-level accountability remained elusive. Deep state theories posit that Dink's killing was orchestrated or enabled by clandestine networks within Turkey's military, intelligence, and judiciary—collectively termed the "derin devlet"—to suppress challenges to official narratives on Armenian history and national identity. These networks, historically linked to extrajudicial actions against perceived internal threats, were probed in the (2008–2013), where suspects faced charges for coup plotting and were investigated for ties to Dink's murder, including Hayal's ultranationalist cell in Trabzon. However, Ergenekon convictions were later contested as politically motivated purges by the AKP government against secularist opponents, with some attributing the plot to rival factions like Gülenists (FETÖ), complicating causal attribution amid institutional biases and evidentiary gaps. As of 2020, the case's masterminds remained unidentified, with Dink's family and advocates arguing that systemic reluctance to confront these entrenched elements perpetuated impunity.

European Court of Human Rights Ruling

In the case Dink v. Turkey (applications nos. 2668/07, 6102/08 and 30079/08), the European Court of Human Rights issued a Chamber judgment on 14 September 2010, finding multiple violations by Turkey in relation to 's 2005 conviction and his 2007 assassination. The applicants included Dink's family members, the estate of , and Turkish citizens Rakip Zarakolu and Hüseyin Demir, who argued that Turkish authorities failed to safeguard Dink despite documented death threats and prior legal harassment. The Court ruled that Turkey breached Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (right to life) under its positive obligations, as national authorities possessed concrete intelligence about assassination plots against Dink—including a tip from police informant Mevlüt Kara in December 2006 indicating a planned attack—yet failed to implement effective protective measures or conduct a thorough investigation into the threats. This inaction persisted despite Dink's repeated appeals for protection after his high-profile conviction, which amplified his visibility as a target among ultranationalist groups. The judgment emphasized that the state's operational duty to protect life from real and immediate risks was not fulfilled, attributing the lapse to institutional shortcomings rather than isolated negligence. Additionally, the ECtHR found a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) concerning Dink's prosecution and six-month suspended prison sentence by the Şişli in October 2005 under Turkish Penal Code Article 301 for "denigrating Turkishness." Dink's articles in Agos had discussed shared Turkish-Armenian historical ties and psychological trauma from the 1915 events, framing them as calls for reconciliation rather than ; the Court deemed the conviction disproportionate and unnecessary in a democratic society, criticizing Article 301's vague application as stifling public debate on ethnic identity and historical memory. No separate violation was found under Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination), as the facts did not sufficiently demonstrate discriminatory intent beyond the Article 10 breach. For just satisfaction under Article 41, the Court awarded €100,000 in non-pecuniary damages to Dink's widow Rakel Dink and children, plus €5,000 to each of three other applicants, totaling €115,000, alongside €30,000 for costs and expenses; Turkey was also ordered to pay default interest on any delayed payments. The ruling underscored broader systemic failures in Turkey's protection of journalists expressing minority views, influencing subsequent domestic reforms to Article 301 while highlighting persistent gaps in threat assessment and inter-agency coordination. Turkey did not appeal to the Grand Chamber, rendering the judgment final.

Recent Developments (2010s–2025)

In the 2010s, the (ECHR) ruled in September 2010 that Turkey failed to protect Hrant Dink from foreseeable risks and conduct an effective investigation into his assassination, ordering compensation to his family. This decision prompted renewed domestic scrutiny, linking the murder to ultranationalist networks investigated in the , though many Ergenekon convictions were later overturned amid allegations of judicial manipulation under both secularist and Islamist governments. By 2021, an Istanbul court convicted three former police intelligence chiefs—Ramazan Akyürek, Ali Fuat Yılmazer, and Gürsel Uğur—of aiding and abetting the murder, sentencing them to life imprisonment for negligence in protecting Dink and obstructing the probe, marking a rare accountability for state officials. However, the trials remained fragmented, with over 70 defendants across multiple proceedings yielding inconsistent outcomes, including acquittals and releases that fueled criticism of incomplete justice despite evidence of institutional complicity. In November 2023, Ogün Samast, the convicted triggerman, was released on parole after serving approximately 17 years, sparking outrage from Dink's family and human rights groups who argued it undermined deterrence against hate-motivated killings. Early 2025 saw mixed results in ongoing retrials: On January 9, an Istanbul court dropped charges against several police and intelligence agents due to the statute of limitations, despite prosecutorial requests for convictions after 18 years of delays. Conversely, on February 7, the same court sentenced nine defendants, including former gendarmerie intelligence officers, to life imprisonment in a retrial focused on the conspiracy, though advocates noted persistent failures to identify and prosecute higher-level instigators. These verdicts highlighted the protracted nature of the case, with nearly two decades of proceedings yielding partial accountability amid accusations of selective enforcement tied to shifting political priorities.

Legacy and Assessments

Awards and Honors

In 2006, Dink received the Oxfam Novib/PEN Award, recognizing his advocacy for freedom of expression and reconciliation efforts amid persecution for his journalistic work. That same year, the Norwegian Academy of Literature and Freedom of Expression awarded him the Bjørnson Prize for his contributions to improving the situation of Armenians in Turkey through and advocacy. Following his assassination, Dink was posthumously honored with Armenia's Presidential State Prize on June 18, 2007, by President Robert Kocharian, citing his role in restoring historical justice, fostering mutual understanding between peoples, and promoting freedom of speech. In 2010, the municipal authorities of Padova, Italy, awarded him a posthumous prize for his lifelong commitment to peace and human rights, accompanied by the planting of a commemorative tree in a public park.

Influence on Journalism and Reconciliation Efforts

Dink's establishment of the bilingual Turkish-Armenian newspaper Agos in 1996 marked a pioneering effort in Turkish journalism, as it was the first such publication in the Republican era to address Armenian community issues in both languages and foster public discourse on historical taboos, including the Armenian Genocide. Through his editorials and columns, Dink promoted a rhetoric that challenged nationalist constraints on free expression, encouraging debate on minority rights and integration without endorsing separatism, thereby influencing subsequent Turkish media outlets to engage more openly with ethnic minority narratives. His assassination on January 19, 2007, amplified Agos's role as a symbol of journalistic resilience; the newspaper persisted under successors like Rober Koptaş, continuing to amplify Armenian voices amid media pressures and serving as a platform for investigative reporting on discrimination and historical reckoning. This endurance inspired a broader commitment to independent journalism in Turkey, with Agos maintaining operations despite declining staff and resources, framing its publication as an act of resistance against censorship. In reconciliation efforts, Dink emphasized dialogue over confrontation, advocating for Turks to confront their history—including the 1915 events—as a path to mutual understanding and Turkey's EU integration, a stance that positioned him as a bridge-builder between Turkish and Armenian communities. Despite prosecutions under Article 301 for "denigrating Turkishness" over columns urging Armenians to "shed the burden" of victimhood and Turks to acknowledge pain, his work laid groundwork for civil society initiatives post-2007. Following his death, Dink's legacy catalyzed Turkish-Armenian reconciliation projects, with the Hrant Dink Foundation—established by his family—facilitating dialogues, youth exchanges, and historical education programs that have engaged thousands in joint Turkish-Armenian activities since 2007. His murder prompted widespread protests under the slogan "We are all Armenians, we are all ," galvanizing civil society against ultranationalism and advancing normalization talks between Ankara and Yerevan, though progress stalled amid regional conflicts. These efforts underscore Dink's causal role in shifting public attitudes toward acknowledgment without denial, influencing policy discussions on minority rights into the 2020s.

Criticisms and Nationalist Counter-Narratives

Turkish ultranationalists criticized Hrant Dink for his advocacy of recognizing the mass killings of Armenians during World War I as genocide, interpreting his stance as a deliberate historical distortion intended to undermine Turkish sovereignty and fuel irredentist claims by Armenia and its diaspora. Dink's writings in Agos, including a 2004 article urging the Muslim Hemşin community—descended from Armenians—to reclaim their ethnic origins, were seen as promoting ethnic fragmentation and disloyalty to the Turkish state, prompting his prosecution and six-month suspended sentence in 2006 under Article 301 of the penal code for "denigrating Turkishness." Nationalists argued that such pieces prioritized foreign-influenced narratives over national unity, portraying Dink as an internal threat who prioritized Armenian identity politics over assimilation into Turkish society. In nationalist discourse, Dink's journalism was accused of aligning with external pressures, such as European Union demands for historical reckoning, which were viewed as tools to weaken Turkey's territorial integrity by reviving long-settled wartime relocations as grounds for reparations or border disputes. Figures like lawyer Kemal Kerinçsiz, who initiated legal actions against Dink, framed his work as treasonous incitement against the unitary Turkish identity enshrined by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, echoing broader sentiments that questioning official accounts of 1915 events equated to betrayal amid perceived encirclement by hostile neighbors. These criticisms positioned Dink not as a reconciler but as a vector for diaspora agendas that exaggerated Armenian suffering while ignoring Ottoman-era mutual casualties and relocations necessitated by security concerns during wartime rebellion. Post-assassination counter-narratives among some ultranationalist fringes rejected the portrayal of Dink as a blameless martyr, instead emphasizing his repeated legal convictions as evidence of legitimate grievances against state-challenging rhetoric, and attributing the killing to individual vigilantism rather than orchestrated deep-state involvement. Such views, though condemned in mainstream Turkish protests following the January 19, 2007, murder, persisted in pockets of online and fringe media, arguing that Dink's legacy had been co-opted by liberal and international actors to shame Turkey and advance agendas like EU accession reforms that diluted nationalistic policies. These perspectives maintained that true patriotism required defending historical narratives against what they deemed politicized genocide allegations, unsubstantiated by impartial forensic or demographic evidence favoring the official account of reciprocal wartime violence.

Long-Term Impact on Turkish-Armenian Relations

The January 19, 2007, underscored persistent nationalist intolerance toward open discussion of the 1915 events but simultaneously galvanized civil society efforts to bridge divides between Turks and Armenians. In the years following, Dink's advocacy for mutual acknowledgment without preconditions—in contrast to diaspora demands for formal genocide recognition—inspired initiatives prioritizing people-to-people contacts over state-driven diplomacy. This shift contributed to a gradual erosion of taboos, with increased Turkish societal engagement in commemorating Armenian heritage sites and participating in cross-border dialogues, though official relations remained frozen with borders closed since 1993. Central to this legacy was the establishment of the Hrant Dink Foundation in 2007, which has sustained Dink's vision through targeted programs under its Turkey-Armenia Relations Programme. These include annual travel grants facilitating direct interactions (e.g., the 2023-2024 cohort enabling Armenians and Turks to visit each other's communities), fellowships for researchers, and dialogue platforms such as the 2016 Armenia-Turkey Expert Dialogue Group, which produced joint reports on normalization prospects. The Foundation's efforts extended to cultural preservation, like the KarDes app for mapping minority heritage and Western Armenian language courses, fostering incremental trust amid ongoing geopolitical strains. By 2023, projects like the 23.5 Hrant Dink Site of Memory received international recognition (Kenneth B. Hudson Award), symbolizing enduring commitment to remembrance and reconciliation. Dink's influence indirectly bolstered diplomatic overtures, notably the 2009 Zurich Protocols signed on October 10 between Turkey and Armenia, which aimed to establish diplomatic ties and reopen borders without preconditions on historical issues—echoing Dink's emphasis on goodwill gestures preceding historical reckoning. Civil society momentum, including conferences like the Foundation's 2014 "Sealed Gate: Prospects of the Turkey-Armenia Border" event in Ankara, helped build public support for such steps, though the protocols stalled by 2010 due to mutual recriminations over Nagorno-Karabakh and preconditions. Subsequent détentes, such as exploratory talks in 2022, invoked Dink's reconciliatory ethos, yet yielded no lasting breakthroughs by 2025, with Turkey conditioning progress on Armenia's Azerbaijan policy. Despite these advancements in non-state spheres, the long-term impact remains uneven, as Dink's murder highlighted institutional barriers like Article 301 prosecutions (largely curtailed post-2007 but symbolic of state complicity risks) and entrenched denialism, limiting broader relational thaw. As of 2024, Dink endures as a beacon for Turkish liberals and Armenian pragmatists advocating dialogue over confrontation, with Foundation-led research documenting reduced hate speech and growing intra-Turkish acknowledgment of 1915 traumas, yet without translating to policy shifts amid regional conflicts. This duality reflects causal persistence: while civil initiatives mitigated isolation, nationalist backlash and geopolitical incentives have perpetuated estrangement, underscoring the fragility of bottom-up reconciliation absent top-down resolve.

References

  1. https://hrantdink.org/en/hrant-dink/3565-who-is-hrant-dink
  2. https://archive.hrantdink.org/d/5ede2976778b652c71130912/312?l=en
  3. https://hrantdink.org/en/hdv-publications/55-hrant-dink-books/2843-hrant-dink-an-armenian-voice-of-the-voiceless-in-turkey
  4. https://hrantdink.org/en/hrant-dink/hrant-dink-articles/728-why-was-i-targeted
  5. https://bianet.org/haber/sixteen-years-without-hrant-the-killing-and-the-trial-273055
  6. https://hrantdink.org/en/hrant-dink/4362-19-january-2025-3
  7. https://www.the-independent.com/news/obituaries/hrant-dink-433200.html
  8. https://merip.org/2007/02/the-pigeon-on-the-bridge-is-shot/
  9. https://www.civilnet.am/en/news/762118/hrant-dink-a-legacy-of-hope/
  10. https://armenianweekly.com/2025/01/21/remembering-hrant-dink/
  11. https://www.armeniapedia.org/wiki/Hrant_Dink
  12. https://hrdmemorial.org/hrdrecord/hrant-dink/
  13. https://www.civilnet.am/en/news/474772/remembering-hrant-dink/
  14. https://aurorahumanitarian.org/en/rakel-dink
  15. https://www.dailysabah.com/turkey/2019/01/19/turkish-armenian-journalist-hrant-dink-remembered-12-years-after-assassination
  16. https://www.facebook.com/groups/14985536235/posts/10161118470761236/
  17. https://www.myheritage.com/names/hrant_dink
  18. http://www.noravank.am/eng/issues/detail.php?ELEMENT_ID=6434
  19. https://kids.kiddle.co/Hrant_Dink
  20. https://www.armenianbd.com/news/view/hrant-dink-0wfs.html
  21. https://www.civilnet.am/en/news/762075/towards-the-future-with-hrant-dink/
  22. https://mirrorspectator.com/2024/05/30/hrant-dink-the-role-model-we-so-desperately-need/
  23. https://tr.boell.org/en/2015/07/15/camp-armen-exile
  24. https://amaa.org/camparmen/
  25. https://armenianweekly.com/2015/05/06/camp-armen-under-demolition/
  26. https://hrantdink.org/en/hrant-dink/hrant-dink-articles/724-dear-humanity-i-would-like-to-press-charges
  27. https://milwaukeearmenians.com/2015/01/15/assassination-of-hrant-dink/
  28. https://en.gariwo.net/magazine/armenian-genocide/agos-20-years-of-independent-journalism-14912.html
  29. https://www.agos.com.tr/en/hahyeren
  30. https://hrantdink.org/en/site-of-memory/about-23-5/story
  31. https://archive.hrantdink.org/d/5ede2976778b652c71130912/81?l=en
  32. https://www.agos.com.tr/en/home
  33. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/culture-and-art/turkish-armenian-weekly-celebrates-20-years-in-print/550830
  34. https://www.eurotopics.net/en/148406/agos
  35. https://cpj.org/data/people/hrant-dink/
  36. https://agbu.org/its-complicated/pressed-time
  37. https://hrantdink.org/en/hrant-dink/hrant-dink-articles/3944-why-was-i-targeted-1
  38. https://www.agos.com.tr/en/article/16999/armenian-genocide-concerns-the-whole-humanity
  39. https://hrantdink.org/en/hrant-dink/90-hrant-dink-articles
  40. https://hrantdink.org/en/hrant-dink/hrant-dink-articles/785-23-5-april
  41. https://medyanews.net/armenian-genocide-at-110-hrant-dinks-23-5-april-legacy/
  42. https://www.economist.com/europe/2019/11/07/how-genocide-denial-warps-turkish-politics
  43. https://www.artforum.com/columns/kaya-genc-on-the-23-5-hrant-dink-site-of-memory-242630/
  44. https://agbu.org/its-complicated/speak-no-evil
  45. https://en.rightsagenda.org/an-exclusive-and-unpublished-interview-with-hrant-dink-october-2006/
  46. https://www.ecpmf.eu/the-cost-of-being-able-to-speak-freely-about-the-armenian-genocide-was-undoubtedly-enormous/
  47. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/armenia-and-turkey-from-normalization-to-reconciliation/
  48. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03064220701334477
  49. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12618575/index.pdf
  50. https://www.cpreview.org/articles/2007/05/how-not-to-conclude-the-debate-on-the-armenian-genocide
  51. https://en.gariwo.net/righteous/metz-yeghern/hrant-dink-s-message-still-strong-16219.html
  52. https://hrantdink.org/en/hrant-dink/hrant-dink-articles/3327-they-are-taking-me-far-away-from-here-my-love-commemorating-the-90th-anniversary-of-the-genocide
  53. https://www.reddit.com/r/armenia/comments/19apujs/today_marks_the_17_year_anniversary_of_hrant/
  54. https://carnegieendowment.org/europe/strategic-europe/2016/04/honoring-turkeys-voice-of-the-voiceless?lang=en
  55. http://www.cpreview.org/articles/2007/05/how-not-to-conclude-the-debate-on-the-armenian-genocide
  56. https://www.channeldraw.org/2020/12/14/hrant-dink/
  57. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2007/jan/22/pressandpublishing.turkey1
  58. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/hrant-dinks-voice
  59. https://www.christianitytoday.com/2021/03/hrant-dink-armenian-journalist-agos-turkey-murder-trial/
  60. https://hrantdink.org/attachments/article/109/TwoClosedpeopleTwoDistantNeighbours.pdf
  61. https://www.rferl.org/a/1074149.html
  62. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2007/jan/20/pressandpublishing.turkey
  63. https://www.cpj.org/2007/01/turkisharmenian-editor-murdered-in-istanbul/
  64. https://www.refworld.org/reference/annualreport/cpj/2008/en/81048
  65. https://www.eurozine.com/why-they-killed-hrant-dink/
  66. https://humanrightshouse.org/articles/prosecution-for-insult-of-turkishness-poses-serious-threat-says-article-19/
  67. https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2007/jan/25/theshadowofarticle301
  68. https://www.refworld.org/reference/annualreport/freehou/2009/en/71226
  69. https://bianet.org/haber/retrospective-on-trials-against-hrant-dink-90480
  70. https://ifex.org/writer-hrant-dink-acquitted-trials-against-other-journalists-continue/
  71. https://www.reuters.com/article/economy/factbox-turkish-journalist-hrant-dink-idUSL19817846/
  72. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-107206
  73. https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/eur440172006en.pdf
  74. https://strasbourgobservers.com/2010/10/04/freedom-of-expression-in-turkey-when-changes-in-the-wording-are-not-enough/
  75. https://www.article19.org/data/files/pdfs/letters/turkey-abolition-of-article-301.pdf
  76. https://rsf.org/en/freedom-expression-still-danger-turkey-despite-article-301-reform
  77. https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/dink-v-turkey/
  78. https://cpj.org/reports/2012/10/turkeys-press-freedom-crisis-sidebar-no-justice-for-hrant-dink/
  79. https://www.hrw.org/news/2007/04/12/turkey-ongoing-restrictions-freedom-expression
  80. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1185&context=sigma
  81. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2007/jan/19/pressandpublishing.turkey
  82. https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/eur440012007en.pdf
  83. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-14282111
  84. https://cpj.org/2023/11/killer-of-journalist-hrant-dink-freed-in-turkey-amid-widespread-criticism/
  85. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2007-01-21/turkish-police-hold-teen-suspect-in-journalists/2176522
  86. https://www.azatutyun.am/a/1586452.html
  87. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/3/26/ex-police-chiefs-convicted-over-turkish-armenian-editors-murder
  88. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2007/1/24/thousands-attend-dink-funeral
  89. https://www.asianews.it/news-en/A-river-of-mourners-at-the-funeral-of-the-murdered-journalist-8308.html
  90. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2007/jan/24/pressandpublishing.turkey
  91. https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/24/world/europe/24turkey.html
  92. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/tens-of-thousands-mourn-turkish-armenian-editor-idUSL23909447/
  93. https://www.benningtonbanner.com/local-news/funeral-of-slain-armenian-journalist-draws-100-000/article_25fff7f5-c299-5228-825f-c0e35f58daa5.html
  94. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/emotion-and-protest-in-turkey-what-happened-on-19-january-2007/
  95. https://asbarez.com/breaking-news-dink-murderer-sentenced-to-22-years/
  96. https://www.dw.com/en/hrant-dink-murder-turkish-court-sentences-several-people-to-life-in-prison/a-57015318
  97. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jan/17/turkish-court-armenian-journalist-murder
  98. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2012/1/18/life-sentence-for-turkish-journalists-murder
  99. https://rsf.org/en/outrageous-verdicts-hrant-dink-murder-trial-another-one-needed
  100. https://www.osce.org/representative-on-freedom-of-media/426122
  101. https://bianet.org/haber/court-says-hrant-dink-murder-organized-crime-sentences-tuncel-to-99-years-6-months-in-jail-210574
  102. https://cpj.org/2025/02/turkish-court-issues-9-life-sentences-for-journalist-hrant-dinks-murder/
  103. https://www.mlsaturkey.com/en/verdict-announced-in-hrant-dink-murder-trial-defendants-sentenced-from-10-years-to-life
  104. https://cpj.org/2025/01/new-charge-against-killer-of-turkish-journalist-hrant-dink-dropped-over-statute-of-limitations/
  105. https://www.duvarenglish.com/turkish-court-drops-charges-against-hrant-dinks-assassin-due-to-statute-of-limitations-news-65517
  106. https://www.dw.com/en/was-the-turkish-state-involved-in-journalist-hrant-dinks-assassination/a-56764394
  107. https://cpj.org/2020/12/to-finally-solve-the-hrant-dink-murder-turkey-must-face-itself/
  108. https://www.hrw.org/news/2012/01/18/turkey-court-protects-journalists-killers
  109. https://www.reuters.com/article/turkey-armenian/turkish-court-sees-conspiracy-behind-armenian-editors-murder-idUSL6N0DW4IC20130515
  110. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng-press?i=003-3262169-3640194
  111. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=002-808
  112. https://futurefreespeech.org/dink-v-turkey/
  113. https://www.hrw.org/news/2010/09/16/turkey-uncover-plot-behind-journalists-murder
  114. https://www.civilnet.am/en/news/757319/dinks-killer-freed-on-parole-in-turkey-after-nearly-17-years/
  115. https://rsf.org/en/t%25C3%25BCrkiye-charges-dropped-trial-murder-journalist-hrant-dink-after-18-years-stalling
  116. https://www.turkishminute.com/2025/02/08/9-defendant-sentenced-life-in-retrial-over-assassination-turkish-armenian-journalist1/
  117. https://armenpress.am/en/article/518259
  118. https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/hrant-dink-1954-2007/
  119. https://www.tnp.no/norway/culture/1897-bjornson-prize-goes-to-iceland-and-slovakia/
  120. https://www.azad-hye.com/news/hrant-dink-honored-with-an-after-death-state-award/
  121. https://www.azatutyun.am/a/1589017.html
  122. https://tert.am/en/news/2010/10/18/dink/199368
  123. https://www.memorializeturkey.com/en/memorial/235-hrant-dink-site-memory
  124. https://ecpmf.eu/the-cost-of-being-able-to-speak-freely-about-the-armenian-genocide-was-undoubtedly-enormous/
  125. https://www.mlsaturkey.com/en/18-years-after-dinks-murder-agos-we-are-publishing-the-paper-with-just-a-few-people-it-is-a-true-act-of-resistance
  126. https://www.securitypraxis.eu/building-bridges-the-role-of-civil-society-towards-a-possible-armenian-turkish-reconciliation/
  127. https://www.rferl.org/a/1074173.html
  128. https://cpj.org/2006/07/appeals-court-upholds-jail-term-for-turkisharmenia/
  129. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7737413.stm
  130. https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/opinions/57775/turkeys-liberals
  131. https://www.azatutyun.am/a/1586193.html
  132. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26506201
  133. https://www.the-american-interest.com/2007/07/01/notes-from-a-funeral/
  134. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2007/01/turk-j27.html
  135. https://hrantdink.org/en/activities/projects/turkey-armenia-relations-programme
  136. https://hrantdink.org/en/hrant-dink/3614-you-can-watch-system-memory-too-low-for-words-this-evening
  137. https://hrantdink.org/en/hdv-publications/63-reports/2288-armenia-and-turkey-an-overview-of-relations-and-prospects-for-normalisation
  138. https://www.resetdoc.org/story/detente-turkey-armenia/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.