Hubbry Logo
National identityNational identityMain
Open search
National identity
Community hub
National identity
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
National identity
National identity
National identity
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Part of a series on
Nationalism
Nation forming
Principles
Types
Organizations
List of nationalist organizations
Related concepts

National identity is a person's identity or sense of belonging to one or more states or one or more nations.[1][2] It is the sense of "a nation as a cohesive whole, as represented by distinctive traditions, culture, and language".[3]

A postcard from 1916 showing national personifications of some of the Allies of World War I, each holding a flag representative of their nation

National identity comprises both political and cultural elements.[4] As a collective phenomenon, it can arise from the presence of "common points" in people's daily lives: national symbols, language, the nation's history, national consciousness, and cultural artifacts.[5] Subjectively, it is a feeling one shares with a group of people about a nation, regardless of one's legal citizenship status.[6] In psychological terms, it is defined as an "awareness of difference", a "feeling and recognition of 'we' and 'they'".[7] National identity can incorporate the population, as well as diaspora, of multi-ethnic states and societies that have a shared sense of common identity. Hyphenated ethnicities are examples of the confluence of multiple ethnic and national identities within a single person or entity.

Under international law, the term national identity, concerning states, is interchangeable with the term state's identity or sovereign identity of the state. A State's identity by definition, is related to the Constitutional name of the state used as a legal identification in international relations and an essential element of the state's international juridical personality. The sovereign identity of the nation also represents a common denominator for identification of the national culture or cultural identity, and under International Law, any external interference with the cultural identity or cultural beliefs[8] and traditions appear to be inadmissible. Any deprivation or external modification of the cultural national identity violates basic collective human rights.[9]

The expression of one's national identity seen in a positive light is patriotism characterized by national pride and the positive emotion of love for one's country. The extreme expression of national identity is chauvinism, which refers to the firm belief in the country's superiority and extreme loyalty toward one's country.[1]

Formation

[edit]
Norwegians celebrating national day
The then-president of Italy Carlo Azeglio Ciampi honors the flag of Cispadane Republic, the first Italian flag, during the Tricolour Day on 7 January 2004 in Reggio Emilia.

National identity is not an inborn trait; it is essentially a social construct.[10] There is no agreed definition of what constitutes national identity.[11] It can result from the presence of elements from the "common points" in people's daily lives: national symbols, languages, colors, national history, blood ties, culture, music, cuisine, radio, television, and so on.[12][5] Under various social influences, people incorporate national identity into their identities by adopting beliefs, values, assumptions, and expectations which align with a national identity.[5] People with identification with their nation view national beliefs and values as personally meaningful and translate them into daily practices.[1]

Three main schools of defining national identity exist:

  • Essentialists view national identity as fixed, based on ancestry, a common language history, ethnicity, and world views (Connor 1994;[13] Huntington 1996[14]).
  • Constructivists believe in the importance of politics and the use of power by dominant groups to gain and maintain privileged status in society (Brubaker, 2009;[15] Spillman, 1997;[16] Wagner-Pacifici & Schwartz, 1991[17]).
  • Finally, the civic identity school focuses on shared values about rights and state institutions' legitimacy to govern.[18][better source needed]

A few scholars have investigated how popular culture connects with the identity-building process.[19] Some found that contemporary music genres can strengthen ethnic identity by increasing the feeling of ethnic pride.[20]

Conceptualization

[edit]

Political scientist Rupert Emerson defined national identity as "a body of people who feel that they are a nation".[21] This definition of national identity was endorsed by social psychologist, Henri Tajfel, who formulated social identity theory together with John Turner.[22] Social identity theory adopts this definition of national identity and suggests that the conceptualization of national identity includes both self-categorization and affect. Self-categorization refers to identifying with a nation and viewing oneself as a member of a nation. The affect part refers to the emotion a person has with this identification, such as a sense of belonging or emotional attachment toward one's country.[2] The mere awareness of belonging to a specific group invokes positive emotions about the group and leads to a tendency to act on behalf of that group, even when other group members are sometimes personally unknown.[2]

National identity requires the process of self-categorization, and it involves both the identification of in-group (identifying with one's nation) and the differentiation of out-groups (other nations). People identify with a nation and form an in-group by recognizing commonalities such as having common descent and common destiny. At the same time they view people that identify with a different nation as out-groups.[23] Social identity theory suggests a positive relationship between the identification of a nation and the derogation of other nations. People are involved in intergroup comparisons by identifying with their nation and tend to derogate out-groups.[2][24] However, several studies have investigated this relationship between national identity and derogating other countries and found that identifying with national identity does not necessarily result in out-group derogation.[25]

National identity, like other social identities, engenders emotions such as pride and love for one's national group and a feeling of obligation toward other members of that group.[26] The socialization of national identity, such as socializing national pride and a sense of a country's exceptionalism, contributes to harmony among ethnic groups. For example, in the U.S., by integrating diverse ethnic groups in the overarching identity of being American, people are united by a shared emotion of national pride and the feeling of belonging to the U.S., and thus tend to mitigate ethnic conflicts.[27]

From the point of view of international law, sovereign national identity cannot be subject to regulation or revision by treaty,[citation needed] and any international treaty aiming to create or change the national identity of the sovereign state appears to violate the jus cogens rights of the nation. A treaty revising national identity could be subject to termination under Article 53 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (which states: "A treaty is void if, at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law."). Any deprivation or revision of the sovereign national identity appears to constitute an ethnocide.[citation needed] National identity could not be subject to imposition, revision, or deprivation under any circumstances.

Salience

[edit]

National identity can be most noticeable when the nation confronts enemies (external or internal)[6] or natural disasters.[28] An example of this phenomenon is the rise in patriotism and national identity in the United States after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.[29][30] The identity of being an American became salient after the terrorist attacks and the evocation of American national identity.[1] Having a common threat or a common goal can unite people in a nation and enhance national identity.[31][self-published source][a]

Sociologist Anthony Smith argues that national identity has the feature of continuity that can be transmitted and persisted through generations: national myths of having common descent and common destiny may enhance people's sense of belonging to a nation.[23] However, national identities can disappear over time as (for example) when people live in foreign countries for a longer time[clarification needed], and can be challenged by supranational identities, which appeal to identification with a more inclusive, larger group that includes people from multiple nations.[32] Dynasties (like the Hapsburgs) and empires (like the Roman Republic and its successors) may exploit this appeal.

Research on study-abroad experiences that focused on the effects of American stereotypes found that American students faced challenges in connecting with their host country during their study-abroad experience because of stereotypes of American identity. A stereotype that affected their experience was related to politics during the 2016 United States presidential election of Donald Trump.[33] A study found that students would disengage, distance, avoid, assimilate, or challenge their identity or host culture in response to the interactions they faced.[33] Preconceived ideas within the host culture, and also amongst Americans, affect the ability of people from different backgrounds to understand and accept one another as individuals, rather than endorsing stereotypes of cultural groups.[33]

People

[edit]

The people are the basic concept for a national identity. But people can be identified and constructed through different logics of nationalism. Examples range from the Völkisch movement to people's republics.

National consciousness

[edit]
American flag as a national symbol

A national consciousness is a shared sense of national identity[34] and a shared understanding that a people group shares a common ethnic/linguistic/cultural background. Historically, a rise in national consciousness has been the first step toward creating a nation. At a glance, national consciousness is one's level of awareness of the collective and one's understanding that without "them", there is no "us". It is the mere awareness of the many shared attitudes and beliefs towards things like family, customs, societal and gender roles, etc. The awareness allows one to have a "collective identity", which allows them to be knowledgeable of where they are and how those places and people around them are so significant that they ultimately make the collective a nation. In short, national consciousness can be defined as a specific core of attitudes that provide habitual modes for regarding life's phenomena.[35]

National identities in Europe and the Americas developed along with the idea of political sovereignty invested in the people of the state. In Eastern Europe, it was also often linked to ethnicity and culture.[34] Nationalism requires first a national consciousness, the awareness of the national communality of a group of people or nation.[36] An awakening of national consciousness is frequently ascribed to national heroes and is associated with national symbols.

National identity can be considered a collective product.[5] Through socialization, a system of beliefs, values, assumptions, and expectations are transmitted to group members.[23] The collective elements of national identity may include national symbols, traditions, and memories of national experiences and achievements. These collective elements are rooted in the nation's history. Depending on how much the individual is exposed to the socialization of this system, people incorporate national identity into their identity to different degrees and in different ways, and the collective elements of national identity may become important parts of an individual's definition of the self and how they view the world and their place in it.[5]

Perspectives

[edit]

Benedict Anderson

[edit]

Nations, to Benedict Anderson, are imagined. The idea of the "imagined community" is that a nation is socially constructed, and the nation is made up of individuals who see themselves as part of a particular group. Anderson referred to nations as "imagined communities". He thought that nations, or imagined communities, were delimited because of their boundaries regarding who is in and who is out. Anderson believed that the nation operates through exclusion. Though nations exclude those outside of it but also their members who are not immediately considered in the collective idea of their national identity.[37] Anderson thought that nations were delimited and also were:

Limited: Because of the mental boundaries or concepts, we set about others are by culture, ethnicity, etc. We do not imagine everyone in one society or under one nationalism, but we are mentally separate.[38]

Sovereign: Nations were sovereign because sovereignty symbolizes freedom from traditional religious practices. Sovereignty provides the organization needed for a nation while keeping it free of traditional religious pressures.[38]

Ernest Gellner

[edit]

Unlike Benedict Anderson, Gellner thought nations were not "imagined communities". In his book, Ernest Gellner explained how he thought nations originated. In his eyes, nations are entirely modern constructs and products of nationalism. Gellner believed nations to be a result of the Industrial Revolution.[39] Since large numbers of people from different backgrounds were coming together in cities, a shared identity had to be made among them. The spread of capitalism brought the demand for constant retraining, and Gellner thought that as a result, the demand was met by creating a shared past, common culture, and language, which led to the birth of nations.[39]

Gellner thought that nations were contingencies and not universal necessities. He said that our idea of the nation was as such.

Two men were only of the same only if they were from the same culture. In this case, culture is "a system of ideas, signs, associations, and ways of communicating."[40]

Two men are of the same nation only if they recognize each other as being a part of the same nation.

It was men's recognition of each other as people of the same kind that made them a nation and not their common attributes.[41]

Paul Gilbert

[edit]

In "The Philosophy of Nationalism", Paul Gilbert breaks down what he thinks a nation is, and his ideas contrast those of both Anderson and Gellner. In the book, Gilbert acknowledges that nations are many things. Gilbert says nations are:

Nominalist: Whatever a group of people who consider themselves a nation say a nation is.[42]

Voluntarist: "Group of people bound by a commonly willed nation."[42]

Territorial: Group of people located in the same proximity, or territory.[42]

Linguistic: People who share the same language.[42]

Axiological: Group of people who have the same distinctive values.[42]

Destination: Group of people who have a common history and a common mission.[42]

Challenges

[edit]

Ethnic identity

[edit]
Aboriginal Australians protesting in Brisbane

In countries that have multiple ethnic groups, ethnic and national identity may be in conflict.[43] These conflicts are usually referred to as ethnonational conflicts. One of the famous ethnonational conflicts is the struggle between the Australian government and aboriginal population in Australia.[44] The Australian government and majority culture-imposed policies and framework that supported the majority, European-based cultural values, and a national language as English. The state did not support the Aboriginal cultures and languages, which were nearly eradicated by the state during the 20th century. Because of these conflicts, the Aboriginal population identifies less or does not identify with the national identity of being an Australian, but their ethnic identities are salient.[45]

Immigration

[edit]

As immigration increases, many countries face the challenges of constructing national identity and accommodating immigrants.[46] Some countries are more inclusive in terms of encouraging immigrants to develop a sense of belonging to their host country. For example, Canada has the highest permanent immigration rates in the world. The Canadian government encourages immigrants to build a sense of belonging to Canada. It has fostered a more inclusive concept of national identity, which includes both people born in Canada and immigrants.[47] Some countries are less inclusive. For example, Russia has experienced two major waves of immigration influx, one in the 1990s, and the other one after 1998. Immigrants were perceived negatively by the Russian people and were viewed as "unwelcome and abusive guests". Immigrants were considered outsiders and were excluded from sharing the national identity of belonging to Russia.[48]

Globalization

[edit]

As the world becomes increasingly globalized, international tourism, communication, and business collaboration have increased.[49] People around the world cross national borders more frequently to seek cultural exchange, education, business, and different lifestyles. Globalization promotes common values and experiences and encourages identification with the global community.[50] People may adapt cosmopolitanism and view themselves as global beings, or world citizens.[51] This trend may threaten national identity because globalization undermines the importance of being a citizen of a particular country.[52]

Several researchers examined globalization and its impact on national identity. They found that as a country becomes more globalized, patriotism declines, which suggests that the increase in globalization is associated with less loyalty and less willingness to fight for one's own country.[49][53][54] However, even a nation like Turkey which occupies an important geographic trade crossroads and international marketplace with a tradition of liberal economic activity with an ingrained entrepreneurial and foreign trade has degrees of ethnocentrism as Turkish consumers may be basically rational buyers by not discriminating against imported products.[55] Nevertheless, they exhibit preferences for local goods that are of equal quality to the imports because buying them assists the nation's economy and domestic employment.[55]

Issues

[edit]
Taiwanese demonstrating in support of independence

In some cases, national identity collides with a person's civil identity. For example, many Israeli Arabs identify as Palestinians in Israel. At the same time, they are citizens of the state of Israel, which conflicts with the Palestinian nationality.[56] Taiwanese also face a conflict of national identity with civil identity as there have been movements advocating formal "Taiwan Independence" and renaming "Republic of China" to "Republic of Taiwan".[57] Residents in Taiwan are issued national identification cards and passports under the country name "Republic of China", and a portion of them do not identify themselves with "Republic of China", but rather with "Republic of Taiwan".[58]

Markers

[edit]

National identity markers are those characteristics used to identify a person as possessing a particular national identity.[59] These markers are not fixed but fluid, varying from culture to culture and also within a culture over time. Such markers may include common language or dialect, national dress, birthplace, family affiliation, etc.[60][61]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

National identity

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
National identity is a psychological and denoting an individual's sense of belonging to a , typically encompassing shared elements such as cultural traditions, historical narratives, , and sometimes ethnic or civic ties that distinguish the group from others. It manifests as part of one's derived from knowledge of membership in this collective, often fostering emotional attachment to national symbols, institutions, and . The formation of national identity occurs through interconnected stages, beginning with structural preconditions like territorial boundaries and political , progressing to cultural dissemination via , media, and rituals, and culminating in psychological internalization where individuals adopt national narratives as part of their identity. Empirical studies indicate that it correlates with higher in-group trust and , enhancing social cohesion within diverse modern states, though its strength varies by factors like personality traits—such as positively associating with civic forms and openness negatively with ethnic ones. Distinct civic variants emphasize inclusive and values, while ethnic variants prioritize descent and heritage, influencing political stability and democratic trajectories. Key characteristics include its dual potential for positive —linked to adherence to national norms and collective efficacy—and risks of exclusionary when identities harden against perceived out-groups, as observed in historical efforts and contemporary identity conflicts. Controversies arise over its constructed nature versus innate roots, with highlighting how non-voluntary (e.g., ascriptive ethnic) attachments may inversely relate to democratic , underscoring causal tensions between identity exclusivity and pluralistic . Despite biases in academic favoring cosmopolitan dilutions, empirical evidence affirms national identity's role in motivating and policy support essential for state functionality.

Conceptual Foundations

Definitions and Core Components

National identity refers to an individual's or group's sense of attachment to a specific , typically involving a collective belief in shared origins, history, , and often territory that distinguishes it from other groups. This attachment manifests psychologically as , loyalty, or willingness to prioritize national interests, and empirically correlates with behaviors like or support for national policies. Unlike broader social identities, national identity emphasizes a political bound by , though its strength varies by context and measurement, such as surveys assessing national or attachment levels. Core components derive from ethno-symbolist frameworks, particularly those of Anthony D. Smith, who posits that nations emerge from ethnic cores featuring myths of common descent, shared historical memories, and cultural elements like language or religion that foster continuity and differentiation. These include:
  • Cultural affinities: Language, customs, and symbols (e.g., flags or anthems) that reinforce in-group cohesion, as evidenced in studies showing linguistic homogeneity predicts stronger national bonds in multi-ethnic states.
  • Historical narratives: Collective recollections of pivotal events, heroes, or traumas that provide a sense of continuity, often mythologized to sustain identity over generations.
  • Territorial attachment: Emotional ties to a homeland, where physical space symbolizes endurance and exclusivity, linked empirically to defense motivations in threat scenarios.
  • Political dimensions: Institutions, citizenship, and self-governance that transform ethnic ties into modern nationhood, though civic variants prioritize voluntarism over ascription.
Empirical research confirms these elements' stability over time, with longitudinal data indicating that national pride and attachment predict democratic engagement but weaken under perceived threats without reinforcing symbols. While some studies emphasize voluntary aspects (e.g., inclusive ), others highlight involuntary ethnic markers as foundational, challenging purely constructivist views by noting persistent ethnic cores in 80% of modern nations per historical analyses.

Historical Development

The historical development of national identity traces back to pre-modern ethnic formations, where groups maintained collective attachments through shared myths, memories, historical territories, and cultural practices, though these lacked the mass political mobilization and standardized citizenship of modern nations. In ancient and medieval , such ethnie—enduring ethnic communities—exhibited proto-national traits, including vernacular languages, folk cultures, and defensive solidarity against outsiders, as seen in the prolonged Anglo-French antagonisms during the (1337–1453), which fostered emerging senses of kingdom-based loyalty transcending feudal ties. These identities blended tribal, religious, and regional elements, with examples like the late Byzantine emergence of Greek self-awareness amid Ottoman threats, but remained fragmented by universalist institutions such as the and . The transition to modern national identity accelerated in the early modern period with technological and ideological shifts that eroded medieval universalism. The invention of the printing press around 1440 enabled print capitalism, standardizing vernacular languages and fostering "imagined communities" among readers who perceived shared cultural narratives despite never meeting, as theorized by Benedict Anderson in analyzing the decline of sacred dynastic realms post-1500. The Protestant Reformation from 1517 onward further localized identities by challenging Latin ecclesiastical authority and promoting Bible translations in national tongues, while absolutist states like France under Louis XIV (r. 1643–1715) centralized administration, coining the term nation to denote politically unified peoples. These developments laid groundwork for ethnic cores—persistent cultural symbols and memories—that ethno-symbolists like Anthony D. Smith identify as bridging pre-modern continuity to modern nationalism, countering purely constructivist views that dismiss earlier roots. The crystallization of national identity as a mass ideology occurred during the late 18th and 19th centuries, driven by Enlightenment principles of and revolutionary upheavals. The of 1789 marked a pivotal shift, replacing monarchical legitimacy with la nation as the sovereign entity, embodied in the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, which emphasized civic equality and conscript armies like the of 1793, mobilizing 1.2 million citizens under national banners. Napoleonic conquests (1799–1815) exported these ideals across Europe, sparking reactions that unified fragmented territories, such as the German Confederation's evolution into the in 1871 under , who leveraged three wars (1864, 1866, 1870–1871) to forge Prussian-led national consciousness. Similarly, Italy's Risorgimento culminated in unification by 1870, blending cultural revival under figures like with military campaigns, though regional divides persisted. Industrialization, per Ernest Gellner's analysis, necessitated cultural homogeneity for labor mobility, amplifying through state education and railroads that integrated peripheral populations. In the 20th century, world wars intensified national identities through total mobilization and propaganda, with (1914–1918) dissolving multi-ethnic empires like and Ottoman domains, birthing 10 new states via the (1919) that enshrined . Post-colonial after 1945 extended this model globally, as over 50 nations emerged by 1970, often adapting European civic models to ethnic bases amid varying success, as ethnic cores proved resilient predictors of stability per Smith's framework. Yet, this evolution revealed tensions: while civic models like France's promoted assimilation, ethnic variants in fueled conflicts, underscoring nationalism's dual capacity for unity and exclusion.

Theoretical Perspectives

Primordialist and Perennialist Views

Primordialist perspectives posit that national identities arise from innate, emotionally charged attachments akin to bonds, perceived as given by and early rather than deliberate construction. These attachments manifest as profound, often inescapable sentiments toward shared blood ties, , and cultural origins, which individuals experience as primordial facts of existence. Proponents such as Edward Shils, who introduced the term in 1957, and emphasized how such ties evoke a sense of sacred continuity, explaining the intensity of ethnic loyalties observed in conflicts and migrations. Empirical support includes surveys of ethnic mobilization, where individuals endorsing primordial views demonstrate 54.2% stronger identification with nationalist parties compared to instrumentalist perspectives, as seen in comparative studies of . Perennialist views, developed prominently by Anthony D. Smith, refine this by arguing that nations possess historical continuity through recurring ethnic cores, myths, and symbols that predate modernity but adapt over time. Unlike strict primordialism's ahistorical naturalism, perennialism treats nations as perennial phenomena that emerge, decline, and revive across eras, drawing on pre-existing cultural repertoires such as shared memories of golden ages or homelands. Smith's ethno-symbolist framework, outlined in works like The Ethnic Origins of Nations (1986), highlights how these elements provide resilience, evidenced by the persistence of identities like the Armenians or Japanese, which trace verifiable cultural lineages back over a millennium despite political disruptions. The distinction lies in scope: stresses immutable, affect-laden origins immune to rational choice, while perennialism incorporates historical agency, viewing national revivals—like the 19th-century Balkan states—as activations of latent ethnic potentials rather than inventions. Both challenge modernist claims of nations as elite fabrications post-1789, citing evidence from ancient polities with proto-national traits, such as Assyrian ethnonyms persisting into modern . Critics, often from academia favoring constructivist paradigms, dismiss as rhetorical lacking falsifiable mechanisms, yet the views' explanatory power endures in accounting for nationalism's resistance to , as ethnic attachments correlate with lower interstate trust in diverse settings per cross-national datasets.

Modernist and Constructivist Theories

Modernist theories of nationalism maintain that nations and national identities emerged as functional necessities of industrial modernity, rather than as ancient or perennial entities. Ernest Gellner, in his 1983 work Nations and Nationalism, contended that pre-modern agrarian societies tolerated cultural diversity due to low mobility and segmented economies, but industrialization demanded standardized education and high culture to facilitate labor mobility and technical expertise, thereby necessitating homogeneous national cultures aligned with states. Gellner emphasized that nationalism, defined as the alignment of political units with cultural homogeneity, arose post-Enlightenment, particularly from the late 18th century onward, as a response to these structural imperatives, evidenced by the correlation between industrial growth in Europe (e.g., Britain's GDP per capita rising from approximately £1,700 in 1700 to £3,200 by 1820 in constant prices) and the proliferation of nation-states. This view prioritizes causal mechanisms like urbanization and mechanization over ethnic continuity, arguing that national identities were engineered to sustain economic efficiency. Constructivist approaches, often intertwined with modernism, further assert that national identities are socially constructed through shared narratives, symbols, and institutions, rather than inherent traits. Benedict Anderson's 1983 book portrayed nations as "imagined political communities" wherein members, despite never meeting most others, perceive solidarity via mediated representations, particularly from the , which standardized vernacular languages and enabled mass dissemination of ideas, as seen in the rise of newspapers and novels correlating with independence movements in by the early 19th century. Anderson highlighted modular forms of exported globally, such as pisak (official nationalism) imposed by dynasties, but stressed endogenous construction through cultural artifacts, challenging views of identity as organically primordial. Eric Hobsbawm complemented this by arguing in The Invention of Tradition (1983) that many national symbols and rituals—such as Scotland's Highland tartans, fabricated in the 19th century, or the Welsh Eisteddfod revived post-18th century—were deliberately invented by elites to legitimize new states and foster cohesion amid rapid social change. Hobsbawm noted that these inventions served to rigidify customs into traditions, supporting nationalism's political utility, as in the British monarchy's rituals elaborated from 1820 to 1977 to symbolize imperial unity despite underlying class fractures. Empirical support includes the timing: European national holidays and flags standardized largely between 1789 and 1914, aligning with state-building efforts rather than medieval precedents. These theories collectively underscore contingency and agency in , attributing national cohesion to modern technologies of communication and , though they have faced for underemphasizing pre-modern ethnic cores that provided raw materials for construction, as evidenced by linguistic persistence in regions like the predating industrialization. Despite such limitations, their emphasis on verifiable historical processes—e.g., rates surging from under 20% in 1800 to over 80% by 1900 in —offers a causal framework linking socioeconomic shifts to .

Civic versus Ethnic Dimensions

The distinction between civic and ethnic dimensions of national identity originates from efforts to classify forms of , with emphasizing bonds of , shared ancestry, , and cultural traditions as the basis for belonging, while prioritizes adherence to shared political institutions, legal frameworks, and civic values such as equality under the law and democratic participation. This dichotomy, popularized by scholars like in the mid-20th century, posits ethnic forms as more ascriptive and exclusionary, often requiring full for outsiders, whereas civic forms are theoretically more inclusive, extending membership through and consent rather than blood ties. Ethnic national identity has historically manifested in states where homogeneity in descent and culture underpins cohesion, such as in , where national belonging correlates strongly with ethnic Japanese ancestry and linguistic uniformity, with surveys indicating that over 90% of the population identifies as ethnically Japanese, limiting rates to fewer than 10,000 annually despite a population of 125 million. In post-Soviet contexts like , ethnic conceptions have fueled tensions, with identification tied to and Orthodox traditions over Russian influences, as evidenced by regional divides where eastern populations favor more inclusive Eastern Slavic views but western ones stress ethnic purity. Empirical studies show ethnic criteria predict stronger , as they frame newcomers as threats to cultural continuity unless they adopt core ethnic markers. Civic national identity, by contrast, defines membership through voluntary commitment to constitutional principles and civic duties, exemplified , where oaths emphasize allegiance to the and its ideals of and self-government, enabling incorporation of diverse immigrants who numbered 1.1 million legal permanent residents in fiscal year 2022. France's republican model similarly stresses laïcité and civic equality, with national identity surveys revealing that criteria like respect for laws and democratic values rank higher than ethnic descent among respondents. This approach correlates with higher immigrant integration in policy terms, though practical success depends on enforcement of shared norms, as seen in experimental data where priming civic histories increases inclusive attitudes toward newcomers. Critiques of the civic-ethnic binary argue it oversimplifies real-world formations, with even purportedly civic nations exhibiting ethnic undercurrents—such as the Anglo-Protestant cultural core in America influencing assimilation patterns—and ethnic ones incorporating civic elements post-conflict, like Germany's 1999 citizenship reforms shifting from to include for immigrants' children. Longitudinal surveys across and indicate moderate stability in preferences for these dimensions, with ethnic criteria persisting at 40-60% endorsement levels despite civic rhetoric, challenging the notion of Western civic dominance versus Eastern ethnic exclusivity. Hybrid models better explain outcomes, where civic ideals mitigate ethnic exclusion but require cultural convergence for sustained cohesion, as pure civic identities risk dilution without underlying shared practices.

Mechanisms of Formation

Socialization Processes

National identity socialization begins in through interactions with primary agents, including members, educational systems, and , which convey shared historical narratives, linguistic practices, and symbolic attachments to the nation-state. These processes foster emotional bonds and cognitive schemas associating the self with national collectives, often peaking during when identity exploration intensifies. Empirical studies indicate that such transmission is not uniform but varies by context, with stronger effects in cohesive units and curricula emphasizing national cohesion. Family serves as the initial conduit for national identity transmission, embedding values through daily practices, , and discussions of heritage. In immigrant contexts, parents' dual identifications—balancing origin and host nations—correlate positively with children's (coefficient 0.60, p < 0.05) across 810 Turkish-origin dyads in seven Western European countries, with mothers exerting stronger influence than fathers on integrated identities. Among native populations, parental national strength shapes children's perceptions; in a study of 34 Irish families (76 children, 46 parents), viewing the family as emblematic of national traits enhanced children's identity exploration and attitudes toward out-groups. This transmission persists via cultural rituals, such as holidays, which reinforce intergenerational continuity, though dilution occurs with reduced parent-child contact or assimilation pressures. Educational institutions formalize socialization by integrating national history, language, and civics into curricula, cultivating a sense of belonging and duty. A survey of 375 Malaysian youth found education imparts knowledge and skills that bolster personality traits aligned with national cohesion, preparing individuals for societal roles. However, outcomes differ for minorities; among 942 Belgian youth of Moroccan and Turkish origin tracked over two years, school belonging (mean 3.58 at baseline) did not predict national self-identification increases, whereas perceiving culturally diverse peers as fitting the national prototype did (B = 0.092, p = 0.023). Peer interactions in schools thus mediate effects, amplifying identity when diversity is framed as compatible with national norms rather than diluting them. Media reinforces national boundaries by selectively portraying events, often minimizing perceived external influences on the domestic audience. of 2,204 articles from U.S. and German quality press during elections revealed depictions of media impact as weaker on the home nation (U.S. mean 0.84; 0.88) than abroad (e.g., mean 1.62), sustaining (p < 0.001). Such patterns embed national exceptionalism, though introduces variability, with exposure to polarized content potentially fragmenting cohesion among youth. Community events, like parades, further embed identity through collective participation, blending familial and institutional influences. Overall, these processes yield durable attachments, evidenced by longitudinal stability in identity metrics from onward.

Cultural and Institutional Markers

Cultural markers of national identity encompass shared elements such as language, customs, traditions, and symbols that foster a sense of commonality among members of a nation. Language serves as a primary conduit for cultural transmission and social cohesion, with empirical surveys indicating its perceived centrality; for instance, a 2024 Pew Research Center analysis across 24 countries found that a median of 80% of respondents viewed speaking the national language as very or somewhat important to true national belonging. Similarly, adherence to national customs and traditions ranked even higher, with a median of 89% attributing importance to them for national identity, reflecting their role in perpetuating historical continuity and collective memory. Religious practices can also function as cultural markers in nations where faith aligns with historical ethnogenesis, though their salience varies; in religiously homogeneous societies, they reinforce in-group boundaries through rituals and moral frameworks shared across generations. Institutional markers, embedded within state apparatuses, systematically reinforce these cultural elements through formalized practices and mandates. Education systems exemplify this by integrating national history, instruction, and civic values into curricula, thereby shaping identity from an early age; highlights education's institutional role in reproducing social values and fostering attachment to the nation-state via compulsory exposure to shared narratives. National holidays and commemorations further institutionalize identity by ritualizing historical events, promoting unity through ; a 2024 in demonstrated that engagement in Independence Day activities significantly strengthens national identification over time, with effects persisting longitudinally. symbols like flags and anthems, mandated in public ceremonies and schools, evoke emotional and delineate boundaries; national anthems, as symbolic songs, cultivate unity by encapsulating collective aspirations and historical struggles. Legal and military institutions contribute by enforcing criteria tied to cultural proficiency, such as requirements for in countries like or , which empirically correlate with sustained identity cohesion. These markers interact dynamically, with institutions amplifying cultural ones to sustain resilience against assimilation pressures, as evidenced in post-colonial states where deliberate policy revivals of indigenous languages bolstered national distinctiveness.

Role of Shared Narratives and Symbols

Shared narratives, including historical accounts, founding myths, and collective memories, function as mechanisms for constructing national identity by instilling a common understanding of origins, struggles, and destiny among diverse populations. These narratives foster a sense of temporal continuity, linking past events to present cohesion and future aspirations, as evidenced in ethno-symbolist analyses where pre-modern ethnic myths and memories are adapted to modern national contexts to sustain group . Empirical examinations confirm that such shared stories enhance and national pride through systems that emphasize collective historical experiences. National symbols, such as flags, anthems, and monuments, complement narratives by serving as tangible embodiments that evoke emotional attachments and reinforce group boundaries. Psychological experiments demonstrate that assigning symbols to groups increases perceptions of entitativity—the sense of the group as a unified —through heightened cohesiveness and similarity among members. Exposure to these symbols, like displaying a , has been shown to causally elevate nationalist attitudes and , particularly under perceived threats. In practice, rituals involving symbols, such as anthem singing at public events, amplify these effects by synchronizing collective emotions and signaling shared values. Together, narratives and symbols operate interactively in processes, where media and state institutions propagate them to bridge internal divisions; for instance, the Anzac legend in , rooted in commemorations, has empirically shaped national self-perception through annual rituals emphasizing sacrifice and resilience. This mechanism's efficacy relies on repetition and cultural resonance, though its strength varies by societal context, with stronger impacts in homogeneous populations where myths align with verifiable historical cores rather than fabricated ones.

Functions and Benefits

Psychological Attachments at Individual Level

Psychological attachments to national identity at the individual level manifest as emotional bonds, senses of belonging, and pride derived from perceiving oneself as part of the national group. posits that such attachments arise from categorizing oneself within the nation, leading to and a boosted through perceived positive distinctiveness from other groups. This process fulfills basic human needs for esteem and belonging, as individuals internalize national achievements and values to enhance personal self-worth. Empirical research demonstrates that stronger national identification correlates with elevated collective , particularly when individuals perceive external threats, which in turn reinforces attachment by heightening the value placed on national membership. For instance, longitudinal studies among adolescents show that social group identifications, including national ones, mediate gains, promoting overall psychological adjustment. At the individual level, these attachments provide cognitive and emotional resources, such as resilience against stressors, by integrating national narratives into one's identity framework. Such psychological bonds also motivate prosocial orientations toward the nation, evidenced by national identification predicting support for measures during the across multiple countries, including higher compliance with restrictions and uptake as of 2020-2021 data. Individual differences in attachment strength, influenced by traits like styles, further stabilize identity content over time, reducing fluctuations in self-perception tied to national events. Overall, these attachments contribute to personal by linking individual agency to collective purpose, though their intensity varies with factors like age and .

Societal Cohesion and Trust

National identity bolsters societal cohesion by cultivating generalized trust, whereby individuals extend confidence and cooperation to unrelated compatriots perceived as sharing a common fate. posits that national identification creates a superordinate group category, reducing intergroup biases and promoting prosocial behaviors across diverse subgroups within the . Empirical analyses, such as those from the European Social Survey, indicate that stronger ethnic conceptions of nationhood correlate with elevated identity-based trust among in-group members, while civic orientations—centered on shared political principles—enhance trust toward strangers, facilitating broader interpersonal reliability. Cross-national and within-country studies further demonstrate positive associations between dimensions of national identity and social trust. For instance, data from the U.S. (2014) reveal that national attachment and pride predict higher generalized trust, independent of , which shows negligible or negative effects. In diverse settings, where Robert Putnam's examination of U.S. communities found ethnic heterogeneity linked to reduced trust and —"hunkering down" across all groups—overarching national identification mitigates these declines by fostering trust in non-coethnics. emphasizes this function, arguing national identity expands trust radii essential for voluntary cooperation in large-scale societies. Such trust mechanisms underpin cohesion by lowering transaction costs in social interactions and enabling for collective endeavors, as evidenced by higher welfare support and public goods adherence in polities with inclusive . Inclusive civic identities prove particularly effective, widening the scope of mutual reliance compared to exclusionary ethnic variants, though both can sustain in-group where dominant. This dynamic explains persistent high-trust environments in nations like , where civic national bonds persist amid moderate diversity, contrasting with fragmentation in weaker-identity contexts.

Contributions to Political Stability and Economic Growth

Strong shared national identity contributes to political stability by fostering trust in institutions and mitigating internal conflicts that arise from ethnic or regional divisions. Longitudinal data from the Netherlands indicate that individuals with stronger nationalist sentiments exhibit higher satisfaction with democracy and greater confidence in political institutions, suggesting a stabilizing effect through enhanced legitimacy. This trust mechanism operates via mutual recognition among citizens, which reduces zero-sum perceptions of resource allocation and promotes cooperative governance, as evidenced in theoretical models where shared identity resolves collective action dilemmas without coercion. Empirical analyses further link inclusive national identities to lower risks of social unrest, particularly when they bridge subgroup differences, contrasting with fragmented identities that amplify inequality-driven volatility. In diverse societies, national identity stabilizes politics by overlaying ethnic loyalties with overarching civic bonds, enabling compromise on policy disputes; for instance, post-colonial states that cultivated unifying narratives, such as under from 1965 onward, achieved sustained stability amid ethnic pluralism through enforced shared identity. Conversely, weakening national identity correlates with rising polarization, as seen in surveys where declining attachment predicts lower institutional trust and higher support for anti-system actors. National identity supports by facilitating public goods provision, as unified polities invest more effectively in , , and without distributive . A 2023 cross-country analysis of found that the consolidation of national identities from the 16th to 19th centuries enabled states to surmount internal factionalism, leading to expanded fiscal capacity and per capita GDP increases averaging 0.5-1% annually in identity-cohesive regions. This occurs because shared identity aligns individual incentives with collective welfare, reducing free-riding and in . By enhancing —defined as networks of trust and reciprocity—national identity lowers transaction costs in markets and bolsters accumulation, with across 90 countries showing that higher social capital stocks raise growth rates by 0.2-0.4 percentage points per decade through improved incentives. In high-identity nations like , where post-1945 national reconstruction emphasized cohesive narratives, this translated to rapid industrialization, with GDP growth exceeding 9% annually from 1955 to 1973, sustained by trust-facilitated cooperation. Such dynamics underscore causal pathways where identity preempts ethnic fractionalization's growth drag, estimated at 1-2% annual GDP loss in diverse but low-identity settings per Alesina's fractionalization indices.

Political and International Roles

Nationalism and Patriotism

Nationalism and represent distinct yet overlapping forms of attachment to national identity, influencing political behavior and . denotes a sense of devotion and pride in one's country, encompassing affection for its institutions, history, and people, often promoting inclusive and trust within diverse populations. In contrast, emphasizes loyalty to the nation as a , frequently prioritizing national interests, cultural homogeneity, or perceived superiority, which can manifest in exclusionary policies toward outsiders. These attachments shape domestic by fostering ; for instance, patriotic sentiments correlate positively with trust in political systems and civic participation, as evidenced by surveys across European nations where predicted higher confidence in . , however, shows mixed effects, sometimes bolstering support for national policies but also eroding generalized trust when linked to exclusionary views. In , drives state policies aimed at preserving and advancing national priorities, often countering cosmopolitan ideals that advocate supranational . Historical examples include the mobilization during , where propaganda invoked national duty to rally populations against external threats, enhancing cohesion but risking escalation. supports diplomatic efforts by encouraging public backing for alliances perceived as beneficial to the homeland, whereas aggressive has been associated with territorial disputes and reduced cooperation, as seen in interwar . Empirical studies indicate that strong national identity, underpinned by moderate , contributes to political stability by aligning with public sentiment, reducing internal dissent during crises; for example, longitudinal data from the revealed 's positive link to satisfaction with democratic processes amid external pressures. Conversely, unchecked correlates with lower institutional trust, potentially destabilizing relations with cosmopolitan-oriented international bodies. The interplay between and also affects responses to , where national attachments provide a bulwark against identity dilution. In cases like Taiwan's movements, reinforces distinct identity against larger powers, sustaining political resolve. , being less confrontational, facilitates economic partnerships while maintaining cultural markers, as observed in stable democracies with high patriotic identification exhibiting greater resilience to supranational influences. underscores that balanced patriotism enhances societal trust without the exclusionary pitfalls of , supporting from cross-national surveys where patriotic orientations predicted higher adherence to group norms without diminishing out-group tolerance. This dynamic underscores their role in calibrating national identity to both internal unity and external navigation.

State-Building and Public Goods Provision

National identity contributes to by enhancing citizens' willingness to support centralized institutions and resource extraction, which are essential for developing administrative capacity and infrastructure. In historical contexts, such as 19th-century , the emergence of shared national identities facilitated the transition from fragmented feudal systems to modern states capable of uniform taxation and legal enforcement, as elites leveraged common cultural narratives to legitimize authority over diverse territories. Empirical analyses indicate that stronger national identity correlates with reduced internal conflicts, enabling governments to allocate resources toward long-term projects like roads, systems, and modernization rather than suppressing domestic rivals. A key mechanism is the link between national identity and fiscal capacity, where individuals perceiving themselves as part of a cohesive "in-group" exhibit higher compliance with , overcoming free-rider incentives inherent in public goods provision. Laboratory experiments demonstrate that priming national pride increases tax honesty, with physiological measures like skin conductance confirming reduced evasion tendencies among participants exposed to patriotic stimuli. Field studies further show that patriotism indirectly boosts tax compliance by fostering trust in state reciprocity, as citizens view contributions as investments in collective welfare rather than coerced extraction. This dynamic supports sustained public goods delivery, such as universal schooling and , which in turn reinforce state legitimacy and economic productivity. In diverse societies, national identity mitigates ethnic fractionalization's drag on by promoting supra-local loyalties that justify redistributive policies across regions. Cross-national data reveal that polities with robust national attachments achieve higher revenue-to-GDP ratios and invest more in non-excludable goods like national defense and , as evidenced by regressions controlling for income and institutions. Conversely, where subnational identities dominate, as in some post-colonial states, public goods provision suffers from localized capture and underinvestment, underscoring identity's causal role in scaling cooperative . These patterns hold across empirical models, with national identity acting as a multiplier on institutional effectiveness rather than a substitute for sound policy.

Defense Against External Threats

National identity bolsters collective defense by instilling a psychological commitment to protect shared , institutions, and way of life against foreign . posits that identification with the national in-group heightens motivation to counter external threats, as individuals perceive attacks on the nation as personal assaults requiring sacrifice. Empirical analyses confirm this dynamic: in experimental and survey data, stronger national attachments predict greater willingness to engage in costly defensive actions, such as or , independent of material incentives. Historical invasions illustrate how robust national identity facilitates resistance and mobilization. During Russia's full-scale of on February 24, 2022, pre-existing Ukrainian national narratives—rooted in distinct , , and anti-Soviet memory—fueled civilian and military resolve, enabling territorial defense despite numerical inferiority. Polls conducted amid the conflict showed over 90% of rejecting Russian claims, correlating with high volunteer enlistment rates exceeding 1 million by mid-2022. Similarly, in , surveys from 2017–2020 revealed that those prioritizing Taiwanese identity over Chinese were 20–30 percentage points more likely to affirm readiness to fight an , enhancing deterrence credibility. Patriotism, as a manifestation of national identity, directly supports military readiness in peacetime. Cross-national surveys across , , , the , and the in 2023–2024 found that higher levels predict stronger support for and enlistment, with nationalist sentiments reducing by fostering voluntary compliance. In the , where all-volunteer forces rely on , data from 2023 indicate patriotic duty as the top motivator for 47% of enlistees, while declining —evident in Gallup polls showing national dropping from 70% in 2013 to 38% in 2023—has contributed to shortfalls, with the missing targets by 15,000 recruits annually. Threats like local war casualties further amplify this effect, boosting national identification and enlistment by 10–15% in affected communities. Perceived external dangers also unify policy preferences toward enhanced security measures. European surveys post-2022 Ukraine invasion showed that threat exposure increased support for defense spending by 15–20 points among those with strong national pride, prioritizing over fiscal concerns. This causal link holds across contexts: threats activate latent identity, mediating collective and defensive resolve, as modeled in structural equation analyses of over 1,000 respondents. Weak or fragmented identities, conversely, correlate with lower , underscoring national identity's role as a force multiplier in asymmetric conflicts.

Challenges and Criticisms

Impacts of Immigration and Demographic Shifts

Immigration and differential fertility rates have accelerated demographic shifts in many Western nations, reducing the relative size of native-born populations and altering the ethnic composition that historically underpinned national identities. In the United States, the (TFR) for native-born women stood at 1.76 children per woman in 2017, below the replacement level of 2.1, while that for immigrant women was 2.18. U.S. Census Bureau projections indicate that will drive most through 2060, with the non-Hispanic white population projected to comprise less than 50% of the total by 2045, marking a transition to a "majority-minority" society. In , native fertility rates average below 1.5 in countries like and , contributing to projected population declines exceeding 30% by 2100 without sustained immigration; models excluding net migration forecast Italy's population falling to 295 million by century's end. These shifts challenge national identities rooted in shared ethnic, cultural, or historical majorities, as rapid changes can foster perceptions of cultural dilution among native populations. Empirical research links increased ethnic diversity from to declines in social trust and cohesion, which underpin national identity by fostering interpersonal bonds and collective solidarity. Robert Putnam's 2007 analysis of U.S. communities found that higher ethnic diversity correlates with lower generalized trust, reduced , and intra-group withdrawal, a pattern he termed "hunkering down." This "constrict claim" has been supported by meta-analyses reviewing over 90 studies, which confirm a small but consistent negative effect of ethnic diversity on social trust, particularly at local levels where interactions occur. In , similar patterns emerge: micro-level data from neighborhoods show ethnic diversity reducing neighbor trust, independent of socioeconomic factors, while larger-scale diversity effects diminish but persist in eroding broader social . These dynamics weaken the shared narratives and symbols central to national identity, as diverse groups prioritize in-group ties over national-level cohesion. Such shifts exacerbate identity tensions by amplifying ethnic threat perceptions among natives, leading to defensive assertions of traditional national markers like language and customs. Longitudinal studies indicate that proximity to out-groups lowers trust only when individuals perceive threats to cultural norms, correlating with rises in nativist sentiments and policy demands for assimilation. In contexts of low assimilation—evident in persistent parallel societies in parts of and —demographic changes strain public goods provision and mutual obligations, further eroding the psychological attachments that sustain national unity. While long-term generational integration can mitigate some effects, short-term disruptions from mass consistently correlate with identity fragmentation, as evidenced by Putnam's observation that diversity's benefits accrue over decades but harms manifest immediately. Overall, these impacts highlight causal risks to national identity from unbalanced demographic , prioritizing inflows over native vitality.

Multiculturalism and Internal Diversity

Multiculturalism, as a policy framework, promotes the preservation of distinct cultural identities within a national polity, often prioritizing group-specific rights and parallel institutions over assimilation into a dominant national culture. This approach, adopted in various Western nations since the late , has been critiqued for undermining the shared values and symbols essential to national identity, fostering instead fragmented loyalties and reduced interpersonal trust. Empirical analyses, such as Robert Putnam's 2007 study across 41 U.S. communities, demonstrate that higher ethnic diversity correlates with lower social trust, diminished , and a "hunkering down" effect where individuals withdraw from community interactions, even within their own groups. Putnam's findings, drawn from surveys measuring generalized trust and neighborly behaviors, indicate short-term erosive effects on cohesion, with long-term integration requiring deliberate efforts to build bridging ties, though such outcomes remain uncertain without enforced assimilation. In , multiculturalism's implementation has yielded parallel societies, where immigrant enclaves maintain separate norms incompatible with host-country values, weakening national unity. Sweden's acknowledged in April 2022 that decades of immigration without effective integration had created such societies, contributing to heightened violence and in designated "vulnerable areas"—over 60 neighborhoods by 2023 where police advise against entry without backup due to dominance and clan-based . reports link these zones to failed multicultural policies that subsidized cultural segregation rather than demanding adherence to Swedish laws and , resulting in rates for non-Western immigrants at 50-60% below natives and disproportionate crime involvement. Similar patterns in the UK, including grooming scandals predominantly involving Pakistani-heritage men exploiting cultural attitudes toward non-Muslim girls, highlight how multiculturalism's reluctance to confront illiberal practices erodes public trust in institutions and national solidarity. These dynamics challenge national identity by diluting common historical narratives and civic rituals in favor of pluralism without reciprocity. Comparative from the Migration Institute's 2012 assessment of in practice reveal that nations like and , while touting diversity as strength, face rising ethnic tensions and , with surveys showing declining attachment to national symbols among second-generation immigrants who retain stronger ties to origin cultures. Critics argue this fosters , as evidenced by Europe's retreats—Germany's 2010 declaration of 's failure by Merkel and subsequent integration mandates—stemming from causal links between unchecked diversity and eroded cohesion, per Putnam's framework extended to transnational contexts. Despite academic sources occasionally claiming positive cohesion effects from normative , such views often overlook raw on trust deficits and prioritize ideological equity over causal evidence of segregation's costs. Ultimately, internal diversity unmanaged by assimilation risks transforming national identity from a unifying force into a contested , as seen in persistent gaps in loyalty metrics: for instance, 2020s European polls indicate 20-30% of Muslim immigrants prioritize religious over national law, complicating shared sovereignty.

Globalization and Cosmopolitan Alternatives

, characterized by intensified , cultural exchange, and migration flows since the late [20th century](/page/20th century), has been hypothesized to erode national identities by fostering transnational connections and diluting exclusive attachments to the nation-state. Empirical analyses from cross-national surveys, such as the , indicate that higher indices correlate negatively with and ethnic national identity in some contexts, particularly in more integrated economies where exposure to global norms reduces the salience of national boundaries. However, this effect is not uniform; a study across 63 countries found that while can weaken national identification in certain subgroups, it often provokes reactive affirmations of national pride, as seen in populist movements responding to perceived cultural threats from and supranational institutions. Cosmopolitanism emerges as an ideological alternative, advocating for a "world citizen" orientation that prioritizes universal , global ethical obligations, and identities transcending national borders, often promoted by international organizations like the and elite transnational networks. Proponents argue it aligns with globalization's realities, enabling cooperation on issues like and pandemics without the parochialism of ; for instance, surveys reveal positive correlations between cosmopolitan orientations and global literacy, though attachment to global identity remains significantly weaker than to national or local ones. Psychological research suggests cosmopolitanism can coexist with national identity in a dual framework, where individuals integrate world citizenship without fully supplanting homeland loyalty, as evidenced in studies of mobile professionals who maintain both. Yet, causal realism highlights limitations: cosmopolitan bonds lack the evolved mechanisms of kinship-based trust and reciprocity that underpin national solidarity, often relying on abstract principles rather than shared history or sacrifice, which empirical data on public goods provision attributes more effectively to national frameworks. In global cities, where hyper-connectivity amplifies cosmopolitan influences, residents may prioritize urban identities over national ones, with evidence from European metropolises showing city-dwellers in high-globalization hubs exhibiting stronger local attachments that compete with, rather than complement, national pride. Despite these trends, aggregate data challenge narratives of inevitable decline; national pride persists or rebounds in response to globalization's disruptions, as in the U.S. where, amid economic since the 1990s, patriotic sentiment has fluctuated but not vanished, underscoring nationalism's resilience as a counterforce to elite-driven . This dynamic reflects first-principles realities: human sociality favors proximate, verifiable groups for , rendering purely global alternatives empirically deficient in mobilizing compared to national identities rooted in tangible shared experiences.

Empirical Evidence

Studies on Positive Outcomes of Strong Identity

A 2021 study analyzing integration found that a strong sense of national identity serves as a positive psychological trait, enhancing adjustment and among individuals in multicultural contexts. Similarly, research from 2017 demonstrated a positive correlation between national identity and , including higher and a greater sense of meaning in life, based on survey data from diverse cultural groups. A 2025 longitudinal analysis among adolescents further confirmed that national identity indirectly boosts through elevated , with stronger identification linked to improved emotional health outcomes. Empirical evidence also ties strong national identity to enhanced social cohesion and trust. A 2022 report using data from the General Social Survey and Cooperative Election Study revealed that national pride positively correlates with interpersonal trust across demographics, including political affiliations and racial groups, suggesting it fosters social norms. In the context of , a 2022 study during the showed that higher national identification predicted greater compliance with distancing measures, hygiene practices, and support for interventions, facilitating societal-level resilience. On economic dimensions, national identity has been linked to improved public goods provision and growth. A historical indicates that the of national identification in modern states reduced internal conflicts over distribution, enabling mass taxation and investments in and , which underpinned industrialization and long-term . This mechanism supports welfare redistribution by mitigating inequality through shared identity, as stronger national bonds encourage solidarity for social safety nets without eroding economic incentives. Additionally, national pride around key events correlates with positive investor sentiment and returns, reflecting broader economic optimism tied to collective self-regard.

Evidence of Negative Effects from Identity Erosion

Empirical research indicates that erosion of national identity, particularly through rapid ethnic diversity without assimilative mechanisms, correlates with diminished social trust and . In a comprehensive study of 30,000 individuals across U.S. communities, political scientist Robert Putnam found that higher ethnic diversity is associated with lower generalized trust, reduced confidence in neighbors, and decreased participation in community activities such as and social gatherings, as residents "hunker down" amid perceived social fragmentation. This effect persists even after controlling for socioeconomic factors, suggesting a causal link where weakened shared identity exacerbates interpersonal suspicion rather than fostering cosmopolitan bonds. Stronger national pride serves as a countervailing force, positively correlating with interpersonal and institutional trust. Analysis of U.S. survey data reveals that 66% of individuals expressing high national pride agree that "most people can be trusted," compared to substantially lower rates among those with weaker attachments, independent of demographic variables. Similarly, —distinct from —predicts greater prosocial behaviors, including tax compliance and electoral participation, as evidenced by experimental manipulations showing flag exposure increases cooperative intentions toward state institutions. These patterns hold cross-nationally, where civic national identity bolsters political trust amid diversity, mitigating fragmentation risks. Declining national also manifests in reduced civic contributions and heightened societal . Gallup polling from 2025 documents American national at a record low of 58%, with only 36% of Democrats expressing strong , correlating with lower volunteerism rates and diminished about collective futures. In military contexts, surveys indicate that eroding contributes to shortfalls, with fewer young Americans viewing service as a tied to national , straining civil-military relations. Furthermore, national emerges as the strongest predictor of hope for national prosperity, with 64% of proud individuals optimistic versus 27% of those lacking such attachment, linking identity to broader psychological and social disengagement. In extreme cases, insufficient national identity has precipitated political instability. Historical analyses of post-communist states like and attribute their 1990s disintegrations to fragile supranational identities unable to unify diverse ethnic groups, resulting in civil conflicts and state failure. Contemporary evidence from shows that perceptions of state weakness—often intertwined with diluted national cohesion—erode identity demand, fostering subnational loyalties and unrest propensity. Such dynamics underscore how identity erosion undermines institutional legitimacy, elevating risks of fragmentation in multi-ethnic polities lacking robust unifying narratives.

Comparative Case Studies

Empirical analyses across 117 countries from 1981 to 2012 demonstrate that a one standard deviation increase in national identification, measured via data, correlates with approximately $780 higher GDP and $200–325 higher public goods expenditure , with stronger effects in democracies featuring political restraints on rulers. These findings underscore how robust national identity facilitates consensus for revenue collection and public goods provision, reducing internal conflicts that hinder development. Japan exemplifies a case of enduring ethnic and civic national identity rooted in homogeneity (over 98% ethnic Japanese as of ) and cultural continuity, yielding high social cohesion and economic resilience. This identity has supported post-World War II reconstruction, with GDP per capita rising from $1,921 in 1960 to $39,353 by 2023, alongside low homicide rates (0.2 per 100,000 in 2022) and effective public infrastructure investment. Generalized trust remains moderate at 37% reporting most people as trustworthy in recent surveys, yet institutional trust in exceeds 50%, enabling stable policy execution without widespread ethnic fragmentation. In contrast to diverse societies, Japan's limited (foreign-born under 2.5% in 2023) preserves identity coherence, minimizing integration costs and bolstering voluntary compliance with social norms. Singapore provides a counterexample of engineered national identity in a multi-ethnic context (74% Chinese, 13% Malay, 9% Indian as of 2023), where post-1965 policies prioritized shared civic loyalty over ethnic primacy, fostering economic ascent from $516 GDP per capita in 1965 to $82,794 in 2023. State initiatives, including in English and Malay, , and public quotas ensuring ethnic mixing, cultivated a "Singaporean" identity that curtailed communal riots (last major incident in 1969) and sustained low corruption ( score of 83 in 2023). This approach yielded high social trust (58% generalized trust in 2022 waves) and public goods efficacy, such as universal ownership at 90%, though it required authoritarian oversight to suppress ethnic particularism. Outcomes affirm that deliberate identity-building can mitigate diversity's cohesion-eroding potential, provided it emphasizes unifying institutions over . Sweden illustrates erosion of national identity amid rapid demographic shifts, with foreign-born population surging from 11% in 1990 to 20% by 2023, correlating with declining interpersonal trust—from 68% in 1996 to 58% in 2018 per national surveys—and heightened segregation in high- areas. Regions with elevated past exhibit amplified trust reductions in response to contemporary diversity, as ethnic fractionalization undermines reciprocal norms essential for sustainability (government spending at 50% of GDP in 2022). rates, including , rose post-2015 migrant influx (163,000 asylum seekers), with no-go zones reported in by 2023, straining public goods like policing and integration programs costing billions annually. Pew data show only 28% of deem birthplace essential to national identity (2021), reflecting diluted civic bonds compared to homogeneous peers, and contributing to populist backlash since 2010 elections. These cases highlight causal links: sustained identity bolsters trust and growth, while unchecked diversity dilutes it absent assimilative measures.

Contemporary Developments

Rise of Populism and Identity Politics

The resurgence of movements since the mid-2010s has frequently centered on restoring national identity amid perceived threats from , mass , and supranational institutions. Empirical analyses indicate that cultural and identity-based shocks from , rather than purely economic grievances, have driven support for leaders and parties, as voters respond to erosion of traditional social norms and community cohesion. For instance, in the 2016 on June 23, 52% of voters opted to leave the , with surveys linking the outcome to anxieties over loss of national sovereignty and cultural dilution from unrestricted EU migration, where 33% of Leave voters cited as their top concern. Similarly, Donald Trump's as U.S. President in November 2016 drew strong backing from white working-class demographics feeling culturally displaced, evidenced by cultural backlash models showing identity threats as stronger predictors of support than income loss alone. In , populist parties emphasizing ethnic or civic national identity have gained parliamentary seats, often framing as a direct challenge to homogeneous . Studies reveal that perceived threats to social identities foster populist attitudes, with right-wing parties in countries like and adopting policies favoring ancestral ties in citizenship definitions, narrowing inclusion to preserve core national character. The 2025 Ipsos Report across 31 countries documents persistent voter discontent with elite , correlating higher populist sympathy with preferences for border controls and cultural preservation, underscoring a causal link between identity erosion and electoral shifts. Parallel to , —prioritizing subgroup affiliations such as race, , or —has intensified divisions within nations, often undermining unified national identity. Theoretical frameworks posit that when policy conflicts exacerbate social cleavages, subgroup identities compete with national ones, leading to polarization where material interests yield to symbolic identity assertions. Data from democratic trajectories show that predominant non-voluntary (e.g., ethnic-based) national identities correlate with stable cohesion, whereas fragmented subgroup focuses erode democratic support and amplify reactions as a corrective force. This dynamic, evident in U.S. polarization metrics where identities predict misperceptions and conflict, highlights how can inadvertently bolster national by alienating majorities seeking collective restoration.

Digital Influences on Identity Formation

Digital platforms, including and online networks, shape national identity formation by amplifying exposure to both domestic cultural narratives and transnational influences, often through algorithmic curation that prioritizes user engagement over diversity of viewpoints. This dual dynamic can reinforce insular national attachments via echo chambers—online environments where algorithms limit content to align with preexisting beliefs—or erode them through unfettered access to global information flows. Empirical analyses reveal that the internet's structural features, such as the distribution of information, power, and freedom, exert measurable effects on identity , , and action. A multilevel study of 50,240 respondents across 36 countries, drawing from World Values Survey data collected between 2010 and 2014, found that higher online information distribution—reflecting broad access to diverse, often global content—negatively correlates with national identity strength, diminishing attachments to national symbols, pride, and participation in identity-affirming behaviors. In contrast, greater distribution of online power (e.g., user control over content creation and moderation) bolsters national identity, while freedom distribution (e.g., open access without censorship) moderates erosive effects by enabling counter-narratives that sustain national cohesion. These findings underscore a causal mechanism where digital openness to information challenges bounded national loyalties, yet participatory elements can counteract dilution by empowering localized identity expression. Social media platforms further influence formation among younger demographics by integrating national symbols into everyday digital interactions, fostering "" through routine shares of flags, holidays, or historical memes. A survey of 386 Saudi Arabian university students reported a positive association between social media usage—motivated by cognitive, social, and recreational factors—and heightened national identity across emotional, cultural, and affiliative dimensions, with participants exhibiting stronger pride in national history and symbols tied to online engagement. However, algorithmic echo chambers exacerbate polarization, as users in homogeneous online groups encounter amplified nationalist , reducing cross-ideological exposure and entrenching identity boundaries; a noted this effect persists even on factual topics, with search behaviors reinforcing selective perceptions. In contexts of rising , digital tools enable rapid mobilization around national identity threats, as seen in coordinated online campaigns that frame as existential erosion, thereby accelerating identity solidification among digitally native cohorts. Yet, pervasive global content—such as cross-border —has been linked to cosmopolitan self-identification, with 2021 data indicating daily users 34% more likely to prioritize world citizenship over national ties, suggesting a long-term shift in identity hierarchies for heavy users. These influences vary by platform governance and cultural context, with state-controlled digital spaces often prioritizing identity reinforcement over openness.

Policy Responses in Democratic Societies

In response to perceived erosion of national identity from and , several democratic societies have adopted integration policies emphasizing assimilation into core civic values, , and cultural norms to foster social cohesion. These measures, often justified by empirical studies linking strong shared identity to higher trust and lower conflict, include mandatory courses and citizenship tests that prioritize national history and principles over ethnic particularism. For instance, Denmark's 2016 integration reforms introduced "ghetto laws" targeting high-immigrant areas with compulsory and employment programs, alongside dispersal requirements to prevent ethnic enclaves, aiming to enforce cultural homogeneity as a prerequisite for belonging. Similar policies in the and mandate value-based oaths and renunciation of practices deemed incompatible with , reflecting a causal understanding that unassimilated diversity correlates with parallel societies and reduced interpersonal trust, as evidenced by surveys showing native populations' declining identification with multicultural models post-2015 migration surges. France exemplifies a longstanding assimilationist approach, rooted in republican universalism, where national identity is defined by adherence to (laïcité), Enlightenment values, and the , without recognition of group-specific rights. The 2004 law banning conspicuous religious symbols in public schools and subsequent citizenship reforms require applicants to demonstrate knowledge of French history and rejection of communalism, with data indicating that second-generation immigrants from culturally distant origins exhibit higher national attachment when exposed to such mandatory civic education. This model contrasts with earlier multicultural experiments elsewhere, which empirical analyses attribute to increased segregation; French policy makers cite integration failures in banlieues as rationale for reinforcing assimilation, supported by longitudinal studies showing stronger economic and social outcomes for those adopting host norms over retaining origin identities. Civic education reforms represent another pillar, with democracies like and the expanding curricula to instill and democratic participation, countering cosmopolitan dilution. Australia's 2019 civics overhaul emphasizes "shared values" statements for migrants, correlating with improved belonging metrics, while U.S. programs post-9/11 stress to rebuild identity amid demographic shifts. These policies, often responding to populist electoral demands, prioritize causal mechanisms like intergenerational transmission of values, with evidence from cross-national comparisons indicating that nations enforcing such measures—such as Denmark's requirement for 37 hours of annual for welfare recipients—experience slower identity fragmentation than those relying on voluntary . Critics from academic circles, potentially influenced by institutional preferences for diversity narratives, argue these approaches risk exclusion, yet longitudinal data on integration success rates substantiate their efficacy in maintaining democratic stability through cohesive identity.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/national-identity
  2. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00131857.2018.1434076
  3. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/28345/chapter/215163614
  4. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-political-psychology/political-psychology-of-national-identity/96FCD2225D5AC2BE2042BC8BA910918C
  5. https://oxfordre.com/internationalstudies/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrefore-9780190846626-e-481
  6. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2024-15720-021
  7. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/nana.12924
  8. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01419870.2025.2462711
  9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147596724000234
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7272103/
  11. https://newprairiepress.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3203&context=aerc
  12. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09662839.2025.2540091
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10319233/
  14. https://is.muni.cz/el/fss/podzim2018/SOC291/um/4_Smith_ch2.pdf
  15. https://unpress.nevada.edu/9780874172041/national-identity/
  16. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/server/api/core/bitstreams/ebde7fb5-4034-492d-85e7-8f04cb2ccc4d/content
  17. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1610082/FULLTEXT02
  18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40441311
  19. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/pops.12888
  20. https://repozytorium.kul.pl/bitstreams/d095e027-67e2-4772-af35-242b0650e13e/download
  21. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01419870.1994.9993832
  22. https://www.aaihs.org/race-and-identity-in-medieval-europe/
  23. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/33882
  24. https://criticallegalthinking.com/2023/04/25/benedict-andersons-imagined-communities/
  25. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/imagined-communities/summary
  26. https://philarchive.org/archive/GEEECT
  27. https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/nationalism/
  28. https://www.oerproject.com/en/oer-materials/oer-media/html-articles/origins/unit7/origins-and-impacts-of-nationalism
  29. https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9780801475009/nations-and-nationalism/
  30. https://www.academia.edu/82549362/Anthony_D_Smith_on_nations_and_national_identity_a_critical_assessment
  31. https://www.amazon.com/National-Identity-Ethnonationalism-Comparative-Perspective/dp/0874172047
  32. https://pureadmin.qub.ac.uk/ws/files/136558806/coakley_primordialism_nn_2017_upload.pdf
  33. https://www.thenandnow.co/2023/05/26/theories-of-nationalism-and-national-identity-an-introduction/
  34. https://www.academia.edu/2079808/Basic_Primordialism_in_Ethnic_and_National_Identity
  35. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/mono/10.4324/9780203167960-14/primordialism-perennialism-prof-anthony-smith-anthony-smith
  36. https://smerdaleos.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/187370296-anthony-d-smith-ethno-symbolism-and.pdf
  37. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-022-01432-w
  38. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/nana.12349
  39. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233458727_Primordialism_and_ethnic_political_mobilisation_in_modern_society
  40. https://ijssrr.com/journal/article/download/551/377
  41. https://calhoun.faculty.asu.edu/sites/g/files/litvpz3321/files/publications/articles/calhoun_nationalismandthecontradictionsofmodernity.pdf
  42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388556324_Imagined_Communities_and_Modern_Nation_Building_A_Comparative_Analysis_of_Anderson_and_Gellner%27s_Theories_of_Nationalism
  43. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/invention-of-tradition/B9973971357795DC86BE856F321C34B3
  44. https://nationalismstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/The-Invention-of-Tradition-by-Eric-Hobsbawm-Terence-Ranger-z-lib.org_.pdf
  45. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/origins-of-nationalism/modernist-paradigm-strengths-and-weaknesses/AB222F4E330D4BEAFBCBED6CA0E4BE1F
  46. https://oxfordre.com/internationalstudies/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrefore-9780190846626-e-57
  47. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-101841
  48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331300849_Not_So_Civic_Is_There_a_Difference_Between_Ethnic_and_Civic_Nationalism
  49. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-journal-of-sociology-archives-europeennes-de-sociologie/article/ethniccivic-dichotomy-and-the-explanation-of-national-selfunderstanding/72136B6BA07A9E9E67BF21651AC140DD
  50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0147176723000214
  51. https://www.cooperative-individualism.org/shulman-stephen_the-contours-of-identification-in-ukraine-2004-jan.pdf
  52. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01402/full
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253394225_Ethnic_or_Civic_Nation_Theorizing_the_American_Case
  54. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nana.12923
  55. https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/10023/12353/20171218135046.pdf?sequence=1
  56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9298910/
  57. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01419870.2021.1939090
  58. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casp.2308
  59. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812037470
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11534893/
  61. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/58485/ssoar-intcomgazette-2013-8-muller-National_identity_building_through_patterns.pdf?sequence=1
  62. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371589454_Cultural_Family_Values_Promoting_National_Identity_in_the_Context_of_Globalization
  63. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jora.12678
  64. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2024/01/18/language-and-traditions-are-considered-central-to-national-identity/
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351415015_Education_as_an_institution_of_national_identity_formation
  66. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/nana.13065
  67. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/national-anthems
  68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271845840_Understanding_National_Identity_Between_Culture_and_Institutions
  69. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394916810_HISTORICAL_NARRATIVES_AND_NATIONAL_IDENTITY_AN_EXAMINATION_OF_THE_RELATIONSHIP_BETWEEN_HISTORY_EDUCATION_AND_SOCIAL_STUDIES_EDUCATION
  70. https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pspi0000047
  71. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01419870.2017.1302094
  72. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-021-01696-6
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12214893/
  74. https://www.e-ir.info/2014/05/08/the-anzac-myth-and-australian-national-identity/
  75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31010674_Individual_and_Societal_Bases_of_National_Identity_A_Comparative_Multi-Level_Analysis
  76. https://positivepsychology.com/social-identity-theory/
  77. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/psychology/social-identity-theory
  78. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230881864_National_Identity_and_Self-Esteem
  79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12080173/
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4171723/
  81. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-27668-9
  82. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3321204
  83. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350892767_National_Identity_Attachment_and_Its_Variables_National_Identity_Attachment_and_Its_Variables_National_Identity_Attachment_and_Its_Variables
  84. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34638/chapter/295111277
  85. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nana.12935
  86. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-political-science-review/article/national-identity-a-blessing-or-a-curse-the-divergent-links-from-national-attachment-pride-and-chauvinism-to-social-and-political-trust/FF8ECB69F7E2347811774F94A4AD73A1
  87. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
  88. https://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/wgape/papers/20_Robinson.pdf
  89. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/why-national-identity-matters/
  90. https://researchprofiles.ku.dk/en/publications/national-identity-shared-values-and-social-cohesion
  91. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13698230.2025.2528378?src=
  92. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232991817_National_Identity_and_Political_Trust
  93. https://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/69853/1/Nationalism%2520and%2520political%2520support%2520longitudinal%2520evidence%2520from%2520The%2520Netherlands.pdf
  94. https://academic.oup.com/book/27158/chapter/196565074
  95. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390019949_NATIONAL_IDENTITY_AS_A_STABILITY-FOSTERING_STRATEGY
  96. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13698230902892184
  97. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/272002/1/cesifo1_wp10358.pdf
  98. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S014759672500006X
  99. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w24533/w24533.pdf
  100. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230245666_National_Identity_and_Economic_Development_Reiteration_Recapture_Reinterpretation_and_Repudiation
  101. https://theconversation.com/what-is-the-difference-between-nationalism-and-patriotism-208170
  102. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/51639/chapter/418867278
  103. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0147176718305625
  104. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372602656_Exploring_the_Nexus_between_Nationalism_and_Patriotism_Perspectives_Differentiation_and_Relevance_in_Contemporary_Societies
  105. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291124003280
  106. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01402382.2025.2481546
  107. https://oxfordre.com/politics/oso/viewentry/10.1093%24002facrefore%24002f9780190228637.001.0001%24002facrefore-9780190228637-e-452?p=emailAK1dNNnaGpfo2&d=/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-452
  108. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/hckelman/files/Nationalism_Patriotism_1997.pdf
  109. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nationalism/
  110. https://www.e-ir.info/2010/11/25/are-nationalism-and-cosmopolitanism-compatible/
  111. https://terpconnect.umd.edu/~smilex3/socy401/Huddy-American_Patriotism-National_Identity-and_Political_Involvement.pdf
  112. https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2023/program/paper/EAHRz5D5
  113. https://faculty.sites.uci.edu/skaperdas/files/2025/05/ST_JCEfinal.pdf
  114. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9851525/
  115. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5125400/
  116. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w30731/w30731.pdf
  117. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.750471/full
  118. https://warontherocks.com/2022/04/roots-of-the-resistance-understanding-national-identity-in-ukraine/
  119. https://austinwang.faculty.unlv.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/anonymous-main-text-revision-150-add-robustness-check-2.pdf
  120. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0095327X241275635
  121. https://press.armywarcollege.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3354&context=parameters
  122. https://uva.theopenscholar.com/files/sonal-pandya/files/casualities_helmsetal2020_8.pdf
  123. https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.12605
  124. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371479988_Perception_of_threat_and_national_identity_Investigation_of_the_mediating_role_of_collective_self_esteem
  125. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2020/03/can-immigration-solve-the-demographic-dilemma-peri
  126. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2020/demo/p25-1144.pdf
  127. https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2025/feb/18/europes-population-crisis-see-how-your-country-compares-visualised
  128. https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1596&context=mlr
  129. https://www.wcfia.harvard.edu/publications/downside-diversity
  130. https://www.hoplofobia.info/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/2020-Ethnic-Diversity-and-Social-Trust-A-Narrative-and-Meta-Analytical-Review.pdf
  131. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0003122415577989
  132. https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/immigration-diversity-and-social-cohesion/
  133. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1490638
  134. https://www.city-journal.org/article/bowling-with-our-own
  135. https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/37195/did-robert-putnam-find-that-diversity-has-incredibly-negative-consequences
  136. https://www.idosr.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/IDOSR-JCIAH-P4.pdf
  137. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/does-diversity-create-distrust/
  138. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/28/swedens-failed-integration-creates-parallel-societies-says-pm-after-riots
  139. https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/sweden-immigrants-crisis/
  140. https://brussels.mcc.hu/news/new-report-on-multiculturalism-in-flames-swedens-rude-awakening
  141. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65174096
  142. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clynyyqdnrdo
  143. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/TCM-Multiculturalism-Web.pdf
  144. https://kenanmalik.com/2015/02/17/the-failure-of-multiculturalism/
  145. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0147176718304784
  146. https://world.hey.com/dhh/failed-integration-and-the-fall-of-multiculturalism-77296314
  147. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349236847_National_Identity_and_Globalization_Findings_from_Cross-National_Surveys
  148. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264476779_Globalisation_and_the_decline_of_national_identity_An_exploration_across_sixty-three_countries
  149. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1469-8129.2011.00532.x
  150. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6294391/
  151. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/nana.12476
  152. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10508619.2020.1827192
  153. https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1475-6765.12700
  154. https://academic.oup.com/isagsq/article/3/3/ksad038/7246564
  155. https://stateofnationalism.eu/article/nationalism-and-globalization/
  156. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7917360/
  157. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316509337_The_Relationship_Between_National_Identity_Subjective_Well-Being_and_Meaning_in_Life
  158. https://bmcpsychology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40359-025-02776-z
  159. https://www.archbridgeinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Archbridge_Patriotism-and-Social-Trust_11_2022_v2.pdf
  160. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nils-Holtug/publication/350815036_National_Identity_and_Social_Cohesion/links/607443c04585150fe99fa94d/National-Identity-and-Social-Cohesion.pdf
  161. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1042443123001476
  162. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science/article/does-ethnic-diversity-erode-trust-putnams-hunkering-down-thesis-reconsidered/DC0DA871517729C51D08C4C7FF34E03B
  163. https://news.gallup.com/poll/692150/american-pride-slips-new-low.aspx
  164. https://publications.armywarcollege.edu/News/Display/Article/4305082/the-consequences-of-declining-patriotism-in-the-united-states/
  165. https://humanflourishinglab.org/patriotism-and-hope-for-americas-future/
  166. https://reflections.yale.edu/article/who-my-neighbor-facing-immigration/lessons-hyperpowers-and-future-national-identity
  167. https://www.ineteconomics.org/uploads/papers/WP_97_Poyker-Ananyev.pdf
  168. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2017/02/01/views-of-national-identity-by-country/
  169. https://www.mccy.gov.sg/about-us/news-and-resources/maintaining-singapore-s-exceptionalism-by-building-a--we-first--nation/
  170. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319929431_Getting_used_to_diversity_Immigration_and_trust_in_Sweden
  171. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2021/05/05/1-national-identity/
  172. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/dani-rodrik/files/why_does_globalization_fuel_populism.pdf
  173. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2020/10/05/in-u-s-and-uk-globalization-leaves-some-feeling-left-behind-or-swept-up/
  174. https://appext.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=1401
  175. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10659129241246213?icid=int.sj-abstract.citing-articles.3
  176. https://www.populismstudies.org/the-role-of-populism-in-redefining-citizenship-and-social-inclusion-for-migrants-in-europe/
  177. https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2025-06/ipsos-populism-report-2025.pdf
  178. https://academic.oup.com/qje/article/136/4/2371/6368349
  179. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8643655/
  180. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0894439318797058
  181. https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/14/2/265/4582957
  182. https://www.ewadirect.com/journal/asbr/article/view/13443
  183. https://www.learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/1091
  184. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-50850-6
  185. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-way-people-search-the-internet-can-fuel-echo-chambers/
  186. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369358286_The_Role_of_Digital_Media_in_the_Rise_of_New_Nationalism
  187. https://disruptive-horizons.com/p/how-the-internet-is-eroding-nationalism
  188. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1481685/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  189. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nana.12834
  190. https://mixedmigration.org/the-changing-politics-of-immigration-in-nordic-countries/
  191. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/french-national-identity-and-integration-who-belongs-national-community
  192. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41253-024-00239-2
  193. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259591301_National_Identity_and_Immigrants%27_Assimilation_in_France
  194. https://cjmd.com.uw.edu/wp-content/uploads/prev-img/bennettciviclearning.pdf
  195. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/civic-education/
  196. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-need-for-civic-education-in-21st-century-schools/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.