Community hub
0 subscribers8 pages, 0 posts
Recent from talks
All channels
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Welcome to the community hub built to collect knowledge and have discussions related to In ordinary.
Nothing was collected or created yet.
In ordinary
View on Wikipediafrom Wikipedia
In ordinary is an English phrase with multiple meanings.[1] In relation to the Royal Household and public officials more generally, it indicates that a position is a permanent one (in contrast to positions that are extraordinary). In naval matters, vessels "in ordinary" (from the 17th century) are those out of service for repair or maintenance, a meaning coming over time to cover a reserve fleet or "mothballed" ships.[2]
History of use
[edit]The term arose from the development of three separate financial Estimates for Royal Navy expenditure; the "Ordinary" Estimate which covered routine expenses such as the maintenance of dockyards and naval establishments, the "Sea Service" Estimate which supported ships and crew at or capable of going to sea, and the Estimate for "Extraordinary Repair" which met the cost of major rebuilding or refit. A ship that was no longer required for active service, or was too decrepit to remain at sea, would be transferred from the Sea Service to the Ordinary Estimate, and would be left "in Ordinary" until returned to duty or broken up.[3]
Ships could remain in Ordinary for lengthy periods, including for example HMS Royal William which spent 38 years in Ordinary between its launch in 1719 and first active service in 1757.[4] Poorly maintained, vessels in Ordinary were susceptible to dry rot and were routinely crewed by pensioned or disabled sailors with little interest in returning to sea service. During the War of the Austrian Succession from 1739 to 1745, a review of ships in Ordinary revealed that at least half of their warrant officers were too old or sickly to serve outside their mothballed vessels.[5] Improvements were made from 1752 when Admiral George Anson, the newly appointed First Lord of the Admiralty, initiated reforms of royal dockyards with the intention of maximising the number of vessels capable of being put to sea at any time. However, most of Anson's reforms were opposed by the Navy Board, which had direct responsibility for dockyard management and felt that Admiralty interference was a rebuke to its authority.[6]
In 1755 the Board of Admiralty conducted a further review of vessels in Ordinary. The review identified Plymouth Dockyard as the worst performer in ship maintenance and repair, with some ships untouched since 1745.[7] Plymouth Dockyard's Master Attendant and Clerk of the Survey were dismissed, a new dock and slipway were constructed, and dock workers and ship's crews were required to work longer hours to ensure that ships held in Ordinary were capable of being sailed. To maximise resources, construction of new vessels was also transferred to private shipyards.[8] Lastly, the Admiralty successfully petitioned the Privy Council to remove the Royal Navy's Surveyor, Joseph Allin, who had held the post for forty years and was now "disordered in his senses."[9]
These various efforts were successful in improving the quality of vessels held in Ordinary, such that more than 200 ships were in commission or capable of being sailed by the end of 1755 compared with 97 in 1753.[10]
Royal Navy officers ashore on half-pay were also considered "in Ordinary" and paid from that Estimate.[11]
Crown servants
[edit]In relation particularly to the staff of the British Royal Household, and more generally to those employed by the Crown, it is used as a suffix showing that the appointment is to the regular staff, for example a priest or chaplain-in-ordinary, or a physician-in-ordinary, being a cleric or doctor in regular attendance. The usage goes back to the 17th century. See for example:
References
[edit]- ^ Oxford English Dictionary.
- ^ "Vessels "In Ordinary" or Reserve — May 1805". html Index of Vessels etc. May 1805. Archived from the original on 13 October 2012. Retrieved 14 December 2012.
- ^ Baugh 1965, pp. 455-457
- ^ Baugh 1965, p. 241
- ^ Baugh 1965, pp. 244-245
- ^ Middleton 1988, pp. 109-110
- ^ Middleton 1988, p. 111
- ^ Middleton 1988, pp. 111-112
- ^ Correspondence, Admiralty to the Lords Justices, 12 August 1755. Cited in Middleton 1988, p. 111
- ^ Middleton 1988, p. 112
- ^ Baugh 1965, p. 103
Bibliography
[edit]- Baugh, Daniel A. (1965). British Naval Administration in the Age of Walpole. Princeton University Press. OCLC 729683642.
- Middleton, Richard (1988). "Naval administration in the age of Pitt and Anson, 1755-1763". In Black, Jeremy; Woodfine, Philip (eds.). The British Navy and the Use of Naval Power in the Eighteenth Century. Leicester University Press. ISBN 0718513088.
In ordinary
View on Grokipediafrom Grokipedia
"In ordinary" is a historical English phrase primarily denoting regular, official, or constant service in an established capacity, especially within the British royal household or public offices, as opposed to temporary, extraordinary, or occasional roles.[1] It refers to positions entitled to fixed remuneration, such as wages or diet, for consistent attendance and duties at court.[1] The term originated in the context of court administration from the 17th to 19th centuries, distinguishing sworn and paid household officers from those compensated via bills or ad hoc payments.[1]
Commonly appended to professional titles, "in ordinary" signifies the principal or resident holder of an office, such as a physician-in-ordinary to the monarch, who provided ongoing medical attendance, or an ambassador-in-ordinary, denoting a diplomat permanently stationed at a foreign court.[2][3] In the royal household, these roles formed the core staff, with examples including gentlemen of the privy chamber and chaplains who received regular allowances for attendance; by 1662, the household under Charles II included over 1,300 such places.[1] The phrase also appeared in naval contexts to describe ships out of commission and laid up, though this usage was less prominent.[3]
Historically, the designation underscored the structured hierarchy of the royal establishment, with numbers of "in ordinary" positions fluctuating under different monarchs—for instance, reduced from 1,160 to 780 by James II in 1685 to streamline operations.[1] Today, the term survives in archaic or honorific contexts, such as the King's Sculptor-in-Ordinary for Scotland, highlighting its enduring association with formal, ongoing royal service.[4]
Definition and Origins
Core Meaning
"In ordinary" is an English phrase denoting a regular, permanent, or official capacity in service roles, particularly within British institutions such as the royal household or public offices. It indicates a fixed, salaried position involving ongoing responsibilities, as opposed to temporary or ad hoc appointments. For instance, a "physician in ordinary" to the sovereign holds a steady role providing continuous medical attendance, distinct from occasional consultants.[2] This term contrasts sharply with "in extraordinary," which refers to roles performed on an occasional or special basis without permanence. In public service, officials "in ordinary" undertake routine duties as their primary occupation, such as the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary, who served as full-time salaried judges in the House of Lords, unlike peers who might hear appeals sporadically. The phrase underscores a commitment to standard, expected performance rather than exceptional or summoned interventions. In English common law, "in ordinary" carries a connotation of standard attendance or duty without the need for special summons, emphasizing reliability in official capacities like resident diplomatic posts. An "ambassador in ordinary," for example, maintains constant residence and ongoing representation at a foreign court, embodying the legal expectation of persistent service over intermittent engagement. This usage highlights the term's role in delineating structured obligations within legal and administrative frameworks.Etymological Roots
The phrase "in ordinary" traces its roots to the Latin adjective ordinarius, denoting something regular, customary, or in proper order, derived from ordo meaning "row," "series," or "arrangement." This Latin term entered Middle English primarily through Old French ordinarie or ordeneire, facilitated by the Norman Conquest of 1066, which introduced a substantial body of French legal and administrative vocabulary into English usage.[5][6] The earliest attestations of "ordinary" in English appear in the late 14th and early 15th centuries, often in legal and ecclesiastical contexts to signify routine authority or standard practice. For example, around 1402, the term is recorded as "þe ordenarye persone" in reference to a judge exercising regular jurisdiction, as seen in medieval translations and treatises like Trevisa's Defensio Curatorum. By the mid-15th century, phrases akin to "ordinarie" service emerge in court records and administrative documents, describing established duties or habitual obligations within judicial proceedings.[6] A key influence on the phrase's development came from ecclesiastical terminology, where "ordinary" described the inherent, routine jurisdiction of bishops over their dioceses in canon law, distinct from delegated or extraordinary powers. This usage, embedded in church governance since the medieval period, provided a model for secular adoption, equating "in ordinary" with permanent, customary roles in administration across broader European legal traditions.[7]Historical Development
Early Usage in English Law and Administration
The term "in ordinary" emerged in the context of 16th-century Tudor administration, where permanent roles were established, though the specific phrase gained prominence in the 17th century to designate fixed officials in central courts, distinguishing them from temporary or extraordinary appointments. Although permanent roles were formalized in 16th-century courts, the phrase "in ordinary" to denote such positions gained currency in the following century, rooted in Latin ordinarius (regular) and Old French influences.[6] In the Court of Requests, a privy council tribunal handling equity suits for the poor and administrative matters, two masters in ordinary were established by 1546 to provide consistent judicial oversight and ensure procedural continuity amid growing caseloads.[8] Similarly, in the Court of Chancery, eight masters in ordinary were appointed as fixed officials to manage investigations, draft decrees, and handle routine equity business, supporting the court's expansion under Henry VIII and his successors.[9] In the King's Bench, one of the principal common law courts, the term applied to permanent clerks such as the prothonotaries, who served for life and maintained records, enrolled pleadings, and facilitated daily operations to uphold judicial stability during the turbulent Reformation era. These roles were essential for processing criminal appeals and civil writs, with prothonotaries like those in Filmer's office exemplifying the "antient" or established clerks trained through apprenticeships under senior attorneys.[10] Justices in the King's Bench, appointed during good behavior, embodied the "ordinary" judicial authority, exercising regular jurisdiction over felonies and crown pleas without the ad hoc nature of extraordinary commissions. This usage reflected broader Tudor efforts to professionalize the judiciary, reducing reliance on itinerant or part-time personnel. Key legal texts from the 1530s formalized such ordinary positions to promote continuity in the judiciary. Complementing this, the 1536 Act concerning the residence of bishops, rectors, vicars, and curates (27 Hen. VIII c. 12) mandated permanent residency for parish clergy to maintain ecclesiastical governance, implicitly designating the resident parson as the "ordinary" incumbent responsible for local spiritual and administrative duties. In parish and local governance, "in ordinary" distinguished resident clergy from non-resident or visiting ones, as evidenced in Elizabethan visitation records that enforced attendance and record-keeping to combat absenteeism. For instance, the 1559 Injunctions required every parson or vicar to maintain parish registers of baptisms, marriages, and burials, underscoring the ordinary parson's role in continuous community oversight.[11] Such applications extended to local justices of the peace, whose permanent commissions under Tudor statutes like the 1531 JPs Act (22 Hen. VIII c. 9) ensured ongoing enforcement of order in counties, separate from royal extraordinary delegations. These uses of the term emphasized reliability in non-royal legal and administrative functions up to the 17th century.[6]Evolution in the Royal Household
The term "in ordinary" was introduced in the royal household during the Stuart period, particularly under Charles I following his accession in 1625, to designate permanent, salaried positions for core household officers, thereby distinguishing them from supernumerary or temporary staff who lacked fixed duties or full remuneration.[12] This usage emerged as Charles I restructured the household to emphasize personal loyalty and direct accountability to the monarch, with approximately 90 such appointments made between 1626 and 1639 across roles including chaplains in ordinary, grooms of the privy chamber, and secretaries in the queen's household.[12] For instance, after dismissing Henrietta Maria's French staff in 1626, key positions like treasurer and secretary were filled by English appointees "in ordinary" to integrate the queen's establishment more closely with the king's service.[12] These reforms reflected broader efforts to consolidate patronage and reduce external influences, building on earlier legal precedents for distinguishing regular from ad-hoc roles in administration.[13] Under George III, following his accession in 1760, the term became more formalized within the royal household through ordinances and warrants that expanded and standardized "in ordinary" appointments, particularly in administrative and clerical capacities.[1] In 1761, Lord Steward Talbot reorganized the Lord Steward’s department, reducing overall numbers from around 220 to 140 "in ordinary" positions while adding specialized roles such as two clerk comptrollers, two clerks of debentures, and a clerk to the master of the household to enhance efficiency.[1] These changes, documented in household warrants, emphasized active service and fixed salaries for essential officers, contrasting with supernumerary staff who received only partial or no pay during retrenchments.[1] By the 1760s, such appointments extended to cultural positions like Principal Painter in Ordinary, underscoring the term's integration into the monarchy's operational framework as a marker of permanence amid growing household complexity. The 19th century brought significant reforms to the royal household that preserved and refined the "in ordinary" designation for vital roles while curtailing sinecures and extraneous positions to address fiscal pressures.[1] Upon William IV's accession in 1830, the Civil List Act of 1831 (1 William IV, c. 25) consolidated household expenditures into a fixed establishment of £510,000, abolishing numerous non-essential sinecures and commuting traditional perquisites like diet into cash allowances, thereby retaining "in ordinary" status primarily for active, indispensable officers such as yeomen and messengers.[1] This overhaul, influenced by earlier Treasury audits since 1816, reduced the household's scale and shifted civil functions to the Consolidated Fund, ensuring that "in ordinary" roles symbolized streamlined, accountable service rather than hereditary or redundant privilege.[1] These changes marked the culmination of efforts to modernize the monarchy's domestic administration, aligning it with broader parliamentary reforms of the era.[1]Applications in the Royal Household
Roles for Crown Servants
In the royal household, positions designated "in ordinary" encompassed a range of categories including medical personnel, clerical staff, and equerries, each requiring constant availability to support the monarch's daily needs and ceremonial functions.[1] These roles involved routine advisory and supportive duties, such as personal attendance, managing provisions, and facilitating court rituals, with servants expected to attend quarterly or maintain readiness for royal progresses.[1] Salary structures typically combined fixed wages—often low in the 17th century, supplemented by fees and perquisites—with board wages replacing in-kind diet provisions after 1663, reflecting a shift toward more standardized remuneration by the early 18th century.[1] Privileges for crown servants in ordinary were formalized through 17th-century precedents, granting them apartments in royal residences allocated by the Lord Chamberlain and precedence in court protocol, such as the Lord Steward's superior ranking among household officers. Additional benefits included livery, immunity from civil arrest during attendance, and exemptions from certain legal processes, underscoring their elevated status as direct royal attendants.[14][1] These ordinary roles were distinct from extraordinary attendants like the Groom of the Stole, who held semi-autonomous oversight of the Bedchamber with more intimate advisory functions, whereas ordinary servants focused on structured, supportive tasks without such elevated personal access.[1] This framework evolved from medieval court structures but solidified under Treasury oversight in the late 17th century, emphasizing reliability over occasional service.[1]Specific Positions and Examples
The position of Physician-in-Ordinary emerged in the royal household during the late 17th century, serving as a primary medical advisor to the sovereign with responsibilities centered on routine health assessments, preventive care, and consultations for the monarch and key household members. These physicians were expected to be in regular attendance at court, offering daily advice on diet, medications, and treatments tailored to the royal lifestyle, often drawing on humoral theory and emerging chemical remedies. For instance, Peter Barwick was appointed Physician-in-Ordinary to Charles II in 1660, where he managed the king's health amid outbreaks like the 1665 plague, including prescribing tonics and overseeing quarantines.[15] A notable early exemplar of this role's functions, though predating the formal title, was Sir Theodore de Mayerne, who acted as chief physician to James I from 1611, conducting frequent consultations on the king's chronic ailments such as gout and digestive issues, and innovating with chemical preparations like laudanum-based elixirs. Mayerne's duties extended to the royal family, including detailed case notes on treatments for Prince Henry and Queen Anne, emphasizing empirical observation over traditional Galenic methods. His tenure highlighted the position's evolution toward systematic medical record-keeping and personalized regimens, influencing subsequent appointments.[16] The Apothecary-in-Ordinary managed the royal pharmacy operations from the early 18th century, compounding prescriptions, maintaining drug inventories, and ensuring the quality of medicaments supplied to the court, often working in close coordination with physicians to fulfill bespoke orders for the sovereign's health needs. This role involved sourcing rare ingredients, such as imported spices and minerals, and adhering to strict protocols for storage and dispensing to prevent spoilage or adulteration. Under Queen Anne, Daniel Malthus held the position of Apothecary to the Person from July 1704, preparing specialized remedies like anti-gout plasters and cordials for the queen's persistent joint pain and mobility issues, as well as supplying the household during her frequent illnesses. Malthus's service underscored the apothecary's integral support in addressing the monarch's debilitating conditions amid political instability.[17] Other specialized surgical roles, such as the Sergeant Surgeon-in-Ordinary, were formalized in the royal household around 1727 amid reforms to the medical establishment under George II, focusing on advanced operative care including wound management, amputations, and tumor removals for the monarch and senior courtiers. These surgeons ranked above standard Surgeons-in-Ordinary but below physicians, performing hands-on procedures in court settings equipped with basic instruments like lancets and trepans, while advising on post-operative recovery. John Ranby, appointed as principal sergeant surgeon in 1743, exemplified this duty through his treatment of battlefield injuries transposed to royal contexts, such as lancing abscesses and setting fractures for the king, and authoring influential texts on surgical techniques that emphasized speed and minimal blood loss. His work during George II's reign integrated military expertise into household practice, enhancing the role's prestige and technical scope.[18][19]Broader Contexts and Modern Usage
Diplomatic and Administrative Applications
In diplomacy, the term "ambassador in ordinary" referred to a permanent resident envoy accredited to a foreign court, emerging as a standard practice in the 17th century to facilitate ongoing relations rather than ad hoc missions.[20] This distinguished such diplomats from extraordinary ambassadors sent for specific negotiations, allowing for sustained observation and representation of the sending state's interests.[21] Under William III, permanent postings exemplified this role.[21] In administrative applications, "in ordinary" denoted regular, non-extraordinary officials in colonial governance structures. The East India Company's 1726 charter established Mayor's Courts in presidencies like Madras, Bombay, and Calcutta, appointing aldermen and mayors to adjudicate civil suits under English common law, thereby extending systematic judicial administration over Company territories.[22] These positions ensured consistent handling of commercial and personal disputes, contrasting with temporary judicial commissions and supporting the Company's expanding authority in 18th-century India.[22] The phrase persisted in legal contexts within British overseas territories through the 19th century, appearing in Foreign Office dispatches to clarify permanent appointments amid imperial expansion.[21]Contemporary Relevance and Examples
In modern British institutions, the phrase "in ordinary" retains a ceremonial presence in certain royal and governmental titles, signifying permanent or regular service to the Crown, though its practical application has waned significantly since the early 20th century. For instance, Alexander Stoddart has held the position of King's Sculptor in Ordinary for Scotland since 2008, advising on monumental works and public sculptures in a role that blends artistic patronage with royal tradition.[23][24] Within the College of Arms, six Heralds in Ordinary—such as York Herald, Windsor Herald, and Richmond Herald—form part of the 13 core officers who support the Sovereign in matters of heraldry, genealogy, and ceremonial protocol, a structure formalized since the 16th century but actively maintained today.[25] Similarly, the Privy Council employs a Clerk in Ordinary, appointed on the recommendation of the Lord President, to assist in administrative and record-keeping duties for this advisory body to the monarch.[26] The term's decline in everyday administration stems from post-First World War civil service reforms, which streamlined governmental structures and shifted many household roles toward honorary status amid broader modernization efforts. In the royal medical sphere, traditional designations like Physician-in-Ordinary have faded, but their essence survives in honorary appointments; for example, royal warrants continue to be issued to physicians and apothecaries serving the household, as seen in the 2024 recognition of Dr. Douglas Glass as Apothecary to the King for his personal service.[27] These warrants, granted since the 15th century, now emphasize prestige over operational duties, underscoring the term's cultural legacy in contemporary contexts.References
- https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Dictionary_of_National_Biography,_1885-1900/Ranby,_John